All Episodes
Previous Next
July 7, 2005 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:03
July 7, 2005, Thursday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, back we are, ladies and gentlemen.
Thank you for being with us today.
This is the award-winning Rush Limbaugh program, and it is the one and only excellence in broadcasting network.
This is the program that meets and surpasses all audience expectations on a daily basis.
And that is no mean feat.
Looking forward to talking to you, 800-282-2882, the email address rush at EIBnet.com.
By the way, folks, one thing we had a call recently, last call in the previous hour, from a woman who was decrying the fact that Muslim leaders around the world, responsible ones, never stand up and condemn the acts of these wacko terrorists.
And that's true, but I think one of the reasons for this is there's a lot of fear in some of these mainstream Muslim societies.
If they stand up and condemn it, they're going to be targeted.
I mean, I've got a story in the stack today that Syria has its own internal terrorist problem.
Al-Qaeda has a $500 million budget to operate inside Saudi Arabia.
And why are they attacking Syria?
Because Syria appears to be caving.
Syria got out of Lebanon, and that means they abandoned Namas.
And the Lebanese, they're on the road there to having elections.
Now, this is what happens in a war.
Too many people, I think, have the impression that something good happens and that ends it.
There's always going to be an opposite reaction.
The people you're at war with are not going to go down easily.
Oh, you want us out of Lebanon?
Okay, we'll go.
It's just like the Democrats.
Oh, you don't want us running the Senate?
Fine.
Look at them.
Your opponents, I mean, we're not going to quit.
You have to keep beating them.
That's why wars go on and on and on and on and on.
It's why you need stick-to-itiveness.
But in terms of the mainstream Muslims, I mean, they're just as scared as anybody else is if they stand up and condemn this because they're going to be targets themselves.
They will be considered infidels, just as you and I are, if they don't back this up.
Or at least if they don't stay silent.
Now, Mr. Sternley just sent me a note, and it's interesting.
It's true.
By this time, after 9-11, 9-11 happened here roughly 9 o'clock to 10 o'clock in the morning and the same time in Great Britain.
They're five hours ahead of us.
But by this time on 9-11, we knew who all the terrorists were on those airplanes.
I was stunned.
We knew who they were before they got on the airplanes.
We just weren't able to stop it.
And that opens a whole can of worms I don't even want to go back into again, but how we've emaciated the CIA.
Save it for another day.
The fact is that we haven't seen any identity of terrorists responsible for this in Great Britain.
So it's not known who these guys are, or at least if it is, their pictures have not been broadcast yet and made public.
It's not a big deal.
It's just by this time on September 11th of 2001, it was Mohamed Ada up there.
We knew what airplanes they were on, and we knew what flight schools they'd gone to, and we knew how they had paid for their airline tickets, and they knew what commuter flights, we knew what commuter flights they had taken to get to Logan Airport to get on those things and to the Washington airport.
So we knew a lot about these people before they made the attack.
That goes back to the old connect the dots business.
Now, here's a story.
I just want to put things in perspective today.
This is a story that was on the website last night for The Guardian, a UK liberal paper.
And it was posted last night, our time to run in today's paper in the UK.
And here's the headline.
UN shows how the West, especially Britain and America, have put military spending way ahead of help for Africa.
Rich Western countries spend up to 25 times as much on defense as they do on overseas aid and have increased their assistance to the poorest African countries by just $3 ahead since 1990, according to the United Nations.
In the United States, 1% in every dollar goes on aid compared to the 25% of the budget that is spent by the Pentagon.
Now, isn't it interesting?
See, this was supposed to time out and coordinate with the G8 agenda, which, as you know, is saving Africa.
And speaking of saving Africa, I saw the most amazing thing last night.
Did I print this out?
I know I printed this out, and I want it.
It may be too long to read this thing to you.
Well, I've got it in some stack here, but it is an African leader and his whole, and it was an interview with Der Spiegel, the German magazine designed to, you know, coordinate with G8.
And this guy, this African leader, stop the aid.
You're killing us.
You're turning us into a welfare country.
You're depriving our people of the ability to work for themselves.
You're creating a bunch of laziness over here.
He gave great examples.
He says, stop sending us all your goodwill clothes.
We don't want them.
You're putting our tailors and clothes manufacturers out of business.
I mean, every question that Der Spiegel asked was, but don't you want more?
No, we don't want more.
It's an abomination.
You have killed this continent with all of your aid.
Look at where it ends up.
It ends up in the hands of people that have made slaves out of most of the people that live in this continent.
And on and on and on.
I didn't find it here in the stack that I thought it was in.
So I'll do my best to dig it up.
Maybe not today because other things we're discussing.
But it's just fascinating that now with this event having taken place to go back and look at what was on everybody's agenda beforehand.
And here comes this piece.
We're spending too much in defense and we're wasting all that money and we're not spending enough on Africa.
And of course, that's a flat-out lie anyway.
The U.S. alone, since 1960, 43 years, almost $600 billion alone to Africa.
That's not insignificant.
And the rest of the world combined the amount of money they've sent in there from the UN and all these other World Bank operations and IMF and so forth.
The amount of money in it probably close to a trillion dollars in the last 40 years.
And look what's resulted from it.
I think just like we've learned in this country, the war on poverty, hey, when are we going to define an exit strategy for that?
We've been fighting that for 40 years.
We still have the same statistics of poverty in this country.
And it wasn't until welfare reform came along that required work and so forth that the poverty rolls actually started going down in this country.
So one thing that these terrorists in London today have done is taken this Africa business off the front page and off of the lead agenda item at the G8.
Now, the G8, Tony Blair said, that's not going to happen.
It's his agenda and he wants to try to keep it focused.
But he had to leave today to go to London.
He said he's going to fly back to Glen Eagles up in Scotland after he had spent some time in London to make sure his agenda remains on track, which is global warming, climate change, and Africa and so forth.
And I think an event like this just sort of puts in perspective All of these things that are prioritized in ways that are really incongruent, way out of whack.
At any rate, that's that.
We've got your phone calls.
I want you to hear what President Bush said.
We've got the audio sound bites from him and some of the media, not much, but some.
I've got Marvin Kalb and I've got Brian Ross of ABC.
And of course, we've got Mrs. or Mr. Christiana Manpoor, Jamie Rubin, who was on Fox and Friends talking about all this.
Interesting to hear what the press is saying about it.
Sit tight, all that, plus your phone calls coming up when we come back.
And back we are, 800-282-2882 into Tampa.
Hello, David.
Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh Program.
Nice to have you with us, sir.
Rush, Megadittos from Tampa.
Thank you, sir.
Just wanted to thank you for your wisdom and perspective every day, but especially on days like today.
I appreciate you saying it.
Thank you.
Much needed.
My question, Russ, just was, of course, the inevitable is going to happen.
You're going to have Kennedy and Kerry and Pelosi all out there saying, well, this, and even some moderate Republicans probably saying that we now need a timetable to withdraw from Iraq.
And my question was, is this not a golden opportunity for the Republicans and Bush also to stand up and slam dunk that argument, just to totally negate it?
Yeah, I think it is.
And I think it'll be interesting to see how long it takes Democrats to stand up and say this.
The real test, if they really believed it, they would say it today.
If they really thought that we needed to get out of Iraq and stop this, they would say, do it today.
They would stand up and they would author their opinions today.
But they're going to wait out of some sensitivity to the suffering in the families of the wounded and dead in London and so forth.
And, well, they might wait.
Yeah, they'll probably wait for some polls.
They're probably taking the polls right now.
They're probably out there asking, how should we as Democrats react?
Probably got polls, private polling going on in the country today of asking the American people, what do you want Democrats to say and how do you want them to react to this?
So once they get all that data in.
But see, that's the difference.
If they really believed that this all happened because we're in Iraq, stand up and say it today.
Well, really?
If I believed it, I would.
I don't know.
Why are you laughing, snurderly?
I mean, it would not be political suicide.
If they really believed it, this is my whole point.
They don't do what they really believe.
They're going to come out in two or three days, and they're going to try to make a political case by saying it two or three days from now once the raw emotion of this day has subsided.
And in that, you have a calculation.
And they're calculating timing and a number of other things.
But it's going to be nothing more than a continuation of their whole political agenda, which is to divide and to force a partisan wedge between the people of this country and to try to end up blaming this on George W. Bush and the war in Iraq.
Now, they're probably in some kook circles.
It's already being said, but I haven't seen any elected Democrats out there saying it today.
But look, I don't have any problem saying what I really believe about this today, have I?
I haven't said anything.
Well, then why should they?
Why should they have any problem?
What they really believe, let's hear it from them.
If they really think Iraq is response, we'll come out.
This is the day to say it.
This is the day when the world will hear them say it.
But no, they don't dare do it today because they know.
They know it isn't true and they know they can't make anybody believe it today.
So I think it just illustrates the bankruptcy of their whole core, that there is none, that all there is is a calculating polling unit that has one objective, and that is their own reacquisition of power.
And it's all rooted in their fear that they're losing it.
So we'll wait and see.
But Pelosi did say it yesterday in a speech.
This war caused terrorism.
If I were Pelosi, and she was speaking to her constituent, a boxer said it, Senator Boxer, and she said it to a Commonwealth Club out in San Francisco.
I think that was the group at some hotel.
And she said in a speech yesterday that Iraq, the Iraq war, caused and is causing terrorism.
Well, if she, and I'm sure she got a standing O from her Bay Area constituents, if she really believes that, today's the day to come out and say, I told you yesterday, I'm prescient.
I told you yesterday.
I told a speech yesterday, said a speech yesterday, and I said that this war is causing things like this.
And look at what happened today.
But she won't do it for whatever reasons.
But among them is she didn't have the courage to do it.
Wait till the emotions died down.
And I'm sure they're having their strategy sessions now.
The talking points are being produced.
So everybody is on the same page.
You've got to get those to the media, too, so that they know what to ask when Ted Kennedy and so forth shows up.
It'll all happen by the Sunday shows.
By the Sunday shows.
Mark my words.
Here's Rick in St. Francis, Wisconsin.
Hello, Rick.
Nice to have you on the program.
Oh, Ditto's Rush.
It's an honor to speak to you, sir.
Thank you.
You know, my first thought when I heard about this, with all the mayhem going on, whatever, was that it happened in London.
I was wondering how they did this.
And then I started thinking about our borders.
And you mentioned saying that they picked London because it's harder to get into our borders, but I know that you said they could still get here.
Don't you think that it's time for Congress and the president to rethink about our borders, how easy it is to get across them?
Oh, yeah.
That's all encompassed in the immigration discussion.
And a lot of people don't understand the lack of action on attention to the borders from a whole different view, a whole different number of standpoints or contexts.
For example, just the notion that illegal immigration is illegal.
Nobody seems to care to enforce that law.
Then you've got the open border connection to terrorists easily getting in.
Nobody seems that concerned about that.
Although there was an interruption, somebody, two al-Qaeda guys were stopped at the, I think, California border the other day or somehow associated to al-Qaeda.
But the problem in Great Britain is an immigration problem.
You know, this is not often said.
I'll say it today.
Hell, I mean, that's what I do.
I will say it today.
One of the problems that all of these Western European countries have is that they're wide open.
And the militant Islamic, these Islamo-fascists have a strategy, and it's to get as many people in these countries as they can as residents.
I mean, you'd be stunned.
I mean, the Brits, you know, they're beginning to talk about it.
There's some people concerned about it.
It was part of their recent campaign over there.
There are a lot of people very, very concerned about it.
There are lifelong Brits who are thinking they're losing their culture.
They're losing their identity to all of the immigration that's coming in.
And it's happening in France.
What do you think the reason that France is so afraid, other than their natural tendency to surrender and to pretend that they're not really part of the world when bad things are happening?
It's just as bad in France.
I mean, it really is.
You can sit there and laugh, snurdly, but it is a serious problem, and it has led to the Shirok not having the guts to lash out because so many of the people that live in his country are.
25% of France is Muslim now, and I don't know what percentage of that would be qualified as middle-to-Islam.
Nobody knows.
That's the thing.
25% of France.
And this is, it's all part of strategy, folks.
So it's, I don't know, in many ways, you can look at what is happening in various parts of Europe and see it happening here.
See the beginnings of it to happen here.
We've got a little roadmap to follow.
They're a little bit ahead of track there, and it gives us an opportunity to prevent it here as it is happening there, but it's going to take leadership.
And a lot of people are scratching their heads and saying, where is it?
Meaning the leadership.
Lou in Houston.
Hello, sir.
Next up, you are on the EIB network.
Well, I'm a ma'am and not a sir, first of all.
Oh, I'm sorry.
You're right.
I misread the line, Lou.
Sorry about that.
But I had to call in and tell you that I am angry also, and I have been seething for a long time.
I have a son in the military.
He's in the Army.
He's been to Iraq twice.
Those young men that went down in that helicopter in Afghanistan last week was from his unit.
And it's been his duty to deal with the families, get the personal effects.
He has to meet with the families and help them deal with this, which is all of that is terrible for a young man to have to go through.
But he gets it, and I get it.
Susan Sarandon made a remark sometime about she hates war, whether it's us against them or them against us.
Well, my son gets it.
He hates war.
I hate war.
Probably most of the young men and women that he deals with hate war.
But the terrorists don't hate war.
That's the point.
They love it.
And if it weren't for young men like my son, who hate war, weren't for people who hate war, standing up against people who love war, those people who blew up those trains this morning and flew planes into our buildings.
I have to stop here, Lou, because of time, but you've hit the nail on the head.
I'm going to expand on this a little bit when we come right back.
Sit tight, folks.
Here's an interesting story for you.
Not saying there's any connection.
It's just an interesting story.
It's from January 27th of this year, January 27, 2005, and it ran on the BBC website.
The headline, Freed Guantanamo 4, a threat.
The four were held at Guantanamo Bay for nearly three years.
The four men who have been released by UK police a day after returning from Club Guitmo still pose a security risk, U.S. defense officials have said.
Martin Mubunga, Faraz Abassi, Richard Belmar, and Mozam Begg were reunited with their families on Wednesday night.
The men from Birmingham and London were freed without charge, but the U.S. says the U.K. has agreed to monitor them.
Asmat Begg, the father of Mozamb Begg, said that his son appeared to be in reasonably good condition when they met.
Washington had claimed that all four were enemy combatants who trained at camps run by Al-Qaeda.
They were released after UK police concluded there was not enough evidence to charge them with any offense.
Home Secretary Charles Clake or Clark said that Britain had listened to U.S. concerns.
The UK had negotiated a security package with the U.S., and every practical step was being taken by the relevant authorities to maintain national security within the law.
But under the new proposals for dealing with terrorism suspects, which he announced on Wednesday, the four men could have been placed under house arrest.
I know that Mozam's a nice gentleman.
He's always ready to help when he gets a chance, said Azmet Beg, father of Mozam Begg.
My son is innocent.
So anyway, bottom line, we held four guys at Gitmo.
The Brits said, you don't have enough to charge them, let them loose.
We let them loose.
These guys are still dangerous.
They still pose a security risk.
The UK said, all right, we'll monitor them.
And they kept them locked up for a day.
I'm not making any connection.
I'm just going back here and finding interesting stories that look maybe a little different.
As you can use hindsight in this case, take this event today and go back and look at recent news about the G8 or stories such as this.
I want, as I said, for you to hear Tony Blair and President Bush.
Let's go to the top of the order here for the audio soundbites.
This is this morning at Glen Eagles, Scotland.
Tony Blair, surrounded by seven other world leaders, said this.
We condemn utterly these barbaric attacks.
We send our profound condolences to the victims and their families.
All of our countries have suffered from the impact of terrorism.
Those responsible have no respect for human life.
We are united in our resolve to confront and defeat this terrorism that is not an attack on one nation, but on all nations and on civilized people everywhere.
We will not allow violence to change our societies or our values, nor will we allow it to stop the work of this summit.
We will continue our deliberations in the interests of a better world.
Blair went on to say about that.
Here at this summit, the world's leaders are striving to combat world poverty and save and improve human life.
The perpetrators of today's attacks are intent on destroying human life.
The terrorists will not succeed.
Today's bombings will not weaken in any way our resolve to uphold the most deeply held principles of our societies and to defeat those who would impose their fanaticism and extremism on all of us.
One of the things I've been reading during the program today, commercial breaks, news breaks, top of the area, I've been reading various websites.
And today especially, I decided to go to some of these left-wing websites.
And one of the things I'm here, let me put it to you in the form of a question.
Do you think that what happened on 9-11 and what happened today in London are acts of war or are they just acts of murder?
Are they just criminal acts?
Are they just acts of war?
Because the sites I've gone to today and read, these are not war.
This is not representable war.
These are just acts of murder and they need to be dealt with criminally with prosecutions and so forth.
But this is not a war.
And see, that's one of the problems in my estimation is that so many people don't really get this.
Even on a day like this, they don't even get it.
Or do get it and don't want to admit it.
Let's move on to Soundbite 5 and 6.
Mr. Oldemont, this is George Bush, who Took his turn to speak, and this is what he had to say.
Spent some time recently with the Prime Minister, Tony Blair.
I had an opportunity to express our heartfelt condolences to the people of London, the people who lost lives.
I appreciate Prime Minister Blair's steadfast determination and strength.
He's on his way now to London, hear from the GA to speak directly to the people of London who carry a message of solidarity with him.
This morning I've been in contact with our Homeland Security folks.
I instructed them to be in touch with local and state officials about the facts of what took place here in London and to be extra vigilant as our folks start heading to work.
President also said that we will not yield to terrorists.
We're going to find them and we're going to bring them to justice.
You got people here who are working to alleviate poverty and to help rid the world of pandemic of AIDS.
They're working on ways to have a clean environment.
And on the other hand, you've got people killing innocent people.
The contrast couldn't be clearer between the intentions and the hearts of those of us who care deeply about human rights and human liberty.
And those who kill, those who've got such evil in their heart that they will take the lives of innocent folks.
This is the war on terror goes on.
I was most impressed by the resolve of all the leaders in the room.
Their resolve is as strong as my resolve.
And that is we will not yield to these people.
We'll not yield to the terrorists.
We will find them.
We will bring them to justice.
And at the same time, we will spread an ideology of hope and compassion that will overwhelm their ideology of hate.
I want now to move on to some of the media soundbites.
This is from Good Morning America today, Charlie Gibson talking to a reporter Brian Ross.
And he said, Brian, there have been some indication that al-Qaeda wanted to move its operations, which now seem focused in Iraq, out of Iraq.
Bin Laden supposedly has sent a message to Zarqawi in Iraq.
Move your people, if you can, out of Iraq to attack Western targets.
And at a recent security conference in London, in fact, that was the main focus of the possible threat that jihadists trained in Iraq, under Zarqawi, much more skilled at urban warfare than those trained in the camps in Afghanistan, would begin to show up in Europe and perhaps in London.
London has long been a center of recruitment for Zarqawi and for bin Laden's groups.
So this little bite here, I predict to you, will be the opening that some people made to blame us, the United States.
You see, if we weren't in Iraq, why these guys would not have been able to get trained in urban warfare.
But they've had to get trained in urban warfare to stop us.
And so we have actually helped them get ready for this attack in London by erroneously and mistakenly going to war in Iraq.
You have to know how to read between the lines here, in this case, here between the lines.
You've got to be able to understand a template that's used to put together these reports.
On the Fox News channel this morning, of all people, they went out and talked with the former foreign policy advisor to John Kerry, who you may not know served in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and was at Omaha Beach in World War II.
And this guy's name is Rand Beers.
And the host, Bridget Quinn, said to Rand Beers, John Kerry's foreign policy advisor, why do you think they did this?
Is this all about disrupting the summit or are there much deeper reasons, underlying reasons for it all?
It's a combination of the displeasure with British policy since the 11th of September and particularly in relationship to Iraq.
I think that the GH summit may have had something to do with this specific timing of the event.
Okay, so here we have is a noted expert on this attack in London, Rand Beers.
Rand R-A-N-D Beers, the former foreign policy director for the defunct John Kerry campaign, saying, well, they're mad at the Brits because of the, you know, the September 11 and the Iraq war and so forth.
You would expect nothing else from somebody in the Kerry campaign.
This is another one.
We're responsible.
If we hadn't gone to Iraq, this wouldn't happen.
British policy since 9-11, particularly in relationship to Iraq and a G8 may have had something to do.
The answer to the question, they did it because this is what they do.
And they've been doing it for 20 or 30 years.
And they did it before we went to Iraq.
9-11 happened before we went to Iraq, Mr. Beers.
This is an example of a pointy-headed intellectual elite who is thought to be among the smartest people in the country who's actually a lame brain.
So caught up in templates, unable to think outside the box, so utterly predictable and still incapable of they do it because that's who they are.
They did it because that's who they are and they thought they could get away with it.
Let's go back to Fox, Marvin Kalb.
He's grand poo-bah at the Joan Shorenstein Center for the Press up at Harvard.
And Fox just hired him as an official commentator, analyst, or whatever.
And so Bridget Quinn says, Tony Blair, even though he faced a tough reelection, and I would think, Marvin, this would only steal his resolve despite all the criticism, all the flack he took over supporting the U.S. in Iraq.
Tony Blair is a man, from all of the evidence that we have, is very much like President Bush.
They are both determined to take on global terrorism, no matter what the domestic political costs may be.
Obviously, they are both politicians.
Obviously, they want to be elected.
And even when I pointed out before that the president last year said we fight in Iraq in order not to have to fight at home, I believe the president might have meant that when he said it.
But that doesn't mean that that's what the terrorists intend to do.
They could be operating on several timetables all at the same time.
They could be setting off bombs in Iraq, setting off bombs in London, and planning to set off bombs in the United States, whether or not we had troops in Iraq.
See, you got to take your shot at Bush here.
You got to do it.
If you're a lib anywhere, you've just got to do it.
You've got to take your shot at Bush.
You don't take a shot at the terrorists.
No, this is, I mean, bombs here, bombs there, bombs there.
Bush.
He said, we're fighting them there, so they want to fight them here.
Well, look what happened.
This is pointless to even analyze this.
We know that the statement is true.
There hasn't been another attack in the United States since 9-11.
We know that terrorists are pouring into Iraq to fight.
And we know that terrorists have also attacked all over the world and are infiltrating all over the world.
I get worn out, folks.
Honestly, get worn out listening to these people.
It's, you know, it's just depressing to think that this is who so many people think are the best and the brightest.
And they're just not.
They're just utterly predictable.
It's, I don't know.
I guess I just choke on the pomposity of it all and the arrogance of it all and the know-it-all, knowingness of it all.
Anyway, quick timeout.
We got a brief break.
Be back and continue after this.
Welcome back.
Great to have you, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.
Before we get out of here, Mike, I want you to go back to the mayor of London.
I want people, if they've missed this, cuts three and four, to listen to the mayor of London, Ken Livingston, today, who I think this is the attitude that is called for in a circumstance like this.
Just run these two back-to-back, just like we did the last time we aired this in the first hour.
I wish to speak through you, directly, to those who came to London today to take life.
I know that you personally do not fear to give your own life in exchange for taking others.
It is why you are so dangerous.
But I know you do fear that you may fail in your long-term objective to destroy our free society.
And I can show you why you will fail.
In the days that follow, look at our airports, look at our seaports, and look at our railway stations.
And even after your cowardly attack, you will see that people from the rest of Britain, people from around the world, will arrive in London to become Londoners and to fulfill their dreams and achieve their potential.
They choose to come to London, as so many have come before, because they come to be free.
They come to live the life they choose.
They come to be able to be themselves.
They flee you because you tell them how they should live.
They don't want that.
And nothing you do, however many of us you kill, will stop that flight to our cities where freedom is strong and where people can live in harmony with one another.
Whatever you do, however many you kill, you will fail.
That is the mayor of London, Ken Livingston, addressing the people of the United Kingdom today.
And that, as I say, that's the attitude.
We Brits, hey, we've seen worse than this.
We were bombed daily during World War II.
You think this is nothing?
You know, I said in the opening hour of this program, I say, I'm going to apologize in advance because some of you people are going to think it's morbid.
But to the terrorists, I would say, what, 33 people dead?
That's nothing.
You think this was a success?
This is nothing.
You think this is going to stop us?
Ama, we've been through far worse than this, and we've overcome it, and we'll overcome.
This is essentially what Ken Livingston was saying.
And it's a welcomed attitude.
Rather than all the morbidity and the hand-wringing and the, oh, what was us?
Quickly, before I have to go, Rob, or I'm sorry, Bob in Detroit.
One minute, Bob.
Make it count.
Yeah, Rush, you mentioned what the Rust is saying on its websites and blogs about this was nothing but a criminal activity that needs to be prosecuted.
Doesn't that prove that Karl Rove was absolutely right in what he said about liberals in 9-11?
Yeah, it's a good point.
Rove said that they want to give therapy to the attackers and hand out indictments.
And I have.
I've seen a couple.
The Nation is one place.
There's some guy wrote a column in The Nation today on their website.
And you can't, I mean, that's out there on the left, folks.
That's Katrina van den Hoovel and her gang.
And oh, this is an act of war, this is an act of murder.
It's not an act of war.
This is murder.
And so Rove, yeah, right on the money.
Prosecute these guys.
Hand down indictment there.
Therapy, rehabilitation.
They don't say it in those words, but if this isn't an act of war, it's just a crime, then Rove's right on the money.
Be right back, folks.
Be patient.
And we'll be seeing you shortly.
Stay with us.
Warning tapes in eight languages are being provided for residents at Club Gitmo.
Just another Sterling service provided the vacationers at Club Gitmo.
This is in advance of the oncoming Hurricane Dennis.
Have a great, it's already open flight Friday tomorrow, right?
▲
Export Selection