All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 17, 2016 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:09:18
20161117_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush-a-woogle, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot, by the river, rifle known to you and me.
One word, roar for signal, token, whistle of an arching tune.
For your bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
With your eyes upon your shoulder By the rising of the moon Out from many a mud wall cabin eyes Were watching through the night Many a manly chest was throbbing For the blessed warning light The waters passed along the valleys Like the man she's lonely crew And a thousand blades were flashing At the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon And a
thousand days were flashing out Rising on the moon Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's November the 17th, 2016.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Okay, last week I asked for you folks to submit MP3 audio files with your comments on the election results, and several of you sent some in.
We'll be hearing a lot of those today, but don't worry.
All you Covingtonistas out there will get your weekly Herald fix towards the end of the program.
I figure we'll let Andy Donner kick it off this week.
Greetings from Seattle, comrades.
Andy Donner here.
I, along with the usual RFN contributors, have been asked to deliver a few remarks on the election.
In the interests of transparency, this material was all prepared before the election, and I did so with a very specific purpose in mind.
As strange as it sounds, I think that purpose is best served by admitting this up front.
So Donald Trump will be the next President of the United States.
We all saw that coming, right?
Now that I've covered the obvious, I need to talk to you all about something really, really important.
What are you going to do about this?
Well, I'll make this personal for a moment in the hope that I can actually come across as relatable for once.
I get my share of hecklers and gripers and naysayers on a regular basis, and I always have, ever since I started making remarks with the party in public.
And still regularly, though not nearly as frequently, someone will actually run to Harold and tattle on me for something I said or did.
This always cracks me up because, with very rare exceptions, I haven't said anything not already said on RFN well before I even knew the party existed.
The difference is that I find new and irritating ways to combine these already extant observations, but that's neither here nor there.
So, as much as it cracks me up to merely repeat things someone else said, and be castigated for having said them, by people who will never, ever lift a finger to help their race, I'm going to do just that now because it needs support.
What just happened electorally is precisely the sort of thing the Northwest Front has warned about for years.
Harold sometimes describes this as events overtaking us.
Let's all remember why we're here, folks.
White genocide.
And specifically, the only viable plan to put a halt to it.
The Northwest Imperative.
This is critically important because we don't have forever to take care of this, and the electoral results have underscored that truth.
I know Trump being elected president is the result you all wanted, merely because Hillary Clinton was denied the office.
And hey, I'm right there with you.
But we need to understand something about this.
It doesn't mean what you think, and here's why.
The white race is still on the clock.
Regardless of whatever happens, there's still a demographic nightmare happening all over the world.
Sure, in an ideal Trump presidency, there would be a complete and total stop of any and all illegal immigration and refugee importation.
And since we're talking ideal scenarios, let's say that all illegals will be sent home on day one of the Trump administration.
Where does that get us?
Nowhere.
As I said, this is most definitely events overtaking us.
The events that matter are demographics, and demographic damage has been done already.
Those of you who have been any sort of white nationalist for any length of time will have run into information which clears up history such that you're aware white genocide is a long process, and it's been in effect for quite some time.
Longer than living memory, at least.
One presidential election wasn't going to vary that a whole lot either way.
At best, this buys us a few years of relatively better economics with which we can enable ourselves.
But again I ask, where does that put us?
Probably nowhere.
Probably.
Here's the real deal, folks.
Another thing which has been said quite a bit on RFN is that white nationalism is a drug because no matter how far around the twist it drives quite a few of you, you always come back for more.
And the same thing that could be said of white nationalism could also be said of liberal democracy and perhaps electoral politics, too.
Unfortunately for the white race, those purporting to be its biggest proponents are on some sort of a high right now, and they're not likely to come down anytime soon.
And while just about every white nationalist is off on their drug binge, events will continue to overtake us.
When the rest of you come down and sober up, you'll find we have exactly the same problem we had before Donald Trump was on our radar.
So what are you going to do about it?
Notice I didn't use the word we there, because I already know what I'm doing about it.
I've been doing it ever since I found the Northwest Front, which was a year before I came home, which, in turn, enabled me to become active with the party here in the Puget Sound area.
If we were all to be honest with ourselves, there's nothing else in America, or the world, going on which could even hold a candle to the Northwest Imperative in terms of ability to actually stave off white racial extinction.
Why, then, did so many of you get wrapped up in some electoral game which doesn't really impact our situation to begin with?
I understand that nearly all of you were acting out of a sense of morality in not wanting Hillary Clinton as president.
And just as many of you were hoping your own personal situation would improve as a result of Trump's election.
But none of that really matters in light of the long game being played.
And guess what?
No matter how much you wanted to opt out by electing Trump instead of Hillary, you're still playing the game despite your own desperate desire not to.
There's no opting out of white genocide just because one person or another gets elected.
And since I'm being totally honest with you right now...
I'm severely disappointed in every single one of you who took this election to be far more important than it actually was, because I know that you know better.
Every single election I've witnessed, and I've paid attention to quite a few of them despite my relatively young age, has always been reported as the most important election in American history, like this last one was.
That's why I tend to disregard any particular election's importance, especially this one.
I got jumped on by the entire internet four years ago when I said that because, as I was told, it was actually true that time.
Just like it was this time.
Just like it will always be.
Hopefully none of you will fall for this again in another four years because you'll be too busy with your party activity here in the homeland.
Hail victory.
And this is Bill from Spokane.
All right.
It is the day after Tuesday, and Trump won.
Am I excited about it?
Absolutely.
I know there's some guys who are throwing cold water on the election, and they have their points.
They're not wrong about what they're saying.
We are still being genocided.
