All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 9, 2005 - Rush Limbaugh Program
33:06
December 9, 2005, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, my good friends.
Great to have you with us.
Open Line Friday rolls on the Rush Limbaugh program right here on the EIB network.
It's great to have you with us.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's Open Line Friday.
So what's a time left, folks, for you to unload, to get it off your mind, to get it out of your system?
800-282-2882.
If you would like to be on the program, the email address is rush at EIBnet.com.
This is an anniversary of sorts today, folks.
If it's not an anniversary, it's one of those, you know, dates in history they sometimes put in the newspapers in the morning.
Let me tell you about it.
11 years ago today, Bill Clinton fired the Surgeon General, Jocelyn Elders, for advocating that masturbation should be discussed in scruple as part of human sexuality.
Also part of a sort of an adjunct to condoms in preventing AIDS.
If you learn to masturbate out there, you're taught how to do this in school, and you can play with yourself and you won't run into any problems.
Of course, four years after he fired Jocelyn Elders, which would be seven years ago today, school children were openly discussing and performing oral sex as part of everyday sexuality, following Bill Clinton's lead, of course.
Nobody fired the president.
A lot of us tried.
Remember those days, but he survived the attempt.
And we have a tribute.
I mean, it was one of the saddest days.
We had mixed emotions here when Jocelyn Elders was released because she was a gold mine.
She showed up at Lincoln Center and there was some benefit.
And Eric Clapton was going to play the guitar.
She was asked if she liked Eric Clapper.
Oh, love Eric Klappner.
She said, she was fabulous.
It's a gold mine, and she's right along part with Janet Reno.
The only difference is that Jocelyn Elders never attacked a religious organization in their buildings in Waco, Texas, as Janet Reno did.
So we have a little tribute.
Hometown Girl, a Jocelyn Elders tribute on the 11th anniversary of her being fired by President Bill Clinton.
From Jocelyn Elders to John Kerry in the short span of 11 years, not much has changed.
All right.
Here's a story on the Washington Post.
You want to know how bad it's gotten.
Democrats consider changes in primaries by Dan Balls, Washington Post staff writer.
Hmm.
Democratic presidential candidates will face a revised calendar of primaries and cauckeye in 2008, including new contests between the traditional opening states of Iowa and New Hampshire, based on new recommendations that will be considered by a Democratic National Committee panel tomorrow at the New York Times.
The commission faces a...
I threw that in.
I'm at the Democrat National Committee Times.
Somebody wrote a piece today.
Maybe it was somebody, was it Ralph Peters?
The Democrat Central Committee instead of national takeoff on the old the Soviet Central Committee and the Politburo and so forth.
The Commission faces a weekend deadline to approve a plan that responds to party criticisms that Iowa and New Hampshire have enjoyed their privileged positions for too long and that more demographic, geographic, and economic diversity is needed to make the nominating process more representative, right?
So when all else fails, change the calendar, which is all this is.
This is to prevent Howard Dean from happening again, like happened last year.
And every time they do this, they end up with a new Howard Dean.
So they're pulling out all the stops now.
I know they don't want another Kerry.
Kerry got this thing.
It was the Cascade effect.
Here's the reason they ended up nominating Kerry.
They were never excited about Kerry.
People forget this.
But Dean goes into the Hawkeye cauckey and the New Hampshire primary as the prohibitive favorite.
I mean, all the polls, he was going to, we're going to win this thing.
He was the nominee.
And then, well, we were pulling for him.
Yeah, we were in current.
I mean, that was the best thing could have happened.
And then all of a sudden, the votes, see, the media starts counting votes before they're actually cast.
The votes were cast, and the vote tally did not come out at all like the polls said.
In fact, John F. Kerry, who once served in Vietnam, emerged as the surprise victor.
And so what this caused was the cascade effect.
Everybody was so certain it was going to be Dean that they thought, wow, this Kerry guy, he has really put it back together.
Wow, look at what Kerry pulled off.
And it wasn't that.
It was just people voting against Dean and voting for name recognition.
Lieberman had already been unceremoniously dumped from the whole process.
They wanted no part of him in the Democratic Party.
And so all these other primaries that came after the Hawkeye Caucasi and the New Hampshire primary, oh, looks like Kerry's the guy.
Everybody voted for Kerry because he beat Dean so soundly.
That's what did in the Brett Girl.
What's his name?
John Edwards, the man in two Americas, the winners and the losers.
He again choosing the losers.
And so Kerry just by acclamation, and then they magically, without any substance, started attaching the term electability.
And then they started saying, why, we've never seen the Democratic Party so unified.
Well, the bottom line is they were never excited about Kerry.
I'll never forget the first official giant Democrat National Committee fundraiser in Washington after the primaries are over.
This is where the nominee comes out and is introduced to the big donors.
And this is the big kickoff.
And Clinton and Hillary got more applause than Kerry.
Kerry was as dead as a tree stump during his speech.
Teresa was more animated or Teresa.
Sorry, was more animated than he was.
And I could just tell then there's no excitement about this guy.
There's zilch.
So they want to prevent another carry from happening as well.
But it all boils down to this.
When all else fails, change the calendar.
That's what this story is about.
Quick timeout.
Back with more right after this.
Stay with us.
I was just looking at a picture of this new Iranian president, this madman guy.
And I was just thinking, if you lighten the hair, shave the beard, add little Botox in a couple places, this guy could be Kerry's brother.
There he is right there.
You shave the beard, lighten the hair a little bit.
I guess he doesn't need that much Botox.
It could be John Kerry's brother.
Here is Mark in Plymouth, Michigan.
Mark, you're next on Open Line Friday.
Hi.
Hi, Megadles, Rosh.
Thank you, sir.
I was just wondering, what's the insider scoop for season five of 24?
Well, I don't know very much.
You know, the people that produced that keep that real close to the vest.
They don't let much out of it.
I know who the terrorists are going to be, and I knew who one of the big guest star actors is going to be, Sean Aston, who was in the Lord of the Rings movies.
Well, he is Frodo's buddy.
I don't know much about Lord of the Rings.
You didn't watch the Lord of the Rings movie.
Well, then you won't recognize the guy, but he's Patty Duke's son.
Okay.
You know who Patty Duke?
How old are you?
26.
You wouldn't know Patty Duke.
Okay.
So Patty Duke was a child actress during my days, way back in the ancient times.
TV Land, yeah.
But yeah, okay, there you go.
TV Land.
Yes, Nicola.
There you go.
So his dad is John Aston because he was married to Patty Duke.
And so I know that all I can tell you about the terrorists, they are separatists from a breakaway republic.
Okay.
That's all I can tell you.
And I don't really know much.
In fact, I don't know any more than that.
Are you getting a guest spot on season five?
No, I suggested it.
I suggested that in one of the episodes, a well-known American talk show host get kidnapped by the new hostages and held for ransom.
And the Democratic Party offered to pay for the talk show host to be killed.
And they didn't, they didn't, they didn't go for that.
No.
But I can tell you that they're excited about it.
They've got six, probably seven episodes that are in the can.
It'll start, I think January 8th and 9th is two days in a row with their premiere.
But I've got to tell you something about this show.
I went out there and met them for the first time last April.
They were still wrapping up last season, season four, and their final air date was in May.
I mean, even though they get ahead, they've been shooting since July, but they do not, and this is fascinating to me, they do not storyboard or plot the whole season from episode one to episode 24.
They'll do a couple at a time, and then they keep brainstorming and take it from there.
Two reasons for this, to keep their creativity fresh and to make sure that plot lines aren't known well in advance and can leak out.
But when they started this season, for example, they had no idea where it was going to end.
Last February, before season four was just disstarted, they had no idea how it was going to end.
They hadn't figured that out yet.
And I think that's fascinating.
They put themselves under the pressure gun every week to do this show and to have it keep going.
And they've found a formula to make it work.
But they're excited about this season, and they've been picked up for another one.
So they're looking forward to this one starting.
Great show, and I appreciate you letting us know about it.
Mark, I'll tell you something else.
Just to give you a little heads up, there's a cover story coming.
I'm not sure if it's January, February, summer, Cigar Ficionado is doing a cover story on the people that produced the program and an interview with Kiefer Sutherland.
And because these guys that produced the show, I went out, they have a giant cigar room.
It's one of the greatest cigar rooms you've ever seen.
And it's right in there in their giant warehouse.
And they take a break every day and repair to the cigar room.
They put on their smoking jackets.
And that's where they get away from everything.
They don't go morning to night crunching mentally on the plot and writing it.
They take a total break from it.
And it'll be the cigar fish.
Gordon Mott wrote it.
He was out there with him for two days.
And if he saw what I saw, it is going to be a fascinating piece.
So it's going to happen sometime in the first part of the year.
If you really want to know more about 24 than you do now, that would be the thing to read because they opened up and showed some of the techniques that they use in filming and there were pictures taken.
It'll be a great informative piece for fans of 24.
Bob in Cincinnati.
Glad you waited, sir.
You're next on Open Line Friday.
Hi.
Hi, Cincinnati Bengals Ditto's Rush.
Thank you, sir.
I need your help.
I have a 16-year-old son who's been spoon-fed global warming myths through school and the media.
And besides the six inches of snow we just received and some South Park episodes, where can I steer him to combat the myth of global warming?
South Park episodes are working to combat it?
Yes.
Or promote it.
What did you say?
Spoof it.
To spoof it.
Yes.
Okay, I'm confused.
I've got a little hearing problem.
I've got a big batch of tinnitus today.
There's a huge, low-frequency hum.
I'm not sure what you in my ear.
Did you say that?
I thought you were worried about your son being brainwashed by people about this.
But South Park is countering that?
What are they doing?
They just had a hilarious episode spoofing the whole global warming.
Oh, okay.
South Park's on the good side about this.
Yes.
Okay.
So what is your concern?
Does your kid watch South Park?
Yes, he does.
Okay, is it having an impact on him?
That episode did, and it kind of got him more curious about that side of the argument.
Okay, well, what does he believe?
What has he been told about global warming specifically that he believes?
Well, a perfect example is he came home the other day, and he said one of his science teachers had said that the hurricanes were caused by global warming.
Okay.
So along those lines.
All right.
Here's, as with so much of liberalism, it is easily countered by fact.
Just this week, William Gray, the head honcho at the University of Colorado or Colorado State, wherever it's out there where we had Dan's bake sale, Fort Collins, issued his preliminary 2006 forecast for next season, hurricanes and so forth.
There are going to be a lot of them, but not as many as this year, and not as many are going to hit land in the U.S. That's the preliminary guess.
And at the very end of the piece, he said there is no evidence.
We see no evidence, Zilt Zero Nada, that global warming has any effect on hurricanes.
This is a 30 to 40 year cycle.
It have been global cycles for hurricanes for years, and it simply isn't true.
Now, I saw that, of course, in our local newspapers here because that's no hurricane predictions make news here.
But it's all over the internet.
It's all over the place what William Gray and the guy that runs the Hurricane Center, Max Mayfield, has been saying it and even testified to Congress all fall.
He went up there two or three times that global warming has nothing to do with this.
There's no scientific evidence.
These are the experts in hurricanes.
And I will guarantee you that your son's teacher is not an expert in hurricanes and is probably not even properly informed.
Your son's teacher is simply a propagandist, maybe innocent, but believes all this stuff and is now spewing it, spewing it to your kid.
And of course, everybody respects the teacher.
It's just, it's human nature.
But when he comes home and tells you these things, you can sit him down and you can do this in a way that's not critical of the teacher because you say, son, it just isn't true.
Now, I know sometimes you can have trouble because you're the dad and dad's, you know, you're also the husband.
You know how that goes.
You don't know anything.
But you can still impart the truth about any number of these things, and it wouldn't hurt.
Does your son have any interest in politics at all?
Some, yes.
Okay, well, hang on a minute, because that'll give you another, on me, another opportunity to steer him perhaps another level of understanding.
That is precisely what we do.
We make the complex understandable.
Now back to Bob in Cincinnati.
Yes, sir.
All right.
Bob, let me ask you another question.
You said your son is sort of oriented toward politics, so he understands liberal versus conservative somewhat.
Somewhat for a 16-year-old.
All right.
Are you a subscriber to RushLimbaugh.com?
I am not.
Well, you are now, because, well, when we hang up here, stay on the phone and we'll get somebody to give you the information necessary to make this happen because I have something on the website called the Essential Stack of Stuff, and it's categorized by topic.
And we have, it's an encyclopedia.
It is a database of countless stories that have been in the media, speeches made by experts debunking every myth about global warming.
Now, this is not to say the Earth isn't warming.
It's not to say this, but the idea that humanity is causing it is something that has swept liberalism.
Liberalism believes in doom and gloom.
They believe we are destroyers, especially prosperous people.
They think that we have no regard for what is here.
They try to make it sound like that, well, this is going to be too complicated for your son to understand, but between you and me, these people think they're secularists.
In truth, they are as devoted to religion as anybody else is.
They just have a different God.
And Michael Crichton made a speech once that is eerie in its perceptiveness about the militant environmentalist wackos.
Their belief system parallels the story of Genesis in striking ways.
Except there's one big difference.
There never has been a Garden of Eden.
If you go back 100 years, you find horse manure all over the streets.
If you go back 200 years, you find pestilence and disease.
If you go back farther than that, we are living in the best times possible.
Life expectancy is at an all-time high.
Global warming relies on the theory that we are destroying ecosystems.
There is no evidence that we could destroy ecosystems.
But if you just, once you log on to the website, you get familiar with how to navigate, and it's very easy.
Just go to the essential stack of stuff.
There's a list of areas of the website on the left side, the left column of the home page.
And let me just give you some of the headlines here, the links that will take you to the stories that document all this thing.
The hybrid myth, it's solar warming, not global warming.
Max Mayfield shouts, it's not global warming with hurricanes.
Our best days are ahead of us.
Clear skies worsen global warming.
There's no oil shortage.
Eventually, everybody will understand liberals.
Grocery bags follow the – these are really not that great of an indication of what this story is about.
But for example, in San Francisco, it's gone so far as to say they're going to start charging people for grocery bags because they're polluting the planet and causing global warming.
It's gotten absurd.
It's ridiculous.
And it's nothing more than a money-making scheme by the city council out there.
There's just any number of resources here that you can check out.
And you could do it with your, does your son use a computer?
Oh, yeah.
Well, let him look at this stuff with you.
I will.
And, you know, he'll say, well, but Dad, Rush Limbaugh is one of those right-wingers.
And you say, well, what's your teacher?
Your teacher is nothing more than somebody who is telling you things that she doesn't know to be true.
Just go right to the hurricane store.
All you need to do is create doubt about one fact that his teacher told him, and the seed has been planted.
And there's nothing better that he could end up doing for his own education than to start questioning these things that he's told rather than just believing them because it's a teacher.
And that's how you learn things.
Absolutely.
So this will be a great learning experience for him.
This is not to provoke a fight with the teacher.
I'm not trying to get that done.
But, you know, teachers do come with this sense of authority in the classroom.
And it's assumed by kids who don't know much that the teacher's gone to school to learn all this, so they must know what they're talking about.
So it does make it tough to counter it and overcome it, but it can be done.
So hang on here.
We'll get the information necessary to make you a complimentary subscriber and then you can poke around and see what I'm talking about with the environmentalist wackos and dangerous extremists in the whole section of the Essential Stack of Stuff on Global War.
And there's essential stack of stuff on thousands of topics, folks.
It's too lengthy to mention.
I mean, really, this website, it's the equivalent of an encyclopedia.
And it's there as a resource.
Most of the people that subscribe discover it on their own and they're blown away by it.
Here's Rebecca in Urbana, Illinois.
I'm glad you called.
Welcome to the program.
Hi, Rush.
It's a pleasure to talk to you.
I have a question for you.
Yes.
I'm wondering what is behind this media drumbeat for a vaccine for bird flu.
I feel like they're trying to scare us into doing something.
I mean, they throw around pandemic, and this morning I heard it's going to cost $7 billion, but that would only be 2% of what it would cost if we actually had the pandemic.
I mean, you always say follow the money, so where's it going?
Well, there's any number of ways of looking at this.
There's a manufacturer of a product.
I don't know who the Manta Drug Company, I don't want them, I don't know who they are.
It escapes me.
The product's called Tamiflu.
And Tamaflu, I saw the Fox doctor is a guy named Isidore Rosenfeld.
And he's good.
He's a brilliant man, he's a cardiologist by trade.
He's a works in New York.
And I was, I was, I don't know how this happened to me, but I ended up on a PBS station the other day, channel surfing around, and it was during one of their pledge drives.
And during PBS pledge drives, they have great programming that you'll never see other than in a pledge drive after you sign up.
You'll never see this stuff.
And it was Isidore Roosevelt, and he was answering questions, basic health 101 questions for members of the audience.
He got a question about this bird flu business.
He said, get Tamaflu.
Get Tamaflu.
It's the first I'd heard of it.
Well, he's got credibility to me.
So I started learning about Tamaflu and his prescription.
Everybody's talking about Tamaflu now.
And so whether there's a financial component with people trying to enrich that company, I couldn't tell you.
I, too, am a little bit perplexed by this.
Bird flu is being trumpeted here as the absolute biggest plague.
It could wipe us all out.
We don't have much of a chance.
We better just get used to it and be prepared to die.
I mean, this is the overall theme of these hysterical stories.
It was just a year ago, was it not, that we had all these horror stories about the general flu.
It was either the swine flu or some sort of flu.
And then the reason was there was a shortage of vaccine because Bush was fighting the war on terror and all of our resources had been diverted.
He was in Iraq and we were going to die because all this flu was coming and there was no vaccine.
Well, the truth of the matter is, there aren't any countries, companies making vaccine because the Clintons try to take the profit out of it back in the late period of their administration with trying to make sure that health vaccine, flu vaccine, was free to every kid, and it bombed out it.
It drove companies out of the business of manufacturing it.
But it seems like every flu season, there's some flu that's going to come and it's going to rear its head up and it's going to kill us all.
And I haven't seen any evidence.
I just think it's natural media hysteria.
It doesn't take much to get it started.
I have a story, and this is related, Rebecca.
There's a story about a college professor somewhere out in California who is running a little project in his class.
He's asking students to produce scam news to see if they can get it printed in California newspapers.
Now, when I first read this, and it's linked to On Drudge, when I first read this, well, who has this guy?
No, this is brilliant because I stopped to think it happens all the time.
Scam news gets printed all the time.
One of the most recent examples of scam news was some outfit in Chicago put out a fax.
They just sent a fax to as many news organizations as possible.
They had a logo on their facts.
And they were a new health group, and nobody knew who they were, but they said that the old food groups that have been designed by the American Medical Association were all wrong.
And we need to reorient the way we look our food and eat our food and organize it in terms of the health charts.
And the media ran with this, and it was the biggest news around this time of year, by the way, for two or three months.
And finally, AMA.
So who the hell are these people?
Okay, Roach makes a Tama flu, they give you the company name.
Who the hell are these people?
It was a hoax.
It was a total hoax.
So the idea that you can scam the media is something that has been established.
Now, where this bird flu thing comes from, I can't tell you.
All I know is there seem to be a whole lot of people hoping it happens.
I think it attitudinally is rooted around the natural desire for disaster, natural desire for calamity, because it'll be big news if this happens.
There's nothing better for the news business than panic, than disaster, than death, plague death.
There are people who get excited about this in newsrooms, folks.
There are people, so they get ahead of themselves.
They get this notion in their heads, this template.
Uh-oh, bird flu.
It's out there.
If you get it, you're dead.
It's coming.
It's big.
So it's established.
So bird flu's bad.
Bird flu's big.
Could be pandemic.
That's the template.
Five cases discovered in China.
There it is.
There it is.
Four cases discovered.
There it is.
See, it's coming.
Five cases discovered.
There it is.
A chick in California discovered.
There it is.
See?
And it's a momentum that builds on itself and just goes sort of like the reporting of the Iraq War.
Sort of like reporting what happened out of New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
I have to tell you here, Rebecca, you know how much I believe the bird flu?
I don't think about it.
I don't care about it.
If it comes, there's nothing I can do about it anyway.
If I'm going to get it, I'm going to get it.
If I'm not going to get it, I'm not going to get it.
I'm not going to sit around wringing my hands.
I'm not going to put a giant tent over my house.
I'm not going to go get an inhaler.
I'm not going to go get a mask.
I'm not going to go walking around.
Bird flu, bird flu.
Hell with this.
I refuse to let these people dictate my lifestyle, my attitudes, or anything else.
If you're going to want to go try to get some Tama flu, go get some Tama flu.
You'll go to the doctor and what have you.
We can do this, deal with this any way you want.
I just, after all these hysterical incidences of flawed, phony, totally incorrect reporting, I am not going to step up and say, you know, bird flu is right around the corner and you're dead.
We're all dead.
During the course of this program, we were going to 50,000 body bags in the first Gulf War, 30,000 body bags in this one.
I'm sorry, they've worn me out.
I don't have the emotion to get hysterical anymore.
And I just, I just don't.
So flu happens.
So, whether there's an organized push behind it in the media, I don't.
I just think this stuff feeds off itself.
They're all of like mind.
And once something gets started and once a notion gets established, it's hard to say, oops, we were wrong.
It's not going to be as bad as we thought.
They'll find a way to do that three or four months down the road if it doesn't materialize.
