All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 28, 2022 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:02:51
20220128_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush, awokel, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot by the river, right well known to you and me.
One word more for signal, token whistle of the marching tune Put your bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon Put your bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon Greetings from the homeland, comrades.
The date is Friday, January 28, 2022.
I'm Jimmy, and you're listening to Radio Free Northwest.
Radio Free Northwest Well, it's been a while, but let's start this week with some housekeeping items.
As our self-appointed archivist, I'm looking for some missing RFN content that I'm hoping some kind listener will be able to provide for the party.
Back on November 19th, 2015, RFN podcast number 304 aired.
But on that same day, there was also an RFN call-in show that got published.
And somewhere along the way, possibly during the creation of the NF Archives back in 2020, episode number 304 got overwritten by that call-in show and is now missing.
If you go to northwestfront.info and listen to podcast number 304, you'll hear that it is indeed the call-in show and not a normal RFN episode.
And as far as we know, all of the call-in shows were not given any podcast number, but were treated as special shows.
And those RFN podcast numbers were only ever present in the announcement emails sent to the NF email list.
And those emails also got posted on the NF bulletin board in the announcements forum.
If anyone still has copies of those old RFN announcement emails, could you please look for the announcement for November 19th, Or if you actually have a copy of podcast number 304,
download it to your hard drive from before the NF Archive got created, load it up, check that it's not the call-in show episode, and if not, we'd love to get a copy of that from you.
And on to item number two.
Before Radio Free Northwest began, and for some amount of time after, Harold sent out his fireside chat recordings.
Previous RFN shows included chats number 4, number 10, and number 12, and the party also has a copy of number 5 we got from the old NF website.
If anyone has copies of any of the other fireside chats, we'd love to hear from you and try to get copies of those from you.
And finally, if you're looking for a way that you can help out the party, and you also happen to be listening to RFN episodes, one way you can help us is by creating index data for the episode you're listening to.
So if you head over to rfnarchive.org, you can look at some of the recent podcasts and expand the index to see a list of timestamps for each section, along with a description of that section.
If you end up creating an index, you can also send that to RadioFreeNorthwest at ProtonMail.com, and I'll include the data on the site.
Although there will probably be a little bit of lag time between when I receive the data and when I'm able to merge it on the site.
So if it doesn't show up right away, don't worry, I'm not ignoring you.
Just been incredibly busy.
And with all of that out of the way, I'll hand it over to Doug.
Covington's paradox is a product of the moral and emotional weakness of post-World War II Aryan man.
It has three parts or facets to it, all of which come into play at various times within our wee little movement.
These weaknesses are intrinsic to the character of the 20th century white man who has been raised and conditioned to material luxury, high technology, White men born after 1940 are pretty much amoral.
We behave as we do, and not like our brave and honorable ancestors, because we are not spiritually the same men our ancestors were.
We are all a product of late...
Not the generation of 100 years ago.
Our values are largely those of the Jews who shaped and who control the world in which we live.
The result is that in our attempts to resist, we invariably display these following three character weaknesses.
1. Ego People enter the movement for the wrong reasons, seeking to get something out of it, not put something into it.
Virtually everyone who comes into racial political activity brings with them some kind of agenda, be it religious, financial or political, covert or openly proclaimed.
And more often than not, The overwhelming majority of the weird and dysfunctional behavior commonly manifested by people within the Aryan racialist movement is due in some way to ego and to these destructive and diversionary personal agendas.
Racial people find, more often than not, that they are working with others Who have their own clashing agendas.
And when these egotists are unable to implement their personal agendas, when they cannot create whatever fantasy world they have decided their movement involvement must fulfill, they become angry and frustrated and begin lashing out at their leaders and their comrades who are all so stupid and self-centered that they refuse to recognize the urgency and overriding importance of our little personal agenda over theirs.
Movement people also tend to share another ego-related character defect.
We either become convinced or have been convinced from birth that we are the bee's knees.
Our ideas are the best.
Our minds are the most brilliant.
Our views are the only correct ones.
We are totally cool and clever beyond words.
We know it all.
Anyone so presumptuous as to deny or denigrate what a fine fellow altogether we are, or who is so rude and crude as to hint that we might actually be capable of error?
Why, such a person is an enemy of the white race.
Anyone who so much as suggests that we might make a mistake must of course be an enemy agent.
Jew!
Fed!
What we have witnessed over the past 70 years, as time after time our movement has degenerated into a three-ring circus with a cage full of baboons, is largely the result of trying to put together a working team of people, all of whom have Mount McKinley-sized egos and are convinced that they are the bee's knees.
The inability of right-wingers, racists, and otherwise sincere national socialists to get along with one another in groups of more than three or four people at a time has become a byword in the movement.
Hence the party's strict adherence to the cell system.
To be fair and complete about this, there is another slightly more charitable explanation to the question of why we're unable to get along together without squabbling like fishwives.
Again, ego-related.
It may legitimately be said that the American right is the last refuge of the genuine, rugged individualist, the man who marches to the beat of his own drum and makes his stand against all corners, the independent thinker, the true nonconformist, the cracker-barrel philosopher and lone wolf.
That, as I have said, is the more Charitable explanation, and there is some truth in it.
The sad fact is, however, that most of the people who disrupt, destroy, undermine, and cause all this ego-related gubu in the movement are not independent thinkers or non-conformists.
There's a strong case to be made that the racial enemy is aware of this characteristic of our people and has in the past employed deliberate disruptors.
And that they are doing so now.
But we give them a hell of a lot to work with.
Here's an old saying that cuts to the heart of the movement's personnel problem.
Great minds talk about ideas, average minds talk about events, and little minds talk about people.
Most of you listening to me will have some movement experience.
What kind of mind comprises the groups that you're familiar with?
Number two, cowardice.
For some such reason which defies rational analysis, we have convinced ourselves that there can be such a thing as a risk-free revolution.
I know of no other ostensibly revolutionary movement in history of any kind who have entered into their struggle with the idea that they would incur no personal risk and that somehow or other...
The tyranny they were opposing would simply go away without any pain being applied and without any physical struggle.
Yet, this is apparently what most of our movement people believe is going to happen in regards to the United States government.
Apparently, most of us have this touching faith that one day the purity of our ideals will simply Our ancestors fought Indians and bears, weathered prairie blizzards, climbed the Rockies, and carved cities out of the wilderness.
Today, threaten a white man's precious job with some multinational and he crumbles like paper.
I've witnessed grown men become Little short of hysterical when they are exposed to the mildest degree of heat.
Shrieking to be removed from mailing lists and demanding that the party never contact them again.
Ever!
And yet these same men would often bitch and moan at me that I wasn't doing anything and they wanted action.
What these people really want, of course, isn't action, but entertainment.
Which is not the same thing.
Anyone in the movement can have all the action they want, but the catch is, you have to make it yourself.
I really can't comprehend the mindset of someone who embarks on a course aimed at removing and destroying an entire power structure, that of the most powerful and destructive tyranny the world has ever seen, and yet who is genuinely stunned and horrified when that power structure strikes back violently to defend itself.
That some tacit understanding exists between ourselves and Zog, and unspoken agreement that it's all just for laughs, that we won't really do anything to annoy the powers that be, and they on their part will kindly refrain from crushing us.
Then, when the system lashes out and punishes us, we're honestly amazed that they're taking it all seriously.
Don't they understand that we don't really mean this?
Yeah, they do understand that most of us don't really mean this, but sometimes they crush us anyway, just to show us who's boss.
Ask Randy Weaver.
We scribble and rave in our little cut-and-paste newsletters and shabby tabloids about Aryan warriors while declining every opportunity to become a warrior ourselves and denigrating every warrior that does pop up.
Whenever things get hot in our little movement, The Aryan warriors scurry for cover.
Let a few guns go off, or let some FBI agents in expensive suits to our workplace and do Clint Eastwood impressions, and almost without exception, our people start screaming, Stop the merry-go-round!
I want to get off!
Sometimes, of course, they find themselves on a roller coaster instead of a merry-go-round.
I can't count the number of times I've witnessed people get themselves into trouble through their own stupidity.
And then blame the movement because we can't provide thousands of dollars in lawyers and blame the leader because the leader can't wave a magic wand and make it all go away.
When said leader proves unable to pull a rabbit out of a hat, we hear the bleated refrain, You betrayed me!
You got me into trouble!
No fool, you got yourself into trouble because you did something stupid.
Just what the hell did you think would happen?
Another illusion we cherish, even more than the Camara of risk-free revolution, is that of the man on the white horse.
We long for the mighty leader who will descend from the clouds on his snowy steed, waving his shining sword aloft, or possibly his magic wand.
And who will do it all for us.
We need never incur any personal risk.
Just write this man on a white horse the occasional token donation.
Sit back and applaud while he vanquishes the hordes of Zog for us.
We commit what is, in this degenerate and self-absorbed society, the worst mistake of all.
We place our trust in living men, Instead of in ideas.
And the men we trust, without exception, turn out to be fatally flawed idols with feet of clay.
Because this modern world produces only weak and self-centered men.
I, I wish I could swim.
Like dolphins, like dolphins can swim.
Though nothing, nothing will keep us together.
We can lead them forever and ever.
Or we can be heroes just for one day.
I, I will be king.
And you, you will be queen.
And nothing will drive us away.
We can be heroes just for one day.
We can be us just for one day.
I, I can remember, I remember standing by the wall.
By the wall.
And the cars.
Shot up on our heads.
Over our heads.
And we kissed.
There's still nothing but more.
Nothing but more.
And the same.
Who's on the other side?
Though we can meet them forever and ever Then we could be heroes just for one day We could be heroes
We could be heroes We could be heroes Just for one day We could be heroes We could be heroes
A few months ago, we had a group of four young guys in Pennsylvania, all of whom were very gung-ho about migrating to the Northwest homeland.
Now, I'm not going to go into great detail about this, since my purpose is not to rag on anybody in particular or badmouth any one individual.
In fact, that's almost never my purpose in anything I say or do.
What I do is I observe and report on phenomena that occur within the movement, since many of those phenomena have to do with character.
I have to do that because character is one of our biggest problems.
In some respects, it is our biggest problem, in fact.
And no one else will talk about it.
So that's what I'm doing here.
I'm not quote-unquote attacking anyone here.
I am observing a phenomenon and drawing conclusions from it.
Anyway, long story short, of these four musketeers who were so all for one and one for all, and who were ready and set to hop on the plane to the homeland, Two of them have now wandered away in search of other, well, maybe not entertainment, I hope not, let's just say they've wandered away in search of something more fulfilling.
Now, this happens a lot, so I'm well used to it.
For one thing, it's part and parcel of who us white boys are.
We are capable of being intensely interested in anything for 15 minutes.
Our characters and our attention spans have been socially and mentally engineered that way by the Jews.
And when you grow up with a television remote and a computer mouse in your hand, And you can constantly change the electronic images flowing into your cortex with the click of a button, then it's genuinely hard to concentrate your attention on any one thing or idea for any length of time.
I get it.
But this has actually been a movement phenomenon for a long time prior to the Internet.
A lot of people come into the Northwest movement, or should I say cyber come in, and for the first few months they're all hot to trot, wild with enthusiasm.
Yeah, Harold, I'm saving my money, and I'm packing my shit, and I'll be up there in just a few months.
Oh, yeah!
And then reality sets in.
And all of a sudden, these people decide that the Northwest isn't exactly what they were looking for.
Now, this usually coincides with the sudden realization that, oh, my God, this is indeed the real thing.
This guy Covington is serious.
Yes, I am, and a lot of people find that genuinely shocking.
They're not used to dealing with somebody who's actually serious about all this.
So part of it's probably down to me.
I freak a lot of people out.
They realize that the Northwest migration is serious, that it involves risk and inconvenience and a lot of physical effort, and it's a genuine life change and life commitment.
Pastor Robert Miles used to say that when people in the movement finally were confronted by the real thing, they wouldn't recognize it.
And they do their best either to destroy it or escape and evade it.
Turns out Bob was right.
And when this realization hits a 21st century white boy that all of a sudden here is something real, something serious, something for the permanent record, whether it's over a woman or a career or a political or racial principle, his usual reaction to any demand that he gets serious about something is to run for the tall grass.
That's just the way that white boys' minds have been hardwired for the past couple of generations.
Some of you may remember there's an old rock song that says, You know, my heart keeps telling me you're not a kid at 33. Well, unfortunately, these days a lot of us are.
Maybe even most of us.
And kids run away from anything involving hard work and serious commitment.
That's one of the differences between a child and an adult.
This business of the suddenly disappearing comrade is one of the phenomena you're going to run into as a Northwest Front organizer.
And the first time it happens, it can be upsetting and depressing.
You think you've got a really hot prospect, a potential comrade who's serious-minded and who seems to have the right stuff and who can go the distance, and then all of a sudden he flakes on you.
He backs off.
In some cases, he or she literally flees screaming into the night, and I've had that happen before.
It can happen virtually without warning.
I once had it happen in the middle of a long-distance phone call.
Yes, really.
The woman was fine when she called.
And then about ten minutes in, I could sort of feel her brain start to give way, and by the end of the call, she was screaming at me to take her name off the mailing list and never contact her again.
Swear to God, you could actually hear her mind, her intellect, and her willpower suddenly slip away like the sand giving way under people's feet in that old movie, Invaders from Mars.
I had this vision of space Jews hiding underground in a flying saucer and suddenly vaporizing the earth beneath her feet as you hear this weird music.
If you ever saw the movie, you know what I'm talking about.
And as she falls into this hole where the slimy things could get at her and put the little metal control chip in the back of her skull and turn her into a pod person robot controlled by the Martians.
It's almost like that, in a way.
You guys will get that feeling a lot when this kind of thing happens.
And it's not a totally inaccurate representation of what does happen.
You think you have your fish hooked, but all of a sudden he slips off the line and he swims back down into the overflowing toilet that is America, and he hides under a rock.
He decides that life and all the sludge and the excrement and the goop of Obama's America is preferable to crawling out onto the land and having to gulp in the fresh air and exert himself a little.
Okay, bad metaphor, but I think you guys get what I'm saying.
If you're lucky, then the person who does the Houdini Act will at least leave a note or give you some kind of stumbling, half-assed rationalization or excuse, if only to try and convince himself that he isn't really cutting and running because all of a sudden he realized what he was getting himself into and American narcissism and self-absorption took over, not to say self-preservation.
But sometimes they don't even do that.
Sometimes our people just plain disappear.
The Internet especially facilitates that, as I'm sure you can see, but actually it's a pre-Internet phenomenon.
Time and again, down through the past 40 years, people I've known by correspondence and in person as well, sometimes guys who stuck with it for years, have simply vanished one day, moved and left no forwarding address.
Phone disconnected, email accounts shut down, mail comes back undeliverable as addressed.
Poof!
Scotty's beamed them up to the enterprise.
Now sometimes there's a reason.
Sometimes they're just on the run from the bill collectors or the ex-wife's lawyer or the police.
But for most of these cases, there's never any explanation, and I think that many of them involve burnout or some kind of mental breakdown into despair.
In the case of new people who come in like lions and slither out like worms, I think it's a kind of mental circuit overload.
We've never been given any moral compass, and the sudden attempt to install one can be disrupting and unsettling.
Sometimes, like a body rejecting a transplant organ, the mind can reject an attempt to suddenly install a moral compass where there was none before, or else that Jewish narcissism reflex that's been hardwired into us kicks in.
The idea that it's all about you, that your whole life is about looking out for number one and forget any kind of idealism that might place anything above the altar of your own self, be it another human being or all human beings of your race.
Or else, more simply, these guys all of a sudden realize with a rush just what the hell they're getting themselves into.
They panic and they just plain cut and run.
The reason I'm getting into all this is that if you're going to be an organizer and an activist for the Northwest Front, you need to understand, sooner or later, this is going to happen to you.
You're going to have people simply disappear on you without explanation.
You will work a prospect for months.
And then all of a sudden he wakes up and he flakes on you, or else he simply vanishes.
Expect it.
Learn to take it in stride.
It's simply something that happens.
It happened with two out of four of the guys in Pennsylvania I mentioned earlier.
However, in all fairness, I think I need to let you folks hear from one of the four who didn't flake.
Mike from Pennsylvania some weeks ago.
This is what he sent me this week.
Dear HAC, no, please do not remove my address from the list.
I would still be happy to meet with anyone interested in Northwest Front or white nationalism in general.
It's very unfortunate that these two individuals have decided to opt out of this.
Yes, it's disheartening, but perseverance is a virtue.
Although these two guys no longer wish to be associated with the Northwest Front, I still believe in it, and I'm still continuing with my plans to migrate, even if I must do so alone.
As you've said yourself in the podcasts, we can't make anyone else brave.
They have to find it within themselves to do so.
I realize that this must be very frustrating for you, considering all the BS you deal with and have dealt with, and believe me, it's difficult for me as well.
I'm currently at a university that I greatly dislike attending, removed from all my friends and family, but still just trudging on with my only hope being to do the right thing in a world that has gone hideously wrong.
I can't control the actions of others or make decisions for them.
If they don't have what it takes to migrate to the homeland, then we can't give it to them.
I'm still hoping to make a scouting trip to the homeland, but I'm unsure when that will be.
When I can form a concrete plan to do so, I'll let you know ASAP.
For now, keep me on the list.
Take care, Mike.
I haven't heard from the fourth individual involved yet, so I don't know if he's gone with the wind or not, but even if he is, four came in and one has made the decision to stay and commit.
That's a 25% pass rate, which for our movement isn't bad.
Guys, what I'm asking you to do by way of organizing and recruiting is hard.
And it can be dispiriting and depressing, especially with people around you periodically going up in a puff of smoke.
But it can be done.
I've been away searching for a reason, another purpose to find.
I've sailed the seas, bought my many demons.
I've looked to gods in the skies.
I've stood in hell where many had to suffer.
I stared the devil in the eyes.
Walked many roads to witness aging idols And found the grey gates apart Had many storms questioned my conviction Gave all these
reason to rise The hangman searching for bones he can borrow While I escape in the night Fight or fly Live
again, all roads in I'll be coming home Send your light'Cause on this night I'll be coming home
Escape the hell of the Captain Lady Mortis And drink the blood of the King The desert rain has washed away direction And angels looking after me So insane Live again
When I will turn I'll be coming home Take your light'Cause on this night I'll be coming home Hope.
Hope.
I'll go.
Live again.
I'll rotate.
I'll be coming home.
Take your light.
Cause on this night.
I'll be coming home.
Thank you.
Two weeks ago, Doug let us know about the arrest of two of our UK comrades.
Both comrades are remanded on bail, but they're required to remain unemployed or they lose their state legal aid.
So if you have the means to assist our comrades financially, please get in contact with Doug at RadioFreeNorthwest at ProtonMail.com and he can provide you with details.
This next clip was sent to us by one of those comrades and is from May of last year.
The clip is on the topic of Australia's inquiry into extremist movements and radicalism, which was held in April of last year.
And it's a good reminder that our fight against Jewish control of government and the tyranny and genocide of the white race is not just happening here in America or in Europe, but it's happening in all white countries around the world.
Greetings, compatriots.
My name is Jacob Hurston.
I like wearing black clothes and taking pictures for my art blog.
The Australian government wants to take that away from me.
Today I will be explaining what is happening with this parliamentary inquiry into extremism and radicalism.
What is this inquiry about, you might ask?
Officially, it is supposed to be an investigation into the nature and extent of, and threat posed by, extremist movements and persons holding extremist views.
And whether the laws need to be changed to deal with this supposed danger.
A closer look at the terms of reference reveals that this is just a lazily designed cover to advance the establishment's agenda.
The government has been collecting greater and greater counter-terrorism powers for the last 20 years, to the point where we have some of the most powerful and unrestrained security agencies in the Western world.
Yet they still want more.
People like us have been asking too many awkward questions about what the endpoint of multiculturalism is, and how exactly white Australians benefit from being made a minority in their own country.
The political establishment is unable to answer these questions, because if they did, it would erode their claim to be carrying out the will of the Australian people, their so-called democratic mandate.
As a result of this, they are trying to do two things.
Firstly, They're trying to conflate holding beliefs like National Socialism with terrorism.
They know that there is no way they can break up our organisation under existing laws as we are a 100% legal political activism group.
Rather than accepting that, they're instead trying to change the laws so that what we do is counted as terrorism.
They want to silence us because white Australians are coming to see that our warnings about racial replacement have become an indisputable fact.
The number of North Whites has increased to the point that they are beginning to be a majority in some areas of Australia's major cities.
Entire suburbs are being ethnically cleansed.
The government knows that the most dangerous time for it is when the replacement is at a stage where white Australians are still a majority overall, yet cannot avoid seeing that they are being replaced.
In other words, when we've had just enough replacement to wake a lot of whites up, Secondly, they want to create a scapegoat for the government's own failed multiculturalism and mass immigration policies by blaming people like me,
in the same way that they tried to blame Muslim extremism five or six years ago.
The reality is that multiculturalism results in the creation of mutually competing racial, religious and cultural groups within Australia which inevitably becomes a struggle for resources and power.
It simply recreates the violent struggle for existence between peoples on the world stage on a miniature level within Australian society.
You can see that every time a pack of blacks bashes up a white high school kid.
Every time the Chinese ghettos expand to include another formerly white suburb.
Every time a Muslim rams his car into a group of whites.
I don't even think that the members of the ruling class seriously believe that a bunch of vaguely liberal values and overpriced real estate can really hold together the seething mess that they've created.
Which is why they need to cover themselves by finding a scapegoat with this inquiry.
But if you live in Australia, you need to understand who these politicians are and the crimes they are trying to get away with.
And make no mistake about it, these people are criminals and they want to throw people like me in jail for many years for exercising the few remaining rights that our ancestors left us as free white men.
The right to politically associate, to freely express our views and not be targeted by political police because the government doesn't like us.
Before we look at the terms of reference, let's take a look at a more candid explanation of what these vermin are trying to do.
Luckily for us.
Canberra-based criminal Christina Keneally likes to give all sorts of interviews clearly explaining the crimes she is trying to get away with for all to hear.
Unlike her more intelligent partners in crime, she always says the quiet part loud.
Now Keneally isn't even Australian.
She's an American.
You should keep this in mind when she tries to lecture you on Australian identity and values.
And she wasn't even elected to her position.
She was just a replacement for someone who retired.
When she actually tried to get elected, she got absolutely beasted on by a guy called John Alexander.
Anyway, that person that she replaced was none other than San Dastyari, a Muslim who resigned because he was caught taking bribes from the Chinese Communist Party.
She literally replaced a traitor to the Australian government in her party and she wants to lecture you on national security.
Keneally is the sort of politician that can't even be bothered hiding her conflict of interest.
Here is Keneally in an article from the Australian Jewish News, titled, Rambam?
What the hell is that?
Rambam is basically an all-expenses-paid trip run by the Australia-Israel Jewish Affairs Council, which indoctrinates politicians, journalists, and other influential people into being good puppets of Israel.
Fittingly, it is named after the originator of much of modern Jewry's pseudo-philosophy, Maimonides.
So let's see what this Jew puppet has to say about her role in trying to disenfranchise white Australians.
Here she is speaking in a podcast called the National Security Podcast, made by the ANU National Security College, which is an institution that churns out new secret policemen every year.
Here is Christina Keneally explaining what her definition of national security is.
National security is about keeping Australians safe.
And, you know, there are the things that we think about, like secure borders, safe from terrorist threat, you know, safe from physical harm.
But, you know, we have to have a more expansive view of national security, and your reference there to national identity is spot on, because one of the great strengths of Australia's economic and community cohesion is that We have a very multicultural, diverse, respectful, tolerant society.
And study after study still shows that Australians, unlike some of our counterparts in Europe or the United States, have valued immigration and multiculturalism.
They understand it makes us economically strong.
They understand that it makes us a stronger, more cohesive community.
If those values about multiculturalism and diversity are not reinforced in every generation, we risk losing them.
And that undermines the cohesion, that undermines the safety, it undermines the collective mentality of who we are as Australians.
And so when we think about national security, we have to not just think about the...
The statecraft and the weaponry and the infrastructure, but we also need to think about the way in which we talk about ourselves, the way in which we uphold the strong ties that bind us together, and the way in which we react and reject those movements, views, or indeed extremist script that would seek to tear us apart.
Now, Keneally is a big fan of the word salad, but I will simplify what she has said here for us simple peasants who haven't had a paid trip to Israel.
Here she says that national security isn't just what us normal people would think is national security.
Here she conflates her beliefs and the government's current policies, particularly multiculturalism and mass third world immigration, with Australian identity and Australia's economic and community cohesion.
This is complete bullshit.
And even if it were true, enforcing her preferred values and policies isn't the role of national security agencies and counterterrorism police in a democracy.
Luckily for Keneally, contemporary Australia isn't a democracy.
It's just an outright Jewish tyranny.
Here she states what she means.
National security isn't just about national security.
It's about enforcing the ruling ideology against political dissidents.
Keneally wants to use the security apparatus to enforce her values on the rest of us, but is too hypocritical to say it outright.
We have to pay attention to this growing terrorist threat.
And it is a terrorist threat.
These are groups that have been prescribed as terrorist organizations overseas in Five Eyes countries.
They are capable and have perpetrated violent attacks.
And indeed, the attacks on the U.S. Capitol in January, not all of the attackers, but a great portion of them were parts of right-wing extremist groups.
I think the real risk here that these groups pose is that They're not really political agitators.
They actually don't believe in democracy.
They are trying to undermine democracy.
They are trying to install fascist or dictatorial governments that actually align with their objectives.
This is extremely misleading.
The other five eyes countries have different legal contexts.
There are big differences over what constitutes a terrorist group.
And the penalties that can be levelled against members.
Let us briefly look at each of those countries.
Certain politicians in Australia love to claim that groups like the Proud Boys ought to be banned, because Canada designated it as a terrorist organisation in February this year.
Yet in Canada, it is not a criminal offence to be a member of a terrorist organisation, nor is it a crime to participate in its activities.
The latter only becomes a crime when the activities are explicitly designed to assist with an act of terrorism.
In other words, it's still perfectly legal to be a Proud Boy in Canada.
It is the same with the US.
The US has not banned the Russian imperial movement as a terrorist organisation, but rather listed it as a specially designated global terrorist.
All this does is restrict Americans from trading with the group.
Our existing laws are closer to those of New Zealand and the UK, but even then the comparison is grossly misleading.
New Zealand has never designated a nationalist group as terrorists.
All it has done so far is claim that Brenton Tarrant on his own constitutes a terrorist organisation so that they could stop admirers from sending him letters and money and openly supporting him.
The UK is not a good comparison either, as its laws are extremely broad and include acts that would be counted as protected political speech in any state.
There is a terrorist offence to Keneally's
argument is therefore based either on lies or complete ignorance of national security legislation.
Knowing her, it's hard to decide which one it is.
Let's move on.
The US Capitol storming wasn't a terrorist attack.
The US system has degenerated to the point where violent protests have become a regular form of political activity for the left and right.
Keneally and the US security apparatus has no problem with Black Lives Matter and Anarchists burning down neighbourhoods.
So I am hard pressed figuring out why she is so upset about right wing Americans mirroring that behaviour.
Now I'm sure we all understand this double standard, but it further illustrates that Keneally wants to attack people for their beliefs, and not their actions.
Here Keneally explains that our views aren't democratic enough for her.
That's why she wants to use the state to suppress and disenfranchise us.
In a liberal democracy, you can hold any opinion you want, so long as it doesn't lead to actual political change.
The National Socialist Network, the latest incarnation of a right-wing extremist group in Australia, gathering in the Grampians, chanting Nazi slogans, doing what looked to be some type of paramilitary training, terrorizing local visitors, and individuals from that same group trying to storm Channel 9 in Melbourne and perpetrated a violent attack upon a security guard there.
So this is a growing threat, and we have to take it seriously.
This is her practical example of far-right terrorism in Australia, and it's just lie after lie after lie.
Even if these lies were true, and they're not, the examples she has given aren't terrorism.
Here is Victoria Police admitting that not a single law was broken during the Grampians trip.
We weren't doing paramilitary training.
We went on a hike and took some beasting photos.
We didn't terrorise local visitors at all, and chanting Nazi slogans isn't terrorism, and it didn't terrorise anyone.
It's protected political speech.
Thomas Sewell and I didn't storm Channel 9. We went to the lobby, asked to speak with the producers.
They refused to talk to us, so we tried to record a video of Tom giving a speech.
We were rejected out of the building by a security guard.
That security guard then attacked me, and Tom came to my defence.
Why is Christina grasping at straws for a far-right terrorist threat in Australia?
It's because far-right terrorism doesn't exist in Australia, at least not at this time.
Here is a list of all the terrorist attacks in Australia since 2000.
A quick glance at this chart shows that there hasn't been a single white perpetrator of terrorism in Australia since 2000, but a whole lot of white victims.
In fact, we would go so far to say that terrorism in Australia is another example of the grotesquely disproportionate amount of criminality committed by non-whites in this country.
Yet Keneally can't shut up about the far-right terror threat.
I wonder why.
The other thing about right-wing extremism and violent right-wing extremism is that the right-wing extremist groups are often quite savvy when it comes to the laws of any particular country.
And that is, we hear from experts, we hear from security agencies that these right-wing extremist groups are often, their radicalization does not openly seek to provoke.
provoke violence often because they know that's the threshold they need to stay just below, particularly in public forums, in order to avoid prescription or other types of sanctions upon And so the challenge when we think about keeping Australians safe in relation to right-wing extremism and violent right-wing extremism is how do we...
is ensuring that the tools that we have are fit for purpose to tackle this threat.
The last thing I'd observe is that most of the right wing, many of the right wing extremists operate in plain sight.
They operate on social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook.
Here, Christina is lamenting the fact that national socialist groups are not calling for violence or committing terrorist acts.
Well, you don't really need to be savvy to figure out how to not be prescribed.
For those who don't know, it's basically don't engage in any terrorism-related activity.
We're not on Twitter or Facebook since we got banned, but we operate in plain sight because we aren't engaged in any terrorist activity.
We're a legal activist organisation, but Christina Keneally has made up her mind that we need to be prescribed because the Jews want it, and to hell with justice.
The other thing that would assist is if groups were prescribed as terrorist organizations or individuals, as happens in New Zealand, can be prescribed as terrorist organizations or entities.
And that would give social media companies some clear guidance about whether individuals or individual manifestos should be shared online or groups should be able to operate online.
Christina thinks individuals should be added to the prescription list, which would make it illegal for that person to have employment, a bank account or meet with their friends.
As she wants to prescribe non-terrorist organisations, it can be assumed that she also wants to prescribe non-terrorist individuals as well.
We prescribe for two reasons.
One, because it gives our agencies tools to fight these groups.
And two, because it sends a clear message about what we as Australia reject.
And so prescription is an important tool to say we as Australia reject the racist, hate-filled, division, anti-democratic views of these organizations.
organizations.
Keneally outright states her belief that counter-terrorism legislation is not only for stopping and punishing terrorists, but also for expressing the displeasure of the ruling clique.
She wants Australians to be sent to prison or otherwise have their lives ruined, just because they dare to suggest that there might be an alternative to the theft, corruption and genocidal obsessions of herself and her friends.
That's the candid explanation about why this inquiry is taking place, but we also need to look at the actual terms of reference, because they're very revealing about the enemy's state of mind.
The nature and extent of and threat posed by extremist movements and persons holding extremist views in Australia.
Right from the start, they've attempted to conflate extremist views with terrorism, as though there's a direct link between political views the government doesn't like and murder.
As we have said before, we do pose a threat to the establishment, a political threat.
It is the government that wishes to make us a physical threat.
So that it can sweep away our movement without having to answer any of the awkward criticisms that we make.
A. The motivations, objectives and capacity for violence of extremist groups including but not limited to Islamist and far right-wing extremist groups and how these have changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Thanks to the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, the Australian Federal Police The government is already well aware of this information.
They know that there are no nationalist or national socialist groups in the country that advocate for or practice violence.
If there were, then the members of those groups would already be arrested, and they would be added to the list of prescribed terrorist entities.
This question was included purely so that the committee can create clickbait headlines with the results and scare the white public into submitting to whatever restrictions on their political liberties the committee can devise.
The geographic spread of these extremist movements and persons in Australia and their links to international extremist organisations.
The government can never admit that its own policies are the reason why it is facing a white Australian revolt.
So instead it tries to pin the blame for so-called radicalisation on the mythical Nazi international, which supposedly controls every national socialist group on the planet.
Without limiting the other matters that the committee may consider, issues for a specific inquiry are A. Changes that could be made to the Commonwealth's terrorist organisation listing laws to ensure they are fit for purpose.
address current and emerging terrorist threats, reflect international best practice, and provide a barrier to those who may seek to promote an extremist ideology in Australia.
This is the real reason why the inquiry is being run.
They want to stretch the definition of terrorism to include the non-violent promotion of extremist ideology.
Such a change would be little more than a legal justification for state terrorism against dissidents, and has nothing to do with protecting the public from actual terrorism.
At least then they would no longer be able to continue with the lie that the police target crime.
B. Changes that could be made to Australia's counter-terrorism strategy in relation to preventing radicalisation to extremist views, including the capacity for further partnership approaches with state, territory and local governments.
Their answer to legitimate criticism of their insane policies is more brainwashing.
If they can only convince white Australians that there is no problem, then the increasing social tensions will just disappear like magic.
Sadly for them, it's pretty hard to cover up the mountain of white corpses created by non-white terrorism and the ethnic cleansing of entire suburbs.
The role and influence are radical and extremist groups which currently fall short of the legislative threshold for prescription in fostering disharmony in Australia and as a conduit to persons on a pathway to extremism.
This is another poorly disguised plea to ban organisations that politically threaten the establishment.
They are trying to implement the new leftist idea.
D. Further steps that the Commonwealth could take to disrupt and deter hate speech and establish thresholds to regulate the use of symbols and insignia associated with terrorism and extremism.
including online, giving consideration to the experience of other countries.
This point shows what a farce it is for the parliament to claim that it is carrying out the will of the Australian people.
They care so much about our opinions that they want to disrupt and deter opinions that they don't like.
The second half of the point is even dumber.
Maybe if they just ban the swastika, then we'll all go back to being complacent slaves again.
The role of social media, encrypted communications platforms, and the dark web in allowing extremists to communicate and organise.
In the paranoid mind of the Jews and securocrats, everyone is always plotting against them.
Any message that they can't access, any private conversation that they can't intercept, must be malicious.
They genuinely believe that only those with something to hide would want to have privacy.
Such is the paranoia of those who rule without legitimacy.
see.
To reiterate, I'm not making this video because I think the government will change its course of action in response to our exposure of its agenda.
I'm doing it to show that the Commonwealth government is a government of occupation, which views its white population as a threat to the glorious, Asianised, globo-homo future that it has planned.
All of the precious human rights That it never stops celebrating are simply lies.
If you are a white Australian resisting your own replacement and subjugation, then you have no freedom of speech, no freedom of association, and no freedom of conscience.
The vote you give at election time will never be allowed to lead to actual change.
Those things were only ever designed to make us believe that we were the ones who chose to bring about our own destruction.
And not the plutocratic and Jewish criminals lurking behind the stupidly grinning faces of our politicians.
Look at the language that they use to publicly describe white dissidents.
The people who run this country are not misguided idealists and they are not fools.
They simply hate white Australia and everything it stands for, especially uppity whites who refuse to hand over their land to their third world replacements.
You need to keep in mind.
That the process is the punishment.
How much time have National Socialists had to spend defending ourselves from this constant harassment from the media, from the police, from the government?
How many people have left because of this harassment?
How many people have not got involved in nationalist politics because of this harassment?
Yet it is precisely this harassment and the horrific plans outlined in this inquiry that shows us why we must fight.
If no one is willing to stand up and challenge their increasingly blatant oppression, even with all of the consequences, then we have already lost.
This is not a blackpilling or a masochistic whinge, but a call to action.
Stand up and say something.
Go out and show some defiance.
If you don't want to live in a country like we've become, then that is the only alternative.
Wolf spit in the tyrant's face.
Well, that's all the time we have for this week.
▲
Export Selection