All Episodes
Previous Next
June 21, 2005 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:34
June 21, 2005, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, welcome back, folks.
It's a distinct pleasure and honor to once again be here to discuss all these important issues that matter so much to our future and even our present.
Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, the Ditto Cam is on.
A hearty hello to all of you at RushLimbaugh.com who want to watch Broadcast Excellence.
Our podcasting continues to grow.
If you're a member at Rush 24-7, it doesn't cost anything else to receive MP3 files each day.
Within an hour of the completion of every show, just get the 24-7 media software, download that, make sure you get the right version for Mac or Windows, install it, which is a snap.
Just direct where you want the folder on your computer to download these files, and bamboo, that's it.
Automatically happens within an hour, hour and a half after the program.
You got to have the 24-7 Media Center software open and running for the automatic feature to work, but you don't need to be logged onto the site for it to work.
Also, we've added a couple items, and I didn't, nobody told me this, and I was a little steamed yesterday.
I was a little steamed yesterday.
We added two items to the Club Gitmo gift shop.
You know, and I'm checking the website yesterday afternoon and last night, and I said, whoa, what is this?
We've added a Club Gitmo cap and a Club Gitmo coffee mug, Jihad Java.
And both, of course, are in the same orange prison jumpsuit color as are the Club Gitmo t-shirts.
So the cap, $19.95, the Jihad Java coffee mug, $16.95, plus a moderate shipping amount, ladies and gentlemen.
All of that at rushlimbaugh.com, in addition to our new little feet picture, you can see it on the homepage, what it would be like at Club Gitmo for Saddam if he were to be transferred there.
It's funny as it can be.
If you want to be on the program for the remaining hour, the telephone number, 800-282-2882, and the email address, rush at EIBNet.com.
I didn't talk about this because I don't really care.
I think it was any big deal.
In fact, I thought it was kind of high school-ish.
But it's backfired, so now I'm going to talk about it.
The LA Times ran an experiment on their editorial page, and it lasted just two days before they were forced to shut it down Sunday morning.
On Friday, the Los Angeles Times announced an online feature that it called Wikitorial, and it asked website readers to improve a 1,000-word editorial, War and Consequences on the Iraq War.
It was the LA Times effort to reach out and include their readers in their editorial opinions, and they allowed the readers to edit the Times editorial as they would prefer it be written and otherwise make changes to it.
Readers were invited to insert information, make changes, or come to different conclusions.
And it was called the Wikitorial because the model was based on Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia where anybody can add facts or update information.
And I ran some information on Wikipedia.
Of course, as a public dictionary and public encyclopedia, it's not accurate.
I ran some checks just on me, and there's some bogus stuff that pops up on me if you enter my name at Wikipedia.
And I'm therefore not surprised that the L.A. Times would rely on, it's just Wikipedia as their model.
Go ahead and let your, that would be no different than my deciding, I'm going to get out of here.
I'm going to do two hours of the show, and I'm going to turn the other hour over to the rest of you where you can correct whatever you think I did that was wrong, improve what you think.
It would be, in this case, it'd probably be entertaining because we'd maintain some controls.
So what happened to the L.A. Times was some readers repeatedly posted obscene photos.
You just knew this was going to happen.
You just, you know who's out there trolling the internet.
It's just like every other segment of society.
You've got your ne'er-do-wells.
You've got, you've got the dregs of society out there, and you have your upstandings, and you have people that don't really care much about anything.
But you know damn well that the people that wanted to play tricks were going to get in there and do it.
And so after two days, the L.A. Times wicketorial experiment had to be canceled.
It sounds nutty, said an introduction to the wickatorial in Friday's paper.
Plenty of skeptics are predicting embarrassment, like an arthritic old lady who takes to the dance floor.
They say the LA Times is more likely to break a hip than be hip.
Nevertheless, we proceed.
We're calling this a public beta, which is a fancy way of saying we're making something available even though we haven't completely figured it out.
This is Michael Kinsley and his gang that run the editorial page at the Los Angeles Times.
What they didn't figure on was hardcore pornography, which the paper's software couldn't ward off.
Their software is open source wickatorial software.
It allowed readers to post without vetting from editors who could take down posts only after they appeared.
