Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 27, 2016 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington

01:01:01

20161027_rfn

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
	Hush your vocal, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
	I hear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the bikes must be together by the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
	For the bikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
	Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
	In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
	One more roar for signal, token whistle, out the marching tune.
	For your bike upon your shoulder, by the rising of the moon.
	By the rising of the moon.
	By the rising of the moon.
	Which arrived upon your shore by the rising of the moon Out from many a mud walled cabin eyes were watching through the night Many a manly chest was throbbing for the blessed warning light The waters passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon At the rising of the
	moon, at the rising of the moon And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon It's October the 27th, 2016.
	I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
	Well, this is our annual Halloween show with all the spooky music, and so let's kick it off with something really scary.
	Here's Andy.
	Greetings from Seattle.
	Andy Donner here.
	I apologize for my extended absence from the program, but I had several family events to take care of, and that had me bouncing all over the country.
	I've also been working on some party projects in the background, as well as a very, very important shortcast I've had planned for months.
	It's taking entirely too much effort.
	What can I say, though?
	It's one of those items where I have to convey unpleasant ideas and figuring out how to do so isn't really one of my better skill sets.
	But enough about that, since you'll all hear it soon enough if I get my way.
	Anyhow, I really didn't want to wade into election 2016 since I've been over system politics for pushing a decade now, but our very own Gretchen asked me a question on this exact subject.
	Gretchen has sent me at least a couple other questions over the years, and they're always really good and insightful, so I'm obligated to share them with the entire NF audience.
	And since I'm addressing the subject of the election, I'm going to go ahead and throw my two cents in and be done with it after answering her questions.
	First, here's the lead-in Gretchen wrote me.
	If Trump were successful in gaining the U.S. presidency, and if he is able to carry out his promise of reduced immigration, we would have the illusion of being taken back in time to the 1980s.
	Many white Americans would be happier, and crisis would be delayed.
	However, you have stated that even in the 1950s, the process of white genocide was already in place.
	For those of you who didn't immediately catch it, Gretchen did something absolutely amazing here, and she might not have noticed it herself.
	She used the word illusion to describe the effect a successful President Trump would have on the country.
	In case you're new to RFN, I'll explain Gretchen's premise.
	You've probably heard someone quip that nostalgia just ain't what it used to be.
	Humor aside, there's a lot of wisdom in that, since, like all of you...
	I'm subject to the phenomenon of nostalgia whereby I idolize the past in bad, bad ways.
	And I do particularly like Gretchen's phrasing, since I myself was born in the mid-1980s.
	Like just about everyone else who has a somewhat normal life, I tend to think about my early to mid-childhood in ways that aren't at all in line with reality.
	I've noticed people's nostalgic tendencies get worse with age, too.
	But at the same time, we can objectively know the past was far better than the present because there are objective measures of such.
	I say that not because I'm trying to cast dispersion on our beliefs or politics, but to expound on the concept of illusion.
	Nostalgia, be it for the 80s, the 50s, or even earlier, results in a perspective of the past that is illusory, because it's not in line with reality, that being the definition of illusion.
	We know the process of white genocide was underway well before most of us alive today were even born, because of the world wars and the events surrounding them.
	That, of course, would be the conspiratorial view of history, a la the Protocols.
	Further, I'll note that Arthur Kemp's March of the Titans, despite some of the bad press it gets, accurately portrays historical periods of demographic brownouts in what were perfectly good white civilizations.
	These periods are remarkably similar to our current predicament, too.
	Depending on one's religious opinion, one might say we've had an issue with white genocide for all of human history.
	I'll add that, religion aside, there's good evidence for this particular claim.
	With all that said, I'll try to drag myself back on topic, but I should sum up.
	Just because portions of the past were far better for our people doesn't mean we ought to want to bring back our preferred era of American, or even European, history without being incredibly careful.
	There's a very good chance that what we would seek to recreate had harmful aspects to it that actually brought about our current situation.
	Okay, now I really do need to get on with answering Gretchen's actual question, which, reworded for broadcast purposes, is...
	Would a Trump presidency buy time in a positive or negative way?
	Or do you think Trump will restabilize the U.S. in such a way that it does not balkanize?
	If the U.S. does not balkanize, is that better or worse for us?
	Okay, so in light of my lead-up to this, I need to challenge the premise.
	Would a Trump presidency buy time at all?
	Maybe this is what Gretchen meant by buy time in a negative way.
	White genocide is a virtual certainty unless something changes.
	Here's an analogy to help with understanding this.
	You might get a late-stage lung cancer patient to stop smoking, but odds are he's almost guaranteed to die, and his smoking, or lack of it, isn't going to make any particular difference as to when.
	So, to my point, we might end up with an illusory feeling of being back in whatever decade we want, should Trump stem the flow of immigrants, but the accumulated demographic damage has been done.
	And continuing that analogy a bit, it doesn't really matter how many more immigrants do or don't come in because the white birth rate is so far below the replacement level that, at this point, immigration is a secondary problem unless a large segment of the rest of the world were to be dumped on us overnight.
	I do not in any way mean to suggest that we attempt to breed our way out of white genocide since we've never been able to keep up with the other races in the past.
	But I don't have time to fully explain that subject today since there are a metric ton of factors involved.
	If you take only one thing away from this talk today, let it be the understanding that whatever else happens in the world, the white race is on the clock, and only the Northwest Imperative can change that.
	Donald Trump doesn't factor into the big picture no matter how much some of us want him to.
	And to the issue of balkanization, well...
	That's another one of those things that is kind of just going to happen.
	But again, our choices as a race matter more than any political issue here.
	As it stands, the breakup is going to occur purely according to the various racial minorities' interests, and not ours.
	It's tempting to see white genocide as a sequence of events or milestones, but it's actually a long, slow grind that happens to individuals and families in ways that add up to whatever trend and or milestone is ultimately observed.
	Waiting to see what watershed event is coming inhibits any non-trivial response to the problem.
	About two and a half years ago, I had to pause my Real Politics series in order to address the issue of non-engagement in white nationalist politics, because too many people were asking questions of the party as if they themselves were only observers.
	And this is more or less why obsessing over major events, such as this election, really doesn't have anything to do with halting white genocide on a day-to-day basis.
	And on that note, we've now moved directly into the territory of whether or not a lack of balkanization is good or bad for our purposes.
	Well, that depends totally on what individuals are going to do in response.
	If this possible upcoming window of slightly decreased trouble is what allows potential northwest migrants to come home and involve themselves in the one way that could genuinely make a difference in the long-term trend, then great.
	If, on the other hand, the reverse happens, then it's absolutely a bad thing.
	But neither one of those outcomes really has anything to do with large-scale events, but rather individuals and their choices.
	The milestone event, or lack thereof, is whatever we each choose to make of it on our own.
	And this is an issue, too.
	Supposing for a moment a Trump presidency has any tangible effect.
	I think it would be surely limited to economics and little else, per my previous comments.
	I've conversed with quite a few people who were very interested in white nationalism to the point where they were starting to work on their own homecomings, only to pretend as if they were never racial at all when their personal situations improved in ways that should have enabled their migrations.
	Hearkening back to my remarks on trends and nostalgia, there's a significant risk that many of us will act as though white genocide has been halted just because we personally are no longer as immediately bothered by its more obvious effects, and this is the worst possible scenario.
	Guys, could we all commit to one another that we're not going to go that route regardless of the election's outcome and its aftermath?
	And lastly, Gretchen asked me if I thought a Trump presidency could rescue Europe.
	Okay, Gretchen, that's a heck of a question.
	Knowing full well that saying never is a bad idea, I have to suppose that it is possible, but almost totally out of the question.
	Europe, for all its differences from the U.S., is in a very similar, though accelerated scenario to what we can realistically expect for ourselves.
	Okay, so stop the immigration.
	Whatever.
	And then what?
	Sure, I suppose if something like a series of Brexits happens in at least a handful of other European countries, and the current banking woes in Europe get really messy, NATO might be the big thing again.
	And since the U.S. is the adult in that club, whatever we do here about immigration might, if the stars align, end up happening in Europe too, since they'll have the political will due to having Brexited the EU into oblivion.
	But again, then what?
	What counts as a rescue for the purposes of the question?
	I can't condone anything other than the implementation of the 14 words as a goal because, short of that, nothing matters at this late date.
	In light of this, even if the above NATO-Brexit-Trump trifecta comes to pass, I'd have to say no only because even in an ideal Trump presidency, Trump won't be able to rescue America, let alone anywhere else.
	And I've gone on way longer than I planned to on short notice, so I'll shut up now.
	I did say I would put my own opinion about the upcoming election out there, but I think I've done that.
	It really doesn't matter, because our individual reactions to the possible outcomes and their fallout is where the real results will be seen.
	Before seeing how long I would jawjack on this issue, I was going to make a prediction about a Trump presidency, but I'll hold off on that to see if he wins.
	I'll tease the matter a bit by admitting I see something far, far worse than many would imagine, should Trump actually win the presidency.
	None of that needs to be covered right now, though, since the premise of my concerns is still entirely theoretical.
	Hail victory.
	Now, Andy's presentation leads into a subject that I touched on a couple of weeks ago, but which I don't think I accorded the level of detail I should have done.
	I talked a lot about what might happen when the Hildebeest wins, and I explained my reasons for thinking she's going to win.
	But maybe we need to look a little closer at the possible results of a Trump victory on November the 8th, or what may be more likely, a seriously and energetically contested result.
