Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 3, 2021 - Dennis Prager Show

02:55:57

The Dennis Prager Show LIVE

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Welcome to the Wednesday show.
	That means we have a male-female hour coming up after this.
	Last night I spoke via Zoom to students in England, all over the UK. Those are moments when you feel, hmm, maybe people are hearing some of these ideas.
	And then I was interviewed at midnight at my time on a podcast in the UK with a young man.
	It was very touching.
	He's about 25. He has his own podcast.
	Deeply affected by the show and PragerU.
	And at the end he said, can my mom come on?
	It was so sweet.
	To be honest, and I told her this, she looked like his older sister.
	And then my wife came on to say hello to her.
	It's all very sweet.
	We are out there, my friends, we who believe in liberty, treating people decently.
	The moral gap between right and left is the only thing that the right and left can agree on.
	That there is a gigantic moral gap, a canyonesque gap between the left and the right, and they believe that they're wonderful, and I believe that they're awful.
	And it's not a matter of belief.
	The impeachment is another example of another manufactured hysteria.
	You know, I've often said, almost every day in fact, that the left destroys everything it touches, and that...
	While conservatives build and liberals build, the left destroys, which is a fact.
	But there is one thing that the left does manufacture.
	Hysteria.
	Nobody does it as well.
	And that's all this is about.
	The president denied for 77 days that he lost.
	So what?
	He's not allowed the freedom.
	If you think it's absurd, he doesn't have the freedom to say absurdities.
	Did he do anything to block the next president from coming in?
	Did he bring in armed forces?
	Who brought in armed forces to Washington, D.C.? And why are they still there, in fact?
	By the way, are they really building a fence around the Capitol?
	It's not clear?
	How disgusting.
	It's this manufactured hysteria.
	It's like the manufactured hysteria about white supremacy.
	So, did you know that Facebook has announced this crisis of free speech is the greatest of such in American history?
	Facebook has just announced it.
	Well, not just.
	When did it announce this?
	It's not going to take any ads.
	For the recall of Governor Newsom of California.
	You know when it was announced?
	But obviously recently.
	Think about that.
	They are given this license, as it were, to be immune from any lawsuits.
	With the deal being, then you have to be a conduit for all information.
	I mean, we don't expect you to allow a videoed rape on Facebook.
	We don't expect you to allow how to manufacture an atomic bomb.
	But without such clear exceptions, people are free to express their opinions, but they're not.
	Why can't there be an ad on Facebook for the recall of the governor of California?
	Which reminds me to remind you that you can go.
	We sent in ours yesterday, by the way.
	Just for the record.
	It said you have to sign in black or blue ink.
	So do you think my more purple-like ink will be okay for my fountain pen?
	Or will they disqualify it?
	We actually thought about that, my wife and I, when I signed it.
	They'll do anything to disqualify a ballot.
	The people who yell voter suppression...
	Don't seem to be all that concerned with regard to voter suppression and the recall.
	This man has ruined so many people's lives in the state of California that he holds a somewhat unique spot in American history as utterly destructive.
	So with the LA Times.
	These are forces of bad.
	They're forces of destruction.
	The LA Times defended Gascon, the district attorney of Los Angeles County.
	Not only endorsed, they're defending his policies.
	It's one thing they could endorse him, because they'll always endorse a leftist.
	But now that they see what he's doing, do you know that other counties are not even referring cases to Los Angeles County?
	Because he has a soft spot, this George Soros-funded, truly evil man, has a soft spot for murderers.
	Because they don't care.
	Do you understand?
	The left doesn't care if you've murdered or if you've raped, if you've sold enough drugs to kill a village.
	They care about your color.
	Do you understand?
	The inversion of moral principles that takes place on the left.
	I judge you by your color, not by your deeds.
	This is considered, there are two groups that do this.
	The left, like Soros and Gascon, and the LA Times, and the Ku Klux Klan.
	They judge people by their color, not by their deeds.
	Tell me if I have in any way exaggerated, in any way, shape, or form.
	It proves, as does so much else, like men give birth, men menstruate, it proves that if anything that is repeated enough, half the population will succumb to.
	It's not a cheerful thought, but you have it in your hands to fight.
	You know, I'm ambivalent now.
	I've gone from opposed to ambivalent about the school's opening.
	My contempt for most teachers in the big cities of this country is very sad.
	It's the last group I ever wanted to hold in contempt.
	But their disinterest in the welfare of students is mind-boggling.
	It's mind-boggling.
	It shows you how left corrupts everything and touches that teachers don't care about the well-being of students.
	And why am I now ambivalent?
	Here it goes.
	Because the longer there is no school, the more people will take their children out of school permanently.
	Which you have to do anyway because your schools do not teach your children.
	They indoctrinate your children.
	Ask your high school student.
	High school?
	I probably knew this in fifth grade, but ask your high school student the following question.
	How many branches of government are there and name them?
	Do you think that most high schoolers in big cities, not in Kenosha, Wisconsin, do you think that they would have an answer to that?
	I don't.
	Obviously, that's why I'm raising the question.
	I mean, obviously, don't ask tricky ones, like how many people did communism kill?
	Or for that matter, increasingly, what was the Holocaust?
	So you wonder at a given point, what do they learn?
	And the answer is, they learn how bad America is.
	1-8 Prager 776. See that?
	There is a silver lining in the non-opening of schools.
	Maybe it will awaken people to the fact that teachers, for the most part, having gone through a left-wing indoctrination, in order to be a teacher, don't care about your kids.
	That's really an important revelation.
	Deeply sad.
	I was of the generation where the teacher was right no matter what.
	One of my teachers in 8th grade, so annoyed that I kept talking in class, he threw me over a desk.
	And if I tell that to kids today, they go, what did your father say?
	To which my response has been, you've got to be kidding.
	If I'd have told my father the teacher threw me over the desk, my father would have thrown me over a desk.
	The teacher was always right.
	There was no higher status in our home than teacher.
	And the left has now made that profession awful.
	So the World Economic Forum is meeting virtually.
	If you don't know what the World Economic Forum is, the World Economic Forum is a gathering of the richest, most well-connected people on the planet.
	They usually meet in Davos, Switzerland, which is very hard to get to.
	And in Davos, Switzerland, a lot of very big globalist ideas are introduced.
	And so this is talked about sometimes in conservative circles as the Davos agenda or as the kind of globalist agenda.
	This is their Super Bowl.
	This is where they do their planning and their announcements.
	This is where you'll have the Bill Gateses of the world, the Jeff Bezos of the world, the heads of state from around the world gather, and they basically say, how can we destroy sovereignty of our nations?
	How can we try and have free flow of people and make ourselves more important?
	Now, we have gone into great detail in this program.
	In the Great Reset.
	What the Great Reset is where they do not want people to own property.
	You will eat less meat.
	I kid you not.
	That's part of the list.
	And you're going to be happier.
	You hear that?
	You're going to be happier.
	And if you don't, you got a problem with that?
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Larry Oller Show.
	Sally Pipes is my guest.
	Sally, do you think it's fair to say that the majority of Americans are really too afraid to have health care, have the private sector completely run health care?
	They don't trust the private sector enough to allow the private sector to run health care.
	They've been trained to fear the private sector and to embrace government to the point now where a discussion about unraveling government entanglement in health care we can't even have anymore?
	Well, first of all, we don't have a complete private market in healthcare in this country, as you know.
	Fifty percent of our healthcare is in the hands of government through Medicare, the program for our seniors, of which covers 65 million.
	Medicaid, the program for low-income people, that covers now 70 million Americans, the CHIP program, the Veterans Administration.
	So we don't have a private market.
	But the progressive liberals like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the mainstream media, have just...
	We've brainwashed the American people to say that the private sector cannot provide the kind of alternatives and different types of plans for people.
	So people are being completely bamboozled.
	But it's interesting that, you know, 59% of people polled say they support single-payer, a complete government takeover of health care, which Bernie Sanders wants.
	But when you ask the people, 160 million of them, well, what...
	Which have private insurance in the employer market.
	If you ask them, well, you're going to have to pay much higher taxes, support goes down to 37%.
	If you tell them we're going to take away your private coverage and everybody's going to be in a government plan, support goes down to 26%.
	The problem is people don't understand what it means.
	And, Talia, the very same people that are complaining about the vaccination rollout are perfectly content to have the government take over everything.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Deliger Show.
	Ron DeSantis is a Republican, so therefore has to be portrayed as some kind of a Yahoo person.
	And Cuomo, who it was literally revealed yesterday, underreported COVID deaths in nursing homes by around 50%.
	Thank you.
	Hello there.
	I'm Dennis Prager.
	Wonderful to be with you.
	Battling the greatest crisis since the Civil War of the 1860s.
	Our Civil War, which I have called it for decades.
	Always praying it would be and remain non-violent.
	The left wishes to crush the country.
	What animates them?
	What were we reading last night?
	What is the endgame of the left?
	Like, letting out murderers in Los Angeles County by George Soros-funded evil men.
	By the way, if that doesn't constitute evil, then what does?
	So I guess the left would answer, ah, systemic racism, that's evil.
	And you're right, systemic racism is evil.
	The question is, is there systemic racism?
	And does letting out murderers because they're black or people of color, whichever term you wish, to include others than black, than African American, all right?
	Is that the answer?
	To the extent that there is a crisis in black life, nothing would come close to...
	A reaffirmation of a Judeo-Christian value system, which is true for whites too.
	Yes.
	The arrogance of the post-Christian era is quite remarkable.
	We don't need a God or a Bible.
	We will make a beautiful world without it.
	But they don't.
	They don't.
	It's really remarkable.
	What did you get when Christianity died in Europe?
	Boy Scouts, as they used to say?
	Or fascism, communism, and Nazism?
	What are we going to get in America after it collapses?
	Christianity.
	Anybody ask that question?
	Are there five students at your local university who have asked the question?
	Let alone pondered the responses?
	Listen to this.
	Again, the left does things, and the question, what will it lead to, doesn't matter.
	So I've told you I discovered in the last few years, after a lifetime of studying the left, their endgame is chaos.
	I know it sounds bizarre.
	I admit it.
	It does sound bizarre.
	And I don't know the psychological impetus here.
	I don't.
	What is attractive about chaos?
	I guess the same could be asked of any drama queen in your family.
	What is the endgame of all of their drama and destruction?
	There is no endgame.
	The endgame, the game is the end.
	This gives them purpose.
	Impeaching a president who is not in office.
	It gives them meaning.
	Fighting for Earth's survival with the pseudo-existential threat of global warming.
	This gives these people meaning, and it gives them the excuse to restructure society.
	Here's a little story that proves my point.
	And this is from CBS Los Angeles.
	Ralph's, that's one of the major supermarket chains in California.
	Ralph's, food for less to close several Long Beach stores over hazard pay law.
	This, by the way, this is only a preview of what's going to happen because of the national minimum wage that President Biden has enacted.
	If indeed it goes through.
	He hasn't enacted anything.
	He hasn't enacted.
	He wants to enact.
	Yes.
	Kroger, the parent company of Ralph's and Food for Less, announced Monday, that's two days ago, that it will be closing two of its Long Beach stores following the passage of a law that hiked grocery store workers pay by $4 an hour.
	Kroger reported That on April 17th, it will be shutting down its Ralph's store and its Food for Less store, and they give another address.
	As a result of Long Beach's decision, it's Long Beach, California, to pass an ordinance mandating extra pay for grocery workers.
	This is their comment.
	Okay, this is the statement from the California...
	Grocers Association.
	As a result of the City of Long Beach's decision to pass an ordinance mandating extra pay for grocery workers, we have made the difficult decision to permanently close long-struggling store locations in Long Beach.
	This misguided action by the Long Beach City Council oversteps the traditional bargaining process and applies to some, but not all, grocery workers in the City.
	That was actually issued by Kroger, and now the statement by the California Grocers Association.
	The Long Beach City Council rushed to enact the misguided extra pay mandate without any meaningful dialogue with grocers in their community.
	We repeatedly warned that $4 an hour increase would have major unintended consequences, including potential store closures, the reduction of work for employees, And higher grocery costs for customers.
	In opposition, Los Angeles Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia tweeted in support of paying grocery store workers more, saying, quote, The Kroger Corporation is closing two markets in Long Beach because our city is requiring temporary hero's pay for grocery workers during this pandemic.
	Grocers are making record profits.
	We go to court this month and we will defend the workers vigorously.
	The left's interest in defending workers and helping them is zero.
	It is the same as the desire of the teachers' unions to help students.
	Zero.
	It is the same as Black Lives Matter desire to help blacks.
	The left uses every group in whose name it speaks.
	Have the feminist groups come out in favor of the high school girls who are losing all their races to biological men who are transgender women?
	No, of course not.
	So, this is...
	When the left in Long Beach says, oh, we care about the workers, just please chalk that up to Bolshevik talk.
	Los Angeles City Councilors are currently considering a similar motion that would provide their grocery store workers with an extra $5 per hour in hazard pay.
	Last March and April, as the pandemic was unfolding, several major grocery stores and retailers provided their employees with one-time bonuses or temporary wage increases of $2 an hour.
	The article is up at DennisPrager.com, 1-8-Prager-776.
	You ain't seen nothing yet.
	if there's a national minimum wage, the number of restaurants that will close after already the horrors that have impacted them because of the lockdown will be tragic.
	Trending now on the Larry Alder Show.
	Dinesh, we've got a new president now.
	He's been in office for about five or six days.
	What are your thoughts?
	He doesn't seem to be very much in control of the situation, but he has been very vigorous in signing a blizzard of executive orders, all of which seem to me thoroughly destructive.
	The business about climate change, the executive orders on oil leasing and fracking.
	Of course, he got rid of the 1776 Commission.
	So he's doing all the bad stuff we warned people that he would do.
	And at some point, you've got to ask, isn't this going to have a very bad effect on America?
	A little part of me wishes that it does, because I think we have to open the eyes of the American people to what moving in a socialist direction means.
	So yes, I think we're off to a very bad start.
	It's what we warned about, and we're about to see the fruits of it.
	Well, but Dinesh, we're healing.
	He's reaching out to the other side and urging everybody...
	To heal.
	I recall when President Trump was campaigning, Dinesh, as you know, one of the big applause lines was lock her up, lock her up.
	One of the first things he did was to say, I'm not going to pursue her.
	Quote, she suffered enough and he felt he wanted to concentrate on his own agenda.
	When is Biden going to pick up the phone, Dinesh, and call Schumer and call Pelosi and say, call off the dogs.
	This is an idiotic trial and we shouldn't be wasting the American people's time with it.
	Well, the very fact that they're pushing ahead with it, I mean, it looks like they may have up to five Republican votes, not even necessarily five for conviction, five just for hearing it.
	And the other 45 would have thrown it straight out.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
	You voted yesterday against proceeding with the impeachment trial.
	Why?
	This is an unprecedented impeachment trial, as you know.
	Never has it happened before in American history.
	And there's no clear path forward in the Constitution or laws themselves.
	As you know, the Chief Justice is not presiding.
	The Constitution provides it when the President of the United States is tried in a court of impeachment, the Supreme Court Chief Justice We shall preside.
	So this is kind of like making it up as we go along here, and I have some very serious concerns about the legitimacy of this whole process.
	Now, Senator Corrin, I and Judge Littig and Alan Dershowitz and Professor Turley have argued for weeks now it is unconstitutional to try a former official, and it is not something we want to begin to do.
	There is one contrary...
	Example from the 19th century when a former Secretary of War was tried, but I believe many senators changed their mind about jurisdiction thereafter.
	Do you believe it's constitutional to try former officials?
	Well, as you know, in Federalist 65, Hamilton says that impeachment is really different than anything else, and it's essentially a political process.
	But I think just from a prudential standpoint, even if you would say that...
	This is permissible.
	I think it's a terrible idea and a terrible precedent.
	This means that if a Democratic majority in the House and Senate can try a former Republican president, it means a Republican majority in the House and the Senate could try a previous Democrat president.
	it.
	I think that's a terrible idea and we shouldn't do it.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Eric Mettaxas show.
	So let's get right to it.
	This is a brand new book.
	How do we turn our seasons around?
	Because a lot of us are going through tough seasons.
	I'm going through a slump right now.
	I'm hitting 220 and that's just Hi, everybody.
	You're listening to The Dennis Prager Show.
	And I am delighted to have the senior editor of The American Conservative, another truly excellent website.
	We have so much thought going on.
	You know, I read the left-wing websites and their emotional diatribes against conservatives.
	And, of course, Donald Trump, without whom they have a paucity of passion.
	And then I read the conservative websites and there's so much more depth on it.
	One of the reasons is the American conservative and its senior editor, Helen Andrews.
	Helen, welcome to the Dennis Prager Show.
	Hi, Dennis.
	Thank you for having me.
	Where are you located?
	In Washington, D.C., the belly of the beast.
	Well, you're very safe.
	I mean, the number of armed troops alone should make you feel wonderful.
	Exactly.
	I can barely get down to the office.
	There are cordons and barricades between me and there.
	Where do they sleep?
	I don't know.
	I haven't asked.
	No, it's a legit question.
	They were, the first couple of nights, they were in terrible places.
	They either had to sleep on the floor or sitting up.
	So it was an actual question.
	It's not like Washington...
	Go on.
	It's a fine question.
	I remember earlier this summer when there were riots in the streets in Washington.
	The National Guard came in to protect the city then.
	And Mayor Muriel Bowser arranged to have hotels kick them out.
	Kick them out of their accommodations.
	So there's certainly a hostility here in D.C. to our servicemen and women in terms of where they can sleep.
	Helen Andrews has written a very, very important book, Boomers, The Men and Women Who Promised Freedom and Deliver Disaster.
	I couldn't agree with you more, and we're going to talk about that in a moment.
	I just want to ask one more thing about your benighted area.
	What are the chances, or even better, It's still not clear to me, what does it take to make a new state?
	Is it just a 51-49 majority in the U.S. Senate?
	What does it take?
	That's not a question that I know the answer to.
	That's funny.
	So, I don't either.
	I wouldn't have asked you.
	So, don't feel bad.
	It's not been made clear to me.
	They would love this.
	Even though it's unconstitutional, D.C. is District of Columbia.
	It's supposed to be a federal district.
	But imagine yourself in a new state.
	I'm sure it excites you tremendously.
	The whole desire, of course, is to produce two more Democratic senators.
	So, I am a boomer, and I actually wrote a column a while ago, an apology to the young generation.
	For how my generation has ruined things in this country, what's your take on boomers?
	I know and love a lot of boomers.
	My parents are boomers and they're wonderful, and I'm sure you're one of the good ones too.
	But as a millennial who's about to inherit the civilization the boomers are passing on, I have to say, an objective assessment of the boomers' record would find them to have failed to pass on the civilization that they inherited in the same state that it was when they got it.
	I think the boomers have been institution destroyers.
	Anything that constrains individual choice, they have knocked down like wrecking balls.
	And that's true across the board from the institutions of the family and the church.
	To the economy and business, technology, the law and the Constitution.
	They've just been institution destroyers, and millennials are going up amid the wreckage.
	Couldn't agree with you more, and that's my generation.
	I felt it from college.
	When I saw, during the Vietnam War, I saw it when I was at Columbia, I saw students.
	Wrecking Columbia.
	They would go into professors' offices.
	This was before computers, so if you took the physical hard copy of a professor's work, he was bereft of that work forever.
	And I'll never forget, they went into a professor's office, stole all his work, and he was bereft of his work.
	And I remember my generation chanting, Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh!
	So I have a tough question for you.
	And we'll take a break, and then I'd love you to answer it.
	What do you say about the generation that raised the Boomers?
	How did the Boomers become a wrecking ball?
	The book is Boomers, The Men and Women Who Promised Freedom and Deliver Disaster.
	It is up at DennisPrager.com.
	Helen Andrews, the author.
	ReliefFactor.com is one of the easiest ads that I have ever done on any regular basis, and it is a regular basis because it is such an easy product to sell to you.
	Everyone I know who has taken it, and that's a lot of people, has been helped.
	It is batting, as we say, a thousand.
	I am one of them.
	The reason that I ever endorsed it, it's the only painkiller I ever did endorse, was my wife had been helped for years and I didn't even know it, thinking I knew everything about my wife I didn't know about Relief Factor.
	Go to relieffactor.com.
	There's a special three-week price to try it out.
	1995 800-500-8384 trending now on the Mike Delegre show Ron DeSantis is a Republican so therefore has to be portrayed as some kind of a of a Yahoo
	And Cuomo, who, it was literally revealed yesterday, under-reported COVID deaths in nursing homes by around 50%, he gets the victory lap.
	He gets the book deal.
	He gets the Emmy Award.
	These clowns, even when they're faced with horrific news like the Attorney General in New York and her scathing report,
	Showing the disastrous response by Cuomo with his mandate that nursing homes must take COVID-19 infected people, which sent thousands and thousands of elderly people to their deaths?
	Well, here's CNN's take.
	Last night, honest to goodness, this came down at like 8 o'clock at night.
	Headline by Chris Saliza.
	CNN editor at large.
	Analysis.
	Andrew Cuomo's COVID-19 performance may have been less stellar than it seemed.
	May have been less stellar.
	They lied about how many people died in nursing homes because they were desperate to try to cover up Andrew Cuomo's Botched response to COVID. Well,
	I think people are being very loose with their language here.
	The president's been impeached for inciting an insurrection, which has a very technical meaning.
	But we know that there's a lot of loose language here in Washington, D.C. I think about Chuck Schumer over at the Supreme Court saying that to Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, I said, you'll never know what hit you.
	Maxine Waters telling...
	The anti-Trumpers to get in the face of people who support the President.
	I think we just need to realize that we need to temper our speech here because there are people who will take it perhaps much farther than anybody ever intended.
	But I don't believe the President intended to incite violence.
	I do believe he intended to try to influence the Congress during the... ...and I believe he intended
	to try to influence the Congress.
	I want you to know that Pure Talk...
	It'll take 30 seconds here to tell you.
	You get now 6 gigabytes of data and unlimited talk and unlimited text for $30 a month.
	I've signed my phone up, one of my phones.
	It's perfect.
	The thing is excellent.
	Again, unlimited text, unlimited talk, and 6 gigabytes of data, $30 a month.
	Say Dennis Prager at pound 250. Just dial pound 250. Say 50% off your first month.
	Pound 250, Dennis Prager.
	Helen Andrews has written a book.
	It's actually about boomers in general, and specifically, it's an analysis of Steve Jobs, Aaron Sorkin, Jeffrey Sachs, Camille Paglia, Al Sharpton, And so know Sotomayor.
	So, I asked you a challenging question, which I have thought of a lot.
	I fully acknowledge the damage my generation has done to this country and continues to do.
	Joe Biden is a boomer.
	And the question arises, did the generation that raised them...
	Or does the generation that raised them, which is called the greatest generation, do they bear any responsibility?
	This is a question that I get a lot, and I suppose it's only fair.
	I've written a book where the millennials blame the boomers for their problems, so it's only fair to ask whether we can put a little bit of the blame for the boomers on the people who raised them.
	But my answer is that, really, you can't.
	The blame stops.
	With the boomers, and I'll tell you why.
	The reason why the boomers are the way they are is not so much how they were raised, but a product of the demographic fact that the boomers are an exceptionally large generation.
	I mean, it's right there in the name, the baby boomers.
	It was a birth boom, which meant that from the moment they came of age in the 1960s, The boomers have been the most numerous consumers, music listeners, voters.
	Anybody who wanted their project to be a success would target it to the boomers and their desires.
	If you were a politician and wanted to win, you would court the baby boomers simply because there were so many of them.
	The consequence of that was that it gave the baby boomers the idea that the world revolved around them.
	So much of the boomer legacy is a product of their narcissism.
	But that wasn't because the greatest generation spoiled them when they were coming up.
	It was because of this demographic fact, which has had just a lot of follow-on consequences.
	Is there a repeat of this?
	I just vaguely recall reading that there's a, I don't know if it's a baby boom, since a lot of people are not having babies, but is there some sort of repeat in the staggering number of either millennials or Generation X or Z or whatever? but is there some sort of repeat in the staggering Or is that wrong?
	Very recently, we crossed the threshold point where Millennials now outnumber baby boomers.
	Mainly because so many baby boomers have driven themselves into an early grave through misdeeds of one kind or another.
	And it is true that the millennials are also a pretty big generation demographically because they are the baby boomers' children.
	And so the main consequence of that, unfortunately, has been that the generation between them, Gen X, So often gets sidelined, because there just are not so many of them.
	So you'll talk to a lot of Gen Xers who feel kind of left behind and left out, and that's the reason behind that, that there were a lot of baby boomers, and their kids are the millennials, and so there are a lot of them too, but the Gen Xers just get caught in the middle.
	So you chose a number of people.
	Oh, by the way, I think I should give you my theory as a baby boomer, because I was...
	Already speaking when I was in my 20s, so I recall audience reactions and I recall what I said publicly.
	And I used to say to audiences, obviously these were the, this was the greatest generation, as they say, audience, the people who went through the Depression in World War II. And I say, you know what?
	You say you're going to give us everything you didn't have, meaning...
	And that's great, but you didn't give us what you did have, and that was religion and love of this country.
	So I do hold them unintentionally responsible.
	They were so preoccupied with giving my generation security and wealth.
	I don't mean large sums of money, but material items that they forgot to give us what made America great for all its years.
	How does that strike you?
	That sounds absolutely correct.
	One of the great resentments that I have as a millennial is that it's against boomer hypocrisy.
	They were the ones who taught us that America was a terrible country and had been racist from its very founding.
	And I think older people sometimes don't appreciate that for millennials, that line that America is terrible isn't something that we heard from the occasional dissident faculty radical.
	That was orthodoxy.
	That was what we were taught in our mainstream public school history classes.
	And, of course, the natural response from the millennials is, okay, if America is so terrible, what is good about our country?
	And the people who were teaching us said, well, America started being good around the time of the 1960s.
	But if you think about it, what that means is that the baby boomers took love of America and replaced it with love of themselves.
	So once again, the baby boomers' narcissism put themselves at the center of, according to them, the only good story to be told about the United States.
	And it's certainly my hope.
	That millennials can be the generation of backlash against that.
	God willing.
	I've got to take a break.
	Helen Andrews.
	The book is boomers up at Dennis Prager.com.
	Trending now on the Eric Metaxas show.
	What do we need to know about COVID that we're not hearing?
	What is your perspective on it right now?
	Because there's never been anything so confusing and so strange in my lifetime.
	Well, you know, Eric, I agree with you.
	And this is politics and medicine has no place at all.
	And unfortunately, the information, the freedom of information for patients so they can make their choices.
	It's just not out there.
	And so the very simple solutions that people should know as a public health editorial is prevention is very important that you can do today.
	Don't wait for the virus.
	Don't wait to get the positive test.
	Just start today with prevention.
	And there's five things, five supplements you can take.
	There's five.
	Lifestyle changes that you can do for prevention.
	Unfortunately, it's not told.
	But you know what?
	It works.
	And we started back in March.
	We had people make sure they elevate their own immune system by three key nutrients.
	And when they increase their vitamin D levels, they increase their zinc levels, they increase their glutathione levels and vitamin C levels.
	Guess what?
	These people are more resistant and resilient to all viruses, including COVID. So if they did get the case, it would be reversed quickly, or they didn't get it at all.
	You know how much this costs?
	You know, the average person, if the government would have given everybody a $100 kit, I believe that a lot of lives would have been saved with the word prevention.
	We don't hear that anywhere.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Burke.
	Why?
	Tackling the climate crisis at home and abroad.
	Yes, the country with the largest military capabilities, with nuclear weapons, Is now back to fighting the climate.
	Just as I explained to you on a prior program when I was asked to run an exercise with colonels and half-bird colonels from the Obama administration, they too, half of the cohorts in that exercise, said that the climate was our biggest enemy.
	Well, here's the new Secretary of Defense.
	The department will immediately take appropriate policy actions to prioritize climate change considerations in our activities and risk assessments to mitigate this driver of insecurity.
	So I'm curious, does Secretary Austin, retired general, know...
	Hi, everybody. - Okay.
	Enjoying my talk with Helen Andrews, who is...
	Are you a millennial?
	What do you characterize yourself as?
	I'm 100% a millennial, born 1986. So, 19...
	25 years old, or 24 years old.
	So you've...
	Oh, you shaved a decade off my age there, Dennis.
	Not that I mind.
	Oh, you...
	Why?
	Well, you said...
	Mid-30s.
	Mid-30s.
	Wait.
	Did you say 94?
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	I said 86. Okay, I really got that wrong.
	Okay, 14 and 21. Yeah, 35. Okay.
	Anyway, I looked at your picture.
	You look 25, just for the record.
	Oh, bless your heart.
	You never know what will happen if you come on my show.
	It's sort of an unpredictable roller coaster.
	I have a theory for you on my generation's narcissism.
	I knew it very early on, and I actually was very alienated from my generation from a very early stage.
	When they announced, in the most narcissistic statement you could probably make, don't trust anyone over 30, they were announcing that we are the wisest humans who have ever lived, and they still believe it.
	It's astonishing.
	And it was all the more annoying then because it went hand-in-hand with the boomer worship of youth.
	They thought that you knew more and understood more before you had any first-hand experience of how the world actually works, which to me sounds pretty backwards.
	That's exactly right.
	And my antidote, I was vaccinated against the boomer thinking.
	By religion.
	Because if you take your religion seriously, you know that you trust people over 30. In fact, the people I most trusted were over 2,000.
	So, it struck me as bizarre.
	Did you ever come across, I'm okay, you're okay?
	Oh, yeah, good heavens.
	That's another...
	So, I added this description.
	I'm okay, you're okay, America stinks.
	That sums it up pretty neatly.
	Of course, that slogan never held much attraction for me, because I know I'm not okay.
	I need to get better, and I'm trying to get better every day.
	Do you come from a religious background?
	I do.
	I do.
	I am an Orthodox Christian.
	I attend a Russian church.
	Yeah, you see, it doesn't surprise me.
	You wrote a very wonderful book, Boomers.
	It's up, folks.
	Biographies of various leading boomers in there.
	The men and women who promised freedom and delivered disaster.
	Helen Andrews, I hope we speak again.
	Thank you so much, Dennis.
	This was fun.
	Good.
	Thank you.
	Not shocked that she came from a religious background.
	Trending now on the Mike Deliger Show.
	I often wonder if people have the ability to be objective enough to look at actual data and be truthful about things like the way Democrat-led states have responded to coronavirus and how Republican-led states have done so.
	For example, Florida.
	You know, I go a little bit back and forth between the state of Florida and New York, so I get to see how both states are responding to COVID with lockdowns, shutdowns, or some semblance of normalcy.
	There is a semblance of normalcy in Florida that there is not in New York.
	So it's really pretty stunning to look at the difference between the way the two states and the two communities really have responded to this pandemic.
	But have you looked at the data?
	Because to listen to the mainstream media, Ron DeSantis is just some wild, out-of-control lunatic who has totally botched Florida's coronavirus response.
	But Andrew Cuomo, on the other hand, is Mother Teresa.
	And has done everything perfectly, and the numbers are great, and everything's wonderful in New York.
	And of course, nothing could be further from the truth.
	If you put on a chart the deaths per capita, the illness, the infection rate, the economy, if you lay it all on a chart and compare Florida to California, And New York?
	It's not even a close call. - Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Berka.
	- Numbers matter.
	And think about the fact that they always tout the popular vote as opposed to the electoral college.
	That's why every vote matters.
	Even if you're in California, like yourself, Victor in Maryland, every single vote matters.
	And this is why you never give up.
	It's not an excuse, but you're absolutely right from the historical perspective.
	Politics is cyclical.
	It truly is cyclical.
	You know, you get a Reagan because of a Carter.
	That's absolutely true.
	You get a Donald Trump because of what?
	Because of the betrayal of the American people by both sides of the political aisle.
	So the idea that simply because they managed to do what they did in November, that that's it.
	We're done?
	Absolutely not.
	Think about one thing and one thing alone.
	How did they treat Donald Trump when he came down those escalators?
	And I don't mean just the left.
	I don't mean the late-night talk show hosts, the quote-unquote comedians.
	I mean the right.
	The establishment.
	Do you remember?
	And what happened?
	He trounced them all.
	Even after the Billy Bush tape, he was a force of nature.
	That's the attitude I want to see in all Americans.
	be more like donald trump never ever give up because trending now on the eric metaxas show what do we need to know about covid that we're not hearing we're What is your perspective on it right now?
	Because there's never been anything so confusing and so strange in my lifetime.
	Well, you know, Eric, I agree with you.
	And this is politics and medicine has no place at all.
	And unfortunately, The information, the freedom of information for patients so they can make their choices is just not out there.
	And so the very simple solutions that people should know as a public health editorial is prevention is very important that you can do today.
	Don't wait for the virus.
	Don't wait to get the positive test.
	Just start today with prevention.
	And there's five things, five supplements you can take.
	Lifestyle changes that you can do for prevention.
	Unfortunately, it's not told.
	But you know what?
	It works.
	And we started back in March.
	We had people make sure they elevate their own immune system by three key nutrients.
	And when they increase their vitamin D levels, they increase their zinc levels, they increase their glutathione levels and vitamin C levels.
	Guess what?
	These people are more resistant and resilient to all viruses, including COVID, so if they did get the case, it would be reversed quickly, or they didn't get it at all.
	You know how much this costs?
	You know, the average person, if the government would have given everybody a $100 kit, I believe that a lot of lives would have been saved with the word prevention.
	We don't hear that anywhere.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	subscribe on youtube today trending now on america first with sebastian gorka Tackling the climate crisis at home and abroad.
	Yes, the country with the largest military capabilities, with nuclear weapons, Is now back to fighting the climate.
	Just as I explained to you on a prior program when I was asked to run an exercise with colonels and half-bird colonels from the Obama administration, they too, half of the cohorts in that exercise, said that the climate was our biggest enemy.
	Well, here's the new Secretary of Defense.
	The department will immediately take appropriate policy actions to prioritize climate change considerations in our activities and risk assessments to mitigate this driver of insecurity.
	So I'm curious.
	Um.
	Thank you.
	You know, whenever I hear that, the last segment of the intro to the male-female hour, I feel sad because there probably are a lot of men who are trouble with women. I feel sad because there probably are a lot of Thank you.
	That might be an interesting topic for a male-female hour.
	Do you have trouble with men, if you're a woman, and do you have trouble...
	With women if you're a man.
	And what does that mean?
	What exactly does that mean?
	Yeah, we have to do that.
	There's no question about that.
	Hi everybody, the male female hour is Wednesday, every second hour of Wednesday.
	And I think it's the most honest talk about men and women in the media today.
	I can't imagine more honest talk.
	I can certainly imagine equally honest, but I don't know of it.
	So I have a topic for you today that is especially addressed to young people, but those of you who are not young can certainly weigh in on the issue.
	I ask almost every young person I meet if they're married.
	Do they want to get married?
	How important is it to them?
	I'm a big marriage pusher.
	Not only for their sake, society benefits when people commit to one another.
	Financially it benefits, socially, in just about every way.
	George Gilder turned my thinking around when I was in college with his book.
	It's no longer listed as such, but it was called at the time, Naked Nomads.
	It was a short book, relatively speaking, by this brilliant man, George Gilder.
	And it was about single men in America.
	I even think that was the subtitle of Naked Nomads.
	And he made me aware of something very powerful.
	He said, you know, we ask who commit violent crimes, and we always give the wrong answer.
	The answer is single men.
	Boy, did that make me think I didn't commit any violent crimes, but it certainly made me think.
	Well, be that as it may, I have a question based on the answers, or I have a theory based on the answers that I get when I ask young people, are you married, do you want to get married, etc.
	So, I get the following answer.
	Oh, when the time comes, I'm definitely up for it.
	I think I've addressed that answer on the male-female hour.
	How silly.
	It's a perfectly silly response.
	When I'm ready, I'll get married.
	I don't even know what that means, when you're ready.
	How many people are ready to get married?
	How many people are ready to become a parent?
	You get ready to get married when you get married.
	That is the general state of human affairs.
	But I'm not addressing that one today as I am a very specific one offered by a lot of single men.
	Oh, I'll get married when I'm financially secure.
	And young women seem to go into that as well.
	Oh yeah, when I am or he is or we are financially secure.
	And I have to admit, to complete non-comprehension of that response.
	What does your financial security have to do with whether or not you get married?
	1-8 Prager 776. That's my question.
	It's a non-sequitur to me.
	You will get married when you're financially secure.
	Why?
	You don't make enough money to support two people?
	Look, a single woman today is likely to be working, and a single man is likely to be working.
	What changes?
	If they don't have children, that's a separate issue.
	But getting married, what changes?
	If anything, you live cheaper because you now share a place.
	They may well share a place to begin with.
	But a lot of them don't.
	A lot of them are not dating somebody seriously enough to be living with them.
	Which is a separate question about the living together before marriage.
	And I'm not talking religiously or morally.
	I'm just talking about does it work?
	We'll leave that to another time.
	Explain to me, because I admit, when I say I don't understand, it is not a euphemism for I don't agree.
	I'm pretty literal.
	I don't understand.
	Don't two people live cheaper than one?
	And did everybody, or did even the majority of people marrying as young as they did in the past, were they financially secure when they married?
	You may be young enough to qualify for this answer.
	You might be a 35-year-old, not only a 25-year-old.
	Or you might be the parent of some young person who offers that argument.
	Oh, when I'm financially secure, then I'll settle down.
	I don't understand why.
	By the way, it helps you become financially secure to get married.
	Married people, especially married men, make more money once they are married.
	This is a statistical fact.
	We have a video that offers that at PragerU, right?
	What is it, The Case for Marriage?
	And it's an academic who gives it, and he just offers all these data to show the economic benefits of getting married for men.
	I'd love to know where this idea arose, I'll get married when I'm economically secure.
	The phone number here is 1-8 Prager, 776-877-243-7776.
	Was this your way of getting married?
	And if it was, do you think it was a wise decision so you put off marriage by seven years, let's say?
	That's another great topic, by the way.
	The people who wait years and years.
	And I'm not talking about 19-year-olds.
	People who wait five, ten years to get married.
	I'd like...
	We've got to do a show on that, because I'd love to ask people who then broke up, do you feel you wasted those eight years with that person?
	Especially asking that of women.
	There's a lot of unwisdom around.
	I want to address another...
	We're going to do a series of shows on the objections to marriage.
	Oh, my parents got divorced.
	So, I'm very wary about getting married.
	To which I've always had the same precise answer.
	And that is, if your parents had a bad car crash, would you not drive a car?
	A divorce is a car crash.
	I just, I don't understand that one either.
	Your parents got divorced, so therefore what?
	So therefore you're going to put off marriage?
	So I always wonder, maybe these are camouflage for real reasons.
	This economic one, which is the one I'm addressing today, truly makes no sense to me.
	I'll marry when I'm economically secure.
	Okay.
	By the way, there's something beautiful about marrying when you're not all that economically secure.
	To remember later those early struggling years is actually a very warm memory for a lot of couples later on in life.
	Back in a moment.
	Trending now on the Larry Elder Show.
	Dinesh, we've got a new president now.
	He's been in office for about five or six days.
	What are your thoughts?
	He doesn't seem to be very much in control of the situation, but he has been very vigorous in signing a blizzard of executive orders, all of which seem to me thoroughly destructive.
	The business about climate change, the executive orders on oil leasing and fracking.
	Of course, he's suspended.
	He got rid of the 1776 Commission.
	He's doing all the bad stuff we warned people that he would do.
	And at some point, you've got to ask, isn't this going to have a very bad effect on America?
	A little part of me wishes that it does, because I think we have to open the eyes of the American people to what moving in a socialist direction means.
	So yes, I think we're off to a very bad start.
	It's what we warned about, and we're about to see the fruits of it.
	Well, but Dinesh, we're healing.
	He's reaching out to the other side and urging everybody, I recall when President Trump was campaigning, Dinesh, as you know, one of the big applause lines was, lock her up, lock her up.
	One of the first things he did was to say, I'm not going to pursue her.
	Quote, she suffered enough, and he felt he wanted to concentrate on his own agenda.
	When is Biden going to pick up the phone, Dinesh, and call Schumer and call Pelosi and say, call off the dogs?
	This is an idiotic trial, and we shouldn't be wasting the American people's time with it.
	Well, the very fact that they're pushing ahead with it, I mean, it looks like they may have up to five Republican votes, not even necessarily five for conviction, five just for hearing it.
	And the other 45 would have thrown it straight out.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
	You voted yesterday against proceeding with the impeachment trial.
	Why?
	This is an unprecedented impeachment trial, as you know.
	Never has it happened before in American history.
	And there's no clear path forward in the Constitution or laws themselves.
	As you know, the Chief Justice is not presiding.
	The Constitution provides it when the...
	The President of the United States is tried in a court of impeachment.
	The Supreme Court Chief Justice shall preside.
	So this is kind of like making it up as we go along here, and I have some very serious concerns about the legitimacy of this whole process.
	Now, Senator Cornyn, I and Judge Littig and Alan Dershowitz and Professor Turley have argued for weeks now it is unconstitutional to try a former official, and it is not something we want to begin to do.
	There is one Contrary example from the 19th century when a former Secretary of War was tried, but I believe many senators changed their mind about jurisdiction thereafter.
	Do you believe it's constitutional to try former officials?
	Well, as you know, in Federalist 65, Hamilton says that impeachment is really different than anything else, and it's essentially a political...
	But I think just from a prudential standpoint, even if you would say that this is permissible, I think it's a terrible idea and a terrible precedent.
	This means that if a Democratic majority in the House and Senate can try a former Republican president, it means a Republican majority in the House and the Senate could try a previous Democrat president.
	I think that's a terrible idea and we shouldn't do it.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Eric Metaxas Show.
	Music So let's get right to it.
	This is a brand new book.
	How do we turn our seasons around?
	because a lot of us are going...
	Hey, everybody, Dennis Dennis Prigler.
	I want to remind you that I have major trips coming up with you.
	My annual cruise, which was, of course, knocked out last year because of the lockdowns.
	First year in about a quarter of a century that that happened.
	Going from London to Iceland in June.
	That has a banner up at DennisPrager.com and my...
	Every other year, trip to Israel with hundreds of you.
	A life-changing experience for the people who go.
	There, too, there's a banner, Stand with Israel banner, up at DennisPrager.com.
	It's fair to say you'd have the time of your life.
	Okay, everybody, I'm Dennis Prager.
	This is the Male Female Hour, second hour every Wednesday.
	Raising a question, something I hear a lot from single people not married, especially single men.
	Well, I'm not financially secure.
	I want to wait until I'm financially secure.
	They say it as if the listener to the statement is completely on board.
	Oh, of course, that makes perfect sense.
	You will wait until you're financially secure to get married.
	You know, I just want to be able to, you know, it sounds noble, actually.
	And things that sound noble and make no sense are very, very alluring.
	I mean, it's not a statement that is bad.
	This is not a moral issue.
	It's just a practical issue.
	So what if you're not financially secure?
	Therefore what?
	Therefore you will not bond with a human being?
	It's a non sequitur to me.
	All right, let's see what you folks have to say.
	And Steve in Cleveland.
	Hello, Steve.
	Good afternoon, Dennis.
	Hi.
	Yeah, I was just making the point to your screener that I was in that mode.
	I'm 52, and I'm kind of always in my 20s and my 30s.
	I was like, I'm not ready yet.
	I'm not ready to jump into this.
	Now at 52, I look back and go, man, I missed all those opportunities to grow a life with somebody else.
	I think that's the missing piece.
	Marriage is a young person's, and it should be a young person's journey, not so much what you should put off until middle age. - Wow, this is a very powerful call.
	I mean, I hope you get married now.
	It's never too late.
	Literally never too late.
	If you're 82, I would say that to you.
	But at 52, it's certainly true.
	But the reason for the power of that call was that's what happens a lot.
	Oh, I'll wait until I'm financially secure.
	Oh, I'll wait until I'm established.
	Oh, I'm not ready yet.
	And then you're 42 or 52. Thank you for calling and sharing that honesty.
	Now, we have people who differ with me.
	And let's try Spartanburg, South Carolina.
	Frank, hello.
	Hi, Dennis.
	How are you?
	I'm well.
	Thank you.
	So I think the problem is it's not financially secure.
	I think it's the wrong word.
	I think it's financially mature.
	With myself, we were in college, and ultimately our careers took us on different paths to different states.
	So it was more about if one of us had a better job than the other one, we were putting the other one in a bad position to have to pack up and move with us.
	Well, was that in fact the case?
	Were you serious with the woman and that happened?
	We were, yes.
	Alright, fine.
	You both packed up and you went to...
	I don't understand why it's different if you're not married.
	Did you break up?
	We did.
	Ultimately, we were engaged and ultimately we broke the engagement off where it just wasn't going to work for us.
	Are you married now?
	I am.
	17 years.
	I see.
	So, when you look back...
	Do you think it was a blessing that you didn't marry, or it was a wonderful woman for you?
	Oh, that's a difficult one, because I'm happily married and can't imagine anything different right now.
	Right, yes, it is a hard question because of that.
	Yeah.
	I'm happy it's a hard question.
	But the other lady is, yeah, the other lady is still, I consider my best friend, so...
	Oh, really?
	Difficult.
	Oh, that's interesting.
	Yeah.
	Is she married?
	She is.
	You know what?
	We need to do that as another male-female subject.
	You're still very close to her?
	I am.
	Sometimes it's a detriment to my current wife.
	She has some misgivings, but we trust one another, so there's that.
	Yeah, good.
	You just gave me a subject, because I'm with your wife.
	I don't quite follow...
	I understand it.
	No, no, I appreciate it.
	I appreciate your honesty.
	I think it was a financial maturity issue.
	Well, in retrospect, let's say you had not met your wife with whom you were happy for 17 years.
	Do you think you still followed the best policy and broke up?
	Because you got different jobs in different cities?
	Oh, wow.
	I mean, because that's what you're really arguing, and I would say it's not easy to find the right person.
	It's clear that you found the right person to marry, but that she would have been the right person as well.
	So I think maybe the decision to wait was the correct decision, because ultimately that's what unveiled my future path.
	So as far as waiting, I think it's the right decision.
	Would the outcome have been different if we had continued to go down the same path, so maybe not necessarily breaking it off?
	But definitely waiting was the right decision.
	There were a couple other things involved in breaking it off.
	It wasn't strictly financial.
	Oh, okay.
	Well, listen, I thank you for the call.
	You gave me a topic.
	For that alone, I should send you a cigar.
	In fact, Sean will be bringing it over.
	Is there an L.A. Spartanburg flight?
	Yeah.
	Not direct.
	Yeah, I understand.
	Alright, the question on the table is...
	Is it wise to wait until you're financially secure to marry?
	My view is it is very hard to find the right person if you do find the right person.
	Letting them go or delaying it indefinitely until you're financially secure just doesn't make any sense.
	And I'm awaiting the argument on its behalf.
	We continue.
	Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
	So the World Economic Forum is meeting virtually.
	If you don't know what the World Economic Forum is...
	The World Economic Forum is a gathering of the richest, most well-connected people on the planet.
	They usually meet in Davos, Switzerland, which is very hard to get to.
	And in Davos, Switzerland, a lot of very big globalist ideas are introduced.
	This is talked about sometimes in conservative circles as the Davos agenda or as the kind of globalist agenda.
	This is their Super Bowl.
	This is where they do their planning and their announcements.
	This is where you'll have the Bill Gateses of the world, the Jeff Bezos of the world, the heads of state from around the world gather, and they basically say, how can we destroy sovereignty of our nations?
	How can we try and have free flow of people and make ourselves more important?
	Now, we have gone into great detail in this program in the Great Reset.
	What the Great Reset is where they do not want people to own property.
	You will eat less meat.
	I kid you not.
	That's part of the list.
	And you're going to be happier.
	You hear that?
	You're going to be happier.
	And if you don't, you got a problem with that?
	Keep up with what's trending.
	subscribe on YouTube today trending now on the Larry Alder show Sally Pipes is my guest.
	Sally, do you think it's fair to say that the majority of Americans are really too afraid to have the private sector completely run health care?
	They don't trust the private sector enough to allow the private sector to run health care.
	They've been trained to fear the private sector and to embrace government to the point now where a discussion about unraveling government entanglement in health care we can't even have anymore?
	Well, first of all, we don't have a complete private market in health care in this country, as you know.
	Fifty percent of our health care is in the hands of government through Medicare, the program for our seniors, of which covers 65 million, Medicaid, the program for low-income people, that covers now 70 million Americans, the CHIP program, the Veterans Administration.
	So we don't have a private market.
	But the progressive liberals like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the mainstream media, have just...
	We've brainwashed the American people to say that the private sector cannot provide the kind of alternatives and different types of plans for people.
	So people have been completely bamboozled.
	But it's interesting that, you know, 59% of people polled say they support single-payer, a complete government takeover of health care, which Bernie Sanders wants.
	But when you ask the people, 160 million of them, well, what...
	Which have private insurance in the employer market.
	If you ask them, well, you're going to have to pay much higher taxes, support goes down to 37%.
	If you tell them we're going to take away your private coverage and everybody's going to be in a government plan, support goes down to 26%.
	The problem is people don't understand what it means.
	And tell you, the very same people that are complaining about the vaccination rollout are perfectly content to have the government take over everything.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Delacare Show.
	Ron DeSantis is a Republican, so therefore has to be portrayed as some kind of a of a Yahoo.
	And Cuomo.
	Who it was literally revealed yesterday.
	Underreported covid deaths in nursing homes by around 50 percent.
	he gets the victory lap.
	He gets the book deal.
	He gets the Emmy Award.
	These clowns...
	You're listening to the Male Female Hour on the Dennis Prager Show.
	Every Wednesday, the second hour is devoted to honest talk about men and women.
	I've raised the question of something I've truly been puzzled by.
	The argument that, well, I won't get married until I'm financially secure.
	I don't understand it.
	Why can't you be married and financially insecure?
	Why is your route to security impeded by your being married?
	Okay.
	Martin in Atlanta, Georgia.
	Hello.
	Yes, Dennis.
	We spoke before.
	I'm an adult male on the autism spectrum who makes a very low salary of $21,000.
	So for most women, when they look at a man making that little amount of money, they don't see you as a provider.
	But unfortunately, I had an older half-brother who passed away last year, and I inherited a little over a quarter million dollars.
	Now, women might look at me at a different perspective now that I have money.
	Well, that's right.
	It's a given.
	Women are more attracted to a man that she feels financially secure with.
	That's the way it is.
	Men value more beauty, physical beauty, and women value more wealth in a prospective partner.
	This is not bad.
	It may be sad, but it is not bad.
	It just is.
	And to deny reality means you've probably gotten a degree in the social sciences.
	It means you've got a degree in reality denial.
	But that doesn't address the question of if a woman wanted to marry a man making $21,000, why he wouldn't until he's financially secure.
	She was obviously at peace with what he's making.
	All right, and Pete in Chicago, hello.
	Pete in Chicago, hello.
	Hmm.
	Any possibility that we understand why Pete in Chicago, it really is like dead air.
	You don't even hear the rustling of feathers, as it were.
	All right.
	And Brett in St. Louis.
	Hello, Brett.
	How are you doing, Dennis?
	Okay, thank you.
	Yeah, the interesting thing, I was 22 years old and wasn't really thinking about marriage.
	I was home for Christmas break, and I was still dating my high school sweetheart for six, seven years.
	And my dad just came to me and said, you're going to get married, aren't you, son?
	And I went and bought a ring that day.
	Good dad, good son.
	Yeah.
	I'm sorry, my fault.
	How old were you at the time?
	22. And you'd already been together six years?
	Yes.
	Right, yeah, well then that makes perfect sense.
	So how did it turn out?
	We're still married today.
	Three beautiful kids, everything as well.
	But I think it's another reason people don't get married when they're young is because 22-year-olds need to be told basically everything.
	And they don't have that guidance that tells them, you know, somebody's got to be in their ear pushing the idea of marriage.
	I probably would have procrastinated just like other people do.
	That's a very good point.
	I serve that purpose.
	Yes, I wasn't listening to you at the time.
	It's okay, you're forgiven.
	You had a good father.
	Really, I do serve that purpose.
	People are not telling young people, they're not giving them the right advice.
	That was a very intelligent point.
	I'll wait until I'm financially secure.
	You know what, let me ask him if he's still there.
	You still there, Brett?
	Yeah, I'm still here.
	So, I assume you were not financially secure when you got married.
	I just signed a contract to make $6,900 that year as a teaching para.
	You made $6,900 that year?
	Yes, and my wife was an ICU nurse.
	I didn't even know it's possible to make $6,900 a year.
	That's kind of what she thought.
	That's a great line.
	Well, she did good and you did good.
	That's right.
	See, women have a certain instinct.
	They don't always follow it.
	Sometimes they suppress it for other reasons.
	When they meet a guy at that age, they know.
	This guy's going to go places.
	I don't mean to become a millionaire or a politician or something.
	But they know.
	And they should act accordingly.
	Ladies and gentlemen, a product that I want to bring to your attention.
	You will thank me, I think, because if you have tingling nerve-type stuff, pins and needles in your feet, hands, whatever, This is an amazing product, Nerve Renew.
	I know it because for much of my life I've had that in my feet.
	And one day, after 10 years, I threw away my inserts in my shoes and I realized, oh, I've been taking Nerve Renew.
	One year money back guarantee.
	NerveRenew.com So, let's get right to it.
	This is a brand new book.
	How do we turn our seasons around?
	Because a lot of us are going through tough seasons.
	I'm going through a slump right now.
	I'm hitting 220, and that's just not right.
	I remember when the media would write me off and say, well, you know, he's having a first half of the season.
	That's not so good.
	But they forgot I have 82 ballgames left.
	You have a whole second half.
	Okay, now we've been in the middle of a struggle, crisis in this nation, and the season has to turn around.
	You have to go through a period.
	We might be going through like eight months, nine months, but at the end of the day, we walk into 2021. And you have to think about a fresh outlook.
	And I think that's what life is really all about.
	That's just the way God works.
	God works in some mysterious ways, and He works in your life to meet you right where you're at.
	And I think we're all in the same boat today.
	And, you know, for me to have a book that comes out...
	Turn your season around.
	We're all gonna have to turn our season around.
	How God transformed your life.
	He transformed your life if you Meet him right where he's at.
	You know the thing about it is What I laugh about a lot of people say well, how did you find Jesus?
	Well, Jesus has never been lost We are the ones that were lost We are the ones that have to turn our season around and he just meets us right in the midst of our season And he brings us to a greater understanding and the purpose of why he created us.
	And that's the cool thing about having a relationship with God.
	The Bible is full of stories of, you know, the Israelites up against the Red Sea.
	Their season was over.
	And then, you know, God turned their season around.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Gallagher Show.
	I often wonder if people have the ability to be objective enough to look at actual data and be truthful about things like the way Democrat-led states have responded to coronavirus and how Republican-led states have done so.
	For example, Florida.
	You know, I go a little bit back and forth between the state of Florida and New York, so I get to see how both states are responding to COVID with lockdowns, shutdowns, or some semblance of normalcy.
	There is a semblance of normalcy in Florida that there is not in New York.
	So it's really pretty stunning to look at the difference between the way the two states...
	And the two communities really have responded to this pandemic.
	But.
	I got caught up in the music.
	and lyrics.
	Thanks.
	Dennis Prager here, male-female hour, second hour every Wednesday.
	Subject.
	The argument that so many young people, especially young men, make, not always that young.
	Well, I want to get married one day, but if it happens, it happens.
	It's another problem.
	People don't say that about things that are important.
	If it happens, it happens.
	They pursue it.
	But that's another subject for another day.
	The subject today is, when I'm financially secure, I will get married.
	And I truly don't understand the argument.
	And Tyler in, is it Winder or Winder, Georgia?
	Hey, Dennis Winder, Georgia.
	Thank you for taking my call.
	Thank you.
	So I've been waiting, not waiting, married now.
	But I was determined, I should say, to get married.
	Probably, I think I was about 12 years old.
	So that was my mission in life, if you will.
	And when I was 18, I started dating my now wife.
	As soon as I felt confident that she was the one I wanted to marry, that was my only objective in life.
	I don't care what my job is, I just need to make just enough money so I can move out of my parents' house and support a wife.
	And that's exactly what I did.
	When I was 21, three months after I turned 21, we got married and married ever since.
	And it's been doing very well.
	Alright, so you're 27, six years now.
	How do you understand your generation arguing, I won't get married until I'm financially secure?
	I guess I'm an exception because I don't understand it either.
	I mean, you can find an excuse for anything you want.
	Yes, that's right.
	I think you're right.
	Well said.
	He doesn't understand it either.
	He's 27 and his peers are saying that and he doesn't understand.
	Okay.
	I don't think the issue is age gap.
	Either something makes sense or it doesn't make sense.
	This notion that, well, you don't understand, that was your generation, that's pointless.
	I believe that there are generational approaches that differ, but it doesn't mean that the new generational approach is rational.
	It just means it's different.
	That's not the same thing.
	Alright, I appreciate that.
	Michael, Akron, Ohio.
	Hello.
	Hey, Dennis.
	Hi.
	So, I don't know.
	I called in because you started to change my mind.
	Hmm.
	But, Then this last point, I just don't know.
	I feel like you guys, in your generation, you made more money than we did.
	You could support a family.
	Right.
	Even if that's true, I don't know if...
	At 25, my generation made more money.
	Maybe they did.
	I have no idea.
	It would be an interesting statistic to look up.
	I mean, that's just an unknown thing.
	Like, you guys definitely made more money than we did, and education was less expensive.
	Right.
	I agree.
	I agree with the debt.
	There's no question about school debt.
	When I went to Columbia, tuition was $3,000.
	$3,000.
	But to get to your question, the thing is, like, okay, so here's my story.
	Like, I'll try to put it in the Reader's Digest version.
	But, like, right now I'm dating who...
	She is pretty much my soulmate, but she expects me to have my stuff together.
	I have $2,000 in the bank, and she has $20,000 in the bank.
	Well, so together you'd have $22,000 in the bank.
	Well, how can I position myself as a man?
	Well, that's not the question.
	The question is, is she okay with it?
	Why would she date you and not marry you?
	You're how old?
	You're 37. I assume she's in her 30s.
	So she's dating you.
	She's what?
	She's 34. Okay, so my assumption was correct.
	I would like to ask her, why are you okay to date for her to give up these years of her life to you, but not to marry you?
	If you asked her to marry you, would she say yes or no?
	She would say yes.
	Okay, then my dear friend...
	But...
	I mean, she needs more than I can give her right now.
	So do you feel you're wasting her time?
	Why are you dating her?
	I mean, these are the best years for her.
	She probably wants children.
	We both have a girl.
	We both have a daughter.
	She's been married.
	Right, so she doesn't want more children?
	We recently talked about this and kind of not really.
	Okay, so there's no rush on that part.
	Let me just say this.
	If she's prepared to marry you, I think there are deeper reasons why you're not marrying.
	Because unless you feel...
	You'll never make enough money to support her, in which case it's immoral for you to continue dating her.
	So, anyway, that's my take.
	And by the way, as I noted at the very outset, when men get married, overwhelmingly they earn more starting immediately.
	We'll be back.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
	You voted yesterday against proceeding with the impeachment trial.
	Why?
	This is an unprecedented impeachment trial, as you know.
	Never has it happened before in American history.
	And there's no clear path forward in the Constitution or laws themselves.
	As you know, the Chief Justice is not presiding.
	The Constitution provides it when the...
	The President of the United States is tried in a court of impeachment.
	The Supreme Court Chief Justice shall preside.
	So this is kind of like making it up as we go along here, and I have some very serious concerns about the legitimacy of this whole process.
	Now, Senator Cornyn, I and Judge Littig and Alan Dershowitz and Professor Turley have argued for weeks now it is unconstitutional to try a former official, and it is not something we want to begin to do.
	There is one Contrary example from the 19th century when a former Secretary of War was tried, but I believe many senators changed their mind about jurisdiction thereafter.
	Do you believe it's constitutional to try former officials?
	Well, as you know, in Federalist 65, Hamilton says that impeachment is really different than anything else, and it's essentially a political...
	But I think just from a prudential standpoint, even if you would say that this is permissible, I think it's a terrible idea and a terrible precedent.
	This means that if a Democratic majority in the House and Senate can try a former Republican president, it means a Republican majority in the House and the Senate could try a previous Democrat president.
	I think that's a terrible idea and we shouldn't do it.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Eric Metaxas show.
	So let's get right to it.
	This is a brand new book.
	How do we turn our seasons around?
	Because a lot of us are going through tough seasons.
	I'm going through a slump right now.
	I'm hitting 220 and that's just not right.
	I remember when the media would write me off and say, well, you know, he's having a first half of the season.
	That's not so good.
	But they forgot I have 82 ballgames left.
	You have a whole second half of your season.
	Okay, now we've been in the middle of a struggle crisis in this nation.
	And the season has to turn around.
	You have to go through a period.
	We might be going through like eight months, nine months.
	But at the end of the day, we walk into 2021. And you have to think about a fresh outlook.
	And I think that's what life is really all about.
	That's just the way God works.
	God works in some mysterious ways, and He works in your life to meet you right where you're at.
	And I think we're all in the same boat today.
	And, you know, for me to have a book that comes out, Turn Your Season Around, we're all going to have to turn our season around.
	How God transformed your life.
	If you transform your life, if you...
	I say hello as well Dennis Prager here.
	Everybody's got an interesting story here on what you've done.
	Nobody's given me a hint of a rational reason to defend the argument, I won't get married, I'm not financially secure.
	It's just an indecisiveness that is built into a lot of people and to the current generation.
	There is no rational argument for that.
	And if there is, why would you waste somebody's time dating them?
	See, if you are a man, you're 25 years old, I'm waiting.
	I can't even consider marriage until I'm financially secure.
	So why would you then, let's say, date somebody for three years?
	If you really don't believe you are worthy financially of getting married, why are you taking her time up when she could meet somebody who is?
	Right?
	I know people don't even think about that, but it strikes me as unanswerable.
	Jay in Glassboro, New Jersey, hello.
	Wow, Dennis, what a pleasure, sir.
	Thank you.
	Now, if you find somebody, man, go for it.
	Don't wait.
	What are you waiting for?
	Anybody?
	My wife and I met in six...
	So 33 from 58 is 25. There you did.
	He did it.
	You see that?
	I'm with you, my friend.
	Hey, you remember why Glassboro, New Jersey was in the news?
	I think the last time I said Glassboro, do you remember?
	There was a big summit conference between a Soviet leader and an American president in Glassboro.
	I don't remember who they were, but it was a very big name during the Cold War for a short period of time.
	Let's see, Pete in Chicago, who didn't pick up.
	He didn't wait, made more money after marrying.
	That's exactly right.
	Ken in Saratoga Springs, New York, did not wait.
	Worked out.
	Yep, Laura in Cleveland.
	We didn't wait.
	We figured it out along the way.
	You've got to give this broadcast to your kid who's procrastinating because they're not financially secure yet.
	Dennis Prager here.
	Here we continue with the show.
	The World Economic Forum is meeting virtually.
	If you don't know what the World Economic Forum is, the World Economic Forum is a gathering of the richest, most well-connected people on the planet.
	They usually meet in Davos, Switzerland, which is very hard to get to.
	And in Davos, Switzerland, a lot of very big globalist ideas are introduced.
	And so this is talked about sometimes in conservative circles as the Davos agenda or as the kind of globalist agenda.
	This is their Super Bowl.
	This is where they do their planning and their announcements.
	This is where you'll have the Bill Gateses of the world, the Jeff Bezos of the world, the heads of state from around the world gather, and they basically say, how can we destroy sovereignty of our nations?
	How can we try and...
	Have free flow of people and make ourselves more important.
	Now, we have gone into great detail in this program in the Great Reset.
	What the Great Reset is where they do not want people to own property.
	You will eat less meat.
	I kid you not.
	That's part of the list.
	And you're going to be happier.
	You hear that?
	You're going to be happier.
	And if you don't, you got a problem with that?
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Larry Alder Show.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	No.
	Sally Pipes is my guest.
	Sally, do you think it's fair to say that the majority of Americans are really too afraid to have the private sector completely run health care?
	They don't trust the private sector enough to allow the private sector to run health care.
	They've been trained to fear the private sector and to embrace government to the point now where a discussion about unraveling government entanglement in health care we can't even have anymore?
	Well, first of all, Larry, we don't have a complete private market in healthcare in this country, as you know.
	Fifty percent of our healthcare is in the hands of government through Medicare, the program for our seniors, of which covers 65 million.
	Medicaid, the program for low-income people, that covers now 70 million Americans, the CHIP program, the Veterans Administration.
	So we don't have a private market.
	But the progressive liberals like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the mainstream media, have just...
	We've brainwashed the American people to say that the private sector cannot provide the kinds of alternatives and different types of plans for people.
	So people are being completely bamboozled.
	But it's interesting that, you know, 59% of people polled say they support single-payer, a complete government takeover of healthcare, which Bernie Sanders wants.
	But when you ask the people, 160 million of them, well, what...
	If you ask them, well, you're going to have to pay much higher taxes, support goes down to 37%.
	If you tell them we're going to take away your private coverage and everybody's going to be in a government plan, support goes down to 26%.
	The problem is people don't understand what it means.
	And, Talia, the very same people that are complaining about the vaccination rollout are perfectly content to have the government take over everything.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike DeLegere Show.
	Ron DeSantis is a Republican, so therefore has to be portrayed as some kind of a Yahoo person.
	And Cuomo, who it was literally revealed yesterday, Under-reported COVID deaths in nursing homes by around 50%, he gets the victory lap.
	He gets the book deal.
	He gets the Emmy Award.
	These clowns, even when they're faced with horrific news, like the Attorney General in New York and her scathing report,
	Showing the disastrous response by Cuomo with his mandate that nursing homes must take COVID-19 infected people, which sent thousands and thousands of elderly people to their deaths?
	Well, here's CNN's take.
	Last night, honest to goodness, this came down at like 8 o'clock at night.
	Headline by Chris Saliza.
	CNN editor at large.
	Analysis.
	Andrew Cuomo's COVID-19 performance may have been less stellar than it seemed.
	May have been less stellar.
	They lied about how many people died in nursing homes because they were desperate to try to cover up Andrew Cuomo's Botched response to COVID. Donald Trump
	incites a terrorist attack and they have a different standard.
	Your assessment of Jake's assessment, Senator?
	Well, I think people are being very loose with their language here.
	The president's been impeached for inciting an insurrection, which has a very technical meaning.
	But we know that there's a lot of loose language here in Washington, D.C. I think about Chuck Schumer over at the Supreme Court saying that To Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said, you'll never know what hits you.
	Maxine Waters telling the anti-Trumpers to get in the face of people who support the president.
	I think we just need to realize that we need to temper our speech here because there are people who will take it perhaps much farther than anybody ever intended.
	But I don't believe the president intended to incite violence.
	I do believe he intended to try to influence the Congress during the certification of the electoral vote.
	I don't think you can also impeach somebody for speech that is protected by the First Amendment, which this may well be under Brandenburg v.
	Ohio.
	I've talked about that already, so I won't go over that.
	What Jake also said, Bill Clinton was impeached while he was in office, and the trial occurred when he was in office.
	Donald Trump, it's just factually different.
	And when journalists wade into the law, often they embarrass themselves.
	Yeah, I agree with that.
	Hi, everybody. everybody.
	I'm Dennis Prager.
	I welcome you to the show.
	The Democrats are obsessing.
	There's always an obsession.
	Did you ever notice that?
	Because, remember, hysteria is the oxygen of the left.
	Marjorie Taylor Greene is a freshman congresswoman from Georgia.
	She got 75% of the vote.
	To the best of my knowledge, she said some pretty awful things, Whether the kids in Connecticut were really killed at that horrible killing at the school, and I find that repulsive to doubt that that happened, if indeed that's what she said.
	So I want to be clear about my position on such matters.
	Whatever she said, she said prior to being elected.
	They now, 70 or so congressmen, Democrats, want to remove her from the Congress.
	Ilhan Omar stays.
	AOC just charged Ted Cruz with trying to kill her.
	Imagine that?
	A member of Congress accused another member of Congress of trying to kill them, and that's fine.
	Nothing is done.
	But it keeps the focus on Republicans as diabolic.
	When there's a much closer devil in the Democratic Party with its hatred of this country that has become normative.
	Ilhan Omar, I was just looking it up, the Jerusalem Post, January of last year, January 7th, Ilhan Omar voted 2019's Anti-Semite of the Year.
	She's okay.
	She's okay for Congress.
	By the way, you might as well vote her Anti-American of the Year as well.
	Anyway, they almost always go hand in hand.
	People who hate America hate Israel.
	People who hate Israel hate America.
	It's almost consistent.
	And it makes sense, because they're sort of kindred spirits.
	So if you hate one, you'll hate the other one.
	Voters, in a democracy, voters vote in their congresspeople.
	I would not be for the House to expel Ilhan Omar if the people of her district want an anti-Semite, America-hating, ingrate from a country that should make her so deeply love this country.
	You took my family in and I crap on you.
	I mean, she has a...
	There is gratitude, ingratitude, and then Ilhan Omar.
	Ilhan Omar is of a different magnitude of ingrate.
	But I would not be for expelling her.
	You get elected, you get elected.
	What about our man Swalwell, who slept with a Chinese spy?
	China's the greatest threat to the U.S. today.
	Slept with a Chinese spy.
	Should we remove him from office?
	This is an example of democracy as the worst form of government except for all the others, said Winston Churchill.
	People elect creepy types.
	Problem is with the people.
	Anyway, if Ilhan Omar were expelled, who do you think they would then have him?
	Some America-loving, gratitude-filled human being?
	People in our district find America repulsive, so they elect Ilhan Omar.
	The battle is with those people.
	So, that's my take on this Marjorie Greene preoccupation.
	The lack of preoccupation with others, I mean...
	Wasn't there in the last month some major revelations about the corruption of the Biden family?
	And I mean it's the whole family.
	What is the guy, Schweizer?
	That's Peter Schweizer's book?
	It was staggering, the corruption of the Biden family.
	How they all became millionaires thanks to his being in the Senate.
	But you couldn't report on it, right?
	Didn't the social media, didn't the big tech close it down?
	1-8 Prager 7-7-6.
	The media preoccupation with what they want you to be preoccupied with is Soviet-like.
	Never thought I'd say that in the United States of America.
	Truly didn't.
	1-8 Prager 7-7-6.
	There was, uh...
	Where's the ivermectin story?
	I think this is a really...
	Is that from last night?
	Yeah, that's from last night.
	Yeah, that's pretty serious stuff.
	I'm going to call that up here, my friends.
	Was that Facebook?
	Hmm?
	No, no, no, no, no.
	Who was the one that closed down the story?
	YouTube.
	Yeah, here it is.
	So listen to this from the Wall Street Journal.
	YouTube cancels the U.S. Senate.
	It censors testimony from physicians on early treatments for COVID-19 patients.
	The collusion in killing Americans.
	This is by...
	He's great, this Ron Johnson.
	He's really something.
	Republican Wisconsin.
	You know why he's got courage?
	He held hearings on ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
	Let me state this categorically once again.
	My credibility is on the line, and so is the American medical establishment.
	One of us has misled you.
	So if I'm wrong, then hydroxychloroquine plus zinc and ivermectin are useless.
	Nobody believes they're dangerous.
	So if I'm wrong, if I've been wrong in taking it myself and advocating that Millions of you take it.
	Then I was dead wrong.
	And at worst, I advocated that you take a medicine that is overwhelmingly harmless.
	If they're wrong, they have killed hundreds of thousands of Americans.
	Okay?
	So I just want that, I want you to be clear.
	And now the colluding in killing Americans.
	And I don't say that the way the left does.
	I mean it literally.
	Killing Americans.
	Americans.
	Get it?
	They're dead because of the anti-ivermectin, anti-hydroxychloroquine zinc people.
	And now Google's YouTube has ratcheted up.
	I'm reading to you from Ron Johnson, senator from Wisconsin.
	Google's YouTube has ratcheted up censorship to a new level by removing two videos from a U.S. Senate committee.
	Isn't that it?
	I saw that.
	I watched it.
	That's astonishing.
	A U.S. Senate committee hearing has now been removed from YouTube.
	They really have become enemies of liberty and enemies of truth, the big tech.
	We were the canary in the coal mine, that is right.
	Wow, this is astonishing.
	YouTube has ratcheted up censorship to a new level by removing two videos from a U.S. Senate committee.
	They were from a December 8th Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on early treatment of COVID-19.
	One was a 30-minute summary.
	The other was the opening statement of critical care specialist Pierre Corey.
	Dr. Corey is part of a world-renowned group of physicians who developed a groundbreaking use of corticosteroids.
	To treat hospitalized COVID patients.
	His testimony at a May Senate hearing helped doctors rethink treatment protocols and saved lives.
	At the December hearing, he presented evidence regarding the use of ivermectin, a cheap and widely available drug that treats tropical diseases caused by parasites, for prevention and early treatment of COVID-19.
	Prevention, that's why I take it.
	Got to admit.
	I do live by what I preach, to the best of my flawed human ability.
	He described a just-published study from Argentina in which about 800 healthcare workers received ivermectin and 400 did not.
	Not one of the 800 contracted COVID-19.
	58% of the 400 did.
	That's what my wife and I theorize.
	Two members of our household had COVID last month.
	We did not practice any social distancing, and we didn't have so much as a sniffle.
	We're on ivermectin.
	That the social media are killing you in the name of what?
	What is it in the name of now?
	Remember, though, you'll know everything you need to know when you know that the left destroys everything it touches.
	Trending now on The Hugh Hewitt Show.
	...under oath.
	Donald Trump incites a terrorist attack, and they have a different standard.
	Your assessment of Jake's assessment, Senator?
	Well, I think people are being very loose with their language here.
	The president's been impeached for inciting an insurrection, which has a very technical meaning.
	We know that there's a lot of loose language here in Washington, D.C. I think about Chuck Schumer over at the Supreme Court saying that to Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said, you'll never know what hit you.
	Maxine Waters telling the anti-Trumpers to get in the face of people who support the president.
	I think we just need to realize that we need to temper our speech here because there are people who will take it perhaps.
	Much farther than anybody ever intended.
	But I don't believe the president intended to incite violence.
	I do believe he intended to try to influence the Congress during the certification of the electoral vote.
	But I don't think you can also impeach somebody for speech that is protected by the First Amendment, which this may well be under Brandenburg versus Ohio.
	I've talked about that already, so I won't go over that.
	What Jake also said.
	Bill Clinton was impeached while he was in office, and the trial occurred when he was in office.
	Donald Trump, it's just factually different.
	And when journalists wade into the law, often they embarrass themselves.
	Yeah, I agree with that.
	And I don't know whether Jake thought that impeachment of Clinton was a good idea or not, or he's just citing that as an example where somebody lies under oath.
	This is not lying under oath.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Eric Metaxas Show.
	What do we need to know about COVID that we're not hearing?
	What is your perspective on it right now?
	Because there's never been anything so confusing and so strange in my lifetime.
	Well, you know, Eric, I agree with you.
	And this is politics and medicine has no place at all.
	And unfortunately, the information, the freedom of information for patients so they can make their choices is just not out there.
	And so the very simple solutions that people should know as a public health editorial is prevention is very important that you can do today.
	Don't wait for the virus.
	Don't wait to get the positive test.
	Just start today with prevention.
	And there's five things, five supplements you can take.
	There's five lifestyle changes that you can do for prevention.
	Unfortunately, it's not told.
	But you know what?
	It works.
	And we started back in March.
	We had people make sure they elevate their own immune system by three key nutrients.
	And when they increase their vitamin D levels, they increase their zinc levels, they increase their glutathione levels and vitamin C levels.
	Guess what?
	These people are more resistant and resilient to all viruses, including COVID. So if they did get the case, it would be reversed quickly or they didn't get it at all.
	You know how much this costs?
	You know, the average person, if the government would have given everybody a hundred dollar kit.
	I believe that a lot of lives would have been saved with the word prevention.
	We don't hear that anywhere.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Korka.
	Tackling the climate crisis at home and abroad.
	Yes, the country with the largest military capabilities with nuclear weapons is now back to fighting the climate.
	Just as I explained to you on a prior program when I was asked to run and exercise with kernels and...
	laughs laughs laughs laughs laughs laughs laughs laughs Okay,
	everybody. everybody.
	I don't even hear me.
	We got an issue here.
	Okay, there we go.
	I do hear me now.
	Sorry, everybody.
	One button can undo a lot of things in life.
	I figured it out.
	It was Studio J. There we go.
	J4. Jurisprudence.
	Hi everybody, Dennis Prager here.
	And the deaths of many Americans can be directly attributed to the medical establishment, which has been corrupted, to the national bodies that are supposed to protect you and have been corrupted.
	They are more interested in political correctness than in saving lives.
	Do you understand the charges that I am making?
	Do you understand?
	I know that I am putting my reputation on the line by making such charges against such established groups.
	They have been corrupted.
	And that Google has now taken...
	YouTube has now taken off...
	I mean, it's a Senate hearing, a U.S. Senate hearing with doctors advocating for ivermectin.
	I mean, this is, to say unprecedented is obviously to understate the case.
	Senator Johnson wrote this piece in the Wall Street Journal, and it is an important piece.
	Did you hear about this?
	The last thing I read to you?
	Argentina, 800 health care workers received ivermectin, 400 didn't.
	Not one of the 800 contracted COVID-19?
	Why do we even need vaccines if we have therapeutics?
	Right?
	Hello?
	You know why?
	Vaccines make billions of bucks.
	And ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine make nothing.
	The corruption at the top levels of American life is new to me.
	I always contrasted America with other countries as being much less corrupt.
	I no longer believe that.
	The FBI, the CIA, the universities, the media, every prestigious institution, virtually, I can't think of an exception, there might be, so I'm saying virtually, is now corrupt.
	It just is.
	Your $50,000 a year is stolen from you by the universities that you send your kids to.
	It is as if they stole it, but you have willingly allowed them to steal it so they can't go to court.
	Dead Americans in the hundreds of thousands because of doctors, because of NIH, because of CDC, because of the New York Times.
	And now because of YouTube.
	Dr. Corey asked the National...
	This is Ron Johnson Moore in the Wall Street Journal.
	Dr. Corey asked the National Institutes of Health to review his group's manuscript outlining dozens of successful trials and to consider updating the August 27th guidance in which it recommended, quote, The use of ivermectin.
	Everybody at the NIH who was part of that should be fired.
	In fact, should be prosecuted for the deaths of 100,000 or more Americans.
	Against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in a clinical trial.
	On December 10th, Senator Rand Paul and I sent a letter to the NIH requesting that it review Dr. Corey's evidence.
	On January 14th...
	NIH changed its guidance to neutral.
	What happened?
	What happened in a month?
	Excuse me, August, excuse me, four months.
	What happened in four months?
	It's now neutral.
	You understand?
	Everybody who said that they were against it should be fired.
	They killed all the people, or nearly all the people who died between August and January.
	God, it's so angering.
	There are no words to describe how angry I am over the unnecessary deaths of Americans.
	And not just Americans.
	Everywhere else.
	The two criminal acts took place around the world.
	The lockdowns.
	Well, there are more than two criminal acts.
	The lockdowns and the non-advocacy of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
	The school shuttings is another criminal act.
	NIH changed its guidance to neutral by acknowledging the successful trials but determined, quote, Currently, there are insufficient data to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.
	So let me ask you something, NIH, you corrupt institution.
	Let's say you don't have enough studies, but given the number of doctors who have said it has saved lives, why would you not allow it given how safe ivermectin is?
	Why?
	Now, I understand why you opposed hydroxychloroquine.
	That's because you hated Donald Trump more than you cared about saving lives.
	That's the corruption at the top of our institutions.
	But what about ivermectin?
	The president never heard of ivermectin or never recommended it.
	Would they do this with cancer?
	You know, we've heard a lot of studies about this cheap, safe drug that seems to be curing people or preventing people from getting lung cancer.
	But, you know, we can't recommend it.
	For this, we need an NIH. On January 21st, I sent an oversight letter asking what actions the NIH had taken to explore the use of repurposed drugs for treating COVID-19.
	More when we come back.
	Take your calls.
	You're listening to The Dennis Prager Show.
	Before being removed from YouTube and other websites, Dr. Corey's opening statement had been viewed by more than 8 million people.
	Government health agencies don't share that interest in early treatment.
	God, is that true?
	Vaccine!
	That's it!
	Vaccine!
	Why would we treat somebody or prevent them from getting...
	sick to begin with when we could get an expensive vaccine.
	Trending now on the Larry Oller Show.
	Dinesh, we've got a new president now.
	He's been in office for about five or six days.
	What are your thoughts?
	He doesn't seem to be very much in control of the situation, but he has been very vigorous in signing a blizzard of executive orders, all of which seem to me thoroughly destructive.
	The business about climate change, the executive orders on oil leasing and fracking.
	Of course, he's suspended.
	He got rid of the 1776 Commission.
	He's doing all the bad stuff we warned people that he would do.
	And at some point, you've got to ask, isn't this going to have a very bad effect on America?
	A little part of me wishes that it does, because I think we have to open the eyes of the American people to what moving in a socialist direction means.
	So yes, I think we're off to a very bad start.
	It's what we warned about, and we're about to see the fruits of it.
	Well, but Dinesh, we're healing.
	He's reaching out to the other side and urging everybody, I recall when President Trump was campaigning, Dinesh, as you know, one of the big applause lines was, lock her up, lock her up.
	One of the first things he did was to say, I'm not going to pursue her.
	Quote, she suffered enough, and he felt he wanted to concentrate on his own agenda.
	When is Biden going to pick up the phone, Dinesh, and call Schumer and call Pelosi and say, call off the dogs?
	This is an idiotic trial, and we shouldn't be wasting the American people's time with it.
	Well, the very fact that they're pushing ahead with it, I mean, it looks like they may have up to five Republican votes, not even necessarily five for conviction, five just for hearing it.
	and the other 45 would have thrown it straight out.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
	You voted yesterday against proceeding with the impeachment trial.
	Why?
	This is an unprecedented impeachment trial, as you know.
	Never has it happened before in American history.
	And there's no clear path forward in the Constitution or laws themselves.
	As you know, the Chief Justice is not presiding.
	The Constitution provides that when the President of the United States is tried in a court of impeachment, the Supreme Court Chief Justice shall preside.
	So this is kind of like making it up as we go along here, and I have some very serious concerns about the legitimacy of this whole process.
	Now, Senator Cornyn, I and Judge Littig and Alan Dershowitz and Professor Turley have argued for weeks now it is unconstitutional to try a former official, and it is not something we want to begin to do.
	There is one contrary...
	Example from the 19th century when a former Secretary of War was tried, but I believe many senators changed their mind about jurisdiction thereafter.
	Do you believe it's constitutional to try former officials?
	Well, as you know, in Federalist 65, Hamilton says that impeachment is really different than anything else, and it's essentially a political process.
	But I think just from a prudential standpoint, even if you would say that...
	This is permissible.
	I think it's a terrible idea and a terrible precedent.
	This means that if a Democratic majority in the House and Senate can try a former Republican president, it means a Republican majority in the House and the Senate could try a previous Democrat president.
	it.
	I think that's a terrible idea and we shouldn't do it.
	So let's get right to it.
	This is a brand new book.
	How do we turn our seasons around?
	Because a lot of us are going through tough seasons.
	I'm going through a slump right now.
	I'm hitting 220 and that's just not right.
	I remember when the media would write me off and say, well, you know, he's out.
	Okay, everybody, Dennis Prager here.
	This is a critical article.
	I'm almost done with it.
	Ron Johnson, U.S. Senator from Wisconsin, one of the great senators, one of the great men in the country at this time.
	Unfortunately, some doctors have the courage to ignore these, I should say, excuse me, fortunately, some doctors have the courage to ignore these compassionless guidelines.
	And are using their expertise to develop protocols utilizing a variety of cheap, available, and safe FDA-approved drugs to treat patients early and avoid hospitalizations.
	Talking about ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
	Instead of being rewarded, they are being censored, ostracized, vilified, and the press even fired.
	This closed-minded approach represents a dark chapter in the history of medicine and journalism.
	We're living in a dark chapter, my friends.
	That's right.
	The censors at YouTube have decided, for all of us, that the American public should not be able to hear what senators heard and what doctors reported.
	They say, follow the science.
	That's another lie of the left.
	They always lie.
	I mean, always.
	They don't follow the science.
	They follow scientists they agree with.
	Okay?
	It's a total lie that they follow the science.
	By the way, I don't raise the issue often, but just for intellectual honesty, they follow the science on abortion?
	Is the fetus a human or not?
	Science-wise.
	Not theologically, religiously, nothing.
	Has nothing to do with God, Bible, nothing.
	Zero.
	Nada.
	Is the human fetus at what point?
	Is it a human?
	At birth?
	Until then, it's not a human?
	Okay?
	I'm not talking pro-choice.
	I'm not talking pro-life.
	I'm talking about science.
	Does science say that there is a male and female in the species?
	Science says men give birth?
	Okay?
	So, when the left talks science, get a vomit bag.
	Censors at YouTube have decided for all of us that the American public shouldn't be able to hear what senators heard.
	Apparently they are smarter than medical doctors who have devoted their lives to science and used their skills to save lives.
	They have decided there is only one medical viewpoint allowed.
	Exactly.
	And it is the viewpoint dictated by government agencies.
	Government-sanctioned censorship of ideas and speech should frighten us all.
	Ron Johnson.
	So I just want to make this statement out loud, and I will be vindicated by history.
	YouTube is killing tens of thousands of Americans.
	And deliberately, deliberately, they are depriving people of life-saving, cheap, safe medicine.
	That's what they're doing.
	There must be some sinister reason that I am not even aware of.
	Do you know that?
	I don't understand it.
	I got it.
	I understand.
	Oh, well, hydroxychloroquine.
	President Trump recommended it, therefore it's better Americans die than we say that the president was right.
	At least it was despicable, but I understood it.
	I don't understand the ivermectin one.
	Does big tech have financial interest in big pharma?
	Are you aware of that at all?
	This is a moral scandal.
	The likes of which I don't recall in my lifetime.
	The killing of Americans for no rational reason.
	Better to give them a ventilator than Ivermectin.
	It's pretty bad that a guy like me, with no science training, knows more about what can help Americans than the American Medical Association.
	That is a bad sign.
	You know why?
	I'm not corrupt, and they are.
	That's why.
	So you don't need an MD to understand what might help people for little money, and that is unbelievably safe.
	And now, with YouTube doing this?
	Whew!
	Wow.
	All right, Lisa, Woodland Hills, California.
	Hello.
	Oh, hello, Mr. Prager.
	What an honor to speak with you.
	Thank you.
	I want to thank you, first and foremost, for being a freedom fighter.
	You have become one of the very few who we can turn to.
	And it's very emotional for me every time you mention Soviet Union since I was born there, not by choice, but through circumstances.
	And that's a long story of its own.
	Yes, hold on.
	I have particular affection for people who came here and particular sympathy for people who came here from communist countries to see a replay.
	And what is that, sir?
	Relief factor, yes, it's a joy.
	You don't need to be an MD to know how good relief factor is.
	It was doctors who developed it, I might add.
	A lot of individual doctors do a lot of good work.
	Three-week quick start is $19.95.
	Why do they pick three weeks?
	They believe the following.
	If it doesn't work in three weeks, it won't work, so try it for three weeks.
	$19.95 plus shipping, big deal.
	Of course you should try it if you have, you know, neck, shoulder, back, joint pain.
	800-500-8384-relieffactor.com I often wonder if people have the ability to be objective enough
	to look at actual data and be truthful about things like the way Democrat-led states have responded to coronavirus and how Republican-led states have done so.
	For example, Florida.
	You know, I go a little bit back and forth between the state of Florida and New York, so I get to see how both states are responding to COVID.
	With lockdowns, shutdowns, or some semblance of normalcy.
	There is a semblance of normalcy in Florida that there is not in New York.
	It's really pretty stunning to look at the difference between the way the two states and the two communities really have responded to this pandemic.
	But have you looked at the data?
	Because to listen to the mainstream media, Ron DeSantis is just some wild, out-of-control lunatic who has totally botched Florida's coronavirus response.
	But Andrew Cuomo, on the other hand, is Mother Teresa and has done everything perfectly and the numbers are great and everything's wonderful in New York.
	And of course, nothing could be further From the truth.
	If you put on a chart the deaths per capita, the illness, the infection rate, the economy, if you lay it all on a chart and compare Florida to California and New York, it's not even a close call.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	subscribe on YouTube today Trending now on America first with Sebastian Cuerca work.
	Numbers matter.
	And think about the fact that they always tout the popular vote as opposed to the electoral college.
	That's why every vote matters.
	Even if you're in California, like yourself, Victor in Maryland, every single vote matters.
	And this is why you never give up.
	It's not an excuse, but you're absolutely right from the historical perspective.
	Politics is cyclical.
	It truly is cyclical.
	You know, you get a Reagan because of a Carter.
	That's absolutely true.
	You get a Donald Trump because of what?
	Because of the betrayal of the American people by both sides of the political aisle.
	So the idea that simply because they managed to do what they did in November, that that's it.
	We're done?
	Absolutely not.
	Think about one thing and one thing alone.
	I'd like to bring to your attention, Navaj.
	You know I'm a big advocate of taking care of yourself.
	That's why I'm on Ivermectin right now.
	As a prophylactic vis-a-vis COVID. I take vitamin D, zinc.
	I'm very serious about not getting sick.
	It's not all in my hands.
	Genes play a lot, but I play a lot as well.
	That's why I use Navage.
	Cleans out your sinuses.
	When you think about it, you have no method other than natural method of sneezing, I guess, to clean out your nasal passages.
	Navage is an amazing product.
	You will sleep better, you will breathe better, and And it is available, N-A-V-A-G-E. It is available at Walgreens, CVS, Rite Aid, Bed, Bath& Beyond, and Target.
	And, of course, directly at navage.com.
	Read about it.
	It's a terrific product.
	N-A-V-A-G-E, navage.com.
	I am speaking with Lisa in California.
	And, Lisa, when did you come from the Soviet Union?
	What year?
	We came in 1981, January 30th, 10 days after President Ronald Reagan's inauguration.
	So, are you old enough to remember it?
	Oh, absolutely.
	I was a young teenager, and I came from a political background, political family, and as a young child, America's name in my household was mentioned quietly.
	For the fear of some big government.
	Right.
	And I knew there was something very special about freedom.
	Yes.
	And now I'm a woman in my 50s and I have dedicated most of my life to celebrate and just spread the word of importance of self-reliance and free speech.
	Well, God bless you.
	As I said before, I have a special warm spot for refugees from communism, and I also have a special hurt spot of empathy.
	I can't think of a perfect analogy, so I'll give you an imperfect analogy.
	It is like getting sick, taking for granted that you'll go to a hospital and they'll try to get you better.
	Then you go to the hospital, And they make you sicker.
	These people have come to freedom, they identify America with freedom, and then they see the removal of freedom before their eyes.
	What they fled is being replicated by the Democratic Party, the New York Times.
	And to deny that is to deceive yourself so deeply that I have no hope.
	For you, I have hope for the country, because there are a lot of us who understand what's going on.
	For you not to see the methodology used to suppress freedom across the entire left is willful blindness.
	And I think you'll have to answer to your maker.
	One of the things that keeps me sane is the belief that we all have to answer to our maker.
	Including me for advocating ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
	If it's hurting people, God will be annoyed with me, to say the least.
	And if it doesn't hurt people or actually helps people, then Fauci and company will be indicted for homicide.
	That's it.
	And YouTube now.
	YouTube has taken down doctors testifying in the U.S. Senate.
	Do you understand what we're talking about?
	It is so corrupt.
	They are so profoundly corrupt in the big tech that it's only a matter of time until there is complete suppression of free speech in this country by companies.
	The government doesn't have to do a damn thing.
	There must be a corruption reason that I don't know of.
	The president didn't advocate ivermectin, that is President Trump, so they can't hate it like they did hydroxychloroquine for political reasons.
	Do they have financial interests in big pharma?
	Or are they just so woke that until the NIH says you must take ivermectin, or should, They won't even allow doctors to speak it.
	But just please do me a favor, folks.
	Never laugh at the Catholic Church with Galileo.
	Never.
	Google is doing to the Galileos of our time what the Catholic Church did to the Galileo of its time.
	But the Catholic Church had an excuse.
	It was the Middle Ages.
	I'm serious.
	Openness of scientific inquiry.
	Had not yet been developed.
	So the Catholic Church, with its persecution of Galileo, actually has more to defend it than YouTube suppressing the Senate hearing by doctors.
	Or Twitter.
	You can't advocate that.
	Is Dr. Zelenko's Twitter account back up?
	I don't know.
	Dr. Zelenko, who has saved lives in New York City since the beginning, has been vilified.
	There are doctors who called this show to their everlasting shame, calling Dr. Zelenko a quack.
	The moral compass of many doctors is broken.
	The statement in the Talmud, the second holiest work of Judaism.
	The best doctors go to hell.
	That's amazing, isn't it?
	I think I'm writing my next column on that.
	Why do the best doctors go to hell?
	These were religious, the major religious figures of Jewish history, the rabbis of the Talmud.
	Why would they make such a statement?
	Because it's so easy to self-deify if you're a doctor.
	Right?
	What other group do people look to?
	As lifesavers, right?
	Think about it.
	So if you take it seriously, you start to deify yourself.
	That's what I think is involved here.
	Zelenko is saving lives, and the people condemning Zelenko are killing people.
	But other than that, not a big issue.
	I mean, it's an amazing thing.
	I told you, when religion dies, you get substitute religions.
	I'll explain.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Berger.
	Tackling the climate crisis at home and abroad.
	Yes, the country with the largest military capabilities with nuclear weapons is now back to fighting the climate.
	Just as I explained to you on a prior program when I was asked to run an exercise with colonels and half-bird colonels from the Obama administration, they, too, half of the cohorts in that exercise.
	Well, here's the new Secretary of Defense.
	The Department will immediately take appropriate policy actions to prioritize climate change considerations in our activities and risk assessments to mitigate this driver of insecurity.
	So I'm curious.
	Does Secretary Austin, retired general, know what the biggest impact on the weather is?
	On the climate?
	Because it's not man-made.
	Whatever impact man has on the environment is negligible, truly fractal in proportion to the effect that a large yellow fireball in the sky has on our climate.
	Yes, the sun, along with the moon a little bit, but mostly the sun, has a larger effect on our environment than anything humans or flatulent cows have.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
	You guys are not going to believe what is going on in Illinois right now.
	Shocking that I have to say that.
	It's that bad, you guys.
	It's beyond your wildest belief.
	So, recently, the Illinois State Board of Education approved this new rule for statewide curriculum mandates called the Culturally Responsive Teaching and Leading Standards.
	And right now, it's pending before the Illinois General Assembly and will be voted on on February 16th to put into all curriculum for K-12 schools in Illinois.
	But essentially, it's a new law that forces teachers to, in their words, embrace and encourage progressive viewpoints and That's, you know, fancy buzzwords, but what does that actually mean?
	Essentially, teachers are mandated by law to discuss current political controversies in class.
	They have to organize what they call action civics, which are field trips, student protests, lobbying expeditions on behalf of causes like gun control or the Green New Deal.
	they have to admit that there's unlimited numbers of genders and prioritize representation in the classroom this is in a state legislature all right another show that went fast so it was a good sign i I want to summarize here.
	So don't hang up, because I want to read some of your topics, please.
	Don't hang up.
	Please do not hang up.
	So I was saying about substitute religions.
	The religious Jew or Christian is moved by thus saith the Lord.
	Right?
	And the modern is equally moved, if not more so even.
	I think more religious people question God than secular leftists question anything that the New York Times says, for example.
	So their substitute for, thus saith the Lord, is studies show.
	Studies.
	There's a study...
	Tucker Carlson noted in a study at NYU that there's no censorship.
	Did you hear this study?
	NYU professors came out with a study that there's no censorship of conservatives in the social media.
	The left lies every day, all the time.
	But because it's all repeated on CNN and the New York Times, NYU, it's all repeated, you forget that it's lies.
	Can you imagine that?
	Professors signed their name to a study.
	That the social media do not censor conservatives.
	That's a doozy.
	Let's see here.
	Jennifer, Mountain Home, Arkansas.
	Do you, Dennis, have any comments on COVID vaccines being rolled out so quickly?
	I never suggest people not take it.
	And I'm not even saying they're not safe.
	I'm only speaking for Dennis.
	I would like to be the last guy in the U.S. to take it.
	Okay?
	And I've taken all the vaccines.
	The rollout and the new type, the speed and the fact that it is a new type of vaccine, never tried, mRNA, is of concern.
	I'm not saying it's dangerous.
	I'm just telling you.
	You asked me, I'm answering you.
	So that's the same with Jesse in Flint, Michigan.
	Same question about that.
	Terry, Philadelphia, Ivermectin.
	Are there side effects?
	How long do you take it prophylactically?
	I will be taking it prophylactically as long as the virus is around.
	The thing is that safe.
	Helen, I wanted to take this one.
	Helen, quickly, we only got a minute in Arizona.
	Hi.
	Hi there.
	My husband's a Vietnam veteran.
	He's been diagnosed with COVID-19 on January 6th.
	And then again this past Monday, the 1st.
	And they offer no treatment whatsoever.
	At the VA hospital?
	No.
	Well, at the VA, they offer no treatment.
	The second time he was diagnosed with it was at a local hospital.
	I see.
	Yeah.
	It's a scandal.
	It's a scandal.
	Actually, in my opinion, it's a crime.
	Send me emails, folk.
	No, don't.
	Go to my website.

▲