LindellTV is now publicly traded! OTC market … Stock symbol: $MLMCShow more Join Rudy Giuliani, famously known as "America's Mayor," for a hard-hitting daily show that rips the veil off Washington, D.C. corruption. With his unparalleled experience and insider knowledge, Giuliani delivers razor-sharp insights into the political dynamics driving the nation’s capital, exposing hidden agendas and breaking down the day’s top news. Fearless commentary, explosive revelations, and a no-holds-barred look at the forces shaping America’s future, straight from one of the country’s most trusted voices. Show less
We are on Lindell TV, and tonight is both the second day of Passover, in which they're often among most observant, or I should say the more observant Jewish families.
There's another feast, another Seder, second Seder, probably not as big and as fulsome as the first, but still.
Following the same essential ritual.
Also, tonight is one of the most important evenings in the history of the liturgy and the year of Christianity.
This is a celebration of the Eucharist, of Holy Thursday, celebration of many things, actually.
And depending on your Christian tradition, you celebrate some or all of them.
The Roman tradition, the Greek tradition, Would cover, of course, the most of them.
So tonight is a blessing of the chrism, which is the oil, water and oil that's used for consecrating priests, for blessing the sick.
And that's done at a special mass this morning at the bishop's church, because the bishop does it for the diocese.
There's also what you see there, the washing of the feet, which recreates Jesus washing the feet of the apostles at what could be called the Passover supper, the Paschal supper, or the Last Supper, as it's referred to in three of the four Gospels.
And the Pope is recreating what is recounted in John 24, I believe, the 20 of 24.
We'll take a look.
In which Jesus shocks his apostles during the Passover supper by asking them to sit down, John 13, actually.
Now, before the feast of the Passover, when Jesus knew that his hour had come to depart out of this world, having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end.
And during the supper, when the devil had already put into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon's son to betray him.
Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands and that he had come from God and was going to God, rose from supper, laid aside his garments, and tied a towel around himself.
Then he poured water into a basin and began to wash the disciples' feet and to wipe them with the towel that was tied around him.
He came to Simon Peter and Peter said to him, Lord, do you wash my feet?
Jesus answered him, What I am doing you do not know now, but afterwards you will understand.
Peter said to him, You shall never wash my feet.
Jesus answered him, I do not wash you.
You have no part in me.
Peter said to him, Lord, not my feet only, but also my hands.
If I do not wash you, Jesus says to him, you have no part with me.
You're not part of me if you don't let me wash your feet.
And at that, Peter changes his attitude completely.
And Peter says to him, Lord, not my feet only, but also my hands and my head.
And Jesus said to him, He who has bathed does not need to wash except for his feet, but he is clean all over, and you are clean, but not all of you.
For he knew who was to betray him.
That was why he had said, You are not all clean.
Now, John goes on to describe the rest of the Passover meal.
And then, of course, the revelation of Judas as the betrayer.
He also lays out a new commandment.
When he had gone out, Jesus said, Now is the Son of Man glorified, and in him God is glorified.
If God is glorified in him, God will also glorify him and himself and glorify him at once.
Little children, yet a little while I am with you.
You will seek me.
And as I said to the Jews, so now I say to you, where I am going, you cannot come.
A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another.
Even as I have loved you, that you also love one another.
By this, all men will know that you are my disciples if you have love for one another.
He then goes on to foretell the betrayal of Peter, which Peter highly doubts.
And of course, it happens shortly thereafter.
And the rest of the passion goes forward.
The interesting thing that you'd have to be a far better theologian than me to give you the answer to this, but I'm sure there are many answers, I'm sure, to this.
There are four Gospels Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
The first three are called the Synoptic Gospels.
Not that they copied from each other, but they did.
To a large extent, if you read Matthew and Mark, you can see a lot of similarities.
Then if you go over to Luke, you'll see some, it changes a little.
Luke got a great deal of his information about Jesus.
We are told, we believe, again, this is an 80% historical fact, from St. Paul, who described in detail.
His travels after he was converted by Christ to really create the church.
He and Peter, and then the other disciples' efforts on behalf of establishing the early church happened and occurred, and they're vaguely mentioned here and there, but the ones that are laid out the most are Paul and Peter.
Now, I mean, this is sort of like Churchill, I guess, saying, The person who writes history commands history, right?
