Pearl Daily Live Stream critiques Rep. Nancy Mace’s congressional testimony on Patrick Bryant, alleging voyeurism, rape, and CSAM—evidence she claims law enforcement ignored despite 10 years of Arlo camera footage. Davis counters with her own divorce trauma, $200K legal fees, and a documentary push to expose systemic bias against men, citing 74% female-initiated divorces and "deaths of despair" stats. Both argue women exploit legal systems while men face unfair scrutiny, framing family stability as a battleground between feminism’s individualism and TradCon’s broken promises—ultimately painting divorce as a weaponized crisis. [Automatically generated summary]
So this is clip going viral online of a dozen women being asked the following question.
Do we need men?
Most answered very quickly, no, because men are useless.
This headline from The Hill, it caught my eye.
Most young men are single.
Most young women are not.
Young men have fallen faster than any demographic in America for the last 40 years.
It's a different world now.
Like, we don't need men the way that they used to.
The future is female.
Men and women are drifting further apart, and society is crumbling because of it.
A fascinating debate has broken out about the value of marriage.
You've kind of got the TradCon versus Red Pill thing.
This men's rights crowd that sometimes just goes too far the other way.
Oh, you need to stop acting like grown boys and infants and actually become men.
Marriage is a bond and it's a sacred bond.
It's a machine designed to extract resources from you.
Now many of the red-pilled have taken the position that it's bad for men to get married.
Hannah Pearl Davis, or just pearly things.
One of the most controversial faces in all of the internet.
She goes on to say that marriage is a terrible deal for men.
Because if me and you were in a business contract, you would never sign a contract where I am paid to leave.
Gee, what could go wrong there?
74% or something of divorces are initiated by women.
Men have everything to lose, primarily their own children.
Men get killed by the courts and by divorce laws.
I had no idea that courts of family law were courts of equity, not courts of law.
Because in family court, you don't need evidence to accuse someone of abuse.
You need no evidence.
When you guys say get married young, a lot of these men don't know what they're signing up for, and you're not going to be there when their entire life falls apart.
I interview them on the other side.
I didn't meet my son until he was 15 months old.
How much did you spend trying to get him back?
The legal fees alone was about $200,000.
Before you know it, you're homeless.
You're literally just thrown out onto the street.
We absolutely reinforce bad behavior from women.
Wives are taught to leave their husbands.
And then daughters grow up without their fathers.
Family is the foundation of the society.
Every problem in society comes from single mother homes.
A lot of women will just chase this negative rabbit hole of happiness, endless happiness.
Feminism's biggest failures is it lies to women.
We tell women to date as many guys as possible.
We tell them to put off family in a marriage.
You are allowed to leave your perfect husband.
You are allowed to end a relationship with a really great boyfriend.
Oh, freeze your eggs, have an abortion.
What?
You're evil.
I don't think there's anything else in life that we actually ever go into preparing to fail.
Like if you have the mentality of this is going to go wrong and be pessimistic, naturally the outcome is going to be that it's going to fail anyway.
It's self-sabotage.
That's the thing.
Like women are so willing to leave marriages because they're not happy.
This is not about happiness.
The most important thing is the children.
And the problem is we have a modern society where it's me, me, me.
My feelings leave when I feel like it instead of doing what's best for the kids.
This myth that we live in an age of male privilege.
What is my male privilege?
They think, well, men have all the rights.
They have all the power.
Privileged patriarchal system that we have.
Why doesn't our society care about men's rights?
I have no friends, no wife, and no social life.
Men are alone in this situation.
Men are homeless.
Men are thinking about eating guns.
I've seen so many men on the brink of suicide and they didn't do anything wrong.
How are you equal if the men are the ones that have to fight and die to defend the country?
The men are the ones that build and maintain all the infrastructure.
Women are helplessly dependent upon men.
The so-called deaths of despair from suicide, overdose, or alcohol, three times higher among men than among women.
Culture is telling men, you are no good.
You got to get your act together.
I think men have failed themselves.
What kind of a man are you?
What kind of a woman are you going to attract?
If men are in trouble, so are women.
Everybody knows this is a huge problem, but nobody wants to admit it.
Every single woman at the table said they wanted a man.
500K, 500, 300K, 300K, 200K.
Am I crazy?
Everything is really set up against you to fail as a man.
If men make less than women, women don't want to marry them.
So you know who wants more economically and emotionally viable men?
Women.
I don't want to be an independent woman anymore.
I don't want to be a strong, independent woman.
I'm over it.
When is it going to be my turn?
Where are we meeting the men that don't stop?
I can't keep having these same conversations.
The only simp here is you, Pearl.
You sent for women.
I think you sent for women.
She's a provocateur.
She says stupid stuff, but Pearl is right about this.
It's already happening.
It's just not out in the open yet.
See, now it's just hookup culture is going to be our fairy tale ending because men don't want a wife and women can't find a husband.
The future, if everybody follows your path, is there is no future.
We go into population decline and our economy goes into decline.
Civilization will crumble.
The American story does not end well.
This is an existential crisis failing young men.
All right, guys.
I just had to plug.
Can you hear me?
Can everyone hear me?
I'm self-producing tonight, so you got to bear with me.
My guy came in earlier today, so we recorded some stuff.
So I want to make sure I need a yes in the chat.
We're just going on YouTube because the dual stream kind of confuses me.
I want to give you guys an update on the documentary.
So thank you guys so much.
We raised $20,000 for this.
That's great.
And I thought through more about how I want to do the documentary.
And I've made the decision that I would like to do the documentary in-house.
I think that it's accumulating a bunch of costs hiring these like Hollywood directors.
You know, all these people get involved.
And I just, I think that's a little bit, it makes it more.
But basically, there's two people I want to make enough money to hire full-time.
We're moving.
I am moving soon out of Chicago and I'm going to announce the city.
But when I do get to this city, that's my goal.
I'd like to hire two people.
One would work part-time on this and also on the show.
The other would just be an editor dedicated.
I think we could get this done if I could hire a full-time person where this is their only job.
Somebody motivated.
That's like impossible to find these days.
My God.
But I think we could get it done in six months to a year and I'd like to keep making them.
And I have distribution options from a lot of different people.
The challenge is, guys, I just want you to understand from my point of view.
If I was going to hire a guy to do this in like six months, let's say he's fast.
He does it in six months.
Documentaries take a while.
That's, let's say on the low end, I got four to eight grand a month, depending how good the editor is.
Times that by six.
On the low end, it's 30 grand.
To get a good editor, let's say eight times six, 48, you got to double.
So we got to really get the GoFundMe.
The second person, I don't really want to say, but I think, and I'm pretty sad I'm wanting to do it in-house because I was looking at the bigger quotes and I just have all this equipment.
I think we should be able to do it in-house.
But yeah, we need to get to at least 100K.
I understand.
You guys are busy people.
You have a lot to do.
I'm not going to like beg for money on street.
But it's tough because I have some big distribution networks that are interested in putting it out there.
The challenge is they don't want to pay for it, right?
And I actually would have had no problem paying for it two years ago.
But the challenge was I just, I didn't know what I was doing, guys.
I was so like, I got thrown into this media world.
Now I know what I'm doing.
But I need money for the documentary at the same time.
So my goal right now is just to get the company to a certain number a month so I can hire an editor and have like six months of salary for them saved.
So yeah.
Crowds are well, there is the GoFundMe is in the description.
It should be.
Let me double check if it's in the in my live chat here.
And we're going to get into the topic today.
Oh yeah, the GoFundMe.
It's like the third link down if you do gofundme-just pearly thing, you know.
And let's see, it says up here we're at 22,686.
That's great, right?
I mean, this, that's amazing.
So I'm not going to like, but it's just not enough.
Like that would maybe cover.
And actually, should I announce what city I'm going to?
Should I announce it yet?
Because I do want editors from that city to apply.
And there's people that have messaged me and they're like, Pearl, I'm an editor.
And I'm like, where are you?
And they message me.
They're in like Argentina or Maryland or just places I'm not.
I will say it's a southern city.
So if you are interested in like doing this project, I do invite you to apply.
Yeah, okay.
So someone says I could do your dock for 10K.
Okay.
Now, I have to be honest.
I have gotten lower quotes like that.
The challenge is usually I see you guys' work and I can see why it's $10,000.
Now, I'm not trying to be rude, right?
But you have to understand in my position, do you know how much I get so much shit thrown at me 24-7?
Oh, I can do this.
I can do that.
And you have to understand where I'm at, guys.
I'm so exhausted of people telling me they can do things.
And you're a subscriber of mine.
I want to believe you.
But I need to show me your work, okay?
Show me your work.
Show me, send it to me.
Send me your documentary you've done.
Oh, it's my first documentary or I've done one.
Like, do you know what I mean?
It's just, I don't know when the hell this is.
I put, I'm at the point where I'm like, I've put so much of my energy and time into this thing just to be like disappointed by people.
Right.
Just to be let down.
Do you know what I mean?
Bamboozled.
And it's my own fault, to be fair.
I know we're all exhausted.
Over promise and under deliver.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's that's been my experience.
Like the last person I put on this project, it was like every month, oh, it's going to be done.
And then it just, there goes six months of a salad.
Now, I'm not claiming I was the same in this whole thing.
But my point is, every time I get a low number, I see the work.
And I'm like, well, I see why this is a low number.
And if I've put in this much time into this, what I'm not going to do, what I'm not going to do is put out a low quality documentary.
I'd just rather put out no documentary.
That's just my feeling.
I'd rather just put out nothing than put out something that's, eh.
The modern wife, I know.
It's the modern editor, too.
So, you know, if you are interested and you're in a southern city or willing to go and move to me in person, because I'm not, I'm not doing this virtual, you know, not for a documentary this big.
You're going to be in my studio showing me what you're doing daily.
Yeah, that you are going to be there.
I want to point and say, what are you doing?
So, yeah, I mean, if you are interested, it's just pearlythings at gmail.com.
Yeah, to succeed is to understand failure.
I mean, the trailer is awesome, right?
But to be fair, guys, that cost me a lot of money.
I paid a very high-level team to make that.
And I don't really want to put numbers out there because then every time I put out a number, okay, then everybody's got to tell me I could have did it for less.
Let me see your work.
Sorry, sorry.
You know, yeah, there'll be various talents among us.
You just have to see proof of work, previous work.
Yeah, but anyways, sorry.
Now I'm now being a woman.
I'm bitching.
Anyways, so that I'm just giving you guys, I think if we got to 100, I could finish it.
But I really would like to get to 200.
And I know it's a lot of money to ask for.
I'm not, you know.
And the reason being, then I could say I have this much that I can pay an on-site employee.
You can relocate, come in person.
Dr. Detroit, boss babe, Pearl sounds hard to work for.
Well, ask.
I mean, you could ask.
I mean, you know, it is what it is.
Okay.
Crowder, Nancy.
Today we're going to talk about this crazy lady.
