All Episodes
Previous Next
May 25, 2017 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:00:25
20170525_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush your vocal, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
In the old spot by the river, rightful known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token whistle, up the marching tune.
Warrior pike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
With your eyes upon your shoulder By the rising of the moon Out from many a mud wall Cabin eyes were watching through the night Many a man they chest was throbbing For the blessed warning light The waters passed along the valleys Like the man she's lonely crew And a thousand blades were flashing At the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon And a thousand
blades were flashing At the rising of the moon It's May the 25th, 2017.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Okay, I got an interesting email last week from a kid of about 18 named Rodney in Texas who has decided that he's a fan of mine, and so he's digging up everything he can find on me on the internet, and also he's reading the H.A. Covington blog extensively, which I'm using as a kind of HAC classic reprint site where I'm reposting a lot of my older stuff from the past 20 years.
After immersing himself in what I suppose might be called Herald World for a while, he's actually managed to ask some seriously intelligent questions, one of them being, Dear HAC, it looks like you've been going at this white nationalism thing for many years, and you've never even been arrested.
Well, that's not quite true.
I'll get into that in a bit.
Anyway, that's quite a trick, considering the five books you wrote advocating the overthrow of the United States government by force and violence, which is supposed to be a criminal offense.
How the hell have you gotten away with saying what you're saying for all these years?
Okay, first off, Rod, yes, I have been arrested on several occasions in the past, four times specifically, three of them actually on paper.
I once received a nine-month suspended prison sentence for unauthorized political activity, but it was not in this country.
It's true, I've never spent a night in jail.
The first time I was busted was in 1973, when I was arrested for chaining myself to the White House fence during a Rudolf Hess protest, and I paid a $10 forfeiture on that.
The other stuff was just a long-involved story.
In point of fact, I do not have the kind of perfect record that, say, Dr. Pierce has.
So far as I know, he was never arrested at all, which is actually very rare for one of us.
And secondly, Rod, I may not have gotten away with it.
Yet.
The fat lady hasn't sung yet, and she won't until I croak.
This, what I'm doing here, could go bad at any time.
All it would take would be some hose-nosed or mungoyer bitch in a Hillary Pantsuit somewhere inside the J. Edgar building in D.C. to get pissed off over something I say on here and scream to the Bureau office in Seattle to take me out.
So they fabricate some audio that supposedly has me hiring a hitman, or else they just plant something on me.
I mean, really, who's going to stop them?
That's one of the things about the so-called justice system in this country.
When push comes to shove, the government and the courts and the police and federal law enforcement are just going to do whatever the hell they want.
And unless you are very, very, very rich, indeed, and you can afford a Johnny Cochran-style dream team, there's really not much can be done to stop them.
Anyway, tomorrow morning at dawn, my door could be kicked in and I could be dragged away and thrown into the cell next to Bill White.
Or I could be just murdered for having wicked thoughts in my mind, like Jeff Hughes or Edgar Steele.
Or Lavoie Finnicum, or Michael Hastings, or Kathy Ainsworth, or Vicki Weaver, or that Chesson guy the FBI murdered in his apartment in Orlando, firing six shots into him when he was lying on the floor, and then a seventh bullet into his brain, all of which was perfectly illegal under the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011, yada, yada, yada.
But, look, I think that's a legitimate question from Rodney.
Not so much having to do with how I have escaped serious arrested charges, but how you guys can escape arrest when you take up where I leave off, as some of you will.
So it's time for another installment of How to Do This Yourselves 101.
So, in the increasingly repressive world of Obama's America, and yes, this is most definitely Obama's America still, How do you exercise your First Amendment rights up to and including open discussion of the struggle that dare not speak its name?
How do you think and say things that the dictatorship doesn't want you thinking and saying and live to tell the tale?
How do you discuss serious subject matter, like what actually we need to do about all this, and not be murdered or beaten into submission by the United States?
Have you guys ever heard of the bizarre sport of snake-sitting?
That used to be popular many years ago, and when I looked it up on the internet just now, I found to my amazement that some people still do it.
That's when some idiot, invariably white, sits in a room or a big glass case in a zoo with 20 or 30 or 60 venomous snakes for days and weeks at a time.
In order to get into the Guinness Book of World Records.
Now, these people get like an hour's break once a day to eat and go to the bathroom or something like that, and for the rest of the day, they just sit in the room with all of these poisonous snakes and hope they don't get bitten.
And sometimes they do get bitten and they die.
Yeah, I know it's crazy, but what can I tell you?
White people do crazy things.
Now, what we do in our wee little movement is like snake sitting.
We have to exist and try to function in a kind of glass case surrounded by venomous reptiles whose bite can kill us and sometimes does.
There's apparently an art to playing that particular silly game and surviving.
You have to know the snakes and their habits.
You have to be able to recognize the signs when a cobra or a puffatter is getting irritated or grouchy.
You have to avoid sudden movements.
But still, they can suddenly just decide to strike at you for whatever reasons occur to them in their little reptilian brains.
More often than not, the reason a snake sitter gets bitten has nothing at all to do with any action on his part.
The snake just strikes.
It's now an open secret that all emails and cell phone calls sent in this country and throughout the Western world are intercepted by the NSA and archived in two huge facilities, one in West Virginia and one in Utah.
Obviously, no secret police agency has the manpower to read or listen to all that internet, so they use automatic computer scanning programs, what used to be called packet-sniffing software back in the day of the dinosaurs, to detect certain forbidden words and combinations of words expressing forbidden thoughts.
When you tap out your first forbidden N-word in an email, or when you make your first politically incorrect post on Facebook, or send your first tweet with an image of a frog, or when your IP address is detected as listening to this podcast, you're automatically flagged by the NSA through their computer algorithms and from then on you're on the list.
You're in the big glass room with the snakes slithering around you.
Now, from then on, the trick is not to attract their attention or irritate them to the point where they strike at you with their poison fangs.
Now, let me digress a little here.
Don't worry, there is a point.
Very much oversimplified, it used to be that back in the day when J. Edgar Hoover and some of his early successors were in charge, there was kind of an unwritten agreement between us and the Bureau.
We could...
Say anything we wanted out in a cow pasture, but any kind of overt physical act that might lead to someone with wealth and power being annoyed in some way would result in prison or defunctionalization.
That was the old way the system used to deal with us, especially in Britain and Canada.
We were told by the powers that be, you may exist, but you may not function.
But since the internet came into being, a number of things have happened.
For one thing, the dictatorship has lost its monopoly of information it once had when all the mass media were under control.
It used to be that all ideas and information were disseminated into the white population from the top down.
Back in the days of my youth, there were only three television networks and two newspapers per city one morning and one evening.
To a degree, young people today would find unbelievable.
This enabled the power structure to more or less completely control what everybody thought and believed.
Nowadays, they've lost control of the flow of information and ideas.
Lateral communication between white people is going on all the time, and the old media are frothing at the mouth in rage and fear and loathing at the loss of their power.
This power of the controlled media constituted the actual chains and shackles that held our people in bondage, and now it's gone.
The cage door has been opened, and people and snakes are running and slithering all around, if we can keep up that one strained metaphor a little longer.
The dictatorship is in damage control mode right now.
They realize they're in the Titanic, and they've hit an iceberg, and the great ship is slowly sinking now, and they are desperate to stay afloat.
Now, as part of this, I believe that when Donald Trump is overthrown in a quasi-legal coup d 'etat, as he will be, or else he'll just be murdered anyway, when he goes, there will be a massive reactive purge, both media-wise, legally, and they're even talking in some of the left loon blogs about sending up what amounts to a Nuremberg Tribunal-type special court to arrest and try anyone who assisted President Trump during his reign of evil or whatever.
Anyway, for the first time, we will see a truly serious attempt in this country to get the internet back under control and get us off of it and get any vestige of white racial consciousness out of the legal or political process.
And that's going to be bad.
It's going to be about like Chairman Mao's Great Leap Forward back in the 60s or something like that.
Anyway, here's a few pointers as to how you can speak about meaningful things and serious topics to other white people.
How you can put ideas in their heads without being seized and tortured and destroyed by men and women in expensive suits who do it for money.
Now, these protocols have worked for me so far.
And I emphasize that, so far.
I'm tempted to say that the rules may change tomorrow, but in these days there just don't seem to be any rules.
And that situation is likely to continue to deteriorate.
Anyway, here goes.
Now, do you see what I just did there?
I took about 12 minutes to say some things that I could have said in about 30 seconds.
That's one defense you can have in order to make sure that you are allowed to exercise your First Amendment rights and speak.
Prolixity.
If you just come flat out and say, you know, I think we really ought to get our guns and go start killing people, that's obviously going to attract a lot more attention from the secret police and the NGOs than taking an hour of babble to say the same thing.
But, you know, I tell you what, this particular segment's going on about, what, 13, 14 minutes now, and I've got something else I want to get into here, which is somewhat relevant to this topic.
And so, we're going to take a break right now.
We're going to do that.
And in the last segment of this podcast, I'll get back into my list of points.
Right, like most movement old-timers, I have a tendency to bitch and moan about upcoming younger generations, and I haven't made any secret of the fact that my opinion of millennials is not exactly high.
However, if I'm being honest, then I have to concede that there are some very sharp, articulate, knowledgeable, and talented young men coming down the pike in the alt-right and on YouTube.
I'm going to play you a clip from one of them now.
He calls himself High Svenergy, and he sounds like the kind of young man I'd like to interview for an internship as a unicorn.
Those of you who received the organizational letters will get that reference.
And before I proceed, though, there is one thing I'd like to comment on regarding this audio clip, and that is that I've done some editing on it, specifically to remove certain negroid words that have become part of young white people's normal everyday vocabulary.
I refer to two of the oldest Anglo-Saxon words in the English language.
Shit and fuck were in the original version of Beowulf, which makes them something on the order of 2,000 years old.
Unfortunately, two millennia after Beowulf was doing his lopping off of monstrous arms and heads in the Hall of Harriet, due to the inexplicable decision of our ancestors 400 years ago to import large numbers of primates from Africa into this country, these days, it's nigger talk.
And yes, I know, it's nigger talk that I myself use on this show on occasion.
I first picked it up in the Army when, for many years, it was not acceptable language outside the all-male environment of the military, but, by now, it's common to hear foul-mouthed little white boys and girls screaming these words on the playground or in the sandbox before they even have any idea what the words mean or how to use them correctly even as expletives.
They hear it on television, and they hear it from the black and brown kids they're forced into contact with.
This is part of the wonderful enrichment that diversity provides.
White children jabbering away in Ebonics.
The fact is that American pop culture has been pretty much permanently niggerized.
I'm reminded of the old saying, integration is like mixing horse manure and ice cream.
It vastly improves the taste of the manure, to be sure, but it doesn't do too much for the ice cream.
Now, I understand that whether I like it or not, the clock of history moves forward and not back.
I recognize that whether I like it or not, it has become normal to sprinkle one's conversation these days with fucks and shits, especially if you were born after about 1975.
Most Generation Xers and Millennials simply don't think anything of it, and most of the time they don't even realize they're doing it.
Now, one of the reasons that I occasionally use these words myself for emphasis is because that when one speaks to a Frenchman, it's always a good idea to speak French.
And when one speaks to a Chinaman, it's a good idea to speak Chinese.
I'm sufficiently historically educated so that I could, if I liked, make my speeches and monologues on this show something that would have passed muster in any private conversation with Charles Dickens or Queen Victoria.
Indeed, my novel Bonnie Blue Murderer is basically a bite off Arthur Conan Doyle, but to audiences consisting mostly of American white people and born after 75 or so, I would just sound labored and snotty and silly or just plain weird.
So, even I drop in the occasional shit or fuck.
But not every third word like some of these millennial kids do.
I mean, come on, guys.
That just makes you sound like some ignorant low-life nigger.
Now, what I've done here, and what I do with most audio I get from millennials, because it's necessary so they don't end up sounding like foul-mouthed little nigglets from the projects, is I edit out about 80% of the shits and fucks.
Leaving in only those variations on the words which actually have some meaning or logical place in a sentence.
For example, when talking about the alt-right in Twitter, we must occasionally discuss shitlords, shitposts, and shit tests.
I myself coined a phrase some years ago, shitjob, meaning the kind of low-paid and menial employment that most white males are forced to accept these days.
So, let's be clear, I'm part of the problem too.
Just bear that in mind as you listen to Heist of Energy.
Yes, let's see how much trouble we can get into this time.
Let's talk about political violence.
Alright, so we all know the manosphere.
What's the greatest, the best takeaway from the manosphere?
Is the agree and amplify technique for dealing with shit tests.
What's a shit test?
A shit test is any kind of countersignal of your position or ideology.
It's not based on any kind of logic or anything.
It's just kind of based in some kind of social shame, some kind of emotional shaming, emotional blackmail.
It's usually, it's like the kind of religious way that a liberal deals with you, where you're just a heretic.
They don't have an argument.
They just have a declaration that you are outside of the Overton window.
Whatever you want to call it.
We seem to have internalized that strategy on just about every kind of shit test, whether it's with women.
That's where the manosphere basically started with that, was with women.
We use it with racism, about someone calling you a Nazi, about all this other stuff.
But the one place where we seem to refuse to use that technique to its, I think, would be a very effective place would be when it comes down to violence, when it comes down to your Dylann Roof's...
your Andrew Breivik's your name, who else?
The base Katana guy who went up to New York City a few months ago and I don't know, slashed some old black man that was going through his garbage.
I don't know.
Either way, anytime one of these things happens, anytime one of these things happens, it seems like, I mean, I hate to kind of admit it, it seems like more than the majority of the alt-right falls over itself to counter-signal this person, to condemn, to disavow, to I'm not sure what good it does yet.
Other than it keeps you, you're still failing the shit test.
You're still communicating to the enemy, to the liberal, to the Jew, to whoever, that you accept blame on their terms.
You accept blame in their paradigm.
That you are capable of internalizing guilt from them as they dish it out.
As you see this violent act is outside of the realm, it's outside of the lines.
You don't want to be associated with it because, for whatever reason, the only reason not to be associated with it is because you think it's going to give them a poor opinion of you and us.
Which is kind of just like, why do you give a fuck what they think?
Now, this is what I think we should probably try to do with this.
Try to stay with me.
I'm sorry.
It's a bit much, I know.
But okay, throughout the Obama administration, they went out of their way Often, as often as they possibly could, to put out these kind of false reports and studies claiming that Nazi white supremacist militias and whatnot, hate groups, were the foremost threat of domestic terrorism in the United States.
You know, all they had to do was kind of just, like, pretend that 9-11 never happened, and they counted up a bunch of stuff, and basically they decided that any white person that had ever committed any kind of shooting was part of a hate group, and therefore, logical bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, you get, oh, yes!
Disgruntled angry whites in America are the premier threat to safety and peace in the United States, when in fact you have, obviously, we had 9-11, you have this clear and present pattern of behavior that these Arabs use, these Muslims, these sand people use, in which they spill innocent blood.
I know that nitpicking about how many people in an Orlando gay club are really innocent people.
I know, it's tough, but still stay with me.
It's like, yeah, they have a clear and present pattern of this kind of behavior where they spill blood of basically non-combatants, of civilians.
We won't call them ministers.
We'll call them civilians because we'll leave the degeneracy question out of it.
You know, they spill the blood of civilians in an attempt to spread their religion, to gain political power for their religion.
And how does the liberal react to this?
The difference between you and these muzzy attackers is that they see them as allies.
So they say about them, the only reason they're performing these acts of violence is because we, white evil Americans, are making them feel uncomfortable.
We are Islamophobic.
We are, I guess, with the Orlando shooter guy, had something about homophobia.
He had, what's the way, he had internalized so much American homophobia, never mind regular good old healthy Muslim homophobia.
That he went and did this shooting because he thought he might be gay, and to be gay in America, it's somehow in 2016, 2017, I think it was 2016 that attack, that somehow that's not like a place of, that's not just a privilege at this point.
I mean, come on, give me a break.
So, yeah, they always come up with these excuses for, these people are just acting out against stereotype threat and against our evil, that we are fucking with them.
So, my thing is, if you're talking to a liberal, If you're in some kind of discussion where you can speak freely, whether you're under a sock or you're talking to somebody that doesn't hold power over you and say it would speak your mind, really, you give them that same argument.
It's like, well, you're so upset about Dylann Roof, what he did was so terrible?
Well, why did he do that?
What kind of policies are in place that inspire Dylann Roof to act out so violently in such an ugly fashion?
Maybe you should stop doing those things, and this won't happen anymore.
What did Anders Breivik do, and why?
What motivated him?
What sort of things was the Norwegian government doing that made him want to act out in such a violent, calculated, and bloody fashion?
Jake, why don't we stop and think about it?
I don't know.
And, you know, maybe instead of running and hiding under the rocks every time something like this happens, I'm not endorsing that things like this happen.
Don't go out and do these things.
But if and when, just look, under this kind of pressure, there are going to be people out there who do crack, and these things are going to happen here and there.
Who knows?
It might even increase.
I don't know.
Don't want to speculate on that.
Not the point of this video.
But I'm just saying, if and when another one of these things happens, don't take the run and hide, oh God, I disavow, oh, be still my beating heart, blood was spilled, blood of the enemy was spilled, or even blood of bystanders was stilled because one of ours went nuts and martyred himself.
Offer up that explanation.
Yeah, you know what?
You have created a dangerous and angry group of people.
Maybe you should reflect on what your policies are.
And what you're doing, what your ideology is, maybe you're alienating people a little bit too hard, and maybe you should stop and this will stop happening.
Because, yeah, talk about who's the most dangerous.
That's one of the lines on history.
That's one of the reasons that whites are just always guilty of everything, is because you go back and say, there's nothing more dangerous in this earth than the white male.
And you know what?
Historically it's true, and in the future it will be true if you wake enough of them up.
And you're working really hard to wake us up.
So, violence.
Agree and amplify, just like everything else we do.
Never apologize.
It's fine.
Alright?
That's about all.
See you, Carl!
See you, Carl!
You know, it strikes me we haven't had one of those great internet parody songs on here for a while.
This is a song somebody sent in a while back.
It's from 2010 originally, which makes it one of the earliest alt-right parody songs I know of.
It pokes fun at global warming and some quasi-scientist named Michael Mann, who apparently just cooked and dummied up his data on climate change something stupid.
I don't know who does this, but apparently this song hit such a nerve with this guy Michael Mann that at one stage he had lawyers and private detectives combing the internet trying to find out who did it so he could sue them and get their tenure revoked or whatever.
It would seem that this main character suspected that the song producers were scientific colleagues of his, which I think is a hoot.
Music.
Making up data the old hard way Fudging the numbers day by day Ignoring the snow and the cold in a downward I deleted Mike's nature trick.
And now my chart looks like a hockey stick.
By deleting the tree ring data's downward line.
Had a decline.
For climate change.
I think you have sealed your fate.
It isn't about truth at all.
It's about sounding plausible.
Had to decline.
Had to decline.
The tree ring data was very thin.
You should have chopped more trees instead of hugging them.
Ignoring the snow and the cold in a downward line.
How to decline How to decline How to decline How to decline Climate gauge, those happy mails And I'm under minimum!
Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain
Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain
Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain Hadidikain Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing The Impeachment of Man by Savitri Devai.
As we all know, Savitri Devai was deeply under the influence of life-centered creeds, in particular Hinduism, which she professed and practiced.
Savitri points to two kinds of cultures.
In a life-centered culture like India, people are often vegetarian, and they're very proud of that.
But on the other hand, they are often indifferent to, for example, things that they see, like starving animals, for example.
On the other hand, you have various man-centered cultures where they really have no difficulty eating meat, but pets and even strays are well cared for.
Now, to a certain degree, economic factors can be at work in these cases, but even the richest Indians can be indifferent to suffering that they happen to notice.
While whites will, if at all possible, Feed and care for various stray animals, even to some extent farm animals, even when they have very little.
Savitri Devai has praise for the element of vegetarian and Indian culture, but laments the cruel streak that she sees in the people.
Savitri is conversely repulsed by the diet in Western culture, but praises the fact that animals, aside from the fact that some types of animals are sometimes being eaten, otherwise they're well cared for.
But Savitri does critique the fact that for Westerners, pets really are property.
They are something...
of a convenience in the sense that they are really tailored in various ways perhaps through selective breeding and also possibly in other ways they are really being altered into certain Now, this presents a dilemma.
Submitry wants all animals to enjoy full lives, but insofar as certain animals are pets or otherwise kept to meet the needs of humans in one way or another, then really they're not existing entirely for themselves.
They're existing for someone else.
They're existing to satisfy some human sensory preference.
Sumitri ultimately comes to decide that these animals should ultimately be reintroduced into the wild.
She admits that this would have to be done gradually.
Sumitri is somebody who was very much an admitted cat lover, and when you're talking about cats, you're talking about a type of animal that can go furrow, and in many cases it can survive.
Certain types of dogs.
There are certain types of larger dogs and mid-sized dogs that could manage on their own.
But personally, I will also note that there are some small dogs, and in particular breeds that are frequently classed as toy dogs.
In such a situation, breeds like that would quickly go extinct because really those types of breeds really cannot exist without people.
But this type of thing really doesn't bother Savitri very much because she's really not a believer in pets of any kind.
Savitri shares with Dr. Pierce this notion of reforestation, and she ultimately hopes for a world with a much smaller human population.
In her ideal vision, families would tend to be very small, with the exception of racial elites.
I think this text carefully, Savitri is not depriving anyone of a desire to have a family.
In her view, anyone could have potentially at least a small family, maybe one child, maybe two children at most.
And I also do not get any sense that she is eliminating any particular racial group.
She seems to feel that anyone who's Ideology is essentially pure.
Someone who would maybe be 100% something or 99.9% certain race that they could have large families, theoretically.
Teaching would be very much individualized, very much like the notion of gurus, for example, in India.
And I'm guessing that she gets this idea from probably living in Indian culture as much as she did.
Savitri is no Luddite because without industry, she fears that both animals and also humans would have to work a great deal.
And Savitri really doesn't want anyone to work very much.
She doesn't want animals to work at all.
And she wants humans to work for maybe an hour or two a day.
So she really wants individuals to have a lot of personal freedom.
Of course, she does remark that there are some humans that would be engaged in things like cultural pursuits, and of course they should have the time to do that, or potentially things like science, so long as they were not doing any animal experimentation.
In this ideal world, there would be industrial parks, because, of course, we do have some industry.
And I suppose these parks would be accessed either by roads that would be like autobahns, I suppose, and would really contain very few cars, or possibly by something like a speed rail, because that would seem a very practical way to do things in this world that she's proposing.
Savitri defends animals and she's concerned for their welfare because philosophically and in actuality, when you think about animals, well, they really have no way of opposing the natural order.
And also, too, when you consider the issue of vegetarianism, for example, nobility is something that is proved by a victory over the self.
So if you could be self-disciplined, you would show a certain nobility.
And she really blames the current, often omnivorous, condition of humans on the fact that there were many humans that had to endure a cold climate.
in this book, she talks about how eating meat can be often a contradiction in some respects, but if there was someone who accepted the notion of the world as being one of eternal struggle, then they could really eat any type of meat.
Now, when I When I think of National Socialism, I think of an ideology that is very bound up in this notion of struggle.
So in that respect, it seems rather odd that Savitri is so opposed to the idea of eating meat.
But the way that I can resolve this conflict is that Savitri very much wants to live within the Golden Age.
So she wants to get beyond the Kali Yuga and she wants to be back in a golden age.
Now, she also talks about Christianity, which of course is...
A man-centered creed, but at any rate, she reminds Christians that the sacrifice of Jesus was a one-time sacrifice that would replace all the pagan animal sacrifices that existed prior to that.
So she says that Christians should perhaps follow vegetarianism on that principle.
She talks about a historical precedent for legalized vegetarianism in the case of Ahsoka, and also she frequently talks about Akhenaten and the religion of the Sun Disc, which apparently is something that has her quite enthralled.
Because she believes in this idea of self-restraint and how self-restraint proves nobility, she argues that even if Harming an animal, for example, would somehow bring back his reign, which, of course, I don't see how it would, but hypothetically is a thought experiment if it did.
That we would be unworthy of his reign if we would make such a bargain.
Savitri, even though she was a writer, and even though she wrote several books, she ironically speaks of a world with fewer books.
Because in her view, really the only books worth reading are those that reveal the truth.
And otherwise...
What's the point of all of this?
And also, too, I think she writes this book to, in her own way, make an argument that the morality of the allied powers wasn't necessarily a particularly special morality, or it wasn't the only morality.
So I think that's her metaphysical reason for writing this book.
So I thank you very much for listening to this review.
This was a book that Harold ended up sending me, and I was quite glad of it.
Now, of course, I was aware of this book prior to this, because I've reviewed several of Savitri's books.
I wasn't sure whether or not this book was going to be relevant to this show, but I was very excited to read it.
I was very much glad that I read it.
At the end of the day, I do find it relevant to the show because of Savitri's larger vision.
So it's not just a vision about a particular diet that she preferred.
I mean, that would be, I suppose that would be fine in and of itself, but I think there's definitely a larger vision here.
Even despite the fact that she talks about Ahsoka, I think she wants this to be a voluntary revelation that individuals would evolve into.
So have a good evening.
Thank you very much for listening.
And hail victory, comrades.
We're about to die on 18 wheels and rollin'.
We've got a long way to go, and it's a short time to get there.
I'm best found just like a band and run.
If you put hard on the belt, the sun will remind them freaks.
Let it all hang out, cause we gotta run.
Greetings, comrades.
This is the trucker coming at you from I-40 down here in Arkansas, or Arkansas, if you will.
And this is about your moving.
I was just listening to one of my gun podcasts, and they recently moved two families, father and mother, and one of the sons' households they ended up packing up in the moving truck and moved from down on the Gulf Coast.
Up to Wendy Oming.
And they've been talking about that on their podcast and stuff.
And anyway, their oldest son, just to announce that if he moves again, he will never, ever, ever, ever cross-country again.
I'm not sure what truck they rented, whether it was U-Haul, Penny, that year regardless.
He said he will go and load his stuff up in pods and have someone else drive it across the country.
So, there's a tip for you from some organic migrants to the fictional part of the homeland, but nonetheless, yeah, I know, I do this for a living, but most of y 'all, a long drive for you is what?
Maybe a couple hundred miles and you're wiped out.
Heck, I'd do that in between.
Pit stops.
I mean, I've been known to go back before, yeah, I know I'm tattling on myself here, but back before electronic logs and we were still running paper logs, I ended up going from, was running with another driver and ran from western Montana over there by the scale house in Hoggan all the way over in one day.
From there all the way over to just shy of Fargo before I petered out and had to go park it, mainly because his truck was faster than mine and he kept walking away from me, and so he basically ended up leaving me in the dirt over there in eastern North Dakota.
But, I mean, I've gone and done some long-distance running, and that even before I started driving truck back when I was still in the Navy.
And that was on a motorcycle, no doubt.
Took off out of my uncle's place on Monday in the upper part of the lower peninsula in Michigan.
And ran up into the upper peninsula and found a campground and pitched my tent and slept for the night.
The birds woke me up in the morning, rolled up the tent in the sleeping bag and put her in the wind from the base of the horn there in the upper part of the peninsula.
And I shut her down over there in Glendive, Montana, which is in the eastern part of Montana.
That was my Tuesday.
And Wednesday morning, bars woke me up again before sunup, rolled up the tent in the sleeping bag, and put the murder sickle in the wind, and I was in Bremerton that evening.
So we're talking about a thousand or so miles.
I don't know how many of you are up to that, much less doing it on a motorcycle.
I definitely wouldn't want to do that anymore.
That was in my younger days, in my late 20s, so that was...
Yeah, it gets a little bit old trying to do that stuff on a scooter machine nowadays.
Or in a car nonetheless.
But trying to do it in a moving truck that you're not used to and getting knocked around by the wind and having to crawl up hills and not smoke your brakes and catch your rig on fire coming down the hill if you decided to come down too fast.
I guess you're going to be going over the mountains out here in the northwest, or to get to the northwest, going over these little hills called the Rockies.
I don't care about you people there on the east coast, the Great Smoky Mountains.
Those are just anthills.
Oh, please.
You just don't know how to grade your roads there.
Anyway, just a little trucker humor there.
Yeah, you might want to.
Instead of renting a truck and having to worry about the insurance and the fuel and where you're going to stop every night and all that kind of stuff, just do it the easy way.
Go and pick out the number of pods you think you're going to need and load them up and they go and put them on a truck and they move them to your destination and they store them until you're ready for them.
So that might be, well, trust me, that would probably be the better way to do things because most of you haven't moved in.
a while or even if you have it's mainly More than likely just been short moves.
So for the longer moves, hey, take it easy.
Take the stress off your mind.
Go and whittle down your possessions.
Get rid of the stuff you haven't used in a long time and really don't need.
And that way you can have a little bit of extra money if you go and sell the stuff for your relocation and stuff.
But anyway, then pack it all into these pods.
You can get different sized ones.
You can get them from pods.com, I think it is.
or PACRA or the moving places like United I just thought I'd go and do a little bit more in-depth on that.
But if you guys listen to podcasts and stuff, you may know which one I'm referring to and all that.
But anyway, so, alright, this is the trucker coming at you from Arkansas, headed east, going up to Ohio for delivery up there.
Alright, take it easy, comrades.
Stay safe, get your scouting trip out of the way, and hope to see you on the road making your scouting trip or your move to the homeland soon.
This is the trucker signing off from I-40.
We're bound now, we're 18, we have a moment, and we're gonna do what they say, and we know.
We've got a long way to go.
Any short time to get there Congress found just a bunch of bandit runs I'm out of here Thank you.
This is Artie McGlynn.
Okay, we're back to the week's main topic.
How can you successfully speak to your fellow white people about the things that really matter and discuss ideas that the dictatorship doesn't want you discussing or even thinking?
In other words, how can you exercise, for real, free speech that counts without being abducted and tortured and killed by government-paid thugs, some wearing badges, some wearing expensive suits, and some wearing black robes?
That's true that I've survived and for many years I've spoken out loud of all kinds of things that the American dictatorship didn't want me to say.
So I'm kind of entitled to give advice on the subject and again with the caveat that my story is not yet done and I might be dragged away tomorrow as the rules change or more likely as the rules simply disappear into all the chaos and the secret police finally get the message that they can just do whatever the hell they want, that we're all Bill Whites.
Okay.
As I mentioned a few minutes ago, prolixity is rule number one for the use of effective free speech, i.e.
talking about important stuff that the regime doesn't want us talking about.
When you are trying to convey an idea or information that the power doesn't want white people to know or think about, wrap it up in wordage, like I'm doing now.
Now, this actually is kind of hard to do on Twitter with its 140-character limit, and all kinds of people have been arrested and sent to prison for saying in tweets what they probably could have gotten away with saying if they'd taken the time to wrap it up in a thousand words or so on a blog or in a podcast.
Now, the reason for this is that modern-day Americans have the attention span of a housefly, and a long blog post containing all kinds of big words and vaulting rhetorical flourishes and obscure cultural and historical references will bore a
jury, distract and confuse them, and make them reluctant to convict because it's harder for a U.S. attorney to browbeat and frighten them over a long essay with big multi-syllabic words than it is over 140-character posts saying kill, kill, kill and simple When you're trying to exercise effective Freedom of speech, in other words, talk about something the dictatorship doesn't want white people talking about.
A close cousin to prolixity is what Lenin called Aesopian language, the language of fable.
It's kind of a code or verbal symbolism wherein you know what you're saying, the people you're speaking to know what you're saying, and most likely the secret police who are monitoring you know what you're saying.
But there are problems with this antiquated judicial system which still uses juries full of dummies before whom the U.S. attorney has to prove what you're saying beyond all reasonable doubt.
Historical observation or discussion of the past can act as a cover for all kinds of Aesopian language.
I have a whole recommended reading list of books that don't mention America or race or niggers or politicians once, but if read by a young white man, we'll put all kind of ideas in the head.
I'll even give you one.
A book called The Irish War of Independence by a British historian called Michael Hopkinson.
It would be virtually impossible for any young American white man of reasonable intelligence and imagination to read that book for content and not get all kind of ideas in his head.
Another of the ways the dictatorship doesn't end run around the First Amendment is to claim that we are threatening somebody, so don't do that.
Now, it used to be that a threat was a threat, or else it wasn't, and determining what constituted a credible threat was a legal paradigm called the reasonable man or person, in other words, common sense.
But in recent years, common sense has gone out the window in this judicial system, and paranoia and coercive control in order to keep the existing elite in power has taken its place.
They now have laws on the books in most states, and possibly federal statutes as well, I don't know, prohibiting something called Terroristic threats.
Which is one of those laws that police and district attorneys and judges love with a passion because it can mean basically any damn thing they want it to mean.
And no reasonable person criterion applies.
Last year, there was a truly horrific case in Texas where some 15-year-old dumbass posted to Facebook that he'd like to blow up his school rather than take some test he had the next day.
Some tub-thumping district attorney with nothing but pork fat between his ears actually charged this boy as an adult with making terroristic threats and seriously attempted to send him to prison for eight years where he would be beaten, tortured, and sodomized by niggers for words that no one in his right mind would take seriously.
Just words.
This is precisely what is...
I'm sorry to say that I lost track of this case.
Now, for all I know, that Stetson-wearing burrow brain might have killed the kid already, which is basically what an eight-year sentence on a 15-year-old would do.
Never threaten any specific identifiable individual or institution by name.
Never say, I'd like to shoot so-and-so through the head.
Never mind how completely morally justified shooting that person through the head might be.
Never say, I'd like to go down to the federal courthouse at 3rd and Main tomorrow morning and plant a bomb under Judge Bumblesteen's chair.
Never dox or otherwise reveal the personal information of anybody even remotely connected to the government or the media or the court system, especially the court system, because most of the big knobs have enough rudimentary sense to realize that they have lost all moral authority in the society.
That everybody, of all colors, pretty much has their number now, and everybody hates them and wants to do them harm, and the only thing maintaining their power is the courts and the judges and the guns of the police and the army of lawyers that infests this country like rats in a grain silo.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know niggers and lefty loon social justice warriors threaten the life of the President of the United States all the time on the internet and nothing is done.
That's part of the degeneration and disintegration of the system I've been referring to.
It used to be that anyone who threatened the life of any President, Republican or Democrat, got scooped up by the Secret Service within 24 hours and locked away for about 20 years.
That no longer applies.
Like all federal law enforcement, the Secret Service is part of the deep state and a...
Apparently, anybody even mildly to the left of center can now threaten to murder the president all they want.
But we're not social justice warriors, and we're not Black Lives Matter.
We can't do this.
There has long been a kind of second- or third-class citizenship reserved for dissident white boys, and formalized by the Bill White case when a Jewish judge created the concept of the quote-unquote inherently violent and criminal audience.
That's you guys.
That's who anyone who speaks up for the white man is supposed to be addressing now.
An inherently criminal and violent audience.
And one of the crucial points of the Bill White case was to create this special little First Amendment free bubble for people like us.
I always say I'm not threatening anybody.
I'm threatening everybody.
I am threatening to end this entire evil and pernicious and crapulent world we live in and replace it with something shining and wonderful.
Never advocate outright acts of violence or criminality like how we should kill and burn and give specific named enemies a colonoscopy with a soldering iron, nothing like that.
Speak of direct action for change in neutral terminology, like I just did.
Look, you know and I know these people deserve destruction and punishment for what they've done.
No question.
We are right.
They are wrong.
They have done unspeakable things and continue to commit these hideous acts even as we speak.
And if there were any kind of just and righteous God, we would see their carcasses lying on the street being eaten by dogs.
I get that.
And I know how much you want to see these wicked people suffer and somewhat balance the scales a little.
We all want to see that, but it's probably not a good idea to speak in public of what you want to see happen and to whom.
You see, our lords and ladies know that they are hated.
They know that overwhelming numbers of their fellow citizens despise them, hold them in utter contempt, and want to see them hurt.
Hear them screaming in pain as they are dragged out of their carpeted offices and limos and their bones are broken with clubs.
It probably isn't a good idea to remind them of that fact.
Our ruling elite are frightened and paranoid.
Donald Trump's election has terrified them.
They're losing control.
They see the shadow of the guillotine looming over their lives.
They still have thugs with guns who will obey them so long as they're paid.
And when you're sitting with snakes, you probably shouldn't poke them or do a breakdance in the middle of the glass cage.
That's my department, guys.
I'm more experienced and I've survived doing it so far.
I'm old.
And every year their ability to punish me becomes less.
That's not true for some of you.
And I've got 63 years now that they can never take away from me.
I only have a few years left and not very good ones by the look of it.
I keep telling you guys, if you want to play the game for a serious payoff, you need to put something on the table.
Well, I'm willing to put the few remaining years I have on the table.
You shouldn't, not unless it's really necessary, or there's some actual result to be gained.
Your remaining years will be needed for the kind of direct action that will bring about change.
Don't blow them on mere words.
My duty station within the movement has always been to speak out loud what no one else dares to say, so leave it to me.
Anyway, our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha Underban.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection