All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 27, 2021 - Dennis Prager Show
10:16
Those Who Do Not Fight Evil, Make Up Evils To Fight
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I hope you had a good weekend.
I should say on Fridays, I hope you'll have a good weekend.
Preemptive strike.
Thank you, sir.
The reason I'm laughing is somewhat at myself.
I have this great question every day.
With what subject do I open the show?
So, this is grisly, but...
I just want to bring it to your attention as a symbol of the brilliant, brilliant statement in the Talmud almost 2,000 years ago.
Those who are kind to the cruel will be cruel to the kind.
And I've adopted that in so much of my life.
My theory, my column on communism this week was, those who don't fight evil.
This is a variation on that Talmudic thought.
Those who don't fight evil make up evils to fight.
That's a good way of putting it.
You know that?
Can I trouble you?
That's a good one.
Those who do not fight evil make up evils to fight.
And I'll give you an example.
The release of so many people who have done horrible things to human beings in the name of...
Justice in the name of compassion, in the name really of chaos.
Sorosian chaos, which is really redundant because all he does is sow chaos.
He's a man who could truly be said to have made the world worse having been in it.
There are a number of people about whom that could be said.
Most people...
You can say contributed something, some people contributed nothing in either direction, and some people made the world worse.
George Soros made the world worse.
That's it.
There's no doubt in my mind he will so be regarded, but not perhaps in your lifetime, since the left has commandeered historical writing.
So the story is reflective of Our thinking, this has nothing to do with Soros specifically or the prosecutors, district attorneys.
This is, a repeat felon has confessed, Daily Mail, a repeat felon has confessed to killing his neighbor, cutting out her heart, I won't read you the rest, and then murdering his uncle and four-year-old girl.
This happened in Oklahoma.
This month, actually just two weeks ago.
Lawrence Paul Anderson, 42, allegedly stabbed the neighbor, Andrea Lynn Blankenship, to death in her home in Chikasha.
He then went back to his house and stabbed three people, his uncle, aunt, and their granddaughter, the same day, according to the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation.
The triple murder sparked outrage after it emerged that Anderson had been released from prison early in January.
See, this is a story that should have national attention.
Not Jussie Smollett's story.
Turned out to be a lie, as you know.
He was sentenced to serve 20 years behind bars for gun and drug offenses in 2017, before Governor Kevin Stitt commuted the sentence to nine years at the recommendation of the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board.
I'm not done.
Anderson has spent much of the past 15 years in prison.
In 2006, he was sentenced to four years for attacking his girlfriend and pointing a gun at her.
And for possessing crack cocaine with intent to distribute.
He was released after serving less than two years.
Hmm.
You attack your girlfriend pulling a gun at her and it's less than two years.
Alright?
Not done.
Anderson landed back in lock-up in 2012 when he was sentenced to 15 years for selling crack cocaine near a Chikasha Elementary School.
He was released after five years and four months with 20 years probation.
Less than five months after that release, Anderson was arrested for confronting a woman with a handgun in a church parking lot.
Police later found a vial of PCP in his underwear.
So, uh, just, you know, just let him out.
And...
I'm not saying that this is not a complex issue.
If a person is only involved in drugs, although I want you to understand, drug dealers are involved in murder.
Okay?
That should be known.
Do you know how many people die of drug overdoses?
And there are people who are selling the things with which these people die, just for the record.
But even putting that aside...
The guy has twice pointed a gun at innocent women.
And now he went out and he murdered the neighbor and three relatives.
Yep.
All right.
That goes under the file of how to get that off my chest.
And it is off.
So, you know, they've now passed this equality bill, the U.S. House of Representatives, which will guard the transgender.
You are, for all laws, you are what you say you are.
This is an invitation to chaos.
And the only question I have on these matters, I have a lot of thoughts, but I have a question on this one.
When will the average Democrat see his country ruined by his party and hold his nose and vote Republican?
That's the only answer.
They are destroying the country.
This is a form of destruction.
Why is it fair for biological men to race against biological women?
Here's an example of the cruelty to decent people.
And I'm not saying the transgender are cruel, in light of my early tell-mute statement.
It has nothing to do with that.
My heart goes out to the transgender.
It can't be a happy life to be at odds with your biological sex.
That's just the way it is.
My heart goes out to these people.
So that's a separate issue.
My heart also goes out to people who, in salons, who, how do I say this for a family show, that remove body hair from the private parts of women, right?
So it's women who are doing that, obviously.
And it's very, very common practice.
And now, if a person comes in and says, I'm a woman, then you must remove the hair from the private parts that belong to a male.
Right?
Do you understand?
I mean, just to give you one little ramification.
But...
99.9% of you don't work in that field, so the hell with those people.
99% of you are not females racing against biological males, so the hell with those females.
Oh, and it will have absolutely no effect on the cohesion of a unit.
To have somebody with a male body say that she is female or vice versa.
So that you, there are women's barracks, is that correct?
So there will be in women's barracks a woman with male genitalia.
And to even, to object to it and say, this is not what I signed up for, will make you a hater.
Because of the simpletons of the left.
So that is the law.
We might as well abolish women's sports.
There's no point in women's sports.
The point in women's sports is the biological differences.
The biological differences don't end because the psychological differences end.
You know what's fascinating?
I read study after study, activist after activist, activist.
A disproportionate number of the people who were active in this arena are female.
It's interesting.
I can't figure it out.
But it's so, it's hit me.
A study was written showing that there's no issue with the transgender in the Army.
And, of course, the study was written by two women.
▲
Export Selection