All Episodes
Previous Next
March 3, 2016 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:02:34
20160303_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Push your vocal, push and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
One for four for signal, token, whistle of the marching tune.
For your bike upon your shoulder, by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
With your bike upon your shoulder, Many a mud-walled cabin eyes were watching through the night.
Many a man big chest was throbbing for the blessed warming light.
Bombers passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew.
And a thousand flames were flashing at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
And a thousand flames were flashing at the rising of the moon.
Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's March the 3rd, 2016.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Right, I said last week that my comments on events in Harney County, Oregon, are not going to be confined to a single episode, nor will they.
However, rather than my go on and on and on about all the things that the Bundy Boys and the Oregon Militia did wrong, most of which I think should be obvious to any 10-year-old of average intelligence, It's natural for you to ask how we should do this right.
Well, as some of you know, I have some rather strong opinions on that subject, so strong that I spent many years in five lengthy novels and detailing them.
But I've found that's not enough.
I've learned one of the ways in which I must sing for my supper these days is that I have to be constantly making up new ways to state and restate everything that I've said before in some more or less new fashion.
Over and over again, I have to repackage and rewrap the same Christmas presents, which is fine with me because they're pretty awesome presents if I do say so myself, and if you need to open them 5, 10, 20 times before it finally sinks in, then so be it.
Hey, you're Americans.
You're the cards I've been dealt and I have to play them.
It's kind of a form of spaced repetition.
Guys, I'm going to let you in on a little secret.
From the time that Freedom's Sons was published in late 2012, when I just turned 59, I have pretty much said everything I've got to say.
From now on, I'm kind of in a holding pattern until such time as some of you decide that you want to do some of this stuff off-internet and in the real world, and you want the world I describe in my novels to become real.
And when you make that decision and you let me know that you've decided, which will be when you step forward and support the Northwest Imperative in some realistic proportion to your ability to do so, in other words, not as a hobby or a form of entertainment, but as your life's vocation, now when that happens, I need to be here and available for you, which is why I'm hanging on, and I'm not shopping around for some old folks home that'll take me on charity a few years early.
So until then, I am at least available to answer questions.
But I do have to bear in mind something that I mentioned before, including a couple of weeks ago, specifically my less-than-pristine constitutional legal status.
Now remember, I am a white separatist, and according to a Jewish federal judge in Chicago in the Bill White case, I have a quote-unquote inherently criminal and violent audience, i.e., you guys.
Yes, that is now a legal principle under American jurisprudence.
I can't say certain things or publish certain information that is in fact a matter of public record because of what you, my audience, are perceived to be like by some Jewish bureaucrat in a black robe.
Yes, I know it sounds like the Mad Hatter's Tea Party, but that is the legal system in Obama's America.
It's all very well for me to carp and criticize and shout the odds and tell everybody what the Harney County militia should have done.
But if I do that, there is always the chance that some United States attorney, who is now sitting in a cubicle listening to this, head bent down low to the speakers with their hand cupped around their ear, to hear any word that comes out of my mouth which they can use to deny me my constitutional protections.
Anyway, there's a chance that that U.S. attorney, with the mid-six-figure direct deposit going right into their bank accounts every month, is going to decide by virtue of my saying something to all you inherently criminal and violent people out there, I am in some way inciting something, or advocating something, or conspiring with the airwaves or some such.
I am doing no such thing.
I merely make observations and offer opinions on certain matters involving human nature.
But apparently someone with my viewpoint is no longer even allowed to offer an opinion on anything anymore.
Remember, as vile as the Bill White case is, Johnny Logan Spencer got five years for publishing a poem to the internet which was critical of the dictator.
So, what to do, what to do, what to do?
Tell you what.
I think I have a dodge that might work, that might let me offer an opinion on things without being arrested for square dancing in a roundhouse or whatever.
About 17 years ago, if memory serves, I think that's right, I think I was in the Texarkana crack house when I wrote this.
Anyway, many years before the events of this January in Harney County, Oregon, I composed and published an article entitled, How Not to Do It.
The similarities between this article from 1999, as I recall, and what happened last month in Burns, Oregon, are uncanny, and this article is very much to the point.
Since this article was first written and published almost two decades ago, the points I make here have been reaffirmed to be true again and again.
They are points that you all need to internalize, so I'm going to read a somewhat updated version of that piece now.
Our white nationalist movement has one great talent.
We are absolute aces at demonstrating how not to go about resisting tyranny and genocide.
That statement is only about half sarcastic.
Negative lessons can be a benefit if we can learn from them an ability that we don't seem to be able to develop.
The latest is that some American militia group has been busted in Canada of all places, quote-unquote, training out in the Northwoods someplace with, of course, an arsenal of weapons which has now been confiscated.
Depending on the degree of corruption in the RCMP or the provincial police units involved, the guns will either be destroyed or sold on the black market to criminals.
Certain it is that not one single round from any of these weapons will ever be fired at the racial enemy.