So Paul had a writer, Luke, and Luke wrote to a very large extent his gospel around Paul.
Paul doesn't show up in the gospel because he wasn't a disciple.
But then when he writes the Acts of the Apostles, which are the things that happened after Christ's resurrection and ascension, Paul is the major player in it, considerably more even than Peter.
And he describes in great detail the tremendous traveling that Paul does.
And I don't think there's much of a dispute that Paul was the primary figure in establishing the church, although Peter would have played also a significant role, but not as significant, although Peter established the church where it then became the center of it, which was in Rome.
So, John does not have a Last Supper.
Matthew, Mark, and Luke all describe the Last Supper virtually similar, not exactly the same.
They choose to emphasize different things.
The washing of the feet was very significant to all of them, as it was to John, although John devotes more time to it, and singularly, the betrayal of Judas is listed in all.
Different kind of, it was really not a betrayal, it was a denial.
It was a denial of not knowing Christ that occurs just a little bit later that night.
So, why John doesn't have a description of the Eucharist, I don't know.
But the significant celebration tonight is that Jesus, during his Passover supper, consecrated unleavened bread and wine into his body and blood and gave it to his disciples.
And said that they should do this in remembrance of him.
And what I'll do, rather than read the many, many, if I have it here, let's see.
Nope, I think I lost it.
We'll read it a little later.
I think the best singular description of how the Eucharist was created, what it's all about in a single, simple little paragraph is from St. Paul, who describes it in one of his letters.
And it's a fact, I mean, This is the greatest gift that Jesus gave to us during our lives, for us to use during our lives.
So tonight is a very, very holy and a very special night, and a night of celebration, but also a night with a great foreboding because it ends with Jesus' arrest in the Garden of Gethsemane, where he's praying.
And his betrayer, Judas, leads the troops to him and goes up to him and tells the commander of the troops, The man that I kiss is the Christ.
And he finds Jesus praying.
I don't know if it's just several of his disciples.
I think all of his disciples are with him at this point.
Judas gives him the kiss of betrayal.
The soldiers now fall upon him.
His apostles attempt to fight back.
Peter draws his sword and chops the ear off, I think, a Roman soldier.
Jesus puts the ear back on to save Peter and says and lectures his apostles and said, if you live by the sword, You die by the sword, basically tells them, This is not us.
This is not what I have taught you to do.
And this is not what I am sending you in the world to do.
So different than Muhammad, huh?
So different than the Muslim religion.
So critically different.
And so much of the wars and our inability to solve them come from the fact that we don't, at least in modern times, focus on this difference and work with our Muslim brothers and sisters.
To read that out, to read the invocations, the massive numbers of invocations of violence by Muhammad and the example of his perverted lifestyle out of the Quran.
Because how can you have a religion where the leader of the religion is encouraging you to kill people?
Jesus is not only discouraging you, he's giving you any number of reasons not to do it.
So even the issue of justifiable self defense.
Or justifiable war, which the Pope took on the other day.
These are big exceptions that need very strict guidelines to even fit, and not all theologians accept them.
And they don't, as far as I can tell, come from the words of Jesus, but rather they come from practical interpretations.
That is what Jesus must have meant.
Not true in the Old Testament.
The Old Testament makes adequate description of self defense and justifiable murder.
So, have a blessed Holy Thursday.
Tomorrow is, of course, the worst day of the year for Christians.
It's the day in which we remember the passion and crucifixion of Christ.
And Sunday is by far the greatest feast in the Christian calendar, and that is Jesus'.
Victory over death and over sin for our benefit.
Pam Bondi Epstein Connection00:14:40
Well, tonight, I guess the big surprise today was that Pam Bondi was dismissed.
There were those that saw it coming and there were those that said it wouldn't happen.
Now, when a member of the cabinet is dismissed or leaves, there are always people that have predicted it.
It's like I think they pass it around and everybody gets a couple of cabinet members to say, They're going to be dismissed.
Now, the rumor is all over the place that Pete Hegsett is going to be the next to go, which I find close to insane.
I think that several of them are doing world class jobs.
I can't say he's doing the best job, but I can say nobody's doing a better job than Pete.
I think that the Secretary of State and he have probably are now the most active and on the line the most to produce, right?
