All Episodes
Feb. 4, 2013 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:10:25
20130204_mhs
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The End
Well, good afternoon and welcome.
This is Mike Harris on Jeff Wren's Video Network, and today is Monday, February 4th, 2013.
Today's guest is Harold Covington.
Harold, are you on the line?
I'm here.
Well, hey, welcome to the show.
Glad to have you.
Always glad to be here, Mike.
Well, you're getting a little bit of media attention here.
I understand you just had an interview or something that you're actually on the map these days.
Yeah, it hasn't actually been published yet, so I probably shouldn't mention the actual website.
It's not with a really first-line news organization, but it's with a news website, which is fairly well known in the United Kingdom.
That seems to be the way it goes.
We can get publicity in the UK and in Europe and elsewhere, but the American media won't touch us anyway.
Like I say, since I have not actually seen the finished publication, I actually did, on Friday, a 45-minute interview with an actual mainstream news website.
I'm in London and that is not, I won't say it's something reverse, but I haven't done that in a long time.
Usually when the media contact me, it's about some specific incident or what they're trying to do is...
They want me to introduce them to our members so they can go into their homes and follow them around like nature show hosts and do smear pieces on, oh, look at these horrible, wicked racists and all that sort of stuff.
But this is the actual first...
Go, go, go.
Natural habitat.
Yeah, right.
Uh-huh.
Yeah.
And especially experienced not to fall for that trap.
But a lot of people, unfortunately, are not experienced in dealing with the media.
And these guys come on to them all friendly and interested.
Oh, yes, we really want to let the public know your views, etc.
know what they want to do is smear white nationalists or white separatists or any kind of white racial people they can.
One of the lessons that I think white Americans need to internalize is that the media are not our friends.
They are never our friends.
And no system media coverage that we get is ever going Mike, you are breaking up really bad.
I very understand you.
I hate when that happens.
Last week, I had perfect contact all week.
I had a great connection.
Everything was good.
This week, it's gone down the tube.
We'll address this over the break.
But one of my favorite topics is the media in this country because it's a cartel.
Yeah.
There's only six companies that control 96% of everything that you ever read, whether it's your high school textbook, all the way through any movie you go see, to what you watch on the evening news.
There are certain companies that control it.
They're all Zionist controlled.
Absolutely.
Three of them are defense contractors.
And we really need a free and balanced media.
We don't have that in this country.
Well, the media are arguably the prime weapon of the ruling political establishment in this country, the ruling left-wing, liberal, and Jewish establishment in this country, in that without the media, all of their money and all of their political influence and whatnot would be...
Much less powerful and would be more vulnerable, but they cover all their misdeeds through absolute control of the means of communication and information in Western society.
White people can't be outraged by something they don't know about.
You're right about that, and that reminds me of during the Cuban Revolution, the first thing Fidel Castro did was seized every radio and television outlet in Cuba.
So he controlled the media, so he could get the message he wanted out, and not the message of Batista of the ruling class, as you said.
The control of the flow of information, the setting of the parameters of acceptable discussion, these are two of the most powerful weapons that the Jews and the liberals and the left-wing use against us.
Now, there has been some development down through the years of the Internet as an alternative source of information and as an alternate media.
I mean, the fact that you and I are sitting here talking and being broadcast on the internet shows that there is some undermining of the previous liberal total monopoly, but I think we should be doing a lot better job of it, I think, than we are.
For one thing, there's just so many different alternating viewpoints out there.
That's one of the main problems with the Internet as a source of information.
There's just so much of it out there.
And the second problem that we have here in the Northwest Front, and I'm sure everybody pretty much has, is that although we're here, we're presenting an alternate point of view, the vast majority of our own people, white people in America...
do not know that we are here.
I don't know how many actual listeners RentsRadio.com has.
I'm sure more than we do.
But still, the total of white people who actually listen to or have access to alternate news sources and alternate sources of information through the Internet is probably a very small minority compared to the number of people who watch Fox News and CNN and MSNBC and all that drugstore.
Well, you're absolutely right on that.
And you have to look at what happened in 1980.
There were 50 independent television outlets in this country.
They competed with each other.
They were independent of each other.
Now it's down to six that are consolidated into Yeah, I tell you, me personally, being an older generation, I'm very sorry to see newspapers go, because there was always at least a little bit of a chance that you'd get a better presentation in print than you would through an electronic media.
For one thing, newspapers and printed media could, if they so chose.
Do an in-depth article that actually presented alternate views, etc.
I know I've done a few of those in the past.
The triumph of the electronic media means that everything has been reduced to a sound bite of 30, 45 seconds, something like that.
And I've had this happen to me myself.
You'll do an interview with, say, a television crew, and you'll shoot an hour of footage where you're sitting there talking to the host, to the reporter, and you think you've got a really good discussion going, and then when the final product comes out, it's like 45 seconds, and the one frame of shots that they choose to show is where you're scratching your nose or something, and it makes you look like you're picking your nose, and they have you saying the most banal part of the interview, etc.
It's just, in essence...
The use of the electronic media is even more controlled than the print media used to be.
This is the main problem with dealing with this media.
They have absolute control over what the audience knows and what the audience sees.
You could give the very best interview in the world.
You could explain a white nationalist position or a white separatist position or a northwest position just down to the ground.
It could be absolutely brilliant, and it's no damn good if nobody hears it or sees it.
No, you're absolutely right about that.
And that's why I have you on as often as I do, is because I think your point of view needs to be heard.
And the people of this country need to look back and judge, have these policies that they've installed over the last 50, 60, 70 years, number one, have they achieved their goals?
And number two, have they been successful in delivering what they promised?
And that's something that we can talk about a little bit later, but here are our music for the break coming up in the background.
We'll be right back after a couple minutes.
Stick with us, folks.
Okay.
Good afternoon.
Welcome back.
This is Mike Harris on the Jeff Rents Radio Network.
Today is Monday, February 4th, 2013.
And the guest today is author Harold Covington.
And Harold, we haven't even talked about your new book yet.
You know, I know it's been long anticipated.
So now is the time to go ahead because I want you to be able to sell your books because what you've really laid out for people in a fictional manner is a template.
For how to achieve some goals that are important to some people and not so important to others.
We're living in our country right now.
In my opinion, the times we're living through currently, these are the worst times the U.S. has had.
So it's probably the Civil War, maybe even longer than that.
