By people who I assume agree with the president, the greatest assault on democracy was January 6th.
So Fred in Cincinnati wants to know how the Capitol attack could be deemed non-violent.
Seven died, but they didn't die because anybody killed them.
Remember Officer Sysnick?
Sysnick, sorry.
Officer Sicknick, who was late in state, said to have been killed by one of the people who entered the Capitol and killed him with a fire extinguisher.
Well, that never happened.
He died the next day.
He was not hurt at all during the attack.
He died the next day of a heart attack.
Stroke.
I condemn that idiocy within an hour of it happening, as soon as I learned of it.
In fact, far more important than the events of the day is the reactions.
While Democrats either praised or ignored...
Months of violence on the left.
Every right-wing politician condemned what happened within a day of January 6th.
Severely condemned.
That is how you judge a movement.
Does it condemn its own?
In Portland and L.A. and New York.
Chicago, all these Democrat mayors and governors said nothing, nothing.
Prosecuted virtually no one.
That's to me a way to judge what happened.
Was anybody actually hurt other than one protester?
Whom they don't even reveal she was murdered.
She was murdered.
I use the term.
They won't even give us the name of the officer who did it.
Because if you kill somebody on the right, that's different than killing somebody on the left.