Any contributor who persisted in bad behavior could be blocked, but not until after he had succeeded in behaving poorly.
During most of Friday and Saturday, readers thoughtfully altered the editorial, but by Friday afternoon, hundreds had weighed in.
Some did add profanity, but just as quickly, a webmaster from the paper took it down.
Nothing bad really happened until after midnight on Saturday, said Michael Newman, the deputy editorial page editor.
8.32 Saturday, Saturday night of posting on slash dot.org, which bills itself as news for nerds, directed readers to the Times Wikatorial.
And so what happened is that a bunch of porno pictures ended up being posted on the LA Times website.
And so they put a note on the editorial page, website explaining the disappearance and thanking the thousands of people who had logged on to participate in this new adventure in newspaper editorials.
Now, does this not illustrate the problem newspapers have?
Newspapers are the dead tree editions, and then you have the internet editions.
They didn't try this on the dead tree edition.
They could just as easily, and then they had total control over it.
But they weren't thinking about that.
They're trying to spur readership on their website, I guess.
But more than anything else, I think it was just a bunch of liberals trying to show how in touch with their readers they can be because that paper is in trouble like all other liberal newspapers are.
They're losing circulation at a rapid rate.
All right, we got some audio soundbites here I want to share with you in this hour, and we may as well start right at the top here.
Audio soundbite number one.
Last night, Monday night in Boston, a party fundraiser, Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean.
I don't care if Dick Cheney likes my mother or not.
We are going to fight back.
I will not be lectured about morals by Tom DeLay and Rush Limbaugh.
We're going to be much tougher and in your face with the Republicans when they say things that aren't true.
Keep it up, Howard.
Just be who you are, baby.
Be who you are, man.
And you are educating more Americans to who you are in the Democratic Party is than anything any of your enemies combined could do.
But I want to go back just to, for those of you that have not been listening that long, a new tune-in factor here is phenomenal on this program from the 2004 election cycle, a montage of then-Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean.
And let me just ask you, who does he still have on his mind?
I am tired of having Rush Limbaugh lay claim to the American flag so that we aren't under the thumb of the Rush Limbaughs.
We are taking our country back piece by piece from the Rush Limbaughs.
We have the power to take back the United States of America, so our flag is not owned by Rush Limbaugh.
So that the flag of the United States is no longer the sole property of Rush Limbaugh.
You have the power to take back our country so that the flag no longer represents solely Rush Limbaugh.
You have the power to take back our country so that the flag never again is the sole property of Rush Limbaugh.
That flag never again will be the exclusive property of Rush Limbaugh.
The flag of the United States doesn't belong to Rush Limbaugh.
You have the power to take back our country so that the flag is no longer the sole property of Rush Limbaugh.
This country does not belong to Rush Limbaugh.
I want my country back, Mr. President.
That flag belongs to every single American, not to Rush Limbaugh.
Move over.
I want my country back again because the flag of this country does not belong to Rush Limbaugh.
You have the power to take back the flag so it does no longer belong solely to Rush Limbaugh.
All Isaac, keep it up, Howard.
Am I a candidate for anything?
No.
Am I out raising money for anybody?
I'm just some kid from Missouri who wanted to be on the radio one day.
Back after this, folks, we will continue with your phone calls, more exciting items from the audio soundbite roster, as well as the stacks of stuff.
Don't go away.
And we are back.
Greetings.
Nice to have you.
Just who is it that's on the minds of these Democrats?
We just shared with you that Dean cannot stop talking about me.
Here is a montage of Dick Durbin, who appeared today on Good Morning America.
Rush Limbaugh was the only American applauding it every day, but the American people knew better.
A right-wing radio talk show host.
He was so emboldened by a Rush Limbaugh, he said, you know, if we shut down the federal government, no one will notice.
Nope, sorry, that was not a Good Morning America today.
That was a montage of Durbin.
That's why I was confused reading this.
That was a montage of Durbin talking about me on the Senate floor.
And of course, Durbin is also out there now saying, and I am the reason that this whole gigmo thing came up.
I forget where he said it.
I read it today.
I forget where he said this.
It was some newspaper.
