All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 13, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:14
February 13, 2006, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, folks, we are back.
Revved up final hour, broadcast excellence, the Rush Limbaugh program kicking off a brand new full week of Busy Real Radio.
Telephone number 800 282-2882 and the email address is rush at EIBNet.com.
I, of course, America's Anchorman and host for life.
The prestigious Attila the Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Well, the media still won't let go of the Cheney shooting scandal, as they are trying to uh make it.
I've been reading some uh during the break here, some uh conservative blogs, and some people are out there saying it, Cheney better go public and explain everything, or he could be finished.
Uh sometimes people on our side of the aisle have to prove too hard or try too hard to prove they're the smartest people and most reasonable, the most open-minded people in the room.
This is patently absurd.
ABC News, top of the hour, several questions still surrounding the hunting injury.
Why did his host call local media rather than his staff call national media?
It's simple.
You guys are a bunch of liars and liberals and cowards.
There's it's pure as simple as pie to figure this out.
These Yeah, how yeah, how many, how many uh how many how many questions do they have about Clinton busting his ankle at Greg Norman's place?
They took whatever sanitized story was put out.
We know Clinton was hanging from a chandelier and fell.
Well, that's what we suspect.
The official story was he was going down the steps.
Yeah.
Hey, going down the steps.
Oh, they were everybody was lauded and heroic and uh and all this sort of stuff.
These kinds of these accidents happen uh all the time.
The media publishes national security secrets.
Why should Cheney call you?
Why should Cheney's office call you guys?
What in the world is Cheney's office?
Oh, you guys and the national media.
You're just out there trying to destroy these people and Bush.
But here's the thing that this is what strikes me about this.
I've lived under the mistaken impression, I guess, all my life that reporters actually went out and reported.
That they went out there and put their finger to the pulse to the grindstone, nose to the whatever the saying is, they walked around out there, shoe leather, and dug up stories.
Found now, you know that the press has to have a body watch on Cheney, just like they have a body watch on Bush.
That's a term that somebody is always assigned to be wherever they are, as within close proximity as they can get.
Now I know they're not out in the fields with uh Cheney and his hunting party and so forth, but at some point, when an accident like this happens, how do you in the media not know about it?
I mean, you know everything going on in the CIA and you're leaking that.
You can find out everything going on with Valerie Plain's life and Joe Wilson's life and leak that.
Why can't you find out about this on your own?
There have to have been some commotion when this happened.
There had to have been at some point vehicles involved, whether they were official looking ambulances or not, there had to be something involved here to show you that something is out of whack.
You had to have some speeding vehicles at some point.
You've got an injured man who's been shot with bird shot here.
Where's the body watcher?
Where's the person assigned to keep sharp eyes?
I know that they're probably off limits, president, vice president wants privacy and this sort of thing, but at some point doesn't this boil down to the fact that these people are mad that they weren't told this happened.
If the media was worth anything, they'd do their own stories rather than relying on having them fed to them.
Besides, they don't trust government anyway.
These thoughts I thought these I thought the media didn't trust what the government said anyway, so I'll tell you what would have happened.
Even if the vice president had put this story out, the first thing that would have happened was it's a cover up, it's a lie, we got to find out what really happened.
And that's why the Armstrong family put this out.
Because the Armstrong family, up till now, nobody's got a grudge against them because well, they might, to a certain extent, they're long life Republicans, But the fact of the matter is, can you imagine if the Cheney's office had put this out what the fire storm what really happened?
What's being covered up?
When can we talk to the victim?
When do we find the official injury reporter?
We want to find out what really happened because we know Cheney lies.
Cheney sent Scooter Libby out to lie about Valerie Plain.
Cheney did this and Cheney did it.
They would just repeat whatever official report came out of the vice president's office as a lie anyway.
They can't treat this as a lie because they've got it.
They've got no brief against the Armstrong family.
Armstrong family's lying.
They can they can allude to it, but they can't charge it like they could if it had come from the vice president's office or from the White House.
So now they're stuck with complaining only about where we don't when you do it.
We're the big media.
Why did you give me some little potent newspaper in Corpus Christy with our story?
I thought you guys went out.
Found your own stories.
I thought you guys are better than anybody else.
I thought you were a cut above.
I thought you found out things nobody knew and then passed them on to us.
Now you want to be the first to be told something.
I guess that's what news has become.
Aha, I have a scoop.
I'm still waiting for ABC News to explain why they sent their anchor to the war zone to do a stand-up.
Outside an armored personnel carry.
I don't care if it was Iraqi.
If he's there, I know what the reason was.
The reason Bob Woodruff was there.
As well, I know what they say the reason is.
The reason Bob Woodruff was there was to do a story on just how effective the new Iraqi security forces really are.
Because, of course, the administration is saying that they're getting better and they're getting up to speed.
But, of course, the administration lies.
Impeach Bush, impeach Cheney.
Condoleezza Rice stinks.
Rumsfield stinks.
We gotta get rid of them all.
So we're gonna go and find out for ourselves just how good the Iraqis are doing because we don't trust Bush, and we don't believe Bush because Bush lied to get us into war in the first place.
So we're gonna okay.
That's why you send the guy over there.
Well, fine.
Have him find out, and then keep him alive so he can tell us.
But he's doing a stand-up as this thing's rolling down the road, and there's a car bomb there.
Bam what.
Somebody at ABC owes us an explanation as to why they sent their anchor into a war zone.
There wasn't anything in particular he would report that it already hadn't already been reported, but he was trying to verify this Iraqi army and Iraqi security force improvement and so forth.
But you know, what where where's the scandal there?
There's no attempt to find any Bush's fault.
Why we wouldn't have had to send him over to Iraq if Bush hadn't lied us into this war.
So this, this, just these people are just it's gotta be one of the dumbest stories ever, and it's just insulting.
Every news story that comes up, every one of them, has as its action line.
How can we make this a scandal and nail Bush?
And frankly, it's getting tiresome, and you would think after a while they'd realize, hey, you know, this isn't working.
We've got to try a different angle if we're gonna try to get Bush.
But in fact, you have that PSA that uh I had Johnny prepare for the Democrats.
Uh Mike, you have that PSA?
It's not a barely PSA.
I asked Johnny to produce something, begging a Democrats just move to the center.
Just just one person.
Yeah, because I you know, we we've they have become so absurd that they have become our parodies.
You uh I know you just played it in the break at one of the one of the breaks not long ago, about uh 25 minutes or so ago.
Um well, I guess we can't find it.
We'll take a take a quick time out and be back in just a second.
Don't go away, folks.
It's gotten so bad out there on the left that I have I asked Johnny Donovan, official production director here, the EIB network to uh Produce a little message of plea for just some, not a lot, not asking for much.
Rationality from people on the left.
The EIB network would like to take a moment to address those of you who are part of the political movement we lovingly call the loony left.
In years past, we've prided ourselves On showcasing absurdity by being absurd.
Our satire has become legendary.
However, you've made it increasingly difficult to continue our satirical tradition.
Your actions and viewpoints have become so extreme that they are cartoonish.
And consequently, they're hilarious on their own.
So what we're asking you is this.
Move a little toward the center.
Try to have an opinion that might appeal to at least one person in the political mainstream.
You can keep your radical leftist bumper stickers, attend your protest rallies.
Don't bathe.
Heck, you can even hug a tree and take it out to lunch afterwards.
Just come back to the center a little so we can start making fun of you again.
A public service message from the EIB network.
It's a sincere plea.
We don't need the comedy anymore.
Because it's being provided for us.
All right, here's a story.
We talked about this in the first uh few minutes of the program today.
Gore laments U.S. abuses against Arabs.
Former Vice President Al Gore.
I mean, do we have.
Have you seen any video of that?
Have you?
I don't know if we have any of the audio from it or not.
I guess we do, it doesn't matter.
Rather not listen to that voice.
Former Vice President Al Gore told a mainly Saudi audience Sunday that the U.S. government committed terrible abuses against Arabs after September 11th, and that most Americans did not support support such treatment.
Gore told a largely Saudi audience, many of them educated at U.S. universities, that Arabs in the U.S. had been indiscriminately rounded up, often on minor charges of overstaying a visa or not having a green card in proper order and held in conditions that were just unforgivable.
Unfortunately, there have been terrible abuses, and it's wrong, Al Gore said.
I do want you to know that it does not represent the desires or wishes or feelings of the majority of the citizens of my country.
Nor does it represent the truth, Al Gore.
What these are the utterances, mad utterances of an irresponsible, angry and bizarre human being who happens to have been born in America.
He's a Democrat in good standing.
It's about the best thing that you can say about him.
But I'm beginning to wonder if...
Thank you.
If there's not some mental instability going on here since this 2000 defeat of his, he's just really uh been a candidate for the little yellow bus and a men in a white coats.
So he laments U.S. abuses against Arabs.
Let me tell you what I lament, Al Gore.
I lament all these ads like moveon.org and Americans coming together comparing our president to Adolf Hitler.
I lament Dick Durbin comparing our troops to Nazis, the Soviets in their gulags and to Pol Pot.
I lament liberals saying that the Bush family fortune is rooted in Nazi blood money.
I'll resent and lament the fact that Howard Dean says John Ashcroft is a descendant of Joseph McCarthy, and Ted Kennedy saying, shamefully we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new management, U.S. management.
I lament these kinds of things, Al Gore.
And I lament you saying that America routinely and terribly abuses Arabs since 9-11.
I lament the New York Times portraying the American military as employing torture as standard practice.
I lament Democrats declaring as a fact that President Bush deliberately lied to Americans and the world about the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq as an excuse to take over that country to control their oil.
And I lament liberals claiming President Bush knew of the 9-11 attacks in advance and let them happen to give him excuse to go to war in Iraq to bolster his presidency.
And I could go on and on and on.
Al Gore and the Democrats have lied purposely.
And repeatedly.
And they have deceived about why we've gone to war and how we've conducted the war.
They have lied about our military during a Time of war for political gain on their part.
They accomplished this hopefully by smearing our troops and their commander-in-chief during a time of war.
The Democratic Party's treatment of great American institutions is what I lament.
And yet, here's Al Gore over in Jeddah in Saudi Arabia.
Telling lies in the midst of all of this Islamo fascist rioting that's going on all over the world.
The last thing that these people need is to be fueled with more gasoline thrown on the fire, and yet leave it to Al Gore to go do just that in Saudi Arabia.
I guess this is what Al Gore defines as patriotic and responsible free speech.
But to me, it is just indefensible and reprehensible at the uh at the same time.
Just and it's it it uh sixteen of the night I know six sixteen of the nineteen hijackers did come from Saudi Arabia.
He goes there and tells them about all the mistreatment that we have visited upon Saudis and Arabs, which would not just be Saudi Arabia, but Arabs uh since uh since 9-11.
I don't understand these people.
Uh it's it's tough to understand irrationality and and it's uh and and by the way, this give me a little transitioner.
Grab audio soundbite number 19, because I mentioned this top of the program yesterday.
Now, how long has it been since December 16th, when James Risen came out in his New York Times story with the leak about this domestic spying case.
Bush was spying on the American people without warrants.
Bush didn't care.
He's dictator, and he's spying on Americans.
This is a leak, and it was all fabricated, and throughout this whole period, they miscast what the program was.
Foreign intelligence was what was being sought so as to prevent another 9-11, the same damned idiots who were demanding that to know why we didn't connect the dots before 9-11 are now trying to make sure we can't connect them after 9-11.
But yet they weren't really because when it came when it came push to shove, they would never say we'll stop the program.
They would never say, oh, we this program is horrible.
Why we're violating all these human rights, we're violating all these civil rights.
Why the American people are being spied on?
If it's as bad as they said, that program should have been stopped immediately.
But they never suggested that, did they?
They just tried to create a scandal out of it, just like they tried to create a scandal over the troop deaths in Iraq with that sickening run-up count that they had.
And that has backfired yesterday on Meet the Depressed.
Tom Dashell and James Harmon spent the entire show proclaiming that Bush broke the law with the program, but each of them repeatedly said they support the program and they don't want to stop the program.
They're all for the program.
Here's our little montage.
I think we should be listening.
I support this capability.
I support the program.
I've never flinched from that.
I still support the program.
We all support going after the terrorists.
We support the wiretapping program.
Should the president stop this program?
No, absolutely not.
I think it's a very valuable program.
You think the program should be stopped?
No, I think the program should go on.
It's a John Kerry moment in the in in this in the period of ten minutes on one show.
We had all these flip-flops.
President spying is engaging in warrantless searches.
Should the program Oh, no, no, no, no.
Valuable program.
Valuable program.
And this reminds me, I don't know if you saw this.
I've got this at the bottom of my stack.
Let me see if I can find it very quickly here.
Big story about how John Boehner, the new sp uh uh Republican majority leader in the House of Representatives, is renting an apartment owned by lobbyist.
In D.C., Representative John Boehner, who was elected House Majority Leader last week, is renting his Capitol Hill apartment from a veteran lobbyist whose clients have direct stakes in legislation that Boehner has co-written, and that he has overseen as chairman of the education and the workforce committee.
Now you know this had to happen.
The minute a leader in the GOP is raised up, the left-wing smear machine goes into high gear.
Wonder if the Washington Post ever had anything to say about Tom Dashell's wife being uh a lobbyist herself.
Tom Dashell was married to a layer.
He is married to a he is a lobbyist himself now.
We get a new Democrat leader, all we get is fawning praise and profiles and puff pieces.
A new Republican leader, and we get a smear machine ginned up.
Quick timeout, my friends, the EIB network and L. Rush bowl rolling right on in just a few short mere minutes.
Only 30 minutes left, and we'll make the most of it as we always do.
We always do.
Saddam Hussein, making his big push to be the keynote speaker at the 2008 Democratic National Convention, shows up in court today saying, Downward Bush!
Downward Bush!
He tortured us all.
He did the I mean, right out of the Democratic Party talking points.
And exactly as I predicted.
So if he keeps it up, you never know.
He could be sitting next to Jimmy Carter in the VIP box after he gets his country back before the 2008 presidential race.
Ian in Jacksonville, Florida.
Welcome, sir.
Nice to have you on the program.
Hello, Russ.
After listening to you for almost 20 years, it's my honor to say Megadeth.
I've been wanting to do that for years.
Thank you, sir, very much.
And next time Vice President Shane goes hunting, I hope he invites Hillary Clinton out.
Now wait.
Now before anybody thinks that's tasteless.
That's tasteless.
I I d I want to I want to read something to you.
I have.
That's not what I called about, but I thought.
No, and you just hang on.
I'm not going to take away from your valuable caller time.
You you just hang on.
I gotta I gotta do this state.
Sarah and James Brady put out an official statement after the vice president's hunting mishap.
James and Sarah Brady made comments today related to Vice President Cheney's reportedly accidental shooting yesterday in Texas.
Said Jim Brady, now I understand why Dick Cheney keeps asking me to go hunting with him.
I had a f I had a friend once who accidentally shot pellets into his dog, and I thought he was an idiot.
I thought Cheney was scary for a long time, Sarah Brady said.
Now I know I was right to be nervous.
So if anybody thinks that Ian here was tasteless by suggesting that Cheney invite Hillary next, let it be known that the handgun people have already made the joke.
Russ, the reason I've been listening to you for twenty years is because you keep me laughing and you keep me serious and you keep me keep my rudder straight.
Well, thank you, sir.
Wait a minute.
Uh that might be a double on Andre.
I don't mean that at all.
But let me go into Saddam Hussein here, because that's what I called about.
Yes.
Uh now in trials in the United States when the defendant keeps interrupting the court trial, you know, like Charles Manson, so forth.
