All Episodes
April 30, 2015 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:00:03
20150430_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush-a-woopal, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O'Farrell, where the gathering is to be, In the old spot by the river, right well known to you and me.
One word more for signal, token whistle, up the marching tune, For your pike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon, By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, With your pike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
It's April the 30th, 2015.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Right, this is a crunch week, again.
I've got a Northwest Observer to get out before the end of the week, and a special project that's going to resurface sometime today or tomorrow, so today being Monday, I'm going to do an all-day RFN marathon, and see if I can get this episode in the can and upload it by sometime tonight.
Let's see how I do.
I've had a number of you email me and ask me what I think about the incident in one of my many former hometowns, North Charleston, South Carolina, wherein a police officer named Michael Slager shot a nigger who was running away from him and, in my opinion, stupidly forgot that every little sambo running around town these days has a phone or some kind of video camera, and he got videotaped doing it.
My opinion is he's toast, which is a pity, but there it is.
Michael Slager violated the prime directive of every government employee in this completely corrupt society and of pretty much everybody else in Obama's America.
Don't get caught.
And more and more, don't get videotaped or secretly recorded.
I like that Jew basketball team owner.
Donald Sterling never figured his Hoppa slut was secretly recording him, and that cost him the ownership of the team, not to mention millions of dollars.
Now with all these spy cameras and recording devices everywhere in the hands of...
People are sticking out of walls.
There is no such thing anymore as privacy.
And, of course, when you've got that kind of situation, a lot of dirty linen of every kind starts getting aired.
From now on, the general rule for anybody of any race who wants to do anything even remotely outside the box, be it a crime or brawl with one's fellow niggas in a McDonald's or screw your secretary in some no-till motel, it is always be aware of the cameras.
Find out where they are and plan your activity so as to avoid them.
And I think I mentioned this a few times in my Northwest novels.
I always figured that one of the first tasks of my, of course, purely fictional NVA, when they initiated operations in any area, was to locate and identify all surveillance cameras and either destroy them or make it clear to the people involved that continuing to spy on their fellow citizens was a poor life choice.
However, this segues into the general situation regarding the police and their role in politically correct America.
Now, I hate to fall back into yet another TV and movie reference, but this country and our people being who and what they are, I think it'll be understood.
Now, some of you may have seen a TV series from back in the 20-aughts called The Shield.
The protagonist of which is a character named Vic Mackey, a police detective in Los Angeles who is, in my opinion, probably the best and most realistic portrayal of an American police officer to come down the Hollywood Pike, and probably will be for some time.
I won't get into the series, but early on, Mackey and his team are hauling some idealistic, politically correct little female rookie just out of the academy around their operational area for her orientation.
Which is one of the worst neighborhoods in East L.A., about 75% Mexican and 25% black.
Mackie is basically showing her the ropes, how things really work in the real multicultural world and our gorgeous mosaic, and she's quite horrified by all the wicked evil racism and sexism and general cynicism and lawbreaking on the part of the police she's seeing and being told about.
Now, Mackie halls her up and gives her about a two-minute speech, which I think I may try to find on YouTube when I have the time, which I can't quote from memory, but it goes something like this.
Look, Officer So-and-so, if you are going to survive out here and not get yourself and your partner killed, you are going to have to learn to live and work in the world of reality.
We are not so much cops as we are jailers.
Our mission is containment.
Our job down here is not to protect and serve anybody down here.
Our job is to keep them down here.
Our job is to keep the lid on this toilet and keep it from overflowing so all the rich lawyers and producers and movie stars and city government officials in Beverly Hills and Brentwood and all the faggots in West Hollywood don't smell the shit.
Having lived on no less than three occasions for extended periods in North Charleston and Hanahan, South Carolina myself, I can tell you that the job of the North Charleston Police Force is to keep all those niggers the hell out of Charleston proper, and specifically to keep them out of the affluent white areas in Mount Pleasant and West Ashley and Sullivan's Island and Isla Palms,
and especially to keep them north of Broad Street in the city proper, which is the historic district, one of the most beautiful places remaining in America, and one of my favorite places on Earth.
One of the few parts of the rest of America I really regret I will never see again.
I sent one of my novels, Money Blue Murder in Charleston, because there are long blocks down there where you can stroll along and for a time be convinced you're still in 1860.
South of Broad Street is the tourist district, and now that the naval base is closed down, the only major source of income in the entire city is tourism, and whatever assets all those wealthy faggots from New York have brought down with them when they moved into the condos which many of those historic homes South of Broad have been turned into.
A Charleston cannot have tourists being robbed, raped, murdered, and victimized by the local savages.