But he's blaming me for getting all this going for all the phone calls.
And folks, I have to tell you, I was not the first on the Durbin case.
There were people, I think Laura Ingram played that soundbite of his that morning on her radio show between 10 and 12.
And I didn't find out what Durbin had said until 2.30 that afternoon.
And yet Durbin still insists that all this is because of me.
It's all this.
Well, no, no, but my point is that I'm responsible for what he said.
As far as he's concerned, I'm responsible for what he said.
It's what I said that made people mad at what he said.
It wasn't what he said that made people mad.
And the point of that is, folks, the liberals and the Democrats still don't think you're smart enough to make up your minds about anything.
You wouldn't be mad at Dick Durbin if it weren't for people like me telling you what a lousy is.
You wouldn't be upset and you wouldn't be calling his office if it weren't for people like me getting you all revved up because you don't have the brains to hear what Durbin said himself and independently on your own get mad about it.
That's what they believe.
And it's the same thing, if I can go back to it, this Hillary book.
This Hillary book, even though it's written and published by a bunch of left-wingers, this Hillary book is all of a sudden the fault of Republicans and conservatives.
Conservatives are trying to trash Hillary.
I had nothing to do with this book.
It just shows up in the stores today.
So it's just the same old thing.
Democrats accuse Republicans of doing what they, the Democrats, do.
Here's Fred in Schomburg, Illinois.
Nice to have you on the program, sir.
Welcome.
Hello, Rush.
Hi.
Rush, are you there?
Yes, right here, sir.
Okay.
Mega Dittos from Schomburg and my 90-year-old dad, John, who's also listening.
Thank you, sir.
Station here about an hour and a half ago reported from a news conference that they had with Mayor Richard Daly, the Democratic mayor of Chicago, who said that Richard's statement was disgraceful and that he should apologize.
Yeah, I have that newspaper story here.
Chicago Mayor Richard Daly says Dick Durbin should apologize for comments comparing American interrogators at Gitmo to Nazis.
Daly said that Durbin's a good friend, but he says it's wrong to evoke comparisons to the horrors of the Holocaust or the millions of people killed in Russia under Stalin or in Cambodia under Pol Pot.
Daly also says that it's a disgrace to accuse military men and women of such conduct.
So what's I somehow I think what's going to happen here, Fred, is that the Republicans will be blamed for poisoning the mind of Dick Daly.
Daly doesn't really know what he's saying because he's been hearing about this from a bunch of right-wingers, that that's not really what Durbin said.
And this is going to be tantamount proof to how the Republicans are poisoning the atmosphere of political discourse to this day.
Look at how bad it's gotten.
Now the mayor of Chicago, Richard Daly, says that this has got to stop, that Durbin's got to shut up.
This is how successful the Republican spin machine is.
The right-wing media message, I think is the current phraseology.
Jerry in Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
You're next.
It's great to have you with us.
82 Airborne greetings, Professor Limbaugh.
Thank you, sir.
It's been a long time since I talked to you back when you were here in WFNC in the mid-80s.
I'm a 20-year veteran.
Most of that spent with the 82nd Airborne Division.
I've got four combat tours, including the two current conflicts that are going on.
And stuff that Durbin says really gets underneath my skin.
I've been over there.
The people, I've got tons of pictures of stuff that we've done with the kids gathered around us, the adults gathered around us.
I've got a broken wrist currently from an Iraqi that tried to stab me, and it was other Iraqis that let me know that he was coming up behind me before I ended up having to take care of that little situation.
And when he was talking about the people sleeping on the floor and the temperatures getting over 100 degrees and then they're laying there shivering to the air conditioning, I at least at first thought he was talking about me when I first got to Iraq.
And when I got to Afghanistan and we were laying on the ground, the temperatures were over 100 days, 100 degrees, and we're out doing patrols and things and come back at night, sweating, no showers, and the temperature drops and we're freezing.
He thinks that the people in Gitmo got it worse than the paratroopers that were initially going into these conflicts and the other soldiers.
He's ridiculous, and he had to shut his mouth unless he goes home.
Not for a week and tours around.
Let me tell you something out there, Jerry.