Yeah.
May 18th, eight years since Chris Cornell passed in two months.
It'll be Chester Bennington.
Sorry to keep just keeping their memories alive.
W Pearl, hey, I'm not, you can totally do that.
So today I'm going to be reacting to Nancy Mace getting tough questions from Crowder following the congressional nude situation.
So as you guys know, I'm not the biggest fan of women in politics.
There are exceptions, I'm sure, to this rule.
Not that I've personally seen any, but there are exceptions.
And the reason that I'm not the biggest fan of it is because we have a tendency to be very emotional and vengeful.
And the challenge is when you ruin a woman's reputation in any way, they're going to go for the jugular.
And so basically, Nancy Mace is accusing her ex-fiancé of keeping footage of sexual acts of women of the past, including her.
And now she's showing her nude videos in Congress and using her position to get revenge.
Now, I'm going to hear her out because she went on Steven Crowder and talked.
Can you guys hear me?
I want to make sure I can.
Dropped some private footage as part of, I believe it was congressional testimony to push for passing some anti-voyarism legislation.
Exhibit one.
Behind me is a screen.
Is this okay?
Audio, okay.
I'm self-producing.
I think she just wanted to show her tits in Congress.
She's trying to land a noon man, but women don't understand when you do crazy stuff like this.
Men don't really want to touch you with a 10-foot pole anymore.
They really don't.
From one of the videos I found of myself, the yellow circle, this naked silhouette, is my naked body.
I didn't know that I had been filmed.
I didn't give my consent.
I didn't give my permission.
And this particular video that Patrick Bryant recorded of me on his secret camera, he saved for over three years without my knowledge.
I didn't pick this fight.
I don't even want to be here today and discuss this.
Yeah, so my mom told me from a young age that any nudes you send out are there forever.
Men do not delete that stuff.
They view us almost like a trophy.
They got, and they're not afraid to show like nudes in their group chat.
And to be fair, women show text messages.
We secretly record men.
We put like dick pics in group chat.
Women do the same bullshit, but men just take it.
But women, hell has no fury like a woman scorned.
And women just can't take L's like that.
Like men will take L's in dating.
You know, women will secretly record them, or if they simp, they'll put dating ad messages on the internet.
I mean, men do it too at times, but women are much worse at this subject in general.
So look, if you made a sex tape, they're keeping it forever.
And if you're married, your wife's nudes are probably on someone else's phone.
It's just, yeah.
Please welcome to the program representative from South Carolina, Nancy Mace.
And you can follow her on X.
And I say her in the biological sense, Rep. Nancy Mace.
Representative Mace, thank you for being here.
And thank you for having me and bringing attention to this very important issue for women and girls all across the country.
Oh, I forgot to make this full screen.
I'm sorry, guys.
Country.
Well, okay, I have some follow-up questions.
Could you, the floor is yours.
Explain to people who may not be familiar with this, what is this important issue and what are you looking to achieve?
We're talking about peeping toms and voyeurism.
Voyeurism being those individuals who film other people in compromising positions, intimate, nude, that sort of thing.
And I shared some examples of upskirt shots, nude imagery and videos yesterday in my hearing because I myself have just recently been through this over the last year and a half and uncovering all these videos I found.
I identified some other potential victims, other potential women, and it's had devastating consequences for them.
And I've learned so much about federal law and also state law.
You know, Democrats tout the Violence Against Women Act as being this holy grail for victims like women of this kind of situation.
It actually does nothing for them.
And so I've drafted a couple pieces of legislation like the Sioux Voyagers Act that creates a civil right of action or a civil tort for those who've been victims of voyeurism or peeping toms because there is no civil right of action at the federal level.
And then also it's not criminal to do this at the federal level under Title 18.
It's only criminal in certain maritime jurisdictions, think cruises, or tribal lands.
And under state law, state law in South Carolina is much weaker.
Like the screenshot you just showed of that clip of my silhouette, naked silhouette on the screen there.
First offense is a misdemeanor and a $500 fine in South Carolina, which is, it's appalling that it's that little and it's disgusting.
It should be far worse.
The penalty should be far higher than that.
Can I ask you, has anyone been charged with misdemeanors or fines in South Carolina where this took place?
Not in this particular case yet, because there's still an ongoing investigation.
And that's part of.
Yeah, so she brought this to the cops, right?
And the cops were like, you're crazy, bitch.
Take the L. Take it.
I'm sure.
And now she's basically using her position to throw a temper tantrum.
God, these women are crazy.
You know, I get scared sometimes making videos saying my opinion on this stuff because that's a woman with a lot of power.
I mean, like a lot of these women, they scare me, guys.
I mean, not really because, you know, I'm scared of like a woman attacking me or anything, but God, they send lawyers after you.
Like, I wish I could put into words what I've been through the last few years.
Like, I've gotten threatened with three lawsuits, not one, not two, but three.
And all of it, like one woman that threatened me with a lawsuit years ago, she never actually sued me.
She just threatened.
And basically what happened was before my friend like brought her, I could show you, I could show you this.
Freaking.
So my friend brought her on the podcast and he was like an actor.
This girl's an actress.
And it was just some lady.
I didn't know her.
And we had a back and forth for like hours.
And in this back and forth, she said her body count.
It was like 27 or 28, which is kind of like a lot.
But hey, it's 2025.
There are people getting 28 in a day now.
So, And by the way, I gave her ample warning to not say this.
I'm like, are you sure you want to say this?
And she's like, yeah.
And I'm like, okay.
And anyways, I debated her.
I just made her look dumb because she was dumb.
And she got really mad that she looked stupid because, again, that's her reputation.
Threatens me with a lawsuit.
Claims she didn't know what podcast she was going on.
And then we printed out text.
And I'm like, you knew exactly what podcast you were going on because my friend right here texted you the exact podcast and the link to the podcast.
And then, and the crazy thing was after the debate, I asked her, I'm like, oh, would you, would you go on again?
Did you have fun?
And then she was like, yeah.
And I'm like, cool, we're good.
And then it wasn't until the public's reaction.
And it's just like women will go to the, even if, okay, like even that, I didn't even go to court, but I had to pay a lawyer money to respond to this woman.
Now, to be fair, maybe I should have just told, I shouldn't have even responded because it was just a cease and desist.
That's hindsight 2020, but I didn't know what I was doing, right?
I got a legal letter.
I went to a lawyer at the time.
But these women, they go to the ends of the earth.
Then this woman made a TikTok about me, claimed like autism or claim, oh my God, made this whole thing.
And then people were, people donate.
I don't know how much money, but basically for her to sue me, she never took me to court.
So you guys are idiots.
So you just gave her a bunch of money, a bunch of cash.
And am I a lawyer?
No.
But even when I make videos about women like that, you have to understand, I put myself on the line being a public figure like this.
They don't just attack.
They are like, I've never understood men so well because they'll just go to the ends of the earth to destroy you.
Some of the victims' frustration is that this thing has gone on for more than a year and a half.
These people are walking free.
But also in the last couple months, you know, in working with these victims, I'm uncovering all kinds of cases that are not getting the justice they deserve.
In the county where this crime, these potential wrong, this potential crime crimes took place, there were over 350 cases of murder and attempted murder that are on the docket for probably close to the last decade and haven't been tried.
We have pedophiles that are walking free.
I've shown some cases of those.
We've got a guy in this same county who had 1,900 images of kids as young as three being raped by animals and adults.
And the guy got one day served in jail.
He was time served.
He's on the streets of South Carolina walking free.
We have, there's a murder case up the road where a guy was chasing some other man nine miles down the road and shot him 15 times in the back and hasn't been no trial.
So what I've learned from this experience over the last year and a half is there's so much of a broken system.
And sometimes a lawyer is involved, sometimes it's judges, solicitors, attorneys.
But okay, so now she's trying to divert, you know, she's talking about real victims, trying to divert attention.
Okay, but we'll keep going.
Generals, et cetera.
We have a really broken.
Is the video volume low?
It's low for you guys here.
Let me make it higher.
Try it now.
In criminal injustice system in this country.
Tell me if this is better.
Well, okay, so I want to get to, and of course, I know that you face some criticism for this, and I want to give you a chance to respond to those.
Obviously, in this case, I would imagine.
To me.
Now, look, I'm not justifying this.
I'm not saying it's right, but if a dude has a security camera in his house and he's not sharing the videos and just using them for his own thing, I don't know if we should be talking about this in Congress.
I just think we have bigger fish to fry.
As you can tell, she's on the couch and she's unconscious, passed out, blacked out.
I think she was roofied.
We don't know.
Okay, now she's adding an accusation that her ex-fiancé roofied somebody.
And my question is, Nancy, if you're smart enough to be in Congress, but you're not smart enough to vet the dudes you were engaged to, holy.
Oh, my goodness.
So now she's throwing out an accusation of this guy.
Okay.
We never will know.
And the tape of her being assaulted by the business partner of Patrick Bryant, John Osborne, this rape tape was saved for years.
Patrick Bryant allegedly raped at least three women.
And I was just allegedly.
So it's not even definitively.
How do you allegedly rape somebody?
Isn't it pretty like definitive?
No?
It's a very specific name and very specific crimes, claims, right?
Raping at least, you know, three women, drugging, roofing.
I also heard the word underage there.
One of the criticisms is that you are relying on congressional immunity where you make these accusations, right?
As opposed to in a court of law, especially in the post-Me Too era.
What do you say to those people that that's the only place you've made these claims definitively?
Well, it will not be the only place I make these claims.
I don't even consider these allegations.
I mean, to me, this is a fact.
This is what I witnessed, what I saw, what I stand by, and I stand by every word, both of my February 10th floor speech and what I stated yesterday in my hearing.
I will have a chance and an opportunity to say this under oath in a court of law, hopefully sooner than later.
And I won't get into too many details, but that.
Okay, but you're using Congress to sway the court of public opinion before you've done it in a court of law.
Fuck you, Nancy.
Oh my gosh.
That's why we got to get these out of politics.
That's already in motion.
And, you know, I dare these folks to, these predators, to sue me because I very much look forward to discovery and the deficit.
Yeah, you see what she's doing there.
She's saying, sue me or I'm going to make your life a living hell.
That's a threat, right?
Positions that will come along with it.
And well, one of them is, though, right?
What's that?
He said, well, one of them is.
One of the men in question is suing you.
Yes.
There was already one case, and that falls under the speech and debate clause or the Westfall Act is the way that I interpret the Constitution.
But I will absolutely have an opportunity.
And everything I've stated Publicly, I have also stated to investigators privately.
And so I've sat down with investigators, I believe, three times in the last.
I can sit down with an investigator.
I mean, I had private eye rush on my show.
I could say I sat down with an investigator and told him blah, Last year and a half.
And then, of course, in my speaking with other potential victims, I've uncovered more potential wrongdoing, more potential victims, more potential information that validates my experience and the experiences of other women.
