All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 7, 2005 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:17
October 7, 2005, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
You get the ditto cam turned on.
That's good.
What time is it?
I know this show starts at noon, but is it noon?
Greetings, my friends.
And welcome.
It's the award-winning Thrill Pact ever exciting Rush Limbaugh program.
It's Friday.
Let's roll.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's Open Line Friday.
And we've got a lot to do today.
It's just, I mean, it's a virtual smorgasbord out there today.
A virtual buffet of news items from across the spectrum, ladies and gentlemen.
From the ridiculous, to the hilarious, to the serious.
And you are at the one radio program that combines all that.
One presentation with credibility everywhere.
Open line Friday, we also add your phone calls.
And, you know, Monday through Thursday, we talk about what interests me.
But on Friday, I will allow you to talk about things that don't interest me if they do interest you, if they've got enough passion about it.
So here's the telephone number, 800-282-2882.
The email address is rush at EIBnet.com.
Well, they've given the all-clear.
Up in Manhattan, a discarded soda bottle filled with an unidentified green liquid was found at Penn Station, which was briefly closed today during the morning rush hour.
The substance did not pose a threat to passengers.
It was removed for testing.
When I saw this, a discarded soda bottle filled with an unidentified soapy green liquid.
I thought it's Mountain Dew.
It's probably just an old stale canner bottle of Mountain Dew.
But anyway, well, not in Penn Station, HR.
It's not going to be a trucker's urine bottle in Penn Station.
It's a train station.
It could be an engineer's urine bottle.
But nevertheless, it's all clear.
And the president today had a little press event in the Oval Office with the Hungarian leader.
And Grab Audio Soundbite number one.
I saw this.
I said, this had to be a joke.
The unidentified reporter said, do you think New York City is overreacted?
I think they took the information that we gave and made the judgments they thought were necessary.
And the American people have got to know that, one, that we're collecting information and sharing it with local authorities on a timely basis, and that's important.
Overreacted for crying out.
You know, this proves.
I have a theory, and I've had this theory for a long time.
If we had known every detail of the September 11th attacks, and if Bush had gone on television on September 10th and announced those details and then said, here are the 19 that we have apprehended.
Don't you think this is a bit of an overreaction?
How do you know?
What proof do you have?
This is racism.
This is bigotry.
And the ACLU would be out defending Mohamed Atta and all these guys.
We can't win.
We can't win.
Overreacted?
Are we kidding ourselves?
Overreacted?
In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina?
Overreacted?
Where do these people, what are they thinking, these people in the press, got a, what was Bush supposed to do now?
Rip Rip Bloomberg and cause a new kind of controversy?
At any rate, folks, let me tell you a little bit about my evening last night.
And I'm here today, and I knew this is going to happen.
I'm here today in about three hours, two and a half hours sleep, so I'm in a giddy mood.
And we all know what happens when I'm in a giddy mood.
The broadcast engineer's finger is poised over the Didle button at all times.
And, you know, we get close to that line, pushing the envelope, as it were.
Last night was the 50th anniversary of National Review Magazine.
Now, National Review Magazine, of course, the creation and brainchild of William F. Buckley Jr., who will celebrate his 80th birthday in November.
next month.
And I realize that because of some of your ages, those of you who are young, Mr. Buckley has passed from the public scene in a prominent way in the last five to six years.
Stopped doing speeches.
He stopped doing his television program firing line.
And he's stopped public appearances other than for things such as last night.
And I want to take a little time.
I didn't speak last night.
I did narrate a 40-minute video that was put together, a documentary sort of retrospective on the 50 years of National Review.
And I was seated at Mr. Buckley's table with his wife, Pat.
Also at the table were Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, who I'd never met, but I did meet last night.
Very, very nice man.
We had a nice conversation.
About a thousand people there last night.
It was in the National Museum Building or Building of Museums or something.
I think it's the old patent office.
Every time I go to Washington, there's a new building that's been there 500 years that I've never been in.
And it was gorgeous.
It was an absolutely beautiful building.
But National Museum Building, whatever, it was very nice.
Also, K. Bailey Hutchison, Senator K. Bailey Hutchison from Texas was at the table as well.
Mr. Buckley is in my life, a formative figure.
I have told him personally, and I've mentioned it on this program, he's almost like a second father to me in the sense that fathers teach.
Fathers inspire, fathers teach, and they inspire.
