All Episodes
Previous Next
June 3, 2024 - Rudy Giuliani
01:33:13
America's Mayor Live (E421): Hunter Biden Trial Day 1—Jury Selected; Opening Statements on Tuesday
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening, this is Rudy Giuliani with America's Mayor Live, another week.
Another week, and how much more of our Constitution is going to be taken away from us by a Biden and the Democrat gang?
They sure did a job on it last week.
I mean, there are more than a few lawyers following the lead of Professor Dershowitz and saying it is without doubt the worst, most egregious trial in terms of rights of the defendant that they've ever seen.
And a short while will contrast it with basically being tried in your own home, where Hunter Biden is being tried.
Not that he shouldn't be, but Trump should not have been trialed before a hostile jury, subjected not only to prejudicial pretrial publicity, but people who would be more prone to believe it.
I mean, The changes of venue are rare because you don't have that many cases of that kind of publicity, but they happen.
O.J.
Simpson got one.
That was okay for O.J.
Simpson.
The defendants in the political corruption trial involving the Koch administration that I tried got it, and I agreed to it.
I agreed to it because I'm a fair prosecutor.
And anyway, I believed in my case.
I believed I could beat him anywhere.
I could probably beat him in front of a group of their relatives.
But the reality is, in that case, we moved from New York to New Haven.
Well, actually, we moved to New Haven, but the jury came from Hartford.
So they were outside of the New York media market.
So Hunter Biden's trial began today.
Very, very different than Trump's trial.
First of all, the judge seems normal.
Judge Noriega.
She seems like... I haven't seen enough of her to tell you how good she is or not, but there's nothing untoward about the way she's handling the case.
They wanted to put it off until after the election.
Well, he's not involved in the election.
He's not campaigning.
But she gave him an adjournment.
I mean, she gave him a couple of weeks to prepare.
I once asked the judge to give me a day or two because I had just gotten the case and I had about 12 hours to prepare and he just said, no.
But I was representing Trump, so it's a little different.
So they went through the jury pool.
She was a lot more sort of down the middle in the way she did it.
They dismissed jurors who basically said that they couldn't be fair.
One juror, I think, had already been accepted and then put his hand up and said, you know, on reflection, I'm too partisan.
Don't remember which way.
The one that made it through that I'm kind of concerned about, there is one juror, six men, six women, there is one juror who believes that you should be allowed to have a gun if you're a marijuana user.
Now, I think the judge should have dismissed that person.
Not because he's a marijuana user or not, it's against the law.
Whether you think it should be or it shouldn't be is another matter, but at least there should have been further questioning.
Like, you know, in this case, they're going to have to accept the fact.
Now, this is crack and cocaine, not marijuana, which is a very different thing.
But that drug restriction that exists in these statutes applies to marijuana.
So I think in an excess of caution, she should have been dismissed by the judge because she might not follow, I think it's the she, I don't remember, might not follow the jury's instruction, the judge's instruction.
And although there is such a thing known as jury nullification, where the jury just says, screw you, judge, we're not following what you say, you're not supposed to have that.
Jurors are not supposed to have or be allowed to use their opinion of the law.
But isn't that hard?
I mean, that's really, really hard.
And when you have so many jurors, why have a question about it?
That's the only one that I would have had trouble with, because it seems like you may be building a hung jury if she finds it impossible to follow the instruction that... I mean, here the charges are, one, That he filled out the government form to get a firearm, and the government forms ask you if you've used drugs or you're addicted.
And he certainly is both, right?
He's a drug user forever, admitted in his book.
replete with photographs in his hard drive over the four or five year period of the hard drive.
There isn't a year in which there aren't pictures of him smoking.
He seems to use a pipe a lot and it's so bad that he puts himself in a closet and I guess he accumulates more smoke that way.
So you hardly see him.
You see like a little red face, see a little, then you have smoke all around the closet.
Not always, but there may be 30 pictures like that, 20 pictures like that.
There are pictures of him walking around his house with no clothes on, smoking crack.
There are pictures of him sitting with various girls, women, smoking crack.
It's one of the reasons why his niece's psychiatrist, I think, let me get this right, recommended When his niece told the psychiatrist that he, Hunter, was sexually inappropriate with her.
And Hunter says that she then withdrew that.
And then he tells his father, but I am dangerous to the children.
Now, nothing was done about that.
Which is extraordinary, because you'd think a grandfather would be quite concerned about that.
You also think you would know that, because it's been on the hard drive from the day that we put it out.
And also, there are several images on the hard drive that, according to the people that we had examine it, would constitute child pornography.
And as soon as I found those, I brought them to the Delaware police, and they did nothing with it.
Other than to give it back to the FBI, who did nothing with it?
Whether they ever visited to protect the girl in question, which is required by Delaware law, I don't know.
I confronted the commander of the Delaware police with regard to that and he wouldn't answer me.
So I don't know if they did what they were supposed to do about this, but obviously Joe never did.
You can see the text right there.
That's a text from Hunter to Joe.
And the thing that makes it crystal clear is the psychiatrist has the right information.
According to this, the psychiatrist doesn't want him around the niece because he walks around with no clothes on, he talks to prostitutes openly on the phone, he smokes dope in front of them.
Now, how would she know all that other than if Natalie told her?
So it's a little stupid when he says, but Natalie denies We don't know if Natalie denies ever telling the psychiatrist that, or denies that it happened.
Problem is, it's photographed.
So Natalie obviously was lying to protect her perverted uncle.
You just wouldn't have known those facts.
They're just too damn accurate if they hadn't actually happened, right?
And then somehow, some kind of a guilt comes out in him.
And after he says that, he says, but you do know that I am dangerous to the children.
To which I said, I'm sorry, what he says is a very unsafe environment for the kids.
Well, that would be true if you just look at the pictures and you see all the smoke.
I mean, those kids are inhaling.
uh whatever is in that smoke that he seems to like so much he crowds it all in a in a uh in a uh in a closet there also are other pictures very disturbing in a different sense of him driving uh and uh actually making it clear that he's smoking because you see the smoke around the and he's driving an automobile and it's at or about the time That he makes this lie.
So there are two essential crimes involved.
I think one is only two and the other is 10 years.
The false statement that he was neither a drug user or addict.
He's both.
And number two, it's a crime for a drug addict or a person using a control substance to carry a gun.
Well, he was Using controlled substance at the time that he was carrying a gun.
If he doesn't get convicted, because this is cut and dry, you know it's a hometown decision.
I mean, you contrast it this way.
Trump was tried by a jury, not of his peers, but of his enemies, in one of the worst places in the country for him, which is Manhattan, where they not only voted against him 90-10 or whatever, They are probably, along with the West Coast, some of the people that are afflicted the most with Trump Derangement Syndrome, which would have them, you know, believe anything anyone said about him that's bad.
And he's being tried hometown.
A lot of people had to be dismissed because they know the Biden family.
Now, the interesting part of that is, and I will concede this, I was told by the Delaware police Who, remember, endorsed Trump in 2020, which had to take some guts against this senator for 2,000 years.
