All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 27, 2011 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:01:08
20110127_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Push your vocal, push and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes will stay together by the rising of the moon Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token whistle of the marching tune.
Warrior bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
With your bike upon your shoulder By the rising of the moon Out from many a mud wall Cabin eyes were watching Through the night Many a manly chest was throbbing For the blessed warming light Warbirds passed along the valleys Like the man she's lonely crew And a thousand blades were flashing At the rising moon Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's January the 27th, 2011.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Radio Free Northwest.
Right, the big news this week is that Rachel Meadow, the infamous liberal Jew-dike television hostess or commentator or whatever the hell she's supposed to be, has developed a real obsession with the Northwest Front, and especially with our website.
She had the usual cacophony of idiots on her website, going ook and eek and yowza.
I tried posting a few comments to her blog in response to the chorus of idiots, and my posts were, of course, removed within 24 hours.
Which gives you some idea of these people's commitment to civil and intelligent discussion, never mind the First Amendment.
And one of the comments I made on Rachel Meadow's blog was that whenever they're forced to confront the existence of white nationalism, the left refuses to debate with us.
But instead, they seek to find some way to silence us, like they've tried to do for years with Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, trying to revive the so-called Fairness Doctrine, otherwise known as the Hush Rush Act, so forth and so on.
Now, for the record, I will always step into the breach personally to defend the Northwest imperative on the Internet, provided that there is anything even remotely resembling a level playing field.
But there never is.
Wherever the discussion is taking place, I make a few good points, and my posts are either removed or altered.
This happens not just with liberal and mainstream media blogs and articles, but also on what purport to be white nationalist bulletin boards and blogs like VNN and Occidental Dissent, so usually I just don't bother.
The way I figure it, if the Northwest Imperative is getting both the lefty libs and the Jews on one hand, and our own movement frauds and pseudo-intellectuals on the other hand, equally hysterical and pissed off, then we must be doing something right.
What started all the Rachel Maddow flap doodle was when somebody left a supposed bomb along the route of the annual Martin Lucifer Coon parade in Spokane on January the 17th.
This bomb, which was allegedly in a backpack, was conveniently found by quote-unquote sharp-eyed city workers because there were wires sticking out of it.
The FBI spokesman babbled at a press conference that this was supposed to be a highly sophisticated radio-detonated explosive device, their words.
And yet it apparently wasn't so sophisticated as to be neatly packed and not have wires sticking out of it.
As of today, Monday the 24th, there have been no arrests made.
The FBI said they're waiting for information to come back from their forensics lab at Quantico.
Frankly, folks, I think this is an FBI hoax.
I think that having failed successfully to use the Arizona Jew and Judge shootings to discredit Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and silence criticism of the Obama regime, our lords and masters are now trying for a more cut-rate version in Spokane in order to gin up a big, quote-unquote, domestic terrorism scare and keep those budget dollars flowing.
In a time when even the federal government is going to soon have to begin some very serious spending cuts, people don't seem to realize just how much the FBI, the DHS, the BATFE, and all the other alphabet soup of the federal security empire depends on all these heightened terror alerts and bomb scares and all this paranoia about any dissent or criticism of a bongo in order to keep those billions of tax dollars flowing into their coffers every year.
Counterterrorism in this country has become an industry, the purpose of which is to milk money and power and health insurance and big fat pensions out of the federal teat.
And the fact is that if there are no terrorists, then there can't very well be counterterrorists with multi-million dollar budgets, now can there?
Just like the ADL and the SPLC.
If there are no Nazis or fascists, then there can be no anti-Nazis or anti-fascists sending out fund appeals to their lists of wealthy liberal donors, now can there?
The likelihood that the whole thing is a gull to shake more money loose from Washington, D.C. doesn't mean that the secret police aren't going to frame some poor dumb bastard out in Spokane or northern Idaho for a hoax bomb that was most likely planted by the FBI itself.
Kind of like those psycho firefighters or security guards who start fire so that they can put the same fire out and then bask in the glow of heroic admiration.
Well, they probably will frame somebody for it, the sons of bitches.
These people do this all the time.
It's been an established technique of theirs, finding so-called conspiracies that it turns out were primarily created and instigated by their own informers.
There is now a small cottage industry in agent provocateur activity.
There are apparently professional informers roaming the countryside and hiring out any federal or police agency who want somebody infiltrated and destroyed, either because they think the targeted individuals are actually committing crimes but they can't prove it, or else it's part of an overall program of silencing anybody who criticizes the regime.
The FBI did it with that Pakistani kid they lured into filling a truck with explosives, and they didn't even bother to conceal the fact from the media.
They did it with a so-called Huttery Militia in Michigan.
The Secret Service did it with those two benighted, trashed-out, skinhead dope fiends whom they accused of plotting to assassinate Obongo while wearing white sequined tuxedos and top hats.
It's all about keeping the American people terrified of a largely non-existent terrorist threat while they keep those millions of dollars flowing into their budgets.
We'll just have to wait and see now who draws the short straw in this little dog and pony show.
Now, something else I'd like to say that bears on last week's Radio Free Northwest.
In that podcast, I mentioned a comrade of ours in northern Idaho who decided that he wanted to join a group that would, quote-unquote, do something.
And so he joined some odd little Klan offshoot operating out of Pennsylvania, I think.
And he and several friends of his dressed up in some kind of Aryan Nation-style costume, a blue shirt and boots or something of the kind.
And they went out and they stood on a street corner for several hours holding signs, picketing a Mexican taco stand, of all things.
I made my attitude towards this kind of activity pretty clear last week, but one of the things I warned about then was that once you do this kind of thing and you get identified by the local police, That means that every time some drunken skinhead kid redecorates the local synagogue, your driveway is going to be the first one that the police cars roll up into.
The police and the FBI are convinced that we all know each other in some deep, dark conspiracy, and once they identify a white nationalist of any stripe, they never cease trying to pull on him like a thread to see what they can unravel.
You may remember the famous phrase from the movie Casablanca, round up the usual suspects.
Well, once you appear in public, wearing a costume and holding a sign, you are henceforth one of the usual suspects.
Now it seems that once more, when I was making last week's Radio Free Northwest, my gift of prophecy kicked in again.
The news came out about the little party favor that was allegedly left along the route of the Martin Luther Kuhn march in Spokane, and my sources tell me...
Guess whose driveway was the first one that the police and the FBI cars rolled up into with their blue LED lights flashing?
You guessed it.
Taco Stan Man.
As it happens, he had nothing whatsoever to do with the bionic backpack.
As the FBI probably knows quite well, since their very expensive profilers, like we see on Criminal Minds, can tell them that the two personalities of the lone bomber and the exhibitionist who wants his 15 minutes of fame through jumping in front of the nearest television camera are two completely different animules.
But like I said, one of the more bizarre ideas that Jews and leftists and the secret police have about white nationalists is that we all know each other, possibly through coded signals.
And that any one of us can identify anybody else in the movement for anything if we're so inclined, which is ridiculous.
If anything, the exact opposite is true.
We hide from each other, as I can tell you from many years of trying to get us to live in communities where we do have a support system and a network of friends.
Without any goodies to give away, like a bunkhouse and a fridge full of beer, I can't seem to interest many people in the idea.
But our idiot enemies' minds are made up, and so I won't try to confuse them with facts.
This comrade of ours in North Idaho may well turn out to be an asset to the movement in the future as a public spokesman, with the emphasis on public.
But as a revolutionary asset, he's kaput.
Because from now on, anytime anything happens in Idaho or eastern Washington, the cops and the FBI are going to be all over him like a cheap suit.
That's a mighty stiff price to pay for 15 seconds on the Spokane local television station.
Hell, when you go looking for your 15 minutes of fame these days, you don't even get the full 15 minutes anymore.
Now, one quick thing before we proceed to this week's emails.
A lot of people keep approaching me with the same questions about the Northwest Front.
What makes the Northwest Front different from all the others?
Why do you say nigger and kike and faggot in public?
What's wrong with coming to the Northwest just to hide ourselves away in a little cabin in the woods where Obama can't find us?
What about white enclaves and PLEs, plus a lot of other frequently asked questions?
Now, I know most of you don't have either the time or the inclination to download the whole past year of Radio Free Northwest podcasts, even though I'm always surprised and pleased when some of you email me to tell me that you've in fact done just that.
Just to remind you guys who haven't had the time to download all my immortal words of wisdom on this show and listen to them with bated breath.
We did an actual FAQ podcast on Radio Free Northwest.
It's the Radio Free Northwest for September 23rd, 2010.
It's a two-hour special, so it's a bit long to listen to, but it had to be to cover all the stuff I thought we needed to go over.
If you guys want to save yourself some time, download the podcast for September 23rd or listen to it directly off the server.
I think you'll find that it offers a lot of answers.
Plus, if memory serves, I have some pretty good music on that show as well.
Okay, on to the emails.
Brenton, Oregon says, Hello, Harold.
Might have a new one for you.
I got some whinings about the NF site and how it says Aryan instead of just white people.
He or she was complaining that the word Aryan is divisive and fuels the stereotype of blonde-haired, blue-eyed people, etc.
I know us white people act so spoiled that we need to complain about details instead of getting down to work.
No matter what's done to the site, someone's not going to like it and use it as an excuse to do nothing.
Do you have any canned answers for this?
Just trying to get as many people as I can.
Yes, Brent, I've run into this before, and this is a legitimate question, because you have to bear in mind that most Americans have been raised to believe all kinds of bizarre and completely untrue crap about the Third Reich and National Socialism, and what actually happened in Germany during the National Socialist period.
The whole blue eyes and blonde hair thing is obviously a canard since Hitler himself was a brunette.
So was Dr. Goebbels, so forth and so on.
But then logic and historical accuracy have never been the strong points of Jewish and liberal scholars.
And unfortunately, that's who's been writing the history books.
The simplest answer to that, when someone asks, by the way, is not to go off into a long historical and anthropological digression about who and what is an Aryan.
For reasons I've mentioned before on this show, this whole idea of getting into arcane racial theory is a dead end, a canard, just for this reason that we don't have any symbols on the tricolor flag.
My experience is that with Americans, when you have to stop and explain something, you've lost them.
Now, the simplest answer to that question that the average American mind can take in is just tell anybody who asks that Aryan is the German word for white man.
That's accurate enough, and it'll keep things nice and simple and down to Beavis and Butthead level, which is what you have to do with Americans.
As to why I use the term at all, okay, I can see that most white Americans have a problem with it because of all the absurd lies they've been told about the Third Reich, and it would be easy to just concede the point here.
But the fact is that in the real world, Hitler was right, and the National Socialist worldview is largely the correct one.
And at some point, we have to stop conceding to our people's ignorance and start educating them.
And that includes educating them in their own identity.
Now, I understand the problems with trying to make Americans understand the truth about National Socialism.
Believe me, I do, since I beat my head against that particular wall for many years.
This is why we don't use the swastika overtly in any way.
This is why we avoid Third Reich regalia.
This is why we don't put pictures of the Furo in our literature.
But at some point in time, we have to stop compromising and tell the truth and begin the long, slow process of bringing the hearts and minds of our own people out of the darkness.
And one good starting point is the use of the word Arian, on occasion, not all the time, but just enough to let people know that there's something there and that that word Arian does indeed have something to do with us.
And by the by, you people listening to this, if you don't know the true meaning of the word Arian, Why not?
If you don't know, you have some basic reading and research to do.
Steve from Missouri writes, Dear HAC, what is the occult background of Hitler and the Nazis?
We've heard hundreds of reports of Hitler making a pact with the devil, of the interests of Himmler, etc., and Satanism or pagan practices, the fuel society, etc.
Also much about Hitler planning to make himself a new god.
What is the truth behind this?
I know Hitler is always shown as being anti-Christian, remembering one Holy Roller comic book that showed Wehrmacht troops on the battlefront begging for Bibles and Scripture to read.
Odd, since the Wehrmacht did have chaplains.
How occult is National Socialism?
Yes, Steve, as a matter of fact, the SS had chaplains as well.
I know, because in Rhodesia I knew an elderly German who was a Roman Catholic priest, and who had been an SS chaplain.
In answer to your question, frankly, most of that Spirit Destiny crap is just that, crap.
Yes, there are strong mystical and spiritual aspects to National Socialism.
Yes, there were many mystical societies in the 19th century and in the Weimar period, generally preceding National Socialism, such as the Fuel Society.
Yes, Einrich Himmler was something of a mystic, and he had a penchant for conducting SS initiations in ancient castles and swearing the SS oaths before the tombs of old Germanic kings, so forth and so on.
But, frankly, Himmler was considered to be a bit dotty on the subject, even by most of his senior colleagues in the NSDAP.
But it was considered to be a harmless eccentricity by Adolf Hitler himself, who was one of the most profoundly mystical and spiritual men who ever lived.
Hitler's mysticism and spirituality were all centered around the German nation and the Aryan ideal, not any specific set of beliefs.
Oh, by the way, Adolf Hitler himself was a Roman Catholic.
Although he never went to Mass in his adult years, he did maintain his church tithes until his death out of respect for the faith and the wishes of his mother, who died when he was a young man.
You might remember that next time you hear this hoarse manure about Nazism being anti-Catholic.
That and the fact that Hitler went out of his way to sign a Concordat with a Vatican that he didn't really need.
Okay, first music break.
I got some good responses from last week's ballad, Little Margaret, and some of you asked me to come up with some more old-time perversity.
So, we'll have a folk music and ballad showcase during this show.
This is a ballad about an 18th century highwoman, Willie Brennan, who was known in his day as the Robin Hood of Ireland.
This is the Clancy Brothers.
It's a brave young highwayman, this story we will tell.
His name was Willie Brennan, and in Ireland he did well.
To our son, the Gilbert Mountains, he convinced his wild career.
And many a wealthy nobleman before him shook with fear.
It was Brennan on the moor, Brennan on the moor.
Bold, brave and undoubted, was young Brennan on the moor.
One day upon the highway, as Willie, he went down.
He met the mayor of Cashel, a mile outside the town.
And there he knew his features, he said, young man, said he, Your name is Willie Brennan, you must come along with me.
And it's Brennan on the Moor, Brennan on the Moor, Oh, brave and undoubted, it was young Brennan on the Moor.
Oh, Brennan's wife had gone to town from business for to buy.
And when she saw Willie, she commenced away from fly.
Said, hand to me that's in play, as soon as Willie spoke.
She handed him a blunderbuss from underneath her coaxie.
Young Brennan, the moor, Brennan, the moor, oh, brave and undone, it was young Brennan, the moor.
Now with this loaded blunt, the bus, the truth they will unfold.
He made the mayor to tremble, and he robbed him of his gold.
One hundred pounds was offered for his apprehension there, so he went horse and saddle to the mountains did repair.
It's young Brennan, the moor, Brennan, the moor, oh, brave and undone, it was young Brennan, the moor.
Now Brennan made an outlaw from the mountains high, and Calvary and infantry, the tiger they did try.
He left the damn but strong until the last was sent by a horse, and that him the neighbors truly betrayed.
It was young Brennan, the moor, Brennan, the moor, oh, brave and undone, it was young Brennan, the moor.
Yeah!
Dear HAC, in the Northwest Republic, what would the attitude be toward higher education?
Support universities, trade schools?
Would the Northwest Republic Authority decide to de-emphasize college and encourage more of a strong high school education?
How many thousands of diploma-carrying individuals does a society need, anyway?
How would the Northwest Authority deal with the universities in the Republic, especially private colleges, in regards to funding and implementing racial policies?
Thought these might make good queries for the audience.
Right.
I am, to some extent, going to get into this issue in Northwest novel number five, entitled Freedom's Sons, which deals with a fictional version of the first 50 years of the Northwest American Republic.
To a large extent, that novel is going to be kind of an exercise in what I would do if I were king, and I'm already starting to get some criticism on the sample chapters I've been sending out to the review and the proofreading committee, because, as I said when I started, my vision is not necessarily that of other people.
But let me answer you in that vein, Brett.
Now, it's true that these days, not only is a high school diploma completely worthless, but a university degree from almost any American college you care to name is virtually useless because the educational standards have been so badly lowered that it's just a piece of sheepskin, and it's no guarantee that you actually know anything.
Now, certain university degrees are...
