All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 25, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
57:04
The Rudy Giuliani Show: Monday, August 25, 2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening.
This is Rudy Giuliani and this is the Rudy Giuliani show on Lindell TV.
Well, we just had a beautiful storm here.
If you can call a storm beautiful.
Ted?
I mean, Rob, let's show it to them.
Pretty nice, huh?
And that rainbow was coming down right in the field between us and the trees.
Very unusual to see live, I'll tell you.
Beautiful.
It was.
There's a longest shot of it.
Look at that.
Beautiful.
That's Dover, New Hampshire.
We had a sunshine.
New Hampshire.
So, The president went through them.
We're going to put on a clip from him in a moment to talk about D.C. and to talk about his new initiatives.
But let's just take a look at that.
Violent crime is down 32 percent.
Carjackings are down 86 percent.
Homicides are down 60 percent.
Robberies are down 47 percent.
Assaults with dangerous weapons down 18 percent.
Property crime down 16.
And we're going on eight days now without a murder, which is the longest in since.
they've been recording crime in the District of Columbia.
So, and so today the president announced that we would that we would I think it might be good if you go back to me now I think we have we've had that up long enough they must be tired of it so the president today made two announcements he made actually
a number of announcements but he made two relating to crime and relating to i guess to follow up from dc uh first of all he indicated that uh his next stops are going to be Chicago.
And at one point he said Baltimore, another point he said New York.
But before that, he signed an executive order that prohibits, well, that basically penalizes states that have cashless bail.
In other words, no, no, you can't put up bail.
People are just released.
The Democrat, the more extreme Democrat left-wing.
socialist leaning, communist leaning states have that.
New York has that big time.
In fact, Andrew Cuomo, who's running for mayor of New York, is the one who passed that.
And it's been a disaster in New York.
From the time it was passed in 2018 or 19, crimes have gone up, even with the decline this year over last year in some of the crimes.
Like rape is up 60%.
Other crimes are down 20% or so.
last year but they're up since pre-COVID or pre-cuomo and the left-wing socialist democratic assemblies no bail people just let out
the young young people 16 17 16 are treated as as babies uh there's no longer an ability to treat them as adults even if they murder their parents and and their brothers and sisters and everybody else around town um there they also have put in a room
for discovery which no one really understands but it results in the dismissal of a lot of cases prosecutor has a turnover is filed within like 30 days they basically passed laws that would benefit criminals
and they have they have benefited criminals they were probably somewhere between seven and nine thousand criminals walking the streets of New York that if New York were governed by people who understand safety and provide for the safety of people we would end up with those people being in jail during this So the president has signed an executive order.
What the executive order says that you cannot.
provide a statute like that.
You can't have a situation where there's no bail.
And if you do, then the penalty will be your aid, maybe your aid relating to the criminal justice programs, maybe your aid in general.
I'm not sure exactly how broad that is.
But a good deal of your aid will be cut.
Federal aid will be cut.
That's with regard to cashless bail.
He's also done an executive order providing that burning the American flag will be treated on the incitement to riot statute as a one-year crime.
I don't know if there's a provision for a second offense.
I had always thought it would be good to make it a one-year misdemeanor first time and a five-year felony second time.
But I'm not sure that it contains that, but I'm glad that it contains what it contains.
So why don't we have the press, why don't we play some of his press conference this morning, press meeting this morning when he talked about that.
So I'll start signing the executive orders.
To me, this is a very, very big deal.
One of the executive orders has to do with cashless bail.
That was when the big crime in this country started.
And I can tell you who did it, when, but I don't want to do that because others followed pretty quickly.
But that was when it happened.
Somebody kills somebody, they go in, don't worry about it, no cash, come back in a couple of months, we'll give you a trial.
You never see the person again.
And I mean, they kill people and they get out.
Cashless bail.
They thought it was discriminatory to make people put up money because they just killed three people lying on a street.
Any street all over the country, cashless bail.
We're ending it, but we're starting by ending it in D.C., and that we have the right to do through federalization.
When you burn the American flag, it incites riots at levels that we've never seen before.
People go crazy, in a way, both ways.
There are some that are going crazy for doing it.
