All Episodes
Previous Next
June 10, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
01:55:36
America’s Mayor Live (687): U.S. Marines Deployed to Los Angeles as Anti-ICE Riots Escalate
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening.
This is Rudy Giuliani, and this is America's Mayor Live, and live from the live free or die state, New Hampshire.
Every time I drive around and see that slogan, man, gets me excited.
Gets me excited.
It's patriotic.
Oh, can't be patriotic.
Well, Democrats, I am completely at a loss to explain them.
I think there must be some terrible, terrible sickness, moral kind of sickness, within the higher echelons of the Democrat Party.
They all say the same things, too.
Peaceful protest, peaceful protest, peaceful protest.
Cory Booker.
There is a real moron's moron.
Cory Booker.
He goes on, I guess one of the CNN or MSNBC or one of those places, and he says a lot of these peaceful protests are generated because the President of the United States is creating chaos.
And confusion by arresting people who were showing up for their immigration hearings.
Whatever he's talking about.
The group that I told you about did not show up for an immigration hearing.
No, no, instead they were beating the hell out of people and shooting the people and robbing people.
This protest is so peaceful.
Can we show them, Ted?
The video of they're attacking the main police department headquarters, which reminds me of what happened in Minneapolis with Tampon Tim when he let them take the police station.
Do we have that video?
Do we have that video?
Do we have that video?
That's a police headquarters.
There are no cops there.
The guy sitting at the desk at the NYPD had come out.
Are those guns?
*Sounds of gunfire*
Okay.
We got it.
So, I mean, doesn't it occur to you that that's a police headquarters?
Not a single cop showed up.
It's outrageous.
And they wonder why they have violent protests.
Because they permit them.
Because they encourage them by doing that.
Trump didn't want that to happen in the federal building, which is one of the reasons he brought out the National Guard.
If they don't protect their own police headquarters, they're not going to protect the federal building.
I have no idea who comes up with this.
I mean, it's almost as if they're criminals themselves.
They're protecting those people.
Nobody got arrested.
The guy must have broken 12 windows of the police department.
He's having a great time.
And the president was wrong to bring out the National Guard?
Thank God he did.
At least the federal buildings won't be destroyed like that.
And Booker says they're peaceful?
I mean, it's just like one liar.
It's like one liar after another.
If it isn't Booker, it's Newsom.
If it isn't Newsom, it's Pelosi.
If it isn't Pelosi, it's Wacky Waters.
Somehow, they have decided that they're going to be on the side of these illegal migrants.
So they try to make a very sympathetic case for the ones who have not broken any other law other than the law of either coming in here illegally or staying over beyond the point that you're illegal.
And, of course, they're not as dangerous as the criminals that come in.
And maybe even in terms of priorities, given how much time we're going to have to spend with these criminals to get them out of here, you almost have to put them in a different category.
I don't know.
I mean, I used to have to do that.
You can't prosecute all criminals.
You don't have the time.
You don't have the resource.
And then you're not going to prosecute the worst ones.
So I agree that the priority has to be for people who committed crimes and the worst, the crime, the more the priority.
They shouldn't come in here illegally.
We're supposed to be a country of laws.
And to get angry at the president because he wants to law enforce is a little ridiculous, isn't it?
I mean, they're the bad guys.
They're on the side of these criminals making the ICE agents.
Who are immigration enforcement officers.
They call them Nazis.
No wonder they feel empowered to beat them up or spit on them or do whatever they want.
The organizations that are funding this, by the way, is the Party for Socialism and Liberation, which has also organized all the anti-Israel violence.
And it received funding from the gentleman that Carol was talking about, Neville Singman, who's well-documented, directly connected to the Chinese Communist Party.
So it's not unusual to see them waving and doing this under the flags of foreign countries.
And then also an organization called the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights.
Which is also extremely left-wing, maybe probably just as communist as the Chinese Communist Party.
On Friday, the head of it, one of the heads of it, Angelica Salas, called for broad demonstrations against ICE.
And it was considered to be one of the things that really kind of pushed this whole thing off.
So they want to make sure they spend their money.
Yeah, there's the peaceful protest.
And I absolutely agree with the president, one year sentence for burning the flag.
And then the second time, she go to prison for life.
Too many people died with that flag, the last thing they saw, trying to protect our liberty.
So that these idiots can do this.
All the people participating in burning the flag should be arrested.
And I don't get the First Amendment.
There's one of those cars.
I think that's one of those cars that doesn't have a driver.
So when that goes up in flames, there's a real fear that the...
So all those green people should be in a panic.
And also, just for the heck of it, have they caught Elpedio Regna yet?
He's the guy who threw the rock, who threw bricks.
And federal law enforcement agents.
So they have a big manhunt for him.
Elpedio Renna.
I don't know.
There was a thing that they thought they were going to get him.
I would like to see him arrested.
Might exercise a little control over the rest of these people.
Well, in other news, a lot going on with China today.
First of all, the exports from China to the United States are way down.
They're down by at least 35 percent, if I'm not mistaken.
There, if you want to take a look at that.
Let me see if I get it right here.
You can see how far down it's gone.
It's down to the lowest that it has been in quite some time.
Down 35% month over month.
Now, you say, well, that's bad for us because we're losing out on certain things that we need and certain things that are cheaper and we may have to pay a little bit more.
But it's three times worse for them.
Because we're an importing nation, not an exporting nation, right?
We want to change that a bit, but we are.
But their business is exporting.
That's one of their prime businesses.
We're their number two country, if not number one.
35% reduction in their being able to send out the crap they make is a killer.
Some communist economists are trying to make the best of it.
But things in China are really bad.
I don't know if you know this, but they have what is known now as a frugality code.
It is a communist country.
And you can't waste money.
And you get disciplined if you do.
The way Xi Jinping puts it, he wants to reduce hedonism.
And he's been doing this for quite some time, but now he's got it up in the stratosphere in terms of the pressure, because he needs money.
And it's a renewed campaign, a renewed frugality campaign.
They put new provisions in the frugality code, and it's a new campaign to denounce extravagant and profligate conduct within the party's ranks.
And among the citizens.
We must insist on zero tolerance.
That's all they have is zero tolerance.
They have a ban against serving alcohol, gourmet dishes, and cigarettes at official meals.
Other causes prohibit floral displays and elaborate backdrops.
Basically, they've got very, very slow growth.
The slowest they've had in a very, very long time.
A real estate disaster because they built too much and they have a weakening to the point of a matter of concern job market.
And if their exports are going to go down or their exports to the country that pays them the most are going to go down by 35%, they're going to have less jobs.
I think even with that, they're being as vicious and as hard as they can be.
They are negotiating right now.
They've had two days of negotiations.
So I don't know where that's all going to come out.
But China is in serious economic trouble.
All of those predictions that their economy was going to pass us by mid-century, believe it or not, are now rethought.
They had...
They punished 313,000 people in 2024 for being profligate.
That's a crime in China.
They decide if you're spending too much.
It's a communist country.
Read George Orwell.
They control everything about your life.
Oh, my child wants to be a doctor.
No, he's going to be a pilot or he's going to be a train engineer.
The.
Between 23 and 24, they doubled the number of punishments for not being frugal.
And they have an eight point regulatory system that you have to follow.
And, and, And the new frugality code was just put out, and people are finding it very difficult to understand.
China is also trying to flex its muscles.
It never had aircraft carriers, and I don't know how good their aircraft carriers are.
They do have a bigger navy.
They don't have a better navy.
They have a bigger navy.
But they have sent their new aircraft carriers.
They've now sent them sort of on a cruise.
that have them involved in drills and um Actually, they have two operational aircraft carriers.
And they went Quite a ways, 725 miles south of Tokyo to Iwo Jima.
And it's kind of surrounded Iwo Jima, went around it, which is controlled by Japan.
And it really was done to try to show Japan how strong they are, and also that they can field a force that could try to take Taiwan by the target date of 2027.
and um and And the Japanese are monitoring this, and these are done, I mean, China does this in Taiwan constantly, right?
They just constantly go around flying over it.
Robert Kennedy, as we pointed out with our discussion with Cara Castronover, has removed The entire board of what is known as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
This is the committee that forced many, many people to take a vaccine that is not a vaccine.
That's a false description because it doesn't prevent the disease.
And the vaccine that has increasing numbers of terrible incidents.
Attributed to it, including heart disease and even neurological damage.
And also a vaccine that made Fauci's friends, possibly Fauci, a tremendous amount of money.
And Kennedy said, he actually wrote a piece for the Wall Street Journal, and he said that it will no longer function as a rubber stamp.
For industry profit-taking agendas.
And, of course, the industry got all upset.
And Senator Cassidy got all upset.
Except take a look at who's on this board.
Susan Rice, Emhoff, a couple of other.
Biden and Obama flunkies.
He's not going to have to work real hard to make it a better board.
It's a completely political board, and I bet all of them have tremendous relationships with the pharmaceutical industry.
I'm sure of that.
I'm sure of that.
The trade talks in London, not much word on how they're going.
Trump always says they're going well.
He's an optimist, and I guess in terms of wanting to get to a solution, you've got to be optimistic about it.
The Russians are putting on a tremendous amount of pressure in Ukraine.
They launched their biggest drone attack.
You know, drones were really more the specialty of the Ukrainians, and they still are, after that masterful drone attack on Russia.
They launched 500 drones on a number of different sites in Ukraine, mostly in the western part of Ukraine, which means Kiev and moving toward the border with Poland.
480 479 drones, to be specific, and 20 missiles were fired at Ukraine on Sunday and Monday, basically targeting central and western Ukraine.
Now, here's the interesting part.
19 of the 20 missiles were intercepted and destroyed.
We don't know what kind of damage the one that got through did, but that's quite impressive.
And they also intercepted more than half of the drones.
And they say one person was injured.
So it sounds like, well, the drones don't cause very much, but the missiles do.
It doesn't sound like it was anywhere near as effective, not even in the same category as their attack.
Thank you.
This Saturday, there's going to be a parade honoring the military on the occasion of the 250th anniversary of the United States Army.
That's what President Trump was doing at That's what President Trump was doing at Fort Bragg today.
Also, it'll be an opportunity for us to show the complexity and the sophistication of our military, which is a tremendous morale boost for them, and they could use a morale boost.
The military I'm talking about, they've been put through a lot with the Biden.
Craziness with gendered crap and things like that.
The travel ban that the president has put into effect is very, very similar to the one that he did in his first administration.
Of course, it changes based on the countries.
And I think it affects Twelve countries.
Now, there is an article in the Wall Street Journal that's very, very interesting from Daniel Pipes, and he's a very, very good writer, and he's the founder of the Middle East Forum.
And the point that he's making is that this is very necessary to protect the Jewish people because The largest number and the most serious attacks, anti-Semitic attacks, are almost all Islamic on the Jewish people and black.
And half of the attacks in the last two years were people who were illegal.
Illegals were involved in the attacks on the Jewish people.
So he ends his article by saying that even more than other Americans, Jews need to worry about who enters the U.S. Mr. Trump's border restrictions are a good start.
So what he's done is there's special screening.
For six of the Islamic countries and six other countries that have a significant amount of terrorism, which makes sense.
Of course, that became a big source of whatever, but eventually it was upheld by the courts.
And most of the attacks take place in New York and Los Angeles.
The others are just a single case in other cities.
And most of them are motivated by the Palestinian-Israel situation, particularly recently, but actually for the last three or four years.
And I would say that that's one other example of why you just can't let anybody in that wants to come in.
And who knows how many of these people we let in.
We've already seen a couple of attacks by illegals.
We're probably going to see more.
Canada seems to have gotten on board.
They're going to significantly increase their military budget, which is good for us.
They want to participate in the worst way in the Golden Dome.
Carney immediately stepped up.
So Canada has been one of the real violators of the NATO policy of putting in 2% of your GDP.
In fact, there were only four other countries that put in less than that.
Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia, and Spain.
And Spain has gone so left, I'm not even sure they still belong to NATO.
So the target right now is 2%.
Of your gross domestic product should be spent on defense.
It's going to be raised at the next meeting to 3.5%.
So they have to first meet the 2%, which he says he's going to do right away.
And Trudeau had also promised to do this.
He was going to get it done in 2032.
By that time, China could have attacked us.
So he says he's going to get this done very, very quickly.
And he also, he has another...
There's a group of seven leaders meeting on June 15th to the 17th, which is coming up, right?
And I think he doesn't want to be in that position of putting in 1.4% for defense.
Really, really looking like he's sponging off the United States for his defense, because we've been paying for it.
Then on June 24th and 25th, there's going to be a meeting of NATO, and at that meeting, the new Secretary General of NATO is going to recommend that immediately the 2% go to 3.5%, and that over a two- to three-year period go up to 5%, because of the threat of China and Russia.
And I would say that this would not be happening without Donald J. Trump.
Whoever talked about the very, very meager contributions to defense and the United States having to carry the entire burden.
So the president announced yesterday that, first of all, he keeps saying that the talks with Iran are going very well, except we've turned down unequivocally and definitely what they say is a deal breaker, which is that they want the ability to be able to enrich at least some uranium so that Iran,
They're willing to make it so small that it would just be for peaceful use.
They're willing to do lots of things, but they want to be able to play around with uranium.
Now, that's just to cover so that we don't go in there and take all their uranium out.
And they can go secrete it in various places.
Remember, they cheat.
Lie, kill, and terrorize.
Why we think we can do a written agreement with them, and that's a good idea, I don't know.
I don't think it is a good idea.
I think there is only one way to keep us safe from an insane act by an insane man, and that is to take his weapons away.
And possibly he'll go with the weapons.
And this is the opportunity because they're so weak.
Now, we were going to put on Ali Razor, right?
Okay, so we'll talk to Ali Razor about that.
I think he has some interesting information about it.
The relationship with India looks like it has a couple of problems in it, and those should really be straightened out.
India is a very, very critical country.
It has a larger population.
I believe its economy will eventually pass China because its people are more industrious and it doesn't have all the socialist and communist restrictions that make it impossible to really be truly productive.
And to be certainly creative, which they're not.
not the Indians, the Russians.
But in the last...
But this began to trouble me when the Pakistan attack on India took place and India attacked back.
And we took a neutral position.
And I wasn't happy about that because...
