Rudy Giuliani anchors his April 1, 2026 broadcast with praise for the Artemis 2 mission and reflections on Passover, before pivoting to a contentious Supreme Court hearing where Solicitor General John Sauer argued the 14th Amendment excludes illegal immigrants. Giuliani condemns Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's reasoning, cites over 500 firms allegedly facilitating Chinese citizens to birth in the U.S., and predicts one million new voters by 2030, ultimately framing the potential 5-4 ruling as a decisive victory for President Trump's executive order amidst global conflicts. [Automatically generated summary]
If you have been watching, we were on X since about 6 30, watching the launch of Artemis 2, which has gone off very successfully, thank God.
And we will be going back periodically.
To it as we cover the many, many items and stories that exist today that we want to make sure you're ready for.
And then, of course, this is quite an exciting and quite a full evening.
At nine o'clock, thereabouts, the President of the United States is going to make an address.
Now, the address was said to be about the war with Iran.
But I'm sure he's going to also address this historic launch where, I mean, he's really the first president since John Kennedy to have this extraordinary dedication to pushing us forward in space.
And it's really unfortunate that we took all those years off, not just because of the fact that, you know, we could have learned a lot more about space in that 40 plus years, but the byproducts.
That came from the effort to go to the moon initiated by John Kennedy were maybe as important, if not more important, than actually getting to the moon, which politically and now scientifically was very important.
But all the things that were developed that have helped to improve human life, improve human learning, cure diseases, save lives it's so extraordinary that it's impossible really to count.
And there's no reason to believe.
That resuming that great quest, you know, the impossible dream, is going to do the same thing.
It's also going to lift the morale of Americans who, right at this point, and I'm sure this will change, and because the press wants to, unlike back in the 60s and 70s, the press wants to do everything it can to beat down America.
I don't know why.
You have articles that people really aren't interested in, and there's no real enthusiasm.
And well, I don't know who those people are that don't have enthusiasm for going back to the moon and the backside of the moon to get to Mars.
Very, very, probably communists who know that America will get there first.
And maybe just a bunch of ignorant people or people who have been brainwashed and spend, maybe they're part of the group that spend too much time in front of their screens and not enough time accomplishing anything.
Maybe we'll increase the number of people who get the hell off their screens and start accomplishing things.
Well, today, tonight, Is a Passover.
This is probably one of the oldest, if not the oldest, continually celebrated worldwide religious holiday ever.
And it is a testament to the strengths of the Jewish people.
It's also a testament to what can happen when you put together a group of people under an umbrella of.
Worshiping God.
I am in the process of reading through the Bible this year, all of it.
Several weeks ago, I did the whole book of Genesis and Exodus and Leviticus.
I'm on numbers right now.
So I've just been through the story of the Passover in the Holy Bible, right here.
The most successful bestseller in the history of the world Old Testament, New Testament.
And I use the Catholic version, of course, because I'm Roman Catholic, and also because they have more books of the Old Testament than the Protestant version.
And depending on the Hebrew version you use, they have even more books that are recognized, but somehow not recognized.
In any event, this is the Bible I grew up with, and it's the one I'm the most familiar with.
It just takes a lot longer to read because there are a lot of additional books.
The story that is behind this great feast is really told in Exodus.
But there are scholars who have found and believe that the first Passover is actually in Genesis chapter 18.
And that's where Abraham and Sarah were visited by angels who informed them that although Sarah was old and Abraham was very old, right, they're going to bear a son one year later.
And tradition records that the visit and then Isaac's birth was on Passover.
Now, how do they determine that it's Passover?
And I will tell you, this is not universally agreed.
Although I don't see why you want to fight over it.
Believe me, the fighting over every word of the Bible is hilarious.
And not just between the rabbis, but the ministers and the priests and the monks and the, oh, wow.
Now, it's not stated explicitly, but you will note that Abraham instructs Sarah after it is found out that they're going to be blessed with a son that turns out to be Isaac, right?
To need some cakes, ugat, for him.
And they're guests, which means they're going to have a feast to celebrate.
Now, this is the same term that's used regarding the Passover matzah that their descendants would eat every year on Passover.
Thus, For many, the conclusion is that this was really the first Passover.
Here's the matzah.
Let's take a big one that I haven't chewed on already.
A pristine one.
There.