I don't know many further details, but I don't need to.
We've all heard the story before.
Look, I know none of you militia or survivalist types or order wannabes out there are going to listen to me.
I've come to accept down through the years that the gods have afflicted me with the curse of Cassandra.
I speak the truth, and it goes in one ear and out the other.
Nonetheless, it is my duty to speak on.
I'm going to tell you some things about guerrilla warfare.
I am far more entitled to speak on this subject than 90% of you.
I have served in two armies and two wars, and I have lived in three countries, Rhodesia, South Africa, and Ireland, which were undergoing guerrilla insurgency.
Plus, I study history and politics and revolutionary movements as a lifelong vocation.
Acting on the highly tenuous proposition that you guys are serious if muddled in your intentions, and you're not simply acting out middle-aged Rambo fantasies, I'm going to give you a few pointers on how not...
To wage an insurrection against a certain powerful and entrenched dictatorship which shall remain nameless.
Now, do I need to stick in the usual ritual disclaimers here in order to advise you what not to do?
Probably not.
Okay, let's push the envelope a bit.
This time I won't bother with multifarious semantic fig leaves that we generally use to try and pretend that I'm not really saying what I'm saying.
It doesn't fool anyone, and I rather doubt that any of these disclaimers would make a dime's worth of difference in a Zionist court.
Now, attend to my children.
Here are ten simple points that I want you to burn into your brains.
Number one.
Revolutionary movements do not have post office boxes.
They do not have newsletters.
They do not have webpages.
They do not solicit donations in the mail from right-wing mailing lists.
They do not maintain mailing lists themselves or keep any written records of any kind for the enemy to seize.
Yes, I know the Northwest Front does all of these things, but then we don't pretend to be a revolutionary movement in real life.
We are the beginning of such a movement.
We could, given proper support, morph into such a movement, but right now we're not and we're not trying to deceive anybody regarding that fact.
They do not talk.
I am presently fighting my own fight with words.
I do not pretend otherwise.
If I felt that armed revolt was appropriate for the place and the time and for me personally, then I wouldn't be talking to you now.
I would be shooting.
I would not be talking about how I was going to start shooting just any old time now when the Spirit moved me.
Nor would I be sending people threats in the mail or leaving threatening messages on their answering machines and getting myself a lengthy prison sentence.
This is the act of an idiot.
Threatening someone at all is the act of an idiot.
If you genuinely mean to carry out your threat, then you're simply putting your target on his guard.
If you don't mean to carry out your threat, then you are a coward and a disgrace to the cause you purport to serve who makes us all look ridiculous.
A large part of the lack of respect which our point of view commands in this country is due to the fact that so many of our people are quite obviously pompous blowhards who dress up in camouflage uniforms and wave their semi-autos in the air for the television cameras, talking and bragging about all the valiant deeds they're going to do at some unspecified time down the pike.
You might call this the Ter Blanche Syndrome.
We lost an old country like that, South Africa.
Please.
Please don't make fools of yourself and fools of the rest of us by doing this.
There's an old saying, don't talk the talk if you're not going to walk the walk.
I disagree.
Don't talk the talk at all under any circumstances.
Either do it and then keep your mouth shut both before and after or just plain keep your mouth shut.
Number three, do not stockpile weapons.
Do not stockpile explosives.
Do not stockpile anything at all.
Stockpiles are nothing but juicy propaganda plums for the BATF to seize and flourish aloft.
If you have a stockpile given the poor quality of the so-called gorillas the militias at all attract, some pale-skinned scumbag will eventually rat you out to save his own wretched hide.
You will lose your stockpile and your freedom.
There will be no other result from stockpiling because the fact that you stockpile indicates that you're not serious.
Yes, yes, I know.
The IRA stockpiles guns and explosives.
They also lose whole arsenals every year to the Gardi and the RUC.
150 Kalashnikals at a time in their original Libyan wrappings, that kind of thing.
The IRA stockpiles because they have a long-engraved love affair with guns almost as intense as that of the American right.
Although theirs is based on the long-standing British policy of prohibiting all Irish people from carrying weapons of any kind, they tend to overdo it for psychological reasons.
But the provos have never had more than about 50 people on active service at any given time in the North and maybe a dozen or so on the mainland Britain and in Europe.
Their ratio of talkers-to-doers is almost as bad as ours, although at least they do have a few fighters.
They always have far more guns than they have men who are willing to pull the trigger.
Weapons of war in a truly insurrectionary movement do not belong in stockpiles.
They belong in the hands of revolutionaries, so the revolutionaries can use them and will not be caught unarmed.
A serious guerrilla team parcels out the weapons and makes each man responsible for his own armament.
Leave explosives alone unless you really, really know what the hell you're doing with them.
The first explosives to start you people off with are hand grenades.
Not big, huge truck bombs or strange concoctions your science nerd whips up in his basement.
Oklahoma City doesn't count as an exception to all rules until we know exactly who is responsible and why, which we probably never will.
