All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 1, 2016 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:05:02
20161201_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush-a-woogle, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot by the river, rifle, known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token, whistle, up, and marching tune.
For your bike upon your shoulder By the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon Switch your bike upon your shoulder By the rising of the moon Out from many a mud-walled cabin eyes Were watching through the night Many a man they chest was throbbing For the blessed warning light She was passed along the valleys Like the man she's lonely crew And a thousand
blades were flashing At the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon And a thousand blades were flashing At the rising of the moon Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's December the 1st, 2016.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Okay, there's something going on right now that very much disturbs me.
I'm worried that Hillary Clinton may be about to rise from her coffin like the Crypt Keeper and make another grab for the presidency.
Kill from the Crypt!
*laughs*
Maybe I'm being an alarmist, and maybe I'm just being paranoid for no reason.
But we're talking about the Hildebeest here, and having been denied her lifelong ambition to be Queen of Hearts by the white people of this country, I would put nothing at all past her.
As far as I'm concerned, this woman is going to be an ongoing threat to all humanity until such time as she's buried at a crossroads with a stake through her heart.
If you'll recall, there were a number of third-party candidates during the recent election, including an old Jewish yenta named Jill Stein from the Green Party.
She has now demanded a recount in Wisconsin.
Now, this Stein woman got clobbered in Wisconsin, along with all the other third-party runners, and so there's no conceivable reason for her to be demanding a recount.
But the Clinton campaign may be using her as a stalking horse and a sock puppet for something much more sinister.
They've announced that they are going in with Stein on this recount gig in order to quote-unquote seek for indications of outside influence, meaning they're looking to bolster the Democrats' ludicrous contention that Donald Trump won because he is in cahoots with Vladimir Putin and the Russians hacked the election computers in the so-called battleground states.
They're also talking about launching similar recounts in two other key states, Michigan and Pennsylvania.
Some of you may remember that at the time, Hillary's people were referring to Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania as her quote-unquote Midwest firewall states.
Yet to everybody's amazement, they all went to Trump.
Three states on a recount are infinitely easier for the Democrats to diddle than an entire 50-state election.
And it could well be that this has always been their plan B in case the beast lost.
If for any reason Trump loses those three states through some fraud or corruption on the part of the state election officials there, that will put him down below 270 votes in the Electoral College and throw the election into the House of Representatives, which has happened twice before in this country's history, although the stakes were by no means as serious.
This time, it isn't just a tussle between two politicians.
This time, the stakes are existential.
Now, in theory, with a Republican majority in the House, Trump should have no trouble.
But remember, Trump isn't really a Republican.
He's a party crasher, if you'll pardon the pun.
Now, remember all those Rick Wilson types in the Never Trump movement?
The majority of congressional Republicans despise Trump even worse than the Democrats because he's a bona fide outsider, not a member of the club, and the people he is so far bringing into his cabinet are genuinely ideological.
People who actually believe in things.
Maybe not necessarily our kind of things, but they do have core political and moral convictions.
And we can't have that in Washington now, can we?
At least not on the Republican side.
It is by no means beyond the realm of possibility that the RINOs may prefer Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office for eight more years of business as usual, so long as they get to keep the House and Senate majorities that Trump brought them.
And they get to keep their beloved committee chairmanships and keep on wallowing in all that lovely money, which is essentially the only real reason for the continued existence of the Republican Party, to give corporate America unfettered access to the ultimate source of all the world's wealth, the American taxpayer.
It is entirely possible that despite the historic vote of November 8, 2016, We may yet end up with that diseased and half-insane hag sitting in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Okay, okay, that's still a long shot.
And I admit that maybe I'm just so twitchy about that hideous evil crone after 25 years that I just can't wrap my mind around the fact that she's finally gone.
We'll see how it plays out.
But this topic does give me an excuse to do something here.
Now, Andy Donner is a pretty sharp and efficient dude, and so just before the election he made me not one, but two audio files for the post-election RFN.
The first commentary, which you've already heard, was for use if Donald Trump won, which he did.
But he also sent me a commentary on the contingency that the Hildebeest won, and since the Eldritch thing has risen from the grave and may be plotting a coup d 'etat which will put her in the White House in spite of everything, maybe I'd best play that one for you as well.
Greetings from Seattle, comrades.
Andy Donner here.
I, along with the usual RFN contributors, have been asked to deliver a few remarks on the election.
In the interest of transparency, this material was all prepared before the election.
And I did so with a very specific purpose in mind.
As strange as it sounds, I think that purpose is best served by admitting this up front.
So Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United States.
We all saw that coming, right?
Now that I've covered the obvious, I need to talk to you all about something really, really important.
What are you going to do about this?
Well, I'll make this personal for a moment in the hope that I can actually come across as relatable for once.
I get my share of hecklers and gripers and naysayers on a regular basis.
And I always have, ever since I started making remarks with the party in public.
And still regularly, though not nearly as frequently, someone will actually run to Harold and tattle on me for something I said or did.
This always cracks me up because, with very rare exceptions, I haven't said anything not already said on RFN well before I even knew the party existed.
The difference is that I find new and irritating ways to combine these already extant observations.
But that's neither here nor there.
So, as much as it cracks me up to merely repeat things someone else said, and be castigated for having said them by people who will never, ever lift a finger to help their race, I'm going to do just that now because it needs done.
What just happened electorally is precisely the sort of thing the Northwest Front has warned about for years.
Harold sometimes describes this as events overtaking us.
Let's all remember why we're here, folks.
White genocide.
And specifically...
The only viable plan to put a halt to it.
The Northwest Imperative.
This is critically important because we don't have forever to take care of this, and the electoral results have underscored that truth.
I know Clinton being elected president is the result none of you wanted for all sorts of reasons.
And hey, I'm right there with you.
But we need to understand something about this.
It doesn't mean what you think, and here's why.
The white race has already been on the clock for a very long time.
Regardless of whatever happens, we as a race already had things to do, though we perhaps have a little less time now.
And that's the only difference.
Take this election in stride, please.
Yes, Clinton's presidency will be an out-and-out nightmare for reasons which, if published, would fill an entire set of encyclopedias and we all know it.
But where does that put us?
Nowhere.
As I said, this is most definitely events overtaking us.
The events that matter are demographics, and demographic damage has been done already.
Those of you who have been any sort of white nationalist for any length of time will have run into information which clears up history such that you're aware white genocide is a long process, and it's been in effect for quite some time, longer than living memory at least.
One presidential election wasn't going to vary that a whole lot either way.
Sure, this upcoming administration is going to be a complete and total disaster.
So I ask again, where does that put us?
Probably nowhere.
Probably.
Here's the real deal, folks.
Another thing which has been said quite a bit on RFN is that white nationalism is a drug because no matter how far around the twist it drives quite a few of you, you always come back for more.
And the same thing that could be said of white nationalism could also be said of liberal democracy and perhaps electoral politics, too.
Unfortunately for the white race.
Those purporting to be its biggest proponents have hit rock bottom in their Trump addiction and are going to need quite a bit of time to recover.
And while all that's happening, events will continue to overtake us.
Once you're all through whatever rehab you can get yourselves checked into with your Obamacare plan, you'll find our problems were just the same as they were before the election, if only slightly more pronounced.
So what are you going to do about it?
Notice I didn't use the word we there, because I already know what I'm doing about it.
I've been doing it ever since I found the Northwest Front, which was a year before I came home, which, in turn, enabled me to become active with the party here in the Puget Sound area.
If we were all to be honest with ourselves, there's nothing else in America, or the world, going on which could even hold a candle to the Northwest Imperative in terms of ability to actually stave off white racial extinction.
Why, then, did so many of you get wrapped up in some electoral game which doesn't really impact our situation to begin with?
I understand that nearly all of you were acting out of a sense of morality, in not wanting Hillary Clinton as president, and just as many of you were hoping your own personal situation would improve as a result of Trump's election.
But none of that really matters in light of the long game being played.
And guess what?
No matter how much you wanted to opt out by electing Trump instead of Hillary, you're still playing the game despite your own desperate desire not to.
There's no opting out of white genocide just because one person or another gets elected, and since I'm being totally honest with you right now, I'm severely disappointed in every single one of you who took this election to be far more important than it actually was, because I know that you know better.
Every single election I've witnessed, and I've paid attention to quite a few of them despite my relatively young age, has always been reported as the most important election in American history, like this last one was.
That's why I tend to disregard any particular election's importance.
Especially this one.
I got jumped on by the entire internet four years ago when I said that because, as I said As I was told, it was actually true that time.
Just like it was this time.
Just like it will always be.
Hopefully none of you will fall for this again in another four years because you'll be too busy with your party activity here in the homeland.
Hail victory.
people.
Thank you.
Okay, time for some housekeeping and inside baseball kind of stuff.
I'm never sure where to put these segments in an RFN broadcast, either right at the beginning or right at the end, or sometimes just any old way or like today.
First off, on contacting the party, some contacts which people are leaving on the northwestfront.org site are not getting through, apparently.
I get irate emails from people saying, I left two or three messages on your website and I never got any reply.
Well, part of that is probably me not checking the website as often as I should, which I don't, but that would account for messages being late, not failing to get through at all.
A lot of these people who complain that they left me multiple messages and I never responded, I don't know from Adam's house cat and I never heard of them before.
It's probably something to do with WordPress on the site is all I can figure.
That part of the site has always been a little glitchy.
The best way to get hold of me is still direct email at nwnet at earthlink.net.
That's nwnet at earthlink.net.
Now, once more, let's talk about mailing addresses.
I say to you folks again that the party needs an accurate and functioning postal mailing address on every one of you.
Okay, I've pointed out before that when some of you get involved with the party, It sometimes seems like your first priority in the whole thing is to continue to hide, as if it's in fact possible to conceal one's whereabouts these days from the secret police if they care to take an interest in you.
I'm still amazed that the name Edward Snowden doesn't ring any more bells than it does.
Sometimes this goes to odd lengths, like this week I got a fairly substantial contribution in the mail with a return address, which I have no idea whether it's valid or not.
And a pseudonym only, Pinky.