But that changes.
I mean, if we have to deal with If we have to deal with the aftermath of this war in terms of our economy, the Secretary of the Treasury will become the most important, Assange, who is far and away one of the very best.
Secretary Duffy, when we deal with transportation problems, becomes critical.
Secretary Kennedy becomes enormously critical in the battles that he's fighting against obstacles to our health that have turned us into a country that spends more money on health but isn't necessarily anywhere near the healthiest in the world.
And his courage in taking that on is inspiring.
Nobody's been willing to do that.
They've all caved in front of the gigantic, wealthy, rich, and very powerful pharmaceutical.
Industrial complex.
So we could go over all of them, and I don't mean to leave any of them out.
He has a uniformly really good cabinet.
But if Pete were to be dismissed, I would be incredibly shocked.
And it sure would not be on the basis of his performance.
The military actions that he has carried out on behalf of the United States will go down in history as some of our most effective.
Brilliant actions of the way that we prepared for this and turned around a country that, I mean, turned on a dime around a country whose military was completely dispirited.
Our enlistments were record lows.
We were training, we were giving people training lessons, not how to extricate hostages or to storm beaches or to land from a.
From an airplane like a paratrooper, or to do precision bombing like they did in Iran, or to do hand to hand combat, which they may still have to do.
We weren't really spending our time on that.
We were spending our time on having drag queens give lectures to soldiers and trying to get our soldiers used to having biological females.
were turned into males or vice versa, serving with them, sleeping with them, and going to the bathroom with them.
And then we had other enormously woke things imposed on them like they were a group of hippies in San Francisco.
You can imagine what that did to the morale of men and women that we trained to be killers.
And if you find that somewhat stark when I said that, you really have no conception of what an army is for.
We might as well not have it if we don't understand what it's for, because then it can't protect us.
I mean, there are other things that it does, but the whole core of how it works is that they are the most effective killers in the world.
And they deter others from killing us because the others know that the consequences for them Will be so dramatic that it isn't worth attacking us.
And when they can accomplish that, they've accomplished the most brilliant part of their career.
So, Pam, I don't know the reasons why Pam was let go.
I have to, and I don't have any inside information about it.
I do think it has something to do with the Epstein situation.
I hear the same rumors that you hear.
Sometimes I hear them from people inside or people that I know or people that are close to any number of different people, the president or others around the president.
And I never took the time because if I did, I wouldn't be able to concentrate on the important things that I have to concentrate to keep you informed as American citizens.
I never took the time to really run down all the stupid things.
If I took the time to run down all the stupid things that come out of Washington, and even this White House, which is a lot better than the last one, but it still is a leaking palace.
And I probably have to say I'm one of the experts on how every presidency, every governorship, and every mayoralty is an application of the Prince, Machiavelli's book, The Prince.
A great, great psychiatrist handed that to me when I first became mayor.
He said, If you read it, you'll understand what your staff is going to do, even though many of me are best friends.
And boy, it helped me greatly.
And it helped me greatly when I had to deal with that.
Of course, I experienced it and saw it in the Reagan White House.
And then it helped me a lot during having to negotiate with it, deal with it once removed in kind of a special position where they couldn't affect me very much with the first Trump White House, because I was not a part of the White House.
But I was in the White House as often or more often than they were as his lawyer.
So, of course, most of what I did there was work, but I observed it all.
The leaking was, in that White House, particularly the first year, the leaking was, second year, leaking was absurd.
It was absurd.
And you knew who did it.
And my partner and I resolved not to have meetings.
In the Oval Office anymore.
And we met with the president in his residence before he left for work, after he came back from work, or any time like on a holiday or if he was staying there, we would like during the shutdown, the big shutdown, we spent a lot of time there upstairs in the area that he has in his residence where he sees guests and does a lot of work.
He has an office next to that too.
So, I mean, did she screw up Epstein?
It's so hard to tell.
Oh, let's see that, please.
Yeah, you want to read that, Ted?
You can have it closer to you.
Pam is a great American patriot and a loyal friend.
I would agree with that completely.
Go ahead.
Who faithfully served as my attorney general over the past year.
Pam did a tremendous job overseeing a massive crackdown in crime across our country, with murders plummeting to their lowest.
Level since 1900.