Grenades are almost idiot-proof, which recommends them highly to American racial nationalists.
Properly used, grenades can be a devastating weapon of urban guerrilla warfare.
Don't fool around with anything homemade.
The provos were constantly blowing themselves up with bathtub gelignite that were called work accidents.
Point number four.
You do not need fully automatic weapons.
Do not buy them.
Do not stockpile them.
Expel from your group immediately anyone who offers to procure them for you.
He is a police agent.
Unless you are properly trained in their use, machine guns are more dangerous to you than they are to the enemy.
Machine guns are not toys with which you may play John Wayne on the Sands of Iwo Jima.
I once saw a stupid nigger at Fort Jackson come very short because he'd watched too many movies and he thought his M60 was a toy.
Given the mentality of many of our purported freedom fighters, the urge for them to play with automatic weapons if you have them will be too great to resist.
Automatic weapons have two specific uses in military tactics.
One is for the defense of established positions.
The other is as a part of a highly trained and properly led fire team for use in fire and maneuver assaults.
You are not going to be engaging in Rambo-like shootouts with police and troops.
At least, not more than once you won't.
A large part of your guerrilla tactics will consist of striking at the enemy while avoiding such entrapments.
You don't have that kind of skill and training level.
No, you don't.
You can accomplish anything you need to accomplish to attain the initial objectives of an insurrectionary movement with other weapons.
Now, what weapons would those be?
Okay, time out.
Now, this is where I'm going to do something I never do.
I'm going to briefly get into the topic of guns.
I never do this because our wee little movement is stacked up to the ceiling.
With people who are convinced that they are the gun gods, and who think that they know every goddamn thing there is on the face of the earth to know about guns.
When I even mention guns in some of the novels, oh god, it was like how many stormtroopers can dance on the head of a pen.
Anyway, most of these people, you guessed it, are men who have either no military background at all, or no combat arms experience.
Genuine combat vets have certain firearms preferences, true, but they will be the first to tell you.
What matters is the man, and not the weapon.
I'm going to save all of us a lot of time and trouble and grief here when I tell you that I'm going to have my say now, but it is not for comment.
There will be no 220 posts back and forth on guns on the site, got it?
The only reason this section is on here is because it's in the original article.
Friends, the most devastating personal weapon for hand-to-hand combat ever invented is the lowly shotgun.
Saw it off as short as possible.
When you start accumulating your initial weapons stocks, legally buy shotguns and handguns, a few good rifles with high-powered scopes, and a few good semi-autos.
SKSs are junk.
Avoid them, but most any other semi-auto long gun will serve.
Buy these weapons lawfully and store them safely, but do not stockpile them in barns or anything that hints at illegal intentions.
Do not flourish them.
Display them.
Hold them aloft in the air for television cameras or let anyone know that you have them.
The police and authorities should never be in possession of any kind of database that tells them who owns what guns.
Achieving such a system is something that they've wanted to do for years because it's the first step to actual confiscation.
Before they can seize guns, they have to know who's got the guns and more or less where.
Don't hand them that information on a silver platter.
Do not buy guns in excessive quantity.
Do not saw off your shotguns below the legal limit until the legal line has been breached and you're going to prison anyway.
Point number five.
The media and the police should not even know that you exist.
At least not until the bodies start dropping.
No press conferences.
No press releases.
No camera crews.
No interviews.
Nothing that would tip your hand.
No Emmon Bundy or Glenn Miller bullshit.
When the time for direct action comes, the media are to be considered legitimate military targets.
They are not our friends, not under any circumstances.
Do not try to use them.
They will use you.
Incredibly, the vast majority of American white revolutionary groups, so-called, do not practice the most basic rudimentary security precaution of all, which is keeping their membership concealed from the enemy.
The worst possible catastrophe a fledgling guerrilla group can have is for one or more of its members to be identified by the government forces.
Point number six.
Do not wear uniforms or costumes of any kind.
If you do not understand why this is an absolute necessity, then do not attempt any kind of insurrectionary activity.
You don't have sufficient intelligence to do so successfully.
Point number seven.
Never defend.
Attack.
The basic strategy, if you want to call it that, of most militia groups, insofar as they have any, which isn't very far, is based on static defense of their communities.
Against city niggers or outlaws in a time of total social breakdown, that might be a feasible goal.
Against the federal government of the United States, which is the most likely attacker of any white community, this outlook is absurd and suicidal.
Again, this assumes, with a big suspension of disbelief, that the present militias would resist at all instead of throwing down their guns and blubbering to the DA for a plea bargain.
Never, never, never allow yourself to be pinned down in a compound of any kind.
You are facing the most overwhelming concentration of military and police power in human history.
To be surrounded is the end.
Period.
End of story.
8. Do not rob banks.
Do not commit other criminal fundraising acts like writing Freeman-style bad checks until you have already established your revolutionary bona fides by several very high-profile attacks against the racial enemy.
Now, this appears to be what happened to the so-called Aryan Revolutionary Army.
