All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 11, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
57:57
The Rudy Giuliani Show: Monday, November 10, 2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, today is the day that we honor our veterans, all of our veterans.
It does, maybe it gets a little confusing since we have a Memorial Day.
Memorial Day is for those who died in warfare, in the military.
Today is a day to honor all that served us, all of our veterans, who all made enormous sacrifices over the history of our country to first gain our freedom and then preserve it and preserve the Union and liberate Europe twice,
liberate Eastern Europe eventually under Ronald Reagan and now under President Trump, bring peace to the world.
And it's not easy.
It's not going to happen just with the snap of a finger.
It happens with a combination.
Well, I mean, I guess the shorthand for it is peace through strength, which means you have to combine diplomacy and an enormously strong and feared military.
Not just a military, a feared military.
A military that, when the president says, I may use them, does the kind of thing it just did to the people in Iran and the people and the people running Venezuela and all over the world.
There is no military like ours.
And that's been earned with the blood of so many and the sacrifices of so many.
Those who died, those who survived.
So our respect for all of them.
The president was, as is traditional, President Trump and the Vice President, the head of the Joint Jesus staff, are at with Arlington today to honor our veterans.
And let's see what the president had to say.
It's a lot more important than any of us.
Again, there are two words you can say that are probably the most important.
Thank you.
And I think our president expressed it for us in a way that gives you chills.
When you think that all that he is handling and all that's on the shoulders of both the president and the military, this is not an easy time.
But it's being handled about as well as it's ever been.
The government shutdown is over.
Well, it's over, but for the voting and the procedural nicety, they say it's all going to happen.
I'll believe it when it happened.
It did work in the Senate with 60 votes finally, the number it needed, with the help of eight Democrats.
Now, it took eight Democrats because one Republican went the other way.
And I agree with Rand Paul on many things and respect him on many things, the way he handled COVID and the way he handled and the way he handled those are those are the Democrats that voted for it.
And to them, I say thank you and congratulations for putting your country first.
I mean, the one who did it from the very beginning and never had any doubt about it is John Fetterman.
And I was actually considering, I was actually considering a trade of Rand Paul for John Fetterman, but the Democrats wouldn't take Rand Paul.
They said, you can't count on his vote.
You can't count on Fetterman's vote either.
They said, yeah, but he's kind of more interesting.
Yeah, well, you better like you make a baseball trade sometimes for the crowd, right?
You want to bring somebody in who can draw a crowd.
Let's face it, Rand Paul is not a, you know, like a, what would you say?
Yeah, a major league performer.
Right?
He's not, he's not like a Trump or even a JD Vance.
I mean, he's a good questioner.
He's, except when he asked the same question 45 times.
Why he has to go over there and vote against this, I mean, I don't even know what his point is.
He got something that he needed for Kentucky.
Put up for it.
Cut for.
He got something put in for Kentucky that he needed.
I don't know why he had to go over there.
I guess they were going to get seven Democrats if they had him and they got eight.
And he said, well, I'll go over on the other side.
Actually, one is actually an independent king.
It's actually an independent who caucuses with the Democrats.
So we have a do we have something from?
Well, we have a picture of Rand Paul.
A lot of Republicans are feeling this way about him right now.
Oh, really?
Well, they want him.
You got to take it down.
They attempted that draft.
Even offered two draft choices, two future possible rhinos.
But he's not really a rhino.
You can't describe Rand Paul.
No, in effect, though, you could.
Is he?
In effect, when you're.
The rhinos all voted for.
This one now is going to go back to the House and it's all taken care of in the House.
But we know we got a little rebel faction in the House.
Probably rebel is the wrong word because it connotes the Civil War.
It's not a Civil War thing.
It's more like, I don't know exactly what it is.
This vote here is a procedural vote.
This is not a vote of conscience.
It's not a vote that can change anything one way or the other.
It's a vote to just recognize the ineffectiveness of our government.
And we have no other choice but to do that.
Otherwise, we will have to fall in on our debt and our economy will.
And our ability to lead the world will be put in jeopardy.
So there's a lot at stake, but it is purely procedural.
If you're going to fix this, you'll fix it in the debates that go on in the future, which is what the Republicans were trying to do.
Now, the Democrats have always tried to do this as well.
And it fails every once in a while.
Sometimes the Republicans, sometimes the Democrats.
Originally, the problem here was going to be that the Republicans weren't going to vote for it.
The very, very, the ones who consider themselves ultra conservative on the budget, at least, they weren't going to vote for it because it recognizes overspending.
It sort of bails out the government that spent more than was budgeted.
And they've had it.
They've been doing that now over and over, and they've had it.
Johnson and I assume with the help of the president worked really hard to get them to agree to this, thinking the Democrats always agree to it.
They would.
And they were.
And they did originally.
And then for some reason, Schumer pulled out this thing.
And nobody really knows why.
Since, although with the press coverage, it gets a little mixed and the Democrats don't quite get the blame they deserve.
They should get the credit they usually get for government shutdowns.
And he comes out looking like an ass because he got the deal that he could have had 45, 46 days ago without all these people being out of jobs and who knows what damage was done to them.
He got exactly the same thing, maybe a teeny bit extra here and there.
He got a promise that there'll be a debate on healthcare.
That and that and a token will catch on the subway.
Everybody knows that.
I mean, there's no way to spin this other than Trump trashed him.
He took Chunky Cheese and threw him in the trash can.
And Chung E. Cheese kept saying, he's going to fold.
He's going to fold.
If we get to the president, if we get a meeting, we can talk him into it.
If we get him to the president, we can talk him in.
We can talk him in.
Please, AOC, don't run against me.
Don't run against me.
Please, AOC, don't run against me.
I have no place to go anymore.
Nobody in the Jewish community wants me back.
They think I'm a traitor.
Please, please don't.
Now, just about every Democrat in the House wants him out.
Because the ones in the Senate are afraid to say it because he pulled their parking spaces away.
And they don't like him.
They never liked him.
Nobody likes him.
Not a likable guy.
I think you told a joke once and he's become like a pariah.
So today, today, a bunch of people in the House said he's got to go.
A bunch of Democrats said he has to go.
But the magic thing hasn't happened yet.
Nobody in the Senate has said it.
And I think if one person stands up in the Senate, except maybe one of those crazy, stupid, they have a couple of really totally witless morons.
But if a senator with an IQ above 50 gets up and says Schumer's got to go, the whole thing will fall down.
Let's play Ro Khanna.
So this is...
He's in Congress.
He's big.
He's a big mouth in Congress.
I don't know if he's a leader in the caucus.
He may be.
He's a leader on television.
So he does have a voice and a kind of a big voice.
Progressive, left-wing, not quite in the squad, but not quite out of it.
Plays it a little more carefully.
But let's listen to what he has to say.
Chuck Schumer called you today, or he dropped by your office, or you went by his office.
What would you say to him?
I'd say, look, Senator, it's not personal.
I respect some of the things you've accomplished in your career.
I get that we would not have had the Chips and Science Act if it weren't for your leadership.
I get that we would not have had the Inflation Reduction Act, but for your leadership.
I appreciated what you did with the bipartisan infrastructure bill.
But you know what?
You've just lost touch with where the base of the party is.
You've lost touch on foreign policy where you supported the war in Iraq and then a blank check to Netanyahu and you refused to endorse Mamdani.
And then this is the second time you've had the shutdown fight and you've caved both times.
And it's time for you to gracefully make way for a new generation.
I wonder, he picks the war in Iraq.
I mean, that's like several generations ago.
And everybody voted for it.
Basically, anybody, anybody in the, I mean, any number of Democrats voted for it.
Hillary Clinton voted for it.
Right.
They all legitimately believed that he had weapons of mass destruction.
And I'm going to tell you, but beyond that, they legitimately believe that he was a great threat to the United States.
Now, Joe Biden voted for the war in Iraq.
They all did.
I mean, that's a ridiculous one, Roe.
You've got to reach back for that one.
Then not supporting Mamdani?
Gee, that could have been one of the smartest things he's done in a long time, not supporting a communist.
I mean, how could he even go back to his Jewish family if he supported Mandami?
He can't go back to the Jew and Netanyahu, whatever he did with Netanyahu, he interfered in the election and tried to get him defeated.
He committed a crime to hurt Netanyahu.
I mean, these guys are, there are a bunch of reasons why a Democrat might not want, might not want him if they really are of the AOC, anti-America, pro-Islamic extremism variety.
There are a lot of reasons you might not want him, but the three you selected are idiotic.
I mean, you have to throw out about half your caucus on that one.
Right.
Well, I think we have Allison with us live from Washington.
Hello, Allison.
How are you?
Hi, Mr. Mayor.
I'm doing great.
And I love your shirt and your background today.
Happy Veterans Day.
Hey, wait, wait.
I got something special for you.
It's not only that.
Oh, my gosh.
The party continues.
I love it.
That's great.
Okay.
So tell us, tell us what happened last night and today.
Well, today was actually a very slow day, not much happening because as we know, on late on Monday night, there was the big vote finally to break the impasse so we can once and for all reopen the government after the longest shutdown in American history, 40 days and counting still until it actually is officially open.
But we finally got the votes we needed from the eight Democrats, as you beautifully highlighted.
There were eight that came around finally.
No thanks to Senator Rand Paul, who voted with the Democrats to keep the government shut down.
But we still got the eight that we needed.
So now we are looking at just merely kicking the can down the road until January 2026, ultimately is what this all boils down to.
The Democrats didn't get what they wanted.
As we know, they were really holding out to have these discussions on the affordable care tax credits, which will now be had in January 2026.
So pretty much this whole shutdown, 40 days of federal employees not receiving paychecks, was a total waste of time because they didn't even get what they wanted.
This conversation is going to be had at a later time.
So with that being said, Mike Johnson has now called all members of the House to return back to DC.
They are currently in route, although it may be a difficult feat because as we know, due to the government shutdown, we have a very severe shortage of air traffic controllers and flight delays and flight cancellations.
So hopefully these guys can get back in time.
The vote is supposed to happen tomorrow on Wednesday in the House.
And then once it passes the House, it'll go on to the president's desk to be signed in the law.
And then we can get our government back open.
But until that happens, we're still sort of in this holding pattern and there may be delays there.
I don't know.
We'll see what happens.
Of course.
I mean, they are, there's no point that they can't even use their congressional privilege to bump somebody.
There's nobody to bump.
I mean, it could be tough getting all of them back.
It's supposed to be tomorrow, right?
He had told them he wanted them back at Wednesday at noon, be ready to come back at Wednesday at noon.
So it might get held over until Thursday.
So then they just have to vote or do they have to go through some kind of they have to have a debate?
There shouldn't be a debate unless for some reason any of the Republicans that previously voted for this have now, for some reason, changed their mind.
I don't know.
Sometimes that could happen.
I mean, we know I'm a little worried about Marjorie Taylor Greene.
I think she might be one of the ones that's kind of like a Rand Paul that may have some issues with this now.
But ultimately, it's the same bill.
There's really nothing changed about it.
So I don't see why any Republican members of the House would change their mind on this issue.
And of course, we have the majority in the House.
So it should be no problem as long as everyone agrees to it and we get enough votes on it.
Then yes, it just goes back to the president's desk to be signed.
So I think it'll pass.
And I have a pretty good feeling he signs it.
He'll be the quickest of all.
That'll get signed as soon as it comes.
And he won't use an auto pen.
He will not.
No, that's the best part about it all is no auto pen for anyone.
So anything else that's going on in that crazy place before they shut down for another vacation?
I know, right?
The shutdowns are just going to be, it's just going to be par for the course for these Democrats because if anything doesn't go their way, they're just going to shut it down.
I can see it happening again in January.
So again, I just feel like this is all just really kicking the can down the road even further.
But I guess this is a small step in the right direction, right?
Because in order to have these talks and these negotiations, we got to have the government open in order to do that.
So it's good that we're reopening it.
So we can talk about the massive failure that is Obamacare, the unaffordable tax, the unaffordable care plan that Democrats love so much that they want to continue to fund with pre-pandemic COVID spending levels.
It's like so insane.
It costs so much money to do it.
And it's not even benefiting the American people because the premiums are skyrocketing and it's more expensive to fund.
And people are really getting the short end of the stick here.
So what really needs to happen when Congress reopens is we need everyone to come together in a bipartisan fashion to discuss serious health care reforms because Obamacare has been a massive failure.
President Trump is also now talking about this, but interestingly enough, he's saying that we should just leave the government out of it and that we should just send the money directly to the people.
And then the people can decide which health care plan they want that best fits them.
And I actually like that idea.
I think that is really the only alternative solution I've heard thus far.
And I think it's a conversation that we need to keep talking about.
I did ask Hakeem Jeffries what he thinks about it.
I'm sure you can imagine what he had to say, but let's play the clip.
Here's my goodness.
President Trump is now calling on Congress to shift the hundreds of billions in Obamacare subsidies from the insurance companies and instead send the money directly to the people.
What are your thoughts on this?
Do you support that?
And is there any action underway to make it?
Trump is unserious about protecting the health care of the American people.
And we've seen that over the last 41 days.
That was a very responsive answer.
I know.
No, I think that's a great improvement.
He didn't tell you to shut up.
Well, you can speak too quickly now.
Don't get ahead of yourself now, Mr. Mayor.
Okay, I'm going to, before the end of the week, I want you to get him to tell you to shut up.
Well, he did.
And that's just a moment later.
He actually did because just a moment after that question.
I asked him about Nancy Pelosi and her stock trading because we know she's made millions during her time in Congress, which is very peculiar for someone who makes $174,000 a year.
How has Nancy Pelosi amassed millions?
This has actually come out in a well-documented report.
And so I just thought I would get Hakeem Jeffries' thoughts on the matter.
Let's take a listen to how he responded.
How about this?
Nancy Pelosi's return on her stock outperformed the Dow by 17,000%, ranking in 133 million during her time in Congress.
Donald Trump, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on.
Do you support legislation to ban stock trading?
Have you ever asked the critical question of Donald Trump and Republicans, who are the most corrupt administration in American history?
Like the guys running a massive pay-to-play scheme, enriching himself and his family.
And you want to show up and ask me a question about a legendary leader like Nancy Pelosi?
Get real.
Good.
Congratulations.
That's even better than shut up.
You've got the more on the slay zone.
I know.
Wow.
But it's just always blame Trump, right?
When in doubt, just blame Trump, which is so ridiculous because if I don't recall, I believe Trump actually has given up his salary to serve the American people, whereas literally every member of Congress comes into this position to serve themselves and enrich themselves.
So his response there leads me to believe perhaps he's participating in some of the same stock trading as Nancy Pelosi.
But hopefully we can one day get an investigation into all of this and actually reprimand these people who have been participating in all that.
The difference is that Donald Trump came into office as a very, very, very rich man.
And in fact, in his first term of office, he was worth less when he came out of office than he was when he went into office by quite a bit.
That guy, that guy came in poor.
I bet he's voted now.
And she came in, you know, they were millionaires, like three, four million.
Her old man, after all, was part of the Baltimore machine.
We can't expect they didn't make anything.
I mean, we can't go buy his salary and his brother had interesting connections.
One of these days, I'll get someone on who really knows about them and explain it to you.
But that's why her father got elected so easily.
You just weren't going to vote against her father.
Wasn't a good idea in Baltimore to vote to vote against the old man.
But in any event, she went in a couple million and they come out worth, people think they may be worth half a billion dollars.
174 million.
I mean, when you said it, you said it correctly, but people may have missed it.
174 million was just last year.
That's what I think I made last year.
I don't know if anybody on Waltham had $174 million, you know, trading.
It is truly incredible.
If we could all follow Nancy Pelosi's movies, we'd be all doing pretty well.
I know.
She's a pig.
I mean, a lot of them trade here and there, and they try to keep it small and they get a little extra money that way.
But she's a massive pig.
But you got to open up.
She came from Baltimore.
Well, great.
We'll see you tomorrow.
That's it all.
Great report.
We'll take a short break, and we'll be right back.
Welcome to Vocal, the free speech social app that gives you a platform to amplify your voice, speak freely, connect boldly, and be part of a growing movement for truth, faith, and freedom.
Want to know what's happening right now?
The now playing feature shows you exactly who's live and what's streaming in real time.
Check out the show's feed, a non-stop lineup, including Lindell TV News 24-7, shows and on-demand programming all in one place.
Connect with your favorite host and never miss a show.
Explore the featured page for quick access to Lindell TV's top shows.
Follow your favorites and watch their newest content flow right into your feed.
And when they go live on Vocal, you can join the live chat and be part of the action.
Ask questions, share your thoughts, even help shape future shows.
Stay informed on issues around securing our elections by following your state's Cause of America account.
Join a group and connect on a deeper level.
From faith and freedom to the future of our nation.
Go to vocal.com or download the app today and be a part of the mission to save our country.
I'm excited to announce that we're having our biggest three-in-one sale ever with a limited edition product, a back-in-stock special, and a close-out deal you won't find anywhere else.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get our MyPillow bed sheets only $29.88.
Any color, any style, any size, even King's, regular $119.98, only $29.88.
Once they're gone, they're gone for good.
How about our MyTowels?
They're finally back in stock, but not for long.
Get a six-piece MyTowel set, regular $69.98, now only $39.98.
And for the first time and the only time ever, get our limited edition premium MyPillows.
They're made with geyser cotton and designer gusset.
Queen, $17.98.
King's only $19.98.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get the best offers ever.
Coins are extremely limited, so order now.
With everybody talking about making America healthy again, I thought today would be a great day to talk to all my fellow patriots about the importance of making your homes healthy again.
Well, we have proudly partnered with AirWaterhealing.com and their revolutionary whole home air purification system.
The V3 from Airwater Healing does 3,000 square feet of purification.
It eliminates dust, mold, viruses, and odors.
But here's the part I love.
They require no filters to ever be changed and virtually no maintenance.
Whether you suffer from asthma, allergies, seasonal bronchitis, or just want to protect your family from the flu or even greater threats, don't wait to get your V3 from airwaterhealing.com today.
Use code Lindel for 20% off in savings and free shipping.
That's promo code Lindel at airwaterhealing.com.
Too many pharmacies and insurance companies are blocking the medications that actually work.
That's why I recommend All Family Pharmacy.
They give you access to treatments like ivermectin now, starting at just $2 a capsule.
They also have methylene blue, hydroxychloroquine, and so much more.
They're helping you stay prepared and they've dropped their prices by 25%.
Also, use promo code Lindel10 to save even more.
Go to allfamilypharmacy.com forward slash Lindel.
Use promo code LINDELL10 and get the medicine you need.
And we're back, Mayor.
This is Rudy Giuliani, and we're back on the Rudy Giuliani show on Lindell TV.
Yesterday, the president had a very consequential meeting with Ahmed Al-Shara.
And Ahmed Al-Shara is now the head of state of Syria.
Now, of course, as you know, it was, well, I mean, I imagine you know, this was an extremely controversial meeting because Al-Shara used to be a member of Al-Qaeda.
He wasn't just a member of al-Qaeda.
He was one of the leading members of Al-Qaeda and of the of the and he was a principal aide to Baghdadi.
You'll probably remember that name.
It's a hard name to forget.
It was a very big deal when we finally killed Ahmed Bakir al-Baghdadi.
And Shara was a probably his principal, his principal aide.
Certainly he considers Baghdadi his mentor.
And as recently as 2014, 2015, the Al-Nusra front of Al-Qaeda, which was the one in Syria,
assassinated and eliminated a group of nuns and priests in Syria, where there is a major issue about the elimination of Christians to this day, which, well, we'll get to that in a moment.
So that's where he was in 2015, 2016.
We actually specifically, I don't know if this happened under Obama or it happened under Trump.
I'll get you the dates, but we have made attempts to kill him.
We specifically went out on bombing missions, like we got Baghdadi.
We went out on bombing missions to get him.
He was such a notorious terrorist.
So this isn't just, you know, a sort of intellectual with the terrorist movement that may or may not have killed two or three people.
This is one of the major terrorists a decade ago.
We had a bounty out on him of 10 million or something, some crazy amount of money.
10 million.
And we had very serious sanctions on the just that were lifted When Trump met with him and is giving him a try in Syria.
Now, that's one side of it.
Sharad did quit in 2016, not yesterday, quite a while ago, and he quit al-Qaeda completely and conducted, took people with him, and they conducted their efforts to overthrow Assad, independent of al-Qaeda, so that al-Qaeda would not control Syria.
should they be successful in overthrowing, well, this is at least a story he told, right?
A lot of people, including our intelligence services, didn't believe him.
On the other hand, we probably did give him some help in overthrowing Assad, because overthrowing Assad, put him aside for a minute, meant that we got rid of Russia in the Middle East.
Very strange, but Russia was out of the Middle East until Obama couldn't handle Assad.
Remember the red lines?
Obama would say to Assad, if you use chemical weapons, that's a red line and we're going to bomb you.
He used the chemical weapons and Obama would say it again.
Well, Obama did that 11 times, never did anything, which of course blew any credibility America had anywhere.
People point to Biden being a weakling.
Obama was as big, if not bigger, a weakling than Biden.
And then eventually he actually said yes to Putin when Putin said, maybe I can come in and help you settle it.
People went crazy.
The foreign policy community, even the lefties went crazy because they had gotten one of the great achievements was to get the Soviet Union and Russia out of the Middle East.
Right back in, and they came in big time.
They put troops in.
They started training Assad and they made Assad into a force against Israel.
Well, kind of against Israel, because Russia and Putin is kind of against Israel, but he's really pretty friendly with Bibi Netanyahu.
He plays both sides.
And Bibi had to play both sides when Biden was around and Obama because Obama and Biden really weren't on his side.
So Obama brought the Soviet, the Russians back in, and they made Syria into a credible force to be dealt with with Assad.
And then Iran glommed onto them and they became part of the reign of terror before Israel deconstructed it.
It was Syria, Hezbollah, Hamas, and the House in Yemen as the main drivers of it.
Lots of help from Turkey, that other guy that smiles all the time, Erdogan.
And this guy was leading a coalition, not just him, but a coalition to try to defeat Assad.
And finally, because all of the props that Assad had, like Iran had, were destroyed by Israel, they went down very easy.
Israel just hit him like that and boom, it went down.
Assad ran to Russia, where, as Shara said, he's having the best time of his life on the money he stole from Syria, the way the Palestinians do with the people in Palestine.
So now the question is, what do we do?
He's in charge of the government.
He claims he has given up terrorism.
Not the first one to do it.
Many lie about it.
Some have successfully kind of got themselves into a different way of thinking and acting.
Remember, the first really conservative prime minister of Israel bombed the King David Hotel, Bagan.
I knew Bagin, and Bagan was a great man, not just a good man.
Now, I don't want to compare this guy to Begin, but there are examples kind of like him also.
And so Donald Trump is making a very, very difficult choice, but I think a very smart one.
If he can flip this guy, and at least all outward circumstances look like he has, if he can flip this guy, or this guy had flipped himself because he realized it was useless to be on the other side, this will go a very, very long way.
Now, follow me here.
This will go a very long way to bring Saudi Arabia along.
Because if he gets into, he already joined the alliance against the Islamic State, which is 90 countries.
That's a big step for a country that was considered a terrorist country a year ago.
It's also a big step for the Saudi Arabian street.
Kind of, if this guy then goes into an Abraham Accord with Israel, it could make it a lot easier for Saudi Arabia to do it and sell it to their street or have some protection against their street.
And I think Saudi Arabia is this close to doing it, this close, which means any little thing could knock him off, right?
Or any little thing maybe could knock him in.
And they are coming to the United States real soon.
And Mohammed bin Salman really does have, I'd say, I can't tell you about this guy.
I don't know if he's surreal or he's a phony, but I think it's worth gambling.
And he's got a couple of natural controls on him.
For example, there's no place for him to go.
I would imagine Russia is trying to kill him.
I mean, he's fighting.
He was fighting Russia for over a decade.
I mean, I'm sure his particular group in their effort to overthrow Assad had to have killed Russians.
And Russians were the biggest prop.
You could say, in a way, if you really want to get interesting, but you'd have to, I don't have time to do this, but this would be a very interesting thing of research.
How much did Putin getting his eye off the ball and going into Ukraine lead to the downfall of his little puppet, Assad?
I mean, if Putin had the normal resources of Russia and the Russian army to assist Assad, I wonder if it would have been easy to overthrow him.
But he had to take his eye off Syria when trying to capture Ukraine turned out to be a lot more difficult than he thought.
So I guess the whole point of this is he's got no place else as he goes.
I don't know where if he decided to double cross the United States and Israel and Trump, Russia's not going to make a deal with him.
Too much blood has been spilled either way.
I don't think he would make a deal with Russia.
So I think if the guy is practical, a killer, but practically, said to himself, the only way you can be safe in this world is if you're either with the Russians and the Chinese and the communists, or you're with the United States.
So I don't know if I want to be with the United States, but I can't be with Russia.
So now he's announced and said to one of our generals or admirals that he wants to be a very close ally of the United States.
Well, Trump has made it real clear to be a close ally of the United States.
You have to be a close ally of what?
Israel.
And there was a time, way back, when this guy was a lot younger, when Syria and Israel had kind of the relationship they've had with Saudi Arabia, where behind everybody's back, they did a tremendous amount of business together, even though they occasionally went to war.
So that is not an unnatural alliance.
That could be done.
And I think the price of him really getting what he wants is going to be the Abraham Accords.
So please watch this.
I know a lot of conservatives, very upset.
A very good point was made to me, and that is: well, it's okay to negotiate him, but why let him come into the White House?
kill so many people, probably Americans.
I often say I really would have a hard time.
I can't stand these killers.
Maybe it's from the time being a prosecutor and prosecuting homicide and stuff like that in the RICO cases.
But I would sit down with him for the good of the United States and the good of Israel if there's a chance.
And I think it's more than a chance.
I think there's a rational argument to be made that he's going to be a positive force, strange as it seems, in bringing peace to the Middle East.
Watch.
And don't underestimate Trump, please.
Of course, President Trump isn't right in everything.
Well, you tell me what he's wrong on, but I mean, he isn't.
Nobody is.
But gosh almighty, he's a lot smarter than they are.
I mean, the ones who are criticizing him are all the ones who have been running our foreign policy for the last 20 years, like the 51 spies who lied.
And where have they left us?
We haven't really won a war, really won a war since the Second World War.
Korean War was a draw.
Vietnam, we lost.
We won the war in Iraq.
We lost the occupation, but we did win the war.
We wiped him out pretty quickly twice.
And I don't know that you consider what we did in Iran of war, but that was over in with the help of Israel.
That was over in.
But that, of course, was under Trump.
So let's watch it.
This will be very, very interesting to see.
You know, Trump has sealed the border as well as you can, better than anybody thought you could seal it.
There's just about nobody coming in.
And I'd love to get an estimate, even on the people who speak it, how many of those avenues have been shut down.
I know you ought to have.
And the simple fact is: the less you have to deal with at the border stops, the more effective you're going to be in stopping people from seeking it.
And the more you have to deal with at the border stop, the less effective you are.
And that is carried over in the calculations they make of how many people come over that we never know about.
And that number goes up drastically when a lot more people are coming in that we know about because our resources are drained.
So I'm pretty sure that that number, although it is a very, very hard one to calculate, that number is down to the lowest it's ever been.
Having said that, we've got an unknown number of illegals here, illegal aliens.
That's what the law calls them, and that's what we should call them.
Even the ones who we say are working in families and all this other stuff, they did break the law to come into the United States.
And then we've got a lot of people that don't break the law to come into the United States.
And every spot we give them, we lose one of those.
And it is more likely that one of those is going to be more of a value added than the people who sneak in and begin their relationship with the United States by breaking the law.
Not a great way to start.
But much worse than that is, that's always been the case with people who sneak over.
This particular group, starting from the day Biden came into office, was disproportionately criminal.
And the lefties who tell you, oh, they don't, the illegals commit less crime.
That used to be a thing of the past.
That was a thing of the 70s and the 80s and the 90s.
When they had to be subjected to a check-in, it limited the number who could come in.
I mean, a lot could come in illegally, but nothing like, I mean, Biden exceeded the highest number ever by like three or four to one.
I don't know if we ever had gotten to a million before, but Biden was up to 3.5 million in one year.
And when the border is open, more criminals come in because they're more comfortable coming in.
Not only that, every criminal group is much more comfortable sending their people in.
It really allowed the cartels to have agents in just about every city of the United States.
It allowed the terrorist groups to put cells anywhere they want in the United States.
We don't know.
It allowed the Chinese to fought us with spies.
And they're all over the United States.
And we don't know.
And the last crooked director of the FBI told you that because he was covering his backside because he sat by for three years and let it happen.
And then he said, oh my God, we have a lot of terrorists here.
We don't know where they are.
Worried that there would be a terrorist attack.
And you see the ones that have been foiled.
So there was open fire at border agents over the weekend in Chicago.
There was a, it's called a little village neighborhood.
And there was a group of people demonstrating against ICE.
And this guy decided in throwing things at the agents and the police to no avail.
I mean, they weren't getting arrested or anything.
The police were even allowed to throw things back.
So this guy came in and decided to take it up another level and started shooting at them.
And the crowd protesting ICE, like the Democrats are all against ICE, you know, right?
They say things about ICE that get these crowds to the point where they think it's okay to kill an ICE agent.
You've got members of Congress who have assaulted ICE agents.
So, I mean, shooting at them.
So this guy has been captured.
They haven't given up his name yet, but he's a criminal alien from Mexico.
So I don't think that they're not still committing lots of crimes.
They are.
And the danger that has been imposed on the ICE agents by Democrats with their incendiary language about ICE is a tragedy.
And it's something for which they should be thrown out to government.
I mean, there's no question that we're at the point where they are inciting the murder of federal agents.
They suddenly are inciting attacks on them when the attacks are up 1,800% on ICE agents.
I mean, that's just unacceptable.
Secretary Noam said she blames Governor Pritzker directly for this.
Well, of course, he protects the criminals.
Fat pig, fat privileged pig, rich privileged pig.
He doesn't have to worry about it.
He's got 2,000 people surrounding him.
He can go off and he can bet $2 million in Las Vegas over a week.
$3 million, $4 million.
How much did he and his wife?
Yeah, how is that possible?
Pig.
As a city governor.
Yeah.
And we got a gambling problem for sure in this country that we're going to talk about at great length in our new podcast.
It's coming up.
So you should be ready for it to be on on Thursday.
It's with Michael Francis, who was a member, a very significant member of organized crime who went to jail and then turned around his life through the help of Jesus Christ, has been straight for over 25 years and has been a very active force in lecturing and both about religious conversion and also about turning your life around.
And he has significant experience in how the mob operates.
So we're going to talk to him about the first podcast that'll be out Thursday at noon.
And it'll be about his criminal life.
The first half of his life, mostly.
Of course, it spills over into the other part, but mostly about who he was and what he did.
And also a lot of it will be his insights into the gambling scandals that are going on both in basketball and now in baseball with these pitchers who were throwing strikes or balls rather and telling the gamblers when they were going to do it.
So I honestly would tell you, I had no idea people gambled on balls and strikes.
It seems to me it all happened so fast, but I guess they do it in advance.
The first, you say, the first pitch of the game, like you bet on the first pitch of the game.
So you can see these guys throwing the ball in the dirt, the first pitch in the game.
And then you look, I went very carefully looked at their records.
One of them has pinpoint control.
I mean, he virtually goes through a season with a couple of strikeouts.
I mean, a couple of walks and unbelievable number of strikeouts.
You used to look at that to determine, did a guy really lose control of the ball?
Or did he hit the guy on purpose?
So if the guy's a wild pitcher, you never know.
But if the guy is Sandy Koufax, Sandy Koufax knew where to put every pitch.
I don't know if he ever threw a wild pitch in his whole life.
Maybe he threw a couple in the dirt because he had to throw low pitches.
But if Sandy Koufax hit you, you knew that Sandy Koufax hit you.
And that's what Willie Mays told me about Bob Gibson, who he hated Bob Gibson.
He never held it against anybody that hit him.
He said, look, it's part of the game.
I realized I hit a home run.
I always felt like sometimes it hit somebody else because they'd be so angry they hit somebody else.
I felt I had to be the one that should be hit if I hit a home run.
And they never hurt me, he said, except for Gibson.
Gibson will look at me like you're going to take my head off.
And then he'd throw it up high, too, right near me.
And he said, and I knew that it was on purpose because Gibson could put the ball any place he wanted.
If Gibson wanted, if you put a little nail there and you said, hit the nail, Gibson could hit the nail with the ball.
So we got a lot.
We got a lot going.
There's a trial in Brooklyn that you should pay some attention to.
It involves a Chinese, I guess she's a Chinese American, but not really an American anymore than a lot of these people who demonstrate or who are communists and Islamic extremist lovers.
But in her case, she got millions and millions of dollars from China.
She lives in a multi-million, she has several multi-million dollar homes.
She never earned more than $145,000 in America.
And she's got millions and millions in property.
And she worked for, of course, Democrats.
They all seem to have some kind of Chinese problem.
Like Diane Feinstein had a Chinese driver for 19 years, and she was on the intelligence committee.
And Swalwell Jerkoff had Ming Fing, Fing Fang, Fang Fang.
Fang Fang.
Yeah, Fang Fang, who he was probably doing all kinds of strange things with.
And she was getting all kinds of information from him.
And he was on the intelligence committee.
Luckily, he was thrown off the intelligence committee.
Should have been thrown out of Congress.
And they should have done a real investigation of him.
She'd been probably put in jail.
No, they're going to investigate Democrat.
They're going to investigate Democrat.
And so this one worked for Acuomo, recently attempted a comeback.
And for a Hokul Moron.
Not only that, but the United States Attorney's Office in the Eastern District of New York charges in the indictment specific things she did to manipulate them that China paid her for.
Taking positions on certain things, not meeting with Taiwan.
So she's on trial with her husband, Chris Yu, and a lot of the money also went to him.
He ran an importing business, which is almost a front for spies.
Used to be a front for a lot of spies that I investigated who were Russian spies.
My history goes back to the Cold War, did a lot of that work and helped to develop the Pfizer court and travel agent business.
Business that involves a lot of international banking and a lot of international work is the kind of thing they set a spy up.
And this guy was importing lobsters.
I didn't know they had great lobsters in China.
If it takes that damn long for the lobster to get to you, who the hell wants it?
I want a fresh lobster.
Right.
And there's also a picture of Sun.
That's our Linda Sun at the 70th birthday party of Communist China in Beijing's Great Hall of the People.
Now, you got to be somebody like a real good old-fashioned communist to do this.
But they got millions and millions of dollars from China and worked for two Democratic governors and got them to shift their positions or stopped things from getting to them.
That was there.
And that was worth it to China.
So you can imagine with the ones that were close to the Congress people and the senators.
And they're all over the place.
The college campuses, Harvard, was filled with them.
Columbia, filled with these Chinese spies.
This is when we considered China, you know, like they have sort of a friend, like jackasses.
Or what traitors?
One or the other.
So this is on trial right now.
And it'd be interesting to see the witnesses because it will lay out.
And of course, she was a former beauty contest contestant.
That's what they do in China.
They take a very, very beautiful woman and they try to entice you.
Sometime I'll tell you the story with Mike Hess and me when we were in China.
We threw her out of the car.
And then we almost got thrown out of China when I walked out on the when I walked out on the Chinese communist head in Beijing.
When I told him, he said, go tell President Bush to kind of, much nicer way, kind of lay off Taiwan.
And I said, well, first of all, I'm not here on behalf of President Bush.
He said, well, you're a friend of his.
I said, well, I'm not here for the United States government.
I'm here for private giving a speech.
And you invited me for a meeting.
He said, yeah, I'm enjoying the meeting very much.
And he said, but I want you to tell him.
And he went on, he gave this big, long speech about Taiwan.
And somehow he said, you know, that they wanted Taiwan back.
And I said, well, maybe if you'd become a democracy, you'd get a chance of getting Taiwan back because they spent a lot of time becoming a democracy themselves if you stop threatening them.
And the guy's smiling at me.
I'm saying to myself, I turn, man, this is fabulous.
I turn this red Chinese guy.
And then my interpreter leans over and says, his interpreter didn't interpret it correctly.
He told you that he told him that you agreed with him.
And the guy doesn't know any English.
I said, well, then you tell him.
I want you tell him.
He told him the guy got up, shook my hand, said it was very nice to see you.
Our meeting's over and walked out.
We were basically left in China all by ourselves, myself and my security company.
So I was able to get out.
Well, we're going to go over to X now.
And we're going to have there, we're going to have with us Ed Martin.
That's right.
Who was in charge of the document that was put out yesterday explaining the pardons that were given by President Trump, which included me, many other people,
but also put out a report from the Justice Department that goes a very, very long way to answering many of the questions about the 2020 election and goes a very long way to certainly proving that everything we were alleging was true.
But what's new?
I can give you 20 instances where I was accused of being a Russian operative for 17 months so they could avoid the Hunter Biden laptop.
Turned out to be a total lie.
Just one among other things.
So we'll see you tomorrow night.
You go over to X and don't forget, noon on Thursday, we'll have our new podcast, our new common sense podcast out, our new series.
So just go hit subscribe on X and you'll be able to get it on Thursday.
▲
Export Selection