We love Pam, and she will be transitioning to a much needed and important new job in the private sector to be announced at a date in the near future.
And our deputy attorney general, the very talented and respected legal mind, Todd Blanch, will step in to serve as acting attorney general.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, President Donald J. Thank you.
Well, you're welcome.
We will attend to the matter, Mr. President.
And I think that's all we're going to say about it because.
I have a very hard time evaluating all these things that are said because there's such a meteor bias against him and a willingness to turn any suggestion of anything bad against him without examining it that, unless you've examined it and you've seen it yourself, there's just as good a chance it's not true as it is true.
So I don't know if the Epstein case situation where She said they had this and they had that, and then it turned out that they didn't.
Doesn't come from the fact that it was presented to her in the wrong way.
That's happened to me.
I mean, people, I have reviewed enormously sensitive and gigantic files.
I mean, not things you don't even know, the church committee.
I was the chief of staff to the deputy attorney general and was sort of in charge of putting together a lot of our response to that, spending many nights going through it.
When I was first given that report, I was told a lot of things about it that once you read through it just weren't true.
Not that there weren't a lot of bad things in it, but some of the bad things in it were not featured in what they leaked to the press.
And some of the bad things they leaked to the press weren't untrue because they were leaked for political purposes.
And my goodness, it wasn't anywhere near as bad as it is today.
Now, I was not in a position at that time because I was a fairly middle level staffer.
I didn't talk to the press about it.
I didn't have to, right?
And probably wasn't allowed to.
But had I been in the position of being the attorney general or deputy attorney general or whatever, and had to answer questions about it, it's very, very possible I would have given incorrect information based on what was given to me.
And given the buildup they had for the Epstein file, it's not unusual that when it was presented to her, it was said, oh, that has an unbelievable amount of information on this and that and the other thing.
And maybe to the eye of that beholder, it was.
Except that person didn't have to sit down and do the hard task of figuring out, well, exactly what that, what does that, he was with Epstein.
But exactly what does that mean?
How many people were with, in his lifetime, how many people were with Epstein?
And how many of those people hadn't the foggiest idea there was anything wrong with him?
Some very large percentage.
And how many of them were with him and knew there was something wrong with him, but never would have imagined that it was the horrible perversion that it turned out to be?
Probably a lot more.
And how many knew about the perversion?
Well, let's go slower.
How many suspected the perversion but didn't know it?
Probably a lot more.
Like, hey, there's a rumor that he does this.
How many knew about it but didn't participate in it?
And either broke off the relationship or just kept it going either for selfish purposes or because they're amoral.
Look, the California legislature has lowered the penalties for pedophilia.
Sounds like me, they would have hung around with Epstein, right?
It looks like they think we go too tough on them.
Maybe they would have thought they could have converted them.
That's what they believe that if we would stop being so hard on these pedophiles, instead of, there'd come a point at which they would be turned and be perfectly fine for you to give your five year old to them.
Unless you're out of your effing mind, it would be, or you're some crazy left wing.
Son, grandson of a hippie.
Boy, oh boy.
Most people that were hippies or grandson have turned out to be enormously conservative, by the way.
It's just like it's a new group that gets addicted and stupid and crazy and has to feel the ego requires them or the insecurity requires them to act bizarre.
She's done some very, very good things on some of the basic law enforcement things like drug enforcement and others.
I can tell she's been excellent.
So good luck to Pam.
And she's going to do, I mean, she's a very, very good person.
She's a very good lawyer.
Nothing she did that was deliberately wrong.
And I'm sure, I'm sure, without any doubt, without having to go through all of this garbage, she did her very, very best.
And I know she did it in the right spirit.
She loved the president and loves what he's doing.
And despite the fact that she's being let go early, she can be very, very proud of the things she did accomplish.
Now, what happens to the next one?
Justice Department Two Sides00:10:02
I guess it's between Todd Blanche and.
I know both well, not well, real well.
I'm not real well.
I probably know Lee better in many ways.
But knownly a longer time.
No, Todd, too, but not as well.
It's an interesting choice.
They both bring interesting things, too.
You might not know that Lee did serve in the Justice Department.
So, as did Blanche, he served in the Justice Department.
They both, I believe, were assistant U.S. attorneys.
I think Todd was in my former district, and Lee was in Brooklyn.
Which is why they're so good because I was an assistant U.S. attorney too.
So I do have a.
And even though they might have been once removed from the Justice Department, it's not as if they don't have any experience in the Justice Department.
They're not going to go into a department where they don't have any concept of what the chain of command is and how things get done, at least in the litigation, criminal, civil area.
And I would say that's probably.
The area of the Justice Department that your problems emerge from.
And that's the one you better have command of.
You should have command of all of it.
But if you have to focus on where you and the president get challenged the most, it's in the area of criminal and civil enforcement.
And both of them have experience with that.
Also, Lee's experience now is his job is an enforcement job, and he's doing it very, very well.
So, yeah, that's the thing.
I mean, he's been doing so good.
I would recommend that the president take not too much time because he's got to get it done in this Congress before we have to deal with savage Democrats who will, you know, make sure they strike down the best candidates.
He has to go to a two or three.
I'd probably take a little time to look at a few others just in case as a comparison.
Although either one of them would be very, very good.
And before, and let's see if they're the final.
I mean, I'll tell you who I think is better.
I know who I know better, and I don't want to just make it based on that.
That would be Lee.
I should be comfortable with either.
And I know what I want to say, but I don't want to say it quite yet.
I do want to think about it a little.
I think this, you know, and maybe again, it's my own experience, but to me, this is maybe the most important position the president picks.
Not that they're all, I mean, right now, you'd have to say the most important positions are Secretary of War and Secretary of State, because we're carrying out a war.
But why do I consider this the most important and most sensitive?
Because this, I remember my boss.
William French Smith and Ed Schmaltz, the attorney general and deputy attorney general that worked for President Reagan, and I was the associate.
Now, both of them would say the job of the attorney general and the toughest job is number one, to know when you have to say no.
And number two, to have the courage to do it and to do it in the right way.
Understand your president and know how to present that.
And I would say that that's true because the attorney general is the pain in the ass lawyer for the company.
And it's often the lawyer in the company that has to say, you cannot do that.
And I can't tell you how many businessmen complain about their lawyers who stop them from doing things.
And there are two sides to that.
Not one side to it.
I mean, one side is the lawyer is preventing you from committing a crime.
True.
The other side to it is the lawyer is paying protect your backside and is not allowing you to take the necessary risks that are required if you're going to take on situations where this government agency or this corporation has never succeeded and has let people down.
You may have to do things differently.
And those things require challenges that implicate the law.
So you need a good enough group of lawyers that can help you challenge when it is appropriate to challenge, like the birthright citizenship challenge.
That's a very, very responsible challenge.
And it's also an extraordinarily close legal decision in which.
When a decision is really close, I could see being a law clerk working for a judge and drafting a decision that would very strongly justify either conclusion.
However, first, the judge and the law clerks who help, and sometimes other judges, when they think things out together, first they've got to come to the right conclusion, or what they believe to be the right conclusion.
And sometimes the right conclusion is obvious.
And sometimes you think it's obvious, and the court goes the other way, and you think the court is crazy or incompetent, which they are sometimes.
And every once in a while, they're corrupt.
Not here, and not on this case.
And this is a perfect example. of a very, very close legal case in which the court could find reasons to decide either way, depending on the priorities you give to certain ways in which to interpret a constitutional amendment, a constitutional provision, or a statute.
After the argument, and now I have the transcript, I've read some of it because I was disadvantaged by not being Able to understand too often what Mr. Sauer was saying in answer to the questions.
I kind of at first blamed it on poor Mr. Sauer, and then I realized I didn't have my earplugs in.
And it could be that.
So I did listen to some of it last night, the very beginning.
I just listened really to his opening, and it was very, very good, by the way.
And I did think, despite the fact that, and maybe I have a few suggestions, helpful ones about the presentation, the style of the presentation, I did think, up to what I've seen so far, he handled it really, really well.
And he definitely had the tougher argument because there's no question that they started off against that position.
Most everyone was originally against that position.
And even public opinion has shifted quite a bit now.
Because a great deal of research has come out that shows that the president's position is very defensible.
I still want to go through a little more of the material to be absolutely certain.
But four or five weeks ago, I would have said he can't win.
And maybe I even would have said he shouldn't.
And I hadn't seen all the backup material.
