All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 14, 2005 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:02
October 14, 2005, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 Podcast.
Greetings, my friends, America's anchor man on the scene on the case, as it were.
Excellence in Broadcasting Network, and once again an end of the week open line Friday, where and I, by the way, I've been reading the email.
If you people want to unload, this is the day.
You know what this is like?
This is like back back in 1992 when I didn't support parole.
I'm getting I'm getting a s it's not as voluminous, but I mean, I'm I'm getting some very critical emails from people.
You just shut up.
You should be supporting the president and so forth.
I do support the president.
But anyway, I I don't want to.
If if you want to unload today, 1-800-282-288-2.
And if you want to talk about something else, uh you're sick and tired of all else that's been discussed.
You want to talk about you want to talk about whatever.
Numbers 800-282-2882, the email address rush at EIBNet.com.
Can I read you a story here from the Associated Press that cleared the wires at about 1027 this morning?
It's by Pete Yost, one of our favorite journalists at the Associated Press.
Uh let's see.
Umvestigation is how the story is slugged.
Top Bush aide seeks to avoid criminal charges.
Washington.
One of President George W. Bush's closest advisors, Carl Rove, appears in court in a final chance to prove that he should not face criminal charges in a CIA leak case.
This is truly outrageous.
Rove could be in there to help the grand jury fill in the gaps.
The media will, if you give me a pin them down on this, will have to admit they have no idea what this prosecutor's doing.
The prosecutor, uh, Patrick Fitzgerald hasn't signaled anything.
But boy, they've got Rove convicted.
That's why I opened the program yesterday asking if he was out on parole yet.
Carl Rove getting a fourth and likely final chance to convince grand jurors he did nothing criminal in the CIA leak case.
An appearance that carries some risks as prosecutors are close to wrapping up their probe.
This is not journalism.
And there's another story.
There's a Washington Post story today, uh, and I think it's by Jim Vandenhae, is that right?
Yeah.
Scandals take toll on Bush's second term.
This is just Democrat talking points in the form of news.
I'm not even going to bother reading the story to you.
They're just salivating, folks.
And we've got some audio sound bites to back all of this up.
But I want to start here uh, in essence, uh with more salivating, more salivating going on out there.
This is about the uh the staged, the staged appearance the president had yesterday with these soldiers in Iraq.
The uh press thinks they've caught the uh president of big one here.
We have a little montage here.
Bush teleconference with the soldiers staged is the theme.
We have Brian Williams of NBC, Andrea Mitchell NBC, Terry Moran of ABC took me out of context uh uh two nights ago in the world news tonight.
Katie Kurick, Bob Schiefer, Diane Sawyer, Claire Shipman, and Lara Logan, CBS News, those are the participants in this montage.
The satellite picture from Iraq was being beamed back to television newsrooms here in the U.S. It showed a full-blown rehearsal of the president's questions, along with the soldiers' answers and coaching from the administration.
Today's encounter was billed as spontaneous.
But troops were coached on how to answer the commander-in-chief.
The fact that this was so carefully choreographed shows just how urgently the White House wants PR success at home for this embattled president.
Is the Bush administration using staged events to sell the war in Iraq?
After satellite cameras caught administration aids rehearsing the soldiers beforehand, the new embarrassment, the White House scrambling, after a photo opportunity with troops in Iraq didn't go quite as planned.
His message was overshadowed by questions about how much staging went into the event.
And a lot of other problems are giving the White House a major case of the nerves, including yesterday's slip-up, staging a photo op with U.S. troops and letting our Cameras see it all.
All right, now what has happened here quite simply is that no answers were choreographed.
They were not told what to say.
They were simply being made familiar with the presence of a camera, and so that the interview would go well.
They were talking breathing exercises and this sort of thing.
Last night on the CBS Evening News with Bob Schiefer, the reporter Lara Logan interviewed one of the participants in the teleconference.
And here is what he had Staff Sergeant David Smithberry, 42nd uh infantry division.
It's what he had to say about the event.
The truth is everything that was said was meant to be said.
Though it may have sounded scripted in some places, uh nerves kick in for one.
Two, everyone puts their thoughts together.
You put it down, you go over and over and over a hundred times.
It was their own words, but they were allowed to rehearse their words.
I mean, it was the whole thing is a mountain out of a molehill, but it's it's it's part of the uh the the inertia, if if you will, that the press thinks they've created here uh in destroying the uh the Bush presidency.
But you know, I don't how many of you people remember when one of these things truly was staged?
No, I'm talking about when Rumsfeld was coached when a when a soldier in Iraq was coached by a media reporter on how to embarrass Rumsfeld on up-armored Humvees.
We have the audio.
Let's go back to that tape.
When the media does the staging, and when it's real staging, and when it's real, really rehearsed, and the question is written for a soldier by the media, why that's fine.
Why that's perfectly okay.
Let's go back to when the press fed a soldier a question to ask Rumsfeld, December 8th, 2004, Kuwait City.
Rumsfeld held a town meeting with the troops.
Soldier specialist Thomas Jerry Wilson asked this question, and it turns out that he was fed this question by Edward Lee Pitts of the Chattanooga Times Free Press.
We soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass to up armor our vehicles, and why don't we have those resources readily available to us?
Our soldiers have been fighting in Iraq for coming up on three years.
A lot of us are getting ready to move north relatively soon.
Our vehicles are not armored.
We're digging pieces of rusted scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass that's already been shot up, dropped, busted, picking the best out of this scrap to put on our vehicles to take into combat.
We do not have proper armament vehicles to carry with us north.
That question, written, structured by Edward Lee Pitts of the Chattanooga Times Free Press during a town meeting in Kuwait City on December 8th, 2004.
That question asked again by specialist Thomas Jerry Wilson.
And it was widely known after the new media.
The new media uncovered the facts on this one.
When the media does the staging, of course, it's not a problem.
The media can stage it, they can set up government officials, they can do whatever they want.
What happened with the uh teleconference yesterday was not a choreographed staging.
They were not told what they had to say in response to the president's questions.
It was simply a uh uh a rehearsal session to make them familiar.
You know what nervous people get on talking to the president for crying out loud.
You have that combined with the fact that they're on television, they get a little nervous, and they know that people are gonna see this, so they were given a chance to just talk about it, uh, plan what they were gonna say.
Uh they even told proper breathing exercises so that they didn't sound nervous or look nervous or uh any of that.
I want you to hear Rumsfeld's answer, by the way, to the question by the soldier that was written for him by Edward Lee Pitts of the Chattanooga Times Free Press.
His Rumsfeld answers, this uh answer was played wall to wall all over the place until the new media exposed that the question was a setup engineered by the press.
I talked to the general coming out here about the pace at which the vehicles are being armored.
They have been brought from all over the world wherever they're not needed to a place here where they are needed.
I'm told that they're being uh the army is is I think it's something like 400 a month are being done.
And it it's it's essentially a matter of physics.
It isn't a matter of money.
It's a matter of production and and capability of doing it.
As you know, uh, you go to war with the army you have, uh, not the harmy you might want or wish to have at a later time.
Uh, since the Iraq conflict began, the army uh has been pressing ahead to produce the armor necessary.
Uh, I can I can assure you that uh General Schoomaker and the leadership in the Army, and certainly General Wickham are sensitive to the fact that not every vehicle has the degree of armor that it it would be desirable for it to have, uh, but that they're working at it a good at a good clip.
All right, now Rumsfeld's answer was fine.
He didn't know that question was coming.
Edward Lee Pitts of the Chattanooga Times Press wrote the question for specialist Jerry Wilson.
They worked together putting it together.
Uh, and and of course, that was purely stage, designed to uh entrap Rumsfeld.
This is the same media now going after Bush in the White House for staging and choreographing this video teleconference yesterday.
This is the same media.
It said next to nothing when their friend Dan Rather used forged documents in the in the National Guard story.
This is the same media that then circled the wagons and gave Dan Rather all kinds of plaudits and awards.
He won a Peabody award.
He won a number of things.
Rather and Jennings and Broco all gathered one night where they celebrated rather they circled the wagons.
To this day, people like Marvin Calb continue to defend Dan Rather.
So I I I I'm I'm not impressed, mainstream press.
What you're doing here carries no water with me.
You have failed to defend yourselves against numerous of these charges that are not charges, they're facts over the uh course of recent years.
And I just I I continue to say, folks, I don't think the mainstream press has the slightest idea how they're perceived by the American people.
By the way, the answer that you just heard, we played it in Toto from Rumsfeld until we got the whole tape and played the whole tape for you.
About all you heard in in of this answer was Rumsfeld saying you go to army, you go to war with the army that you have, not the one you wish to have, as if he was slighting the military and slighting this soldier.
Remember that aspect of it too?
They edited Rumsfeld's answer.
We played you the whole answer.
But they edited that answer as if to say, screw you, kid.
You go to you go to war with the army you have.
Stop complaining to me about it.
That's the impression they tried to leave.
They're the ones that blow up trucks and make it look like spontaneous on their nightly news magazine shows.
These are the people that fabricate stories.
These are the people that set up events.
And I carry no brief for these people, ladies and gentlemen.
I have I when they start going down this road, you know, their their objectivity is long ago vanished.
They're nothing more than a political party with an agenda, and they make it known each and every day.
Quick timeout would be right back.
Don't go away.
Well known radio raconteur, General all round good guy, Rush Limbaugh, talent on loan from God.
All right, so this is the same media.
Same media that said next to nothing when Dan Rather used forged documents, turn around, give rather all kinds of awards.
Marvin Cowd still to this day defends him.
You know what's really staged in this country?
You know what's really staged?
The evening network news.
The evening network news, folks, is what's staged.
Most major daily newspapers in this country are staged.
In almost every case, we know the bias and spin the media will use when reporting on Republicans.
As in this AP piece on Rove, he went up to the grand jury today and one final chance to stay out of jail to avoid criminal indictment.
They don't know anything of the sort.
They have no idea why Rove went in there for a fourth time.
It's all speculation.
But they're all saying the same thing, are they not?
It doesn't matter if it's Pete Yosted AP, doesn't matter if it's UPI, doesn't matter if it's Reuters, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, M S N B C and all the others, New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, they all say the same thing.
How is that not staged?
It's all staged, as the audio clips I just played show.
That montage of all these different reporters talking about this teleconference.
The fact that scores of media outlets say exactly the same thing suggest their reports are what's staged.
As I have told you, my friends, the news is a packaged product, just like any product on the shelves.
It's packaged and marketed so that you will buy it.
It's packaged and marketed in the image that the people who package it and market want you to buy it.
And it's all the same.
It's identical.
It doesn't matter what you watch.
You want to talk about staged?
We'll be glad to talk about staged.
You want to talk about choreographed?
We'll be glad to talk about choreographed.
You want to talk about stunts, phony baloney stunts like blowing up trucks?
Didn't NBC do that one night for a dateline show, trying to make it look like the truck blew up on its own in an effort to what was it, Ford or Chevro?
It was GM they were trying to harm in that circumstance.
How many other instances of this?
Look at the reporting after the Hurricane Katrina.
All the same, wherever you tuned, whatever you read, all wrong.
None of it was right.
But it was all the same.
What did they do?
Gave themselves awards, proclaimed certain reporters new media stars for their big hearts and their sensitivity and their tears and their compassion and the like.
And I can probably, if we look it up, find uh few more instances of where the news has been staged, the outcome pre-arranged.
In order to create the appearance of spontaneously occurring news.
One more soundbite on this.
This is uh last night on uh on Hardball Andrea Mitchell, speculating that the staged photo op wouldn't have happened if Carl Rove were not facing jail.
If you remember the Matt Lauer interview with George Bush down in New Orleans the other day, or down in Louisiana the other day, when he in fact looked almost stricken when asked whether he was worried about Carl Rove and about these other members of his administration.
And he he seemed to be uh looking and searching for the politically correct answer, but he does seem really affected by this.
I think it's reflected in everything that's going on right now, from the stage management of this conversation with the troops today to more profoundly the Myers nomination and how it's not being sold on the Hill.
All this because Carl Rove is so distracted that he can't possibly be telling Bush what to say and what to do, and Bush is lost without Carl Rove because Bush is an idiot.
Bush is an empty suit.
Bush doesn't know diddly squat, Bush can't think for himself, has no ideas of his own, and with Carl Rove desperately preoccupied trying to stay out of jail, Bush is wandering aimlessly in the presidential desert, clueless.
That's the template.
That is staged as well.
She may be the one to say it here, but somebody else will say it tonight.
Somebody said it a couple days before in their own way, saying, on theme here last night, hardball with Chris Matthews talking to Andrea Mitchell.
Um, and Matthews here literally uh foaming at the mouth over the idea that Rove will be indicted, even refers to the White House being filled with arrogant bastards.
Listen to this.
I guess there's a question here about the attitude of the special prosecutor and what he feels these people are like.
Does he feel that he's up against some bad guys, some arrogant bastards in the White House who think that they can just lie to him, or he thinks they're think they're better than him, or I'm trying to figure out the motivation of the pro prosecutor.
I gotta be honest here.
We don't know what what's motivating Fitzgerald.
I mean, unlike many white-collar crime investigations, we're not getting any signals whatsoever from his office on what direction he's going or why he's interested in Rove and Libby.
Wait a second.
That's Jim Vandenhae, by the way, of the Washington Post.
Wait, wait, what did he just say?
What did he just say?
I have to be honest here.
We don't know what's motivating Fitzgerald.
Well, then everything that they've written and said about it is then worthless, is it not?
If they don't know what's motivating Fitzgerald, the prosecutor, I mean, unlike many white-collar crime investigations, we are not getting any signals whatsoever from Fitzgerald's office.
What is it on what direction he is going or why he's interested in Rove and Libby?
Well, what about all of these stories?
Sources close to the investigation.
Say, what about all that?
Are they just making this up?
Here's a Washington Post reporter admitting the prosecutor hadn't given a hint as to what he's doing or why he cares about Rover Libby.
Uh-huh.
Uh-huh.
I've been thinking of some more staging events here, folks.
How about Koki Roberts?
In the studio, during an ABC World News Tonight, wearing a winter coat against a green backdrop so that they could chroma key, the capital in the background.
Cokey was made to appear standing out in the freezing cold while she was in the warmth of a studio.
Kokie Roberts, ABC News, Capitol Hill.
No, Koki Roberts, ABC News, trying to make you think I'm on Capitol Hill as an inside journalist learning everything going on up there while I'm actually here in the ABC studio wearing a coat that is not necessary to be worn.
And by the way, how about all these massive underreported scandals going on with staging false circulation numbers at newspapers?
All of that so as to charge higher fees to advertisers throughout the print media.
We've heard uh this is happening in Chicago.
We've heard it happening at the Los Angeles Times.
We've heard it happening at New York News Day.
These people have routinely been misrepresenting their circulation.
Many of these newspapers are offering rebates to advertisers now because they overcharge them.
Their audiences are dwindling, their readership is dwindling, their circulation is dwindling, and yet they still echo every other newspaper in the country.
And how about one of my all-time favorite staged moments?
Bill Clinton decided to go get in on the action on one of the anniversaries of D-Day at Normandy, the Normandy Beach.
Actually, Omaha Beach, beaches of Normandy.
We had this video on Rush the Television Show.
I've been to that beach, folks.
There are no rocks, there are no stones on that beach.
But Bill Clinton with cameras up on the hill overlooking the beach, decided to take a stroll as a lone man.