Because we've been invaded by a foreign enemy, two foreign enemies.
One is a Zionist-Israeli-based foreign enemy.
The other one is this Mexican-Hispanic-based foreign enemy that have taken over our country.
And I, for one, am very unhappy with it.
So I want people to be able to buy your book, read it, study the template, because it is fictional, and you can tell people what you develop the template around and why it will be effective.
Right.
First off, did you get the copy of Freedom of Sons that I sent you, the complete one?
Yes, I did.
And I need to ask you, because I read the other copy.
Yeah, the volume one, yeah.
Right.
Where did this volume two start in this?
Because I haven't even opened the book yet.
Oh, okay.
Well, what happened is...
This was a long undertaking.
The book took me almost two years to write, and frankly, people were getting impatient.
So about a year ago, I put the first two sections into Volume 1. Now, that is available on lulu.com, L-U-L-U dot C-O-M.
And that is the prologue, which begins with the Battle of Portland.
And then there's the first two sections.
The first actual section of the book deals with the first year of independence in the Northwest American Republic and its establishment as a white homeland.
And it shows how, in my personal view, it would be possible for white nationalists and separatists to set up a government to deal with the immediate problems that any such independent white nation will face, including economic sanctions from the Americans and from the rest of the world, including a very urgent need to establish energy independence, the need to set up a separate currency, the need to consolidate the new government's control over the territory and deal with all the government.
There are various problems that are left behind from the American era, such as a large part of the ruling and administrative class fleeing, so forth and so on.
It's 12 years on.
And this is the longest section in the book, and it deals largely with the Well, this deals in a fictional sense with that whole objection.
Now, some people may find that my solution to the problem of the Americans being about to nuke us is a little bit fanciful and a little bit...
Well, there's a little bit of dramatic license there, but the basic nature of the problem, I think, is stated fairly well.
And the solution of, how can I put this, the white ethnostates' military survival is dealt with.
Now, those, well, I guess three sections, the prologue, the first section, and the second section.
Form Volume 1 of Freedom Sons.
And you can still order Volume 1 on lulu.com.
But in the next year after that, I completed the last two sections and an epilogue.
And in this one, I get a little bit more fanciful.
In the third section, I get into something which a lot of people...
Actually came to me and asked me to deal with it one way or another over the years, and that is the Solutrean hypothesis, wherein it would appear that there's a good deal of archaeological and anthropological evidence that white people were here in North America first, before the so-called American Indians.
And I work a plotline around that.
Basically, part of the Northwest Republic's territory is in Montana, and a...
A dig site called Lost Creek is discovered, which contains some pretty surprising archaeological and anthropological evidence of the North American continent's early white habitation.
And there's a big spy story running around that where the evil Americans and Jews and Canadians and whatnot are desperately trying to discredit this new salutary and fine, so forth and so on.
And then in the fourth section, I deal with another subject, which, and by the way, that third section is...
It's 32 years after the creation of the Republic, and in the fourth section, it's, I can't remember, I think it's 40 years on, and it's set up in Montana, on the border between the United States and the Northwest American Republic, and it deals largely with not so much American efforts to undermine the Republic as with the issue of reconciliation between whites,
because we have to understand that in any struggle for a white ethnostate, a white homeland in this country, It's going to end up basically the same way that it was in 1861 through 1865.
Most of the fighting and bleeding and dying will be done by white people.
Any such war or revolution is going to be a civil war between white people caused by the presence of non-whites in our society, which is our national...
So you've got a little bit of a cross-border Romeo and Juliet going in the fourth section there, and then you wind it up in the epilogue.
But what this book does is it covers the first 50 years of the Northwest American Republic's existence, and in every section I try to show what problems might arise for a separate white state in North America.
Okay, while I hear our music here, we're ready for another break.
We'll be right back after this, folks.
Okay.
Well, good afternoon.
Welcome back.
This is Mike Harris on the Jeff Rents Radio Network.
Today is Monday, February 4th, 2013.
Our guest today is Harold Covington.
And Harold, I'm glad you got the new book out.
You did because our country is facing some challenges it's never faced before.
We've got the ridiculous Patriot Act, which strips Americans of freedom.
You've got the NDAA, which allows them to declare anyone a terrorist and murder them at will or rendition them without charge.
Now we have this Second Amendment gun grab coming down the pike.
We're sitting on the verge of giving amnesty to 50 million illegal immigrants who don't belong in this country and are stealing jobs and classroom space and public service and everything from good taxpaying Americans who've done nothing wrong.
But yet, you know, big business wants this here.
And I don't want it here.
I don't think you want it here.
But yet...
Our representative government no longer represents us.
So what are people to do?
Well, the thing is, that's the problem.
What you and I want no longer matters.
This country used to be ruled...
By white people, mostly white men, who were educated, who were raised in a civic tradition of American patriotism and American democracy, and who believed in representative government.
We used to have legislators who actually believed that they were sent to the legislature or to Congress to represent the interests of the people who put them there.
And all kinds of old red, white, and blue stuff like that.
But the absolute...
The change in American society and American politics and in American culture since you and I were born, Mike, is just stunning.
Literally, this country right now is, I think you're about my age, and right now this country is literally unrecognizable compared to what it is when we were 12 years old.
I see the headlights of an oncoming train here because I think we're going to have sort of An unholy harmonic convergence, and I think I mentioned this in the last program I was on with you, where all of this mess, all of this crap, this horrible stuff that we've been doing for the past 20 or 30 years or longer than that, is all going to converge at a pressure point or a point of collapse.
The economic collapse, the system's just going to run out of money, the immigration bomb, where the illegals are finally legalized, and then...
We will find out just how many of them there are in this country.
I was listening to some news items over the past few days.
We're finding out more about Obamacare now.
Finally, somebody's gotten around to reading the bill and letting us know what's in it.
And so, right now the IRS, which will be the debt-collecting force to collect all this money for this forced health insurance, now estimates that in order to purchase Obamacare, An average family, and I'm not quite sure how they define average family, but Obamacare, which you will be forced to buy if you're not in one of the exempted categories, like basically one of the Democrat constituencies, for an average family, Obamacare will cost approximately $20,000 a year.
Now, how many so-called average families do you know that can afford to fork over $20,000 per year for health insurance, or for anything for that matter?
And for ordinary single guys like me, it presumably won't be quite so bad, but I've already said on my own program, Radio Free Northwest, if the FBI wants to come and arrest me, all they have to do is wait a year or so whenever Obamacare kicks in, because I will not be purchasing this mandatory health insurance.
I can't.
I just don't have the money.
It's not a matter of making a political statement or anything like that.
I just ain't got the money for it.
What they're going to do is they're going to take all of these uninsured illegal aliens and the 80 million people that make up what I call the permanent underclass in this country and they're giving them health insurance and the average middle class family of four at 20 grand a year is going to have to pay for it.
That's where the money is going to go.
The other thing you can't forget about government is that Somewhere out there, one of Obama's cronies someplace or somebody in the Department of Health and Human Services, somebody out there is going to get a contract and they're going to win and they're going to provide something to somebody and they're going to set up a skim off the top and they're going to make money that way too.
I mean corruption is endemic in this country.
Obamacare is a form of redistribution of wealth from people with white faces who earned the money and saved the money to people with black and brown faces who vote Democrat.
In essence, Obamacare is, among other things, one gigantic scheme for the Democrat Party to buy votes by giving their voters their constituencies.
That's what the whole welfare state has been.
It's been free goodies to buy votes since 1965.
Yep, that's it.
It's taken a long time to set it up.
And so the trouble with that is, is that now that the programs that were set up in 65 are no longer looked at as a goody, those are looked at as a right.
I have a right to my EBT card.
I have a right to my Section 8 housing.
Entitled.
And I need health care, too.
And they're really killing the goose that laid the golden egg in this country.
Well, you would think that they would know that, but the thing is, they don't, and that's...
I think possibly the greatest danger, these people are idiots.
Let me give you a little bit here because the powers that be, the corporatocracy, if you will, and this goes corporations and banks, they walk around holding hands.
They're that close.
They don't want competition.
They don't care.
That they give the best service.
They don't care that they have the best product.
But everything, every industry we have in this country is now a cartel.
I don't care if it's your cell phone service.
I don't care if it's an airline.
I don't care if it's the media.
I don't care if it's steel companies.
I don't care if it's automobile.
Anything.
there's only a limited number of providers for anything that you come in contact with on a daily basis.
So you have to deal with one of those providers within the cartel and they don't care if the service is good as long as you because they have you they know you need a cell phone they know you need gasoline for your car They don't care about what you think.
They don't care at all.
We have to find a way to make ourselves as self-reliant as individuals as possible.
That is certainly one way to look at it.
I mean, if we could get millions and millions of white people doing some little thing every day to make themselves more self-reliant and not only make themselves more independent, but withhold X amount of dollars from the cartels, that would definitely have an effect.
But as you say, they don't care.
And what impresses me most about what's going on right now, Mike, is that these people, honest to God, just don't seem to have any idea of what they're doing.
Did you see this thing about two weeks ago, three weeks ago, whenever it was, that Paul Krugman, who is the absolute economic guru of the Democrat Party, the Obama regime, and the liberal left, as far as they're concerned, economically speaking, this man walks on water.
He comes up with this incredibly idiotic idea that the president has the right to coin money, right?
And so all Obama has to do to balance the budget and get rid of the deficit is to mint a single platinum $1 trillion U.S. coin and deposit it in Fort Knoxville, the Federal Reserve, or wherever, and bingo.
What scares me is that there were voices being very seriously raised in the liberal media saying, yes, yes, this is a good idea.
I mean, we are ruled by people who are that effing stupid.
That worries me.
I think more just about anything.
Well, I understand.
Thank you for mitigating or moderating your vocabulary.
I appreciate it.
But no, I understand what you're saying.
And what people don't understand is that real wealth is created by mining, by farming, by manufacturing.
That's real wealth.
That's not this paper finance stuff.
Here are our next break coming up.
We'll be back in a couple of minutes.
We can revisit this some more when we get back.
Okay.
There's no more flowers.
There's no more spring.
There's no more promises of golden wedding rings.
I'd love to care enough to slam another door, and I would, but I don't feel that way anymore.
I don't want to write you letters.
I don't want to write you a song.
This is Mike Harris on the Jeff Rents Radio Network.
And our guest today is Harold Covington.
Harold, before the break, we were talking about how real wealth is created.
And it's not created through this financial chicanery.
No.
And that's really what the Federal Reserve is.
It set up the foundation to defraud the American people.
And this was set up before you and I were ever born.
1913.
1913.
We examine policies, and if I could go back in time, I would go back to the day before they killed Kennedy in 1963, because before that, this country was on a pretty good trajectory, and that was a really gruesome act that the bad guys did.
I mean, Lyndon Johnson was involved, and that's obvious from the work I've read by Jim Fetzer and others.
And, you know, Israel was involved in it.
That's obvious from Fetzer's work as well.
And, you know, they took this country and they've been trashing it ever since.
And it's time to say no.
We have to stop this.
But the American people, you know, need to wake up while they still can.
And the thing is, we're only given about 75 years, plus or minus 10 either way.
That's the lifetime for us.
But yet these guys have got plans that span generations as to what they're trying to do to this country.
And I don't understand how...
How do they operate over time where people, you know, normal people can't do that?
Well, the actual movement of left-wing liberalism, socialism, Zionism, all these things, however you want to designate the enemy, the Germans have a word for it, the Weltfiend, the world enemy.
There are different viewpoints as to when exactly and how it got started, the French Revolution, with their various philosophers.
As I've said before, I am not one of these people who believes that there is, in fact, one big, huge, centralized conspiracy with some 95-year-old rabbi with a long white beard sitting at the center of it with like a spider in his web or anything like that.
I think it's a movement of consensus that has developed down over the generations that Sort of a whole wave or trend of philosophical ideas that are basically pernicious and antithetical to human life and human dignity.
One of them being that the races are equal.
I know you're very big on the Frankfurt School whole thing.
That's part of it.
Another of them being, of course, that the Jews actually are God's chosen people.
The Jews of today are God's chosen people.
And point of fact, when I first ran into Christian identity as a younger man, I...
I've thought a lot of this stuff about how the Jews of today aren't really the Jews of the Bible was kind of, well, kind of out there.
But since then I've learned that there is actually a very good, very strong case to be made that that's true.
But anyway, Zionism, which is the idea that basically the Jews are something special, that's another such trend.
The equality of the sexes.
I think we still have not fully assessed the damage that feminism and the so-called women's rights movement has done to Western culture because basically when women are taken out of the home and they're put into jobs and they're subjected to the same stress that men are.
Right now, for example, they'll be going into combat now.
When they're doing all these things, they're not having children, so the result is that the white birth rate has decreased almost nothing.
And more than that, there is a philosophical idea current in the liberal left that has been For many, many generations.
And that was best expressed by the Jewish philosopher, historian, whatever she is, a woman named Susan Sontag, who stated that the white race is the cancer of history.
I believe that there is an overall consensus or agreement or whatever you want to call it among all of these elements of the Velfin, the world enemy, that for the good of the whole world, the white race must disappear because the white race is evil.
We build things.
We make things.
We conquer things.
We invent things.
Now, let me interject something here.
And that is, if that's true, if the white race is evil, if we accept their premise, you know, of this world enemy, don't you think they'd be more than happy to segregate us and put us all someplace where we can't hurt anybody else and just left to our own devices?
Well, that's no fun.
You see, in addition to thinking that we're evil and that the world needs to be saved from us, they also hate us because they recognize that we really are better than they are.
The sheer resentment that so many blacks have for us is not based on slavery 150 years ago or the fact that a white man drives a Cadillac or anything like that.
I believe that this is the source of most black anger and most black resentment in the country today is that They understand that we really are better.
We're smarter.
We are more beautiful, whereas they are ugly.
They can look in a mirror.
They can see their own resemblance to the apes, the primates.
They know, basically, that we are a higher form of being, and God, they hate us for it.
They don't just want to segregate us.
They don't want to isolate us.
They don't want to just go their own way.
They want us.
Dead.
And that is why no form of white separatism will ever work unless there is a military or forceful component.
We've had movements in the past where people just tried to go off out on the prairie or up in the north woods somewhere, live in communities, live in little cabins.
And Waco, although Waco wasn't racial, but basically people, white people especially, are not allowed to opt out of the system.
No one is allowed to opt out.
No one is allowed to go their own way, but especially white people.
And if a white person, a white family, or a white community, be it religious or whatever, tries to go their own way, tries to opt out of the system, the feds will track them down and find some excuse to come in, arrest them, and send in the militarized police and the black body armor.
That always happens, because they don't just want white people separate.
They don't just want white people neutralized.
They want us all dead because it's not just that we're dangerous.
It's just that they hate us.
Who is the they that wants this?
Who is the they that orders the black body armored boys out there to go out and do another Waco?
In a very simplified way, I can tell you flat out that it's the Jews.
Now, the Jews have a lot of allies.
The Jews have a lot of fellow travelers, but essentially, yes, it's the Jews.
The Jews hate us most of all because, you know, for many centuries, white people refused to accept them as God's chosen people.
White people in Western Europe or all over Europe refused to bow down to them as God's representatives on Earth.
White people took this Jesus person whom Jews hate and whom Jews consider to be a Jewish heretic and so forth.
And made him the Messiah.
And not only that, but we built a whole civilization based on that particular worldview, and we did so much better at it than the Jews themselves did.
The Jews have even less excuse, I suppose, than the blacks.
Blacks are primitive beings, and I suppose it's natural for them to hate those that are better than they are without a just sheer bestial resentment.
But Jews are intelligent.
Jews hate us, and they know why they hate us.
Because they know.
That we are, in the long run, better people than they are, smarter, that we have a stronger character than they do, and they know that if they let the white man be free, they let the white man fulfill his destiny, that eventually the white man will take care of them in a very negative way.
In fact, it almost happened once in the last century in National Socialist Germany.
They can never take the risk that there will ever be another Nazi Germany.
An entire nation of white people who is racially aware, not only of who they are, but of who the Jews are.
The Jews can't ever risk that happening, which is why they have imposed such an iron control on Western civilization.
Well, there's more of the World War II story than just the Jewish issue there.
Oh, yeah, a lot more.
There's really the financial issue, because Germany and Japan had both adopted an economic system that did not allow usury.
And without usury, Jews have to go to work for a living, and they hate work.
Mm-hmm.
Okay.
I don't know how much time we have left before the music, and I don't want to take up too much time on a long historical anecdote, but if you ever hear of something called the Venlo incident, you might want to look it up on the internet.
Basically, it was an intelligence operation carried out by the Germans in 1940, and it involved all kinds of cloak-and-dagger spy stuff, but the idea was to pose as Germans that were opposed to Hitler, get in contact with Winston Churchill, who had just become the Prime Minister of Britain, and find out what Churchill's price would be for ending the war, what his demands would be.
And so eventually it worked and involved kidnapping a British intelligence officer and all kinds of cloak and dagger, stuff like that.
And the second demand...
In order to bring it into the war, was that Germany had to return to the international gold standard.
That right there tells you why that war was fought and why all those billions of people died.
Okay.
Well, why don't you tell us a little more about it, because I'm not familiar with it at all.
Oh, okay.
Well, it was run by what was called the SD, the Sicherheitsdienst, which became an arm of German military intelligence.
And what they did, this was actually 1914 before the main Blitzkrieg, Holland was still neutral, and there was a little border town on the Dutch border called Venlo, and they...
We got in contact with British intelligence via this little border town, and they pretended to be Prussian junker officers, you know, aristocrats, who were tired of Hitler, this little Austrian that was bossing them around.
But they said, okay, we'll overthrow Hitler, but we want to know what we'll have to do in order to end the war if we do.
And, like I say, that was Churchill's response.
Number one, overthrow Hitler.
Number two, return to the gold standard.
And I hear the music.
Yes, you do.
And this is our long break, so if you need to go grab a cup of coffee or a glass of water, now's a good time to do it.
We'll be right back, folks.
All right.
After all I knew it had to be something to do with you.
I really don't mind what happened.
The End
The End Good afternoon.
Welcome back to the second hour of the show.
Today is February 4th, 2013.
It's a Monday.
Our guest today is Harold Covington, who, by the way, if you get his books, they're fun to read.
I mean, they really are.
This is action.
It's adventure.
It's romance.
You know, he touches all the voices on this, and they're really fun to read, and you'll find yourself in a place where it'll be 11 o 'clock at night, you know you should put the book down because you need to get up early the next day, and you're going to stay up another hour and a half reading the book because it's just harder to put down.
Anyway, Harold, welcome back to the show.
Okay.
You know, we've got another hour to go.
You know, what issues are on your mind?
Out of your books or other items, given today's current events, this whole thing with this amnesty, it's a bad dream happening here to any real American.
This Second Amendment, this is treason.
This is in your face treason by our government.
This is the reason we have a Second Amendment.
And yet, the mainstream media tries to put a lid on this.
What are regular folks supposed to do?
How do they get involved?
What can they do?
A lot of people either have forgotten or they never knew that the incident in April of 1775, which led to the Lexington and Concord shots heard around the world, were in fact a gun raid by British troops who were marching, looking for powder and muskets and whatnot that the colonists had got stashed for the Minutemen.
But they kind of hit the ground running when Congress slithered its way back into session.
They hit us with a one-two punch.
The gun control law of Dianne Feinstein and the Gang of Eight's little immigration proposal.
Obama, now that he doesn't have to worry about being re-elected, of course I don't think he ever did, has basically decided to cast aside all pretense and we're finally seeing his true colors, so to speak.
Anyway, the Feinstein...
Bill has already been preceded by, what was it, 24 executive orders on the subject of gun control.
The clause in the velvet glove there are not so much...
The way that this is going to work out in practice is that if you give your nephew a shotgun for Christmas or whatever, in theory, you're supposed to do a background check on him.
And in essence, what this does is it outlaws all private sales and states that any time a firearm ever changes hands, You have to do the background check, which in turn will be a form of registration.
You presumably will be doing your background check with BATFE or whatever.
And so that begins the building of a national registration database.
What you always have to remember is that they can't confiscate the guns until they get them registered and they know who has what guns wired.
Registration must always proceed.
Confiscation.
So the idea of the background check and not doing your background check then becomes a criminal act and it gives the courts, the law, a handle on a gun owner.
Some judge or possibly even some U.S. attorney, you may not even get a trial with this, some U.S. attorney may decide, well, this person, we have reason to believe that he or she transferred a firearm without doing a background check.
Therefore, he or she is a criminal.
Therefore, under executive order number blah, blah, blah, we hereby revoke this person's right to own firearms on a temporary basis, and I'm sending the militarized police and the black body armor to take away all this person's guns.
They will then be held in a warehouse or something by the BATF until this person can come to court and show that blah, blah, blah, blah.
Anyway, what we have here is the beginning of what will be eventual confiscation.
It can't happen overnight because of the large number of guns in the country and millions of people who own them.
The government simply does not have the resources to stage big, massive gun raids all over the country at once, although I suspect what they will do once they get their new law in place is they'll stage a couple of spectacular raids just to basically frighten the others into compliance.
But in essence, what we have here is the beginning of two things.
Number one, the gradual criminalizing under many, many conditions of gun possession or gun ownership.
Yeah, technically the Second Amendment is still in effect, but you can't own a gun if a U.S. attorney says you can't.
You can't own a gun, blah, blah, blah, if you didn't do a background check, so forth, and the beginning of the registration database.
The gun control people themselves have stated that it's not going to be an overnight thing.
What they themselves have said with this new law is that they're going to begin the process of drying up all of the guns in the country.
So, what we're seeing here is the beginning of what will be a long process of slowly disarming the American people.
As the American people get more and more disarmed, then conditions will probably get worse and worse and worse.
Now, on the immigration front, anytime you hear the words, path to citizenship, you know you're being sold out.
These people should not, under any circumstances, get citizenship, because citizenship means the right to vote.
The right to vote in...
Practice means the right to vote Democratic.
And in essence, what Democrats are doing here is conducting a massive voter registration drive.
Once these illegals get the vote, as apparently the plan is to do so by 2016, the Democrats basically won't have to steal any more elections.
They will have simply have stacked the deck to the point where they don't need to stuff the ballot boxes anymore.
Still, I don't think white Americans have gotten their minds around this yet.
We are looking at generations, in theory, of one-party rule by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi and people like this.
Basically, the Republicans will never see the inside of the White House again.
Not that that would be an improvement, but white people still don't understand this.
But I don't think it's going to happen.
I think there's going to be some kind of collapse, possibly even within the next four years, when the system runs out of money.
And I'm running on and on here, but you asked what I thought would happen.
Well, no, but I need to, let's go back to the control issue, because there's some other things in that bill that frighten me.
One of them says that if you were a grandfather, then you can own weapons, but they must be stored properly.
But they don't say what story it properly is.
So that implies they want to come into your home and inspect them.
Yeah, inspect.
Right, exactly.
And then the other issue is about transporting.
I mean, you're not going to be able to throw your gun in the trunk of your car and drive out and shoot pheasant or quail anymore without getting a permission slip to drive out and shoot pheasant, letting someone know what you're doing in advance.
All of which tends towards registration.
It's the way democracy treats any real dissent.
You see, we technically speaking have the right to keep and bear arms.
The government does not want us to exercise that right.
So what they do is they create a kind of a box, and we're not allowed to step out of it.
It's like nationalist parties in Europe who are confined by their hate laws, like we will be eventually in this country.
What they say is, yes, yes, you have these rights.
You have the right to own a firearm.
You have the right to believe and to speak as you please, etc., etc., but...
If you try to exercise these rights, we are going to so hem you in with laws and petty little regulations and limits and this sort of stuff that you will not be able to effectively do it.
This basically is how democracy handles dissent.
It says to dissenters, you may exist, but you may not function.
And this is what's going to be done to all white descent in this country.
Again, I think I've used the analogy of the frog that is slowly boiling to death because the temperature of the water is being increased very, very slowly.
Well, they're not increasing the temperature slowly anymore.
Starting with Obama's re-election, the heat's really on.
They're starting to bring the water to a boil.
Well, and the other thing is about, you look at the elections these days, they say, oh, we have to pander to the Hispanics.
We have to pander because they're the fastest growing demographic in the country.
Well, if you would deport them and close that border like you're supposed to, they wouldn't be the fastest-growing demographic.
They'd be right back to what they were in 1986 when Reagan let out, you know, four million of them in the country.
Well, yeah.
But if we did that, then the Republicans would lose all their cheap labor for their corporate buddies.
Well, the Republicans have got to figure out they can't have it both ways.
They can have political power or they can have cheap labor.
Choose one.
Republicans are just as stupid as Democrats when it comes to that sort of thing.
Both of our ruling parties are idiots.
All right, we'll hear our music.
We'll be right back in a minute.
Hang with us.
All the way up and down.
To me, I'm going to want to know.
My love, I want to know.
Every breath you.
So good afternoon and welcome back.
This is Mike Harris on the Jeff Rents Radio Network.
Today is Monday, February 4th, 2013.
Our guest today is Harold Covington.
And Harold, boy, over the break, I had a second to check a couple of emails, and I'm getting ones from a friend of mine in Cameroon who's listening right now.
And he's both agreeing and disagreeing with me on subjects.
Then I got another email from a friend who says that Janet Napolitano is going to be the woman to beat in the 2016 presidential election.
I had something like that on Drudge Report just now.
Did you?
Yeah, how she was going to run for president.
I don't know.
I still think Hillary wants a bite at the apple.
I know she's got a bit long in the tooth, but she's definitely got that ambition.
Janet is no spring chicken.
Okay?
And I tell you what, if it was possible, Hillary is better looking than Janet up close.
Yeah.
Janet Napolitano, I'd say this looks a lot like Janet Reno, who is about one of the ugliest looking.
Well, they have more than that in common, you know, than just the fact that they're not physically attractive, but they have other things in common as well.
But that's not the point of the show today.
I wasn't sure how far I could go on that yet.
Well, you know, that's not my issue, and the trouble is here, is that...
We talk about white people and how they're demonized on one hand, but yet everybody wants to hitch their wagon to the white man to pull it up the hill for them because they can't get there by themselves.
They want to get on the white man's back and ride.
Yeah, so how do we reconcile these two things?
Because they're telling us conflicting messages.
Well, we don't.
We separate ourselves from these people, and we back them off into their own little corners of the world where they belong.
And we take back the part of the world where we belong, and then we get on with our lives, and we let them get on with theirs, and we make sure that never the twain shall meet.
That means that, effectively, the white man must always maintain the upper hand in order to, in essence, as archaic as this sounds, keep these mud people in their place, because they do have a place, and it is not with us.
Well, you know, Harold, I'm glad you brought up about keeping the upper hand because that's what the regular citizens of this country, all colors, black, white, brown, even Chinese, yellow, whatever, they're all facing the same thing, and that is the Zionists in our government, the dual Israeli citizens, etc., you know the class I'm talking about.
They've built this theory of total spectrum dominance.
And, you know, you look at how our lives exist today.
Every phone has a camera in it and a GPS.
So they can take a picture of you where you're at.
They can locate you within a millimeter of where you are.
And they can send out the black body armor guys to come pick you up or take you down or do whatever it is they want.
Now with the 30,000 drones going in the sky, they can put that Hellfire missile right into your front lip.
They could.
It's called a surveillance state.
And the creation of the surveillance state has been one of the ambitions of the left for many, many...
George Orwell first described it in 1984.
In Romania and East Germany, they came probably as close to creating perfect surveillance states as anybody has done.
At one stage in East Germany, it is estimated that one out of every three Germans living in the so-called Democratic Republic was a Stasi informer.
They would literally have somebody on every block and every...
Hallway of every apartment building watching the others.
And that's, in essence, the goal of the surveillance state, to watch everybody all the time.
And now with modern technology, that is becoming possible.
But there is a catch there, and I'm sufficiently optimistic to think it might save us.
Like the trouble with the Internet and with computers.
They're fine when they work.
The thing is, will the United States dictatorship, because that's what it is now, Be able to maintain the technological expertise and the infrastructure and the upgraded networks and whatnot that they need to maintain this surveillance state.
I personally believe that when you're saddled with things like affirmative action, which puts incompetence into every position of power, that is not really within the realm of possibility.
I mean, look at everything that the government has attempted.
They have screwed up everything.
The federal government of the United States is notorious for being complete, total incompetence at just about everything they attempt.
And so the question is, will they be able?
To construct this super-duper surveillance state.
I mean, I know what we see on 24 and on all these TV shows and movies where it shows the FBI following people around with drones and closed-circuit TV cameras and tracking their cell phones and everything like that.
There are certain programs that seem to specialize in this.
And I think, in a way, some of these television programs and movies are propaganda turned out by the media to convince Americans that, yes, it's happening.
Yes, the FBI and the NCIS and the secret state can watch you all the time.
They'll track your telephone.
They'll put a microphone in your sugar bowl.
They're under your bed.
No, no, it's all hopeless.
I think you're right on that.
I really do because you look at shows like the CSI series or Bones or any of those forensic type shows.
They don't have the resources.
They don't have the money resources for a police department or whatever to follow the serial killer and do the forensic analysis to find that one hair and that one partial fingerprint.
They don't take the time to do it because they've got cases to clear.
They've got to move fast.
There is a big difference between television and reality.
Well, we could talk about that.
We could have the handle of the JT Mediator.
We know who did that one.
We'll be back in a little bit right after this break.
Oh, good.
That's me, though.
Yeah.
This is Mike Harris on the Jefference Radio Network, and our guest is Harold Covington.
So, Harold, we've got about 30 minutes, not quite 30 minutes left, but I kind of want to open the floor up for you and let you discuss issues that you think are important and germane that you'd like the listeners to know about.
Well, the main problem, I believe, that is going to come back to bite this...
The system in the derriere is that the Democrats, the Jews, the liberals, etc., are overreaching.
They are now excessively overconfident.
If you look at their websites, the Republican Post, the Salon Magazine, etc., they are screaming in bestial triumph.
We've got it!
We've got it!
Yes, yes, we can make our own brave new world now!
Yes, we're going to destroy the Republicans completely!
And I think that like all Jews or Jewish-controlled enterprises, they are overreaching.
That's the thing about Jews, I've noticed historically.
They always go too far.
I think what they have done here is they have allowed themselves to get into a point where they are clearly in violation of the Constitution and of the norms of American democracy because they've learned over the years that no one will do anything about it.
The Republicans tried to impeach Clinton and they failed.
And since then, none of them have the stones to attempt it again.
And so that is one thing that I think if anyone listening to this is involved in any kind of white nationalist or conservative or any kind of resistance on the internet or with the Tea Party or anything like that, this is a point that we need to convey to the American people that Obama has crossed the line, actually crossed the line when he...
We imposed the DREAM Act without congressional approval after Congress had imposed it twice.
Now, a lot of people say, Harold, this is just a legal quibble.
Nobody understands it.
Nobody cares.
You talk about the Magna Carta and all that sort of stuff, and this is just way, way, way over the heads of Americans.
And yeah, okay, it probably is.
But the simple fact is that if white Americans could be convinced and could come to know for sure in their heart of hearts that their so-called government We have a president who is ruling without Congress.
We have a president who is basically ruling by decree.
This is exactly what the Founding Fathers did not want to happen.
That's why they created the Constitution with all the checks and balances.
that I think would be the first step into changing this either through the Northwest Republic or in any other way any other way that anybody wants to try the United States government has to be delegitimized in the White Americans have to understand that the United States government is no longer their government.
It is a foreign occupying power.
The second part of that is that the So-called law enforcement agencies are going to have to be delegitimized.
Entirely too many white people tend to think of the police and the FBI and all these other various cops as their cops that are there to serve and protect them.
The thin blue line that's protecting them against the hordes of blacks and browns, etc.
And that's not true.
Because they don't look at the cops like all white people do.
If white people begin to treat law enforcement the way black and Hispanic communities do, then suddenly the American doesn't have a friend in the population more.
Well, a lot of people ask me why I spend so much time on my own show, you know, baiting the cops and talking about cops and FBI agents, etc.
Americans have to understand, well, when I say Americans, of course, I mean white Americans, but white Americans have to understand that cops and FBI agents and whatnot are central.
To the whole issue of how long this system will survive.
Obama and all of his flunkies, those 535 yay-saying leeches in Congress, the bureaucracy, the media, none of these people will last a week if they don't have the muscle men in the black body armor to protect them from the consequences of their own behavior.
And this is why, somehow or other, we have to not only get I'm not saying here that every single police officer is a bad guy or that he's a pure mercenary who's doing it for money.
I understand that a lot of these, especially young officers who are going into local law enforcement in their own communities, they genuinely swallow all this.
Ipecac about protecting and serving and about making a difference and serving the greater good and so forth and so on.
Now, with most cops, I get the impression that doesn't last very long once they actually get out on the streets.
And number one, they see who is actually committing most of the crime.
And number two, they get involved in the station politics and all the political correctness.
They start losing their own promotions and they start getting messed over by minority and incompetent female supervisors, etc., etc., who are there basically because...
There's another dynamic as well there, Harold.
That is, with the Drug Enforcement Act of 1970 and the value that is given to very, very cheap commodities of drugs that are so profitable.
I was just about to say, you know, a lot of these cops get corrupted by the money.
They become disillusioned and they do become...
Bad guys.
Now, somehow or other, the white community in this country as a whole has got to reach the mind of your average policeman, maybe even some of the FBI agents.
I don't know.
I personally think anybody that would voluntarily serve the FBI is so far gone, morally speaking, spiritually, that there's no point in even trying to reach them.
But we have to appeal to such better nature as these men and women might have.
And we not only need to awaken up the American people as a whole, but we need to get to these officers and say, look, What you are doing is wrong.
You are propping up these tyrants who are doing terrible, terrible harm to this country, and this is where my legalistic quibbles come in.
You have to understand that you are now on the wrong side of the law if you support Obama, because Obama is no longer a legitimate president of the United States.
He is violating the United States Constitution by...
Trying to destroy the Second Amendment, but he's mainly violating it by ruling without the advice and consent of Congress, which is what he's doing.
I mean, it's true.
These executive orders he signed on the Second Amendment and controlling guns without having to go through Congress first, that's not only a violation of the Constitution.
As far as the Second Amendment goes, it's a violation of the whole procedure, of the whole balance of powers.
And I hear the music coming.
Well, you do hear the music.
We have a break.
We'll be right back in a couple minutes, folks.
Stick with us.
Okay.
There's no more flowers.
There's no more spring.
There's no more promises.
Oh, golden wedding rings.
I'd love to care enough to slam another door.
And I would.
But I don't feel that way anymore.
I don't want to write you letters.
We got a...
This is Mike Harris on the Jeff Wintz Radio Network, and we're down to our final segment here with author Harold Covington.
Harold, you made some really good points, and I don't know where to direct people to now, but the one thing I do want people to do is be prepared for big change, because it's coming at us, and I don't know if it's going to be a financial collapse.
I mean, imagine the pandemonium in the inner cities and across the country.
When suddenly the debit cards don't work and the credit cards don't work, the EBT cards, and Obama comes out and says, we had to have a two-week bank holiday.
Imagine the pandemonium.
You can't buy gas, you can't buy food, you can't go anywhere, you can't do anything.
Imagine how that's going to be.
I just don't know what the trigger event is going to be to bring about what I feel is going to be very harsh and civil unrest.
And a crackdown by what is really a burgeoning police state in this country.
You know, one of the things that happened recently, and I noticed that it got relatively little play in the media, was that Benjamin Netanyahu has been re-elected as Prime Minister of Israel.
And you remember last summer I was ranting and raving about the imminence of an attack on Iran, and all of a sudden that just...
Completely dropped off the radar.
It's like it never happened.
And I said, well, maybe they reached some kind of secret agreement to let Iran have their nuclear reactors.
But Netanyahu's back in now.
He had his election.
And so it could be that that's back on the table.
And if that's the case, the closing of the Strait of Hormuz due to an unprovoked attack on Iran could definitely be a trigger event because it would cut off one-third of the West's imported petroleum.
Well, my guess is that the trigger event will be something either economic or technological.
White Americans, or any Americans, they just don't react to political or spiritual or legal or emotional news anymore in that manner.
We're dead.
We're hardened.
We just don't get outraged about anything anymore, but something that's either economic, in other words, it's their money, or it's technological, as in a major breakdown of a system.
Say, if the whole internet were to go down through some kind of...
I mean, it could be anything, but my guess would be that the triggering event will be economic or something technical, and it will cause the central government in Washington, D.C. to lose control.
All of a sudden, Obama is sitting there in his Oval Office, ranting and raving and ooking and eking and waving his paws in the air and screaming orders, and they're just not getting through.
They're not being obeyed.
And when that happens, that will be quite America's window of opportunity.
I keep telling people that our window of opportunity in the Northwest is going to be when it's just our 5% of the population versus their 5% of the population right here on the ground in the three and a half states that we claim for our homeland.
And the mayor of Portland or the governor of Washington can't pick up the phone and call for the 82nd Airborne or the 101st or the 3rd Marine Division or anything to back him up because they're all stuck out on a firebase in Afghanistan or sinking in the Persian Sea or whatever.
So my guess would be that the triggering event will be something economic or technical that causes the blacks and the browns to riot first.
Like, the cutting off of the EBT cards would be, what, either through some computer glitch or because the government just plain runs out of money.
Well, they had that incident in Georgia a year or so back where they were eight hours late and the EBT card replenished, and they were down there.
They were down at the office in full force.
I think that probably scared the regime enough to put reliable backups in place to make sure it never happens again, but backups can fail.
I don't think the people running us are quite so stupid as not to understand that that can happen.
And I would suspect that whatever monetary and financial priorities and technical priorities that the system has, getting those EBT payments and those welfare checks out every month is definitely top of the list because I think there's at least some people in the establishment who understand what could happen if all of a sudden it's the first of the month and they can't feed the animals.
You were talking about a triggering incident.
My guess it will be something economic or technical that will cause the blacks and the browns to riot.
And if they ever did that on a massive scale, the government could not control them because half of the army and the military and the police right now are black and brown themselves.
I'm thinking about the actual combat arms that would have to suppress the disorder.
It takes something like, what, 70 support troops to keep one combat soldier in the field?
I had a kid asking me the other day, what should I do?
And he said, it looks like I won't have to go in the military because there's no jobs in my little town here in Kentucky.
And I said, well, look, if you have to do that, join the Air Force.
It's whiter.
You'll learn better skills.
It's basically just a nicer lifestyle.
But you look, I mean, to the Army especially, to this day, they're taking gangbangers, they're taking drug addicts, people with criminal records, and just they've lowered the standards so badly.
That the Army right now, I imagine if some of these people have any sense, they don't consider the Army completely politically reliable anymore.
But yeah, certain units are being kept white.
Like, for instance, you'll notice that the Marines, it looks like they're going to get an exemption from this women in combat rule.
Yeah, the Marines and certain other elite Army units.
And I just have a breaking story here, just what's sent to me by the editor of Veterans Today, Gordon Duff.
It's asked about this, Dr. Jim Garrow claims Obama asked military leaders if they will fire on U.S. citizens.
And this is a debunking issue, and I think we're trying to find out.
I haven't read the story yet, but it looks like this is a big story.
I'm going to recommend that all of our listeners go to www.
This is a brand new breaking story.
And this thing, it may be that rumor about U.S. military being weaned out if they refuse to fire on U.S. citizens.
That may be a, what do you call it, a hoax, a fraud.
So anyway, just passing that along, as I said I would do.
Considering the caliber of the Army, as I just mentioned, and some of the scum that they're recruiting, especially the minority scum, from the gangbangers and the drug addicts, etc., I imagine some of them would have no trouble at all firing on white people.
And let's face it, when they say, will you fire on U.S. citizens, what they're talking about is, will you fire on white people?
Will you fire on the Tea Party?
There's internal memos within the military that I've seen that are circulating that talk about the gang problem in the military because you're having units that are being divided and gangs are flexing their muscle.
with inside of units themselves.
And this has created a discipline nightmare for the officer corps.
And so, you know, what do you do?
You take these people out, you train them how to be, you know, effective military personnel, which means they're trained killers.
That's what they are.
And you do this, and then suddenly they get out of the army, and they apply these skills they've learned to civilian life.
I hate to say it, folks, but these 50 million illegals that are living in this country, most of them have gang and or drug ties.
These are not Nice people who came up here just looking for the better life.
That's the propaganda story they gave you.
That's BS.
What came up here to do is to take what you have, and they're going to do.
Absolutely.
And the gangs are there, or you might say they're, I wouldn't call them gangs now anymore.
They've gotten so big.
I would refer to them as militia.
Well, let's do a little historical review on that, because MS-13 came out of El Salvador, where the U.S. was putting the Contras in place.
The MS-13 is...
They derived from the leadership of the Contras who were trained at the School of the Americas at Fort Benning, Georgia.
This is a completely government, U.S. government-created monster that is loose in this country, raging violence at every sector against every demographic in this country that was created by our own CIA U.S. government.
That's who created this.
Thank you, George Herbert Walker Bush.
We're the ones that trained bin Laden.
When something gets to the size and power and extent of MS-13, I don't call them a gang anymore.
I think you could basically say that they are a Hispanic militia who, in a time of crisis, will side with the so-called Hispanic community, the illegals.
And so you've got to bear in mind, these illegals not only are here unlawfully themselves, and they're doing their own damage to the economy, etc., but they have their armed wing.
The trouble is, the white man doesn't anymore.
Well, what they're doing, Harold, and I've seen this in person where Hispanic women will come into a surplus store, and they will buy case after case after case of used USB-DUs, and they will pay cash, they will put them in the back of a van, and they will drive away with them.
And where they're going or what they're going to do with them, nobody has any idea.
But they're always small, medium, and large.
They don't really have many extra larges, but they will buy them by the case.
And like I said, pay cash and be gone.
I've seen it happen twice now.
Yeah, see, this is to get back to what we were talking about in the earlier part of the program with the media.
There are things going on right now that if white Americans knew and understood and were being told, and if white Americans were allowed to collate all of these various stories into their obvious patterns, they would be up in arms and possibly quite literally, but the white Americans just don't know that these things are happening.
The news out of Arizona, for example, unless your home state, is all about the evil, wicked racists who are trying to hassle the illegal immigration to that horrible sheriff got in Maricopa County that's doing all this horrible, wicked racist stuff, etc.
We don't hear about these Mexican drug cartel.
We don't hear about the damage that the illegals do.
We don't hear about the violence.
It's just we are not allowed to know.
The only reason I know is because I watch alternative internet sources, but most white Americans just don't have a clue as to what's going on in your state.
No, Harold, it's so bad that we have, you know, 12, 13, 14-year-old white girls getting picked up out of the mall on Saturday afternoons in broad daylight by human trafficking gangs.
These are young girls and they're never seen from them again or they'll find them five years later if they've been turned into prostitutes and junkies.
But that's what's going on in our country because we let it happen.
Some of us want this clean and make things right.
I know you're one of them.
I'm one of them.
And there's a whole lot of us out there who feel the same way.
We've taken enough of this and it's time to do something proactive.
Anyway, Harold, thank you so much for joining us.
And as always, the time goes very quickly, John, because I like your message.
I like what you have to say.
So thank you so much.
I'm always ready any time to come back, Mike.
I really love doing this show.
Hey, Harold, thank you so much.
We'll talk to you again soon.
I'll have you back, I promise.
Okay, all right.
Export Selection