America's Mayor Live (701): U.S. Senate Votes on Changes to President Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill"
|
Time
Text
Good evening.
This is Rudy Giuliani, and this is America's Mayor Live, live from Dover, New Hampshire.
And thank you for joining us tonight.
It's been quite a weekend as the Democrat Party moves further and further into the circle of evil by nominating a candidate in New York that I don't think you can believe.
I really can't.
I don't think you can believe that an American political party would nominate a person who expresses these views and is so poorly qualified and educated and has an intellect of a child and not like a good child, a bad child.
Karl Marx couldn't have been happier with the Democrat Party and it doesn't really need the name Democrat Party any longer.
It's a dirty name anyway.
It's the party of slavery.
It's the party that embraced communism.
It's the party that now seems to think it's okay for children to mutilate themselves.
And it's the party that was for segregation and Jim Crow and the Civil War.
It's the party that seems to be enormously sympathetic with terrorist groups.
It's the party that gave billions and billions of dollars to the Ayatollah, who turned around and used some of it to kill us.
That's sort of the things the Democratic Party stands for.
Meanwhile, over this weekend, in the course of this weekend, here are a few of the things, if you just want to take a look at it, Ted, accomplished by President Trump, the Israel Iran ceasefire, a boost in NATO spending, which no American president has ever been able to do, SCOTIS rulings.
We reviewed them on Friday, but we'll go quickly through them again, that have across the board started to restore American civilization and culture.
Oh, the economy that was, you know, they were Democrats were rooting for recession and all those tariffs were going to destroy the stock market.
Stock markets at a record high.
And the big, beautiful bill, let's not count on chickens yet, but we'll go over that very shortly.
We just finished a review of it on the other show, is on its way to, looks like getting passed.
And most importantly, of that group of measures, the tax cut.
Now, the situation in Israel is complex, complex to the point where it's hard to say exactly what's happening.
The president has urged Bibi Netanyahu, who he's also effusively praised for Churchillian-like achievements, for which the president deserves equal praise, if not even more.
He's also urged him to end the war in Gaza, the way the war with Iran appears to be, at least for now, over.
Certainly the hot part of the war is over.
Of course, we say that, we say that with some degree of trepidation because we know how easily something could go wrong and it would require a response either by us or by the United States, indicated by the president, who during the course of the weekend did point out that he may have to hit them again if they do something to suggest that they're going to try to go around and
continue to be a nuclear anything.
However, the situation in Gaza is complex.
There, the president has asked the Israelis to end the war.
It appears to me that Netanyahu is of the view that they have not sufficiently wiped out Hamas so that they can assure their safety and security for the next 20 years at least.
And they can't assure it, but they can make their safety and security a lot more secure than it has been up until now.
And that there's a lot of cleaning up work that has to be done while they have the opportunity to do it.
So as they are talking about some kind of a ceasefire, a peace, bringing the hostages back, of which there were very few left.
They maybe killed a hell of a lot of them.
And they give them bodies back now, including they killed Americans.
Hamas did, the group that this guy, Mandami, seems to be supporting.
But I mean, is he an American, really?
I don't raise that as a legal point of view.
I think he's a naturalized citizen.
I raise it from the point of his thinking and his ideas.
They seem to be extraordinarily dangerous to the safety and security of our citizens at a time in which we probably have more terrorists in this country than we've ever had before.
Listening to vicious, violent maniacs like him is not going to make us any safer.
And then to have him as mayor of our largest city is a nightmare.
But they are still beginning, they are still wiping out Hamas leadership.
I do think the government of Qatar should turn over the big leaders who have billions of dollars so that they can be put in jail.
I mean, if Qatar wants to come over on the right side, I mean, look what happened.
Look what happened the other day.
They're going to attack our airbase in Qatar.
And Qatar had to take down the Iranian planes.
I don't know if they should be playing FTSE with them quite as much As they are.
So now the Israelis have set a new group of evacuation orders from the northern part of Gaza.
And the northern part of Gaza was, you know, the first, was the more populated part at the beginning.
And they've wiped out leadership there.
But they've also hit Khan Yunus, which you might remember is in the southern part of Gaza.
And Netanyahu, when asked, said they're going to end when Hamas is fully destroyed.
Now, he said that from the very beginning.
And of course he should.
It's like when we were attacked by the Japanese and went to war and went to war with the Japanese and the Nazis.
We weren't looking for a negotiated peace.
We were looking for an unconditional victory.
And so was the president against Iran.
I think Bibi is entitled to that.
He's entitled to an unconditional victory against Hamas.
And we should be patient enough to stay with him until he gets there.
And I think the UN and Zolron Mandupis or whatever his name is, I mean, they should just be patient.
I mean, they've done enough killing of innocent people, so they got to pay the price.
And since they vow to wipe out the state of Israel, well, Israel's got to wipe them out first if Israel wants to exist, right?
I mean, how the hell else are you going to defend your country when people want to wipe you out?
The other thing we have to worry about, and particularly we'll get to the subversive candidate for mayor in New York.
This is even more dangerous than usual because we have Iranian sleeper cells in this country.
Now, what do we mean by sleeper cells?
It's a silly word.
They're spies and they're terrorist activists and they're secret.
That's why they're sleeper cells.
We've had that for a long, long time on a limited basis, because although we've had a problem with illegal immigration for a long time, we never knew a problem until we got Biden.
That when the country became totally wide open and nobody was vetted in any meaningful way, there were then no restraints on the terrorists like Iran, like Hamas, like Hezbollah, like al-Qaeda, like ISIS, or like the fentanyl groups from China or the organized crime groups or the human trafficking groups.
There were no restraints on them at all.
It was a field day.
It was a terrorist, pervert, criminal holiday.
Just bring anybody in you want.
I mean, it's only if they're stupid, if they didn't take advantage of it, right?
I mean, I think I heard President Trump as a candidate say it would be stupid if they didn't.
And we'd be stupid if we didn't realize it.
And of course, we do realize it.
We realized it very late.
We realized it four years into Biden's term when that criminal who was running the FBI announced after three years, oh, we have more terrorists in this country than ever before.
How many?
I don't know.
But why don't you know?
Well, because you did nothing about it when they were coming in.
That's why.
Because you sat there as the head of our largest law enforcement agency on your stupid ass and did nothing about it.
Because you never should have been director of the FBI.
I don't even know if you should have been working at any job of responsibility.
But you sure played a big role in putting our country in probably the greatest danger it's been in from the people that are here that came in here.
So if you ask me, and people ask me all the time, because it was my business both in government and out, how dangerous is it now compared to September 11 or before September 11?
First of all, I actually don't know, nor do they, except to say it has to be more dangerous because the numbers are much greater.
They've become more sophisticated.
They've become more organized and they have a good deal more internal support.
In 2000, you never would have had a candidate like this, a guy who's running in New York.
You'd never have a candidate, but I kind of built up over time.
You've got, you know, Omar and AOC and people like that.
The one who was married to her brother, which one is that?
Johan Omar.
And Presley and Presley's still there.
One of them got booted.
Yeah.
Well, no, they got the book.