Out there on the horizon, a lone battleship.
Bill Clinton strolling along in pensive, sensitive, deep, caring thought.
All of a sudden, Clinton stops.
He looks down.
He notices something.
Why, it's a pile of rocks.
On a beach where there are none.
Bill Clinton, with a tear now beginning to stream from his eye, kneels down and arranges with the photographers and TV cameras all focused from atop the hill, overlooking the beach.
Bill Clinton kneels down and places those stones, which had to be put there by somebody, into the shape of a cross.
The battleship in the background, the lone, but he knew exactly where to stop, battleship was told where to be, stones were placed so that he would be right in the line of fire for those cameras shooting the beach and the horizon.
And Clinton leaned down and placed those stones.
This is the man who wrote once of having loathed the military.
It was an entirely purely staged event, but did the press see it as such?
Heck no.
The press themselves started crying.
What a man, what a president.
Look at how he cares.
They marveled at this miracle of the stones on the beach.
But then it was but two days later.
Clinton found himself in an American war dead cemetery in Italy.
And each grave had planted a little tiny American flag.
Bill Clinton, walking sensitively deeply and caringly through the cemetery, stopped.
A look of pain on his face.
Why, one of those little flags had just miraculously fallen on its side.
Bill Clinton, deeply caring, with a tear strolling down his cheek, leaned down, picked up that flag, and planted it properly.
And the press went, Oh!
Is he good or what?
Is he good or what?
Both events choreographed.
Both events staged.
And none of these events labeled as such.
Oh, and yes.
Shall we go back, ladies and gentlemen, to one of Clinton's most articulately staged events?
It was over the Christmas holidays on some lonely beach, some far out of the way beach, somewhere in the Virgin Isles.
Bill Clinton on the beach in a swimsuit with Mrs. Clinton on the beach in a swimsuit.
And they were dancing.
There was only one problem.
There was no music.
There was no music.
Photographers had strangely been alerted to the fact that this might happen, and were told where the best vantage point would be to get this picture.
Then, and remember now, this is just weeks before the Lewinsky story breaks.
Then miraculously, one picture, one still photo of Mr. and Mrs. Clinton dancing arm in arm to no music on a lonely beach in the Virgin Islands shows up on the front page of the Los Angeles Times.
At the White House press briefing later that day, Mike McCurry took it upon himself to lambass the LA Times for publishing such a photo of privacy, saying it showed total disrespect for the president and first lady.
The rest of the press corps said, What picture?
They didn't know anything about it.
This too was choreographed and staged so that the whole press corps would then see the picture, and so that it would appear as though spontaneously this picture materialized in the media nationwide.
All under the guise of McCurry being outraged over this invasion of privacy.
Well, what was the purpose, you say?
To show Mr. and Mrs. Clinton in a loving embrace in swimsuits on a lonely beach in the Virgin Isles, dancing to no music just weeks before the truth came out about Monica Lewinsky, the cigar, the semen stain dress, so forth and so on.
Something I I I read I read something.
H.R. Where is this?
Where's this this this house of the Clintons is made a museum?
Where is that?
Yeah, they used to live in Fayetteville in this house, is that right?
Their first Okay, Bill and Hillary's get this.
Bill and Hillary's first house where they got married in Fayetteville, Arkansas is being turned into a museum.
And there's gonna be a sign outside, maybe not a sign, but in the in the little book that you get when you go through the museum, it's actually gonna say Bill and Hillary Clinton once slept here together.
At the same time.
Uh I'm joking about that for those of you who might be prone to believe it.
Um but the the choreograph staged events have just been legion, and they've been part of the daily plan.
And the press just slavishly just sucking it all up, went right along with it, because they were so dazzled at the effectiveness of their boy president.
They were so happy he was so good at doing these kinds of things.
And here comes an event that was not staged and not choreographed, and they try to misrepresent it all over the place.
So if the press thinks that they're getting away with any of this uh to people whose minds are still open about things, they uh they are not.
Uh let's see, what do we have?