	In other words, the Democrat fraud is really blatant, and Trump makes a very serious effort to overturn the beast's so-called victory, most likely through a combination of legal appeals in the courts, combined with what might be called extra-parliamentary pressure, meaning street tactics which might at times verge on insurrection when his followers get carried away, but which keeps Trump himself just barely on the line of legality.
	Like I've said before, I don't think he has the balls to call for outright revolution.
	And being 70 years old, I can kind of get that.
	Although there was the Ayatollah Khomeini, who was older than Trump when he took down the Shah of Iran.
	Anyway, these inchoate, disorganized masses of American white boys wouldn't know how to give it to him if he did.
	If that happens, the only way Trump could hope to succeed is if he has the military behind him.
	And as we've discussed here before on RFN, Barry has spent the past eight years purging the American field-grade officer corps in the Pentagon and the world theater commands of anyone he feels might be disloyal.
	The latest victim of this being a General Cartwright who has been charged and now faces prison for allegedly doing exactly what Hillary Clinton did and was cleared by the FBI for.
	Who says Democrats don't have a sense of humor?
	Okay, the first thing that will happen if Trump is declared the winner on the morning of November 9th is that the lefty loons and the entire establishment will go into a kind of St. Vitus' dance of hysterical fear and loathing and madness, the like of which has never been seen in the history of the modern electronic media, just as they will go into a howling frenzy of bestial triumph if the Hildebeest wins.
	Now again, I warn you guys, if the sea hag quote-unquote wins, Turn your computers off for at least a week until the level of triumphalism fades somewhat.
	A month would be better still, but I know most of you won't be able to do that.
	I warn you that this triumphant and hate-filled bacchanalia will enrage you and drive you to the point where you might do stupid and self-destructive things.
	If Trump wins, then sit back and enjoy for a while.
	But I say again, one thing that I have to concede to liberal lefty reptiles is that they never, ever give up.
	The shrieks of general outrage and despair off Salon and Hufflepuff will be sheer pleasure for us.
	But very quickly, they will change into something really vicious.
	The beginning of a four- to eight-year offensive to get Donald Trump out of the White House by impeachment or assassination or whatever they can incite.
	They will probably try to do a repeat performance of what they did to Richard Nixon in 1973 and 74. Remember, these people are infinitely patient.
	They've been doing this for a long time, almost 100 years now, and they never stop chipping away until they get what they want.
	As far as the media is concerned, the next four years will be one long campaign to destroy Trump's presidency, prevent him from accomplishing anything at all, and forcing him out of office.
	In this, the media will be aided and abetted by most of the Congress, including a lot of the Congressional and Senatorial Republicans.
	Who apparently would rather hand the country over to a criminal and half-insane diseased old hag of a tyrant than to accept the rules of their own democracy when someone wins who is not a member of their exclusive little club.
	Paul Ryan and John McCain will be especially out for Trump's blood.
	The combination of power arrayed against Trump from the media, the Congress, and the Democratic bureaucracy and everybody who benefited under the old system will make it almost impossible for Trump as president To achieve any of his major policy goals, although I have to admit that I was impressed with his Gettysburg Address, because most of what he outlined there could be achieved through executive orders without congressional help.
	But something that requires serious funding, like the building of a wall on the border, or preventing future vote fraud through new laws, or voter ID and citizenship, or constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget, that's going to have to go through the federal and state legislatures.
	And that's where Trump will have problems, because he's kind of a one-man band.
	He doesn't really have his own faction in the Republican Party yet, and the media and present power structure aren't going to let him create one.
	If anyone dares to speak up in support of President Trump, the media will leap on him like a striking cobra, like a striking snake, and just tear him to pieces.
	Pardon my mixed metaphors.
	Congress still, in theory, retains the power of the purse, and just because the Republicans have been too chicken shit to use it to stop Barry for eight years doesn't mean that the new congressional coalition of Democrats and RINOs that will arise will fail to use it to obstruct and defeat anything President Trump wants to do.
	The Trump presidency is going to be one long saga of obstruction, delay, political guerrilla warfare, chaos, and endless vituperation.
	Probably punctuated with a few impeachment and assassination attempts.
	In other words, basically, if Trump wins, the Hillary Clinton people are going to do what we need to be doing if Hillary wins.
	Now what this will mean is that the rest of the country and its political, economic, and administrative machinery is going to collapse just as fully as it would under Hillary, just for different reasons and with different bad actors playing the destructive parts.
	Look, I'm not saying that there might not be some improvement under Trump.
	Especially if he's able to actually do something about immigration and get at least a few million of these mud-colored creatures the hell out of here.
	Especially Muslims and the so-called Syrian refugees and all these goddamn Latin American gang members that Obama let into the country disguised as children.
	That will make white people a little bit safer, especially women and children.
	If Trump can actually make a dent in the number of employed illegals and get them off the assembly lines and back south of the border, and if he can drag all those H-2Bs out of the IT and other technical industries and toss their brown asses back on the plane to Mumbai, then the employment situation will definitely improve for whites and a lot of us will start earning a paycheck again instead of living off an EBT contract.
	Getting a few million illegals out of the country, which is immediately doable with...
	Inheritively little effort, once there is the political will to do so, will also ease the housing shortage and open up more rental property at cheaper rents until the newly employed white folks can work their way back up to buying a house again.
	If Trump can do a couple of specific things, like ban or otherwise disincentivize outsourced foreign call centers and bring the call centers back to America, that would be an immense help.
	Twenty years ago, call centers were a vast pool of bottom-rung jobs for white people who were down and out or starting over, single moms, etc., etc.
	In those days, you didn't really have to end up living in your parents' basement when you got out of college.
	If nothing else, you could always go to work in a call center.
	I know because I worked in one, which has now been outsourced to South Rochistan or wherever.
	There are all kinds of things that Trump can do.
	Which simply require the political will to do so.
	Good things, like he outlined in his Gettysburg Address on Saturday.
	But long term, he will be fighting almost single-handedly against a system and a bureaucracy and an ideology which has been entrenched in power for three quarters of a century or more, depending on when you date the original fall of America from.
	I choose the year 1913.
	So, we have been ruled by bad people of evil intent.
	For 103 years, that's an awfully large accumulation of encrusted barnacles on any society to be scraped off in a mere four years.
	And all those bad people are going to be fighting Donald Trump tooth and claw, hammer and tongs, to just basically screw up whatever he wants to do.
	The result is going to be a national chaos, almost as bad as if Hillary takes over.
	Let's get something clear.
	If Trump wins, we're going to need the Northwest imperative more than ever before.
	There's no going back now.
	It's just that under President Trump, it's going to take some of us too long to realize that fact.
	Okay, this is a ballad from the Canadian folk singers Ian and Sylvia.
	It's kind of a medieval anti-abortion song.
	Now the ghostly part is there, but you do have to listen to the words to pick up on it.
	There was a lady lived in York, all of Lee and Lonnie.
	He fell in love with her father's clerk down by Greenwood Sidey, oh.
	She loved him up, she loved him down, all of Lee and Lonnie.
	He loved him till he filled her arms down by Greenwood Sidey, oh.
	She leaned her back against a no First it bent and then it broke Down by Greenwood's IDO She leaned her back against a thorn All early and lonely There she had two fine bathes born Down by Greenwood's IDO She
	took out her weepin' knife on the Lee and Lonnie.
	There she took those sweet paid life down by the Greenwood side, yo.
	She wiped the blade against her shoe on the Lee and Lonnie.
	More she rubbed the rhetoric guru down by the Greenwood side, yo.
	She went back to her father's hall, all early and lonely.
	Saw two babes up playing at ball down by Greenwood's IDO.
	Oh babes, oh babes, if you were mine, all early and lonely.
	dress you up in scarlet fine down by the Greenwood side, yo.
	Oh, mother, oh, mother, when we were yours, Olly and Lonely, Scarlet was our own heart's blood down by the Greenwood side, yo.
	Amen.
	Oh, babes, oh, babes, it's heaven for you, all the Lee and Lonnie.
	Mother, oh mother, it's hell for you Down by Greenwoodside, yo Down by
	Greenwoodside, yo Good evening, comrades.
	Tonight I'm going to be discussing The Conservative Case for Trump by Phyllis Schafly.
	Now, Schafly was the author of the famous essay on conservatism, A Choice, Not an Echo.
	To Schafly, Trump embodies an active choice for conservatives, not merely someone following a rearguard retreat.
	Some believe that a president must be a highly academic intellectual with ideas so complex that few listeners can even follow the train of thought.
	However, when we recall the effective presidency of Reagan, we see a man with simple ideas who successfully led the free world out of the Cold War.
	This is not to say that Trump is the same as Reagan.
	While Reagan was guided by Nancy, Trump is very much his own man.
	In any case, the point is that there is nothing wrong with simple, clear ideas.
	The first of these ideas that really propelled Trump to notoriety as a candidate was the very...
	And Trump's answer is that he would increase border fees, he would raise the price of temporary visas, impound remittance payments, cut foreign aid, and levy tariffs.
	He would also, and this would be...
	I suppose the first of his job creation efforts, he would increase law enforcement regarding illegals.
	Trump would also defund sanctuary cities.
	Now, in November of 2014, 87% of all illegals became essentially home-free.
	And this, of course, invited more to pour in.
	Now, another thing that happens with Mexico, but also with Asia, is this issue of birth tourism, where expectant women are encouraged to visit the United States.
	When they are due, in order to access the welfare system.
	However, Shafley points out that in the case of Mexico, for example, they and their children remain subject to Mexican jurisdiction.
	Now, Trump would propose federal legislation to clarify that not everyone born on U.S. soil is a citizen.
	And this would be in accord with proposals by Congressman Steve King of Iowa and Nevada Senator Harry Reid.
	Also, because of the H-18 visas, foreign nationals have a tendency to replace highly skilled American tech workers.
	Now, Shafley also discusses a Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is a trade deal, which only allows for yes or no votes, so apparently you can't easily modify this deal.
	And according to some flawed estimates, it is said that this deal will gain some jobs, but Shafley points out that ultimately more would be lost.
	Now, Shafley also talks about another trade deal with Korea called Corus.
	She's very concerned about its future impact on the already stressed American auto industry.
	She points out that since NAFTA, trade deficits have gone up and wages have gone down or have been stagnant, even for those with college education.
	Now, as a businessman, Trump understands these type of business dealings.
	And for another thing, President Trump would of course be in a position, like any president would be, to appoint federal judges.
	Trump has a short list of very conservative judges that he hopes will serve on the Supreme Court.
	Like Reagan, Trump is very much a believer in school choice.
	He really sees the U.S. Department of Education as a tremendous bureaucracy that really should be made much more irrelevant.
	Now, Shafley points out that Reagan actually wanted to defund this department.
	I'm not sure whether Trump will actually be able to do this.
	However, he does believe in Education reform.
	He wants to bring back discipline, merit pay over seniority, and he wants to have more civics classes.
	And he also wants parents to become more involved in the curriculum, and he's against Common Core.
	One of the other interests that Trump has, he's very interested in the plight of persecuted Christians.
	And Shafley points out that it is very interesting to note.
	That 18% of refugees from Syria, for example, are Christians.
	Now, if we really are concerned with humanitarian efforts, why aren't we bringing in more of these individuals into the States?
	Right now, only 3% are coming in.
	And Shafley also notes that 73 jihadis were employed by Homeland Security.
	Now, this sounds incredible.
	It sounds like it's some kind of a joke, but evidently this was the case, and I know that I've read this in other sources, so it isn't just Shafley saying this.
	This is an author who held relatively mainstream beliefs, but she also believes that the current president may well be some type of Muslim because he has had, on occasion, a couple of slips of the tongue, one of them back in 2008 when he made reference to his Muslim faith and then later claimed that he had misspoke.
	Another issue that Trump will address is this concern with Social Security.
	And this has been a worry now for, goodness, probably at least a decade.
	Trump wants to secure Social Security.
	So what he would like to do, first of all, is he wants to reform the tax code.
	And he wants to enable seniors, if they're able to work, if they're able to...
	Use investments for retirement.
	He wants to let them do that.
	He wants to allow wealthy seniors to opt out.
	And of course, in that way, saving a good deal of money.
	Trump is also very disappointed with Obamacare, but he does want some sort of a national health insurance safety net.
	But he wants health insurance companies to be able to compete across state lines under the auspices of this health safety net.
	He also wants to help veterans who have not had enough access to care, so he wants to Make sure that veterans have more clinics.
	And he also wants them to get involved in business and entrepreneurship.
	And to that end, he wants to make sure that low-interest business loans are available for them.
	Now, Shafley points out something that's going on that I had never heard of, but apparently there is a movement to rewrite the Constitution.
	Some conservatives are very interested in this, apparently.
	Now, Shafley warns that this may end up working out better for liberals than it does for conservatives.
	One of Shafley's final comments in this book is that it may seem rather odd to talk about a conservative revolution, but according to Shafley, The colonists who wanted to claim their rights as having equal rights to the English were essentially conservatives.
	And she also talks about Reagan, the Reagan Revolution, and how Trump wants to restore America.
	And Chaffley warns that this is a very, very critical election.
	If conservatives want to win, this is really their last chance to do so.
	And this is really so critical, and she even believes that it's actually God's work.
	At the end of this book, you will find many appendices, and in these there will be speeches by Trump.
	And really, Trump speaks very eloquently for himself.
	And one of the things that he really drives home in these speeches is the question of energy independence.
	And he really wants to develop all forms of energy.
	He supports the Keystone Pipeline.
	He supports fracking and coal.
	But he also is willing to look into new forms of energy, such as wind and solar.
	He wants to make America energy independent.
	For really two reasons.
	It takes us out of the fray in the Middle East, but it also creates a great many new jobs.
	And he plans on creating 400,000 new jobs a year.
	And this is going to pump trillions of dollars into the economy and also billions of dollars of overall wage increases.
	And, of course, he also talks about the various reforms that he wants to bring about in NATO and getting various countries to pay for their own defense.
	And he wants to choose the American middle class over globalism.
	And he, obviously, is not one to appease radical Islam.
	I have a certain admiration for Shafli.
	She was always a voice of reason and logic, and she never indulged in emotionalism.
	And apparently she worked right up until the end because she just died in early September and apparently was still working and posting to the Eagle Forum until late August.
	So she was in her 90s and still working very hard.
	So I admire that.
	But, you know, I would really say of Trump that he's wonderful to have as a friend and an ally, but he would be terrible to have as an enemy.
	So that is the only risk with Trump.
	We really don't know, for example, in this movement, even though a lot of us are supporting him or liking him or cheering him on, it's really hard to say what his attitude will be, if anything, towards this movement once he gains power.
	So that is something to really think about with regard to Trump.
	So I hope you enjoyed this discussion.
	Have a good evening and hail victory comrades.
	Peace.
	you you you Well, we've been talking about Donald Trump for the entire show almost, and we'll probably be talking about him for some time, so I figure it's time to let the man himself have a few words.
	There is nothing the political establishment will not do, no lie that they won't tell, to hold their prestige and power at your expense, and that's what's been happening.
	The Washington establishment and the financial and media corporations that fund it exist for only one reason: to protect and enrich itself.
	The establishment has trillions of dollars at stake in this election.
	As an example, just one single trade deal they'd like to pass.
	This involves trillions of dollars controlled by many countries, corporations and lobbyists.
	For those who control the levers of power in Washington and for the global special interest, they partner with these people that don't have your good in mind.
	Our campaign represents a true existential threat, like they haven't seen before.
	crowd cheers
	This is not simply another four-year election.
	This is a crossroads in the history of our civilization that will determine whether or not we the people reclaim control over our government.
	The political establishment that is trying to stop us is the same group responsible.
	For our disastrous trade deals, massive illegal immigration, and economic and foreign policies that have bled our country dry.
	For them, it's war.
	And for them, nothing at all is out of bounds.
	This is a struggle for the survival of our nation.
	Believe me.
	This election will determine whether we're a free nation or whether we have only the illusion of democracy, but are in fact controlled by a small handful of global special interests rigging the system, and our system is rigged.
	This is reality.
	You know it, they know it, I know it, and pretty much the whole world knows it.
	The establishment...
	And their media and neighbors wield control over this nation through means that are very well known.
	Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe, and morally deformed.
	They will attack you.
	They will slander you.
	They will seek to destroy your career and your family.
	They will seek to destroy everything about you, including your reputation.
	They will lie, lie, lie, and then again, they will do worse than that.
	They will do whatever is necessary.
	The Clintons are criminals.
	Remember that.
	They're criminals.
	Our great civilization.
	Here in America and across the civilized world has come upon a moment of reckoning.
	We've seen it in the United Kingdom where they voted to liberate themselves from global government and global trade deals and global immigration deals that have destroyed their sovereignty and have destroyed many of those nations.
	But the central base of world political power is right here in America.
	And it is our corrupt political establishment that is the greatest power behind the efforts at radical globalization and the disenfranchisement of working people.
	Their financial resources are virtually unlimited.
	Their political resources And here's one for all my fellow Lovecraftians out there.
	Happy Halloween!
	Come, Cthulhu, and shorten their lives.
	Come, Cthulhu, hear our shadows prayer for you.
	Yeah, Cthulhu, waganagal faze.
	He sent his poor old nightmares to.
	May Cthulhu waken from slaughter birth, swinging back on horror and war.
	Hear us come to lose, except our sacrifice.
	Oh, hear our shadows prayer, pray for.
	Oh, hear our shadows prayer for you.
	Oh, hear our shadows.
	Oh, hear our shadows.
	You might call this another installment of How to Do This for Yourself 101.
	I got an email a couple of days ago wondering why there is no PayPal link for the NF listed on our website and why we don't take credit or debit cards.
	No, it's not just Harold being lazy.
	It's not being lazy when you really don't have the time to screw around with it.
	But beyond that, there are a couple of specific reasons for a lack of PayPal.
	About ten years ago, I did have a PayPal address and a PayPal bank card, which was a hell of a convenient and which I wish to hell I had again.
	But about my second year in Astoria, we lost access to PayPal because somehow or other PayPal found out that I was a wicked, evil, racist.
	It may have been because someone listed their PayPal remittance as a political donation and that got somebody at the company curious.
	It may be that one of my internet stalkers found out what email address I was using and ratted me out to the Jews who run the company.
	You just never know how these things happen.
	I never published the email address I was using.
	I just passed it around to those who wanted to use PayPal.
	But it could be somebody who soft-soaked me into letting him know the address and then informed on me, either someone from one of the NGOs like ADL or SPLC or paid professional trolls and cognitive dissonance operatives like Cass Sunstein's unit, which ran out of the White House during the early Obama years, and which, as we learn from the John Podesta and DNC emails, is still in operation under assorted different names.
	It's more likely, though, that this was just one of these self-appointed little Jewish internet vigilantes who have decided that they have the right to police other people's thoughts and beliefs, and they get to decide who gets to post what online.
	I mean, them being the chosen people and all.
	There are a lot of those, and in some way they cause more aggro than the professionals.
	I've had several stalkers on my tail for some years now, some of them showing real staying power.
	One is a disbarred Jewish attorney from St. Paul, Minnesota, although I haven't heard from him in a few years.
	Another is this bizarre wog of some kind from Vancouver, British Columbia, who, back in 1998, vowed on Usenet that he intended to drive me to suicide by making mean posts about me and crushing my spirit or whatever.
	And 18 years later, he's still trying.
	No, swear to God, I am not making this up.
	I thought at the time it was one particularly slimy troll who sweet-talked me into releasing the address for an ostensible contribution and then went running to the Burger Kings at PayPal.
	To complain after he claimed that I never sent him a book he ordered, which order I never received.
	Anyway, be that as it may, I got ratted out to the PayPal hebes as someone whose mind is not sufficiently under control, and the account was frozen out of the blue, no appeal allowed, because I was allegedly propagating quote-unquote hate.
	About $300 sitting in the account was frozen and returned six months later, finally.
	I tried reopening the account under another name, but they demand a social security number and PayPal has mine flagged, as also the bank account numbers I was using back then, plus of course my name.
	They closed down the second account as well in about a week.
	Now, one thing I have learned down through the years is that it's impossible to keep anyone off the internet or any part of the internet who wants to be there.
	For example, I've been banned for years from having a Facebook account under my own name due to my wicked wasist ways, and so I just run one under a pseudonym so that I can not only read Facebook pages, but comment or participate if I have to, which I don't find necessary very often.
	I personally wouldn't use Facebook even if I was allowed on there, just too much bad craziness.
	Twitter is almost as bad as far as the nuttiness goes, but actually has some use as a potential medium for real mass communication.
	Anyway, if I wanted to, I could get us back on PayPal with comparatively little effort.
	But with all the trolls slithering through cyberspace like leprous eels, we couldn't advertise the link on our sites or in our other internet work because that would just lead to more frizzy-haired little Jews sitting behind their computers in their yentas' basement screeching like macaws to PayPal about the evil, wicked wascists using their service.
	There's little point in having a service if you can't advertise it or use it without getting kicked off every few weeks.
	And then you have to go through all kinds of rigmarole to get back on and then let everybody know your PayPal has changed, so forth and so on, and then you go through the same thing again when some online kike decides that the Constitution of the United States doesn't apply to you.
	Since this is largely for the instruction of those of you who will be carrying on to form party units here in the Northwest or possibly become mini-fuers in your own grouplet, You need also to bear in mind something else.
	If you use PayPal or any other digital financial service, you are leaving a paper trail that is easily accessible to what we laughingly refer to in this country as law enforcement, and also vulnerable to hacking.
	I think the DNC and Mr. Podesta's recent experiences along that line are a cautionary tale for the rest of us.
	You don't really want your financial supporters' names, addresses, and bank account numbers splattered all over the world and posted on Reddit and emailed to the media, that kind of thing.
	It's happened before with the NSM, although that was based on a paper mailing list that was stolen from Commander Schlepp's house.
	But it goes beyond practical considerations.
	There are some big-picture strategic issues here.
	Last week, there was a major internet-wide hack attack that took down a number of major sites, including Twitter and Amazon and Salesforce.
	There was some speculation that it was Russians, or Chinese, or anarchist hacker collectives, or Ming the Merciless, or somebody engaging in a practice run for a major takedown of the entire internet.
	Such a thing is possible, maybe not likely, but possible, and it's a possibility our wee little movement needs to quit ignoring.
	I know that I've been a real Eeyore about this for many years, and my contention that someday we're going to lose the internet.
	Either lose it per se when it gets rendered inoperable, or we will be legally denied access to it in any meaningful form.
	No one has ever believed me on this, but perhaps you guys need to contemplate the events of last week, and when you set up your own operation, make sure that it's something that exists in the real world, and not just online.
	Because virtual reality isn't real reality.
	This is why I persist in my archaic Luddite tendency to do as much of this as I can do with paper and postage stamp.
	This is why I encourage these Radio Free Northwest podcasts to be copied onto CDs or thumb drives, and why I keep them below an hour and twenty minutes so that they can be placed on one disc.
	A playable disk or drive is a more concrete platform than having everything you've got in somebody's cloud with some invisible Jewish hand on the plug.
	This is why, if you're serious about keeping up with what the party's doing, you need to provide me with a valid name and mailing address.
	Now, the name need not be your own, and the address can be a post office box or a private mail drop.
	That's fine.
	But make sure that the post office will deliver mail to that name at that address.
	Else it comes back and wasted postage is expensive.
	One day that internet is no longer going to be there, or else we will be blocked from accessing it, and when that happens, 95% of the so-called white nationalist movement and alt-right is going to vanish like the morning dew.
	So far as I'm aware, the Northwest Front is the only movement tendency that is at all prepared to continue operations in the event of the loss of the internet.
	Another reason why, when all is said and done, as far as the 14 words goes, the NF is really the only game in town.
	Those of you who know me are aware of the fact that I'm very much an aficionado of horror movies, the good ones anyway.
	In my personal opinion, the greatest ghost story ever filmed.
	It's a movie from 1963 called The Haunting, starring Shirley Jackson and Claire Bloom and Russ Tamblyn.
	It's not one of these horror slasher-type films with guts flying everywhere and chop, chop, chop, anything like that.
	It's an actual ghost story.
	And when you finish the movie, you will recall, or you will notice, that you never actually see anything at all.
	But I tell you guys, even after a period of 50 years, Flick will scare you shitless.
	I know it did me.
	I grew up watching this on Halloween nights when I was a kid and black and white on my old TV set back home and I still watch this every Halloween.
	I've got it on DVD.
	I highly recommend it for your All Hallows Eve viewing if you're into that kind of thing.
	This is the prologue from The Haunting.
	It's a bit long, but it will give you an idea of the general plot and maybe motivate you to stream it or get a DVD, something like that, and watch it.
	No kidding.
	This is worth it.
	An evil old house, the kind some people call haunted, is like an undiscovered country waiting to be explored.
	Hill House had stood for 90 years and might stand for 90 more.
	Silence lay steadily against the wood and stone of Hill House.
	And whatever walked there, walked alone.
	The End
	Scandal, murder, insanity, suicide.
	The history of Hill House was ideal.
	It had everything I wanted.
	It was an evil house from the beginning.
	A house that was born bad.
	The young wife died seconds before she was to set eyes on the house.
	She was killed when, for no apparent reason, the horses bolted, crashing her carriage against a big tree.
	The End Mrs. Crane was carried, ah, lifeless is the word, I think, into the home her husband had built for her.
	Hugh Crane was left an embittered man.
	with a small daughter Abigail to bring up.
	MUSIC Fortunately, for me that is, Hugh Crane did not leave Hill House.
	He married again.
	The second Mrs. Crane's death was even more interesting than her predecessors.
	The second Mrs. Crane's death was even more interesting than her.
	I've been unable to find out how or why she fell, although I have my suspicions.
	Hugh Crane left Abigail with a nurse and went to England, where he died in a drowning accident.
	Marvelous.
	I mean, the way the history of Hill House follows a classic pattern.
	For some reason, Abigail always kept that same nursery room in Hill House where she grew up.
	And grew old.
	In later years, she became a young man.
	She became a bedridden invalid.
	She took a girl from the village to live with her as a paid companion.
	It's with this young companion the evil reputation of Hill House really begins.
	The story goes that the old lady died calling for help in the nursery upstairs, while a companion fooled around with a farmhand on the veranda.
	The companion inherited Hill House and occupied it for many years.
	The local people believe that, one way or another, she had murdered her benefactor.
	She lived a life of complete solitude in the empty house, though some say that the house was not empty and never has been since the night old Miss Abby died.
	They say that whatever there was, and still is, in the house, eventually drove the companion mad.
	We do know she hanged herself.
	After her death, the house passed legally into the hands of a distant relative in Boston, an old lady, Mrs. Sanneson.
	And if you're interested, you'll just have to get the DVD and watch it, because that's all the time we've got for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
	This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington 98310, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
	This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
	Until then, Sasha Underban.
	Freedom.
	I just moved in my new house today Moving was hard but I got squared away Bells started ringing and chains rattle out I knew I'd moved in a haunted house Still I'm made up in my mind to stay Nothing was gonna drive me away
	When I seen something that give me the creep Had one big eye and two big feet I stood right still and I did the three He did the throw right up to me Made a noise with his feet to sound like a drum
	Say, yes, I'll be here when the morning comes.
	I'll be right here and I ain't gonna run.
	I bought this house, now you know I'm bald.
	Ain't no Hank gonna run me on.
	In the kitchen, my stove was a-blazing hot.
	The coffee was a-boiling in the pot.
	The Greasy The ice had melted in my hand I had a hunk of meat in my hand From outer space there sat a man On a hot stove with a pots and pans Say that's hot,
	I began to shout He drank a hot coffee right from the spout He ate the raw meat right from my hand.
	Drank a hot grease from the frying pan.
	He said to me, now you better run.

▲