Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 13, 2012 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington

01:09:13

20121213_rfn

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Harold Covington speaking.
	The date is December the 13th, 2012, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
	Now, some of you may recall that this last summer we hit a patch where I was getting overwhelmed with all kinds of stuff at once, learning how to use video camera and YouTube, but mostly my time was commandeered by a whole parade of new migrants and potential migrants, making their scouting trips, who had to be shown around the area and wined and dined and so forth.
	And so I ended up having to slap together a few weekly podcasts of Radio Free Northwest out of bits and pieces, do some reruns, etc., etc.
	Well, I'm afraid I'm going to have to kind of phone it in again this week.
	I'm in the middle of a very special project that's making great demands on my time and concentration, and which I really need to get back to as soon as I can get something uploaded to the site for this week.
	Some of you know what I'm talking about, and all I have to say about that at the moment is that I hope to announce the successful conclusion of this project sometime before the end of this year.
	As it turns out, I don't have to slap together a rerun this week.
	On Tuesday morning, Mike Harris called me up from RentsRadio.com, and he asked me to step in that day for one of his regularly scheduled guests who couldn't make it.
	And so I did.
	Now, most of you will have heard me on the Mike Harris Show before, and for those of you who haven't, I think this will make an adequate substitute for a normal RFN episode, so long as I don't make a habit out of this kind of thing, which I have no intention of doing.
	I'll see you again next week with a proper podcast.
	Until then, here's Mike.
	The End
	This is Mike Harris on the Rance Radio Network, and this is the short end of the stick.
	And today is Tuesday, December 11, 2012.
	Today we're being joined by what I consider to be a very popular guest.
	Okay, anytime.
	So, how you been?
	Well, rolling along, I have finally finished Northwest Novel No.
	5, Freedom's Sons.
	It's now available in PDF format for those of my fans who don't mind reading a long book on a computer screen.
	I'm working right now on getting it ready for hardcopy book publication, and so that's kind of the big news right at the moment.
	That is big news.
	I do appreciate the autographed copy that you sent me, which I know was a preliminary copy.
	Yeah, that was Volume 1, actually.
	What's that?
	That was Volume 1. See, this is such a long book that I published it in two parts.
	About a year ago, I published Volume 1, which is the first two sections.
	And now I'm adding the last two, and so the one I'm working on right now is going to be the complete novel from beginning to end.
	For those of you who aren't familiar with my series, Freedom Sons is the last in a series of five Northwest independence novels, and it describes the first 50 years of the Northwest American Republic's existence, the various kinds of obstacles that the people have to overcome in establishing a white homeland here in the North American continent.
	It follows three families.
	The first two sections, which I published as volume one last year on lulu.com, which you guys can order as a separate book if you feel like it, cover the first year of the Republic's existence, and then a period 12 years later when the United States attempts to reinvade the Northwest Republic and reconquer it, to return it to the fold of wonderful liberal democracy, so forth and so on.
	And then the last two sections, which I've just completed and which I'm now tacking on and creating the whole book, deal with a period 32 years later after the signing of the treaty when the people in the Republic have discovered an archaeological site called Lost Creek where they're finding very, very ancient white artifacts.
	This gets into the whole Solutrean hypothesis.
	I don't know if you ever discussed that on your show.
	Well, actually, I haven't.
	And since you brought it up, let's discuss that.
	Because it turns out that what we perceive as Native Americans, us politically incorrect types call them Indians, they really aren't Native Americans.
	They were not here first.
	And it appeared from the archaeological record, which is being heavily, heavily repressed, that the white inhabitants of North America, prior to the Indians appearing on the scene, were here, they were peaceful, they were thriving.
	And they were brutally and savagely wiped out, genocided by the Indians that everyone speaks of as being such noble savages.
	The only thing I can say is they haven't changed very much and they still seem pretty savage to me.
	Well, this idea of the Indians as noble savages has always been ridiculous.
	I mean, you take a look at the Aztec culture that Cortez conquered in Mexico.
	Their big number was cutting out the hearts of thousands of prisoners and slaves and rolling the dead bodies down the pyramids.
	But yeah, the salutary hypothesis basically...
	That the white man was here first.
	And there is actually some archaeological and anthropological evidence that this was true.
	The most case, of course, was Kennewick man when a human skeleton was found up here in the Northwest, Kennewick, Washington, in the mid-1990s.
	And the forensic anthropologists and the police actually first thought it was a homicide.
	But they did get skeletal remains and then they carbon dated those remains and they found to their astonishment that this was the remains of a man of about 45 years who was 9,000 years old.
	He died about 9,000 years ago before the Indians were even here.
	And no one quite to this day knows exactly how he got here.
	Then, of course, there was a big legal to do with the Indians who managed to, in essence, legally seize the remains and hide them away.
	They've pretty much disappeared now.
	Well, Harold, not only that, but the Army Corps of Engineers came in and took the site and entombed it under 10 feet of concrete to prevent anyone from finding any other artifacts or anything else.
	And not only that, but let's talk about the Clovis people a bit as well, because that's out of Clovis, New Mexico, where they had other findings of white human remains that were 10,000 years old or older.
	And so they don't want to even hear about this nonsense because it jeopardizes the Native American franchise.
	in this country for freebies.
	Yeah, exactly.
	It's politically incorrect to the highest degree.
	It's interesting that about a year ago, I reviewed a novel called White Apocalypse.
	It's one of many up-and-coming new white novels.
	I'm not the only writer who deals with pro-white themes in fiction.
	It's by a young man named Kyle Bristow.
	I noticed that Bristow's self-published novel got a lot more of an irate, frantically angry, and negative reaction from people like the Southern Poverty Law Center and the liberal establishment than my Northwest novels did, which actually talk about an armed overthrow of the United States government.
	And I think it has to do with the fact that Kyle Bristow's book, White Apocalypse, concerns the Solutrean hypothesis, the idea that white people were here on this continent first.
	That seems to actually get them a lot more up in arms and hot and bothered than my NVA does, which I find significant.
	It's an indication of what they're really afraid of.
	I don't think they're worried about armed insurrection so much right at the moment, but what they are worried about is losing the ideological war.
	And if the consciousness ever seeps into most white Americans that our people actually were here first, and we weren't just brutal conquistadors who came and slaughtered all the hapless natives and blah blah blah, that's something they're worried about.
	But there's archaeological evidence of all kinds all over this country that there was, put it this way, something before the Indians.
