All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 9, 2021 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:02:52
20211009_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Curl, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush, a woogle, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Greetings from the Northwest homeland, comrades.
It's Friday, October the 8th.
I'm Douglas Morrison, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
As always, I like to start with listener-submitted questions.
So let's see what we can do with what we've got today.
I should warn you I'm under the weather, so if my voice sounds terrible, there's a good reason for it.
Probably got me a little case of the Wuhan flu.
Not like I'm going to go to a hospital and let them charge me a gazillion dollars to run a fake PCR test on me.
Run it 40 times the cycles that it's supposed to, so all you get is positive readings.
So can I tell you 100% that I've got the COVID?
No.
But that's probably what I got.
But that's okay.
No big deal.
I've been sick before.
I'll get over it.
So forgive me if my voice doesn't last all that long.
And stay tuned.
Later we're going to do the second part of our interview with Kurt Doolittle of the Propertarian Institute.
Invert writes, What is the current state of the Northwest Front?
I've been thinking about this.
Given Harold passed and the org seemingly became defunct until you picked up the torch, are we restarting from essentially zero?
Did the original settlers disband?
Break off contact?
Has the Phase 1 plan changed a bit?
It seems Harold was promoting having most of the settlers trying to relocate within...
This is a question I actually get quite a bit, and it's a difficult one to answer without divulging information on the air that shouldn't be divulged.
And I want to be as honest and plain and upfront with you guys as I can.
So let me see how I can answer this question in a way that honors that commitment.
So when Harold died, he left everything party-wise to Andy Donner.
Andy Donner got doxed, and then in order to save his job, I think, he gave the website over to, I guess, essentially Antifa.
If you go to the old party website now, you'll see that it's a link to Some sort of a hope-not-hate type organization.
And then he dropped off the face of the earth party-wise.
So I don't have any contact with Andy.
Most of the people that were part of the HQ group scattered to the wind, I suppose.
I do have a few contacts, but not easy to get a response from.
So as for people that were running things, I'm pretty much it.
However...
The Northwest Imperative has been going for almost 20 years now, and that's just through Northwest Front.
Movement into the Northwest, for specifically racial purposes, has been going on since Reconstruction in the South.
So maybe a brief history of Northwest migration is in order.
When Reconstruction was imposed upon the South, Many of those people took to the Oregon Trail out of Independence, Missouri, and headed west in their Calistoga wagons through hostile Indian territory on a six-month journey to get to Oregon City, Oregon, the end of the Oregon Trail.
So those people risked life and limb to move with usually nothing but what they could fit in their Calistoga wagons.
Losing horses and family members along the way.
And the first thing they did when they set up the Oregon Territory, which includes Oregon, Washington, Idaho, big chunks of Montana, and Wyoming, is they said no slavery here.
In fact, no blacks here at all.
And so Peter Burnett presented a new bill to the provisional government of the territory, this was before it was a state, saying that to prevent slavery from entering Oregon, They should exclude niggers from settling at all, because they would bond together with the Indians against white settlers.
So, in June of 1844, Oregon enacted the Exclusion Law, banning niggers from living in Oregon.
And those were called the Lash Laws, because if a nigger was found within the territory, he would receive 39 lashes every six months until he left.
So they enacted another law in 1849, this barred niggers who were not already in the area from entering or residing anywhere in the Oregon Territory.
In 1855, mongrels were forbidden from becoming citizens as well.
In 1857, another law was enacted that barred niggers from holding property in the state.
In 1857, they had to put to a vote during the process of becoming a state, and 89% of the people voted for excluding niggers and Mexicans and Indians.
And the state offered up to 1,300 acre plots of land for free to white settlers.
One of the clauses in the state's original constitution stated as follows.
No free Negro or mulatto not residing in this state at the time of the adoption of this Constitution shall come, reside, or be within this state, or make any contracts, or maintain any suit therein.
Because they became a state, they were prevented from expelling existing black residents, and the Oregon Constitution banned any further blacks from entering, living, voting, or owning property in Oregon.
And so in 1859, Oregon did enter the Union, but they still had the exclusion laws on the books.
And in that same year, they enacted yet another law to prohibit niggers from owning property and making contracts.
Those exclusion laws remained in effect until 1926.
In 1862, because they had joined the Union, they were forced to vacate their LASH laws, and so they levied an annual tax.
On niggers, Chinese, Hawaiians, and even multiracial people who persisted in living there.
The Chinese were specifically denied state citizenship until 1893.
In 1868, the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was passed, granting citizenship to niggers.
And Oregon didn't ratify that until 1973.
In 1870, the 15th Amendment, which prohibited denying the right to vote to niggers, And it wasn't until 1959 that Oregon ratified the 15th Amendment.
All during the 1880s, the white residents of Portland set fire to dozens of buildings in Chinatown to try to get rid of the Chinese.
By 1890, there were only a thousand niggers in Oregon.
In 1906, the case of Taylor v.
Cohen in the Oregon Supreme Court sanctioned the right of white Americans to discriminate against niggers.
In 1918, nigger soldiers from California saw a sign that read, We employ white help and cater to white trade only.
And the niggers, of course, proceeded to destroy the sign.
In 1921, the KKK arrived, and Oregon was a stronghold for the Klan.
The Klan gained formidable power in Oregon, especially in Portland, and Oregon had the highest per capita KKK membership of any state in the Union.
Interracial marriage was prohibited until 1951, and that's why this Oregon territory is still the whitest part of the country, excluding New England, which is, as far as I'm concerned, basically unlivable.
Oregon was probably the most racist place in the country.
So the history of racial politics in the Northwest goes back to its very inception.
This was always the land that was meant as the white redoubt in America.
So I've gone into this long, probably way too long, historical digression to make the point that if we don't have contact with the racial migrants who came to the Pacific Northwest because of the Radio Free Northwest broadcasts, it's really not a big deal.
And for two good reasons.
One, I don't want a list of people that somebody can take advantage of.
I don't want any contact information on anybody.
I don't want to know any of your real names.
I don't want any of your phone numbers.
I don't want any of your addresses.
Because that information could be exploited and used against you.
Two, because you're not coming home to join a community.
You're coming home to create a community.
You also don't want to know 2030 racial migrants.
Because then you could give information about who those people are and how to get a hold of them.
Now, that being said, obviously at some point, that's going to have to change.
But we are so far back on Phase 1 of the Butler Plan that Phase 2 and Phase 3 aren't even on our itinerary.
But you can change that.
I do encourage anyone that hears this broadcast and is already home...
To have an anonymous email account that's not your real name or something stupid like that and shoot me a message.
Let me know what area you're in.
The reason I want to do that is it's going to be a lot more comfortable for people to come home if they have a local contact that can help them in some way.
Show them around town.
Tell them where they should and shouldn't eat.
And I know not everybody is up for that.
You should be, but maybe you aren't.
But what I want to have And I have in a lot of places already, is essentially a welcome wagon.
Somebody who, if you're planning your migration and you know what area you want to go to, you can reach out to your local representative and they can meet you on your scouting trip.
I'm meeting a lot of people on their scouting trips and it is a lot of work for one guy because this is a big territory.
People really don't understand how big the Pacific Northwest is.
You know, we're working with a landmass of 250,000-300,000 square miles.
That's a lot of territory.
For comparison, Germany is only 140,000 square miles.
The entire country of Germany, as it exists today.
This is one of those things when people say, Oh, but you're going to get Waco-ed.
You'll get this a lot.
In a territory that's about twice as big as the entire country of Germany?
Come on, get serious.
If you are in the homeland and you're hearing my voice and you're willing to meet somebody that's looking to move into your area to sit down for a cup of coffee with them, please drop me a line.
And that leads me to another part of Invert's question.
He writes, Are you going to be compiling a roster, doing background checks, etc., like Harold talked about?
Well, nobody's compiling a roster.
Like I say, I do want to have local representatives for particular cities, particular sections that I can refer new migrants to.
I would like very much to be able to do some background checks.
But as it sits right now, the party is not taking any dues.
I'm not selling any merchandise.
We're not bringing in any money.
And background checks are, while not incredibly expensive, cost money that we don't have.
So, no, unfortunately, right now, those aren't happening.
I am working on putting some things in place so that the party can start making some money for these kind of things.
But I'll tell you guys, it is something I am dreading.
I do not want to do anything with money.
At all.
And I'm going to be forced to do so if we're looking at any kind of party professionalization.
Which we need to have.
And then the last part of Invert's question is, Are we still dealing with the stupid gooboo goat dance crap?
Andy had referenced Harold having to carry a gun due to freaks that were feuding with him over the NF.
So are we still dealing with that kind of stuff?
Well, nobody knows where I live, very few people know my face, and I'm going to keep it that way for as long as I can.
Again, I have to stress that this is not a social organization.
We're an organism.
Your job is to come home and build your own cell.
Again, at some point that will have to change, but we're talking about Phase 1 here.
And we will build towards Phase 2 and Phase 3 and Phase 4. We can expedite that process if we can start getting some replies from people about joining the welcome wagon.
I would like to have relocation services set up for people.
So I'll see what I can do towards making that a little more of a reality step by step.
But we're building all too slowly, and the people that come first, they're going to be the founding fathers of a brand new nation.
We probably have thousands here right now, and they just don't have any contact with the party.
We can work on changing that.
So get this broadcast out to as many people as you can.
Let them know we're here.
But no, I have yet to receive any kind of death threats or have to worry about freaks and all of Harold's old feuds.
I've done a lot of repairing bridges within the movement.
That's pretty much the first thing that I worked on before I started doing any kind of public stuff, is repair some of the bridges that had been burned in the past.
That's the old generation.
The new generation understands no more...
Brother Wars.
We are all fighting for the exact same thing, and that's for our people to be able to live on this continent as something other than sex and tax slaves.
And so with that incredibly long answer, let's go ahead and take our first music break.
I'm in the mood for some marches tonight.
I heard an old German one earlier that really put a smile on my face.
So I'm going to share that with you guys now.
This is Erika.
Auf der Eide blüht ein kleines Blügelein.
Und das heißt Erika.
Preis von hunderttausend kleinen Bielein.
Wird umschwert, Erika.
Denn der Herz ist voller Süßigkeit.
Zahner Luft entströmt dem Blütenlein.
Auf der Eide blüht ein kleines Blügelein.
Und das heißt Erika.
In der Heimat wohnt ein kleines Blügelein.
Und das heißt Erika.
Dieses Mädel ist mein treues Schänzelein.
Und mein Glück.
Erika.
Wenn das Eide kraut und die lang blüht.
Singe ich zum Brust dir dieses Licht.
Auf der Eide blüht ein kleines Blügelein.
Und das heißt Erika.
Wie mein Känzerlein.
Blüht auch ein Blügelein.
Und das heißt Erika.
Schon mein Morgenkorn.
So wie mein Läuverschein.
Schaust mich an.
Erika.
Und dann ist es mir als kleines Blügelein.
Stellst du auf an deinen kleinen Blügelein.
In der Heimat freit.
Und ich ein Hütelein.
Und das heißt Erika.
you you So here's his first submission.
Hello, comrades.
I wanted to talk about my experience in coming home to secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
When I first heard of the Northwest Imperative, I was already racially conscious.
So putting my beliefs into action was the next logical choice if I wanted to be able to look at the man in the mirror in respect who was looking back at me.
I started by reading the novels, as all of you should do first.
If you're hearing my voice right now and have not read the novels, turn this off and go read them.
I can't stress enough how important it is to read the books, to know what kind of people we must become to see through this great responsibility that has fallen to us to bear.
I knew I had to answer this call to duty of the Northwest Imperative.
At first, I was afraid.
The thought that I will take physical action and personal risk for a task so far above me was daunting to say the least.
But I knew that responsibility was the price I paid for clarity, and I had to hold up my end of the bargain if I could respect the man in the mirror.
Getting yourself right spiritually is the first step.
After reading the novels, of course, to start your migration northwest.
Harold would say it is not the action that is important more than it is the actor.
Once you come home, you're here forever, and you dedicate your life to the cause.
If you haven't spiritually accepted that, you won't last long, and we need the best of the best to make history.
Maybe some of you hearing that are feeling a bit scared and thinking you'll just prep for the worst and stick it out where you are.
I'm telling you, this is being completely dishonest with yourself and disregarding the future of our race.
If we do not get off our ass and follow the Northwest Imperative, there is no future.
Period.
You may survive for a time.
But without state power, every corner of the earth will be hunted until the last white is killed.
Now that I've made myself clear about being spiritually prepared, I'll move on to the logistical details that many of you use as an excuse not to do the right thing to come home.
I was able to get a job quickly around the Seattle area.
Due to the nature of my job, I was able to start right away working remote until I can relocate.
My wife is currently about to graduate medical school, so now we'll have time to secure a position for her too when we make the move.
Another important aspect to making the migration permanent was meeting Doug in real life.
For me, seeing a human face and having it sink in that these are real people and this Northwest thing is not some fantasy really kicked my sense of urgency into overdrive.
We'd live far too much of our lives behind our computers, and this makes the world seem farther away than it really is.
Getting yourself out there in the real world solidifies the perspective needed to become champions of our race.
Thanks for your time, comrades, and thanks, Doug, for putting me on the most important radio show out there right now.
I'll end by saying, don't wait any longer, guys.
The window of opportunity is closing faster than we realize, and very soon it may be too late to get up here.
That is a very impressive young man.
Very brave, very smart, and he's been a great help to us here at the party.
Horst Wessel became the most prominent martyr of the NSDAP.
He wrote the words to the song which became the party anthem, Raise High the Flag.
In the following essay, Joseph Goebbels reports on his death.
This is from Thy Fine Hawk, 1935.
It was late in the evening and I was enjoying the rare pleasure of reading a good book.
I was relaxed and at ease.
The telephone rang.
I picked up the phone with trepidation.
It was worse than I expected.
Horst Wessel has been shot!
Trembling with fear, I asked, Dead?
No, but there is no hope.
I felt as if the walls were collapsing around me.
It was unbelievable.
It cannot be.
A few days later, I step into the small hospital room on the ground floor and am shocked by the sight.
A bullet in the head has done terrible damage to this heroic lad.
His face is distorted.
I hardly recognize him.
But he is happy.
His clear, bright eyes shine, though we cannot talk for long.
The doctor has ordered him to keep calm.
He only repeats a few words.
I am happy.
He does not need to say it.
One sees it by looking at him.
His young, bright smile overcomes the blood and wounds.
He still believes.
I sat by his bed on a Sunday afternoon as streams of visitors came until evening.
One can hope.
He is improving.
The fever has dropped.
The wound's healing.
He sat up partway and talked.
What about?
A foolish question.
About us.
About the movement.
About his comrades.
They stood outside his door today.
And one after the other came by and raised his arm to salute the young leader for a moment.
I could not bear it otherwise.
I look at his hands, which are now small and white.
His strong nose stands out in the middle of his face, and two bright eyes sparkle.
But the fever is back?
He cannot eat.
His strength gradually declines, though his spirit remains fresh and alert.
He is not allowed to read.
He may only talk.
It is hard to obey the warning look of the nurse.
Will I ever see him again?
Who knows?
If blood poisoning does not develop, everything will be okay.
A lonely mother sits outside.
Her face reflects a question.
Will he make it?
What can one say but yes?
I try to persuade myself and others.
Blood poisoning develops.
By Thursday, there is little hope.
He wants to talk to me.
The doctor gives me a minute.
How hard it is to walk past the death watch into the room.
He does not know how serious his condition is, but he senses it may be the last time.
Do not go away, he begs.
The nurse relents, and he is comforted.
Do not lose hope.
The fever comes and goes.
The movement, too, has suffered in the last two years.
But today it is hard and strong.
That consoles him.
Come back!
His eyes, his hands, his hot dry lips say, As I leave with a heavy heart, I fear I have seen him for the last time.
Saturday morning.
It is hopeless.
The doctor is no longer allowing visits.
He is hallucinating.
He does not even recognize his own mother any longer.
It is 6.30 Sunday morning.
He dies after a hard struggle.
As I stand by his bed two hours later, I cannot believe that it is Horse Wessel.
His face is yellow, the wounds still covered with white band-aids.
Stubble shows on his chin.
The half-open eyes stare glassily into the eternity that we all face.
The small, cold hands lie in the midst of flowers, white and red tulips and violets.
Horst Wessel is passed on.
His mortal remains have given up struggle and conflict, yet I can feel almost physically his spirit rise to live on with us.
He believed it.
He knew it.
He himself put it in words.
He marches in spirit in our ranks.
One day in a German Germany, workers and students will march together singing his song, He Will Be With Them.
He wrote it in a moment of ecstasy, of inspiration.
The song flowed from him, born of life and bearing witness to that life.
The brown-shirted soldiers are singing it across the country.
In ten years, children will sing it in the schools, workers in the factories, soldiers on the march.
His song makes him immortal.
That is how he lived.
That is how he died.
A wanderer between two worlds, between yesterday and tomorrow, between that which was and that which will be.
A soldier of the German Revolution.
Once he stood with his hand on his belt, proud and upright, with the smile of youth on his red lips, always ready to risk his life.
That is how we will remember him.
I see endless columns marching in spirit.
A humiliated people rises up and begins to move.
An awakening Germany demands its rights, freedom and prosperity.
He marches behind them in spirit.
Many of them will not know him.
Many will have gone where he is now.
Many others will have come.
He strides silently and knowingly with them.
The banners wave.
The trumpets sound.
The pipes sound.
And from a million throats the song of the German Revolution resounds.
Raise high the flag.
The End
The End The End The End The End The End The End The End The End The End The End The End The End The End The End The End
The End The End The End The End The End The End The End Oh werden ge
Leute oh The summer shield, the joy of the strengthens.
The shield, the joy of the strengthens.
The summer shield, the joy of the strengthens.
The summer shield, the joy of the strengthens.
The End you Let's go ahead and get into the second part of our interview with Kurt Doolittle of the Propertarian Institute.
When we left off, Kurt was talking about racial integration and the inability of the other races to compete in a white man's world.
It makes me think of the Kalergi plan.
The idea is essentially to have a slave class and then your upper ruling class.
Kalergi said that that ruling class, naturally, should be the Jewish-European Ashkenazi types.
These are cast as conspiracy theories, but they're not, right?
No matter who wrote them, they're observations.
It's not an inaccurate expression of their strategy.
However, the thing is, you don't need to have that as an overt strategy if your natural instinct, like the female, is always to undermine males.
And so you're talking about a genetic strategy that they evolved in the Middle East that through reproduction and cultural assimilation became a group evolutionary strategy that 90% of them follow because they're programming an instinct.
Just like there's a few of us on our side who understand our group strategy and can articulate it in scientific terms, there's a few people on their side that can do it.
And so the difference is they, like women, they continually agitate and never stop, whereas we're actually seeking the point of non-agitation.
So it's very difficult because their means of distribution of these, which is...
Gossiping, shaming, rallying, moralizing, undermining, lying, cheating, stealing false promises, baiting into hazard.
Their system for undermining a civilization is as evolved as our system of rule of law is.
And we don't think of it that way.
We practice rule of law.
I can articulate the Western group evolutionary strategy in one sentence.
It's a long one.
And the Jewish strategy in one sentence.
What other Westerners can?
None.
We practice it.
It's metaphysical.
We don't know it.
We just take that as the world for granted.
But they take the opposite strategy.
In effect, Europeans are the male extreme of group evolutionary strategy, and Jews are the female extreme of group evolutionary strategy.
I'm sure my listeners would love to hear that sentence.
For Europeans?
For either or for both?
I'll do Europeans, because then it'll make sense.
The European is very easy.
Because all it takes is the one example we know.
What kind of government do pirates have?
Democracy.
So what they have is a constitution, a contract, because they're all volunteers.
They're all going on a risky business venture.
They separate the power, which means they elect a captain.
The captain may bring a boat or not, and he will get extra shares for bringing the boat and being the captain.
But he can be de-captained relatively easily.
And they produce another guy who's responsible for divvying up the loot.
And these people are a separation of powers.
So you have a guy who divvies up the loot and judges conflicts between men, and a guy who orders the men.
It's written as a contract.
We have lots of copies of them.
So why is that?
Well, it's not possible to organize a high-risk entrepreneurial venture by any other means, when the only capital you bring into it is violence.
Well, what did our ancestors do?
They combined horse, cart, and wheel to build what we think of as covered wagons, or they think of as yurts on wheels, and they left the lower river valleys of Russia in the spring to go out on the steppe and graze.
But that was just a means of sustenance.
The way you get rich is you get a bunch of guys and their horses and carts or chariots, which is what we think about them, together, and you go raid other people's cattle.
Well, how do you do this?
It's only one way.
And that's the origin of Western civilization.
It's what we call the rule of law, the origin of that basic strategy.
And you see this most, not in Athens, you see it most accurately in what record we have of Sparta.
The men go out, they conquer and take territory, they keep the women they want and enslave the rest of the men and make them as work.
And they've turned themselves into a professional group of warriors.
But how do you govern that professional group of warriors?
Well, you have to govern it pretty much as a democracy in most cases, in the distribution of loot, so to speak, and a judiciary in the selection of policy, and as authority in the execution of war.
And this is only because those are the only three decision-making processes that are possible for those three contexts.
When you have professional warriors, each of which is marginally indifferent from the other.
So, that's the origin of Western civilization.
How do you express that in legal terms or in scientific terms?
You'd say that men who bear arms reciprocally, I mean, to all one another, equally exchange insurance of one another, and they ensure the sovereignty of demonstrated interest.
In other words, if you were responsible for your wins, You get to keep them.
And limiting themselves to reciprocity in display word and deed, meaning what libertarians think of non-aggression, this leaves only markets for voluntary cooperation available to all members, which means markets and everything.
Association, cooperation, reproduction, production, commons, polities, and war.
So what you get out of this is what we think of as rule of law.
But is the maximum rate of adaptation possible for man in any social order?
Because there is no friction to adaptation, no friction to innovation, and only friction to loss.
So Western man evolved faster than all other civilizations combined in both the bronze, so the Indo-European expansion, the Mediterranean, the rationalist expansion, and the Atlantic expansion that united the world.
So these are the Bronze, Iron, and Steel Ages, with two Dark Ages in the middle, the first being the consequence of expansion into Europe and downward.
That was the Bronze Age collapse.
The second being the success of the Christians, like the woke, at destroying the institutions of cultural production of the Mediterranean.
And third, the classical recovery in Europe, starting with the restoration of fundamentalism in Islam and the flight of scholars back to Europe.
And the invention of the printing press and the Italian translation of classical works, which led to the Protestant Reformation and the empirical revolution, the agrarian revolution, the commercial revolution, the financial revolution, industrial revolution, and subsequent technological and medical revolutions.
So we adapt faster than all of it combined, but we do this at one cost.
At one cost is suppression of the reproduction of the underclass.
Instead of stagnating because we parasitically live off the underclass.
You had said earlier about the Dark Ages and that having to do a lot with Christianity.
I wonder if you would expand on that and maybe touch on why a return to the fundamentalist point of view.
They live under the illusion that it worked.
And I'm like, yeah, your ancestors experienced century after century of declining knowledge, increasing poverty, until the Vikings were restored to Europe because the Christian churches who domesticated Europeans were unable to create a military force.
So they directed the energy of the Vikings, or basically the people who'd recently been civilized, so to speak, to the salvation.
And then they pulled back before they finished it.
I mean, there was no reason Europeans didn't conquer the Middle East back then.
Just like there's no reason we just didn't conquer them in World War I or conquer them now.
And the answer is we just don't want to because they're impossible.
We have a bunch of idiots in this world and the Christians are the same.
They're regressing to an anchor point in the past that they can understand instead of the future anchor point that they need to understand.
And so the future anchor point is we either restore our rate of adaptivity and maintain our genetic, cultural, and territorial advantage or we don't.
And we make the choice for all men that follow us through all of history, as long as there is history, to be made.
Christianity is mandatory ignorance in exchange for irresponsibility for anything.
And so they lie about all this stuff, but in the end, there's no difference between the false promise of life after death in exchange for obedience to superstition so that you don't have to be responsible for your status.
Or you're low status.
Or responsible for a status signal pressure.
Or that you don't have to be responsible for the commons.
Or you don't have to be responsible for picking up arms and keeping the enemy out.
It's just irresponsibility because it's a feminine strategy.
What is all female behavior reducible to?
Complaining, whining, bitching, whatever.
In order to generate stress among men so they solve the problem.
What is female strategy to create stress in men?
It's done by undermining.
And what is female natural inclination to do is escape all costs, not directly related to her children, and push that cost onto men.
So what is the enemy doing?
Exactly that.
They're just taking the female strategy.
The problem is we think they have to understand it to do it, and just like our people think they understand what they're doing, they can't even talk about it.
If I didn't say it's the use of arms, For the reciprocal insurance to guarantee the sovereignty and demonstrated interests, limiting us to reciprocity and display word and deed, and as a consequence, markets for survival in every one of the markets of possible means of cooperation, thus yielding the greatest rate of adaptation available to any human organization, they wouldn't have any idea.
It's actually really simple, because it's how the universe operates.
It's just physics.
I did try to do a bit of a breakdown on propertarianism 101, but trying to get what shouldn't be all that complicated into terms that your average, everyday American can understand isn't easy.
I'm sure you know that better than I do.
I think that was where John's big talent was in.
Unfortunately, he figured out that there's one good man for every 1,000 fucking losers on the right.
This is the job, is we're panning for gold in a stream of shit.
Just going to have to keep sifting and sifting and looking for that little bit of color.
The thing is, anybody worth anything is worth something.
And so what they want to do is they want to have a practical solution.
If you're offering theology or philosophy or ideology, I won't name the three leaders of those three camps, but we have populists online in all three of those camps.
They're loser magnets, right?
And so anybody that's participating in those conversations is, by definition, somebody we want to leave behind anyway.
And I think that's the beauty of the Northwest Imperative, the Butler Plan.
You have to put the effort into doing it.
You have to pack up your van.
You have to get your ass home.
The Northwest Front is the only clique, if you will, in the white nationalist sphere whose quote-unquote membership is based on a physical act.
It's based on a deed.
It's not based on saying things.
It's not based on words.
It's based on actually doing something.
The Northwest Imperative of the Butler Plan is not white flight.
It is white fight.
I think it's time for us to take our third musical break.
Let you digest some of what you've just heard.
But I hope you're enjoying it.
Let's take a break.
And enjoy this Blast from the Past!
Deutschland!
Deutschland!
Fieber alles!
Fieber alles!
In der Welt!
Welt!
The world is still to the power and the brothers together.
From the Mars to the men, from the edge to the world.
Deutschland, Deutschland, über alles, über alles in der Welt.
Deutsche Frauen, deutsche Treue, deutscher Bein und deutscher Sang.
Sollen in der Welt behalten ihren alten schönen Klang.
Uns zu ihrer Tat befreien, unser ganzes Leben lang.
Deutsche Frauen, deutsche Treue, deutscher Bein und deutscher Sang.
Deutsche Frauen, deutsche Treue, deutscher Bein und deutscher Sang.
Freiheit und Recht und Freiheit für das deutsche Waffenland.
Danach lasst uns alle schriegen, müde dich mit Herz und Hand.
Heiligkeit und Recht und Freiheit, süßes Glück ist unverfall.
Lüben, fangst du, dieses Glück ist, müde deutscher Sang.
Lüben, fangst du, dieses Glück ist, müde deutscher Sang.
you You can't run because everybody who's run has eventually been defeated.
You can't defeat the Abrahamic method of cancer, you know, civilizational destruction, by running from it because it eventually eats everything around you.
So I'll say this over and over again, and nobody's got the balls to show up.
I'm probably going to take advantage of moving back to the Northwest.
We have a few years left to move before their strategy of delay and deceive and accumulate forces has succeeded, and it's going to have to be pretty soon.
We can secure some territory so that we can raise some generations of good white men and women that haven't been poisoned, that aren't going to be poisoned by the kind of brainwashing that you get out of Hollywood and New York Jews.
I'm an empiricist.
So, the Amish only exist because we let them.
There's nothing you're going to do that doesn't evolve using force to create a new state.
There's no other way to win.
Winning is actually fairly easy.
Agreed, 100%.
Now, the FBI has told me to be very careful that I don't...
They would love to put me away.
So be very careful that I'm not inciting violence.
I'm saying that the only solution is to have enough men together so that it's impossible to use violence against them.
At one point in the novels, what's discussed is, after a few years of conflict, let's say, the U.S. government is forced to the table, and at that point, an agreement is reached, an agreement for sovereignty for an exclusive territory in the Northwest.
Ukraine can't move because it has no possible trade routes.
So they're the borderland, and so they're screwed.
And this is my home.
I consider Ukraine my home, so it's somewhat painful to me.
On the other hand, Russia's in the same position.
Why did Russia have to expand it as she still feels she has to expand?
Because it needs the ports.
It needs the ports.
Seattle and Portland would be part of that northwest, and so there would be deepwater ports that trade routes would be available to, even back into Russia.
Okay, now let me just try.
So what are you going to do about the people in Seattle and Portland?
Nothing that I would say on air.
At some point, the power structure is going to have to be asked to the table.
And one of the things that they're going to need is a way out of it.
And you can never take somebody's complete power unless you want to destroy them, but you can take something that they may not care so much about.
That's why it's a corner way out on the other side of the country.
That no one in New York or D.C. is really going to care all that much about.
I don't think the Butler plan is one that you've spent a whole lot of time studying, but we can at some point kind of go over that together and make sure that I've got all my I's dotted and T's crossed.
It's still a plan, and somebody's thought about it and invested in it, so fine, and frankly, I'd rather live out there with you guys than other people.
We have justification for a common lawsuit against the state.
The founders established the method for the correct adjudication of those differences, and the North and South conflict violated that.
On the other hand, we're not in that position anymore, and they're clearly burning down capital, this is theft, and destroying our middle and working classes in order to replace them with dependent serfs.
And they're hoping that they can manage a decline at the benefit of the financial and bureaucratic classes who are restoring, basically, serfdom.
And the serfs are fucking happy about it.
Let's get it straight.
The majority of people aren't ready for freedom.
They want to be serfs.
No kidding.
They absolutely positively do, and it's not right for us to claim that they need freedom.
They don't need it.
They can't do it, and so they don't want it.
The Jeffersonian fallacy of an aristocracy of everyone failed.
It failed by the French Revolution.
But we've taken a long time to play out the theory.
The theory's failed.
The world doesn't want it because the world is genetically capable of it.
So we are.
That's what we want.
It's our competitive advantage.
So we need to recreate states that allow us to do it, just like we should allow them to follow their fantasies.
And so that's the original intent of the formation of the government, and that's all we need to do is we just need to recreate that and restore rule of law for us, and they can have arbitrary rule for them.
But that's the only thing that's possible.
It's also the only moral claim.
It's also one that they definitely cast themselves as immoral and wrong if they try to oppose.
We have a template.
That template is encoded in our law.
It's encoded in our history and our ethics.
It's the basis of the common law.
It's the basis of European law for 5,000 years.
And so if people want to be serfs, that's their right to self-determination.
But they cannot deprive us.
So sort into serfdoms, which is what they want, which is high and low.
And we'll sort into freedom, which is the majority middle.
And that's fine.
They'll be left behind as poor peasants, and we'll continue our rapid evolution, which is why they're afraid of it, because it'll invalidate their civilization.
And to do that, we're going to have to have exclusive territory, because you can't have the leeches sucking all the capital out of your society.
And they'll keep up the argument that, fine, your red states will be poorer.
And I'm like, well, that's only because you don't get that all you're doing is burning debt in those urban areas.
You're not actually making anything.
It shows up as a positive number on an income statement, but you don't understand it's just debt.
It's not income.
So, you know, you say to us, what are we going to do?
We're just going to have kids, create commons.
The difference is we can create commons because we're not parasites.
The problem for you guys is you're all parasites, so you can't create commons except with debt.
It's not complicated.
It's math, science, and totally deterministic.
The commons is a big theme in proprietarianism, and it's also something that I think is highly misunderstood amongst our people.
I wonder if you could flesh out what the commons are for people.
I suppose we've discussed just calling it commonsism, because that's really what it is.
That rings so great in people's ears, though.
It's the opposite of communism.
So communism says there's no private property, and for that matter, no commons.
We say that the purpose of the group is to produce commons.
In other words, commons being parks, neighborhoods, places for families, peace, education, all the good things.
Wouldn't like a water supply and areable land and all of those things also be considered commons?
I was trying to work outward to there.
Same story either way.
The difference is that you have resources and a territory, but the territory has to be created by common effort.
In other words, common defense.
So a commons is anything that's commonly defended against consumption.
There is no environmental crisis.
There is a population crisis.
The problem is that evolution requires continuous increase in the transformation of energy per capita.
If you look at the evolution of man, that's all that's happening.
If you look at any evolutionary system, it's the continuous increase and the transformation of energy by some sort of genetic life process.
So what we've done as mankind is we got to where we could cooperate, which allowed us to eat everything on the planet to the point where we had to invent agrarianism so that we could eat something else.
And we had to invent Weight Watchers, too.
To the point where now our biggest problem is eating at the cost of burning 100 million years' worth of trees as petroleum products.
The environmentalists are still thinking in herds that more is better.
Of course, more is always worse.
What you're trying to do is say more energy transformation per capita.
So that means that there's no end to our need to maintain energy transformation per capita in order to continue evolution.
Because there's no end to the race or the Red Queen, whether we talk about it among mankind or nature or the climate or geology or the solar system or the universe.
There's no end.
And frankly, we've done everything we're aware of has taken place in a brief warm period in global history on a planet that's all but hostile to letting us survive on it.
I think most philosophers are liars.
I know all theologians are liars.
It's a really simple thing.
Philosophy was done with Darwin.
There's no philosophy left anymore except choice.
In other words, preference.
Truth is really simple.
Science is solved.
Basically all but the last problem that we have to face, and that's what my work does, is say this is the law going forward.
Whether you want to call it the law of nature, the law of God, or whatever, or the laws of the universe, it doesn't make any difference.
This is the science of human cooperation and furtherance of human condition and evolution.
Period.
End of story.
There's no more discussion.
So these are the choices available to us at any given point of time.
Which choice do you want to make?
Because the outcome is deterministic.
What outcome is deterministically produced by those choices that you make?
So we just get to choose.
We get to choose whether we're going to organize a couple of million people large enough to make it impossible for the state to rebel against, large enough to control the discourse, and large enough to demand the same kind of reformation as we have, or we're going to disappear into the night and that's all there is to it.
You have to make it more trouble than it's worth to quell the uprising, if you will.
You can't have an honest discussion when they can use the female mean of undermining to circumvent the common law, which we developed over 5,000 years, which limits us to market competition by truthful, meaning reciprocal means, or via positiva competition, or the courts via negativa competition for injustices.
Those are the two choices we have.
What we don't get to do in our history...
is undermine each other, which is why we invented things like reason and science and courtrooms and juries, because you have to put your arms away.
That doesn't mean just physical arms.
It means lying, cheating, stealing.
It means undermining.
So that's our choice.
We created two markets, a positive market and a negative market for the resolution of differences, and both of these markets are purely empirical.
The minute you bring in gossiping, rallying, shaming, undermining, moralizing, Reputation, destruction, interference in marriage, interference in work.
You're no longer competing in a market with truth and reciprocity.
And those are the female ways of waging war.
And you'll see that in the press and on TV and any of your media.
And there's a reason for that.
It's war.
It's simple war.
And they're using the female method of war.
And our law used to contain defenses against the female method of war.
But we got this stupid idea, because they couldn't solve the problem of truth, which is one of the central solutions of my work, because they couldn't solve the problem of truth, so they said you've got to have freedom of speech and freedom of press.
You have to have freedom of speech and freedom of press of truthful, reciprocal speech.
You have to have that right, but you don't have the right to lie, cheat, scheme, and whatever, and they open the doors.
They open the doors at two times.
They not only let women into the workforce, They also brought in the people who specialize in the industrialization of lying by lying, cheating, stealing, gossiping, shaming, moralizing, and their means of warfare against the institution of cultural production doing it in order to foment discord among our people, divide us, weaken us, and therefore conquer us.
And those people are the ones that were historically, and for thousands of years, and who developed their life strategies around being an outsider.
We then allowed them in and put them in control of our institutions.
Our institutions weren't based anymore on outcomes.
Same reason the Chinese bureaucracy failed, based on tests.
We gave up meritocracy.
So it used to be that you had to be in the aristocracy, in other words, show that you were competent before you got into a university.
Or at least somehow.
But now we don't have to do that.
Any fucking idiot can get into a university without demonstrating moral, ethical, and civilizational competency.
That's one.
They get in there and then they deprogram them.
I mean, if you study law at Yale, or Harvard, or Georgetown, these schools are not producing people who assist in the governance of Western civilization by ancient rule of law limiting us to market competition.
What they're doing is creating revolutionaries.
Who are specifically taught how to undermine that rule of law?
We have to clean house.
The problem is cleaning house means we've got a third of the population that really needs to go away somehow.
What are we going to do?
Then we have a third of the population that's unfit.
The people who say, I want all of America back, I think, why don't you just do ourselves an evolution a favor and say, we've gotten rid of them and separate.
Yeah.
And with my work, law is a science, not a philosophy.
It's just like math.
There's no way out of it.
There's no confusion anymore.
The Jews brought positive law into the West for various reasons because they used positive law.
They got the French.
The French implemented theirs.
Now the continent is lost.
And thankfully, the Anglo civilization never got brought into that.
We still have our common law at which the origin and the basic principles of which are 5,000 years old.
I'm just the first guy to write them down in scientific form and show that they're just a reflection of the laws of the universe.
In other words, what we do is just what we call evolution.
Western European civilization is just following the same rules as evolution, which just follows the same rules of the rest of the universe.
All right, well, our time is up.
This broadcast has been brought to you by the Northwest Front.
You can reach the party on our website at northwestfront.info.
As always, hail Victory Conference.
Tell me why you hurry so.
Hush a vocal, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon.
For the pikes must be together at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together at the rising of the moon.
And come tell me, Sean O'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
At the old spot by the river, quite well known.
good to go.
That singing river That black mass of men was seen High above their shining weapons Flew their own beloved marine Death to every foe and traitor Whistle out the marching tune And hurrah,
▲
Export Selection