This was a group back in the 1990s.
They wanted to be the order, but so far as is known, never struck a blow at the enemy other than to rob banks containing the hard-earned money of white people which was insured by the FDIC.
This is the worst possible publicity they could have received, thanks to those turkeys, the public in the Northwest, now views Christian identity people as criminals and bank robbers.
Thanks a lot, guys.
Why me, Lord?
I mean, you made other men out of clay.
Mine, you made out of shit.
Now, how do you raise your initial funds?
I'll tell you how.
And I'm not joking.
Sell the damned compound.
And yes, in view of some of the things I've been saying in recent organizational letters, I am aware of the irony here.
But we're not planning an armed insurrection, and so this doesn't apply to the NF.
If you are, sell the compound and use the money you raise to buy transport.
Vans, RVs, trucks, vehicles which can transport men and weapons and supplies in small fire You do not need land or anything else which may lead to your getting surrounded.
Land is useless to you.
Either you will most likely die and not need it, or you will win and you can then appropriate all the land you want from the enemy.
Point number nine.
Establish an achievable political goal before you begin.
You're supposed to be guerrillas, not natural-born killers on some kind of pointless bloodbath crime spree.
Violence is a means to an end, not an end in itself.
One of the reasons the IRA has failed is that they've been taken over by common or garden-variety gangsters and hate-mad psychos who have either forgotten this or never knew it.
Point number ten.
The best idea yet.
Forget the whole thing.
We have completely wasted the past thirty years, comrades.
That is a fact.
Some of this wastage was due to sincere and hopeful expeditions down some dead ends, which, in retrospect, were pretty obvious.
The Duck Club and electoral politics are two examples which spring to mind.
We've also been plagued with a series of self-appointed leaders who have been corrupt, incompetent, and dishonest, and we're still plagued by some of these holdovers from the past.
You can yell and scream and moan and spread rumors that I'm a government agent all you want, but that's a fact as well.
Had we not wasted those 30 years, it is possible that we might be in a position to engage in an armed insurrection against SOG.
We are not, and anyone who tells you otherwise is either a fool or a real police agent.
I'm telling you to get your heads together and learn.
I'm not asking you to die for your race.
I'm asking you to live for it.
And more difficult, I'm asking you to work for it.
I know this is a message that a lot of you don't want to hear.
For the sake of our future folks, you'd best take heed.
You know, the murder of Lavoie Finnicum wasn't the first time by a long shot that our so-called federal authority has Gone very bad out there in the West.
Here's a song about a kind of a FBI visit that took place a long time ago.
I don't know.
For the Tony Park, every man's home Ain't there dark to sand We've got things to talk about
Your steps are framed He's hiding on this land And we're gonna drive him out He's a low-down rebel irregular He's been riding with one real thing They've been burning and looking Raving and shooting Clean across Jimiland Bring me my gun, boy
Bring me my gun Fuel your cup to stay here No, wait a minute, maybe you'll call Sergeant, strip him Corporal, whip him Beat him till he can't walk He's just your home He's only a mover What do you
persecute us for?
He ain't a part of this war Why do you have to harm the kid?
He don't know where Frank is here Let's hang me open and leave you Let's hang me open and leave you They ain't got nothing to say
These sudden sympathizers will get a little wiser When they see what's happened here When they see what's happened here today When they see what's happened here today When they see what's happened here today You live to be breakfast You live to be breakfast You live to be breakfast
You've been beaten black and blue.
Tell me, child, what is wrong?
What's been going on?
What's going on?
What's going on?
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to discuss a historic book.
I'm going to be discussing Lothrop Studard's Rising Tide of Color, and two major events precipitated the writing of this book.
The first was the Russo-Japanese War, which occurred in 1904 and resulted in a Japanese victory, and also World War I. The author is interested in the way in which both conflicts exposed a soft underbelly to the various colored races.
In World War I, Japan was technically an allied country, and in 1916 they actually signed a treaty with Russia.
Now this alliance was fickle.
During the First World War, the fickleness of this alliance was compounded by a disagreement that the Japanese were having with the French at this time.
Now, the author couches this disagreement in racial terms, but you also have to consider that during this time, historically, the Russians were very close with the French.
Now, this author very much believes in a yellow peril, as it was then called, and the author believes that at that time, the Japanese wanted Latin America.
So the author very much fears that the tropics might fall into Asian hands.
And the author believes that Asians will take over the production of goods.
And because of this, Europe will be devitalized.
The author wants to discuss all colored threats, not only the yellow peril.
So the author also discusses Wahhabism.
Wahhabism is a source of much of the Islamic Jihad that we see today.
Now the author says that Wahhabism is a subtle but not rigid And he talks about how there's power in the Hajj, which is a pilgrimage that every Muslim must make at least once in their lives.
Now, the author talks about how the Islamic world was angered by the 1911 Italian raid on Tripoli.
And it's important to remember that the Islamic world has a much longer memory than the Western world does as far as historical events.