Now that I've seen the backup material, I'm sort of flipped over to think he should win.
I still have a few questions on things that I haven't been able to read completely.
If they get resolved the way I think they will, I'm going to be very much in favor of doing away with birthright citizenship and solidify the conclusion that I've preliminarily come to that that's what they intended, really, to the extent that they even thought about it at all.
So it's going to be an interesting process.
I predicted last night that the decision will be made right before the end of the term.
And then I heard the experts say that the court intends to get it done early.
Now, I don't know how they know that unless they're getting leaks.
And if they're getting leaks, we should find out about them, fire them, and get rid of them.
There should never be a leak from the Supreme Court.
There rarely has been.
Under Biden, there was, but Biden made the whole government corrupt.
Just the odor from the White House had to have reached those poor law clerks, and it made a few of them corrupt.
To leak, I think it was Alito's draft that they leaked.
That made it clear that Roe against Wade was going to be reversed.
That could have led to the death of a Supreme Court justice.
We know that there was a guy that came to Washington prepared to kill a couple of them, got convicted.
And we know that Schumer invited it.
So here's, let me just check before I.
Liver Health Formula Review00:03:42
Yeah, we'll take a short commercial and we'll be right back and we'll let you know about where.
Where Lee Zeldin served.
We'll be right back.
If you want to drop extra pounds, boost energy levels, and reduce swelling in your legs and feet, then this message is for you.
Pure Health Research is on a mission to make America healthy again.
And two of their best selling health supplements are leading the way.
First is Liver Health Formula.
Over 100 million Americans have a sluggish liver that's riddled with fatty deposits.
This can kill your metabolism, pile on the pounds, and make you feel tired.
Liver Health Formula takes care of that.
supports thriving liver health with special nutrients like artichoke extract and milk thistle.
This is one of the easiest ways to slim down and revitalize your energy levels.
Next is Lymph System Support.
If you struggle with fluid buildup or swelling in your legs, ankles, and feet, this is for you.
The natural ingredients in Lymph System Support help gently flush away extra fluid and toxins out of your body.
And right now, for a limited time, you can get 35% off Liver Health Formula and Lymph System Support, along with 50 plus other health supplements that Pure Health Research has to offer.
So head over to PureHealth.com.
Research.com and use promo code Lindell at checkout.
That's purehealthresearch.com.
Promo code Lindell to save 35% on your order today.
For the first time ever, we're bringing you MyPillow mattresses and mattress toppers for as low as $99.98.
Remember, sleep's all about temperature and pressure points.
Whatever sleep needs you have, we have the right technology for you.
Like our MyPillow mattress topper, our queen size has over 10,000.
Individual comfort supports to help relieve your pressure points.
And how about our three inch hybrid plus mattress topper?
It's infused with copper and silver to help your body get the restorative sleep it needs.
And our MyPillow and Case Coil mattresses, I personally help develop these mattresses to make sure they have everything needed to give us great sleep.
Plus, they're made right here in the USA and they ship right to your front door absolutely free.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use this promo code to get my pillow mattresses and toppers for as low as $99.98 and free shipping!
Have you ever noticed how complicated it is to get your medication?
When you're not feeling well or you're running low on something, it turns into a whole process.
You call the doctor, your appointment's days away, you sit in the waiting room, then you stand in line at the pharmacy, and sometimes they don't even have it.
That's the old system.
It is slow, it's frustrating, and it doesn't have to be that way.
That's why I've been telling you about all family pharmacy.
My family loves it, and I use that myself.
You go online.
You choose what you need, you fill out a short medical form, and one of their licensed doctors reviews your request.
If it's appropriate, they write up the prescription and it shifts straight to your front door.
This is how healthcare should work.
If you believe in being prepared like I do, this is one of the smartest moves you can make.
Go to allfamilypharmacy.com forward slash Lindell.
Use the code Lindell10 to save 10% today.
Temple Sacrifice and Levites00:03:32
Welcome to Vocal, the free speech social app. that gives you a platform to amplify your voice, speak freely, connect boldly, and be part of a growing movement for truth, faith, and freedom.
Want to know what's happening right now?
The Now Playing feature shows you exactly who's live and what's streaming in real time.
Check out the show's feed, a non-stop lineup including Lindell TV News 24-7, shows, and on-demand programming all in one place.
