Doctors are Playing Politics Rather Than Saving Lives
|
Time
Text
Your doctor may have enabled your loved one to die.
And you'll enter a realm of cognitive dissonance.
Why would a non-doctor, who speaks on the radio, know more about how to save my beloved relative or friend than my doctor or his or her doctor?
And the answer is, I don't have an agenda except to save their life.
Whereas your doctor is angry that Donald Trump advocated hydroxychloroquine.
And there are other reasons.
Because they read the New York Times to learn about the drug, and they don't read the actual literature, which I delved into.
And the studies around the world, oh, they weren't randomized, double-blind.
No, they weren't.
So what?
So what?
Most studies are not.
Why would you not go with as close to completely safe a drug as possible, rather than do nothing except wait to give the death-oriented ventilator at the end?
Oh, it's angering.
But we'll see what happens.
Maybe this will convert some people from the left, which has killed their parent with their opposition to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
Which social medium took down the Senate hearing?
YouTube?
Is that astonishing?
A U.S. Senate hearing with doctors advocating ivermectin has been taken off YouTube.
It might have been put back, but it was taken off.
Check if it's put back, because people should see it.
I'd be very curious about that.
Mike in North Carolina, hello.
Hello, Dennis.
Hi.
I told your call screener that we share the same birthday on August 2, 1948. Holy crow!
Where were you born?
How about that?
I was born in Buffalo, New York, other side of the state.
Yes.
All right, quickly, tell me your story.
Quickly, I had COVID, and I was pretty sick with it, but I got in, my son took me in, and I was able to get into an investigative study with a product called Bamlanivimab.
And it's very similar to the remdesivir that the president took.
And within a week, I was feeling good enough to get going again, doing all my volunteer work.