But there is some positives, potential positives for a Trump presidency.
One thing that Trump can do...
Is interior enforcement of our immigration laws.
Right now, it's not being enforced.
The border's not being enforced either.
So, if we have real interior enforcement of our immigration laws, it can have a positive impact.
Another thing I think that'll lead to is solving this anchor baby problem.
Because right now, with basically the anchor baby rule, the Supreme Court never ruled on it.
They haven't ruled on anchor babies yet, in terms of an illegal alien showing up here and taking a crap, and then it's an instant U.S. citizen.
They've never ruled on that.
So, hopefully, what I would like to see happen, and this could just be a flight of fancy, is interior enforcement ramps up, people are going to court, Democrats are going to court, Republicans are going to court.
And hopefully this anchor baby situation winds its way up to the Supreme Court and we can get a proper ruling on this that says, no, illegal aliens cannot come here.
Leave a skid mark on the carpet and that skid mark becomes a U.S. citizen anchor for them to stay here.
The 14th Amendment was written, was put in place, so it was understood that slaves were full U.S. citizens with all their rights and privileges.
And as far as I know, it's just a State Department interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
That is the reason why people from China and Mexico and Central America and whatnot fly in here when they're prego and have their kid here in our hospitals.
We pay for it, and bam, they've got an instant U.S. citizen.
Which leads me to my next point, which is Trump being elected does not change the immigration laws that are on the books.
Allows for chain migration, which means if you have a family member here, you have the inside track for immigrating and getting a green card, which favors Latinos and it favors Mexicans a ton because one or two will sneak in and then, you know, Mamacita and Papacita, Grandma Rosemary and everybody else is showing up.
And Grandma, you know, Rosalita showing up here a week before retirement and getting right on Social Security having never paid a dime in.
And we're paying this.
Social Security is already going broke and now it's just going broke faster.
And in terms of demographics, the ship has already sailed on that thing.
If you look, you take a look at Wikipedia, birth rates and whatnot.
I was looking at it for Washington State, and the amount of one-year-olds that are non-white, it's like 44% in Washington State.
It's like one of the whitest places the country still left.
What does that tell you?
The non-whites are outbreeding us.
That means in 15, 20 years, Washington State is going to look like every other part of the country in terms of the amount of shitskins we're having to deal with.
So basically, all it is is maybe a moderate delaying of the inevitable.
The country is going California.
That is the Democrat plan, and they're enacting it.
They took Colorado, just like they took California.
They're going to do Texas.
And they took Virginia.
Virginia used to be red Republican as it gets.
But Virginia has a shitload of illegal aliens.
And looky here.
Surprise, surprise.
Now all of a sudden, Virginia's blue.
I mean, the end is nigh here, folks.
It's just...
I mean, the Republicans, or excuse me, the Democrats throwing away the white working class.
They were just a little bit premature.
In a few more election cycles...
Their prediction of being able to throw away the blue-collar, white middle working class and still being able to get elected, that will come true.
You know what this country's gonna look like when nothing but a bongos and Hillary Clintons get elected to office?
Shit!
So if you have any questions about whether or not we need to still do this...
Because Trump was elected?
The answer is absolutely, hell yes, we need to do this.
Think about what your great-grandkids' life is going to be like in year 2087, when the white population is a small minority, a small, hated, and very much persecuted minority, you know, because they deserve it, paybacks in the mind of the minority, and what they've been taught by liberals to hate white people.
And you don't want your kids going to a government school that's 10% white, where they're teaching Howard Zinn's history about how it was whitey and colonialism that robbed all the poor little brown and black people and made the white rich slave owner what he was.
You don't want that fallout for your little grandkid.
That's why this is right, and that's why we're righteous in what we're doing.
And we're gonna do it.
Greetings, comrades.
This is the Trucker coming at you from the homeland.
I saw this come across my Facebook feed earlier this week, and I thought this would be perfect for the post-election podcast.
It reads, Dear Democrats and liberals, I'm noticing that a lot of you aren't graciously accepting the fact that your candidate lost.
In fact, some of you seem to be posting even more hateful things about those of us who voted for Trump.
Some of you apparently triggered because you are posting about how sick you feel about the results.
How did this happen, you ask?
You created us when you attacked our freedom of speech.
You created us when you attacked our right to bear arms.
You created us when you attacked our Christian beliefs.
You attacked us when you constantly referred to us as racists.
You created us when you constantly called us xenophobic.
You created us when you told us to get on board or get out of the way.
You created us when you forced us to buy health care and then financially penalized us for not participating.
You created us when you allowed our jobs to continue to leave our country.
You created us when you attacked our flag.
You created us when you confused women's rights with feminism.
You created us when you began to emasculate men.
You created us when you decided to make our children soft.
You created us when you decided to vote for progressive ideas.
You created us when you attacked our way of life.
You created us when you decided to let our government get out of control.
You created us the silent majority.
And we became fed up and pushed back and spoke up.
And we did with ballots, not bullets.
Well, comrades, we need to do it with one other thing.
That's with our feet.
In other words, move your asses to the homeland.
That's the best way to vote.
Alright, this was a quick little segment from The Trucker, so I'm signing off from the home front.
Have a good one, comrades, and hope to see you migrating or making your scouting trips to the homeland soon.
This is The Trucker, signing off.
This is Waylon Jennings.
It's a Civil War song I've actually never heard him do before.
����
Through the smoke and the mud and the blood we walked behind Robert E. Lee Sixty miles from Richmond to face the Union Army We dug our holes and we built a wall cause we knew there'd be a fight If the blue coat wearing soldiers crossed the river that night Sure as hell
that sundown came a hundred thousand men And it sure did shock me, Lord, to see kin killing kin.