	The human remains that have been found in places like Kennewick, Spirit Cave, as you point out Clovis, and some other places indicate a Caucasian presence.
	There's also archaeological evidence form of what's called Solutrean points, which are unique to an area in France called Solutre, hence the name.
	But what it does is it establishes that there was a connection between North America and Europe.
	And what you're talking about, when you say salutary in points, you're talking about the tips of arrows, the tips of spheres.
	Spheres, knife blades, arrows, that sort of stuff.
	Exactly.
	So that there was a commonality of technology, even though it was with flint and with rock and other primitive materials.
	But it shows that knowledge was passed between the two continents 10,000 years ago or more.
	Yeah.
	There basically are three types of blade artifacts.
	Again, it's spear points, arrowheads, and knife-type, dagger-type implements.
	There's the salutrian, which is kind of leaf-shaped.
	It's kind of hard to describe verbally, but they're shaped like a leaf.
	Then there's the clovis point, and there's the folsom point.
	Each of these is...
	It's kind of differently made.
	They're all flint, but it has to do with the technique and the shape of these points, and it indicates a different type of culture or tradition of stone working, if you want to call it that, among these primitive peoples, and you can use that as a clue to their origin.
	There was definitely some kind of connection between Europe and North America back around 10-12,000 years ago.
	There has been some speculation that there was actually an ice bridge from northern Europe.
	You could kind of walk across to Iceland and Greenland and on into northern Canada.
	By the way, another way in which this type of information is suppressed, there is a very good Discovery Channel video called Ice Age Columbus, and it talks about how the first white people might have arrived on this continent.
	And you can hardly get it now.
	Discovery pulled it offline.
	Right now you're going to pay about $50 or $60 for a copy of it, even when you can find it on eBay or wherever.
	They decided they don't want that information getting out there.
	Well, we're going to make that information get out there.
	We're going to continue right after this short break.
	Every breath you take.
	Every move you make.
	Every mind you break.
	Every step you take.
	I'll be watching you.
	Every single day.
	And every word you say.
	I'll be watching you.
	Good afternoon and welcome back.
	This is Mike Harris on the Jeff Rents Radio Network.
	And we're on today with guest and author Harold Covington.
	And Harold, just to bring the listeners up to date who may have just tuned in, we're talking about the Soltrian people in the U.S. and what this might do to the exclusive Native American franchise on many things.
	And let's just say hypothetically.
	That we were able to get a DNA sample from Kennewick Man or from the Spirit Cave or Clovis that showed that we had DNA haploid types that go directly to modern-day European types that were present in this country 10,000 years ago before the "Native Americans" even appeared here before their brutal genocide.
	What would be the greater political implications of this?
	First off, unfortunately, if we were able to somehow prove scientifically that in essence white people were here first, I doubt there'd be any implications because the information simply would not be allowed to percolate through into the consciousness of white Americans.
	They've done a very good job of suppressing the whole Kennewick man thing.
	They literally abducted the remains and sealed it up in the Army Corps of Engineers, and that's it.
	I mean, there's all kinds of knowledge out there, Mike, that if people knew it and understood it and could wrap their minds around the implications of it, it would blow the lid right off this entire system.
	Not the least being that the whole Holocaust is a fraud, but we simply aren't allowed to know these things.
	Through some freak, the system were to acknowledge that white people were here first and that also the whole story of the settlement of America wasn't quite the politically correct plunder and pillage and raping mission that it's been portrayed in the college history books.
	Well, here in the Northwest, I can tell you right now, if nothing else, it would mean that white men could fish for salmon again.
	Indians have special salmon fishing rights on all these rivers here.
	They can use nets that nobody else can.
	They don't have to abide by things like hunting seasons and that sort of stuff.
	Just all of these nagging little, annoying little petty privileges that they have.
	It's not generally known that virtually every Indian, from the time of their birth, gets some kind of government check as compensation.
	It would, in essence, deprive the liberal system of one of its larger rackets.
	In essence, that's what a liberal democracy is.
	It's a racket.
	It's about money, about raking in the greatest source of money in the world, the U.S. taxpayer, and dividing up that pie.
	This, in essence, is what system politics is about today.
	It's about that huge Financial pie in Washington, D.C., and who gets what slice of it?
	And if somehow or other the Indians were taken out of the equation and it was recognized that they don't have any special rights other people should have, that would eliminate a huge liberal victim narrative and industry, if you will.
	I'm not quite sure what to call these things, but they are just like civil rights rackets for blacks and the immigration racket for...
	Well, Harold, you just hit the nail on the head here.
	These things are sources of revenue for interest groups in Washington, D.C. I've named the Republican Party as the War Party, and they support all things defense, and they support all things that contribute to a perpetual state of war.
	And I call the Democrats the Welfare Party.
	And they advocate all things that are for welfare and people who don't have to work, you know, so they can sit back and, you know, collect off the public dole.
	But, you know, I look at the American Indians as a people, and they can't compete with Caucasians.
	No.
	I'm sorry.
	No, not white people can't.
	And the blacks can't compete.
	That's why they have affirmative action.
	And, you know, I look at these things, you know, affirmative action, for instance, how damage that has done to Black people.
	It's really hurt them.
	You may take a few of them, and they may make a few more shekels than the average black does.
	But whenever you have a black who truly is gifted and truly has the ability to make it into law school or medical school or something, and then you lump him in with a hundred others who are there from affirmative action, it downgrades his achievement.
	And it makes him one of those.
	And I hate to say this, but if I'm going to go in for heart surgery, I don't want the black guy.
	I want the white guy or the Asian.
	I don't want the black guy because I know he doesn't belong there because of affirmative action.
	Well, all this is logic and common sense that people should be able to figure out themselves about these affirmative action programs.
	But unfortunately, logic and common sense and reality have nothing to do with American society or American government.
	Like I said, it's all about the money.
	Affirmative action is a way of distributing money to a Democrat Party constituency in order to buy their votes.
	If you describe War Party and Welfare Party, my way of putting it is that Republicans steal money.
	Democrats steal votes.
	I kind of hate to talk about the last election, etc., because it seems to put me in a position of defending the Republicans, and I'm not, believe me.
	I haven't forgotten eight years of George W. Bush, but...
	Well, me neither.
	When we come back from this short break, we'll talk about that because I'll tell you why Obama won after this, okay?
	Okay, right.
	Okay, right.
	Good afternoon.
	Welcome back.
	This is Nick Harris on the short end of the stick.
	This is the Jeff Rents Radio Network.
	And today is Tuesday, December 11, 2012.
	We're on with author and guest Harold Covington.
	And before the break, Harold and I were starting to talk about this recent election and why Obama won.
	And, you know, Harold, let me give you my take on this.
	And, you know, I want your opinion because you're obviously a brilliant man.
	And so let me just give you what I say.
	I see George H.W. Bush, not George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush took over.
	He didn't legitimately win the election in 2000.
	They had to have that fraud in Florida where the Supreme Court appointed him really as a dictator because he was not duly elected.
	So that started off to a bad start.
	And then it was followed up with the 9-11, which in my opinion, and only my opinion only because there's never been a legitimate investigation.
	There has been quite an active cover-up, which I believe Israel was involved in, and I believe elements of our own government were involved in.
	So we had a major treason, which occurred under his watch, which he oversaw and did nothing about.
	And then you look at how America was de-industrialized.
	We've closed 56,000 factories.
	We've shipped between 35 and 40 million U.S. jobs overseas.
	10 to 12 million people have We have a drug epidemic.
	We have an invasion of between 50 and 100 million illegal aliens in this country.
	And you look at why would anybody want Mitt Romney who is going to If you like George Bush, you're going to love Mitt Romney.
	Because of all the trauma George W. Bush caused this country, I don't think that a Republican president, particularly one who is such a clone of W, as Romney was, would have had a chance.
	And people don't forget getting fired and not being able to find a job.
	People don't forget being foreclosed and evicted out of their own home.
	They don't forget those things.
	They don't forgive those things.
	What I'm surprised about is that people haven't gotten angry enough yet to get up off the sofa and do something.
	I, again, hate to find myself in a position of appearing to agree with, say, Rush Limbaugh.
	I mean, I'm aware of Limbaugh's many, many limitations, but the way he put it is that when it comes right down to it, people aren't going to vote against Santa Claus.
	Right now, the fact is that for all practical purposes...
	Normal white people are now a minority in this country.
	We may not be so statistically or numerically, but electorally speaking, we are now a minority, and we are now living in what is effectively a one-party state.
	I believe that the November 6, 2012 election will probably be the last presidential election in the traditional sense.
	By the time 2016 rolls around, Obama will have legalized those millions of illegal aliens.
	They will be voting, and in essence, we're going to have 70 or however many years of one-party Democrat rule similar to what the PRI did in Mexico, which ruled for about 70 years.
	Harold, let me give you a little input, because I think we have a one-party system right now.
	I think that there's two factions to the one-party system, the welfare faction and the war faction.
	But if you look at who controls politics, you realize that 96% of the time, the candidate who has the most money wins, and 70% of that money comes from corporations.
	And then you look at who the biggest contributors to both parties are, and it's the same corporations are contributing to both sides.
	So it doesn't matter who wins, whether it's Democrat or Republican.
	And, you know, I had a guy a couple weeks ago, Harry Hughes, who's a friend of mine, and his comment was that it's not a matter of voting left or voting right.
	It's a matter of do you want to vote up or do you want to vote down?
	And if you vote down, we're going to continue this downward spiral into a pathetic welfare state where nobody has enough.
	Or do you want to vote up and recreate really a new vision for this country going forward?
	And that's one of the things I like about having you on is you're one of the few individuals who does have really truly a vision and has mapped it out as a template for what white people can do to protect themselves against being overwhelmed within their own country by foreign black and brown races.
	Well, there's no question in my mind that now that Obama is free of the specter of having to face re-election, he's going to let it all hang out.
	It looks like we're going to go over the so-called fiscal cliff, and so come the first paycheck people get in January, they're going to scream with horror.
	Most of them are probably going to get down on their knees and beg for some kind of time machine to take them back to November 6th, but they can't undo what they've done.
	So the progress into a mediocre socialist welfare state is going to continue.
	But none of this actually invalidates what I've been saying for years.
	All of this is simply moving us closer and closer to the point where there's going to be a Soviet-style breakup of this country because the center just can't hold because there's going to be no more money.
	I noticed that on Huffington Post and Salon Magazine and all these liberal sites, they are just crowing and screaming in triumph.
	Yes, yes, we won!
	It's ours!
	It's all ours now!
	Well...
	Not really, because they've still got to pay for it all, and they can't.
	Once all the election hurly-burly has faded away, the problems remain.
	And the main problem, of course, is that America is broke.
	We can't raise any more money on taxes because we've destroyed our own tax base.
	We can't borrow any more money because nobody's going to lend to us anymore, not even the Chinese.
	So the only alternative is going to be to have the Jew Ben Bernanke crank up those printing presses over there at the Federal Reserve and start printing money.
	That's already started to happen.
	I noticed that Obama hadn't been re-elected for 24 hours when Bernanke announced QE3, quantitative easing 3. And so Obama, at some point in time, probably in about two years or so, is going to simply run out of money and he just...
	He's going to have to either cut spending to the point where he can't bribe his constituencies anymore, or else he's going to just have to let them printing presses roll, in which case we've got Zimbabwe-like inflation, and that's another slide down to the same destination of destruction and breakup.
	Either way, whether he cuts the...
	Now, I don't consider Social Security an entitlement, because everybody who collects it had to put money in.
	That's their money.
	They're getting it back.
	They made a government-mandated investment.
	So that's not an entitlement.
	That's something that has been held in trust, allegedly.
	Entitlement or not, it's going to be gone.
	But let me finish my point.
	My point is that whether they cut benefits to the permanent underclass, and let's say they reduce the food stamp allegation.
	Or whether it costs $25 for a loaf of bread.
	Either way, the permanent underclass is going to be in full-out rebellion, and they're going to have great civil unrest.
	And I'll let you respond after we get back from this break, okay?
	Sure.
	Thanks.
	There's no more flowers.
	There's no more strength.
	There's no more promises.
	The golden wedding rings I'd love to care enough To slam another door and I would But I don't feel that way anymore.
	I don't want to write you a letter.
	This is The Short of the Stick, and I'm Mike Harris on the Jeff Rents Radio Network.
	And today we're on with author Harold Covington.
	And Harold, welcome back to the show.
	And where were we?
	I lost my train of thought.
	We were talking about entitlements, and you mentioned that Social Security isn't an entitlement, and I would agree with that.
	I've paid into it, you know, all my life myself.
	But what everybody's going to have to understand is just because it's not an entitlement doesn't mean it's going to be there when the time comes for you to collect it.
	Obama and the Democrats are going to be so greedy for cash, any kind of cash that they can find anywhere, to keep on paying off their constituents and keep on with the wild spending and keep all their balls juggling in the air, so forth and so on, that they are going to grab it.
	They're going to lose Social Security.
	They're going to lose Medicare.
	Obamacare itself is going to be a nightmare as far as just the financial end that's coming up.
	I talk about that some on my own show.
	And what older people are going to be facing very, very shortly, I think, within this decade, certainly.
	They're going to hit age 65 or whatever retirement age is.
	I think they're upping it now to 67, maybe 70 or whatever.
	But at some point in time, they're going to find themselves old and all of these things that they have been expecting to collect, be it Social Security, Medicare, all these benefits that they always assumed would be there, they're not going to be there anymore because basically Obama and the Democrats will have looted it.
	And then what do you do?
	And it reminds me, I saw a YouTube video that came out, I think it was August or October of 2011 about a county in Georgia where the EBT cards for some clerical error did not get replenished on 1201 on the first of the month.
	Right.
	And I mean to tell you, they were down there at 6 a.m. banging on the doors and ready to riot.
	Exactly.
	That was very heavily surprised.
	I'm impressed by the system media, but there were some things on YouTube regarding that.
	I think they cleared it up after a couple of days.
	It was a computer glitch or something, but I did see the homemade YouTube-type videos and some of the early news reports that you mentioned.
	And if you will recall, the so-called permanent underclass that was rioting were all black.
	We have a lot of euphemisms that we use in this society to get around using racial terms or discussing race.
	Permanent underclass is one of them, but basically, let's face it, when we say permanent underclass, we mean blacks and increasingly illegal Mexicans.
	The number of Mexicans that come into this country, I saw some statistic on the internet the other day that stated that at least 75% of illegal aliens are on some kind of government welfare, so what we're talking about basically is non-whites.
	Versus the few remaining productive people in the country who are white people.
	A lot of white people are receiving government assistance of various kinds now due to the economic collapse, which of course adds to the Democrat constituency.
	Limbaugh refers to them as low-information voters, which is another polite term for American dumbasses.
	White Americans have kind of lost the ability to think.
	So, yeah, you're right.
	There is a permanent underclass being created that will spend the next 70 years voting Democrats back into power because the Democrats are the ones that give them the goodies.
	Well, Harold, I don't think it's going to last that long.
	I don't think it's going to last 70 years because, you know, there just isn't the resources to support what's been created.
	They don't exist.
	I agree.
	I'm kind of speaking as a traditional conservative there.
	That's a habit.
	I guess I've been listening to too much Rush Limbaugh.
	It's a habit I've picked up.
	But no, as I've said before in my books and elsewhere, I don't think it'll last 70 years either.
	I think the country is going to break up.
	This whole house cards are just going to come tumbling down.
	We're going to break up geographically, politically, economically, socially, into various racial and ethnic groups and self-interest groups that all are trying to grab a piece of the...
	Collapsing pie, be it geographical, economic, whatever.
	I believe that the part of the pie that the white man needs to concentrate on grabbing for himself is here in the Pacific Northwest, hence my novels, hence the Northwest Front.
	I don't think this present system is going to last for 70 years either.
	I use that figure 70 years because I keep thinking, for some reason I keep thinking of the PRI in Mexico because it's almost an exact replication of what happened down there around 1920, but everything comes to an end.
	No system, no empire, no society lasts forever.
	I think it's pretty clear now that America is not going to last forever in anything like its present form and the bust-up is going to come sooner rather than later.
	I think the exact date is probably not too predictable.
	The exact stresses and strains that will cause it to come apart, again, not totally clear yet, but it's going to happen.
	And I think we can predict in a general way what's going to happen in this country.
	The federal government will either collapse completely or become so weak that it can no longer enforce its will, largely because they can't pay their mercenaries anymore.
	And government and society will revert to The state and local level, which in a weird kind of way is what it should be.
	It's what the founding fathers envisioned in the Constitution and whatnot.
	But instead of doing it for the right reasons, because the way the Constitution says things should be done, we're going to be reverting back to state and local level as a matter of necessity, because the federal government just isn't going to cut it anymore.
	I think you're right on there.
	I think you're spot on.
	As you said, they're paid mercenaries.
	If we have great civil unrest and a police officer with a very, very thin blue line, if he has a choice between going out on duty and leaving his family unprotected and he's not getting paid or staying home and protecting his family, what's he going to do?
	I put it out in my books, and sometimes people ask me on my own show, "Harold, why do you constantly bait and provoke the FBI, etc., and the cops?" Police, FBI agents, ATF agents, these people are central to the whole problem.
	How long do you think Obama and the Democrats or any American government would stay in power if they didn't have these muscle men backing them up and doing their bidding?
	Let's face it.
	Most American police and FBI and whatnot, they don't do it for the good old red, white, and blue.
	They do it because they get paid huge amounts of money and also because they get things like medical insurance, which these days is definitely a perk.
	If you've got your family, you want health insurance.
	And so we have a situation where these people are doing horrible things to others, violating the Constitution, violating everything that this country was founded on.
	And they're doing it for money and for medical insurance for their kids.
	Now, in a way, I suppose that's humanly understandable, but somehow or other, we have to reach those of these muscle men who are reachable and try and persuade them that what they're doing is wrong.
	And those that aren't reachable, we have to...
	I probably can't get into that on this program, but if you're more interested in that, read my novels.
	The whole problem of police, FBI, and law enforcement is central to the crisis of existence that we face because they are what is keeping these tyrants and these incompetents and these thieves in power.
	Well, Harold, as you know, I'm down here in the Vico Valley in Arizona, which is the drug...
	This is the aorta of bringing drugs and human traffic into this country.
	This is where I'm located.
	And the most frightening thing in the world for me is the corruption that these drug cartels bring into law enforcement and into the judiciary.
	Because there's nothing more frightening than a corrupt police department or a corrupt judge or any of these things.
	Because there is no premise of justice for anyone.
	They haven't been in this country for a long time.
	They literally get away with murder.
	If you look at any town in this country, coast to coast, any town with a population of over 25,000, I will guarantee you you can find a chapter of MS-13 or some other drug gang from South America there.
	And that's what white people and that's what civilized people from coast to coast are going to wake up one day and have to deal with these armed thugs running rampant with no restraint on them.
	The trouble is, we could deal with them if we had to right now, but we're not allowed to because if we deal with them in the way that they should be dealt with, we'll have the federal government all over our ass screaming racism and civil rights violations.
	Everyone knows what needs to be done with these creatures.
	And nobody has the guts to do it because we're too terrified of the monster in Washington, D.C. and our friends in the silk suits that might rock up on our door flipping their badges and screaming about violating their civil rights and how dare you be racist and all this sort of stuff.
	That monkey has got to get off our backs.
	And if somehow or other we could undermine or remove these muscle men...
	These cops, these FBI agents, these federal goons of various kinds, certain elements of the military that keep these people in power and get that federal monkey off our backs, I think we might actually have a chance to survive in this country and recover something of what we've lost because local people on a local basis know what the problem is.
	They know what has to be done.
	I think local people in America would have dealt with these problems long ago if we weren't so terrified of the central government in Washington.
	The retaliation.
	You make me think of a couple of good points here.
	One of them was San Francisco in the 1850s when they had to form the Committees of Vigilance because everything was so corrupt that the people had to do something about it because it was not a tolerable situation for men, women, and children to live, exist, and survive.
	That's one of them.
	And the other one I hear in music and our other is that we have these predators who go out there and prey on children, these pedophiles, pedofenders.
	And nothing is done to them.
	I believe it's the one offense rule for a pedophile.
	I think you should have a bullet in the back of the head the first time he touches a young boy or girl.
	But anyway, that's just my opinion.
	We'll be right back after this.
	Harold, it's a good time to go grab a cup of coffee because this is our news break here.
	a little bit longer than the other ones, okay?
	I want to...
	Good afternoon.
	And welcome back to the second hour of The Short End of the Stick.
	This is Mike Harris on the Jeff Rents Radio Network, and our guest today is author Harold Covington.
	Harold, welcome back.
	Anyway, I have a question for you, because nobody on the liberal side can ever give you an accurate definition.
	How do you define what is a racist?
	A racist is someone who knows who he is.
	And I wish I could claim credit for that definition, but I can't.
	That was what my old movement mentor, Bob Miles, taught me.
	A racist is someone who has a sense of his own racial identity.
	He knows not only who he is or she is, but where they come from and what their role is in the scheme of things.
	Well, it seems to be one of the most misused words in the English language.
	I mean, it really does, because liberals will use it, and blacks will use it, and everybody uses it, and no one seems to understand what the true meaning of the word is.
	And they always put it as someone who has evil intentions towards people of other races, and nothing could be further from the truth.
	The actual proper term would be ethnocentrism.
	In other words, someone who cares more and who prefers to be around people of his own race or ethnicity, which is a very natural human feeling and certainly nothing intrinsically evil about it or anything like that.
	You can have ethnocentric blacks, Mexicans, Asians, and yes, you have ethnocentric whites.
	It's only evil in white people.
	White people are the only race on the face of the earth who are not allowed to be ethnocentric.
	When other races are ethnocentric, it's...
	It's yellow pride, whatever.
	It's Jewish pride.
	It's gay pride.
	Let me put it this way.
	You can't be white and like girls and be ethnocentric.
	Well, why do you think whites aren't allowed to be proud of their race and to work hard to advance their own people?
	That really seems what it comes down to.
	Well, that's because basically we have a lot more to be proud of and a lot more to advance than the rest of them do, and they know it.
	And what you have to understand, Mike, is that people of other races hate us, and they want us dead because they know.
	That we are better than they are.
	That may sound a bit facile, but it's true.
	Well, that brings up something, because I had a guest on earlier this week who is living in Cameroon in Africa, a white guy.
	And the rumor over there is that once Nelson Mandela dies, that the blacks are going to genocide all the whites that remain in South Africa.
	See, here's the problem.
	They need us.
	We don't need them.
	Because if we leave them to their own devices, if we leave, let's say, blacks, for instance, if we leave blacks to their own devices, what do you get?
	You get Haiti.
	You get Zimbabwe.
	You get Cameroon or Nigeria, any of these places that they can't take care of themselves.
	And that's the bottom line.
	I agree.
	I think it's no coincidence that not only are we the only race on the face of the earth who are forbidden to be proud of ourselves and who are forbidden to work and live for our own advancement, but we are the only race among mankind.
	I think the overall idea is basically to commit genocide and render all whites extinct.
	The ultimate game plan of the agenda is for there to be no white people left on the face of the planet within a couple of centuries.
	And if we don't do something about it, they're going to succeed.
	Well, what can we do?
	Well, in my five Northwest novels, I tell you what we do.
	We take back part of this continent, which our forefathers created and made what it is today, and we hold it against all comers, and we create a secure environment where we can follow the 14 words of David Lane and secure the existence of our people in a future for white children.
	This book that I just finished...
	Freedom's Sons.
	As I said, it covers the first 50 years in a fictional sense of the existence of such an independent white nation.
	It deals with all the various problems.
	The first two sections, as I mentioned, deal with, number one, establishing a government, establishing an economy, and then the problem of an American invasion to attempt to reconquer the Northwest.
	But in the third, I get into something more metaphysical, the solutrient stuff, which we talked about earlier.
	But in the fourth, I talk about life on a border town between the United States and the Northwest Republic, the contrast in life there.
	But even more importantly, I talk about reconciliation.
	Bear in mind, this last section takes place 40 years after the guns have fallen silent, so to speak, in the Revolution.
	And you've got a whole new generation of white people who have grown up on either side of the border between the Northwest Republic and the United States who don't remember the War of Independence, but there's a lot of bad blood left over and got this kind of Romeo and Juliet thing going back and forth across the border and so forth.
	But one of the things I point out in there is that most of the wars and the conflicts...
	This war of independence that I mention in my fictional novels, I have several of my characters pointing out that, once again, white people did all the shooting and the killing and the dying simply because of the presence of these non-white creatures in our midst.
	Any future war of independence that we have, I'm sorry to say, will probably be like that.
	It will be a war between the white people of the country, the remaining normal white people, and the federal government, but it will also, in essence, be largely a civil war between white people, simply because these other races and these other beings are here, where they've got no business to be.
	I think the stupidest thing we ever did in our history happened in 1619 when the Jamestown settlers accepted 20 blacks in exchange for a couple of perfectly good barrels of whiskey.
	Really, I'm not joking.
	That is historically the fact.
	The first slaves actually came to the country itself, and they were bought with whiskey.
	That's a great point you bring up there, but let's look at who...
	It wasn't whites who ran the slave trade, and I know you know this, so I'm going to ask you, who ran the slave trade?
	Who really...
	Well, there was sort of a division of labor.
	The white man took all the risk.
	The white man actually sailed the ships and ran the risk of the fevers and the storms and the slave revolts, etc.
	But it was financed by the Jews, and the Jews, in essence, took all the profits.
	Michael Hoffman II, who I don't know if you're familiar with him, he's a good researcher, but he actually...
	Ran down all the paperwork on this, historically speaking, and he has like a table of X number of slave ships operating out of Charleston, South Carolina from 1790 to 1830, whatever, and a list of their owners.
	And like 80% of the actual ships themselves that were engaged in the slave trade, what was called Middle Passage, were owned by Jews.
	Yankee Jews at that in most cases.
	And oddly enough, Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam has also I figured out that the Jews were largely behind the slave trade.
	In essence, the Jews are responsible in many respects for just about everything that has undermined Western civilization, that has caused us problems, that has destroyed our morale, that has underlined, you know, Western religion and our very biological integrity.
	But we are also at fault because we let it happen.
	Kind of like, you know, a con man and a victim.
	The old saying, fool me once, shame on you.
	Fool me twice, shame on me.
	Well, the Jews have been fooling us for a long time.
	Well, since before the Romans, actually.
	That's as long as their scams have been going on.
	But, you know, you just mentioned something, and I'm going to go back to the Soltrian conversation there.
	And I'll get to the Soltrian conversation as soon as we get back after this.
	Here it comes.
	That's what tells me it's time we have to take a commercial break.
	Folks, stick with us.
	We'll be right back with Harold Covington.
	Every breath you take Well, good afternoon.
	Welcome back.
	This is Mike Harris on the Jet Friends Radio Network.
	And today is Tuesday, December 11th, 2012.
	And Harold, let's get back to this issue because nobody wants to talk about race in this country.
	And we talk about affirmative action.
	We've talked about all these things a little bit.
	And how damaging affirmative action is.
	And we do have some pretty clever people.
	I've got a particular friend who works for a company that's a government contractor.
	And by mandate, they have to hire a percentage of black employees.
	And this individual has segregated the black employees into one particular department so that they make their head count, they make their quota, and they only have one department that performs poorly.
	And then she put the best and brightest in charge of that department and then forces that manager to deal with his people.
	And it just strikes me as the amazing machinations that people have to go through to make these government-imposed things.
	Let me guess.
	That department was shipping and receiving.
	You know, to tell the truth, I don't know.
	For some reason, back when I was younger and I was doing the employment thing myself, I noticed that they always tended to put all of the affirmative action hires into shipping and receiving because, for some reason, they thought that that was where they could do the less damage, which...
	Probably wasn't the case, but I used to work a lot for temp agencies, and I got a pretty good reputation.
	In essence, I would be brought in to work in, say, a stock room, an inventory room, shipping and receiving, whatever.
	But my basic job, although it wasn't so described, would be to follow the affirmative action department head around, the black or the Mexican or the incompetent black woman, as it was sometimes.
	In essence, follow them around and clean up their mistakes and do their job for them.
	But I was a temp, you see.
	That's one way that companies deal with the requirement for affirmative action.
	I would really love to read a good, well-researched book one day on how American business has dealt with things like affirmative action and political correctness and quotas and whatnot in the real world and still managed to function and make a profit because I imagine some of the stories there are pretty a testament to Americans' brilliance in avoiding stupid laws and regulations.
	You have to look at our country and you have to look at that we are in a globally competitive market.
	And you have to look at countries like Japan or China, which are racially homogenous.
	And they don't have to have any fear of affirmative action or any fear of political correctness or being called racist or any of those kind of things.
	Not like we do here.
	We have to make allocations which impact the competitiveness of our business and impact the competitiveness of our nation.
	And nobody wants to acknowledge what I see as simple transformation.
	That race is real.
	It is not some artificial construct.
	I'm glad you brought that up because race was considered to be real until a guy named Franz Boas, who was a member of the Frankfurt School that came over here, a group of Jewish intellectuals who came over into Columbia University, and he was considered to be the father of modern anthropology.
	And as such, he rewrote all the books and dismissed...
	Centuries worth of real research done by very intelligent, educated men dismissed it and proliferated throughout academia.
	So now the common knowledge, the prevailing academic paradigm, is that all races are equal and it's only a matter of skin color.
	But that's not what was said before the Frankfurt School rewrote the book.
	It turned out in practice that the races were not equal.
	Then, obviously, the fault isn't the ideology.
	It's because you must be doing something wrong.
	You must be secretly racist, or you must be doing this wrong.
	In other words, they never question the basic premise.
	That's the mark of all true liberals.
	They start by claiming they want equality of opportunity for poor little persecuted minorities.
	No, they don't.
	What they want is equality of results.
	And they want guaranteed equality of results between blacks and whites and whites and Mexicans.
	And you can't do that because the races are not, in fact, equal.
	And so the only way that you can get this is to fiddle the results or, in some way, work around the fact that the races really are different.
	This is how you get teachers and principals in the Atlanta City school system having broad parties after work and on weekends to falsify their students' test results.
	You've heard the example, you know, you can't take a draft horse and a race horse and expect to get equal results out of them because they're different.
	They have different purposes.
	The draft horse is made to pull heavy objects, you know, like a plow or a wagon or something, and the race horse is meant to go fast.
	And if you try to make the race horse do the plow horse's job, you'll break him down and you'll ruin him.
	If you try to make the draft horse do the race horse's job, you'll ruin him just the same.
	You can't run him that hard, that fast.
	He will break down.
	He will die.
	And so we expect this out of humans that we're going to get these equal results, and it's really a false paradigm.
	And people need to realize that it's okay to be different from the black guy or the Mexican guy or the Hispanic guy.
	It's okay to be white.
	It's all right.
	You're allowed.
	For our next break, we'll be right back.
	We'll be right back.
	Welcome to that.
	This is Mike Harris.
	Welcome back to the show on the Jeff Renz Radio Network.
	Our guest today is author Harold Covington.
	And Harold, we're into our last half hour here.
	And before that last break, I was going to talk about Franz Boas and how he had hijacked the entire study of anthropology and reinvented it to fit a more egalitarian that all races are equal.
	Whereas there are differences between different races.
	I mean, how come they can take a 1,000-year-old skeleton and tell you that it was a 14-year-old Asian girl if everything is the same on all people, if it is more than just skin deep, which obviously it is.
	You look at black athletes, they don't do well in the powerlifting sports, but they do great in sprinting and things that require explosive muscle power.
	Okay, yes.
	Sorry, I'm having a little bit of difficulty understanding you.
	You're breaking up a little bit.
	Okay, look.
	The trend over the past 50 years, ever since, as you pointed out, Franz Boas and that whole Frankfurt School thing, is to try and make science fit political ideology.
	In fact, Stalin started this back in the 1930s in Russia with the Lysenko and so forth and so on.
	But the problem is that science cannot be made to fit.
	With a politically correct ideology.
	This is what I get into in the third section of this novel.
	I'm talking about Freedom Sons, wherein in the Northwest Republic, they find these archaeological remains that indicate that there were white people here 10,000-12,000 years ago.
	And the rest of the world, in essence, unites and attempts to sabotage this site because the idea that there were white people here first before the Indians is kind of blasphemy against what has become a secular religion.
	Left-wing liberal political correctness amounts to a religion.
	And if you question it these days, you're going to be burned at the stake or the modern-day equivalent thereof.
	Good example, the global warming hoax.
	Any scientist, any climatologist, any meteorologist who dares to question the concept of global warming as the result of human activity is going to be excommunicated and shouted down and in some cases physically assaulted by left-wing goons on campus because what they're doing is they're blaspheming against a secular religion.
	Left-wing liberalism, political correctness, Marxism, whatever you want to call it, this whole...
	Lefty scene has become the new orthodoxy, and like all orthodoxies, it enforces its will with force and violence.
	You dare not deviate from it, or you will be punished.
	So this is why a lot of scientists today probably know in the privacy of their own thoughts that global warming is a hoax, and that there's a good chance that there were white people here before the Indians, but they simply don't dare to say so because it would be career suicide if they did.
	Okay, so what is the source of this orthodoxy?
	Where does it come from, and how did it get so much power?
	Well, there are conspiratorial aspects of it, like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergs, etc.
	I have never been one of these right-wing conspiracy theorist types who believes that there is some big, worldwide, unified...
	Jewish conspiracy where all of the rabbis and the Sanhedrin gather around a guttering candle at midnight on a specific night of the year saying, hee hee hee, this is how we will destroy the white race for the next year.
	What we have basically is a conspiracy of consensus.
	There are all kinds of elements in the whole left-wing liberal scene that are moving in a common direction.
	You have the, I'll just pick one out of the air, the homosexual element.
	A lot of the BS that we have to put up with today has to do with a long-running campaign on the part of homosexuals to make their practices not only equal with normal people, but better.
	Betraying homosexuality as an alternate lifestyle, saying it's biological instead of behavioral, which is bold, it's not, so forth and so on.
	Then you get your Jewish Zionist elements, the ones that basically worship the Jews as gods and believe that Israel is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy, and we've got to do everything Israel says, blah, blah, blah.
	Then you get your feminists, who are man-haters, because I guess they couldn't get dates in high schools or whatever, and all of these various trends.
	Plus the general anti-authoritarianism of the 1960s.
	Someone once said that a large part of our problem is that we are ruled today by people who are still angry at their fathers for not letting them use the car back in 63 for a date.
	So all of these elements have kind of converged.
	They've been combined with a lot of money that has been deliberately abused.
	A good example being the way George Soros has bought the last two elections.
	And so all of these various interests...
	Groups have a common interest, if you want to call it, in destroying the white man and Western civilization.
	And so that's why I call it a conspiracy of consensus.
	I wish there was one big, huge conspiracy that we could point to and say, there it is.
	These are the people that are involved.
	Let's get them.
	But what we're dealing with here is overall social and economic and political trends that are the result of centuries.
	Well, Harold, I'm going to take exception a little bit to that because I see the influence that the Rothschild banking empire has had on funding all of these issues, all of these causes from so many ways.
	It's massively parallel in how it's been attacked.
	I do not deny that there are individual people who have done terrible damage to Western civilization and who are very culpable and who should be punished for what they've done.
	I don't deny that there are specific conspiratorial elements where groups of people sat down and said, hey, let's do this and let's do that.
	The trouble is that, again, we're talking about something...
	Where do you begin?
	Some people go back to 1776 with Adam Weishaupt to the Illuminati.
	Some people go back to the Knights Templars in the 15th century or the 14th century.
	And it's just like when you look at American history, everybody kind of has their own idea as to where the rot began.
	Some people choose 1913 with the Federal Reserve.
	Some people say 1933 with Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 58th Louisville.
	I tend to date it to 1861, when Lincoln refused to allow the South to secede and violated the Constitution.
	There's all kinds of historical interpretations that can be put on why we are where we are and how we got here, but the problem is there's just so much of it.
	You can't really say, "This is the one head, let's cut it off.
	I wish we could." Whenever you get back, you hear the music, when you get back, I've got a suggestion for you.
	And it's going to challenge the paradigms of the left.
	It feels good to me, but now I find it up.
	Simply irresistible.
	There's no more flowers.
	There's no more strength.
	There's no more promises of golden wedding rings.
	I'd love you care enough to slay on another door.
	And I would, I don't feel that way
	Well, because even if they could somehow convince us that we were all evil and we needed to be put on a reservation, they know that it's not true.
	They know that eventually if we did get our own piece of land where we could raise our own generation after generation in peace and security.
	That we would eventually make a comeback.
	In order for the white man to be defunctionalized, he has to have the Jew on his back.
	He has to be surrounded by non-whites, blacks and Mexicans, etc.
	He has to have some kind of non-white monkey on his back riding him.
	If whites ever were allowed to live off on their own, pretty soon we'd be out there exploring and building and creating and conquering again.
	It's in our nature.
	Well, Harold, you just touched on something.
	It's like having fleas.
	Nobody goes out looking for fleas.
	The fleas look for the dog.
	The dog doesn't look for the fleas.
	And same with ticks.
	Nobody goes out hoping to get ticks on them, but somehow the ticks find them.
	And as soon as they do, they latch on and they suck the blood, suck lifeblood right out of you.
	And that's really...
	Go ahead.
	This is why we get some people up here in the Northwest who say, Harold, forget about all this independent nation thing.
	Forget about having our own country.
	Let's just pick some nice little town out in Idaho, and let's all just move there, and we will create our own little Beaver Cleaverville, Idaho, and we can all live in this wonderful little town with white picket fences, and it'll be all white, and we can just live on our own, and nobody will mess with us.
	And I have to tell them, no, it doesn't work like that.
	The system will not allow us to voluntarily resign.
	We can't say, stop the merry-go-round, I want to get off.
	They don't dare.
	And the only way in which we will ever be allowed to live on our own, with our own law courts and police chiefs and our own industry, our own economy, and without all of these other problem people around, the only way we'll ever be allowed to do that is if we seize...
	state power from the existing government of the United States and in essence force them to Well, look at what's going on in Sweden right now.
	They've been importing, you know, many Somalians and other dark Muslims and things, and it's turned what was a very safe, sanitary, sane, white country, and it's becoming a progressive hell.
	And that's happening in all of the countries around the world.
	And it's okay to have...
	Safe, sane, white countries cannot be allowed to exist.
	There cannot be an example.
	Let me go.
	Africa is for Africans.
	China is for Chinese.
	Japan is for Japanese.
	Why aren't white people allowed to have their own nation-state?
	Well, because we are wicked and evil.
	We're responsible for it all.
	Remember, we're just bad, bad people.
	And it gets back to that whole left liberal ideology where, of course, instigated by the Jews.
	It's like Susan Sontag said, the white race is the cancer of history.
	And what the Jews have successfully done is they have been able to instill this idea throughout the entire fabric of Western culture that somehow white people are guilty and evil and must be punished for being...
	Better than other people, for being smarter than other people, for being more creative than other people, for sailing the seas and exploring new lands, for building great cathedrals, for inventing great scientific discoveries, so forth and so on.
	That's wrong.
	We're not fair.
	And everything, of course, has to be fair.
	Basically, the Jews have gotten away with it.
	They have succeeded in poisoning white and Western civilization with self-hatred.
	For the very people who created it.
	It's been a long, involved process.
	As I said, it's involved many, many different aspects down through the years and the centuries.
	But in many respects, I hate to say it, the Jews have won.
	They've made us hate ourselves.
	This is why we are so short of time now and why, in a way, I'm glad to see the great economic and political collapse finally coming on the horizon because I think the worst thing that could have happened to our race is another 50 years of quiet torpor under a reasonably prosperous liberal democratic regime because then our morale would have been just totally destroyed and we would be genetically destroyed as well.
	Maybe in the coming crisis things finally will get.
	Well, young white kids I know are angry.
	They're angry that they've been cut out of the system.
	And they know their ancestors built this country.
	They know that they created it.
	And they have less opportunity.
	It's easier for an illegal alien to get hired as an entry-level job than it is for a white teenager.
	I agree.
	I'd like to ask you a favor, Mike.
	Send some of those angry white teenagers to www.northwestfront.org.
	That's our website.
	I will, and you know what?
	I do, you know, Harold, believe it or not, I promote you because I think you've laid out the best working template for a very, very dire situation.
	And if people need proof, you have to go back, just go back to 1960.
	When we were a 92% white country, we had the highest education level.
	And every year since then, as the demographics have changed, the SAT scores have fallen across the country.
	And they're going to continue to decline as long as we continue to darken America.
	And if you want to live in a third-world country, let this trend go on.
	But if you want to live in a first-world country like we were in the 50s, 60s, and 70s, we have to reverse the trend, and we have to think of a new vision for what we want America to be.
	Because this multiculturalism, this diversity, this is an abject and unmitigated failure for the people who made this country, who are the rightful heirs to this country.
	We can't really have a vision of a new America or anything like that because there just isn't going to be any more America in the future.
	The old America from sea to shining sea just ain't going to make it.
	The future of our people, if we have any, and I hope we do, is going to lie in a continent of, say, 100 years from now where there's probably about six or eight separate nations, just like there is in Europe and Africa and every place else.
	And some of those nations will be white, some will be black, some will be Judeo-liberal, who knows?
	But as long as the white parts of that family of nations there, of the future, as long as that white part is all white, as long as it is based on racial knowledge and racial identity, and as long as it is kept secure for white people only, eventually, at some point in the future, our descendants will be able to kick down the doors and take it all back.
	But we've got a long, hard road to hoe first.
	Well, we do.
	And, you know, the journey of a thousand miles begins with one step.
	And let me recommend to everyone listening to buy Harold's novels.
	And if you don't want to buy them, go online and pick up a PDF copy of them because they offer an excellent template for what is possible.
	And they're fun to read.
	They're action.
	They're adventure.
	There's violence.
	There's intrigue.
	There's mystery.
	There's all of it.
	I mean, the guy really writes well.
	And I tell you, his books, I mean, they're page turners.
	Buy his books.
	Support the cause.
	Support the movement.
	Harold, give out your email address and where people can contact you if they want to stay in touch with you or with your organization.
	Right.
	Well, as I said, the website itself is www.northwestfront, all one word, northwestfront.org, or you can go to www.northwestfront, all one word,.net.
	My personal email is nwnet, n-w-n-e-t, at earthlink.net.
	And you can contact me, and we'll get you hooked up and get you part of the program here.
	Our group is called the Northwest Front.
	We advocate the creation of a white homeland here in the Pacific Northwest, and we'll be waiting to hear from you.
	Well, and I hope you do.
	As listeners out there, I encourage you, if you have an interest in this, and if nothing else, just read the book so you can critique them, because it'll introduce you into a new way of thinking.
	About what is the future of the country?
	And we need to examine what our future is going to be because the path we're on is not working.
	It's failing miserably.
	And we go back and we look at the policies, everything since they murdered John F. Kennedy, everything that's been passed since then has been one step closer to making us into a third world dung heap.
	And we have to change it.
	It's up to us.
	Nobody's going to do it for us.
	There ain't no Superman.
	We have to do it.
	And Harold's taken the time and a lot of effort, I mean, years of work, putting these novels together, and they offer a really viable working template for what may be our last best hope.
	Well, Harold, we're running out of time, and I've got about a minute left, and I'm going to give a little...
	Plug for my guest tomorrow, who's going to be Maxine Taylor.
	And since tomorrow is 12-12-12, and she's an astrologer, she's going to be on tomorrow to tell us what the coming month is going to look like and what the coming year is going to look like for this country, because we've got this 12-21 thing out there that nobody knows what's going on about, and hopefully she'll be able to give us some astrological insights.
	And anyway, Harold, thank you so much for joining us, especially.
	I'll be glad to be back anytime next year if the Mayan gods don't destroy the Earth.
	Well, Harold, thanks again, and you will be back on next year.
	We'll talk to you soon.
	Thanks again.
	Okay.
	All right.

▲