RadixJournal - Richard Spencer - Aspirationally Jewish Aired: 2023-09-29 Duration: 10:31 === Elon's Jewish Friends (10:07) === [00:00:00] So I would actually praise Alan Dershowitz for his commentary. [00:00:08] So Dershowitz has dedicated his life to promoting Zionism. [00:00:17] So he obviously has a dog in this fight, no question. [00:00:22] But I would praise him first off. [00:00:26] As just being the most clear and explicit. [00:00:30] So all I heard before Alan got on was just a lot of platitudes that had some very strong built-in assumptions, I would say. [00:00:43] And there was also some things that were pretty interesting that were revealed by seemingly throwaway comments. [00:00:51] Maybe I'll just go into those just because those are... [00:00:57] So, this notion of being aspirationally Jewish came up, and Elon was talking about this, and he said something to the effect of, well, I'm aware that all anti-Semites say that they have a Jewish friend, but I would say the majority of my friends are Jewish. [00:01:19] That's whatever. [00:01:20] I mean, that might be true for a lot of people. [00:01:22] You're in Silicon Valley, you're in the world of finance, whatever. [00:01:27] I don't care about that. [00:01:28] But then he offered some interesting things, which he said that Elon is a very common name in Israel. [00:01:36] And that is true. [00:01:40] And that is pretty interesting. [00:01:44] Although not... [00:01:45] Definitive. [00:01:46] And then he mentioned that his father sent him to Hebrew school when he was growing up in South Africa. [00:01:53] So I would ask the question, you don't just casually go to Hebrew school. [00:02:01] I mean, maybe... [00:02:03] You might, in some circumstance, like, I've heard of plenty of people, including Jews, who, you know, they went to a Catholic school for whatever reason. [00:02:12] It's better, it's close to their home, the public school sucks, etc. [00:02:17] So, I mean, there's some plausible deniability about it. [00:02:20] However, it just seems curious to be going to Hebrew school when you're young. [00:02:26] He also said that his father took him to Israel when he was 13 and he saw the wall. [00:02:32] So I presume he's referring to the wailing wall. [00:02:35] Now, Elon's estranged from his father. [00:02:58] I don't quite know what to make of it. [00:03:00] There are all these curious suggestions about Elon's background that he's part Asian. [00:03:06] I mean, to be honest, in terms of his physiognomy and even comparing it to his brothers, if you see some of those early childhood photos, there was a lot of these being passed around after the release of the recent book by Walter Isaacson. [00:03:28] If someone said that he is half Asian or a quarter Asian, I would believe them. [00:03:34] There's just something about it. [00:03:36] Now, that doesn't kind of mean anything. [00:03:39] Maybe his father isn't his father. [00:03:42] Might mean that. [00:03:44] But it's just there. [00:03:45] But there does seem to be a suggestion that Elon's connection with Judaism goes deeper. [00:03:53] All of these things are plausibly deniable, but... [00:03:56] I don't know. [00:03:57] Many, many Jews in South Africa got out of there at the end of apartheid time, and it would fit a pre-existing narrative, a kind of personal narrative of a lot of people. [00:04:11] You meet many Russians who immigrated to the US or Canada or Europe in 1992 or 1996. [00:04:20] It fits a narrative. [00:04:25] I don't know, just saying. [00:04:27] It was rather odd. [00:04:29] I think it also would throw a lot of cold water on what seemed to be happening about two weeks ago, which was that there was this notion that Elon is just outright attacking the ADL. [00:04:49] Yeah, I think it throws some cold water on that, or it kind of turns a fastball into a curveball, so to speak. [00:04:56] I think it's worth looking into these things. [00:05:01] At the very least, just to understand where he's coming from, because Elon says a lot of different things. [00:05:07] And they're contradictory. [00:05:10] There's, you know, I'm a free speech absolutist. [00:05:13] And then there's also, oh, you have freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach. [00:05:17] As Alan Dershowitz correctly pointed out, that is already, like, sliding rather fast, quickly into censorship land. [00:05:27] Just saying that. [00:05:28] It rhymes. [00:05:29] It sounds better, I guess. [00:05:30] But you're already kind of, like, surrendering the past before the battle. [00:05:36] And I think it's worthwhile just knowing who he is. [00:05:41] And I'm not sure Walter Isaacson would be the right person to reveal that, to be honest. [00:05:48] But to go back, I'll just jump around a little bit and throw out some of my ideas. [00:05:54] You guys can pick up on them and we can have a conversation. [00:05:58] Alan Dershowitz, to his credit... [00:06:01] Did not engage in platitudes. [00:06:04] He did engage in kind of memorable visual metaphors, but I think those are actually really helpful. [00:06:15] And he objected to something that I think Elon might have said or someone else on the call when they said, oh, we need to draw a line. [00:06:24] And he's like, look, we're not drawing lines because a line, you're on either side of that. [00:06:32] And instead, you should draw a circle, which is legal speech under the U.S. Constitution. [00:06:37] And I guess in this case, this is a very American-centric discussion. [00:06:42] Obviously, different lands have different laws. [00:06:45] But he said, so you're going... [00:06:50] There's what is legal, of course, and then there's what's permissible in a U.S. country that should, at the very least, be kind of inspired by the ideals of the U.S. Constitution and should reflect them and certainly be coherently connected to them. [00:07:11] Everything is inside. [00:07:13] Every ism is inside. [00:07:15] So Zionism is in there, anti-Zionism, presumably white supremacism is in there, Buddhism, Islam, etc., etc. [00:07:25] It's all in there outside of things that are quite obvious abrogations of law. [00:07:35] Things where speech turns into crime. [00:07:38] Because speech is an absolute, of course. [00:07:40] And that is, you know, who knows? [00:07:43] Sex trafficking, explicit death threats, selling illegal items on a platform, etc. [00:07:50] It's actually kind of easy. [00:07:52] But what he said is that because we're all in this one circle, you can't police. [00:07:57] If you're going to police someone else, you're going to police yourself. [00:08:00] So it's kind of self-reinforcing. [00:08:02] And Alan, all of these esteemed Jewish leaders were on the program saying, oh, I'd love to talk with you offline, Elon, about this. [00:08:12] They're like, you should come visit us. [00:08:13] We should all go to Auschwitz. [00:08:14] I know you know about this, but I want you to feel it. [00:08:17] You need to feel what this means. [00:08:19] All this stuff, they all wanted to kind of get with Elon. [00:08:23] It was kind of embarrassing, almost. [00:08:26] There were threats, implied threats, probably is more accurate. [00:08:31] But there was also a kind of cloying bootlicking going on. [00:08:36] It was strange. [00:08:38] But anyway, Dershowitz offered something that was actually constructive. [00:08:45] And so I would praise him for that. [00:08:48] And he's... [00:08:50] He offered the only thing that was tangible that could lead to some sort of policy. [00:08:57] And I know a lot of people probably don't take him seriously because Dershowitz is as much a Zionist as Jonathan Greenblatt. [00:09:07] He's more of a Zionist than most liberals in Congress, etc. [00:09:12] I mean, he has a dog in the fight, but... [00:09:17] He said this, and it's a tangible policy that would seem to work. [00:09:21] He also noticed that this freedom of speech but not freedom of reach, it is choosing sides, and it kind of reminds me of the famous line by Antonin Scalia. [00:09:33] I think he might have written this about the Westboro Baptist Church, or he might have written it. [00:09:38] I think it might have been St. Paul, that Supreme Court case, which is, you can't declare that one side plays boxes. [00:09:46] According to the Marquis of Queensbury rules, and the other side goes freestyle. === Cannot Prohibit Symbolism (00:39) === [00:09:52] So you can't, and I think if I'm correct, I mean, perhaps Chris can correct me here, but I think I'm right on this. [00:09:59] You can't, like, you know, burning a cross in someone's front lawn, you are absolutely harassing them. [00:10:07] But you can't create laws that make a differentiation between, say, In the sense that just engaging in arson is obviously criminal, but there's no kind of symbolism to it. [00:10:27] You can't create a law prohibiting burning of crosses.