Revved up final hour broadcast excellence, the Rush Limbaugh program kicking off a brand new full week of Busy Real Radio.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
And the email address is rush at EIBnet.com.
I, of course, America's anchorman and host for life, the prestigious Attila the Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Well, the media still won't let go of the Cheney shooting scandal, as they are trying to make it.
I've been reading some, during the break here, some conservative blogs, and some people are out there saying that Cheney better go public and explain everything or he could be finished.
Sometimes people on our side of the aisle have to prove too hard, try too hard, to prove they're the smartest people, the most reasonable, the most open-minded people in the room.
This is patently absurd.
ABC News, top of the hour, several questions still surrounding the hunting injury.
Why did his host call local media rather than his staff call national media?
It's simple.
You guys are a bunch of liars and liberals and cowards.
It's pure as simple as pie to figure this out.
Yeah, how many questions do they have about Clinton busting his ankle at Greg Norman's place?
They took whatever sanitized story was put out.
We know Clinton was hanging from a chandelier and fell.
Well, that's what we suspect.
The official story was he was going down the steps.
Yeah.
Okay, going down the steps.
Well, everybody was lauded and heroic and all this sort of stuff.
These kinds of accidents happen all the time.
The media publishes national security secrets.
Why should Cheney call you?
Why should Cheney's office call you guys?
What in the world does Cheney's office?
Oh, you guys, and the national media.
You're just out there trying to destroy these people and Bush.
But here's the thing.
This is what strikes me about this.
I've lived under the mistaken impression, I guess, all my life that reporters actually went out and reported.
That they went out there and put their finger to the pulse to the grindstone, nose to the, whatever the saying is.
They walked around out there, shoe leather, and dug up stories.
Now, you know that the press has to have a body watch on Cheney, just like they have a body watch on Bush.
That's a term.
Somebody is always assigned to be wherever they are, as within close proximity as they can get.
Now, I know they're not out in the fields with Cheney and his hunting party and so forth, but at some point, when an accident like this happens, how do you in the media not know about it?
I mean, you know everything going on in the CIA and you're leaking that.
You can find out everything going on with Valerie Plame's life and Joe Wilson's life and leak that.
Why can't you find out about this on your own?
There have to have been some commotion when this happened.
There had to have been at some point vehicles involved, whether they were official-looking ambulances or not.
There had to be something involved here to show you that something is out of whack.
You had to have some speeding vehicles at some point.
You've got an injured man who's been shot with birdshot here.
Where's the body watcher?
Where's the person assigned to keep sharp eyes?
I know that they're probably off-limits.
President, vice president wants privacy and this sort of thing.
At some point, doesn't this boil down to the fact that these people are mad that they weren't told this happened?
If the media was worth anything, they'd do their own stories rather than relying on having them fed to them.
Besides, they don't trust government anyway.
I thought the media didn't trust what the government said anyway.
So I'll tell you what would have happened.
Even if the vice president had put this story out, the first thing that would have happened was, it's a cover-up, it's a lie.
We've got to find out what really happened.
And that's why the Armstrong family put this out.
Because the Armstrong family, up till now, nobody's got a grudge against them.
Because, well, they might, to a certain extent, they're long-life Republicans.
But the fact of the matter is, can you imagine if the Cheney's office had put this out, what the firestorm?
What really happened?
What's being covered up?
When can we talk to the victim?
When do we find the official injury reporter?
We want to find out what really happened because we know Cheney lies.
Cheney sent Scooter Libby out to lie about Valerie Playman.
Cheney did this and Cheney did it.
They would just repeat whatever official report came out of the vice president's office as a lie anyway.
They can't treat this as a lie because they've got no brief against the Armstrong family.
Armstrong family is lying.
They can allude to it, but they can't charge it like they could if it had come from the vice president's office or from the White House.
So now they're stuck with complaining only about when weren't we doing?
We're the big media.
Why did you give it some little potential newspaper in Corpus Christi?
What's our story?
I thought you guys went out and found your own stories.
I thought you guys are better than anybody else.
I thought you were a cut above.
I thought you found out things nobody knew and then passed them on to us.
Now you want to be the first to be told something.
I guess that's what news has become.
Get some leaker in the CIA, get somebody somewhere, call them up.
Guess what's happening here?
Aha, I have a scoop.
I'm still waiting for ABC News to explain why they sent their anchor to the war zone to do a stand-up outside an armored personnel carry.
I don't care if it was Iraqi.
If he's there, I know what the reason was.
The reason Bob Woodruff was there as they're, well, I know what they say the reason is.
The reason Bob Woodruff was there was to do a story on just how effective the new Iraqi security forces really are.
Because, of course, the administration's saying that they're getting better and they're getting up to speed.
But of course, the administration lies.
Impeach Bush.
Impeach Cheney.
Condoleezza Rice stinks.
Rumsfeld stinks.
We got to get rid of them all.
So we're going to go and find out for ourselves just how good the Iraqis are doing because we don't trust Bush.
We don't believe Bush because Bush lied to get us into war in the first place.
So we're okay.
That's why you send the guy over there.
Well, fine.
Have him find out and then keep him alive so he can tell us.
But he's doing a stand-up as this thing's rolling down the road and there's a car bomb there.
Somebody at ABC owes us an explanation as to why they sent their anchor into a war zone.
There wasn't anything in particular he would report that hadn't already been reported, but he was trying to verify this Iraqi army and Iraqi security force improvement and so forth.
But, you know, where's the scandal there?
There's no attempt to find any Bush's fault.
Like, we wouldn't have had to send him over to Iraq if Bush hadn't lied us into this war.
So, you know, these people are just, it's got to be one of the dumbest stories ever, and it's just insulting.
Every news story that comes up, every one of them, has as its action line, how can we make this a scandal and natal Bush?
And frankly, it's getting tiresome.
And you would think after a while they'd realize, hey, you know, this isn't working.
We've got to try a different angle if we're going to try to get Bush.
But, in fact, you have that PSA that I had Johnny prepare for the Democrats, Mike.
You have that PSA?
It's not barely a PSA.
I asked Johnny to produce something begging the Democrats, just move to the center, just one person.
Yeah, because I, you know, they have become so absurd that they have become our parodies.
I know you just played it in the break at one of the breaks not long ago, about 25 minutes or so ago.
Well, I guess we can't find it.
We'll take a quick timeout and be back in just a second.
Don't go away, folks.
It's gotten so bad out there on the left that I asked Johnny Donovan, official production director here, the EIB Network, to produce a little message, a plea for just some, not a lot, not asking for much.
Rationality from people on the left.
The EIB Network would like to take a moment to address those of you who are part of the political movement we lovingly call the Looney Left.
In years past, we've prided ourselves on showcasing absurdity by being absurd.
Our satire has become legendary.
However, you've made it increasingly difficult to continue our satirical tradition.
Your actions and viewpoints have become so extreme that they are cartoonish, and consequently, they're hilarious on their own.
So, what we're asking you is this: move a little toward the center.
Try to have an opinion that might appeal to at least one person in the political mainstream.
You can keep your radical leftist bumper stickers, attend your protest rallies, don't bathe.
Heck, you can even hug a tree and take it out to lunch afterwards.
Just come back to the center a little so we can start making fun of you again.
A public service message from the EIB Network.
It's a sincere plea.
We don't need the comedy anymore because it's being provided for us.
All right, here's a story.
We talked about this in the first few minutes of the program today.
Gore laments U.S. abuses against Arabs.
Former Vice President Al Gore.
I mean, do we have you seen any video of that?
Have you?
I don't know if we have any of the audio from it or not.
I guess we do.
It doesn't matter.
Rather not listen to that voice.
Former Vice President Al Gore told a mainly Saudi audience Sunday that the U.S. government committed terrible abuses against Arabs after September 11th and that most Americans did not support such treatment.
Gore told a largely Saudi audience, many of them educated at U.S. universities, that Arabs in the U.S. had been indiscriminately rounded up, often on minor charges of overstaying a visa or not having a green card in proper order and held in conditions that were just unforgivable.
Unfortunately, there have been terrible abuses, and it's wrong, Al Gore said.
I do want you to know that it does not represent the desires or wishes or feelings of the majority of the citizens of my country.
Nor does it represent the truth, Al Gore.
These are the utterances, mad utterances of an irresponsible, angry, and bizarre human being who happens to have been born in America.
As a Democrat in good standing, it's about the best thing that you can say about him.
But I'm beginning to wonder if there's not some mental instability going on here since this 2000 defeat of his.
He's just really been a candidate for the little yellow bus and the men in the white coats.
So he laments U.S. abuses against Arabs.
Let me tell you what I lament, Al Gore.
I lament all these ads like moveon.org and Americans coming together comparing our president to Adolf Hitler.
I lament Dick Durbin comparing our troops to Nazis, the Soviets and their gulags and the pole pot.
I lament liberals saying that the Bush family fortune is rooted in Nazi blood money.
I resent and lament the fact that Howard Dean says John Ashcroft is a descendant of Joseph McCarthy.
And Ted Kennedy saying, shamefully, we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new management, U.S. management.
I lament these kinds of things, Al Gore.
And I lament you saying that America routinely and terribly abuses Arabs since 9-11.
I lament the New York Times portraying the American military as employing torture as standard practice.
I lament Democrats declaring as a fact that President Bush deliberately lied to Americans in the world about the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq as an excuse to take over that country to control their oil.
And I lament liberals claiming President Bush knew of the 9-11 attacks in advance and let them happen to give him excuse to go to war in Iraq to bolster his presidency.
And I could go on and on and on.
Al Gore and the Democrats have lied purposely and repeatedly.
And they have deceived about why we've gone to war and how we've conducted the war.
They have lied about our military during a time of war for political gain on their part.
They accomplished this, hopefully, by smearing our troops and their commander-in-chief during a time of war.
The Democratic Party's treatment of great American institutions is what I lament.
And yet, here's Al Gore over in Jeddah in Saudi Arabia, telling lies in the midst of all of this Islamo-fascist rioting that's going on all over the world.
The last thing that these people need is to be fueled with more gasoline thrown on the fire and yet leave it to Al Gore to go do just that in Saudi Arabia.
I guess this is what Al Gore defines as patriotic and responsible free speech.
But to me, it is just indefensible and reprehensible at the same time.
I know 16 of the 19 hijackers did come from Saudi Arabia.
He goes there and tells them about all the mistreatment that we have visited upon Saudis and Arabs, which would not just be Saudi Arabia, but Arabs, since 9-11.
I don't understand these people.
It's tough to understand irrationality.
And by the way, give me a little transition here.
Grab audio soundbite number 19, because I mentioned this top of the program yesterday.
Now, how long has it been since December 16th when James Risen came out on his New York Times story with the leak about this domestic spy engage?
Bush was spying on the American people without warrants.
Bush didn't care.
He's dictator and he's spying on Americans.
This is a leak, and it was all fabricated.
And throughout this whole period, they miscast what the program was.
Foreign intelligence was what was being sought so as to prevent another 9-11.
The same damned idiots who were demanding that, to know why we didn't connect the dots before 9-11 are now trying to make sure we can't connect them after 9-11.
But yet, they weren't really, because when it came, when it came push to shove, they would never say, we'll stop the program.
They would never say, oh, this program is horrible.
Why, we're violating all these human rights.
We're violating all these civil rights.
Why, the American people are being spied on.
If it's as bad as they said, that program should have been stopped immediately.
But they never suggested that, did they?
They just tried to create a scandal out of it, just like they tried to create a scandal over the troop deaths in Iraq with that sickening run-up count that they had.
And that has backfired yesterday on Meet the Depressed.
Tom Daschel and James Harmon spent the entire show proclaiming that Bush broke the law with the program, but each of them repeatedly said they support the program and they don't want to stop the program.
They're all for the program.
Here's a little montage.
I think we should be listening.
I support this capability.
I support the program.
I've never flinched from that.
I still support the program.
We all support going after the terrorists.
We support the wiretapping program.
Should the president stop this program?
No, absolutely not.
I think it's a very valuable program.
Do you think the program should be stopped?
No, I think the program should go on.
It's a John Kerry moment.
In the period of 10 minutes on one show, we had all these flip-flops.
The president's spying is engaging in warrantless searches.
Should the program...
Oh, no, no, no, no!
Valuable program.
Valuable program.
And this reminds me, I don't know if you saw this.
I've got this at the bottom of my stack.
Let me see if I can find it very quickly here.
Big story about how John Boehner, the new Republican majority leader in the House of Representatives, is renting an apartment owned by a lobbyist in D.C.
Representative John Boehner, who was elected House Majority Leader last week, is renting his Capitol Hill apartment from a veteran lobbyist whose clients have direct stakes in legislation that Boehner has co-written and that he has overseen as chairman of the Education and the Workforce Committee.
Now, you know, this had to happen.
The minute a leader in the GOP is raised up, the left-wing smear machine goes into high gear.
Wonder if the Washington Post ever had anything to say about Tom Daschell's wife being a lobbyist herself.
Tom Daschell was married to a lawyer.
He is married to a lobbyist.
He is a lobbyist himself now.
We get a new Democrat leader.
All we get is fawning praise and profiles and puff pieces.
A new Republican leader, and we get a smear machine ginned up.
Quick timeout, my friends.
The EIB network and El Rushbow rolling right on in just a few short mere minutes.
Only 30 minutes left, and we'll make the most of it as we always do.
We always do.
Saddam Hussein, making his big push to be the keynote speaker at the 2008 Democratic National Convention, shows up in court today saying, down with Bush, down with Bush.
He tortured us all.
He did that.
I mean, right out of the Democratic Party talking points.
And exactly as I predicted.
So if he keeps it up, he could be sitting next to Jimmy Carter in the VIP box after he gets his country back before the 2008 presidential race.
Ian in Jacksonville, Florida.
Welcome, sir.
Nice to have you on the program.
Hello, Russ.
After listening to you for almost 20 years, it's my honor to say Mega Did I've been wanting to do that for years.
Thank you, sir, very much.
And next time Vice President Shanny goes hunting, I hope he invites Hillary Clinton out.
Now, wait, now before anybody thinks that's tasteless, that's tasteless, I want to read something to you.
I have heard.
That's not what I called about, but I thought.
No, you just hang on.
I'm not going to take away for your valuable caller time.
You just hang on.
I got to do this statement.
Sarah and James Brady put out an official statement after the vice president's hunting mishap.
James and Sarah Brady made comments today related to Vice President Cheney's reportedly accidental shooting yesterday in Texas.
Said, Jim Brady, now I understand why Dick Cheney keeps asking me to go hunting with him.
I had a friend once who accidentally shot pellets into his dog, and I thought he was an idiot.
I thought Cheney was scary for a long time, Sarah Brady said.
Now I know I was right to be nervous.
So if anybody thinks that Ian here was tasteless by suggesting that Cheney invite Hillary next, let it be known that the handgun people have already made the joke.
Rush, the reason I've been listening to Deeb for 20 years is because you keep me laughing and you keep me serious and you keep my rudder straight.
Well, thank you.
Wait a minute.
That might be a double entre.
I don't mean that at all.
But let me go into Saddam Hussein here because that's what I called about.
Yeah.
Now, in trials in the United States, when the defendant keeps interrupting the court trial, you know, like Charles Manson, so forth, they put these people, put these nuts, in a separate room with a closed-circuit TV so the trial can go on.
And why aren't the Iraqis doing this with Saddam Hussein?
Put him in a separate room, closed-circuit TV.
He can shout all he wants, but no one can hear him, but he can still see the proceedings.
And I don't know why they're not doing this.
Because, Rush, if it goes on like it's going on, to borrow a phrase from you, you and I will both assume room temperature before this gets beyond the preliminary stages.
Well, it is true that Saddam has some very nifty advice in dealing with all this, and the advice is distinctly American.
He has taken over the courtroom.
He is dominating it.
He is making the court and the judges and everything the issue, not himself.
He has to be getting advice on this from Ramsey Clark, one of his American attorneys, member of the Democratic Party, by the way, and perhaps others who are filling him in.
But the point is to turn this into a television show and not a trial.
Because the verdict of public opinion, regardless of what the verdict of the court ultimately is, the verdict of public opinion, they hope will redound to Saddam's benefit.
I have some people sent me emails saying it's become a travesty.
It's a joke.
And he doesn't deserve a fair trial.
And neither does Milosevic.
Milosevic doesn't deserve fair trial.
The Iraqis are doing this because they want their civil justice system, criminal justice system, to be seen by the new population.
The population, they want this to be seen and everybody know full well what goes on in court.
And I think ultimately, you know, Saddam's going to get his, he's going to hang or do something, and he knows it.
He's just trying to forestall it.
You know, they tried this with this Wacko Masawi, Zakarius Masawi, when we first put him into court, he started making a show out of everything.
Our federal trials are not televised, but he still turned it into a circus.
And, of course, the judge bent over backwards to be sensitive and understanding.
So it's not to have people think ill of, I think it was her.
But I look at this, frankly, and this trial, and I chuckle it.
I can't help it.
I know it's deadly serious stuff, but the guy, I forecast what his defense would be.
I suggested his defense.
Just wait till he starts calling witnesses.
I want to see John Kerry as a witness.
I want to see Ted Kennedy as a witness.
I want to see all these people.
I mean, Ted Kennedy has said that Abu Ghraib is no different under our management than it was under Saddam Hussein's.
Bring Ted Kennedy in as a witness.
The Democrats have been telling everybody Bush lied.
There was no reason to go to war.
There were no weapons of mass destruction.
Saddam was harmless.
He's going to be demanding his country back.
He's going to be demanding that Bush be tried as the war criminal.
And this is all going to come from Democratic Party talking points, as is his behavior in court as a means of disrupting things.
So I think at some point they'll get a handle on it because their patience will be tried to its maximum, and it'll all even out.
But for now, it's interesting to see because it provides quite an interesting, I mean, anytime some foreign dictator, despot thug sounds like leading Democrats in this country, I'm all for it.
More of it.
I mean, when Saddam Hussein starts bashing Bush, you know, in the White House, they just start smiling because people can't hear the difference between what he's saying or between any other Democrat and what he's saying.
This is Sylvie in Waldorf, Maryland.
Sylvie, thanks for waiting and welcome to the program.
Hi, hi, nice to talk to you.
Thank you.
I was watching CNN, and it got to me where they're talking about Vice President Cheney, and it seems that some of the reporters are kind of depressed and sad that Mr. Whittington is not more badly hurt or, gas, God forbid, you know, deceased, because it feels like they would want him to be more badly hurt or even deceased so that someone can charge or accuse Cheney.
Sylvie?
Yes.
This is a very cynical view.
Because what I hear you saying is, and I want to give you a chance to confirm that you actually get this impression, that you're watching the media in their feeding frenzy in the White House, ostensibly about how they weren't told.
Do you actually get the impression that they wish the victim were more seriously hurt or perhaps even dead?
I get that impression.
And why?
They were at the hospital, and the doctor was giving a press conference about 45 minutes ago.
I don't know if you saw that in your screen there.
Yeah, it showed some of it.
I didn't hear any of it, but I saw some of it, yeah.
And I mean, I didn't just some of the questions were not very audible, but you know, Mr. Whittington apparently is going to be transferred to a trauma or is there already?
And, you know, and how bad, you know, kind of asking questions in a way to kind of tweak it in a way of, well, is he really badly hurt?
Is he not that badly hurt?
Is he to me, it seems that, I mean, it's like a feeding frenzy because I've never seen such coverage for an accidental shooting of any kind.
Just because he's a vice president, all of a sudden, this is number one news today, even number one, even in front of the blizzard, which is, I think, the bigger news today.
But yes, I may be cynical, Rush, but that's what I got out of it.
Well, I can understand the cynicism, especially if the questions that the media were as you characterize them.
There's no question they want this to be as bad as possible for Cheney.
And they want this to have dire consequences and ramifications for Cheney.
And of course, the worse the condition of Mr. Whittington, the happier the media will be.
I mean, the organization oriented around doom and gloom.
And, you know, you remind me of something.
This has nothing to do with what you said, but you reminded me.
I don't even know what it was that you said that reminded me of something, but it did remind me.
Oh, you said the snowstorm.
I know it's not a perfect analogy that there are some flaws in it, but this snowstorm is a record snowstorm for New York, correct, Mr. Snerdley.
And there were plenty of weather forecasts early on saying how bad this was going to be.
Were there not, ladies and gentlemen?
There were.
And from everything I'm watching on television, I have seen governments with plenty of advance warning taking proper precautions and making steps to see to it that all vital services were maintained and that disaster in the midst of disaster did not happen.
And as I watch, I haven't yet heard any reports of calamity in New York or Boston or Washington or wherever the giant snowfall was.
Now, granted, it's a snowstorm and it's not as devastating as Hurricane Katrina, don't misunderstand, not nearly as such, but still, it's a record snowfall.
And we know that during record snowfalls, the poor and the infirm and those who are shut in have a tough time getting out.
Emergency services are tough to provide.
And just because it snows doesn't mean people stop having heart attacks or stop needing groceries or food or something.
Looks like a job well done in all these cities in terms of advanced planning and dealing with the emergency and the weather and the storm as it happened.
I haven't heard, for example, of any New Yorkers clamoring for their $2,000 debit cards from FEMA.
I'm sure FEMA's already got them distributed if Mayor Bloomberg didn't beat them to it.
So this observation that I had to share with you there, I'm glad you triggered that.
So we'll be a quick break here.
We'll be back and continue in just a moment.
I want to go back to a story on February 7th.
I had this story in the stack of stuff back on that date.
It was 7th?
Yeah, that's right.
Last Monday.
And I didn't get to it.
No, it was last Tuesday, and I didn't get to it.
It's from the New York Sun, Congress's secret Saddam Tapes.
And it's something that the antique media has no interest in this.
I have seen.
The New York Sun is the only place I have seen anything about this.
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence studying 12 hours of audio recordings between Saddam Hussein and his top advisors that may provide clues to the whereabouts of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
The committee has already confirmed through the intelligence community that the recordings of Saddam's voice are authentic, according to Chairman Pete Hookstra of Michigan.
He wouldn't go into detail about the nature of the conversations or their context.
The audio, they were provided to his committee, by the way, by a former federal prosecutor named John Loftus, who says he received them from a former American military intelligence analyst.
Loftus is going to make the recordings available to the public this week on the 17th at the annual meeting of the Intelligence Summit, of which he is president.
And on that organization's website, Mr. Loftus is quoted as promising that the recordings will be able to provide a few definitive answers to some very important and controversial weapons of mass destruction questions.
The audio recordings are part of new evidence the House Intelligence Committee is piecing together that has spurred Chairman Hookster to reopen the question of whether Iraq had the biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons American inspectors could not find.
President Bush called off the hunt for those weapons last year and has conceded that America has yet to find evidence of the stockpiles.
In the interim, we've had this former Iraqi government official testify that they did exist and the Saddam flew them out on civilian airliners that have been stripped of their seats and were basically cargo planes that have been flown to Syria.
Now, I can imagine that there's a lot more known about this than what has been reported.
I would imagine that there are people that are going to try to discredit the person who gave the tapes to Loftus.
There are going to be people trying to discredit Loftus.
Because this story is two hot potatoes.
It is too hot potatoes.
Bureaucracies everywhere are either going to try to kill or discredit or delay this story.
And this is why.
This is why it gets wacky.
Of course, the dream of our side is proof of weapons of mass destruction.
But that has become a nightmare for everybody else.
If there ever is established proof of weapons of mass destruction and they were moved, then the left gets whacked.
And I don't care who their nominee is, and I don't care what their plans are, and I don't care what they think their future holds.
They are in deep doo-doo because they bet the whole farm on no weapons of mass destruction.
At the same time, the United Nations and the Security Council of the UN would become laughing stocks.
Now, they are already, but they would become laughing stocks to more and more people.
And they don't want these tapes to be authentic, and they don't want these tapes to be released.
Hans Blix and this Mohamed Al-Baradai and the Nobel Peace Prize would be exposed as the jokes that they are, along with the media, the New York Times and the Washington Post, they would lose most of the last remnants of their credibility.
The CIA, the CIA, which has got some rogue members obviously trying to do damage to President Bush, would be humiliated because they went from slam dunk to no slam dunk and now back to slam dunk on weapons of mass destruction, all other intelligence.
Why did it take three years to learn this?
If somebody had these Saddam tapes and there's proof on the tapes that he had weapons of mass destruction and moved them, you know, nobody's going to look good in this other than Bush.
And the people that don't look good are not going to want to look bad.
And they're going to try to do everything they can to suppress this or discredit the people behind it.
So I'm just warning you.
When this hits, you're going to have massive skepticism on the mainstream press.
They don't have to react when the news comes out.
By the way, the insiders already know whether this is true or not.
There are people who already know whether it's true or not.
We don't.
But if there are people who know about it, they already know about it and have known about it for a long time.
Congressional leaders, National Security Agency.
And there's still a week left here for this stuff to be released.
So keep a sharp eye on this.
This one's fascinating to me, these Saddam tapes, because as I look at this, there are more vested interests lined up who would try to bury this, discredit it, or stop it than there are those who would like to see it come out.
Be watching this with bated breath.
Back in just a second.
Hell, you know, the news has not been good lately for the feminists out there, but this story might please them.
Saying she was tired of men mistreating her, an ex-strip club waitress in Boston mailed condoms filled with potentially explosive mixture to strip clubs, a TV station, and other places.
This, according to the Boston Globe, Kimberly Lynn DeSilva, 40, says you just couldn't take it anymore.
And FBI documents unsealed in the city's U.S. District Court on Tuesday.
According to FBI affidavits, a strange package showed up at the Bridgewater State College Admissions Office on September 21 with a note inside saying, boom, workers evacuated the building and a state police bomb squad was called in when fluid was seen leaking from the package.
Turns out that she's the condom bomber.
Apparently, this woman's been mailing condom bombs all over Boston because she's fed up.
with the way men at strip clubs treated her when she worked in the strip club as a waitress.