I love matzah, by the way.
A lot of people don't.
I do.
Isaac's descendants, by the time, were then known as the people of Israel.
And they eventually, as you know, ended up in Egypt, where they were enslaved.
The idea that slavery began in America is the most absurd, woke, anti American bit of propaganda ever created just to hurt America.
And by the way, it didn't start in Egypt either, it goes way back.
And God commanded Moses and Aaron to go to the Pharaoh and demand the release of his people, the people of Israel.
And each time that Pharaoh refused, he brought down a plague on them blood, frogs, lice, 10 plagues in all.
The final one was, of course, the one that leads to the story of Passover.
And the final plague was the death of the firstborn children of Egypt.
And he had Moses and Aaron go to Pharaoh and demand.
That his people be released and told that the firstborn sons would be killed if that didn't happen.
And then God instructed Moses and Aaron to prepare the people of Israel and tell them to bring a sheep to their home.
And on the night that he was about to have the angel of death accomplish the fulfillment of the threat that he made to the Pharaoh, the Israelites were told to slaughter the lambs.
Eat them that night, not leave them for the next day.
In fact, what's left for the next day should be burned.
And to eat them with unleavened bread, which is what this is with unleavened bread and with herbs, maror.
And then they were instructed to take the blood that, of course, comes from the lamb and to smear it on their doorposts.
And that would be a sign to God and to the angel of death that this was the home of an Israelite and it should be passed over.
And when death was visited upon the firstborn in other homes, the people of Israel were spared that conclusion.
At the same time, God instructed them in very, very powerful language that Passover, and he called it a statute, a law.
However, you want to interpret it.
He enacted a law, decreed a law.
What was the law?
That Passover should be celebrated every year on the anniversary of their exodus from Egypt.
On the first full moon of the first month of spring, which in those days was called Abib.
Now, at various times, that has changed.
Due to circumstances, which we'll mention a few, but the others, you know, this is a great story to read, and it goes, it finds itself all throughout the Old Testament.
I mean, Passover was.
One of, if not the most significant event in the lives of the Hebrew people, and one of God's initial signs and most powerful sign that they were the chosen people.
Something that some Jewish scholars have tried to de emphasize because they believe that that has created some of the hatred of the Jewish people.
I can't dispute that, that's the case.
I think that's unfortunate because it's the Word of God in the Bible.
And I think the more you try to avoid it, the more you emphasize.
But in any event, he passed a law requiring them to celebrate every year.
The first full moon of the first month of spring.
The entire story, although it goes beyond just the book of Exodus, is described as the Exodus.
But it finds itself played out in Exodus and in Leviticus and Numbers and Deuteronomy until finally the death of Moses and their ability to go to the Promised Land, which was delayed by 30 years.
A year after Exodus, God instructed the people of Israel to bring the Passover offering on the afternoon of the 14th of Nisan and to eat it that evening, roast it over the fire, together with matzah and bitter herbs, as they had done the previous year before they left Egypt.
But this was done in the Sinai desert.
There were, however, certain persons who had become ritually impure.
Through contact with a dead body and could not therefore prepare the Passover on that day.
They approached Moses and Aaron and they said, and this is in Numbers 9 6 to 7 Why should we be deprived and not be able to present God's offering in its time amongst the children of Israel?
In response to their plea, God instructed Moses and Aaron to set up a second Passover on the 14th.
On the 14th day of Lyre, another month, a little later on, as a second Passover.
It's called Pesach Sheni for anyone who was unable to bring the offering at its appointed time in the previous month.
So I don't know how often there were two official Passovers, but at the time of the second Passover, God gave them a pass for a second Passover.
Second Passover Explained00:02:47
Now, another significant Passover is the first one in the Promised Land when they went into Canaan.
After being delayed by 40 years because of their unfaithfulness, right?
And Moses, as you know, although he brought them to the promised land, never entered the promised land.
He died five weeks before the Passover on the seventh day of Adar.
And according to the book of Joshua, when they got into the promised land and Passover was fast upon them, Joshua organized the circumcision.
Of all the Israelite males, something that they hadn't been able to do when they were exiled in the desert.
So that must have been quite a preparation for the Passover, where the entire male contingent of Israelites who hadn't been circumcised, born in the 40 year period of exile, hadn't been circumcised.
A lot of business for the Moyles and a lot of screaming and yelling going on.
But the children of Israel encamped in Gilgal.
And they made a Passover sacrifice on the 14th day of the month at the evening in the plains of Jericho.
And that's in Joshua 5 10.
And then throughout the Old Testament, there are references to Passover celebrations with King Hezekiah, who revived it, King Josiah.
The Passover that was celebrated in the second.
Temple.
And the celebrations continued in the Second Temple for 400 years until about 70 AD, the temple was destroyed by the Romans.
And that's where the wailing wall is that you often, if you've gone to Israel where you've gone and placed a request of God, you put it in the wall, or you see on television all the time.
That wailing wall was the wall of the Second Temple.
And very observant Jews will point out that their celebration of Passover is incomplete because they've been unable to celebrate it without the sacrifice of the Passover lamb in the Temple.
Birthright Citizenship Debate00:15:44
They go through the required prayers and recitation in the Haggadah.
I think it's called the Haggadah.
Of the story that I just told you in brief outline.
They eat matzah and herbs.
They have four celebratory cups of wine during the meal, and they read the Haggadah, which again is the biblical story of the delivery from Egypt.
So let's begin with a little unleavened bread.
And have a blessed Passover.
We'll have our second class of wine when we go to X at eight, Ted.
And then we'll have one in the middle, and then we'll have one at the end.
By the time we're finished, I'll be ready for bed.
Now, what would happen at a Passover Seder now, if you've never been to one, is the Haggadah would be read usually by the senior person, the grandfather, the father, the rabbi.
But there's a great participation in it, particularly from the children.
And then various rituals and ritual eating of different foods.
Really fascinating.
If you haven't been to one, ask a Jewish friend to invite you to one.
So, Allison Steinberg is with us.
We'll move on to our story of the fascinating argument in the Supreme Court today, of which I listened to a good deal of it.
Allison?
Tell us your analysis of it, what you think and what you heard, and sort of your prediction.
Yeah, well, it's good to see you, Mr. Mayor.
It was an exciting day over at the Supreme Court where Lindell TV was live covering the oral arguments today regarding birthright citizenship.
Of course, U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer argued on behalf of the Trump administration, telling the justices basically that the constitutional misreading of the 14th Amendment has had.
Devastating effects on this country and will continue to do so so long as this continues.
Now, the 14th Amendment says all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and the state wherein they reside.
The Supreme Court now is currently trying to decide what exactly that means.
But Sauer said today that it was meant to grant citizenship to formerly enslaved families alone, not temporary visa holders or citizens who entered the country.
Illegally, which we know happens far too often currently.
So, as President Trump put it, rightfully, I think he said, We are the only country in the world stupid enough to allow birthright citizenship, and obviously signed that executive order at the beginning of his second term to end it.
Now, we heard from all the Supreme Court justices today.
I think the most interesting arguments came from Katanji Brown Jackson, who obviously is largely opposed.
To ending the birthright citizenship.
She had an interesting argument.
Let's take a listen to what she had to say there.
I was thinking about this, and I think there are various sources that say this that you can have permanent allegiance based on being born in whatever country you're from.
That's what everybody recognizes.
But you also have local allegiance when you are on the soil of this other sovereign.
And I was thinking, you know, I'm.
I, a US citizen, am visiting Japan.
And what it means is that if I steal someone's wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me.
It's allegiance, meaning can they control you as a matter of law?
I can also rely on them, if my wallet is stolen, to, under Japanese law, go and prosecute the person who has stolen it.
So there's this relationship.
Based on, even though I'm a temporary traveler, I'm just on vacation in Japan, I'm still locally owing allegiance in that.
Stupid, as President Trump said.
I mean, this is a ridiculous argument because last time I checked, if you steal a wallet in Japan, you will go to jail with forced labor requirements, and you certainly will not get citizenship.
It's almost equivalent to saying, you know, if I break into your home and I steal all your jewelry, Am I now a member of your family and entitled to your life's inheritance?
I mean, this position of hers is completely ridiculous and nonsensical, but that's really honestly par for the course for someone like Katanji Brown Jackson.
What I do want to point out is a couple interesting highlights here to put into perspective how devastating birthright citizenship is to the nation and how, if this continues, we will probably not have a country.
Just a good example if a foreign diplomat who's in our country legally gives birth on U.S. soil, Their child is not a US citizen.
What brings you out today?
Who are you with?
Sorry, wrong clip.
But if that diplomat had instead crossed our border illegally and then given birth, as we see with many of these illegals today.
Then their child is granted full U.S. citizenship.
So, complete backwards logic on that.
Then, to add more fuel to the fire, there are more than 500 firms in China currently that facilitate people coming from the Chinese Communist Party to give birth here in America.
And that means 1 million new voters by 2030.
In fact, there's one example of a Chinese billionaire who has over 100 American citizen children through surrogacy.
Ultimately, these babies.
Are born here in America.
They're sent back to China.
They're indoctrinated by the CCP.
And then after 18, they'll move back to America where they will live and vote.
Or, I don't know, maybe they'll just stay in China now and vote by mail from Beijing if we don't get our elections under control.
So this is extremely dangerous for the future of our country.
In the next decade, over 1 million Chinese communists will be able to vote in American elections thanks to birth tourism.
So this is a very, very important issue that we've got to stop.
Pew Research is actually reporting that 9% of U.S. births.
In 2023, were unauthorized or temporary illegal immigrant mothers.
So, if we look at the patterns, this birthright citizenship plus mass illegal immigration plus guest visas, it's really the end of America as we know it.
So, I just wanted to go out today while we were there at the Supreme Court and get some of the people who are present to weigh in.
Lots of opposition to President Trump's EO, lots of far radical leftists out there protesting.
And it was really interesting because I asked them why they were there.
I just wanted to get their opinion on.
What was going on today?
And they didn't even bother to answer.
Take a look at this.
Lindell TV.
As in Mike Lindell, the pillow dude?
Yeah.
No.
Move along.
Grown ups are busy.
They're busy doing what?
Exactly.
Go away.
Interview somebody else.
I'm just curious to get your thoughts.
You're here with the giant.
Interview somebody else.
Bye bye.
Go away.
You don't like free speech?
We're here documenting what the people have to say.
And I'm not going to interview with you, so go away.
Do you think people that have come here illegally, their children, should be allowed to stay here in America despite parents having come here?
I'm not gonna answer anymore.
I think Donald Trump is a sociopath.
He's trying to do everything he can to bring chaos to the United States of America.
So, you think that anyone who's here, regardless of where their parents are from, should be allowed to stay in America, even if their parents are illegal?
I think if you're born here, you should be allowed to stay.
We're all equal.
We're all human.
Like, yeah, we might have different skin colors.
We all might look different, but at the end of it, we're all human.
Yeah.
That's the reality of it.
I've seen y'all exaggerate stuff.
I make The left looked like if we were lunatics when nothing was happening.
Your song is a little bit like it's calling to kill.
I think your microphone makes you entitled to people's time and energy.
It doesn't.
Bye bye.
Get it out of my face.
Get it out of my face.
Kill anyone who opposed to gives me.
So, some real deranged lunatics there.
Did you just pick them out, or is that a fair representation of the morons who are outside of the court?
That was a pretty fair representation.
They all look similar to what you saw there at the end.
I've seen them.
I used to live right across from the Supreme Court.
Oh, my gosh.
During the Reagan administration, I used to see the justices come in and out.
It was really fascinating.
It's also an unbelievable thing to argue in front of the Supreme Court, which I did when I was in the Reagan administration.
I was glad to see the president win.
Yes, that was very interesting.
This will define America, you know, possibly forever.
It's very hard to get a constitutional amendment passed in the fractured country we have right now.
So, should the court adopt this sort of kind of very loose definition, the scholarship is on the side of the Trump administration.
The practice of 140 years is on the side of the people against it.
But if the Constitution has been incorrectly interpreted, as it was with race, As it was with women's rights in so many areas, it should be corrected.
And there's no question that the people primarily responsible, the senators who wrote this, believed that it did not apply to people who were not under the political jurisdiction of the United States.
So the justice is using criminal jurisdiction.
Well, when they wrote jurisdiction of the United States, she's acting as if anybody who can be arrested or prosecuted.
In the United States, that would be what jurisdiction meant.
What the senator said is jurisdiction means people that have full allegiance to the United States, not people who have allegiance to a foreign power.
And one of the other justices, it could have been Sotomayor, asked a question like, well, why are you talking about allegiance so much to the Solicitor General?
Well, he's talking about allegiance because the people who wrote the law talked about it constantly.
And they kept making the point that in order to have a birthright citizen, you had to have an allegiance to the United States.
And if not, you can't be a citizen.
And the one case they kept talking about, the Wang Kimar case, is a case in which the two Chinese parents were lawfully in the United States.
They weren't illegal.
So let's see what happens.
It'll be interesting to see what happens.
They are going to continue arguments and then hopefully make a ruling by mid year here in June or July.
So we'll stay posted to see what happens.
But hopefully they do the right thing.
We'll see.
I do think, unless there's a real disagreement, I do think they'll get this done by the end of the term because they've had a lot of time.
They've had a lot of time before this.
It's not as if this was a big surprise.
They've been thinking and writing about this for a couple of years.
So.
It seemed to me that suddenly there are three against.
You can count on it, right?
Yeah, even about the all views on it.
They might as well not even be there.
It's just like wasting time.
Seriously.
Justice Thomas sounds like he's definitely has understood the argument.
Alito seemed to take the lead in doing that.
But even Amy Comey Barrett and Gorsuch seem like they understand the complexity of the legislative history.
So, Roberts asked one or two questions, was very, very careful not to give away his position.
Yeah.
And Kavanaugh only asked a few questions.
So, those are probably the two that'll get you to decide the case where they go.
It'll certainly be interesting to see what they decide.
Well, that guy there, can I ask you a question?
The first guy you interviewed?
Yes.
How long has it been since you took a shower?
I don't know.
I'm scared to get too close.
Some of these people.
All right.
Okay.
Good.
I would just make sure I took all the anti disinfectants I could find tonight if I were near him.
I know.
I'm going to go douse some ivermectin after this.
Yeah.
Right.
Great job.
Thanks.
What a great sense of humor she has.
She's terrific.
I love to tease with her.
She's absolutely terrific.
But that guy was so dirty looking.
And I don't think, you know, I was teasing her, but I don't think she's.
Ted can tell you this.
You've interviewed crowds like that, Ted.
Right.
And what she put on is a pretty fair representation of what the scumbuckets look like outside the courtroom.
Right.
I know that.
Look, just because they're protesters and they have a First Amendment right to do it doesn't mean I have to think they're clean or.
Sensible, or they don't look like a bunch of freaks.
I mean, that position is not so crazy.
I mean, it's not as if in this particular case it's like, you know, supporting Hamas, or it's a rational position that's been the position and the legal interpretation for 120 years, whatever, 130 years.
There are a lot of very responsible legal scholars who hold that position.
And this would be a case that if they reach the conclusion that because of stare decisis, the need to have.
Consistent interpretation of a law.
Or, I mean, you could make a contrary analysis of the legislative history.
I think that'd be a little more dishonest.
But this is not one of those where whoever comes out on the other side is being dishonest or crazy.
This is a great, great legal question that would be terrific for a law school class.
Supreme Court Jurisdiction00:10:07
It would certainly be terrific for the course that people take in law school about statutory and constitutional interpretation that has rules, but they're not rules like a Supreme Court decision that sets down a rule of law or a statute that's passed.
They're rules that are most often used.
For example, the plain language rule.
The plain language rule says that if a statute or a constitutional provision Is absolutely obvious from the plain language of the statute.
There is no need to go into the history of it in order to flesh out the meaning of each one of the words if it's not ambiguous.
So, the first part of it, the first part of it, born in the United States, the plain language of it is pretty simple.
It means inside the United States, in the United States.
However, if you're an American, if you and your wife, or I and my wife, let's say, have a child, and we have our child in Berlin, our child is still an American citizen.
We sort of moved away from the plain language, didn't we?
That's not born in the United States.
Now, if you're a diplomat and the child is born to you in an American embassy, Well, but what happens if you're a diplomat born in an American embassy, but you're born in an Italian hospital?
I'm sorry, you have to find a broader interpretation of born in the United States than just the language allows, right?
Born in the United States means, pretty simple, in the 50 states or territories thereof.
And if you're born in Vietnam, you're not born in the United States.
If you're born in Puerto Rico, you're born in the United States.
Except the law stretches it further than that to come to a more logical conclusion that American parents who have a child overseas.
Let's say you're pregnant and you deliver in your eighth month, and you have to rush back to the United States, or the kid's not a citizen, can't be president.
So now we have the second phrase under the jurisdiction of the United States.
Well, jurisdiction of the United States is not subjected to a plain meaning interpretation either, because jurisdiction of the United States.
Means jurisdiction for what?
Jurisdiction to be criminally prosecuted.
Jurisdiction to be served with a civil lawsuit.
Jurisdiction to have to comply with rules and laws concerning driving and other things.
Jurisdiction, as they point out, meaning what happens if you also have.
Allegiance to another country.
So if you're a Chinese citizen, right, like an American citizen abroad, right, and you have a child in America, the child is a Chinese citizen.
Well, if under the jurisdiction of the United States, it has a broader meaning than just criminal jurisdiction, and the meaning is that you are tied to the United States, allegiance to the United States.
Then that person who has an allegiance to some other country wouldn't be a citizen of the United States.
And then that creates the situation of what happens to the people who are here legally, right?
Even people who are here and become citizens.
That have dual citizenship back there.
So if you have American citizenship, America considers that, and you do, you have to renounce the other citizenship to be an American citizen.
And if you are here legally, the concept is if you went through the process of being here legally, right, as the family in the Kim Van R. case, Then that's a sufficient allegiance.
But if you're here illegally, there is no nexus to the United States.
So you're not under the jurisdiction of the United States based on the meaning of the 14th Amendment.
So this is what they'll be arguing about.
Now, most likely, in probably most of their cases, as I understand it, The Supreme Court justices have already voted once.
The practice, as described by people who are really not allowed to talk about this, right, but they do, practice as we understand it, who are not in those conferences, don't get to hear them, is that the way most chief justices run the court, just so that everybody can get on record right away, They'll take an initial vote after the argument before they all disband for the day.
And it's a very non binding vote.
It's really for the purpose of the Chief Justice doing his job, which the Chief Justice assigns the writing of the decisions.
Now, you can write a concurring or a dissenting opinion on your own, where you're joining two other justices, but you have a slightly different view, even though you're voting the same way they do.
But there's only one decision for the court and one main decision for the dissent, and that is determined by the Chief Justice.
So, in a case like this, there is absolutely no doubt, unless he's in the minority.
That Roberts would write the decision.
In enormously important cases, the Chief Justice writes for the court, unless he's in dissent.
So let's say that he takes a vote today, and the vote is 5 4 to uphold Trump's decision and to uphold his interpretation.
As the correct reading of the Constitution, 5 4.
Well, he would assign to himself writing the majority opinion, and he would talk over, he pretty much let the dissenters decide, but they decided with him.
So let's say they selected Justice Jackson to write the dissent, and it's a 5 4 decision.
There could be other opinions that are written.
In which people agree with the conclusion of the chief or Justice Jackson, but they want to add a reason or they want to detract a reason.
And I suspect this case will have four or five opinions.
And you'll have to do a little chart and you'll end up with five in one place, upholding Trump's view, four disagreeing.
Or it could go the other way.
I think the votes in question are the ones that I mentioned.
I think Justice the Chief and Kavanaugh.
And I'll have to go back.
I listened to the argument.
I have to confess, and this is not meant as a criticism, and it could be my hearing, which isn't the best.
And I use hearing aids, and I didn't have them on this morning.
So that could have affected this.
But I had a little trouble understanding.
The solicitor, John Sauer, whose arguments, by the way, were superb.
I mean, you can't fault his argument.
He gave the right answers that should be given and some that you wouldn't even anticipate.
But he has a little bit of a harsh, I think, a harsh voice, and he talks very, very fast, which for a New Yorker usually isn't a problem.
But I had a little trouble following him, so I want to get the transcript and read it.
And I think I'll get more out of it because there are things I think he said and I'm not sure because to me it seemed he was saying it too fast, but it could be this as well.
But in any event, I began all of this by thinking that I began all of this by thinking there was no chance that they'd do away with birthright citizenship.
PureHealth Research Promo00:04:22
And I now get pretty close to 50 50.
Still, probably.
A little bit tilting toward the side that they're not going to overturn so many years of president.
But as I continue to look at the What we would call legislative and amendment history.
I'm much more impressed with the fact that they, and I am absolutely positive that they never intended to cover something like this.
If they had an opportunity to tell us what they think today, they'd say you're crazy.
So let's take a break, right?
We should take a break, and we'll be right back, and then we'll check up on where the mission is, okay?
If you want to drop extra pounds, boost energy levels, and reduce swelling in your legs and feet, Then this message is for you.
Pure Health Research is on a mission to make America healthy again, and two of their best selling health supplements are leading the way.
First is Liver Health Formula.
Over 100 million Americans have a sluggish liver that's riddled with fatty deposits.
This can kill your metabolism, pile on the pounds, and make you feel tired.
Liver Health Formula takes care of that.
It supports thriving liver health with special nutrients like artichoke extract and milk.
Thistle.
This is one of the easiest ways to slim down and revitalize your energy levels.
Next is Lymph System Support.
If you struggle with fluid buildup or swelling in your legs, ankles, and feet, this is for you.
The natural ingredients in Lymph System Support help gently flush away extra fluid and toxins out of your body.
And right now, for a limited time, you can get 35% off Liver Health Formula and Lymph System Support, along with 50 plus other health supplements that.
Pure Health Research has to offer.
So head over to purehealthresearch.com and use promo code Lindell at checkout.
That's purehealthresearch.com, promo code Lindell to save 35% on your order today.
For the first time ever, we're bringing you my pillow mattresses and mattress toppers for as low as $99.98.
Remember, sleep's all about temperature and pressure points.
Whatever sleep needs you have, we have the right technology for you.
Like our MyPillow mattress topper, our queen size has over 10,000 individual comfort supports to help relieve your pressure points.
And how about our 3 inch Hybrid Plus mattress topper?
It's infused with copper and silver to help your body get the restorative sleep it needs.
And our MyPillow and Case Coil mattresses, I personally help develop these mattresses to make sure they have everything needed to give us great sleep.
Plus, they're made right here in the USA and they ship right to your front door.
Absolutely free.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use this promo code to get MyPillow mattresses and toppers for as low as $99.98 and free shipping.
Have you ever noticed how complicated it is to get your medication?
When you're not feeling well or you're running low on something, it turns into a whole process.
You call the doctor, your appointment's days away, you sit in the waiting room, then you stand in line at the pharmacy, and sometimes they don't even have it.
That's the old system.
It is slow and It's frustrating and it doesn't have to be that way.
That's why I've been telling you about All Family Pharmacy.
My family loves it and I use it myself.
You go online, you choose what you need, you fill out a short medical form, and one of their licensed doctors reviews your request.
If it's appropriate, they write up the prescription and it shifts straight to your front door.
This is how healthcare should work.
If you believe in being prepared like I do, this is one of the smartest moves you can make.
Family Pharmacy.com forward slash Lindell.
Use the code Lindell 10 to save 10% today.
Welcome to Vocal, the free speech social app that gives you a platform to.
Amplify your voice.
Speak freely.
Connect boldly.
And be part of a growing movement for truth, faith, and freedom.
Artemis 2 Rocket Launch00:09:41
Want to know what's happening right now?
The Now Playing feature shows you exactly who's live and what's streaming in real time.
Check out the show's feed, a nonstop lineup including Lindell TV News 24-7.
Shows and on-demand programming all in one place.
Connect with your favorite host and never miss a show.
Explore the featured page for quick access to Lindell TV's top shows.
Follow your favorites and watch their newest content flow right into your feed.
And when they go live on vocal, you can join the live chat and be...
Part of the action.
Ask questions, share your thoughts, even help shape future shows.
Stay informed on issues around securing our elections by following your state's cause of America account.
Join a group and connect on a deeper level from faith and freedom to the future of our nation.
Go to vocal.com or download the app today and be a part of the mission to save our country.
Now we're back.
Welcome back to the Rudy Giuliani Show.
And maybe we should get an update on the Artemis II flight, which is going off into space and head to the moon.
10 days, back in 10 days, coming down to the Pacific.
And it will, for the very first time, give them and then give us an opportunity to explore the backside of the moon.
And this is all done for several reasons, one of which is to prepare for a landing on the moon, which will be one more Artemis launch after this.
There'll be an Artemis attempt three, and then there'll be an Artemis four and five, and those are intended to land on the moon.
So let's see where they are.
When we checked before, The booster rockets, I think all of them have disengaged, which means it's being propelled into space by its main rocket.
And so it's made up of a little cone, the cabin for them called Integrity, the storage cabin in the back, and a massive set of rockets from, I think, the rockets.
Well, I'll get all the right attributions in a second.
Let's see if we can check.
Let's see if we can check with the mission.
Yep, about an hour and 15 minutes in.
As of now, everything seems to be.
And what are they just showing?
The rocket continue to ascend?
Yep.
And headed toward.
We're up in space now.
Oh, they're showing a picture from the rocket itself outside.
Right.
So that you see the outside version.
Right.
You see what's remaining with the rocket.
Right.
Yeah, that's amazing.
What would really be interesting, of course, there's the moon.
You can see the moon if that's on right now.
So it's headed for the moon.
Amazing.
And eventually, if you want a little breakdown here of it, if we can show this just so you understand what happened, I'm going to do for you what I did for my granddaughter Grace because I built this little thing for her.
To show her how this all works.
So, if you first look at that, you see it that the launch aboard system, right?
The little cone at the top there looks like a golf tee, actually.
Then you see the crew module.
That's the integrity, okay?
That's where the four astronauts are.
Then behind it is the service module.
That's where a lot of their equipment is.
And I think they can access that if they have to.
I'm not absolutely certain.
The spacecraft's adapter and the encapsulated service module panels, well, the panels hold it together.
The spacecraft adapter adapts the spacecraft to the Orion stage adapter, which adapts it to the.
To the Orion, to the rockets, right?
And the propulsion stage there and the main R 10 engine, the core stage.
So now I think at this point, at this point, this is what's happened.
It takes off like this, if you can come back to me, Ted.
It takes off like this.
On either side of here, those two smaller pens are what they call the solid rocket boosters.
Okay?
Very shortly into the trip, as it ascended, they fell away.
And that went away.
And now this is heading up there.
See, beyond.
Oh boy, there it goes.
I don't see it anymore.
And it'll be back.
After it goes around the moon, and there'll be like a 30 minute break in our ability to transmit back and forth at some point when they go toward the back of the moon.
I think that's toward the end of the trip, but about seven days.
Then they'll go around the back of the moon a couple of times.
Now, technically, they're not going to be in the moon's orbit, they're going to be a little outside of it, but they'll be able to see it.
And then they'll come heading back to Earth.
And baboon, they'll land in the Pacific Ocean.
And God willing, everybody will be in great health and they will have made another great leap for mankind.
And they will.
What great people, great human beings, great Americans, and a Canadian.
And the bravery is awe inspiring.
Absolutely awe inspiring.
The war, we'll get you up to date on that as soon as we go over to X.
And then it will be on X leading up to the president's remarks, which last night he said would be about the war, both what we've accomplished, where we are, and where we're going.
And I suspect there would necessarily be some comments about this extraordinarily historical and important event.
That just occurred.
So, you know, remember the pilots that were shot down at the very beginning of the war?
They're all flying missions now.
That's what America has serving it.
Like the three of the four people that you see going up there.
I mean, their patriotism is unparalleled.
Unparalleled.
The Secretary of War posted pictures.
Today, of his secret mission over there to boost the morale of the troops, which is one of the things that I think that this Secretary Pete Hegg said is just unparalleled in the way he's been able to.
The way he's been able to motivate the troops and his relation with General Kane is like that, and it has to be that way.
So we'll see what the president has to say.
We'll talk about it in a few minutes.
So thank you very much for joining us on Lindell TV, and we'll be back tomorrow night.
Dr. Maria is going to be on at nine.
And we urge you to see her now.
If in fact you watch The President or something, you can pick that up.
You can pick as you can us.
And actually, more people watch us after the show is over than they do during the show by a lot.
So we have nothing, we have no reason to believe you have to watch it tonight.
You can watch it tomorrow.
More than pretty much double the audience, maybe sometimes triple it, right, Ted?
Right.
And then on weekends, it's extraordinary.
They'd have two days.
Again, let's this time add to our prayers, not just to people who are in harm's way overseas and people we always pray for of Israel and Ukraine and Iran, and of course, people in the United States and the President.
Let's pray for those four astronauts.
We deliver them home safely, God, during this very, very holy season for Christians and for the Jewish people.