They used to be an ally and they now are an enemy.
They're an ally of Russia and particularly Russia, but China also.
And we acted as if, you know, they both were wrong and they should settle it.
Well, they weren't both wrong.
I mean, the reality is that Pakistan has terrorist groups operating within India all the time.
It's a little bit like Hamas and Israel.
And the Indian attack did a pretty good job of taking out a lot of their, I don't know if it was offensive or defensive capabilities.
They do have nuclear weapons, and any nuclear weapon is very dangerous, but they don't have anything near.
What India has, and they don't have anywhere near the military that India has.
Nor do they have anything like the economic potential.
The switch in allies was very beneficial for us.
Pakistan used to be our ally.
India used to be Russia's ally.
And somewhere in the 90s and the 2000s, the switch was made.
And Bush really accomplished it.
And Modi, who is the Prime Minister of India, seems to have a very good relationship with Trump.
But since Trump has come into office, there's a lot of grousing now in India that maybe he's not so good for them.
First of all, there are the terrorists.
They expected the terrorists.
They think they can work out the terrorists.
And the deportations they were expecting.
But the large numbers of deportations apparently have them shocked somewhat.
And at least it's their version of it that Indians who are being deported are not being treated respectfully.
And as I'll demonstrate to you, respect is a very important part of what has to be done with India.
Also, they are in shock over the provision that we may not take any foreign students next year.
We were in the middle of doing those regulations.
And India had passed China as having the most foreign students here, more than China, over the last two years.
But the State Department, May 27, 2025, decision to stop scheduling new interviews.
Shocked Indian officials.
I mean, they have 331,602 Indian students enrolled in U.S. campuses.
China only has 277,398.
And we want those Indian students to be enrolled.
We'd like a lot of them to stay here.
So a little flexibility there might go a long way.
In making sure that we have a very, very close ally in India and we don't have problems with it.
We're going to have to count on them in this cold to lukewarm war with China.
Also, another thing that has them all upset is Apple, in order to make things a little bit easier with us because all of our concerns about About infiltration or surveillance and everything else by China.
Apple is going to move a lot of its work from China to India.
And in fact, iPhone production, which is I think done in China, but some of it's done in India.
Eventually, it's all going to be done in India.
Now, with the tariffs that we're going to place on the iPhone.
Trump wants that in the United States.
So, of course, that's just a natural source of...
So, this is something Trump knows how to handle.
A few little adjustments here.
And then the way in which we talk about them and the way in which we deal with them and how much concern we have about making sure we have the right arrangement with them and we treat them with the same with the same I guess attention that we do Japan and the United Kingdom and Israel and that sort of thing.
So I think that's A word to the wise.
Maybe we'll pass that on.
Israel has released these videos.
I don't think we have them, Tim.
Maybe we'll get them for tomorrow night.
Of where Mohammed Sinwar died.
And it was in Khan Yunus.
Remember, Khan Yunus is the southern part of Of Gaza, which Biden didn't want him, didn't want Netanyahu to extend his military operations to the southern part.
But that's where he was hiding.
And they killed him about a month ago, I think.
But they finally found his rotting corpse of Mohammed Sinwar.
So, remember his brother.
Was the original leader, Yahya Baba Sinwar, was the mastermind of the October 7th, 2023 attack.
He took over for his brother.
He was about 25 feet below the hospital in Khan Yunus.
So, you know, when they say attacking hospital, that's what they do.
They surround themselves with civilians and hospitals.
And he was in a tunnel that was connected to almost, I don't know if it was connected to the entire country, but you could move long, long distances in it.
But he was in a little room, and his body was already rotting.
And they believed that he died of asphyxiation because of the bomb raids that plugged up.
A lot of the tunnels.
They also believe that some of the hostages were kept in tunnels like that.
I believe they have evidence that they were.
Greta Thunberg I have no idea how she is anything.
Greta Thunberg Who is a joke, had some kind of ship that was going to come to Israel and they have now detained her and they're going to send her back to where she came from.
And she's all upset.
She's saying she's been kidnapped.
No, they're just not letting her in.
They don't want you there, Greta.
I mean, maybe they're worried that you're going to get their people all screwed up.
According to you, the world was going to end in 2010 or something, right?
So they don't want to get their people all confused and nervous that the world's going to end.
I mean, that could be very, very destabilizing.
Right?
We do now have our guest.
We do, okay.
We have a very good friend of the show.
Those are regular viewers.
We'll definitely recognize him.
Ali Reza Jifar Zeta, he's the Deputy Director of the Washington Office of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, and they have broken a major story today, Mayor.
Yes, yes, yes.
I'm anxious to...
Hi, Mayor!
How are you doing?
Great seeing you!
Great seeing you too.
So tell me what the, I mean, I know, but tell everyone what, what, what, Well, during the press conference this morning, we showed the world that unlike what the Iranian regime claims and some people in the intelligence community and others were trying to insinuate as though the Iranian regime did have a nuclear weapons program many years ago,
but they actually shelved it in 2004.
We showed that that program never stopped.
Not only that, but the plan that they had before, which is now exposed, has now been replaced with a new plan to develop nuclear weapons.
And that has been going on since 2009 under the directive of the Supreme Leader Khamenei.
The name of the new plan is called Kavir Plan.
Kavir means desert.
And the reason they use that name is that the center of the gravity of the operations that is focused on building nuclear weapons is actually in a desert area in the central province of Semnon.
60% of that province are actually desert.
And they have set up a number of sites which we identified over the past few months that are involved and are part of the This Kabir plan.
You're looking at the map right now.
I see it, I see it.
Yes, the map that you see is actually, the blue boundaries are actually the boundaries of the Semnon province, which is declared since 2009 as a military province.
Right to the left of it is actually the Tehran province.
Now, in this area, as you notice, there are four...
Nine percent of the whole province of Semnon, which is not a small province, it's the fifth largest province of the country, is actually red zone.
And then you have the yellow zones that you can see marked on the map.
That's about 27% of the whole area that is still, you know, you need to have a special permission from the Revolutionary Guards, from the Ministry of Intelligence.
And now we showed in these sites that they are developing.
Working on several aspects of developing nuclear weapons.
Number one, trying to boost the power of the nuclear weapons.
You know, what they call a boosted nuclear weapons.
The second, to extend the range of the missiles for over 3,000 kilometers.
And then third, trying to basically hide it and accelerate the program.
The whole thing is run...
Now, this is very timed and very crucial because this is happening at the time that there are negotiations going on with Iran.
The IAEA, which is the UN nuclear watchdog, is now meeting starting yesterday, actually, in Vienna.
It's going to be four days.
of a session discussing, including discussing the fate of the Iranian nuclear file.
The IA itself had a report that just came out last week.
It was a damning report showing that the regime had done various tests that are only used for building nuclear weapons, that there are missing nuclear material, that they believe it's diverted to somewhere.
They don't know where.
And there are missing equipment that the regime did not declare to the IAEA.
So these are very important aspects of the program that we got on top of it.
We found out about them and we revealed them today.
Well, that's really terrific.
Now, explain the history that you have in revealing situations like this, their hidden plans for nuclear power.
Well, you know, it was back in August of 2002 that we revealed the existence of a nuclear site in Natanz which was being used for uranium enrichment.
No one knew anything about it.
On that same evening the International Atomic Energy Agency requested to go to Iran and inspect the site.
Until then, there were no inspections.
Of the IAEA of Iranian sites.
And the regime dragged this field, playing games.
Eventually, they allowed the IAEA in February 21st of 2003, several months after our revelation, they allowed the IAEA to go to Iran.
But before their plane landed, They show them all the buildings with the exception of the key building.
And just telling them that, you know, the person who has the key is not here today.
We had another press conference as the team was landing in Tehran that this is the trick they're going to use.
But also, we pointed to another site.
So when the IAEA went to Iran, they had that information.
The regime had to allow them into Natanz.
They found centrifuges, which the regime always claimed they never had them.
And then they demanded to go to that second site, that color electric.
And now the regime played games and dragged it.
And it took about a year before they allowed the IAEA to go to that site.
When the IAEA went there, they realized that the whole place was refurbished, you know, new tiles, new things.
Still, they found traces of highly enriched uranium.
Then we had another press conference in May of 2003, exposing a site known as L 'Avizan Xi 'an.
And by the time the IAEA was allowed there in June of 2004, which is 13 months later, The regime had raised the place entirely.
It's in the document that we release today.
And, you know, basically there was nothing left for the IAEA.
No buildings.
The soil was removed.
Still, they took samples and they found traces of highly enriched uranium there.
So, in fact, one of the main points of contention that now exists between the IAEA and Iran is actually that site.
In La Byzantine, which we first exposed.
We also, in July of 2011, revealed the existence of a new organization run by the Ministry of Defense that is in charge of weaponization, building the nuclear weapons.
It's not about energy.
It's not about energy reactor, nuclear reactors.
Explain what that is.
Well, you know, you can have a nuclear...
You have submarines that operate based on nuclear energy.
You have power plants that operate based on nuclear energy.
France is something like 70% nuclear.
Yes.
There are a lot of countries around the world, but using that as a cover, But all of their actions was exactly the opposite of any nation doing that.
Actually, there is no country in the world that is enriching uranium up to 60 percent, which is what the regime is doing now, that is not...
And you only need 3.6% of enriched uranium under certain circumstances.
You know, certain processes.
None of that is actually taking place in Iran.
You have these secret sites that we found, and some of them were examined by the IAEA, that the regime was working on high-explosive tests.
They were working on putting fissile material, you know, in a sphere, shape.
There's only use for when you want to build a bomb.
All of these tests that they have done, the level of enrichment, you know, the lack of accountability for the nuclear material, none of that corroborates with a nuclear energy.
Interestingly, you know, the sole nuclear energy reactor that exists in Iran is down south in Boucher.
That has just recently become operational.
The nuclear fuel for that is not...
That's produced by the Russians.
And there is not even enough uranium ore, you know, original raw material that you can actually refine it enough for, you know, fueling your nuclear reactor, that one nuclear reactor.
So that's why, you know, what the explanation the regime is giving.
Does not sell.
No one is convinced with that.
Plus, you know, the regime is spending a huge amount of money, but $2 trillion has been the cost of the nuclear weapons program of the Iran regime.
That's $2,000 billion.
And yet, there's absolutely no use for the people.
That nuclear reactor in Boucher doesn't produce even 1% of the power needed in the country.
So they have one nuclear reactor right now that's operating?
Right.
There's one nuclear reactor in Boucher.
They say they want to build another 19. But it's not supplying any electricity or energy.
It supplies very little.
less than 1% of the electricity of the country.
And keep in mind, Iran sits on the second largest level The president has made that point.
Yesterday or today, I don't recall, but yesterday or today, he made the point that they're at a standstill.
Is insisting on no enrichment capacity for them at all.
And they want to retain some enrichment capacity.
We know why.
Because they want to cheat.
Also, what he has in mind, they're going to find very, very difficult.
What he has in mind is that if they reach an agreement, he and he and Israel will come in and destroy the reactions.
It'll be like a control bombing.
He wants to make sure they're all gone.
Do you think that this intelligence is known to the Israelis and to the Americans about these new facilities in Semnon?
Well, you know, the new plan that we revealed today, of course, we shared that information with the United States Administration and also Congress, as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN Nuclear Watchdog.
They have that information.
In the past, they have always found that information to be very useful.
In fact, President Bush, George W. Bush in 2005, He said in a press conference that, let me tell you how we know about the nuclear weapons program.
I remember that.
He said that, you know, it was an Iranian dissident group that brought that information.
I remember.
I do remember that.
Yes.
I have been a fierce opponent of the two Ayatollahs from the day they started.
Of course, it's only been heightened by my relationship with you and Madam Rajavi and all the great people at MEK.
But I am very – I don't see a way out of this other than Israel is going to take out the facilities.
They're not going – what he wants from them, they can't agree to.
It would cost them a fortune, wouldn't it?
What he wants from them is he wants them to destroy everything they have that's nuclear.
Like that plant, that power plant.
He wants to destroy it.
Now, if they go ahead and destroy everything that he and the Mossad know about, how much money will that cost them?
Probably cost them a trillion dollars to build that.
Well, Mayor, you know, let's keep in mind that the threat of the Iranian regime is not limited to its nuclear weapons program.
They are the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism.
Oh, sure.
They are the epicenter of terror and instability and warmongering in the region.
They're the world's major violator of human rights.
But most importantly, they are rejected.
By the people of Iran, the vast majority of the Iranian people have rejected the regime.
They want change.
I think the biggest ally, because at the end of the day, think about it, you want the entire threat of the Iran regime eliminated the same way that the people of Iran want the mullahs to be overthrown.
So the biggest ally I think the West has is actually the people of Iran, the organized resistance, the same movement.
That exposed these nuclear sites, but it's also the movement that is involved in acting as engine for change in Iran.
They have paid the price over the years for confronting the Revolutionary Guards, confronting the regime.
Right now, as we speak, Mayor, the resistance units of the revolution, Despite all the claims, all the things, they're extremely vulnerable.
When it comes to the people of Iran.
And I think that's where everyone needs to invest on, rely on the people, see them as the true partners of the West, see them as the solution to this problem.
Because, you know, the experience has shown, Mayor, that the only short way to end forever is...
There's no peace on the ground.
It's the only way to have peace in the Middle East, too.
Exactly, because you will never have a peace so long as the Mullahs are there.
It's inconsistent with their goals to have a peace there.
Absolutely.
One of the points, actually, the 10-point plan of Mrs. Rajavi is supporting peace in the Middle East, ending all of those hostilities.
And I think the practical way of achieving that is to end the rule of the clerics, because they will sabotage any effort you will do, as they have done before.
They are the epicenter of instability and chaos.
And that's why a change in Iran by the people of Iran would be the biggest factor contributing to peace in the Middle East, not only by eliminating the nuclear threat of Iran, but also eliminating the epicenter of violence.
Well, I am hoping that if we follow through on taking out the nuclear facilities, either us or Israel or both, That that's going to result in the Ayatollah being overthrown.
I mean, financially, it would be a disaster for them.
Just think of all the money they've put into that program.
And that's going to just be wiped out?
And of course, it's their only hope of being able to contest with Israel to be a nuclear power.
The only fear that I have, or I had, I don't think it's going to happen, because there are some people that are around the president who talk about, well, maybe they can have a small enrichment capacity.
You can't allow them under the tent at all.
So if this is a nuclear tent, they have to be thrown out.
They can't have their nose under it.
Because they'll do what they've been doing for 30 years, cheat.
So I am hoping it ends up in complete destruction of their nuclear capacity.
And I think that might be enough with all that's going on inside Iran to really do the clerical regime in.
Well, Mayor, you know, the stated policy of the United States as enunciated by the President, President Trump, you know, Special Envoy Whitcoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been no enrichment into the nuclear weapons program of Iran, saying that the Iran regime cannot have nuclear weapons, period.
If that is the stated goal, which it is, Then you have to focus on that, never back down, never accept anything less, because otherwise it will be more of the same in the past.
Remember the previous negotiation that started in 2003 by the EU3, you know, the three European nations, Britain, France, and Germany with Iran.
It was basically based on appeasement, hoping that, okay, we give Tehran, you know, whatever they want in return for abandoning their nuclear program.
They never did it.
And then the JCPOA, the talks under the Obama administration that led to the 2015 JCPOA, legitimized all of these sites, legitimized the enrichment program, and allowed the Iran regime, for instance, under the mountains in Fardo near Qum, near Tehran.
To have that enrichment facility with, you know, over 1,000 centrifuges saying, you know, okay, you promised that you're not going to enrich uranium here.
And the regime said, sure, we want to enrich it.
Just let us keep that place.
Guess what?
Right now, the 60% enrichment that the regime is doing, which is very close to the weapons grade, is actually taking place in that underground facility in Fardo.
So promises of this regime are absolutely nothing.
It's taking place where?
It's a uranium enrichment facility known as FORDO, F-O-R-D-O or D-O-W, which is built way entrenched under the mountains near QOM, Q-O-M.
This is the site that we first exposed in 2005.
And that's where they do all the enrichment?
Most of the enrichment is actually the higher level of 60%.
It's taking place in Fardo.
They have advanced centrifuges there.
It's well protected.
And the JCPOA actually allowed them to have that.
That's why I think the argument you're making is throw them out of the tent, the nuclear tent, is valid.
Based on the experience in the past, because the promises the regime made at the time means nothing.
If they have the ability and the capability, with any level of enrichment, any equipment, they will use it.
And that's exactly what they did.
You don't want to go that route again.
There's no question.
So now what, in Semnon, what are they doing with all the facilities they have there?
Now, in Semnon, the Semnon province, the three or four sites that we identified there, all of them are run and controlled by this entity known as SEPAN, which is the organization run by the Ministry of Defense, whose only job has been building the bomb.
Now, in two of those sites, one in Semnon, the city of Semnon, and the city of Shahruud, both of them are in Semnon province.
They're working on missiles, which they say is for launching satellites into orbit.
But in fact, those are actually part and parcel of launching satellites with nuclear warhead on them with an extended range of up to 3,000 kilometers.
And by going to the orbit, that's one stage for building intercontinental ballistic missiles.
Armed with nuclear weapons, they have gone that far and they're always camouflaged.
Oh, this is a place where just launching a satellite and like everybody else is doing.
But in fact, this is all entirely run by the military.
So we raised, you know, alarm about this, saying don't look at them as a simple like a missile launch place for satellite, you know, like you do in China.
This is all part and parcel of their nuclear weapons program.
We showed the involvement of CEPAN, which is the organization run by the Ministry of Defense, how they're on top of it.
We showed a lot of examples and details about it.
And ironically, most of the sites that we have exposed have not been inspected by the IAEA.
Even those who have been inspected.
The regime, the IAEA found traces of highly enriched uranium.
The regime never responded to them.
So in reality, inspection of those sites mean nothing.
Because whatever you find, Tehran will not going to respond to it.
It's not going to make a difference.
That's why we have called for closing on all of those sites, saying the only role the IAEA should have is to basically monitor the closing.
off the sites, not just go and take samples and just pick it.
I would, I would, if, if I, wouldn't trust the AEA to do it.
I think we have to And we have to be there watching it.
Because you can't trust them.
This is not even Russia where you can trust and verify.
You've got to do it.
This was a statement that he made on Monday.
He said that Iran is pushing hard, the president, for the right to continue enriching uranium in any nuclear deal, which the U.S. president says can't have.
This is a quote from the president.
They're just asking for things that you can't do.
Trump told reporters at the White House.
They don't want to give up what they have to give up.
You know what that is.
They seek enrichment.
We can't have enrichment.
We want just the opposite.
And so far, they're not there.
However, he has expressed hope that Washington and Tehran can reach an agreement.
And he says they are good negotiators, but they're tough.
He's sort of putting out a little bit of an olive branch to them.
But he's pretty darn clear.
They seek enrichment.
We can't have enrichment.
We want just the opposite.
And so far, they're not there.
Oh, and then he does say, I hate to say that, like what happens if they don't, because the alternative is very, very dire one.
But they're not there.
They have given us their thoughts on the deal, and I said, you know, it's just not acceptable.
So, I don't know how you go from there.
Mayor, the position of the president has been very clear since the beginning when the nuclear talks started.
It's the Iran regime who wants to drag the whole issue.
You know, this is the sixth round of talks.
Over two months has passed, way more than that.
And you're still back to square one.
Nothing is moving forward.
And the regime now is offering, oh, we're going to have our own plan as a counter plan to the United States.
They just want to play this cat and mouse game.
What does it do for the regime?
It actually drags.
It keeps the talks alive while the clock is ticking.
They are trying to run the clock out.
Now, which clock are we talking about?
Come October of this year.
The mechanism at the UN, which is part of the JCPOA, to snap back all the sanctions that existed prior to the JCPOA is going to expire.
Between now and then, the Western nations, the Europeans, have the ability to put all the sanctions back on.
But what the regime wants is just keep everything alive without doing anything, just drag it.
So the time will expire.
This is something that the United States must avoid.
There's not much time.
The Iran regime has already shown its hand.
It has made it very clear that they're sticking to their position of not giving up their enrichment capability, which is the core of their nuclear weaponization.
And you need to, you know, say, okay, here's the deadline.
You either deliver that or we're going to start with snapping back all those sanctions on the Iran regime.
Also, there's talk right now at the IAEA Board of Governors in Vienna.
And tomorrow, Wednesday, is the day that they're going to table a resolution basically against the Iran regime and then vote on it.
And then decide what the next step would be.
And, you know, like 2005, they went through the same process and they referred the Iranian regime file to the UN Security Council.
And that's when, you know, those sanctions came.
So I hope no one will back down on this.
They press it hard and, you know, push forward.
The experience has shown that the regime, when they see the other side, is firm, is decisive.
They will back down.
They have no choice.
Well, I don't know.
Do you think they would ever possibly agree to our taking out their entire nuclear program?
Well, I think the only time they will agree to that is that they would feel otherwise their entire survival is on the line, that they're going to be overthrown.
And that's why I think, you know, this is the reason why The United States and other countries should look at Iran not just as the regime, the regime is only ruling the country, but look at the people of Iran as the real ally, the vast majority of the people, the organized resistance, those who are exposing these nuclear sites, those who have been in the forefront of the opposition to the regime.
I have to run, but I just want to ask you a quick question.
Do you No, I didn't get the feeling that they knew it.
Because a lot of times the things that we revealed, they really didn't know anything about it and they welcomed it.
So, I mean, this may be too early, but...
And I hope they will act based on that.
Well, I'm sure they will.
I mean, this is critical.
I mean, there are two parts to it.
You have to have the atomic weapon and you have to have the delivery system.
The atomic weapon isn't worth very much unless you want to pull yourself up if you don't have the delivery system.
One last question.
In Iran, is there concern about an attack?
You mean when it comes to the people in Iran or the regime?
Both, the regime and the people.
Well, certainly the regime is so concerned.
and that's why they are hanging on to these talks.
They feel so long as the talks are going on, that's sort of like, you know, it's...
So that's why they want to drag it.
They have a lot of interest in dragging the talks.
But the people, I mean, the people don't care at all.
The only thing they care about is how quickly and how sooner they can end the rule of the clerics.
They will look for any opportunity to bring down the Ayatollahs.
Well, this has been very, very useful.
And again, congratulations on getting this information.
MEK is remarkable, and we'll be talking very soon.
I want to see all those papers you have.
Okay?
Okay.
Thank you so much, Amir.
Always a pleasure to be on your show.
You're doing a great job on informing the American public, but also around the world.
Appreciate that.
God bless you.
God bless you.
As usual, Alireza was right on the money.
We did spend an extra amount of time with him because that's the information you don't get.
You don't get any kind of information from inside Iran that's worth it.
A curfew has been issued for downtown Los Angeles from 8 p.m. Pacific time to 6 a.m. Pacific time per Mayor Karen Bass.
Oh, but everything's fine.
Things are fine.
Everything is perfect there.
We're just going to have a curfew for the hell of it.
Why not have a curfew in the middle of the summer, right?
Everybody wants to go home in Los Angeles at 8 p.m.
My God, 8 p.m.
Good luck in force on that.
So that's a very, very interesting report.
And we'll take a look at the report so we can dissect it a little bit for you tomorrow.
But I was very encouraged with the President's strong language about this because there is always this little thing hanging out there.
About the possibility that maybe we'll accept some kind of enrichment capacity for them.
And that would be like just letting them have the bomb because they cheat so much.
And this makes a lot of sense because no use having the bomb if you can't, if you don't, if you don't have missiles that can make it to the United States.
So if this is what they're doing in Semden province, that's that.
And as Ali Reza says, they don't need it.
The judge in Wisconsin who assisted the Flores Ruiz, The illegal who was, well, he was in front of her because he beat his wife or his girlfriend with a hammer 17 times and then beat up his friend.
But ICE was there when he was before the judge, Judge Dugan, in order to grab him on an ICE detainer because he's an illegal immigrant criminal.
Just the kind we're supposed to.
And the judge found out that the ICE agents were outside of her court.
And she left the bench and went outside and told them that they had to have a judicially approved, as far as she knew, they had to have a judicially signed warrant in order to arrest him.
Which is not true, actually.
But she told them that.
And she sent them to the chief judge, who actually told them they don't.
But it gave her enough time to allow him and his lawyer to escape through the jury box and the jury door, which is private, and the agents had no access to it.
So the agents kind of knew that she was screwing around with them, and they got outside and they ran after him, and they caught Ruiz.
Now, the question is, is she prosecutable?
So they made a motion, the defense did, to drop the case because of judicial immunity.
I do not see how judicial immunity gives you the right to help prisoners escape.
Suppose the judge let one of the prisoners that he had escape.
I mean, suppose the guy is in front of him and he's going off to the penitentiary for 10 years.
And he says, hey, go out the back door and go away.
That'd be a crime, wouldn't it?
So I don't see how this Judge Dugan It's been going on quite some time, where another judge did the same thing.
But this goes back to, like, 2020, 2019.
It's been going on for quite some time.
So that would be the third judge that's been involved in obstructing justice.
Or, like Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom, they have decided that their state and their city is going to be immune to that one particular federal law.
I mean, suppose...
We're not going to accept that.
You can have it somewhere else, but it's too hard for us to have it.
There'd be too much trouble here if we had to enforce that.
Because that's what she's saying.
She's saying, we can't enforce it because we're going to have riots.
we have too much trouble.
So therefore here, You see, it is in California.
It's not a state right.
It's a right that the states have given to the federal government as part of its ability to carry out the foreign policy of the United States.
They're asking to be something other than the United States.
They want to be a province that's something other than the United States for the execution of the immigration law.
It's quite a disconcerting proposition that comes pretty close to destabilizing the government.
So Judge Dugan was in front of the federal court today and
I don't know if they argued it today, but she's going to raise that she's immune and the government is going to say she's not immune to helping prisoners escape or obstructing the operation of federal law deliberately.
And they argue in their brief that this would broaden the scope of judicial immunity very, very much.
Since no duties under Wisconsin authorized Dugan to help someone evade federal arrest, her actions fall way outside the bounds of protected judicial conduct.
In order to be immune, the doctrine would say that It has to have something to do with one of your duties as a judge.
So that's why you're immune.
Well, your duty as a judge is not to help somebody escape federal arrest.
It'd be a heck of a ruling, wouldn't it?
Such a ruling would give state court judges carte blanche if it was valid law enforcement actions by federal agents in public hallways of a courthouse, and perhaps even beyond.
Dugan's desired ruling would, in essence, say that judges are above the law and uniquely entitled to interfere with federal law enforcement.
Nowhere does it say that.
So let's hope this gets decided the right way, even though it's in the very, very.
It's in Wisconsin and we have that Supreme Court that has been liberalized and that's the Supreme Court that.
And then they actually corrected it after.
But it was too late.
Also, they just got a case.
They just got a case.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court just got a case reversed unanimously by the Supreme Court.
And of course, it's one of their woke.
And they denied a religious tax exemption to one of the diocese's Catholic charities.
And they said that their activities, the Catholic charity's activities, were secular in nature and didn't involve teaching the faith or supplying religious materials.
the the Now, Catholic Charities, of course, Catholic Charities, of course, takes care of the poor.
And that's one of the critical duties and obligations of a Christian.
I just read it the other night.
One of the, I don't know if it's one of his disciples or one of the Pharisees asked him, what is the law?
What is the new law?
He said the law is very, it can be very simplified.
Love the Lord thy God with your entire heart and soul and do to others as you would do to yourself.
So he basically said, you have a duty to do charity.
So this is at the core of the religion, right out of the Bible.
But, gosh almighty, they're so intent on destroying religion that, of course, a Democrat anti-religion, atheist position, 4-3, took away the tax exemption from Catholic charities.
Because they said they failed to demonstrate that the statute imposes a constitutionally significant burden on their religious practice.
I mean, the reality is it takes a lot of the money they're going to use to help the poor people.
Now, here's the interesting thing and why this court is such a jackass court.
You know who wrote the decision?
It's a 9-0 decision.
Which means, like, hey, stupid.
This is what the law is.
This is what should have happened to their election case.
Because of the same four numbskulls and hacked Democrats.
This was a 9-0 decision.
And the...
So, maybe this will temper them a little.
Terry Moran is gone now?
Is that right?
That's right, Mayor, and I think we predicted that last night.
Yeah, I don't see.
There was an article today about all sorts of leaks from ABC that they all wanted him gone.
Ah, so he wasn't well-liked in the building.
That can kill you in situations like this, right?
You know what I think was funny?
ABC News executive said he didn't meet the standards of objectivity and impartiality that they have at ABC.
Oh, wow!
Almost anybody can reach those standards because they don't have any standards for objectivity and impartiality.
Man, they got one...
Trump derangement syndrome person after another.
Miller is a man who is richly endowed with a capacity for hatred.
He's a world-class hater, Moran said.
You can see this just by looking at him.
Because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment.
He eats his hate.
I have no idea what that means.
But I do think it's quite interesting that he can discern this by just looking at him.
He must be some kind of a spiritualist.
Maybe that's what he can do now.
He can put a little shingle saying, I can look at you and tell you what you eat.
It'd be a good job for you, Terry.
It'd be a lot better than the one you had because you were awful.
You weren't even a particularly good reporter.
The Supreme Court also decided, and this is, you know, this is the Supreme Court that Trump put together.
The Supreme Court had a very, very important decision on Thursday of last week, Ames versus Ohio.
Ames was a 61-year-old woman, a white woman, heterosexual white woman, and she sued the Ohio Department of Youth Services where she'd worked for 16 years.
And she sued because in 2020 she was turned down for a higher position that went to a lesbian.
And she had all very, very excellent work recommendations and it was almost her turn to be promoted.
And then they hired a gay man and demoted her.
From the position she was in and gave it to him.
So she sued them based on alleged discrimination, based on her heterosexuality.
The lower federal courts rejected her claim because they said that she's not part of the special class, protected class of people, that she's part of a majority group, heterosexual white women.
So she had a higher burden of proof.
If you're a minority, the presumption is that there is discrimination, which is kind of strange.
But if you're a heterosexual or a white or whatever, then you've got to prove either by clear and convincing evidence or certainly not a reasonable doubt, but probably by clear and convincing evidence that there was discrimination.
The Sixth Circuit and four other circuits say that there is this double standard.
That if you are part of the historically discriminated against group, you get a presumption in your favor.
If you're not, you've got a big burden of proof.
So you're going to be treated differently.
The Supreme Court struck it down.
They've reversed all of those five circuits that have the double standard.
Because basically, they're saying that reverse discrimination is not discrimination.
And among other things, it violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act that outlaws workplace discrimination.
Discrimination is discrimination.
It shouldn't be any different if you're discriminating against a black or a white.
Our goal is to be a colorblind society, says our constitutional documents and Dr. Martin Luther King.
So let's just sum up, since we did it on the other show, but we didn't get a chance to do it as completely with you, let's just sum up what's going on in...
Any report on what's going on other than the curfew that they put on?
Well, that's right, Mayor.
We already covered that a curfew has been enacted, declared, starting at 8 p.m. Pacific time.
That's 11 o 'clock on the East Coast.
And what we're seeing now tonight, Mayor, is unrest popping up in other cities.
Tonight in Chicago.
Let's just stick with LA for a second.
What are we seeing about LA?
We're seeing crowds gather.
With this curfew being announced, we will be continuing to follow the developments in Los Angeles.
There are crowds making their way to downtown.
How about the violence?
Well, it's still only 6.30 there.
6.30 there, yeah.
So, as we know, a lot of the violence starts to pop up at night.
Am I looking at a live shot now?
This is live.
So these are the protests in L.A., but anti-ice protests are growing violent in places like Chicago.
That's the beginning of one of the things that they do wrong.
They shouldn't be in the middle of the street.
They should be on the sidewalk.
In order to have a protest and take over the streets, You have to get a permit in New York.
Otherwise, you have to be on the sidewalk.
And you almost never get it to take over the streets.
You see now, if an ambulance has to get through there, let's assume one of those is an apartment building, some guy gets a heart attack, you take more than four or five minutes, the guy's more likely going to die than not.
And these people are interfering with that.
That's why you can't be in the middle of the street.
It isn't just for aesthetics.
You think that this goofball whose picture we see now, Mr. Smoothie here, you think he knows that or cares about that?
You think it ever occurred to him that if those people are in the middle of the street, his citizens can't be cared for the way they should be by the emergency services?
If there's a fire?
Well, if this is a fire, there's no use anyway.
They don't have water in the fire hydrants, right?
They've got to fight it with sand.
It's a new way of fighting fires.
And what is he...
Well, Newsom gets exposed as a complete liar because he was complaining that the president hadn't called him, wasn't even a voicemail.
And the president immediately said, you're a damn liar and produce this receipt here.
And we showed it to the people on the other side.
The president had a 16-minute conversation with him that he seems to have forgotten on June 7, which is the night before the first big riot.
There had been some...
activity on that day.
And that's why the president called.
And I also went through, is that now a That's live.
That's a fairly large crowd.
And look how they've completely blocked that.
You see, the idea is...
The way we do it in New York, the way I did it because de Blasio screwed it all up, in order to do that, in order to do a protest, you cannot block traffic because there are emergency reasons for lanes to be open.
There might be some occasions on which the city would give you some of the street, like a lane or two, so the cars can go through.
But more likely than not, particularly at this hour of the day where the sidewalks aren't going to be that crowded, those people should be on the sidewalk.
And that street should be open.
Because I don't know who's there, who's working there, who's living there.
Somebody gets a heart attack, I don't know how far away the hospital is.
Any delay can mean death.
So, look how it's blocking traffic down the side road.
Well, there's all this dispute about And there's really no question that he has the legal authority.
The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 says that the president cannot use the military for civil law enforcement purposes.
Well, first of all, he's not using them for civil law enforcement purposes.
He's using them to protect the federal building.
Which, as you can see, did we play on here the attack on the federal courthouse?
Yes.
On the federal building?
We did.
Well, I mean, on the police department, rather.
Did we play that?
Yeah, we played that one at the beginning of the show.
Why should President Trump assume that they're going to guard the federal building any better than they guarded their police department?
And one of the reasons you can use them is to protect federal property.
Federal property is in jeopardy of being burned or destroyed in that place.
Burn anything.
So when he signed the memorandum to deploy the National Guard, he did it on the Title X. Title X is an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act that you can't use the military.
And you can use the military if there's an insurrection.
A revolution, an attack, or if the law isn't being enforced.
Well, the law isn't being enforced.
And you can do it without getting the permission of the governor.
And that can allow you to both use the Marines and the National Guard.
And the president has used versions of this.
The presidents have done it 30 times.
So the idea that this is, oh, Trump is making this up.
It's ridiculous.
Of course, whatever judge writes his opinion will probably, they won't.
So, it should be fairly easy.
To get this case resolved.
Now, Title X, which is the law under which he operates, whenever the president considers that unlawful obstructions Make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any state by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.
He may call into federal service such of the militia of any state and use such of the armed forces as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.
Well, doesn't he need to call someone in to enforce the immigration laws?
They're refusing to enforce them.
Is it any clearer?
I've got to figure out the judicial and intellectual dishonesty that will be used to try to screw Trump on this one.
But when you put the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act and Title X together, he's got about four different possibilities of doing this, and the one that he selected is perfectly sound.
And it's been used by other presidents, and it's been used for things like hurricanes.
And the mayor is quoted as saying she's not going to enforce the law.
And they haven't been enforcing the law for 20 years.
So it's a practice.
I don't know if they have a law there like they have in New York.
have a law not to enforce law.
So that very, very Darrell Issa who is a senior member of the House and one of the very best is going to start, if he hasn't already, with the Judiciary Committee, they are going to investigate why there was a two-hour delay once they did decide that they might help.
And, you know, in a riot...
It was a one-hour delay.
Doesn't matter to riot.
You need the help when you need the help.
And all of the left-wing press, of course, is saying that these are peaceful riots, and everything you see on television, buildings are burning down.
People are throwing things.
They're burning automatic cars, which have the extra problem of...
Right now, the authorization is for 2,000 National Guard and 750 Marines, and there is discussion of maybe another 2,500.
I think that'll depend a lot on how it goes tonight.
How it goes tonight.
I don't know if we have any of the yo-yos who say that there was no violence.
It would be interesting to show that, Ted.
Pelosi, I think.
No, not Pelosi.
Waters said that and Spartacus said that.
Yeah, what's that?
Spartacus said it.
Yeah, yeah.
Dopey Spartacus.
Right.
So, Also, at a very critical moment, the police chief, when the president was making this decision, the mayor of Los Angeles was saying on television everything was under control.
And the police chief was saying it wasn't.
They were completely diametrically opposed, which had to say to him, I can't trust these people to protect my federal agents and my federal property.
Also, their history.
These are the two bozos who brought us to fires that didn't have to be that extensive, except for the fact they didn't have water in the fire hydrants.
I just used that one thing as how incompetent.
They are.
On a historical scale, I would say.
It's hard to really exaggerate.
Also, I think that if we had a hearing, we would call Chief Villanueva, who was the prior chief.
Therefore, he isn't.
You know, it doesn't have to suck up to the mayor.
This other chief was in a lot of trouble when he contradicted her.
She said everything is fine.
He said they're out of control.
But Villanueva tells it like it is.
Villanueva says the cops are scared out of their minds to ever cooperate with ICE because they can get in trouble with the politicians because they interfere in the law enforcement, which leads to an awful lot of extra crime.
And I guess nobody cares about that.
And the other thing that is completely distorted is that all these people that are arrested are, oh, these poor people that get arrested.
We went through a list.
We went through a list last night and pretty much the same list, a few extra people.
On the list, but by and large, I mean, these are people with significant violent criminal records.
And why they're fighting so hard to get ice out of there so these people can be back out on the street is mind-boggling.
It's mind-boggling.
And the violence was there.
The threat to the federal law enforcement was there.
But most importantly, the threat that federal law will be completely ignored in that part of the United States.
Yeah.
That's what they're saying.
Well, let's show...
We'll play it.
Yeah, I'll play it as you talk.
Why don't we play, before we go, why don't we play a little of the violence and just trust me that Cory Booker said that there was no violence.
Maxine Waters said there was no violence.
And Pelosi said, well, you can't really tell.
I mean, the car could have gone on fire for any number of reasons.
Yeah, right.
40. He's behind the back.
He's behind the back.
Ah!
Ah!
He's behind the back.
No!
Stop resisting!
No!
Well, that was a very, very strong
*Sounds of fire* Oh, here we go.
There we go.
How do they defend their own food?
How?
How do they not defend, Ted, their own police department?
They don't have cops there?
That's police headquarters.
So, I mean, we have a police headquarters in New York.
It was right around the corner from the U.S. Attorney's Office, right in the same plaza as the U.S. Attorney's Office.
I was actually closer to it when I was here as attorney, the mayor, although it was only two blocks from the mayor's office.
And I can assure you, Or, I mean, yeah, Adams would do that.
Sure, absolutely.
He's not going to let them attack the...
That caused, I think, a lot of the violence.
It was like a signal that we're in control.
Well, here, ICE is being treated with such disrespect.
It's disgraceful.
It's absolutely disgraceful.
And it triggers the law that says that the federal law is not being effectively followed in that jurisdiction.
And therefore, the president has the option, quite legitimately, as other presidents have exercised, to bring in the military.
Otherwise, you see what was happening to that police station?
That's what would be happening to the detention center.
Imagine doing that to a prison.
You don't think they'd do that to the federal?
They'd probably rather do it to the federal facility anyway.
If I were the president, I would not trust either one of these two people to protect anything.
I mean, they are.
California, they may be crazy, but they're still citizens of the United States.
And they come under the protection of President Trump, who takes it seriously, not like these bozos.
Well, I think we've covered all of the key topics that we wanted to cover.
Get everybody ready for the parade that's coming up on Saturday.
It's going to be a really great, great celebration of the 250th anniversary.
Of the United States Army, which I think was actually today, but it's going to be celebrated on Saturday, I think.
I'm not sure.
We'll have to check that.
Yes, yes, I think we covered.
We did a good job, Ted.
We covered almost everything.
The Democrats minimizing the riots.
All using, I mean, I didn't get a chance.
I was going to, all using the same language also.
Somebody wrote it out for them.
All using the same key words.
Okay.
Also, the president recommended a one-year sentence for burning a flag.
I think it's about time we do that and try that again in the Supreme Court because I don't see how the flag is a First Amendment issue.
First Amendment is about words, not actions, not destructive actions.
And I mean, very often they take that flag.
It's somebody's property as well.
It's also dangerous.
You start lighting fires in the middle of the street, in any crowded city.
Who knows what can happen?
A car can go up.
So I can see all kinds of reasons why you would make that illegal, as well as respect for the flag of the greatest nation on earth.
And they're treating it horribly.
So, we'll be back tomorrow.
We're going to ask you to pray for the people, as we do every night, people of Ukraine and the people of Iran, because we've spent a little time talking about their And they're having the opportunity maybe to get freedom if President Trump plays his cards right.
And of course, the people of Israel and the people in Los Angeles.
What a shame not to have a governor, not to have a mayor.
To have these, I don't know what they are.
Are they communists?
Are they stupid?
Are they liberal sillies?
I don't know what they are.
What they are are terrible, terrible public officials.
Disgraceful public officials, actually.
So we'll be back tomorrow at 7 on Lindell TV and on Rumble and on X. We'll be back here tomorrow night on X. And we'll see where this goes.
And apparently there are demonstrations In New York, Philadelphia, Washington, a couple other cities tonight.
We'll have to see what they amount to.
I mean, they didn't amount to much in other cities last night, but, you know, there's a lot of money going into this.
This isn't like some kind of a just spontaneous.
This is a paid spontaneous reaction.
And some of this is communist money that goes into it.
Well.
God bless.
God bless.
God bless.
that nice.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
It's our purpose to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
It was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's common sense.
Written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers in which Thomas Paine explained by rational principles the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate from the Kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech.
The ability to select the people who govern them.
And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
Because the desire for freedom is universal.
The desire for freedom adheres in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
Look at what we've done in the past.
And see if we can't use it to help us now.
We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world.
The greatest democracy, the freest country.
A country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.
All of us are so fortunate to be Americans.
But a great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we're able to reason.
We're able to talk.
We're able to analyze.
▲
Export Selection