Because if the word gets out it's not safe for white people, then the city's one reliable source of income will dry up and be blown away.
And that whole beautiful city will become what Savannah was 40 years ago when I first went through it.
Don't ask.
In Charleston, even more than other American cities, the Chamber of Commerce runs the show.
They give the police their true marching orders and everybody in the city knows what those orders are.
Keep those black animals under control and keep them out of the nice touristy places where the white people spend their money.
Officer Michael Slager was doing his job in the real sense.
The problem is some asshole with a video cam on his phone caught him doing it.
This is the completely covert but universally understood mission of all American police.
To keep the existing order in power and make sure that the money keeps on flowing up out of the pockets of the poor and the middle class and into the pockets of the 1%.
Remember, the purpose of democracy is to prevent change.
What we have going on now throughout the empire is a struggle for control of the police, with a view on the part of the lefty libs to wrest control of the society's armed men who are licensed to kill away from the 1% in the Chamber of Commerce.
and into their own hands through so-called civilian supervisory boards for which read Stalinist political commissars are the kind that used to control the old Soviet police in Mariboros.
I know most of you won't follow my repeated recommendations to read things like Huffington Post and Salon Magazine online, because these sites are simply too loathsome.
They make decent people physically ill, and I get that.
But these sites are where the Lefty Lib agenda for the next 20 years is laid out for all to see.
And one of the suggestions our lords and masters are now batting around among themselves is to prohibit heterosexual white males from becoming police officers, or else ban them from carrying guns and restrict them to office duties, rather like the first female cops 60 or 70 years ago.
And yes, they're serious, and we had better take heed, especially you cops who are listening for whatever reason.
Salon Magazine is almost 20 years old now, and I've followed it since the Clinton years, and what you see on Salon today has a habit of ending up as mainstream culture and government policy 10 years later.
What's going to be interesting is when the 1% realizes that their wealth and power is actually being threatened by these attempts to take control of the police away from them.
White people as a whole may not resist their own genocide with force because they are terrified that the dictatorship with its police and courts and lawyers will take their stuff.
But the 1% damn sure will resist with force any attempt to take their stuff.
And they know they need to keep control of the police so all their stuff will be safe from all those grungy poor people of all races who want to take it.
This is going to be fun to watch.
Okay, we're going to first music break a little early this week with a word of explanation, because this song is a little bit longer than normal for our show.
For some months now, I have had a couple of our comrades, one in Sweden and one in Wisconsin, barraging me with literally dozens of unsolicited music tracks, mostly skinhead rock of various kinds.
These guys are of what I suppose might be called the modern school of thought, and they feel I play too much of that.
Pointy-headed stuff with archaic things like acoustic instruments and identifiable melodies and singing voices that can actually be heard and can actually carry a tune and other such outdated remnants of the past.
Look, I've mentioned in the past my attitude towards skinhead rock, otherwise called white noise or oi music.
I give it an A-plus for enthusiasm and generally, with most of it, a doubtful C for quality.
Which, to be fair, sometimes is not the rock group's fault, because a lot of this stuff, especially the earlier tracks from the 90s, were recorded in somebody's garage with crappy instruments and gear and no access to all the fancy mixing boards and woofers and tweeters and whatnot in a proper studio.
Now that having been said, some of this kind of music does seem to be, how can I put it, maturing, and the musical and technical quality both do appear to be improving.
Some of these groups can't really be called quote-unquote ours in that they don't seem to be overtly political or racial, but their music tells a different story to those who can read between the lines.
Now, this is a group from Texas called Axe.
The song is called Silent Soldiers, and if a Hollywood movie is ever made about the NVA, this might well be part of the soundtrack.
We'll see you next time.
We'll see you next time.
We'll see you next time.
Silent soldiers fighting battles here on the streets.
Growing stronger every night at face.
Unlock the power and see what you'll find.
Unleash the anger that grows in your mind.
All right.
Reach for the answer.
It's gone at a glance.
You won't survive if you don't take the chance tonight.
Silent soldiers fighting battles here on the streets.
Growing stronger every night at face.
Silent soldiers fighting battles here on the streets.
You won't survive if you don't take the chance tonight.
Silent soldiers fighting battles here on the streets.
Silent soldiers fighting soldiers fighting battles here on the streets.
Silent soldiers fighting battles here on the streets.
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight, I'm going to be discussing Colin Cleary's What is a Rune?
And this is a collection of essays which has the same author as Summoning the Gods.
In this series of essays, Cleary is interested in discussing how Western culture conceives of the nature of being.
This effort to define or make abstract this notion of being really started with the cave art that we find particularly in France because that would distill an animal or a fertility symbol to its essence.
