Since Jesus is from Bethlehem, he's technically a Palestinian.
Would he say that about indigenous Americans?
Since the Navajo are from, and then where are the Navajo in Arizona?
So since the Navajo are from Arizona, they're technically Arizonans.
He would never say that, because it denies who they are.
But much, much more remarkable, there was no such thing as Palestine at the time of Jesus.
It was an invention, complete invention of the Romans.
It didn't exist.
It never existed.
There was never a country named Palestine.
There was never an independent entity named Palestine.
In fact, before Israel was created, Palestine was associated with the Jews.
The Jerusalem Post was the Palestine Post.
The Israel Philharmonic was the Palestine Philharmonic.
The United Jewish Appeal was the United Palestine Appeal.
So just since we live in the age of enforced ignorance, because the left runs our schools and our media, you know, almost nobody knows that.
So this Jesus was a Palestinian thing is the classic.
I've said this before I even knew the young Turks existed.
Anyone who says Jesus was a Palestinian, or in the case of Hitler, Jesus was an Aryan.
That's what the Nazis said.
The de-Judaization of Jesus is the mark of a Jew hater, of an anti-Semite.
It's the de-Judaization of Jesus.
In this entire tweet, the fact that he is a Jew is not mentioned.
Are we familiar with this tweet?
No.
Isn't it something?
Since Jesus is from Bethlehem, he's technically a Palestinian.
It's a lie.
It's a stupid, ignorant lie.
Does he believe what he wrote?
After all these years, I've come to believe that leftists often believe their lies.
A, they don't know a lot.
And B, they convince themselves.
He's technically a Palestinian.
There was no Palestine.
He was a Jew in Judea.
That's all that Jesus was as a man.
Obviously, to Christians, he was more than a man, but that's who he was as a man.
Remember that the next time you hear a death toll from the Palestinian territories, if Jesus returns to the place of his birth, could he survive the night?