Dennis Prager Show - In States Where People 'Engineered' Voter Problems, There Were Problems Aired: 2020-11-11 Duration: 04:50 === Suspicion in Key States (04:49) === [00:00:00] Actually, he's the dean of election experts in America. [00:00:06] John Fund. [00:00:07] I won't even ask, how are you? [00:00:09] I'll just say hi. [00:00:10] I got some sleep the last couple days. [00:00:13] Is that a good sign? [00:00:15] As opposed to... [00:00:16] Sleep is good. [00:00:18] Sleep is good. [00:00:20] That is correct. [00:00:21] I don't get much sleep, but I'm lucky. [00:00:25] I'm almost like Donald Trump on the sleep issue. [00:00:28] I don't need a lot. [00:00:29] Anyway, John, I have no idea what you will say, truly, but I simply respect you so much I want to get your take. [00:00:38] If you had to bet your right leg, do you believe, would you vote that, would you bet that this was an honest result or not? [00:00:52] Depends on the state. [00:00:54] Most of the country voted very smoothly. [00:00:57] Most of the country voted well. [00:01:00] Most of the country didn't have major problems. [00:01:03] But where there were people who wanted there to be problems, who planned to have problems, who engineered problems, there were problems. [00:01:14] Were there enough problems to have determined the election? [00:01:21] Maybe, but can you prove them before December 8th when states certify the votes and name their electors at the Electoral College? [00:01:29] Highly doubtful. [00:01:31] Right. [00:01:32] So I'm not asking what will work. [00:01:34] I'm just asking, and it's really an open question. [00:01:39] I believe, I did not know last week, but the more I have read, the more I have become. [00:01:48] Suspicious of the results in states like Pennsylvania and Michigan and so on. [00:01:57] Wisconsin. [00:01:59] So that's... [00:02:01] Was there enough... [00:02:03] Were there enough shenanigans to alter the result? [00:02:07] Well, Dennis, I'm going to have to give you a different answer, which is this. [00:02:14] In March and April, when we had COVID, This was planned chaos. [00:02:47] Our election system isn't equipped to go to that transition that quickly. [00:02:52] So if you go from 20% of the vote cast early or absentee to 60 or 65, you're going to have massive problems. [00:03:00] You're going to have a tsunami of ballots. [00:03:02] And in that tsunami of ballots, you're not going to have the same safeguards and oversight and verification that you would normally have. [00:03:11] And that is where the thesis of my first book 20 years ago began, when I said what we really have to fear in this country is a situation of planned chaos in our elections where you can't tell where the incompetence ends and the fraud begins. [00:03:29] Why some states and not others? [00:03:32] Some states weren't close. [00:03:34] I mean, do you really want to invest resources in making sure that... [00:03:40] New Mexico goes to all-male elections. [00:03:43] No, we know how New Mexico is going to vote. [00:03:45] Do you really want to be sure how North Dakota is going to vote? [00:03:48] No, we know how North Dakota is going to vote. [00:03:50] They targeted and picked the states where they changed the election rules. [00:03:56] Oh, so there wasn't mass mail-in in New Mexico or North Dakota? [00:04:00] Well, there was greater, but the point is the shift, the dramatic shift. [00:04:06] In Pennsylvania, it was from 4% of the vote cast earlier absentee to over 50. Pennsylvania, of course, was the critical state of any state of the country. [00:04:17] In California, it didn't so much matter. [00:04:20] They've already gone to basically all mail-in voting. [00:04:23] But in states where it really counted, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, you can predict the states as much as I can, Nevada. [00:04:33] The shift was dramatic. [00:04:36] And it overloaded the system, and it meant a lot of things could happen behind the curtain that we'll never know about. [00:04:44] So is it fair to say, I'll ask, I'll put on your analyst hat now.