And so it's also for me, the reason I did the floor speech and the reason I did this hearing is because I've learned how much failure there is in the system at the federal level, which is where I, as a member of Congress, have a say, whether it's the Violence Against Women Act, whether it's men in women's spaces, I am vehemently opposed to men being in women's bathrooms, showers, locker rooms.
And part of that vehement anger that I have about men being in private spaces is because of the experience that I just went through, this trauma a year and a half ago.
Okay, so this is coming out before paternity fraud becoming illegal.
Milani is doing this stuff too.
So what women are going to do, they'll go to the end of the earth to get abortion and protect their reputation.
Half ago, when I uncovered all these things, you can imagine my shock and awe to discover: holy shit, this guy, this monster, had videos of me undressed and he saved them for over three years.
I had no idea.
I mean, the guys save it in their mental forever.
Look, ladies, any nude you've ever sent a guy, consider it a gift to him because they will keep it forever.
Forever, until they're literally old and they'll show their friends.
The same way women love telling their sex stories to their friends.
He put me in that position or that.
Look, we do the same stuff.
We show texts.
We put arguments in the group chat.
We are not saints.
We are not angels.
Men, they're more visual.
We're more emotional.
We talk about the emotional ups and downs.
We talk about men opening up to us and we tell our friends.
Should they take us to court over that?
Should the government be that involved?
and now men can't have their nudes?
Come on, let the men have their nudes, damn it.
I didn't have any knowledge of it.
I didn't give my permission.
There was no consent.
And then the fact that he saved these videos of me for over three years was really terrifying.
And sometimes I feel hopeless.
Not true, Pearl.
I'd rather delete that stuff.
Well, what are you, a woman?
You might be the exception.
Most men, they keep it.
They keep it.
And then I meet and talk to all these people.
Pearl, you can tell me anything with hard eyes.
Get this simp out of here.
Stop simping in the chat.
Go find a real woman to hit on.
Come here for your entertainment.
Simp out.
Stop simp.
We don't simp here unless you send a super chat.
Sorry.
There's other potential victims.
I do have two questions.
Sorry.
I just want to.
Are any of those other victims pressing charges?
Are they going through the court process?
And to be clear, you are standing by the claim that Patrick Bryan raped three women and some were roofied and underage.
Well, that's the assumption in some of the cases.
So with some of the women, it seems a lot like roofing.
And I said yesterday, I believed one of them.
You said it seems a lot like roofing.
I mean, I'm sure there's been times in my life where I had seven shots and it probably would have looked a lot like a roofie.
You know what I mean?
Then the then the fake trad women in the chat.
I would have never did that.
Okay, sure, sure, Diane.
Actually, probably more based on women that I've spoken to.
Now, some of the women who are victims.
Thank you, Ricky Lee.
If you're going to simp, I'm charging you.
Yep, $2 super chat.
I will charge you for simping.
I will.
I'll send you guys invoices.
Don't simp for me.
You know, it just, if you guys are going to simp for me, right?
And now, I know, I know people think whatever about me.
But wouldn't you want to simp for a woman that like it would have an ROI on?
Like, I'm taking that.
There's a 0% chance this is going to lead to anything.
Like, don't you want your attention to have an ROI?
You know what I mean?
I don't keep the photos for more than one year.
All right.
I'm sure, Jeremy.
Could you virtue signal somewhere else?
Do you know what?
You know what photos go nowhere?
The ones in your mind.
Yeah.
I know you guys have flashbacks.
Look, you don't forget a good gluck cluck.
You don't.
You don't.
Okay.
Are too afraid to come forward.
And I'm going to be their voice.
Others have come forward.
And I encouraged women yesterday who think or believe they may be a victim within this.
They may be a victim.
Yeah.
This is a scorned group of individuals to said, I love this girl.
100, 100, 100.
Simp elsewhere.
Jev TV, I expect, I want $5.
You call the state law enforcement division.
You can tell me you're taking in my dreams.
That's $10.
$10.
I'm charging you guys.
And then, or we have a tip line with our office that we will provide their information confidentially to the appropriate law enforcement officials.
But like if I went to law enforcement and falsely reported a crime, that is a crime.
And, you know, it's something I have never done and would never do.
But I've sat down with them three times.
I'll sit down with them again if I have to.
And then I will testify under oath to the same exact statements I made both in the hearing and in the floor speech.
And I expect to be able to do that.
I expect I will have an opportunity to do that.
Right.
Is it sometimes a complication?
Because I know this being on air all the time, where if you are planning on pressing charges and going through that process, speaking publicly in a separate form can be a problem.
Since this investigation has been going on since 2023.
And I wanted to ask, so you're saying women have come forward against these specific men.
So there are other women who are claiming to be victims and pressing charges.
Correct.
Yes, multiple women.
Okay.
And there's our roofied, raped, or any underage, or is it voyager?
I would say the allegations are all of the above, including, you know, potential CSAM or child sexual abuse material.
That allegation, I've not been able to verify that, but that is an allegation that a few folks have come forward with.
And, you know, time will tell.
I think one of our frustration, my frustration in the first place.
But was it on the tape?
Because you implied that there was underage sexual abuse in the tapes.
Not yesterday.
Oh my gosh.
Crowder knows what he's doing.
He can't get her on the defense yet.
Yesterday I didn't.
I didn't say anything about CSAM yesterday.
Okay, but in your waste.
Since my poor speech, there are some people who have come forward about potential CCM with one of the individuals mentioned in that speech.
Look, let me ask you, I want to ask this: did this man or these men, I think there's four or five, right, who are included in, and I don't know the is it four or five?
It's four, but it's various locations at different locations, different it's complex because there are different people, different locations, different victims, different potential wrongdoing and crimes.
It's a complicated thing, yeah.
So, women want to be whores and then not have evidence of them being whores.
Um, so women are gonna legally make it so you guys can't keep your they're coming for the nudes in your phone, fellas.
Because here's the thing: men have started recording sex so like they can say, Yep, consent, see, can't get me.
Now, the women are like, Hey, I don't want that to be used, I don't want that recorded.
Can't win.
The only difference, hell yeah, America says the only difference between a Democrat and Republican woman lying about false allegations and maybe a victim will be how good-looking the man is.
Or if you have money, MGTOW all the way, boys, be safe.
Look, you do what you want to do.
I'm not here to tell you one way or the other.
Complicated case, but there are no charges or convictions yet.
None yet.
That's part of the frustration.
Like, I went to authorities in December of 2023.
And if you, if you saw the whole hearing and saw my introduction, to me, it's very cut and dry.
It's black and white.
Like, the threshold for probable cause is so very low.
And then, if you add on top of it, I brought a witness forward, witnesses, I brought victims forward, I brought footage forward with metadata, date and time stamps, file names, folders of where these things were saved, the devices where they were saved.
You know, most investigations, when you have someone come forward, you just have some hearsay.
You just have, hey, I saw this.
I did a lot more than that.
I literally delivered on a silver platter.
Here is evidence that you can use right now to go make the arrests.
And they haven't done it yet.
And, you know, that's why, you know, I'm so passionate about this.
Why do you think they haven't though?
Because that is not normal in these cases.
I mean, especially after Me Too, where we have men who are accused.
And, you know, you have to bounce.
I have a son and I have a daughter.
And I'm very worried about her with predators, but I'm equally worried about him being falsely accused.
We've seen men be railroaded, and it turns out they didn't do anything.
So if there's all of this evidence, why do you think there have been no charges, no convictions?
And it doesn't seem like there's going to be anytime soon.
Well, I think that Sled confirmed this week that they were going to provide whatever their investigative file is over to the solicitor at some point.
But this is the problem with South Carolina.
It is a completely corrupt system.
So one of the attorneys, for example, of one of the predators in this case, headlined a fundraiser for the solicitor who's taken this case by hand, handling it herself.
So her last fundraiser before her re-election last year was headlined by one of the attorneys for one of these men or one or more of these men.
It says the conflict of interest is massive.
The attorney general who should be championing this case is going to run for governor.
I might run for governor.
So, you know, when you have these conflicts of interest, there's a political bias, I believe, underneath.
And then when you look at all the cases of rape or assault of women, domestic violence in South Carolina, I've talked to so many women who've gone to law enforcement or gone to the authorities for these kinds of cases.
And then they just tell you, well, there's nothing we can do for you.
And I hear that over and over again.
I know you're running.
I know you mentioned the AG, and that was a thing, right?
That was a little bit of a controversy because you said that he was dragging his feet.
And I do know that he said, hey, I hadn't heard anything about this until the public statements.
And you have his cell phone number.
You've gone to a lot of events.
Did you, since you have access to him personally, did you bring this up to him personally before the public testimony?
My attorney did.
One of my attorneys brought it up to him at an event.
But here's the thing: my speech was in February.
It's now almost June.
And instead of saying, hey, you're right, this is such an egregious case, instead of saying, you know, let's get justice for these victims.
Let's change our state laws in South Carolina because they're so weak for women.
Instead.
You can commit paternity fraud and have nothing happen to you.
Conservatives are the biggest simps.
The women and a lot of the conservative party, it's still laws for women.
It's never laws for men.
It's always for women.
Let's make it about the women.
Instead, he's attacked me as a.
Also, hit the like button, guys.
Stop being stingy with the likes.
We should get to 500 likes.
There's 570 of you.
Come on.
That's reasonable, right?
I worked for free for a year and a half.
As a victim, he's attacked me for coming forward.
Well, you kind of attacked him first.
I mean, I just want to say, I want to be, because this is a very complicated issue.
You did say he was dragging his feet, and that almost makes him seem like he's aiding and abetting rape systemically.
If I was, I probably wouldn't be thrilled about that either.
I'd go, well, that's not true.
I only saw it when you were out there publicly on C-SPAN.
Well, he is letting pedophiles walk free, and that's a fact.
And I've been putting that information out there as well.
Yeah, okay.
So now she's threatening.
Do what I say, or I'm going to say you're letting pedophiles walk.
Women's reputation destruction is crazy.
I did.
I worked for free for a year and a half.
Guys, imagine I was basically unemployed to keep on this show a year and a half.
That's fine.
He's not attacking you, right?
You're both attacking each other.
I think that's important because we need to be better on the right than doing the victim thing, either him or you.
Yeah, no, no, I hear you, and I hear that loud and clear from folks.
But here's the thing.
I waited 11 months to get a victim's rights advocate in my case, 11 months.
And do you know how I got the victim's rights advocate?
I got it through his office.
So I knew he was well aware.
There's no way with this high profile as an individual as I am and as an elected official.
There's no way in October of last year when I got my victim's rights advocate through his office that he had no idea.
I mean, either you're incompetent or you're ignorant.
And that's the only, you know, that's the only answer there.
Yeah.
Well, I mean, it could also be, you know, AG's, this is not really their job, obviously, to go forward from the base level.
It would need to come from the police department first.
So I think maybe there's a miscommunication there where maybe he didn't know.
And then maybe he felt attacked and then he kind of came back at you.
So, you know, I hate to see that kind of infighting, especially over something as serious as, you know, underage rape accusations.
And I really don't want this to get muddied when truth is paramount in all of this.
And I know that you're running against him potentially.
People talk about this as governor.
Let me ask you this.
Because I wouldn't know about this unless you came forward.
Sounds to me like you're saying this is to raise awareness because the justice system has not been very just.
Did this, did Mr. Bryant at any point threaten to use this, disseminate this material?
Did he give it out to anyone else?
I have no idea.
And I hope that the investigation will shed light on that because I have no idea where this material went.
So I just don't have those answers.
And that's, again, another frustration I have of knowing this person carried this around for years.
What did he do with it?
Why did he have it?
Why did he save it?
Why did he catalog it?
Why did he store it?
And what was he going to use it for?
Or what had he used it for?
But also the experience has informed me legislatively on all these bills, whether it's about rape kits.
I'm filing a bill this week that would prohibit rapists from suing their rape victims.
And can they sue if it's a false allegation?
Because I think we need to have an equal punishment for.
I think that's fair.
And I have a son, like you, I have a son and I have a daughter.
My fears are the same.
My fears for my daughter are the same are your fears for your daughter.
My fears for my son are the same as your fears for your son.
I've had to have very frank conversations with my son about false allegations because that is a problem.
And the women that come forward and make false claims do a great disservice to real victims when they come after or come later because women aren't believed generally.
And so, you know, that's tough.
And so that has to be, you have to tamp down.
Hold on a second.
That sounds like covert feminism.
Women are very much believed.
I mean, we have example after example in the me too.
The problem was the proliferation of false.
Democrats don't believe women.
So like.
No, That's the opposite.
That's the opposite.
Aziz, I'm sorry.
Now Democrats don't believe women.
Come on.
Bullshit.
Had a bad date for crying out loud.
I mean, you look a guy like Chris Hardwick.
He's a Democrat.
I was in defending people and going, well, this is not the same as rape.
You went over to his hotel room at two in the morning.
There are plenty of sex out there.
He mattress girl, the guy at Columbia, never got to graduate, go to graduation.
And it turns out she was sexually assaulting him.
So I would disagree with that premise that women are not.
It's going to be charged with the crime and should face jail time.
Women that do that should face jail time.
Yes.
But the problem is.
Right, but you're out here advocating that women aren't believed and women, women, women.
The problem I have with the premise is that right now in today's society, women are often believed, and there's the court of public opinion that often takes priority over the actual courts, which is why I think you can understand, as you said, if you have a son, people being skeptical here, if this man didn't go out and disseminate it, is it possible?
Because it looked, I will tell you this: when I look at it, it looks exactly like the security camera that I have in my living room.
Is it a security camera that existed in the house that you knew was there or you both knew were there?
And then it stores automatically to the cloud because that would be the same of every yeah.
You see what Crowder's doing?
He got caught up with the security camera.
He got caught up.
Sort of ring camera.
And now her answer should be no.
If she's coming out publicly doing this whole spectacle, her answer right here, it should be no.
It was not a ring camera.
As it were.
Well, I found the brand of the camera and provided that information, the serial number and the screenshots.
Yes.
The answer is that's why she's going around the question.
I showed yesterday.
I provide all that evidence over to law enforcement.
Again, these are questions that I have.
I don't know if it was on the cloud.
One would presume because a lot of them are on the cloud.
I don't know how long they save it.
Like as soon as I found out about this, you know, I reached out to the camera company to find out when it's deleted.
Does it stay on the cloud?
Because oftentimes once it's deleted, it's gone.
And that was hard to hear too.
So a lot of my questions can't be answered until I see what the investigation turns up because I'm not an investigator.
I'm not a detective.
I'm just this person who accidentally found these files and was like, what the hell?
And I identified some of the women and some of the victims I talked to clearly didn't know they were being recorded, whether they saw the camera or not.
And they were told they were not being recorded.
And then let's just say, let's just say, quote, it is a security camera and was used for security, but there were no security cameras on the outside of that property, which is odd.
You'd think if you had security cameras, you'd have cameras all over the place, inside, outside, wherever.
And that wasn't the case.
And so even if it was a security camera, why would you just save the naked videos of women?
Why would you just, why would you save only the naked videos of women and nothing else?
Like, it's just, it's.
Let me look up.
Is it illegal?
I'm going to ask Rock.
Is it illegal to have a security camera in your house and not tell people that are in your house that it's recording?
let's see uh it says in the most u.s states you can legally install um security cameras in your home without notifying visitors as long as the cameras are in common areas where there's no reasonable expectation of privacy um Bathrooms, bedrooms, and changing areas.
Okay.
Okay, so according to Grock, he's cool.
The living room is fine.
No, it's only the videos of naked women of these crimes were what was saved, nothing else.
That's what I saw.
I didn't see any.
That's what I saw, bitch.
I'm so tired.
Oh, my God.
She doesn't say, if you're going to the extent of putting this in Congress and ruining his reputation, she says that's what I saw.
Not yes.
Those are the only videos saved.
Security camera footage.
I saw footage of women who were naked.
Lots of it.
Video after video after video.
And I was able to identify several women on that camera and other cameras.
I found up to four recording, potentially four recording devices.
And the stuff that I found spanned almost a decade, long before I ever met my former fiancé.
This was years in the making before I ever knew.
Yeah, so she found his vault.
But I was able to identify several victims and I provided all that information, of course, to law enforcement.
What was the brand of camera?