Well, Comrade Pinky, thank you very much for your support.
I appreciate it.
If you're listening to this, please drop me an email and give me some kind of full name.
I can send your intro pack just to Occupant at that address that was on the envelope, but sometimes those get through and sometimes they don't.
And yes, more and more I've noticed that we have a lot of white people who are either literally living in their parents' basement, Or else bunking with assorted muggle relatives and or friends and you're worried about mail being intercepted.
I can understand that, but you need to scrape up enough shekels to rent a post office box or a UPS store box or otherwise arrange for some secure and private mailing address.
I say again, people, one day we are going to lose the internet.
Twitter is still going nuts canceling any account that they can find anywhere to the right of center.
And while I have almost recovered all of the 40-some-odd followers I lost after the election, as more and more of them sneak back onto Twitter under different aliases, my own account could go any minute now, and that would be me cut off from almost 900 of you right there.
Speaking of getting cut off, all of you should be downloading Radio Free Northwest if at all possible so that you will have your own archive of RFN programs on your own hard drives in case there is a really major assault on the party's internet presence.
So far we've been lucky in that we have had no serious problems with our various providers.
But as the NF grows in general awareness among our own people and among the enemy and more pressure is brought to bear, Maybe there's another Dylan Roof or two.
That could change.
I have a contingency plan if that happens, but it would take a long time to fully recover, and I need to be able to communicate off-internet with as many of you as possible.
A comrade in Idaho has provided us with a number of DVDs of the latest party video, Our Time is Coming, at no little personal expense to himself.
Now let me know if you want one of these.
Also, there are a number of new NF videos appearing on YouTube made by multiple individuals.
I'm a little hesitant to advertise those too publicly on the blogs and whatnot for fear of the thought police pulling them down, but I will be advising the Northwest Revolution email list of the links, and you need to download those as well as re-upload them to your own channels to make sure that we are never driven offline completely.
Now, Once more, I need to go over some things with you about migration that I've mentioned before, but we're now getting more and more inquiries and contacts on migration and homecoming than we ever have, and I need to run this down for you again.
We have at least three new people who have arrived here in the Puget Sound area over the past few weeks and whom neither I nor anyone has met yet for their first face-to-face.
They're still getting settled in, and I get that.
We'll get together when they're ready.
I need to discuss migration zones with you guys again.
Now, almost every migration inquiry I get asks, Harold, where should we move to within the homeland?
Should I come up and camp out on your doorstep and help you in the Seattle area?
Well, I hope some of you do.
However, you need to come here with your eyes open.
Right now, the Seattle area is booming economically like never before, what with the usual mass employers like Microsoft and Boeing and a massive military presence from Joint Base Lewis-McChord and from the Bremerton Naval Base, and also from newer mass employers like Amazon and a bunch of others.
Plus, that wog socialist city councilwoman managed to pass a $15 per hour minimum wage.
Which is effectively either driving all the fast food joints out of the city itself, or else it's making them switch to robots.
But the fact is that we've got a lot of low-skilled people coming here thinking they're going to get paid $15 per hour flipping burgers at Mickey D's.
Anyway, the end result is that everybody and his dog is coming to Seattle.
Housing costs are going through the roof over there.
The overflow is fleeing across the water here to Kitsap County in search of cheaper rents, which is having the opposite effect of driving rents up even higher.
And what with two carriers in port long-term at Bremerton, there is also a critical housing shortage to begin with.
The few places that still offer affordable housing are gentrifying and evicting their poor tenants, and it's a mess.
Plus, there's all the damn Seattle retirees who are fleeing the city to Palsbo and Whidbey Island and Bainbridge Island, so forth and so on, until Kitsap and Jefferson counties are kind of like Long Island is to New York City.
Now, this may not last.
Perhaps President Trump will declare war on somebody in the Pacific and deploy the carriers and get all those squids and their dependents out of here.
But right now, affordable housing is for all intents and purposes impossible to find on the western shore of the Puget Sound, unless you go way inland or maybe up to vampire country in forts or maybe as far north as Port Townsend, which is very pretty country, but which isn't really within easy reach of Seattle if you have to work in the city.
Now, this doesn't mean that housing is not available here.
I've made it a point to keep up with what's going on, and actually, availability of housing, including rental accommodation, is a little better now than it was even six months ago.
Not sure why.
But it will still cost you an arm and a leg.
Basically, in all fairness and decency, I have to warn you guys, if you're coming to the Puget Sound area, we will welcome you and we will help you all we can.
But you need to have a pretty sizable chunk of change in your kick.
Because initial housing is going to be very costly and home prices are sky high.
I really hate to say this, but we're kind of turning into a West Coast version of New York here, where an upper class techno elite with low to middle six figure incomes are screwing things up for the rest of us.
Although nowhere near as bad as San Francisco and Silicon Valley.
Now, if you did not dick off in school, And if you have a trade, something that you can do with your hands, electrician or plumber or carpenter or mechanic, if you know how to fix things when niggers and Mexicans break them, if you can do anything in the medical field, then you can write your ticket anywhere here in the Northwest homeland and you don't need Seattle or Portland.