The cannonballs were heavy, filled with iron and steel and lead.
And the James River water ran a bloody rail.
Oh, Lord, is it right.
Did you mean for me to kill my brother here tonight?
*music*
It's been one hundred years and as I look around I see a mighty city where there once was a battleground I thought when Lee surrendered we would fight no more But the ghost of Lee can still see us fight the civil war Greetings,
comrades.
This is Sam from Little Rock.
And I appreciate the opportunity to speak on the program.
Radio Free Northwest is by far the most sober commentary available on our little corner of the political spectrum, but on a business.
Like most of you, I'm very pleased with the outcome of the election.
This is the first presidential election I've participated in where I don't think that my time would have been more productively spent being asleep or doing literally anything else.
I expected that Donald to receive the majority of votes by far, but given the total control the established political lead have over every level of the political process, I fully expected Hillary to have won the election.
Exploding violent machines and good old-fashioned ballot stuffing were undoubtedly well within their capabilities.
I suspect that overt election fraud was viewed as too high-risk by key decision-makers within the political establishment.
Maybe rumors of a countercoup spearheaded by intelligence agencies is true, but I think that it'll be decades, if ever, before we know what really happened.
For now, it seems, every Don has his day.
This is a refreshing change, and from all appearances of his first few days as president-elect, Donald Trump means business.
His named appointees, like Steve Bannon, suggest a commitment to the wishes of the people who drove his guerrilla political campaign.
I would describe myself as cautiously optimistic.
I see Trump's election not as a total victory as much as it is a stay of execution.
I suspect that he will buy us much needed time if he implements even a few of the policies he's campaigned on.
But that being said, Trump is not a white nationalist.
At best, he's a civic nationalist, but at a minimum, he just isn't anti-white.
I think that speaks volumes about the kind of state that we're in when a man who merely abstains from vowing to dispossess whites of everything they own and their ancestors built is vilified by a litany of Trotskyite pejorative by the press and almost half the population.
What I'm getting at is that Trump does not seem particularly sympathetic to nationalists, and I would not expect him to grant any pardons if somebody does anything imprudent.
Furthermore, his so-called allies in the GOP, who populate most of Congress and the Senate, are the same mob of useful idiots, corrupt shills, and Bohemian Grove-style child traffickers who have been in power for years.
They cannot be counted on, and the work our movement does is still vital to our survival.
Trump will not be president forever.
For now, I'm going to avoid the Soros rent-a-mobs and enjoy the sweet sound of liberal tears.
Hail victory, comrades.
Hail victory, comrades.
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing the second volume of Spengler's Decline of the West.
Now Spengler begins this volume by discussing animals versus plants.
Plants to Spengler are a symbol of cosmic life because essentially plants have to accommodate themselves to the cycles of the seasons, whereas animals will have a life cycle, but they also have an ability for independent motion and an increasing degree of self-awareness until you get up to people when there's actually an awareness of their own mortality.
Spengler sees this duality in other facets of life, and one facet of life where he sees this duality in particular is the difference between the aristocrat and the priest.
Now, in this instance, Spengler is talking about the Catholic priest in particular, and he talks about how priest life is really about contemplation.
Priests, according to Spengler, have very little in the way of race.
Now, at this point, we have to ask ourselves what Spengler actually means by race in this context, because obviously a priest isn't necessarily a different race from a noble, but there is one definition of race.
For example, when you talk about current in the ocean, where there's a particularly fast current, it is often spoken of as a race.
And in this respect, Spengler is talking about the flow of generations and of the life force, and clearly a priest, especially if we're talking about a celibate priest, not necessarily so much the Vedic...
who were very much involved in life cycle rites and who themselves married and had offspring.
But if you're talking about the Christian priests who are celibate, obviously someone like that does not participate in the flow of generations.
So that's really what Spengler is talking about here.
Now, Spengler also talks about the Reformation.
And how that was supposed to be an awakening of faith.
And especially for someone like Martin Luther, who was synonymous with the Reformation, really not the only reformer, but the one that's most remembered and the key player, this worked out very well because someone like him, they could spend their whole life...
Examining their conscience.
And of course, Protestantism is an invitation for both individuals and clergy to examine their conscience and work very diligently at their salvation.
And even today, if an individual joins a small Protestant church, that individual, especially if they become very involved, may be asked to help with the service.
To give a talk, to play an instrument.
And this is all part of the fact that Protestantism is really meant to be more difficult.
But what ultimately happened with the Reformation, you know, people learning to read, having to read their Bibles, having to try and think for themselves, over time there was more and more rationality and more and more skepticism.
Spengler talks about how all this rationality and skepticism even led to Darwinism.
Religion seemed more and more relative.
Spengler continues to talk about this idea of how societies mature.
And he talks about how in the springtime of society, we have the peasant and the noble.
And how everyone at that point is really tied to the land.
But as society matures, civilization starts to replace culture.
What happens, and the way in which this happens, is that the city becomes prominent over the country.
And money becomes less and less tied to actual commodities and things like gold and silver.
Money itself becomes less and less real.
And as industrialization particularly comes about, Money becomes more and more about things like speculation and certain notions of productivity.
And also on the needs of industry.
Both law and money become really beholden to industry.
And he talks about how even though there's really not any more art, there's going to be a new age of jurisprudence.
Now he also talks about this notion of the press.
And how it begins to shape opinion.
And of course, with regard to the Trump campaign, we've all heard this term, Ludin Presse, the lying press.
He also blames newspapers for a lack of literary knowledge within society.
And I would also talk about...
I know in contemporary times, literature and how there's so much nowadays, and in terms of things like fiction, there's a lot of fluff in terms of literature.
For example, if you go to a library, of course you'll find a lot of popular fiction.
You're not going to find, for example, a lot of alt-right literature necessarily.
So I would say there is a lot of fluff out there in the literary world, not just newspapers.
In the second volume, once you get about 85% into it, there's very much a change in voice.
Because earlier on in this volume, Spengler's idea of race is very difficult to pin down.
There are even times early on in the second volume where Spengler writes about the supposed influence of environment.
Now, I really don't know if these statements are meant to perhaps be ironic or if they're perhaps to be taken seriously.
I really can't tell.
But they seem a bit, even at times, rather ridiculous.
So perhaps they're ironic.
Once you get about 85% into this volume, Spengler talks about this need for leadership, which would be highly trained, would be self-replenishing, and would be an aristocratic minority.
So it sounds rather like the SS.
He talks about, of course, aristocracy, of course, being connected to culture and democracy being a hallmark of civilization.
He starts talking about this notion of how, at a certain point, society renounces destiny because even the intelligentsia, their opinions are shaped by the press, by a certain window of what is acceptable, and so civilization or society ends up going to sleep.
This seems a very interesting notion.
This notion of history actually going to sleep is what he says.
This seems to bring in a cyclical view of history.
And even though the comment is made in passing, I find it very interesting.
And he talks about how we've created this civilization and we are very much in danger of becoming its servants.
And how another power, he hopes this other power will come along and will overthrow what has been built up.
And how we now have the freedom to either do the necessary or to do nothing.
And in talking about doing the necessary, he starts to sound rather like Marchera G, also like Evola with his traditionalism and talking about regeneration.
So I'm not sure what is happening here.
I don't know if Spengler is getting caught up in the zeitgeist of the age or if there's a certain pragmatism in his writing.
Or if, as I said before, he was simply being ironic at the beginning.
So this volume has a lot of detail in terms of classical studies, and all of this detail really reminds me of Bill White's writing.
Again, like a lot of philosophy, the second volume is really designed for someone with a lot of time on their hands.
If you don't have a lot of time on your hands, you might want to skip to the very end of this volume to really get something meaty and applicable.
So I hope you enjoyed this discussion.
Next time I'm going to be moving on to Schopenhauer.
So I thank you very much for listening.
Have a good evening and hail victory comrades.
Thank you.
I haven't gone all Celtic on your asses for a while, so this is an ancient song from the Scottish Western Isles about a maiden who encounters a water horse, which is a mythological creature similar to a sea serpent.
I don't know, maybe she met the Loch Ness Monster or something.
Anyway, the singer is the Scottish Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis.
The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis
The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis
The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis
The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis
The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist
Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis
The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis
The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis The Gaelic folk artist Julie Fallis
I won't go over my usual whines about technical problems, but when we tried to do one on the night of the 10th last week, this time, I swear to God, it wasn't our fault.
This time, all of our internet went down in the Bremerton area.
You can hear the beginning of one call on here, and then poof, Richard goes out, and the service doesn't get restored in time for us to take any more calls.
So in order that the whole thing shouldn't be a total washout, here's Don and me nettering Okay, this is the Radio Free Northwest call-in show for November the 10th, 2016.
This will be the first call-in show we've had since the November the 8th election.
And we'll be getting your comments and views on that.
And right now we have no callers, and we're waiting for Comrade Don to get back.
You're on Radio Free Northwest.
Who am I speaking with, please?
This is Richard, and I'm in Virginia.
Hey!
I kind of figured you'd be the first one tonight, Richard.
First one?
Wow.
We're just getting started here.
Comrade Don is just getting back.
And so I guess we'll kick off with you tonight.
What'd you think of that election?
Well, it's a start.
It's a start.
I thought it was...
Well, you talk about the election.
I thought they tried to skew it towards Hillary.
I don't know what happened, but it seemed like everybody, the media was on board, even some of the commentary when they were counting the votes, seeing what state won.
They seemed reluctant to give Trump his due and admit that he was winning.
Hi, Richard.
This is Don.
Hello.
Richard?
Gee.
Okay.
Well, he's still showing his...
I just dropped.
I think that was on his end.
Mm-hmm.
And people on both sides of the election are talking about assassination now.
Oh, yeah.
There was a whole slew of threats on Twitter.
I think it was Drudge pointed them out, that just, I mean, there's literally hundreds of these loonies demanding that someone, quote-unquote, take one for the team and kill Trump.
And I tweeted myself, I said, can you just imagine?
What would happen if any of us, before the election or at any time, had just so much as whispered the words Hillary Clinton and assassination or kill in the same tweet?
And, my God, we would have had FBI SWAT teams kicking in the door within hours.
Ever since the primaries, Twitter has just been full of people threatening to kill Trump and begging for other people to kill Trump, and not a damn thing seems to be done about it.
Yeah, we have too much of a good boy reputation.
We need to develop a bad boy reputation.
Well, you notice today there are nigger mobs running up and down the streets and several of them actually dragged white people out of cars and demanded to know if they voted for Trump and kicked the crap out of them.
And again, always it seems to be the white man who's on the receiving end of this stuff.
Seriously?
Well, yeah, I'm...
Serious as well.
It's just, I'm a little bit restrained in how I can actually say these things.
I have to use a lot of what Lennon referred to as aesopian language, but it's pretty clear that at some point in time the white man has to acquire a deterrent.
We have to be able to disincentivize this kind of behavior, and we have to get these people, especially these niggers, to stop looking at us as targets and victims and easy marks.
Right.
I'm choosing my words carefully.
I think we need to get the reputation as being bad boys.
Well, we have whole generations of niggers now that have grown up not being afraid of white people, except within certain limited parameters police.
The police are really the only white males these days that have a limited permission slip to use force and coercion against people with dark skins, and it is very limited.
And restricted pretty much to making sure that these coups don't go over into the rich white neighborhoods and mess with the rich people.
Yeah.
One of the true comments I read by some woman on the left was that this election was all about race.
That's what it was about.
Oh, yeah.
And, of course, she meant it in a negative way, but, of course, she was correct in the neutral way and a way that we would view as positive.
First thing is, in America these days, race no longer means what it meant when you and I was growing up.
It was just basically black and white.
Now we've got all of these other mystery meat creatures in the mix.
The Mexicans and Asians and Hoppas and, you know, strange brown things that look like they crawled out of the Black Lagoon.
The place is literally turning into a cesspool.
And race is no longer...
Come to mean black and white.
It doesn't mean white supremacy anymore, despite what those idiots at Salon say.
Race means the ongoing genocide and the survival or not of the white race.
That is the racial issue now.
That's how it's defined, is will the white race survive or not?
And of course, what's happening is not an accident.
War is being waged against us.
Racial war is being waged against us.
People need to wake up to that fact and take action.
And I think a lot of white people actually are aware of it and they don't know what to do.
And I think when Trump came along, there was a charismatic leader that people could follow.
And so, for a variety of reasons, white people jumped on the Trump train, as they call it.
And so that's what's happening now.
And, of course, everybody's waiting to see what Trump's going to do when he has his plan for the first hundred days.
But even Trump cannot come out and just say explicitly that he's going to look after the interests of white people as white people.
Oh, yeah.
No, I get that.
I think we should give him a bit of a honeymoon.
For one thing, we don't need to be demanding that he immediately...
Fix everything with the wave of his magic wand.
For one thing, he's not actually going to be in the White House for another two months.
And Obama has another two months there in which he can do God knows what kind of damage.
And so we need to understand that.
And also we need to understand that while there is a lot that he can do through executive orders and through his bully pulpit, etc., he is still going to have to have some cooperation from the Congress.
Now, he's got a good Congress.
He's got Republican Senate and Republican House.
In theory, there is no reason why they shouldn't cooperate with a Republican president and start cleaning things up, but remember the treatment he got during the primaries.
There are large elements of the Republican Party that do not want him in there.
Harold, I have to disagree.
I think you're downplaying the power of the...
Office of the President as it currently exists.
Congress has given previous presidents extraordinary powers under the Patriot Act and other laws that they've passed, and if Trump makes full use of those, what Congress does is almost trivial in terms of blocking his agenda.
And I think that as Commander-in-Chief, and in fact, even now, before he takes office, the Russians are communicating with him, and the risk of World War III is evaporating as we watch.
And so already he's having a huge international diplomatic impact, and people are going to talk to him between now and Inauguration Day, and he obviously has authority there.
As far as other things, the president completely controls the executive branch of government.
It's not just executive orders.
He can just give oral instructions to the military, and they are supposed to obey immediately because he's the commander-in-chief.
He can give orders to the CIA, orders to the FBI, have his man in the Department of Justice investigate anybody.
And if someone in particular is a pain in the ass, he can have them assassinated.
Yeah.
And that's all been established by precedent.
Congress passed the laws.
So what does he need Congress for?
If they don't want to cooperate, he can do a tremendous amount of things and completely bypass them and scare the hell out of them, I think.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Well, one thing you could do is just revoke a number of Obama's executive orders, starting with that one on November 20, 2014, the Dreamers thing.
Some of the things like building the wall, he is going to have to get some congressional cooperation because they do still have the power of the purse.
Harold, I think the wall is really a symbol.
In terms of blocking the border, he can turn on the border patrol and they will enthusiastically enforce the border.
And if they don't have enough manpower, he can direct the military there.
He can close off that border within 24 hours if he wants to.
And again, the wall is a nice symbol and it's a good thing to do, but he doesn't need Congress's cooperation to completely stop the inflow of illegal aliens.
He can throw the illegal aliens out of the country who are already here.
He can do both of those things quickly, and Congress can't stop him.
Oh, yeah.
We don't even need any more laws.
All he has to do is basically send a couple of sentences to the appropriate agencies, ICE and Border Patrol and whatnot, saying, okay, under new management, from now on you will once again enforce the law.
Our existing laws are quite adequate.
It's just that for many, many years they haven't been enforced, and various administrations, both Democratic and Republican, have turned a blind eye.
Democrats want them here to vote Democrat, and the Republicans want them here for cheap labor.
And so you've got years of accumulated neglect.
But yeah, all it would take would be for a President of the United States to have the political will, the balls, to just tell the agencies involved, go get them.
I was reading my Lefty Loom blogs, and before the election they were saying, oh no, that's impossible.
He can't just deport millions of people.
Sure he can.
We've done it before.
There was a period about 50-so years ago, I think a little bit before that, when they did a more or less roundup of about 2 million Mexicans and moved them out.
That was in the late 40s, I think, something like that.
I think it wasn't in the 50s.
It was under Eisenhower.
Operation Wetback.
He appointed one of his West Point buddies, who was a general, to be in charge of it.
And as I recall reading about it, once they started it up...
The Mexicans just left to their own accord.
They didn't even wait to be rounded up.
And so I would expect that to occur this time as well.
They don't have to go after every single one who's here.
They start going after them, and a whole bunch of them will just go back to Mexico on their own accord.
I'm hoping the mere election of Donald Trump will have some of that effect.
It could be that some of the Mexicans will just say, well, might as well go back to Guadalajara or whatever.
I think also the fact that so many of these Mexicans do pass back and forth across the border, almost at will, indicates that while Mexico is definitely a poorer country than the United States, it's not, like, intolerable for them down there.
It's not like they're starving in the ditches or anything in Mexico.
You know, they're coming here basically just to live in a richer country and also to take what we have.
I see Arpeo got voted out.
Yeah.
Sheriff.
Yeah, well, of course...
I have to admit, he was getting on up there.
He was, what, 70?
He was almost 80, wasn't he?
I don't know.
That was my one problem with Sheriff Joe when I first heard about him.
I realized that, yeah, he's probably the last of his kind.
I think David Duke got about like 3% in Louisiana.
Do you think the vote was honest?
In Louisiana, probably not.
Louisiana has always been a very strange place politically since the time of Huey Long.
Yeah.
At the time when they locked Earl Long, his brother who was governor, locked him up in the state insane asylum in the 50s.
And so they neglected to remember that under Louisiana state law, the head of the state insane asylum was appointed by the governor.
So Earl just fired the head of the asylum and appointed one of his own flunkies.
And of course they had to have a sanity hearing though.
And so Earl went into the new guy's office and sat down and the new guy says, Governor, tell me, are you insane?
And Earl said, no, sir.
And Guy said, well, that's good enough for me.
Off you go.
People have been talking about presidential power to pardon people, and some people have been saying that the president can even pardon himself, although that hasn't been done yet.
In theory, I don't see why not.
Of course, it would be a bit ridiculous.
But a lot of people were saying that, no, he can't pardon Hillary in advance because she hasn't even been charged with anything.
My recollection is that the precedent on that is this blanket, open-ended pardon for anything and everything, which Gerald Ford gave to Nixon after he resigned, and according to some gossip, was a condition of his resigning.
Basically, the idea was that once Nixon left, the Watergate thing would be over.
Supposedly he was about to be impeached and he would have been charged for whatever under federal law.
But I believe with that precedent, yeah, Obama can basically pardon Hillary for any and all crimes committed from now until the end of time or whatever.
And I suppose that would include a lot of the stuff that happened during their first reign.
The death of Vince Foster.
The cattle futures thing and all that BS.
So, I noticed on the Left Loon blogs she is now turning into St. Hillary.
They would give a little bit of a mention to some of her problems before that on Salon and Hufflepuff and the Daily Beast and Slate and all that sort of stuff.
At least they'd mention some of these scandals.
Now those are gone completely.
She is this saintly being who was brutally robbed of her birthright by that horrible troll Trump.
So they presumably don't say much about Bernie Sanders.
Bernie's kind of the skeleton in their closet at the moment.
Supposedly, I saw something today to the effect that he'd made a casual offhand remark, well, you know, I could have beaten Trump, and I'm sure that's going to get some of them jumping up and down.
Michael Moore laid out four things that the left needs to do in order to recover.
And number one is recover the Democratic Party and throw out all these apparatchiks.
That negress Donna Brazile apparently was having a meeting today as to, you know, what we're going to do now to recover from this horrible disaster.
And some young white male type gets up and starts yelling at her, saying, it's people like you that have caused all this.
The first thing you need to do is resign.
And then he walked out on her.
Hmm.
This sort of stuff.
I mean, the knives are going to be out for the old guard and basically for all these hard-eyed feminist bitches that Hillary Clinton and Debbie Wasserman Schultz brought in.
Yeah.
That's basically who's running or been running the Democrats for quite some time.
All the ladies in the pantsuits of a certain age in their 40s and 50s.
In other words, Hillary's contemporaries, almost contemporaries.
And I think they're going to get turfed out, probably replaced by millennial pajama boys or whatever.
I don't know what they're.
Maybe college Marxist types.
Well, the way the Democrat Party screwed Bernie Sanders, I mean, that just created or revealed a huge schism within the Democrat Party.
Oh, no.
What I want to see is what's going to come in the rest of those WikiLeaks email dumps because apparently they're not through yet.
There's going to be more of those emails from John Podesta leaked.
Oh, yeah.
Also, if Trump carries through...
With his threat to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the Clinton Foundation, and a whole bunch of stuff is going to be revealed in such a way, in a legal setting, that Hillary will need the pardon to stay out of jail.
Yeah.
Well, there doesn't seem to be any question that she's actually committed multiple federal felonies.
The entire putting of her email on that private server, as I understand it, was illegal.
There's this weird situation where, in some circumstances, breaking the internal rules of a federal agency constitutes a violation of the law, even though it's not specifically illegal under a statute of Congress, and things like violating secrecy.
Well, speaking of illegality, someone pointed out that now that Trump is president-elect, threatening his life is a Class E felony.
Well, somebody ought to tell Twitter.
Yeah.
It now appears, if we can believe all this buzz about the investigations, the FBI now has evidence that her private server was actually hacked by not one, not two, not three, not four, but five, count them, five foreign intelligence agencies.
I would assume the Chinese, the Russians, and the Israeli Mossad would be three.
I just wonder who the others were.
Maybe the North Koreans.
Possibly the French.
Yeah.
The British.
The Canadians?
I don't know.
But, I mean, if that happened, and if they can prove for sure that not only was her use of the server negligent and against regulations, but it actually resulted in damage.
Yes.
Then, I mean, I don't know what the hell this Comey guy's playing at.
He sent that letter that said, yeah, we're looking into these emails that were found on this guy Weiner's laptop, which obviously, at some point in time, he must have been sharing the laptop with his wife or his wife was using it and very carelessly putting 650,000 emails on her own private laptop.
But then he, like two nights before the election, he writes another letter and says, all right, nothing to say here.
No, we looked at all 650,000 of them.
I don't know what the hell he's playing at.
I think somebody must have literally grabbed him and pushed him down on the floor of his office and twisted his arms.
Maybe Hillary sent a goon squad or something.
That's a good question.
What was motivating him to first accuse her, then let her off, then re-accus her, and then let her off?
That back and forth is so suggestive of all kinds of skullduggery in the background.
From what I can remember, that first press conference back in July where he says, yeah, she violated all these procedures and she did all this really stupid stuff, but we're not going to charge her because we can't discern intent.
Someone pointed out that the law does not require intent.
The law for sloppy handling of classified material is an offense, a legal offense in itself, no matter whether there's intent or not.
Yeah, I know there are various legal charges involving negligence and gross negligence.
Now, negligence doesn't necessarily mean you intend to do something.
It just means you're too lazy and you can't be bothered to do the right thing.
I mean, there's no question that she should have been charged.
And then we're getting to this stuff with the Clinton Foundation.
It looks like it was just like an open bribe shop.
But what I want to know, all of those foreign governments and corporations and mobsters and whatnot that were dumping millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation all those years in the assumption that she was going to be president, what are they thinking right now?
Are they going to demand their money back?
Yeah.
That is the interesting thing about this Trump victory.
I think it was honest to God, unexpected.
Either these idiots thought that they had it taped because they'd done whatever rigging they thought they'd done, or else these people had actually gotten to the point where they believed their own propaganda.
And that's why I think you saw this.
I think there's a lot of that.
Especially on these lefty blogs, these people just screaming because they were really, honest to God, convinced.
They were just absolutely confident, you know, on Tuesday morning that their bimbo was going to win.
Because, well, the polls said so, and I think that's the thing.
These polls, to me, were clearly diddled.
You can make a poll say anything you want, depending on how you sample your audience.
I must admit, I have enjoyed watching these people's heads explode on the internet.
Couple of fun things are coming out of this, among others.
One, of course, is the credibility of the media is in the dirt now, and a whole lot of them are going to go bankrupt in the near future.
And in particular, polling organizations are completely trashed.
Nobody believes what they say, so nobody's going to pay them to produce polling data.
So those pollsters are going to go out of business.
Oh, yeah.
I personally think polls need to be outlawed as far as election goes anyway because the potential for abuse is obviously too great.
The way I think we ought to have some kind of media control because it's become just obvious that the media no longer reports the news.
They manipulate public opinion in favor of one party and one ideology.
And, okay, yeah, we're supposed to have freedom of the press and all that sort of stuff.
That was meant, basically, so that people could criticize the government and so that the press could expose government corruption and government skullduggery without being dragged away and have their ears cut off and stood in the stocks like it used to be back in King James.
Yeah, I would add corporate scrutiny to that, not just the government scrutiny.
That's freedom of the press.
But, again, does the press have the freedom to deliberately manipulate public opinion to obtain a specific ideologically driven result in elections and in society?
And to do things like normalize strange sexual perversions and Caitlyn Jenner and drag queens going into women's bathrooms and this sort of stuff?
I mean...
This is not reporting the news, and it's not opposing the government or speaking truth to power or whatever.
This is the deliberate psychological manipulation of the population to obtain results desired by a particular ideological movement or group.
Well, following up on the idea of freedom of speech and freedom of the press, the problem is that that's not being honored completely on the Internet, and it ought to be.
Because the sources of real, independent opinions and facts that some people want suppressed has been the Internet.
And the corporations who control social media have been abusing the social media to suppress unpopular ideas.
Unpopular with them, of course.
And the other thing is there are attempts to censor the Internet, and if that doesn't work, then they use distributed denial-of-service attacks and things like that to try to shut down criticism.
And I think that's where the focus ought to be, to protect the Internet.
From censorship, whether legal or illegal, and to thoroughly establish the legal principle that the Internet is completely protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Now, what Obama did, which was interesting, was give control of the Internet to the United Nations.
Before he did that, the implication, the clear implication, was since the United States government controlled the Internet, then the Internet was protected by the Constitution and specifically the First Amendment.
Now that the UN is in charge of it, what guarantee do we have of freedom of speech on the Internet?
This is going to be interesting.
It will be actually pretty hard to completely suppress all dissent on the Internet, but what I was expecting, as I mentioned, I think, last week, if Hillary had gotten elected, would have been an attempt to put the genie back into the bottle of the alt-right.
Twitter accounts would have been cancelled.
Facebook pages would have been pulled down.
You know, Mark Zuckerberg is now being officially criminally investigated in Germany because he refuses to take down quote-unquote hate speech.
I think what the German government wants is a situation whereby they are given some kind of trigger or button themselves.
Apparently they expect Zuckerberg and his Facebook people to either just jump automatically at whatever they say.
Okay, get rid of this guy.
Get rid of this guy.
Take down this post, take down that post.
Basically, the German government is using this investigation, I think, to try and seize control of the Internet in Germany.
I don't know how it would wash in this country, because the Internet here is very wild and woolly, as you can see by looking at it.
And almost anything that any of these governments can come up with to censor the Internet, somebody will find some way to get around.
I mean, look at WikiLeaks, and look at Anonymous, look at the so-called DeepNet.
So, I'm not overly worried about completely losing the internet, the whole movement as a whole.
I'm a little bit worried about specific groups being targeted.
I think they'll target maybe us if they consider the Northwest Front to be that important.
But also, I think they'll target Andrew Anglin's Daily Stormer.
They'll target Breitbart.
They are definitely going to try and target Alex Jones.
If Hillary was in power and these people had the backing of the government behind them, There might be a problem.
I don't know how successful they're going to be trying to do that with Trump in power.
Also, I think they're really getting pissed off at Rush Limbaugh.
There have been rumblings in the past few months, I know, about trying to reintroduce the Fairness Doctrine, but all of that was based on the idea that Hillary was going to win.
And she didn't win.
So, in a way, we're entering something of a period of uncertainty here, but there's no question that, as I said earlier on one of my, I think it was this week's RFN, The people who want us dead are still out there.
They've been knocked for a loop, but very quickly they're going to recover and they're going to start circling around like sharks looking for another way to come back at us.
Now, we want to battle.
I say we, I don't mean the Northwest Front.
I mean, you know, white people in general.
We want to battle.
We haven't won the war.
I think President Trump is going to be fought at every turn.
I wouldn't be at all surprised to see the media try and do a Nixon on him.
They're already talking about if the media must now do an investigation of the Trump Foundation, and just, they're going to try and do a Nixon on him.
I think they're not going to be successful.
I think Trump is clean gene.
I don't think they can find anything, because I don't think there's anything to be found.
Well, they found him on that big so-called, he got out of paying a billion dollars in taxes or something, that was some years ago, about, what, 20 years ago?
But it was pointed out that, yeah, he did get out.
He did exactly what everybody else did.
Yeah, and it was perfectly legal.
Yeah, he did get out of paying a huge amount of taxes on his alleged losses, which might have been losses, might not have been.
But the fact is, it was perfectly legal.
So there's nothing.
There's nothing there.
That's my point.
Yeah.
Well, Trump is now 70. I think he's probably been slick enough for a number of years.
And he's used to dealing in billions of dollars and shifting money around all over the place.
And if he doesn't know what the ropes are, he can hire somebody who does.
So I think they'll probably have a lot of trouble getting him on anything financial.
They've tried getting him on the grabbing and the calling some Venezuelan girl fat and this sort of stuff.
That doesn't seem to have any effect.
I don't know what they could throw at him as president that they didn't throw at him before.
And it just all seems to roll off him like water off a duck's back.
So I'm really worried that they're going to try and use extra parliamentary methods to get rid of him, activate some John Hinckley type.
And I think the danger point actually is the next two months, between now and the time he goes into the Oval Office, if I was somebody in the deep state who had either decided or received orders that Trump must not get into the White House, I would do it now.
I'm sure he's got Secret Service bodyguards and all that sort of stuff right now, but it won't be as comprehensive as when he's actually in the White House.
I kind of wonder, this is a peripheral thing, Obama has been praised as being the best firearm salesman in history.
And now that Trump is in, I wonder if the firearms manufacturer's stock is going to go down.
Are people going to buy fewer firearms because they say, oh, well, you know, Trump's in.
I don't have to worry about losing my guns.
I don't have to worry about government coming after me.
I don't have to worry about the government not protecting me from these mobs of third-worlders and whatnot.
Every time Obama or Hillary Clinton or Chuck Schumer or somebody did something, said something, or every time there was some vague half-assed movement towards gun control, you got seven Democrats doing a sit-in on the floor of Congress, which is absolutely absurd, but they're just talking about doing things like establishing a national gun registry, etc.
Every time something like that happens, then because Obama was in power and there was a possibility that it might actually happen, I think he did sign a couple of executive orders about guns.
And every time something like that happens, then is when everyone gets into a panic and goes rushing to the gun store to buy up anything that can shoot.
I think there won't be that with Trump.
Trump will probably make it clear from the beginning that he supports the Second Amendment.
I don't think we're suddenly going to find him trying to set up a national gun database.
So, should we short Smith& Wesson?
Well, even assuming that Trump turns out to be the greatest president we've had in 200 years and so forth, he's still kind of a temporary phenomenon.
It's not just that he's limited to two terms of four years each.
The fact is, he's old.
He's 70 years old.
He just plain might not make it eight years.
And then if he goes, we're going to have this character, Pence, who, from what I've heard about him, he's one of these Christian Zionist neocon types.
He's good on things like abortion and the social issues, but...
I don't know that much more about him.
But even if Pence is good, you've got to bear in mind, this is a temporary phenomenon.
The demographic horror story is still going on.
We are still getting smaller and smaller as a community in this country every year.
That might actually shift a little if Trump can succeed in getting some of these damned illegals out of here.
That might actually, if he can really get some millions of them out, that might actually repair the numbers a bit.
But even so...
Long term, we're still in danger, and there's always the chance that these people will come back and get back into power.
And I think after having received this scare at the hands of Donald Trump, if they do get back in in four years or eight years, then they're just going to pull the plug.
They're going to say, screw this, no more elections.
We can't risk another Trump.
So the danger is still there, and that means that guns are always a good thing to have.
Well, you don't have to convince me.
I was just wondering.
The impact of Trump's election would be on the firearms industry here in the United States.
I think the firearms industry will always be in good shape in the United States because basically Americans have always bought a lot of guns.
I mean, the one thing about the gun thing that just almost never gets mentioned in all this raging debate on the internet and whatnot is a very simple fact.
Guns are fun.
And Americans love to have fun.
So...
Boys like guns.
Yeah.
And also, I think the people are aware that this Trump thing may be just a temporary thing.
I think they understand that their enemies are still out there, and we're not by any means out of the woods yet.
And so, don't sell your Smith& Wesson or your Colt stock yet.
We might not have these big, huge gun-buying binges that we had under Obama, but there will always be a market in this country for anything that can shoot.
Well, for now, our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha Underbond.
We're good to go.
▲
Export Selection