Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 12, 2020 - Dennis Prager Show

02:40:41

The Dennis Prager Show LIVE

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	The coup, all the misinformation, the disinformation, all this.
	We won Florida by three points.
	That was not supposed to happen.
	We are going to win North Carolina.
	We won Ohio convincingly.
	We won Iowa convincingly.
	And the Democrats spent a combined $410 million on failed races in the Senate.
	Republicans are poised to get 8 to 10 seats in the House, despite being outspent 12 to 1, Eric.
	12 to 1, and insiders in the Republican House said they thought they were going to lose 10 seats.
	The DCCC has come out and they said it is a dumpster fire.
	They can't believe what's happened.
	We might flip seats in Illinois, we might flip two seats in Orange County, and we might have one of the strongest minorities Republicans have had in 30 years and almost guarantee that we'll take back the House in 2022. Why is it that
	there was a 1,778% increase in voter registrations for voters over the age of 90 in Pennsylvania in the midst of a pandemic?
	I'm just asking questions.
	That's all we're doing here.
	I think you guys can draw your own conclusions because you're pretty smart.
	But who else is asking these questions?
	Why is the Department of Justice not actually investigating all of this?
	How are there 100% of ballots that were dropped just for Joe Biden in Michigan?
	And so I have a lot of people that are emailing us and they say, we will win, we will win.
	I hope you're right.
	But don't be blinded by your own optimism, everybody.
	It's going to take you to do something about it.
	There are some very, very powerful, sinister and malevolent forces at play here.
	The only way we win this is if we rise up in record numbers and our lawmakers actually start representing us and the Department of Justice does something about this.
	Maybe it'll happen.
	Maybe it won't.
	I'm not just going to be completely and totally, you know, 100% cynical.
	But I will say that...
	If we do not contest the fraud that is so clearly happening in front of us with all of this evidence, and this is not an exhaustive list, everybody.
	I just have, I have page after page after page after page of irregularities and People saying they were backdating ballots and postal service problems and voting locations that have gone down and irregularities and counties that really surprised, like counties that are not behaving the same as they should as we have here.
	I mean, there's a really good case.
	And some of you are saying, well, won't that stand up in a court of law?
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Deliger Show.
	Biden is not officially or... ...the last one.
	...the last one.
	I'm going to get a little bit of a lie.
	Yes, everybody.
	Wow.
	We're living in a very bad time.
	The announcement...
	Oh yeah, let me get that.
	It's the Breitbart article.
	Why don't we get that for me?
	the report on the on the epidemiologist that want to give his name out Let me just make something clear.
	Again, I'm having the exact same number of people over for Thanksgiving as every year.
	I am publicly announcing it.
	And if Newsom wants to send the police, I'll send them my address.
	And those of you who are scared, are scared.
	Okay?
	You are irrational.
	If you're old, or you are not even old, you have a comorbidity.
	I was, for example, I was in Salt Lake last night with spectacular people.
	And there was a woman who could not be there, who was a member of this wonderful family.
	She had had a terrible bout of a virus that she contracted in Vietnam a few years ago, and it affected her lungs, and so she's playing it careful with being with strangers because of her lungs.
	Okay.
	I totally get that.
	But her husband came, and her children came, and her grandchildren came, and she wanted them to be with me.
	The ability to scare half the population is as remarkable as the inability to scare half the population.
	The scared voted Democrat.
	The less scared voted Republican.
	Count me with the less scared.
	Shame on you for getting...
	Now, by the way, I have a relative who is very scared, and she voted for Trump.
	I recognize that it doesn't follow a complete pattern.
	To her great credit.
	So look, I don't care if you're scared.
	I care for your loved ones, because you don't see them.
	But I don't care if it doesn't translate into a mandate or law, which would be unconstitutional, that people cannot go out.
	Which is what these scientists who are morons.
	Do you understand?
	Why is it not obvious that a scientist is as likely to be a moron as a plumber or a chiropractor or a dentist or a professor or a lawyer?
	Do you think there are any lawyers who are morons?
	I'll bet you do.
	Why don't you think there are doctors who are morons?
	I don't know why.
	I really don't know why.
	Maybe you never gave it thought.
	I'm going to listen to morons because they have a degree in epidemiology?
	Are you joking?
	Am I stupid?
	Did you put this guy up?
	I bet you did.
	Yeah, here we go.
	Joe Biden, coronavirus advisor, urges national lockdown for four to six weeks.
	Wow.
	Yeah, well, of course it won't work.
	You're asking, of course it's not going to work.
	People are going to come out of their solitary confinement in six weeks, and then what?
	It's gone?
	Whoa, whoopee, wow, magic, abracadabra, no more virus.
	Dr. Michael Osterholm, a moron, get it?
	He's a moron.
	He has a degree.
	That doesn't mean a thing.
	Morons can get degrees.
	You don't become a non-moron when you get a degree.
	Dr. Michael Osterholm.
	O-S-T-E-R-H-O-L-M. Those of you who voted for Biden knew you would get this type of person to direct you not to have a life.
	The stupidest vote of your life was for Joe Biden.
	Not Obama.
	Not any other Democrats.
	This was the stupidest vote of your life because you were intoxicated with Trump hatred.
	Let me screw America because I hate Trump.
	That's deep.
	On Wednesday, he appeared on CNBC and attempted to rationalize a national lockdown order.
	We could pay for a package right now to cover all of the wages, lost wages for individual workers, for losses to small companies, to medium-sized companies, or city, state, county governments.
	We could do all of that.
	This is a moron, do you understand?
	How many trillions of dollars should we print to do that?
	So that we give our children paper money.
	Paper.
	They might as well invest in monopoly money.
	If we did that, then we could lock down for four to six weeks.
	This is the moron that the moron named Biden picked.
	Morons love morons.
	The thing is, if you voted for Biden, you did this willingly and knowledgeably.
	I still will invite you for Thanksgiving.
	I guess it was done happily.
	Osterholm claimed that would help get the virus under control.
	In August, Osterholm said the state-led lockdowns did not go far enough.
	The problem with the March to May lockdown was that it was not uniformly stringent across the country.
	For example, Minnesota deemed 78% of its workers essential, he wrote in the New York Times.
	To be effective, the lockdown has to be as comprehensive and strict as possible.
	That's it.
	Six more weeks where you don't leave your house except to get food.
	That's right.
	Oh, so there will be more drug use, more drug deaths, more alcoholism, more child abuse, more kids.
	I read to you yesterday.
	I only began yesterday.
	I'm going to find that article about what in Britain they said.
	About what the effect that this is having on children.
	There are kids who are now reverting to diapers.
	This is from the UK Chief of Health.
	They're seeing, I mean this is not, it's not happening to every kid.
	But they're reverting.
	You see, he's a nothing by it, okay?
	I'm sorry.
	I said it the whole time.
	He's a nothing.
	He's a crook, and he's a nothing.
	But the media love him because he's a Democrat.
	That's all it has to be.
	And his vice president is not a nothing.
	She's just bad.
	But, hey, Trump!
	Trump!
	Oh, Trump and his stupid tweets!
	Oh, Trump said they were good Nazis!
	Oh, Trump!
	Anti-Semite!
	Fascist!
	Dictator!
	And only God knows if the votes were honestly even counted.
	1-8 Prager 776. Wait a minute.
	Why?
	If we saw voter fraud, if we have examples of voter fraud, why wouldn't that work out?
	And you're saying the states have that much power.
	Well, a couple things.
	Here's what can happen.
	The states do have almost all the power, but the federal government's not just an innocent bystander.
	The DOJ can come in and prosecute voter fraud, and they should.
	The DOJ Civil Rights Division can come and investigate whether or not there was widespread shenanigans.
	Remember, state officials can be investigated as well.
	Here's the thing is that these county recorders have gone to jail before.
	Vote counters go to jail.
	That's not above, you know, the DOJ can go do that.
	Don't you think that they will and had better do that for the sake of the nation?
	I don't know what Bill Barr is doing, Eric, okay?
	I don't know where the Durham report is.
	I don't know where the indictments are.
	I don't know why Antifa people aren't being arrested.
	And I don't know why the DOJ is not going into these states.
	And at least we have eyes on you, okay?
	I don't know what, because I'm going to tell you right now, the Michigan election security division is not going to prosecute any of that.
	So here's what can happen, though.
	If the DOJ starts to open up a lot of these cases, it makes it a lot easier for the Trump campaign to then file a lawsuit with a circuit court judge or a federal judge outside of the DOJ, so then the judge can get involved in exactly what can happen.
	Now, judges have almost unilateral power now in these elections, okay?
	The judges are the final voice.
	Now, if the Democrats in Michigan don't like it, they can appeal to the Supreme Court.
	They might just kick it back down to the federal court.
	For example, if the DOJ starts to make a case in Michigan that there's a lot of voter fraud and voter cheating, the Trump campaign's already filed a lawsuit in Michigan. the Trump campaign's already filed a lawsuit in Michigan.
	Professor, how does this end?
	Well, you know, look, so here's the problem.
	We're all focused on the counts.
	And it looks like President Trump may lose Georgia to Joe Biden because of the count coming out of Atlanta.
	And then he may well lose Pennsylvania because of the count coming out of Philadelphia.
	I think he's going to pick up Arizona, but he may well lose Nevada out of the count coming out of Clark County.
	But the problem is the significant trigger event was not the count, but the verification of which ballots were legitimately cast in order to be counted.
	And Republicans in a lot of those jurisdictions were blocked out of the verification process.
	The signature verification process, the legitimacy of the absentee ballots that have been collected and harvested, and oftentimes in violation of state law.
	But once that threshold decision had been done, and the ballot is separated from the envelope that allowed you to verify the legitimacy of the ballot, then you can't unravel the question of which votes were illegitimate and cast, or who they were cast for.
	And so unless the court would be willing to step in in Pennsylvania and say, because we can't determine, we know that there were illegitimate votes cast, but we can't determine which way they went, and therefore we can't invalidate the election, unless the court's willing to invalidate the election, as it did two years ago in North Carolina when there was the illegal ballot harvesting that was conducted.
	So you believe that when all the challenges, let's just stick to Pennsylvania for a moment, when all the legal challenges are exhausted, the U.S. Supreme Court will not likely even pick up the case.
	I think that's right.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Deliger Show.
	So George, I don't know how widespread it is.
	I don't know if it'll change the outcome of the election.
	But why is everybody so scared just to have a fair election and find out?
	We gave Al Gore 37 days to run the process before we decided who was going to be president.
	Why would we not afford the 70.6 million Americans that voted for President Trump the same consideration?
	Hi, everybody.
	I was interviewed last night, and the interviewer asked me to give an example of the cancel culture.
	We have a whole video on the cancel culture at PragerU.
	Cancel culture is a euphemism for totalitarianism.
	Everywhere, wherever it can, is totalitarian.
	Liberals are not.
	Leftists are.
	So, here's a living example of someone who has been cancelled.
	Paris Denard, D-E-N-N-A-R-D. Mr. Denard is a media consultant.
	But he, for years, I believe, or he'll tell us in a moment, has been with Historically Black College.
	What is HBCU? What does it stand for, Paris?
	It is Historically Black Colleges and Universities.
	Oh, and Universities.
	Yeah, I missed the end.
	Yes.
	Oh, good.
	So how long were you with them?
	I was at an organization, a national organization called TMCF, that represents the public HBCUs for four years.
	Tell everybody what TMCF is.
	TMCF is an organization that represents the publicly supported HBCUs across the country.
	It's approximately 300,000 students.
	It's a fundraising and scholarships and programmatic support for these deserving students that President Trump and a lot of people have supported through this past four years.
	And I was there starting in government affairs back when President Obama was in office.
	And through the re-election, or through the election, 2016 was still there and was there up until this year.
	TMCF stands for Thurgood Marshall College Fund.
	Just wanted everybody to understand that.
	So you were working in organizations that were supporting black students, black colleges, correct?
	Correct.
	Helping them get resources to attend these schools and programmatic and scholarship support.
	So what has just happened?
	So, Mr. Brager, literally, we were allowed to have outside consulting opportunities as long as there was no severe conflict of interest.
	And I had, for the entire time that I was there, worked for the Republicans.
	I supported political candidates publicly as a commentator, and it was never an issue.
	President Trump gets re-elected, and I continue to do the work, both at the organization, but also in my, you know, in my abilities as an American citizen.
	And what happened was I had an opportunity at the Republican National Committee to be a consultant doing black media affairs for the 2020...
	I was forced to take a leave of absence for this, which I said, you know, fine, because I think the cause is great for the American people, for our country.
	And so I took the leave of absence, and I was assured that I could come back December 1 and work back in my communications capacity.
	And matter of fact, a couple months ago I was called and said, are you still planning on coming back, you know, in December?
	Because...
	You know, we just want to make sure we're doing some staffing things.
	And I said, yes.
	I haven't had one conversation about not returning.
	And if I did, I would call and give you, first of all, a refusal to make a better offer or whatever, because I'm loyal to this organization that's been good to me.
	I got a call on Wednesday evening saying they looked at the staffing needs and decided that they weren't going to bring me back, as was verbally told to me.
	I think it was devastating because I had given four years to the organization, worked in a bipartisan manner, utilizing my relationship that I had in Washington, D.C., helped to facilitate millions of dollars to come to the organization.
	And just like that, no thank you.
	You're no longer needed after they saw, I believe, the election results and realizing that the leadership there is from Delaware.
	Wow.
	What recourse do you have now?
	You know, I don't have recourse in terms of suing or pressing charges or anything of that nature because, you know, there's nothing that prevents people from not bringing you back because there was nothing technically in the contract that said that they had to bring me back.
	You know, I work on a voluntary leave of absence.
	And, you know, the burden of proof is very high in terms of trying to make these allegations.
	But what we do know is the facts are very clear.
	Yes, they are.
	Back in a moment, let me first remind you.
	I took it last night on my return from Salt Lake.
	An amazing thing, a relief factor.
	I don't know how these guys came up with it.
	I don't think there's an imitator, or it might be imitators.
	I don't think there's anything nearly as effective.
	If you have backache, legache, armache, jointache, the beauty of this is their three-week tryout.
	Their theory is if it doesn't work in three weeks, it probably won't work, so you've simply lost $19.95 plus shipping.
	That's it.
	Give it a three-week try for that amount.
	relieffactor.com 800-500-8384 So,
	George, I don't know how widespread it is.
	I don't know if it'll change the outcome of the election.
	But why is everybody so scared just to have a fair election and find out?
	We gave Al Gore 37 days to run the process before we decided who was going to be president.
	Why would we not afford the 70.6 million Americans that voted for President Trump the same consideration?
	If Joe Biden really wants to unify this country, he would wait and make sure that we can prove we had a fair election.
	Wow.
	And there's nothing that George Stephanopoulos can really say to that.
	You see, here's the thing.
	George Stephanopoulos doesn't get to determine the outcome.
	The courts do.
	Everybody gets their day in court, and that includes Donald Trump.
	And the Trump campaign.
	And they want this debate.
	The Stephanopoulos of the world, the media mob, they all want us to be screaming about the election, the presidential...
	Listen, the courts are going to decide that.
	We've got no...
	I'm not giving them what they want.
	You shouldn't either.
	Let's focus on what we know to be true.
	Serenity prayer.
	Have the courage.
	And the wisdom to know the difference between what you can change and what you cannot.
	We're not judges.
	We're not the Supreme Court.
	the courts will decide keep up with what's trending subscribe on YouTube today trending now on the Charlie Kirk show trending now on the Hugh Hewitt show Thank you.
	Brian in Pittsburgh, what do you think, Brian?
	Yeah, Hugh, I think the heart of the issue is people's irrational hatred for the president.
	Now, I didn't vote for him in 16, but I came to discover the irrationality of just hating the guy and feeling self-righteous about hating the guy.
	You know, I've discovered the Russian hoax was a hoax.
	You know, I discovered the pandemic was not as it was being framed by the left-wing media.
	Until people come to grips with that, even these journalists, Chuck Todd, your buddy, when he's defensive.
	No, Chuck's not defensive.
	Chuck was making a point which I should have made, which is the systemic bias is not intentional.
	And in the law, this matters.
	For example, intentional racial bias subjects whoever is committing it to penalty and to remediation.
	Unintentional consequences of inherent bias, for example, in a police exam, disparate outcomes do not subject you to penalty.
	So Chuck is talking about, yeah, we have disparate outcomes all the time, but we don't mean it.
	I believe that.
	No, right.
	I hear you.
	I understand.
	What I'm saying is this is subconscious with people.
	And it's that group heard thinking when it comes to Donald Trump.
	I know.
	I know.
	Hi there, everybody.
	Stop bringing a...
	Paris Denard back for a moment.
	He has worked for years with the historically black colleges and universities and for the Thurgood Marshall Fund.
	Thurgood Marshall Fund.
	And was fired after he returned from doing work for the Trump campaign.
	And I'm having him on because obviously there are thousands of such examples in America.
	That's why people are afraid to speak up and come out of the closet as conservatives.
	I would say that today people are as fearful of coming out of the closet as conservative at work as 50 years ago they were to come out of the closet as gay.
	You'd have to go 50 years back.
	There's no closet today for the vast majority of gays, obviously.
	But there is indeed, for half the country, that's the irony, And the reason I'm having Paris Denard on, he has a video up, a recent video at PragerU about the cancel culture.
	And here he is.
	We should make a new one and have you as one of the examples.
	I mean, it's true, Mr. Prager.
	I mean, again, my attorney, Jennifer McGrath, based in California, is looking into...
	You know, legal action.
	I know California and D.C. are one of the places where you cannot be fired or let go for your political beliefs, but we have to, you know, it's the bar to prove that intent and otherwise is high, but we're looking into it.
	But at the end of the day, we're going to stand up and be vocal about it because I don't want Republicans, conservatives, to be intimidated.
	You know, AOC said she was putting together a list, and I've heard media organizations say they're trying to put, There's a website together to make sure that people who supported the President Trump or his movement or any part of the administration don't work again.
	Don't get on corporate boards.
	They're trying to destroy livelihoods.
	And this is why it's important for, I'm so grateful to PragerU and to you personally to be on the show today, to tell people, to encourage people, do not back down.
	Do not go quietly into the night.
	Fight back, stand up, and call it out for what it is or what you perceive it to be, but don't let them get away with it.
	I have a lot of support.
	I have people who are coming out saying, whatever you need to do, how can we help you?
	This is not right.
	So I have faith in God, and I have faith in my friends and my family that I'm going to be okay.
	But I cannot sit silently.
	My grandfather, who was my hero, Mr. Prager, used to say all the time, it's easy to stand up for things that are right, but it's difficult for a lot of people to stand up against the wrong.
	And a lot of the things that we've seen the past four years have been great patriots standing up for things that were wrong.
	We're seeing that today.
	And I'm not going to sit quietly and say that this is okay, that this should be tolerated, that it's fine.
	It's not.
	And I don't want it to happen to anybody else.
	And if I can be an example, For someone that's listening that may watch the PragerU video and say, you know what, this is not right.
	I'm going to speak out on it.
	We have to do that.
	And we have to unite and support each other.
	We have to support others when this happens with resources and opportunities just like this.
	And so we've got to be very, very vigilant because if we feed any ground to the radical left, in my opinion, they will continue to try to silence.
	Try to destroy the livelihoods, the recutations of people who might be more conservative in thought.
	That's exactly right.
	And it's not just Republicans.
	Yep, that's right.
	That's right.
	All right, listen.
	I just want to thank you and salute you for your courageous soul.
	Thank you, sir.
	Yes.
	The Paris Denards are the people who save civilizations.
	Watch this video on Cancel Culture.
	It's five minutes.
	It's America this is happening.
	That is because America is an idea.
	When the idea is abolished, America is abolished.
	One of the ideas is free speech.
	And freedom generally.
	You're really going to listen to these people?
	And not have Thanksgiving dinner with loved ones?
	Okay.
	It's your call.
	As I said, I'm having the same exact number of people for Thanksgiving as any other year.
	And if I am arrested, then it will be a signal as to what America and California have become.
	But if enough of you decide that safety is not the only value in life, and that the price of safety could be a ruined life, a deadened life for you, your children, especially your children, then you will get together with people.
	Unless you have some really serious underlying condition, Even if you get COVID, they keep telling us millions and millions of cases, so how come the deaths are going down?
	Millions and millions of cases, so what?
	For the vast majority of people, getting COVID is like getting a vaccine.
	It's a free vaccine.
	Yep, bad news, my friends, bad news.
	Thank you.
	The way people have buckled under in this.
	Really, really something.
	Vicki in Seattle.
	Seattle, is it Seattle?
	Hi, Dennis.
	Hi, Seattle, Washington?
	Of course.
	Yeah, I agree with you, but somebody put down California here.
	Okay, go ahead.
	No, no, I never said California.
	No, I'm sure you didn't.
	Disappointed I am in you, Dennis.
	You used to be my idol, and I mean that, and I'm a liberal American Jew.
	But I have heard you day after day on the radio.
	As I drive to work, I listen to you.
	Your last comment about God knows how many votes were cast accurately has just about turned me off to ever turning our show on again.
	You buy in to a man, and I use that word really loosely, to an infant who's a sore loser, throws tantrums, lies, And I don't know how many other adjectives...
	Alright, hold on with me.
	Hold on with me.
	I still have a chance with you.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Berger.
	Here's the tweet from this afternoon.
	Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future?
	I foresee decent probability of many deleted tweets, writings and photos in the future.
	Why are you cataloguing supporters of the president?
	There's 70 million of us.
	What are you going to try and do, AOC? Because we're ready for you.
	Got that, Media Matters?
	Somebody who's really been upping his game, we always like him, but he's been getting even more...
	Heavy and meaty is Greg Gutfeld.
	Let's play a little video cut from our buddy Greg on the issue at hand.
	Video cut seven, Eric.
	I'm not sure if this is a first world or third world country anymore, if we can't handle this.
	And the thing is, I keep thinking, all right, who made this bed?
	Let's say there isn't anything illegal going on.
	It's just mere incompetence.
	But the Democrats for four years have said that Trump is an apocalyptic threat.
	To our nation, to our species.
	He has to go.
	So that's going to elevate suspicion among everybody else that likes Trump that there will be fraud.
	Because if you're that emotionally invested in getting rid of somebody, and especially the hard left who are emotionally invested in politics, they're going to do anything that they can.
	They will cheat.
	And your suspicions are valid because if they think he's Hitler, cheating is completely justified.
	That last sentence is the key.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
	Okay, there's two big fights.
	Number one, we have to be relentless.
	We have to be persistent.
	We have to be on top of all of the fraud and find the truth.
	All across the country.
	We are not going to back down.
	We are going to continue to dive into some of these numbers.
	I have them up here, which they scream irregularities.
	Just breaking in the last 20 minutes, Fulton County in Georgia has just come out and said that there have been some errors with the election reporting, which could be significant in the vote tallies in Georgia.
	Quote, significant.
	So that's number one.
	We must...
	Go after the fraud and we must find the truth.
	But number two, it's very important.
	It is very clear that as the media tries to push this thing along, that as the media tries to coronate Joe Biden, that there might not be enough time left on the clock for us to expose this fraud before they actually inaugurate Joe Biden.
	Oh, no, she's gone.
	Why'd she hang up?
	I was going to respond.
	I wanted to have a conversation with her.
	I will respond, but I wanted to respond so that she could respond.
	Well, a woman called in from Seattle, said I was her idol.
	I'm not sure that that's true, but I'm not going to say she was not telling the truth.
	I guess you could stop being an idol to somebody easily.
	It's an interesting issue, by the way.
	This is very common in life.
	I have talked about this in the past, but not in the recent past.
	Then I'll get back to the actual issue of people who have a sort of idolized status in somebody's mind, and then they do one thing That they differ with, and then the statue was taken down.
	It's really actually analogous to the statue issue.
	Oh yeah, Lincoln, of course.
	Lincoln fought and led a civil war and emancipated slaves, but he said some things about blacks that were wrong.
	So let's take down his statue.
	So, I believe, I believe, you can believe otherwise, I believe that there was fraud committed in some states with regard to ballots.
	I have no joy in believing it.
	It has nothing to do with whether Donald Trump is a great human being or an awful human being.
	Those are completely independent issues.
	And the caller immediately lapsed into a series of adjectives about the president.
	What is the difference if fraud was committed?
	But I have a question for all of those who find it objectionable to even suggest there was fraud.
	I have one question.
	If you believe that Donald Trump is a fascist, white supremacist dictator, Isn't it the moral thing to do, if you can, to cheat so that he's not re-elected?
	I would.
	If I believed that a candidate for President of the United States was a white supremacist, fascist dictator, and I could make sure he was not re-elected by manipulating votes, I would.
	I admit it.
	Is no fascist, no white supremacist, no dictator.
	You can't have it both ways.
	You can't believe that of the president and then say, oh, nobody would commit fraud.
	They're so honest.
	We'll be back.
	Thank you.
	Wait a minute.
	Why?
	If we saw voter fraud, if we have examples of voter fraud, why wouldn't that work out?
	And you're saying the states have that much power.
	Well, a couple things.
	Here's what can happen.
	States do have almost all the power, but the federal government's not just an innocent bystander.
	The DOJ can come in and prosecute voter fraud, and they should.
	The DOJ Civil Rights Division can come and investigate.
	Whether or not there was widespread shenanigans and remember state officials can be investigated as well.
	Here's the thing is that these county recorders have gone to jail before.
	Vote counters go to jail.
	That's not above.
	The DOJ can go do that.
	Don't you think that they will and had better do that for the sake of the nation?
	I don't know what Bill Barr is doing, Eric.
	I don't know where the Durham report is.
	I don't know where the indictments are.
	I don't know why Antifa people aren't being arrested.
	And I don't know why the DOJ is not going into these states.
	And at least we have eyes on you.
	I'm going to tell you right now, the Michigan Election Security Division is not going to prosecute any of that.
	So here's what can happen, though.
	If the DOJ starts to open up a lot of these cases, it makes it a lot easier for the Trump campaign to then file a lawsuit with a circuit court judge or a federal judge outside of the DOJ, so then the judge can get involved in exactly what can happen.
	Now, judges have almost unilateral power in these elections, okay?
	The judges are the final voice.
	Now, if the Democrats in Michigan don't like it, they can appeal to the Supreme Court.
	They might just kick it back down to the federal court.
	For example, if the DOJ starts to make a case in Michigan that there's a lot of voter fraud and voter cheating, the Trump campaign's already filed a lawsuit in Michigan.
	Professor, how does this end?
	I'm going to go ahead.
	Well, you know, look, so here's the problem.
	We're all focused on the counts.
	And it looks like President Trump may lose Georgia to Joe Biden because of the count coming out of Atlanta.
	And then he may well lose Pennsylvania because of the count coming out of Philadelphia.
	I think he's going to pick up Arizona, but he may well lose Nevada out of the count coming out of Clark County.
	But the problem is the significant trigger event was not the count, but the verification of which ballots were legitimately cast in order to be counted.
	And Republicans in a lot of those jurisdictions were blocked out of the verification process, the signature verification process, the legitimacy of the absentee ballots that had been collected and harvested, and oftentimes in violation of state law.
	If the ballot threshold decision had been done and the ballot is separated from the envelope that allowed you to verify the legitimacy of the ballot, then you can't unravel the question of whether those votes were illegitimate and cast or who they were cast for.
	And so unless the court would be willing to step in in Pennsylvania and say, because we can't determine, we know that there were illegitimate votes cast, but we can't determine which way they went.
	And therefore we can't invalidate the election, unless the court's willing to invalidate the election as it did two years ago in North Carolina when there was the illegal ballot harvesting that was conducted.
	So you believe that when all the challenges, let's just stick to Pennsylvania for a moment, when all the legal challenges are exhausted, the U.S. Supreme Court will not likely even pick up the case?
	I think that's right.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Delecker Show. .
	So George, I don't know how widespread it is.
	I don't know if it'll change the outcome of the election.
	But why is everybody so scared just to have a fair election and find out?
	We gave Al Gore 37 days to run the process before we decided who was going to be president.
	Why would we not afford the 70...
	0.6 million Americans that voted for President Trump, the same consideration.
	If Joe Biden really wants to unify this country, he would wait and make sure that we can prove we had a fair election.
	Wow.
	And there's nothing that George Stephanopoulos can really say to that.
	You see, here's the thing.
	George Stephanopoulos doesn't get to determine the outcome.
	The courts do.
	Everybody gets their day in court, and that includes Donald Trump.
	And the Trump campaign.
	And they want this debate.
	The Stephanopoulos of the world, the media mob, they all want us to be screaming about the election, the presidential race.
	Listen, the courts are going to decide that.
	We've got no...
	I'm not giving them what they want.
	You shouldn't either.
	Let's focus on what we know to be true.
	Serenity prayer.
	Have the courage.
	And the wisdom to know the difference between what you can change and what you cannot.
	We're not judges.
	We're not the Supreme Court.
	the courts will decide.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
	you Thank you.
	you Brian in Pittsburgh, what do you think, Brian?
	Yeah, Hugh, I think the heart of the issue is people's irrational hatred for the president.
	Now, I didn't vote for him in 16, but I came to discover the irrationality of just hating the guy.
	Feeling self-righteous about hating the guy.
	You know, I discovered the Russian hoax was a hoax.
	You know, I discovered the pandemic was not as it was being framed by the left-wing media.
	Until people come to grips with that, you, even these journalists, Chuck Todd, your buddy, when he's defensive.
	No, Chuck's not defensive.
	Chuck was making a point which I should have made, which is the systemic bias is not intentional.
	And in the law, this matters.
	For example, intentional racial bias subjects whoever is committing it to penalty and to remediation.
	Unintentional consequences of inherent bias, for example, in a police exam, disparate outcomes do not subject you to penalties.
	So Chuck is talking about, yeah, we have disparate outcomes all the time, but we don't mean it.
	I believe that.
	No, right.
	I hear you.
	I understand.
	What I'm saying is this is subconscious with people.
	And it's that group herd thinking when it comes to Donald Trump.
	And it's harming us as a country.
	There's such thing as truth.
	And when we hate another person, and the hatred of Donald Trump is off the charts, then truth becomes a fatality.
	And this is what happens.
	This is what's happening right now.
	Appreciate you, Hugh.
	Thanks.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the air.
	The battle theme from Gladiator.
	or...
	When did we do this after 9-11?
	Yep.
	Battle in America is even greater.
	Amazing that Georgia actually holds the key to whether America is changed for the foreseeable future from what it was for all of its history.
	I think that that is the one thing the left and the right can agree with.
	If they get the Senate, if the Democrats get the Senate, As Chuck Schumer said, we will change.
	Remember he actually said we'll change the world.
	He meant it.
	That's what the left wants to do.
	They're going to change.
	They live for change.
	The mature mind understands that civilization is fragile, and if you do enough banging on its foundations, it will crumble.
	To which leftists say, great, then we'll make heaven.
	Then we'll make a society of no competition, no fat shaming, no losers and winners.
	Everybody ends up in first place.
	All kids get statues.
	Everybody feels great about themselves.
	Everybody does only what they want and they get paid exactly the same or nearly the same.
	Ah, what a beautiful world.
	We all live in government-owned apartments, getting rid of these much-too-big homes that we really don't need.
	No longer call our dogs our pets, but our animal companions.
	Ah, that's the world.
	My immediate fear is obviously Georgia.
	It's hard to believe that in an honest election that the Democrats would win both.
	They'd have to win both.
	There would be a Republican majority if they win one.
	I hope they win both.
	Because there is always Mitt Romney.
	I was in Utah yesterday.
	The people I was with were not admirers of Mr. Romney.
	It is inconceivable to me that he will be re-nominated for his seat in the Senate.
	Utah Republicans made a spectacular mistake.
	And that's, look, to err is human.
	So, I have been talking to you about...
	Whoops, that was my boo-boo.
	Goodbye, Tone.
	There we go.
	I've been talking to you about the announcement by one of those appointed to the COVID Commission by the Biden people.
	That an advisor to Joe Biden on coronavirus has floated the idea of a nationwide lockdown for four to six weeks.
	Dr. Michael Osterholm.
	These are the crackpots that Joe Biden is putting on his COVID commission.
	You would think, by the way, you would think he would put one dissenting scientist on, wouldn't you?
	But why would he do that?
	Dissent is patriotic.
	I remember that on bumper stickers during the George W. Bush administration.
	They all disappeared when Barack Obama was elected.
	The left doesn't believe dissent is patriotic.
	They believe it should be suppressed.
	So this is what this fool, Osterholm, believes.
	We could pay for a package right now.
	You ready?
	To cover all the wages, lost wages for individual workers, From losses to small companies, to medium-sized companies, or city, state, county governments.
	We could do all of that.
	This is when an epidemiologist, who is a fool about epidemiology, tells you about society and economics.
	This is who Joe Biden is appointed to his commission.
	To be effective, the lockdown is to be as comprehensive and strict as possible.
	I will defy it, and if I go to jail, I go to jail.
	I'm telling you now, I will defy it.
	I actually believe in give me liberty or give me death.
	I really do.
	That Patrick Henley line, that's why I'm a happy man.
	I am more interested in living fully than living long.
	I want to live both, fully and long.
	I love life.
	But America's more important than I am.
	Yes, it's amazing.
	Would you...
	Let's see, where is this now?
	Let's see.
	World News Tonight.
	I would shut it down.
	I would listen to the scientists.
	ABC World News.
	Joe Biden tells David Meir...
	In an exclusive interview that as president, he would shut the country down to stop the spread of COVID-19 if the move was recommended by scientists.
	It's a lie.
	The whole thing's a lie.
	He knows there are scientists who don't recommend it.
	So, in other words, if the move is recommended by scientists that I agree with, okay?
	So, that's what it should be done.
	That's it.
	Shut it down.
	Have we not been shut down since last February, since last March?
	He's talking about a Chinese-style shutdown.
	Yeah, no, a Chinese-style shutdown, that's right.
	And, by the way, with an army of snitches.
	That's the new America that the Democrats will revel in.
	Of course, the people...
	It's the people who make money, keep their salaries and work from home, who are overwhelmingly for a lockdown.
	I ate in a restaurant last night in Salt Lake City.
	Inside a restaurant.
	You don't understand how joyful that was.
	I can't do that in LA. I might die.
	You believe that?
	What do you think the chances are of my dying if I eat in a restaurant?
	Isn't that the only question worth asking?
	Oh, there's one other.
	Or getting so sick that there would be permanent damage to one of my internal organs.
	Okay, what do you think the chances are of death or permanent damage to an organ for eating in a restaurant?
	What do you think?
	One in a million?
	Is it worth it?
	One in 500,000?
	That's right.
	Serious food poisoning.
	Or a car crash on the way to the restaurant.
	That's the most likely of the alternatives.
	You who voted for Biden will never ever say you were wrong. - Okay.
	But you were wrong.
	This is a good reason to understand why I think you were wrong.
	All right.
	Mark in Long Beach, California.
	Hello.
	Good afternoon.
	I'm sorry.
	I meant good morning.
	You can say either.
	There are a lot of listeners for whom it's afternoon.
	Okay.
	Thank you for taking my call.
	I'm kind of an independent voter, but I voted for Trump.
	But I'm dying to ask you a couple of quick questions.
	I've heard you complain about possible fraud and how bad Biden is in the left and all that.
	But is there anything in your honest opinion, Dennis, that if you could have advised Trump that may have changed the result of the election?
	Stop tweeting.
	Really?
	Yeah, I said it the whole time.
	And I thought his performance in the first debate was awful.
	I said that, too.
	Oh.
	Well, I didn't know that you said that.
	That's okay.
	And I have to admit, I think that's very honest of you.
	I did want to tell you one quick thing.
	There's no way in the world the Democrats are going to win both seats in Georgia.
	And having said that, McConnell will make sure that Biden stays in line and, um, Well, to a certain extent he can.
	But the president is a powerful position in America.
	I mean, it might be too powerful, but with all these executive orders that he could do.
	But there's no comparison between the left having the presidency and the Senate and the House and not having the Senate.
	There's no comparison.
	The country is on the line in the state of Georgia I wish it weren't, but it is So,
	George, I don't know how widespread it is.
	I don't know if it'll change the outcome of the election.
	But why is everybody so scared just to have a fair election and find out?
	We gave Al Gore 37 days to run the process before we decided who was going to be president.
	Why would we not afford the 70...
	0.6 million Americans that voted for President Trump, the same consideration.
	If Joe Biden really wants to unify this country, he would wait and make sure that we can prove we had a fair election.
	Wow.
	And there's nothing that George Stephanopoulos can really say to that.
	You see, here's the thing.
	George Stephanopoulos doesn't get to determine the outcome.
	The courts do.
	Everybody gets their day in court, and that includes Donald Trump.
	And the Trump campaign.
	And they want this debate.
	The Stephanopoulos of the world, the media mob, they all want us to be screaming about the election, the presidential...
	Listen, the courts are going to decide that.
	We've got no...
	I'm not giving them what they want.
	You shouldn't either.
	Let's focus on what we know to be true.
	Serenity prayer.
	Have the courage.
	And the wisdom to know the difference between what you can change and what you cannot.
	We're not judges.
	We're not the Supreme Court.
	the courts will decide keep up with what's trending subscribe on YouTube today trending now on the Charlie Kirk show trending now on the Hugh Hewitt show Brian in Pittsburgh
	what do you think Brian Amen.
	Thank you.
	Yeah, Hugh, I think the heart of the issue is people's irrational hatred for the president.