Connect with your favorite host and never miss a show.
Explore the featured page for quick access to Lindell TV's top shows.
Follow your favorites and watch their newest content flow right into your feed.
And when they go live on Vocal, you can join the live chat and be part of the action.
Ask questions, share your thoughts, even help shape future shows.
Stay informed on issues around securing our elections by following your state's Cause of America account.
Join a group and connect on a deeper level, from faith and freedom to the future of our nation.
Go to Vocal.com or download the app today and be a part of the mission to save our country.
Welcome back to the Rudy Giuliani Show on Lindell TV.
Right behind me is an aerial shot from probably the most religiously significant place on the planet.
I would think.
We'd have to think about that, but I would think that's right.
So let's go in chronological order.
So that's the place where the Jewish people in Jerusalem set up the temples the first temple, the second temple.
And that's the place where the Romans destroyed the Second Temple about 70 AD.
And the Temple was a very, very significant part of their services.
For example, many observant Jews still lament as part of their service that they can't do the complete Passover service as dictated to them by God through Moses because they don't have the Temple.
At this point, to do the sacrifice.
Now, would they actually sacrifice a lamb today?
Probably not.
But would they do something symbolic of that?
Yeah, probably in the temple.
Now, they do go to the synagogue and pray.
But now, this gets you're now going to get to the step where it gets beyond my knowledge of Judaism.
But the temple was not the synagogue, it is not the temple.
I think the temple is the place of sacrifice.
If you read the early books of the Bible, it's an extraordinarily detailed explanation of God to Moses and Aaron of how to do it and where to put it.
And the synagogue is the place of learning, it's the place of scholarship, it's almost like a school.
And the rabbi is not a priest, the rabbi is a teacher.
The priests are all descendants of the Levites and were.
Especially that family of Levites was selected and set aside from the other Jewish families as the families that would produce the priests.
Priests offer the sacrifice, rabbis teach.
Attacks on The Emirates00:10:33
Different.
The war, President last night did what I would say was an excellent job of laying out.
The reason for the war very succinctly, very powerfully, and made it clear we're there until we get the conclusion that we've been seeking since he first thought about this, which is to make it impossible for them to ever have a nuclear weapon.
And implicit in that is it's going to have to be a very different kind of government, because if we leave behind a government that has any relationship at all to the government that's there now with the insane.
Interpretation of the Muslim religion or the correct interpretation, depending on how you read the Quran, it's just going to be, we're going to start all over again.
So, these lives and this treasure hasn't been spilled for us to just start this all over again in a couple of years.
The president made that pretty plain last night.
He also laid out the reasons for it, which I think make it so rare that we have someone like President Trump.
You look at these world leaders, I mean, look at.
England and France and Italy.
I mean, they're affected by this a lot more than we are, both financially and potentially militarily.
And believe me, Iran or the regime of terror would easily, if it had the right missiles, do to them what it's doing to the EAU, what it's doing to Saudi Arabia, what it's doing to even their friend Qatar and Oman, they've sort of left off the hook completely.
Now, having said all that, their attacks on the Arabs are many more times their attacks on the Jews.
Their attacks on the Emirates is more than Israel.
The Americans have lost 13 people.
The Israelis have lost 17 people.
Margo, look what the Emiratis have lost.
The number of attacks in the Emirates is double the number of attacks in Israel.
The number of attacks in the Arab countries is much more than double the number of attacks that they've made against both Israel and the United States, who's carrying on the war against them.
I mean, I've never seen a war conducted this way.
We're attacking them.
About 40% of their attacks, 30 to 40% of their attacks, are against us.
And about 60%, on some days, 70% of their attacks are against other Muslim countries.
Remember, they're not Arabs, right?
So I hear people, I hear some of the morons on television and radio who are ahistorical and uneducated say, they're attacking Arab countries, other Arab countries, other Arab countries.
Never heard of Persia jerk.
They're not Arabs.
And it's very important that you understand that because it could very well be that's the cause of the great animosity, which only gets magnified by the fact that one group became Shiite Muslims and the other group became Sunni Muslims.
Or no matter how you reconcile it, the Arabs conquered the Persians and eliminated their religion.
They conducted a successful genocide.
Muhammad's two immediate successes did this Abu Bakr, and I've forgotten the name of the next one.
And they eliminated the entire Zoroastrian people who fled from Persia.
Now, some have come back, and there are among the NCRI, the group of dissidents that are opposing and having some success against the RIGC.
IRGC rather, are Zoroastrians, but I think it's like, it's pathetic, it's like 50,000.
There are 50,000 left, and I think they came back.
But deep in the soul of the Iranian people has got to be the fact that they were forced to be Muslim.
When I was talking before about St. Paul and St. Peter, and when he went to Egypt, Paul did and converted the Egyptian people to the Coptic Christians, he didn't kill any of them.
They didn't torture, they didn't persecute him.
They kind of persecuted him a couple of times.
He taught them, and they accepted it, and they believed it.
And that's the way Christianity was spread.
Even when you think about the Crusades, Crusades were a defensive war against the Muslims who were taking the Holy Land.
About Jerusalem.
Amazing, huh?
And about that, what you see, probably about that piece of territory you see right behind me, the Al Aqsa Dome.
Which is also where the temple was.
And right below it, you can't see it right now, is the Wailing Wall, which is so famous in Jerusalem.
And right behind it, that church circle, you see a window with a circle, that's the Church of the Holy Sepulchre.
That is traditionally the place where Jesus, in that area, but in that particular place where Jesus was buried.
It's also the place where Muhammad was sleeping one night, getting over one of his fits that he used to get.
And Gabriel came and took him up.
They went up to the, you know, on top of the dome there and they flew off to heaven.
And Muhammad came back and told all his friends in Mecca that he had just gone to heaven and he had met Abraham and Isaac and Jacob and Jesus and hung around with them.
Abraham was really cool.
He was the best.
He was the most important one.
Jesus was like a middle level guy, but not a bad guy because he didn't really believe all that crazy Christian stuff.
You know, virgin births.
Oh, he never actually crucified either.
That was a hoax, according to Muhammad.
Which is why, when he finally rejected him, he had a whole big story he could tell about why they should kill Christians and Jews, which they did in large numbers and for 1400 years.
And today, somewhere.
I want to guess Africa, Nigeria, 25 on Palm Sunday.
Yeah, somewhere in the world or several parts of the world, there are Muslims who are killing Jews because Muhammad told them to.
Face it.
Don't walk away from it, or it's going to get worse.
So I think the president made it clear last night that the fears that he was going to walk out and leave the Straits of Hormuz and the whole situation.
Unresolved was definitively cleared up.
He made it clear we're going to leave when we achieve our objective.
And basically said that he will hit them very, very hard.
He's still aiming for, let's be fair now, he says he's still aiming for a diplomatic solution.
But in the meantime, he vowed.
and said, I will hit Iran very, very hard.
And if they don't, in the coming weeks, pummel them back to the Stone Age where they belong.
Shall we hear it?
Still be winning and winning big.
And then, very importantly, I terminated Barack Hussein Obama's Iran nuclear deal, a disaster.
Obama gave them $1.7 billion in cash, green, green cash.
Took it out of banks from Virginia, D.C., and Maryland, all the cash they had.
Flew it by airplanes in an attempt to buy their respect and loyalty, but it didn't work.
They laughed at our president and went on with their mission to have a nuclear bomb.
His Iran deal would have led to a colossal arsenal of massive nuclear weapons for Iran.
They would have had them years ago and they would have used them.
It would have been a different world.
There would have been no Middle East and no Israel right now, in my opinion, the opinion of a lot of great experts.
Hold on.
Well, I think you kind of remember it, but it was good that he did that.
I think the country needed that.
The country needed the rationale for the war.
I mean, they really shouldn't need it.
It's only been.
Developed over 47 years.
But given the press and given the hatred for America of so many of our members of the press, they have distorted that message horribly.
And you would think that he's the bad guy and the mass murderer.
Ayatollah, my goodness, poor thing, was killed.
Very, very strange world we live in, but he's doing the best he can to turn it around.
So go over to X now.
We're going to continue with America's Mayor Live.
We've got a very interesting guest.
We've got some further analysis of the war to do.
And of course, that very interesting decision in the Supreme Court or argument in the Supreme Court last night.
I had a chance to read a good deal of the transcript.
I think I can give you some pretty good ideas on where that's going to go.