All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 20, 2016 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
57:07
20161020_rfc
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
If Trump has it, that's going to create a very real problem for the Democrats and their associates.
Well, all Trump has to do is use the precedents that have been set by Obama.
Oh, yeah.
And I presume it's also kosher, pardon the expression, to use an executive order to revoke previous executive orders.
Oh, absolutely.
So, if he starts ruling by decree because he can't get any cooperation out of Congress, all he has to do is say, look, this is what my predecessor did.
Okay, the date is October the 20th, 2016.
We're a little over.
Two weeks and five days.
Two weeks and five days from the 2016 election, and this is going to be our talk show wherein people will be calling in to rap about Trump and the Hilda Beast and whatnot.
No calls so far.
Hopefully I won't get totally slammed tonight like I was last time, but we'll see.
And that, of course, is Harold Covington, and I am Donald Welke, your co-host.
And now we mark time until the first caller comes in.
Well, we can talk about the election, too.
As you were saying, he can use his predecessor's example and his precedent and do a lot of arbitrary things as President of the United States.
If Trump gets elected, he will be in a position where he has a lot of power, more than the President should have according to the Constitution, but according to the laws that Congress passed.
He can do it.
What about extrajudicial assassinations and just a whole panoply of things?
Congress passed that law.
That's the National Defense Authorization Act of 2011.
Congress passed a law giving him that power.
Yes.
Originally, the executive orders were intended to basically just be internal stuff for the executive branch, like the president would sign an order saying that all bureaucrats will use number two pencils and have green staplers on their desks or whatever.
And again, he doesn't have to use an executive order if he doesn't want to.
All he has to do is pick up the phone and talk to the head of ICE or whatever and tell him, okay, new boss in town, start doing your job.
I assume at some point there would have to be some written confirmation, but all he would have to say would be enforce the law from now on.
We could end this immigration thing quite easily without having to pass a single law.
We don't need Congress's help because we've got existing laws on the books, forbidding people from entering the country illegally and establishing procedures whereby you get naturalized.
And if you don't follow those procedures, you're breaking the law.
There's another interesting aspect here, and that is a lot of people think that the Supreme Court decides what the Constitution says, and that's not true.
All three branches of government can decide what the Constitution says.
I forgot the President who did it, but he said let Mr. So-and-so, who was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court at that time, enforce his ruling.
Because the President wasn't going to because he disagreed with it.
So, the President is at least equivalent to the Supreme Court in interpreting the Constitution, and Congress also has the ability to interpret the Constitution, and if we look at what the founders of the nation intended, people also have the ability to decide what the Constitution says, what the proper interpretation of it is.
The Supreme Court has been getting away with having people think that it's the final authority, and it's not.
No.
Well, Congress, if they don't like something the executive branch is doing, or for that matter the Supreme Court is doing, they can exercise a kind of veto simply by refusing to fund whatever it is.
In theory, the power of the purse is about the only power that Congress has anymore.
They've always, I noticed, Refused to use that weapon against Obama and against the various bits of Democrat lunacy that have been going on for the past few years, or for that matter, against Bush, this lunatic Iraq war.
In theory, the constitutional system established by the founding fathers works well.
It did work well for some years.
And it could supposedly still work well if the people involved in administering it were not such totally corrupt criminal assholes.
You can see that coming.
Well, any system is only as good as the men who are operating it or administering it.
I think we may even have had a question on one of the Colin shows here.
I know I've gotten them online.
People asking, okay, I've read the Constitution of the Northwest American Republic.
Looks real good on paper, but what's to stop this from happening, or this from happening, and I have to...
Well, one huge factor is there will be no Jews in the Northwest Republic, Northwest American Republic, and there won't be any dingers, and there won't be any mestizos, there won't be any Asians, it'll be just white people, and that will improve the political environment tremendously, especially the Jews.
They are the disease.
Everything else is just a symbol.
Here we go.
First caller.
You're on Radio Free Northwest.
Who am I speaking with, please?
This is Richard from Virginia.
Hey, Richard.
Hi, Richard.
Good to hear from you.
Yeah, how are you guys?
Well, rolling along, rolling along.
You're the first caller tonight, and now we're just sitting here rapping about, well, started off with Trump and then we got into constitutional stuff.
Uh-huh.
About how any constitution and any system of government is only as good as the men who administer it.
That's true.
That's true.
But how's the presidential horse race looking down there from where you are?
The one thing I want to kind of inquire, Richard, I think of all the callers tonight, one thing I'm picking up off the internet from the Left Loons and their blogs and their sites is their official party line.
is, oh, Hillary's got it won.
It's all over.
Trump is finished.
Trump just really screwed up.
He's going to collapse.
He's going to lose big.
It's going to be a landslide for Hillary.
It's all over with the shouting, blah, blah, blah, blah, which obviously is intended to demoralize people, to suppress the white vote, to keep us away from the polls on November the 8th.
Does this seem to be working at all where you are?
Yes and no.
It depends who you listen to.
If you listen to the bulwark of the mainstream media, that's the message that comes across.
But if you look outside that, alt-right and look local, listen to local radio stations, Trump's killing it.
So, I don't know.
I think, personally, I think there's a lot of mind control going on with this.
That's what they're trying to do, yeah.
Yeah, because there's different levels of awareness with people, and different memes take hold, depending on how aware you are.
Myself?
This is simple.
This is simple.
Despite all the red herrings they throw out and all the sexual picadillos that they try and hang on Trump, it boils down to, for me, if you like the way things are going, vote for Hillary.
If you want change, vote for Trump.
And it's as simple as that.
I'm not talking so much about the media.
What about the man on the street, so to speak?
And we've got another caller coming in.
And we now have Barry from Texas and Richard from Virginia on.
Do you want me to continue?
Yeah, go ahead, Richard.
Yeah, you asked me how it's going locally.
Locally here, the people I talk to and the signs you see on the lawn, it's Trump all the way.
Big margin.
Even the people that were on the fence and kind of liberal over the past couple of months as you talked to them, a lot of them swung over to Trump.
That's what I see in the scope of my people that I come in contact with.
What do you think is the reason for them changing?
I think it's starting to sink in.
I think Trump has, even though they don't like him, he woke them up.
I think they're starting to realize how corrupt the government is.
There was a lot of us that knew it all along, but some of them didn't drink the Kool-Aid, so to speak.
But I think he woke them up.
Things are never going to be the same.
Even if Hillary wins, it's never going to be the same.
I agree, absolutely.
Because he's enlightened everybody, as much as you want to be enlightened.
But for some people, they're comfortable with their thoughts and what they've been taught about government, and Trump hurts their head.
Because he's bringing up subjects that really, really causes them to think, and they don't like to think.
Barry, how's things down there in Texas?
About as good as you can expect for a state that's making the transition from a white majority to a brown majority, unfortunately, and I live here in the ghetto on the Gulf that we call Houston.
But down here, as overrun as we are with every type of third world savage you can think of, you see a lot more Trump signs than you do Hillary Clinton signs.
The local minorities are still all going to go out in mass to vote for Hillary, but they're just not excited about Hillary.
The black women, they're solid for Hillary.
If they're going to bother to vote, they're sure going to vote for Hillary.
A lot of black men and Hispanic men you talk to, they were so sick of Obama, they're not ready to go for Hillary.
A lot of the indigenous down here don't really want to share their jobs and their welfare benefits and their space in the schools and the emergency rooms with another wave of third world savages coming over here to suck the blood out of us.
So they just can't get real interested in Hillary, and I think Texas is going to be pretty solid for Trump.
Let's hope so.
Supposedly, this will be the last election wherein Texas is guaranteed to end up as a red state.
The influx of Mexicans and other assorted third-worlders is supposedly going to turn it blue by 2020.
They're breeding like rats, and the old white people are dying off, and the young people are either not reproducing or they're breeding with third-worlders, unfortunately.
That's the way it goes.
That's why we have to have a homeland, and that's why we have to get on the stick on this.
Of course, we know all of the LGBT types that are drawn to Houston like moths to a flame, all of them are solid for Hillary no matter what.
They're like the black women.
You know, Harold, I'm reading a book right now called An Interview with Hitler and Oprah Winfrey.
It's by Mike...
I can't remember his last name.
Tomato Bubble website.
Mike King!
Mike King, that's right.
That's who it is.
The guy with the white hat.
Yeah, and he's going over the history of World War II from about 1900 to 1945.
But in reading it, I see a big parallel between what's going on right now and Wehrmacht, Germany, during the 20s.
It's uncanny.
It's history repeating itself for me.
Different cast of characters, but it's the same thing.
The degradation of the morals, the political intrigue, and behind it all is the Zionist influence using the Marxists to attain their goals.
History repeats itself.
There's a really good book on the Weimar period in Germany called Before the Deluge, and it gets into a lot of things that happened between 1919 and 1933, but the main thing that this book emphasizes is that for the time, for the early 20th century, there was this whole atmosphere pervading Germany, especially the urban areas like Berlin, especially Berlin, of just degeneracy.
And they show some pictures of some of their burlesque shows and that sort of stuff.
And I don't know if you ever see that movie Cabaret.
But you've got to bear in mind that for that time, all of this 1920s, 1930s drunkenness and flappers and avant-garde this and blah, blah, blah, and they had that Negress Josephine Baker dancing over there and blah, blah, blah, blah.
This was just an incredible level of degeneracy for the German people.
And one of the reasons that the National Socialists did so well by 1933 was the fact that the German people just reacted very strongly against this.
Cultural contamination, and it was recognized as contamination at the time by the majority of the people in Germany, and it was also recognized as Jewish.
Yeah, LGBT again.
So, who actually saw the debate last night?
I did.
I saw it, and I thought Trump did great.
He called her out.
She couldn't respond in kind.
All she could do was just lather.
Also, the moderator was the...
He actually asked Hillary some tough questions and tried to get her to answer them.
Agreed.
The ones he didn't laugh off.
Yes.
I didn't catch that.
I caught some of the highlights on YouTube, but I understand he called her a nasty woman, which, of course, she is.
Then he said something like, I'll let you know whether or not I'll accept a...
I'll leave you in suspense.
Right, yeah.
And that's what the left loons are screaming about this morning.
They're claiming he's threatening civil war.
Oh, God, don't I wish.
I watched the comments directly after.
All those newscasters, this paid horse, that's the first thing they jumped on.
How could he do that?
That was the most horrible thing.
Well, hey, if you don't know what the outcome's going to be like, how can you make a commitment?
Well, one of the things I'm advocating on Twitter, in my own little section of alt-right, is that we need to be prepared in the, I'm sorry to say, likely event of a Hillary Clinton victory to establish an entire campaign.
Nationwide, and this is exclusive from anything the NF is going to be doing here in the Northwest, to delegitimize the Hillary Clinton presidency and to basically create the overall attitude among white people that she is not president, that she obtained her office by fraud, which of course she will have done.
Which she will have done, that's right.
A lot of Bernie Sanders supporters know that.
Yeah.
I was telling Don before you guys started calling, I admit I am not totally immune from the germ of hope in all this.
I think if the votes are counted honestly, and if the fraud is either not as pervasive as they used to could make it, because it could be that basically just the Democrats have been slipping so bad over the past few years that they can't even rig an election anymore.
But it's just possible that if we get anything remotely resembling an honest count, that Trump can actually win.
And if that happens, we're going to have a whole new zoo to deal with because he's going to have everybody out after his scalp, the Republicans, Democrats.