It's unlikely that this painting was done as a part of a magical hunting technique or storytelling, which is something we find in other parts of the world.
However, it is very possible that this early form of European art may be linked to shamanism or incubation rites.
And the author reminds us that the first philosophy that we see coming about in Europe was really an outgrowth of shamanism.
This author is very interested in Heidinger, and Heidinger made a distinction between concrete being, which is ordinary, for example, people and things in the world, versus abstract being, which is just an abstract notion of being in general.
In certain respects, Heininger is a contradictory figure.
On the one hand, he felt that Germany ought to lead the West.
But on the other hand, like so many German intellectuals, He felt compelled to look to Greece to give voice to essential ideas about his notion of being and how being contains the implicit idea of growth and development.
Now, because Heidinger is not Germanic enough, according to this author, he did not study the runes.
Cleary wants to correct this.
He talks about how to, the modern intellect, it's very difficult to understand the essence of the runes.
And this is because modern language uses intelligible abstract universals.
By this we mean words that are not rooted in cultural knowledge, but they're just simply vocabulary words that are generalized.
The runes are quite different from this.
They use something called imaginative universals.
And to explain this, an imaginative universal is a type of language that's very much akin to poetry.
The author maintains that language is a registration of being or an acknowledgement of being, and that communication is just a side effect of this.
To Cleary, creation has a desire to produce beings that understand a notion of abstract being and want to conceptualize the universe.
Now, for example, in Ozotro, we have this notion of Asgard, and it may...
than a place.
And he says concept because he says that we really have to give our northern European ancestors more credit because they saw their myths as symbolic, but they would express them poetically because they intuitively understood poetry.
And they understood that poetry can be used to explain concepts that are difficult to It's true today that when we try to explain Norse mythology, we do tend to use abstraction.
But again, that is because we no longer understand imaginative universals.
A great part of this problem is that we live in societies where not everyone has the same mist.
And we also have a lot of baggage coming from other philosophical ideas and also ideas of recent history.
Now, in a totally unrealistic way, one way to remedy this is to hope for Ragnarok, after which our people will again read this world as if it were a book filled with meanings.
He reminds us of this story of Odin's gifts and the story of Votin, Vili, and Vey, when inspiration, will, and hollowing is given.
Along with inspiration and will, implicit in that is a sense of ought.
And then we also have this very important sense of the hollowed temple.
Then, of course, comes the question, well, who can enter the temple?
So then we have to ask, what is the nature of Ozotro?
This author gives us a very important definition.
He says that Osatro is a heroic commitment to our people.
Other factors, such as ceremonies and mead horns, are all external.
So, when we speak of heroics, we next find ourselves asking about the notion of free will versus determinism.
We have this notion of the opposable self.
But are we really separate from our consciousness, or our genes, or our body, or our environment?
We're all shaped by these things, and we're limited by them.
So, what then is freedom when we don't really choose who we are?
But the author then says that if our idea of freedom is absolute choice in who we are, then we have a very unrealistic idea of freedom.
Freedom, instead, is becoming who we are.
Now, this is a movement that struggles for the absolute affirmation of our conception of being in the abstract and also our being as being.
So those who struggle for this movement, they are without the limit of social convention or expectation.
And they are attaining, in the ideal at least, the realization of their true self.
So those who are in this movement, ideally, they have true freedom of will.
And this explains why we do not have a conservative movement.
Because conservatism is rooted...
In social convention.
So in contrast, this movement works to recreate the world.
So I think that's an important distinction.
In order to further illustrate this notion of abstract being versus actual being, this book ends with an essay about a play called The Prisoner.
Which is evidently theater of the absurd, in which a member of the clergy sacrifices everything because of religious beliefs, which is essentially a notion of abstract being over concrete being.
Now, my only question or my only criticism of this book might be that I would have rearranged the essays.
Because I think the last essay is perhaps rather out of place.
But aside from that, I actually found this series of essays to be more focused than the last series.
So I agree with the critics who said this is a slightly better book.
So I hope you enjoyed my review, and have a good evening, and hail victory, comrades!
*music*
Greetings from Seattle, comrades.
Andy Donner here.
From time to time, there are remarks I need to make in response to subjects which are highly emotional, and I usually decide to wait until the fury dies down in order to avoid dealing with the inflammatory aspect of the matter.
For example, I could write a dissertation on the Bundy Ranch nonsense and how it demonstrates the utter lies people tell the party about their inability to migrate, but it was so long ago that most of the Americans in the audience probably don't remember the sequence of events I'm referencing.
It has, after all, been over a year since that wreck was a news item.
I may eventually cover that just for the sake of getting my thoughts out there, but I'd have to sneak up on people with it since my comments won't make me any friends.
In fact, I may not do myself any favors tonight, either, but things need to be said.
A couple of months ago, there was a discussion going back and forth from various RFN contributors and some e-hangers-on by way of comments on a couple of RFN episodes.
From time to time, one of the reasons the party is given for someone's inability to come home is their need to care for elderly or otherwise dependent relatives.
While Stefan and Annie made perfectly valid, helpful, and practical points in their presentation which dealt with this exactly, I actually need to explore some deeper and more fundamental aspects of this situation with you all.
Provided those of you making this claim are honest and accurate, which is a twist I'll cover in a moment, there's a very obvious, reasonable, and civilized way to proceed in your situation.
The same day in early February when I recorded that long panel discussion with comrades Don and AJ, I pitched this concept to them to make sure I wasn't out of my mind or overstating my position, and they agreed I was right on the money.
Admittedly, Don had to admonish me to be a little less rigid and forceful, And I suppose he was right to do so.
Nevertheless, the position of having your familial elders dependent on you puts you in the position of being the breadwinner.
In the case of emotional dependence or other types of need, you're still the breadwinner, but not of financial resources.
And since you're the one providing what your family members need, you're the one calling the shots.
In past generations, as well as our own, elderly or other infirm relatives who truly needed support usually end up moving in with those they depend on.
Granted, this is usually not by choice, since it's very similar, in more ways than one, to our childhood years.
That's usually an upsetting condition to be in, and sure, no one likes it when their parents or other family members have no other choice.
This is mostly because it makes us imagine what our own golden years will be like.
Nevertheless, this is the ultimate form of dependency and it's very akin to having your parents make decisions for you when you were a child.
At best, your own input was politely asked for, but this usually wasn't the case.
Don reminded me that because these dependent family members of yours are likely adults of sound mind, asking their opinion about your moving to the Pacific Northwest is perfectly fine, regardless of whether or not they currently bunk under your roof or theirs.
But remember, you're the one calling the shots.
In any sort of family, the people bringing home the bacon, financial or otherwise, are the ones in control because it's their responsibility to keep providing.
They're the ones who get to make the big decisions, even if those they support don't always like it.
Moving to better conditions for the family is perhaps the most drastic, yet most practical, choice which can be made and it certainly falls under the umbrella of leadership decisions For years now, one of the reasons we've been told not to expect people to migrate is that they can't stand how a move will affect their children.
You can take my word for it.
Nothing bad happens.
As adults, we all know that adolescent concerns are just that and nothing more.
Like with younger children, whatever it is they're worried about will be a distant memory in a month, if not sooner.
True, it's a bit harder with actual adults, but if they truly depend on you, they'll just have to come along.
No, really, that's how this works.
That's how it has always worked.
It has to be this way, because survival is involved, and survival usually requires one person to call the shots and have everyone else fall in line.
Truth be told, these concerns are actually a type of narcissism.
Yeah, really, here's the deal.
A person's class, be it social or economic, is frequently demonstrated by what their dependents have access to, and more importantly, what they do not have to do.
Sure, most parents dote on their children when they're able, but this doting is frequently made into a public display, which reinforces whatever class standing the provider sees themselves as having attained.
The party occasionally has to explain why everyone's children must have a required stint in the NAR's National Labor Force, and it's for this exact same reason.
The inability to avoid work or inconvenience isn't pleasant, and it is absolutely a shock to the modern American psyche.
The inability to shield your dependents, children or otherwise, from the same problems we all face means you're not exactly the elite you pretend to be.
Now, as I said earlier...
So far, I've been pretending everyone is honest with us and has accurately described their situation as their elder being dependent on them and not the other way around.
I almost didn't want to go here today, but when I pitched this concept to Don and AJ, the conversation almost immediately went in this direction, so I'm not the only one thinking it.
Periodically, the party is given some reason for outright refusal of Northwest migration, and it's obviously sugarcoating a screw-up.
My personal favorite was one instance where someone made their penchant for risky property speculation into a situation where they were quote, damaged by a bad real estate deal, unquote.
I like this example because it's only a real estate deal if you're a professional investor.
Otherwise, what really happened is you took a huge gamble and lost.
I'm not trying to rub it in, but I do need to insist on a little bit of honesty.
Honesty is the basis of this deep and objective inventory of our own moral characters you've periodically heard about here on Radio Free Northwest.
Oh, look!
It's the character issue again.
Yay!
No, but really, this is a problem.
Over the years, the party has turned detecting internet bullshit into an art form.
And this I have dependent elders excuse is starting to sound a lot like I'm economically or emotionally tied to my relatives because I can't support myself.
While I understand this situation is becoming more and more common than any of us is comfortable with, being unable to admit what is actually going on is nothing short of denial and avoidance.
Further, BSing the party about it is even worse since you're actually trying to convince yourself by convincing other people.
I once gave a talk on RFN about solving problems, and how running your life on autopilot is a bad idea.
While that was all well and good as far as RFN material goes, the precursor to solving problems is admitting they exist, which, of course, goes back to performing this character self-examination we keep talking about.
Do it.
And please, do it right.
Hail victory, comrades.
This is James Hooker.
Rolling all the planets together Rolling all the planets together Calling all the clans together.
Brothers come around.
Calling south and north together.
Calling west and east together.
Calling all the clan together from the road Can't afford to be a bed of sleepin'Can't afford to be a bed of sleepin'
Can't you see the reefer wreathin'?
Brothers, come a runnin'.
Never mind the shells of flyin' Never mind the dead of dyin' Can't you hear the pie we're talkin'?
Brothers, come a runnin'.
Come a runnin' fast!
Come a runnin' hard!
Runnin' for all you worth!
Come a runnin' through the gates of hell itself!
We're going to be calling all the clan together.
Calling all the clan together.
Calling all the clans together, brothers and comrades.
Amen.
you Well, I don't think China's going to wait that long.
I think they've got their own pressure in their own country, and they've already got a beachhead up in Vancouver, and another beachhead in San Francisco.
I mean, they're not far from us right now.
Well, we don't really know how it's going to play out.
Now, that's a lot of the problem.
This long, slow decay could continue for many years.
I've been in this 40 years, and I remember in 1976, when Jimmy Carter was elected president, we had people in the middle saying, "Oh, that's it.
The U.S. is done.
We've got another two years back.
Jimmy Carter's in there.
He's just going to destroy everything, and we're going to be Mad Max and running around on motorcycles, purple Mohawks, shooting crossbows at each other, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah." That didn't happen.
I have been hearing these prophecies of doom about how the balloon's going to go up for, like I said, about 40 years now.
Up until a few years ago, I was always kind of blasé about that.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I've been hearing this.
I think now that there is a chance that the balloon might go up, but we don't know.
And a large part of the problem of planning for any kind of major catastrophic event like this is the fact that you don't know exactly how it's going to happen.
My guess still would be that it will come from one of two things or these two things acting in conjunction.
Number one, the EBT and benefits system will fail.
And all of a sudden there will be millions of ravening, screaming, frothing monkoids in these cities who are physically hungry and thirsty and they're going to break out like animals out of a pen and they're going to go looking for food and drink and recreation in the...
Like suburbs, and they're going to start moving to the countryside.
That could be one thing.
The second thing might be some kind of event in the Middle East whereby some idiot starts a war with Iran and all of a sudden a huge amount, one-third or more, of the imported petroleum supplies of the world are cut off.
If those two were to happen in conjunction, there would be kind of a perfect storm.
That could definitely cause the balloon to go up.
And that might happen, but we just don't know.
There's a third possibility.
We could have an EMP event, you know, some nuclear device being detonated 50 miles up that would take out the power grid.
Or like the Carrington event that happened when they had a massive solar flare that fried the telegraph system.
It would shut down all electronics in this country.
Speaking of one thing, what is your take on this explosion they had a few days ago in Washington, D.C. that took out a large part of the government buildings in D.C.?
I noticed that that was like a one-day wonder on drugs and most of the other Internet things I've looked at.
That event has now completely disappeared off the media, but evidently somebody blew a power station in Maryland and cut off...
The White House backup generators kicked in, but they managed to cut off the State Department and a number of fairly high-level government offices in D.C. for some hours.
What I find interesting about that is immediately, like within the first hour, the Department of Homeland Security goes charging up saying, "No!
No!
No!
It's not terrorism!
It's not terrorism!
No!" They won't say what it is, but "No!
No!
Not terrorism!
Never!" And then the whole thing just poof!
Disappears from the media.
So I personally think somebody may have been doing some out-of-the-box thinking there, but we'll just have to see.
Interesting.
Very interesting.
What do you see as the next concrete steps that would...
If you're going to make the Northwest into its own stand-alone sovereign nation, what concrete steps do you see happening or occurring?
What are the next things you need to do?
Okay, well, the first thing we have to do is build communities.
Now, in our manual, the White Book, we define a community officially as, say, three a dozen non-dysfunctional adult white people living within half an hour's drive of each other who are racially aware and who can serve as a support system.
An official unit would be three or four of such people.
They would have a public contact address and so forth.
But the idea is to build an infrastructure here in the Northwest of genuine people, an economic infrastructure, and a support system so that, number one, these communities can grow and thrive, and number two, so that there will be something waiting when the balloon does go up and all of a sudden we have got massive numbers of whites who are literally fleeing to the Pacific Northwest with nothing but the clothes on their backs.
I think it's Chapter 5 in Freedom's Sons, probably the most important of any of my Northwest novels, where I talk about a white family in Chicago who, all of a sudden, they've got a problem.
Monkoid invades their home and ends up dead on the floor, and they're living in a totally politically correct society.
The 16-year-old son of the house actually killed this primate in physical defense of his sister.
He was totally justified, but that's going to do him no good at all.
He's white, the dead creature is black, and that's it.
He's done, just like this police officer in South Carolina's done.
And there's just no excuses.
He has white skin, so he's utterly in the wrong.
And all of a sudden, that family is confronted with a race issue in a way that cannot be ignored, in a way that is going to destroy their family if they don't do something.
And so this is what's said after the revolution, and they have to literally flee.
To the Northwest American Republic with nothing but the clothes on their backs and whatever gas they can put in their van.
That particular chapter of Freedom Sons details all their adventures along the way.
But that is going to be the situation of so many white people when the balloon finally does go up.
I think by that time there will be a general awareness among the white people of this continent that there's something in the Northwest.
We need to work our propaganda so most white people have at least this vague notion that there's supposed to be some kind of white country building in the Pacific Northwest, and it might be a good idea to go there.
And all of a sudden, when the balloon goes up, they say, hey, we better get the hell out of Dodge.
And when they do, they're going to head Northwest.
So we need to build an infrastructure here in the Northwest right now that will facilitate that outcome when the balloon does go up.
So that's basically what I'm talking about right now.
We're not starting any armed revolutions.
We're not asking anybody to commit any crimes.
We're not asking anybody to go to prison.
We are not breaking any laws.
I'm simply telling people, come here.
And so far as we have a promised land left in this country, the Pacific Northwest is it.
Pack your moving van.
Do your job hunting.
Get your ass up here, because this is where God or destiny or the cosmos has appointed for us white people to finally make our stand.
And decide whether or not we deserve to continue to exist.
What sort of infrastructure are you advocating be created?
Eventually, Northwest Front itself will be a proper party and a proper movement.
We are, frankly, waiting on two things.
We're waiting on money and boots on the ground.
This is a crucial point because somebody in the FBI is probably listening to this and saying, hmm, looks like they're getting organized.
We better do something about this.
That's a risk we've got to take.
I don't know how much time we have left before the break, but I get into something in my writing called the revolutionary tripod.
There are three conditions necessary for revolution to take place in a society.
The first must be the existence of a revolutionary party, not a reformist party that just runs in elections like, you know, we've got this little constitution party up here, and I get emails from them every now and then.
You know, I figure that's all I do.
Every now and then they'll run a candidate and they'll get like 1.2% of the vote.
Okay, Harold, here's our break.
Hold your thought.
And when we get back, I want to address the three legs of the tripod.
So we'll be right back in a short break with Harold Covington.
Stick with us, folks.
Good afternoon.
Welcome back.
This is Mike Harris on Revolution Radio.
Today is Friday, April 10th, 2015.
My guest today is Harold Covington, author.
And Harold, before we go any further, where can people get your books?
Okay.
I need to go to www.northwestfront.org.
Northwest Front, all one word, northwestfront.org.
They will find all kinds of information on the Northwest Front there and on Northwest Independence Movement in general.
As far as the books themselves go, the Northwest novels, they're available on Amazon, through Barnes& Noble, and in most books that sell books are what's called print-for-order books over the Internet.
Libris.com, so forth and so on.
I'm really amazed at the number of outlets that have sort of proliferated down through the years.
There are companies I've never heard of online now that you can order my novels from.
And it's not just my Northwest novels.
I'm the author of, I think, 21, 22 books, something like that.
And you can get all my other stuff there as well.
But the main thing is to try and get people to that site, northwestfront.org.
We also have another site at Northwest Front.
That's our backup site.
Every week, I do my own podcast on that site, northwestfront.org.
It's called Radio Free Northwest, and I highly encourage everybody to dial in there, log on, and listen to Radio Free Northwest.
Okay, but now let's go back to the three legs of the tripod for a successful level.
Basically, again, this is, unless I introduce an inciting, it's simply an observation based on my own study of history.
In order for a corrupt society such as this one to undergo revolutionary experience, there have to be three conditions prevalent.
Number one, there has to be a revolutionary party, an organized effort to terminate the existing regime and to replace it with themselves, not one of these anarchist things that, "Hey, man, we're just going to burn everything down and let everybody do their own thing." That's anarchism and that doesn't work.
The revolutionary party must desire to become the state, to become the government.
It must have a viable program.
They must know exactly what they want and what they want to do when they obtain state power, how they're going to do it.
We have that, by the way.
If people will go to northwestfront.org, they will find our proposed constitution for the Northwest American Republic.
Also, they can find more information in the white book, which is our party manual.
Okay, that's the first thing, is the existence of a revolutionary party.
The second necessary precondition for revolution in a society such as ours is a withdrawal of the consent of the governed, which, frankly, I think we just about We've got now among the white people.
The only reason that white people don't withdraw their consent to be governed by the United States more than they do is because they are not aware of any alternative, and that's where our propaganda and public relations have to take over.
People have to be made aware of the fact that there is an alternative.
But the people of the country involved, the society involved, have to make a more or less conscious, collective decision that the people who are ruling them are no-goodniks.
They are bad.
They're bad, they're evil, they're detrimental to the country's mental and moral health, so forth and so on, and they just don't want to be ruled by these people anymore.
They do not want to take orders from people like Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi and Eric Holder and these jackasses in Salon with these people who rule the country right now.
They do not want to be ruled by them anymore.
They do not want these people to hold power over their lives.
So that's the second condition is withdrawal of consent of the government.
The third one tends to get me in the most trouble and cause people to stick their fingers in their ears when I talk about it.
They'll stick their fingers in their ears and go, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm not listening, because they're so terrified it's going to get them into trouble.
But the third condition is that there must be a loss of the credible monopoly of armed force by the government.
Basically, the established regime must not be the only one who can use armed force in order to coerce obedience and get away with it.
Now, this is what I saw in Ireland.
So I'm not just sitting here blowing smoke.
I have seen this in action.
Without going into a long, involved, aggressive things about Ireland and my Irish experience, I was there for most of the 1980s in the Republic, in the 26 counties, and I saw how it works in practice.
The government of the 26 counties, the Irish Republic...
It was fairly limited.
It was a small country, small government, and the provost, the provisional IRA, were to some degree able to pose a significant threat to that regime.
And it was a case of neither side wanted what the other could dish out.
And so they reached a sort of a modus vivendi, the Irish government and the provost.
They were basically allowed to shelter down in the 26 counties from their problems in the north, and they were able to operate more or less publicly as Sinn Féin.
Participate in the political process a little on the ground that they didn't show their butt too bad.
And every now and then, the provost would show their butt really bad.
They'd rob a bank or they'd kill a cop or something like that, and then the Irish government would come after them.
But generally, they tried to maintain an equilibrium.
And also, when I was first married, when I lived in a housing project, as we would call it, that's known as a housing estate over there in Dublin, and saw, again, how these things work in practice.
There was one family in our state who was generally known to be the local contact with the provost, and if there were problems with, say, the Dublin Corporation, which ran a housing estate, and was known by the bureaucrats in the Dublin Housing Corporation as well, that they couldn't push too far.
They couldn't just come in and evict a family and throw 'em out in the street.
There's just certain things they could and couldn't do, and that was very complex, very nuanced.
In order to get the provost's help, you had to be connected with the provost, quite frankly.
They wouldn't do it just for any Tom Dick and Harry off the street, except maybe as a political statement, but long and short of it, in the Irish Republic when I was there, government officials, including tops, Yes.
Yes.
too bad if you acted in too tyrannical or arbitrary a fashion, if you did harm to a family with children and basically did the kind of things that the American government does all the time, One night you would get a knock on the door and there would be some gentlemen outside wearing ski masks who wanted to have a word with you.
And because of this, the provost were able to provide a deterrent to government excess in Ireland.
Like I say, there was a court of appeal.
If some government individual or revenue commissioner or somebody was just messing with you really bad and trying to ruin you in some way or do harm to you, it was always possible to go down into the back room of the local pub and talk to the local commandant and see if he could do anything.
So this is the situation that has to prevail in the United States.
And again, I'm not inciting or advocating.
I'm just observing here.
White people need a court of appeal.
They need some place to go when the system has just decided to F them.
I don't know what the language restrictions are on this show, but when the system has decided to commit an unnatural act upon their body, there needs to be a place for them to go.
And among other things, in my Northwest novels, that's a function that the NVA provides.
But again, those are the three conditions where revolution can take place.
There must be a revolutionary party, an active revolutionary party seeking regime change, as they call it these days.
There must be withdrawal of consent of the government.
People must not want to be ruled anymore by the existing regime.
And number three, there must be the government's loss of the credible monopoly of armed force.
So the government can't do like they can do in this country and just walk in and knock you in the head and say, "Screw this.
Screw your right.
We're not going to let you do this." We say you're not going to do it.
What are you going to do about it?
And if you get out of the line, I'm going to knock you in the head, I'm going to put you in an orange jumpsuit, we're going to drag you away in chains, and we're going to let you be sodomized by moncoids in prison, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it, so shut up and do what you're told.
In an ideal situation, that would not be the case.
There would be some restraint on government.
That's what I'm referring to there.
And as I say, I have seen this situation operate, and it is not perfect.
It is complicated by the fact that the provosts are Marxists.
I'm drawing a very simplistic picture here, but this is what has to happen.
The people have to know that there is an alternative to doing what the government tells you to do.
This is the Scottish Celtic rock group RunRig.
*applaudissements*
*applaudissements* *applaudissements* *applaudissements* *applaudissements*
*applaudissements* *applaudissements* *applaudissements* *applaudissements*
Let's go.
Let's go.
Thank you.
Okay, for some weeks now, I've been wanting to address one specific topic and one thing and another.
Somehow, I can never get around to it.
I was planning on doing a whole podcast talking about nothing but this, but after some thought, I don't think it really needs quite so much exposition as all that, because what I want to say is really simple, brutally so.
Now, you know what our problem is.
The one thing more than anything else that is holding us back and preventing me from tossing down the magic beans from my pocket and all of a sudden the whole nine revolutionary yards springing up from the earth?
It is the simple fact that no one knows we are here.
You know that young white man I referred to in the past?
The one who will make TLC, Total Life Commitment to the Northwest Republic?
And who will one day become our own Northwest George Lincoln Rockwell?
He's out there.
Yes, he is.
Most likely more than one of him.
Most likely a whole army of young men like him.
Where is he?
Why hasn't he made his appearance yet?
Because he does not yet know that we are here.
No one has made an effort to locate him, identify him, drag his ass to northwestfront.org willy-nilly and make him read and think.
The future father of our country is out there right now sitting in some military barracks or working at some heft-and-tote job for the temp agencies or living in his mother's basement while he delivers pizzas for three nights a week.
He most likely has a computer and he spends entirely too much time on it, but not one of you people have yet posted a link to northwestfront.org in some place where he can see it.
and in such a way as to get him curious enough to click on the link.
We need them, and we need them right now, so we can get this show on the road.
Where are they?
Why are their dues not descending on us through the mail like a shower of green rain relieving a 40-year drought?
Because none of them know that we are here.
No one has posted a link or given them a leaflet or a business card that brought them to Northwestfront.org.
Remember 20 years ago when so many of us, myself included, thought the internet was going to be our salvation?
Fast, cheap, instantaneous electronic communication which with learnable skills could be used to break the Jewish stranglehold on mass media?
Well, it's 20 years later and sure enough we've got hundreds of great websites out there.
And it doesn't seem to have done us much good, because we have used this miracle of the modern age to communicate almost exclusively with each other.
To validate ourselves by isolating ourselves from the real world instead of forcing our way into it.
We are hiding in a cyber cave where we can hear only the sound of our own voices, and we seem terrified to venture out of it.
Because if we peep out of the cave, somebody might find out our secret.
They might shout at us.
They might say bad things about us on a blog or try to shame us on Twitter, and no, no, no, we could never handle that.
The first and foremost aspect of our character issue that we have to solve is the fact that we talk only to each other.
Periodically, our people produce excellent small printed items, leaflets, brochures, stickers, patches, other knickknacks, and they send me a few of them and I pass them on to the people on our list, sometimes in comparatively generous amounts.
And they then get remailed to each comrade's own little circle of already racialized friends.
Almost none of them is ever seen by a muggle, by which I mean a non-racialized, unaware white person who is still plugged into the system and who needs to be dragged out of the bizarro world of Obama's America through being confronted with the truth.
There are millions of white people out there who would be receptive to the Northwest message if they could somehow be persuaded, cajoled, compelled, or frankly tricked into going to northwestfront.org and actually sitting down and reading the site, then listening to a few Radio Free Northwests.
Yet we seem perpetually stuck on our own site at about 5,000 hits per week.
Been that way for years, because that seems to be about the size of our wee little community.
And we're too frightened or lazy or discouraged or apathetic to try and break out of the bubble.
I tell you what, rather than me just go on and on ranting and raving here, why don't we hear from some of you on this?
Why don't you send me some short MP3 files explaining in your own words what you think we need to do about this, how we can change what appears to be the hardwired character of the people who, for better or worse, constitute what this party has been given to work with, and save a race and a civilization from extinction.
But that's for next week.
For now, our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 4856, Seattle, Washington, 98194.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sarsha Andaban.
Freedom!
Export Selection