At any rate, I'm a little long here in this segment.
A quick timeout.
We will be back and continue in just a moment.
Yeah, I'm just sitting here watching Fox, and they got Lawrence Eagleberger on there, and what's his name?
David Ignatius of the Washington Post.
Eagle Burger's on Fox.
He thinks this GOP white flag ad is great.
And he's hammering Kerry and he's hammering a Democratic Party.
He's saying the Democratic Party leadership ought to be ashamed of itself.
And then this little reporter, this columnist of the Washington Post, you can just see, he's just tight as he can be, just sitting there when he's arrogant elitist pointing heads.
He says, it's unfortunate that the Republicans are further politicizing the war by running this ad.
Unfortunate.
It's like saying it isn't useful or it's unjust.
We know your lexicon, you mealy-mouthed liberals.
It's unfortunate.
Oh, yeah.
So we're not, we don't get to respond.
You guys can run around and you can destroy the effort.
You can say we need to lose.
You can call our troops terrorists.
We're just supposed to sit and say, well, we can't politicize this by reacting to that.
Furthermore, we don't have the right to respond to the left.
Why?
They're the final word on things.
Who the hell are these people?
Who the hell do they think they are?
They get to dictate the debate.
They get to lecture us and tell us what to think and say and when we can say and think it.
May have been the case some time ago.
It isn't the case now.
All right, quickly, a federal appeals court, the U.S. Ninth Circus, reinstated this unbelievable, a California man's death sentence, ruling yesterday that jurors did not invalidate their deliberations by considering biblical arguments in favor of vengeance.
The Los Angeles jurors in the 79 case of Stevie Lamar Fields unanimously agreed that death was the appropriate punishment after their foreman circulated biblical and other religious passages, an eye for an eye, for example, that seemed to require it.
Biblical references supporting mercy and forgiveness were not circulated in the jury room according to a lower court's ruling.
A federal trial judge in LA reversed Fields' sentence five years ago, called this jury misconduct.
The decision by the Ninth Circus to reinstate it appears to be the first of its kind and could make Fields, now 49, a candidate for execution in the near future.
The Ninth Circus is saying it's okay to consult the Bible because the Bible is working against the Bible just make believe to them.
The Bible's not a source of authority.
That's why it's okay to do it.
If the Ninth Circus, in this case, they end up doing the right thing because they're a bunch of secularists.
They think the Bible's an absolute comic book.
So what harm could come from citing the comic book?
So we're going to, so the guy's going to fry.
And in North Carolina, a judge dismissed a lawsuit prompted by outcry over the inability of Muslims to be sworn in in Guilford County courts using the Quran.
In throwing out the case, Superior Court Judge Donald Smith decided that no controversy existed because the plaintiff was still able to affirm that she could truthfully testify despite not being allowed to swear on the Quran.
Now, ACLU fought for the Muslims on this.
The ACLU fights to get the Quran in the courtroom.
They fight to keep Christianity out of the courtroom and out of the public square.
Anybody wonder what the true agenda of the ACLU might be?
Susan in Alamo, California.
I've got one minute, Susan, so you're going to have to be brief here.
You're going to have to get in, get it, and get out.
How are you?
Well, Rush, I am mad at you again.
You have deserted Arnold in his hour of need.
After all that I have done for you.
Well, you know.
You call here and still say you're mad at me.
I haven't abandoned Arnold.
Yes, you have.
You know why you abandoned him?
Because you have wheeled out of admitting to a caller on Monday that you were wrong about Arnold, and I was right.
And I just want you to mean it for my Christmas present that I was right about Arnold and you were wrong because you and I, Rush, changed the course of history in California and we saved the citizens of California from living under the rule of Busta Mondi.
What did I do?
What did I do Monday?
You lost me there.
I failed to admit.
You told a caller that you didn't mean it when you said you were wrong to me before an audience of folks.
No, That's your female side hearing that way.
I didn't say I was wrong.
No, You failed to admit that you were wrong about Arnold when I first challenged you two years ago.
Oh, oh, no, when I said I was wrong about Arnold, I was telling the truth.
Susan, I wish that I'd gotten to you sooner, but I do have to go because we just don't have any time.
But I'll spank myself for you.
You know, I actually love it when Susans get mad at me and start fighting with me.
I get a big thrill out of it when Susans, any of them, start fighting.
Anyway, have a great weekend, folks.
▲
Export Selection