Still fairly honored, like maybe MIT and Stanford in the technical and engineering fields, and of course Harvard and Yale and the Seven Sisters for liberal, politically correct social reasons.
If you don't have the right degree from the right school, you're not going anywhere in the Democrat Party of the government, period.
It's still possible for self-made billionaires to buy their way into the Republican leadership.
I mean, look at Michael Bloomberg.
But the Democrats are pretty much a closed shop, and you do need the right college degree to get anywhere in the politically correct world.
In fact, I can't think of any major figure in world liberalism who does not have a college degree.
But in politically correct society, the higher education system has been downgraded to a kind of nursery school, which is used as a kind of a fish farm for the production of minnows who are then thrown into the sea and told to swim upstream.
Yeah, I know that's salmon, but I don't know what baby salmon are called.
Anyway, in America, young people are kicked out of the university degree mill with a piece of sheepskin, and then they're expected to make their own way up to the system, either in the private sector, if they're Republicans, or in the government bureaucracy and patronage system, if they're Democrats.
In the Northwest Republic, I believe that a university should not just be an educational institution of higher learning.
Although that's certainly one very major purpose.
I believe that the university system in the Northwest Republic needs to function as the universities did historically from the Middle Ages almost into living memory in Europe and to some degree in this country as well.
They need to function as repositories of learning and knowledge and history and also as powerhouses in research and the development of new knowledge.
In my ideal Northwest Republic to come, remember we're talking about if I was king, the university and higher education system will have three major purposes.
First and foremost, of course, will be to produce an educated ruling elite for the nation, just like Oxford and Cambridge for the Tories and the London School of Economics for Labor used to do in Britain.
And the older European institutions like the Sorbonne, the University of Heidelberg, so forth and so on, used to do.
Of course, that's all in the past now, since the entire higher education system in Europe is now riddled with Marxism and political correctness, but you get the idea.
Secondly, the university system needs to be the center of acquisition of new knowledge, medical and scientific and scholarly research.
I personally think that about half of a university system's budget and manpower needs to be devoted towards educating and graduating students, and the other half needs to be devoted to research and development and the assembly and the cataloging of knowledge.
Instead of leaving research in such fields as medicine and physics and energy and technology to private corporations, who do it for profit, which is how the vast majority of new knowledge is acquired these days, I believe that the acquisition and development and the use of human knowledge should be carried out as a kind of partnership between the state, between organized science and scholarship and the people of the nation as a whole.
And that's the third purpose that I believe that the university system in the Northwest Republic needs to serve.
It's kind of hard to describe verbally, but it needs to be the brain of the nation is the best way that I can put this.
It needs to be the organized thought of the whole republic.
And as such, it needs to operate in tandem with not only the people of the country, the folk, but with the state and with the other institutions of the state, military, whatever.
Is this making any sense at all?
I don't think I put that last one quite well enough.
But anyway, an established university system giving the full backing of the state and of society as a whole makes a lot more sense from that perspective than leaving.
Part of the mission statement of the university system in the Northwest Republic needs to be the advance of the whole state of human knowledge and understanding of the universe.
And maybe that was what I was trying to get at just now.
We will, of course, be in a unique position to do that, because in our Northwest Republic's universities, white scientists and scholars and men of learning will have the freedom to discuss topics which are now forbidden in Western academia, such as the science and biology of race, and to assemble a true history and narrative for our own people.
That kind of academic freedom, free of political correctness, will attract Nobel laureates and great men and women of learning throughout the world.
Do you get what I'm saying here, Brent?
Do you get a glimpse of part of the Northwest vision here?
Now, as far as private schools and what you term racial policies go, Brent, certainly anyone who wants to run a private college or university can do so, although I myself think that there needs to be a distinct separation between the official and the private universities, especially when it comes to money to run the institutions.
I'm always very leery whenever the state and the private sector start doing money deals of any kind on any subject with money flowing either way because this is the first step towards corruption.
Remember that Scottish dude from back in the 18th century whose name I can never remember who wrote that quote-unquote democracy always fails at the point when men realize that they can vote themselves money out of the public funds or words to that effect.
Basically, if Christians or free enterprises or Methodists or whoever wants to run a private college, fine, let them do so, but they have to come up with the money themselves.
The United States government uses all kinds of financial subsidies to pressure private schools into compliance with political correctness.
That won't happen in the Northwest Republic.
That does not mean that someone can run a private college and teach Zionism or liberalism.
Those things are threats to the state and to the community.
Now, we're going to make sure that that kind of inner poison and corruption that destroyed the old Western civilization never happens here.
That kind of thing will be the purview of the Bureau of State Security.
That has nothing to do with academic freedom.
That has to do with the life of the race.
As to what is the difference between studying liberalism and Zionism in the abstract as historical and political subjects, and actually teaching and advocating it and trying to instill it into young white minds, well, I'm sure Boss will know the difference when they see it.
But I don't think we're going to have that problem, really.
The attempts to corrupt our republic's young people will be made, no doubt, but I'm pretty sure they're all going to come from outside the republic's borders.
Okay, now I need to do a few quick Northwest Front internal announcements here.
First off, a quick word for our listeners in Europe, especially in Great Britain.
Now, every week, I get emails here at Radio Free Northwest from people in Europe, especially in the UK, who want to immigrate here to the homeland.
A percentage-wise, I actually get far more of those inquiries from Europe than I get from the United States itself.
I've always found it highly ironic that Europeans get all this homeland stuff far more clearly and concisely than Americans.
I have, in fact, discussed the issue of immigration into the Northwest from the non-USA part of the white world before on this program.
Long story short, it's hard, but it can be done.
Just like white people can do pretty much anything they want if ever you'll quit bitching and moaning on the internet about it and actually do it.
But rather than have me go back and locate and pull the script and read it out to you guys on here again, what I'd like for those of you from the UK to do who are interested in immigration to the Northwest homeland, I'd like you to go to www.northwestfront.org.
That's all one word, northwestfront.org.
I want you to click the button on the top menu that says Radio Free Northwest.
Then scroll down through the various episodes to the Radio Free Northwest podcast for July the 1st, 2010.
That's the one in which I discuss UK immigration, visas, and whatnot.
That's the Radio Free Northwest broadcast for July the 1st, 2010.
You need to download or listen to it off the server if you're a Brit who's interested in becoming a Northman.
Another movement note.
The Jews on YouTube are proving to be singularly inept in suppressing the Northwest Front's videos.
They keep pulling Colonel House and several others offline, and House keeps popping back up within 48 hours, and the others are back up almost as fast.
If you'll do a YouTube search on Northwest Front or NVA, you'll find all kinds of NF-related YouTube videos on there.
And it's not just from Colonel House, but...
From people all over the world, including Europe.
Most of these videos consist of segments of these Radio Free Northwest broadcasts of mine with me doing a voiceover and with various visuals added, and I have no idea who most of these people making these videos are, and that's a very good sign.
The Northwest idea is starting to take on a life of its own, and that's great.
The reason I mention this now, guys, is so that I can tell all you amateur video makers out there who want to try your hand that you have my permission to use anything you hear on Radio Free Northwest or any other kind of Northwest Front literature or material you like if you want to make a video and put it up on YouTube as a general rule.
Anyone who wants to use or reprint or distribute any of my copyrighted material has my permission to do so, on the understanding that the material is being used to advance the cause of the 14 words as you see fit.
I don't write what I write for royalties or for money people, which is probably why I have so little of it.
But what I do write is for all of you and for our racial posterity, if we have any, and you're welcome to use it for leaflets, videos, whatever.
Right, second music break.
We're doing ballads this show, remember?
And one of the oldest and most well-known of all English ballads or folk songs is one called Greensleeves.
It's known to come from the time of William Shakespeare, and some people even believe that Shakespeare may have composed the song himself.
It's generally considered to be so staid and respectable that it was even commonly played as a parlor piece back in the straight-laced Victorian era.
Well, perhaps fortunately, the Victorians weren't quite as up on their Elizabethan history as they might have been.
In point of fact, in England, from about the mid-15th century on, the term green sleeves referred to a working girl, a lady of the evening.
In medieval times in the Renaissance, all over Europe, prostitutes were required by law to wear a distinctive dress or badge so that they wouldn't pose as respectable ladies and show up at the Duke's garden party or the Bishop's banquet, that kind of thing.
They were also required to be registered so that they could be taxed.
For example, in London, all of the licensed bordellos were considered to be a financial prerogative of the Bishop of Winchester.
Well, I suppose it beats the clergy's later taste for little boys.
Anyway, in England for many years, the official dress code or uniform of London's working girls was the wearing of green sleeves on their gowns.
And bear in mind, in those days, the sleeve was actually a separate part of your dress.
You would actually attach them, button them on separately.
Before that, they were required to wear hoods trimmed with fox fur, which may be the origin of the term foxy lady.
Like I said, in modern times, Greensleeves has been considered to be a very mild and courtly old melody.
You hear it all the time.
It's G-rated.
But in the light of this little snippet of historical knowledge I just mentioned, if you'll actually listen to the words, there is another possible interpretation.
I have this vision of a young Will Shakespeare, Having just been thrown out of a London cat house by the bouncer with his lute thrown after him, and now he's sitting in a mud puddle in the street outside, plunking away on his lute and singing this nasty, complaining little song to his lady inside who just had him chucked out because he ran out of silver shillings.
We can't be sure, of course, but I think this interpretation of mine may actually be a little bit more accurate than the G-rated version.
Anyway, this is Barbara Dane.
Yes, my love, you do me wrong to treat me so discourteously.
and I have loved you so long delighting in your company green sleeves is all my joy green sleeves Is my delight.
Greensleeves is my heart of gold.
And who but my lady, Greensleeves.
I sent thee curches for thy head, all wrought fine and gallantly.
Kept thee both at board and bed, yet thou wouldst not love me.
Green sleeves is all my joy.
Green sleeves is my delight.
Green sleeves is my heart of gold.
And who but my lady, green sleeves.
By gone was all the grassy green.
Sleeves of satin hanging by.
That made thee be our harvest queen.
Yet thou wouldst not love me.
Green sleeves, green sleeves.
Is all my joy Green sleeves Is my delight Green
sleeves Is my heart of gold Who but my lady Green sleeves Green sleeves Now fare thee well Adieu God I pray Will prosper thee
And I am still thy lover too.
Come once again and love me.
Green sleeves is all my joy.
Greensleeves is my delight Greensleeves is my heart of gold Oh, but my lady Greensleeves
*Music*
One quick addition to something I said earlier in the broadcast.
It seems that Rachel Maddow has not only removed all my comments from her blog about the Spokane bionic backpack incident, she's also canceled my registration and locked down both northwest front threads.
They'll probably go down the memory hole completely soon.
So much for liberals' dedication to civil discourse and open discussion, never mind the First Amendment.
I say again, when confronted with dissent or argument from anywhere on the white right, Liberals' first reaction is to try to silence us, and if they can't do that, they ignore us.
They know they can't win any kind of debate on a level playing field, so unless they can tilt the playing field, they don't even try.
Next email.
I get one of these at least every week.
This one comes from Alex in Tennessee.
Dear Northwest Front, I just found your website and I was really blown away.
I've been looking for something like this for years.
How did this Northwest thing come about?
Who started it, and how will you proceed in order to make this new republic a reality?
Well, Alex, I've gone over this before in a lot of the previous podcasts, which I hope you'll download and listen to when you get time, but I'm quite happy to do so again, especially since our Rachel Maddow coverage will be bringing in a lot of new listeners this week who haven't heard this particular rap of mine before, so here goes.
I don't know how familiar you are with the whole white resistance movement, Alex, how long you've been involved or what your track record is, but the Northwest Imperative is not new.
I didn't invent it, and I make no such claim.
And what I did do is I wrote four novels about a white revolution in the Northwest and the establishment of a homeland for all of our people worldwide here in this land.
And a lot of what I have to say in those books is important, so that's the first step.
You need to get hold of the Northwest novels and read them because I go into detail and I say things in those books that I can't really say on the air here.
An independent white homeland in the Northwest was first advocated way back in the 1970s by people like Pastor Bob Miles, Pastor Richard Butler, Pastor Wesley Swift, and of course the heroic freedom fighters of the Order.
Now, if you really want to get esoteric about it, you might say that this idea goes all the way back to the early 1800s with the great Historic conspiracy of Aaron Burr and General James Wilkinson to seize what was then the Louisiana Territory and make it into a new country, separate from the United States.
Wouldn't that have changed history, huh?
One of the great might-have-beens.
You might say also that the Northwest idea goes back to the 1940s when the people of Northern California, even back then...
Got so sick and tired of being governed by corrupt politicians in Sacramento who were responsive in those days only to the equally corrupt cities of Los Angeles and San Francisco and the Jewish Empire down in Hollywood that they got together in the first secession convention since 1861, somewhere up around Eureka, I think.
Anyway, they declared Northern California to be a separate state, which they called the State of Jefferson.
I guess they figured if Washington had a state named after them, so could Thomas Jefferson.
And they were on the verge of quite seriously petitioning Congress to recognize them as a separate state when Pearl Harbor happened.
And so that pretty much put pay to that.
But the idea has been there for a long time.
The Northwest Independence Movement has one single overriding imperative.
The world must change.
The purpose of democracy is to prevent change.
The purpose of revolution is to bring it about.
And that's our purpose.
I'm not ruling out the possibility that one day the Northwest Front might run in elections up here, but if we do, it'll only be to provide a legal format for revolutionary organizing.
Specifically, the Northwest movement is based on a number of principles, all of which I believe are demonstrably true if they are approached with an open mind.
One of these principles is that the white race is faced with literal physical extinction both here and in Europe.
Establishment media now admit that white people will be a minority on this continent by the year 2050.
And that doesn't even take into account the problem of the age of the white population at that time.
As a matter of fact, I saw a news article on the internet today admitting that the white population worldwide is now down into single digits, percentage-wise.
The second basic principle of the Northwest Imperative is that the United States of America, in its present form, is doomed.
And that the only way to secure the existence of our people and the future for white children is physical separation from the mud races.
And this requires territory.
Land of our own and a government of our own.
This white homeland must be a sovereign and independent nation where no non-whites and no Jews and no homosexual perverts and no bird-brained liberals are even allowed to live.
None of this garbage about a territory or a white Puerto Rico or some nonsense like this.
All of those people that I just mentioned have to be completely removed from the whole political and social equation.
When people say to me, "Oh, Harold, you're a monster.
You're cruel and mean and heartless," I tell them to go take a flying leap at a rolling doughnut.
My eyes are on the prize, people.
I want the result, an all-white world where white children don't have to go through what we've had to go through.
Yes, Virginia, sometimes the end does justify the means, and that's the case with white survival.
The survival of the white race on Earth is non-negotiable.
The 14 words of David Lane are non-negotiable, and we need to start manning up and doing what's necessary to make sure that there are still some people with our color skin alive on this continent in another hundred years.
You can't cure disease without dealing with germs and the infection they cause.
Historically, human problems are very seldom caused by nature anymore.
The Black Death wiped out one-third of Europe in the 14th century, but this isn't the 14th century anymore.
Earthquakes in Haiti notwithstanding, the Western world has the science and the technology now to beat famine and plague and to predict and deal with things like hurricanes and volcanoes and repair the damage they do when they occur.
Well, the white man does anyway.
Black primitives in Haiti don't.
Blacks in Africa and mestizos in South America and browns in India don't.
But I'm not concerned about them.
If global warming were real, which it's not, it wouldn't wipe us out.
At least, it wouldn't wipe white people out because science, white man's science, I might add, would find a way to deal with it.
Now, in recent centuries, human problems have been caused mostly by people.
And the only way to put a stop to some problems is to remove certain people from participation in the process.
Now, this may sound cruel and cynical, but it's true.
And if you look at human history, that's more often than not how mankind solves its problems through what I may call proactive human intervention that one way or another removes certain groups, nations, and races from the picture.
That's just the way it is.
And it's not going to change just because some people don't have the courage or the energy to do what's necessary to save white people from extinction.
There have been some white separatists who believe, sincerely, that we can and we should do like the Amish and just buy some land somewhere out in the boondocks and go off and live in little log cabins and be on our own and to hell with the outside world.
Well, unfortunately, it doesn't work like that.
The establishment will not allow anyone to opt out of this system.
Ask Randy Weaver how that worked for him.
Ask the Branch Davidians.
Ask those Mormon fundamentalists in Texas whose compound was raided a couple years ago and whose children have been taken away from them to be raised as brainwashed American consumer animals.
It is impossible to secure the existence of our people and the future for white children without establishing our own territory, our own state, and our own government.
It is impossible for white people ever to be truly free or even to survive as a race without confronting the Zionist state, without confronting the empowered Zionist and liberal ruling elite, and removing them from power.
They have the power, and if we are to survive, we cannot continue to try and escape and evade and hide.
We must take their power away from them and appropriate it for ourselves.
In the real world, that's how it works, and we're going to have to start living in the real world.
And when a man is attacking you with a gun or another weapon in his hand and trying to kill you, you may survive for a bit by running away.
But if you're in a cage, even a cage as big as the United States of America, and you can't flee out of his range, then eventually that armed killer will catch up with you and find you.
And when a man is attacking you with a weapon in his hand, you can't just turn your back on him and ignore him and pretend that he doesn't exist, hoping he'll concentrate his murderous intentions on someone else and always pass you and your loved ones by.
Tyranny needs victims.
Human beings and human blood and suffering are the fodder on which tyranny feeds, whether the tyrant be Hammurabi or Genghis Khan or Stalin or Barack or St. Obama.
You might achieve survival for a time, if not peace, through silence and submission.
The monster may not bother you for a while if you're very quiet and don't attract his attention, but eventually he's going to notice you, and it will be your turn.
All you accomplish by turning your back on him and pretending that he doesn't exist is he'll shoot you in the back.
In our society, the armed homicidal maniac with a gun who's coming to kill us is the United States government.
If we don't disarm this crazy man, this insane beast, then it's going to kill us all and force our children to live in a world that doesn't bear thinking about.
Now, at this point, I suppose I should ask you to bear in mind that there are distinct limitations on what I can say on the air here.
We always need to bear in mind that the enemy is listening.
He's listening to this show right now, and he's monitoring every email and every phone call we make.
Even if this may not be literally true all the time, we have to act as though it is true.
Like Winston Smith in the George Orwell novel 1984, we have to learn to live as if we're watched every moment of our lives, from our cell phones to our chat rooms to the spy cameras in shopping malls and office buildings.
And then we have to learn the art of ignoring that fact and continuing to function in spite of it all, because we have to function.
we dare not allow ourselves to become so terrified of fbi agents under the bed and microphones in the sugar bowl that we can't function because that's what they want constant government surveillance is a form of terrorism The regime's secret police want us to be afraid to speak, afraid to communicate with one another, afraid to function, and we can't let them do that to us.
We just need to develop a level of care about what we say until it becomes almost instinctive.
Now, in keeping with that, I think we all realize that there are parameters, like I said, to what I can say here on the air.
Very often, I have to resort to what Lennon referred to as Aesopian language, the language of fable.
I have to follow the late Pastor Bob Miles' dictum about never committing to paper anything you wouldn't want read out in open court, or in this case, never saying anything on the air that I wouldn't want played back in open court, as no doubt someday it will be.
If at times, on this show, I seem to be dancing around something, beating around the bush, or...
Going around my elbow to get to my thumb in order to make a point that you're just going to have to learn to read between the lines.
I just remember what I said about that crazy man with the gun from Washington, D.C. who's coming to kill us all.
You can't run and hide from him forever, and you can't just pretend that he doesn't exist.
On his part, the man in the silk suit with his government-issue gun and a shoulder holster can't be merciful.
He can't just decide to let us alone any more than we can ignore him, because he has no will of his own.
It's not up to him.
He has to do what the computer tells him to do, because he's sold his soul for a little computerized check every month, and to be fair, also for medical and health insurance for his family, which is almost unobtainable now.
Putting on that federal badge is a form of resignation from the human race.
A federal agent made the decision long ago to trade his or her And they have become so morally corrupted...
That they are no longer amenable to reason or to human decency.
A federal agent's entire reason for being.
The reason he was brought into existence is specifically to do us harm.
Sooner or later, one way or the other, we're all going to have to deal with these people.
And I think it's best that we do so acting together and with a plan.
That plan is the Northwest migration.
And I'm rambling again, aren't I?
Sorry about that.
Okay, third music break.
Back to our ballads.
This one is a good old murder ballad from the immortal Walter Forbes, the same folk singer who gave us Little Margaret last week.
I really like Forbes' arrangement of these old songs.
If you want to be really purist and ethnic on a song like this, you really need to listen to Frank Proffitt or Iris DeMint sitting on the front porch up there in the mountains plunking on an old wooden gut-string banjo.
But I know people these days expect a little more than that.
Forbes' arrangements are just modern enough to take advantage of better musical technique and technology that we have these days, but they're not jazzed up to the point where they ruin the song.
This is Pretty Polly.
Polly, oh Polly, over yonder she stands.
No rings on her fingers, her lily white hand.
Come along pretty Polly and go along with me.
Come along pretty Polly and go along with me.
Before we get married some pleasure may we'll see.
They roamed over mountains, they roamed over dell.
They roamed over mountains, they roamed over dell.
They roamed over dell.
She heard through the morning the sound of a bell.
Polly, oh Polly, I'm feared of your way.
I'm feared of your way, I'm feared that you're leading my body astray.
They went a little further And what did she spy?
They went a little further And what did she spy?
A newly ducked raven Just made it lying by.
Polly, pretty Polly, you're guessing just right.
Polly, pretty Polly, you're guessing just right.
I finished your grave I was digging last night.
He stabbed her to the heart and her heart blooded low.
He stabbed her to the heart and her heart blooded low.
Then down in her grave pretty Polly must go.
He threw the sod over her and turned to go home.
He threw the sod over her and turned to go home.
Oh Polly, pretty Polly, over yonder she stands.
Polly, pretty Polly, over yonder she stands.
The brains on her fingers And fog around her hands Oh, yeah Oh, yeah you you
There's something I want to get into now, but it's hard because it's something that came up from the Proofreading and Review Committee for Freedom Sons, and only about 30 of you actually read what I've written so far, which is five chapters totaling around 54,000 words, something like that.
I don't want to get into details because the novel is still very much a work in progress.
I don't want to ruin it, but let's put it this way.
Once again, I'm coming up against this idea that even some of the most politically and ideologically developed people among us seem to have a lot of difficulty shaking.
And that idea is that somehow it's going to be possible for us to restore in some form or another the America that we knew as children.
Well, the problem is that no, that's not possible.
And yet some of us continue to cling to that idea like a drowning man clings to a life preserver.
So once more, I got to go back over some old ground here, but that's okay.
I'm willing to keep on going over this and over it until it sinks in.
We are not trying to bring back the old.
We're going to have to build something new from the ground up.
Let's start with the basics.
If there is to be any hope for any kind of survival on this continent for white people and for the Western civilization that we've created, then it lies in some form of secession to coincide with the political breakup of the United States, which is something that will, let me repeat that, something which will happen, almost certainly in our lifetimes.
Listen very carefully, people.
Read my lips.
We will never.
Be able to take back the entire United States because we have left it too late.
We, in our movement, screwed around for 60 years and wasted our time on dead-end leaders who were frauds and dead-end ideas.
And yes, I include myself there, too.
I was around back then, and I have to take responsibility for my own mistakes as well.
The fact is that there's nothing left to take back as far as America goes.
It's gone.
There are simply too many of them and not enough of us.
Too many niggers.
Too many Mexicans and other illegals.
Too many bugger boys and carpet munchers.
Too many white women who have been damaged beyond repair by feminism.
Too many liberal left-wing dumbasses.
Too many pale-skinned...
Dumbasses of our own race who are just hopelessly brain-dead and who can't be reached because their minds and their thought processes have been destroyed by the television and the personal computer and the thousand and one lies of the Jews.
In order to restore any semblance of the old USA, we would have to kill or forcibly expel from the North American continent at least 60 million people, more likely closer to 100 million people.
Now, how are we ever going to do that?
How?
All you guys out there who send me these emails telling me that I'm wrong and we mustn't engage in secession and that we have to infiltrate and take over the Republican Party, whatever the hell, explain to me, how is this going to happen?
How are we going to get rid of all these people who just don't have any business here in the military?
Is some general going to suddenly develop a conscience and stage a coup d 'etat and drag Obama's baby-shit brown ass out of the White House and turn his troops loose on the Mexicans and drive them out?
Would such a general be obeyed?
Who do you think makes up the rank and file of the U.S. military these days?
Do you think that white people are just gonna simultaneously rise up and throw all this garbage out of the country?
How and who?
Who's gonna do that?
A bunch of middle-aged men with big bellies who spend their time emailing news media articles to one another telling each other how bad things are?
A bunch of quasi-intellectuals who spend their time making silly blog posts on a computer?
A bunch of old people in their wheelchairs and their walkers who just don't want to pay taxes?
Young white punks who do nothing except sit around listening to rap music with their baseball caps on backwards and playing their Game Boys and living with their mothers until they're 30?
Are these the people that are going to rise up in a revolution and expel millions of non-whites?
Guys, this take-back-all-of-America-for-white-people thing, not happening.
We had damned well better start thinking up another plan.
Oh, wait, we have one.
It's called the Northwest Imperative.
We've been raised from birth with this idea of one nation indivisible under God, which is codswallop.
Nowhere is it chiseled in stone by God or anyone else that the North American continent absolutely must be politically united into one national entity for all eternity until the crack of doom.
Manifest destiny is horseshit.
History and human realities don't work like that.
Anything and everything is possible for white mankind.
Human beings create their own reality and we have to create a new one here in the Northwest.
Every other continent on the face of the Earth has many countries on it and eventually so will our continent.
That's just the way it's going to work out.
That's how human nature will shape this up.
A century from now, North America will be almost like the old South Africa with Bantu stands.
The Southwest, from Southern California to Texas, will be Aslan.
There will be a Republic of New Africa in what is now the South, unless the Hispanics push in from Aslan and kill or enslave all the niggers, which they may well do since they've done that in other places like Brazil and Central America.
There may be some remnants of the United States left in the Midwest in the Northeastern corridor, in theory ruled over by some decrepit remnant of the Washington, D.C. government, but independent in fact.
And there will be a Northwest American Republic.
For white people only, in the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, western Montana, and with any luck, bits and pieces of Northern California, British Columbia, Alberta, and Alaska.
It will be there a hundred years from now because we're going to make it so.
Now, in order for us to accomplish this, all we have to find...
is 1,000 people.
1,000 white men and women who are throwbacks to an earlier age and an earlier type of human being who is capable of making moral decisions and acting on them.
Once we get those thousand people living here in the homeland and organized into activity groups, then the fun part can start.
Until then, I just have to keep on sitting here begging and pleading with you guys every week to make the decision that we're going to get this show on the road.
Well, our time is up, and so that's it for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 4856, Seattle, Washington 98194, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha on the bond.
▲
Export Selection