There are others that are angry, angry about them doing it.
Do you want to discuss that?
Sure.
What the executive order does, sir, it charges your Department of Justice with investigating instances of flag burning.
And then where there's evidence of criminal activity, And what the penalty is going to be, if you burn a flag, you get one year in jail, no early exits, no nothing.
You get one year in jail.
If you burn a flag, you get, and what it does is incite to riot.
I hope they use that language, by the way, did that?
Incite to riot.
And you burn a flag, you get one year in jail.
You don't get.
Well, that's a long time coming, and I'm glad that this great president did that.
It's becoming ridiculous with these people burning the American flag and then holding up flags of terrorist groups and countries that are opposed to us and Iran that wants to kill us and they burn the American flag, which is of course what they're taught in their school.
They're taught to hate America.
That's part of our education.
Our American educational syllabus is geared around.
hating America.
And you know why we've talked about it often enough because it is Marxist influenced.
It's not a coincidence that our educational system, when you look at the biases of it are all come right out of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels and then those who interpret them afterwards.
So cashless bail, let's see, I'm sure the Democrats will oppose this.
They've gone completely insane.
Anything he does, they do the opposite.
So he just brought down crime by ridiculous numbers in Washington.
He had no murders for an entire seven, eight day period.
That probably about 70%.
favored by people, by the way.
The rate is about 7, 8 out of 10, the black people who are shot and killed in D.C. Yeah, it's about 7.4 or something like that out of 10.
But instead of saying, hey, good job, Or think of Chicago.
I mean, Chicago has weekend murders like there's no tomorrow.
It's like a shooting gallery.
And now, one would think that if the mayor were interested in saving the lives of his people, he would want the president to do with the National Guard and the federal agents the same things in Chicago that he did in D.C. Wouldn't he like to have a 30, 40 percent decline in homicide?
I guess not.
I mean, he'd rather have people killed than give Trump the way they look.
at it is if they do anything, they give Trump a win.
Well, since he's the president of the United States, assuming he doesn't do everything that's wrong, which is what they, they're hurting the country.
You've got to analyze what he's doing with objectivity and common sense and support the things that help the American people and then oppose the things that you truly believe are going to hurt the country or not help.
It can't possibly be that reducing crime in Chicago and New York and Baltimore.
We have Lowler.
I remember when I became the U.S. Attorney, this is before I was mayor, Ed Koch, I'm not going to say begged me.
He wasn't the kind of person that begged, but it was kind of pleaded with me, let's put it that way, to use my federal resources to help New York City reduce crime.
Well, I couldn't bring out the National Guard, but I did a program called Federal Day, which used to be quite famous.
And it's really how I developed a lot of my ideas that I then used as mayor.
People don't realize that I was involved in a lot of New York City law enforcement, particularly with the police commissioner who I became a partner with, commissioner Ben Ward.
And he wanted my help.
And Ronald Reagan and the Justice Department under Ronald Reagan had done a whole violent crime task force to see the whole purpose of it was, look, I ran it, so I know the purpose of it.
The whole purpose of it was to see how we could help, how the federal government could appropriately help.
the cities that were in terrible trouble using federal laws, federal resources where we could.
And I don't, we didn't have any opposition to it.
then they were then still democrat mayors mostly and they work with us we had the commission the violent crime task force was i've forgotten the exact number but it was pretty much like 5 4 5 3 republican democrat we have a lot of pardon we have a lot of congressman we have that Oh,
well, now the president did say he wants to go to New York.
So the question is, how is New York going to react to it?
And this is the congressman.
He's from what we call in New York City, upstate New York, but he is quite knowledgeable about New York and I think he made a very good point here on Sunday Sunday Television.
Why don't we listen to this?
Though, that we have also been discussing with the governor, that is crime.
The President of the United States has mentioned New York as another city he wants to look at to deploy National Guard troops.
Do you think that's the best use of federal taxpayer dollars and are you comfortable with that happening in your state?
Well, crime has been a major problem in New York.
York for years.
And Kathy Hochul and Albany and New York City Democrats have failed miserably to tackle this crime.
But we want National Guard to be involved.
By the way, Kathy Hochul has mobilized, Kathy Hochul has mobilized National Guard troops to go into the subway system because of the crime in the subway system.
So that has been done, obviously, for the purpose of surging resources and trying to prevent crime.
When you look at the fact that in New York City, for instance, 80% of gun crimes do not result in a conviction or prosecution, that 80% of these individuals individuals are released back out onto the street despite using guns in the commission of a crime.
You look at Washington, DC, 1,7% of gun crime convictions result in jail time.
So when Democrats talk about gun violence, how come they don't want to actually prosecute and enforce the law against criminals who are using guns in the commission of a crime?
No, but that's a local problem that needs to be changed.
But in terms of the question on the troops, you'd rather troops than FBI agents or ATF agents or DEA agents who are trained law enforcement officers in New York City.
You would rather National Guards men who have a training to police?
No.
No, no.
Don't put words in my mouth.
I'd rather all of the above.
The FBI, the DEA, ATF.
I've met with ATF just a few weeks ago in my office on this very issue of really cracking down on gun crimes and prosecuting criminals who use guns in the commission of a crime.
Well, that's exactly what I did in the 1980s as the US attorney.
Exactly what he's talking about.
National Guard, but I used all those federal agents and to the maximum extent that I could.
I utilized federal laws to help the city.
And the mayor asked me to do it.
And the Republican congressman that then represented what used to be called the Silk Stocking District.
We don't have a Republican congressman from Manhattan any longer.
It's Congressman Green, by the way.
They both asked me to do it.
and any number of city council members and and as i said they were very appreciative of what i did and what the justice department helped with And it, of course, it's amazing how it's like she was a Democratic member of Congress debating him on the floor of Congress.
She doesn't treat a Democrat that way, the way she did with Lola.
Of course, he beat the hell out of her because he's a lot smarter than she is.
I remember what a jerk she made out of herself during one of the presidential debates.
But in any event, Lola really made the point.
And it's going to be really hard for them to complain about the National Guard in New York when Hochul used it.
It's okay for Hochul to use it, but not for the President of the United States.
And that's absurd.
It's the same National Guard.
It's like the thing with any of the things like the fence.
Schumer was in favor of the fence.
Pelosi was in favor of the fence.
Biden was in favor of the fence.
Trump runs for office and says, fence, they're all against it.
Now, that's a racist, xenophobic position.
Not when they took it, but when he did.
They're a pathetic political party and the press.
is as pathetic, I mean, she's a pathetic jerk.
But she really got knocked out when she asked him, oh my God, he's in the National Guard in New York.
Well, the governor did.
Don't you know that?
Probably not, even though she lives in New York.
So it looks like the president is very, very serious about sticking to this, sticking to this issue and trying to, and trying to, and trying to, I mean, trying to bring crime down all over.
And by the way, the federal government can help a lot with gun crime.
There's a lot of federal statutes that can be used.
And also, I actually didn't realize I was very, I was very interested in hearing what Congressman Wallace said, because one of the things that we did, particularly when I became mayor, we enforced very, very strictly the gun laws.
That continued through Michael Bloomberg's term in office too.
If you got caught with a gun, you went to jail for one year for sure.
Even accidental, I don't know if you remember the famous case of the giant football player Pikes and Gill Burroughs.
who shot himself in the foot.
He had to go to jail because he had an illegal gun.
And it was illegal in the sense he had registered it in Florida, but not in New York.
Now, that happened.
under Bloomberg.
And I always wondered what I would have done because I was a big Giants fan.
And the Giants run the way to the Super Bowl.
And Flexigo shot himself in the foot.
And boom, there goes the season.
But in any event, in any event, homelessness.
There's an excellent article.
It was pointed out in the post today.
And here's the article from Chronicles magazine by a man named Adam Mill.
And the point that he makes is that, I mean, a lot of the crime problem in the cities and the quality of life problem in the cities is because of the problem of homelessness.
And he points out, and this of course wouldn't mean every organization, but more than you'd like to think, organizations that fight homelessness are paid to fail.
Their budgets go up when they fail.
So if they were to wipe out homelessness, goes up.
They have to hire 10 more people.
They have to give them raises.
They can take raises.
And these homeless contracts are stupendous.
And I don't know if you remember the contracts for the illegal aliens.
They were totally ridiculous.
And now Adam's people are under investigation for a kickback scheme involving that.
And of course, there have been any number of investigations and cases.
and in New York too of homeless situations like that.
So it works pretty much the same way.
You jack up the contract, put a lot of extra money in it.
And then Everybody gets kickbacks and the homeless operator makes a lot more than it looks like he makes because he has an interest in the security company that's hired.
He has an interest in the catering company that's hired.
He has an interest in the transportation company that's hired, because the contract has all of these parts to it.
They are very rich contracts.
This is a billion dollar business in the United States, homelessness.
Don't think of it and don't think of these not for profits as wonderful charitable organizations.
They're just as likely to be crooked as to be honest.
I investigated so many of them.
I can't imagine they change very much.
And the very investigation that is screwing up the mayor of New York involves whacking up money from the very, very rich, overly funded, maybe three times more than you really need, contracts.
And then states like New York and the crooked Democrat states always go for the highest option.
They go for the highest option, not because they want better services, because there's more money to kick around, more money to steal.
So no one ever really made this point quite as well as Adam does here in the shocking hypocrisy and callousness of the left's homeless outrage.
It's really a homeless industry.
More homelessness means more demand for more programs.
But the institutions they work for have an incentive to make these people successful.
Fixing the homeless problem begins by refusing to allow the homeless to occupy the the public square They do not have a constitutional right to inflict mystery on the taxpayer.
In 2023, the Supreme Court reiterated this in Grant's past verses.
first and John, well, I mean, that's the first thing that I did.
This is like reliving the things that I did as U.S. Attorney and Mayor.
I was down to almost no homelessness.
And Bloomberg came back a little bit under Mike, but it came back big time under, I mean, ridiculous under, under, under DeBlasio.
He did away with all of the reforms and changed it completely.
In fact, I wrote an article about it.
toward the beginning of his administration saying you can tell a mayor doesn't love his city if there are homeless people because to let a person remain homeless.
shows that you're a pretty callous son of a bitch.
I don't, I mean, just from that point of view, I can't imagine as a mayor how I would let people sleep on the street.
For their good, they turn violent.
Also, do you know that housing is the issue for about 4% of them?
What are the issues?
Straight out now, just poverty, tremendous poverty.
Very small percentage for that too.
Big percentages now.
Drugs, alcohol, crime.
That's about 80%.
So now you put them on the street.
Let's say they have a mental issue.
What do you think happens if you live on the street to a paranoid schizophrenic?
He becomes a very, very serious, violent paranoid schizophrenic.
And if he's not, there's plenty of them around to beat him up or kill him.
So this is not a solution that you perpetuate.
This is something that you deal with as an emergency issue because people are on the street, but you work your tail off to make sure that people aren't living on the street.
Streets are not for sleeping.
They're not for urinating, and they're not for defecating, right?
That's what we kind of figured out in the Middle Ages somewhere.
But the Democrats, in many ways, don't care because these people become a captured vote.
vote for them They'll round them up and bring them in to vote and give them a little money to do it.
Well, I don't know what.
what Lavrov is all about.
But when you look at what's going on with Ukraine, it's just a damn tragedy.
You just think of the, there was the meeting in Alaska.
It looked like although people were disappointed, a lot of people just wanted to see the fire, there were some very major breakthroughs that made you see a road toward an agreement because Putin had made concessions about an effective that Ukraine,
he wanted, he wanted, he, the toughest one was he wanted the donbass region or a good portion of it that he doesn't have he wanted that and we'll get into that in a little while that's that's critical even now uh but it but uh some of that would have been some of that would have been ameliorated by uh his agreeing to allow or
not objecting to in terms of the peace agreement a peace a peace uh accord with uh ukraine where he would first of all promise not to invade and the European countries and the United States would support Ukraine.
And they would have to agree not to join NATO, but they could have a security arrangement similar to what they would get in NATO.
They just wouldn't have the other things that go along with NATO.
So that seemed like he could get to a solution of that.
And he also seemed to be prepared to give some territory or to cede the other three areas where he was asking for more territory originally and to not insist on a lot of the ridiculous things that he was saying like Ukraine should demilitarize.
Well, all of a sudden, we now have him last week, well, not him, but leaks through Lavrov say, first of all, the security agreement has to be approved by Russia.
They have a veto power over it or even a formulation role and they want China to come into it.
Well, that's just true.
I mean, that's absurd.
What's the point of having a security?
The security is security against Russia and you're going to let them have a veto power over it?
You might as well not have a security agreement.
That's done just to delay this thing.
That's an absurd thing to ask in a negotiation if you're serious about wanting to have peace.
It's not absurd to ask for Donbass.
It might be absurd to give it to them, but it's not absurd to ask for it.
But it is absurd to say, well, we're going to, it has to be done just to screw up the peace agreement.
Then he now is going back to, he wants all the other regions as well, not just Donbass.
And he wants basically a demilitarized Ukraine.
Now this weekend, Lavrov added a whole new one, which according to the people at the meeting, including the vice president, is completely contrary to what Putin said at the meeting.
And that is that they can't really negotiate with Zelensky because he's not really legitimately the president of Ukraine because he extended his term.
Now, I believe the constitution of Ukraine provides that you shouldn't have an election during a time of war.
So the reason they're not having an election is a legal one, and it's because Putin invaded them.
And so let's listen to Lavrov's interview.
I think we have that, right?
I will look in.
Okay.
Yeah, let's listen to that..
Well, I would say that those who are sincerely interested in understanding what is going on would know, should know by now that never ever Russia deliberately targeted any sites which are not linked to military abilities of Ukraine.
This is an electronics factory, though, sir.
This is an electronics factory.
I've spoken to people on the ground there.
It builds coffee machines among other electronics.
This is not a military site.
Well, I understand that some people are really naive and when they see a coffee machine in the window, they believe that this is the place where coffee machines are produced.
Our intelligence has very good information.
And we target only, as I said, either military enterprises, military sites, or industrial enterprises directly involved in producing military equipment for Ukrainian army.
You can almost look at his face and see he isn't serious because he knows the demands are put in to be roadblocks to being able to get to an agreement in the next couple weeks or in a month or because they want to kill more Ukrainians and they want to try to get as much territory as they can grab for as long as they can grab.
For them, a long, long war with Ukraine would be exactly what they want because it would wear Ukraine down.
Meanwhile, they're losing troops like three times.
But Ukraine, I mean, if the calculation was made, if Putin had to fight to get what he's asking for now, he could lose as many as a million more troops, actually over a million troops.
That would mean taking the Donbass.
If he could take it, he's been trying to take it from forever.
And the reason it's important is it's a very, very fortified position.
And the reality is that if he gets it, He's got pretty much a free run into Ukraine.
Even the topography favors him once you get beyond the two major cities that are the big, big fortifications that he wants.
So this has become a situation where the president, who has all the cards really if he wants to play them, the president has to hit him hard, really, really hard, both with sanctions.
with equipment for Ukraine.
Also, it appears as if, I don't know how true this is, but it appears that the The missiles that we gave them, I don't know what good they are if they can't be used.
Now, it isn't right that they can bomb all the way over on the western end of Ukraine, Lviv.
And they can't do the same.
They can't hit Moscow.
They've been hitting Kiev, which is the capital.
They've been hitting the cities, they did an attack the other day that was so close to Poland that Poland had to scramble its air force.
So he should be able, Zelensky should be able to hit back.
But he's got to get from Hagsdad in order to do that.
And it goes through, if I'm not mistaken, I believe that it I think it goes through Eldridge Colby, who is the Pentagon Undersecretary for Policy.
And he's the one who pretty much has been very favorable to Russia and very unfavorable to Ukraine throughout.
So he's going to say no.
And meanwhile, the president pointed out the other day that Zelensky should have the ability to hit inside Russia since they're hitting him.
So I don't know what's going on here, but I think the president maybe should bring Pete and this guy Colby in.
Maybe somebody else should be put in charge of it, not Colby.
He may have a bias or a prejudice here.
I mean, not, not, you've got to have be objective in order to handle this right.
There's too much at stake.
This is a very, very serious situation if Putin were to get what he wants, both with regard to Putin and with regard to China.
So we're going to take a short break.
And when we come back, we're going to have with us our friend Ali Reza, Jeff Sudati, who is going to talk to us about...
Um, And this video has existed for quite some time.
It answers an awful lot of questions from the people who lie about the availability of an alternative and a strong alternative to the reign of terror.
We'll be right back.
Welcome to Vocal, the free speech social app that gives you a platform to amplify your voice, speak freely, connect boldly, and be part of a growing movement for truth, faith, and freedom.
Want to know what's happening right now?
The Now Playing feature shows you exactly who's live and what's streaming in real time.
Check out the show's feed, a non-stop lineup including Lindell TV News 24-7, shows and on-demand programming all in one place.
Connect with your favorite host and never miss a show.
Explore the featured page for quick access to Lindell TV's top shows.
Follow your favorites and watch their newest content flow right into your feed.
And when they go live on Vocal, you can join the live chat and be part of the action.
Ask questions, share your thoughts, even help shape future shows.
Stay informed on issues around securing our elections by following your state's Cause of America account.
Join a group and connect on a deeper level from faith and freedom to the future of our nation.
Go to vocal.com or download the app today and be a part of the mission to save our country.
Too many pharmacies and insurance companies are blocking the medications that actually work.
That's why I recommend All Family Pharmacy.
They give you access to treatments like ivermectin now starting at just $2 a capsule.
They also have methylene blue, hydroxychloroquine, and so much more.
They're helping you stay prepared and they've dropped their prices by 25%.
Also use promo code Lindale 10 you save even more.
Go to allfamilypharmacy.com forward slash Lindale.
Use promo code Lindale 10 and get the medicine you need.
If you want to drop extra pounds, boost energy levels and reduce swelling in your legs and feet then this message is for you.
Pure Health Research is on a mission to make America healthy again and two of their best-selling health supplements are leading the way.
First is Liver Health Formula.
Over 100 million Americans have a sluggish liver that's riddled with fatty deposits.
This can kill your metabolism, pile on the pounds and make you feel tired.
Liver Health Formula takes care of that.
It supports thriving liver health with special nutrients like artichoke extract and milk thistle.
This is one of the easiest ways to slim down and revitalize your energy levels.
Next is Lymph System Support.
If you struggle with fluid buildup or swelling in your legs, ankles and feet, this is for you.
The natural ingredients in Lymph System Support help gently flush away extra fluid and toxins out of your body.
And right now for a limited time, you can get 35% off Liver Health Formula and Lymph System Support.
along with 50 plus other health supplements that Pure Health Research has to offer.
So head over to purehealthresearch.com and use promo code Lindell at checkout.
That's purehealthresearch.com.
Promo code Lindell to save 35% on your order today.
With everybody talking about making America healthy again, I thought today would be a great day to talk to all my fellow patriots about the importance of making your homes healthy again.
Well, we have proudly partnered with Airwater Healing.com and their revolutionary whole home air purification system.
The V3 from Airwater Healing does 3,000 square feet of purification.
It eliminates dust, mold, viruses, and odors.
But here's the part I love.
They require no filters to ever be changed and virtually no maintenance.
Whether you suffer from asthma, allergies, seasonal bronchitis, or just want to protect your family from the flu or even greater threats, don't wait to get your V3 from Airwaterhealing.com today.
Use code Lindell for 20% off in savings and pre-shipping.
That's promo code Lyndell at airwaterhealing.com.
Thank you.
Welcome back, this is Rudy Giuliani, and we have with us, a little bit of a question.
Ali Reza, Jeff Sardardi, who is one of the leaders of the resistance movement, has been involved in it for many, many years, probably is one of the most knowledgeable people in the United States on both the history and what's going on in Iran right now.
And tell us what...
And all of a sudden it gets put out today.
And it's remarkable.
I mean, among other things, it points out what you and I and so many others have been saying and all of the, I don't know what we want to call them, the regime lovers say the MEK is not important and the MEK doesn't mean anything.
Meanwhile, the Ayatollah has actually pointed out that the MEK is the only organization that could replace them.
That's why he's worried about them.
He's actually said it.
So tell us about this video.
Sure.
First of all, Mayor, this is such a great pleasure to be on your show as always.
Really appreciate the opportunity.
The tape you're referring to that was also tweeted by the President of the United States, retweeted actually by him on his social media platform is a confession by a senior official of the Iranian regime who was the former deputy speaker of the parliament of the regime,
a sitting member of parliament between 2008 and 2020.
And he said in an interview that was recently publicized that the goal of the Iran regime since day one that they got involved in nuclear activities has always been to build a bomb.
And he said we were moving forward until the MEK, which is the main Iranian opposition movement fighting the Ayatollahs, until the MEK actually exposed it.
And he said if they hadn't done it, we could have become like Pakistan.
And he mentions, you know, specifically Pakistan, we could have moved forward, done the testing and it would be a done deal that nobody else would be able to do anything.
Clearly, is he referring to the original discovery by MEK of the enrichment of uranium?
Oh, I think we've lost it.
Revelation of the Perfect.
Here we are.
Yes, the 2002 revelation of the nuclear site in Natanz, where the MEK found out about the information, they shared it,
And it was that revelation that triggered the inspections of uranium nuclear sites by the UN nuclear watchdog known as the IAEA.
Before then, there were no inspections, no presence of the IAEA in Iran.
And then it was that revelation that triggered a lot of the other unearthing of information about that that eventually led to the world knowing about what the ayatollahs were all about.
It led to six UN Security Council resolutions imposing sanctions on the Iranian regime.
So, I mean, Ali Reyes, you also made other discoveries along the way, like in'05, I think, right, Florida.
Actually, within one year, four major press conferences was held right here in Washington exposing nuclear sites, you know, the Labizan Xi'an, which became one of the major cases of contention between the IAEA and Iran,
they later found traces of highly enriched uranium actually you also held a press conference a couple of about two months and a half ago just right before the israeli and the american uh actions uh in in iran uh to point out that they were now uh they they they
You wouldn't need missiles if you wanted the peaceful use of uranium.
And I think that had something to do with Israel and the United States probably knew they were going to have to do this, but this made it really necessary to do it right away.
Well, you know, to get back to the revelations you mentioned, that those revelations continued.
And in 2005, we exposed the underground facility in Fardo, where deep under the mountains, they were building a facility to install, you know, centrifuges to enrich uranium.
That's where they were actually enriching uranium to 60 percent, very close to weapons grade.
And also throughout these years, we had over 130 cases of revelations that we made over a span of two decades that show the complete picture of the Iran regime that they were building nuclear weapons.
It's not about energy.
None of the work they're doing is about energy.
Also, a necessary component of that was a missile program, which is a necessary part of a nuclear program.
You can't have a nuclear bomb without the ability to deliver it.
Yes, we're going to run out of time.
So I want to play his video, too.
This is Ali Mottahari.
Is that his name?
Yes, Ali Mottahari was a member of parliament for many years, very, very conservative member, close to Khamenei for years.
And he's the one who is making the interview, making the confession.
Well, let's give it a try, Ted.
put it on.
You got the video.
As you can see, he says this is in.
Farsi, of course, but he says that, you know, he says the whole system were behind it and they wanted to build the ball.
So what was the whole goal was that we wanted to have leverage to have the ability.
And then he said, and then we couldn't keep it secret.
It was exposed by the MEK.
It was the MEK who exposed it, he says.
And then he said, how did they exposed it?
How did they find out about it?
And he basically says that they are everywhere.
He's talking about the MEK being everywhere, having the ability to monitor and to have an impact on the whole society.
And then the reporter asks him, aren't you afraid that you're saying all these things that we're actually building the bomb?
And he says, well, no one is paying attention to me.
He said, well, the whole world is going to find out about it.
And of course, that's what you hear, you see that.
He says, 100% the program was for building the bomb.
That was the whole project from stage one.
is his saying that it was M.E.K. that revealed it and that they're everywhere, meaning they're everywhere in Iran, which is a complete contradiction of your enemies, of which there are many because a lot of pro-Iranian, pro-regime types have infiltrated the government.
A lot more than we'd like.
No, it's the ability of the movement to be able to find out about the secrets of the regime everywhere, not just on the nuclear issue, about their terror network, about their repression inside Iran.
And also, this is the movement that is engine behind change in Iran.
They are the engine behind the uprisings in Iran.
They are the main target of repression inside the country, the main target of their terrorism outside of Iran when they had, you know, huge rallies and the regime wanted to bomb it.
And this is the movement that is calling for firmness against the regime.
You know, next week, Mayor, on September 6, that's a Saturday, the next S capital of pretty much the capital of Europe, the MEK supporters, NCRI supporters, tens of thousands of them are gathering to call for imposing a snapback of all the sanctions on the Iran regime,
to call for free Iran, to call for regime change, and to call for supporting the ten-point platform of misses Mariam Rajavi.
She is the leader of the same movement that exposed all these nuclear sites and is trying to bring about change to establish a democratic, free, non-nuclear republic form of a government began to be the point of the current theocracy.
Well, I think the interesting thing is in a strange way she has the endorsement of the ayatollah because he said the only organization he's worried about that could have the resources to take over would be MEK.
And the MEK has in addition to the great work in bringing out the nuclear ambitions of Iran, the MEK has also worked with other organizations in a very,
very big umbrella movement in which you have a shadow government ready to be an interim government for what are the six or nine months to bring things to a democratic election.
And the 10-point program, which we've gone over very often on the show, I hope people remember it, but I mean, the main features of it are, first of all, it would be a non-nuclear.
Iran, it would not be a religious state.
It would be a state in which there'd be freedom of religion.
Very important, freedom for women.
I mean, if the organization is run by a woman and women are about just about as equally involved in it as men if if you go to your facilities whether it's ashraf or the other ones around the world there's just as many women as men involved in including in the in the military work that has to be done so this would be extraordinary to have you know the the transition guided by a woman and by people who have been involved in this for
10 20 30 years not you know newcomers that don't know anything about Iran.
Very different than what we've had in other countries where we didn't have an organization, you know, ready to go that's thought its way through this and has proved itself so thank you very much Alli Reza we've got it we're near the end but this was very very helpful to get this out and we'll have you back this week to talk more about this people people need to know more about it particularly the capacity of mek and
the related organizations to guide a transition Well, thank you.
Thank you so much, Mayor, for really being on top of this issue from day one and educating.
the American public, educating the world, reminding people that as horrible as the Ayatollahs are, at the same time, the people of Iran are exactly the opposite.
There is an organized force, there is a solution.
We don't have to live with the Ayatollahs and their proxies in the region forever.
To the country, the prospect for change has never been so great.
Think about it, Mayor, a free Iran, a democratic Iran, a non-nuclear republic form of government would replace the Ayatollahs.
place the, you know, the head of the state of war and terror in Tehran, what a difference it will make, what an impact it will have everywhere.
Thank you very much.
It was great to see you, Ali Reza.
It was really great to see you, Ali Reza.
You take care of yourself.
They've attempted to kill this man a couple of times, so that's why when I say that, it's quite serious.
Let me also point out as we close out.
that there was a poll released today or maybe the day before it was covered today in which 7,000 people were surveyed inside Iran and 80 80 80 percent want to see the ayatollah and the regime of terror go 80 percent eight out of ten and something like 63 64 65 percent want to do not want to have a religious government they want to have a government that
is allows you to practice your religion without all of these restrictions So this is a this is there's a movement going on there and MEK and the council., the overriding council is ready, willing and quite capable of both guiding this without any American troops on the ground and also guiding the transition.
And you heard it right from the mouth of a very dedicated Islamic extremist.
They're very frightened of MK and they're killing him left and right, unfortunately.
So we'll pray for the people of Iran and the people of Israel and the people of Ukraine, of course, and the people of America and for the president.
And we'll be back tomorrow night and go over now to X and we will continue with this and all of the other incredible things that are going on today.
Really quite a busy day in making America great again.
▲
Export Selection