Okay, get to get the goods here on this ABC email scandal, quote unquote.
And we have lots of other things, including a scam being run on the people of Bulgaria about buying real estate on the moon.
Greetings.
I'm not kidding.
Welcome back, folks.
Nice to have you.
Final hour of broadcast excellence is underway on the one and only EIB network.
We come to you from the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882.
The email address rush at EIBnet.com.
But I have to mention this: every time that I show up here wearing one of these very comfortable and stylish EIB mock turtleneck shirts, I'm overrun with email from those in the EIB store.
I don't see them in the EIB store.
No, they're not in the EIB store, but there appears to be sufficient interest.
I will look into getting some at the EIB store.
I bought a bunch of them to get ready for all these golf tournaments.
They're Adidas Climacool, and it's a stay-dry material.
You don't even feel like the shirt is on.
And if you think they look good on DittoCam, you ought to see them personally.
They're really sharps.
I'll look into getting them.
You could go anywhere that sells them and get them, but they will not be logoed with the EIB logo and my signature on the left sleeve.
But I will look into this.
Here's this.
Apparently, this is what Drudge has posted so far.
A top producer at ABC News declared Bush makes me sick in an email obtained by the Drudge Report.
John Green, currently executive producer of the weekend edition of Good Morning America, unloaded on the president in an ABC company email obtained by the Drudge Report.
Quote, if he uses the mixed messages line one more time, I'm going to puke, Green complained.
The blunt comments by Green, along with other emails obtained by the Drudge Report, further reveal the inner workings of the nation's news outlets.
A friend of Green's at ABC says that Green is mortified by the email.
John feels so badly about this email.
He's a straight shooter.
He's a great producer who is always fair.
And that said, he deeply regrets the sentiment expressed in the email and the embarrassment that it causes ABC News.
Well, apparently there's more emails received by the revealed or whatever to the Drudge Report.
You know, give me a little hint, in case you haven't noticed it, the media, when they're accused of bias or when they're accused of an agenda, they always say, well, we are fair.
Our reporting is fair.
And they're not even fair.
I mean, that's what they tell themselves.
But I don't care what the people in these news divisions think.
It's when they deny it that I feel insulted, trying to insult everybody else's intelligence in the process.
Bulgarians.
I wonder how many people could find Bulgaria on a map.
Anyway, Bulgarians were warned by something called the Lunar Embassy to hurry up and buy real estate on the moon as only a limited number of properties were left for sale.
We have already had over 30 orders since we opened a lunar embassy two days ago, said the coordinator, Denislav Stoichev.
A one-acre property on the moon will cost you $24, although plots on Mars and Jupiter's moon, Io, were also available.
The Plovdiv Lunar Embassy is the first in Bulgaria, but one of dozens around the world licensed by the galactic government CEO, in this case, Celestial Executive Officer, U.S. entrepreneur Dennis Hope.
Only 1 billion lots are left for sale.
Lucky owners will receive a lunar deed certificate with the coordinates of their plot and their signature as proof of their ownership.
There are certain lunar codes.
Absolutely no weapons will be tolerated ever.
on the moon and littering will lead to exorbitant fines, the lunar primary law reads.
Last October, a lunar embassy in China was shut down as a government watchdog called its sale of space property fraudulent and illegal.
What a scam.
It's like the adopt a highway program.
Every time I see that, the adopt a highway program.
Has anybody ever done that?
What do you do when you adopt a highway?
You pay to keep it clean.
Despite all the taxes that we're paying, a bunch of suckers that go out there and adopt a highway.
Damn right, they're suckers.
You know how many, do you know what the taxes that we pay, property tax, gasoline taxes?
Look, it's absurd.
We use prisoners to go clean it up.
They don't cost anything.
You see these prisoners out there let out of jail wearing the bright orange out there with their pokers and the medians of the highway.
Every time I drive by one of these adopt a highway signs, who are the fools that are falling for this?
And I can just demand they're the new castrati.
I am going to take care of my community and my highway.
Jobless claims fall more than expected.
The number of newly laid off Americans filing claims for unemployment benefits fell by a larger than expected amount last week.
Who's doing the expecting?
The experts here are constantly wrong about this.
This is another giveaway as to what the agenda is.
They're not only waiting for the housing bubble, they're waiting for unemployment to skyrocket because as far as they're concerned, we're still in the recession of 2001.
Now, listen to this.
The Labor Department reported that a total of 302,000 laid-off workers applied for jobless benefits, a decline of 11,000 from the previous week.
