Time | Text |
---|---|
What I said before you came on is the New York Times is prepared to have half the country think it's a lying piece of propaganda because there are so many on the left that will support it that it doesn't matter to them to have credibility that transcends the left. | |
Is that a fair analysis? | |
I think that's true, but I wouldn't say the way they are is because they're seeking that market. | |
I would say they have that market because of the political and corporate interests that are pulling strings in the news and at the New York Times. | |
And so they've been left with that dynamic, and that's fine with them. | |
They don't have to have a bigger segment. | |
It's not that they're, in my view, seeking that audience. | |
I mean, that's sort of a secondary thing. | |
They've been directed to go for that audience because they're serving, whether it's pharmaceutical interests or powerful political people on... | |
The left who have money ties. | |
You know, I think all this goes back to money. | |
It's not just ideology. | |
So where you see narratives being pushed, it's not necessarily just for our own good, they think. | |
It's because there are donors somewhere in the background, you know, in third parties that are pulling strings. | |
Let me tell everybody, because I want them to read your book. | |
It's called Slanted, How the News Media Taught Us to Love Censorship and Hate Journalism. | |
Up at DennisPrager.com and, of course, Amazon and elsewhere. | |
And what is the name of your podcast? | |
The Sheryl Ackeson Podcast. | |
That's easy. | |
Good luck to you. | |
We need you. |