But the fact is that if he does win, it will be, in essence, an act of insurrection on the part of the white majority in this country, and that in itself will make it all worth it.
If Trump gets elected and gets sworn in, makes it to inaugural day, gets sworn in as president, and then drops dead of a heart attack, he will have served his purpose in history.
Because he will have broken this evil two-party system, this vile dichotomy between crony corporate capitalism and socialism on the Democrat side and naked buccaneer laissez-faire capitalism on the Republican side.
Well, he's already saved them a little bit of trouble when they took Nixon down.
First, they had to get rid of Spiro T. Agnew because he was a real American who loved this country.
They had to get him down and replace him with a 33rd degree mason.
So when they got rid of Nixon, they had somebody that they could use and somebody they had some goods on.
And in this case, they already got Pence in there.
So you might as well have Paul Ryan or Mitch McConnell in there and have Mike Pence in there.
I gather Pence is mildly socially conservative.
I think Trump chose him in order to Placate the party establishment.
The Christian right-liking, he's just a pro-Israel shill that pretends to be a Christian conservative.
And so all the Christians think he's wonderful, and all the Jews think he's wonderful.
And some people have pointed out that he has betrayed Trump four times already.
Mm-hmm.
That's what he's all about.
He's a shill for the globalists.
That would be an interesting thing to watch if Trump becomes president, what their relationship is like, or what it becomes like.
If, through some miracle, Trump gets elected and survives up until the 2020 election, Pence will probably stab him in the back and run against him in the primaries.
Would not be surprised.
Do you think that maybe Pence is hedging his bets, so to speak?
If Trump doesn't get in, he doesn't want to go totally anti-establishment because he's going to have to jump back in again.
He's not independently wealthy.
Maybe Paul Ryan's doing the same thing.
He's hedging his bet just in case Trump doesn't get in.
But that may be part of it.
I'm getting a kind of a deer-in-the-headlights impression from some of these rhino Republicans like McCain and Paul Ryan and Pence and all these guys basically that have been lounging around up there for the past 30 or 40 years in Capitol Hill.
wearing their expensive suits and drinking bourbon and branch in the senate lounge and just ruling the roost and they've gotten to the point where they don't particularly care if the democrats are in the white house or what the democrats do out in the streets so long as they've got their little club and so long as they've got their committee chairmanships they can handle all that lovely taxpayer money get all their contracts and just wallow in them greenbacks and i think The easiest thing to do.
Shocked.
I think they're stunned by Trump.
I mean, you think the Democrats and the liberals are upset.
To the rhinos, Trump just came out of the left field.
This was supposed to be Jeb Bush's year.
Jeb Bush is supposed to be up there right now going neck and neck with Hillary.
And I think as far as Trump, as what he's done to the Republican establishment, he has freaked them out major.
They're just going...
Because they don't know what's happened.
They don't know how it's happened.
Those who do understand how it's happened, which is that their own base has revolted and turned on them.
The grassroots rose up against them for once.
Yeah.
I mean, all of these people, all these little people that the Paul Ryans and the John McCains and the...
The people that the grassroots hate.
Yeah, just using his political cannon fodder for all these years.
And now, all of a sudden, the worm has turned.
Well, I think that Ryan and McConnell and all those people, Lindsey Graham and all those claimers, they have seen the establishment operate for so long through ups and downs.
And they know that as long as the Federal Reserve is there, certain people in the club control all the money.
And those people are going to have their way, and if they get tired of you, they can give you the John Kennedy treatment, or the Tricky Dick Nixon treatment, either way.
Until we deal with that, as the Fuhrer did, when he took power, he went in there and he kicked the Jews out of banking.
And people tell me what a terrible thing that was he did, and I always inform them, yeah, he kicked the Jews out of the banks and the media, and their economy took off like a rocket, while the rest of the world was mired in a depression for nearly another decade.
Well, here's another parallel, because I think, Harold, you mentioned that...
Republicans are, you know, caught deer in the headlights.
I think all the government, especially established government, be they Democrat or Republican, I think they're in a panic.
Yeah.
And I think that's why all this posturing with Russia's about, rattling the sabers and talking about war.
That's their Hail Mary pass, yeah.
Yeah, and again, mind control.
Trying to divert public's attention away from what's really going on.
They always need a war to divert people's attention from all the domestic woes.
The only thing is, when you know you're playing against the House and the game is stacked, all you can do really is kick over the table.
War with Russia is going to be the Democrats' way of kicking over the table.
I can see some scenarios here.
Let's say Trump loses by obvious fraud.
He takes it to court.
And this drags on through November, December, and he ends up in a Supreme Court that's four and four, and Obama, for example, could use this as an excuse to stay in office, but also what might serve to, quote-unquote, break the deadlock or give Obama and Hillary the excuse to, in essence, just seize power is a war with Russia.
Because in wartime, obviously, all the norms are suspended and so forth and so on.
And so, apparently, the way it would start would be the United States would try to declare some sort of no-fly zone over Syria, which would put the...
Yeah, Harold, you notice that Hillary doubled down on that mistake.
I think she started realizing she made a mistake previously talking about a no-fly zone when she was debating, I think, Bernie Sanders.
She's doubled down on that now and really talking tough.
And it's just like you say, that is a way to start an unnecessary war is by telling a foreign country that you're going to control their airspace.
And the whole world will look at us as the aggressors when that happens.
Even our allies, except our most beloved allies, all of our European allies will regard us as the aggressor in that thing and say if Russia takes our planes out or nukes our bases and we had to come.
Talking about Russia.
Or the Iranians take out a carrier.
Yeah.
Talking about Russia, I read on one website, I haven't verified this on any other yet, but apparently the Russians, which I guess is a way of saying Putin, has declared that the Roth trials are not allowed in Russia under any circumstances.
I've read the same thing.
I don't blame you.
Sounds like a good move.
Well, Russia is part of this BRICS financial bloc.
Brazil, Russia, India, China.
South Africa.
There's a risk now.
There's no more Brazil.
I think they pulled out of it.
Well, they impeached their president, which is always a good idea.
They had some real commie-like woman, Dima Rousseff, who I suspect was probably a Jew.
And anyway, she got kicked out.
I'm just glad to see that as a matter of principle.
Anytime you can find some way to get rid of one of these so-called democratically elected politicians, other than the usual electoral way, is always good.
It's always a good sign.
Hope for the future, so to speak.
To go back to this thing about the war with Russia, you know, I just wonder this phenomenon of Donald Trump sort of like pulling back the curtain and giving the public a peek about what's really going on in government.
I wonder whether if they did declare war, how many people would participate?
Or has the public been tainted from their eyes and want no part of war and won't cooperate?
I just wonder what kind of an influence Trump's...
I can't help but wonder exactly how such a war would proceed.
It would probably begin in Syria, of course.
Which would give that part of the Middle East an excuse to disgorge more and more and more and more refugees, quote-unquote, into Europe.
I saw that the Iraqi army is now beginning to attack the city of Mosul in northern Iraq.
We're going to try and take it back from ISIS, and I saw this little thing that thousands of refugees are fleeing the city, blah, blah, blah, blah, and they're heading northwesterly, you know, possibly to try and get into Europe.
Well, that's part of the agenda is to totally flood Europe with these people.
I think anybody with a room temperature IQ knows that third world immigrants are just a Zionist battering ram against Christian civilizations.
And when they can kick the Syrians out of Syria to make room for Israeli occupation and then double repurpose them by using them to invade and destroy white Christian Europe, then they think they're doing a great job.
Have you seen the story of the child refugees of Calais?
300 so-called child refugees have been snatched up out of the jungle in Calais and have been brought to Britain now because they supposedly have families in Britain or something.
And they showed pictures of these guys getting on and off the ferry and on and on.
They're being taken to some home office hotel and whatnot in London.
And these are all young men of military age.
They look like they're about between 17 and 24. Yeah, the children, yeah.
Like the children that came up from Salvador and wetback and places like wetback land in Mexico.
places like that.
They're children, but what they looked like to me was a bunch of tattooed up gangsters A Trump victory means is white people rolling over and going back to sleep and think things are going to be good, like they did when Reagan got in, and then get screwed in the backside in a Hillary victory.
We'll piss off and aggravate and energize the white resistance like nothing you've seen in a long time.
Maybe.
What might happen is if Trump wins and the reaction of the lefty loons, Black Lives Matter.
They're going to go ballistic.
Yeah, they're going to go ballistic in the streets, and that might prevent the white people from rolling over and going back to sleep if they've got riots.
If the white people and the law enforcement are going to know that they've got a president that backs law and order.
It'll definitely help, yeah.
We'll see a different version of the Ferguson effect.
I do think that Trump is going to be very effective on the illegal immigration issue.
His campaign is almost centered around that issue, and I believe that he will be very effective, as Harold was saying before you guys called.
The laws are already there.
All we have to do is enforce them, and Trump will do that.
I think a turning point would be if they turn off the freebies.
You know, like the politicians say, how can you deport 11 million people?
It's impossible.
You just turn off the freebies, they'll wander right back across the border.
Well, it's a lot more than 11 million.
That figure always gets up my nose.
that figure is 30 years old and it's very well when you turn off the freebies and those people actually take jobs from America Well, the solution has always been to go for the employers.
If no one would offer these creatures a job once they came here, then there would be no...
Real serious enforcement was what we need, not just talking about enforcement.
Well, I gather that even before Obama came along, the enforcement wasn't exactly...
No way.
Illegal immigration has always been that both parties want them here.
Democrats want them here living on welfare and government benefits and voting Democrat, and the Republicans want them here for their cheap labor and not voting at all.
Exactly.
That's why the working man's caught in the middle and getting screwed every time, because rich Republicans want cheap labor, and liberal Democrats want more third-world goons to vote the D to get it for free and vote the donkey to screw the honky.
Yeah.
I've never heard that one before.
That's pretty good.
Me neither.
That was good.
I tell all the minorities that I've talked to that the Democrats are just conducting economic warfare against black America.
And they look at me kind of funny.
I say, they're bringing in people to take your jobs and take all your opportunities.
And I said, these white Republicans and business owners, they love cheap labor.
I just don't understand why you black people like cheap labor.
I said, when prices go up and wages stay the same, it's called a diminished standard of living.
I said, you're having to work harder to get less, but yet you keep voting for the Democrats.
And that gets them going.
The dumb whites vote Democrat and the dumb Hispanics vote Democrat, too.
They all just kind of give me a funny look.
I said, hey, they conduct economical warfare against you, and you keep voting for them.
Yeah, but you know, if the Democrats are supposed to be for labor, and believe me, I was in unions.
They could put up an Irish setter to run for president, and the unions will tell you to vote for the dog.
Just vote Democrat, that's it.
They don't want to hear anything else.
The Democrats empower the union bosses, they just don't empower the blue-collar workers.
Because the politicians allow union conditions and union wages to exist in their jurisdiction, and they keep the non-union workers, the low-wage workers out.
But in my own experience, occasionally, though, somebody will come in from the outside, pay off a politician.
They'll allow a couple of jobs to come in, and you can see these Mexicans and these people from out of state come in, and you know that they're working under the prevailing rate.
Well, that's what I tell these people.
When you see scabs come in to break union, it's always partners.
It's Vietnamese, Mexicans, ragheads, Africans.
They come in here and scab and break your...
I said, that's what happens every time a company kicks a union out.
They bring in scabs that Democrats bring into this country, and they come and kick you out.
I said, look at the U.S.T.W.
had all those meatpacking plants up north, and now they're all non-union, and they're all mostly non-union.
They're full of Vietnamese and Mexican and other foreigners up there, and there's hardly any white people working at these plants.
And the wages are so low, most white people don't want to take those jobs.
But 30 years ago, they were high-paying union jobs, and machine jobs, and the steel mills that are still operating, and clothing manufacturers, and a few textile mills that are still operating.
It's the same thing.
The gooks and the wetbacks take these jobs, and the unions get busted out, but yet the unions keep pushing Democrats back in office.
Yeah, well, the Republicans have stopped that if they just be fair, but they're not.
They're for big business.
They're for the people that bankroll their campaigns, get re-elected, and working-class whites, they don't donate any money.
Unions and big corporations that have the money and people tied in with the Federal Reserve, they have access to the money.
They're the ones that buy the politicians.
And it only costs $500 million to buy Congress.
That's a million dollars apiece.
If you own the kind of money that they have, that's chunk change.
Yeah, there's no reason, in my opinion, this country, the potential to make wealth, that we can't have decent wages, decent jobs to pay decent wages.
Poverty shouldn't even be here.
Well, there's one very good reason.
It's called supply and demand.
Every commodity, including labor, is supply and demand.
When your immigration rate is higher than your job growth rate, while you're exporting jobs and importing labor, you've got so many people looking for jobs that the person doesn't like the wages an employer is offering.
There's somebody else in line to take that job.
You keep wages down, and people like Newt Gingrich say, well, that's how we make American manufacturing more competitive with foreign markets.
But no, that's how you lower the standard of living, by flooding the country with labor while you're at...
Well, government's first concern should be the effect of economics, etc., on its own people, not on the competition with foreign markets or the problems of the capitalists.
Exactly.
One time, a wise black man that's smarter than most of the white people in Washington, a guy by the name of Alan Keyes.
commented that at one time when our nation was on its way up, we didn't tax wages and incomes, we taxed incoming foreign goods.
And now we have practically no tax on incoming foreign goods, but we tax the hell out of incomes.
And we have economic stagnation as a result.
Yeah, but that was a temporary war measure.
Up until 1913, when they first brought in the income tax, the only real source of income that the federal government had was, number one, excise taxes and various fees that they charged for this and that.
You know, little bits of odds and sods, but they actually had a very lean budget, yeah, compared to what they have today, and...
The Jews couldn't have had their war if they hadn't had the income tax and the Federal Reserve money machine to provide the wherewithal to have such a huge war.
That has always looked a little bit suspicious to me.
Yeah, but I think they accelerated.
You're right.
When they first instituted the income tax, it was for, like, real high-wage earners.
Oh, yeah, the rich people making over $5,000 a year.
Yeah, that was 1910 or 1913.
Yeah, that was a lot of money.
Yeah.
Those rich people.
Yeah, I think the Second World War, they put on an income tax on everybody, and it was supposed to be for the duration of the war, but it never got taken off again.
Yeah, another convenient thing about wars, these laws that get passed supposedly as war necessity and national defense, etc., etc., somehow they never get repealed.
It's like the pub laws, ours in Britain, were originally curtailed from like, you know, noon to two, and then, you know, like...
5 to 10, etc.
during World War I because they didn't want all the factory workers hanging around in the pub getting drunk.
That was an emergency measure and it's still the same way today.
It's over 100 years of that emergency.
Daylight savings time was first brought in in World War I. I did not know that.
Yeah, so that there would be more light to work in the factories and whatnot, but it's still around today.
Daylight savings time may not be such a bad idea, but you see the point.
You can pass things and institute practices and do things in time of war and just get people used to doing it, and all of a sudden these so-called emergency measures, when the necessity is gone, they just don't go away.
War is always a good time to steal people's freedom.
Oh, yeah.
Rahm Emanuel said never let a crisis go unused or something like that.
Never let a crisis go waste.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
The bisexual son of an Israeli terrorist.
Yeah, he's got a...
And I think he was just quoting Alinsky, wasn't he?
Probably.
Could be, could be.
And Hitler and the Abomination, they're both students of Alinsky.
And the draft came in, I think, came back in for World War I, and then it stayed around until the end of the Vietnam War.
They ended the draft in 72. I was very wise to graduate the next year, so I missed the draft of the Vietnam War.
Let me tell you, I was in the Army from 1969 to 1972, and the ambiance, the social structure, the social ambiance, the spirit of the times, was very rebellious.
The Army was not reliable.
A lot of drugs there.
Well, drugs, but it was political and social rebellion against the war in Vietnam and against the military and the politicians.
And that was very eye-opening to me when I was in the Army.
It was amazing to see what people were doing in the military.
And there were riots.
There were race riots.
I saw a mini race riot up close, and I heard about the, oh, ships, aircraft carriers had to return to port because there were massive riots on an aircraft carrier.
I like to bring up something.
You know, I often think of this, and it pertains to the Northwest Front, too.
I think change comes about not so much with people going out and doing things, but just attitude.
And if you're a Trump supporter or a white nationalist or whatever, you've got to live that.
And I think that's what's wrong in our movement and, of course, with politics, too.
Ah, we have another call.
Oh, great.
Hang on a minute, guys.
You're on Radio Free Northwest.
Who am I speaking with, please?
Okay, guys, we've got Greg from Buffalo on with us.
That's great.
Good.
Greg, can you hear me?
Yes, I can.
Okay.
Greg, we've got Richard from Virginia.
We've got Barry from Texas, and now we've got you from Buffalo.
We were talking about the way that the Trump campaign and the election is going in their particular areas.
From where you sit up there in Buffalo, how's Trump doing?
Very well.
Very well.
You know, during the primary, this neck of the woods indeed on New York, but I'm in what is called Western New York, and it went heavily for Trump, as did the state.
It will not be problematic, as most people think, that Clinton will take the state.
It still could be up for grabs.
Bear in mind that with the heavy Jewish influence down state, that might be wrong.
I beg your pardon?
New York City, yeah.
I think you guys in New York kind of probably have the same problem that the people in Washington here have.
Washington has this reputation as this great big liberal blue state, and it is technically, but that's all Seattle.
And a few pockets like Spokane.
The rest of the countryside itself is white, and I'm sure it's going to go very solidly for Trump.
It's just a matter of sheer numbers.
The people in the countryside in Washington can't outvote this big mass of liberals and scum here in Seattle.
So I think that's the same situation you've got in New York.
Yeah, Hillary, I think, is expected to take New York largely because of New York City.
And with that, she'll take New York's 30-whatever electoral votes.
In all of this blue state, red state thing, there is a very distinct divide between the cities and the countryside.
Unfortunately, the cities are more numerous, and therefore there are more votes.
Harold, let me ask you something.
You mentioned Seattle.
What's the difference in population between, say, the state of Washington and Seattle?
I don't know how densely populated the rest of the state is.
The city of Seattle itself is actually just like the core of what we call the Pugetopolis.
There's a whole string of suburbs.
Kent, Auburn, Snohomish County, Everett, that's where I believe Boeing is, and just on and on and up.
Basically, the Pugetopolis is one big huge string of towns and cities and whatnot that have grown so connected.
It's almost one big urban strip from Olympia in the south, which is the state capital, on up to Bellingham in the north on the Canadian border.
Huge number of people, a lot of money up there.
Oh, yeah.
And so the city of Seattle itself is only a part of the Pugetopolis.
Now, in the Pugetopolis, I...
Damn, I should know all these things off the top of my head.
But it's big.
It's many millions of people, and I would say probably it contains about half the population of Washington.
Spokane has got a liberal elite ruling it, but I'll be interested to see how the vote goes in Spokane.
They actually have a small nigger community in Spokane.
I think actually Trump might carry Spokane itself, because most of the people are white and normal.
It's just the ruling elite that is liberal and abnormal.
Unfortunately, I think we can assume Washington's going to go blue for Hillary because of this big mess here.
And I think that the big problem with white people is that they want to play fair.
Yeah.
Republicans play fair and Democrats play to win.
That is every time.
This goes back to what I started to say before, before the other calling came.
It's attitude.
Why can't we just coalesce together?
It doesn't even have to be white nationalists.
It could be people that want to go back to the way the country is supposed to be.
And these people, these leftists and the elite, why do we treat them so good?
These people should be snubbed at the very least.
We've got to be nice, you see.
Yeah, that's what I mean.
Most of us probably had like a typical, I guess, middle class or more or less middle class upbringing.
And our parents taught us that you mustn't be rude.
You mustn't yell and scream and make a fuss and throw mud at strangers.
You must be polite to people.
You must respect or at least pretend to respect them.
You mustn't raise your voice.
You mustn't act in an aggressive or loud manner.
And then again, there's other subtle threads going to it.
In America, I think we're raised with this idea of don't make waves, don't rock the boat.
Got to go along to get along.
So there's a lot of that as well.
I think that's where activism starts.
You know, you've got to have the right attitude and start defining who your friends are and who your enemies are.
Don't give aid and comfort to the enemy.
Yeah.
Another problem that white people have always had is, especially when we became fairly prosperous and it was a luxury we could afford, is compassion, empathy.
White people are the only race, certainly not the blacks, not the browns, not the yellows, we are the only people who seem to be capable of feeling empathy for others.
I mean, if you look at the history of, say, China or Africa and the way they slaughter each other like sheep, it's just, empathy is something that only Western civilization and white people seem to have developed.
Dr. Pierce wrote on that one time and said, you know, white people seem to be the only people on the planet that don't enjoy torturing, they don't enjoy torturing animals or anything like that.
If you have to kill an animal, you kill the animal, whereas almost every other race...
The people just get delight in spending hours, even their children, spending hours making something suffer and scream and an agonizing death.
And white people, it's just not in our soul to enjoy that unless it's a very committed white person.
Oh, this is a little off topic, but speaking of torturing animals, the Kapurot ceremony has now arrived from the Jewish ritual calendar.
I'm not sure what that is.
I'm sorry.
It's part of Yom Kippur, I think.
But this is where the Hasids take these chickens and they dance around.
They slug the chicken.
Yeah, they slug the chicken.
Yeah.
And they just dance around with these chickens waving in their hands and they basically, I think, shake them to death or something.
They twirl them over the head nine times after they slaughter it.
And that is to put their sins on the chicken.
Now, there's nothing in the Tanakh or the Old Testament of the Bible or the Torah.
Nothing in that that says a chicken is strictly a Talmudic thing, and it's just a very demented thing for really weird, lost, sick-minded people to do.
But that's just, it's one of the weirdest.
Now, apparently in Israel it's not officially approved, because I think the Israeli government knows it makes them look like fools, but there are videos taken with people's cell phones.
You see these Hasidic Jews dancing down the street in Israel someplace, waving these chickens in the air.
It just looks like...
Something out of a Muppets deal with all the rubber chickens or something.
Anyway.
Okay, we were talking about Trump.
Got into the subject that white people are the only people who feel compassion.
Oh, and interesting.
With regard to Trump in this election and the statement about Trump saying, well, I'll keep you in suspense about whether I will accept the result of the so-called election, the will of the American people.
His daughter Ivanka and several other people have also, and of course this includes Pence, several of his people in his camp have said, well, of course he will.
They are stabbing him in the back, basically, and I don't understand why his daughter Ivanka would do that.
Maybe she really thinks he will.
Well, you've got to understand, Trump has a strong Jewish influence.
His daughter is married to a Jew.
If you're going to deal in New York State real estate, guess who you're dealing with?
Oh yeah, and people who think they're not smart don't realize that because he fought the Jews, he competed with the Jews in Manhattan real estate and he won.
Yeah, but he got along with them too.
Yeah, and his daughter converted.
Yes.
Yeah, she went from Schicks to Convert.
You know, there is a strong possibility that although there's going to be a wailing and gnashing of teeth, that he's going to pull this off.
That I was reading today online, a reputable source, and they said, okay, this is in the bag for the Democrats by any stretch of the imagination.
What people say to posters and what they do with the ballot box might not jive.
And the polls, of course, are crooked.
The change methodology three times already to keep Hillary ahead.
They are overweighting Democrats dramatically.
And that just completely changes the statistics in their favor.
And they know it, and they know they're cheating, but they're doing it because, as you said, Democrats play to win.
We were talking about this earlier, Greg, and what the left loons are doing on the internet and in the media is creating this narrative.
That's the big thing over the past few years.
It's what they call the post-factual era.
Facts don't matter.
It's the narrative that matters.
And they say this openly.
But the narrative is that Hillary has already won.
They might as well just forget about all this election thing and just go ahead and crown her and let her.
March into the White House on a red carpet strewn with flowers and blah blah blah because Trump is finished.
Trump is done.
The people of America have rejected Trump.
It's almost...
I mean, if you were to look at some of these headlines on Salon and the Huffington Post, you would think that the election was held yesterday and Hillary had won in a landslide.
It's almost triumphalist.
I know what they're trying to do is create the narrative, but then again, I wonder if it might have gotten to the point where they're just so out of touch with reality and so delusional and so hysterical that they're whistling past the graveyard and they've actually started to believe their own propaganda.
I don't think so, Harold.
I think they're just engaging in a psyop.
Well, from what I can gather, and I'm not just saying this because I'm pro-Trump, but from what I can gather just by observing the more quiet and sane aspects of this campaign, Trump should win it.
The most telling things to me is Trump will have a rally in some place like Orlando's main sports stadium.
Or like in Houston, people that got there three hours early couldn't get in.
Yeah.
And Hillary has her rallies, if you want to call them that, in the local Howard Johnson's or local gym of a high school.
And she can't fill that up.
I mean, there's like two or three hundred people turning out half of the media.
And Trump is filling up these stadiums.
And I mean, it looks almost like maybe I shouldn't say this because I know it's not a comparison, but it looks almost like a Nuremberg rally.
Which is the closest thing we've ever had in this country to a Nuremberg rally since the days of Huey Long.
Anyway, I've said on my RFNs, Trump can give our people what they need.
They see signs in him of money which they equate with success.
He's not a quote-unquote loser because a loser is somebody that doesn't have any money.
Above all, he can provide the crowds where the white man can go and cheer and say and be who he is and say what he thinks and yell nigger, nigger, nigger at the top of his lungs if he wants.
And he's safe in a crowd.
The enemy, the bad men in the black bonnie armor, can't see his face.
And so all the beta males in the white race can get together to Trump rally and let their hair hang down and jump and shout and have a good old time.
If somehow or other we in our movement ever get to the point where we can do anything remotely resembling that, as I may have mentioned before, word has gotten out that we occasionally have little social gatherings here in the Northwest.
I've had people calling from the East Coast wanting to come to these because they think the Aryan Nations has come again.
The most impressive thing the Aryan Nations ever did was those picnics that they used to have at Hayden Lake.
Our guys want their picnics.
And they will, hell, they'll literally come across the continent to attend one.
Even in a little, just in a little 20-acre space like Richard Butler had, white people want to be in a herd.
We become herd animals.
Even a fairly small herd.
Harold, you guys mentioned before about Trump and his Jewish influence, which to me begs the question, how far do you think he'd get if he condemned Jews?
He's going to make us so mad when he gets arrested.
He's been accused of being doing that over the past couple of days because he said something like Hillary was getting together with her banker friends and plotting to control the world, which he probably was.
But a number of hebes on Twitter were yelling and screaming, That's anti-Semitic!
That's anti-Semitic!
That is an anti-Semitic stereotype!
And I don't think Trump ever bothered to answer that.
And then there was the other one.
Somebody in his campaign pulled something with some picture with Hillary and it happened to have a Star of David on it.
And so they're looking for an excuse to accuse him of being an anti-Semite, which he's not.
But they might piss him off to the point where if he thinks he's being attacked by organized jury like the ADL or the Israeli government or something like that, he might.
Lashback.
I don't know.
He has the lowest Jewish support of any candidate in 50 years.
Lest I know, I had mentioned that Trump wouldn't be around long if he condemned the Jews.
I remember in the beginning when he spoke before the Israeli PAC I can only paraphrase, but he said something about they have something in common.
They both understand business, and they understand business.
But I know you don't like it.
You don't like me because you can't control me because I don't need your money.
And I thought that was kind of a bold statement to make before them.
And it kind of got lukewarm applause, I thought.
But another point is you sent on a YouTube.
Just before the show started, I listened to it, and I said, boy, Trump is really sticking his neck out there.
He's really letting the cat out of the bag to the public what's going on.
I don't know whether it's in the video or my thoughts.
I said, gee, JFK got shot because of the things he was saying.
So, you know, I think Trump is surreal.
I think if Trump loses, or if he accepts defeat, he will not be allowed to retire.
They're going to come after him in some way over his foundation or something like that.
The big thing that they're ranting and raving about on, again, these idiot left-wing blogs, which I have no idea how accurate that is, they claim that all of this is supposed to be a big build-up for his real ambition.
He's going to create his own Trump TV network.
Well, that would be an interesting way to respond, but it's not what we need.
What we need is change.
Again, I hate to admit it, but the lefty loons are right about one thing.
I don't see too much point in building up another big, huge network of entertainment and news and whatnot for the white demographic, because the white demographic is dying out.
Let's take a for instance.
Let's just assume for the sake of argument that Trump is blatantly and obviously robbed of the election.
He goes running to the courts, and the courts basically just tell him to piss off.
Screw you, Donald.
You knew when you started this thing you weren't going to be allowed anywhere near the White House.
Stop acting stupid.
You knew this was never going to happen.
Now go away.
And basically, Trump and the millions of people who vote for him are just flipped the bird by the system.
Now, I have stated before that the white man has to have a permission slip to actually take direct action.
It's something apparently now socially engineered into our psychology.
We can still do all kinds of good rambunctious deeds.
But we have to do it with some kind of validation from the power structure or from the society as a whole.
We're incapable of doing these things just on our own as lone wolves.
So, do you think that Trump, when he finally realizes that he is being publicly humiliated and dissed and robbed of something he earned, do you think he will have the balls to do the old Bonnie Prince Charlie number and raise the standard of rebellion in the literal sense?
No, I don't.
I think this will fracture the Republican Party, which more the merrier, I say, and I will take exception with the formation of the Tea Party starting getting in people's faces at the town meetings, that it will coalesce.
I do not see, and I hope we don't, not at this time and stage, active acts of rebellion, if that's what you're inferring.
I'm not saying it wouldn't happen, but the time and the place is not yet.
I'll just briefly, I want the other gentleman to talk.
What struck a lot of us here is that this is opening up for citizen leadership, where he comes from out, even out from the political cesspool, as it were, and hopefully it will allow others at the local, state, county, whatever level, to re-engage.
Whether it be on racialist lines, I don't know.
But that's my take.
You know, it's great until somebody gets their jaw shot off or an arm blown off.
Then it's not so goddamn romantic.
That's all I gotta say.
I was one of the first responders at the Baltic Exchange bomb in London in April of 1992 when the IRA blew up one of the main financial centers in London one night.
I don't just write about these things from the comfort of my book line study or anything.
Well, I'm not talking about you, Harold.
I'm just saying...
Well, I have a friend in Denver, he talks like this.
I say, yeah, but it's okay to romanticize this until people start dying getting it, and you see what modern ammunition can do to flesh.
And somehow or other, you know, it's never the people that are responsible.
Like Ezra Pound said, the problem with warfare is that the right people never get killed.
I think if Trump gets dissed by the establishment, If I put myself in his shoes, here I am, 70 years old, I've got this beautiful family.
If I keep this up, if I go away, I can enjoy the rest of my years and my family will probably be alright.
If I keep fighting, who knows what they're going to throw at me.
That thought would cross my mind.
Is this worth it?
Unless I can see where I really do some damage and really turn things around.
But who knows at that point whether he'd be able to do it or not.
He's kind of a sensible guy.
I don't think he'd do a suicide mission and just throw caution to the wind and just allow them to take him out.
And they would, because they don't forget.
The Zionists don't forget.
Well, what could happen?
And this is something that I never actually got into at any length, but I have always felt that something at some point, this whole country, this whole continent, I should say, could reach a point where...
Just the right combination of combustible ingredients would be mixed together and a spark could be struck and once the fire starts it might burn the whole hen house down.
That's one of the more, to me anyway, exciting possibilities about this whole Trump thing.
We've been speculating for years how it could happen and we've got all these plans and we've got our Northwest plan, etc, etc.
But when you've got this type of Incredibly volatile human mix of economic and social and racial conditions going on and add a depression and add threat of possible war with Russia and nuclear holocaust and blah blah blah.
There's always a chance that some spark can actually set off the main charge, so to speak.
All of a sudden you've got a rip-roaring, full-blown racial war all throughout the North American continent, which would probably spill over into Canada because they've got niggers up there too.
No one in his right mind wants that, but let's face it, it's something we've got to accept might happen.
We cannot control events on the scale.
I'm just a guy with a computer and a microphone once a week.
There's nothing I can do to stop this from happening, and I think it would be fatuous to not accept and understand and try to work out some contingency plan in case it did happen, but...
I think a blatant stealing of the election from Donald Trump is just the type of thing that might finally get the attention of the white blob.
Yeah, this is the start of something, absolutely.
Whether it'll culminate in violence or indeed grow in ways that we can't imagine is yet to be seen.
But I've often thought about this.
Just remember, and you're pretty astute about historical movements.
After the revolution, Harold, there's always the reaction.
I think your point's well taken, Harold.
I was going to say the same thing, that what Trump has done to wake people up may be, if they cheat him out of the election, that may be the spark or the start of a slow burn that's going to burst into flames, because things are never going to be the same.
He's changed the common man's outlook on politics, if he cares to look.
You're right.
It could be the spark that sets off a revolution.
Me, personally, if Trump loses, I've got to rethink my life a little bit, because things don't look good.
I've got to be in a safe place financially, physically, geographically, because I don't see things getting better.
You're up in the mountains of Virginia, aren't you?
That's right.
That probably would be one of the safer parts of the country east of the Mississippi, so you're not doing too bad in location there, but...
A situation may arise where our little Northwest front here might have to start providing help and accommodation and immigration and migration a lot more quickly than we thought we would have to.
Anything else real quick?
Yeah, Harold.
No, thank you.
Good program.
I'm signing off.
Take care, man.
Bye-bye.
Hold that thought about help to get out there to the Pacific Northwest.
That's...
That's really good.
I don't necessarily mean financial help or anything, but just help them getting situated out there for people that are older.
That'd be very nice.
Okay.
Good subject.
Thanks a lot.
It was a great show.
Bye-bye.
▲
Export Selection