	Now, I didn't vote for him in 16, but I came to discover the irrationality of just hating the guy and feeling self-righteous about hating the guy.
	You know, I discovered the Russian hoax was a hoax.
	You know, I discovered the pandemic was not as it was being framed by the left-wing media.
	Until people come to grips with that, you, even these journalists, Chuck Todd, your buddy, when he's defensive, people...
	No, Chuck's not defensive.
	Chuck was making a point which I should have made, which is the systemic bias is not intentional.
	and in the law this matter trending now on America First with Sebastian Kroker the new Trump voters the newly minted Trump voters are prepared to you know
	load the magazines, man the barricades, What does that mean about the state of the conservative movement to you, if that is a trend?
	Well, I think it's telling about the shift that's happened in recent years, which is, and we saw this throughout maybe the Brett Kavanaugh fight, a number of other fights that happened in recent years.
	Where perhaps old guard conservatives, the kind of voices that are speaking from the mountaintop, would say, oh, well, let's let this one go, you know, that kind of thing.
	They were willing to accede to a loss with honor, which is not honorable, in my opinion.
	But anyway, that kind of...
	Aspect of the movement, they're still around, but that's not the attitude of the newer, younger people who view this as more of a confrontational moment.
	And I think that that's a big tell about the future of conservatism in the country, which is not going to shy away from confrontational culture war issues.
	It's going to call things as they see them.
	them.
	They're not going to be deferred at all by the media in a way.
	See you in the Pacific.
	Dennis Prager here.
	You know, the decline in rates is fueling a boom in refinancing.
	I did, and you should.
	Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
	These guys, bless them, have been with me from the first day of the lockdown.
	That's how hard-working they are, and obviously competent.
	So this is probably a time when you're considering a refi, a new purchase, a cash-out refi, or a reverse mortgage.
	Don't wait.
	The rates are remarkable.
	And andrewandtodd.com, or andrewandtodd, at andrewandtodd.com, are there to help you.
	You can call them at 888-888-1172.
	That's a very easy number.
	888-888-1172.
	Or go to andrewandtodd.com.
	They'll take it from there.
	Thank you, guys.
	Thank you, my listeners.
	It was another foolish error that the president made, aside from that first debate.
	And talk about the tweets in a moment.
	And that is the interview.
	That he sat down with, with Bob Woodward.
	Why would he do that?
	I know why he does it.
	And it's actually an admirable mistake.
	He thinks he has nothing to hide.
	See, the man is actually infinitely more transparent than any Democrat I know.
	When Barack Obama left office, I said, The man has been in public life, in my life, as it were, eight years every day.
	I don't know him any better than I did eight years ago.
	I remember saying that at the end of his term.
	He's the opposite.
	He's opaque.
	He's the opposite of transparent.
	Whereas Trump is absolutely transparent.
	The flaws, the virtues.
	So he says, I have nothing to hide.
	Woodward could interview me.
	And not realizing, he doesn't realize, Woodward wanted to screw him.
	Forgive me for the language, I can't, there's no, if you have a better clean word, I'll use it.
	So on occasion I will use, obviously not an expletive, but a non-genteal term.
	So, it just, I understand that.
	If a hostile, Interviewers wanted to interview me.
	I'll tell you what I do.
	I do get hostile interviewers.
	BuzzFeed interviewed me.
	Mother Jones interviewed me.
	The New York Times interviewed me.
	Big, big articles.
	And it's fine with me.
	I'll happily be interviewed by anybody on the left, providing my answers are sent by email.
	As good as I am, Spontaneously.
	After all, every show is non-read.
	I never have read once anything I've prepared.
	I read others, but I don't read me.
	I speak spontaneously.
	And as good as I feel I am speaking spontaneously, my entire Penn State speech a few days ago on Zoom to Penn State students was without notes.
	I'm not bragging.
	I'm just telling you I know that I can do that, and I do it well, but I wouldn't do it with an interview.
	I only interview with written comments.
	And I always tell them, you're free to respond and argue, and I'll do it as long as you want.
	Go back and forth.
	But I'm not going to sit with a Bob Woodward.
	But he would.
	The President did.
	By the way, he didn't want to panic the American people.
	What should he have said?
	What should he have said?
	You know, this notion, oh, if we'd have locked down sooner.
	If we'd have locked down sooner, what?
	We finally did lock down, and now it's back again.
	He should have said, let's follow Sweden's lead.
	Sweden didn't ever lock down.
	They don't wear masks.
	They eat in restaurants.
	They go to work.
	Their children have gone to school maskless, sitting in a normal classroom.
	What, do Swedes have special antibodies?
	Well, you say, well, look at their rate.
	Their rate was all nursing home deaths, virtually all.
	I don't know why they had such a failure with nursing home patients.
	But that was it.
	By the way, 40% of ours are nursing home patients, if I'm not mistaken.
	More than that, you believe, in the country?
	Yeah, right, I think 40%, right.
	And virtually no kids.
	Todd in Los Angeles, California, hello.
	Wow, Dennis, thank you very much for taking the call.
	I appreciate it.
	Yes, sir.
	I hope that my signal stays.
	It looks good.
	But I want to commend you.
	First off, you know you're doing major influential work across the country with PragerU and everything else you do.
	And if I was ever envious of anybody, it would be that.
	So congratulations.
	Well, thank you.
	I try hard.
	Thank you.
	Well, you're doing more than that, you and Alan and everybody at the station and whatnot.
	But, you know, one thing that I remembered from years and years ago, you said, and I want to remind your listeners, that the Union saved this nation in the Civil War and that it's likely the South would save the nation in the 21st century.
	And here we are on the precipice of...
	Oh, that's right.
	What a great point.
	I have said this all of my adult life.
	The North saved the Union, or the country, in the 19th century.
	The South will save it in the 21st.
	And by golly, you are right about Georgia.
	Look at that.
	Smack dab in the center of the South.
	That's right.
	You're good.
	That was a great call.
	Keep him on, and Sean, you should pay him a visit.
	He's in L.A. I think...
	Just one visit?
	Is that what you're asking?
	Yeah, just one visit.
	That's fine.
	And he'll supply the cigars and it'll be fine.
	That was really beautiful.
	That's right.
	I've always been saying that and it's coming true.
	I gotta write that up.
	Georgia can't save the union.
	Whoa, I get the chills.
	Partially I do because this room is freezing.
	It's just a biological fact.
	Do you know if the living martyr wears a sweater the entire time I broadcast?
	Which is very interesting because that sort of contradicts your martyrdom status.
	May I mention the shower issue in your life?
	The living martyr takes a completely cold shower each day.
	Feeling that it helps his immune system, which it may.
	and then he wears a sweater in the studio.
	This is Owen Strand for townhall.com.
	In the film No Country for Old Men, a sheriff played by Tommy Lee Jones recounts a dream.
	He saw his father riding a horse going on ahead to make a fire somewhere out in all that dark and all that cold.
	And I knew that whenever I got there, he'd be there.
	The Coen Brothers film wasn't political, but these words resonate today.
	Hopelessness abounds, lockdowns continue, marriages suffer, children languish, and politics divide.
	Many years ago, a wise man said to his followers that they should love their neighbor.
	Christ's words promised to galvanize us in the wake of a bitter election.
	We must love our neighbor in divided days.
	We should not fall prey to hate or insufferability.
	We should go on ahead and make a fire somewhere in the dark and work to prepare a better country for our children and for citizens yet to be born.
	I'm Owen Strand.
	The Pepperdine Graduate School of Public Policy.
	Impacting policy decisions today.
	Preparing public leaders for tomorrow.
	Learn more at publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu.
	Trending now on the Larry Elder Show.
	David is in Tampa, Florida.
	David, you're on the Larry Elder Show.
	Yeah, Larry.
	I used to believe in...
	I don't have free and fair elections, but at this point, I don't.
	I mean, Trump was just elected in the biggest landslide in the history of this country.
	He received more votes in this election on Tuesday than any presidential candidate has ever received up until now, up until, of course, Joe Biden.
	So Trump won the state of Florida by over a million.
	He got over a million more votes than he did.
	Four years ago in the state of Florida.
	Am I to believe that Joe Biden, who can't draw more than 10 people to his rallies, can actually receive 800,000 more votes than Hillary Clinton did four years ago?
	This is an atrocity, and the American people are not going to stand for this.
	At the end of the day, they've stolen this.
	130...
	138,339 ballots show up in the middle of the night at 4 a.m.
	in Michigan, and all of a sudden, Joe Biden leaves at 122,000, show up in the state of Wisconsin in the middle of the night at 4 a.m., and all of a sudden, now he leaves it?
	He was up by over 700,000 votes in the state of Pennsylvania, and miraculously, they're just fined him.
	Just enough, just like Al Franken found in 2008 in the Minnesota Senate race.
	And David, imagine if the shoe were on the other foot.
	Imagine if all of a sudden things were reversed.
	Those guys went to bed.
	The American people would not.
	Yeah, if those guys went to bed on election night thinking that they won Pennsylvania and they wake up and all of a sudden their guy is losing, they would be going absolutely crazy.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Borka.
	The new Trump voters, the newly minted Trump voters are prepared to, you know, load the magazines, man the barricades.
	What does that mean about the state of the conservative movement to you, if that is a trend?
	Well, I think it's telling about the shift that's happened in recent years, which is, and we saw this, you know, throughout maybe the Brett Kavanaugh fight, a number of other fights that happened in recent years, where perhaps old guard conservatives, the kind of voices that are speaking from the mountaintop, would say, oh, well, let's let this one go, you know, that kind of thing.
	They were willing to accede to a loss with honor, which is not honorable, in my opinion.
	But anyway, that kind of...
	Aspect of the movement, they're still around, but that's not the attitude of the newer, younger people who view this as more of a confrontational moment.
	And I think that that's a big tell about the future of conservatism in the country, which is not going to shy away from confrontational culture war issues.
	It's gonna call things as they see them.
	They're not Hi everyone My daily, or, well, every other day, look up Sweden.
	Sweden had no lockdown at any time.
	You go to coronavirus, actually, worldofmeters.info.
	That's where I go every day.
	There are different sources.
	I think Johns Hopkins has a source.
	This is the one I use.
	Deaths in every state.
	Deaths per million.
	Deaths in every country.
	So, Sweden, the thing is to look up daily deaths.
	That's the only thing that I look up on any country, any state.
	So, let's see here.
	The latest I have, November 11th.
	That makes sense, because today is November 12th.
	Three.
	Let's see, what is the day before that?
	Eight.
	The 9th of November.
	Let's see.
	Where's November 9th?
	7. It's a little hard to maneuver.
	It's very small things here.
	But it is the test case for the world.
	5 November 8th.
	11 November 7th.
	13 November 6th.
	So there has been a spike.
	12. November 5th, 10, and so on.
	This spike started on October 22, but it went up and then it's going down.
	In the meantime, they have not ruined so many people's lives as we have, and children.
	So I mentioned to you the other day, and now I'll read it to you briefly.
	It's from the AP in Britain.
	Some young children have forgotten how to eat with a knife and fork, and others have regressed into diapers.
	As the coronavirus pandemic and related school closures take a toll on young people's learning, the UK Education Watchdog said Tuesday.
	The Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills, known as Ofsted, published five reports based on findings from more than 900 visits to education and social care providers across England since September.
	Some of the children most affected by the disruption of the pandemic were those in their earliest years of education with working parents, who, quote, experienced the double whammy of less time with parents and less time with other children, said Chief Inspector Amanda Spielman.
	She said teachers reported some toilet-trained students needing to use diapers again.
	And quote, others who had forgotten some basic skills they had mastered, such as eating with a knife and fork, not to mention the loss of early progress in words and numbers.
	But the weak politicians listening to the crackpot epidemiologists, there are non-crackpot epidemiologists, but they chose to listen to the hysterics.
	To the irresponsible.
	And they don't care.
	Now you say, of course they care.
	So in life, what you feel is not relevant.
	It is what you do.
	Do they care about?
	Of course they care about the children.
	But they don't care enough to stop the lockdown.
	So it's irrelevant.
	That's the way it works.
	What is the U.S. death toll?
	I gave Sweden.
	Let me look up U.S. here.
	For which we're going to have a lockdown, according to one of the people on the Biden COVID thing.
	And it is critical for you to disobey it.
	It is critical.
	It's critical for you to disobey the Thanksgiving edicts that have been sent to you.
	It's just, it's critical.
	Okay, USA. Let's see here.
	She could read what to me?
	What is she speaking about?
	It's talking about Nancy Pelosi.
	What a...
	Yeah, this cases thing, it's beyond belief.
	The case epidemic.
	Who cares how many cases we have?
	Who cares, Nancy?
	Tell us why that's important.
	ReliefFactor.com is the place to go to relieve back pain and any other muscle pain.
	They're so confident that they charge you $19.95 for three weeks.
	Telling you if it doesn't work in three weeks, it probably won't work.
	So you threw out 1995. What if it does work?
	And it does in the great majority of cases.
	That's the amazing thing.
	I think 70% of people reorder.
	I don't remember the exact number, but it's very high.
	Go to relieffactor.com, 800-500-8384.
	Trending now on the Mike Gallagher Show.
	So George, I don't know how widespread it is.
	I don't know if it'll change the outcome of the election.
	But why is everybody so scared just to have a fair election and find out?
	We gave Al Gore 37 days to run the process before we decided who was going to be president.
	Why would we not afford the 70...
	0.6 million Americans that voted for President Trump, the same consideration.
	If Joe Biden really wants to unify this country, he would wait and make sure that we can prove we had a fair election.
	Wow.
	And there's nothing that George Stephanopoulos can really say to that.
	You see, here's the thing.
	George Stephanopoulos doesn't get to determine the outcome.
	The courts do.
	Everybody gets their day in court, and that includes Donald Trump.
	And the Trump campaign.
	And they want this debate.
	The Stephanopoulos of the world, the media mob, they all want us to be screaming about the election, the presidential...
	Listen, the courts are going to decide that.
	We've got no...
	I'm not giving them what they want.
	You shouldn't either.
	Let's focus on what we know to be true.
	Serenity prayer.
	Have the courage.
	And the wisdom to know the difference between what you can change and what you cannot.
	We're not judges.
	We're not the Supreme Court.
	the courts will decide keep up with what's trending and subscribe on YouTube today
	turning now on the Charlie Kirk show trending now on the Hugh Hewitt show Brian in Pittsburgh what do you think Brian Yeah, Hugh, I think the heart of the issue is people's irrational hatred for the president.
	Now, I didn't vote for him in 16, but I came to discover the irrationality of just hating the guy and feeling self-righteous about hating the guy.
	You know, I discovered the Russian hoax was a hoax.
	You know, I discovered the pandemic was not as it was being framed by the left-wing media.
	Until people come to grips with that, you, even these journalists, Chuck Todd, your buddy, when he's defensive.
	No, Chuck's not defensive.
	Chuck was making a point which I should have made, which is the systemic bias is not intentional.
	And in the law, this matters.
	For example, intentional racial bias subjects whoever is committing it to penalty and to remediation.
	Unintentional consequences of inherent bias, for example, in a police exam, disparate outcomes do not subject you to penalty.
	So Chuck is talking about, yeah, we have disparate outcomes all the time, but we don't mean it.
	I believe that.
	No, right.
	I hear you.
	I understand.
	What I'm saying is this is subconscious with people, and it's that group herd thinking when it comes to Donald Trump, and it's harming us as a country.
	There's such thing as truth.
	Just read the first paragraph.
	Hi, everybody.
	Wall Street Journal is a courageous piece because it's actually committed to a non-left-wing version of life.
	Case for mask mandate rests on bad data.
	A top scientific journal lowballs the percentage of Americans who are already covering their faces.
	The top scientific journal Nature Medicine published a study on October 23rd with an astounding claim.
	By simply wearing masks at higher rates, Americans could prevent as many as 130,000 COVID-19 fatalities by the end of February 2021. By the way, is there any way that you could show that to have happened?
	How do you prove what didn't happen?
	I'm just curious.
	It's not even so much as the challenges.
	I'm curious.
	The models.
	I love models.
	Produced by the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics Evaluation, the study garnered immediate acclaim.
	More than 100 news outlets trumpeted the study's findings.
	The price for not wearing masks, perhaps 130,000 lives, was the New York Times headline.
	And a few hundred more articles have been written since.
	The study was also invoked by Francis Collins, head of the National Institutes of Health.
	to push for stricter masking requirements.
	Nature Medicine rushed the study into print after an expedited, peer-reviewed process that took only seven days.
	But we're supposed to trust the science.
	But what if there is very little science?
	Unfortunately, the modelers The findings contained an error that even minimal scrutiny should have caught.
	The projected number of lives saved and the implied case for a mask mandate are based on a faulty statistic.
	Using a months-old survey, the modelers assumed, erroneously, that the U.S. mask adoption rate stood at only 49% as of late September, and therefore had plenty of room to increase to universal adoption.
	Defined as 95% or to a more plausible 85%.
	According to more recent findings, however, America's mask adoption rate has hovered around 80% since summer.
	New numbers would completely alter the study's findings.
	If 80% of Americans already wear masks, a new mandate could add only a few percentage points.
	To the mask adoption rate instead of nearly doubling.
	Additional gains would be small and certainly nowhere near 130,000 lives saved.
	And so on.
	Huh.
	Just tempted to live in Sweden for the next six months.
	I'm not joking.
	Do a show from Sweden.
	To see people's faces.
	Do you understand the price paid, my friends?
	A veiled population?
	Have any of you visited any Arab Muslim country where nearly all the women are veiled?
	Don't you feel something is missing in not being able to see a human face?
	Now it's both sexes in this country?
	And no price is paid?
	More and more Americans getting used to being anonymous.
	Children growing up that way.
	Why are children wearing masks?
	I'd love to know.
	The moronic rule about airlines?
	Your three-year-old has to wear a mask?
	It's almost child abuse.
	Watching the society take irrational laws.
	Watching people snitch.
	Watching people's livelihoods crushed for no good reason?
	It was supposed to end in March.
	We're supposed to have two weeks then, right?
	Not to overload our hospitals.
	The hospitals were actually so underloaded that many of them lost vast sums of money because they didn't have any patients.
	It's amazing.
	Yes, indeed, it is.
	Allen in Monrovia, California.
	Hello.
	Hello, Dennis.
	I'd like to continue with this discussion of how the South, and specifically the state of Georgia, can save our union by electing both Republican candidates so that the Republican Party maintains its majority in the UNS Senate.
	But I've heard something about the election process that's really bothersome.
	I've heard that the Democrats are encouraging people to move to Georgia and to register so that they can vote in the Senate election.
	I was wondering if you could explore that and see if that is actually legal.
	It is?
	I'm laughing because, not at the caller, but I believe they would do something like that.
	So you can register for a runoff.
	Right before the runoff?
	Apparently.
	It's something that's legal in Georgia.
	So you could basically visit, claim an address at your hotel, right?
	I mean, they don't know it's a hotel.
	Just put the address of the hotel.
	Yeah, but how many people are going to do that?
	Yeah, that's the thing.
	I mean, I'm sure they would encourage people to do it.
	Thomas Friedman what?
	You're joking.
	Thomas Friedman?
	By the way, we will pay Thomas Friedman $10,000 to $20,000 to have a dialogue with me or Larry Elder or a whole bunch of other people.
	He could choose which one.
	Now, he doesn't need the money, but he can give it to charity.
	I always publicize these invitations to any of these people to debate me.
	And not just me.
	Ben Shapiro.
	There's a lot of us.
	And they never do it.
	They never debate.
	We yearn to debate the left.
	They are afraid to debate us for good reason.
	Okay.
	There's two big fights.
	Number one, we have to be relentless.
	We have to be persistent.
	We have to be on top of all of the fraud and find the truth all across the country.
	We are not going to back down.
	We are going to continue to dive into some of these numbers.
	I have them up here, which they scream irregularities.
	Just breaking in the last 20 minutes, Fulton County in Georgia has just come out and said that there have been some errors with the election reporting, which could be significant in the vote tallies in Georgia.
	Quote, significant.
	So that's number one.
	We must go after the fraud and we must find the truth.
	But number two, it's very important.
	It is very clear that as the media tries to push this thing along, That as the media tries to coronate Joe Biden, that there might not be enough time left on the clock for us to expose this fraud before they actually inaugurate Joe Biden.
	That's a horrifying realization.
	I'm not saying Joe Biden won.
	That is not what I'm saying.
	I'm saying there might not be enough time on the clock for us to expose all the fraud, but that is not an excuse for us to...
	Not look into the fraud and audit everything that's happening.
	So how do we counter 46?
	I put that in quotes, 46, because he would technically become the 46th president of the United States.
	We have to have the belief and the commitment and the plan that despite what they throw at us at every single level.
	That Joe Biden and his radical socialist agenda is dead upon arrival in Washington, D.C. So where does that start?
	The Georgia Senate race.
	Where does it go into?
	The demonstrations, the rallies.
	Every single nominee that he puts up in front of the U.S. Senate for advice and consent, it must be challenged, must be cross-examined.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	This is Owen Strand for townhall.com.
	In the film No Country for Old Men, a sheriff played by Tommy Lee Jones recounts a dream.
	He saw his father riding a horse going on ahead to make a fire somewhere out in all that dark and all that cold.
	And I knew that whenever I got there, he'd be there.
	The Coen Brothers film wasn't political, but these words resonate today.
	Hopelessness abounds, lockdowns continue, marriages suffer, children languish, and politics divide.
	Many years ago a wise man said to his followers that they should love their neighbor.
	Christ's words promised to galvanize us in the wake of a bitter election.
	We must love our neighbor in divided days.
	We should not fall prey to hate or insufferability.
	We should go on ahead and make a fire somewhere in the dark and work to prepare a better country for our children and for citizens yet to be born.
	I'm Owen Strand.
	The Pepperdine Graduate School of Public Policy, impacting policy decisions today, preparing public leaders for tomorrow.
	Learn more at publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu.
	Trending now on The Larry Alder Show.
	David is in Tampa, Florida.
	David.
	All right.
	Alright.
	Eddie in St. Paul is a good point.
	I'm glad he called in.
	Since media lied so much about Trump, he should tweet.
	You're entirely right.
	I spoke in shorthand, and I shouldn't have.
	It's not that the president tweeted that bothered me.
	It's that he bounced none of the tweets off anybody else.
	It is inconceivable to me to tweet or write anything.
	And not bounce it off people I trust.
	That was my concern.
	Yes, he was bathed in lies by the media.
	Thank you, Eddie and St. Paul.
	Even though I didn't get to talk to you, I don't have a lot of time in this fifth segment, actually.
	But that's what I meant.
	Even Melania.
	Or anybody.
	Okay.
	Lynn in Nampa, Idaho.
	There's more fear because people have no faith.
	It's a godless society.
	It's a very interesting question.
	I am a big believer in God.
	I do not believe that God will protect me from COVID. Yet I am 100% opposed to the lockdown from the beginning.
	Maybe the first two weeks, but after two weeks, I wrote about it.
	I spoke about it.
	So it's an interesting question.
	Why are the religious less cowed by the secular?
	And it really is a secular-religious divide.
	Not completely.
	But largely.
	And it's a very interesting question.
	I don't think that the religious are opposed to the lockdown because they think God will save them.
	And I'm not saying that the caller does.
	I think it is because, by and large, religious Americans are wiser than secular Americans.
	That's what I think.
	They're less intimidated, and they're wiser.
	There are some wise secular people, and there are some religious fools.
	But overall, there's no comparison.
	And the most secular institution in our society is the most foolish of all, the university.
	That's not a coincidence.
	It's causality.
	Godless is stupid.
	Sorry!
	That's just the way it works out.
	Where do they get their wisdom from?
	The secular.
	The New York Times?
	I rest my case.
	We'll be back.
	You're listening to The Dennis Prager Show.
	The Dennis Prager Show.
	Why?
	If we saw voter fraud, if we have examples of voter fraud, why wouldn't that work out?
	And you're saying the states have that much power.
	Well, a couple things.
	Here's what can happen.
	States do have almost all the power, but the federal government's not just an innocent bystander.
	The DOJ can come in and prosecute voter fraud, and they should.
	The DOJ Civil Rights Division can come and investigate whether or not there was widespread shenanigans.
	And remember, state officials can be investigated as well.
	Here's the thing is that these county recorders have gone to jail before.
	Vote counters go to jail.
	That's not above, you know, the DOJ can go do that.
	Don't you think that they will and had better do that for the sake of the nation?
	I don't know what Bill Barr is doing, Eric, okay?
	I don't know where the Durham report is.
	I don't know where the indictments are.
	I don't know why Antifa people aren't being arrested.
	And I don't know why the DOJ is not going into these states.
	And at least we have eyes on you, okay?
	I don't know what, because I'm going to tell you right now, the Michigan, you know, election security division is not going to prosecute any of that.
	So here's what can happen, though.
	If the DOJ starts to open up a lot of these cases, it makes it a lot easier for the Trump campaign to then file a lawsuit with a circuit court judge or a federal judge outside of the DOJ, so then the judge can get involved in exactly what can happen.
	Now, judges have almost unilateral power in these elections, okay?
	The judges are the final voice.
	Now, if the Democrats in Michigan don't like it, they can appeal to the Supreme Court.
	They might just kick it back down to the federal court.
	For example, if the DOJ starts to make a case in Michigan that there's a lot of voter fraud and voter cheating, the Trump campaign's already filed a lawsuit in Michigan.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Larry Oller Show.
	Professor, how does this end?
	and Well, you know, look, so here's the problem.
	We're all focused on the counts.
	And it looks like President Trump may lose Georgia to Joe Biden because of the count coming out of Atlanta.
	And then he may well lose Pennsylvania because of the count coming out of Philadelphia.
	I think he's going to pick up Arizona, but he may well lose Nevada out of the count coming out of Clark County.
	But the problem is the significant The trigger event was not the count, but the verification of which ballots were legitimately cast in order to be counted.
	And Republicans in a lot of those jurisdictions were blocked out of the verification process, the signature verification process, the legitimacy of the absentee ballots that had been collected and harvested, and oftentimes in violation of state law.
	If the ballot threshold decision had been done and the ballot is separated from the envelope that allowed you to verify the legitimacy of the ballot, then you can't unravel the question of whether those votes were illegitimate and cast or who they were cast for.
	And so unless the court would be willing to step in in Pennsylvania and say, because we can't determine, we know that there were illegitimate votes cast, but we can't determine which way they went.
	And therefore we can't invalidate the election, unless the court's willing to invalidate the election as it did two years ago in North Carolina when there was the illegal ballot harvesting that was conducted.
	So you believe that when all the challenges, let's just stick to Pennsylvania for a moment, when all the legal challenges are exhausted, the U.S. Supreme Court will not likely even pick up the case?
	I think that's right.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Deliger Show.
	music So George, I don't know how widespread it is.
	I don't know if it'll change the outcome of the election.
	But why is everybody so scared just to have a fair election and find out?
	We gave Al Gore 37 days to run the process before we decided who was going to be president.
	Why would we not afford the 70...
	0.6 million Americans that voted for President Trump, the same consideration.
	If Joe Biden really wants to unify this country, he would wait and make sure that we can prove we had a fair election.
	Wow.
	And there's nothing that George Stephanopoulos can really say to that.
	You see, here's the thing.
	George Stephanopoulos doesn't get to determine the outcome.
	The courts do.
	Everybody gets their day in court, and that includes Donald Trump.
	And the Trump campaign.
	And they want this debate, the Stephanopoulos of the world, the media mob, they all want us to be screaming about the election, the presidential race.
	Listen, the courts are going to decide that.
	We've got no...
	I'm not giving them what they want.
	You shouldn't either.
	Let's focus on what we know to be true.
	Serenity prayer.
	Have the courage.
	And the wisdom to know the difference between what you can change and what you cannot.
	We're not judges.
	We're not the Supreme Court.
	the courts will decide keep up with what's trending subscribe on YouTube today trending now on the Charlie Kirk show trending now on the Hugh Hewitt show you
	Brian in Pittsburgh, what do you think, Brian?
	Hugh, I think the heart of the issue is people's irrational hatred for the president.
	Now, I didn't vote for him in 16, but I came to discover the irrationality of just hating the guy.
	Feeling self-righteous about hating the guy.
	You know, I discovered the Russian hoax was a hoax.
	You know, I discovered the pandemic was not as it was being framed by the left-wing media.
	Until people come to grips with that, you, even these journalists, Chuck Todd, your buddy, when he's defensive.
	No, Chuck's not defensive.
	Chuck was making a point which I should have made, which is the systemic bias is not intentional.
	And in the law, this matters.
	For example, intentional racial bias subjects whoever is committing it to penalty and to remediation.
	Unintentional consequences of inherent bias, for example, in a police exam, does not.
	You know, disparate outcomes does not subject you to penalties.
	So Chuck is talking about, yeah, we have disparate outcomes all the time, but we don't mean it.
	I believe that.
	No, right.
	I hear you.
	I understand.
	What I'm saying is this is subconscious with people, and it's that group herd thinking when it comes to Donald Trump, and it's harming us as a country.
	There's such thing as truth.
	And when we hate another person, and the hatred of Donald Trump is off the charts, Truth becomes a fatality, and this is what happens.
	This is what's happening right now.
	appreciate you keep up with what's trending subscribe on YouTube today trending now on the Eric hello hello everybody Dennis Prager here
	I have been partially focusing on the announcement that the team, or a member of the team, the COVID-19 team of Joe Biden, has said that we should have a four to six week lockdown in February or March.
	And the way we'll cover the devastation to people's livelihoods is the government will pay everybody.
	Literally everybody.
	And I'm supposed to take this man seriously.
	Sweden had no lockdown at any time and is doing fine.
	My guest is...
	A man who has quite a remarkable biography here.
	He has a PhD in mathematical statistics.
	Calls himself a data philosopher.
	He was a professor at Cornell Medical School and a meteorologist with the National Weather Service and played third base for the Pittsburgh Pirates.
	I mean, that is quite a resume, sir.
	It was first base.
	Oh.
	I hate getting that wrong.
	I really do.
	I heard you were so good you alternated third base and first base.
	Utility infielder.
	Yes.
	And now I should say your name.
	William Briggs, who has a great website.
	A really great one.
	WMBriggs.com Sir, it's a pleasure to have you on the show.
	Where do you live?
	In New York.
	New York City?
	Yep.
	Are you a masochist?
	It has been claimed, yes.
	Okay, just checking.
	Why someone...
	No, no, I mean, I ask this of all those with your views.
	See, I live in LA and you could theoretically ask the same question, but I am surrounded by people who are kindred spirits.
	I don't believe, or maybe I'm wrong, are you surrounded by people who have the same values as you do?
	Absolutely not.
	Almost very few.
	Very few in number, but escaping is a different thing than desiring.
	So, one of these days.
	I see.
	So, you were a professor at Cornell Medical School?
	I was, yeah, a while ago.
	What was your field?
	Statistics, biostatistics.
	Oh, so even there it was biostatistics.
	So we got two subjects, doctor, professor, epistemologist, third baseman.
	We have two subjects.
	One is the voting statistics issue, and the other is COVID-19.
	We'll begin with the voting.
	So in a nutshell, what do you believe?
	I don't think anyone could say what they know, but...
	Unless I'm wrong.
	What do you believe happened in some of these states with regards to honest or non-honest voting?
	Well, look, we could use statistics to try to find anomalies, strange occurrences, things that look like they should not look.
	These are indications of potential fraud, but they're not proof of fraud.
	In order to get that...
	You have to look deeper than just the statistics.
	Statistics is only a tool to guide you towards discovering where fraud may have taken place, or where it may not have taken place.
	So it is able to concentrate your efforts.
	That, there is fraud, though, is sort of certain in many ways.
	I mean, there's a 2012 report from Philly Magazine, for instance, that They acknowledged Philadelphia's long history of voter fraud.
	They reported in some of the districts in Philadelphia, I think it was 54 districts that had received absolutely no votes for Romney at the time of that election and all for Obama.
	And they had turnout rates of 94%, 95%, 96%, which are absurd turnout rates.
	And they were lamenting the...
	The commonness of how cheating was prevalent in Philadelphia.
	And we know that this kind of stuff happens.
	I mean, look at Chicago.
	Look at the history of Chicago.
	Look at Detroit.
	Look at all these Democrat machine towns in which we know that there's cheating going on and has been for a long time.
	So this election, of course, is much bigger, and so we have to expand our looks out from just these cities.
	And there's a lot of stuff, like you say, going around everywhere.
	Some of it good, some of it less good, and there's a lot of enthusiasm.
	But we have to be real cautious about these things, because, you know, you could use these tools, but if you're not real familiar with them, you could end up crying wolf a little too often.
	So, if you were under oath, and you were asked to tell the truth, nothing but the truth, And yet it was still an opinion question.
	Would you say under oath, I believe that there was enough cheating to have turned this election?
	B, I don't think there was enough cheating to turn this election.
	C, I just don't know.
	I think C at this point.
	I don't know yet.
	I mean, there's lots of indications.
	I lean towards A, but we don't have enough information yet.
	We have to get more data in and analyze it in a very thorough and systematic way.
	There's lots of, you know, a helter-skelter kind of stuff going on.
	We need to really focus on the same questions in a lot of different jurisdictions, so we have good comparisons and so forth.
	Right now, there's indications towards...
	They're being fraud.
	I mean, I think it's probably, and even highly probable, but I wouldn't swear to it at this point.
	No, no, swear to that you believe it.
	You couldn't swear that there is.
	That was not one of my options.
	I wanted to make that clear.
	I believe there's cheating because there always has been.
	There always has been.
	There's always been admitted cheating.
	Right, but has it been election-determining cheating?
	It has, yes, in the past.
	In this case, like I say, there's just not enough information yet.
	What would you look for now?
	Now I would look for all of these.
	You'd have to go very systematically in each of these contested states and look for the same kinds of things.
	This question has been studied, and people know what to look for to find evidence of fraud.
	And we would look for those kind of measures.
	Some of them are complicated to explain.
	Some of them are easier.
	For instance, we could look at, I'll give you one anecdote, in Chester County in Pennsylvania, which has got predominantly Republican registration, anomalously, overwhelmingly voted for Biden, had 200-some thousand votes in Biden's favor over Trump.
	Which was not at all expected in comparison with last elections, like the election in 2016. Well, what happened in that county in 2016, do you recall?
	Well, that was against Trump versus Hillary.
	Yes, I know.
	Trump did much better.
	Well, much better.
	These are the kinds of anomalies that we just look at.
	Well, forgive me.
	Did he win it, or he just did much better?
	Did he win that county?
	No, he didn't win that county in 2016. It was a very minimal difference.
	And now it was a 200,000 vote difference?
	Yes.
	Well, that's an interesting question.
	Any fair-minded person would have to say, how did that happen?
	How do you think it happened, by the way?
	That's not the statistical question.
	That's exactly right.
	So that's something we can't say with statistics.
	You've got to say, okay, here's something strange that happened.
	Right.
	No, no, I understand.
	That's why I understood that.
	All you can do is go and look at something.
	Here's what I think has probably happened, is because of the corona doom, all of these states leveraged mail-in voting, which is very loose and unaccountable sort of system.
	You know, in Michigan particularly, I've heard anecdotal reports, only anecdotal reports, like up to half the ballots in some areas were mail-in ballots, and that anybody who wanted a mail-in ballot was allowed to have one if they wanted for fear of this virus.
	And so these things are really, really difficult to find out.
	They're really unaccountable.
	And so how could cheating happen?
	So if you have on the voter rolls, For instance, registered Democrats were people who haven't necessarily shown up to vote in an election or something like this.
	And you mail them, you legitimately mail them ballots.
	And they weren't necessarily going to go to the polling station to go vote.
	And you only do this to register Democrats.
	And these people return the ballots.
	They'll be genuine returned ballots.
	There'll be nothing wrong with them.
	They'll be legitimate.
	But you sort of waited the system and who you sent the mail out to.
	So we really have to look at the accounting of who they sent the mail-in ballots to.
	All right.
	Please stay with me.
	His website is WMBriggs.com.
	Trending now on the Larry O'Leary Show.
	music Professor, how does this end?
	Well, you know, look, so here's the problem.
	We're all focused on the counts.
	And it looks like President Trump may lose Georgia to Joe Biden because of the count coming out of Atlanta.
	And then he may well lose Pennsylvania because of the count coming out of Philadelphia.
	I think he's going to pick up Arizona, but he may well lose Nevada out of the count coming out of Clark County.
	But the problem is the significant trigger event was not the count, but the verification of which ballots were legitimately cast in order to be counted.
	And Republicans in a lot of those jurisdictions were blocked out of the verification process.
	The signature verification process, the legitimacy of the absentee ballots that have been collected and harvested, and oftentimes in violation of state law.
	But once that threshold decision had been done, and the ballot is separated from the envelope that allowed you to verify the legitimacy of the ballot, then you can't unravel the question of which votes were illegitimate and cast, or who they were cast for.
	And so unless the court would be willing to step in in Pennsylvania and say, because we can't determine, we know that there were illegitimate votes cast, but we can't determine which way they went, and therefore we can't invalidate the election, unless the court's willing to invalidate the election as it did two years ago in North Carolina when there was the illegal ballot harvesting that was conducted.
	So you believe that when all the challenges, let's just stick to Pennsylvania for a moment, when all the legal challenges are exhausted, the U.S. Supreme Court will not likely even pick up the case.
	I think that's right.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Dillager Show.
	So George, I don't know how widespread it is.
	I don't know if it'll change the outcome of the election.
	But why is everybody so scared just to have a fair election and find out?
	We gave Al Gore 37 days to run the process before we decided who was going to be president.
	Why would we not afford the 70.6 million Americans that voted for President Trump the same consideration?
	If Joe Biden really wants to unify this country, he would wait and make sure that we can prove we had a fair election.
	Wow.
	And there's nothing that George Stephanopoulos can really say to that.
	You see, here's the thing.
	George Stephanopoulos doesn't get to determine the outcome.
	The courts do.
	Everybody gets their day in court, and that includes Donald Trump.
	And the Trump campaign.
	And they want this debate, the Stephanopoulos of the world, the media mob, they all want us to be screaming about the election, the presidential race.
	Listen, the courts are going to decide that.
	I'm not giving them what they want.
	You shouldn't either.
	Let's focus on what we know to be true.
	Serenity prayer.
	Have the courage.
	And the wisdom to know the difference between what you can change and what you cannot.
	We're not judges.
	We're not the Supreme Court.
	The courts will decide.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
	Trending now on The Hugh Hewitt Show.
	The Charlie Kirk Show.
	Brian in Pittsburgh, what do you think, Brian?
	Hugh, I think the heart of the issue is people's irrational hatred for the president.
	No, I didn't vote for him in 16, but I came to discover the irrationality of just hating.
	I'm Dennis Prager, speaking to William Briggs, former professor at Cornell Medical speaking to William Briggs, former professor at Cornell Medical School.
	He has a PhD in mathematical statistics, which really makes us kindred spirits, because I did my graduate work in communist affairs at it.
	They're like soul brothers, those two subjects.
	And he has this great website, wmbriggs.com.
	Which you should all go to.
	He is also the co-author, and I had his co-author on, and that is actually co-authors, right?
	Three of you wrote it.
	Yeah, Jay Richards, Doug Axe, and me wrote The Price of Panic about the Corona Doom, well, the Corona Doom panic, and how a tyranny of experts has worked us over.
	If I may call you William, I have...
	By the way, do friends call you William or Bill?
	Matt.
	My middle name is Matt.
	My mom did that to me.
	You know, that's as good as your comeback with first base.
	I just want to say.
	Do your friends call you William or Bill?
	Matt.
	Why didn't I... Kerbald!
	Yes!
	As soon as you said that, I thought, why didn't I think of that?
	I can't believe it.
	So, what would you like me to call you?
	That's too large an opening.
	I'll let it pass and just say Matt is fine.
	Okay, Matt, great to talk to you.
	I hope we meet one day, because you need more kindred spirits in your life living in Manhattan.
	Or wherever you live.
	Yes, absolutely.
	So, I just want you to know, the subtitle of your wonderful book, How the Tyranny of Experts Turned a Pandemic into a Catastrophe, That I have finally said to, after all these years, I have said to my listeners, whenever I now see experts say, I assume what I'm about to read is nonsense.
	That is an excellent rule of thumb, especially if it's being pushed by the sort of global corporate media.
	I mean, they've got everything wrong.
	They've made predictions.
	In the beginning, based on models coming out of England, the Imperial College model that said that this virus was going to be worse than the Spanish flu, which killed 50-some million people.
	It was an absurd prediction to begin with.
	It never should have been believed.
	But it was believed because experts said so.
	The same experts who had predicted every single virus and pandemic and...
	For the past, I don't even know how many years, 20 years was going to have many, many, many more dead bodies than actually occurred.
	These people are consistently wrong, yet they're always believed, because they're wrong in the right direction.
	And what I mean by that is they tell the government that they're needed.
	They tell the bureaucrats that they're needed.
	And the government loves nothing better than to hear that they're needed, and they need to increase control over our lives.
	And they embrace this.
	This message with vigor during this pandemic, which was never ever done before in all of human history.
	And this is just a typical routine pandemic.
	It sounds brutal to say so, but that's because we have completely lost all perspective about this bug.
	I mean, we've had, in 2009, the swine flu killed anywhere up to about 600,000 people, the estimates are.
	In 68, we had the Hong Kong flu, which killed about the same number as the corona doom did this year.
	And that was at a time, of course, when the population was a lot less.
	In 57, we had the Asian flu, which killed 2 million people.
	And that was when there was only a third of the population we have now.
	We get these things every 10, 15, 20 years.
	They just come along.
	It's just the way it is.
	It's something we've been living with throughout the entire human history.
	And yet this time, this time we panicked.
	I mean, this is akin to a really bad flu year, but for some reason this time it was just a matter of mixing in politics, fear, and the instantaneous reporting of every new death, every new infection.
	And everybody just drove themselves mad and demanded to be made.
	To be made safe, and the government loved to hear that message and said, we're going to keep you safe.
	And the way they did that was to lock down people into their houses, kick them out of their jobs, and the lockdowns kill.
	The lockdowns kill because of all kinds of reasons.
	But I'd like to give this example.
	Now you know, Dennis, every year in the wintertime we have a peak in flu and pneumonia deaths, right?
	Mm-hmm.
	Why is that?
	Don't know.
	Well, because we're all going inside.
	We're all locking ourselves down, voluntary semi-lockdowns, just like the lockdowns we had in the summer over the corona doom, or the spring, I should say, where you go out to the grocery store and everything else, and then meanwhile you go home and you're spreading this flu disease around because everybody's in close quarters with one another.
	The healthy are locked in with the sick.
	And flu spreads and pneumonia develops, and we every year have a peak in flu and pneumonia deaths.
	Every year you can look at the CDC stats, and there's a routine, it's just regular as clockwork, regular as clockwork.
	And our government hit upon this solution to lock people down.
	And they're saying, you know what, we should have more lockdowns.
	This Fauci guy is saying we should do lockdowns again.
	There's many countries in the world that did not lockdown and did fine.
	Everybody points to Sweden.
	They did great.
	But Japan did even better, and they have a death rate a tenth of what Sweden's is, and Japan's got a population that's much, much larger, and they never locked down.
	Taiwan did fine.
	They got, I think it's twice as many people as Sweden, I can't remember, but they have like 30 million people in Taiwan, and they never locked down.
	They did fine.
	In fact, I think they had eight deaths reported.
	uh...
	they didn't go test crazy like we did and are are doing now it's just madness it's madness and it's fear building upon fear and everybody is certain they're gonna get this bug you have people running around wearing masks thinking this this this bug is living in the air like some kind of uh...
	i don't know like a radioactive cloud one with sort of uh...
	fresh air is gonna kill you it's just not agree with every word I've said every word in my own words.
	Yep.
	Well, I announced before I had you on that if they do this in January, February, or March, this four to six weeks, I will publicly violate it.
	I'm publicly violating the mandate in California on Thanksgiving.
	I'm having in my home the exact same number of people I have every year for Thanksgiving.
	I will give Newsom my address, and if he arrests me, we'll make a big deal of it.
	No, Thanksgiving is a mostly peaceful protest.
	Yeah, well, that's the way we protest, we conservatives, peacefully.
	And it's funny, I think that on the left, I think that people who will have a lot of people for Thanksgiving dinner will be more hated than the people who burned stores in the riots of the spring.
	Absolutely.
	There's no perspective in this.
	That's right.
	People have no sense of history.
	I have a plot.
	The CDC data, you can look at it.
	The all-cause deaths.
	People are much, much, much more likely to die of something else than the coronavirus.
	That's right.
	Hold on there.
	By the way, his point, they want to be needed.
	I hadn't thought of that.
	That's big.
	Trending now on the Eric Metaxas show.
	When you look at what the Democrats have been saying the last couple of months, when your opposition tells you what they're going to do, maybe you should believe them.
	Why we didn't have platoons of people in downtown Detroit and Milwaukee waiting for these criminals, for what they've been doing.
	Just what the con job that has happened with all of a sudden we're winning by Hundreds of thousands of ballots.
	They told us.
	They said it was going to be a red mirage.
	And then all of these mail-in ballots are going to come through.
	Well, what about cross-referencing voter registration, cross-referencing it with whether or not these people are alive or not?
	Let me just take a step back, though, Eric, and I want to just say one thing that's very positive.
	Republicans did really well.
	I mean, with all the nonsense that's happening, with the virus, the lockdowns, impeachment, the coup, All the misinformation, the disinformation, all this.
	We won Florida by three points.
	That was not supposed to happen.
	We are going to win North Carolina.
	We won Ohio convincingly.
	We won Iowa convincingly.
	And the Democrats spent a combined $410 million on failed races in the Senate.
	Republicans are poised to get 8 to 10 seats in the House despite being outspent 12 to 1, Eric.
	12 to 1, and insiders in the Republican House said they thought they were going to lose 10 seats.
	The DCCC has come out and they said it is a dumpster fire.
	They can't believe what's happened.
	We might flip seats in Illinois, we might flip two seats in Orange County, and we might have one of the strongest minorities Republicans have had in 30 years and almost guarantee that we'll take back the House in 2022. Why is it that
	that there was a 1778% increase in voter registrations for voters over the age of 90 in Pennsylvania in the midst of a pandemic.
	I'm just asking questions.
	That's all we're doing here.
	And I think you guys can draw your own conclusions because you're pretty smart.
	But who else is asking these questions?
	Why is the Department of Justice not actually investigating all of this?
	How are there 100% of ballots that were dropped just for Joe Biden in Michigan?
	And so I have a lot of people that are emailing us and they say, we will win, we will win.
	I hope you're right.
	But don't be blinded by your own optimism, everybody.
	It's going to take you to do something about it.
	There are some very, very powerful, sinister and malevolent forces at play here.
	The only way we win this is if we rise up in record numbers and our lawmakers actually start representing us and the Department of Justice does something about this.
	Maybe it'll happen.
	Maybe it won't.
	I'm not just going to be completely and totally, you know, 100% cynical.
	But I will say that...
	If we do not contest the fraud that is so clearly happening in front of us with all of this evidence, and this is not an exhaustive list, everybody.
	I just have, I have page after page after page after page of irregularities and People saying they were backdating ballots and postal service problems and voting locations that have gone down and irregularities and counties that really surprised, like counties that are not behaving the same as they should as we have here.
	I mean, there's a really good case.
	And some of you are saying, well, won't that stand up in a court of law?
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Delegger Show.
	All right, one more question for William Briggs, a.k.a.
	Matt, my new friend.
	Former professor at Cornell Medical School.
	PhD in mathematical statistics.
	Is that right?
	Mathematical statistics?
	Yep.
	Good.
	So, I want to go right back to just one question on the election issue.
	And this is not purely a statistical question.
	And so you may or may not have an answer for it.
	I will ask it in any event.
	Do you believe if there was only voting on Election Day and the usual number of absentee ballots that had been requested, do you believe that the vote total would have been different?
	Absolutely.
	We've already seen the patterns in the mail-in vote ballots differ greatly from the on-the-day ballots.
	If you like, particularly in Pennsylvania and Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, once they started counting the next day after the election, huge increases for Biden right off the bat, mostly from those mail-in ballots.
	So that's suspicious, but it's suspicious to be looked at.
	But these mail-in ballots, they were allowed to do so many things with them.
	Putting them out so early and everything, and then withholding information in the media.
	All this kind of stuff.
	It's just far too easy to tamper with.
	And I think that absolutely you can state with almost near certainty that if there were no mail-in ballots, the election would have turned out differently.
	Yep.
	And they knew it, and I knew it too.
	I said it as soon as they started it.
	I said, this is going to determine the election.
	Well, I'm delighted to meet you.
	Thank you for your work.
	Oh, thank you for having me.
	I appreciate it.
	My pleasure.
	His website is WMBriggs, William Briggs, so it's WMBriggs.com.
	And I know my producer visits it every day.
	He's co-author of The Price of Panic, How the Tyranny of Experts Turned a Pandemic into a Catastrophe.
	That's what we are watching.
	And listen, 70 million of us have to fight back.
	If there's going to be a lockdown, you cannot observe it.
	You should have as many people as you want for Thanksgiving.
	You cannot stop life for the people who are scared and who are scaring you.
	The kids need to be with friends or relatives on Thanksgiving.
	Thanksgiving.
	And kids aren't getting, they may get it, but kids don't die from it.
	If you're afraid of a kid dying from COVID, then I have nothing to say to you.
	I can't speak to the irrational.
	Reason is the only thing that allows people to dialogue.
	If there is no mutual commitment to reason, you don't have a chance.
	It's a waste of time.
	Darlene in Glendale, California.
	Hello.
	Hi.
	How are you, Dennis?
	Good.
	Thank you.
	Okay.
	I'm an avid listener.
	Good.
	Today in the paper, in the Daily News, because I hate the time, is an article about L.A. County is going to create worker-driven health councils.
	Now, that means that in places of work, They're going to create a council that will tell on you, switch, if you're not following protocol.
	That's very important, what you just told me.
	Can we look that up?
	Daily News, so the Daily News, that's the...
	That's on the front page.
	That's the Valley Daily News?
	Valley Daily News.
	And the second part of it is the kicker.
	Is that if they'll give them legal assistance, the county will give them legal assistance if they're retaliated against the snitchers.
	So what is it called?
	Retaliation of Republicans?
	Of course.
	What is it called?
	Workers' councils?
	It's called Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted to create worker-run public health councils.
	Public health councils.
	Let's look that up.
	Now, it's interesting.
	So, let's see.
	They created a totalitarian state in Russia on the basis of commitment to workers and equality.
	They did it in Germany based on commitment to racial purity.
	And they're doing it here on the basis of commitment to safety and health.
	The results are still totalitarian.
	Okay.
	Ridiuzone is a product that was developed by doctors.
	And they convinced me that it is responsible.
	An excellent product, and if so, I have promoted it.
	They have two patents on it.
	It's the only FDA-accepted product that includes OEA, the molecule your own body produces to help you feel full faster.
	So you burn stored fat.
	Because you're not eating as much.
	RIDUZONE is exclusively available at RIDUZONE.com.
	promo code Dennis 30% off riduzone.com.
	Trending now on the Eric Metaxas show.
	When you look at what the Democrats have been saying the last couple months, when your opposition tells you what they're going to do, maybe you should believe them.
	Why we didn't have platoons of people in downtown Detroit and Milwaukee waiting for these criminals, for what they've been doing.
	Just what the con job that has happened with all of a sudden we're winning by hundreds of thousands of ballots.
	They told us.
	They said it was going to be a red mirage, and then all of these mail-in ballots are going to come through.
	Well, what about cross-referencing and voter registration, cross-referencing it with whether or not these people are alive or not?
	Let me just take a step back, though, Eric, and I want to just say one thing that's very positive.
	Republicans did really well.
	I mean, with all the nonsense that's happening, with the virus, the lockdowns, impeachment, the coup, all the misinformation, the disinformation, all this, We won Florida by three points.
	That was not supposed to happen.
	We are going to win North Carolina.
	We won Ohio convincingly.
	We won Iowa convincingly.
	And the Democrats spent a combined $410 million on failed races in the Senate.
	Republicans are poised to get 8 to 10 seats in the House despite being outspent 12 to 1, Eric.
	12 to 1, and insiders in the Republican House said they thought they were going to lose 10 seats.
	The DCCC has come out and they said it is a dumpster fire.
	They can't believe what's happened.
	We might flip seats in Illinois, we might flip two seats in Orange County, and we might have one of the strongest minorities Republicans have had in 30 years and almost guarantee that we'll take back the House in 2022. Why is it
	that there was a 1,778% increase in voter registrations for voters over the age of 90 in Pennsylvania in the midst of a pandemic?
	I'm just asking questions.
	That's all we're doing here.
	I think you guys can draw your own conclusions because you're pretty smart.
	But who else is asking these questions?
	Why is the Department of Justice not actually investigating all of this?
	How are there 100% of ballots that were dropped just for Joe Biden in Michigan?
	And so I have a lot of people that are emailing us and they say, we will win, we will win.
	I hope you're right.
	But don't be blinded by your own optimism, everybody.
	It's going to take you to do something about it.
	There are some very, very powerful, sinister and malevolent forces at play here.
	The only way we win this is if we rise up in record numbers and our lawmakers actually start representing us and the Department of Justice does something about this.
	Hey, by the way, you want something to look forward to this October 1st.
	I will be taking listeners again, my fourth time, I believe it is, to Israel.
	The trips are life-changing, unbelievably meaningful, enjoyable.
	You meet terrific people.
	Everything is first class.
	There's a banner at DennisPrager.com, Stand With Israel Tour, and click on it for information.
	Coming up this October.
	Going with my friend and colleague, Mike Gallagher.
	And I intend to go hell or high water, man.
	I am not going to allow crackpots to tell me what to do.
	Standwithisrealtour.com or simply click on the thing at dennisprayer.com.
	Well, the woman was right.
	Daily News, L.A. Daily News, L.A. County moves to create worker-driven coronavirus compliance councils.
	I love the subtitle.
	The county is experiencing a surge in new cases and higher transmission rates.
	What is the difference between transmission rate and case?
	Isn't the only way to make a case through transmission?
	So this is typical distortion of the media.
	They don't even know they're distorting.
	They just get these words.
	Notice it doesn't say deaths.
	Hmm.
	It doesn't even say hospitalization.
	It just says transmission rates.
	So now there are official snitch councils.
	And to my amazement, I'm joking, Supervisor Sheila Kuehl authored the motion.
	Woman is a Bolshevik.
	I said yesterday it might be a better term than communist.
	God, the idea of workers' council snitching on fellow workers who were disloyal to the loyalty religion, to the safety religion, this must have just caused her euphoria.
	Workers' councils.
	Do you know what the word for workers' council is, by the way, in Russian?
	Do you know?
	Soviet.
	That's how you get Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
	They were workers' councils.
	They should have called them a Soviet.
	I mean, why not be true to its origins?
	I think that that's...
	I would propose to Sheila Kuehl and Mark Ridley Thomas, the sponsors here, another Bolshevik, that you call it a Soviet.
	The Coronavirus Compliance Soviet.
	That's what we should do.
	God.
	The ease with which Americans have accepted totalitarianism is...
	That's the most disconcerting.
	That's the only surprise for me.
	That the left would want to control your life and ruin the lives of tens of millions of people, that is no surprise.
	That Americans went along with it, that was a surprise.
	That's the thing.
	Jim in Filbertsville, Kentucky.
	Hi, Dennis Prager.
	Hey, how are you?
	Okay, thank you.
	God bless you, man, for what you're doing.
	I just wanted to call and tell you I appreciate what you're doing.
	I'm originally from Chicago.
	My folks, both of them were Chicago police officers for 30 years.
	And I really don't want to get into this politics stuff because I'm sick to my stomach.
	But I just wanted to call and let you know that I really appreciate the job you're doing and what you do.
	Well, thank you.
	I get a lot of wonderful thanks and gratitude and praise.
	And I get a lot of hate.
	And that's the way it is in life, but I'm very touched by those of you whom I've touched and who express it.
	Thank you.
	Natalie, Irvine, California.
	Hello.
	Hi, Dennis.
	Hi.
	How are you?
	Good.
	My husband's giving me a funny look because he thinks I'm so obsessed with you that I should probably take out Dennis Prager shares, if there is such thing.
	That's very sweet.
	So, my sister met you at the Beverly Hills Rally.
	My whole family's obsessed with you.
	You speak nothing but truth and logic, and your values and morals are completely in line with ours as conservatives, so thank you.
	I wanted to let you know, there's a restaurant, in case you'd like to patronize another Patriot small business.
	He's in Huntington Beach.
	And he actually doesn't allow masks, whether you come to eat there or whether you work there.
	He does not allow masks.
	So he has signs on his doors with a face with a mask with a red line through it.
	So when people come in with a mask, he says, I'm sorry, you either have to remove your mask or you cannot eat here.
	He says the same thing to people that apply for jobs there.
	If you want to work here, you cannot wear a mask.
	You're free to go work somewhere else.
	He's got the news media there every other day.
	He's got police coming in over there every day.
	And he says that that's fine.
	You can come visit.
	It's basically free publicity for me.
	I am standing my ground.
	This is my business.
	I don't believe in masks.
	And he is booming.
	His restaurant, you can't even get a reservation there on a Saturday night.
	There's so many people there.
	So I just wanted to give him a shout-out and let you know.
	You realize if only 1,000 restaurants of the tens of thousands in California, 1,000 did what he's doing.
	Or just even said, we don't care if you wear one.
	It's okay.
	Even not as extreme.
	I love his attitude because I don't like the irrationality that governs.
	By the way, are you allowed to say the name of the restaurant?
	Yes, it's called Basilico Pasta Evino, and it's in Huntington Beach, and the owner is amazing, and he will open his door with grace if you come in with no mask.
	And they have amazing service, and their food is unbelievable.
	Thank you.
	Look, folks, I just want you to know, when I'm asked to wear a mask going inside a place, I wear it, you know, I don't want to...
	Panic people.
	But wherever possible, I don't.
	That's it.
	So I don't cause a rumpus.
	but when I see people walking alone in the street, walking their dog with a mask, I fear for my society.
	Trending now on the Mike Dillager Show.
	Biden is not officially or legally or in any way the president-elect.
	President Trump is challenging the results.
	The courts are going to make a determination.
	Only when the courts determine the outcome can anybody talk about the president-elect or the president being re-elected.
	That's a fact.
	South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, who I am really, really liking more and more.
	Every time I hear this woman speak, every time I hear her represent the state of South Dakota, I get more inspired.
	Here she was with George Stephanopoulos over the weekend on ABC. But the other thing that I think is going on here, George, is that this is all premature.
	This is a premature conversation because we have not finished counting votes.
	There are states that have not been called.
	And back in 2000, Al Gore was given his day in court.
	We should give President Trump his day in court.
	Let the process unfold.
	Because, George, we live in a republic.
	We are a government that gets its power from the consent of the governed.
	That is the people.
	They give their consent on Election Day.
	Election Day needs to be fair, honest, and transparent.
	And we need to be sure that we had an honest election before we decide who gets to be in the White House the next four years.
	Do you have any evidence that it wasn't an honest election?
	You heard about a tweet earlier this week saying it was rigged.
	Do you have any evidence at all of widespread fraud?
	I've spoken with Republican secretaries of state in Georgia, in Arizona.
	I've spoken with Republican officials across the country.
	They have come up with zero evidence of widespread fraud.
	And that is not true.
	That is absolutely not true.
	People have signed legal documents, affidavits, stating that they saw illegal activities.
	And that is why we need to have this conversation in court Keep up with what's trending and subscribe on YouTube today Trending now America first with Sebastian Burke Here's the tweet from this afternoon and
	Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future?
	I foresee decent probability of many deleted tweets, writings and photos in the future.
	Why are you cataloguing supporters of the President?
	There's 70 million of us.
	What are you going to try and do, AOC? Because we're ready for you.
	Got that, Media Matters?
	Somebody who's really been upping his game, we always like him, but he's been getting even more heavy and meaty, is Greg Gutfeld.
	Let's play a little video cut from our buddy Greg on the issue at hand.
	Video cut 7, Eric.
	I'm not sure if this is a first-world or third-world country anymore, if we can't handle this.
	And the thing is, I keep thinking, all right, who made this bed?
	Let's say there isn't anything illegal going on.
	All right, everybody, Dennis Prager here.
	It's been an intense day because of these incredibly panic-inducing news from the epidemiology team of Joe Biden.
	Remember, he chooses his epidemiologists.
	The ones with the most freedom-depriving ideas are the ones he keeps.
	The ones from Oxford, Harvard, and Stanford who were against the lockdown, none of them have made his counsel.
	John in Canton, Michigan, hello.
	Hi, good afternoon, Dennis.
	Hi.
	Hi.
	I just wanted you to confirm something I think I heard you say, that children don't have to worry about this COVID virus?
	Correct.
	You heard it correctly.
	Okay, well, yeah, I would take exception to that, because I think all you really have to do is Google children dies of COVID-19, and would you say those are all fake?
	No, I would say they're irrelevant to my point.
	Well, would you say that...
	Yeah, okay.
	Yeah, okay.
	So they both can be true.
	In general, children have nothing to worry about by COVID. Are there any children who have died of COVID? Yes, an infinitesimally small amount.
	Well, you know, be it that as it may, would you say those parents are, you know, inconsequential that their child passed away from it?
	Are the people who are eaten by alligators inconsequential?
	Okay.
	Fine.
	I think that it's clear to the listener that we're not talking logically here.
	But I thank you.
	I really do thank you for your call.
	That's why I took it.
	Did anybody ever say that a child who dies of COVID is inconsequential?
	Is that the upshot of saying that almost no child dies of COVID? It's painful to me.
	There is a part of me, and I feel silly.
	There's a part of me that expects more from my fellow American.
	And I have been wrestling with that.
	Maybe I just had a romantic view of Americans.
	I'm not kidding.
	I don't know what to say.
	A call like that, with all respects, depresses me.
	It's not easy to depress me.
	If I say almost no kids are dying of COVID, it means that the kid who did die is inconsequential.
	Okay, everybody.
	A lot of fighting.
	You've got to fight.

▲