That's why we're posting the five-day forecast at rushlimbaugh.com for Gitmo and Baghdad to illustrate exactly what you're talking about.
But you have to understand something.
The mainstream press is starting to circle the wagons around Durbin now, just as they are around Hillary.
The Minneapolis Star Tribune today is upset that Durbin even tried to apologize, and they're urging him to speak out even more.
Richard Cohen in the Washington Post says that Durbin needs to speak more like this, that this is just an example of what's gone wrong in this country.
Somebody can't be honest about who we are without getting tarred and feathered and this sort of stuff.
And he says, doesn't understand what all the uproar is about.
And that doesn't surprise me at all because there's a double standard.
You know, when the liberals say outrageous things, well, the whole campaign of 2004 was nothing more than one outrage after another, one lie after another, one attempt to destroy a president after another.
And there wasn't one bit of examination of it by the mainstream press.
But boy, when the Swiftboat vets came out, and when they had documented evidence of the truth of John Kerry, and it forced Kerry to change his Vietnam and Cambodia story two or three times, from his official biography, no less.
Guess who got attacked?
The Swiftboat Vets.
And guess what?
This Hillary book is being described as the next effort of the Swiftboat vet type thinking in the Republican Party.
So just get used to this.
In fact, I've got a story from the American Spectator online today, and it's got a real interesting quote here from an unidentified staffer at the Democrat National Committee.
And it's this.
Part of the problem, too, says the DNC staffer, is that the Democrat headquarters has become a playground for fringe groups that never would have been given access under previous DNC chairmen.
You see some of the people being let in here for meetings and for coordination briefings, and you have to wonder where this thing, this party's going.
There's no judgment about who the party should be associated with.
If they hate Bush, if they can raise money, then they get into this office.
That's what happened with a Downing Street hearing, and that's why we're backpedaling from it now, because the only people that are tying themselves to that are the left-wing fringe kooks.
So you've got a DNC staffer worried about what's happening to the Democratic Party.
That's why Kerry didn't go forward with the Downing Street memo.
They don't trust it.
They don't believe it.
He threatened to take it to Congress and start impeachment inquiries over it, and he backed off on that.
So exactly what I am telling you happening to the Democratic National Committee and Party is indeed happening.
And if they're worried about it inside that building, then that means they know the American people can figure it out on their own without any urging from people like me.
We will be back.
Ladies and gentlemen, I have to clarify something based on some emails I just checked during the break.
I am not attempting to exonerate myself, apologize, or extricate myself from any culpability leveled at me by Dick Durbin for all of his troubles.
I'm honored.
I was just making a point that it wasn't until 2.30 that afternoon, and it was the day before that he said what he said, 7.16 Eastern Time on this floor of the Senate.
He's still out there blaming me for this, and I will gladly accept the blame.
I'm proud to be the man who shot Liberty Balance, Dick Durbin.
Don't misunderstand here.
They've got me on the brain, and there's a reason.
And I'm not even a candidate.
I'm not even out there raising money against these guys.
We all know why this is, and we all know why this makes me a target of these guys and their allies, but if I bring it on, do not misunderstand.
I'm not trying to extricate myself from any culpability or response.
I'm honored by it.
I hope they keep mentioning my name.
I don't understand why they do.
Well, let me put it this way.
If the situation reversed, I'm not going to say, leave them alone.
Let them keep doing what they're doing.
I'm not in control of it anyway.
And I don't want to give anybody the impression that I am trying to control what they do.
Let's go on to the Bolton nomination.
And if you're watching cable news, you're seeing little slugs run across the screen that John Bolton or that Bill Frist is not going to schedule another vote on Bolton.
That's not true.
Frist has changed his mind after a meeting with President Bush.
And he said this afternoon he will continue pushing for a floor vote on Bolton for U.N. ambassador.
Frist switched his position after initially saying today that negotiations with Democrats to get a vote on Bolton had been exhausted.
The Democrats picked up a Republican vote in the cloture vote last night.
Voinovich, Voinovich said, you know, I've even learned more.
He started crying.
I've learned even more about Bolton since the last time I was here talking to you about it.
So he voted with the Democrats against cloture.
And this just frustrated Frist.
He said, ah, to hell with it.
I'm through talking to these guys about it.
And then all the talk about a recess appointment for Bolton began to gin up.
And that's where we pick up on our audio soundbites.
This is Dingy Harry yesterday at a press conference.
The president will have to make a decision whether he wants to send this flawed candidate to the United Nations under an also questionable constitutional measure, which is being tested in the courts as we speak.
This questionable constitutional measure is being tested in the courts as we speak is the recess appointment.
And so apparently Dingy Harry is more informed than I.
I don't know how that's being constitutionally tested in the courts right now.
But the argument, you know, Bush is being urged to recess appointment to a recess appoint Bolton, which would allow Bolton to serve basically through January of 2007.
And a lot of people were suggesting that.
A lot of people said, oh, you don't want to do this, Mr. President.
You don't want to send a guy up there under a cloud.
You don't want to send him up there weakened by the fact that he couldn't get voted on by the majority of the Senate.
Well, there's a filibuster, folks.
They're not calling it a filibuster, but it's a filibuster.
I told you there was going to be filibuster.
I told you it was going to happen.
Told you there were going to be this filibuster.
The reason this is being filibustered, I'm going to say there's two reasons.
It's not just that they hate Bolton.
It's that the Democrats are stymied.
They think they got the short end of the gang of 14 deal.
And they've been itching to pull their filibuster trigger, and they're not able to on these judges until a Supreme Court vacancy comes up.
So they're doing it here with Bolton.
And they're killing two birds with one stone.
Where I come down on this, who cares what the world thinks of why Bolton's there or how he got there if he didn't show up with the full support of the U.S. Senate?
Screw that.
If he's the right man for the job, we haven't had an ambassador up there for how many months now.
If he's the right guy for the job, send him to hell up there and have him start shaking things up.
Who cares what anybody thinks about it?
I'm getting so sick and tired of this.
I'm really losing my patience over, well, we can't do this.
What will they think of us?
Well, we can't do that.
What will they think of him?
We can't send him up there.
What will be?
Who gives a rat's rear end if he's up there to straighten a place out?
So Bush is still saying he wants an up or down vote on the guy, but we'll have to wait and see whether there's a reason.
He couldn't make the recess appointment until the Senate next goes on recess, which is not that far down the road.
They have the July 4th recess.
They have the two weeks before the July 4th recess.
They have the week after July 4th recess.
They've got the campaign recess.
They've got more recesses in the Senate than you and I could count on combined on both of our hands.
But the next one's coming up relatively soon.
Now, last night on Hard Boiled, you had Barbara Boxer on there along with Senator George Allen of Virginia.
And I saw a little bit of this last night.
Allen handed Barbara Boxer her lunch.
He calls here for Maverick Democrats to break ranks and support Bolton.
The guest host last night was David Gregory.
He said, Senator Allen, do you think there's a deal to be had here with Bolton?
Or do you think a recess appointment's the only way?
I think the ones you have to look at are Senator Feinstein, Lieberman, and others.
I think some of the Democrats, it doesn't matter what the president does, they're not going to support him.
John Bolton ultimately should be our ambassador to the United Nations.
I would like to see senators not obstruct, but actually advise and consent or withhold their consent.
That's what we're doing.
No, you're not.
You're filibustering, and senators ought to get off the cushy seats.
All right.
George, it was your leader who said that it is totally appropriate to have a closure and you're not getting information.
And then Mitch McConnell said that, and Sam Brambach said, yes, but you're making it sound as if we're not doing our job, and we are doing our job.
You just don't like the way we're doing it.
Alan's close was, you are obstructing.
Up next, this is Senator George Voinovich on the Senate floor during the Bolton nomination debate.
Too many of my colleagues are not going to understand that this appointment is very, very important to our country.
At a strategic time when we need friends all over the world, we need somebody up there that's going to be able to get the job.
And I know some of my friends say, y'all, let it go.
George is going to work out.
I don't want to take the risk.
I came back here and ran for a second term because I'm worried about my kids and my grandchildren.
And I just hope my colleagues will take the time.
And before they get to this, well, do some serious thinking about whether or not we should send John Bolton to the United Nations.
Well, at least we know he's admitted that they're not doing any serious thinking, that they're just obstructing.
But old boohoo, he starts crying as though John Bolton at the UN is going to endanger his kids and grandkids.
You ever heard of Osama bin Laden?
Have you ever heard of the militant Islamists of al-Qaeda?
Have you ever heard of any of the people destroying American property and people all over the world?
I have not yet seen John Bolton accused of this.
I came back.
My kids and grandkids.
We can't send this man to the U.S. What the hell does one have to do with the other?
You know what this is?
What Voinovich is saying is if we send somebody mean up to the UN, we're just going to make him even angrier at us, and then they're going to attack us again.
That's what it adds up to, folks.
Well, it wasn't me that made him cry this time.
There's no question about that.
One more on this.
And that's from Good Morning America today, the forehead, Paul Bagala, one of the guests with Charlie Gibson, who says that, look, the president could be in the offering of a Supreme Court nomination, would have to go through the Senate.
Does he dare get senators angry at this point?
He's got other fish to fry.
And senators in both parties don't like recess appointments because it bypasses the Senate's obligation to advise and consent.
So it's not a partisan thing.
It's not just Democrats who would be inflamed.
You're right.
He's, I think, strategically thinking ahead to a potential Supreme Court nomination.
Were advising him and I I used to work for UH, i'd say, don't, don't pick this fight here on a comparatively unimportant job at the UN BIG, but not as big as the Supreme Court.
Well, it's a comparatively unimportant job at the U.N. Boy, we're stopping the presses here to keep this guy away from the U.N.
But so now now, the gauntlet's been thrown down here.
The foreheads just said, if you go ahead and recess this guy, then you can forget about your Supreme Court nominee.
We're not going to take that.
I I don't know why anybody is sitting around and taking any of this from the Democrats.
They are the minority and they're losing elections and by that measure alone, in the way our country is structured, they don't get to rule the place.
And, of course, when you've got crybabies like Voinovich uh, and you're Frist what, what do you do what?
What do you?
What do you do when you, when you've got renegades like that well uh no, i'm talking.
If you're Frist, what do you do when you can't control your own party like that and they're going to run out, start crying on the Senate floor about kids and grandkids over Bolton.
I can just hear it now, Bush Recess appoints, his recess appoints.
Well, that's what happened here.
You just heard the audio Snurdly.
You're going to recess, appoint Bolton, and what are we going to say?
He goes to the U.N. Without a mandate.
You know that's what we'd hear.
He can't do anything.
He's going up without a mandate.
Uh anyway, I got to run here quick timeout.
We will be back much more broadcast excellent, straight ahead.
We just had a question posed by a drive-by caller.
It's a caller who cannot stay to talk with us on the air, but wanted to raise a question, and the question is, who's eating it better these days, Elder Gonzalez or Al-qaeda terrorists at Gitmo?
I think we would have to conclude, based on free rice cookers and rationing of beans and so forth in Cuba, that uh, that the?
Uh, the terrorists at Gitmo are eating far better than Elder Gonzalez.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, I want to talk a little bit here, before we have to go today, about the Supreme Court.
Uh, still a bunch of cases yet to be announced next week uh, and they're already decided.
They're just writing the?
Uh the opinions here uh, the majority opinion of dissenting opinions, and that may already be done too.
The court will go on a Three-month recess next week when these decisions are all handed up, but uh, or handed out, but it's already done.
They're not still in there debating these things that in fact, they don't debate.
They take individual votes and that's how this is decided.
But uh, the Ten Commandments case is going to come next week, but there's also some other things coming.
Uh, and there was a a ruling on monday.
It didn't get a whole lot of attention but it was about privacy or not privacy, but uh, property rights.
Uh, the Supreme Court said yesterday that people who lose state lawsuits claiming the government improperly took their property cannot count on federal courts for help.
Uh, land rights, property rights a major issue at the Supreme Court this year, and so far the justices have made it tougher for people to win lawsuits claiming that local, uh and state state laws amount to an unconstitutional taking.
Now, the biggest of those three cases dealing with the government's authority to seize personal property will be announced next week.
But in yesterday's decision the justices ruled against an historic San Francisco hotel that wanted to convert rooms they were previously designated for permanent residence to accommodate tourists.
The city of San Francisco had restrictions on hotel changes as part of an ordinance intended to preserve housing for the poor, the disabled, and the elderly.
When the San Remo hotel was ordered to pay $567,000, it sued in state court and narrowly lost at the California Supreme Court in 2002.
Now, this brings Janice Rogers Brown into the picture because she was California Supreme Court justice then.
She supported the hotel, and she wrote a strongly worded dissent, and that dissent was used by some senators in opposing her elevation to a federal appeals court in Washington.
What she wrote is this, theft is theft, even when the government approves of the thievery.
Turning a democracy into a kleptocracy does not enhance the stature of the thieves.
It only diminishes the legitimacy of the government.
Now, there were no harsh words in Monday's decision because it was nine to zip.
It was unanimous.
The Supreme Court ruled or found that the 62-room hotel could not pursue a federal case because state courts had already addressed all the issues.
A Notre Dame law professor, Nicole Garnett, said this is a big victory for local governments.
The ruling was the second in a land rights case.
Last month, the court ruled that Hawaii did not overstep its authority in putting caps on the rent paid by dealer-run gas stations, part of an effort to control gasoline costs.
So if I understand it right, this hotel in San Francisco, the San Remo, and it was its property.
Of course, it owns San Remo is owned by people that own the San Remo.
They wanted to convert some of the rooms to accommodate tourists, which is what a hotel does.
You rent rooms to people who come into town.
And the city of San Francisco said, nope, you can't do that.
There's an ordinance here that preserves housing for the poor, the disabled, the elderly, and you got to keep those rooms for those people.
So the San Remo was ordered to pay $567,000 in fines because they went ahead and violated the ordinance.
So that went all the way to Supreme Court.
And the Supreme Court basically said, if the state tells you that you have to do with your property what the state tells you, then you've got no recourse to come to us because the state explored all the issues.
So they didn't really lose the property.
I mean, the city or the state didn't take the hotel away from them, but they're basically dictating to the owners how they have to run it.
So it may as well be the same thing.
So these people own a hotel, but the state says, yeah, you got to keep these rooms open.
Or did the state take it from them?
State didn't take it, but the effect is the same.
But it was a nine-to-zip decision.
So I don't know what this bodes for the next decision on land rights, property rights coming next week.
Let me go up the line two, Ed in Westchester in New York.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Thank you.
When you were talking about Mayor Daly, I remembered that his son had enlisted in the Army.
Yes.
I went and Googled it and found that he actually had.
So I can certainly see why Mayor Daly is not the only one in the position of being a prominent Democrat and being, well, I guess basically his son is being smeared by the Democratic leadership.
Yeah, and by the senator from Illinois.
Yes.
In fact, Daly's son, this is from November 30th of 2004.
Daly's 29-year-old son enlisted in the Army and was scheduled back then to soon report for duty in the Airborne Infantry.
Patrick Daly is his name.
Says he left West Point during his freshman year when he was 18 years old and always remembered their motto, duty, honor, country.
But I was so young, not really old enough to understand what it really meant, but now I know, so I want to go into the airborne infantry.
And this may explain why Mayor Daly sees fit to, seen fit to light into Durbin, because he feels the personal sting of Durbin's.
And they ought to listen to Daly on this because there's a whole host of Americans that feel this, the words of Dick Durbin on a personal, deeply personal level.
Back after this, folks, stay with us.
Runaway Boy Scout news.
CNN is saying that two volunteers have told them that the 11-year-old Boy Scout Brennan Hawkins has been found alive in the mountains east of Salt Lake City.
Two volunteers telling CNN, and they're running with this full bore.
So if that's true, it's good news.
It's also good news for the Boy Scouts because if you're a Boy Scout, one of the things you'll learn is how not to get lost out there in the woods.
So good news all the way around there.
We are out of busy broadcast moments here, ladies and gentlemen.
However, there's always tomorrow.
And in life, there is always tomorrow if you're lucky.
And we'll all be lucky there will be tomorrow.
And we'll be back here at the same time in the same place and kick it up all over again, depending on whatever the news of the day is then.
▲
Export Selection