All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 4, 2018 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
39:03
20181004_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush, O 'Farrell, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by Readings
from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
The date is Thursday, October 4th, 2018.
I'm Andy Donner, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Radio Free Northwest The rising of the moon And the rising of the moon And the rising of the moon And a thousand cliffs were flashing And the rising of the moon We've got another short one for you today, but hopefully you'll find this edifying.
For starters, someone has asked me to comment on Twitter's censoring of the party website domain name, and yeah, that's going on.
It started at the very, very beginning of July this year, and since then it's proven impossible to tweet anything containing northwestfront.org.
And yes, there are ways around that, but this does bear remarking on at least somewhat.
I'm actually deeply troubled by this, not because, oh no, the party website has been censored.
The reason for which the party website has been censored is very, very concerning.
When you attempt to tweet anything with the party website in it, you're told that your request appears to be automated.
Yeah, sure, censorship is nothing new to a white nationalist, but this?
After how many years of Harold, myself, and others tweeting things containing northwestfront.org?
There's an actual problem here, and the actual problem is that the reason given, that is, automation, is patently false.
Okay, look, lying is nothing new to our enemies, but this sets a bad precedent, and the precedent being set is that a social media platform may choose to classify your speech in such a way that allows them to effectively block it without claiming that you're violating terms of service.
not having the guts to just straight up say, this website is hate speech, or this website is censored on the basis that we don't like it.
It's that Twitter has taken it upon themselves to represent our opinions as, Again, that's just not the right way to phrase this.
Having stopped myself and thought about this a little bit more, it occurs to me the right way to express my concern is.
Twitter, instead of just censoring us or saying we're hating or whatever, has decided That they can represent us.
Now, I can hear a few of you asking already, Andy, what are you talking about?
They're not misrepresenting you.
They're not representing you at all.
They're just muting you.
Well, that's not quite right, because a mute is a mute and a ban is a ban.
Classifying us as something other than what we are is, in effect, representing us.
What they do as a consequence of that is somewhat secondary, simply because this is, in effect, Twitter assigning us a label and not quite putting words in our mouth that indicate, oh, you don't need to take these people seriously because they are robots or whatever.
This is a little bit like YouTube putting tags under certain movies that are not left of center, linking to Wikipedia articles or other sources that contradict the non-politically correct content in said videos.
This is very much like YouTube recently slapping labels and tags under videos that are right-of-center, linking to Wikipedia articles and other sources that disagree with whatever non-politically correct content is in these videos.
Slapping the label a liar on someone is almost as bad as what Twitter's doing to us because they're slapping the label robot on me.
Okay, in my case, that might make a certain amount of sense, but jokes aside, this is an issue.
And it's a very serious issue because we don't know how far other websites are going to take this or if Twitter will step it up and say quite literally anything right of center is somehow artificial content or fits into another classification that should be ignored or blocked or hidden for whatever other reason they choose.
Now, yes, this is still censorship, but the fact of the matter is that it's more vicious because instead of saying this is hate content or, again, whatever nonsense someone wants to say about white nationalism, instead what Twitter is doing is actually classifying our speech in such a way that other people are very likely to simply pass it by.
I will continue to monitor the situation and provide updates.
As I said, at this time there's no way to tell how far this will go or who else it will be subjected to.
Now let me know in the comments, guys, if you've heard of this happening to anybody else, because I would be very interested to see what other ways this tactic has been used to silence people.
Music Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be uploading the third installment of my Last Box tribute.
Now, this book is entitled The Jewish Threat, Anti-Semitic Policies of the U.S. Army by Joseph W. Bendersky.
Now, this is a historical treatise by someone who, judging from the name and the subject matter, is most likely a Russian Jew who wants to discuss the history of anti-Semitism in the U.S. Army.
Now, this is especially with regard to the era between 1900 and even into the early 60s, when many of the old guard wasps were elderly codgers, so to speak.
Now, the author is interested in various lectures given at the Army War College, especially those that were taking place in the heyday of those sorts of ideas back in the 1920s.
And this was a time when concerns were being raised as to the future of North America, especially with regards to the United States.
In this case, there was a concern that there were too many Eastern European Jews that were coming in, and also was more of a side note, perhaps also Eastern and Southern Europeans in general.
And this was a fear having to do with the original character of the states.
Now, of course, by the early 1960s, the concern about Eastern and even Southern Europeans did go out of vogue.
And, of course, it had shifted to the concern about Third World migration.
And this book, this author, really tries to find the most extreme examples of anti-Semitism and also supremacy within the U.S. Army.
One of the most notable examples, although it's a somewhat Latter-day example, and therefore somewhat atypical regarding Latter-day, talking about General Charles A. Willoughby.
And even after the Second World War, when this kind of thing was clearly on the wane, Because by the 1930s, you had a more environmental assessment of populations and individuals that was coming into vogue.
Now, Willoughby was actually descended from German aristocracy, not surprisingly.
And he was really at such a point, one would wonder why he even wants to be in the American military or even American at all.
He's a Franco supporter.
He's a fan of Haushofer.
And he likes to talk about the battle between the Saxon and the Cossack.
Now, he was a friend of John Beattie, who was somewhat more what we might term on point in terms of he was more focused on anti-Khazar.
Now, this Willoughby, he was of a mindset that he sent congratulations to Donitz when his prison term was up.
And he was also a supporter of Walter Beecher, a National Socialist who managed to get elected in the Bavarian Legislature after World War II.
So kind of like an early David Duke character, I suppose.
Now, in this respect, Willoughby was much the same as Amos Fries and General Van Horn Mosley.
Who really saw the Reich as a savior of civilization and was for eugenics.
I don't know if that was any relation to, you know, mostly England.
Perhaps not.
Perhaps just a coincidence.
It also...
Seems that even though in the 1930s there was already a movement towards notion of individuals and environmental differences as being the main driver for individual motivations and temperament, as I say, it does seem that the military was a bit behind the fashion in these notions.
In a way, I suppose you can speculate as to why.
I mean, it would be rather hard to make any predictions when you're talking about differential home environments, for example.
It's rather hard to take that and bring that into an understanding of geopolitics.
There's just too much variation.
On the other hand, if you want to theorize that the Russians, for example, are less able to engage in self-rule due to Asian admixture, and you say, for example, that the Poles are likely to be less Asian than the Russians, but you do fear that Poles, for example, could be the prey to Khazars, then you have much more of a basis for generalized discussion.
One interesting controversy that was brought up in this book, specifically with regard to World War II, because that is a central feature in this book even when it's not explicitly mentioned, is the question of these railways, especially railways to Auschwitz, and the fact that they were never bombed.
Now, one argument for avoiding these railways was that The forces would have been diverted from other important missions and that winning the war was the most important thing.
There was also a discussion of a fear that prisoners could end up dying in these raids.
But on the other hand, it was feared that late in the war, which was when these bombings might have taken place, they were probably going to be killed anyway.
So there were ethical arguments about this, but...
The author points out that by 1944, they did have long-range bombers that did actually strike very close to Auschwitz.
So the author is essentially arguing that the military taught brass.
Really, they essentially were very anti-Semitic, and that's why they didn't actually bomb Auschwitz.
Another interesting fact, though, about the military...
In contrast to that, in contrast to what the top brass was thinking and doing, was that even back in those days, the demographics of the U.S. military was already changing.
And in actual fact, the author does point out that there were many Jewish enlisted soldiers, for example, in the military in some capacity.
Now, it was said that they tended to avoid combat, so maybe they went into non-combat roles in some cases, but it really states that there were a lot more than anyone assumed.
Also, very much inherent in this book is the question of to what extent Jews were involved in the communist movement.
Now, there is a cliche that Jews and Bolsheviks were almost synonymous, but this book points out that many Jews were essentially Mensheviks rather than Bolshevik.
And it reminds us that all of this involvement with communism, that they would have essentially been apostate Jews.
Also, too, after a while, communism, and especially Stalin and Stalinism, It begins to see that the Jews are very much attracted to Zionism, and the real sort of authentic communists saw this as way too nationalistic and retro.
And so when you read this book, and it's talking about all this anti-Semitism and anti-communism, it is possible to better understand The delusion that was supposedly suffered by Hitler in the last days of the war, this idea that somehow the Allies were going to take his side to fight communism.
Personally, I must admit that I've never really taken very strongly to any notion that anybody seriously in those days had the belief that America was going to suddenly switch sides.
That just is...
I mean, they fight a war, they're bombing cities day and night, and then suddenly they're going to switch sides.
It just doesn't make any sense to me.
Now, the army, it's true, they might have been somewhat anti-Semitic in some cases, but you do have to understand that the army does serve at the pleasure of the government.
And that was certainly with Roosevelt and, of course, also surreptitiously with the Rothschilds.
Now, take Patton, for example.
He was a sympathizer to some extent with the National Socialists, and certainly this may have been for the cause of the expertise, the fact that there were so many experts who were National Socialists.
As much as for ideological reasons, but at any rate, generals, of course, they do carry out orders, and even though Patton was uncomfortable with the whole denazification interrogation techniques, he was ultimately replaced by another general by the name of Two Scout, who would have no misgivings about such interrogation processes.
And also, too, you have to realize that by the 1960s, you had more up-and-comers in the military, such as a Jewish individual by the name of Hertzberg, who would take an active interest in integration.
So, definitely a book about very much historical, very much about days gone by.
And it's a very long book, I have to admit.
It's a rather tedious book in some sense.
It's not going to be concise.
So at any rate, the title is The Jewish Threat to Anti-Semitic Policies of the U.S. Army by Joseph W. Benderski.
So I hope you found this discussion interesting.
Have a good evening and hail victory comrades.
Music by Ben Thede A few weeks back, someone left a comment that may or may not have been a heckle regarding my theorycraft presentation, which I replayed on a recent RFN episode.
What they said was more or less that I remind them of a white nationalist version of Trotsky preaching an odd brand of white nationalism to the unwashed masses.
If you're going to compare me to a communist, could you at least do Lenin?
That's more where my aspirations are.
But anyway.
My first reaction was to classify that as another of these non-criticisms I don't really need to deal with and move on, but my gut told me, no, I should rethink that, and I did.
Now, even if this was a heckle, there's actually an important point in there that I would very much like to discuss with you all.
And by the by, I have no indication someone meant that to be a heckle or an insult or whatever, just an observation.
And regardless, thank you whoever you were, because I actually need to give a very important talk.
But first, I'm going to replay a bit of Harold Covington from the archives for you.
This segment is being pulled from the September 23rd, 2010 Q&A two-hour special episode of Radio Free Northwest.
In it, Harold discusses precisely what makes the Northwest Front different.
In response to the probably-not-heckle I received, what I need to talk to you all about is that, yes, actually, the Northwest Front does come across as very odd, and I actually think there's a reason why.
But before I get into that, here's some Herald for you.
Okay, moving right along here.
Next question.
What makes the Northwest Front different from all these other groups?
A legitimate question in view of the fact that, as yet, our listenership consists mostly of people who have some movement experience and who've been burned by previous fearless leaders.
Well, actually, a lot of things make the NF different from all the others, and I'll do my best to hit the high points.
First and foremost, the Northwest Front has a plan.
It's called the Butler Plan, and it's in the party manual, the white book.
The others don't have a plan.
None of them, at all.
Northwest Front, plan.
All of the others, no plan.
It's that damn simple.
Are we clear on this now?
Good.
That's the first thing that makes us different.
The second thing that makes the Northwest Front different from all the others is that our group is deed-based rather than word-based.
All the other groups' central purpose or litmus test or reason for being is based on something that you say.
The Northwest Front is based on something that you do, specifically coming here to the Pacific Northwest to make your life here and to join in the struggle for a sovereign and independent white nation.
These other so-called white groups, those that are left anyway these days, demand that you fill out a form and or pay so much money per month and then you're in like Flint.
Now, we demand of our people that they commit a completely legal physical act, specifically that they come here to the Northwest.
Other organizations have membership cards.
With the Northwest Front, your membership card is your zip code.
The rest of the movement responds to this existential crisis of civilization our race is facing by tap-tap-tap-tapping on a computer keyboard and, maybe once in a blue moon, having a little meeting in a rented motel banquet room where they eat rubber chicken served by Mexican and nigger waiters, where they can stand up and whine about how bad things are and pass around a few books and pamphlets describing the Jewish world conspiracy, so forth and so on.
The same information that was available 50 years ago.
The same thing we were doing 50 years ago.
Except not nearly so many people at the rubber chicken dinners these days.
Meet, eat, and retreat, and then shuffle out into the darkness while the third world waiters clear away the debris and set the table for the Rotary Club luncheon tomorrow.
That's it, the whole John Burt Society shtick.
That's all the existing movement is doing about our impending racial extinction.
Unless you want to count posting a lot of deranged and childish rubbish on V-bullets and internet forums, which I don't.
Now, there's something else that makes the Northwest Front different from the rest, a mindset that I've discussed before, but I'll give it another whack.
Throughout the so-called movement, deeply embedded therein, there runs a streak of profound and overpowering defeatism.
The terrible fact is that most of us have accepted in our own mind that our race is completely doomed.
That there is nothing that can actually be done to save our people or Western civilization, and that any attempt to try is foredoomed and very dangerous.
The Northwest Front rejects that, absolutely.
I say again that our whole strategy is based on one primary actual physical act, a deed, which, although it's perfectly legal, will eventually lead to revolution, because in addition to its strategic and tactical value, Homecoming produces a profound moral and psychological victory.
It breaks the pattern of passive acceptance and gets white people back into the habit of doing rather than saying.
It puts an end to the interminable tap, tap, tap, tap, tap.
At least it will do if we can fix our character problem.
Now, there's something else.
Growing out of this sense of hopeless defeatism...
There is also, some of us think, some kind of tacit agreement that we have with Zog.
This is especially common among the so-called leaders in the existing movement, such as they are and such as it is.
You see, these people know in their hearts that they don't really mean it, and they think that Zog knows and accepts that as well, and so will refrain from crushing them just so long as we don't actually rock the boat.
Well, they're half right.
Let's be honest, guys.
Collectively speaking, most of us don't really I mean, come on.
For once, let's tell it like it is.
If we meant any of this, we wouldn't be babbling about it on the internet.
We'd be out there in the real world doing real things.
Barefoot Iraqis and Afghans with nothing but an AK-47 and a couple of magazines can fight against the same tyrant who oppresses us and they do so with success.
We can't, apparently.
These people that we despise and whom we call ragheads and sand niggers will fight.
We won't.
The difference is simple.
They believe.
We don't.
It's time we looked a brutal fact in the face.
None of us feels sufficiently strongly about our so-called racial ideals to place our physical bodies at risk of death, prison, pain, or even moderately uncomfortable physical exercise.
We know that life for our children and grandchildren is going to be a hell that we cannot even imagine.
And we do nothing about it because it's too hard and too dangerous, the armchair is too soft, the beer is too cold, and the nachos are too salty and tasty.
And we're just going to do like our own grandfathers and our own fathers did.
We're just going to sit back, enjoy the ride as much as we can, and we're going to let our children and our grandchildren fend for themselves.
That's been the unspoken movement attitude for 50 years.
And then along comes this horrible Northwest migration led by the horrible Harold.
For the first time, we have a chance to change ourselves inside by adopting a simple program, the Butler Plan, and just acting on it.
Really doing it, and not just talking about it.
It's safe and it's legal.
The only danger is economic, and that can be avoided as well with a little effort in advanced planning.
Now, laying aside the merits of the idea itself for the moment, what is the Northwest migration?
It is first and foremost an act.
It involves physical motion, doing physical things like packing one's possessions into a van, driving up an interstate highway to the Northwest homeland, not sitting behind a computer screen and playing in the artificial virtual movement that exists on the V-bulletin boards and the internet forums.
These acts are not of themselves illegal.
The Northwest novels are fiction.
There's no NVA yet.
In real life, no one's asking you to shoot anybody or detonate a bomb or break a single law that will get you in trouble.
Northwest migration is completely lawful, and once the preliminary hurdles are overcome, it's actually in your self-interest since the Northwest is one of the very few remaining decent places to live on this continent.
As an aside, I have yet to hear of anyone leaving here once they get properly settled in and established.
I've heard of people turning down six-figure salaries rather than relocate from the Northwest back to California or Chicago.
But at the risk of repeating myself to the point of boring you, I cannot emphasize enough that the precedent of doing rather than talking is what makes us different.
Somehow, down through the years, we have bought into this false idea that knowledge alone is enough.
How many times have we heard this business about, well, we have to educate our own people, and when this or that happens, it'll wake white people up.
Okay, but once you get white people awake, what then?
The one thing that distinguishes the American racial right above all things is that it is almost completely devoid of action of any kind.
We have spent the past 60 years trying to fight against this terrible evil with nothing but words, and it clearly isn't working.
We have to somehow break out of this paralyzed mindset that prevents us from acting.
The Northwest Front is the beginning of that process, and this is what makes us different.
And I'm back.
Okay, look.
Before I really get going, I need to let you know that my schedule this week has been unexpectedly tight, and I'm sort of out of time.
I've got to get this cut, edited, and uploaded.
Even so, that's probably good, because I'd like this talk to be shorter rather than longer.
I'll try and hit the high points, and give you guys time to digest the material.
Just so I'm clear, I actually take the remark spawning this presentation to be positive.
Even if it wasn't, it is somewhat accurate.
It was made in response to my TheoryCraft Part 1 presentation, and if memory serves, I was particularly tired when I recorded it, and I probably could have done a better job.
Even so, I actually like that it's dry because I want someone to think about the content and rather whether or not it feels good to listen to, as odd as that sounds.
Now, as to whether or not the NF comes across as odd, Well, yes, there are reasons for that, and some of them are very good.
Now, others, yeah, I could stand to improve my presentation.
I am trying to do more ad-libbing and more helpful as well as easier to listen to content, and I hope I'm getting better at that.
Seriously, if anybody wants to comment on that, well, this might be the episode to do so.
But anyway, on with the main point of the show.
As I said, I do take the feedback I was given very seriously, because even if it was a heckle, there's actually something important I need to talk about.
Yes, the Northwest Front would most definitely come across as bizarre, odd, or strange, even in the world of white nationalism.
But let's unpack that.
Now, first and foremost, yes, we are very, very different, as I proved, by playing an old cut of Harold.
And that's actually one of my favorite cuts of his from back in the day.
Now, that difference should not be understated.
In fact, it should be emphasized.
And the reason it should be emphasized is that there's a good reason for it.
The difference is, first and foremost, we are mission-based, and we have a plan, and we intend to bring the NAR into existence.
That's the only solution to white genocide.
Always has been, always will be.
And that's where everyone else in the movement falls down.
And no, I'm not trying to pick on people, or shame them, or mock them.
That's just the reality.
There is no other plan.
As such, The NF comes across as very different because we don't do any of the other things that people are taught to expect by everyone else in the movement.
And what that means is that when they come to us and receive whatever initial presentation they do receive from us, they genuinely don't know what to make of it, and I'll get into the reasons why that is in a moment.
I had planned to spend much more time on this particular point, but in my abbreviated form, I will at least say this.
What we do isn't like anything else in the movement.
The very first thing you'll notice about that is we don't tell you to go to stupid rallies where you'll get yourself outed and fired from your job and so on and so forth.
Now, that's not just because of the security risk or the risks to individuals, it's because the actual methods required to bring about change don't call for those activities to begin with.
True, this is somewhat unfair of me to say here because I'm attaching no explanation whatsoever, but...
Take my word for it and listen to some back RFNs, and I'm sure you'll come into that material.
Another thing the Northwest Front absolutely does not do, unless it's absolutely necessary, is news commentary.
Now, news commentary is the staple of the right wing in all of its various manifestations and is the bread and butter of white nationalism.
For some reason, it's incredibly popular and is considered...
Utterly important, at the cost of everything else, to do nothing but state and restate the problem in various permutations over various decades, using various news clippings so that we can all cry to each other about how bad things are and when are people going to wake up and how bad does it have to get before people act and so on and so forth.
Now, bear in mind, the Northwest Front actually wants you to take legal action that will put you in a position to assist with actually stopping white genocide.
For some reason, whenever anyone goes anywhere near discussing actually doing something with these beliefs, even if it's legal and to their personal benefit, the whole thing shuts down and it's characterized as, well, again, odd.
Now, sometimes the Northwest Front is correctly critiqued for being odd, even if it's odd for the right reasons, and other times a lot of the, oh, you guys are just weird, is, well, precisely what I just made it sound like.
In addition to the obvious concern that the Northwest Front doesn't really do any of the other things that other white nationalists do, there's actually a more fundamental and long-standing difference between the NF and everyone else, and I don't just mean the Butler Plan.
This actually has to do with what you might call two different categories that just about every white nationalist falls in, the egghead and the skinhead.
Over a period of decades, white nationalism kind of stratified itself into eggheads and skinheads.
And the eggheads, well, they might be the types like Dr. William Luther Pierce.
Now, as great as he was, it was also well known that unless you had two college degrees on your wall, he wouldn't want to know you.
Now, that's obviously wrong.
And it's wrong.
Not just because it rejects otherwise perfectly good comrades that happen to have not attained the heights of academia that others might have, but it's wrong because it's the realm of theorycraft.
The egghead wing of the movement are the pseudo-intellectuals that love to hash and rehash and re-rehash all of the various problems and all of the various attempts at solving the problem that never succeeded and why they didn't succeed and so on and so forth.
You see where this is going.
Like I said, it's probably best that this is going to be an abbreviated talk.
And as bad as I'm making the egghead sound, wait, there's more.
It's obvious the Northwest Front doesn't fit into the egghead scene because we don't do the whole theorycraft.
We've done enough theorycrafting.
It's time to actually act on it.
I'm about to make the skinheads seem even worse, and trust me, skins, that's nothing personal.
It's just that the NF has had periodic run-ins with skinheads over precisely the same issues, but in reverse, as we've had run-ins with the eggheads.
Now, here's what I mean by that.
Where the eggheads do nothing, the skinheads do all the wrong things.
Skinheads are the gotta-do-something-where's-the-action-at end of white nationalism.
Now look, as great as these people can be as individuals, that particular subculture isn't nearly as white nationalist as you would think it is.
In fact, it actually started as the very, very low end of the working class communist type stuff over in Europe, but that's a talk for another day.
Ultimately, responsible white nationalists end up leaving that scene and rejoining the rest of society when they decide to be productive.
Now look, Skins, I'm not trying to pick on you.
That's kind of just how this is.
Clearly, though, you can tell, if you're listening carefully, that the Northwest Front doesn't fit in either of these categories because we want you to do one specific thing that is actually geared towards permanently ending white genocide and creating a white ethnostate on the North American continent.
And that leads me to my overall thrust for this particular episode.
There are, as yet, these two types of white nationalists, but neither one is at home with the Butler Plan or the Northwest Imperative.
And that is probably the real reason we actually come across as odd.
I admit it.
That's kind of the situation we've put ourselves in.
To put that in a more clear and more relatable fashion, the Northwest Front comes across as odd because we don't hand out the usual sorts of validation that most white nationalists expect.
Like I said, nobody's quite at home in this unless they're actually participating.
So, if you want to be at home with the Northwest Imperative, you will actually need to participate, but that's for another time.
I always make it a point to give everyone at least one takeaway every time we produce a new episode of RFN, and if I had to specify a takeaway for this, it's that you should all endeavor to reject the unearned validation that the rest of white nationalism will give you merely for showing up.
Harold put it best, just about every other episode of Radio Free Northwest over a period of years, that to truly be a white nationalist, you need to contribute with something constructive other than words.
And that is probably the underlying reason that the Northwest Front comes across as strange.
Nobody else makes any expectation.
Or any claim of any expectation on you other than that you keep tuning in week after week and make sure to catch the latest white nationalist gossip or the latest news analysis or whatever else.
The pinnacle of this was probably the unearned validation that the alt-right offered everyone.
Now briefly, I'll touch on the election of Trump.
I had an interesting conversation about this and several other things recently with the rest of the headquarters group here in the homeland.
Trump might actually be one of the worst things that ever happened to white nationalism in the long run simply because it gave everyone voting for him the illusion that they had some sort of political power.
Incidentally, that exact phenomenon is the thing the Northwest Front has been trying to warn you all about for many, many years.
System politics ultimately will not save us.
But again, that's for another time.
Very recently, prior to his death, Harold and I were asked a very, very odd question.
Well, odd from our perspective, maybe not the rest of white nationalisms, but anyway, odd from our perspective question over Twitter.
In talking about serious political activity and what it would take to actually secure an existence for our people and a future for white children, a very, very young alt-writer point-blank asked us, Isn't he helping move white nationalism forward just by being part of white nationalism?
And anybody listening to RFN for any length of time should know the answer to that is absolutely not, but Harold and I had to stop and explain this to him.
I can't imagine we came across as anything less than very, very odd, simply because up until that point in time, that young kid and every young kid like him had been just accepted for showing up.
It's the political equivalent of a participation trophy, and that's not what the white nationalist movement needs.
Even if the Northwest Imperative and the Butler Plan were to never have existed, the white nationalist movement doesn't need to give itself that sort of validation.
It needs to kick whatever is keeping it from solving the character problem.
It will never encounter that, as long as everybody in the white nationalist movement agrees to give each other whatever validation they want simply because somebody decided it's good to give mental assent to the basic facts of race and the Jews and things like that.
No, no, the Northwest Front patently rejects that, and that is the reason we come across as odd.
Serious question, guys.
When are we going to decide to take charge of our own characters and stop accepting unearned validation?
For young men especially, that is kryptonite to your Aryan soul.
Think on that, and I'll shut up about this now.
Now before I close this short episode of RFN Out, I do need to make one quick announcement.
Those of us dealing with the transition here in the headquarters group are very busy right now, and in preparation for some upcoming tasks and administrative needs, I've made the decision that we're going to do a whole lot less new content for at least the next month on Radio Free Northwest.
Now, our regular contributors do send in material, and for that, I am grateful.
I will try and cut their material in as best I can.
The one thing I didn't want to have happen is for us to seem as though we're haphazard or unorganized or doing things by the seat of our pants here.
That's not the case, and I figured it's best if I just level with you all up front.
Thank you for your understanding.
That's all the time we've got for today.
Radio Free Northwest is brought to you by the Northwest Front.
P.O. Box 2188 Bremerton, Washington 98310 Or you can visit the party's website at www.northwestfront.org Until next week, freedom!
▲
Export Selection