It marked the first decline in a month, and it left benefits claims at a level consistent with strong labor market growth in coming months.
The overall strength, however, does not conceal the fact that some U.S. industries, such as autos, are struggling with serious problems.
Of course not.
We have to make sure that we get in the rotten news.
We have to make sure that we do everything we can to depress people.
What's the next item in this?
Ah!
Both of these stories are Associated Press.
Existing home sales post unexpected gains.
Now, I wonder why that is.
Well, let's see.
Sales of existing homes unexpectedly.
That's right, because these clowns have got themselves convinced that there's going to be a housing boom bubble.
And they just burst or whatever.
They want it so badly, they just convince themselves it's going to happen or has happened.
And that's why they continually are surprised.
Let's say, let me keep reading to find out why this unexpected news happened.
Sales of existing homes unexpectedly rose last month as a warmer than usual winter.
Aha!
Boosted demand in many parts of the country, but a slack demand in some areas produced what one analyst called a tale of two cities.
Well, if temperatures are warming and if it's known that warm temperatures somehow impact positively home sales, then how is it a surprise and unexpected?
The experts, if they know enough to know that warm weather will produce increased home sales, have got to know it's a warmer-than-usual winter.
And so they should have been able to tell us months ago, by the way, we expect home sales to skyrocket because it's been unusually warm this winter.
But no, they profess to be shocked and surprised, and the news was unexpected.
How could there be unexpected gains in home sales if warm weather is a positive factor?
And speaking of that, warm weather is a positive factor.
What are we to do?
Warm weather, it is said, is causing the ice caps to melt.
And John Kerry says that Boston and New York will be flooded by 20,000, 2036 unless we do something serious.
No, he says there's nothing we can do.
It will take some sort of major event beyond our control to reverse this obvious fact that we're going to flood New York and Boston in 2036.
And yet this warm weather is causing the U.S. economy to boom.
The warm weather caused people to go more to the malls.
The warm weather is causing all kinds of good things.
I'm sure it's the warm weather that's causing businesses to hire more people.
I'm sure it's warm weather that caused that coyote named Hal to go running through Central Park yesterday before he was nabbed with a tranquilizer dart.
I'm sure it's warm weather that's causing these peace nicks over there in Iraq to get captured and then rescued.
Sorry, released.
The warm weather, it seems to me that, in fact, we've got warm, dry weather in the Amazon and it's growing.
I mean, it seems to me that this warm weather is bringing a whole bunch of good news and yet we're supposed to be in panic about it.
I'm sure by now, ladies and gentlemen, you've seen the story in the New York Times and elsewhere.
Mrs. Clinton says GOP's immigration plan is at odds with the Bible.
Senator Hillary Rodham start again here.
Sometimes you have to have a totally clean mouth to get these names out without stuttering through them.
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton invoked the Bible yesterday to criticize a stringent border security measure that, among other things, would make it a federal crime to offer aid to illegal immigrants.
Fortunately, no Bible was near her when she made the statement, as it would probably have burst into flames.
I wonder if Mrs. Clinton knows what the scriptures say about her husband boinking interns in the White House.
What are the she's aware what the Bible would say about that?
You have the probably turn the other cheek, turn the other cheek.
What's your view of forgiveness and so forth?
Both those work.
And, of course, if you list the Ten Commandments, would it take longer to list the ones that that administration blew to shreds, or would it take longer to list the ones they haven't blown to shreds?
It is certainly not in keeping with my understanding of the scripture because this bill would literally criminalize the Good Samaritan and probably even Jesus himself.
We need to sound the alarm about what is being done in the Congress.
Again, quote Mrs. Clinton.
Now, you know, Jesus was an illegal immigrant.
Jesus was homeless.
Well, Mary and Joseph were homeless, and now Jesus is an illegal immigrant, according to Mrs. Clinton.
But now, interesting contrast.
Can you imagine if Pat Robertson had said this?
Just stop it.
If Pat Robertson had said the exact thing that Mrs. Clinton is, it'd be having experts on to talk about it on cable news.
He would be ripped apart in the press.
She says the immigration bill would criminalize Jesus.
She cites the Bible as justification for her opinion.
Well, what would Jesus say about xenophobia?
Where in the Bible does it say a company based in an Arab country must never be allowed to own some terminals at our ports?
Does the Bible embrace bigotry of Mrs. Clinton and xenophobia?
You're right.
I'm going to work the ports deal into any story I can.
Here's Howie in Sugarland, Texas.
Howie, welcome to the program.
This outside Houston.