Yeah.
Okay, put these people, these put these knots in a separate room with a closed circuit TV.
So the trial can go on.
And why aren't the Iraqis doing this with Saddam Hussein?
Put him in a separate room, close circuit TV.
He can shout all he wants, but no one can hear him, but he can still see the proceedings.
And I don't know why they're not doing this.
Because, Russ, if it goes on like it's going on to borrow a phrase from you, you and I will both assume room temperature before this gets be beyond the preliminary stages.
Well, it is it is true that that Saddam has some very nifty advice in dealing with all this, and that the advice is distinctly American.
Uh he has taken over the country the uh courtroom.
He is dominating it.
He is making the court and the judges and everything the issue, not himself.
Uh he has to be getting advice on this from uh from Ramsey Clark, his uh one of his American attorneys, member of the Democratic Party, by the way, and uh uh perhaps others uh who are who are filling him in, but as the point is to turn this into a television show and not a trial, because the verdict of public opinion, regardless what the verdict of the court ultimately is, the verdict of public opinion, uh they hope will redound to Saddam's benefit.
Uh I I have uh some people sent me emails saying it's become a travesty, it's a joke, uh and and they don't they don't he didn't have to deserve a fair trial.
And neither does Molosevich.
Milosevic doesn't deserve fair trial.
Uh The Iraqis are doing this because they want their their civil justice system, uh criminal justice system to be seen by the new population.
The population, they want this to be seen, and everybody uh uh know full well what goes on in court.
And I think ultimately, you know, Saddam's gonna get his, he's gonna hang or do something, and he knows it, and he's just trying to forestall it.
Um they they tried this with uh uh this wacko Mosaui uh uh Zakarius Massawi, when we first put him into court, he started making a show out of everything.
Our federal trials are not televised, but uh it's it's he still turned it into a circus um and and of course the judge bent over backwards to be sensitive and uh and understanding so it's not uh to have people think ill of uh I think it was her.
Uh but I I I look at this uh frankly and and this trial and I chuckle it.
Well, I I I can't help it.
I know it's deadly serious stuff, but the guy I I forecast what his defense would be.
I suggested his defense.
Just just and I he's wait till he starts calling witnesses.
I want to see John Kerry as a witness.
I want to see Ted Kennedy as a witness.
I want to see all these people.
I mean, Ted Kennedy has said that Abu Ghraib is no different under our management than it was under Saddam Hussein's.
Bring Ted Kennedy in as a witness.
The Democrats have been telling everybody Bush lied.
There was no reason to go to war.
There were no weapons of mass destruction.
Saddam was harmless.
He ought to be next he's going to be demanding his country back.
He's going to be demanding Bush be tried as the war criminal.
And this is all going to come from Democratic Party talking points, as is his behavior in court as a means of disrupting things.
So I I think at some point they'll get a handle on it because their their patience will um uh be tried to its uh its maximum and it'll all it'll all even out.
But for now it's it's uh interesting to see because it provides quite a an interesting I mean, any time some foreign dictator despot thug sounds like l like like leading Democrats in this country, I'm all for it.
More of it.
I mean, when Saddam Hussein starts bashing Bush, you know in the White House they just start smiling because people can't hear the difference between what he's saying or between any other Democrat uh and what he's saying.
This is Sylvie in Waldorf, Maryland.
Uh Sylvie, thanks for waiting and welcome to the program.
Hi, hi, nice to talk to you.
Thank you.
Um I was watching CNN and it it got to me where they're talking about Vice President Cheney, and it seems that some of the reporters are kind of depressed and sad that Mr. Whittington is not more badly hurt or gas, God forbid, you know, deceased, because it feels like they would want him to be more badly hurt or even deceased so that someone can charge or accuse.
Sylvie.
Yes.
This is a very cynical view.
Because what I hear you what I hear you saying is, and I want I want to give you a chance to uh uh confirm that you actually get this impression that you're watching the media in their feeding frenzy in the White House, ostensibly about how they weren't told you actually get the impression that they wish the victim were more seriously hurt or perhaps even dead.
I get that impression.
And why?
Um it's just they were at the hospital and the doctor was giving a press conference about 45 minutes ago.
I don't know if you saw that in your screen there.
Yeah, I it's joked.
Some of it I watched I didn't hear any of it, but I saw some of it, yeah.
And um I mean I didn't just some of the questions were not very audible, but you know, you know, i Mr. Whittington apparently is going to be transferred to a trauma or is it's there already.
And you know, and how how bad, you know, kind of asking questions in a way to to kind of tweak it in a way of well, is he really badly hurt?
Is he not that badly hurt?
Is he uh it's to me it seems that I mean it's like a a feeding friend because I've never seen such coverage for an accidental shooting of any kind, just because he's a vice president, all of a sudden this is uh number one news today, even number one, even in front of the blizzard, which is I think that's the bigger news today.
But yes, um I may be cynical, Rush, but uh that's what I got out of it.
Well, uh you know, I can understand the cynicism uh especially if if the if the questions the media were as you characterize them.
There's no question they want this to be as bad as possible for Cheney.
Uh and And they want this to have dire consequences and ramifications for Cheney.
And of course, the worse the condition of Mr. Whittington, the happier the media will be.
I mean, they are the organization oriented around doom and gloom.
And uh, you know, I've sp that you remind me of something.
This is nothing to do with what you said, but you reminded me, I don't even know what it was that you said that reminded me of something, but it did remind me.
Oh, you said the snowstorm.
Uh I know it's not a perfect analogy, that there are some flaws in it.
But this snowstorm is a record snowstorm for New York, correct, Mr. Snerdley.
Uh and there were plenty of weather forecasts early on saying how bad this was going to be.
Were there not, ladies and gentlemen?
There were.
And from everything I'm watching on television, I have seen governments with plenty of advanced warning taking proper precautions and making steps to see to it that all vital services were maintained and that disaster in the midst of disaster did not happen.
And as I watch, I haven't yet heard any reports of calamity in New York or Boston or Washington or wherever the uh giant snowfall was.
Now, granted, it's a snowstorm, and it's not as devastating as Hurricane Katrina, don't misunderstand, and not nearly as such, but still it's a record snowfall, and we know that uh during during record snowfalls, the uh the poor and the infirm and those who are shut in uh have a tough time getting out.
Emergency services are tough to provide, and just because it snows doesn't mean people stop having heart attacks or stop needing groceries or food or something.
Um looks like a job well done in all these cities uh uh in terms of advanced planning and dealing with the emergency and the the the uh the weather in the storm as it as it happened.
Um, for example, of uh any New Yorkers clamoring for their $2,000 debit cards from uh from FEMA.
Uh I'm sure FEMA's already got them distributed if Mayor Bloomberg didn't beat them to it.
So I just observation that I that I had had to share with you there.
I'm glad you triggered that.
So we'll be a quick quick break here.
We'll be back and continue in just a moment.
I want to go back to a story on February 7th.
I I had this story in the uh uh stack of stuff back that on that date.
It was uh when is it seventh?
Yeah.
That's right.
Last Monday, and I didn't get to it.
Uh, it was last Tuesday, and uh and I didn't get to it from the New York Sun, Congress's secret Saddam Tapes.
And something that the the uh the antique media has no interest in this, and that I have seen.
The New York Sun is the only place I've seen anything about this.
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, studying twelve hours of audio recordings between Saddam Hussein and his top advisors that may provide clues to the whereabouts of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
The committee has already confirmed through the intelligence community that the recordings of Saddam's voice are authentic, according to Chairman Pete Hookstra of Michigan.
He wouldn't go into detail about the nature of the conversations or their context.
The uh audio uh they were provided to his committee, by the way, by a former federal prosecutor named John Loftus, who says he received them from a former American military intelligence analyst.
Uh Loftus is going to make the reporting uh recordings available to public uh this week on the 17th and the annual meeting of the Intelligence Summit of which he is president.
And on that organization's website, Mr. Loftus is quoted as promising that the recordings will be able to provide a few definitive answers to some very important and controversial weapons of mass destruction questions.
The audio recordings are part of new evidence the House Intelligence Committee's piecing together that has spurred Chairman Hookster to reopen the question of whether Iraq had the biological chemical and nuclear weapons American inspectors could not find.
President Bush called off the hunt for those weapons last year and is conceded that America has yet to find Evidence of the stockpiles.
And in the interim, we've had this uh former Iraqi government official testify that they did exist and the Saddam flew them out on civilian airliners that have been stripped of their seats and were basically cargo planes have been flown to Syria.
Now, I can imagine that there's a lot more known about this than what has been reported.
I would imagine that there are people that are going to try to discredit the person who gave the tapes to Loftus.
They're going to be people trying to discredit Loftus.
The and because this story is two hot potatoes.
It is two hot potatoes.
Bureaucracies everywhere are either going to try to kill or discredit or delay this story, and this is why.
This is why it gets wacky.
Of course, the dream of uh of our side is proof of weapons of mass destruction.
But that has become a nightmare for everybody else.
If there ever is established proof of weapons of mass destruction and they were moved, then the left gets whacked, and I don't care who their nominee is, and I don't care what their plans are, and I don't care what they think their future holds.
They are in deep doo-doo because they bet the whole farm on no weapons of mass destruction.
At the same time, the United Nations and the Security Council of the UN would become laughing stocks.
Now they are already, but they would become laughing stocks to more and more people.
And they don't want these tapes to be authentic, and they don't want these tapes to be released.
Hans Blix and this Mohammed Alberadai and the Nobel Peace Prize would be exposed as the jokes that they are.
Along with the media, the New York Times and the Washington Post, they would lose most of the last remnants of their credibility.
The CIA.
The CIA, which has got some rogue members obviously trying to do damage to President Bush, would be humiliated because they went from slam dunk to no slam dunk and now back to slam dunk on weapons of mass destruction.
All other intelligence.
Why did it take three years to learn this?
If somebody had these Saddam tapes and there's proof on the tapes that he had weapons of mass destruction and moved them, you know, nobody's going to look good in this other than Bush, and the people that don't look good are not going to want to look bad.
And they're going to try to do everything they can to suppress this or discredit the people behind it.
So I'm just warning you.
When this hits, you're going to have massive skepticism on the mainstream press.
They don't have to react when the news comes out.
By the way, that the insiders already know whether this is true or not.
There are people who already know whether it's true or not.
We don't.
But if if if there are people who know about it, they they they already know about it and have known about it for a long time.
Congressional leaders, National Security Agency, and there's still a week left here for this stuff to be released.
So keep a sharp eye on this.
This one's fascinating to me, uh, these Saddam tapes, because it as I look at this, there are more vested interests lined up who would try to bury this, discredit it, or stop it than there are those who would like to see it come out.
Be watching this with dated breath.
Back in just a second.
Well, you know, the news has not been good lately for the feminists out there, but this story might please them.
Saying she was tired of men mistreating her, an ex-strip club waitress in Boston.
Mailed condoms filled with potentially explosive mixture to strip strip clubs, a TV station, and other places.
This according to the Boston Globe.
Kimberly Lynn DeSilva, 40, says he just couldn't take it anymore, and FBI documents unsealed in the city's U.S. district court on Tuesday.
According to FBI affidavits, a strange package showed up at the Bridgewater State College Admissions Office on September 21 with a note inside saying, boom, workers evacuated the building, and a state police bomb squad was called in when fluid was seen leaking from the package.
Turns out that the the this she's the condom bomber.
Apparently this woman's been mailing condom bombs all over Boston because she's fed up with the way men at strip clubs treated her when she worked in the strip club as a waitress.
What?
Well, it it it's uh it leaked whatever was in there.
I uh I don't know.
Uh but uh it was a potentially explosive mixture.
Hey, folks, I just report the news.
Uh see you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection