All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 21, 2020 - Dennis Prager Show
02:54:05
The Dennis Prager Show LIVE
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
How are you, everyone?
Now, that's a tough question to answer.
My standard answer for half a year has been, I'm fine.
My country isn't.
I gave my fireside chat yesterday, which comes out on Thursdays.
You know what the theme was?
That were it not for the invented...
Anger of the left.
Pre-COVID, obviously.
We should have been living in a golden age.
We are a country at peace.
We were a country with the lowest unemployment rates for all groups since unemployment figures had been recorded.
The average American gets along with the average American of every race.
Every ethnicity, nationality, and religion.
The opportunities to start business were remarkable.
People were enjoying life.
You know what was a harbinger of these riots, and it wasn't a riot at all, to make that clear, was the Women's March.
Remember the Women's March?
Was it called the Million Women's War March?
I don't know.
It wasn't called that?
See what it was called, all right?
I think it had an official name.
And I remember saying, why are they demonstrating?
What are they demonstrating against?
Why are so many women angry?
You have to be angry about something to demonstrate.
Or extremely enthused about something to demonstrate, which is rarer.
What were they angry about?
No women in the history of the world had it as good as American women.
Freedom of opportunity, income, college education, all the criteria that most people use.
I don't use those criteria.
They're part of what I use.
I use happiness.
I use fulfillment.
And in happiness and fulfillment for most women, it includes a man and a family.
Imagine saying that on the campus.
I wonder if Twitter would remove you.
The removal of anything by a scientist with regard to masks is removed.
Did I say the removal of anything about masks?
A tweet about it, or a video about it.
Twitter is an arm of the left.
That is all it is.
And Dorsey, what's his first name?
Jack?
Jack Dorsey, the CEO, is being subpoenaed to Washington.
He needs to be confronted exactly with what they've been doing.
CDC study.
85% of coronavirus patients reported wearing masks always or often.
you Breitbart, October 14th.
An overlooked study published recently by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggests that cloth face coverings or masks are mostly ineffective in preventing the spread of the Chinese coronavirus as promoted by public health officials.
The CDC conducted the study, largely ignored by the media, in the U.S. Ah, I see.
They had a capital I in in because it automatically capitalizes after a period and the word before it was US. Is that clear to anybody?
Anyway, it was in the US in July and made its findings public September.
The researchers found that 71% of the case patients contracted the virus despite reporting always, Always wearing a cloth face covering or mask at least 14 days before illness onset.
And 14% contracted the virus despite reporting often wearing one at least 14 days before illness onset.
That indicates 85% of the COVID-19 study participants Contracted the virus even after either always or often, 71-14, wearing a face covering or mask.
Wearing a mask at, quote, gatherings with less than 10 or less than 10 persons in a home, shopping, dining at a restaurant.
Going to an office setting, salon, gym, bar, coffee shop, or church, religious gathering, or using public transportation, quote-unquote, did not prevent them from getting infected, the CDC study indicated.
Nevertheless, that's where you wore a mask at those things.
Nevertheless, Dr. Anthony Fauci and CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield Both prominent members of the White House Coronavirus Task Force and other public health officials have urged everyone to wear masks.
Redfield went as far as telling a Senate panel last month that masks are "more guaranteed" to protect against the coronavirus than a potential vaccine.
Hmm.
Ever since I was in college, I knew that there was a war against common sense.
Thank you.
Whereas in the past, people felt that intelligent people, people with wisdom, could assess things given the data that is no longer the belief.
You are rendered a person who assesses nothing.
Experts tell you everything.
This is what was learned.
So, you know, if I say that Americans are a friendly people, which I have said often, so a person with collegism as a form of religion would say, where are the data?
Or where is the data?
Technically, you'd say, where are the data?
Right?
That's what they...
Where's the data?
We get that a lot.
Where is the data?
You offer an informed opinion and you're asked for the...
How can you have data on friendliness?
So, in fact, you can't have data on many of the most important questions in life.
These happiness surveys are a bit bizarre.
I'm somewhat of an expert on happiness.
People want to defend their choices in life, so they may not say that they are unhappy or even know that they are unhappy, which is obviously a complex question unto itself.
Ask a 25-year-old woman, would you be happier with a good man?
What do you think?
Would it be interesting to ask that question?
Nobody would ask it, of course.
What survey would ask such a question?
Imply that a woman needs a man.
Oh, my God.
It's okay if you say a man needs a woman, but you can't say a woman needs a man.
It's like you could say anything you want about Christianity, but you cannot say anything critical about Islam.
We have, not we, the elite, almost all of whom are on the left, have suppressed vast arenas of thought.
How many Americans know the Arab slave trade?
If you speak about the West slave trade, you're enlightened.
If you speak about the Arab slave trade, you're a bigot.
So the truth is they don't care about the slave trade.
They care about smearing the West.
Correct?
1-8 Prager 776. I didn't report this.
They took a statue of former Governor Pete Wilson down in San Diego.
Is it back up?
It's really astonishing.
You don't agree with somebody's position, you take down the statue, you just remove it.
And the authorities seem to allow it.
This is from the LA Times.
Recently, racial...
Oh, I'll read you when we come back.
Hi, this is Dennis Prager, this is Dennis Prager, and you know we are in a fight for our fundamental freedoms. Prager, and you know we are That's why I am grateful for my friends at Alliance Defending Freedom.
They are on the front lines fighting pivotal lawsuits for Americans whose freedoms are threatened, and they do it for free.
That's why we're asking you to be as generous as you can by giving today so that Alliance Defending Freedom can continue to fight these lawsuits and be ready when your rights are threatened, too.
Give your gift now by visiting adflegal.org slash Prager, and thank you for joining the fight for free.
Thank you.
But don't voters have a right to know where you stand?
They do have a right to know where they stand, and I'll have a right to know where I stand before they vote.
So you'll come out with a clear position before Election Day?
Yes, depending on how they handle this.
But look, what you should do is you got to make sure you vote.
And vote for a senator who in fact thinks reflects you.
People are voting now.
I've already voted.
He makes that point repeatedly.
If George had been a real moderator, he would have pointed out, Mr. Vice President, you always say people are already voting.
So why don't those people deserve an answer right now?
The answer is, he doesn't want to answer it.
Because it's radical.
He's going to say yes, and he's going to fundamentally change the United States.
Court packing is an assault on everything.
And you just understand, the radical left got Joe Biden to sign on to court packing.
I don't know if there will be enough senators.
We've got to hold the Republican Senate against the possibility that Joe Biden wins.
I think it's a neck and neck.
Three new polls came out this morning which tell you that.
They're all North Carolina.
In North Carolina, it is a tie between Biden and Trump, according to Emerson.
In North Carolina, Cal Cunningham is allegedly one point ahead of Tom Tillis.
I don't believe that after Cal Cunningham cheated on his wife and it has become a national news story and everyone in North Carolina knows about it.
I don't believe that.
I believe Tom Tillis is going to win.
And it shows the governor up four, the Democratic governor up four over the Republican governor.
It's within the margin of error in my view.
So North Carolina, dead heat.
I think Pennsylvania's a dead heat.
I think Wisconsin's a dead heat.
I think this is a dead heat presidential election.
Pat is in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Pat, you're on the Larry Elder Show.
Thank you so much for calling.
It seems to me during the Democratic primary, there was a lot of talk about not only taxing the wealthy, but something called the wealth tax.
And it was my understanding that they were taxing the wealth that you had from your savings, from your assets, from your house, that kind of thing.
That's right.
At 10% a year, at every year.
Every year.
A state tax that goes every year.
Now, I haven't heard anything about that.
Can you tell me what that is and if they are still trying to promote that tax?
Because I think us seniors with some savings would probably not be happy about that.
Well, you're absolutely right.
And certainly that did come up during the campaign.
I will tell you this.
The lawmakers here in the state of California are absolutely proposing a wealth tax.
They want to increase the state income tax from the highest in the nation, 13.3% to 16%.
And they also want to pass a wealth tax.
Now, why do I mention what's going on in California?
Because every dumb idea that the federal government wants to do has been tried at least twice in California.
And so California is considering this.
The lawmakers are all Democrats.
Democrats occupy two-thirds of both chambers of the legislature here in California, plus they run the governorship.
So in the unlikely event that the governor vetoed such a tax, there are enough lawmakers in both chambers to override the veto.
So, do I believe that if these guys get in charge, there will be something like a wealth tax?
I certainly believe that.
All right.
Thank you.
Los Angeles Times.
Recently, local racial justice and gay rights groups have called for the statue's removal.
That is, of former Governor of California, Pete Wilson, Senator Pete Wilson, and the mayor of San Diego prior to that.
I find...
I'm sorry?
I find Pete Wilson to be...
One of the most fine people I have had the honor of knowing in my lifetime.
The President of the United States was totally right.
As soon as they took down any statue, you think it's going to stop here, he said?
It will go to Jefferson and Washington.
And it did.
It is symbolic of just ripping out our history.
It's not new.
Many of you in the L.A. area will remember.
I think a thousand of you came on immediate notice when they wanted to take the cross off the county seal of Los Angeles.
They had six, seven symbols or eight symbols on the county seal of L.A. County.
LA was founded, Los Angeles, the City of Angels, was founded by Catholics.
So they have a cross.
It's a little tiny part of the seal.
And they removed it.
And I testified, I am a Jew, but you are removing my history.
You're not removing my religion.
You're removing my history.
How dare you?
And of course they dared.
The vote won straight Democrat-Republican on the county supervisor.
That's where it started, remember that?
That was the symbolic taking down of the statue.
A county is founded by Christians, but no cross is allowed.
If the county were founded by Wiccans, I would be okay with the broom.
I want my history.
Glad you liked that, Sean.
They would put a broom there anyway now, just to be inclusive.
America's being torn down by the left, and you have lovely relatives who are going to vote for the Democrats.
I sit in startled, almost awe, At people's voting the end of their civilization.
Because they don't like Trump.
What a stupid, immature reason to vote Democrat.
It's mind-boggling.
Mind-boggling.
Pete Wilson's statue.
Yes.
He used his influence Those who took it down said, to empower, to demonize and dehumanize Latino and gay communities for political gain.
Demonized.
What was his demonization?
That he thought we should limit the number of illegal immigrants?
Oh, services to illegal immigrants.
Right.
In other words, you should be able to come to America.
And have every benefit that every citizen has.
You should be able to come illegally into America and then get everything in America.
Otherwise, you're demonizing these people.
See?
There's no rhetoric.
There's no debate allowed.
He demonized gay people?
Why was he against same-sex marriage?
I'm against same-sex marriage.
I've never demonized gays in my life.
Having dinner tonight with a gay couple.
My wife and I are godparents to another gay couple's children.
Why is believing that a fundamental religious value of your religion is that marriage is only between one man and one woman?
Why does that demonize anybody else?
Does it demonize singles?
Does it demonize polygamists?
Why does it demonize gays?
This is what the left does and this is what passes for intellectual rhetoric.
Enrique Morones, who founded Gente Unida, spearheaded the removal effort.
He said Thursday he is glad the statue was taken down because it was not something the community wanted in the first place.
There was so much community support, Morones said about his efforts to remove the statue.
No one has unified the Latino community more than Pete Wilson, Morones said in an email.
His racist support of Proposition 187 back in 1994 unified Latino community and supporters of human rights against him.
All right.
Wilson was mayor of San Diego, 71 to 83, represented California in the U.S. Senate, 83 to 91, served as governor, 91 to 99.
And that's been it for Republicans.
I don't know what the Latino community...
Believes about illegal immigration, given the threat to their having jobs.
At a certain point, I'd like to take a vote, a plebiscite, among all Latino Americans.
Do you believe that there should be unlimited immigration to the United States?
Okay?
What do you think the vote would be?
I think the vote would be against it.
It is so obviously the end of your country as a distinct country if you support what the Democrats do.
They deny it when asked directly, are you for open borders?
But that's what they are for.
Except in their home.
Why don't they allow anybody into their home?
Why is in America their home?
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ben, hello.
Ben in Pittsburgh, come in.
Hello, how are you?
Okay, thank you.
I'm calling about the article from the CDC about people who wear masks getting sick.
Yeah.
This is a complete turnaround from what they've been reporting for months that we should wear them to protect others.
Well, they don't say it's a turnaround for some reason.
They don't really read their own stuff and then react.
But I want to hear your jogging experience when we get a chance.
This is Owen Strand for townhall.com.
If you're on a college campus today or have a child on campus, there's a solid chance you'll hear this.
All white people are racist.
You might hear this too.
America is founded on white supremacy.
These two sentences are not mere overheated emotion.
They express an ideology called critical race theory, or CRT, which argues that race is a social construct made by white people.
Just as race was once used to enslave and terrorize, so it is used today to keep America unequal, unfair, and hostile to minorities.
The Trump administration just took symbolic and courageous action against CRT. It issued a memo to federal agencies calling for the end of the government's CRT racial sensitivity trainings, terming them divisive anti-American propaganda.
Does America have real issues in its past?
Yes.
Have we made real progress that we must guard carefully?
Also yes.
The White House has led well here.
I'm Owen Strand.
The Pepperdine Graduate School of Public Policy, impacting policy decisions today, preparing public leaders for tomorrow.
Trending now on the Larry Alder Show.
The indoctrination of the American voter has been going on for a very, very long period of time.
And we as Republicans, we as believers in liberty, we as conservatives, We should have pushed back a lot sooner, and we need to push back harder.
That's why I made the Uncle Tom movie, because we also have to fight this battle at the cultural level, too.
Melissa, thank you so much for that.
This is a crucial election.
I'll tell you why.
These guys get in charge.
By these guys, I'm talking about Democrats, of course.
Assume they take the presidency.
Let's assume they take the Senate to retain control of the House.
They're going to immediately get rid of the filibuster so that they can pass any budget they want on a simple majority vote.
They're going to vote on whether or not to admit Washington, D.C. as a state.
That gives them two more senators.
They're going to vote on whether or not to admit Puerto Rico as a state.
That gives them two more senators.
They're going to push for a commission to study reparations.
We're crying out loud.
They're going to raise taxes.
They're going to repeal the Trump tax cuts.
And those tax cuts, 80% of the benefits went through the non-top 1%.
They're going to push for the legalization of the illegal aliens who are here.
Amnesty.
And believe me, the number of illegal aliens in America is not 11 million.
That's a number that they all cite.
One study by a professor from Yale, so therefore you know it must be legitimate, puts a number at between 20 and 25 million illegal aliens.
That would change our voting electorate forever.
That's exactly why the Democrats want to do it.
Can you imagine if 11 to 20 million illegal aliens...
Turn citizens, turn voters, pull the lever for the Republican Party.
we wouldn't even be having this discussion. - Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Mike Dellinger Show. - Here was what the President pointed out.
He wants and he, this is the facts.
Democrats are blocking the last relief package that Republicans put on the table and had the backing of the White House.
Over a month ago, Democrats filibustered any discussion on an eventual passage of a $300 billion package.
$1,200 to desperate Americans.
$400 a week unemployment.
The President broke it down last night beautifully.
The problem you have is Nancy Pelosi.
She couldn't care less about the worker.
She couldn't care less about Our people, and we should have a stimulus.
And I want a stimulus.
The Republicans will approve a stimulus.
The problem is, she doesn't want to do it because she thinks it's bad for her election.
The fact is, she's wrong.
Because people know she's in our way.
She's not approving it.
She doesn't appreciate our people, and she doesn't appreciate at all our workers.
Nancy Pelosi, we are ready to sign and pass stimulus, but she's got to approve it.
And of course, right away.
You can hear the minor bird interrupting him.
That's not a sh...
All right.
All right, y'all.
I have on the line Senior Legal Counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, known as ADF. Boy, is that exactly what they do.
They're indispensable to the society at this time.
So, Matt Sharp, welcome to the Dennis Prager Show.
Thanks for having me on.
You deserve it.
You've earned it.
Earned it, and I always tell my listeners, earn is my favorite four-letter word.
That's what ADF has done.
Tell me about the story everybody knows, vaguely at least.
About the shop owner in Washington State who had a gay customer for years.
Tell me if I have any detail wrong.
And then the gay customer was going to marry a man, and he asked her to bake a cake for the wedding.
And she said, do I have it right thus far?
Floral arrangement.
I'm sorry, I make a floral arrangement.
Yes, I got it mixed up with another case.
Fine.
But I mean, to make a floral arrangement for the wedding.
She happily has always sold this gay man, and any gay is irrelevant to her.
She's sold them flowers.
But to be asked to, as it were, participate in an event to which she objects religiously, that's the issue, correct?
That's exactly right.
Washington State did what?
They came after her with full force, saying that she violated state law by not being willing to use her creative talents to serve this longtime customer in a gay wedding.
And this was not just coming after telling her she's got to change, but next thing you know, the ACLU jumps in, going after her business, her livelihood, even her home.
We're looking at millions of dollars potentially in legal fees that she could be forced to pay simply for trying to operate her floral business, a business where she serves everyone, but to operate it consistent with her religious beliefs about marriage.
I want people to understand, I don't know why this is difficult unless you have an agenda that blocks logic.
There's a difference between an individual and an event.
Is that fair to say?
Absolutely right.
And I think one of the things that's been encouraging is in cases like Barronelle's or Jack Phillips, you mentioned the baker.
We've actually seen gay owners of businesses who also own wedding businesses stand up in support for Jack and Baronelle because they recognize that the freedom of Baronelle to operate her business consistent with her beliefs also protects the freedom of those gay-owned businesses to operate consistent with their beliefs.
And that's ultimately what we're asking for is a live and let live approach of let these people decide for themselves which events, again we're not talking about people like you said, but which events that are consistent with their beliefs that they feel comfortable using their creative talents to celebrate.
I am in no way comparing a gay wedding to a white supremacist rally, but I will use an extreme example.
In order to make the point, and that is, would an individual who objects to white supremacy be obligated to supply flowers to that event?
No.
We think the freedom we're fighting for is the freedom to decline any event that violates a person's deep convictions.
Right, so again, I don't know why this would be an issue to people.
So Washington State came against her.
You took her case, the ADF? That's right, representing Baronelle free of charge through years of litigation now that's been to the Supreme Court.
And was sent back down to the Washington State Supreme Court, who doubled down and said, nope, we're still going to find you in violation.
And so now we're once again back at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
The Supreme Court did not rule on it?
No.
So they had ruled in Jack Phillips' case, the Colorado Baker, and granted him relief.
And what they did is told the Washington Supreme Court, hey, you need to look at Baronell's case again in light of us ruling for Jack.
We want you to go back and take a look and resolve this.
And the Washington Supreme Court refused to and almost copied and pasted their previous ruling against Baronelle rather than taking seriously their duty to see if Baronelle deserves the same justice that Jack Phillips did in his defense of his ability to operate his cake business consistent with his beliefs.
So this is an ongoing battle where time and time again we're having to fight against Baronelle.
The Washington State Supreme Court, the ACLU, and others.
Right.
Let me just remind people, before we take a break, please now click on the banner for the ADF. I raise funds for very few groups.
This woman would have no defense if you didn't support the ADF. The banner is at DennisPrager.com.
I'd like to remind you that if you suffer from back pain, Leg pain, arm pain, elbow pain, knee pain.
And you haven't tried Relief Factor.
I would be fascinated to know why.
The number of people this has helped is, I don't know, hundreds of thousands.
Help me.
I only sponsor it because...
It's helped my wife before I ever started advertising it.
Try it for three weeks.
Doesn't work in three weeks.
Doesn't work.
Simple as that.
$19.95 for three weeks.
ReliefFactor.com 800-500-8384 When it happened to Trump and the New York Times,
they didn't say a peep.
And when it happened to Biden, they pretended suddenly we can't, not only are we not wanting to show this, but we're going to go out of our way to anytime anybody links to that article, we're not going to allow them to tweet it out.
This is gigantic influence.
Peddling.
I don't know.
I guess my question to you, Kevin, is what do you think is going to happen?
Because this is genuinely in our nation unprecedented.
Well, I think it gives you a real clear snapshot of what it looks like without someone in the federal government bureaucracy that is dismantling it and tearing it apart and saying these things are crooked and corrupt.
Without that force, this stuff would happen with no consequences.
And so just imagine the amount of spying that we knew that went on with the Obama administration and just imagine all three branches of government all under the same control.
All allowing such surveillance, and in this case, cover-up of corrupt behavior, etc., to be allowed to continue to occur without any consequence, and in all likelihood, without any awareness being raised to it.
Again, it was the people of the United States responding to these huge media platforms.
And let's be very clear about one thing about these platforms.
They are not governed.
The same way that media outlets are.
They're not governed by the same rules that the New York Post or the New York Times are.
They're supposed to be neutral pass-throughs.
They're like a phone company.
We're not supposed to know what's coming through the individual calls that people make on the phone lines.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Hi, this is Dennis Prager and you know we are in a fight for our fundamental freedoms.
That's why I am grateful for my friends at Alliance Defending Freedom.
They are on the front lines fighting pivotal lawsuits for Americans whose freedoms are threatened.
And they do it for free.
That's why we're asking you to be as generous as you can by giving today so that Alliance Defending Freedom can continue to fight these lawsuits and be ready when your rights are threatened too.
Give your gift now by visiting adflegal.org slash Prager.
And thank you for joining the fight for freedom.
Thank you.
They do have a right to know where I stand and I'll have a right to know where I stand before they vote.
So you'll come out with a clear position before Election Day?
Yes, depending on how they handle this.
But look, what you should do is you got to make sure you vote and vote for a senator who in fact thinks reflection.
Okay, y'all.
you Don't forget there's a banner for ADF at my website.
This is an example of what they do.
So it's both fascinating radio, morally compelling, and a justification of my asking you to help fund them.
You guys have to raise a lot of money each year because you have to take on a lot of cases and lawyers are not Cheap.
So, we're there for you.
I believe in what you're doing.
The case here that ADF took is a famous case of a florist in Washington.
Washington state happily serves gays.
Anybody else?
And would not, however, make cake for a gay wedding.
I keep doing a cake.
Would not make a floral arrangement for the wedding.
Because it's an event that she doesn't believe in.
I don't believe in it either, and we have...
It has nothing to do with anti-gay.
It has to do with the belief that marriage is defined as a man and a woman.
If you don't think we're right, fine.
I'm going to a dinner, as I said.
Two men married to each other, very close to.
They know my position on same-sex marriage.
It would never occur to them I'm anti-gay.
It's the cheapening of language that the left engages in, in order to stir hatred in the country.
So, why didn't the Supreme Court simply say to the Washington Supreme Court, as we've ruled, In the case that I keep thinking of, the cake baker in Colorado, you cannot force this woman to make a floral arrangement for this event.
Why didn't they do that?
Yeah, well, usually when the court sends a case back, that's exactly the message they're sending, is you got something wrong here, go back and fix it, consistent with what we did with Jack Phillips, the Colorado baker.
And I think that's what made what the Washington Supreme Court did all the more galling, is that they rejected that.
And rather than reconsider the case, rather than give Barronell a fair shake and rule for her, consistent with the ruling for Jack Phillips in Colorado, they copied and pasted and issued the almost exact same decision against her once again.
And I think that goes back to the religious hostility that is underlying a lot of this, that was in Jack Phillips' case and these other cases, where it's a simple, we don't like your beliefs, and we're going to make you suffer for it.
And all Baronelle is asking is, let me operate my business, that I serve everyone.
And she even says to this day she would love to welcome this gay couple back in her shop and sell them anything they want, as long as she's not forced to participate and create floral arrangements for weddings, That it's even a case shows the deterioration of America in my lifetime.
No matter what your position, the issue is a freedom issue.
So has she suffered as a result?
Absolutely.
She has obviously been subject to Terrible, vile attacks on her that have required her to take extra precautions and threats that she's received.
And even her business has been impacted by it.
And so this is something that's not just an academic legal battle.
It's her life.
And hovering over all of this is that if she loses and the ACLU comes after her for over a million in attorney's fees, they can come after her business, they can come after her house, they can come after everything she and her husband own.
And so this is truly a fight for her very livelihood and everything she's worked her life for, all over her very polite declining to do a specific event for a long-time customer that she loves and continues to love to this day as a good friend.
That's what we're fighting for.
Well, that part I find hard.
I can't stand the guy, okay?
I don't understand how she could possibly love him.
She treated him perfectly, decently for how many years, and then he screws her life?
I can't stand this man.
I think he's a lowlife.
It's completely a testament to the character of Baronelle.
Well, she's got a better character than I do.
I loathe him.
You know, she truly does not love him to this day, and I've seen it in her eyes of tearing up, of the thought that She would love to have him walk back in the shop and give him a hug, and I've heard that from her own lips.
And it just shows that this is, like you said earlier, this is not a thing where she opposes Rob and his lifestyle, but rather is standing true to her religious beliefs while still continuing to love Rob and his partner and anyone that walks in her shop.
I don't know how he justifies to himself.
This woman has treated me so well.
And now I'm trying to destroy her, her husband, and their livelihoods.
I don't know.
I mean, he is a hate-filled human being.
You don't have to react.
I'm telling my audience.
There are very few people I loathe.
This person that she loves, I loathe.
But what are you going to do?
I don't think...
I believe love is earned.
She doesn't.
It's a separate question.
It has nothing to do with you or ADF. So, this is now, where is it now, legally?
So, we are back at the U.S. Supreme Court, once again asking them to correct what the Washington Supreme Court did once again, to say, don't just send the case back, but give Baronelle a clear ruling of her ability to live out her faith.
And it's part of ADF's larger battle that we're representing other creative professionals like her that have gotten relief.
In Arizona and Minnesota and other states where people like Baronelle have gotten victors and been able to go on to their life.
And that's what we're seeking at the U.S. Supreme Court now on behalf of Baronelle.
And by the generosity of so many people that are listening and have supported her, we've been able to do this free of charge.
So she never has to worry about paying a cent of ADF. We're honored to stand with a woman like this.
Well, I'm honored to support you, Matt Sharp.
Thank you so much.
And let me please ask you folks, I mean, if this does not compel you to give, nothing will.
Good people are divided into three groups.
Those who fight, those who help the fighters, and those who do nothing.
Just help the fighters.
Go to the AVF banner at Dennis Prager.com.
This is Owen Strand for Townhall.com.
If you're on a college campus today or have a child on campus, there's a solid chance you'll hear this.
All white people are racist.
You might hear this too.
America is founded on white supremacy.
These two sentences are not mere overheated emotion.
They express an ideology called critical race theory, or CRT, which argues that race is a social construct made by white people.
Just as race was once used to enslave and terrorize, so it is used today to keep America unequal, unfair, and hostile to minorities.
The Trump administration just took symbolic and courageous action against CRT. It issued a memo to federal agencies calling for the end of the government's CRT racial sensitivity trainings, terming them divisive anti-American propaganda.
Does America have real issues in its past?
Yes.
Have we made real progress that we must guard carefully?
Also yes.
The White House has led well here.
I'm Owen Strand.
The Pepperdine Graduate School of Public Policy, impacting policy decisions today, preparing public leaders for tomorrow.
Trending now on the Larry Alder Show.
The indoctrination of the American voter has been going on for a very, very long period of time.
And we as Republicans, we as believers in liberty, we as conservatives, We should have pushed back a lot sooner, and we need to push back harder.
That's why I made the Uncle Tom movie, because we also have to fight this battle at the cultural level, too.
Melissa, thank you so much for that.
This is a crucial election.
I'll tell you why.
These guys get in charge.
By these guys, I'm talking about Democrats, of course.
Assume they take the presidency.
Let's assume they take the Senate to retain control of the House.
They're going to immediately get rid of the filibuster.
So that they can pass any budget they want on a simple majority vote.
They're going to vote on whether or not to admit Washington, D.C. as a state.
That gives them two more senators.
They're going to vote on whether or not to admit Puerto Rico as a state.
That gives them two more senators.
They're going to push for a commission to study reparations.
We're crying out loud.
They're going to raise taxes.
They're going to repeal the Trump tax cuts.
And those tax cuts, 80% of the benefits went through the non-top 1%.
They're going to push for the legalization of the illegal aliens who are here.
Amnesty.
And believe me, the number of illegal aliens in America is not 11 million.
That's a number that they all cite.
One study by a professor from Yale, so therefore you know it must be legitimate, puts a number at between 20 and 25 million illegal aliens.
That would change our voting electorate forever.
That's exactly why the Democrats want to do it.
Can you imagine if 11 to 20 million illegal aliens...
turn citizens turn voters pull the lever for the Republican Party we wouldn't even be having this discussion Keep up with what's trending subscribe on YouTube today Trending now on the Mike Delegger show
There's a school Where is the school that played the PragerU video, or is it?
Ohio.
Toledo.
Outside of Toledo.
It's gotten national attention.
A teacher decided to play a PragerU video.
One parent...
I'm sorry?
I want you to get the microphone so that I don't have to translate you.
You're on.
The teacher...
In the class offered extra credit for students who watched a PragerU video and wrote a report on it.
Any PragerU video?
Any PragerU video.
One parent objected.
The program was stopped.
Completely halted.
The administration at the school apologized objectively.
And life goes on.
Thank you.
The dominant beliefs about America's, Americans' beliefs about themselves have crumbled.
the land of the free and the home of the brave is no longer the land of the free and the home of the brave.
It also points out one other thing, which is that if the left needs to control 100% of the narrative, They can't let any other view in.
Right.
Because then the edifice starts to crack and then crumble.
Right.
That's right.
One PragerU video is lethal to four years of leftist indoctrination in a high school.
That's right.
I see it when I speak at colleges.
You should all watch my speech at the University of Wyoming.
It's on YouTube.
Socialism makes you selfish.
The very large number, I think it was 700, because there was an overflow into another room, audience of students had never heard these things.
They never hear us.
And it's critical to the left, any left, any country, anywhere, The left does not allow dissent.
There were bumper stickers, dissent is patriotic during the Bush administration.
But dissent is only patriotic when the power is on the right.
dissent is suppressed when the left is in power.
To Ben in Pennsylvania, he wanted to say that when he sees people, when he runs, he sees people quickly put their mask on.
I know, it's astonishing.
As you run by somebody, you will infect or be infected.
We continue.
Trending now on America First with Sebastian Bercat.
It demonstrates that Joe Biden, the Democrat nominee for president, this is not a Hunter Biden scandal.
This is a Joe Biden scandal.
Joe Biden lied to the American people when he said he had nothing to do with Hunter's businesses.
We now know we have email documented proof that nobody's disputing the authenticity of these emails.
Nobody's disputing the authenticity of the documents that Joe Biden met with Burisma leadership.
At the behest of his son, Hunter Biden, when he was vice president of the United States, and then he lied to the American people about it.
His campaign doesn't even deny taking a meeting.
What do they say?
It's fascinating.
They just claim that there was no meeting on his quote-unquote official schedule.
Doesn't mean anything.
Doesn't mean anything.
I can tell you presidents and vice presidents take scores of meetings that are not on their quote-unquote official schedules every day.
We've been able to document at least three in the last 24 hours that Biden has taken as vice president of the United States.
In fact, I can tell you because I've met with the current president and vice president of the United States, and those meetings are not on their official schedule.
The last time I met the president, I was in the White House, said I wanted to meet him, and they put me in the Oval Office after a COVID test.
I wasn't on the agenda.
Right, exactly.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Mike Delliger Show.
Like including what police officers he thinks should do when their life is in jeopardy and a dangerous bad guy, a dangerous person armed.
Is charging a police officer, Sheriff Joe knows how to handle that.
We can do this.
You can ban chokeholds.
But beyond that, you have to teach people how to de-escalate circumstances.
De-escalate.
So instead of anybody coming at you and the first thing you do is shoot to kill, you shoot them in the leg.
There's ways you have to do more background checks in terms of whether or not the person coming in passes certain psychological tests.
Yeah, he just lost the entire law enforcement vote in America.
Because anybody who is law enforcement, anybody who loves law enforcement, like a family member, anybody who is a relative of law enforcement knows how asinine it is to say you shoot somebody charging at you.
Instead of center mass, to stop them, you shoot them in the leg.
You clip them, right?
Right, Uncle Joe?
You clip them in the ankle.
That's what you do when they're coming at you with a.357 Magnum.
You shoot them in the...
And when you shoot them in the leg, don't shoot them in the femoral artery.
Shoot them in the fleshy part of their ankle, preferably on the left side, where there's a little...
Maybe you could just get their big toe.
Right?
Right?
Mr. Law Enforcement Expert.
He just lost the entire law enforcement vote.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
Last night, would you explain to people why it is ominous, though not illegal, what Twitter and Facebook did?
The New York Post broke a story about emails discovered that indicate that Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son, set up a meeting with his father when his father was vice president and the officers from Burisma, the Ukrainian natural gas company that was paying Hunter Biden millions of dollars.
Throughout all of impeachment, Joe Biden insisted he didn't know anything about Burisma.
He wasn't involved.
He didn't know what his son was doing.
And so if this story is right, it means Joe Biden was lying, that he was very involved, and what he told the press and told everyone else was a flat-out lie.
I don't know if the New York Post story is right or not.
It seems to me that it raises some real questions that need to be answered.
But what Twitter and Facebook did is they decided they didn't want anyone talking about it.
So they banned anyone from linking to the story.
So if you sent out a tweet, It was absurd, and they even took it a step further.
The New York Post themselves were sending out tweets with their own story, as media outlets do.
They blocked the New York Post.
They prevented the New York Post from posting.
The New York Post has the fourth highest circulation newspaper in the country.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Eric Metaxas Show.
Kayleigh McEnany is the press secretary for the President of the United States.
When she posted a New York Post article, not just some crazy tweet, she posted a New York Post article, she was locked out of her Twitter account.
Facebook suppressed this stuff.
Twitter suppressed this stuff.
They did it for different reasons, and the explanations that they gave were equally dissatisfying.
Facebook tried to claim that this was illegitimately gained material, that they didn't have the right to this material to begin with, that it was hacked.
Twitter took a wholly different path, saying something along the lines of, well, we can't prove that any of the facts involved here are true.
So one of them's kind of admitting...
Maybe truth to the facts, but saying that the legitimacy of how it was obtained was wrong, and the others saying they don't have proof that it is in fact true.
Okay, but Kevin, let's say somebody finds material, private material on me.
They steal it, and they put it all over the web.
You'd say, yeah, that's wrong.
Eric, let me give you a more concrete example.
The New York Times published information related to the president's tax information that was not legally theirs to publish.
Correct.
They had no source on the record for it.
They had no clear legal obtaining of it, and yet they published it.
And Twitter and Facebook did precious nothing about those articles when they were retweeted in Facebook throughout the universe.
In other words, if you need proof that they are biased and that they're using their unbelievable Dr.
Fussband, the hero of the Dennis Prager Show, the unsung hero.
I know his official name is Dr. Fassbinder.
I'm well aware of that, and I thank you, but it's not what is said.
It's not what we hear.
This is the male-female hour.
I've been broadcasting this since right after the Civil War.
So from Civil War I to Civil War II, we've had the male-female hour.
It feels like that, but it's not true.
I don't know, we began, this is about 15 years, would you say?
16, 17 years?
A lot of people, it's not that much, really.
Because it's 20 years on the happiness hour, I thought I started about 3-4 years later, the male-female hour.
Alright, anyway, whatever it is, we've been doing it a while.
Many of you...
This is very touching to me.
Have written to me or told me that this has played a significant role in improving your marriage.
Couples have come over with big smiles.
It's very touching to me.
Free marital therapy.
You know why?
Because most problems, not all, of course, but most problems between the sexes are universal.
Therefore, universal clarity can help a very large number of people.
Look, there may be specific issues in your marriage, obviously.
But most issues between men and women are universalizable.
And therefore, a show dealing with all these issues can be very helpful.
All right, y'all.
You'll forgive me, but today there will be a political overtone to the male-female hour.
It's very rare that politics intrudes on the happiness hour or the male-female hour.
Sometimes, by definition, it will on the ultimate issues hour.
The three dedicated hours of my weekly, of my week broadcasting each week.
So here it goes.
I read constantly that the suburban woman is now going over to vote Democrat in the presidential election.
Maybe others.
That President Trump has lost a lot of suburban women.
Or is there another term?
Is soccer bomb the same as suburban woman?
They don't use soccer mom anymore?
Why not?
Really?
What about water polo mom?
No?
I'll tell you this.
If your mom plays water polo, she's in good shape.
I'd like to know how long it would take for me to play water polo before I fainted.
That would be my only question.
How long would I last?
Not would I score a goal.
How long would I last?
That is an amazing sport.
So the suburban mom, we're told, which is usually a mom.
I guess single women are not living as much in the suburbs as in urban areas.
Be that as it may, the suburban woman, we are told, I mean, if the woman didn't vote for Donald Trump last time, it's irrelevant.
So I want to ask you, my dear listeners, do you believe that?
Are you one of the suburban women who voted for Donald Trump in 2016 and will not vote for him in 2020?
And are those of you who know such women Please call.
I'd like to know what it is that has led them to this decision.
By the way, you can call in if you don't believe it's true.
I have no idea if it's true.
None.
I don't even have a theory on it.
I have theories on almost everything.
I have theories on when...
Beethoven uses the key of A major.
But I won't share them with you right now.
But I don't have a theory on this.
I don't even have a theory on whether it's true.
1-8 Prager 776. 877-243-7776.
Has the suburban American woman left the president?
That's the question.
Yes or no?
What do you think?
Do you know someone who has?
Are you someone who has?
If you are someone who has, you get a special gift from my engineer.
He will send you a knob.
Used on the Dennis Prager Show.
I mean, that's eBay material, my friends.
1-8 Prager-776-877-243-7776.
It raises the larger issue of women and this president.
The mainstream media are telling us how...
Women who even normally vote Republican or even voted for the president last time won't this time.
I don't know if it's true.
But if it's true, I don't understand it.
Nothing has come out about the president vis-a-vis women or women's issues in the last four years that would have alienated women from him.
He has no scandal, even hint of scandal, in the White House, as a former Democratic president did.
In fact, two former, John Kennedy and Bill Clinton.
So, what would have turned a woman around?
Is she unhappy about the lowest unemployment rates in American recorded history?
Is she unhappy about peace in the Middle East that is breaking out dramatically?
Is she unhappy about sanctions on Iran?
What is she unhappy about that would have turned the suburban woman who was apparently or allegedly a bastion of support of the president, right?
Otherwise, it's irrelevant.
They don't speak about the urban woman, because urbanites in general don't vote for this president, don't vote Republican.
So, this is really a big issue, because that, if it's true, that could decide the election.
A lot of suburban women in the United States.
Danielle in Phoenix, the famous Danielle of Phoenix.
Hello.
Hello, hello.
Thank you for taking my call.
Well, thank you for calling.
So, I am a suburban woman in Phoenix, and I voted for Trump in 2016, and I will again in 2020. And I just would like to say that I know a lot of suburban women between my job and just socially, and I don't know any of them that are not going to vote for Trump in 2020 that also voted for him in 2016. But I do know women that didn't vote for him in 2016 that will vote for him in 2020. Really?
Yes, quite a few.
If I asked them why, what would they say?
Most of them would say that they've watched what he's done, you know, as far as with the economy and with jobs and, you know, just all the progress he's made in spite of everything he's been through.
I mean, that's the conversations I've had.
I do want to tell you a story about my daughter, too.
My daughter's 21. She graduated from Grand Canyon University.
She's in med school to be a physical therapist.
We went to the Trump rally in Prescott on Monday.
And she got a call yesterday.
She works for a very large company in America.
She got a call yesterday because she posted pictures and wasn't wearing a mask from her work.
And she was not working.
She was on her personal time.
And her manager called her and disciplined her for it.
Hold on.
I want to hear a little more about that.
It's getting bad.
back in a moment this is Owen Strand for townhall.com If you're on a college campus today or have a child on campus, there's a solid chance you'll hear this.
All white people are racist.
You might hear this too.
America is founded on white supremacy.
These two sentences are not mere overheated emotion.
They express an ideology called critical race theory, or CRT, which argues that race is a social construct made by white people.
Just as race was once used to enslave and terrorize, so it is used today to keep America unequal, unfair, and hostile to minorities.
The Trump administration just took symbolic and courageous action against CRT. It issued a memo to federal agencies calling for the end of the government's CRT racial sensitivity trainings, terming them divisive anti-American propaganda.
Does America have real issues in its past?
Yes.
Have we made real progress that we must guard carefully?
Also yes.
The White House has led well here.
I'm Owen Strand.
The Pepperdine Graduate School of Public Policy, impacting policy decisions today, preparing public leaders for tomorrow.
Trending now on the Larry Elder Show.
The indoctrination of the American voter has been going on for a very, very long period of time.
And we as Republicans, we as believers in liberty, we as conservatives, Should have pushed back a lot sooner, and we need to push back harder.
That's why I made the Uncle Tom movie, because we also have to fight this battle at the cultural level, too.
Melissa, thank you so much for that.
This is a crucial election.
I'll tell you why.
These guys get in charge.
By these guys, I'm talking about Democrats, of course.
Assume they take the presidency.
Let's assume they take the Senate to retain control of the House.
They're going to immediately get rid of the filibuster so that they can pass any budget they want on a simple majority vote.
They're going to vote on whether or not to admit Washington, D.C. as a state.
That gives them two more senators.
They're going to vote on whether or not to admit Puerto Rico as a state.
That gives them two more senators.
They're going to push for a commission to study reparations.
We're crying out loud.
They're going to raise taxes.
They're going to repeal the Trump tax cuts.
And those tax cuts, 80% of the benefits went through the non-top 1%.
They're going to push for the legalization of the illegal aliens who are here.
Amnesty.
And believe me, the number of illegal aliens in America is not 11 million.
That's a number that they all cite.
One study by a professor from Yale, so therefore you know it must be legitimate, puts a number at between 20 and 25 million illegal aliens.
That would change our voting electorate forever.
That's exactly why the Democrats want to do it.
Can you imagine if 11 to 20 million illegal aliens...
Turn citizens, turn voters, pull the lever for the Republican Party.
We wouldn't even be having this discussion.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Mike Dellinger Show.
Here was what the president pointed out.
He wants and he...
This is the facts.
This is the fact.
Democrats are blocking the last relief package that Republicans put on the table and had the backing of the White House.
Over a month ago, Democrats filibustered any discussion on an eventual passage of a $300 billion package.
$1,200 to desperate Americans.
$400 a week unemployment.
The President broke it down last night beautifully.
The problem you have is Nancy Pelosi.
She couldn't care less about the worker.
She couldn't care less about our people.
And we should have a stimulus.
And I want a stimulus.
The Republicans will approve a stimulus.
The problem is she doesn't want to do it because she thinks it's bad for her election.
The fact is she's wrong because people know she's in our way.
She's not approving it.
She doesn't appreciate our people, and she doesn't appreciate our people.
I want to remind you, as we get back to the male-female hour, which is a rare moment, It's on politics, but it's not advocative.
It's just descriptive.
But I want to remind you about KeepAmericaAmerica.com.
Those of you who believe that there's a lot at stake, maybe America is at stake in this election.
The Job Creators Network that they have created now, KeepAmericaAmerica.com.
It is about getting out the vote.
Please visit it.
We need your help to save this country.
I've never talked this way.
I don't believe that it's at stake.
I know it's at stake.
So do your part.
Go to KeepAmericaAmerica.com.
Let's Keep America America.
And I thank you on behalf of America.
I'm talking to Danielle in Phoenix.
The subject is, are all these reports about suburban women who voted for President Trump in 2016, not voting for him, abandoning him, are they accurate?
If so, why?
Do you know anybody to whom this applies?
Does it apply to you if you're a suburban woman?
You know what you sound like, Danielle?
What's that?
You sound healthy.
Well, thank you.
I am healthy.
I love that.
I love your response.
Oh, God, is that refreshing.
Are you married?
I am married.
Yes, I am.
Are you happily married?
Very happily married.
You have children?
Yes.
Between us, we have five.
Four of them are adult children, and then we have one still at home, and then our nephew also.
You're raising your nephew?
Yes.
That's very nice.
Are you religious?
Yes, Christian.
Were you always?
My parents started going to church when I was in high school, so since then.
I went actually to a Bible college in Nashville.
No kidding.
Nashville keeps cropping up.
A lot of people are moving there.
It's a great town.
Yes, it is.
I agree with you.
You know the opposite of what is being reported.
Absolutely.
Women who did not vote for Donald Trump who will now.
So, a final question.
What do you make of these reports?
I think they're like all the other reports.
They're just nonsense.
I hope we meet one day.
I talk to people on both sides, and I actually know more people that traditionally vote Democrat that are voting for Trump this year also.
I mean, I could probably name Tim off the top of my head.
What's going to happen in your Senate race?
Ugh, I don't know.
That's scary.
It's a good question.
It's very scary.
Anyway, I said when you didn't pick up on it, I really do hope we meet.
I get to Phoenix a lot.
We have massive...
PragerU has massive support in Phoenix.
I mean, certainly a member of the board is from Phoenix, but...
I tell you, I just had another fundraiser there.
The particularly wonderful people that we meet there.
So, I have very warm feelings to Phoenix and to my Phoenix station.
Very warm feelings.
Alright, let's see.
Wow.
This is fascinating.
John in Chicago, hi.
Hi, Dennis.
That's me.
Hi, happy to be talking to you.
Good.
So, I found the opposite.
I actually live in a town called Marengo, which is northwest of Chicago, and I've found so many suburban women around here.
That, you know, voted for, you know, like Bernie Sanders, voted for Hillary Clinton proudly because she was a woman, has really, and has traditionally voted Democrat, has really gone back and, I mean, including my, you know, including my fiancée, I'll be married next year, but including her, you know, she was, you know, very much a Democrat voter and, you know, did not like Trump, and, well, she's the one who bought the Trump yard sign this year.
How do you explain your fiancé's change?
I've talked to her about it, and I tried to educate her.
Not that Democrats are uneducated.
I just wanted her to be informed.
So I had her watch the debates.
I had her watch some stuff.
She kind of dragged on through it because she hates watching the news.
But then she started to realize that the left does not make any sense.
And it's not that they don't make any sense.
For normal people, they make scary sense.
She said, oh my god, these people are radical.
They're nuts.
So she's really grasped the importance of this election.
Well, look, she's 29, so I'm sure she's in her 20s or early 30s.
Going to be a very revealing thing.
All of these reports, will they turn out to be true?
The defection of the suburban woman.
That is the subject of this male-female hour.
I rarely do political, but we're so close to the election.
And it is a male-female issue, because they don't say the suburban man, right?
You never hear that.
So, is it true?
That's the question.
Kelly, Orlando, Florida.
Hello.
Hey Dennis, how are you?
I'm well, thank you.
Good.
I really appreciate you taking my call.
Great.
Glad you called.
So as I told your screener, I did vote for Trump in 2016, and I will most definitely be voting for him again this year.
I'm looking forward to it, and I can tell you that...
People around me, while they are quiet about it, to liberals, the conservative women that I know are voting for Trump.
That's so interesting.
You know, if a person of the left who only listened to NPR were to listen to this hour, They wouldn't know what to make of it.
The calm, the non-hate, the intelligence of the people calling and who are going to vote for Donald Trump would cause cognitive dissonance in these people.
Yes, I agree.
They don't hear people like you.
They don't know you exist.
No, and they don't want to know that I exist.
That's right.
And then they look at the election and go, where did all these people come from?
I'm hoping they're going to be in shock and awe.
Yes, shock and awe.
That's good terminology.
Do you even understand that there would be a defection?
Do you think it's just a phony news item?
I think it's completely made up.
I think it's made up to make people think that Joe's got it in the bag, and if you do support Trump, then your vote isn't going to count in the first place.
That's right.
I think you're right.
Bless you.
Turning now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
Amy Coney Barrett was, of course, pressed on Roe vs. Roe.
Wade.
Let's go to cut one.
This is her response on the decision of Roe v.
Wade.
Play tape.
I think on that question, I'm going to invoke Justice Kagan's description, which I think is perfectly put.
When she was in her confirmation hearing, she said, That she was not gonna grade precedent or give it a thumbs up or a thumbs down.
And I think in an area where precedent continues to be pressed and litigated, as is true of Casey, it would be particularly, it would actually be wrong and a violation of the canons for me to do that as a sitting judge.
Now, Roe versus Wade was a decision that nationalized abortion.
Now, prior to Roe versus Wade, there were several states across the country that had outlawed abortion.
The problem with Roe vs.
Wade is not even the issue of abortion.
Abortion does stop a beating heart and abortion does terminate a human life.
The Roe vs.
Wade overturned the state mandates.
People did not vote for this.
It was one of the most undemocratic decisions in the history of the Supreme Court.
It basically nationalized the slaughter of innocent life.
It was a 7-2 decision.
It was done by the Burger Court.
The Warren Court prior to the Burger Court really set the landscape and set the framing for Roe vs.
Wade.
And what's happened since Roe vs.
Wade?
60 million plus abortions in our country.
It was a 7-2 decision.
And the decision actually involved the case of a woman named Norma McCorvey.
She used the pseudonym, of course, Jane Roe.
She wanted an abortion.
She lived in Texas where abortion was illegal.
and eventually sued her local district attorney, Henry Wade.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on America First with Sebastian Borka.
This is the point that Scott Adams made.
Yeah, I think he said that really well.
I agree with him.
Another Russiagate thing, I'm not interested, because that's what they want you to be.
They want you to switch off so you believe the surface garbage, the prostitutes, the urinate...
And what you think you remember.
Most people, there's so much...
I think it's a really exciting movie.
I think a lot of people have said, wow, I didn't realize how...
Fun and exciting and kind of inspiring it would be to watch, considering you're like, well, I know this story, but actually you don't.
You don't know the story.
So what is the story?
People need to watch it.
Well, tell them how they can watch it.
It's the plot against the president.
But in the Washington style of the elevator pitch, you made this movie, but if you had to sell it in Hollywood, what is the two-sentence pitch of the plot against the president?
What happened?
Well, I mean, I'd say it was an absolutely organized coup against an administration that...
By who?
By the intelligence agencies, by overreaching law enforcement agencies like the FBI. And by the Democrat, the DNC and the Hillary campaign, in addition to the Obama administration, I mean, I think we do a pretty good job of showing how all of those things are connected.
All the agencies, the White House, Brennan, Comey, the NSA. And the real, I think one of the better points that was made is that...
You don't really understand the real danger and implications of what happened.
It's like people are like, oh, Russiagate, yeah, it turned out not to be true, and that was really annoying that we had to go through that, but actually it's really dangerous.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Subscribe on YouTube.
Subscribe on YouTube.
Remember, that's the beauty.
That's why it's called Wednesday, because it's male-female wed.
Get it?
Wednesday.
Very few people know the origin of the term, because they don't pronounce it Wednesday.
I don't either.
And the topic is, are there reports about the suburban woman leaving?
The Trump support camp.
True.
That's it.
I'm just hearing you out on this matter.
A suburban woman that I married to, as I am me, Trump is going to get votes from women and blacks and Hispanics who didn't vote for him in 2016 many more than from those who voted for him last time.
Many more new votes from those groups than members of those groups who will abandon him.
So, that's very interesting.
I think that it's...
I just don't know.
I mean, how could I know?
That's why I have a show and I learn because of the largeness of the audience.
You get to hear from people and, you know, These are calls from around the country.
From women, suburban women, saying, it's not my experience.
The women I know are, more women, are voting for him than previously.
All right, let's go to, I'm going to try to make it in different parts of the country, unless there's somebody who has a different view.
Oh, this is interesting.
Maya in Evanston, Illinois.
Hello.
Yes, hello.
Hi.
Hi.
My comment was, in 2016, I really didn't want to vote for Trump, but I didn't like Hillary either, so I held my nose and I voted for Trump.
And this year, I'm very happy to go and vote for him.
No holding of the nose.
Not at all.
I really look for the man.
His style is not the best, but I like the substance.
And I know a lot of people who voted for Hillary, actually, in a previous election, and they are voting for Trump.
Where are you from originally?
Ex-Soviet Union Republic, Estonia.
Oh, really?
Fascinating.
So, from Tallinn?
Oh my god, yes.
I'm from Thailand.
Yeah, I was there.
It was fascinating.
It was a great trip.
Well, thank you so much.
I'm just looking at my producer.
Have I not told you that he has the Estonian-American vote wrapped up?
We were just discussing that.
The Baltics are a great place to visit when you can resume travel, my dear friends.
you Thank you.
So she held her nose four years ago, and now she's enthused.
Wow.
I really do.
I said earlier to one of the callers, I wish an NPR listener were listening to this hour.
There is so much more anger on the left.
When you hear the people calling in, does it sound like haters and, you know, the angry...
They say it's the angry white male.
The white male that you blame everything in America on?
Why would he be angry?
All right, y'all.
And let's go to Pittsburgh.
And Rebecca.
Hello, Rebecca.
Hi, Dennis.
Hi.
I voted for Trump last time, and I will vote for him this time.
But I think with that poll, you have to look at age difference.
My daughter is 33, and she gets her news from Saturday Night Live, truthfully.
I believe you.
And she believes...
She believes anything they tell her.
She will not believe the Democrats will raise her taxes.
They're saying, free this, free that.
I told her the Democrats buy their votes.
That's why they're giving everything away for free.
That's right.
It's literally buying votes.
Exactly.
So I think, I don't know anybody that's changed from 2016 till now.
I want to talk to you about your daughter for a moment.
We'll be back.
Trending now on the Mike Deliger Show.
Trending now on the Mike Deliger Show.
This is the facts.
This is the fact.
Democrats are blocking the last relief package that Republicans put on the table and had the backing of the White House.
Over a month ago, Democrats filibustered any discussion on an eventual passage of a $300 billion package.
$1,200 to desperate Americans.
$400 a week unemployment.
President broke it down last night beautifully.
The problem you have is Nancy Pelosi.
She couldn't care less about the worker.
She couldn't care less about...
Our people, and we should have a stimulus, and I want a stimulus.
The Republicans will approve a stimulus.
The problem is she doesn't want to do it because she thinks it's bad for her election.
The fact is she's wrong because people know she's in our way.
She's not approving it.
She doesn't appreciate our people, and she doesn't appreciate at all our workers.
Nancy Pelosi, we are ready to sign and pass stimulus, but she's got to approve it.
You could hear the minor bird interrupting him.
That's not a shock.
I told one of my kids last night, I said, Dad, Joanna Guthrie's terrible.
Well, that's not a shock.
You thought she was going to do a good job and be fair?
You thought an NBC Today show host would be fair to President Trump?
Don't be distracted by that.
Focus on his answers.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
So we have the New York Post article that I want to get right into, Biden's secret emails.
Can you just tell us a little bit of background on how you were able to obtain these emails and build it out for us?
So there is just the repairman.
He repairs computers, specializes in Mac, somewhere in the area where the Bidens live.
And about a year and a half ago, Hunter Biden, inebriated, he was somewhat drunk, came in with three devices to be repaired.
The gentleman recognized him only when he came up very close because he has bad eyesight.
And he took the three devices and he said one of them is gone and they deconstructed it and got rid of it.
He said one of them just needs a keyboard to be attached to it and we can see if we can run it.
He said, the third one's in bad shape, but I think I can shave it.
Hunter Biden, who then identified himself, said, well, that's the important one, meaning the one that has to be repaired.
So they signed up a form document which required payment, but it also had a very interesting clause in it.
It said, if you don't reclaim your property within 90 days of the completion of the work, the property is deemed to be abandoned.
And under the law, abandoned property becomes the property of the first paid person who takes it.
So the merchant would be the person who took it.
So for 70, 80, 90 days, he was trying to reach Hunter Biden.
Hunter Biden never responded.
120 days, 130 days, never responded.
Then he started hearing things on television and radio about the crimes allegedly committed.
Keep up with what's trending.
subscribe on YouTube today trending now on the Eric Metaxas show you you you you Thank you.
Hi everybody, male-female hour, Wednesday, second hour.
It's a political topic, but it's not a political advocacy.
I just want to have some clarity.
Here's an example of what the issue that I've raised this hour, this male-female hour is.
New poll is a headline here.
Suburban women will not vote for Trump.
This is from September 14th.
I'm sorry?
It's very new, yeah.
Survey is part of the most comprehensive study to date of women voters in 2020. It's interesting what it says.
President Trump does hold an advantage with non-college educated white women.
Well, so there are two possible conclusions to be drawn.
Forget the white part.
There are two possible conclusions.
Either, boy, you're really stupid if you don't go to college, or boy, you're really stupid if you do go to college.
There's no doubt in my mind that college makes many students stupid.
There are only two exceptions.
The student who has a very strong value system going in and thinks very clearly and logically despite what they are indoctrinated in.
And the other exception is the student who is largely drunk for four years.
I don't advocate it, but there is an upside.
They are much less likely to hear the lectures to indoctrinate them.
Suburban women...
God.
New poll.
Suburban women will not vote for Trump.
I know.
It only matters if they change their vote.
It's a very interesting thing.
That's correct.
And it doesn't address that issue about...
How did suburban women vote last time?
I don't know.
I mean, it's worth...
Obviously, you're right.
It's worth figuring that out.
Alright, I want to go just back for a moment to Rebecca in Pittsburgh.
So, this was fascinating to me.
Your daughter, how old is she?
She's 33. She's 33. She gets her news from Saturday Night Live.
She lives in downtown Chicago, and the first big riot after the George Floyd came was right outside her window.
She was terrified.
She still hasn't changed her mind about voting for Democrats.
Okay, this is very interesting.
So if you raise gingerly or non-gingerly the question, who rioted, what will she say?
She'll say there were white people and black people on the street.
Well, if you asked her, was it the left or right rioting?
What would she say?
She wouldn't know.
I wouldn't get an answer to that.
She wouldn't know.
That's a little distressing.
No.
Yeah.
Does she...
I assume she's not married?
She's single.
Yeah.
Does she want to get married?
Yes.
Does she acknowledge that she does?
Does she...
Yes.
Well, that's good.
What do you think...
What estranged her from your values?
School.
The public school here in the suburbs.
And when they went to college, my son and daughter, they would email their papers home to me to edit.
They had very poor grammar, even though this is a blue ribbon school area.
Very poor grammar, punctuation, etc.
I didn't write their papers for them.
I just corrected the errors.
And what they were writing curled my hair.
It was all...
You know, I went to Catholic school, and when we had religion, we had religion.
But every other class, the nuns did not inject Catholicism into math, geography, whatever.
No, there's no comparison.
I'm totally with you.
I've got to let you go.
Thank you.
That is exactly right.
There is more leftism.
In the average high school than Catholicism in the average Catholic school.
It's not an indictment of Catholic school.
I went to Jewish school called Yeshiva.
I mean, there's rigorous Jewish education.
Half the day in Hebrew, half the day in English.
But when we were learning secular subjects, it was just the subject.
There was no indoctrination.
Thank you.
But today, there's indoctrination in every subject in the regular schools.
That is correct.
Okay.
Let's go to Tammy in Aurora, Colorado.
Hello, Tammy.
Hi, Dennis.
You qualify as a suburban woman, right?
I think I understand what these reports are saying and why they've come out with this.
Because just a few weeks ago, I want to say just right before Trump came down with COVID, he was at a little rally at, I think, one of those that was at an airplane hangar, and he mentioned the suburban women and how they love him.
Oh, interesting.
And so, see, because they don't have a scandal to throw out there at the last minute.
Right.
That's what they're going to do.
They're going to come back and say, oh, the polls say that suburban women are bailing.
Do you have children?
Oh, I do.
I have two daughters.
I was just listening to that formal call.
I have a daughter that's 31 that basically falls right into that same category.
This is the issue.
I mean, it's so bad between me and her that we can't even discuss.
Anything having to do with politics.
Thank God you could discuss other things.
There are parents who lost their children.
What turned her around?
I'm sure it was public school, but who knows?
If you could do it all over again, would you have homeschooled her or sent her to a religious school or what?
Yes, I think I would have if I'd have known what I know now.
That's what people need to know, my friends.
These people calling in.
This is your child's future.
back in a moment hi this is Dennis Prager and you know we're in a fight for our fundamental freedoms
That's why I am grateful for my friends at Alliance Defending Freedom.
They are on the front lines fighting pivotal lawsuits for Americans whose freedoms are threatened.
And they do it for free.
That's why we're asking you to be as generous as you can by giving today so that Alliance Defending Freedom can continue to fight these lawsuits and be ready when your rights are threatened too.
Give your gift now by visiting adflegal.org slash Prager.
And thank you for joining the fight for freedom.
Thank you.
They do have a right to know where I stand, and I'll have a right to know where I stand before they vote.
So you'll come out with a clear position before Election Day?
Yes, depending on how they handle this.
But look, what you should do is you've got to make sure you vote.
And vote for a senator who, in fact, thinks reflection.
People are voting now.
I've already voted.
He makes that point repeatedly.
If George had been a real moderator, he would have pointed out, Mr. President, you always say people are already voting.
So why don't those people deserve an answer right now?
The answer is he doesn't want to answer it because it's radical.
He's going to say yes, and he's going to fundamentally change the United States.
Court packing is an assault on everything.
And you just understand, the radical left got Joe Biden to sign on to court packing.
I don't know if there will be enough senators.
We've got to hold the Republican Senate.
Against the possibility that Joe Biden wins.
I think it's a neck and neck.
Three new polls came out this morning which tell you that.
They're all North Carolina.
In North Carolina it is a tie between Biden and Trump according to Emerson.
In North Carolina Cal Cunningham is allegedly one point ahead of Tom Tillis.
I don't believe that after Cal Cunningham cheated on his wife and it has become a national news story and everyone in North Carolina knows about it.
I don't believe that.
I believe Tom Tillis is going to win.
And it shows the governor up four, the Democratic governor up four over the Republican governor.
That is within the margin of error in my view.
So North Carolina, dead heat.
I think Pennsylvania's a dead heat.
I think Wisconsin's a dead heat.
I think this is a dead heat presidential election.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Larry Alder Show.
Pat is in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Pat, you're on The Larry Elder Show.
Thank you so much for calling.
It seems to me during the Democratic primary, there was a lot of talk about not only taxing the wealthy, but something called the wealth tax.
And it was my understanding that they were taxing the wealth that you had from your...
That switch is very, very significant.
Hello, y'all.
I'm Dennis Prager, Male-Female Hour.
The report's on the suburban woman and her political preference this year.
And do you believe it's true?
All the suburban women calling in, and they and everyone they know that qualifies as a suburban woman are voting.
For the Republican candidate, Donald Trump.
This is not an advocacy hour.
You all know what I advocate anyway.
But it is a clarifying hour in this regard.
Lisa in Philadelphia.
Hi.
Hi, Dennis.
How are you?
We love you so much.
Thank you so much.
I'm a middle-aged American woman.
I grew up and my hero was Ronald Reagan.
And he started me down the...
I think the problem with young women these days, under 30 or maybe under 35, is that they're just completely uneducated.
A lot of older women have a little bit more knowledge under their belt, although I can't say that all of them are voting for Donald Trump.
But when it comes to issues that are macro instead of micro, They have absolutely no knowledge, and they're rather feelings-based.
Do you have a daughter?
I sure do.
Is she in the same category as the previous daughters mentioned?
No, I am blessed.
She is tremendous.
She is 33 years old, happily married, just had her first grandson, and I taught her a lot about this.
She grew up listening to talk radio, and thankfully, I can say that she came out unscathed.
Regarding college as well.
Where did she go to college?
Temple University in Philadelphia.
Yeah, well aware of it.
Well, thank you.
I never mentioned that.
That's a very important antidote, talk radio.
It's a very powerful force.
When I think of my colleagues and myself, Certainly in the Salem Radio Network.
And for young people to hear us, we're calm, we're reasoned.
Many of us are funny.
I won't mention the ones who are not.
And very rational.
So the kids will hear this.
This is another good example of something you can do if you're still raising your kids.
Jody, Lisa, Angela, Maria, Linda, Lily, and Marie.
My usual words of truth.
I wish I could take your calls.
Well, I hope this was an enlightening hour.
It was to me.
We'll find out how the vote goes in just a couple of weeks.
All right, we continue.
In the meantime, click on the banner for ADF.
Back in the...
Trending now on America First with Sebastian Brucker. .
This is the point that Scott Adams made.
Yeah, I think he said that really well.
Another Russiagate thing.
I'm not interested because that's what they want you to be.
They want you to switch off so you believe the surface garbage, the prostitutes, the urinate.
And what you think you remember.
Most people, there's so much.
So, I think what...
I think it's a really exciting movie.
I think a lot of people have said, wow, I didn't realize how fun and exciting and kind of inspiring it would be to watch, considering you're like, well, I know this story.
But actually, you don't.
You don't know the story.
So what is the story?
People need to watch it.
Tell them how they can watch it.
It's the plot against the president.
But in the Washington style of the elevator pitch, you made this movie, but if you had to sell it in Hollywood, what is the two-sentence pitch of the plot against the president?
What happened?
Well, I mean, I'd say it was...
An absolutely organized coup against an administration by the intelligence agencies, by overreaching law enforcement agencies like the FBI, and by the DNC and the Hillary campaign, in addition to the Obama administration.
I mean, I think we do a pretty good job of showing how all of those things are connected.
All the agencies, the White House, Brennan, Comey, the NSA. I think one of the better points that was made is that you don't really understand the real danger and implications of what happened.
And it's like people are like, oh, Russiagate.
Yeah, it turned out not to be true.
And that was really annoying that we had to go through that.
But actually, it's really dangerous.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
This is Owen Strand for townhall.com.
If you're on a college campus today or have a child on campus, there's a solid chance you'll hear this.
All white people are racist.
You might hear this too.
America is founded on white supremacy.
These two sentences are not mere overheated emotion.
They express an ideology called critical race theory, or CRT, which argues that race is a social construct made by white people.
Just as race was once used to enslave and terrorize, so it is used today to keep America unequal, unfair, and hostile to minorities.
The Trump administration just took symbolic and courageous action against CRT. It issued a memo to federal agencies calling for the end of the government's CRT racial sensitivity trainings, terming them divisive anti-American propaganda.
Does America have real issues in its past?
Yes.
Have we made real progress that we must guard carefully?
Also yes.
The White House has led well here.
I'm Owen Strand.
The Pepperdine Graduate School of Public Policy, impacting policy decisions today, preparing public leaders for tomorrow.
Trending now on the Larry Alder Show.
The indoctrination of the American voter has been going on for a very, very long period of time.
And we as Republicans, we as believers in liberty, we as conservatives should have pushed back a lot sooner.
And we need to push back harder.
That's why I made the Uncle Tom movie, because we also have to fight this battle at the cultural level too.
Melissa, thank you so much for that.
This is a crucial election.
I'll tell you why.
These guys get in charge.
By these guys, I'm talking about Democrats, of course.
Assume they take the presidency.
Let's assume they take the Senate retaining control of the House.
They're going to immediately get rid of the filibuster.
So that they can pass any budget they want on a simple majority vote.
They're going to vote on whether or not to admit Washington, D.C. as a state.
That gives them two more senators.
They're going to vote on whether or not to admit Puerto Rico as a state.
That gives them two more senators.
They're going to push for a commission to study reparations.
We're crying out loud.
They're going to raise taxes.
They're going to repeal the Trump tax cuts.
And those tax cuts, 80% of the benefits went through the non-top 1%.
They're going to push for the legalization of the illegal aliens who are here.
Amnesty.
And believe me, the number of illegal aliens in America is not 11 million.
That's a number that they all cite.
One study by a professor from Yale, so therefore you know it must be legitimate, puts a number at between 20 and 25 million illegal aliens.
That would change our voting electorate forever.
That's exactly why the Democrats want to do it.
Can you imagine if 11 to 20 million illegal aliens...
Turn citizens, turn voters, pull the lever for the Republican Party.
we wouldn't even be having this discussion.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Mike Dellinger Show.
Here was what the president pointed out.
He wants any...
This is the facts.
This is the fact.
Democrats are blocking the last relief package that Republicans put on the table and had the backing of the White House.
Over a month ago, Democrats filibustered any discussion on an eventual passage of a $300 billion package.
$1,200 to desperate Americans.
$400 a week unemployment.
The President broke it down last night beautifully.
The problem you have is Nancy Pelosi.
She couldn't care less about the worker.
She couldn't care less about our people.
And we should have a stimulus.
And I want a stimulus.
The Republicans will approve a stimulus.
The problem is she doesn't want to do it because she thinks it's bad for her election.
The fact is, she's wrong.
Because people know she's in our way.
She's not approving it.
She doesn't appreciate our people.
And she doesn't appreciate at all our workers.
Nancy Pelosi, we are ready to sign and pass stimulus, but she's got to...
People do not love...
And of course, right away, you could hear the minor bird interrupting him.
That's not a shock.
I told one of my kids last night, I said, Dad, Joanna Guthrie's terrible.
Well, that's not a shock.
You thought she was going to do a good job and be fair?
You thought an NBC Today show host would be fair to President Trump?
Don't be distracted by that.
Focus on his answers.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
So we have the New York Post article that I want to get right into.
Biden's secret emails.
Can you just tell us a little bit of background on how you were able to obtain these emails and build it out for us?
So there is just the repairman.
He repairs computers, specializes in Mac, somewhere in the area where the Bidens live.
And about a year and a half ago, Hunter Biden inebriated.
He was somewhat drunk.
Hi, everybody.
Dennis Prager here.
USA Today.
Disneyland to reopen?
No time soon under new California theme park guidelines.
Disney World is open in Orlando.
Disneyland in Europe is open.
Wherever Disneyland exists, it's open except California.
They're a little ticked off at the little person, the fool.
That the people of California voted as governor, a lover of power, a misuser of power.
They called Donald Trump a dictator, and it is one of the great lies of the time.
All the dictatorial tendencies are on the left, as it is almost always.
Not always, almost always.
Certainly in America.
People on the right stand for less government.
How could they be dictators?
Right?
I mean, let's be honest here.
Where are you more likely to get a dictator in America, from the left or the right?
The right wants less power.
The left wants more power.
But the right, that's the dictatorial group.
Think about it.
The enormity of the idiocy as well as the lie.
The question is, how does he get away with it?
I can't tell you how I find this distressing.
Will Disneyland, which has massive money, will Disney sue Newsom?
Why has there been no lawsuit against this governor?
I still can't eat in a restaurant in Los Angeles.
It's astonishing.
The number of businesses that have been destroyed and are being destroyed by people like Newsom.
You know, he reminds me of every so often, have you noticed, folks, where there might be a traffic, not even policeman, just some traffic officer who revels in his newfound power to stop cars, right?
So that pedestrians can cross.
I mean, I'm not saying they're not necessary.
But, you know, there are certain types who it's clear this is the only time in their lives they have authority.
That's Gavin Newsom.
Look at what I can do.
I can crush a state.
Why in the name of perfect health and no risk?
Why is that nobler than any other source of dictatorial regime?
Every dictatorial regime has some noble cause that it attaches to its dictatorial policies.
It's astonishing.
You know, I'll tell you.
So, Dennis, what should be done?
I'll tell you what should be done.
Open up everything, and if you don't want to go, don't go.
That's what you do.
Take vitamin D.
That alone would reduce, I mean, serious doses of vitamin D.
Read about it.
Thank you.
That's not even controversial.
I don't know why hydroxychloroquine and zinc are controversial, except that the president recommended them.
I take hydroxychloroquine once a week, take zinc every day, take vitamin D every day.
California health officials.
Oh, health officials.
Issued theme park rules.
Who were they to issue theme park rules?
I didn't elect these health officials.
Isn't that interesting?
This makes sense to people.
Oh, health officials told Disney when they can open up Disneyland.
Who the hell are they?
Who the hell are they?
And by the way, if you have other health officials who differ, then Twitter takes them down.
YouTube takes them down.
Remember what happened to the doctors with Simone Gold, the ER physician in Washington?
How it was taken down?
Most viral views in a short period of time, I think, than any other non-entertainment video.
California health officials issued theme park rules Tuesday.
That made it clear Disneyland, Universal Studios, Hollywood, and other top attractions won't reopen anytime soon.
By the way, do you know how much this is costing?
Aside from what it's costing Universal and Disneyland, billions of dollars to the economy of California.
But that may sound like nothing.
So let me tell you whose billions that is.
Middle class and lower class folks who make a living.
Outside these places.
The guy who works as a chef in a small mom-and-pop restaurant outside of Disneyland in Anaheim.
Bye-bye, baby.
No business for you.
Guys who park your cars.
Democrats care about the middle class.
Like communists cared about workers.
They used them.
The guidelines require that large theme parks can't open until the county in which they are situated reaches the highest of four tiers when it comes to COVID-19 spread.
It's all about cases.
It's not about sick.
It's not about death.
It's about cases.
You don't want to go to Disneyland?
You're afraid?
Don't go.
No compulsion to go.
I'd go.
I mean, I'm not dying to go, but I would go just on principle.
1-8-Prager-776.
It's the explanation.
What is distressing is the acceptance.
Of all of this.
Well, the latest summit Simone Gold, the doctor, organized has also been removed.
So they're liars, the left, when they say follow science.
They don't believe that at all.
They follow the scientists they agree with.
Others are shut down.
You laugh at the medieval church with regard to Galileo?
It doesn't compare to Jack Dorsey and Twitter vis-a-vis science, or to the folks at Google, YouTube, and now Facebook.
Follow the science is a left-wing lie.
It's follow the scientists we agree with.
That is all it means.
A scientist disagrees that there's an existential threat to the world from global warming?
Take him down.
A scientist disagrees with the lockdown?
Take him or her down.
Get it?
They don't follow the science.
Think they follow the science on human life?
The science on human life is you're a human at conception.
That's the science.
That's the atheist science.
My column yesterday was that we're drowning in left-wing lies.
And I didn't even get to all of them.
I couldn't even get to this one.
Follow the science is a lie.
Yes, indeed.
Indeed.
Thank you.
Well, Simone Gold just let this out.
What's YT? What's YouTube?
Oh, I don't see it.
This is from Dr. Gold.
In addition to YouTube and Facebook deleting videos, Vimeo just took down my entire summit.
Almost six hours of education by professors and clinicians.
Some of the videos are just a bit boring, science-y videos.
They're truly sick people.
Well, they're not sick.
I wish they were sick, because then there's a cure maybe, or you have others who are healthy.
They're morally sick.
I know that's what she means anyway.
I mean, this lockdown...
When will we not have a lockdown?
When will we not have masks?
It will never...
By these guidelines, it should go on really forever.
What is this?
Until there's a vaccine?
Doesn't California now say it will have to approve a vaccine?
I disagree with the President entirely on hanging on the vaccine issue.
His original instinct was right.
Lead a normal life, ladies and gentlemen.
Except during the terrible times in New York or New Jersey.
We'll be back.
So we have the New York Post article that I want to get right into.
Biden's secret emails.
Can you just tell us a little bit of background on how you were able to obtain these emails and build it out for us?
So there is just the repairman.
He repairs computers, specializes in Mac.
Somewhere in the area where the Bidens live.
And about a year and a half ago, Hunter Biden, inebriated, he was somewhat drunk, came in with three devices to be repaired.
The gentleman recognized him only when he came up very close because he has bad eyesight.
And he took the three devices and he said one of them is gone.
And they deconstructed it and got rid of it.
He said one of them...
It just needs a keyboard to be attached to it, and we can see if we can run it.
He said, the third one's in bad shape, but I think I can shave it.
Hunter Biden, who then identified himself, said, well, that's the important one, meaning the one that has to be repaired.
So they signed up a form document which required payment, but it also had a very interesting closet.
It said, if you don't reclaim your property within 90 days of the completion of the work, Property is deemed to be abandoned.
And under the law, abandoned property becomes the property of the first paid person who takes it.
So the merchant would be the person who took it.
So for 70, 80, 90 days, he was trying to reach Hunter Biden.
Hunter Biden never responded.
120 days, 130 days, never responded.
Then he started hearing things on television and radio.
about the crimes allegedly committed.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Eric Matazas Show.
When it happened to Trump and The New York Times, they didn't say a peep.
And when it happened to Biden, They pretended suddenly we can't not only are we not wanting to show this, but we're gonna go out of our way to anytime anybody links to that article, we're not gonna allow them to tweet it out.
This is gigantic influence peddling.
I don't know, I guess my question to you, Kevin, is what do you think is gonna happen?
Because this is genuinely, in our nation, unprecedented.
Well, I think it gives you a real clear snapshot of what it looks like without someone in the federal government bureaucracy that is dismantling it and tearing it apart and saying these things are crooked and corrupt.
Without that force, this stuff would happen with no consequences.
And so just imagine the amount of spying that we knew that went on with the Obama administration and just imagine all three branches of government all under the same control.
All allowing such surveillance, and in this case, cover-up of corrupt behavior, etc., to be allowed to continue to occur without any consequence, and in all likelihood, without any awareness being raised to it.
Again, it was the people of the United States responding to these huge media platforms.
And let's be very clear about one thing about these platforms.
They are not governed.
The same way that media outlets are.
They're not governed by the same rules that the New York Post or the New York Times are.
They're supposed to be neutral pass-throughs.
They're like a phone company.
We're not supposed to know what's coming through the individual calls that people make on the phone lines.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Hi, this is Dennis Prager and you know we are in a fight for our fundamental freedoms That's why I am grateful for my friends at Alliance Defending Freedom.
They are on the front lines fighting pivotal lawsuits for Americans whose freedoms are threatened.
And they do it for free.
That's why we're asking you to be as generous as you are.
All right.
I want to remind you.
Another Dinesh D'Souza movie is out and available to be seen at SalemNow.com.
It is titled Trump Card.
And it is very revealing, educational, entertaining.
Look, nobody makes movies quite like Dinesh D'Souza when it comes to left-right issues.
He has a magic touch.
There's a lot about socialism in this.
And indeed, the corruption, I don't know who's more corrupt, the Biden family or the Clinton family.
Isn't that interesting?
There's no level of corruption comparable to those among the Republican presidential candidates or presidents.
Nothing.
There's nothing comparable.
Yes, including Trump.
It's not comparable.
Enriching your family, doing government service?
He wasn't even in government, so it's irrelevant.
So see Trump card at SalemNow.com.
I'm Dennis Prager.
It's astonishing to me, these rules.
There is a piece, we should put it up, the Wall Street Journal, an ex-liberal reluctantly supports Trump, about Fred Siegel.
I should devote a lot of time to this.
This is a very intelligent explanation of what has happened in America.
Donald Trump can count at least one new supporter in this year's election.
Quote, I had a close friend who'd been a business partner of Trump in the 90s.
The critic and historian Fred Siegel tells me, this is the author of the Wall Street Journal, quote, Trump ripped off a quarter of a million dollars from him.
He told me this when we were discussing the election four years ago.
Trump just said, so take me to court.
Unquote.
I couldn't vote for him.
Unquote.
Mr. Siegel couldn't abide Hillary Clinton either, so he, quote, slept through the 2016 election.
Next month, he'll be wide awake, though not woke, and will vote for Mr. Trump.
Mr. Siegel, a professor emeritus at New York's Cooper Union, And a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute says he overcame his distaste for Mr. Trump for three reasons.
First, foreign policy.
Crushing ISIS, pulling us out of the Iran nuclear deal, moving our embassy to Jerusalem, and making fools of those people who insist that the Palestinian issue is at the heart of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Second, his ability to withstand a prolonged coup attempt by the Democrats and the media, which started with the Steele dossier.
Quote, if I'm saying what I find impressive about Trump, it's that he survived.
He has an extraordinary amount of arrogance, egotism, and self-confidence.
Mr. Siegel's third reason goes to the heart of his own political philosophy.
He sees the president as a champion of, quote, bourgeois values, unquote, under threat from the clerisy.
That's the secular clerics.
Mr. Siegel's word for the dominant elites who despise those values.
That is middle class bourgeois values.
He regards Mr. Biden as a, quote, captive, unquote, of this clerisy, and running mate Kamala Harris as the embodiment of it.
I don't want to see her as president, Mr. Siegel says of Senator Harris.
I don't want a San Francisco Democrat who's likely to impose elements of the Green New Deal, which she sponsored but lied about sponsoring on television.
If Biden wins, she will be president in short order.
I don't know how long Biden will last.
I asked Mr. Siegel to define political correctness.
The inability is a good definition.
The inability to speak the truth about the obvious.
Isn't that great?
That's what it is.
That's what political correctness is.
What have I said all of my career?
I get paid well to state the obvious.
The obvious is almost always politically incorrect.
Men do not menstruate.
That's obvious.
That's politically incorrect.
The United States is the least racist country in the world.
That's obvious.
That's politically incorrect.
When he offers examples of political correctness that annoy him, a young man walking by the house looks startled.
Why can't you say Wuhan virus, Mr. Siegel exclaims.
Why can't you say there are two genders?
The young man scuttles past as if singed.
And Mr. Siegel says with palpable sadness that people don't stop to talk to him on his porch as much as they used to.
Word has got around that he is a, quote, Trump supporter.
So fewer people schmooze with me.
By 2012, when he voted for Mitt Romney, Mr. Siegel had developed an exceedingly low opinion of President Obama, whom he describes as a, quote, faux intellectual, with preachers, cadences, and an academic veneer.
In his opinion, the worst thing, that is, Siegel's the worst thing about Mr. Obama, Was his effect on race relations.
We couldn't have the cold Civil War we have now without Obama.
Because he, in a very cunning way, exacerbated all of our racial tensions.
I told you I thought Obama's the worst president since the Civil War.
Maybe ever.
Well, Andrew Johnson would be up there.
Under Mr. Obama, Mr. Siegel says racial grievances took on a new legitimacy, and it came from a president talking in asides and saying things between the lines.
He didn't push back against anything, not even against the idea that Michael Brown said, hands up, don't shoot, in Ferguson, Missouri, which was just a fabrication.
I've got more from this very powerful piece.
It's up at DennisPrager.com and it's from the Wall Street Journal.
He's got it clear.
Mr. Obama exacerbated racial tensions.
Man elected in large measure because Americans hoped he would get rid of them or subdue them greatly.
And the truth is they weren't that great to begin with.
That's the unspoken truth.
Blacks and whites were getting along just fine, 95%, 99% of the time.
Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
Last night, would you explain to people why it is ominous, though not illegal, what Twitter and Facebook did?
The New York Post broke a story about emails discovered that indicate that Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son, set up a meeting with his father when his father was vice president and the officers from Burisma, the Ukrainian natural gas company that was paying Hunter Biden millions of dollars.
Throughout all of impeachment, Joe Biden insisted he didn't know anything about Burisma.
He wasn't involved.
He didn't know what his son was doing.
And so if this story is right, it means Joe Biden was lying, that he was very involved, and what he told the press and told everyone else was a flat-out lie.
I don't know if the New York Post story is right or not.
It seems to me that it raises some real questions that need to be answered.
But what Twitter and Facebook did is they decided they didn't want anyone talking about it.
So they banned anyone from linking to the story.
So if you sent out a tweet that linked to the story and someone tried to click on the link, it came up with a page instead that blocked you from the site and said this site contains dangerous information, which I guess it was dangerous for Joe Biden's political fortunes.
But it was absurd, and they even took it a step further.
The New York Post themselves were sending out tweets with their own story as media outlets do.
They blocked the New York Post.
They prevented the New York Post from posting.
The New York Post has the fourth highest circulation newspaper in the country.
Kayleigh McEnany is the press secretary for the President of the United States.
When she posted a New York Post article, not just some crazy tweet, she posted a New York Post article, she was locked out of her Twitter account.
Facebook suppressed this stuff.
Twitter suppressed this stuff.
They did it for different reasons, and the explanations that they gave were equally dissatisfying.
Facebook tried to claim that this was illegitimately gained material, that they didn't have the right to this material to begin with, that it was hacked.
Twitter took a wholly different path, saying something along the lines of, well, we can't prove that any of the facts involved here are true.
So one of them's kind of admitting...
Maybe truth to the facts, but saying that the legitimacy of how it was obtained was wrong and the others saying they don't have proof that it is in fact true.
Let's say somebody finds material, private material on me.
They steal it and they put it all over the web.
You'd say, yeah, that's wrong.
Eric, let me give you a more concrete example.
The New York Times Published information related to the president's tax information that was not legally theirs to publish.
Correct.
They had no source on the record for it.
They had no clear legal obtaining of it, and yet they published it.
And Twitter and Facebook did precious nothing about those articles when they were retweeted in Facebook throughout the universe.
In other words, if you need proof that they are biased and that they're using their unbelievable, unprecedented power to try to get Joe Biden elected, you need no more proof than this.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
Amy Coney Barrett was, of course, pressed on Roe versus Wade.
Let's go to cut one.
This is her response on the decision of Roe versus Wade.
Play tape.
I think on that...
All right, everybody.
Dennis Prager here.
I have a courageous doctor on the line, Dr. Jeff Barke, B-A-R-K-E. He's a primary care physician in Newport Beach, California.
In a previous life, he was also, correct me if I'm wrong, I think he taught medicine.
He was on the faculty of University of California, Irvine Medical School.
He has a book out.
It's a short paperback available to Amazon.
COVID-19, A Physician's Take.
On the exaggerated fear of the coronavirus.
Dr. Barkey, hi.
Good morning, Dennis.
Thank you so much for having me on.
I appreciate it.
Why is Amazon even allowing it to be sold?
You know, it's interesting.
For a while there, they weren't.
They were listing it as unavailable.
It was hard to find it, etc.
But I think finally, because there's enough people that are reaching out wanting to purchase it, And Amazon is all about profit, but finally they decided that they would make it available and no longer block it and no longer list it as being unavailable.
Again, it's COVID-19, a physician's take on the exaggerated fear of the coronavirus.
It's also linked to DennisPrager.com, folks, so it's very easy for you to get to.
Yes, and I'm very proud that a hero of mine wrote, and it's...
An outstanding forward for the book as well.
Well, that's good to hear.
Who is that hero?
Some guy named Dennis Prager.
Oh.
He's my hero, too.
That was a joke against me, just for those listening on the left who then want to say Dennis Prager said he's his own hero.
Be that as it may, I want to ask you about this line on the left, follow the science.
So, what does that really mean in your view, given how much scientists say that you differ with?
Well, what follow the science means in their view is follow their perspective on the science, and if you don't, your voice will be silenced.
You know, the way science is supposed to work is you have hypotheses that are put forward, that are tested against reality, and then we see what the experiment comes out to be, and then we change our minds and we move forward and we come up with new hypotheses.
So it's supposed to be about a lot of different opinions of people, of having polite arguments and putting forward different ideas and coming to consensus and then testing those hypotheses.
Different perspective than the mainstream media.
Not only are you not invited to the table, but you are banned from speaking.
You are banned by YouTube, from Twitter, from Facebook, and your voice is not welcome in this debate.
And that's not the way that science should happen.
Yes, it's unbelievable.
Follow the science, unless it's a scientist who I differ with, then we don't allow him to...
I don't care if they follow you, you shouldn't be suppressed.
Exactly.
And, you know, look what's happening now to Dr. Scott Atlas, who President Trump put on his Corona Task Force team.
He has a different perspective than the mainstream.
And, of course, now they're attacking him.
Not attacking his ideas, but attacking him personally.
He doesn't have the right credentials.
He's not an epidemiologist.
He's an orthopedic surgeon and so forth, rather than looking at his ideas and making arguments for those ideas or against those ideas.
The same thing is happening with these three epidemiologists of great credentials that put forward the great Barrington proposal.
What's happening to them?
They're being suppressed, so mainstream media is not putting them on.
Their opinions are not being shared.
They're being pointed at and told that they're charlatans, that their ideas are risky, despite the fact that about a half a million people in the healthcare industry have signed on to their ideas, which basically is protect aggressively those that are at highest risk, but allow the rest of us to go about our lives with...
Only common sense precautions, not unlike what they're doing in Sweden.
But those ideas now are being viewed as being high risk and being crazy and being radical and so forth.
Yeah, I don't care how they view them, but suppressing them, this is new in American history, and it's, as you pointed out, the antithesis of the scientific method.
There is only one approach in any given scientific arena is unbelievable.
That's the part that's really scary.
It's not about whether you agree or disagree with my perspective.
It's about that my perspective is being suppressed.
It's being banned, and then not my ideas are being attacked, but me personally is being attacked, as are the other doctors and scientists that don't agree necessarily with the mainstream narrative.
All right, we're going to hear what you have to say on a lot of these things when we come back.
The book is up at DennisPrager.com, also, of course.
It's at Amazon.
Jeff Barkey is the doctor.
The book is COVID-19.
While we're talking about health, I'd like to remind you about Riduzone.
R-I-D-U-Z-O-N. Riduzone.com is where you get it.
30% off if you mention Dennis.
Very simple.
Riduzone is composed of the molecule that tells your brain you're full.
So you'll eat less.
Pretty effortlessly because you're not hungry.
And that should lead to loss of weight, but in any event, eating less is simply healthier.
I strongly recommend the product.
It's the only one of its type that I've ever recommended.
Doctors made it with two patents.
30% discount review zone promo code Dennis Trending now on the Eric Metaxas show
Kayleigh McEnany is the press secretary for the President of the United States.
When she posted a New York Post article, not just some crazy tweet, she posted a New York Post article, she was locked out of her Twitter account.
Facebook suppressed this stuff.
Twitter suppressed this stuff.
They did it for different reasons, and the explanations that they gave were equally dissatisfying.
Facebook tried to claim that this was illegitimately gained material, that they didn't have the right to this material to begin with, that it was hacked.
Twitter took a wholly different path, saying something along the lines of, well, we can't prove that any of the facts involved here are true.
So one of them's kind of admitting...
Maybe truth to the facts, but saying that the legitimacy of how it was obtained was wrong, and the others saying they don't have proof that it is in fact true.
Let's say somebody finds material, private material on me.
They steal it, and they put it all over the web.
You'd say, yeah, that's wrong.
Eric, let me give you a more concrete example.
The New York Times...
Published information related to the president's tax information that was not legally theirs to publish.
Correct.
They had no source on the record for it.
They had no clear legal obtaining of it, and yet they published it.
And Twitter and Facebook did precious nothing about those articles when they were retweeted in Facebook throughout the universe.
In other words, if you need proof that they are biased and that they're using their unbelievable, unprecedented power to try to get Joe Biden elected, you need no more proof than this.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
Amy Coney Barrett was, of course, pressed on Roe versus Wade.
Let's go to cut one.
This is her response on the decision of Roe versus Wade.
Play tape.
I think on that question, you know, I'm going to invoke Justice Kagan's description, which I think is perfectly put.
When she was in her confirmation hearing, she said that she was not going to grade precedent or give it a thumbs up or a thumbs down.
And I think in an area where precedent continues to be pressed and litigated, as is true of Casey.
It would be particularly, it would actually be wrong and a violation of the canons for me to do that as a sitting judge.
Now, Roe versus Wade was a decision that nationalized abortion.
Now, prior to Roe versus Wade, there were several states across the country that had outlawed abortion.
The problem with Roe versus Wade is not even the issue of abortion.
Abortion does stop a beating heart, and abortion does terminate a human life.
You should get the book now before Amazon bans it.
They've just banned another book with regard to COVID. So Amazon is not yet there, I will say, but it is moving in the direction of Twitter and Facebook and banning what it differs with.
And it always differs with things that conservatives tend to believe.
Dr. Jeff Barkey, physician, primary care physician, Newport Beach, California, has written this short paperback.
It's up at DennisPrager.com.
I wrote the forward to it, as you mentioned earlier.
That's how much I think of him and of the book, COVID-19, a physician's take on the exaggerated fear of the coronavirus.
Just tell me, if I recall, were you responsible for my speaking at the University of California, Irvine Medical School graduation?
When I graduated from medical school, we came to your office and invited you to speak.
That was some years ago.
I doubt that they would have you back at this point.
No, no, you don't doubt it.
We were proud to have you.
Yeah.
Exactly.
The thought would cause...
They would call on a physician if somebody even mentioned it in the President's office.
Let's have Dennis Prager speak at the graduation.
Well, by the way, Dennis, that just goes to show you how long you've been an influence in my life.
It's been a great influence, and it's much appreciated.
Well, to be very clear, if I've influenced people like you, then I've done a lot of good.
That's very important to know.
So let's go to the book here and the exaggerated fear, which I completely agree with.
To what do you ascribe?
This is not a medical question.
To what do you ascribe the exaggerated fear, and this part is medical, among people in medicine?
Oh boy, that's a really good question, and I'm not sure.
Maybe it's just that a lot of people in medicine are just like other human beings, and when they're infected by fear, they don't think clearly.
And to be quite honest with you, it is a lot easier, more comfortable.
To just go along with the mainstream narrative.
To keep your head down.
To wear a mask.
Not speak out.
Than it is to challenge the, you know, the mainstream media narrative.
And I think a lot of doctors are like that.
They just want to go about their business.
They want to be left alone.
They want to take care of their patients.
They're not interested in speaking out.
So they kind of go along to get along.
You know, my favorite essay in the book is, Premium Non-No Crate.
First, do no harm.
And I think, unfortunately, our reaction to this virus has caused far more harm than the virus itself, especially as it relates to keeping our schools closed and our children that don't have the ability to talk about their feelings and to overcome their fear.
They internalize those feelings, and as a result of internalizing those feelings, they end up with delusional thinking.
Delusions are fixed.
Well, I wish one of the long-lasting effects was not to believe in panic, but I think it's the opposite.
If there's panic over the coronavirus, then what virus won't there be a panic over?
Exactly.
You know, I think it's fair to have concern over coronavirus, especially if you're in a high-risk group.
But listen, if you look at the CDC's own numbers, if you're less than 20 years old, the survivability rate of this virus is 99.997%.
It's almost hard to do the math to calculate your risk.
Yet we're keeping the schools closed.
There's also been some studies that recently came out that showed children just do not spread this virus to at-risk adults.
But here we are, our schools are closed, and when they do go to school, we're requiring the masking of healthy children.
That doesn't make any sense, and there's going to be long-lasting damage as a result.
So what's your take on masks in general?
Listen, it's not a hill I want to die on.
I think if you want to wear a mask that makes you more comfortable, I have no problem with that.
There is very limited science showing efficacy of masks.
And I just don't agree with the concept that the government should be mandating the masking of the healthy population.
I think Sweden mostly got it right.
Swedish health minister recently came out and said that we will not require the masking of our population of all the things we do to control the virus.
Masking is so low on the list of successful and important interventions that we're just not going to mask people that are not ill, and we just don't see that as being helpful.
So I think we've gone crazy with this mask thing, and I don't think it's particularly helpful, and so especially as it relates to schoolchildren.
What do you think of rabbit's foot?
That might be a more effective...
A more effective preventative measure.
Are you seeing a diminution in patients coming to your office?
You mean as far as being fearful to come in because of coronavirus?
No, not really.
No, not at all.
Additionally, we did.
People were mostly staying home, and I think understandably so, in the early days when we didn't know a lot about this virus.
Now we know a lot more.
Our treatments are much more successful, especially early on with mild symptoms.
So our volume is pretty much back to normal.
And so we're not seeing a problem as far as patients accessing us and getting preventative care and things of that sort.
Are you aware of the vitamin D suggestions?
I am.
I recommend it strongly.
So I think there are several supplements that are important in preparing our immune system.
Most important, of course, is get some exercise, lose weight if you're overweight, you know, and take better care of yourself because we know 94% of the deaths occur in folks that have significant pre-existing conditions.
So to the extent that you can mitigate those, all the better.
But vitamin D, absolutely.
Vitamin C, I'm a fan of.
Taking daily zinc, I think, is a good thing.
Quercetin, another supplement spelled with a Q. And now even melatonin.
There's some evidence out of the immune-boosting properties of low-dose melatonin.
So I take a milligram of melatonin every night.
All right, we're going to speak again.
Dr. Barkey is not only a great doctor, he's a courageous man.
His book is up at DennisPrager.com, COVID-19.
It's also on Amazon This is Owen strand for townhall.com If you're on a college campus today or have a child on campus, there's a solid chance you'll hear this.
All white people are racist.
You might hear this too.
America is founded on white supremacy.
These two sentences are not mere overheated emotion.
They express an ideology called critical race theory, or CRT, which argues that race is a social construct made by white people.
Just as race was once used to enslave and terrorize, so it is used today to keep America unequal, unfair, and hostile to minorities.
The Trump administration just took symbolic and courageous action against CRT. It issued a memo to federal agencies calling for the end of the government's CRT racial sensitivity trainings, terming them divisive anti-American propaganda.
Does America have real issues in its past?
Yes.
Have we made real progress that we must guard carefully?
Also yes.
The White House has led well here.
I'm Owen Strand.
The Pepperdine Graduate School of Public Policy, impacting policy decisions today, preparing public leaders for tomorrow.
Trending now on the Larry Alder Show.
The indoctrination of the American voter has been going on for a very, very long period And we as Republicans, we as believers in liberty, we as conservatives should have pushed back a lot sooner.
And we need to push back harder.
That's why I made the Uncle Tom movie.
Because we also have to fight this battle at the cultural level too.
Melissa, thank you so much for that.
This is a crucial election.
I'll tell you why.
These guys get in charge.
By these guys, I'm talking about Democrats, of course.
Assume they take the presidency.
Let's assume they take the Senate retaining control of the House.
They're going to immediately get rid of the filibuster.
So that they can pass any budget they want on a simple majority vote.
They're going to vote on whether or not to admit Washington, D.C. as a state.
That gives them two more senators.
They're going to vote on whether or not to admit Puerto Rico as a state.
That gives them two more senators.
They're going to push for a commission to study reparations.
We're crying out loud.
They're going to raise taxes.
They're going to repeal the Trump tax cuts.
And those tax cuts, 80% of the benefits went through the non-top 1%.
They're going to push for the legalization of the illegal aliens who are here.
Amnesty.
And believe me, the number of illegal aliens in America is not 11 million.
That's a number that they all cite.
One study by a professor from Yale, so therefore you know it must be legitimate, puts a number at between 20 and 25 million illegal aliens.
That would change our voting electorate forever.
That's exactly why the Democrats want to do it.
Citizens turned voters pull the lever for the Republican Party.
we wouldn't even be having this discussion.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Mike Gallagher Show.
Yes, everybody, I'm Dennis Prager.
Here we go.
Good to be with you.
I was reading to you this remarkable Professor Siegel who didn't vote for Donald Trump in 2016 and is resolutely pro-Trump in 2020 because of all of his accomplishments.
Republicans who don't care about accomplishments.
Like this, the guy's name, Stevenson?
Stevens?
He was campaign director for Mitt Romney, but he said at the time he had no ideology.
Mitt Romney had as his campaign director a man with no ideology.
For that alone, there was reason not to vote for Mitt Romney.
Though I campaigned for Mitt Romney.
Mr. Siegel traces the origins of the present-day contempt for the middle class.
That's what it is.
He's right.
The hatred of Donald Trump and the hatred of conservatives is the hatred of the middle class.
He traces it back a century.
He cites H.L. Mencken's demeaning of the bourgeoisie in the celebrated editor's coinage of booboisie.
Boobs.
We're boobs, we who believe in bourgeois values.
Mr. Siegel has written extensively on Herbert Crowley, the political philosopher and co-founder of the New Republic, as well as on the novelists H.G. Wells and Sinclair Lewis.
These three men, Mr. Siegel says, laid the foundation for an elite revolt against the American middle class that endures to this day.
Crowley's idea was that the college-educated, the elite, should become a new aristocracy, Mr. Siegel says.
Crowley believed that the middle class and their allies, latter-day Jeffersonians who advocated individual freedom and acted in their own self-interest, were impeding the path of the experts.
That's it.
That's what we're doing.
We're impeding the path of the experts.
They want to govern the society.
They know better.
You get it, folks?
It's like Gnosticism.
They have the secret knowledge.
Mr. Siegel cites a passage in Lewis's novel Main Street, 1920. Which he regards as a sardonic sally at the small-town American middle class and its commercial culture.
Yes.
We'll get to the passage on the next show.
That's what it's about.
Will you govern or will they govern?
I'm Dennis Prager.
▲
Export Selection