And they all told me as if, one, people here don't like them.
I mean, they've been a real cause of tremendous trouble.
And of course, a few exceptions, but not many.
And boy, would we love to get rid of them.
Now, he gets elected all the time, but I mean, we get some very strange results like that in New York, where you have this brainwashed sort of reflexive... Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, Democrat So tomorrow the trial will really get started, because tomorrow you'll have the opening statements.
Now Hunter's got another, if you compare it to Trump, advantages, disadvantages.
One guy's having a home court advantage, the other guy's in the enemy's domain.
The prosecutor in Trump's case was bloodthirsty, right?
And they brought the guy from Washington.
It's really funny when they say Biden wasn't involved, except his number three guy in the Justice Department was sent there, you know, to be the hitman.
Kind of hard to say he wasn't involved.
But in any event, the guy trying this case doesn't want to do it.
This is the guy that was willing to fix the case for Hunter.
They were willing to give him a plea in which I don't know what he even pleaded guilty to, some meaningless tax violation, and he wouldn't have gone to jail.
So we got a guy who's trying them solely with something less than full commitment, whereas the other ones were trying it with over-the-top, unbelievably raw anger and admission and hatred.
Uh, so will he pull his punches?
Will he do things that allow him to, uh, will he take a dive?
We will, we will see.
And, uh, the critical witnesses of course, are going to be his ex-wife.
Um, and, um, his girlfriends, uh, Zoe Teston and Haley Biden, who had been a sister and all, but at this point, at this point, when this is going on, She was his mistress and, um, and it was, if I recall correctly, it was kind of fading out.
They were beginning to have a lot of problems.
And I mean, she, there are images of her doing drugs with him.
Don't know if she was a drug user before she met up with him or he made her a drug user.
I do think there are some references by her blaming him for it, but you never know.
Right.
One of the other really troubling facts that should have everybody in front of a grand jury.
Joe Biden visited with his former daughter-in-law and girlfriend to his other son a week or so ago.
She's going to be the main witness.
She's the one who discovered the gun.
She's the one who disposed of the gun, and she's the one who did it because he's a drug addict.
Those are all the elements of the crime.
What's he meeting order for?
He says he's meeting with her because the anniversary of everything goes back to Beau Biden, right?
Whenever he's in trouble, Beau Biden died in combat, although he didn't.
Uh, or I, I, I, you gotta feel sorry for me because of Beau Biden.
And so he says he went to see her because it's the anniversary coming up of Beau's death, except according to, uh, everyone who's checked this, he's never done that before.
Somehow, after 14 years?
9.
9 years?
Oh, let me check.
11?
He died when?
At 14?
Or 12?
He died before 12 because he used that as an excuse.
9.
Pardon me?
9 years ago.
9 years ago.
So, in the last 8 years, he didn't visit her.
But now, just when she happens to be the main witness against his other son, he's visiting her.
Is he prompting her?
Is he telling her what to say?
I mean, all that is well within his level of immorality.
I mean, he's done far worse than that.
So when we come back, we will take a look at what's happening with the aftermath of the Trump verdict and what people are saying about it.
Can we get any kind of impression yet as to how it's going to affect the election?
We'll be right back.
Here we are, pretty much at the beginning of the process here at this pristine, I call it a laboratory.
It's not like a factory, it's like a hospital.
This is the beginning of the process for roasting.
Deep green, very good quality.
Most people don't use this quality.
We deal with small farmers because they like to know who we're dealing with.
They give us the highest quality, all organic, non-GMO.
You should know, all Arabica beans.
No Robusto.
All Arabica.
They're gonna go into the roaster and it'll get roasted for about 20 minutes or so.
Oh my goodness, look at these!
My goodness.
Ha ha ha.
You're going to want to specially order these.
Cheers.
♪♪♪ This is what goes into Rudy's coffee.
Coffee.
And we're back.
Rudy Giuliani back with you with America's Mayor Live and in person, very much alive.
And there are some people that are happy about that, I bet.
80 and feeling like he's 40.
Eat your heart out, Biden crooks.
I'm very proud of the fact that I'm the guy who caught you.
And I'm very proud of the fact that I'm the guy, along with Bob Costello, Who was the guy that Mac Isaacs trusted with the hard drive?
Because I think if you're giving it to the wrong person, you may never have seen the light of day.
Because I don't know when the Justice Department and the FBI were going to let us know that there was a hard drive.
They didn't let us know in time for the impeachment, even though they had it for eight months before.
They didn't let us know when, extraordinarily, Joe Biden lied about it on national television and said that it was a product of the Russians, and then specifically accused me, calling me your pal Rudy Giuliani.
I think he kind of fumbled my name a little.
You're the Russian pawn.
That's right, I'm a Russian pawn.
By the way, that has been proven to be categorically untrue.
But I'm the bad guy.
According to all the left-wing press.
Which means I'm the good guy.
You gotta know how to, you know... This is like 1984.
The Ministry of Peace is the Department of War.
So you just know that, and you know... When they start...
Like when Biden did that whole pompous thing and pious thing about how terrible it is with classified documents.
I mean, he had done worse, but we didn't know about it yet.
He was sort of setting the groundwork.
So there is a body of opinion developing that the case in New York was a travesty of justice.
And it's beyond now just the usual Trump people.
Two Republicans that never support Trump, one of whom is really a bitter enemy, have said as much, and that would be Romney and also McConnell.
And I think, you know, are we giving them the benefit of the doubt or just looking at it straight?
It's obviously because they realize the long-term effect of something like this.
This is an extremely jarring attack on the system.
That will lead to other people trying to copy it.
And maybe some people on our side.
Look, I can't vouch for everybody on the Republican side.
Even everybody on the Republican side who shares my views.
I mean, we got crazy people on both sides.
And we got people that would play with the law on both sides.
They got a lot more of them.
And they're currently in control.
And they're the ones who have started this.
Which often becomes a rationalization and then you get into a whole cycle of crime.
But I mean, I have had over the period of the last three to four years, plenty of occasion, I shouldn't say plenty, enough occasions to tell people, no, no, you better not do that.
We don't, I mean, I've had people propose to me, how are we going to win if we don't cheat like they do?
I said, well, it isn't worth winning.
We might as well move to some, if we're going to have a, They cheat and we cheat, we might as well go move to some other country because ain't America no more.
We got only one way of getting this back.
That's at the ballot box, and then when we're in power, no vindictiveness, but no lack of justice either.
And I'm pretty good at that.
I spent a good deal of my life making judicious decisions about who to prosecute and who not to.
And I didn't prosecute a lot of people, and I did prosecute a lot of people.
But, you know, I didn't agree.
And in retrospect, I'm probably even more convinced I was right.
I didn't agree with the president's decision not to prosecute Hillary.
And that really isn't out of hatred or anything else.
It was out of a sense of justice and also deterrence.
And I didn't think they all should be prosecuted.
And I don't think now they should all be prosecuted.
But I think the people who were the most egregious lawbreakers, with the kind of lawbreaking that others could be tempted to do and follow if they're not held accountable, should have been prosecuted.
And I actually believe to this day, if Hillary had been prosecuted, And Comey had been prosecuted, and Strzok, and the girl, the mistress, Strzok, and I've forgotten her name.
Page.
Yeah, Page, right.
And one or two of those FBI guys, that's it.
Then I think they better have been more hesitant to continue this.
Because even the January 6th lying, when they lied about the people that were killed, none of those people were killed on January 6th.
The guy they gave the state funeral for died according to the District of Columbia Coroner of Natural Causes the day after.
So it might have put the fear of God in them about that, and you might see less of it.
So I think somehow The next president or the next attorney general, a combination of both, are going to have to find a fine line here between those who shouldn't, this shouldn't be like a thousand prosecutions in January.
This is, that's maybe one of the worst things that's happened to the American justice system.
They went wild and crazy sending stormtroopers in to arrest white collar criminals, basically.
It should be a few judicious prosecutions of the people who were the worst actors, not little people, big people, and it should be limited.
But we shouldn't avoid the hard decisions of prosecuting some of those people, so this never happens again.
Because this can't happen again.
Now, the other thing that's very, very interesting is some Democrats are slipping over and saying, hey, this was a really unfair trial.
I mean, you can't not say it if you're an intelligent human being.
Governor Patterson, Democratic governor in New York, said as much on WAVC.
I have a quote from him.
There are a lot of erroneous qualities to that trial.
Some of the people who are involved, the person who worked at the White House, somehow wound up in the Manhattan DA's office.
I mean, he's obviously emphasizing the fact that Biden was behind this, which the liberal press, including the Wall Street Journal, is making a fool out of themselves, saying, well, he had nothing to do with it.
All of it, when it adds up, really looks very much like the former president describes it.
He said.
The other one to support the fact that the case shouldn't have been prosecuted was Cy Vance, who of course decided that the case shouldn't be prosecuted before he left.
And so did Bragg before they twisted his arm.
I don't know who did it, if it was Soros or Biden, but it was one of them, because he did a complete
flip around. So now, you know, Trump, of course, made a speech, or he made more than one,
in which he's attacked the system, which I think he should.
I mean, the system, somebody's got to attack it so it can be changed.
We were just going to sit there and make believe it was.
I mean, there's some people that shouldn't criticize the judge.
Hey, when the judge is a crook, you criticize, right?
I mean, this is ridiculous.
There's no way to defend this judge.
His daughter is making a fortune.
He doesn't recuse himself.
What the hell is the recusal statute for?
The one that gets me, and it wasn't a big contribution, it was a very small contribution, but it's the name of the organization that he contributed to that means he should have been right out of the case.
Stop Trump.
How do you sit in a trial where you're supposed to be an impartial juror, when you have donated some of your money, even two cents, to stop Trump?
And I asked people, how would you feel if you were on trial and the guy sitting up there, way up there, had contributed money to the Stop You movement?
You think maybe he'd be unfair?
Or you had a right to at least the appearance of impartiality?
It's a very serious trial.
It's a historic trial.
First time an American president's being tried, and we've got a judge who contributed money to a movement to stop that person, and also contributed money to his opponent.
I mean, this is really, really extraordinary what they got away with.
So Trump attacked the system, but let me give you an idea of how bad this is and how very intelligent people lose all perspective when they get into this hate Trump thing and this Trump derangement thing.
In two places, I think in the Wall Street Journal, which is, you know, high quality newspaper, very intelligent people, they say things like this.
Biden has no control over state courts.
And Trump's legal team, like any criminal, was given broad latitude in jury selection, legal motions, and appeals.
He doesn't have any control of his state courts.
So how do you explain the fact that every single prosecutorial team here, including the one that almost prosecuted him in Arizona, they're all Democrats.
And they're all very, very excessive anti-Trump Democrats.
And the ones who actually prosecute all had an extraordinary amount of contact with the White House, like visiting there.
What's Fannie Ho's boyfriend doing visiting the White House twice?
What, going for parties?
I mean, come on.
Come on.
Don't be stupid.
You might want to know me.
I mean, I'm a little more intelligent than that.
He had no control over it.
It's his political party.
New York City is a democratic dictatorship.
All Biden had to do is call up and say, don't do it, and they would have shooken their boots and not done it.
And Fannie Ho, what's Fannie Ho doing coming to Washington, taking hundreds of thousands in contributions from Democrats all around the country?
They don't contribute to just any DA.
They contribute to a DA that did their dirty work for them.
Went after Trump on a completely contrived case.
They just didn't know that whatever she's charging Trump with, she's done far worse, for sure.
Including the one thing they don't bother to even talk about, which is stealing money from our campaign fund, which they're apparently going to just get away with because Georgia is crooked.
Thank you, Governor.
You really do a good job there, Kemp.
Wow.
Really good job.
And what is it, 175,000 ballots are missing?
Hoping that nobody pays attention to it because of the way they just censor the news and try to make you into a hero when you ran like a really, really awful election.
175,000 ballots missing, at least 3,000 caught that were counted more than once.
Which ends up being 6,000 and the margin was 11.
We're starting to get there, babes.
175,000.
I only got to make up another 5,000 votes on that 175,000.
And is it possible, having now heard the judge's description, judge, what's his name?
Merkin.
With the daughter who makes, you know, hundreds of thousands of bashing Trump.
He explained circumstantial evidence.
Not everything has to be direct evidence.
And there's not circumstantial evidence that there's something wrong with these ballots that are missing.
I mean, from very, very early on, we had information that they were stuffing the ballot box.
After it was over, they were shocked that Trump was ahead.
And they had to make up an additional number, or if they hadn't already, possibly, of phony votes.
So how do you do that?
Well, you mark a ballot for Biden and then you find a registration of somebody who didn't vote and you attach it to it.
And sometimes you get sloppy and people show up to vote and they're told they already voted.
Now we put witnesses on the witness stand who said that.
If you read the Lytton report, you'll see that way, way back the report that was sent to Pence lists a number of people like that.
So all of a sudden now corroboration is coming forth for that.
So if that's correct, there were a whole bunch of phony ballots hanging around, which is the reason they fought us tooth and nail not to show us any of the paper.
Nobody on behalf of Donald Trump got a chance to examine the ballots.
They were counting the same phony ballots three times.
And if they were straight and they were pure, They had nothing to hide.
They just said, Giuliani, drive yourself nuts.
Go through those ballots as many times as you want, and all you're going to find are official state stationery that was ordered for the ballots.
Your expert is not going to find, as you're saying, ballots that were printed later.
He's not going to find ballots that were marked by a machine, like we had evidence of.
You just look at it.
One thing you can tell for sure is if the ballot was marked by a pen, pencil, or machine.
Now, people don't go into the voting booth and mark a ballot with a machine, nor do they submit an absentee ballot.
And absentee ballots, even from 20 feet or 30 feet away, we had plenty of observations and plenty of affidavits and witnesses who said they saw this.
Well, they didn't see this.
That's what an absentee ballot would look like.
Not like that.
Of course, it has to go in an envelope.
If it doesn't have an envelope, it doesn't have a signature.
Of course, the signature goes on the envelope.
And if it doesn't have a signature, it's not a valid ballot.
They sold lots of those.
So Wall Street Journal, will you stop this?
He didn't have control over the state courts.
They're all Democrats.
He's the head of the party.
And they're all saying and doing the same thing.
By osmosis?
When they all decided to stop counting the vote, all the ones that slipped around, and only the ones that slipped around, that was just an accidental, sort of like coincidental decision by five different jurisdictions.
Hmm.
And when it happened that every place where he was ahead, and they stopped the vote, Not one did Trump win.
Biden won them all.
That was, like, accidental.
And the fact that you didn't let people get near the ballots in Philadelphia and in Detroit and in Atlanta was all accidental.
They all decided to get them put behind barriers like they were cows and not let them see the ballots.
It's kind of like, eh, it just happened that way.
It wasn't coordinated.
They sure ended up doing exactly the same things that they never did before.
I guess they woke up and they had a dream.
Maybe somebody visited them nocturnally.
I thought it was interesting, Ted and Rob, that Trump joined TikTok.
You know, we go back and forth on that, right?
It's crazy, but there's a good chance they treat us better than some of these platforms.
My goodness!
But it does sound like they have a little bit of a, I don't know, they make me nervous because of the connection with Red China.
170 million Americans use TikTok.
But you want to know an interesting fact?
Biden has 330,000 followers on TikTok.
And he's been on there forever.
I have 1.7 million on X, for example.
Trump got 800,000 in one visit.
How did that guy get 85 million votes?
Even that's ridiculous.
Back in 2020, when he would show up, three people would show up.
More people showed up, they were honking their horns, booing him, than for him.
So what, they all came out to vote?
Out of the woodwork?
Or was there a... We'll see.
I heard 5 million is up to Trump, is that true?
There's a guy put out a video today saying exactly the same thing you're saying right now.
That Biden's been on it for months now.
Trump within 24 hours got up to 5 million.
I don't know if that's true.
Well, I think they can't hear you.
So you shouldn't do that.
They can't hear you.
So they get all upset.
So, there was a great article written today, and when we come back, we're going to play it for you, because it really is a scene and a speech, a short one, for our times.
It comes from the play A Man for All Seasons.
It's about the patron saint of lawyers, Thomas More.
Saint Thomas More, who gave up his life because he would not agree That the king had the power to divorce himself, to allow an annulment that only belonged to the pope, and that the king was not superior to the pope, which Henry VIII, you may remember, was married to Catherine of Aragon.
He wanted to divorce her.
There's a lot of reasons historically that are debated as to all the reasons, one of which was he had not been able to bear a male child, and he felt to protect the sort of fledgling Tudor dynasty, he had only been the second Tudor king, he had to have a male heir so that the guy could, like his father did, fight.
So she only bore him females, and the most famous of which was Mary, who later became queen for a short period.
But then he came up with the notion that he didn't leave the Catholic religion, believe it or not.
Henry VIII died believing he was a Catholic, but he believed that the king had certain extraordinary powers similar to the Pope's in his own jurisdiction.
Sort of his state's rights guy, I guess.
And was this a legitimate thing of his, or was it because he could do the divorce then?
Was it because he wanted the church property, because he took plenty of it?
Look, we can't figure out what the hell was going on with Joe Biden.
How the hell are we going to figure this out?
So he required everyone to sign an oath, and essentially the oath was an oath to him as the head of the church.
Well, Thomas More wouldn't do it.
Thomas More was his chancellor, Thomas More was his friend, Thomas More was his teacher, and many people think that Thomas More was his ghostwriter for one of his most famous publications, which was a defense of the faith, where he defended the Catholic religion against Martin Luther and was given a great honor by the Pope for being a defender of the faith.
Many people believe that Thomas More either ghost wrote it or inspired most of it.
As I said, he was Henry's teacher and a man that Henry respected greatly, but he wouldn't sign the oath.
So here is a scene in which his son-in-law, who by the way was a Lutheran, is explaining to him why sometimes you have to compromise. So we're going to take a
short break and when we come back we're going to listen to this scene
from A Man for All Seasons and then explain it just a little bit because it really has
relevance to today and maintaining your principles or not.
To live is on its promise to do good and never forget the sacrifices
America's greatest heroes have made for us.
Heroes who risked their lives to keep our communities and our country safe.
Heroes like United States Marine Corps Captain and Pilot John Jeremy Sachs.
Captain Sachs sustained fatal injuries when his military aircraft crashed during training, killing him and five other service members.
He's remembered by loved ones as courageous, brilliant, and devoted to his career, family, and friends.
John is survived by his wife, Amber, who gave birth to their second daughter three months after his death.
Tunnel to Towers paid the mortgage on the family home for Amber and their two daughters.
The foundation has helped over 1,000 military and first responder families navigate the worst of times by removing the burden of a mortgage payment.
Our nation's heroes and their families need your help now more than ever.
Donate $11 a month to Tunnel to Towers at T2T.org.
T2T.org.
That's T. The number 2 T.org.
T2T.org.
Please, donate now.
Make sure you get your 11 bucks in for T2T.org, for Tunnel to Towers.
It's a great organization.
You're gonna be the better for it.
So, I'll set the scene for you.
I mean, Thomas More had been elevated to Chancellor of England.
Which is the highest position other than the king.
They even had a chancellor's court.
And although he wasn't a priest, he was a very, very scholarly student of religion to the point at which he's one of the greater theologians, and a highly respected man.
And his failure to sign the oath had become glaring now.
And this little weasel, Thomas, comes to visit him, who eventually rats on him.
Could be the Cohen of this scenario.
And tries to persuade him to hire him and also, you know, to be careful.
Well, he just basically throws the guy out nicely.
And then the family is trying to persuade him to make an exception and, you know, kind of sign the oath and hold your nose.
You know he's not really the head of the church, but you want to keep your head, so sign it.
And his son-in-law-to-be, whose name is Roper, exhorts him to do it.
And then he gives the explanation as to what happens when you don't follow your conscience and a very, very significant law.
So let's listen to it.
For what?
He's dangerous!
He's a libel, he's a spy!
Father, that man's bad!
There's no law against that!
There is God's law!
Then God can arrest him!
While you talk, he's gone!
And go he should if he were the devil himself until he broke the law!
So, now you'd give the devil benefit of law?
Yes, what would you do?
Cut a great road through the law to get after the devil?
Yes!
I'd cut down every law in England to do that!
Oh?
And when the last law was down and the devil turned round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?
This country is planted thick with laws from coast to coast, man's laws, not God's, and if you cut them down, and you're just a man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then?
Yes.
I give the devil benefit of law for my own safety's sake.
What a scene, huh?
And how wise those words, and how much they apply to today, because the acting judge Mershon cut down one of the largest trees that goes back to those days.
That is a unanimous jury verdict.
Everyone tried in Henry VIII's England had to be convicted by a unanimous jury in a criminal case.
Goes back to before Henry VIII, as Justice Gorsuch points out in Ramos versus the United States, No doubt they never read it.
They're too damn lazy.
Their attention span is too short.
And the dedication to the law is overwhelmed by their dedication to this cheap politics and also to making money.
The daughter was pulling in a lot of money.
So he cut down one of the big trees called Unanimous Verdict.
I'm telling you, in Henry VIII's England, you had better protection at a criminal trial than you do in Biden's America or the crooked Manhattan Supreme Court, which is run by the Democrat county leader.
He calls the shots there, not the judges.
When you see a Manhattan Supreme Court justice, remember, he had to be approved by the bosses of the Democrat party in Manhattan.
Otherwise, he wouldn't be on the ballot.
Acting trader here hasn't even been put up for nomination.
They've been dragging him along by the nose for about 20 years, 22 years, which is why I call him acting judge.
Never been put on the ballot.
I don't know if that makes a big difference.
Engelmoron was put on the ballot three times without an opponent.
That's the way they did it in the Soviet Union.
I don't know if they did it that way in Nazi Germany, where Hitler pulled some people out to be on the other side and just make sure you lose, because he ain't gonna be around if you don't.
So the point is, people sitting on that bench owe their judgeship not to the people, not even to the mayor or the governor or the president, one person.
They owe it to the Democrat Party.
And as I was taught in law school, A lot of these judges can be honest on lots of things, and good.
Comes to a political case, don't be naive.
You're not going to beat the Democrats unless they want you to.
They control the courts in the places where we have a one-party system.
That can be Manhattan, that can be Fulton County, Georgia.
Remember, when Fannie the Hoe admitted extraordinarily That she took money from her campaign account to use for personal reasons.
The judge didn't even bat an eyelash.
It's okay.
They have taken ethics.
They've defined it down for some time.
Now they've defined it away, as they have with equal application of rights.
Believe me, Hunter will get a unanimous verdict.
I don't think he's going to have a multiple choice verdict.
You know, pick three crimes.
There have been some non-unanimous verdicts in America.
Two states.
The whole history of it is racism.
The whole history of it was done to make sure that you could convict blacks in Louisiana.
Nice, huh?
He takes an odious, racist, singular exception to a rule that's 800 years old and they apply it to get Trump.
I mean, they would do anything.
Now, Bragg, Bragg sat around for the whole trial.
It took like six weeks off.
He was in court every day.
Wasn't doing anything.
It tells me he's afraid to try a case.
In any event, while he was doing that, crime was going crazy in New York.
Absolutely going crazy!
Nicole Galenis has an article in the Post today in which she put out the fact that
the major felonies while he was messing around were up 22.5 percent over 2019 before COVID hit.
If you want a nice little thing, I'm going to read it.
This isn't a return, at least not yet, to the gritty Gotham City that New York has put up with before 1994, when Rudy Giuliani arrived.
That's me.
NYPD complaints on those seven major felonies, both citywide and Manhattan, remain lower today than back in the bad old days, but they're way up!
over the last three to four years, and that's the relevant thing.
The people alive today don't remember our 20 golden years.
A lot of them don't.
They don't remember my 8 and Mike's 12, when crime was almost not an issue in New York, when we were the safest large city in America by a lot.
But while he was doing this on the Upper West Side, a 30-year-old man was walking to his car when a stranger approached him with a knife and without any warning stabbed him.
A man was stabbed in both legs by three men, one of them wielding a machete outside of the Times Square McDonald's.
This is all while the DA was, you know, taking his It's placed among the people who hang around in courts and watch trials because they're retired.
How about one o'clock in the afternoon?
It happened at one o'clock in the afternoon on Times Square.
He wrote an official memo when he became DA saying he wouldn't prosecute people who resisted
arrest like beating the hell out of cops.
He had to change that one, but he still doesn't do it.
About 50% of the crimes, he just lets them go out.
We're constantly dealing with people out three, four days from one crime and they commit another one.
He's got about 7,000 to 9,000 people walking the streets that'd be in jail if I were the mayor or Mike Bloomberg.
Uh, and one of the commitments he made in his odious memo was commitment to making incarceration a matter of last resort.
Which means an awful lot of people are walking the streets, uh, that can do an awful lot of harm to you.
Uh, but he's done a very, very good job of one thing.
He is really scared the hell out of accountants making mistakes and entering business records and calling something That appears to be a legal expense, a legal expense, when he decides that it isn't.
Do you realize how picayune this crime is?
Do you also realize that they're all concerned about the three so-called felonies, none of which we know which one they convicted him of, Because you let them pick, and if they got 12 votes in any combination of the three, so you have no idea if they found them guilty of federal campaign finance, state campaign finance, or tax.
We don't know.
It's one of those though, multiple choice.
Weird.
Illegal, unconstitutional.
drastic deviation from the rights that everybody else has in order to get Trump.
In order to stop Trump, to which he contributed money.
Now he contributed, he gave up his conscience to do it.
His decency, his morality, really his position as a judge.
I mean, I don't know if I were in his court, if I would stand up when he came in, I'd probably get in trouble.
But I don't know, blind obeisance to me has never made much sense.
This guy is worse than the people he's sentencing.
At least they don't.
They may hurt somebody or do something, but they haven't destroyed our system of justice.
Since the year before Bragg took office, NYPD complaints are up 7.3% for felony assaults, 8.4% for robbery, and 31.3% for grand larceny.
And right now, felonious assault is up 70% while he was sitting in the courtroom.
And his assistants were letting people go based on his orders.
And the one that really gets me is he's letting Broadway go.
The attendance at Broadway plays is way down.
Broadway is not recovered.
It's making less than it made pre-COVID.
It has many fewer people coming.
And to say it has something to do with plays is garbage, because the theater district in London is doing just fine and has grown back to more than pre-COVID.
It's because people get knifed in the middle of the day there.
It's because he has no idea how to patrol it like Bratton and I did, and straightened it out in a couple of weeks by using police officers on horseback, anti-crime cops in the crowd, who would alert them to the pickpockets and the harassers, and they didn't get more than one.
Whereas on a good night under Dinkins, they could do 20.
But they didn't have the attention span to sit down and figure out, let's go through a skull session on how we can bring it down, which is what I did on all these crimes.
It didn't happen just... We decided on the strategy for getting the squeegee man off the street.
We decided on the strategy for getting rid of all of those horrible paintings Uh, that they had all over the city in which they were defacing people's property.
We figured out a totally new strategy for domestic violence, execution of which was a dangerous thing for cops, and we lost the life of a very brave police officer who was executing the new rules of returning.
We motivated police officers to get there before the crime was completed.
So that we elevated crime reduction from just arresting someone to the real goal is to prevent the crime, isn't it?
Does anybody talk like that now?
The real goal now is to let people out of prison.
Speaking of crime, Mayor, we now know that the Venezuelan migrant accused of shooting the two officers here in New York City early Monday morning and overnight had crossed into the U.S.
illegally last year, and the case against him had already been dismissed.
So, Eduardo Mata is 19 years old, had a hearing in Chicago on May 6th, where an immigration judge closed his case.
Yeah, and then he's been a multiple offender.
What he's been doing is, on Sunday morning, He shot at two cops and wounded both of them, and they wounded him.
But basically, he's part of a gang that steals your cell phone, and they do it on a moped.
And there are sections of New York where this is prevalent.
So you're standing at the bus stop, you're standing outside a restaurant, you're standing somewhere.
Reminds me a little bit of the Broadway crimes.
And they're quick.
They come by on the moped and boom!
They pull it out of your hand and they're down the street.
And then they got a whole business in recycling these, you know, thousand, two thousand dollar complex phones.
And they're making a fortune with it.
Meanwhile, the crime rate in Venezuela is way down.
We've had a lot of problems, particularly with the people from Venezuela.
Eight of them beat up cops about a week ago.
Six were out.
Alvin Brad got six of them out on the street so they could do it again quickly.
All while he was paying attention to the serious problem we have in the entry of Picayune allegedly false business records.
Really, I mean, we really dodged a bullet with that because now nobody will Put in legal expenses when they should put down hush money.
Big problem.
That's a much bigger problem than this guy shooting cops or all the people, all the foreign criminals that Biden has invited here.
I mean, this guy who shot the cops is a Biden escorted into the United States person and a tenant of Adams.
Because he lives in one of the much nicer residences that are made available to the illegal aliens that are not made available to our own homeless or our veterans.
So this crime doesn't take place if you people, if you people weren't so stupid as to elect these two Democrats, this crime would not have taken place.
So will you stop being stupid?
That party needs to get seriously jolted so the good people can take over.
The only way to do that is to get rid of the... This started with Clinton.
It started with buying all of Clinton's crap and letting Hillary off the hook for serious crimes.
33,000 emails destroyed, classified material hacked that goes off to some of our enemies.
That you shouldn't have had in the first place.
But Broadway, you know, Broadway was a big focus of mine.
And it was one of my great successes in turning Broadway around.
When I was first mayor, Broadway was, they had nothing.
I mean, Broadway had nothing.
They had, even the prostitutes wouldn't operate on Broadway because it was too dangerous.
All you could get were, you know, movies and pornographic pictures.
You had to go a couple of blocks away if you wanted to have some kind of physical contact with a prostitute because it was too dangerous for them.
Live performances were gone.
They wouldn't even have pornography there.
Just drug dealing.
This is after, but you can get a good sense of it if you look at the movie Taxi Driver with that piece of crap De Niro, who does a great job in the movie, and you watch the scenes that were filmed, I think by Scorsese, would show you what Times Square looked like then.
It was controlled by the pimps, the drug dealers, prostitutes, All the theater's gone.
You fast forward to the second or third year on Mayer, and it already changed.
Lion King performed there for eight straight years to sold-out audiences.
Broadway went to record levels.
Pornography gone.
We got rid of it.
We fashioned a new statute that had to be taken through the courts, and we won, thank God.
This didn't happen by wishing it.
It didn't happen by the usual Democrat bullshit.
It happened with hard work and dedication and being willing to be criticized.
When I required people to work who were on welfare, I was accused of running a plantation.
I knew I was doing good for people.
It didn't bother me.
I look at myself in the mirror and sometimes I pray and I say, am I doing the right thing?
Guide me.
I'm sure not going to be guided by the New York Times.
I live by what I was taught by Ronald Reagan.
Yeah, read the Times and then do the opposite.
It works well.
I mean, they get worse and worse.
And if you read it, do the opposite, you're going to be a pretty moral and decent person.
Just recently, Felony crime in Midtown South, which includes Times Square, remains 50% higher than in 2019.
Serious assaults have nearly tripled.
So who's gonna go to Times Square?
And Adams just lies to everybody.
Adams does about crime what Biden does about the economics.
Everything's great!
Bidenomics is fabulous!
Meanwhile, you're paying three times more for groceries than you paid before.
Or you're paying more for gasoline.
Oh, gasoline is down!
Gasoline is down from the big high that he created to 40% higher than when Trump was here.
And this guy says, oh, crime, we got murder down.
Well, nobody gets murdered, really.
I mean, statistically, murder is extraordinarily relevant to the level of morality and the ability to control crime, but it doesn't affect most people's lives.
I mean, now we're talking about increases in murder or decreases in the hundreds.
It affects hundreds of people among over 8 million.
But if you're talking about serious assaults, you're talking about 7,000, 8,000, 9,000.
And so that everybody is affected by it.
I don't mean everybody is affected by it.
Everyone is a victim, but everybody knows somebody who is, which is almost like being a victim.
And it creates a fear quality that destroys a city.
And we're in that cycle right now.
And between Biden and this The illegals, these people all are hard workers.
My backside.
The guy who shot the cops today, yeah, he was working.
He was working with a gang that stole cell phones.
Look at them when they're coming in.
They're not coming in with families.
These are military-age men.
And you might have a few exceptions, but they ain't looking to work hard.
We'll be back very shortly.
For example, save 60% on our goose down comforters.
The best comforters ever.
They go perfectly with our MyPillow bed sheets and duvet covers.
Save 25% on our brand new kitchen towels.
They're made with the same technology as our famous MyTowels.
Our initial quantities are extremely low, so get them now before they go.
Our seasonal flannel sheets are finally in.
You save up to 50% and they sell out fast every year, so order now.
They're truly the best flannel sheets you'll ever sleep on.
Or save up to 80% on all our clearance items.
And this is where it gets even better.
For a limited time, your entire order ships absolutely free.
So go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use that promo code to get deep discounts on all MyPillow products.
And for a limited time, your order ships absolutely free.
Welcome back!
Let me give you this breaking news, pretty much breaking, you know, later during the afternoon today.
The Georgia appeals court has set an argument for the disqualification of Fannie the Hoe, who stole money from her campaign funds, which is being ignored by the crooked state of Georgia.
But the court, the appellate court, has set the argument for October 6th, Virtually accomplishing, kicking this till after the election, which after all is the equitable thing to do.
They had to be aware of the fact that they were doing that.
They're not unaware of life around them, even though they're judges.
In Israel, four more hostages have been found dead, which shows you the good faith of Hamas after Biden announced on Thursday or Friday that he had a big settlement.
That was to try to take attention away from the extraordinary fact that up to that point, Trump had raised in about eight hours after the verdict $35 million, then $70 million, then $100 million, and now I believe it's up to $114 million.
And that's not counting the big donors who, like Miriam Adelson, who has come back to the fold and is going to make a Six-figure donation and the 800,000 that was gotten by Congressman Zeldin and and people that I know that are people that I know
I don't have the kind of money they have, but who are going to put in, you know, enormous amounts of money.
And these are people, some of them are on the fence, right?
Some of them are on the fence, but some of them are against them too.
And they have decided that the only way they can vote for saving some form of justice in this country is by getting Trump in.
Because whether they agree with what he says or what he tweets, they know he's going to restore a fair and equitable justice system instead of, you know, prosecuting his enemies when he came into office.
He just went ahead and did his, you know, he let it go.
No.
I mean, the mere act of a president prosecuting the person running against him has got to
get you pretty close to the fact that that's politically corrupt, right?
And I'm going to go ahead and close out the webinar.
And particularly since it's never happened before in America.
And then when you look, if you just analyze what he's being prosecuted for, this is a case that was turned down three times.
Three times.
The one with the electors is idiotic.
These electors, there was no fraud involved.
They were there if a court or a legislature changed the vote because it was crooked.
Like if they had caught the 175,000, if they had gotten to count the 175,000 votes that are now
missing in Georgia, it's quite possible that Trump would have won. And if it was after the electoral
college was over, these electors would substitute for, for, for Biden's.
Exactly the practice followed by Nixon and Kennedy in 1960.
It wasn't made up by Professor Eastman or Chesbrough.
Poor guy pled guilty because they terrorized him.
It was open, clear, And you've got to lie for there to be fraud.
Nobody lied to them.
They were put up as alternate electors.
Should there be a change by lawful authority?
And who can make that change?
The courts?
Maybe.
We're not even sure the courts can.
Certainly the state legislature.
If you read Article 2 Section 2 of the Constitution strictly.
It's really the state legislature that can do it until it gets to the Congress in an election where there is not enough electoral votes.
And that's where the appeal was made by me and the other Trump lawyers to the legislatures.
That's why we stopped going to the... I'm gonna tell you the straight-out truth.
We stopped going to the courts because it looked like they were fixed.
They weren't going to listen to witnesses, and I knew that we might not win, but I wanted to make sure, historically, we preserved the evidence of the witnesses.
And we got to do that in Pennsylvania.
We got to do that in Michigan.
We got to do that in Georgia.
And we got to do it in Arizona.
And that's the basis on which we've been able to continue this.
And it's the basis on which a lot of these revelations have now come out, which makes it clear that the election was stolen.
And they, you know, have a conniption when you say, I don't want to put you in jail for the rest of your life and accuse you of creating violence.
I haven't created any violence.
I even have a judge opinion that says I didn't from Obama judge about how unfair they've been to me, but you've never seen it.
They hit it, you know, on page 955 of the New York times.
The judge said there's no plausible evidence that anything that I did or said created violence.
But I'm suspended by the New York Bar for that reason.
Because they're a bunch of... You know what?
They... Well, yeah, they're suck-up Democrats.
Suck-up left-wingers.
Very intelligent.
Very bright.
Very, very bright.
It's outrageous what Trump is doing.
Netanyahu is going to come and address Congress on the 13th of June.
What a shot right in the puss to the traitor Biden, the traitor to Israel.
I wonder if Schumer is going to show up, that miserable weasel.
Turn his back on his own people.
What do you think?
Do you think Sherman's going to show up, or is he going to be... He should be on rat patrol.
Adam should put him on rat patrol.
He'll be there.
He could probably draw a lot of rats around him.
Yeah.
He won't be able to help himself.
He'll be there.
He knows a lot of families.
How many Democrats do agree that they should investigate and maybe prosecute the people that run the oil companies for raising the price of oil?
He should prosecute Biden for it by getting rid of the pipeline and just cutting out like all kinds of oil property in Alaska.
That's the reason why we were energy independent.
We were energy independent when Ratface came into office and now we're not.
That's the reason.
It's also because of all your green garbage.
That doesn't have to do with the people running the companies.
And so you get, I mean, this criminalization thing is now really taking over.
So now instead of just having a political argument, you want to put those guys in jail.
Because, oh, they're colonialists, they're bad guys, and they're white.
Maybe there's one or two that are black, and we'll see what happens then.
So I think I got you most of the...
Most of the news you're not going to get elsewhere, or it's not going to be.
BB in Congress, right?
Four more dead in Gaza of the hostages that Biden never mentions, except to get their names wrong.
The Georgia appeals court has put it off to the fourth, which sort of takes the Georgia case out of the equation, so there's just two others left.
And I guess Trump has to decide, where does he go with his appeal?
And there are a couple of interesting decisions there.
You could attempt to go directly to the Supreme Court on the grounds that there's a constitutional question involved, and like they did in 2000, it's eventually going to show up there, but too late to make a difference.
So the court there extraordinarily took the case.
I don't know.
If they were paying attention to what happened in New York, And you're a person of good conscience.
You've got to say it's the most unfair trial that you've ever seen or heard of.
And you did something that was unbelievably unconstitutional, unfair.
You denied a basic human right, which is a right to a unanimous jury.
And if you are a strict, If you are a strict constitutionalist or you strictly follow the beliefs of the Founding Fathers, you decided to play God, because those rights there in that Bill of Rights come from God.
Sorry, stupid face, you're not God.
You're just not God.
You think you are.
You act that way and you do a pretty good job of being a phony, very nice in front of the jury.
And then when the jury's not around, you really are a nasty guy.
So, I don't know why you came up with this non-unanimous multiple choice jury thing, but it sure indicates that you're the guy who should be having his law license taken away, not me.
Bragg is trying to figure out whether to recommend a jail.
Hang on, put anybody in jail.
He's the guy who said that we should, you know, minimize jail sentences.
Use them very rarely.
So here we got a first offender on a tenuous theory, at best, of law.
The original statement sounds like it's true.
Legal expense, perfectly legitimate way to describe a payment for an NDA.
And particularly since, uh, you tried to make it seem like the only, only thing you had to describe is the payment to Stormy Daniels.
There are four or five other payments that are in that 400,000.
So the best and most accurate description of it wasn't put down hush money.
You would think that's all it was.
It wasn't.
And it was all an expense done through a lawyer.
I would say it was absolutely truthful.
I certainly would say there's no way you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it was false.
Also, it wasn't chosen as the evidence said.
Trump didn't choose that description.
The description was obtained by Weisselberg and his assistant using a drop-down menu.
In other words, they had a list of different Ways you could describe generic or combined expenses.
That's the one they picked.
no intent to do anything to anybody.
The idea that some of that money was helping Cohen pay his taxes, there's no evidence
I mean, if you know Trump, it's kind of hard to believe he's going to give him extra money, but In any event, it had nothing, from Trump's point of view, to have to do with the tax laws.
Nor were the tax laws even explained to the jury.
Nor were they unanimous on it.
The campaign finance offense, the jury never found out.
The campaign finance board doesn't consider it illegal because they wouldn't let the guy testify.
He let Cohen say it's illegal.
Who's a disbarred lawyer, but he wouldn't let the preeminent expert testify.
That's a fair trial.
Yeah, for Democrat dictators, it's a fair trial.
So now this guy, Bragg, is going to figure out whether to put him in jail for a year.
Why don't you put the guy who bashed in the head of the 74-year-old woman and...
What are these people doing out in a day that are going into stores and ripping them apart and taking everything out of the stores?
Why don't you pay a little attention to them?
Why don't you take a look at all the retail stores that are leaving?
Why don't you take a look to Broadway?
Why don't you read Nicole Glynnis' column today and see how you ruin them Broadway, you bum?
We just don't have like a crime wave of...
of ambiguously described business records.
We do have a 70% increase in felonious assaults though.
What are we doing with you anyway?
How is this city extraordinarily... I mean, I watched your debate.
You really are a poor excuse for a lawyer, which is why you didn't try the case.
And even the stuff you said when you were running, I will say one thing for you.
You didn't hide it too much.
You look like you were going to be a completely dishonorable, dishonest lawyer and not follow your oath.
Then you announced right away you weren't going to follow your oath.
And the silly person we have in Albany doesn't have the guts to take you out.
Hochul.
She doesn't have the guts to do anything.
She's just waiting to cash in on the stadium.
And Adams didn't have the guts to really squeeze it.
Now Adams could have done it.
Adams could have gone to her and said, I'm not going to support your hogelpogel unless you get that law changed.
And then he could have told Cousins and the other guy, I'll be in your district every day.
And every time somebody in your district is injured and let out, I'm going to let the people in your district know that you're the cause of the crime.
You're not gonna like it very much.
Back then Adams was popular.
Now he's got... At one point he had the highest disapproval rating of any mayor in history.
Seems a little unfair because no matter how bad he is, he isn't as bad as de Blasio.
But he's got a worse disapproval rating.
than de Blasio.
People see through you.
Maybe they feel better about a guy that is crazy and stupid and nutty and is honest with them, because everybody knew that de Blasio was a communist, than a guy who fools them and says, I'm going to change it, but he doesn't because he doesn't have the guts to do it.
Or he's blaming immigration on Abbott.
Abbott's a racist.
That's why we have all these people here.
No, it's Biden.
You almost got to say that one or two times until they went after your chief fundraiser for Turkish money, and you got remarkably silent.
Yeah.
And now we see that all these Turks came in.
And they're a real problem because they come in and it looks like they're high-value immigrants because they're coming in with special arrangements that are made with the cartels, which says to me they're coming in here for one of the main purposes that they have in ruining our country.
Maybe it's drugs.
Maybe it's human trafficking.
Maybe it's terrorism.
I mean, they are supporters of Iran.
They can make a lot of money with Iran.
Basically, just redirect and get some of that money that Biden has given to the terrorists.
Maybe Iran still has some of that cash that Obama gave.
Mexico had an election.
They elected a communist to succeed a communist.
So we'll have to see how it goes.
Trump did a pretty good job of tying Andres Manuel Obrador around his finger.
Obrador did a pretty good job of tying Biden around his finger, but that's not hard.
The guy's got no brain.
But she's coming in and she wants to move even make it even more communist
Criminal gangs are running Mexico Oh.
Doesn't look to me like she can do a damn thing about it, except let them continue to run Mexico.
I don't even know why they had an election.
The six major cartels run the damn place and they run our border.
They run us and they run them.
So, we are going to have to speed up the clock.
And get to January.
Who knows what he's gonna do at the last minute?
He's letting all these people in now, a lot of these immigration people, he's letting them in in a very sneaky way.
He's paroling them into the United States, hundreds of thousands.
He's letting them make a call, schedule interviews, It was supposed to reduce the number of illegals and asylum dwellers.
He's in the millions now.
Letting them in.
Then he's gone ahead, and very strangely, they've dropped a couple hundred thousand cases.
Dismissed them.
Because some of them I can get to for five years.
And the people just remain here.
They're not legal.
They don't have any legal status.
But we're willing to give them jobs, even if they're not legal.
I don't know how we change that law.
Isn't this complete Marx 302 on the way to create a communist government?
You create exactly what Rob said, chaos.
That's exactly why Soros put all that money into DAs that would let criminals go about the streets so that we would have chaos.
And then we could have Soros' dream, get rid of the American nationality, because he hates American nationalism, and we'd all be part of one world.
And I think they have the guy in mind, Prince Obama.
Well, wait a second.
Xi Jinping has his own guy in mind called him.
And the communists are using him to a fairly well.
You know what communists do with the people they use?
They kill them before they kill us.
So, we'll see, we'll see.
Let's stop it all, huh?
Looks like the American people, let's see how these polls work out.
There was one poll that I have here that was like 51% Thought he was guilty and 47% thought the case was politicized.
So that's pretty much even, isn't it?
But you gotta ask the question, even if he was guilty, even if you thought he was guilty, would he be a better president than Biden?
I mean, what does he do?
He's guilty of inaccurate or incorrect business statements.
Not getting a couple hundred thousand Ukrainians killed because Putin would invade under him, but not... I mean, we'll take the business record thing in exchange to have all those Ukrainian lives back.
Or how about the lives that we lost in Afghanistan?
Or how about if we can get the Bagrami Air Base back 400 miles from China?
I don't know, we could have a little bit of inaccurate, debatable statements About things that are, you know, 16 years old that have nothing to do with anybody but their personal life.
As opposed to this guy who's gotten more Americans killed than any American president other than a time of war.
And who knows what he's going to do as he continues to break down.
So.
Would we get that airbase back if Trump gets in?
It would be hard.
We'd have to go capture it.
Yeah, I mean, that was a horrible thing you did to our country.
You should have been prosecuted for treason for it.
In the old days, they'd have hung you for it.
Given up an American base for no reason.
Got nothing for it.
Yeah, I mean, forget the fact that you left $85 billion worth of armaments there and made the Taliban one of the biggest arms dealers in the world.
I don't know what you got for that.
But what you get for all the money they give to Iran, a big article today, trying to figure out why the hell you're so good to Iran, why you and Obama, you're among the biggest financiers of this terrorist government.
What, you got stock in it?
And you want to create a new terrorist state in Palestine?
Bring some of them here so they can kill us, like they get trained to do.
What is wrong?
What is it?
You have no brain, but the people around you, is that, is that what happened with the brainwash and the Marxist brainwashing?
I mean, it's quite clear that Obama went through that.
Knew that a long time ago.
They hate us.
They hate America.
Well, tomorrow we'll be back at three.
On the Rudy Giuliani show right here on X. We'll be back tomorrow night on America's Mayor Live.
We'll see what transpired.
I do think we need a little time between the verdict and getting a sense of, did it help?
It certainly helped Trump in certain respects.
You know, $114 million is a lot to collect in four or five days.
But let's see what happens with the polls.
It was pretty obvious to a lot of people that are not necessarily Trump people that this trial was extraordinarily dangerous to all of us as Americans.
You can't take away one person's right to a unanimous jury and not expect that other people are going to have it happen to them too.
I'm one of them.
So we'll be back tomorrow night.
Praise be to the people of Israel.
Pray for the people of the United States, and God bless America.
Thank you.
This is a production of the Center for Contemporary Art.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
There was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking That brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers, in which Thomas Paine explained, by rational principles, the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate from the Kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the ability to select the people who govern them.
And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
Because the desire for freedom is universal.
The desire for freedom adheres in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
Look at what we've done in the past and see if we can't use it to help us now.
We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world.
The greatest democracy, the freest country.
A country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.
All of us are so fortunate to be Americans.
But a great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we're able to reason.
We're able to talk.
We're able to analyze.
▲
Export Selection