You get to live in the picture postcard little villages in the mountains and by the sea, if you want.
If you require an actual job with a salary, you can get one here.
I've never known anyone who came here to remain unemployed longer than about three weeks, but there are other cities in the homeland.
You might want to try Spokane or Eugene or Boise or Coeur d 'Alene or at least one of the more far-flung Pugetopolis suburbs like Olympia or Everett or North Bend or Bellingham.
Or if I'm lucky, you can come and move right down the street from me.
I hope you do, but be aware, it's going to cost you.
This is an old 70s folk group called Steely Span.
Steely Span
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing Schopenhauer's World as Will and Idea.
First of all, as we start to read this book, or this actually series of small books, Schopenhauer warns the reader that they really ought to be students of Kant, and even more importantly, they should be students of Indic literature, and particularly Vedanta.
And if not, he urges them to avoid reading his work.
In the first part of this work, Schopenhauer spends a good deal of time discussing this idea of subject and object, and essentially this notion of how the world is perceived by the self, and how the self will produce such things as ego.
He says that ego is an object produced out of the subject, and subject is produced by object in a process called construction.
And he talks about different ways in which the world is understood, and especially he highlights this idea of materialism.
But he talks about how there is also a world of abstract concepts and There are worlds of numerical understanding and also a notion of the world as a miraculous thing that arises out of nothingness.
Now Schopenhauer starts to make more sense, I think, when he starts to talk about this notion of abstract concepts and how essentially you can make Venn diagrams for any concept.
And these concepts are always going to overlap somewhat.
So you can pretty much make an argument for anything, and even if you make some sort of a logical fallacy, it doesn't necessarily mean that you're wrong.
To Schopenhauer, there is no such thing as a harmless error.
Any error is cause for concern.
He talks about how there are four principles of rational knowledge.
There's identity, there's contradiction, there's an excluded middle, and then there's a cause.
There's different types of knowledge.
I mean, you have sensuous knowledge, which is a type of knowledge that artists will use, versus abstract knowledge.
And he talks about how there can be errors and they can be either a consequence of false reason or they can be due to an overgeneralization of a cause.
And he talks about how there's a need for philosophy because it makes mathematical truths permanent.
And then he starts talking about how this notion of abstraction, this notion of having concepts and principles, can transcend over the animal nature of beings.
And at this point, he gets very influenced by Vedanta and talks about how the wise should avoid both joy and sorrow.
There are four kinds of truth.
And again, this is more about perception than any kind of absolute truth, which really seems irrelevant as far as Schopenhauer is concerned.
There is myth.
There is...
Empirical truth, metaphysical truth, which, again, like mythology, is often bound up with things like religion or, I suppose, philosophy in the case of metaphysics.
And then there's methodological truth.
He seems to have a love of fours, grouping ideas in fours, and this seems to be an influence of Indic literature.
Schopenhauer talks a great deal about the will and how the will is the essence of existence.
Sometimes when we talk about will, in fact, most of the time, we talk about it in the sense of a desire, like a conscious thought.
And we talk about having a certain will.
Maybe there's a project you're involved in and you have this will, this stamina.
In terms of Schopenhauer, this idea of will seems to be more like the term essence, or in a sense, maybe a dharmic essence.
So water is wet, for example.
Water is essentially wet.
That's really more what he means by will than really anything else.
Will extends to everything.
Things like gravity, for example.
And he talks about how a stone, for example, is rigid.
It's acted upon by gravity.
It can, under certain circumstances, produce an electrical charge.
And it can also have certain chemical properties.
It's all according to the circumstances that it's put under.
He talks about how ideas compete with each other.
And when he talks about ideas, again, this notion of ideas is very generalized with Schopenhauer.
It isn't just ideas like, I thought of something.
He also uses this term in a sense of natural elements themselves.
He also talks about...
Self-awareness and to Schopenhauer, the goal is to actually become someone who is without...
A sense of will.
And to that end, Schopenhauer praises various forms of art that do not excite the will.
And in particular, Schopenhauer is fond of a landscape, for example, but he questions the genre of still life.
Schopenhauer was writing in the 1800s, and back then they really didn't have abstraction.
So he talks about various fairly realistic genres of painting.
He also talks about things like history painting and painting that dealt with symbolism, which he finds is wordy and therefore less artistic in his view.
Schopenhauer also praises architecture as something that is original and not merely a copy of nature, as we often find in painting.
And he talks about music, and he says that music is really quite a special art because it copies this notion of will.
The will, or essentially the essence, can be embodied in whether a tone is high or low.
It can give you a sense of character.
And she talks about how different cultures have used art in different ways.
The ancient Greeks were more about concrete perceptions, whereas in Indic culture, sculpture, for example, is more idea-based, more concept-oriented, and they really didn't care as much about the actual figure, for example, and observation.
But at the end of the day, the essence of freedom for Schopenhauer is this notion of life denial.
And everyone has this notion of right and wrong, and we get this notion often being enshrined within the state.
We get laws and morals from the sense of the self, and property rights are simply an extension of the body.
We want to deny encroachment on the will of others.
So that's why, for example, things like murder and assaults are crimes.
States exist to decrease egotism.
They want to apply this notion of morality.
Punishment is about the future.
It should not be retrofitted from the past.
So Schopenhauer seems to believe in notions of jurisdiction, for example, and binds of the state.
Clearly, as I said, Schopenhauer is influenced by Vedanta to the point of being a world renouncer, and he's always praising the Jans, for an example.
They're a very extreme sect.
They're very much dedicated to nonviolence to the point of denying their own hunger.
One of the virtues for a Jand is to starve to death.
In general, Schopenhauer is against active suicide.
Starving to death is passive, so that's a denial of the will.
However, actively committing suicide is actually an act of will, and it's an objection to various conditions.
Love to Schopenhauer is about empathy and sympathy, and this monastic Vedanta that Schopenhauer is obviously enshralled with is something that must have arisen in India.
As the racial situation in India was deteriorating, because there seems to have been what they call a white influence or an Aryan influence in India, but as that began to miscegenate, I would suppose the conditions in India became worse.
And I think at a certain point, the religion in India, which had been fairly life-affirming, when you read...
It talks about things like ritual and devotion and the notion of deity and devotee as being interdependent on each other.
It's a fairly life-affirming philosophy.
But then later on with Vedanta, you suddenly have this extreme emphasis on renunciation and indifference to the point of being someone who really Schopenhauer
has really bought into this philosophy.
It is said that Hitler was a student of Schopenhauer, but it seems that the Life-affirming philosophy of National Socialism is quite the opposite of Schopenhauer, and in some sense, a reaction against it.
So I hope you enjoyed this discussion.
I have to say, even I find Schopenhauer to be, at times, rather tough sledding, and particularly the first book in this small series.
Now, when I say this is a series of books, it's really more like a series of essays.
I found it something that you can read in a reasonable amount of time, but I do find it very dense.
So I thank you for listening.
Have a good evening and hail victory comrades.
The End Thank you.
Thank you.
Okay, we haven't had any alt-right rock parodies or rock songs on here for quite a while.
This is something somebody sent in this week.
I'm not sure from his notations whether the group is named Blink 1488 or whether the song is named Blink 1488, but I think it's the group, and I believe the song is called Privilege.
And it's obviously a takeoff on something in the rock world, which I'm too old to understand anyway.
give it a listen.
I understand you said it many ways.
I can't be proud of my people or my race.
It's just so great, all this privilege that we get to have.
What's next for you to pick at?
Forget I have, it's not for me to know.
Just take my job, what else do I owe?
I've another goal, I conquer the union.
Another goal, I'm not worthiness, I'm proven.
This new age is a fucking nightmare.
The only way out is through ethnic warfare.
We need to find our solidarity.
And it returns to clarity.
If no people want to stay, you're gonna hear me twice.
Late 1488 was never playing nice.
I'm telling you that we'll make it through somehow.
Even if our methods raise some eyebrows.
This new age is a fucking nightmare.
The only way out is through ethnic warfare.
We need to find our solidarity.
A return to clarity.
A return to clarity.
Don't turn your back and run now.
We really got a chance now.
The only way out is through the world.
I started uploading Radio Free Northwest in January of 2010, before most of the so-called alt-right ever got going.
That was almost seven years ago, and nowadays everybody and his kid brother in the white nationalist movement has a podcast.
This is probably one of the reasons that our RFN listenership seems to be stuck at about 5,000 hits a week.
Same problem we've always had with the internet.
There's just so much of it out there.
And, to be sure, most of it's pretty good stuff.
And people simply don't have 24 hours in the day to do nothing except sit and listen to podcasts.
Nor am I the only Northwest Front-associated individual with his own show.
Recently, Comrade Jay from Tacoma sent me some clips from his own show.
It's called Condition Critical, and it's on American Voice Radio, I believe.
Now, I've never used one of these services like Blog Talk or TalkShoe.
Or anything like that, because there's always at least some censorship involved, and I have never been comfortable with anybody having their hand on the plug or their hand on the rug that might pull said rug out from under me, but a lot of our people do this, and most of them report no problems.
Anyway, I'll see if I can get Jay's showtimes and post them to Northwest Revolution for you.
Here's a sample.
Well, that's kind of what I want.
And I'm not going to muckrake a whole bunch of articles.
I'm really not.
I'm going to mention a few.
And I'm not fed up about this recently.
I've been fed up about this for a long time.
And it's about race.
It's about blacks.
I don't call them African Americans.
I call them blacks.
Check this out now.
I'm going to digress just for a moment here.
And the reason I don't call them African Americans is because I believe that's a cultural Marxist term for blacks.
That they...
Created.
And now, over the years, it's become kind of accepted.
And kind of less cultural Marxist even.
It's kind of become kind of generic and whatever.
But I don't use it.
I call them blacks.
And look, I can maybe take a lot of criticism for that, but fine.
But there's another one out there.
There's another one out there, and I'm going to get into this.
I'll just kind of come up front with it.
It's person of color.
That's like kind of the new one.
That's the new cultural Marxist phrase for, I guess, blacks.
And to me, it makes no sense.
A person of color?
I say to myself, what does that mean?
I'm white.
Am I not a person of color?
Isn't, like, everyone kind of a person of color?
Well, I guess not.
I guess white's not a color.
And so I, kind of being flippant, say that I must be a person without color.
And I even sometimes, I'm not white.
Like, I'm looking, I have a tablet here that I take notes on, and, you know, the sheets of paper on this, they are white.
That's not how my skin is.
I'm more of a, I don't know, what do you call it, guys?
Peach or whatever?
So it's just absurd.
And here's another thing about this whole person of color thing.
About how these cultural Marxists will hammer you with this stuff, and then they get you to say it, right?
And then these black people, right?
They must be howling.
They must be hell and thinking, man, we can make anything up.
Just come up.
See, I'm not that clever.
And neither are they.
Somebody else is doing the thinking for them.
I'm not that clever to think of like a really absurd term for blacks, like a person of color.
Like, they had to really think of that.
But they have it, right?
And people say it.
And it's white liberals.
They get on the news and, oh, we offended a person of color today.
And just the way they say it.
And yet, I can see these blacks.
Sitting back in their easy chair, just howling, thinking, man, we got them to say that.
That's unbelievable.
We could think of anything.
Think of the most absurd racial term, and we can get them to say it.
Just whatever.
You guys, because I'm not that clever, like right here on the radio, to kind of come up with one.
That's where we are.
That's where we are in today's society, where these blacks, they say jump, and stupid white liberals say how high.
And it's everywhere.
Like I said, I wasn't going to muckrake these articles, and I'm not really.
Here's a headline.
Supreme Court takes up racial discrimination in jury selection.
The example they're using is a guy named, let me get his name here, Timothy Foster, who in 1987 murdered, here it is here, Foster, who was black, was swiftly convicted of murdering an elderly white woman.
I would add, as a cultural Marxist, an unarmed elderly white woman.
That's what I would have added, but they didn't do that.
And so he was swiftly convicted and sentenced to death.
And they go on in this article, and there's some statistics in there, if there had been more black people on the jury, and they put percentages out there.
Now look, I don't have to read those out to you.
What do you think would happen, guys?
Because this is what they want.
This is what they want.
They don't want there to be any real diversity.
They want the jury to be all black.
Let me ask a question, show of hands.
If the jury had been all black in this guy's case, what do you think would have happened?
Do you think they would have convicted him?
To life, maybe?
For murdering an unarmed, elderly white woman?
Probably raped her, too.
Do you think they would have sentenced him to life?
Do you think maybe they would have given him 25 years?
Okay, show of hands, hold on.
One more.
Do you think maybe they would have given him, like, 5 to 10?
No, I'll tell you what would have happened.
They would have acquitted him.
Period.
Do you guys remember the phrase, if the glove don't fit, you must acquit?
Do you think in your right mind that if that had been an all-black jury, they would have convicted this guy?
Are you out of your mind?
Not guilty!
Back to the ghetto with you so you can go rape and murder other unarmed white people.
You piece of garbage.
But this is what they do.
Now, that's one article.
Here's another one.
I'm sure you've all heard about the white police officer, and I believe it was South Carolina.
He was fired.
And they show the video, and look, okay, that's kind of different, because that's what cops do to people.
If you don't listen to them, they brutalize you.
Now, there's another dynamic in play here.
This girl, black girl, in school, you know how public schools are.
The inmates run the asylum, right?
Multiple teachers told her to put her phone down.
Administrators, put your phone down.
Finally, because nowadays we have to have a school resource officer.
In other words, we got the cops in the schools because...
Does that make any sense to you?
Why would you need police officers in the school unless they're going there to, like, recruit or say, hey, I'm Sheriff Bob, and I'm here to tell you what I did today and how my job goes.
No, they're there to maintain, in school, maintain peace in a public school setting.
Anyway, this black girl, of course she's defiant, and ignorantly so.
Why?
Well, because she's black.
And she's a public school student.
She's a child and all this.
She's got all the cards, man.
Anyway, he brutalized her, and so he was fired.
Well, anyway, they were talking about it on The View.
You know, the one with Whoopi Goldberg, that piece of garbage, and that idiot white liberal, what's her name, Joy Behar, whatever her name is, anyway.
Well, there's another host on there.
Her name is Raven Simone.
She looks like a black woman.
She looks mixed race to me, but you know how it is when you're mixed race and you're black.
Or if you've got, like, white mother, black father, I'm black.
That's just too convenient.
But anyway, surprisingly, though, this Raven-Symoné, and maybe I'll post it, she kind of says, hey, wait a minute here, man.
Let's back up.
We don't have all the facts.
We do know that she was being disruptive and multiple people and this and that.
Well, now...
There's a petition drive out there, and they want this person gone.
They want her off there.
And here's a quote.
Here's a quote.
This stuck out to me.
And this is a quote from...
And they don't give the name of the person or the organization.
Maybe they do.
That has formed this petition to get her off the air.
And it goes like this.
Quote, African Americans and black people around the...
And I suddenly have lost it.
Here it is again.
It says they need a voice representative...
Of their views, and not a voice representative of what white people want us to say.
We need strong black role models in prominent positions on television, and Raven-Symoné cannot provide that.
As soon as I read that, I'm like, really?
Fine, great.
That's great.
That's what you want?
I agree.
You know what?
White people need the same thing.
White people need strong white people out there that look out for their views.
Okay?
Their views and their views only.
And strong role models and all that stuff.
I adhere to the 14 words, guys.
You ever heard of the 14 words?
You can look it up.
And it goes like this.
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
That's what I believe.
That's what I believe.
I've come to the conclusion, not today, I've felt this way for a very long time.
And I'm a fair person.
I'm a very fair person.
This is my conclusion.
We cannot live together in harmony.
We're just not the same.
And I furthermore believe, and this is something that, I'm not a Bible scholar, perhaps, maybe someday I'll ask Pastor Mike about this, because he's the expert on this, but I don't believe we were meant to live together.
Look, I've said it before, I have black neighbors on this street, and I get along excellent with Joe.
He's a retired Master Sergeant from the Army, and he'll pull up in front of my driveway, he'll go out of his way to wave to me, and I will do the same thing to him.
But at the end of the day...
There's not enough good people like me and good people like Joe, and that's unfortunate, that one day Joe and I might have to stand in front of one another and say, it ain't working out, man.
I know, Joe.
There's just too many forces of evil, and it's on the left.
It's the cultural Marxist.
It's not the white people.
It's in his community.
He might not want to admit that.
Guys, have you ever heard the term or the phrase, there goes the neighborhood?
Like when a black person moves in.
I know, that's kind of racist, and you're not supposed to say that.
Ooh, you're such a racist.
But you know what?
When the Beverly Hillbillies move in next door, you don't really hear that, do you?
I'm just asking.
A show of hands.
When the Beverly Hillbillies move in next door, the people say, there goes the neighborhood.
Yeah, they might hang an engine block from their tree.
Yeah, they might build a fence that gets broken and the dog gets out.
Yeah, they may do some of those things.
But you don't hear people say, there goes the neighborhood.
Like when the black family moves in.
Hey man, I didn't just make that up.
Do I want it to be that way?
Glad that it's that way?
Of course not.
But it's that way, and I didn't make it that way.
The black people have made it that way.
And they continue to do so.
I think I told the story years ago when I first moved out here.
I used to ride my bike all over the city of Seattle.
All over.
Well, I wasn't afraid to go through the black neighborhoods, and I did.
Even after this one incident, in broad daylight.
Going up on the hilltop district, Capitol Hill, going kind of down the street, cutting through the projects.
Here come this horde of little black kids, and they're running towards me from afar, but still coming out, and I didn't really put two and two together right away.
Okay, kids playing, they're going to maybe run over to the park or something.
No, they were running towards me, and they started throwing rocks at me.
Yeah.
Like a scared white liberal just...
I didn't stop either and make a spectacle of myself because, I mean, I'm not Superman, but I was on a mountain bike and I just kind of rode through the area, but that always stuck in my mind.
What do you think would happen today if a black kid was walking down this street where I live and I walked out of my garage and started throwing rocks at him?
Well, I can tell you what would happen.
I'd have CNN helicopters.
I'd have to quit my job.
I'd have to move away, change my name.
I would have to have private security go snatch my kids up out of school so some blacks didn't go murder them because they feel that they can just do that.
It's just over, folks.
It's been over for a long time.
And, you know, these articles are everywhere.
Everywhere in the paper.
Dusty Baker, a former successful manager for the Cincinnati Reds and San Francisco Giants.
The article, the headline of the article is, Major League Baseball has a minority manager problem again.
It's not enough that one is a manager, or two, or three, or sometimes none.
That doesn't matter to them.
They want all of the jobs, and if they don't have each and every one of those jobs, well, then it's racist.
Well, you know what?
Go to hell.
Go to hell.
I'm for segregating it again.
Hey, you want your black league?
And they even say that 40% or more of the league is made up of, now they say, Foreign-born and U.S.-born minorities, they always do that.
And that's funny, too, how they do stuff like that.
If they can't get true numbers, they'll kind of add things to make it to kind of increase their numbers.
It's unbelievable.
And if you just listen, if you just open your ears and listen, you will hear these things.
You'll hear them, too.
It's like you're not supposed to say black anymore, right?
You're supposed to say African-American or person of color.
Well, what do you think would happen if...
What do you call a white guy from South Africa?
And he comes to the United States.
Is he an African-American?
I bet you if he identifies as an African-American, they're going to say, you can't be an African-American.
And he'd say, well, why?
And they'd say, well, you're not black.
And I would say, whoa, whoa, wait a minute.
What do you mean I'm not black?
I thought we weren't supposed to use that term anymore.
Which is it?
And then they get caught.
They don't know.
Oh, well, well, then you're not a person of color.
And I would say, what do you mean I'm not a person of color?
I'm white.
Is that not a color?
I'm least peach or something.
What's going on here?
Well, what's going on, folks, and I know we're getting close to break, what's going on is that things have been out of control.
We have a half-black president who masquerades, and after we get back from the break, I have one more thing to say about this.
So I'll wait until after the break, until I do this.
Go ahead and enjoy the music, folks.
I'm a little early, I know.
I know, Frank, I'm a little early.
I'm getting better at this.
I do have your clock right there.
So, after the break, folks.
We will continue.
Okay, we're running long, so I need to start winding this up.
But before I do, I want to natter at you guys for a bit on something.
It's something that came up...
Earlier this week, which calls this to mind.
Now, this is not a topic I'll get specific about because it involves an internal movement debate, which in my opinion is not a good idea to conduct in public in earshot of our unpleasant neighbors who are listening over the fence.
But in general, what I want to talk about is our movement's eternal and so far unsatisfactory search for purity.
Guys, I'm sorry to have to tell you, but the last moral purity in our people effectively perished in 1945.
And ever since then, every individual who's been involved in white nationalism or any kind of pro-white politics has been pretty much flawed, sometimes deeply flawed, and contaminated to at least some degree by the poison that floats in the air and has seeped into the very bones and chromosomes of America.
Now, some examples are worse than others.
I would tend to give the late Commander George Lincoln Rockwell maybe a 95% purity rating.
And on the other extreme, you have the so-called movement modernizers, who claim that buggery and Jewish blood are no big deal in a so-called white leader.
And isn't it odd how many of our so-called leaders seem to have little problems like that, especially in Europe?
But that's not what I'm talking about here.
I'm not talking about the failings or weaknesses of others.
I'm talking about our own expectations, how those expectations are so often disappointed and how that affects the attitude and the participation of so many of us.
Look, we live in a society which is always at least a little contaminated from birth for all of us.
Sometimes a lot contaminated.
I think the last purely healthy and vigorous world that existed on this continent was prior to World War I. You can see a little bit of this world in the novels of Booth Tarkington, especially the Penrod series.
I first read those books when I was about ten years old, and I still reread them every couple of years, even to this day.
It's really wonderful to be able to go back in time for a few hours to the last point in history where this country was even remotely sane.
World War I killed that world.
It wasn't just all over Europe that the lamps went out in August of 1914.
What I'm saying here is that anyone who was born and raised in this broken and bleeding and deranged society, including myself and those of my generation, is to some degree contaminated and poisoned and deformed mentally and morally and emotionally.
You just can't be raised in a nut house and not be at least a little nuts.
This society is so dysfunctional, so badly broken, so unnatural and bizarre that everybody born after maybe 1940 is going to have some kind of flaw or slight disfigurement of character and anyone born after 1970 or so, it's going to be pretty noticeable.
Obama's America being what it is, there will be some kind of skeleton in almost any white American's closet.
Some quirky past.
Some questionable behavioral trait or peculiar habit.
Some involvement with drugs or petty run-ins with the law or weird stuff on the internet or minor scandal.
If you're over 40, there's probably going to be a couple of divorces.
There'll be sketchy financial stuff.
Now, this is just who white people are these days.
The Jews have succeeded in killing normal, in destroying the whole concept.
This phenomenon is by no means limited to white nationalism.
It affects every stratum of white society.
The standard way liberals explain it is, well, so-and-so made bad decisions.
Never addressing or admitting the fact that the world of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and Juggiers Bush encourages and enables and facilitates nothing but bad decisions.
Now, what I'm saying here is, insofar as possible, the party tries to vet people who become involved with us.
That is amazingly easy with the internet up to a point, and we're not looking for Beaver Cleaver.
The beaver no longer exists, if indeed he ever did.
I get that.
I don't expect to find people who are squeaky clean, and I'm surprised and maybe a little suspicious if I do.
What we're looking for is stuff in your past that is not just weird or silly or poor judgment, but bad if you get the difference.
Drug dealing as opposed to one or two youthful experiments.
Questionable racial attitudes off social media, like the guy who wanted to join us and we looked on his MySpace page and it turned out he was an impresario for nigger rap groups.
Public indications of strange sex stuff.
A history of actual criminal acts as opposed to a criminal record like anybody can acquire in a police state, if you get the idea.
The question is, what kind and level of past deviance and various fucking up can be overlooked, and where is the cutoff line beyond which it's no longer just growing up young and stupid in Obama's America, and it becomes indicative of something irreparable and disqualifying, some kind of damage that can't be fixed.
The answer is, I don't know.
It's a judgment call, and it's a call I've made wrong on a few occasions in the past.
I'm somewhat hampered by the fact that we so desperately need help that I will sometimes deliberately attempt to get mileage out of people whom I know deep down to be fundamentally and permanently unsuitable for our way of life, despite all the times in the past that doing that has blown up in my face.
Now, the reason I'm mentioning this is by way of more Fearless Leader 101.
Remember, you guys, most of you, are going to be doing this for yourselves one day and making your own judgment calls on who to let close.
All I can say is weigh the balance sheet, pros and cons, as carefully as hell.
And always make contingency plans in case you make a wrong call and somebody turns out to be not as advertised.
And no, nothing has happened.
This is just one of the many things that you guys need to understand and think about for the time when you're on your own and trying not to fall down a rabbit hole.
But for now, our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha Underban.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection