All Episodes
Previous Next
April 6, 2020 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
58:21
20200406_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush, awokel, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O'Farrell, where the gathering is to be, in the old spot by the river, rightful known to you and me.
One word more for signal, token whistle of an arching tune, for your pike upon your shoulder, by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, with your pike upon your shoulder, The date is Monday, April 6th, 2020.
I'm Andy Donner, and you're listening to Radio Free Northwest.
Radio Free Northwest
I'll open today's episode of Radio Free Northwest with the usual housekeeping matters which will include commentary on the novel coronavirus out of the city of Wuhan in China.
You might wonder why this is a housekeeping item and not a segment all on its own, and that is simple.
Right now, the situation changes on an almost hourly basis in response to both government and private actors' behavior amid the outbreak.
And because of that, we're not comfortable making more than cursory comments.
We'll also offer precious little analysis on the situation because, again, it keeps changing so often that any commentary we release would be almost immediately invalidated and unhelpful to you.
Generally, our take on the Kung Flu is this.
Yes, it's a genuine emergency that is causing all sorts of problems for everyone.
No, it is not a catastrophe, and it's best if we all do everything we can to avoid panic at a time like this.
As things stand, the locations least affected by the virus in the United States are those where people voluntarily locked down early in the outbreak.
What happens in the immediate future is anyone's guess, and yours is as good as mine.
So much of the changes in the day-to-day situation are due to people's actions that can't really be anticipated right now.
I would imagine our situation here in the homeland isn't really that different from anywhere else.
The Northwest Front in particular has seen a spanner thrown in the works of every infrastructure project we've attempted since the end of January.
We're going to stay heads-down focused on those, because that's what needs to happen.
Of course, we're going to provide regular, though obviously less frequent, updates on Radio Free Northwest as things progress.
The one thing I will say, though, is that I hope you all stay safe and don't take unnecessary risks.
As I and the rest of the headquarters group are staying heads down on long-term projects, I'd actually like to ask you all to do the same, to distract yourselves from everything going on in the world.
Just about all of you will be in some sort of voluntary or perhaps less voluntary lockdown situation, and that's going to last for some weeks more, unfortunately.
The best thing for you to do is take care of you and yours first, since this is a trying time for all of us.
For several different reasons.
But more importantly, I would like to ask every single one of you to have something to show for this.
Develop a skill.
Improve a skill.
Gain some new knowledge.
Plan your homecomings.
Anything and everything you can do to find a silver lining or even come out of this situation ahead once it ends, and it will end, is the best thing you can possibly do.
That's what we're doing, and if you want to impress us, do the same.
Even if that seems difficult, don't give in to temptation to do nothing for yourself at this time.
True, this is economically, socially, and politically trying for all sorts of reasons, but that's no excuse to not make the best use of the time, since most of us have way too much of it on our hands right now.
Above all else, the time this situation gives to each of us should not be wasted.
The HQ group and I have resisted the urge to fritter away the time with worthless pursuits and entertaining ourselves, and we're actually quite proud of that.
We know just how important this is, and we're asking all of you to do something significant so that you come out of the situation ahead, even if that seems like it can't happen.
That's about as much as we want to say on this subject, and that may come across as a cop-out, but the fact of the matter is, the situation does keep changing, and our opinions, which we definitely have, may simply not be relevant.
When the dust settles, we'll share with you what our take on the situation is.
But until then, everybody hold tight, stay sane, and stay safe.
A moment ago, I discussed the infrastructure projects we hinted to you in March were happening, and it's time I gave you a little bit more of an update on those.
Our financial supporters found this out in the supporter letter last month, and it's time to disclose it to you.
Two of the projects bore some fruit, although they were immediately interrupted by the COVID-19 situation, and that is unfortunate, but we're dealing with it.
The other project was almost entirely subsumed by the administrative costs associated with the other two.
That largely remains the same, simply because, again, a spanner has been thrown in the works of pretty much everything going on in society right now, and it's the same for us as it is for you.
As stated, we remain heads down on those projects.
I wish we could give you more detail, but the time's not right.
I'm going to wrap up housekeeping with a request that you please not send us packages.
If you need to, coordinate it with us beforehand.
We don't like receiving boxes full of unknown things that we're not expecting.
In the future, it may be our policy to simply return these things to sender unless we've been sent a manifest of their contents well ahead of time and approved receiving those exact contents.
Granted, this has happened only a couple times in our history, but one of them was recent, and we do need to address it.
Also, thankfully, these packages were from friendly people who only wanted to send us things they thought relevant.
And indeed, you may have something relevant to send us, but it's better if you again coordinate that with us ahead of time and get our approval before you send the package.
When this happened some years back...
The HQ group had, well, an interesting time throwing out a whole bunch of personal possessions that someone who just wanted to be friendly sent us out of the blue because, again, they were looking for friends.
And there's nothing wrong with that, but that's not primarily what we're here for.
Aside from various safety and security concerns, there's also the element of trouble of what has to happen to the contents of your package if we don't want it, because, again, we're not really inclined to go through the effort of boxing something up and sending it back to you.
Again, please, if you want to do this...
And on to today's brief Q&A segment.
Now, first and foremost, everybody, please do not send the party questions, the answers to which are Google-able.
The fact of the matter is you're only going to get one or two people's opinion rather than aggregate reality.
This is especially true regarding where you might live in a particular location, what housing prices are, where things are located, commute times, and a whole bunch of other demographic data that one person's perspective really can't help you with.
For some strange reason, over the last month we got quite a few of these questions.
And while I'm always nice enough to try and give the best answer I can, if you end up with a response beginning with a more polite version of let me Google that for you, please take the hint.
When someone is examining a particular migration location, job, commute, apartment community, and a number of other things related to where they might end up living in the homeland, they need to do that research themselves because this is a very personal decision and they need to make absolutely certain they're okay with the decision they're making.
The limited perspective of someone who might not be in exactly that same situation It's not unheard of for someone to not do their research and not examine a situation for themselves on a scouting trip before making a move.
True, that can work out, but there are a very small number of times, and when I say very small, I mean I can count them all on one hand with fingers left over.
Where someone didn't do this and did the minimal amount of research and ended up regretting their situation quite a bit.
For that reason, I really want to encourage everyone trying to make a decision even about temporary housing at some location in the homeland to do the work themselves in terms of research and follow-through.
I may very well simply come up with a boilerplate response when someone asks these questions that I'm not comfortable answering them anymore, simply because it removes the impetus for someone to completely follow through on a research process.
Having said all that, I will now answer a question we were sent some time ago about the possibility of religious communities in the Northwest American Republic.
And for those of you not familiar with that term, that effectively refers to nunneries and monasteries of various sorts.
Before I actually answer the question, though, I need to point something out.
Quite a few of the questions we're sent are purely hypotheticals based on what somebody thinks should or should not happen in the NAR that, quite frankly, the party will never be in a position to address.
For one thing, some of these questions are of piddling importance.
And I don't mean to denigrate someone's interest in the subject, but the fact of the matter is we have other things to worry about.
Secondly, we're not the people who are going to make these decisions, at least most likely we aren't.
Those who actually birth the NAR into the world will get to call these shots, and until someone is at that point, we really won't know the answers to many of these questions.
Harold had a habit of avoiding crystal ball gazing unless it was on a very important subject, and we're going to adopt that stance as well.
I've opted to answer the question about religious communities simply because it serves as an excellent object lesson in how you can find these answers for yourselves, which, as it just so happens, we expect you to do before sending them to us.
When someone gets in contact with the party, we send them a number of resources as well as point them to others.
Among these resources are the pages on the party website that outline what we're all about, what Northwest migration is, what the Butler Plan is, and what the goal is, namely the Northwest American Republic and its draft constitution.
Note again that that is a draft and it is a proposal.
We're not interested in entertaining discussion on it.
We merely want to show that there is some political thought going into this.
That draft was created with the input of better white nationalists than you and I, who have contributed more to the movement, and it's going to stay the way it is.
That said, it, along with the novels, are especially important Q&A resources because the answers you want are in those documents.
So then how does one answer the question of whether or not religious communities would be allowed using the material we've provided?
To start with, there is nothing in any of those documents that indicates a religious community would not be allowed in the NAR, so by default, they're allowed.
But wait, there's a catch.
As written, the draft constitution does a couple of things.
It imposes property tax on structures, especially businesses, but structures in general, where children are not raised.
Now, I note children ought not be raised in a religious community because, well, it's supposed to be all men or all women in one of those situations.
So, yeah, there would be some property tax on said religious community and their structures.
Now, two, income, or rather taking income for religious service of any sort, is prohibited.
And what that means is these religious communities would actually have to provide services to other people by which they draw their income.
Freedom's Sons briefly dealt with this issue when it was pointed out that a whole bunch of priests in various religious orders would actually have to go get day jobs whereby they were paid for doing something other than performing religious duties, since again, drawing income for being a minister of some sort is prohibited in the NAR.
And what that effectively means is that a religious community and the people in it would be subject to the same regulations and prohibitions placed on any other religious community of religious people.
Now, that wasn't so hard, was it?
No, but one would have to go through the material we ask people to go through before they ask us questions.
And yes, we do have that expectation of you.
It should be quite obvious why we have this expectation of you, and it's not because we don't want to answer important questions, but we expect you to be able to apply the material the party has released over a period of years to the questions you have.
Odds are, you don't need our help to solve these things for yourself.
Greetings, comrades.
This is the trucker coming at you from somewhere here in Texas on I-20.
Not sure of the exact town, but laid up here in the rest area.
Going to get ready to do my 10-hour break.
And I thought I'd go ahead and drop you all a quickie shout-out from the road here.
I'm assuming that most of you are by now sheltering in place, as this is the 24th of March.
I couldn't believe it yesterday when I had to go and...
Man, it was a breeze getting in and out of there.
I know it's going to be a pain for most of you, especially in the liberal states like the West Coast where they're telling everybody to stay home, shelter in place, don't go outside.
Yeah, well, that's not the life of a trucker.
We go breezing down the road anyway because y 'all got to eat and we got to supply the stores.
And I'm in part of the industry that calls temperature-controlled products, be it.
Milk, eggs, ice cream, whatever.
If the temperature needs to be regulated on it, we haul it, pretty much.
We don't do any hazmat and stuff, at least not the company I drive for right now, because I don't have a hazmat endorsement.
Yay, me.
Just remember that wherever you look in your house, at some point or other, that item was on a truck at least once in its travels around the country, around the world, wherever the heck it came from.
At one point or another, like I say, it was on a truck.
Other than that, I still see people out there driving U-Hauls, heading to and from the homeland.
I don't know if they're actually migrants that are making their relocation to the Northwest because of the podcast or the movement, whatever you want to classify it as, or just as a term is organic migrants.
But if you are out there bogeying down the road with one of those big old U-Haul trucks, Especially if you're towing something behind it, like your car on a towed alley or a towed trailer.
Just be aware that it's not your Pinto that you're driving, because I just, the other day, saw one.
They had something behind it.
I don't know if it was their personal vehicle or what.
I couldn't tell, but the U-Haul was spun out and laid over on its side with the hood up there by the shoulder.
The rest of it was down in the weeds in the brush, so I couldn't see what the heck they were towing, but they'd lost control of it, so you've got to consider that you're not used to driving that big of a vehicle around if you do decide to go and move yourself that way.
Even if you're just towing a trailer behind your personal vehicle, you don't do it all that often.
I don't care what you say, that sucker will eventually get the better of you because you don't tow.
All the time.
I tow all the time as part of my job and fortunately I have not had the thing get away from me yet.
I've always managed to keep it on the road.
I've hit a few patches of black ice or slick roads and managed to keep it under control unlike some of these videos that you'll see of good instances like over there in Michigan or a lot come out of Wyoming that trucks crash into each other because they're just...
Going too fast for conditions and they're tooling along at like about say 60 miles an hour and the visibility is more like about a speed of about 20 or 30 miles an hour if that fast and don't have time to stop and slick roads and yeah not a pretty picture.
So be aware of that.
Please take your time if you're going to be doing a move with a U-Haul.
Don't get in too big of a rush because if you do you might end up laying it over.
All your personal belongings, or even worse, killing yourself.
This is just a quickie from the trucker out here on the road.
All right, comrades, have a safe one, and I hope to see you out here as the weather gets nicer, making your scouting trips and your migration soon.
Signing off from Texas.
We're going to do what they say can't be done.
We've got a long way to go.
Got a short time to get there.
I'm Westbound, just watch a bandit run.
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing Might is Right by Ragnar Redbeard.
Now, this is clearly a pseudonym.
So the question is, who wrote this book?
This book was written originally in 1896.
This book is fitting right into the Victorian and Edwardian notion of nature, and around the time it was written, Jack London, who many people say wrote it, would have only been 11 years old.
This is a very grim book to have been written by an 11-year-old, so it's fairly questionable whether Jack London would have written it.
However, Anton Sandar LeVay, who wrote the Satanic Bible, did end up copying parts of this book, and the parts of it were said to be copied from Jack London's notes.
So this is a book that would have appealed to Jack London, but it's...
Likely not written by him.
Also, there are people who say that this book may be connected to the Wobblies, and it may have initially been a parody.
However, the editor of this book states that it was used as an introduction to The Eagle and the Serpent, and that it's not likely to have been a parody because it was used as an introduction, and the editor claims that it would not have been used as an introduction in that case.
Now, having said that, parody can be very subtle, and maybe even to the point of being missed by some, especially in the case of it being written in a book.
One of the examples of subtle parody we have from modern times is The Colbert Show, and one can probably notice that's parody, but it can be a fairly subtle parody.
Now, As you might guess, this book is a response to a Darwinian worldview that gets filtered through a Victorian-era thought process, and it's a material worldview.
However, it's a kind of materialism that's just as biological as it is economic, although the two can easily get conflated because this is very much a Herbert Spencer kind of a book as well.
I'm also inclined to see a kind of Nietzschean influence in this book as well, although it's probably a somewhat simpler book than Nietzsche would have written.
But this book is talking about how the church is the idol of the priest and the state is the idol of the politician.
So people can get trapped in certain limiting beliefs.
One of the beliefs that people might get trapped in more contemporaneously is a notion of Americanism.
A person who is trapped in Americanism would have a hard time, for example, obviously wanting to fully commit to an intellectual movement such as ours.
Anyone can get trapped in these types of beliefs in one way or another, and they can cause limitations in terms of sometimes a person's self-concept and sometimes even how a person considers strategy.
So it's always something to really watch out for.
The author notes that leaders either should not or do not, hopefully do not, get caught up in these states of mind.
And the author notes that leaders of states do use the power of law and the military.
However, the trick to being a really convincing leader is that you need to convince yourself of these beliefs before you can convince anyone else that you have these beliefs.
The psychological trick is that for a person in leadership, you need to genuinely feel and even in some sense convince yourself that you actually do have these beliefs.
That way you'll have plausible deniability, and the best way to do that is to almost completely fool yourself.
So it should be buried somewhere in your semi-subconscious that you're really not believing these things, but you're using belief for the sake of being truly convincing.
Talks about the question of scale.
So if you steal a small amount, and when I say small, I don't necessarily mean it's what an average person would consider small, but I'm just saying it's relatively, let's say a fortune, but it's kind of like a personal fortune.
You could be still considered a thief, but if you conquer, then you could be an emperor or a king.
If you tend to tell a lot of stories to people that are close to you, you could be seen as just dishonest.
But if you write these things down in a book, whether you call it fiction, or whether you call it religion, or whether you call them fables, then if you're successful, you'll be seen as an author, and eventually people might think that the stories you're telling are true.
The author of this book talks about how it's very important to always have your own code and how everywhere cultures and codes are made up.
The author talks about how like tends to prefer like in terms of marriage when marital choice is unimpeded and how certain temperaments tend to gravitate towards like temperaments and how that can bring about certain casts of individuals.
Despite the fact that this author is writing a book and does have a lot of theories, this author has a certain disdain for intellectualism.
And the author is always talking about how the best do normally win, except when impeded by ideologies, and how the best, in fact, should win, and how normally the winner will get every resource.
Winners are always going to attract mates easily.
And one example that we would have in more contemporary times, we can talk about, for example, the war brides that came about in World War II.
However, unlike what this author is stating, this doesn't.
Only happened with regard to women, but really this was happening over the whole scale of the population.
For example, when you look at Germany after World War II, there were many Germans that wanted to work with the Americans and come to the United States.
For women, this often meant being a war bride, but for men, often they looked for employment with the Allies, and most especially with the Americans, and many of them did want to come to the United States.
In all honesty, that looks like somebody who wants to suddenly side with someone who they see as winning.
So I think that is a fairly universal theme, although that doesn't seem to have been necessarily as true for the Japanese vis-a-vis the end of World War II.
Now, this was likely for both racial and cultural reasons.
Now, the author talks a lot about how because of this truth and because it is for the best that the strongest should win, the author talks about a kind of return to nature.
Now, of course, this is a view of nature, again, viewed through a Victorian and Edwardian era type of lens.
One of the things that they talked about a lot in those days was the notion of male animals fighting each other, and the stronger would have a tendency to find mates, and then the species would get even stronger.
That does happen, of course.
In nature, you'll watch any nature program and you'll see that.
On the other hand, sometimes with certain species, there are things that get bred in that at first don't seem to make sense because they seem like they are handicaps or they seem rather impractical.
And these can be things like peacock's tails.
And that's ultimately because the larger tails were more attractive to peahens.
So sometimes it doesn't always evolve in the way you think.
I think that it would evolve, but that depends really on the species.
However, the author of this book would be happy to learn that there are certain key species and that they are often predator species.
And that when these predator species go into decline, whole ecosystems can also go into decline because you'll have more of the prey species than the environment can handle.
Also, to state the obvious, there are times when human beings, and this particularly happens to humans who are not always the brightest, sometimes human beings will look at things that have been cultivated.
And one of the memes going around the internet recently is the meme of the wonderful banana and how bananas are made by God.
But if you think about nature and reality, this really doesn't...
Make very much sense because the bananas that we have now, for example, are actually clones and they've been bred a certain way and they're really nothing like wild bananas.
So, of course, when you look at nature, you've got to ask yourself whether you're looking at something that's been constructed and perhaps something that's been constructed for a long time or whether that really is a natural thing.
This can happen when people take an overly, perhaps sentimental view that is flavored by religion.
So the valuable thing about this book, and the thing that we should all be reflecting on if we should read this book, is the way that belief systems and value systems, whatever they are, can bring forth limitations in thought that wind up being problematic if we allow them to be.
People who are successful, and success is certainly something we need a lot more of, need to really question a lot of things.
And they need to ask themselves what their primary goal is and what it is they need to do to bring about this success that they so desire.
And that the goal of this success, if it is indeed valued more than anything else, needs to be the thing that is primary and not the various vehicles that you might use to get to that success.
And that's a difficult lesson for anyone because we all become very attached to those things that have morphed into religious beliefs.
So again, I'm discussing Might is Right, and the author is unknown, but the pseudonym is Ragnar Redbeard.
So I hope you found this enlightening, and I hope you meditate on the ideas in this.
So have a good evening, and hail victory, comrades.
Thank you.
Not too long ago, someone emailed the party asking what we thought our sort of people would be motivated by.
He asked because he wants to design posters and other similar media items while he does his own Northwest migration.
Others were able to converse with him, thankfully, because I found myself very much unable to answer his question, and a few interesting observations from RFNs of old immediately flooded my mind.
The overall thrust of this subject is that white nationalist pop culture and ending white genocide are at odds with each other.
A relatively recent comment on the party's website asked why it is the NF never seems to get anywhere, and whether or not we're just a bunch of conservative wannabe white nationalists.
There's an answer to that, but before I get there, it's worthwhile to recall some other instances of similar comments.
Just after Harold's death, someone left us, perhaps, the most salient and insightful comment we've ever received, even if that's not what they meant to do.
I was told that I come across as a white nationalist version of Leon Trotsky preaching a strange version of white nationalism in the intellectual wilderness, or words very close to that.
I followed that up with a talk on just that subject because it bore a striking resemblance to reality.
One of the most critical turning points, though, in the NF's history was the advent of the Trump 2016 campaign and the defection of a large part of our audience to the Trump phenomenon, even after Harold warned about Trump's message before Trump even announced his candidacy.
And no, Harold had no idea that the man he was talking about was Donald Trump.
Rather, Harold was very astutely observing the reality of white nationalist pop culture, and that's what I need to talk about today.
Before discussing our own slice of life and its pop culture, I want to make it clear why I'm picking on pop culture in general, since the very definition thereof is immediately relevant to its white nationalist variant.
On some level, you all know what I mean by this.
Popular culture, above all else, must be palatable to most of society, or else it would not be popular.
The Northwest Front's dim view of liberal democracy is well known, and because of that, you can imagine what we think of popular opinion.
The disasters of world history, in no small part, largely come down to large groups of people with very mediocre opinions and desires, messing things up for everyone.
And while that's true, there is a more pointed complaint I could make, and that is that pop culture, because it must appeal to the masses, must never be inconvenient or a challenge.
Over European history, the progress made in ever-upwards development of the arts and culture was due to the fact that they were funded by people with elitist tastes, who were willing to intellectually, emotionally, and culturally engage with avant-garde works produced by people who knew they needed to appeal to their customers, who had for the most part incredibly high standards.
One certainly couldn't say the same about pop music, for example.
And that isn't a blanket condemnation of those who enjoy pop music either, but none of us is so silly as to imagine that pop garbage is anything other than convenient and mediocre at best.
The messages therein are very mainstream, and the positions taken by pop music performers, as I'm not willing to call them artists, are anything but cutting edge.
In fact, they're all very politically correct and culturally safe.
But what does this have to do with white nationalism?
In the early years of Radio Free Northwest, Harold had a habit of explaining the difference between the Northwest Imperative and the rest of white nationalism.
What he was addressing implicitly was white nationalism's own pop culture.
The most important observation is that system politics and white nationalist pop culture, sadly, fit nicely with one another because neither asks anything of you.
System politics only asks that you vote when the time comes.
In the last few years, white nationalist pop culture has demanded about that much, which is interesting because for decades, it demanded nothing at all.
And lest you think this is me whining about how the NF was sidelined in favor of everyone and their dog getting on the Trump train, it's not.
The problem I'm talking about is part of the human condition, and it existed prior to the NF showing up at all.
The truth is that we will look for any reason to avoid doing what we know we should, and this doesn't just apply to entertainment or politics.
You know what, though?
That's not especially shocking, since we all must cut ourselves some slack somewhere.
The problem I want to talk about today is what happens when a culture dependent on supporting and reinforcing this tendency forms and envelops an entire community without anyone realizing it.
Perhaps the best example of this in recent years was the A- and B-level leadership of the alt-right deciding that they would tolerate various forms of bad behavior out of one another in exchange for the same treatment.
One of the most harmful effects of this white nationalist pop culture is that it practically demands, very few, if any, objectives outside of a theoretical ethnostate.
Not only would an actual objective require something more than system politics, since being subject to Zogg's laws is the core issue we face outside of restoring demographic homogeneity, but anyone who would be inconvenienced by participating in this objective will certainly complain about and oppose.
And now, back to that comment the NF never gets anywhere.
That's a very interesting thing to say, because there doesn't exist a single, tangible, workable plan Some time after Donald Trump's inauguration, both Harold Covington and I were told off in front of white nationalist Twitter because we were quite appropriately concerned about the entire movement, with the exception of a few people who had the experience to know better getting on the Trump train.
To put this in alt-right parlance, our takes were trash, and no one liked our opinions.
As it turns out, the party's take on what would happen if the movement tried system politics in general, and our concerns about Donald Trump specifically were spot-on, and the Northwest Imperative is more important now than ever.
I don't want to point out specific people or outfits, since I really don't care to address anything other than ideas at this juncture.
In recent months, there have been a couple of developments whereby white nationalists are deceived into various types of warmed-over libertarianism or even an America-first political strategy.
Unfortunately for us all, this is just more white nationalist pop culture combined with a limiting belief such as Americanism, as Gretchen spoke about earlier.
If any of the other current popular tendencies in white nationalism get their way, we'll still have essentially the same problems we have now.
Even so, these ideas are far more popular and far more liked simply because they are comfortable and demand nothing of you other than a vote here or there for someone that uses words, and only words, at the right time to make you feel good about avoiding actual solutions to white genocide.
If we as a movement cannot reject our own popular culture, we'll find that we've rejected our own survival, and we simply don't have more time left for this sort of dalliance.
Either we confront our own character problems, or white nationalist pop culture becomes our race's mausoleum.
Greetings everyone, this is Comrade Jason.
We are currently living through the most extraordinary period of my lifetime.
Deep in my gut, I never truly believed I would necessarily see this kind of national crisis.
One which affected and galvanized the entire nation on a scale not seen since the last disastrous world war between white nations over 70 years ago.
But I have lived to see it, as have we all.
With the COVID-19 coronavirus crisis, we have rapidly been caught up in something monumental, the scope of which we are still struggling to grasp, and the most important long-term effects of which are almost certainly unforeseeable.
Almost overnight, America has seen 30% of its economy shut down.
As people all across society working in fields deemed non-essential by our lords and masters are currently forbidden from working to make a living by government order.
And this kind of government crushing of the basic operation of society has been seen in many other nations all around the world.
So this is certainly extraordinary and unprecedented in the modern age of hyper-specialization of labor in a system of interdependency that is the highest in mankind's history.
We don't know when these extraordinary circumstances will end, but one thing is for certain.
Major things are going to change because of this viral pandemic that has put the entire globe into a panic.
While I hate using a trite and overused term such as global crisis, I don't think it can be denied this is exactly what we have on our hands.
And if the virus itself does not actually justify the magnitude of this crisis, it doesn't really matter.
Because government has decided for us.
As Andy said in his earlier segment, we don't feel it's particularly useful or appropriate right now to present extended commentary in the midst of this crisis.
Lord knows there is no shortage of that around right now.
And what we think we know and don't are changing literally on a daily basis.
However, there are some things that bear on our possible future that we should be thinking about as these events unfold around us.
For one, America is learning hard and overdue lessons about our dependency on foreign production.
With so much of our economy tied to China, Who have been, as President Trump might say, very bad actors since the start of this crisis.
It is clear now that China lied about the extent of their problem and the transmissibility of the virus from the beginning, which led to an underevaluation of the rapidity with which its spread would threaten to overwhelm the world's medical capacity to deal with it.
The World Health Organization, obviously at the time, were stupid for believing the lies of communists.
But that's a bit of a side issue.
The disruption of supply lines in America for all manner of commercial goods was the first economic impact we noticed.
But not far behind that has been the realization of just how much of our own medicines and medical supplies, the very things needed most in this crisis, are produced in China and other places outside our borders.
Our dependence on China for rare earth minerals in our computer and defense industries has recently been highlighted again too.
So we can expect at least a partial reversal of decades of outsourcing our nation's domestic production to foreign lands.
Another hopeful sign is the turmoil in the European press over the fact that every single European nation has adopted essentially the same strategy in this crisis, namely a nationalistic strategy and actions such as the closing of borders.
limitations on travel by outsiders and foreigners, and a return of the recognition that government's first responsibility is to the citizens of the nation, not to some bogus concept of citizens of the world.
In fact, some talking heads in Europe are publicly worrying over the possibility that this crisis may quote-unquote jeopardize the European project.
Italy, for one, with the highest per capita infection rate in the world.
Doesn't feel it has received the kind of help from the EU that its coronavirus numbers would suggest that it deserves.
Into the breach have stepped China and now Russia, both of which have sent flights of medical supplies into Italy to bolster their international support and reputation.
And their efforts are proving successful.
In some locations in Italy, the European Union flag has been taken down at public buildings, and the flags of China and Russia put up in their place as a message to the EU.
So on this matter of jeopardizing the European project, well, to the extent that the European Union is firmly in the hands of white race traitors and our racial enemies, and has facilitated the non-white invasion of Europe at every turn, the destruction of the European project would obviously be a very good thing to come out of all of this.
A third excellent result is that the effective lockdown of the Mexican border has finally been accomplished, and demonstrated to be possible to the American people.
Illegal immigration has been severely reduced because of the measures taken against the spread of the virus, and asylum requests are not currently being entertained any longer.
All persons seeking asylum for whatever reason must now stay beyond our borders.
While that is surely a temporary situation, it's yet another good result that we can be thankful for.
Perhaps it will lead to long-term changes in our processes for dealing with the invasion from the South.
Additional possibilities for long-term changes to our overbearing, bloated, too-powerful government It's widely acknowledged that perceptions of initially slow and inept government response to the Wuhan-China virus crisis were due to over-regulation and unreasonable roadblocks at the Center for Disease Control and the Food and Drug Administration,
which strangled rapid development of any effective American coronavirus screening in January by the private sector after the CDC test was found not to work.
The overly complex and burdensome requirements of the FDA have also historically blocked pursuit of new and potentially effective drug development and testing, which makes pharmaceuticals in America so exorbitantly expensive in comparison to much of the world.
Recently, Trump signed Right to Try orders for treatment as a response to the epidemic.
And there has been a drop of regulatory burdens in many sectors of the economy to get resources and supplies where they need to go in a hurry.
If we are very lucky, many of these unnecessary restrictions on the innovation of America will not be coming back when the crisis has passed.
So, here's hoping.
Well, here's kind of hoping.
We may want these restrictions released permanently because they hamper American innovation and productivity.
However, this would actually help America remain stronger, longer, and therefore more viable as a country.
It could push off America's inevitable final days of weakness and decay.
So I wonder, which should we root for?
To the degree that we still emotionally identify as Americans, we want these problems solved.
However, the racial situation in America is irretrievable, and that means that America itself is now unsalvageable.
We have to remember that, as white racial patriots seeking a better world and future for our people.
We actually want this modern, irretrievably anti-white, anti-racist, corrupted, and thoroughly unserious and childish version of America that we suffer with today to become weaker, more bureaucratically diseased, more chaotic, and ultimately ineffectual enough to be moved out of our way.
Truly, we do need to be focused on what comes after America, and what it will take, one way or another, to get there.
Music playing.
And it's down along the fault road, it's very long to be.
Lying in the dark with the Provo Company.
A comrade on me left, aye, another one on me right.
A clip of ammunition for me little Arbolite.
I was stopped by a soldier.
He said you are a swine.
He hit me with his rifle and he kicked me in the groin.
I begged and I pleaded.
Oh, my manners were polite.
But all the time I'm thinking of me little Armalite And it's down in the box side, it's where I long to be Lying in the dark with the Provo Company A comrade on me left and another one on me right And a clip of ammunition for me little Armalite Well, man came marching up our street.
Six hundred pretty soldiers he had lined up at his feet.
Come out, you curly pinions!
Come on out and fight!
He cried, I'm only joking, when he heard the arm of life.
And it's down in Malachi, it's very long to be, lying in the dark with the Provo Company.
A comrade on me left and another one on me right.
A clip of ammunition for me left.
Little Arboline!
Well, the army came to visit me, it was in the early hours, with Saracens and Saladins and ferret-armoured chars.
They thought I had me cornered, but I gave them all the pride, with the armour-piercing bullets off me little arm alight.
And I stoned in the new lodge, it's where I long to be, lying in the dark with the Provo Company.
A comrade on me left and another one on me right A clip of ammunition for me little arm alive The generals, they had told him, we've got them on the run.
But corporals and privates, while on patrol at night, say remember narrow water and the bloody Armalite.
And it's down across my glen, it's where I long to be, lying in the dark with the Provo Company.
A comrade on me left and another one on me right, and a clip of ammunition for me little I have the duty of show integration and closeout this time.
And for my last segment, I want to offer some additional commentary to follow the Gretchen review that we've picked out for this episode of Radio Free Northwest.
Back about a decade ago, when I was on my intellectual journey that led me to white nationalism, and at my most determined to understand this world of ours and the societal and racial stupidity that I continued to see around me, and the source of the lies that I continued to hear, which I could ignore no longer, one of my favorite books that I came across to properly ground me in reality was Might is Right.
The full title of which is actually "Might is Right" or "The Survival of the Fittest." The spirit of "Might is Right" is reflected in many famous contemporary phrases with which we are all familiar, such as "Everyone loves a winner." "History is written by the victors." "To the victor go the spoils." And "Nothing succeeds like success." It is reflected in the message of the Athenians to the Melians.
Before the Athenians, having emerged victorious in battle, put all their men to the sword, enslaved their women and children, and wiped their country forever from the face of the earth.
The strong do as they will, the weak suffer what they must.
These are important truths, examples of which are found throughout human history.
We must always have these truths in mind when contemplating future political or military action to bring about the world that we want to see.
And, of course, the purported author Ragnar Redbeard, who professes his appreciation for accurate observation and rational thought, is quite naturally racially awakened and aware, as most of our people from his time indeed were.
Here is an excerpt on the supreme importance of the value of quality in the human races to the world.
And the way superior men view the most common dictates of government, which are usually designed for the utilitarian purpose of controlling and corralling the lowest and least capable.
No paternalistic governmental mechanism, however theoretically perfect, can ever keep the base-born and the well-born, the thoroughbreds and the hybrids, in a state of perpetual equilibrium.
You might as well try to bind down an earthquake with hoop iron.
As to rule the strong with "Be it enacted." Be it enacted's were invented only to frighten captives with.
What power on earth can permanently keep the negro on a parody with the Anglo-Saxon?
The strong must have their way in spite of all puritanic proscribings, all mock moralisms, all degrading legalisms, all constitutional covenantings.
Neither the machinery nor the raw materialism of equality has ever existed.
Only the dream, the idea of it, equality, in that one word is summed up the accumulated dementia of two thousand years.
The thought of it was born in the brain of an inferior organism, and the brains of inferior organisms nourish it still.
This passage shows, once again, that the equality argument, the unholy intellectual spawn of the instinctive communistic levelers, has been around to plague the white man's superior and meritocratic societies for a long time.
And obviously, we are not talking about equality before the law, which I continue to believe is one of the most valuable social and governmental innovations the white man has ever invented.
We are talking the foolishness of an imaginary physical and mental equality of individuals that has never existed, as well as the communist slaver's call for equality of outcome, equality of condition.
Equality of worldly results.
This, despite the well-proven reality, that the imposition of equality of result only ever moves things in one direction, downward.
Here's another excerpt.
"He that is slow to believe anything and everything is of great understanding.
For belief in one false principle is the beginning of all unwisdom.
The chief duty of every age is to upraise new men to determine its liberties.
To lead it toward material success.
To rend, as it were, the rusty padlocks and chains of dead custom that always prevent healthy expansion.
Theories and ideals and constitutions that may have meant life and hope for our ancestors may now mean destruction and slavery and dishonor to us.
As environments change, no human ideal can standeth sure.
wherever therefore lie has built unto itself a throne let it be assailed without pity and without regret for under the domination of a falsehood no nation can permanently Well, that sounds precisely like the conditions we labor under today, where anti-racism and the dogma of false equality rule the land.
A small cautionary word for the religious, and more specifically Christians, among our folk.
The author of Might is Right sees religion as a soporific, a drug that dulls the senses, deadens the mind and spirit, and saps otherwise superior men and women of moral strength and the crucial impulse to dominate that he says is demanded by the raw and unforgiving circumstance of existence.
You will likely not care for that aspect.
However, as with all things, if you can look past what displeases you for the gold nuggets that are of greatest use and value, I can't imagine you will not appreciate much of what is on offer in this book.
As for me, I don't fully subscribe to everything contained in it.
However, I will say that I have always been highly annoyed by the religious concept of being in the world but not of the world, an attitude which can cause otherwise valuable people to ignore real and important problems because they find them too "worldly" for their proper consideration and As the saying goes, all that is necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing.
And we have had far too much of good white men and women doing nothing in the face of increasing social impositions and racial aggression against us.
We need people fully in this world, and not mentally and philosophically detached from it because of religion or any other reason.
The tragedy and chaos of the collapsing racial order is unfolding here, now, on this earth, and in front of us, and it demands our proper, full attention.
The act of creation requires that an empty space be clear so that human ingenuity and talent can be poured into that space, allowing something new to arise.
That is the entire philosophy behind our desire to one day see the dead and rotting corpse of an anti-white and Jew-murdered America hauled off for disposal in order to make room for the Northwest American Republic which is to follow.
When I want to usefully and enjoyably get back in touch with my most angry, cynical, and space-clearing, destructive self, I enjoy returning to might makes right.
Hatred, rage, and contempt, of course, are not mental spaces where we should routinely live, but neither are they emotions to unrealistically always try to avoid the way weak, unmanly, and completely hypocritical leftists say they are.
After all, leftists rarely hesitate to send their own rage and hatred in our direction.
They deserve the same back, and we should all be able to gin those emotions up for ourselves when circumstances warrant.
The philosophical perspectives contained in Might Makes Right make that all the easier, and I highly recommend it.
It is not an essay, so it is not short, but neither is it overly long, and it is one of the more famous historical works of social and political subversion, and somewhat fascinating for its backstory and its reputation.
It is well worth your time.
The version I have from Dill Pickle Press, edited by Daryl W. Condor, which claims to offer the full and unabridged text, and has numerous insightful and helpful footnotes throughout, seems to have been purged from Amazon.
But interestingly, I found it online through Target, of all retailers, and for a token sum of about $7, which I consider a steal, and I will include a link to that in the show description so you can check it out.
Okay, I think that everyone is pretty much sick of talking and thinking about the thrice-damned Chinese coronavirus and what we're all being put through right now because of damned lying communists once again.
So it's time to wrap up.
That's it for this episode of Radio Free Northwest.
As always, we've enjoyed having you alongside us this week, working together for a better future for our kind.
Stay safe, stay healthy, and stay committed, and we'll talk again with you next time.
Radio Free Northwest is brought to you by the Northwest Front.
P.O. Box 21933, Seattle, Washington, 98111.
You can visit the party on our website at www.northwestfront.org.
Until next time, comrades, hail victory!
▲
Export Selection