One more and I just have to I you have to hear this sound bite again.
I this is this soundbite number six with Chris Matthews and Jim Vanden Hay last night on Hardball.
Matthews, you will hear, he's got Rove convicted, Libby convicted, Bush going down the White House as a bunch of um arrogant bastards.
And Jim Vandenhay's answer is the key here.
I want you to hear this again because and then I want you to compare this to all the reporting you have heard about Rove and Libby and Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson and this case.
Here's the bite.
I guess there's a question here about the attitude of the special prosecutor and what he feels these people are like.
Does he feel that he's up against some bad guys, some arrogant bastards in the White House?
Do you think that they can just lie to him?
Or he thinks they're think they're better than him, or I'm trying to figure out the motivation of the pro prosecutor.
I gotta be honest here.
We don't know what what's motivating Fitzgerald.
I mean, unlike many white-collar crime investigations, we're not getting any signals whatsoever from his office on what direction he's going or why he's interested in Rove and Libby.
Well, then, how in the world can the the things that the press be reporting be reported?
If the prosecutor hasn't given any signals whatsoever on what direction he's going or why he's interested in Rove and Libby, then doesn't this just make worthless and cancel out every story on this whole case?
Especially that which focuses on the guilt of Rove and the guilt of Libby.
Most certainly does in my mind.
John in Columbus, Ohio.
Thanks for calling you are on Open Line Friday.
Hi.
Thanks, Rush.
Yeah, I don't want to pile on, but sort of turning into that.
I mean, last night there was an ABC story, I think it was about nuclear reactors on campus and how easy they are to get to.
Again, this is a manufactured story.
In fact, it proved they were wrong, and it was a meaningless story, but pure manufactured.
And it's just, you know, it's whether they're manufactured for political purposes or for trying to get ratings or whatever, it's all manufactured.
What was this?
Is this the one where they hired college kids?
Yeah, they hired like college interns and send to say go in your graduate students who want tours, but don't lie, but you know, pretend to get try to get close to reactors.
And here in Columbus, they went to a speaking of that, what about what about ABC and these grocery stores?
Food food lion.
They totally staged events at the end of the day.
Oh, that's right.
They got food for that.
Yeah, yeah.
You're reminding me of all kinds of things with this.
And there have been a number of incidents where networks have staged people going in as terrorists to see how easy it would be to uh uh uh get inside the inner workings of an airline on the ramp or some such thing as this.
Uh you know, I I I'm looking, that's that's true.
I've not I heard about this story.
I read about it this morning, the one you were talking about uh with the college uh new nuclear reactors and the uh the recent breach there, how ABC staged it, but uh it reminds me of so many other things that uh that they've done as well.
So uh you know let them keep trying this stuff, folks.
Our memories are long.
Our research apparatus is profound.
And their unfairness is so obvious that it makes them an easy target when they try stuff like this.
A quick timeout, we'll be back.
Stay with us.
It's open line Friday, Rush Limbaugh having more fun than a human being, should be allowed to have uh Eric and Destin, Florida.
Hello, sir.
Welcome.
Judas Rush.
Thank you.
Yes, sir.
I uh Susan Esther is floating a trial balloon in a in her latest book that if Hillary loses the 08 election, that it sets back the women's movement uh more so than Judge Bork ever could have.
And I just want to get your opinion on that.
I think I you know, I've I've I've grown to like Susan Estrich, uh, but I I just think that's poppycock.
I I think it's what set the feminist movement back is feminism.
Feminism's already set the feminine the feminist movement's already set been set back.
Feminist movement, we're gonna be overturning Roe versus Wade before too long.
We've got all these career women who believe feminism way back when who said, I can have it all.
I'm gonna have, I'm gonna get married, I'm gonna have a couple kids, I'm gonna have a nanny or a daycare center raise them, and I'm gonna climb the corporate ladder and I'm gonna rule the world.
And then they get pregnant with the first kid, they fire the nanny, they stay home and raise the kid themselves, and they say the hell with a career.
And they and you talk about selling out the feminist movement.
Mother Nature's doing that.
Mother Nature's doing it.
If if if if Hillary doesn't win the White House, that sets back the feminist movement.
Uh I guess certain women would would certainly lose with uh with Mrs. Clinton not uh ascending to the throne uh in the in the White House.
But I uh I th I think this group and identity politics, as it's uh as it's become rooted in the Democratic Party, is uh uh uh telling.
I mean, look at that.
That whole comment's rooted in fear.
You've got to elect Hillary to save women.
We have to elect Hillary to save feminism.
Feminism's gone.
Feminism is lost, at least as it was originally.
Hell, just the other day we had this story about the new uber sexual.
And this uh Jay Walter Thompson uh put out this book, some authors, a couple others put up a book defining the uber sexual.
And as you read the definition of an uber sexual, it's what men used to be before feminists came along and neutered them.
It's real simple.
So the cycle has come full, and now it's reverting to type.
And what this book is all about is what women want.
And how many years?
I'm I'm 54 years old, and my whole life, what women want has been supposedly changing.
Uh, and it's all been changing because of what a lot of women and men thought they were supposed to be because of feminism.
So everybody started playing a role rather than just being who they are, naturally.
They started being what they thought they had to be, according to political pressures and feminism and so forth.
Men and men too.
Uh and finally, everybody finds it doesn't work.
A true feminist is a miserable woman.
And you get right down to it, they are miserable.
And the things that make them happy are the things that feminism tried to wipe out.
Well, you may snurdley's in there laughing at me, but this is this is I've never been more right about anything in my life.
I have seen it countless times.
I'm a I am a student of the culture, folks.
I pay attention to all these things, and I'm looking at all these women who are going through life miserable.
And all these women who follow the dictates of feminism, what's the one thing they want, Dawn?
A man.
They want a man, they want children, they want a home, they want to, they want a picket fence, they want the the station wagon, the SUV, whatever.
And if they don't have it, they're miserable, regardless what they've done in their careers.
There are exceptions, naturally, but I'm talking about on average, and uh in in a vast majority, that's the case.
Well, I'm telling you, if a woman in order to be happy wants a relationship, a marriage, kids, family, and all that sort of stuff, that is a dagger to the heart of Germaine Greer, Molly Yard, what's her name, Gloria Steinem, you name them.
This is not what they had in mind, folks.
And they certainly didn't have in mind the arch typical feminist Hillary Clinton having to bend over forwards and backwards and defend her two-timing husband.
That's another thing the feminists weren't going to put up with.
You know, men that were scalawags and rascals that we're gonna put up with that kind of stuff.
And here's Hillary.
Why?
Because she can't get anywhere without her husband at her side on her team.
You uh so Estrid's saying that if Hillary loses, women lose.
The feminists have lost.
It is a great day, folks.
You got you got it, you gotta be positive about this stuff and stop looking at everything through Prism of Fear.
Back here in a moment, we'll continue.
Folks, I'm gonna tell you one more hard truth.
It's gonna hit some of you very hard.
But there are a lot of women who are 40-ish, 50-ish today, who back in their twenties when they were in college, they were hardcore feminists.
They were buying into all of it.
And they probably met some guy or a couple guys back then, perfect for them.
Maybe a guy they actually really love, but they blew the guy off.
Said, nope, I'm not gonna become your slave.
You're not gonna imprison me.
You're not gonna limit me, you cad.
And so the one guy, the dream of their life, bye-bye.
And then they go through the rest of their life trying to find the dreams is promised by feminism.
And they get to their 40s and it's Panic City, and they end up settling for some guy they don't really love all that much just to get married just because they want to have the child or what have you.
Thank you, feminism.
I have seen this, ladies and gentlemen, as I say I am a student of the culture.
I feel I feel badly for these women.
Stare happiness in the face and say it's not intended for me because it's not in a feminist manual.
Quick time out, we will be back.
▲
Export Selection