And Mr. Buckley, unbeknownst to him all of his life, other than the last 15 years when I've had a chance to tell him, had that kind of effect on me.
Back when I, well, I've been a conservative in my heart and soul for all my life, but like any young person, I've had the instincts, but I may not have known quite how to explain it to other people.
I was inculcated well, and my father was brilliant as well, and stimulated all this thought in me.
I left home when I was 20, and it's about that time that I ran into the magazine National Review.
And I had been reading Mr. Buckley's columns for, you know, since I was in junior high school.
He was published in the St. Louis paper.
And of course, I was in awe from the first moment I read one with his vocabulary and his logic and his manner of explaining things because they were inspirational, educational.
And I devoured anything I could get that Buckley had written.
And I became a subscriber to National Review.
It was funny, too, because back in those days, I thought National Review, you had to be a member of some club to get it.
I thought you had to qualify.
Because I'd never seen it anywhere.
Newsstands.
I'd never seen it.
But I kept hearing about it.
Well, you must have to be something special to get this.
So one day, and this is 1984, 83.
I'm sorry, 83.
I'm in Kansas City.
I decided I got courageous, and I called New York Directory Assistants and asked for the number for National Review.
I didn't know if it would be one, I didn't know if it'd be listed.
And they gave it to me, and I called them up, and I'm very sheepish on the phone.
I said, excuse me, Could I subscribe?
Well, of course, of course.
And I then found out that it was what it was, a magazine of conservative opinion.
So I subscribed.
I've been a subscriber ever since.
And it has been, and particularly Mr. Buckley, but all of those that he surrounded himself with in putting this magazine together and publishing it every two weeks have just been instrumental in nothing more fundamental than my education.
And I've always felt a great debt of gratitude even before I met Mr. Buckley for this because he spawned so many others who do the same thing.
He spawned so many other conservative journals of opinion.
He spawned others.
He was the kind of figure that inspired others to want to be like him, although nobody can.
There's only one William Buckley as there's only one of every of us, every one of us.
But he's special.
He's unique beyond unique.
And finally got to meet him in the late 80s or early 90s.
I was invited to an editor's meeting at his home in New York.
And it was very uplifting to be welcomed in to the movement of the circle, so to speak.
And I've been a devotee and fortunately a good friend for a number of years.
But I wanted to tell you all this so that when I come back from the break and describe what happened the evening last night, you'll understand it.
And I also want to tell some of you this because Mr. Buckley may not be that known to some of you.
He may not be as widely known today as he was because he's cut back on his activities.
His reputation is there.
There's no question.
But he's, I mean, the best thing I guess I can say, he was like a second father to me in the terms of learning and being inspired and wanting to emulate someone in terms of knowing as much as there is to know about something, being conversant in it, being persuasive.
My father and Bill Buckley are probably the two most influential people in that regard.
And so it was a thrill and an honor to be asked to host one of the hosts, George Will, was the other, along with Henry Hyde, one of the three hosts for the evening last night, and to narrate the video.
But I've got to tell you some of the things that happened last night when we come back from the break, because it was a hoot, folks.
I mean, there were, had to be a thousand people there.
And I was, when it was over, well, I was there for 90 minutes, an hour and a half, signing autographs, posing for pictures, engaging in conversation, just surrounded by a bunch of people.
And it was just a hoot.
There were 11 recovering wounded soldiers from Iraq, from Walter Reed Hospital, who were there.
The priest that offered the invocation of benediction, people were laughing during the benediction.
It was a step back in time.
It was refined.
It was erudite.
It was funny as it could be.
MC'd by M. Stanton Evans.
But it was just, it really was a step back.
It was the kind of good time that was, I don't want to say, well, I'll say it.
It was just 100% healthy.
There was no evidence of the modern decline of public culture.
No cheap laughs, no easy laughs with bathroom or sex humor.
It was all just really good stuff.
And I was thrilled to be included and be a part of it.
We'll take a break.
I'll come back and I'll give you some of the details that happened last night because there was a stellar cast of people that showed up.
Back in just a second.
Stay with us.
Welcome back to Open Line Friday, America's Anchorman Rush Limbaugh here on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
As you know, the well-known anti-American Mohamed ElBaradi and the International Atomic Agency, Atomic Energy Agency, are the joint recipients of the prestigious Nobel Peace Prize awarded today.
BelBaradai and the agency will get $1.3 million, a diploma and a medal.
Folks, it is an absolute joke.
You just have to figure that nobody who is pro-American is going to be given this award during the Bush administration.
It just isn't going to happen.
Here's the guy who sat there and presided over the Iranians nuking up.
It's a guy that one week before the presidential election in 2004 got hold of the New York Times and tried to sabotage the re-election of George W. Bush with his mythical story of all these missing bombs that we uncovered and then somehow lost in Iraq.
And that probably was what won him the award, that little leak to the New York Times.
But essentially, folks, the UN has been given, because the ElBaradi's agency is an adjunct.
The UN's been given the Nobel Peace Prize here.
You know, how did they get, how did they miss being given the prize for the genocide in Rwanda that they missed?
How did they miss being given the genocide for all the sex abuse that they've been accused of meeting out in various parts of Africa?
So anyway, we'll have more on this here in just a second.
I have to say, a little bit about this night because it was just uplifting in so many ways.
As I say, one of the big topics of conversation all night long was the Supreme Court nomination.
People from both sides of the issue were coming up to me.
You will love Harriet.
You got to keep doing what you're doing, Russia.
Saving the Republic.
You just got to keep.
I'm just being as polite as I can, listening to all thanking everybody.
And everybody was great.
Everybody in this audience was fine.
I want to thank all of the people that were there that were so nice to me before and after the event.
One moment just prior, in fact, it was during the salad course.
And I never eat at these things because I'm never seated long enough.
I'm standing there minding my own business.
I'm talking to somebody, and I get a tap on my left shoulder.
So I turn around.
This is a very elegant, erudite man.
And he said, hi, I'm so-and-so.
I couldn't hear his name because of my hearing problem in crowded rooms like that.
But I did hear him say, I'd like to introduce you to my wife, Janice Rogers Brown.
So I look, and it was her.
It was her.
And I couldn't, I just gave her a huge hug.
She asked if she could have her picture taken.
She wanted to thank me and everybody who had been so supportive of her.
And she said, I want to also thank you for explaining to people what a three-year nomination battle in the middle of a filibuster does to somebody, what that's like.
I said, no, you're great.
You're a walking lesson.
You hung in there and you didn't cave during any aspect of it.
So I gave her a big hug and I said, do I get to get my picture taken with you?
So her husband snapped the picture.
We had a little conversation for two or three minutes.
Judge Bork was there.
As I said, K. Bailey Hutchison was there along with Senator Lieberman.
And you may, well, what was Senator Lieberman doing there?
Bill Buckley is responsible for Senator Lieberman being in the Senate.
Back in the 80s, Bill Buckley and the National Review staff got fed up with Lowell Weicker.
They had had it with Lowell Weicker.
So they set up a pack called Buck Pack.
And Buckpack essentially got Lieberman elected and knew they weren't going to elect a, I mean, a Republican up there.
And Lieberman, so he was there and Buckley in his speech last night made mention of the fact that Joe Lieberman's a favorite Democrat.
And we talked a little bit about Buckpack because I remembered reading all about that in National Review when it was taking place.
What at who?
Oh, talk a little bit about his job, how he goes about it, a little bit about my job, how I go about it, about Buckley.
This night was about Bill Buckley and what everybody had in common with Buckley, one way or the other.
And, you know, some of the speakers last night took some real shots at politicians.
And I caught Kay Bailey Hutchison was on one side of our table, circular tables, and Lieberman was two seats to my right.
He was on Buckley's right.
I was on Buckley's left.
And Kay would just look over at Joe Lieberman and smile whenever these politicians accused of selling out or whatever.
But it was all in good fun.
Nobody got mad about it.
But they're sitting there.
They're taking their shots.
You know, it was funny.
But during this video, the 40-minute retrospective video, it concluded with excerpt of Ronald Reagan, President Reagan, addressing the 30th anniversary of National Review from the podium with the presidential seal.
And I don't know what made me do it, but a couple times during the, and folks, if you wish everybody could see this, seeing Ronald Reagan as president being just perfect in a circumstance like this, awarding National Review and commemorating it for 30 years of service.
And Reagan was a subscriber.
The magazine was instrumental in turning him from the Democratic Party of the Republican Party, in fact.
But a couple times I looked over and Bill was tearing up.
They were really, really close friends.
Bill's going to be 80 next month, and he's watching Reagan.
And there's only one Ronald Reagan.
And a couple, he's wiping tears from his eyes.
It was just touching.
I think a lot of people in the audience were.
And then Bill went up and he gave the closing remarks.
And he choked up at the end.
And it was just everything about the evening was genuine.
It was touching.
But I really wish there were a way to convey better than I have today just how important Buckley and National Review have been to me.
He's just irreplaceable.
And it's such a dream for me.
I mean, this man was godlike.
The only difference between him and my father was I knew my father.
But I never thought I would meet Bill Buckley, much less become a friend of his.
And there I am sitting next to him at his dinner last night.
And I was honored.
And I'm happy to be able to share the evening with you.
Back in the morning.
You're listening to Rush Limbaugh on the Excellence in Podcasting Network.
Of course, that's what we do here, folks.
The truth.
We make the complex understandable.
Open line Friday, 800-282-2882.
Last night, I must have received 20.
What's the word for this?
Yeah, I guess proposals, solicitations, 20 requests from different women applying to be my mistress.
No, I didn't get hit on 20 times.
If I said I got hit on 20 times, I'd say that.
These were classy, upstanding females, and they wanted to be my mistress.
And they were from all over the country.
There's a big crowd.
One young woman even proposed, seriously proposed.
That's why I only got three hours sleep last night.
She even gave me a she gave me a little ring.
But here's the thing.
I'm leaving.
I guess I left the place about the Museum National Building, whatever the building was, at 11.15.
And I got out to Dulles about midnight.
And I'm walking through the terminal.
I'm walking through the building.
And I'm looking down the end of the hall.
It's a pretty long hallway.
And I said, that person, this woman approaching me looks familiar.
And they got closer and closer.
By gosh, it is.
It's Andrea Mitchell.
So stopped and said hello to Andrea Mitchell.
And she said, boy, you have been on fire this week.
I said, you ought to be with me on the weekends if you think this has been something.
But it was, it just was a fun night.
I'm happy to be able to share a little bit of this with you folks.
I wish this is one of the, there were all kinds of cameras there.
There were TV cameras.
I don't know if C-SPAN taped this and is going to air it sometime later.
I know it's their 25th anniversary weekend this weekend at C-SPAN starting tonight.
They're doing 25 hours of call-ins.
But I'm assuming that there's going to be some video of this.
M. Stanton Evans, Stan Evans was the MC.
We've interviewed him for the Limball letter.
One of the driest wits, funniest, just had us laughing all at one.
One of the bits he did, he says, for those of you who've been busy today, preoccupied with whether or not George Will's going to survive at the White House or because of all these Supreme Court nominations, there was big news today out of California, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals saying that women and minorities were not present during the writing of the Constitution.
The Ninth Circuit today declared that the U.S. Constitution is therefore unconstitutional.
Of course, the reason it's funny is because it's true.
It's got this element of truth to it that you can believe it.
Might happen.
Here's an interesting email I got.
This is from Houston.
A Rush 24-7 subscriber.
Hey, Rush Ditto, I'm writing to you today because I'm so mad and I want you to spend some time on your show spreading the word about this.
I have a co-worker whose family was displaced, but hardly affected by Hurricane Katrina.
Here are the facts.
They lived in a lower middle class neighborhood in or right outside New Orleans.
They had nice enough things, but by no means had expendable, disposable income for any type of over-the-top things.
They had all their credit cards maxed, and life at best was paycheck to paycheck.
Then the hurricane happens.
My co-worker's father worked for a shooting club, which collected over $250,000 to give him to help him with repairs.
So the man she's talking about, father, works at a shooting club.
They took independent donations, gave the guy, gave his son $250,000.
The recipient is now in Shreveport, gambling with the money.
Our office collected $8,000 and gave it to him.
He now has new tires on his car.
State Farm was going to total his house and give him a lump sum for it.
He's using that money and the money he collected from the shooting club to sue State Farm.
His sister lied to FEMA and told him she had children, so she collected.
No questions asked.
She got a lump sum for them too.
She makes about $60,000 a year at a chemical plant.
She has suffered nothing, no loss.
Rush people are totally taking advantage of the situation.
They're blaming President Bush.
Why can't stories like this be told?
Please speak about this so everybody will know how much of a loser people can be.
Hey, this doesn't surprise me at all.
Sue the insurance company after they pay off, take the donations and go to a casino and max it out.
This is no different than lottery winners.
This is big-time lottery winners.
This is what happens.
By the way, there's big news out there on the Hurricane Katrina front.
Guess what, folks?
I wonder where we first heard this to.
They overestimated the total cost of the cleanup, the fix-up, and the repairs by about $100 bill.
The original figure was $250 billion.
Now it's been revised downward to $150 billion.
Mary Landrew, fit to be tied that the Senate is talking about debating defense issues instead of grab audio somebody's 10 and 11 and instead of dealing with the hurricane aftermath.
This is this morning on the Senate floor.
Cute little baby fat Mary Landrew is whining that Louisiana isn't getting enough cash.
The federal government sent us a third-rate FEMA, offered a second-rate levy system, and now tight-fisted lending policies.
And then criticize us for not being more self-reliant.
I have to listen to people in Washington and the power, the power in Washington, the Republican power from the White House to this Senate to the House, tell me that people in the Gulf Coast area need to be more self-reliant.
And I'm told, sorry, Senator, we can't loan you the money the way we have lent it to everyone for the last 30 years.
And by the way, when we do it again in the future, we're going to lend it to everybody under the old program.
But just for you, we have a special deal.
I have no idea what she's talking about here, but clearly she's losing it.
Little Dick Cheney lingo there.
She is coming unhinged, folks.
Upset here.
Third rate FEMA, a second-rate levy system.
Hey, don't talk to us about the levy system.
We know about the levy system, Senator, and we know that it was local corruption that led to the problems, the 17th Street Canal levy.
We know this.
It has been documented and proven.
A lot of things have come out in the aftermath.
We know of the incompetence at the local and state levels in dealing with all of this.
We also know now it's not going to cost anywhere near the $250 billion that you requested.
And of course, what's self-reliant?
What's wrong with self-reliance?
At some point, self-reliance has to take over.
I mean, even if you just look at the money being dispersed, okay, what are you going to do after you get the money?
You got to do something.
You have to get off the sofa.
This whole diatribe here against self-reliance and this whining.
This is perhaps the most offensive thing.
This ungrateful whining.
Look at the outpouring of aid, assistance, love, and affection from the people of this country and from the government, the Congress.
My gosh, these people were running around spending money faster than we could print it.
And here she is whining and moaning on the floor of the Senate.
She may have said thanks to somebody sometime.
I haven't heard it from her.
Have you?
You have.
Okay.
Well, I take it back.
Well, I haven't heard it.
But if she's offering thanks, she's whining about 10 times for every time she thanks anybody.
One more little soundbite to this.
It's a quickie.
She says that she's calling Hurricane Katrina our Baghdad.
The reason I've been spending so much time on this bill, the defense bill, talking about this issue is because, Mr. President, this is our war.
This is our Baghdad.
Okay, so that's Senator Mary Landrew here complaining and whining and moaning about what isn't happening the way she would like it to happen down in Louisiana.
Clayton in Scottsdale, Arizona.
You're the first call today on Open Line Friday.
Hello.
Maha Rushie, Second Amendment 24-7 member Dittos.
Thank you, sir.
My wife and I are expecting our first child in two weeks.
We want to make sure we do our best to teach them the importance of limited government, peace through superior firepower, and ultimately be a true conservative.
Any advice on how to do that, especially when they're subjected to the public school system down the road?
Well, this is an excellent question.
I don't know that I'm the one to answer it, given that I've never done what you're going to do, and I've never had a desire to do what you're going to do, and that is raise a crumb cruncher from birth to adulthood.
If I were in your shoes, I mean, just to be honest with you, I'd be praying for the next 18 years when I can kick the kid out of the house would go by faster than any 18 years in my life.
But everybody tells me I'm wrong, that if I ever did goof up and have a kid, that I would totally change my attitude about that.
But I do have some ideas for you, but I could rely only on my own parents and my own father.
But I think, you know, my father never told me what to think, never wagged his finger, except when I was, you know, needed to be disciplined or something.
But you're talking about ideological type things.
My father never told me what to think.
I just couldn't escape his ideology.
And he was profoundly influential and inspiring.
And what was inspiring to me was his knowledge.
The man knew so much.
I wanted to know what he knew.
I wanted to be able to speak like he.
I wanted to be able to be conversant in so many things as he was.
And one of the reasons that I got disappointed with school was that I thought I was wasting my time with half of it.
Half of it I didn't care about.
And well, it's part of a well-rounded education.
You don't know how to educate yourself.
You're not smart enough.
We have trained educators to do that, which I understand.
But, you know, when you design a mass appeal education system, it's designed to hit the most people in a positive way.
There are always going to be oddballs like me who can't wait to get out of school once they're introduced to the first or second grade because they know then that it's not for them.
And that was me.
But my father, I had a couple teachers in school too that were inspirational in this way.
But I think the best thing you can do is be smarter than any teacher he's going to have.
Be smarter than any principal.
Live your life the way you want him to live his.
But don't make him.
Let him see it for himself because he's going to rebel against it at some point, regardless of age.
All crumb crunchers do that.
But if you just set the example, and especially one that's inspiring, and that's what worked with me.
And I don't think a human being, I mean, it's possible to take a human being and mold them and shape them and turn them into little robots, but you don't want that.
You want an independently independent thinking, curious.
When you tell him something he doesn't know, you want to be able to explain why when he asks you why.
You don't want to have to say, because I said so.
You want to be able to tell him why.
You want to be able to have the answers.
And if you don't have the answers, go with him and look them up and show him how to learn.
May I ask a question about that?
Yeah.
One thing that I'm, and I appreciate that advice, and one thing I'm foreseeing is that if you have a, And I don't want to come across as fighting his teachers, but if he comes home from school with some example that I disagree with, I don't want to see my child see me go to school to battle every student, every teacher he disagrees with.
So how do you send him into the battle, him or her into that battle?
Well, again, let me take a break here and come back and deal with this after the break.
I've not done this, and I'm probably not the best to advise on this.
I'll tell you what I think.
And the only way I could do it is put myself in your shoes.
And even though I'm sweating bullets at the thought, if I had a kid that was in school and this happened, I think I know what I would do about it or how I would handle it.
So that's what I'll tell you.
But keep in mind, I haven't done it.
So the advice may be worth what this is costing you, which is zero.
We'll be back here in just a second, folks.
Stay with us.
Get this.
Get this.
And this is, and Clayton, Clayton and Scott Steele, this email, even though nothing to do with what you're asking about, illustrates a bit of a problem that you have.
Here's an email.
You didn't abuse the people last night at the Buckley event by talking football, but I bet you're going to abuse us listeners by talking stinking football today.
So here's a guy anticipating a problem that may not even happen.
Well, I did talk football with some people last night because there were some people interested in football.
And I may talk about it today.
You know it's Open Line Friday for me, too.
All right, Clayton, back to you.
Your question basically is, you don't want to have to go to school and beat the hell out of teachers that are trying to poison your kid's mind, right?
Correct.
All right.
You do what I, what I can't, what I would do is exactly what I told you first.
Just get the fundamentals, get that base of ideological belief in your son built simply by the way he observes the way you and your wife live and the way you inspire him as a father with your knowledge and with your ability to answer his questions and with reasons to back up why you believe what you believe.
By the time the kid's 15, no teacher will have any impact on him.
I never, I had liberal professors even my first year in college.
I had all kinds of, never shattered me at all, never even questioned me.
But if it happens, I wouldn't confront the teachers, but it may not happen.
Give us another, your son's not even born yet.
It's not going to happen for 10 or 15, 20 years.
10 or 15, 20 years, we may have beaten that problem for you, Clayton.
We may have reformed the education system enough.
There won't be a problem.
But if we haven't, if your son comes home with some outrageous essay question or some problem with the teacher, only if it results in bad grades do you take it up at the school.
But he comes home with some problem or some question or some story about what the teacher did.
Just make him smarter than the teacher.
Teachers aren't infallible.
And liberal teachers obviously aren't.
And they obviously don't know what's right.
And they're probably even not thinking much.
They're probably just like all other liberal school shape.
Make your son smarter.
You know, he's going to have a chance to have an average or above average IQ, which means he's going to be able to learn.
That really is the key to it.
And he's got to make him confident.
Don't make him let him know that it's okay to be who he is so that his self-esteem is naturally derived and not dependent on what other people think of him.
This is another great things you can do that will insulate you from all these problems, from any influences he might have.
Gotta go.
We'll be back.
Take just a brief break and don't go away.
You want to laugh?
Tom Harkin says that the conservative attacks on Harriet Myers are despicable.
The libs are loving this.
We'll talk about that as the program unfolds.
Open Line Friday.
▲
Export Selection