No.
Yeah.
No, no, Corey Booker isn't one of them.
No, Bush.
Corey Booker is Spartacus.
He's Corey Bush.
Bush is a former Roman slave.
He's Spartacus.
Oh, that's you're right.
He's not part of the squad.
He's the Marticus of that debate.
He's a Spartacus.
He's his own.
He's Spartacus.
He doesn't need a squad.
He's Spartacus.
He alone.
That's his contribution.
What a shitty mayor, too.
Well, he's also now.
I know that firsthand.
It was in Newark.
He gave the longest.
Well, I think they cheated like they usually do, Mayor.
They say he gave the longest floor speech recently, remember?
But didn't he take breaks or something?
We got to check him on that.
And even if he did it, right, what did he actually accomplish?
Clapping his gums for 28 hours?
Remember they all celebrated?
They all celebrated on those embarrassing.
He's a completely useless senator, but that's okay.
Most of them are.
But he was a totally useless governor.
That's got to be good.
The place was a cesspool of corruption and crime.
But he got elected, of course.
New Jersey.
So remember this?
There's an article.
Oh, you have something for us?
Well, we'll save it.
You have a little trinket for us, Dad?
A little snippet here of our friend.
You have something for us?
Come on, this was momentous.
They celebrated this as history.
He, in the highest office of our land, wants to divide us against ourselves, wants to make us afraid, wants to make us fear so much that we're willing to violate people's fundamental rights.
We're willing to go after the speech on college campuses.
We're willing to go after law firms, go after the freedom of the press.
Don't let him do that.
Don't become like him.
Be an American that says, I look to the future and I'm excited.
Yes, things are tough right now.
They're hard.
They're scary.
They're hurting.
But we can overcome this.
Our American history, if it's nothing else.
I can't.
I'm sorry.
Hello, Spartacus.
Put up my little board again.
Put up my little board.
While these bullshit jackass artists are doing this, this is what happened.
Israel Iran ceasefire, NATO spending boost.
Supreme Court, five major rulings to help restore American culture, civilization, and law.
Stocks at a record high.
And the Senate advances one of the biggest tax cuts in American history.
So, and that's only about half of what he did this weekend.
Meanwhile, you got those things walking around doing that.
the hand clapping, where the hell did that come from?
Spartacus had a Kirk Douglas played Spartacus.
He wasn't sitting there.
Yes, that's the Tim Wallace.
What the hell is he doing?
Does he know?
What?
I did not know Kirk Douglas.
No, no.
Is he aware?
Did I know Spartacus?
Jesus, I'm not that old.
Is he aware of how stupid he is?
No, no.
He thinks he's smart.
Well, I think he maybe was taking a cue from this guy.
Our other friend.
Happy Friday, everybody.
Is that Tampa?
That's Tampa.
Oh, he's not.
Was that in Beijing?
Is that in Beijing?
Right.
There's no way that's...
I don't know why they said it.
As we noticed, There's nobody on the street.
There's nobody on his roof.
Yeah, he's just...
I mean, maybe it's because it's not New York and I'm used to New York, but that's like one row deep.
And what's this two-hand wave?
Weird guy.
This is a new thing, the two-hand wave.
His wife, too, who accompanied him 30 times to China.
Right.
Oh, look, he almost did a Chinese bow.
Now, there's a guy who has to be investigated for his ties to China.
It's ridiculous.
It's absolutely ridiculous.
The guy, they pick him out of college and they give him an education.
They set up two businesses for him.
They have him bring kids back and forth to China once a year for 30 years.
He teaches in China, which means you got to teach what the Chinese tell you to teach.
And he thinks socialism is great.
He must be really happy about this Islamic extremist sympathizer and communist who's now an anti-Semite who's now running for mayor of New York.
So I don't know, check out Mary Anastasia O'Grady's article today about Iranian spies, and it'll give you a sense of how South America contributed, has contributed to that, particularly with the communist Venezuelan government.
And remember, just think, all you have to do is think in your mind about Trenti Aragua.
And also when you hear the lists of the murderers and rapists and pedophiles and drug dealers and whatever that have come in under Biden, remember how many are from Venezuela.
Because that's the place that Trump told you a long time ago, emptied its jails and nuthouses to send their people here.
And I'd say, you know, rough numbers, about a third of what you hear of these thousands and thousands of criminals that are being sent back are from Venezuela.
Well, she has a pretty good, this woman has a very, very good understanding of South America.
And she's raising a concern that in this era of asymmetrical warfare, the response of Iran may very well be a terrorist attack, as opposed to a straight-on attack and one in which they can claim some form of ignorance.
Because they lie like crazy.
And it seems to me the president has given up on any form of an agreement with them, which actually is very, very wise.
It isn't worth the paper it's written on.
There'd have been no way we could have gotten to an agreement with Iran that they weren't going to violate.
They have never done an agreement in the short history of the Islamic terrorist republic of Iran.
Has there been an agreement they kept?
They're not allowed to keep it with us.
We're infidels.
And we're supposed to be either killed or we pay tribute to them.
Now, I'm sorry.
That's what Muhammad wrote in the Quran.
There's another article, I can't remember where, I will find it for tomorrow, that I read last weekend that was really good about dividing up the two Muhammads.
I mean, very, very few people have the courage to write this.
Although the person who wrote it seems a little confused about the dividing line, but notice the dividing line in the Quran, like there are two Qurans.
There's the Quran of Muhammad teaching that we're all part all, meaning Jews and Christians and Muslims, we're all part of the religion of Abraham.
We all have a common prophet, Abraham.
And then in the early part of his career, when he thought he was going to be successful in converting, first of all, the Arabs of Medina and the rather large Jewish and Christian populations there, he would say, we're all brothers of the book, meaning the Bible, right?
Then when the Jews rejected him and the Christians rejected him and his own people rejected him, and his teachings that he claimed were given to him directly by Muhammad when he was taken up to heaven by the angel Gabriel.
Now they might have rejected him because he seems to have been, well, seems to have been a pedophile and he was an epileptic, which they interpreted both, not just the Jews and Christians, but the Arabs as being possessed by the devil.
So therefore they thought the teachings that he was giving were coming from the devil.
Now, I don't think they were coming from the devil.
I think they were coming from an insane mind.
But in any event, they thought they were coming from the devil.
And they didn't believe for a minute that Gabriel had taken them up to heaven.
But then he went out.
He was exiled, basically, and he went out into that vast desert that you see there, the Saudi Arabian desert.
And that's populated by the Bedouins.
Bedouins were not really a specific national group.
They were just wandering Arabs, you know, who would go from one place to another, setting up their tents based on, you know, where it wasn't 130 degrees.
And they were uneducated.
They were illiterate.
And they bought it in big numbers.
They bought the Muhammad thing.
And then he figured out another way to convert.
He set up an army.
And he came in and killed people in large numbers.
His own people, the Jewish people, the Christian people.
And eventually, it became an obsession.
It became a big thing.
And it was really successful.
He's making a fortune.
And then some wise person told him, because originally he went from, we're all brothers of the word or whatever, to there are a bunch of infidels who have to be killed, meaning Jews and Christians and non-believing Arabs.
He then made an asset.
He made an assessment that he might not be able to kill them all, but he could get something of value.
And I've forgotten what the name for it is.
I've forgotten what the name for it is, but we would call it kickbacks or extortion.
You could pay him not to kill you.
He would let you live, but under his subjugation and rule, you'd be his vassal.
And you wouldn't actually be allowed to practice your religion.
It's only recently that anybody can practice a religion in Saudi Arabia.
And they don't allow in any of those countries a cross or a Jewish star.
I mean, these are very, very tolerant countries.
And you know what they do to women.
So when you say to me, I was in a debate today, you know, well, all religions have their bad points.
I'm sorry.
Not all religions were founded by a mass murderer, pedophile, who taught his people to murder to spread the religion.
They were founded by, in some cases, human beings.
In the case of the Christian religion, we believe by God.
And we're imperfect and we make mistakes and do things wrong, have done evil things, meaning Christians have.
I defy you to find any place where Jesus told me to go out and kill Jews or where they weren't Muslims or anybody else.
In fact, didn't he say about the Jewish people to forgive them?
And they don't know what they're doing when this whole thing comes up about how Jews killed Jesus.
It's a horrible thing that Christians have interpreted it that way.
First of all, the founder of their religion was born, lived, and died as a Jew and a proud one.
And second, he made it very, very clear that God had a command for us.
Forgive him.
Forgive the Romans who killed him.
Forgive that group of Jewish people who killed him.
The Jewish people didn't kill him.
Some of the people of the day agreed with killing him.
Some didn't.
Some agreed with him.
And some didn't think he should be killed at all.
Similar with everyone else there, Jewish or not.
And he was officially killed by the Romans, by the Roman government, with some degree of trepidation on the part of Pontius Pilate's wife and Pontius Pilate himself.
It's a very complex, you know, very complex situation.
But the man was a good man who taught good things.
Only time he showed any anger was when they were defiling and blaspheming the temple by trying to make a profit there and defiling the house of his father.
But he scolded them.
He scolded them and broke up their sacrilege.
He didn't execute them.
He didn't say their children should be executed.
He didn't put a fatwa on them.
In fact, not just the Jewish, but he forgave all of them for killing him.
He said they know not what they do.
And he loves sinners because he understood the human condition.
I mean, there's no comparison between Muhammad and then Jesus and Moses.
And if it isn't written out of that religion, it's going to be with us forever.
I raised that question with someone today who's a sympathizer with, or at least really confused about Islamic extremism.
And he said, well, you can't ask people to read out their religion.
Well, of course we can.
Don't we require Mormons to read out polygamy?
Don't we?
Well, we sure as hell should be able to tell Muslims, sorry, boys, it may say in the Quran that you can kill us, but that's not right.
I don't find in the Bible any, I mean, I'm thinking about back on both in the Old Testament and in the New Testament.
I don't remember a commandment like, thou shalt kill the non-believers.
Well, the Quran says that.
I don't know, different kind of religion?
One that has a danger to it, if taken literally?
Okay.
President Trump's foreign policy has become for some deliberately a cause of confusion because, and there's been more than a few in the foreign policy magazines because they want to make them either an isolationist,
like an unrealistic 1920s isolationist, or an insane crazy interventionist.
And you got to be one or the other.
You got to be an isolationist or an interventionist.
You got to be a dove or a hawk or whatever, however they do it.
So for a while, he was making all of these people who have ruined to a very large extent the foreign policy establishment of our country.
And they were getting real happy because he was talking a little like Biden, you know, we should have an agreement or Obama, we should have an agreement with Iran and let's stop the war and peace, peace, peace.
I'm for peace.
And they really liked that.
And then some of the guys on the other side, the Hawks or the interventionists, were getting really nervous that he was going to become too soft and too much like the people that they regard as having been appeasers of Islamic extremism, communism, whatever.
Well, it turns out that he's not a label.
He's somebody who actually really does love this country and really does want to make decisions that are the best interest of this country.
And so far, I think he's made all the right decisions.
But even if he didn't, he would have made them for the right reason.
But they won't grant him that.
I just showed you the list of achievements.
I mean, I don't know if the president ever had a weekend like that, except maybe when we won a war or something.
So he's an isolationist when he thinks it's in the best interest of the United States to be that way.
He's an interventionist when he has to be to protect the United States.
It's really as simple as that.
And all our great presidents were like that.
I don't know that we've had a president, and I take Biden out because Biden didn't even have a mind that ever wanted to see us go to war or deliberately wanted to appease a monster.
I don't think, maybe we did.
But in any event, his foreign policy, if you look at it carefully, is a fine combination between the use of strength when absolutely necessary and the use of diplomacy when you can, and not being slavishly addicted to one or the other.
And I think the balance that he's striking is remarkable since he is able to make peace where he can.
And he showed by the line that he drew with Iran that he also knows where to draw the line.
He's not, you can't have peace with strength if you're afraid to use your strength.
And people perceive you as afraid to use your strength.
So it's a fine balance between you would like to achieve your goals peacefully, but when really tested, you're going to have to be willing to use your strength.
So people have some, you want to call it respect for you or fear of you.
And I think that he has struck very, very quickly a very, very good balance between the two.
And when circumstances suggest that we should be trying very, very hard to make peace because we can avoid war, don't believe that he's not capable of using military force if he believes he has to, nor ever think that he's going to use military force because he likes to do it.
There's no liking about that.
It's a necessity.
You know, it's very, very interesting because we've talked a lot and it hit me immediately when this debate over schools crystallized about the role of children.
You know, we think of the race in Virginia, but I think it's actually even more finely crystallized in Minnesota with Tampon Tim, who sure pretends like he's an agent for China, 30 times having gone there,
having gotten a great deal of money from them, we don't know how much, saying things that are very favorable to them, recently saying that China was the only country with the moral suasion to settle the Iran-Israel thing.
What is he crazy?
Moral what?
Is he crazy or is he brainwashed?
I don't know.
He sure has been there enough to be brainwashed, and they don't let you teach there unless you're brainwashed.
But in any event, China, among the groups that they persecute, we know about the Ugers who they want to eliminate completely.
We know about the Falun Gong that they want to eliminate, but they're keeping them alive because they're a great source of organs.
So they will do this to Christians and Muslims as well.
But apparently they're victims of choice for selling organs, which they engage in to very high profit.
And they are the biggest, without any doubt, illegal sources of organs for transplantation in the world.
But they take them out of living human beings.
And it's the people they're persecuting.
They'll do it with Ugers and they'll do it with Christians, but their main focus is the Fallen Go.
Of course, it was a prime objective of Mao, of Stalin, of Hitler, to get control of the children and make them creatures of the state.
In other words, take them away from the parents at the earliest possible age.
And what they're doing now with the Tibetans, largely because maybe they're not having success in wiping them all out, which they have had tried at various times, they've now reduced the age of when they have to be put in the state-run school.
And they keep making it a younger and younger age.
And it had been about five and now down to four years old and three years old.
So in Tibet, these children are being brought, taken away from the parents at about four years old and made a property of the state, which is precisely what we do in the United States, isn't it?
With the Communist Teachers Union, formed by the Communist Party, filled with the principles of Karl Marx.
And so many of the Democrats have now said that parents shouldn't have much to say about McAuliffe was the first one that really said it.
I mean, what do parents know about the education of their children?
It should be up to the state.
Well, I mean, he got that one from Karl Marx and Frederick Engels and Adolf Hitler and Mao Zedong and Joseph Stalin.
And now from Xi Jinming, who's using that in Tibet.
And what they do is he's a school of party loyalty.
Well, you don't think that our preschool and run by the teachers' union is, is it?
We don't have an American Pledge of Allegiance anymore.
We'll conduct, we have 90 languages.
Pretty soon, people won't even know what English is.
And America's done everything wrong in human history.
So bad our flag should be burned.
So bad that we take down the statues of the men and women who created us.
And we put up the statues of George Floyd.
Well, take a look at what's going on in China and in Tibet.
And you'll see what's going on in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and in right across the river in Fairfax County, Virginia, where the school board is at war with the parents.
There shouldn't be a war.
The parents are in charge.
The school board is a creature of the parents.
Also, China is apparently cheating on cars.
They've designated a lot of used cars.
They've designated a lot of new cars as used cars so they can escape the tariff.
And they've been doing that not just in America, but in Europe.
And I should have clipped this picture up.
There's a gigantic picture at a port at Yantai that was, I don't know if it was headed off for the United States.
I mean, it's sort of like they're laundering the cars.
They're trying to sell them through either European countries or, which is why secondary sanctions are so important to really jam these people up, which we really should have on Russia right now.
So they clear the vehicles from ports like in Horgos in northwest China, and then they ship them first to Krakenstan or Kazakhstan or someplace else.
And then they'll enter like either into the Russian market or some other market, but not directly from China.
And this is apparently a big, big business.
And it...
And it's becoming a real source of problems as an illegal trade practice with Europe, not just America.
And it looks like it's decreasing the value of Chinese cars.
Now, the economy of China, which you have to, I've recently found myself a couple more Chinese publications so I can keep up with what's going on there.
But the value of China, of the condition of the Chinese economy is very, very bad right now.
And it may be even worse than we think.
There's also an awful lot of rumors that Xi Jinming is no longer in charge.
Now, I don't have any proof of that, none.
And it isn't, and I remember when we first started talking about when President Trump was going to invade, and about a day before or two days before, I said, well, it's really just rumor, but it seems to me to be just a little too many.
It's starting to get the feeling of this is what happens before there is an invasion, but I still can't put my finger on it, but there seems to be too much chatter, too much.
We're not quite there yet with Zijinmi, but it has been going on for about two or three months.
It dates back to when a number of his allies were removed both from the Politburo and political command and the army.
One interpretation was he was doing a house cleaning.
The other interpretation was the little cabal around him was taking away his sources of power that he could fight back with.
I still don't know the answer to that.
And, you know, we may find out the answer to that if he remains there or if all of a sudden, as they say in the Godfather, you're not going to see Zi Jinming anymore.
The situation of mass is just typical of the Democrat Party, like with the wall, right?
So the wall is great to keep out illegal immigrants.
In fact, it's terrible that Bush didn't build it until Trump comes along and says there should be a wall.
Then it isn't just bad.
It's racist.
It's xenophobic.
It's inhumane.
It violates human rights.
It causes cancer.
So now the Democratic Party seems to have two different positions en masse.
So they say it's absolutely terrible that in places like even New York, they want people who are doing demonstrations and protests that almost always seem to end up in violence.
I don't know, you show me a peaceful protest of more than three people recently.
Well, I mean, I know it's not violence.
They just burn down buildings, kill people, bash them in the head, beat up cops.
It's not really violence.
It's like when the reporter from CNN is standing out there and saying, this is mostly a peaceful protest.
Boom, bam.
But the reality is they say those people should be entitled to wear masks, all those people paid by Soros and by the communists and by that rich guy in Shanghai, they should be allowed to have their masks on.
After all, they might get in trouble.
They committing crimes.
But the ICE officers, who have been experiencing a great deal of blowback from their undertaking just completely lawful activities that they have to, and their families have been threatened, and some have actually been attacked, But they shouldn't wear masks.
I don't know if you know this, but when I was the mayor, the law in New York was, and it had been for 10 something years, that any group that protested of, what was it, three or more, you could force them to take their masks off.
I use that.
I use it against a group for which it was written 100 years earlier, the Ku Klux Klan, when they came to New York and they wanted to demonstrate.
They had to get a permit because they wanted to demonstrate in front of the courthouse.
I made them get a permit and the judge ruled that I could take their masks off.
It was a very small protest.
I think we outnumbered them.
There were about 2,000 anti-Klan protesters and 20 Klan protesters.
Yeah, that was it.
See?
You see the faces?
Look at these guys.
There they are.
Now you got a good picture of them.
Oh, they had to take their masks.
Probably less of them when they had to take their masks off, right?
See all the people out there?
There were about 12 or 15 of them.
So I'll tell you, want to hear a funny story?
Want to hear a funny story?
That's right across.
That's right on.
That's those steps, Ted, where Barzini got killed.
You got so many stories from those steps.
The hardest thing there was protecting them.
So they had the court gave them from noon or one until four.
At three o'clock, this piece of shit here.
He knew that he's one of the left-wing lawyers.
Oh, he was defending them.
Protecting their rights.
He was protecting them.
That guy now wouldn't go anywhere near the Klan, I bet.
He's some real left-wing lawyer.
Isn't it funny how that works?
And they objected to our taking their masks off.
Of course, we did.
So it gets to be around three o'clock that was supposed to end at four, right?
Right.
The guy who's head of the clan says, it goes up to Chief Hale, who's the head of Manhattan North.
And he says, Chief, you think you could help us get out of here now?
They quit early.
They were afraid the crowd was going to beat the crap out of them.
Hey, they got, I will say it.
I stayed in my office about.
You're like, I don't want to go anywhere near that.
You should know that I actually went up in a helicopter and washed it.
So I stayed in my office for the end, and the chief called me and he said, should we, you know, should we?
I said, well, you know, it's up to them.
It's their permit if they want to go.
He said, yeah, they think it'll be safer if they break early because nobody will know they're going.
Would it be all right if I took them through the courthouse so I can get them out the back end?
I said, look, we don't want them to get hurt.
I don't know what kind of crazy nuts they are, but we believe in the First Amendment and we do.
I never let anybody get hurt in a protest if I could help it.
They could be protesting, calling me Hitler, and I was protecting them.
You see how they're leaving?
This is an hour before the end.
This is an hour before the end of the demonstration.
I don't know how you got your handling that right away.
That's great.
It was a Saturday afternoon.
Gee, I remember exactly where I was sitting when that happened.
I was so relieved.
When the chief called me and they were out of town?
Yeah.
You know, these were the days in which you get an ulcer as a mayor.
Well, yeah, if you care about that.
Unlike the mayor of Los Angeles when the city was burning, I wasn't in Uganda.
Right.
Right?
Jeez.
You got a good memory, Mayor.
Or afraid to make a decision about whether they should wear a mask or not.
Or when we had the million man march, which was the 220-man march, we had a million man march.
They wanted all of Harlem.
And I went to court and I lost.
The time said I lost.
They got eight blocks.
Who won?
They wanted two miles.
They got eight blocks and they got four hours.
The same four hours the Klan got.
Comes to be four o'clock and they want more time.
Chief Hale calls me and says the head, and this is a guy that used to call me Hitler and all kinds of other things.
The head says that they'd like another half hour because they came late.
They came late.
And the chief was actually more easygoing than I was.
I said, Chief, what time do we say it was?
Four o'clock.
What time is it now?
Two to four.
When that little hand goes to four o'clock, cut off the electricity, cut off the sound, and start taking everything down.
He said, they may riot.
I said, well, then put them in jail.
The court order says four o'clock.
That's not 410.
It's not 408.
It's not 401.
It's not 359.
People got to learn to respect the law.
And we did.
And they were starting to riot.
And then all of a sudden, they got really scared.
A whole group of helicopters came over.
They actually thought the helicopters were going to attack them.
And then they sued me for violating their civil rights by sending the helicopters over.
They said I was doing that to intimidate them.
I wasn't.
I was going to take pictures of them.
I used to take pictures from the helicopters all the time to show that the million man march was the 250 person march.
But of course, the press never reported it that way.
Today, the million man march in four blocks of Harlem.
You couldn't have a million people in four blocks of Harlem.
There's more realistic.
I don't think, you know, I've written a book about leadership, but I've written another about, I don't think I could write a book about this because it's like not rational.
It's hard to describe this crazy, this crazy, this crazy stuff.
This is crazy.
This is absolutely crazy.
Well, you know that the first stepmother has a work husband?
Ever heard that expression?
Work.
This little tip squeak, they call him like Rasputin.
Rasputin.
You know, the story of Rasputin, you know, like the guy with the dog.
No, no, yeah, Joe Biden, the first stepmother.
Anthony Bernow.
Yes, we were talking with him last week.
Let's see him.
He's about four foot three.
But Anthony Bernow, who everybody apparently hates, including the Democrats, because he's one of these self-important, nasty little shits.
Oh, yeah.
Well, he refused to show up for the House Oversight Committee because I think they're trying to get to the bottom of who signed what.
I mean, one person, one person didn't know who ordered her to use it.
That sounds a little weird.
Right.
Maybe some of those pardons aren't going to be effective.
But now this is really serious because this guy, Brunel, I mean, they can't not put him in prison after what they did to my friend Pete Navarro or Steve Bannon.
Imagine they put Navarro in leg irons.
Come on, are they not Nazis?
Like, I'm over the top if I say they're not.
Before when I was on television or whatever, and I said that Zohan, what's his name again, Zohan?
Mamdani.
Amamdani, yeah.
Zohan Mamdani is very favorable toward Hamas.
He said, well, you can't say that.
They should go from the river to the sea.
We should globalize the anifata.
I don't know.
Am I stupid?
He's not favorable to Hamas.
Yeah.
Somehow we're the ones that like our lioneers don't believe our lioneers.
I can't figure it out.
I couldn't figure it out.
I'm so stupid.
So the first stepmother, man, this picture, she doesn't look like a Vogue model.
I'll tell you that.
She looks really upset here next to Rasputin.
But Rasputin now is going to get a subpoena.
I guess they didn't give him a subpoena.
They just requested that he come.
So now he's going to be subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee.
So if he doesn't show up, then I don't know.
They got to go to get those probably have to get little smaller leg irons because I think if you put him in normal leg irons, he'll be able to get his leg out.
But I mean, aren't they going to have to put him in leg irons?
Now, here, I don't think so.
I'm going to tell you my answer to this.
There shouldn't be a matter of vengeance, and it's going to be really hard to convince people it's not.
Look, they're going to think it's vengeance.
But if this is the way you want to interpret the law, then we've got to interpret both ways.
But you don't have to do that.
You don't have to do the Nazi shit, you know?
We don't have to have the FBI show up in military uniforms.
And you don't need machine guns to serve a subpoena on Roger Stone, you know?
Right.
Or Colonel or United States General or member of the cabinet.
So hopefully, if he doesn't show up, we'll give him a chance to show up in court and put him in jail.
But we won't send out the people kind of looking a little like the other Gestapo, you know, or the Stasi or the Savak or one of those secret police types that ruined the reputation of the FBI plan along with it.
Now, there are a couple of FBI agents who are under investigation, it looks like also, in fixing things for the Bidens, including the guy who was the lead agent arresting Navarro.
That was Walter Chardina.
And he is now under investigation in front of Senator Grassley's committee for weaponizing the FBI and the DOJ.
And this is based on several whistleblowers.
And he openly stated his desire to investigate Trump.
And according to the whistleblower, even if it meant that he'd have to falsify.
So I don't know if that's true or not, but this is what part of the investigation.
And there's another FBI agent also, Giardina, Walter Giardina, is one of the agents.
He also was an initial recipient of the Steele dossier.
And he claimed he claimed that at least in one rendition, that this was a completely accurate document.
Of course it turned out to be never verified, totally untrue, even though Comey swore under oath that it was true and verified when he knew it wasn't.
But of course, because he's serving the interest of keeping Democrats out of jail and covering up their crimes, he was never prosecuted for that.
Also, if you want to talk about questionable practices, looks like the Pelosi's made quite a score.
The House Speaker and her husband took in, and because they put it in categories, like did you get, and they have ridiculously big categories to protect all these crummy scoundrel congressmen and senators.
Like if you made between 5 and 50 million, check this box.
So if you look at the boxes for the Pelosis, who are the best investors in the history of the United States, do you know that?
The Pelosis have the most successful record of investing.
Financial advising.
I mean, she didn't do too well politically, but last year she made on the investments that she was trading on, all of which seemed to be connected to some news that only congressmen would know about.
And from knowing about, they would know which way to trade.
But she made anywhere from 7.8 million to 42.5 million.
And her net worth, I mean, she started off as the daughter of a mayor, Mayor D'Alessandro, in Baltimore.
She's now worth, I just never knew she was such a brilliant investor and husband, $413 million.
$413 million.
Almost all from her stock portfolio, because she's just a brilliant investor, or a husband.
In July, he sold 5,000 shares of Microsoft just a few months before the FTC announced an antitrust investigation and the stock went way down.
And then he dumped 2,000 Visa shares just a short while before the Justice Department sued them for monopolizing the debit card market.
Maybe he's a...
Maybe he's like a witch who can predict the future, you know, that kind of thing.
And for quite some time, they've been trying to ban congressional stock trading.
You know, box it?
A woman who went from a little girl from Baltimore to being worth $413 million based on her and her husband's brilliant stock decisions that turned out to be right all the time.
Well, there is some good news, Ted.
Really good news.
In addition to the good news.
Give us some good news.
Not enough good news in the news.
Well, I showed you all that good news before.
Remember when Trump said you're going to get tired of winning?
Yeah.
Come on.
Are we tired?
You think we're there yet?
Man, I mean, some days it seems like it's some weeks, right?
And we got to cover it all in one show.
I think we got to get the two wars over for us.
Yeah.
But yeah, but he moves at quite the pace.
He works seven days a week like you do, like we do.
I don't get this, you know, sometimes you hear about people, you get bounce back emails from people, right?
I'm on vacation, you know, not taking emails for a week.
I'm on vacation.
I'm like, wow, must be nice.
Oh, yeah, we have somebody like that right now, right?
No, no, I'm not saying I'm just saying, I get, I get reporters, it's reporters to be honest, in the summer.
These guys, if you're a normal person, I don't consider myself a normal person.
Well, yeah.
When did you ever take, did you like week-long vacations?
What's your, yeah, you would get if I were to say, hey, Mayor, let's go sit on the beach for a week in, I don't know, where do people, Florida.
Let's go sit on the beach.
Maybe there's a reason why.
Maybe Rudy Giuliani goes on vacation.
Second day, he blows his brains out.
Maybe we could do some more beach time, though, in Florida.
We don't do anything.
We're never at the beach.
I'm going to find something to do that made me that.
Well, you're going to be reading this.
I'm going to tell you something really strange.
I used to take time off.
I don't know, about a week.
I remember taking four or five days off once just to go to Saratoga, New York to the horse races.
I went there with my friends and we played the horses for four or five days.
Really?
But I mean, we were up until like three, four in the morning analyzing the sheets and made our own charts.
Oh, like really getting into it.
Oh, yeah.
How'd you do?
But my wife, my wife came, the wives came and they were so angry.
I was going to say, I know where that story was going as soon as you said the wives, the wives involved.
It's a little bit like hunting deer count.
It's a little like the Kentucky Derby over a four-week period in Saratoga.
They bring up all the best horses.
They race at the end of the season.
That is cool.
And they also have horse sales.
They have them at the beginning of the season in Lexington, Kentucky, at Keeneland.
And that's the week before the Kentucky Derby.
And then they have them at the end of the season in August at Saratoga.
And that's where you can buy your racehorses.
And I became a big racehorse fan because I was stranded in Lexington and Hazard, Kentucky to run a coal mine.
And all the people that I was working with and who were advising me owned horses or they were involved in the horse business.
And if you live in Lexington, Kentucky, I mean, if it isn't basketball, it's horses.
So I always was interested in horse racing sort of as a game.
So I got into it the way I studied the Bible.
I mean, I've read every book about it.
We made up charts.
I got a number of my friends involved in it.
And I'm not saying this to like defend myself because I'm just not.
It really wasn't the gambling.
It was the art of predicting that was so much fun.
I used to get like a big charge out of, I would handicap the race.
And you know, the easiest thing to figure out who's going to come out of the gate first.
The most predictable thing about a horse is who's a front runner.
Unless you have a field of eight frontrunners, right?
But usually you don't.
Usually you got two, three frontrunners and two, three from the back and two, three in the middle.
And it's very, very rare that if you look at the racing form and they show you where the horse is at each point of the race.
And you're going to see there's a consistency to horses that come out first.
Doesn't mean they win, but it means they've got great speed out of the gate.
Acceleration.
They're going to do well the shorter the race is.
So in a six-furlong race, that's going to be a good horse.
In a mile and a half race like the Belmont that they just had, first out of the gate can very often be deadly because you can't sustain it for that period of time.
But it was a lot of fun.
It was a lot of fun.
It's a great sport.
They used to call it the sport.
Horse racing.
They used to call it the sport of kings.
And it really, it really.
We have friends that are into horse racing, right?
Wellington.
Wellington down in Florida.
I may be wrong about, I may be dead wrong about this.
I don't think it's as bad in terms of gambling addiction as the casino games.
Because the casino games, the betting is constant, constant, constant, constant, constant.
Like you sit at that machine and you become like, or you sit at the blackjack table.
Here you only have eight races, seven races, eight races.
Now, I may be wrong.
I just don't know any degenerate horse players.
I know, including some very nice people who had the illness of addicted casino people.
And it's tragic because some of the casinos know them too, and they call them up and send planes for them.
Wow.
Okay.
That's why I have a real fear of gambling.
Not for me personally.
It was never anything that, I mean, I was enough involved in and exposed to it to know I don't have that.
But I really feel bad because I think a lot of people do have it.
And I think you have to.
The addiction to gambling?
I mean, yeah, I went back and forth during my political career as to whether I favored it, didn't favor it.
And my opinion on it was sought a lot because of the mafia, you know, because let's face it, one of the great, like Fat Tony Salerno, who I put in jail for 100 years, and he's the author of the case that allows for preventive detention.
Fat Tony, you accomplished something.
It was my case in the Supreme Court.
And Fat Tony was a brilliant gambler.
Fat Tony figured out how to do, how to offset bets.
Now think about this, an unskilled guy graduated probably from the height, that high, this probably was my father in East Harlem.
I'll think of the name of it, named after maybe Grover, Cleveland or something.
High school, something like that.
But in any event, he figured out, and he owned Floyd Patterson.
Allegedly, he owned Muhammad Ali when he was Cassius Clay.
Allegedly.
He was alleged in the Sports Illustrated article, which you can go back and find right now, to have fixed a fight between Cassius Clay and Sonny Lister, which it's disputed whether it was fixed or not, but there's a whole body of opinion that it was.
And he was supposed to be the one that fixed it.
He did not own Clay.
He owned Sonny Lister.
Who was a hardcore criminal?
Wow.
I mean, he was in and out of Sing Sing.
Well, those were the big sport, yeah.
Boxing and horse racing.
There's a great Sports Illustrated article written by some great sports writer laying out the evidence that the fight was fixed that could lead you to either conclusion.
It's a very, really, very, very fair and very well done.
So CNN.
Have they closed it yet, Ted?
I don't.
I mean, after the report about the leaks report that the bombing at Fordow caused minimal damage and barely delayed Iran's nuclear program.
And they deliberately left out that it was qualified as low confidence and preliminary.
And they deliberately left out four other contemporary reports from other services saying that the damage had been catastrophic in order to contradict Trump for that purpose.
Why do they exist anymore?
I mean, isn't it obvious that they're anti-Trump and also are willing to sacrifice the good of the United States in order to hurt Trump?
I mean, why?
Yes, Mayor.
You're an American.
There's an attack.
Right.
We don't know yet if it's successful or not.
The president said it was successful.
The report says it doesn't have confidence in its conclusion that it wasn't successful.
Right.
Other reports say it's successful.
And the report at the end says it doesn't have confidence in the also the equally the equally prevalent view at that time that it was very catastrophic, but they don't have confidence in that either.
Right.
So the report says nothing.
Right.
If you're being honest.
Right.
But they're not honest.
They're not honest.
And how do they keep Natasha Bertrand, who I have problems with, because she created tremendous issues for me by falsely maintaining that those 51 spies who lied and said that Trump and I were deliberately peddling the hard drive with earmarks of Russian collusion.
She's the person who pushed that.
Right.
Now, you had to know that was untrue.
If you had half a brain.
First of all, they only had a day to come to a conclusion like that.
That had to be very low confidence.
And second, it's a giveaway when they tell you they have earmarks of Russian collusion.
And if a reporter was doing the job of being an inquirer as to the truth, she would have said, well, give me an example.
And since they can't give an example, it would show they didn't know what the hell they were talking about.
And they were just lying in order to suck up to the Democrat Party as happened so often in the Democrat Party and making a and probably engaged in one of the great and worst cover-ups in American history.
And then she's got three or four others.
I mean, Russian collusion.
I mean, she's not a reporter.
She's a political activist and a dishonest one.
How do they keep her on staff?
Right.
Absurd.
Now, the article, the article that I read, I don't know where I got this one.
It's called National Security.
I don't know if that's the magazine.
It's written by Beckett Adams.
He says, if CNN's reporting is wrong so often about so many things, we all understand.
Well, must it not be equally wrong about things that we don't understand?
and isn't that very often what happens now?
So I see so many things that are just dead, straight out false that I know about.
I mean, I've read things in the Washington Post and elsewhere that happened in the White House while I was there that didn't happen in the White House.
That's just untrue, completely, not even a fig leaf untrue.
So I read those.
I don't know what to believe.
when it's a subject I don't know about and there's any controversy to it at all, I don't trust these.
These people are useless.
The facts can turn out to be totally different.
They're constantly engaging in their form for brainwashing.
So the president now, the president has requested a federal investigation of this leak and um he says they should focus on the reporters um who who got it and um since they're since it's a violation of law and a violation of national security.
I disagree a little.
I think they should contract the government officials.
There are only a certain number of government officials.
There are only a certain number of government officials who could possibly have handed this over.
And they are ripe for polygraph tests.
Polygraph them all.
They're accurate enough.
Polygraph them all.
Just start narrowing it down.
I mean, I don't understand why we don't.
You're not going to have to do a thousand.
I can't imagine there are more than 200 people.
Right.
And Mayor, doesn't that send a message to others just how serious this sort of leaking can be?
The minute you go with the reporters, you're talking about a big long legal proceeding where you're going to have to litigate the First Amendment, their First Amendment rights to have sources.
How does that compare to national security?
And in a way, reporters getting access to things like that at times when the government is doing something wrong is important.
So you can't cut off reporters completely.
You can't make laws that are completely based on the fact that everybody's a rat.
So there is a valuable purpose to a certain level of confidentiality in these things when and if the press goes back to playing its role as the watchdog of government ethics.
And right now, it isn't.
Right now, it's not much better than a communist owned news enterprise.
Maybe voluntary, but still owned and operating for that purpose.
So I think it is worth doing a full-scale investigation.
And listen, in many ways, you have more control over your employees than you do the press.
To require your employees to take a polygraph test about a matter of national security is perfectly proper.
And whereas if you require reporters to give up sources, it becomes a big balancing test between protecting the First Amendment and the ability of their press under the right circumstances to get damaging information about what the government is doing, which after all does happen, as we found out with Biden, right?
And the right to protect our national security.
It doesn't exist with government employees.
They should have no reason why they wouldn't take a polygraph test if they didn't leave.
I mean, you're not going to fail it if you're telling the truth.
And if you are, it's discernible.
You can see from the person's makeup and their...
I couldn't use it in evidence, but I used it a lot for investigatory purposes.
And I had people that couldn't be polygraphed.
The polygraph examiner would come to the guy who's too much of a nervous wreck.
Or he's a pathological liar.
Try that one on.
The joke used to be you couldn't possibly polygraph Bill Clinton.
I wonder if he ever was polygraphed.
I don't think so.
I doubt it.
Pretty soon he became the machine.
The machine just blows up.
So, you know, all this stuff about tariffs.
And here we are with the stock market booming.
Booming.
And we have Canada caving in again.
Oh, the least breaking news of the least breaking news of the day.
We love to straighten you out.
I love Canada.
I really do.
I just think they've politically gone lefty haywire.
Right.
Right?
I mean, really.
Like, silly, silly, lefty haywire.
Well, Ted, just since people may not have seen this jackass completely, let's show them some of the Mondoni so they can get ready to figure out who else they're going to support other than him for mayor of New York and who they're going to send money to.
And right now, those possibilities would be Curtis Leewer, who will be the Republican candidate, for sure.
Eric Adams will be an Independent candidate, for sure.
And possibly Cuomo.
Cuomo is on a third line.
And I think I've seen both things said, that he's not going to run, but then he's rethinking and he might run.
So let's play.
And I have a thought on that, which we'll finish with after you hear this.
Lies the intifada.
That's not language that I use.
The language that I use and the language that I will continue to use to lead this city is that which speaks clearly to my intent, which is an intent grounded in a belief in universal human rights.
But do you actually condemn it?
I think that's the question and the outstanding issue that a number of people, both of the Jewish faith and beyond, have.
Do you condemn that phase, globalize the intifada, which a lot of people hear is a call to violence against Jews?
I've heard from many Jewish New Yorkers who have shared their concerns with me.
I don't believe that the role of the mayor is to police speech.
Quickly, for the people who care About the language, and who feel really concerned by that phrase, why not just condemn it?
My concern is to start to walk down the line of language and making clear what language I believe is permissible or impermissible.
Do you believe in the first election, Tom Holman?
How many more to New York has been charged with that target?
How many more to New York has been charged?
Do you believe in the first election, Tom Holman?
How many more to New York has been charged with that target?
Two key ways.
The first is to match the state.
I've proposed is that we raise $10 billion to pay for our entire economic agenda and start to Trump-proof our city because we know he'll use federal funding as leverage over this city.
And we will do so in two key ways.
The first is to match the state's top corporate tax rate to that of New Jersey.
We are at 7.25%.
They're at 11.5%.
Corporations can pay it over there.
They can pay it over here.
And the beauty of it is that it doesn't just apply to corporations headquartered in New York City.
Because when you say this, people will say, well, they're going to go to Florida.
Wherever you are headquartered, as long as you do business in the state of New York, you are taxable for that corporate tax.
We're talking about corporations that are making millions of dollars, not in revenue, but in profit.
And the second is taxing the top 1% of New Yorkers.
We're talking about people who make a million dollars a year or more, taxing them just by a flat 2% tax increase.
And I know if 50 Cent is listening, he's not going to be happy about this.
He tends to not like this tax policy, but I want to be very clear.
This is about $20,000 a year.
It's a rounding error.
And all of these things together, they make every New Yorker's life better, including those who are actually getting taxed.
New Yorkers are afforded to the people who are in the world.
Rent-free, free buses, universal childcare or susti groceries.
But I want to ask one question.
Have you ever voted?
The country.
Who's the most effective Democrat in the country?
Mr. Momdani.
Mayor Wu of Boston.
Who's the most effective Democrat in the country?
Mr. Mom Mayor Wu of Mayor Manny.
That alone should disqualify you from trying really hard to get the murderers and the rapists back that were taken out by ICE.
She wants to get them back.
I mean, Boston misses them, Mayor Wu.
Yep.
Bizarre.
How do they, I mean, but I mean, he's worse than Mayor Wu.
Now, first of all, what he's saying is crazy.
It's crazy.
First of all, how do you tax companies that leave New York unless he's talking about taxing them on the money they make in New York, which will be constitutionally challenged, but there are ways in which you can do that.
But if they leave New York, I don't see how you can tax them on the same way you, well, never mind.
It's all stupid.
And that's not stupid, actually.
It is not at all stupid.
It's part of the Marxist plan.
He's about, he's right out of Marx and Engels and Mao and Stalin and right out of them.
I mean, this is a tragedy for New York that a city like ours has a straight out and out communist, Islamic terrorist sympathizer and Jew hater as a candidate for mayor who's going around campaigning in a foreign language.
Well, let's hope, like with Trump and the insanity of electing Kamala Pamela, that people in New York will see better, look at it better.
It's complicated because there are three candidates.
And the popular wisdom would be this.
They have to unite behind one.
Now that's really hard.
I know two of them pretty darn well, Curtis and Andrew Cuomo.
And these are both very...
Adams and Sliwa had an enormously bitter campaign.
And I would normally, of course, support Curtis.
Curtis is worried that I might not because we've had a few personal issues over WABC and stuff like that.
But that wouldn't get in my way in making the best decision for New York City.
And that doesn't change knowing the guy for just my entire life and knowing who he is.
But this decision is bigger than Cuomo.
It's bigger than Curtis.
It's bigger than Adams.
It's bigger than me.
I truly believe this city is going to be ruined, or that city is going to be ruined.
I don't live there anymore.
And the city I gave my blood for, it's going to be ruined by this maniac and by the silly people of my city.
I'm sorry, fellow New Yorkers, but you voted for him.
I did.
Or you didn't show up to vote.
What the hell is wrong with you?
You don't listen to that guy?
You want your kids to grow up there?
Well, they're not.
They're not going to grow up with a lot of good kids because the parents are going to take them out of there.
So the point is, there's only one way to beat it.
One of them has to run.
And I can tell you my personal feelings about it, but they're not worth a damn thing here.
I am a bit of a professional politically, so I'm going to try to put my head on who would have the best chance If the other two supported them, not based on their liking each other, not based on ego, but based on loving New York City, how about even just caring about it?
And I honestly don't know the answer to that.
I can see arguments for any one of the three of them.
Curtis is the least defiled, right?
So Cuomo went out of office on a scandal.
Doesn't seem like he made up a lot of that, but maybe a little.
He got about 30% of the vote.
Adams was having all kinds of problems before he saw the light about immigration.
But many people can say he helped to cause the problem by inviting them here, giving them credit cards, putting in all kinds of money for their housing, which looks very suspicious now, which is being investigated.
And then, I think, And then Curtis.
Curtis has no scandals, thank God, but you'd have to say experience.
Of course, if you compare him to Mondami, we're not talking about, I mean, Curtis has probably more experience than he does.
So I'm going to think on this a lot.
And I don't know if it'll do any good, but I mean, I'll try to be as honest.
I'll be as honest with you as I can be with myself about who I think has the best chance.
But I only think that chance works if the other two support him, I think.
Maybe at least one of the other two.
Well, it's worth a great deal of thought because I am not exaggerating this one bit.
There's plenty more of what we played for you from this maniac.
There's something really wrong with this guy.
Really wrong.
And it's deep and it's dangerous.
Well, anything else we need to cover?
Because I want him to go over and listen to Dr. Maria.
Let's send him over to Lindell TV for the Dr. Maria show.
And we'll be back tomorrow night from a special location.
Oh, yes, yes.
We'll be in a new location tomorrow for a little bit.
Short while.
We're going to tease them, though, right?
You got to tune in to find out where.
Yeah.
We're not going to tell you.
I'm not even sure we are.
But why don't you take a guess?
Where do you think we're going to be tomorrow?
Tomorrow night and told where to go.
Right.
All right.
Well, pray for the people of Israel and the people of Ukraine.
And the people of Iran.
Pray for the people of New York.
And pray for the President of the United States.
He's dealing with so much and he's doing so well, but he needs the help of God.
Obviously.
And he's getting it.
So we'll be back tomorrow night, 7 on Lindell, and 8 here on X. And we'll keep you up to date on what the heck's going on.
And we'll see what happens with the big, beautiful bill, if it's still beautiful or not, right?
I don't know if it's come out of the Senate yet.
I don't think so.
But it might, it probably will before you go to bed tonight.
So, but we definitely will be on top of it tomorrow, for sure.
Okay?
Well, thank you very much.
We'll see you tomorrow night.
And God bless America.
U.S. Army Major Scott Smiley paid a high price serving our nation.
Scott was leading his platoon in Iraq when a blast sent shrapnel through his eyes, leaving him blind and temporarily paralyzed.
Scott would become the first blind, active duty military officer before medically retiring years later.
Thanks to friends like you, the Tunnels of Towers Foundation gave Scott and his family a mortgage-free, specially adapted smart home.
Show your support for America's heroes.
Now, donate $11 a month to Tunnels of Towers at t2t.org.
Are you ready for some action?
I'm ready for action!
Get the Elite TV plan only through the portal.
218 channels, and it's only $69.95 a month, including your free portal.
That's cheaper than everyone else.
Your favorite sports.
Movies.
News.
Even daytime drama.
We're talking about ESPNOAN newsmax.
Channels you can't get any more in certain areas.
Compared to the competition, this is a way better deal.
Enemy selection.
Not to mention all the free music channels.
There's over 700 premium and classic movies all ready to go.
Plus, they got catch-up TV that allows you to go back and watch what you've missed or want to watch again.
Cut your cable in half and get twice as much for free.
Way more channels for half the cost.
After the first year, the subscription then drops to $57.95 monthly where you change or upgrade anytime.
Go to QUXNow.com and get yours today.
Use promo code Rudy.
These deals are selling out.
Here we are, pretty much at the beginning of the process here at this pristine, I call it a laboratory.
Not like a factory, it's like a hospital.
This is the beginning of the process for roasting.
Deep green, very good quality.
Most people don't use this quality.
We deal with small farmers, but they'd like to know who we're dealing with.
They give us the highest quality, all organic, non-GMO.
You should know all Arabica beans.
No Robusto.
All Arabica.
they're going to go into the roaster and it'll get roasted for about 20 minutes or so Oh my goodness.
Look at these.
My goodness!
Ha ha ha!
You're going to want to specially order these.
This is what goes into Rudy's coffee.
It's our purpose to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
It was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers, in which Thomas Paine explained, by rational principles, the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate from the Kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the ability to select the people who govern them.
And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
Because the desire for freedom is universal.
The desire for freedom adheres in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
Look at what we've done in the past and see if we can't use it to help us now.
We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world.
The greatest democracy, the freest country, a country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.
All of us are so fortunate to be Americans.
But a great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we're able to reason.