The author does state that Muslims in India tend to be very moderate, and this is true even to this day.
They're really the only group that I can think of in the world of truly moderate Muslims.
And at first they tended to support the British in terms of the British keeping their political control, but then they became influenced by the pan-Islamic movement.
Now, the author says that he's willing to give up Asia as long as the Asians don't go into Latin America and Africa.
And, of course, this author is still thinking very much in colonialist terms and very much fears for the white areas in Latin America and Africa.
This author mistakenly, apparently, believes that brown races, and by this he means the Islamists and the South Asians, Have enough room to stay at home.
However, he does say that businesses are often tempted by cheap labor, which certainly Asians can provide.
And he also says that Asians may try to farm land and eventually take it over.
He also talks a bit about the blacks and says that they have great vitality.
And his primary fear with regard to the blacks is in proportion to how much they might be influenced by the Arabs, as they tend to accept foreign tutelage in a way that Asians don't.
He also does an assessment of the Red Race and says that in South America, there are some Indians, such as the Aztec, the Inca, and the Maya, that do have a stability and a poised conservative nature that may have progressed had it been left alone.
However, the Indian, the Red Race, as he calls it, is plagued by many crossbreeds.
And so he believes there really aren't enough pure Indians, and he says they really don't benefit from crossing.
He also believes that eventually, and he comes to this theme again and again, that Asians will eventually dominate Asia by the year 2000.
Certainly that's true.
And Lothrop warns that many people talk in these days about survival of the fittest.
But fittest is not always what we deem the best, but only what's best for its environment.
Some worry over a loss of traditional values or religion, but this is mistaking cause for effect because healthy populations have healthy dreams.
And he talks about the different ideologies of nationalism and internationalism, but the author says that at least in these days when he's writing the book, and it might have been true back then, There's always an underlying white unity.
I don't know if that's as true today as it was back when he was writing this book.
But he says that by 1905, a lot of the nation states had become very mercantile.
He criticizes certain aspects of nationalism.
He criticizes...
The filio-Germanic ideology of Houston Stuart Chamberlain, because he states that not all Nordics are Germanic, and he wants to make sure that ideology is grounded in race, not nationalism per se.
He also criticizes the Pan-Slavic movement for being too much in love with Asia.
Now, he discusses World War I and discusses how it made various strange bedfellows.
The German alliance with the Turks and the French bringing in blacks and yellows into France.
Now the author, like so many during those days, is very concerned with Bolshevism, which he sees as a fate worse than death.
He's very concerned that the colored races will lie against the whites through Bolshevism.
Now, he divides the world into two forms of control, and one being political control and the other being settlement.
And he does see in the world two cases of in-between states, one of them being Africa and the other being Australia.
He says that the case of South Africa is an exception because South Africa has a series of white enclaves.
And he says that Australia is also something of an exception because white settlement is essentially on the rim of that continent.
Now, in terms of areas of political control like India, he says that there's two arguments in these areas.
One is the argument of independence, which is an argument that we would be familiar with, and the other argument is one of vital expansionism, which is a term I'd never read before, and it's obviously something that's been abandoned.
In some areas, this author believes that independence is absurd, but he does believe that the Asians are smart and they will get control of what they want.
He talks about how the white areas of settlement have three perils, and these perils are arms, markets, and migration.
And he talks about how China has great numbers, and he fears that China will one day amalgamate itself with Japan.
And, of course, this prediction has shades of the co-prosperity sphere, which is something that you would read about or hear about when you study World War II.
He notes that Asia has learned much about industry from the West, and Asia is certainly working towards its independence.
He talks about the threat of migration, and he sees migration as something which tends to depress native birth rates.
He talks about how Asians are already trying to get into England.
The author plainly states that World War I accelerated an inevitable change that was going on in terms of equilibrium, and that even if it hadn't been for World War I, he fears that there would be colored migration into white areas anyway, but it was certainly accelerated by the First World War.
And the whites should remember the example of Central Asia, which was an area that was once a white land but was taken over by the yellows.
And he does remind us of the plain fact that political control is not the same as large numbers.
The author very much laments for size.
He discusses...
How we're in an age of science and we should realize a chain of high duties over the urge of profit.
Now, this book is beautifully written and it's really worth a read just for that.
It is true that the author tends to strongly focus on the yellow peril while underestimating a partly understood brown peril.
Now, the author is very much correct to point out the role of greed.
Really, you have to ask yourself, if books like this were already being written in the 20s, then why do we even need this show?
We really have to reconsider our priorities, and we have to ask ourselves, why do we care so much about money?
Why are we so beguiled or in love with popular entertainment?
And we should reconsider our priorities.
Of course, naturally on this show, I have to admit, I'm preaching to the choir because most of the people on the show are not in the same position that, for example, the very wealthy are, but I suppose you have to use the audience that you have.
So have a good evening.
Thank you very much for listening, and hail victory, comrades.
Greetings, comrades.
This is the trucker coming at you from the homeland this time.
Last week I was down there in California and I was wanting to talk to you about scouting your area that you're going to be coming to or where you already are or however you want to put it.
But last week, down there in California, middle of the state, Bay Area, there in the produce-growing neck of the woods and stuff, Every reader board I went past said, warning, severe drought area, no outdoor watering, conserve water, all that kind of crap on the reader boards.
Well, duh.
We're talking, you're building in a desert area that doesn't get a whole lot of water, and you're bringing your water in from...
Elsewhere, like up in the mountains, you're building reservoirs and bringing it down and tapping off the Colorado River and bringing the water and aqueducts in from other states.
It's one of those, you don't have a drought area, you've just got too many damned people in the area to support the rainfall that you've got.
Hey, up here in the Pacific Northwest, yeah, we have our drought areas or times also, For the most part, we're not trucking or not trucking, but bringing water via aqueducts in from other areas.
We just go and try to get as much of the snowpack and rainfall in the reservoirs and that's that.
Yeah, they've got their aqueducts over there in eastern Washington to go and support the farmlands, but that's mainly just to get it from the rivers up into their little aqueduct irrigation ditches so they can irrigate the farmland.
It's not coming hundreds of miles in from other states to do it.
So, I could talk about the Ogallala Aquifer that they keep sucking more and more water out of, and it's not refilling because they keep...
Sucking more water out than what leaches back down to it.
So, yeah, that's going to end up drying up eventually.
Yeah, you've got the Mississippi and Missouri rivers, and they've got dams across, what is it, North and South Dakota there, big reservoir areas up there too.
But, yeah, the aquifer there isn't refilling like it should.
They just keep sucking more and more water out.
So, eventually, that's going to dry up.
That's something that you really need to consider is look at the rainfall and drought conditions in the area that you're going to be moving into.
Take that into consideration.
Well, I'll go and cut this one off and talk to you soon there, comrades.
Hope to see you out here making your scouting trips and migration trips.
I'll look for you on the road.
This is the Trucker signing off.
Okay, there's a marginal character hanging around the Homeland blog who I'm not too sure about.
He's either an outright troll of some kind or he's an obsessive, which is a slightly different kind of troll.
But we won't get into that.
Anyway, it's obvious that what he's trying to do with his comments is to stir and to force himself to my notice.
I've got several semi-stalker types like that whom I usually ignore, but every now and then if they actually make a serious point, I'll approve their posts.
Now, this one guy was complaining about all the European music I play on here, basically explaining to me that Americans are dumbasses with nothing but pork fat between their ears, which I already knew, and commanding that I should play only skinhead rock or country and western, or else I will lose this great huge mass of white people who are out there just waiting with bated breath to take up their pitchforks and torches and follow me to the barricades.
If only I will do it somebody else's way besides mine and follow the instructions of these unknown and anonymous people on the internet, kind of like Joan of Arc hearing voices from God telling her to go out and save France from the English.
No, really, I get that a lot.
I've told you about this before, the Dutch uncle thing.
The party's failure is all my fault, but I can fix it if I will just do what this or that person tells me to do from behind the safety of a computer keyboard hundreds or thousands of miles away.
I get so much of this that I do feel bad, really, about having to come down on Ammon Bundy and his Argon crew.
People tell me, well, at least the Bundys did something besides sit there and chatter on the internet like grackles.
Yeah, trouble is they did the wrong thing.
Anyway, back to the music.
Let's run this down again.
Somebody once said that Americans are a people without a past.
I once saw a statistic to the effect that less than 50% of Americans, meaning white Americans, can name all four of their grandparents.
I mean, actually name them.
Grandpa and Meemaw don't count.
And less than 10% could name more than one great-grandparent.
Many Americans confused the Korean War with World War II.
Something like 30% of the reporters in the first Gulf War did not know that there had been a World War I, although you'd think the designation of World War II might have tipped them off that there was a previous version floating around somewhere.
That's a true story.
We as a people have no idea where we've been, so it's no wonder we have no idea where we're going.
Now, some of the music that I play on here is an attempt to re-establish white America's connection with our past and our homeland, which is now vanishing in a sea of Muslims.
A connection, frankly, we'd better re-establish before it's gone forever.
Anyway, here's some more of that Furin stuff for you.
This is supposedly a Vikings song in Icelandic, although since it came off a video game, I'm not able to vouch for its authenticity completely.
This is the story.
And I'm going to have to drop in an old piece from a Mike Harris show.
I'm sorry about this, but I not only feel like I've been drug through a knothole, my voice is pretty much the same way, so I won't inflict any more of it on you.
The End
The End Well, good afternoon.
Welcome.
This is Mike Harrison.
Today's guest is Harold Covington.
Harold, are you on the line?
I'm here.
Well, hey, welcome to the show.
Glad to have you.
Always glad to be here, Mike.
Well, you're getting a little bit of media attention here.
I understand you just had an interview or something that you're actually on the map these days.
Yeah, it hasn't actually been published yet, so I probably shouldn't mention the actual website.
It's not with a really first-line news organization, but it's with a news website, which is fairly well known in the United Kingdom.
To be the way it goes, we can get publicity in the UK and in Europe and elsewhere, but the American media won't touch us anyway.
Like I say, since I have not actually seen the finished product yet, I think I'll, you know, not get into actual details.
But yes, I actually did on Friday a 45-minute interview with an actual mainstream news website in London.
And that is not, I won't say it's something of a first, but I haven't done that in a long time.
Usually when the media contact me, it's about some specific incident or what they're trying to do is...
They want me to introduce them to our members so they can go into their homes and follow them around like nature show hosts and do smear pieces on, oh, look at these horrible, wicked racists and all that sort of stuff.
But this is the actual first...
Go, go, go.
Natural habitat.
Yeah, right.
Uh-huh.
Yeah.
And especially experienced not to fall for that trap.
But a lot of people, unfortunately, are not experienced in dealing with the media.
And these guys come on to them all friendly and interested.
Oh, yes, we really want to let...
No, what they want to do is smear white nationalists or white separatists or any kind of white racial people they can.
One of the lessons that I think white Americans need to internalize is that the media are not our friends.
They are never our friends.
And no system media coverage that we get is ever going to be favorable.
Mike, you are breaking up really bad.
I can't very understand you.
I hate when that happens.
Last week, I had perfect contact all week.
I had a great connection.
Everything was good.
This week, it's gone down the tube.
We'll address this over the break.
But one of my favorite topics is the media in this country because it's a cartel.
Yeah.
There's only six companies that control 96% of everything that you ever read, whether it's your high school textbook, all the way through any movie you go see, to what you watch on the evening news.
There's six companies that control it.
They're all Zionist-controlled.
Three of them are defense contractors, and we really need a free and balanced media.
We don't have that in this country.
It's missing.
Well, the media are arguably the prime weapon of the ruling political establishment in this country.
The ruling left-wing, liberal, and Jewish establishment in this country, in that without the media, all of their money and all of their political influence and whatnot would be much less powerful and would be more vulnerable.
But they cover all their misdeeds through absolute control of the means of communication and information in Western society.
White people can't be outraged by something they don't know about.
Well, you're right about that, and that reminds me of during the Cuban Revolution, the first thing Fidel Castro did was seized every radio and television outlet in Cuba.
So he controlled the media, so he could get the message he wanted out, and not the message of Batista of the ruling class, as you said.
The control of the flow of information, the setting of the parameters of acceptable discussion, these are two of the most powerful weapons.
that the Jews and the liberals and the left wing use against us.
Now there has been some development down through the years of the Internet as an alternative I mean, the fact that you and I are sitting here talking and being broadcast on the Internet shows that there is some undermining of the previous liberal total monopoly, but I think we should be doing a lot better job of it, I think, than we are.
For one thing, there's just...
There's so many different alternating viewpoints out there.
That's one of the main problems with the Internet as a source of information.
There's just so much of it out there.
And the second problem that we have here in the Northwest Front, and I'm sure everybody pretty much has, is that although we're here, we're presenting an alternate point of view, the vast majority of our own people, white people in America, do not know that we are here.
I don't know how many actual listeners RentsRadio.com has.
I'm sure more than we do.
Still, the total of white people who actually listen to or have access to alternate news sources and alternate sources of information through the Internet is probably a very small minority compared to the number of people who watch Fox News and CNN and MSNBC and all that.
Well, you're absolutely right on that.
And you have to look at what happened in 1980.
There were 50 independent television outlets in this country.
They competed with each other.
They were independent of each other.
Now it's down to six that are consolidated into a television company.
Yeah, I tell you, me personally, being an older generation, I'm very sorry to see newspapers go, because there was always at least a little bit of a chance that you'd get a better presentation in print than you would through an electronic media.
For one thing, newspapers and printed media could, if they so chose, do an in-depth article that actually presented alternate views, etc.
I know I've done a few of those in the past.
The triumph of the electronic media means that everything has been reduced to a soundbite of 30, 45 seconds, something like that.
And I've had this happen to me myself.
you'll do an interview with say a television crew and you'll shoot an hour of footage where you're sitting there talking to the host to the reporter and you think you got a really good discussion going and then when the final product comes out it's like 45 seconds and the one frame of shots that they choose to show is where you're scratching your nose or something and it makes it look like you're picking your nose and they have you saying the most banal and part of the video.
It's just, in essence, the use of the electronic media is even more controlled than the print media used to be.
This is the main problem with dealing with this media.
They have absolute control over what the audience knows and what the audience sees.
No, you're absolutely right about that.
Why I have you on, you know, as often as I do, is because I think your point of view needs to be heard.
And the people of this country need to look back and judge.
Have these policies that they've installed over the last 50, 60, 70 years, number one, have they achieved their goals?
And number two, have they been successful in delivering what they promised?
