All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 10, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
01:24:56
America's Mayor Live (817): President Trump Hits the Campaign Trail Ahead of 2026
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening.
This is Rudy Giuliani.
This is America's Mayor Live and live from the District of Columbia, Washington, D.C.
And we're sitting here trying to figure out just how pervasive the fraud that we see in Minnesota is.
So we now have, and probably we have to adjust the numbers to the size of the state, but we have a similar kind of situation possibly in Maine.
We've got one in California.
Of course you have one in California.
I know we have one in, if anybody just take a look at the immigration money in New York, you'd realize that when people were saying, oh my goodness, the illegal aliens are getting better accommodations than the homeless get or better accommodations of the veterans, you would realize that that money is built in for payoffs, for graft.
I'll tell you a story about Governor Hochul, who could probably withstand a prosecution for this because she's so stupid.
But when she was running for office after she was put in when scandal-ridden Cuomo was thrown out, she had a pretty good race with Zeldon.
I mean, Zeldon as a Republican almost beat her.
He got to within like 4% or 5%, which were a Republican in New York.
That'd be like saying that about California.
So she was a little afraid.
And she did a $300,000 deal.
I think it was $300,000.
I've got to get the exact right amount of money.
The amount of money is as important as the concept.
She bought PPP for COVID, probably after it was necessary.
After people realized that the masks really weren't helpful.
In fact, they might be harmful.
And we didn't need the ventilators as much anymore.
She went and bought them anyway.
And she paid $300,000 more than anybody else did, including California.
And California, you can compare it to because California paid the top price because they have plenty of graft too.
And California had about the same necessities.
Within a couple of days before or after the purchase, she got a $300,000 contribution from that company.
So there's no doubt, says the prosecutor, that that $300,000 extra, which was way beyond anybody in the world ever paid for this, and way beyond states that are very well known for graft and high contracts.
That extra $300,000 was for her campaign.
And of course, it was the Biden administration, so she's a Democrat.
Nobody's an investigator.
If it were $2 over, if she would a Republican, they'd have put him in Rikers Island.
That's what New York is like.
Something like that doesn't even bother them.
It's like we always do that.
Or when Adams was running for mayor, a big scandal came out about how he had this one guy who was like the king of Brooklyn or something, and he gave homeless contracts to him.
And the guy's homeless facilities were awful.
There were worms in the food and there were rats in the facilities and the food was rotten.
It was getting people sick.
And he wanted to open another homeless facility in Brooklyn.
And the people in the area, which is in Crown Heights, a black portion of Crown Heights, Black area, were dead set against having this guy because they hurt his reputation.
Not only does he charge a fortune for his homeless facilities, but he gives you, he gives you worms to eat.
And he went there and he got the guy, he pushed the guy through.
Then it turned out a big scandal erupted.
The guy had become a multi-millionaire handling homeless.
And his brother had become pretty much of a millionaire too.
And when you looked at his structure, he got inordinate amounts of money for this contract.
I mean, more than it would cost to go on, to go to a luxury hotel.
And then here's how the graph got passed out.
He had, in addition to the millions that he got, he got the ability to subcontract.
So his brother did the security work, although he had no knowledge of security.
His wife handled the catering, although she didn't cook at home.
And somebody else in his family handled the transportation and a couple of other things that they do.
Oh, the cleaning contract.
And this is like a major hotel, big hotel, with all kinds of contracts going out.
Every one of them, the Democratic politicians are dipping into.
Oh, and by the way, homeless in New York had been declared an emergency.
So there was no bidding for this.
So Adams could say, I'll take my pal here, who, you know, who my little group here has assigned it to.
That's the group that's pled guilty, being prosecuted for doing the same thing in the mayor's office, except they hit the jackpot.
The very, very high-priced homeless contracts went up to the very, even more high-priced illegal alien contracts because Biden was giving them out to all the Democrats.
And Biden, of course, would know better than anybody else or the people around him, the Politburo and the Autopen would know that if we're talking Democrats, we got to build in about half for graft.
Now you say, Rudy, you're exaggerating.
You're exaggerating all those little details.
Why are you exaggerating?
Can I give you one big overview that if it doesn't prove it to you, I can't prove it to you.
So New York has 8.4 million people and Florida has 22 million people.
They have the same budget.
New York spends as much money on 8.4 million people with education rates where not even half of them are at grade level for reading and writing, where we've got streets that have fallen apart.
We've got a police department that's down about 5,000.
You just go on and on and on, right?
We've got a foster care system that, unfortunately, which I revised and got it to be the best in the country, is now a danger to children.
You go on.
But New York City spends the same amount of money on 8.4 million people as Florida spends on 22 million people.
So do you really think that money is spent on those people?
And they're so unhappy?
Or do you think, as these individual cases show, the Democrats take everything that isn't locked down and then build up the contract so there's money in it for graft?
Now, I know that.
And I could promise you, they made me U.S. attorney, I'd probably take it all apart.
I did it once before I could do it again.
And it's probably much worse now.
But that's what's going on in Minnesota.
And there's an article by someone I don't know, Jonathan Ingram, in the Post, who's the president of the Foundation for Government Accountability, that says the Democratic Party is addicted to fraud.
This is only two pages.
I mean, you could write a history of this going back to the 1830s, 1840s, when the Party of Slavery also became the party of graft and people like Boss Tweed and all over the country.
And what he points out is that Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, is just, it isn't just a small tip of the iceberg.
It has to be looked at more as the just an example of the systemic fraud that grips old Democrat cities and states in massive amounts, in amounts of money that shock the conscience and that destroy the economy of a city and that destroy the ability of people to come out of poverty.
You look at the money just on a smaller scale, and a billion dollars is horribly small.
That money was intended to people who don't have enough money to eat.
That money was intended for people who don't have enough money to buy clothes.
That money was intended for people who don't have a place to live.
So when they don't get the money, what happens?
Well, it looks like the amount of fraud in Obamacare is worse.
The Government Accountability Office announced the results of a recent test in 2024.
That's during the Biden era.
What they did was they set up fake consumer accounts.
They did an undercover operation.
And they applied with these fake accounts for Obamacare.
Almost every fake account was able to get it.
In other words, almost every non-existent person was able to get Obamacare and was able to put in bills and collect enormous amounts of money with fraudulent doctors working with them and taking hundreds of millions of dollars out of Obamacare.
That's the money that Republicans are saying has to be disciplined and not just kept at this highest level, because it became much, much worse when Biden increased the eligibility for health insurance to four or five times the poverty level.
So this year, we're going to pay $148 billion to cover premiums for 22 million people.
Exactly how many of those 22 million people really exist and how many of them really need it?
There's a whole group that doesn't exist.
As I said, when they did the undercover program, every person who didn't exist who applied got it.
So there was no accountability.
Nobody goes and checks.
You don't have to get an examination.
You don't have to show papers.
You don't have to show your economic.
You just say, I want Obamacare and I'm Joe Schmedlap.
And you get it.
And then you put in, I just broke my hip, and you get it.
And we're talking hundreds of millions and billions of dollars.
And that's the reason why Americans have such high health care.
It isn't the insurance companies trying to make tremendous profits.
Insurance companies have been around a long, long time and they've made tremendous profits forever.
This is way above that.
This is the crooks in the Democratic Party making more money than the insurance companies.
And Obama, I mean, Biden expanded it, the Obamacare subsidies, knowing, I'm sure, as the Democrats all knew, that this was a cash cow for them, just the way they did the same thing in Ukraine, because they knew Ukraine was a cash cow for them.
60% of those getting Biden's bigger subsidies misrepresented their income to the IRS, according to the IRS.
That's their agency, by the way, not ours.
Insurance brokers signed up non-existent people to get commissions.
They get a thousand dollar commission for each family they enrolled.
They wouldn't enroll non-existent families.
One insurance broker who's been convicted made $233 million that way.
Another Democrat, not even the top one.
That's why you got to end the extra subsidies, boom.
That's what the fight over the government shutdown was.
And you have to go through a documentation, just like you have to show identification and have to have identification to vote.
And you should be required to show up and present yourself in order to vote to make sure you're a real live person.
If we're going to give you $1,000, $100,000, $233 million, you got to show up.
We've got to be able to see you.
We've got to be able to take your picture.
Don't you agree?
Of course you agree.
So that, I think, is what Minnesota is going to do for us, because they're going to find a lot of other Minnesotas and they're going to find it horrible, horrible fraud.
I've already sketched out for you the fraud of New York in the illegal alien programs.
The illegal alien programs are all inflated in terms of numbers because of the kickback situation.
But you've got to watch for something that people don't watch for and the press doesn't tell you about because they're corrupt.
If you see a no-bid contract and a lot of money and a Democrat in charge of it, and you're a prosecutor, investigate it, you're probably going to have a good case.
You may, look, every once in a while you investigate a case and it's not so.
But I'm willing to tell you that's a hell of an investment of resources.
It's also a great way of getting that money back for the country.
So we will take a short break and we'll be right back.
Here we are pretty much at the beginning of the process here at this pristine, I call it a laboratory.
It's not like a factory.
It's like a hospital.
This is the beginning of the process for roasting.
Deep grain, very good quality.
Most people don't use this quality.
We deal with small farmers because they like to know who we're dealing with.
They give us the highest quality, all organic, non-GMO.
You should know all Arabica beans.
No Robusto.
All Arabica.
They're going to go into the roaster and it'll get roasted for about 20 minutes or so.
Oh my goodness.
Look at these.
My goodness, you're going to want to specially order these.
This is what goes into Rudy's coffee.
Are you ready for some action?
I'm ready for action.
Get the Elite TV plan only through the portal.
218 channels, and it's only $69.95 a month, including your free portal.
That's cheaper than everyone else.
Your favorite sports, movies, news, even daytime dramas.
We're talking about ESPN, OAN, Newsmax, channels you can't get anymore in certain areas.
Compared to the competition, this is a way better deal.
Endless selection.
Not to mention all the free music channels.
There's over 700 premium and classic movies all ready to go.
Wow.
Plus, they got catch-up TV that allows you to go back and watch what you've missed or want to watch again.
Cut your cable in half and get twice as much for free.
Way more channels for half the cost.
After the first year, the subscription then drops to $57.95 monthly, where you change or upgrade anytime.
Go to quxnow.com and get yours today.
Use promo code Rudy.
Act fast.
These deals are selling out.
Welcome back to America's Mayor Live.
I think you recognize Christina Bob.
She's been on a good deal and she's on Newsmax all the time and elsewhere.
But you haven't met the little puppy here.
This is a puppy, believe it or not.
This is a big puppy, but a puppy.
Oh, big boy.
That's Doug.
Doug the puppy.
Yep.
You know, he's got a little brown in there.
Yeah.
He's a Bernadoodle.
So he's got some rust coloring in him.
Oh, so he's a Saint Bernard and a poodle.
Kind of.
A Bernice Mountain Dog and Poodle.
Yeah.
A Bernice Mountain Dog.
Yeah.
Yep.
But now this guy is going to be, she says, about 80 pounds when he grows up.
He's going to be up here somewhere.
Right?
Yeah, he's two and a half months right now.
Will he?
Yeah.
How big is he going to get?
85 pounds?
Yeah.
No, you know, so I always thought if it was a well, poodles are pretty big, right?
Poodles are big.
They're not as big as Bernice Mountain Dogs or like the St. Bernard group, but those dogs will get to be about 120 pounds.
The St. Bernards and the Bernard.
Yeah, they could even get bigger.
And the poodles?
Poodles are about 80.
Male poodles.
For some reason, I always throw the poodles until I really got to know dogs as little as little dogs.
But poodles are big dogs.
Relatively big dogs.
Well, he got dressed up for you, sir.
He's got his Christmas.
You like to do a little bit of his Christmas bandana on.
I know you like to chew because you're teething.
Yes.
Teething.
Are you teething?
He is teething.
Are you creating havoc at home?
A little bit.
Not yet, though.
He's doing pretty well.
He hasn't destroyed anything yet.
Not yet.
He will.
Well, we'll see.
We'll see how that goes.
I love him.
He's fabulous.
But if you're looking for puppies for Christmas, Bernadoodles are a great breed.
Tell us how you got them.
I just, I got him from a breeder.
I should research the type of breed.
You know, I wanted, I'm allergic to dogs, so I wanted one that was hypoallergenic.
I wanted a bigger dog.
So he's interested in Ted, I think in Ted's phone over there.
He wants to know what that is.
Yeah, he's eager.
Well, you're very, I bet you're a very smart dog.
Those are two smart breeds.
Yeah, they are.
Yeah.
So they're good family dogs.
And yeah, he's just an all-around cool dog.
Teddle take him.
So if you want a puppy for Christmas, burn a doodle.
A burner doodle.
Wow.
So, yeah.
Let's talk a little about election fraud because you know so much about it.
There's a lot to talk about.
So are we safer?
In some sense, yes.
I think in a lot of sense, no.
I think in the positive part is it's a conversation.
We're talking about it, right?
We weren't really talking about this prior to 2020.
So I think the fact that we're having the conversation, we're having the discussion in and of itself brings transparency and exposure, and that makes us safer.
The problem that we have is Republicans refuse to acknowledge it's a problem and Democrats continue to do it.
Now, I'm not saying, I'm not throwing it out there saying Republicans aren't also doing it.
I believe this is a bipartisan issue that Republicans are also partaking in.
I don't think they're as good at it, and I think Democrats are a lot more aggressive with it.
Why is it that the examples seem to come up disproportionately?
Yeah.
Because Republicans have time and time again signaled that they are not going to check Democrats.
They're not going to push back when Democrats do it.
So Democrats continue to be more extreme and more extreme, knowing Republicans aren't going to do anything about it.
And so it's easier to see it that way.
Right.
But you think there is the same, there's some situation like that within the Republican Party, too.
Yeah.
And I think that's why, I mean, if there wasn't and Republicans really wanted secure elections, we would have them.
We have the House.
We have the Senate.
We have the White House.
We have the Supreme Court.
We have a majority of governors.
We have a majority of AGs.
We have a majority of state houses and we have a majority of state senate.
The problem is not Democrats.
I mean, Democrats are doing it, but Republicans are allowing them to do it.
So if Republicans wanted clean, secure, safe elections, meaning you need ID to vote, no mail and ballots, same day, you know, election day voting, all of the kind of checks that President Trump has been talking about, that President Trump has been talking about for this executive order.
If you want all of that in place, we have the ability to do that.
And Republicans are just refusing to secure that.
That is really amazing.
Now, even in Democrat states, where, or let's say, contestable states, we don't use that as a Republicans don't use that as a program.
Right.
No, they're not.
You know, like in a state like New York, it would seem to me, even though we're a minority, we should try to introduce a bill.
Right.
Or like Tennessee could do it.
They haven't.
I mean, to my knowledge, I welcome comments if we're wrong.
But to my knowledge, I don't think there's a single state that has taken the kind of talking points that President Trump has put in or is in the process of putting in this executive order to actually codify it at the state level.
Even a smaller state.
Right.
Well, any state should easily do paper ballots.
Yeah, easily.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Or even like Arkansas.
Arkansas is prosecuting Colonel Reynolds right now for drawing attention to the fact that mail and ballots were a problem in Arkansas, a very red state.
He's getting prosecuted.
For.
I don't know the exact charge.
I think it's a misdemeanor or a very, very low-level felony.
So it's not, you know.
Because he criticized the system.
Basically.
I mean, that's my assessment of it.
That's probably not what the prosecutors would say.
But yeah.
Maybe, maybe it's because they're so they're so used to the system, they're afraid that, oh my gosh, it's going to have to actually work.
Right.
And I think that for on the Republican side, they go, well, this is the system that got me elected.
I like my seat.
If I change something, I may have to actually win the votes of people.
I don't want to have to change the way I campaign because I have a program that worked for me and I want to continue with that program.
Yeah.
And then that program, which might involve a small amount of cheating or maybe no cheating, when they really have to exploit it, it's very easy to exploit.
Right.
It's much easier to exploit that if you had a paper ballot and you had same-day voting and people had to show up and they had to show identification.
Right.
And it also appeases.
You still have somebody to cheat, but you keep the number down very long.
That's right.
And it also, you know, not putting this type of system in place helps Republicans in the sense helps Republican officials.
I don't mean actual Republicans in the sense that it kind of appeases Democrats because it gives the Democrats what they want.
And so it earns them favor with the other side as well.
I saw a lot of that when I was on the ground reporting post-2020, as a reporter reporting on the 2020 election, and there were so many Republicans.
That was my first book that I wrote about.
And there were so many times where I was like, why are Republicans doing this?
This doesn't make any sense.
And, you know, the only kind of logical conclusion I could come to was that they just, they don't want to change the system because it worked for them.
And then it gives them favor.
They don't want to, they don't want to challenge Democrats because if they challenge Democrats, eventually the Democrats are very good about this.
If you push on the Democrats too hard, they will come for your seat.
You know, we see it for Marjorie Taylor Green and some of these others that they're really kind of pushing on them and they don't want that level of opposition.
It's a shame, really a shame.
But now we, now there's a real breakthrough and a real chance for America to really get fixed.
And that is the tremendously groundbreaking campaign that's going to be waged by Congresswoman Crockett.
She should really revolutionize Texas.
Well, it makes sense that she's.
Texas is doing so poorly.
I mean, it's probably the most profitable state in the country.
Yeah, well, and they have, they have one of the lowest tax rates.
They have one of the best.
Which is funny.
You know, everyone's like, oh, taxes make everything better for everybody, right?
That's kind of the talking point.
And it's like Texas has one of the lowest tax.
It's always among the top two or three states that people want to live.
Yeah.
And it has, of course, absorbed about half of California.
Right, right, right.
And, but she's going to fix it.
Yeah.
I mean, it makes sense to me that she would launch a Senate campaign because she's losing her House seat, right?
She's, she's not going to be in the House because the redistricting.
She doesn't know where else to go.
So she might as well try for the Senate, which gives her a bigger stage, a bigger platform.
She'll likely lose.
And then she can go join the Kamala Harris speaking tour.
I guess.
I mean, she doesn't have the benefit of an AOC has, which is a, you know, a completely brainwashed electorate that'll vote for a conference.
Yeah.
No, I think that's true.
And I would, I haven't seen the data on this, but I suspect that the data of the people moving into Texas, it's more Republican than Democrat.
Of course, you're going to have both, but I think there's more conservative people that are being about 60-40.
Yeah.
According to Carl Rove.
I believe that.
And then, you know, you also have to figure that if they move into Texas at 60-40, it probably then goes to 70-30.
They convert, yeah.
And they're like, oh, this is actually good.
Your neighbors I mean, that's all your neighbors are are are Republican.
Yeah, you know, I was always used to in New York.
The New York suburbs were very Republican because they had moved out of New York.
And sure they were.
They were the old um Jewish Italian, Irish Democrats who became Republicans right, and they knew why they moved out.
They moved out because there was too much crime.
The schools were terrible uh, the politicians were all crooked, the courts were crooked.
What do we want to be here for?
Well, we saw Tim Burchett mentioned that.
Um, I think it was last week when they had the special election in Tennessee.
You know, he did a little video that he posted on social media saying, don't blame the people moving into Tennessee.
He said it's not the people moving in, he said my constituents that are from California or New York, or you know some of these liberal states that are moving into Tennessee.
He said they're coming to me saying we want to help Tennessee not become California, not become New York, and they're actually becoming active and they're reaching out to their members of congress saying we want to help the state not get corrupted the way our last state did, and so um, don't blame the people moving in it.
It, it really is the locals, and I hate saying it, but it's like the liberal white women that uh, have just embraced this woke mind virus right um, and they're eating it up and they're, they're the ones that are converting states.
I mean, if you look at the demographic breakdown the, the demographic of, you know, liberal white women who went to college, you know, have an advanced degree right, it's like 75 of them vote Democrat.
It's, it's the what's the issue that turns them used to be abortion.
I can't imagine it's still abortion.
That's probably part of it.
I don't, I don't, I don't get it.
I think it's, I think it's bizarre um, especially especially after the last five years, but there's probably some abortion um I, it appears to me that they genuinely just believe they're morally superior.
They've been brainwashed into believing that you're, if you are morally superior, meaning you're a good person, you care about equity inclusion diversity, everybody coming in yeah, even if then you vote Democrat.
Yeah, even if they disproportionately rape people yeah yeah, I mean that.
I mean it's crazy.
Yep, it's absolutely crazy.
Well the, the situation in Minnesota has got to be waking people up.
The amount of fraud there is off the charts.
Off the charts if you, if you were to tell me that they they had a billion dollar fraud program and little Mogadishu I just said well, you sure doesn't show that, show it from somebody's taking that money out of little.
Yeah, little Mogadishu's fallen apart, but we saw that I mean there's billion dollar fraud, multi-billion dollar fraud schemes coming out all over America, all over America.
I mean it's, it's astonishing the amount of money the American government is hemorrhaging into places where we just never see the money again.
And it I mean whether it's um, Whether it's Minnesota or, you know, Stacey Abrams nonprofit that had never done a thing down in Georgia and suddenly it was granted $2 billion.
Who knows where that money went?
I mean, there's billions of dollars being funneled into these nonprofits that are then either doing the liberal agenda to some extent and the money is going to their friends or the money is just going to their friends and they're not even trying.
Like, I don't know.
It's not clear.
In New York, this has gone on for years.
And you try to get the government contract as up as high as possible.
So it's got a lot of room in it for passing around the money.
Yeah, of course.
You got to have the expectations a little bit.
So the big boondoggle for the Democrats in New York is the illegal alien money.
Right.
A lot of people think illegal aliens are wanted for vote and for census.
And that's true.
There's some of that.
But they're also wanted just from the mere fact that they produce lots of money that's unaccountable because they put them into emergency programs.
So homelessness was so bad in New York that it was made an emergency.
So you could give out, so the mayor could just give out, or borough president could just give out homeless contracts.
So you gave it out to your friends.
That's infuriating.
Like every American should be so angry at the amount of money that these groups and these individuals are just raking in for doing nothing.
And they all have these very, very heartbreaking, tear-jerking, you know, feed the poor, not-for-profits.
Bleeding spirit.
And it's really like the Gambino crime family.
Yeah.
And then they get really angry sometimes about the distribution of them and they get violent.
Yeah.
I mean, I think that one of the biggest phonies, two words you got to be really careful of.
And if I were a prosecutor again, I would target them.
Not-for-profits.
I think they're more crooked than corporations.
And then over in Europe and Asia, we call them non-governmental organizations.
Right, right.
And that's the way Soros made all this money.
Yeah.
Non-government organizations.
Yeah.
The non-government organizations would take, they want to cure corruption in Ukraine.
So they take all the corruption prosecutions out of the attorney general's office and they set up a special prosecutor and special investigator.
That sounds really great.
We're focusing on it a lot.
The first thing they did was dismiss all the cases against us.
That makes sense.
I mean.
And then everybody else.
And that's the way they fix.
Well, and that's like you know, that's how Biden fixed the case.
That's what he got the bribe for.
Right.
And that's that's similar to a lot of the U.S. aid money, which I'm not, you know, they shut USAID down or, you know, we're in the process of doing that.
But I think a lot of the programs, I think there's still a lot of money lingering out there.
Yeah.
Five billion that goes back to 2016, 2017.
Ukraine got 5 billion in money that unaccounted for.
So the president of Ukraine, Poroshenko, who was a massive crook and Biden's big buddy, that's the guy who Biden brought.
But he actually got worried that when America found out that the whole is unaccountable money, they better do something about it.
So he got together a group of people he could trust and he put together like an accounting team to try to recover some of this.
Right.
He showed some good faith.
And all of a sudden, the ambassador shows up one day and says to him, President Obama doesn't think you really have to do this.
We're so close.
There's no reason to do this.
We cut down the audit.
We stopped it.
Why do you think we stopped it?
Yeah, because most of the money was going to us.
Yeah.
Well, not to us.
Well, not to us, but to America.
Yeah.
There's one program.
They were able to uncover a couple of these before they got shut down.
One of them was to help the prosecutor's office do better prosecutions of corrupt Ukrainians.
And the money never got out of Italy.
It was given to a non-government organization in Italy was going to supervise.
But for some reason, they never made a trip.
They never made a trip to Ukraine.
That's the key word, right?
Oh, I'm going to supervise the use of funds.
And all the money, all the foreign aid goes through a non-government organization.
None of it goes directly.
So there's a middleman immediately that sucks out all the money.
Or free condoms.
The condoms never showed up.
They confirmed they never showed up.
Well, at least in one case, the condoms never showed up.
But I mean, at what point, at what point, or is there a part of this?
You know, the type of programs that they say that they are running, like, what is it?
Like LGBTQ plus dance lessons in random locations.
You know what I'm talking about?
Like the O2.
All of like the dance lessons and all like.
You mean some of these, are some legit?
No, I think most of them are not legit.
And even if they are legit, like it's still worth cutting.
Yes.
But my point is, at what point are the people who are creating, let's assume for a second, some of these are maybe created for fraud, right?
And I'm not pointing fingers at the LGBTQ2 interpretive dance, but let's, for the sake of the hypothetical, let's say that's designed for fraud.
At what point are the people who are designing this for fraud coming up with the most bizarre names and the most bizarre purposes just to see what they can get away with?
They are.
Because it's the most random things that they're putting into the actual budget that people, you have members of Congress actually arguing in their sessions on behalf of like condoms and wherever tampons in the men's bathroom.
And like it's like a humiliation ritual.
It is.
And I think the point, the point is they now feel no, maybe now it's beginning a little bit with Trump being there and some of the scrutiny, a little bit.
But I think they feel like they can just push the envelope and push the other.
Right.
And I think they enjoy doing it.
It's like kind of sick and twisted.
Like a child, right?
The child goes, pushes as far as you let them.
Yeah.
So what can we get away with?
Yeah.
I'll get away with more.
And then I think what happens often when we were healthier, they'd exceed the pig factor and they get caught.
Right.
I always thought.
Well, they get caught now and no one cares because Republicans don't have the backbone to do anything about it.
But even when I was doing this in the 80s and 90s, fraud investigations, I used to always talk about the pig factor.
I'd say most politicians can get away with a lot of stealing if they don't go beyond the pig factor.
And what is the standard?
It's hard to say.
Something that could shock the billion dollars.
Right.
Like if you, if they had only taken a quarter, if they have taken a quarter of a billion, nobody would have noticed.
Nobody would have noticed.
But if you have a whether it's the president or maybe just a senator's son, which is whether you're a Republican or Democrat.
Then if you're the president's son, it depends on whether you're a Republican or a Democrat.
And if you're a Democrat, you can smoke dope.
You can definitely do whatever you want.
Including in the White House.
Yeah.
Oh, I guess we didn't know where those drugs came from in the White House.
Yeah, no, no, I don't.
It's really hard to figure out.
I mean, this would be really hard for Charlie Chan.
You know, Charlie Chan is okay.
Ted, do you know who Charlie Chan is?
Charlie Chan, I know this from you.
Because I'll probably get in trouble for some kind of racial.
Oh, boy.
Charlie Chan was a very, very famous movie sequence when they used to, they used to have a lot in the 30s, up to about the war.
They used to have a lot of these movies that were detective movies.
They had like a couple of men and a woman who played detectives.
And they had Humphrey Bogart played a detective.
And they had a series called Charlie Chan.
And Charlie Chan was a Chinese American.
And he had a son and a first son.
And he was a very, very intuitive, great detective.
Okay.
So they must have done 20 of these movies, Charlie Chan movies.
And Charlie Chan would always solve the crime.
Okay.
So Charlie Chan.
Like a Columbo?
Yeah, exactly like a Columbo.
Okay.
Except not as humorous.
Okay.
More serious.
More serious.
Yeah, but not completely.
But it was always, I mean, it was always, there you go, Chinese, Charlie Chan in the Chinese cat.
They were very good.
It actually looks...
Movies look great.
These were like real.
These were movies.
It wasn't like a TV show.
for the Watch TV.
It's now on the Internet.
Ted, Ted's a magician.
I forget.
No, no, put it off.
I'll watch him tonight, though.
Oh.
Oh, look at that.
Well, unlike Colombo, they don't tell you.
I always thought Columbo was ingenious because Colombo, you pretty much, you knew who did it at the beginning.
And then you watched him unravel it.
And I thought it was very, very good.
I used to tell my assistant, U.S. attorneys, to watch it for investigating, learning and investigating, because it really did show you the elements of how you do an investigation.
Right.
Well, the FBI could learn a thing or two.
They just supposedly found the pipe bomber this week or last week.
That was real quick.
That was quick work.
It was five years.
And the guy was on tape.
Yeah.
And then they went out and found little old lady, little old ladies who were five blocks away from the Capitol.
And one time during January 6th, they yelled out Trump and they arrested him.
No, I know.
That's what's so frustrating about this is they so clearly targeted like.
Well, you were here with me when that happened.
Yes.
Yeah.
Yeah.
We were working together then, remember?
Yeah.
It was a different hotel, but yeah.
At the Pillar.
At the Pillar.
We were there.
At one time, at one time, they actually did think that that's where J6 was planned.
No, I know.
They still, there are people who still believe that.
We didn't even know shit.
Nobody knew what was going on.
No one knew.
And then there's all this stuff all over Twitter and the war room.
Yeah, it was the war room.
It was the master.
Several.
That's what apparently, according to liberal media.
January 6th, right after the election, that's where I met both of them.
Yeah.
Was that campaign headquarters?
Juliana was seen going into Professor Eastman's room at four in the morning.
It's a rumor that was.
You want some rumors?
Twice, Professor.
They call us conspiracy theorists.
Vice Professor Eastman fell asleep in my room.
I put a blanket on him.
No, we had put out a whole co-defendants in the criminal case.
I don't know.
I probably shouldn't tell this.
They'll probably revive the case.
But we put out all these things, but it was more about getting the letters from the state legislators.
And we're putting out who we have that supports us.
And he's saying, well, I talked to him and I talked to him and I talked to him.
And he was sitting on the bed.
And I had to go take a telephone call.
And I come back.
He just slumped over.
Well, it was a lot.
So it was a lot going on.
I took all the papers and I took a blanket and I put it over and I went to sleep in the other bed.
Nice.
Nice.
No, that was a wild time.
Like, I can't.
We're still facing.
We may still have to go to jail to get in Arizona.
There's not a better soul.
Well, I was really.
The case I wanted, you know, I was thinking might not be bad.
We'd be in Georgia.
We could go to jail with the president.
That'd be, he's a lot of fun.
He is a lot of fun.
He could have like every Saturday night, he could be the DJing on the iPad.
He could be a DJ for all the criminals.
It'd be like Mar-a-Lago, but it would suck.
Well, he would make it into something nice.
That's true.
He would charm.
He would charm all the prison guards.
He would.
Prison guards would call him, you know, Mr. President.
Yeah, yeah.
And then we'd have a great mafia.
The mafia love going to prison.
They used to have, when they were in Atlanta, in the Atlanta penitentiary, they used to have food brought in.
Did they really?
Oh, yeah.
And they established like little Italian restaurants around the penitentiary and brought people down from New York who did the cooking.
And they brought food from Italy because they had to have a very good Sunday meal.
Oh my gosh.
Okay.
Well, if our case doesn't get dismissed, you're going to have to teach me how to make that happen.
I want that's the kind of service I want in prison.
So tell us what you're doing now.
Yeah.
Well, I've got my book out.
I know.
Defiant inside the Mar-a-Lago raid and the less ongoing law fair.
Show a picture.
As they say in Brooklyn, show a picture of it.
Yep.
There's my website with the book.
I was President Trump's custodian of records and attorney on site during the raid, got sucked into all of the investigations regarding Jack Smith and January 6th and everything.
We should do a movie about that.
It absolutely needs to be a movie.
It really does.
It's a wild crazy story.
That's that one.
That's that.
I mean, you could do a movie.
If you did a movie about all of them, it would take too long.
Yeah, it could be a series or whatever.
But yeah, I mean, the information that I've got, I've got text messages, emails, everything you want to know that happened.
It's all in there.
So I'm selling the book.
I'm at Judicial Watch now.
Absolutely love Judicial Watch.
Thank you, everybody that's watching that happens to be a lot of people.
What a great organization.
I agree.
They're fantastic.
It's been great.
So I'm enjoying that.
And I'm just fighting my last case.
Is this your how many cases do you still have open?
Criminal?
Anything that relates to I have one criminal that's open.
That one with you.
I don't think there are any others that they've told me about.
Civil cases, maybe three or four.
Okay, so it's whittling down.
That's crazy.
That is so wild.
So so wild.
But yeah, I had nine at one point.
I wasn't a party to all of them.
I was a party to two of them, and then I was subpoenaed in the other seven.
For little old me, that was a lot, though.
That was a lot.
It was a lot for me.
That was a lot.
Yeah.
Were they all in Arizona?
No, it was mostly the January 6th stuff.
And then it was both criminal and civil.
So it was both Jack Smith.
What?
You're not doing January 6th.
You were working on the election.
No, I know, but I was reporting on it.
I was at the Capitol.
I have nothing.
I'm going to tell you.
I don't.
Yeah.
Well, tell Chris Mays that because she doesn't believe you.
Doesn't matter that she doesn't have any evidence to prove the fact that she's convinced that she's a part of it.
What did you do?
Well, all of in my initial disclosure, you know, because the prosecutors are required to disclose everything to you, they only turned over my reporting.
They were like, she has intent.
And so they turned over the fact that I was reporting on the election, which I was.
Oh, well, that's you go to jail now in England for intent.
Yeah.
If you think about that.
So what criminal activity they think I actually did on January 6th?
On January 6th.
Has not been established.
I mean, I don't know.
They dismissed the case very early on.
One of the judges in the District of Columbia, who turned out to be a pretty mean judge.
So I'm surprised you dismissed the case on me.
He dismissed me from the case that was brought by the J6.
Oh, yeah.
The Erasmus stuff.
He dismissed me and he just, this Donald Jr., because they had taken a statement I made and taken it out of context.
And the statement that I made was we should have trial by combat.
But before that, I had a whole big explanation that we could take our machine that we tested and they could bring their machine and we'd have them test against each other and then we could have a trial by combat.
So it was quite clear I was talking about machines.
And they took it all out like they did with the president with those two things and made it sound I was talking about trial by that kind of combat.
Meanwhile, that was three hours before anything happened.
Right.
Nobody reacted to my statement.
Right.
Well, certainly nobody was like, oh, trial by combat.
Let's luckily you couldn't hear the crowd applaud because they all had gloves on.
Well, that's the thing that I don't think people realize.
It was so cold.
Nobody wanted to like, no one wanted to take their gloves off.
No, no.
It had to be a very, very small percentage of the people there.
Well, I was there.
I was at the Capitol.
I was reporting from the Capitol when it all started.
I don't know if you remember, I walked from the Capitol to your hotel.
But when it started, I was a reporter.
I was there as a reporter and I did not bother reporting on it because it was so small, the amount of like disruption and the number of Capitol police that were on site.
I was like, oh, this is like they're going to quash that quickly.
I didn't even bother reporting on it.
I had my cell phone.
I didn't tweet it out.
I didn't, to me, it was like such a nothing burger.
And then I walked to your hotel, which is a mile and a half away.
So it took me 20, maybe a mile, 20 to 30 minutes to get there.
And I walk in the room and everyone's sitting there and it's like smoke, you know, smoke grenades.
And I was like, what?
What happened?
This is not, what is that?
So it struck me from the moment I saw the very first reporting on it.
It seemed extremely manufactured.
So that night I got the, I got the, I got the film.
Yeah.
And the film, the, I mean, the film shows a lot and show, it show, it kind of shows that they weren't really excessively violent.
No, didn't burn it.
I'm used to a riot.
The Capitol Police were more violent than the protests.
Yeah, 200 riots that led up to that.
Every one of them had a burning.
I mean, it was almost necessary for Black Lives Matter.
But it was mostly useful.
Chief of riot to burn.
No burning.
No, I didn't see any real violence.
But then I saw the tape and I'm watching it and I see the cops holding the door open.
Yeah.
And then moving the barricade.
And all of a sudden, the two cops in front of Pelosi's office, big, big guys.
They're guarding Pelosi's office.
You can't come in.
The crowd shows up like they knew where they were going.
And they go up to them, including Sullivan, who was doing the, they talked the cops into giving up Pelosi's office.
The two cops walk away.
Oh my goodness.
And then two guys, one of whom was identified as an Antifa member, starts banging the door open.
And all of a sudden, out of nowhere, a gun appears.
And instead of shooting the two guys who were breaking the door down, who were very close to him, he shot this woman that was all the way over there, who was no danger to him because she didn't have a weapon of any kind.
She was going to come over a transition and fall on her ass.
Yeah.
And then when I first saw it, it wasn't so bad.
Then I go through the whole film and I see about six cops on his side and about eight cops on her side who could have stopped him.
Yeah.
And I'm saying, now, why would this guy shoot somebody?
He had six cops to come and help him with this little girl.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And so I got several of the detectives with me because they started my security company then before they went and raided it.
Unreal.
I'm one of them that I'm not homicide detective.
So I'm gonna tell you, I want to just watch that.
She sounds like murder one to me.
Yeah.
He's like, you remember the standard for a cop.
I said, sure, reasonable fear of death.
Yeah.
That guy's not a reasonable fear of death.
He's not afraid of anything.
He's not reasonable for death.
Anybody's got like an army around him.
Yeah.
I mean, man, that guy'd be in a lot of trouble in New York.
Well, maybe he had in New York 20 years ago.
Yeah.
Or if she had been black, I mean, and he had been white, it would have been a disaster.
Yeah.
But he got away with it.
He got promoted.
He got cash.
He got all kinds of cash.
Yeah, they paid him.
They paid him.
And I read his grand jury testimony.
And in the grand jury, the prosecutor was afraid to ask him, were you afraid of getting killed?
Because they knew he would have said that.
That's the only defense.
It would have been absurd to say he was afraid of getting killed.
There were more cops there than there were rioters.
Yeah.
And they had no weapons.
The whole thing, it's infuriating.
And then you realize how many people, how many good Americans' lives were absolutely devastated and disappointed.
Yeah, I mean, I'm sure.
I'm only going to say this because I can't be sure of the opposite.
I'm sure there were some that probably got rough with the cops.
Probably.
Maybe some unjustifiably, maybe.
But even the pardons for them were fair because the punishment they were given was disproportionate.
Right.
And the trials, they weren't given real trials.
The trials didn't, the prosecutors didn't turn over the birdie evidence.
They didn't, they didn't play by the rules.
Steve Baker pointed out, he compared the tapes to the Capitol Police testimony at a lot of these trials.
They did not match.
So you've got incidents where it looks like a lot of the prosecution's witnesses were lying under oath.
They could have provided the videotape to dispute all of that to all of these defendants, and they didn't.
The video didn't come out until way, way later.
Most of them had already been convicted at that point.
So it was, I mean, it was, they were manufactured trials.
Do you ever think we'll get to the point where we reveal the truth about that and it becomes similar or worse than the Japanese internment during the Second World War?
Because I always thought of it that way.
I said to myself, this is one of the darkest days in American criminal justice.
And I don't know why, but it always made me feel a little guilty about what they're doing to me when I would find out what they were doing to them because they'd have him in solitary confinement.
They had him in places where rats were around.
And then after a while, when it went into high drive, when Biden got upset that they weren't prosecuting enough, remember?
And his crooked attorney general decided to take millions and millions of dollars and go around the country and arrest people in Minnesota and arrest people in Wisconsin.
Well, and that's what I was saying.
So that's the difference.
So they went really nuts.
When they went really nuts.
So when people get upset saying, oh, Donald Trump shouldn't be going after his political opponents, and that's the perfect, I think it's a fair debate whether it should be happening or not.
So you can ask the question.
However, the difference between what Donald Trump is doing and what Biden's DOJ is doing is Donald Trump is going after the people who were at the top, who were the decision makers.
The Biden DOJ, yes, they went after Donald Trump, but for the vast majority, they went after normal, everyday Americans who did not have the ability to push back.
Thousands of them.
It would be as if Biden were going after the FBI agents and cops who raided Roger Stone or raided me or raided.
Or not even that.
I mean, just people who post, sorry, just people who posted on Facebook or posted on social media.
I'm glad they got Rudy Jelani.
That's who they were going after.
Just regular people.
So, the difference between the way that the Trump DOJ is handling the situation and the Biden DOJ, the Biden DOJ targeted us.
They targeted Americans.
They targeted people who didn't have the ability, whether it was financial, just regular resources, or the understanding of how it all works.
They went after defenseless Americans.
That's the difference.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And people weighed down the totem.
Yes.
I mean, Jim Call me is hardly way down the totem pole.
He was the head of the FBI.
Exactly.
That's the difference.
The special prosecutors way down the totem pole.
He's the head of the guy.
I mean, and just a selection of him had to show how crooked the AG was.
Here, so I was involved in a lot of special prosecutor appointments and evaluations when I was in the Reagan administration.
And that's when we had a real special prosecutor.
So you try very, very hard.
And I had to get a few special prosecutors.
You check everything.
You want a person that they can't criticize.
Right.
So they pick a guy who probably had one of the worst records in the Justice Department for unethical behavior.
Documented by the Supreme Court of the United States.
Right, right, right.
You know, when you appoint him, the first thing they're going to say is, this guy got a case reversed 8-0 for his unethical behavior in trying to frame a governor.
Yes.
I mean, even like he did somewhat successfully.
And even if the Supreme Court, you think they were wrong.
You don't pick the guy because if they were a normal administration held accountable by the press, they'd have ripped it apart for appearance.
Yeah.
You can't find a guy that hasn't.
I mean, almost nobody has had their case reversed eight-nothing in the Supreme Court for unethical behavior.
Here's the guy who did that.
And you put him.
And then he targeted the Tea Party.
He was part of the IRS targeting Tea Party.
And he was an expert in what they wanted him to do because he did it to the governor.
They wanted him to prosecute Trump before the election to kick him out of the election.
They wanted him to do to Trump what they did to Bob McDonald.
Yeah.
And it worked because he didn't get re-elected.
He dropped out of the race.
They were hoping that to have the same effect.
You know, who cares?
They picked an expert.
One of the few.
That's exactly what they did.
I mean.
But no reporter ever wrote that.
Well, except maybe on our side.
I would say, I think I did.
But no, but I mean, no, it didn't become the major history.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
No.
And very few people know, even know to this day about Smith's terrible record.
Right.
It was a joke.
The Justice Department.
He's revered.
Yeah, revered and maniac, complete maniac.
But the president sometimes says people are maniacs.
You wonder if he's exaggerating.
He's not exaggerating about Smith.
No, I mean, how you can do that to people for political gain?
Like you're putting political ideology above human lives.
Yeah.
Like you're willing, especially with the January 6th stuff, you're willing to destroy thousands of people's lives, their homes, their livelihood to score a political point.
I think there's something wrong with you as a human.
Well, I turned over all the evidence on Ashley Babbitt to the U.S. Attorney's Office in the district about eight days later.
And I told Maria, because she helped me put it together.
I said, you know, I think one thing they may not screw around on is first-degree murder.
Because I remember crooked prosecutors, you know, DAs in Brooklyn and Clean.
Yeah.
Once you take money, it's a murder case.
I hope.
I hope something about their conscience.
Well, they had no conscience.
They just buried that case completely.
They just buried it.
It's as if, well, you can get away.
You can get away with it.
But I'm talking about the Trump DOJ.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
But I mean, have they reopened it?
No.
Well, that's my, that's, but that's not statute of limitations on it.
Right.
It's a murder case.
No, I know.
That's my point.
I know in New York, in New York, the tradition is that no murder case is ever closed.
Oh, really?
When I was mayor, we solved a murder that was 105 years old.
Oh, my gosh.
And it got added to my statistics that year.
Congratulations.
Yeah.
Wait, you were angry?
No, I wasn't angry.
I was teasing.
Oh, because I was trying to get crime down in every single murder.
Oh, I said, oh boy, instead of having gotten down to 605 murders, 606.
Got it.
Because most of them we solved three or four years ago.
Yeah.
But you know, if you don't solve a murder in the first, almost first couple of days, it's very hard to solve it.
I believe that's true.
But we have the cold case squad.
In fact, I think they did a television thing about this.
Yeah, it's called the first 48.
I think you can probably still find it.
The cold case squad, they would go back and sometimes they go back 20 years, 30 years, 40 years, 50 years.
People are dead.
Yeah.
How to solve it.
It was like, I think they just did Jack the Ripper, didn't they?
It was an insult to the homicide detectives, but there was an open case.
Yeah.
So I so I came from that tradition.
And I say, Democrat or Republican, this guy's going to be really upset when he sees these two guys.
And they never did any face recognition of the two guys who were banging it down.
They never did a face recognition of all the people in there to find out how many Antifa people are in there.
Yeah, of course.
And there's indications that our side though.
Of course, there were.
Of course, there were.
Boy, Jeb, do you ever just look back?
I'm sure you did.
Perhaps I'm going to ask you this question.
It's almost a rhetorical question, but I'm going to get an answer.
When you look back, it's unbelievable, isn't it?
It is very surreal.
Aren't there times you woke up and said this can't be true?
Every day, actually.
Every day, every day that we have our case open, I wake up and go, man, I can't believe I'm in this position.
Not just in that position, but like how, where I am, how I'm here.
How am I here?
Well, you came to volunteer to help me.
That's one of the things.
I know it was your fault.
That's right.
2020, I remember.
And you ended up being really good.
You're very affected.
And you're very patriotic.
All terrible things.
Right.
Well, thank you very, very much.
Thank you so much for having me and for having Doug.
He's sleeping.
Doug is sleeping.
You can grab him, but he's asleep.
Puppy, puppy's sleeping.
Yeah, he sleeps.
Do you know that our numbers went way up the minute we put Doug?
Oh, really?
Oh, don't wake him up.
He's okay.
He'll go, but he'll go right back to sleep.
Yeah, let him let him rest.
One more time.
Come on, Ted.
Come on, Ted.
I know, but he won't be as small.
But how is it important?
You won't be able to just pick him up.
How often does he eat now?
Is he still?
I know when they're real puppies, you got to give him a bottle all the time.
Yeah, no, he's not on a bottle.
He eats solid food.
So, how old is he?
He is 11 weeks.
Oh, that's still a puppy.
He's still very two and a half months.
He's off the bottom.
He's a baby.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
He eats regular food.
And I got him.
Anything special to like softer food and stuff like that?
No.
Oh, he can eat regular dog food.
He can eat regular dog food.
But for a while, he had to have.
Yeah, he was nursing and all that.
But no, I got him at eight and a half pounds three weeks ago, and he is now 22 pounds.
So he's almost triples in size.
He was eight and a half, and now he's 20.
He's still a puppy.
Yeah.
But he still looks like a puppy.
Yeah, he does.
He has that puppy look.
He's so stinking cute.
You want to take him?
Yeah, I'd love to.
My good boy.
Yeah.
He's so tired.
Come on, Dougie.
You're tired.
Puppies get very tired.
Yeah.
Don't they?
You get very tired, don't you, puppy?
Yeah.
You know, I have to get a dog, right?
You do.
They're the best.
Well, we're going to take a short break and we'll be right back after we do that.
Hang out with Dougie for a minute.
What a good dog.
What a good doggy.
What a good doggy.
Ted is taking pictures, so that's why we're hanging out a minute.
Yeah.
Oh, look at him.
Right back after these short messages.
Here we are, pretty much at the beginning of the process here at this pristine, I call it a laboratory.
It's not like a factory, it's like a hospital.
This is the beginning of the process for roasting.
Deep green, very good quality.
Most people don't use this quality.
We deal with small farmers because they'd like to know who we're dealing with.
They give us the highest quality, all organic, non-GMO.
You should know all Arabica beans.
No Robusto.
All Arabica.
They're going to go into the roaster, and it'll get roasted for about 20 minutes or so.
Oh, my goodness.
Look at these.
My goodness, you're going to want to specially order these.
This is what goes into Rudy's coffee.
Are you ready for some action?
I'm ready for action.
Get the Elite TV plan only through the portal.
218 channels, and it's only $69.95 a month, including your free portal.
That's cheaper than everyone else.
Your favorite sports, movies, news, even daytime dramas.
We're talking about ESPN, OAN, Newsmax, channels you can't get anymore in certain areas.
Compared to the competition, this is a way better deal.
Endless selection.
Not to mention all the free music channels.
There's over 700 premium and classic movies all ready to go.
Wow.
Plus, they got catch-up TV that allows you to go back and watch what you've missed or want to watch again.
Cut your cable in half and get twice as much for free.
Way more channels for half the cost.
After the first year, the subscription then drops to $57.95 monthly, where you change or upgrade anytime.
Go to quxnow.com and get yours today.
Use promo code Rudy.
Act fast.
These deals are selling out.
Evening, this is Rudy Giuliani back without Doug and Christina.
What a great dog.
I love these sitting over there.
What a great dog.
He's very tired, though.
I mean, he's a big dog, but he's only 11 weeks old.
He's a little baby, but he looks pretty mature for a little baby.
It can be a very smart dog.
Well, those are two smart breeds.
So I wanted to make sure you want to make sure that you get this evidence because, like, we had to do with the incidents of the illegal aliens killing people that they were trying to hide.
Every day, every day, I could probably report four or five acts of disgusting anti-Semitism.
It's become, I don't think I'm exaggerating at all if I say that it's become a bit of an epidemic of the oldest and most horrible hatred in the world and certainly in our civilization.
And the fact that the fact that it has been completely tolerated by the Democrats, whether they participate in it, agree with it, or just enable it.
Particularly, you want to enable it.
It's horrible.
You look at somebody like Chuck Schumer, who's Jewish, and he sits by and he lets the AOCs and the Taibs and the whatever say anything they want.
horrible things about the Jewish people, horrible comparisons between Israel and even the Palestinian Authority, much less Hamas.
I mean the Palestinian Authority, please don't tell me about the Palestinian Authority.
I investigated Yasser Arafat when he was a terrorist.
He turned into, he reformed.
He became a massive crook before after he was a terrorist and stole money from his people.
So you could say about Palestine the same thing you can say about the poor areas of America, particularly in the cities.
Enough money has been given to them so they could be a beautiful kingdom.
And it's all been stolen by their people.
That's how you have congressmen from Harlem or congressmen from Baltimore or congressmen dying, you know, multi-millionaires, and their people are still starving.
And that's how you have Mrs. Arafat in the south of France as one of the richest people, because the people in Palestine are starving.
Israel didn't take it from him.
Netanyahu didn't take it from him.
Fatat took it from him.
And Fatah's the good guys.
So the fact that you don't know that is a conspiracy.
It's called communism or Islamic extremism or applying strictly, but honestly, the teachings of Muhammad.
I mean, I don't have to go make it up.
It's in the Quran.
What I have to do is write it out of the Quran.
That's a much more affirmative act that's necessary if we're going to be safe.
Bibi has said that he is not going to be deterred in coming to New York based on the fact that the mayor of New York, Mandani, has threatened to arrest him.
Now, that's going to be a hell of a confrontation if it occurs, because what Bibi is charged with is under the International Court of Justice.
We specifically don't belong to it.
We don't recognize its jurisdiction.
So you got to tell me what's the authority the New York City Police Department would have to arrest him.
It would be an absolute blatant false arrest.
And I do believe he gets some extra, I do believe he gets some extra Secret Service protection.
And the New York City Police Department and the Secret Service work together like this.
And we have a police commissioner who's first rate.
I don't know how long she's going to last.
May I just take a moment to say this?
I put it out on Twitter today, or on X, sorry.
I put it out.
I'll probably always say Twitter.
It's like I'll always say 6th Avenue and that Avenue of the Americas.
Actually, it was changed probably before I was born.
I congratulated Adams and I congratulated Commissioner Tish.
New York City had 12 days in a row of no murder.
And that this ties a record.
This year, it will not be the lowest murders ever, but we're getting back down under Adams.
It's a shame in a way.
I mean, Adams got it in the last two years.
And Jessica Tish has been an excellent police commissioner.
Now, Mandani is keeping her on.
And I have mixed feelings about it.
For the city, thank God.
And maybe, just maybe, it'll work.
Bratton was disciplined on de Blasio.
And things got really terrible when Bratton left.
Because Debasi was always afraid to do something that would require Bratton to leave.
He's further than De Blasio.
And the worst thing about Mamdani is he's surrounded by people who will hold him accountable, meaning the Democrat Socialists of America.
His team is filled with Democrat Socialist of America communists who are advising him.
One of which is a convicted murderer who's going to advise him on police.
I don't think he has a single police professional on his transition team for the police department.
They're all criminals or advocates for criminals.
What does that tell you?
That also tells you to say, okay, let's add a few extra police.
They can go nuts on him.
And it isn't as if he has another way to the top.
It's not as if he has room to change to being a moderate, because nobody's going to accept him with the horrible things that he said and the associations that he has with terrorists and murderers.
All that will happen if he tries to go to the middle is he'll lose his supporters.
He's not going to gain anybody, except maybe some people who can't read and write.
So I think he's stuck.
And he doesn't seem to be a guy of very strong moral character, given who he hangs around with and what he does.
So this idea that he's going to go to the middle the way like Ed Koch did, he has a far different character than Ed Koch.
First of all, he's not anywhere near as smart as Ed Koch.
Governor Hochle is like the got to be, I don't know, it's really hard to say.
They keep saying about the governor of Minnesota, Tampon Tim, that he's so really, really stupid.
And I just keep thinking he's some kind of agent of the Chinese Communist Party, but he might be too dumb for the Chinese to have recruited him.
I don't know.
Have you seen the fake?
What do you call those things that are completely fake?
Trump shows up in front of his house in the presidential limousine and yells out the R word.
I will not say it.
AI video.
Yeah, but boy, that one got me the first time.
You laughed.
First time I saw it is what you do.
What do you want?
It would be funny.
I thought he played along with it to make a joke, and then I realized it was not really him.
So Governor Hochul has no problem, no problemo, with Mamdani appearing, giving people video instructions on how to avoid immigration detection.
In other words, how to violate the federal law.
The mayor's first video as mayor-elect is a tutorial on how to avoid the lawful application of the federal immigration laws.
I still have Christina here, and she's a lawyer.
It has to be some kind of crime.
A mayor advising people on how to violate the law has to be some kind of crime.
I mean, the First Amendment can't possibly allow mayors to give instructional videos on how to commit crimes.
Everybody in this state should know their rights.
It isn't their rights.
They don't have a right to cross the border.
Right.
I have no problem with the mayor-elect using his platform to let people know the rights they have in this great country.
We can all stand up to ICE if you know your rights.
Well, he does have a very, very good guy now advising him.
This guy had started off with a, he started off with a very promising career as a rapper.
So you know what happens to every person with a promising career to a rapper.
They kill somebody.
I mean, it's part of the whole thing.
I mean, like in the mafia, you got to kill somebody to get made.
To be a rapper, in order to be a real rapper, you have to kill somebody.
So he did.
He robbed two cab drivers.
He was convicted in 99.
I was mayor then.
So this is one of my guys.
And they let him out after a short time because I was gone by then.
I don't know.
They must have had some kind of ridiculous parole board thing.
They let him out.
He got like 25 years and he no, no, no.
He actually got two different sentences, seven to 14 and then 25 years.
And he served six.
And he robbed Joseph Irizzi.
And then he robbed Francisco Monsanto.
And he belonged to the rising.
Oh, then he set up when he got out the rising kings and it teaches classmates.
He teaches inmates at Rikers Island.
I have not monitored the course to see what they're taught.
And he considers Linda Sarsour the virulent anti-semi-Jew hater, an American hater, and admirer of Islamic extremists as his very close associate and friend.
So he's on the committee to advise him on police policies.
And as Benny Basio of the Correction Officers Benevolent Association pointed out, none of the uniformed officers of any kind are on any of his committees.
They've been completely shut out to give him any advice on how to handle the police, which tells you he's going to try to make him his serfs.
Then he's got, oh, this guy's had a bunch of other names too.
He also has black nationalist Lumumba Bandeli.
Oh, by the way, on his list, Ted, where he lists them all, he misspells all their names.
He misspells all their names.
Yeah, yeah.
Misson Lin, who spent seven years in state prison, is described as they got, he got his name misspelled.
Then Mumbubba Bendeli, they have and Mary Travitt Bissett is Bisset.
And they got an Italian name wrong too, which I'll never forgive them for.
They can't seem to get Scalia and Vaccaro right.
That's a little too tough for them.
Do you know that Maria Carina Machado cannot go to get her Nobel Prize because she probably won't get back in the country?
I would, I was on that list once.
I think I lost to Bin Laden or something.
I actually thought that if I got the prize, I would give it back.
Well, I think Hitler got the prize.
I know Arafat got it.
Arafat only killed 27 Americans.
I mean, what the heck, that's not enough to be denied the Nobel Prize.
I don't even know why the president wants it so much.
He should hold a big ceremony and say one of his patented things when they give it to him, like something like shove it.
You know, I can't say the rest.
I will if I have to.
Israel and Hamas are still fighting, although we have a ceasefire.
They're killing each other every day.
But we have a ceasefire.
And apparently, they're getting back in control of a certain part of either Gaza City or Rafa.
But the Israelis are blowing them out of the tunnels.
So we'll have to see.
A group of kids at San Jose High School, I'm sorry, I don't have this picture other than here.
Maybe we'll show it to you tomorrow.
Decided that they were going to make a swast sticker on the football field.
So they did a swastika on the football field.
This is what we got going on in America.
And if you want to know more about the danger of it, well, we're going to sign off now.
And you should go get my podcast.
You should go on X, hit subscribe, and there'll be three interesting podcasts there for you, and one more tomorrow.
The first one will be with Michael Francis.
It'll describe his life in the mafia.
A question by me, who knows a little about it.
Now, Michael's going to be back in about a week telling us about his life outside the mafia.
But it's very, very interesting.
Listen for the reason why he went back and forth about turning four or five times, almost, almost, almost, actually did once and went back.
And then it became permanent.
And permanent means 27 years now.
And it's very interesting.
And when you listen to it, we can talk about it more.
And we will in the next podcast.
It's very interesting as to what was the key to his conversion.
It's a little like reading the Confessions of St. Augustine.
Of course, he's not quite St. Augustine.
And then the second one is a very, very deep analysis of Nick Fuentes.
And not just his interview with Tucker, because his interview with Tucker, frankly, he was asked no questions that would probe whether, in fact, it is fair to say that he is a virulent anti-Semite, a Jew hater, a Hitler lover, and somebody that is actually dangerous because he inspires that in other people or not.
Are people just using that?
Are they making it up?
Are they?
And the only way you're going to find that out is to really research his background, which we do.
And we present it to you, and then you decide.
We'll present what he was saying 10 years ago and what he's saying today.
And are those things exceedingly dangerous that help kids encourage kids to make swastikas on football fields?
Or worse than that, burn synagogues, smack Jewish people across the head, or support a massive terrorist group like Hamas or the Palestinians or the Palestinians who killed Americans and are taught from the time they're two to kill Americans, not just Jews.
And block out any analysis of the Muslim religion, which read in a certain way, which is legitimate reading of the Quran, is a religion that encourages the killing of Christians and Jews, which some Muslims are doing in large numbers in several continents in this world.
So we'll be back tomorrow.
We're going to ask you to pray very, very hard for the people of Ukraine because that whole situation is at a critical point right now.
There seem to be gaps that can't be overcome between Russia and not just Ukraine, but Europe, which is almost as concerned about Russia as Ukraine is.
And then of course, we want to pray for the people of Israel, because although there's a ceasefire, it really is a ceasefire with a little bit of a question mark around it.
And we want to pray for the people of Iran.
In fact, we'll have a report tomorrow about all the killings that are going on in Iran, which I don't think are reported here because there's a kind of softness for the Ayatollah here in America.
And then, of course, pray for the president, who has very, very difficult decisions to make.
And more than anyone else, of course, the president always needs your guidance more than anyone.
So, what do we say?
Get ready.
God bless America.
It's our purpose to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
There was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers, in which Thomas Paine explained, by rational principles, the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate from the kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the ability to select the people who govern them.
And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
Because the desire for freedom is universal.
The desire for freedom adheres in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
Look at what we've done in the past and see if we can't use it to help us now.
We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world.
The greatest democracy, the freest country, a country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.
All of us are so fortunate to be Americans.
But a great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we're able to reason.
We're able to talk.
We're able to analyze.
▲
Export Selection