Nice to have you with us.
Nice to be with you, Rush and Pack of Fan Dittos.
Thank you.
On the Adopt a Highway thing, we have a local fan club for the Green Bay Packers, and we signed up with the Texas Department of Highways to go ahead and adopt a couple mile section of highway down here.
And what we did, it didn't cost us any money.
You know, we'd just get together, a bunch of people, go out there with a bunch of adult beverage and other sort of goodies.
And we'd go up and down the highway using the vests and the trash bags provided by TechSdot.
And we'd pick up trash and set the bags off to the side of the road, do that a couple times a year, and it was always a hoot.
Never cost us a cent.
But they put up a nice little sign announcing our fan club had adopted that section.
Wait a minute.
How big is the sign?
Is it like a billboard?
No, it's like one of those informational signs that you see on the side of the highway saying rest area ahead or something.
Oh, it's one of those green signs?
Yeah.
And does it actually say this highway, this portion of whatever is been adopted by the city?
Yeah, it was adopted by the Cheddarhead Pack of Houston.
I tell you, you learn something every day on this program, and this is something I did not know.
So literally twice a year, for twice a year, you'll go out and clean up the garbage off the highway for the privilege of having your fan club sign posted on the side of the road.
Yeah, it was neat.
It was a way to promote our club, and it did.
Well, what do you get out of the sign being on the side of the road?
We actually had people seek us out and join up the club.
Oh, okay.
So it's advertising.
Certainly.
When you adopt a highway, you can go out and advertise.
Oh, okay.
I just thought it was a government scam.
No, no, no, no.
You know, I mean, you know, they provided all the equipment, you know, as far as bags.
They pick them up.
Right.
It is a government scam, but they found a way for you to think you're having a great time doing it.
Ah, this is cool.
I always thought, I always thought when I drive by these things, adopt a highway, I imagine mom and dad and the 2.8 kids going by the sign.
Some little kid in the back, Mommy, Mommy, can we have a highway when it got the highway, mom?
You know, just designed to appeal to, you know, the kind of people I'm talking about.
They're the touchy-feely, you know, they want to feel good about what they're doing, community activist types.
And there are plenty of them out there.
But, well, this is opening up possibilities.
Can you imagine this stretch of highway adopted by Rush Limbaugh?
How long would it be, depending on where I did this?
It could be fun.
Tomatoes would end up on the sign, rotten eggs.
The stretch of highway that I adopt, if I did it in the right county where it's 80% Democrat, would cause more damage and pollution and garbage than it would clean up.
All right.
Dan in Toronto, Canada.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Rush, Megadiddles from the great white north.
Thank you, Definitely.
Following clouds of Monte Cristo smoke.
Oh, yes.
You're a man after my own heart.
Yeah.
Rush, listen, I am appalled and disgusted at the reports from the lack of gratitude from the so-called Christian group.
We have apparently our own troops from the elite JTF2 involved in that rescue.
And this guy art who called, the only thing he can try explaining to me is how he represents himself as a Christian, but lacks the first and foremost thing that he should have done is use the gratefulness, shown his gratefulness for our troops, your troops, all the coalition troops to put their life in harm's way to rescue their sorry butts.
Yeah, well, you know, people can define these things any which way they want, put the definitions that they prefer at the top of the list.
But these are just, you could tell, you know, who these people are.
They're just blame America people.
They don't like America and they're trying to cloak themselves as peacemakers.
They're not doing one damn thing for peace.
No peace movement ever has done one thing for peace.
No.
Because these are not the peacemakers.
They call themselves.
This is, you know what this is?
These are a bunch of people who really just feel left out.
They are unnoticed.
They're not even average.
And they just want to matter.
You know, everybody wants to matter.
Everybody, and a lot of people have a notice me problem.
Everybody wants to get in the act.
Everybody wants to go on a reality show.
Everybody wants to be a comedian.
Everybody wants to be on the radio.
Everybody wants to, you know, they'll embarrass themselves to go on shows like Jerry Springer and all those rest of these things.
Everybody wants to get in the act.
These people, this is the way they've gone about getting noticed and trying to matter and make a difference.
And they've added a nice little touch to it.
They call themselves peacemakers and they live a total lie and illusion that they are mattering and that they do make a difference and that they're helping to speed whatever it is they profess to believe along.
Actually, they're roadblocks to everything they believe.
They end up siding every time with the bad guys.
Whether they do it on purpose or not, I'm sure some of them do.
Some of them are just innocent dupes.
You know, like these people that get roped into these cults, fly off and meet the mothership floating up there somewhere, Jim Jones type people.
It's sort of a shame in a way, but with as many people as populate the planet, you have to figure that a certain percentage of them are just going to be idiots.
Media loves to focus attention on as many idiots as possible because they think Bush is the idiot, and he'll side with anybody that opposes Bush because they hate Bush.
An informant friend of mine in Missouri reports the following: the Ku Klux Klan in Missouri tried to adopt a highway and succeeded.
The sign kept coming down, and people kept defacing the Klan's sign.
They got lots of complaints, letters to the editor, and then the state of Missouri found a loophole, and the KKK lost the right to adopt the highway due to not cleaning it enough.
That part of the highway is now named the Rosa Parks Memorial Highway.
True story.
Well, okay, I must profess to being uninformed as to the scope of the Adopt a Highway program.
You ought to see this.
Everybody the other side of the glass asked, oh, yeah, good program.
How many of you have adopted a highway, Mr. Sneddley?
All right, then don't sit there and act like I'm an idiot for making fun of it.
Have you adopted one, Brian?
Don't even have to answer because I know you.
And Dawn hasn't.
All right.
We've got to go audio soundbites because I got a lot here.
We got a half hour left.
We do have Hillary talking about her understanding of scripture.
Moving up to soundbite number nine.
We'll go in order from there until I say otherwise.
Mike, here's Hillary.
It is certainly not in keeping with my understanding of the scriptures because this bill would literally criminalize the good Samaritan and probably even Jesus himself.
We want the outcome to be that they're on the wrong side of the politics as well as on the wrong side of history and American values.
Right, right.
So, you know, as I said, what would Jesus say?
What the scriptures say about xenophobia and bigotry?
Where does it say in the Bible, for example, Mrs. Clinton, that a company based in an Arab country must never be allowed to operate a few terminals in our ports?
He's familiar with the scriptures in there.
Dingy Harry says he's promised a filibuster to stop immigration reform.
Situation room with Wolf Blitzer.
A question from Wolf, are you prepared to use every parliamentary maneuver you have in the Senate to block this Republican-backed legislation that passed the House?
If the majority leader brings to the Senate floor a bill that has not been had a thorough hearing, the Judiciary Committee, and he's going to bring his own bill to the floor dealing with only one of the problems we have with immigration, then I will use every procedural means at my disposal to stop that.
Hmm.
Bill Frist flushing the Democrats out here on immigration.
Here's Frist, by the way, yesterday.
This is what he said.
Our country needs security at our borders in order to stop the flow of illegal immigration and make America safer from foreign criminals and terrorists.
So Frist pushing ahead on immigration, despite Hillary saying Republicans are on the wrong side of the issue and in violation of the Bible.
Pam in Omaha, welcome to the program.
Great to have you with us.
Hi, Rush.
How are you?
I'm good.
Thank you.
Yeah, thanks so much for taking my call.
Listen, I have a comment here.
If it serves my memory correctly, when Clinton was in the White House, the left viewed the military's mission as humanitarian kind of a meals-on-wheels, so-called, with weapons.
So I'd like to know where the left's humanitarianism and compassion is, compassionism, you know, is when it comes to the people of Iraq.
You know, I mean, I don't understand as a Christian how Christians on the left could not support the removal of a cruel dictator regardless of finding WMD.
Well, you know, the let's let's deal with the first part of your question first, because it really will answer both.
You make a good point.
The U.S. military used under Clinton could be summed up as Meals on Wheels.
The military was used as social playground experimentation.
Gaze in the military, ask but don't tell, or ask not but don't tell.
Whatever it was.
Don't ask but tell.
What was it?
Don't ask, that's right.
Don't ask.
I forgot what it was.
Don't ask, don't tell.
See, it was, it was meals on wheels.
In fact, that, Pam, was my very own term.
And of course, the reason the left loved that was because they love Clinton.
We could do no wrong.
Number two, that to them is an appropriate use of the military to pass out medicines and breads and grains and suppers and dinners and water and so forth to starving and thirsty around the world.
Use the military when there is no national interest at stake.
And when you do have to use weapons, make sure you only use airplanes from 15,000 feet or higher so that the pilot can't get shot down.
Because the last thing that you want is any casualties.
And also, the more the military fails militarily, the happier the left is.
Yeah, they don't like the military, and I actually think that they secretly applaud military failure because it doesn't advance in their minds the use of the military.
Anything they can say or do that will convince people that military use has failed and therefore is ineffective and therefore should not be used again, they'll do.
So when it comes to where is the humanitarian, it can't possibly view the U.S. military in Iraq as humanitarian because they're not distributing food.
Of course, even though they are.
In fact, our soldiers pass out candy on the street corners to Iraqi children.
But again, our military in Iraq is firing weapons, not only from 15,000 feet, but from 500 feet and from on the ground.
And we are shooting the enemy.
We are trying to kill the enemy and break the enemy's things.
And that, of course, is not humanitarian.
Whatever the reason.
I mean, you've got people out there.
Who was it that I saw said, I can't remember.
You've got people.
It won't be long, folks, as the Democrats' campaign fizzles to get us out of this war.
It won't be long before, it may have already happened and you may have heard of it.
Some Democrat somewhere, some elected Democrat somewhere will advance the notion that, you know, it was better under Saddam.
And after that, somebody's going to say, why don't we just put Saddam back in and get out of there and just get rid of all of this?
Because they view the operations as basically inhumane since we're firing weapons and not passing out meals on wheels.
And that's the basic difference.
I mentioned this story, this column in the San Diego Union Tribune in the opening hour of the program by Ruben Navaret.
And he starts out by saying, I have to wonder, whatever happened to good old-fashioned shame?
It used to be that a person in his 20s and 30s who was out of hasskruel and into the job market still living with his parents was too humiliated to show his face in the light of day.
Yet these days, a lot of stay-at-home kids feel completely at ease with the experience.
Psychologists, sociologists, and other experts say it's become socially acceptable to be a young adult and still live at home.
I don't get it.
In my 20s, I lived with my parents twice, once while I was writing a book and later while I was contributing freelance material to several newspapers while trying to launch a career as a columnist.
And don't get me wrong, my parents are fine people.
They're delightful company.
Besides, I left home when I was 18.
I went to college 3,000 miles away.
When I got there, I was homesick.
Ever since, it's been hard for me to ever feel as if I'm spending too much time with my family.
Still, there's nothing like an extended stay at Shea, Mom, and Dad, to convince you that you're spinning your wheels or getting off to a late start in life.
That's how I felt at times.
Certainly not a situation with which anyone with any amount of ambition and self-respect should be totally comfortable.
This phenomenon is the plot of the movie Failure to Launch, a new film starring Matthew McConaughey and Sarah Jessica Parker.
McConaughey is a 35-year-old who lives with his parents, seems to be in no great hurry to move out.
Why should he?
His mother cooks for him, cleans up after him, does his laundry, packs his lunch, and that's all in the first 15 minutes of the movie.
According to the Census Bureau, since 1970, the percentage of people from the age 18 to 34 who live at home with their family has increased by nearly 50%.
Get this now to 18.6 million people.
18.6 million people from age 18 to 34 still live at home with their family.
And if these young people live in areas of the country where home prices are astronomical, they even have a built-in excuse.
Many may be unable to buy a home of their own and thus are more likely to move back with mom and dad.
Some may have decided they'd rather live in a nice area of the country, even if it means living with their parents.
They must know that they could have their own home if they move to a place with more opportunity and a lower cost of living, but they stay put.
We already knew that.
According to U.S. employers who are dependent on foreign labor, the work ethic is slipping among members of the younger generation.
Now, also in short supply, is the willingness to seek out opportunity wherever it exists.
Though this guy has hit the nail on the head, fits my theory perfectly, which is that most limitations that we face are self-imposed.
And one of the biggest ones, I'm not moving.
My family is here, and I am not moving.
Fine.
You don't move.
You are governed by the opportunities that exist where you are.
If you want to admit to that little ambition, fine.
If you want to admit that it's more important to you to be at home with your family and at the same time, that's fine too.
I'm not judging that.
Don't misunderstand.
I'm just saying, don't come along later and say, I can't get ahead in life.
There's nothing in this town for me.
Nobody likes me.
Everybody discriminates.
Go somewhere else.
No, I have to be where I grew up with my friends.
Fine.
Fine.
That's a self-imposed limitation.
That's all I'm saying.
It's nobody else's fault.
And Mr. Navarett says society has become an enabler.
In the 1990s, there was a fair amount of pressure on those of us who lived at home to get the hell out.
There was on me.
Alarms are going off all over the place.
Boomerang kids, they called us.
There were articles about how we were on our way to becoming the first generation in American history to not improve upon our parents' standard of living.
Today, there are fewer alarms and dire predictions.
Experts say that with so many young people living at home, the stigma has gone.
Barbara Mitchell, an associate professor of sociology at Simon Fraser University near Vancouver, British Columbia, surveyed 2,000 young people who were living at home.
And she told USA Today, they felt their friends were doing it.
It became so much more prevalent and popular that it was like, you know, almost perpetuating itself and reduces the stigma.
That's the problem.
When you're trying to influence behavior, a little stigma can go a long way.
The rest of the blame, says Mr. Navarette, goes to the parents.
Too many of them are making it too easy for their children to put off the decision to strike out on their own.
I've heard some parents boast about the fact their grown kids don't want to leave the nest.
It's as if parents, many of them baby boomers who couldn't wait to move out of their own parents' homes a generation ago, now draw satisfaction from the fact that they're supposedly hipper, cooler, and more fun to be around than were the parents of old.
In trying to be their kids' best friends, they wind up the innkeepers at their own best western.
Ruben Navaret, a man after my own brain, in the San Diego Union Tribune.
Be right back.
Stay with us.
I don't know if you've heard about this, folks, but some outfit called the FightGlobalWarming.com, something has joined up, partnered up with the Ad Council to make a PSA on global warming.
And it's typically a scare tactic.
This is the same bunch that, oh, what are some of the other PSAs that the Ad Council has done?
Having a mental block.
If you don't use a seatbelt, you.
No, no, the Ad Council is PSAs.
I can't.
There's one, a really big one.
I just can't think of what it is.
Just let you know who it is.
Anyway, let me describe this to you because we only have the audio here.
It's hilarious, but they're trying to scare people, particularly children.
And this ad shows children's faces who say tick, tick, tick, while ominous music plays.
The children say massive heat waves, severe drought, devastating hurricanes.
Our future is up to you.
There's still time.
Go to fightglobalwarming.com.
Sort of like the anti-Goldwater Daisy ad.
Only at the end of this one, Al Gore's World is the one that will explode.
We got that countdown going.
Here's the audio to this thing.
Tick, Massive heat waves, heat waves.
Tick severe droughts.
Tick, devastating hurricanes.
Tick, Our future tick ticket.
Tick, tick to you.
Tick.
Go to fightglobalwarming.com while there's still time.
Wait a second.
You know, every time I tell people this is a political issue, don't rush.
This is a genuine scientific issue that we have to seriously address.
It's nothing more than politics.
People have an agenda.
They want you to believe it.
Employees at the San Jose Mercury News have started a website called save the merck.com.
They put it up four days after McClatchy Company said they intended to sell the Mercury News and 11 other papers around the country.
We wanted to make sure everybody understands what the stakes are, said Mike Cassidy, a columnist who's written for the paper for 20 years.
It's important to let prospective owners know how concerned employees and readers are about what will happen with this paper.
We're too important.
You can't hold us to these conventional business standards.
We're too important.
Jim in Chicago, glad you called.
Welcome.
I'm glad I called, too.
Hello, sir.
How are you?
Fine.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you so much for your diligence and radio excellence.
I appreciate it very much.
Thank you very much.
It's my advice.
I listened to Hillary struggle with the scriptures.
It dawned on me that the liberals, as they attempt to get some sort of moral base, will always politicize that which is moral and moralize that which is political.
If you take the issue of the borders and the protection of the borders, that is not a moral issue.
You will not find it in the Bible anywhere.
And she attempted to moralize that, but you take an issue which is inherently moral issue like abortion, and they will politicize it.
That is an interesting thing.
And the Bible does address killing.
It addresses murder, and it addresses murder, certainly.
Thou shalt not murder is, well, they call it killing, but the Hebrew word is actually murder.
Yes.
Thou shalt not shed innocent blood.
Yes.
Yes.
And it seems to me that that is going to be their little attempt to get some sort of moral ground.
Well, Look, what they're cap, they're trying to capitalize on the same, they think the same sentiment exists on abortion as existed on the ports deal.
But your point is really, really good.
Here, take immigration and make it a moral issue.
Just and take abortion.
No, no, no, it's not more.
This is privacy.
This is women's rights.
This is a political issue.
But immigration is a moral issue now.
It's not so much immigration, it's the fact that the bill would make it a crime to provide benefits to illegals.
At any rate, I'm glad you called, Jim.
It's an excellent point.
We've got to go back in just a second to wrap things up.
Another sterling example of broadcast excellence today.
Three hours of it, but we're out of time.
Ladies and gentlemen, have to vomitos.
But tomorrow's Open Line Friday, and we will be back, and I can't wait.
It's one of my all-time favorite days of the week.