And that's something that we can talk about a little bit later, but here are our music for the break coming up in the background.
We'll be right back after a couple minutes.
Stick with us, folks.
Okay.
Welcome back.
This is Mike Harris on the Jeff Rents Radio Network.
Today is Monday, February 4th, 2013.
And the guest today is author Harold Covington.
And Harold, we haven't even talked about your new book yet.
You know, I know it's been long anticipated.
So now is the time to go ahead because I want you to be able to sell your books because what you've really laid out for people.
In a fictional manner, there's a template for how to achieve some goals that are important to some people and not so important to others.
We're living in our country right now.
In my opinion, the times we're living through currently, these are the worst times the U.S. has had.
So it's probably the Civil War, maybe even longer than that.
Because we've been invaded by a foreign enemy, two foreign enemies.
One is a Zionist-Israeli-based foreign enemy.
The other one is this Mexican-Hispanic-based foreign enemy that have taken over our country.
And I, for one, am very unhappy with it.
So I want people to be able to buy your book, read it, study the template, because it is fictional.
And you can tell people what you develop a template around and why it will be effective.
Right.
First off, did you get the copy of Freedom of Sons that I sent you, the complete one?
Yes, I did.
And I need to ask you, because I read the other copy.
Yeah, Volume 1, yeah.
Right.
Where does Volume 2 start in this?
Because I haven't even opened the book yet.
Oh, okay.
Well, what happened is, this was a long undertaking.
The book took me almost two years to write, and frankly, people were getting impatient.
So about a year ago, I put the first two sections into Volume 1. Now, that is available on lulu.com, L-U-L-U dot C-O-M.
The prologue, which begins with the Battle of Portland, and then there's the first two sections.
The first actual section of the book deals with the first year of independence in the Northwest American Republic and its establishment as a white homeland, and it shows how, in my personal view, it would be possible for white nationalists and separatists to set up a government to deal with the immediate problems that any such independent white nation will face.
Including economic sanctions from the Americans and from the rest of the world, including a very urgent need to establish energy independence, the need to set up a separate currency, the need to consolidate the new government's control over the territory and deal with all the various problems that are left behind from the American era, such as a large part of the ruling and administrative class fleeing, so forth and so on.
It takes place 12 years into the creation of the Northwest American Republic.
It's 12 years on.
And this is the longest section in the book, and it deals largely with the constant objection that, oh, Harold, we could never set up a new country of our own in North America, because if we did, the Americans would just nuke us, or they'd invade us, they wouldn't allow us, blah, blah, blah.
That whole objection.
Now, some people may find that my solution to the problem of the Americans being about Tanukas is a little bit fanciful and a little bit deus ex machina.
Well, there's a little bit of dramatic license there.
But the basic nature of the problem, I think, is stated fairly well.
And the solution of, how do I put this, the white ethnostates' military survival is dealt with.
Now, those, well, I guess three sections.
Prologue, the first section, and the second section form Volume 1 of Freedom Sons.
And you can still order Volume 1 on lulu.com.
But in the next year after that, I completed the last two sections and an epilogue.
And in this one, I get a little bit more fanciful.
In the third section, I get into something which a lot of people...
Actually came to me and asked me to deal with it one way or another over the years, and that is the Solutrean hypothesis, wherein it would appear that there's a good deal of archaeological and anthropological evidence that white people were here in North America first, before the so-called American Indians.
And I work a plotline around that.
Basically, part of the Northwest Republic's territory is in Montana, and a dig site called Lost Creek is discovered, which contains...
Some pretty surprising archaeological and anthropological evidence of the North American continent's early white habitation.
And there's a big spy story running around that where the evil Americans and Jews and Canadians and whatnot are desperately trying to discredit this new salutary and fine, so forth and so on.
And then in the fourth section, I deal with another subject, which, and by the way, that third section is 32 years.
I think it's 40 years on.
Yeah, 40 years on.
And it's set up in Montana, on the border between the United States and the Northwest American Republic.
And it deals largely with not so much American efforts to undermine the Republic as with the issue of reconciliation between whites.
Because we have to understand that in any struggle for a white ethnostate, a white homeland in this country, it's going to end up...
Basically the same way that it was in 1861 through 1865.
Most of the fighting and bleeding and dying will be done by white people.
Any such war or revolution is going to be a civil war between white people caused by the presence of non-whites in our society, which is our national...
So you've got a little bit of a cross-border Romeo and Juliet going in the fourth section there, and then you wind it up in the epilogue.
But what this book does is it covers the first 50 years of the Northwest America Republican Republic's existence.
And in every section, I try to show what problems might arise for a separate white state in North America and give at least some theoretical ideas as to how they might be dealt with.
Okay, well, I hear our music here.
We're ready for another break.
We'll be right back after this, folks.
Okay.
Bye.
We'll be right back.
you Thank you.
Well, our time's up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week when hopefully my voice will be in a little bit better shape.
Until then, Sasha Underban.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection