All Episodes
Previous Next
July 21, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
58:48
The Rudy Giuliani Show: Monday, July 21, 2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Nice picture.
adjust the flag Good evening, Rudy Giuliani, and this is the Rudy Giuliani Show, and welcome to a new week of hopefully our long but steady march to a more peaceful and a much more beautiful world.
So now that my American flag is pointed in the right direction, we can get started.
And we're going to begin today with something that I have been talking about, speculating about, thinking about, reading about, and felt,
and have always presented it or packaged it around some very, very serious allegations, allegations of it seems this way, as opposed to proof.
But from the very beginning of the many, many stages, the persecution of Donald Trump, it had always seemed to me that the people behind it,
although Hillary put a lot of money into it and wanted to be president based on it, and Biden similarly, but the person behind it was the Obama gangsters, the Obama crew.
The Obama crew would be Obama, Brennan, some of the other people closest to Obama, Rice, those we know, those we don't know.
Biden as a hanger on, you know, whatever you want, boss, you know, I'll follow along, which has been Obama forever.
Obama would not have had a creative thought from the day he was born, but whatever Obama was doing, he was going to follow right along, probably stupidly thinking he was going to benefit from it rather than Hillary.
Obama was probably the most surprised person in the world when they had to turn to the idiot vice president that he had to be president of the United States, but it was better than Trump.
So now the question, which is put a lot more, with a lot more substance behind it than someone's instincts or even informed instincts based on evidence, but not conclusive evidence, is was the architect of this Obama?
And I'm talking about Obama now corporately.
Trump is a different kind of president.
He's a very singular, tough individual.
That doesn't mean there aren't people around him who are important, like Rubio, like Hegset, like Stephen Miller, maybe.
Even put Stephen Miller first, maybe.
They have great influence on him, of course, as do any of the advisors that you trust.
But I don't think you have much doubt that Trump is running things in a little bit more of a hands-on way than, let's say, even Obama was.
Now, Biden is way off on, Biden is off in some other stratosphere of, I'm not even sure he was president.
There's some committee that was acting as president.
Since we're just the American people, and this is just a government of, for, and by the people, but we're not entitled to know, and never were entitled to know who those people are.
I mean, the Democrats know that because there are overlords, and therefore they're entitled to know, but we're not.
We can suspect who they are, but we don't know who they are.
Obama had a similar situation, but not anywhere near as pathological or as necessary because Obama, whatever else you think of him, had a brain.
Biden, I don't even know if Biden ever knew what a brain was from the day he was born until whatever he passes on.
he was the dumbest member of Congress.
He was, I will tell you, honestly, told you this many years ago, he's probably one of the dumbest people I've ever met in or out of politics.
From the very beginning, and now I can say more about this.
I don't represent President Trump right now, although the things that he said to me are still privileged.
So they remain and go to my grave with me.
And none of them are harmful.
I wish I could say them.
But I can speculate based on the public facts.
And I would speculate occasionally, more than occasionally, that it seems to me, although I can't prove it and I don't have solid facts, that Obama is behind this.
Now I think I can go one step further and say it's something that really is worthy of a very significant investigation.
And I think possibly Brennan is the brains behind it.
Particularly the early plot definitely had CIA written all over them, much more even than the FBI.
The FBI helped a lot by lying and cheating and covering things up for Biden, fixing Hillary's case.
But that whole situation with Russian collusion, the steel dossier, the things in it were like a stupid CIA novel.
And it seemed to me that that would indicate that Brennan had a big role in orchestrating the first one with Russian collusion, of course, right?
And then variations of Russian collusion.
The press helped an awful lot.
They were primary co-conspirators in that one, having won Pulitzer Prizes.
Amazing, right?
They won Pulitzer Prizes for probably one of the biggest falsified political stories in American history.
And that's what Pulitzer stands for, really, ultimately, an absolutely corrupt inducement to cheat, to lie, to support your predetermined theory of one world or the weakness of America or Marxism or whatever the heck it might be.
And the fact that those Pulitzer Prizes have not been withdrawn or surrendered shows you that they were given in bad faith.
What I'm telling you is when those reporters were writing this, except maybe the dumbest and youngest ones, they knew it was completely false, just like Brennan did.
Brennan was creating it.
He knew it was completely false.
I mean, who decided that Michael Cohen went to Prague and met with Russian agents?
Who decided that?
Who decided to put that in?
And then James Cardinal Comey swore that it was true.
See, it never happened.
So it can't be based on, well, they had a document showing he was there a year before, or they had some evidence that he snuck in at some point, and then they just kind of like turned it around a bit, changed a fact here, a fact there.
That's the way the old-fashioned political liars would do it.
But this new group of, if not Marxist in 100%, this group that used Marxist tactics had no regard to whether there was any truth at all to what they were saying.
They would just make it up.
Cohen was in, I believe, Los Angeles or San Diego at the time, watching his son try to get a baseball scholarship, which was provable.
And the part of it that should have put Brennan, I'm sorry, of James Cardinal Comey in jail like that was James Cardinal Comey announced that this was something you couldn't really validate.
Well, there's no such thing as something you can't validate.
There's something you either try to validate or you don't.
Now, this actually was a pretty easy document to validate in certain respects because it made assertions a fact.
So let's just spend a second and say to ourselves, if we're honest people, which excludes everybody working for Obama and Biden, if we're honest people, and we have this guy that comes to us and has given us a tale that I don't know any reasonable person with common sense would say sounds kind of crazy that Trump peed on a bed because he was angry at that Obama had slept there or something or that he'd been an agent of the Communist Party for 10 or
20 years or something.
I mean, if you knew his political views and his economic views, the whole thing would be like a joke.
Like this is some kind of a stupid, idiotic joke.
So you would have looked at the document.
I mean, the first time I looked at the document, first time I got to read it as his lawyer, or the excerpts from it, I said, well, maybe these are just the excerpts and it'll get better.
I pronounced that it was a piece of crap the day I read it.
So this is not a CIA.
This is made up by pretend, terrible CIA agents.
And I figured right away it came right out of Brennan's office.
Because you also think Brennan is smart, and he's not.
He's your typical left-wing phony.
He's an absolute phony.
One of the reasons our intelligence has been so bad in the last 20 To 30 years, is there are a lot of Brennans that are feeding that intelligence.
First of all, under the best of circumstances, they're not even good at what they do.
And the worst of circumstances is they lie to tell the president what he wants to hear, or they lie to fit the political ideology that they have.
Always been rumored, rumored.
I have no proof of this except two or three stories that were told to me.
But a question, is Brennan a Muslim, a practicing Muslim?
Is he a Risney?
I don't know.
I know people have alleged that.
I know he doesn't answer the question.
And I know people who have said, CIA people who have said, that he prayed in the office next to his and that he left behind and then had to retrieve a prayer rope.
Now, that's alleged.
I don't know if that's true.
I do know from his actions that he seemed to favor Islamic extremism over America.
It was during Obama's era that we were not allowed to say that it was an Islamic terrorist attack, even if the guy killing people was yelling Allah Akbar, which might be a pretty good indication that it was, since he's telling us that he's doing it in the name of the Muslim religion, that it was a Muslim attack.
But both Obama and Brennan made that probably a capital offense.
I mean, some of it was absolutely absurd.
A guy would be running around shooting people in the name of Allah and was saying, well, it's not determined what cause he was.
A lot of that is attributed to what people felt was a very unhealthy sympathy that Brennan had for the Islamic cause, including the distorted part of it.
Not unlike his friend Biden, whose position as a Muslim was always very, very questionable.
He was for a good deal of his school years listed as a Muslim, then later as a Christian.
He seemed to be a strange Christian in that he went to a church where the minister didn't seem to be a preacher of the gospel, but a preacher of hatred against Americans, including curse words that we used about Americans.
There aren't too many ministers or priests that I've heard give sermons cursing about America.
So how much of the plot goes to Obama?
Whoa, it looks like a lot.
I may have to write a new book.
I mean, I did the Biden crime family with the boss being Biden.
It may be that the boss is Obama.
And remember, the way I see it, maybe it'll help you to see it this way.
I see the pots against Trump.
Oh, gosh, let's call them each, let's say a chapter in a book or a section of a book.
It's like different, they could be separate stories or separate conspiracies.
So we have the Russian collusion, a lot to that.
I mean, the core of it being Hillary paying, laundering a 1 million plus payment to steal in order to produce a phony document laundered through the Perkins Coe law firm, who was crying so much because they were penalized.
Of course, they did what Bragg attempted to convict Trump of.
They said, oh, you know, when Trump paid Cohen, it was, Trump said, a return of the money that Cohen had laid out for the case, but it was listed as legal fees.
Well, I mean, that's not terribly far off as a description.
Probably not meeting the standard, very, very high standard has to be met for a very precise false statement.
But what Hillary did is like completely 180 degrees different.
She was paying Christopher Steele money to dig up lies about Donald Trump.
He did.
And there's nothing to reflect that other than payments from Perkins-Coey to Steele for legal work.
I don't know, maybe framing somebody as legal work.
At least it should have been listed as for illegal work.
Right?
So that's chapter one or sorry, that's section one of the book in which there are many chapters, you know, starting with going after Papadopoulos, who was completely innocent, Carter Page, who was completely innocent.
Gosh Almighty, framing General Flynn, all the shenanigans and lies of James Cardinal Comey, including the one that is just, it's like a neon sign flashing out from hell,
the hell of legal lies and perjury, saying, please come and prosecute me, please come and prosecute me, where Comey submitted four Pfizer affidavits, all of which said validated on the top, and he validated nothing of it.
Nothing, not a single thing.
And his answer was there was nothing to validate.
And the lapdog, equally complicit criminal press just accepted that When you could pick out big giant sections that could be corroborated, like the one I did about Cohen's trip to Prague, that's as hard to corroborate as calling the passport office.
I think a second grader playing this game Clue would have figured out how to do that.
Don't you think?
How about the following?
The guy writes all of this about Russia.
How about asking him, hey, Christopher, you got paid a million plus, and who knows how much you got paid on the side?
Exactly when's the last time you were in Russia?
Well, suppose he lied to you and he told you, oh, during the time I was doing this.
Oh, gee, well, let's just, just to be sure, let's take a look at the passports and the travel documents.
And even if they're laundered, let's take a look at the laundered names.
So if you ever have to prove it, we can.
Well, had they done that, they'd have found out he hadn't been in Russia for 17 years, which would have made writing about things that were supposedly generated from Russians on the ground at the time that they happen.
It would mean that every bit of that was a lie and that you, Comey, were putting your, well, after all, you are a cardinal, you're imprimater on it.
Everything I'm saying to you could have been prosecuted then.
It should have been prosecuted then.
I really do believe it would have stopped them a bit had they been holding Hillary to account for destroying all the emails, holding Comey to account for blatantly committing perjury on a very,
very, very, very sensitive document, Pfizer application, holding Brennan, prosecuting Brennan for framing General Flynn and Comey together.
Had those been prosecuted, even if they ended up in front of District of Columbia juries that would acquit them, even if there was video proof that they assassinated most of Trump's administration, it still would have slowed them down.
And maybe some of those venue could have been switched to a place where in America we still can get fair trials.
The District of Columbia court turned into something that looked more like Germany during the Nazi era or Russia during the Soviet era.
Those were not American courts, nor were they American judges, nor were they particularly humane judges, the way they treated the January 6 people, who, whether you believe they committed a crime or not, certainly hadn't committed a crime that required long-term pre-trial, pre-conviction, incarceration under very, very cruel circumstances.
Those people have to be held to account.
But it seems to me now, as I rethink this, the head of the RICO case should be Prince Obama.
I think he was calling the shots, which of course makes a lot more sense than no brains doing it.
I mean, in order to run a RICO conspiracy, one as complicated as this, you have to have some kind of brain.
You don't have to be a genius, obviously, but you got to be better than, you know, I don't know how many other people would agree with me that Joe Biden is one of the stupidest people they ever met.
And that's before he was Sena.
When he was Senao, I don't even know if he would qualify as a sentient human being.
I mean, anything out of him could have been like, you know, I just saw a dead person or going around the White House looking for a dead person or thinking he saw Roosevelt on television when Roosevelt was dead before there was television.
I mean, the sort of little arguments they make now that somebody should have come forward because there were hints that he was senile and therefore a great danger to America where the president has lethal power.
I mean, those are really very, very silly, very euphemized, very reduced descriptions of reality.
There was no question that the man was a blithering idiot who didn't have a brain that was functioning way back in 2018, 2019.
And if you need any inside proof of it, you just go to the hard drive, which all the Republicans ignore.
I don't know what Kumer was doing.
He never really bothered to read the hard drive, or he would have emphasized the conversation between Hunter Biden and Abelow, his psychiatrist, in which they said in 19, 2019, that could Joe run after all.
He has dementia.
And then they make fun of him having dementia.
That's a year before he actually ran.
That's when he was telling stories like, oh, I guess it was in 20, tell the story about he likes the little children touching the hair on his leg.
Maybe that should have raised some alarms.
I don't know how many grown men like little children touching the hair on their legs.
I hope there's not a lot of them.
But I do think the minute you say that, there got to be a couple of things that come to mind.
One, you're a pervert.
And two, you're some kind of stupid pervert For saying it or demented pervert because if you ever had a filter, when you lost that little brain cell, the filter went.
So, congratulations to Tulsi Gabbard, who has already lived up to what she promised to do.
And there's plenty more for her to do.
If she wants to have disagreements about isolationism and interventionism, and these disagreements have been going on in our country since the day it was founded.
And I disagree with her.
I'm not an extremist, what I would consider.
And please, Tulsi, don't get upset with me.
From my point of view, you're a bit of an extremist isolationist.
So was Tucker.
So were some of the other people.
I think it's good that we have some people like that because they control the extremist interventionists.
But we really shouldn't have isolationists and interventionists.
We should have people prepared to use the power and strength of the United States when necessary and maybe thought of internationally as more willing to do it than they really are.
Because unfortunately, we live in a very, very cruel and a very wicked world.
And we're not going to deter everybody just because they think we're fair-minded and easygoing.
They're going to be deterred because they know that if we have to in the defense of our freedom and our people, we can be ruthless.
We will do everything we have to do to prevent you from killing Americans.
And if you do, we will hunt you down until we catch you and bring you to justice or send you off to someplace else where you're going to get justice.
But we don't forget.
We don't put it aside.
If it's 50 years later, like we did with the Nazis, we still come after you.
You don't get to abuse Americans.
It's just not allowed because of our loyalty to our fellow citizens.
Now, how many Democrats feel that way now?
What do you think?
They probably do, but they're afraid to say it.
Instead, they seem to take up passionately the causes of the people who want to kill us.
Like all the ones demonstrating.
I mean, you can call those demonstrations whatever you want, but part of them is a very, very strong support for Hamas that's dedicating to killing and has killed many Americans.
So there's a long way to go.
I do hope we have the I do hope we have the stick-to-itiveness and strength to stick with it.
I'd prefer to see a little different cast of characters than the people who investigated the Biden allegations in the House because they never got anywhere with it.
I mean, they were on television a lot and they talked a lot, but they never did anything with it.
And also, for reasons never understandable to me, they missed some of the most powerful evidence that either was there then sitting in front of them, and they didn't seem to understand it, or they didn't know the significance of it because they weren't well-trained investigators or lawyers.
And second, there now are facts coming out that they never bothered to even find out about.
Maybe it doesn't matter because some of the most significant facts they found out about, they never were able to utilize properly.
I do not believe that that was on purpose.
I don't think this is a conspiracy thing.
I do think it's a question of their being in over their heads.
Coomer, Comer, what's the word?
I get them confused with the...
It seems like he's an honorable guy.
Well, I don't know.
I don't know.
I can't, I can't, there's no reason I wouldn't believe he's honorable.
But from the very beginning, it seemed to me that he was way over his head in this investigation.
And he's done some really extraordinary things like Harry's had the microphone for forever, and he seems befuddled when he's asked questions like, did Biden get any money?
Well, of course Biden got money, and you have the single biggest proof of it.
You have what's known as an admission by his son that's virtually written out.
And I don't know if Coomer is a lawyer or not, but maybe he should have consulted one because there's probably no more powerful evidence in the law than an admission.
Now, it may not be the most powerful evidence, but the rules of evidence denominated as such.
And although you could have quite an interesting argument over it, the law, American English jurisprudence for thousands of years, hundreds of years.
Well, for a thousand years.
Right.
Let's see.
The whole hearsay rule and the exceptions to it probably are about 700 years old.
And here's the simple explanation of it.
Let's suppose Hunter Biden were arrested and he were questioned for 48 hours.
And after the 48 hours, he said, yeah, yeah, okay, okay.
For 35 years, I was forced to give half of what I earned to my father.
Now, that would probably, they probably accept that right away as true because it kind of looked that way anyway, right?
I mean, how many times have people said in reviewing all the different incidents and I won't go through all of them how many times have people said who the hell is going to pay Hunter Biden 3.5 million dollars to help Moscow or who's going to who's going to put one who's going to put a billion dollars in a in a private equity fund that has no history of making money and is made up of him Kerry's stepson and
Whitey Bulger's brother.
That sound to you like a top-notch Wall Street genius investment house?
Or does it look like a fixer committee?
Bringing together political organized crime and real organized crime.
Now, China, you know, China is careful with its money.
So they were looking for some value there.
The value was not Hunter's advice on investments or Kerry's kid's advice on investment or Whitey Bulger's brother's advice on investment.
It was being able to carry out very sophisticated, very important bribes with, when necessary, Joe pitched it in for you.
That's why you have those calls between Hunter and Joe.
We still have, I don't know, Comer doesn't seem to know that there are four nights of conversations between Hunter, not Hunter, between Joe Biden and the president of Ukraine, which is when the deed is done trying to remove the prosecutor who was prosecuting
Hunter's, Hunter, Hunter's boss, Zoloshevsky, who was a multi-billionaire organized crime thief that ran a burisma.
far as I know, there was no attempt to get those recordings.
Now, somebody in Ukraine kind of, we used to use the word goose somebody when you push them, right?
Kind of goose them by putting out one of those conversations in which they said that the president of Ukraine not only fired the prosecutor for Joe Biden, but he sought Biden's approval for the new prosecutor.
And that's recorded.
But we've never heard the recording.
I've seen the transcript of it, though.
I saw it when I was in Ukraine before I had to sneak away, run away, outrun Soros and all those people.
kind of an interesting adventure.
Well, we're going to take a short break as we get to, you know, chapter two, three, four, and five of the now Obama-Biden crime family.
We'll be right back.
Whether it's being a weekend warrior or spending time with your family, feeling your best is the key to doing the things you love.
That's why I'm excited to tell you about Nirvana.
It's a natural solution designed to help you stay active and live well naturally.
Nirvana is a topical blend of all natural essential oils like frankincense, myrrh, and a proprietary gold standard plant stock extract.
It's perfect for your hands, feet, knees, back, or anywhere else that needs a little extra care.
use Nirvana proactively as part of your daily maintenance routine and you're guaranteed you're going to feel the difference.
Simply massage Nirvana inwardly.
at least 60 seconds two to three times a day to get the best results and if you're not completely satisfied you get your money back no questions asked there's simply no risk and no reason not to try nirvanta today right now you get 15 off with code lindel exclusively at nirvantahealth.com so stop reaching out for that medicine cabinet get nirvanta instead and experience the difference go to nirvantahealth.com use
Use code LINDELL to get 15% off today.
Nervonta Health.
Live well, naturally.
Friends, we all know the truth.
Big Pharma and the federal bureaucracy have made a mess of health care in this country.
And boy, that's an understatement.
President Trump signed an executive order to bring prices down, and that's a great step.
But we know that real change takes time.
There's one pharmacy that is already stepping up.
I want to tell you about All Family Pharmacy.
They're not waiting.
They're taking action now with a summer sale that gives you the power to take control of your health.
Right now, through the end of June, you get 20% off, site-wide, no insurance required.
Did you hear that?
20% off, site-wide, no insurance required.
They work with licensed doctors in all 50 states,
they ship fast straight to your door whether it's ivermectin hydroxychloroquine methylene blue antibiotics emergency kits or your daily prescriptions this is a time to stock up if you believe in medical freedom if you're tired of waiting for someone else to fix things do what i do take action go to allfamilyphharmacy.com slash lindell and use promo code lindell20 l-i-n-d-e-l-l20
for 20 off your entire order that's allfamilypharmacy.com lindell promo code lindell20.
Let's protect our families, defend our freedom, and make America healthy again together.
With everybody talking about making America healthy again, I thought today would be a great day to talk to all my fellow patriots about the importance of making your homes healthy again.
Well, we have proudly partnered with AirWaterhealing.com and their revolutionary whole home air purification system.
The V3 from Airwater Healing does 3,000 square feet of purification.
It eliminates dust, mold, viruses, and odors.
But here's the part I love.
They require no filters to ever be changed and virtually no maintenance.
Whether you suffer from asthma, allergies, seasonal bronchitis, or just want to protect your family from the flu or even greater threats, don't wait to get your V3 from AirWaterhealing.com today.
Use code Lindel for 20% off in savings and free shipping.
That's promo code Lindel at airwaterhealing.com.
The last time President Trump was in office, gold soared 50% and silver went up a huge 53%.
Americans who invested in silver and gold during Donald Trump's first presidency are very happy that they did it.
And right now, gold continues to soar to the highest numbers in history.
These gains are just an appetizer for what's to come.
Some market analysts are saying that gold is predicted to rise another 30% in the next year alone.
So now's the time to invest in gold and silver, and that's why I partnered with Fisher Liberty Gold.
Fisher Liberty Gold is a conservative owned and operated precious metals investment company.
They even helped my good friend President Trump get elected through their contributions to Turning Point USA and other conservative groups.
I have dedicated my life to ensuring that people get the best sleep ever.
And in addition to owning a MyPillow, I can now sleep well at night knowing that you can all protect your savings with precious metals with Fisher Liberty Gold.
With Fisher Liberty Gold, you can sleep well knowing that your retirement is secure.
And if you call now, you're going to receive your very own presidential gold guide and qualify for up to $20,000 in free silver.
But wait, there's more.
Call now or text medals to 26786 to receive your presidential gold guide from Fisher Liberty.
And for a limited time, I will send you a free My Pillow for qualified accounts.
This Presidential Gold Guide from Fisher Liberty will tell you exactly why you need to own gold, even while Donald Trump is president.
And just by calling in, you get a free MyPillow for a limited time for qualified accounts and up to $20,000 in free silver.
So don't wait.
Call 1-888-4GOL19 or text Medals to 26786 today.
That's 1-888-4GOL19 or text medals to 26786 today to receive your free MyPillow and up to $20,000 in free silver.
you you It's called the swamp.
And you know what happened?
And you know what I did?
A big favor.
I caught the swamp.
I caught them all.
Let's see what happens.
Nobody else could have done that but me.
I caught all of this corruption that was going on and nobody else could have done it.
Remember when President Trump posted this two months ago?
All roads lead to Obama.
Read truth if you want public military tribunals.
Well, at first everyone thought this was a joke, but now it's as close to reality as ever.
Obama and his cronies could be in for a real rough week after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard uncovered a bombshell, exposing that Obama manufactured evidence in the debunked Russia collusion hoax against President Trump.
These newly released documents provide further evidence that those involved were, in Tulsi's words, a years-long coup determined to undermine both the mandate and legacy granted to Trump by the American people.
Some of the most powerful people in our country, directly leading at the helm, President Obama and his senior most national security cabinet, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper, and Susan Rice and others, their goal was to essentially not accept the decision of the American people and to use this manufactured politicized intelligence as a means to enact what would be essentially a years-long coup against
President Trump.
This could potentially rank among the most significant political scandals in U.S. history.
It also marks the first time a Trump administration official, the highest-ranking intelligence official no less, openly accusing Obama of being directly involved in this plot.
Tulsi's disclosure comes on the heels of two previous Trump-era document releases.
One in May revealing discrepancies in Nellie Orr's sworn testimony regarding crossfire hurricane, and another in early July, which declassified the December 2016 intelligence assessment on alleged Russian collusion.
However, now, Tulsi's Russia hoax memo and timeline, as well as a 35-page evidentiary document, drives home several undeniable truths.
The intelligence community colluded both before and after the 2016 election that Russia lacked the intent and capability to alter U.S. vote totals.
Talking points for DNI James Clapper on December 7th stated, quote, foreign adversaries did not use cyber attacks on election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential election outcome, end quote.
Tulsi also discovered that an intelligence community asset, or ICA, released shortly before Trump's 2017 inauguration, partly relied on the discredited sealed offsier and became the foundation for years of investigations and impeachment efforts despite internal warnings.
It was politicized intelligence.
But wait, it does not end there.
We will be releasing more detailed information about how exactly this took place and the extent to which this information was sought to be hidden from the American people, hidden from officials who would be in a position to do something about it.
And that's really the point here that I think is most important, Maria.
And you said it in your opening.
Accountability is essential for the future of our country, for the American people to have any sense of trust in the integrity of our democratic republic.
Accountability, action, prosecution, indictments for those who are responsible for trying to steal our democracy is essential for us to make sure that this never happens to our country again.
For years, the public has been demanding accountability and justice.
By that, it means arrests and prosecutions.
And this is exactly what Tolson Gabbard is threatening.
Trump is also now going all out on true social with memes and AI videos of Obama getting arrested.
*music*
So, I don't know.
Is he just trolling?
Or what about disclosing to the public what is about to happen?
Maybe now Democrats will have to start retracting these statements they made themselves about President Trump.
No one, especially the president, is above the law.
No one is above the law.
Nobody is above the law.
No one is above the law.
Nobody is above the law.
No one is above the law.
No one is above the law.
Hypocrisy could not be more obvious.
Democrats claim to be the defenders of democracy, when now new evidence has come to light that they willingly tried to subvert the will of the American people.
If defending democracy still matters, then it is far past time we hold the real culprits accountable.
Reporting for Lindahl TV, I'm Alison Steinberg.
Well, you know, Alison, the two of us are talking here while she's, Alison does a great job.
Thank you.
I mean, she really independently puts these things together.
She figures it out.
She explains it to you.
I don't mean this in any way, in a derogatory way.
I mean, I mean it in very high praise.
I think she'd have been a great teacher.
And that's what, you know, I think that's what I think of a journalist as.
And not necessarily all the time print journalists, because they have to get you the immediate facts of what happened.
Let's say, God forbid, there's a bombing right now somewhere of significance, right?
So we're going to have to get you the who, what, when, where, and why.
That's what journalism is about.
Do you know that?
Do you know the classic story in a journalism class was an inverted, well, inverted pyramid?
No, a pyramid.
Yes, I remember this.
A pyramid.
So you know what that means?
If I have it, I can draw it.
A pyramid means in the first paragraph, you have all the facts you need.
Who, who did it, allegedly.
What happened?
When did it happen?
And if you can, why?
All in the first three or four sentences.
John Jones, John Jones dropped a bomb in front of the Capitol today.
And who?
John Jones.
What?
He dropped a bomb.
Where?
In front of the Capitol.
Why?
Well, maybe we don't know.
Or maybe he was yelling Allah Akbar.
Wally was yelling Ala Akbar.
Now you got a pretty good indication of why, right?
So John Jones, who?
Dropped a bomb, what?
In front of the Capitol today, when?
And why?
He was yelling al-Akbar.
Looks like he was doing it to protest the cause of the Muslim extremists.
Who, what, when, where, and what.
Now, the rest of the story explains who, what, when, where, and why in more detail.
And if you're a really great reporter and you understand how they used to do newspapers when newspapers were great, you've got to be very disciplined by putting the most important things first.
Now, why do you do that, the most important things first?
It looks like this, right?
Because newspapers get edited.
I got the front page.
I got the second, the jump page.
I got a certain amount of space.
Oh, I got all the space I want.
I got 30 columns for this story.
So I edit it.
I put my 30 columns in.
And then the boss says, I'm sorry, I got to break it down to 24 columns, 24 sections.
So you wrote it in the order of importance.
So when your story got edited, it got edited the way you wanted it to be because you put the least important stuff at the end.
So if they're going to cut the last five, they're not cutting the reason why you did it.
So it's a pyramid.
Most important, second most important, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh.
Now what I'm cutting is the editor, and I chop off your last three paragraphs.
I know I'm not killing your story because I really don't have the time probably on a daily newspaper like the old Daily Planet that Superman worked for to call you.
Well, you're out there doing another story.
Think of the discipline of that.
It meant you had to analyze the story that way.
You had to write it that way.
And it became muscle memory for you.
You weren't thinking about it.
You were just writing it that way.
These were the great reporters of the 1910s, the 1920s, and the 30s and the 40s.
And it would require them To analyze very, very quickly the weight of the story, how important it was, where the important facts were.
And they were performing a major public service for you and bringing you without hopefully bias or prejudice what happened so you could make up your own mind and fit it into your own bias or prejudice if you had such.
Nowadays, God almighty, most of the stories I see are like these sloppy attempts to brainwash you.
Now that isn't, I will say honestly for the great newspapers, that isn't true.
No, it is true, but they do it more subtly.
So you can tell the difference between the great newspaper that wants to brainwash you and the cheap newspaper that wants to brainwash you, because the cheap newspaper who does it does it right up front, and the more sophisticated one does it right up front, but you don't feel it as much.
I'll tell you where they really got sloppy.
They got really sloppy with adjectives and adverbs.
An angry Trump, an angry mayor walked out of the press conference.
I looked at it and I said, man, they should see when I'm angry.
Even my press, my staff used to say that, boss, they don't have any idea what it's like when you're really angry.
One time I was there for 45 minutes doing a press conference, and they say I angrily rushed off after 45 minutes of being asked the most inane, I thought I was teaching a fourth grade history class.
I did.
Their knowledge of New York history was juvenile.
So these are the things we have to deal with, which leads to the story today that I am very, very angry about.
And I don't know if it's press inspired or quizlings within the Trump administration.
Quizlings are traitors.
I'll give you the whole background of why Quizlings later, but it has to do with the Second World War.
So today there were any number of articles.
I can't remember in what syncophant newspapers they were in, but about how people think that Bibi's become a madman because he's bombing so much.
Where does this come from?
Bibi is bombing.
Sorry, ladies and gentlemen, what we should be bombing.
He's taking a big weight off Trump by doing that.
I mean, first of all, he cleaned out Iran so that when we went there for the extraordinary bombing mission, we didn't encounter almost any interference.
But Israel had been hitting them for two weeks.
I don't think Iran has an Air Force left.
I think they're defenseless.
It sure looked that way.
They didn't even bother to contest us when we came in there with 28, 30,000-pound bombs.
That's going to send your whole country to China.
We didn't even contest it.
They didn't contest it because they couldn't contest it.
Israel had taken that whole infrastructure away.
And more than that, they took away all the protectors, the Praetorian Guard, you know, the protectors, Hezbollah, Hamas, most importantly, Syria, Assad.
Now, baby, it was you and me, America and Iran, not all the bullies that could help you.
america and iran is even a fair fight it's like However, unless we're being extraordinarily unrealistic, we owe a lot to Benjamin Netanyahu for that.
He cleaned up that nest of vipers for a year.
Even better than we thought, I think.
So he doesn't bomb.
There's nothing about Netanyahu that suggests that he's a wild and crazy bomber.
I haven't seen a bombing mission that he inspired that wasn't critical or one that probably we should have done.
A lot of the bombing missions he does take out, look, he did the lion's share of the bombing in Yemen against the Houdis that were killing Americans.
Thank you, Bibi.
Thank you.
I mean, he's the one who got rid of Assad when they thought nobody could do that.
So now, we would like you to come over with us as one big group.
We'll show our solidarity to X for America's Mayor Live, where we will continue and we're going to tell you about a practice that is now going on about organ donations.
It seems like we're becoming China.
So we'll be with you again tomorrow night here at 7.
9 o'clock, I want you to come back here and watch Dr. Maria.
She's got a great show tonight.
Now we're going to go over to Ags and we're going to do America's Mayor Live, the 700th and something, 16th performance of it.
▲
Export Selection