It was an Arlo brand camera.
You can see that on the screenshot, I believe, one of the screenshots I had.
All right.
Is Arlo brand cameras a security camera?
Arlo is a well-known brand that specializes in security cameras.
I'm so done.
Yesterday, that particular device at one point had 10,633 videos on it based on the screenshot I had.
But they're not usually hidden cameras, Arlos.
Like it's one of the brands that they set up.
I mean, especially when I had new, when my children were very young, I had these cameras out there in case something happened.
His excuse has been, oh, it's a security camera.
Okay, well, why did you only have videos of naked women on it?
I don't understand.
Yeah, okay.
So what happened?
He just kept this, he didn't post them anywhere.
He didn't do anything with it.
He just kept the naked pictures of women that were in his living room.
Now, look, this isn't a nice thing to do, but should the government really be, if he's not putting it out there publicly, he's not showing people around the town, should the government really be monitoring what a dude has in the privacy of his phone?
Scream security camera to me.
That seems like a- If they're only videos of naked women, yes, that's certainly not.
That's basically a modern day pair of binoculars.
But if that's not the case, I mean, again, I know many people, most people here who have, some of us have Arlos.
I was going to, you said this is, this footage goes back 10 years?
I have footage going back.
It was at the time when I found it roughly eight years of upskirt photos of women's genital areas, photography images, videos.
I saw almost a decade worth of stuff.
How did you get this, by the way, since you had this before an investigation?
How did you come upon this footage?
We went to couples counseling and the couples counseling said, hey, you know, to rebuild trust in your relationship, you need to give her access to your phone.
Yeah, this is why you don't bring your chick to couples counseling.
That is the worst.
So she was nagging him about videos from like 10 years ago that he kept to jerk off to.
That's really what it was.
So he put my thumbprint on his phone, so my biometrics were on there, and I was allowed to go on his phone at any time.
And that's when I accidentally uncovered all.
I just wasn't, I wasn't expecting that.
It wasn't something I was looking for, wasn't expecting it.
It was a real shock to the system.
And when I found it, I took a couple screenshots and I handed everything over to law enforcement.
Again, this isn't, it's not my job to be an investigator or detective.
It is law enforcement's job to do that.
And I hope and pray that they're doing an extensive investigation and that justice is brought for all these victims.
And that at the same time, we reshape federal and state law to do better.
So you're going through couples therapy, and he gave you the passcode or the biometric unlocking mechanism to his phone while you guys are, I assume, in somewhat dire straits.
Isn't that bad?
They're like, this bitch is crazy.
And didn't delete not.
Yeah, if you put it on the internet, okay.
You could argue that's good for a case.
But I mean, ma'am, take the L. Like, sometimes in dating, you just, it's an L.
I think there's a lot of women out there that would love to be able to scrub all the naked nudes they sent out there.
But it's just an L, you know?
On consensual footage on the phone that you had access to?
Oh, he definitely was transferring footage.
And I showed a screenshot yesterday of files that were being transferred off his device.
He got a second device, I said yesterday.
Like I saw a second device hit our Wi-Fi like that same day.
It was the Terra Masu operating system.
A couple weeks later, he would replace his Android S22 with an Android S23.
And there's some indication and data indicating that he may have been transferring terabytes of data, terabytes and terabytes and terabytes of data, which would indicate lots and lots of photos and videos, thousands of files potentially.
Okay, wow.
Yeah, that's terabytes.
That's a lot, especially if you're going back eight years where it's pre-HD.
That's many, many hours.
But you did get this while you two were still in a relationship is when you found the footage.
Yeah.
I mean, I got the hell out as soon as I found out about it.
It took me about a week.
I wanted to just get all my ducks in a row.
I had children.
You know, I had a tumor that month as well.
And I had to have surgery.
And so I had all the.
I don't care.
Sorry.
I don't care about your surgery.
I care about the facts of this case.
These things going on.
And it took me about, I don't know, a week to 10 days to make sure I had all my things in order to be able to leave.
I fled.
Let me ask you this.
How do you balance?
Because you just said you had a son.
And I don't know if, Gerald, you had a question that you wanted to.
Who is Nancy Mace's ex-fiancé?
Let's see who this dude is.
To ask, but how do you balance, like you just said, being concerned for a son and a daughter, due process, obviously post-MeToo, which was spearheaded by Democrats where it was a witch hunt, and obviously protecting.
All right, let's see.
Patrick Bryant.
See if he wants to come on the show.
I'm going to message him.
I'm going to see, is he on Insta?
I'm going to find him.
Victims of actual, you know, of actual rape and sexual abuse.
How do I balance that?
Yeah, with this legislation, how do we balance those things?
Because, you know, I disagree with the premise that women are not believed.
So, for example, that legislation, that legislation that you proposed, would it still permit or would it allow, I should say, victims of false accusations of rape to sue their accuser or have equal criminal penalties?
Like, how do we balance this out?
It doesn't have to do with false allegations.
It has to do with real, real crimes and convictions.
It doesn't have to do with false allegations, number one.
Number two, when I talk about my Sioux Voyagers Act, that is creating a civil tort at the federal level.
When Democrats did the Violence Against Women Act, there was no civil right of action.
Women couldn't sue federally civilly over being filmed in this way.
They will be able to do that with the Sioux Voyeurs Act.
With the Stop Voyagers Act, we expand the federal prohibition against voyeurism.
So you can only, it's only illegal federally to film women in this manner in certain maritime jurisdictions or tribal lands.
And so this would expand that very narrow definition to make it a crime under Title 18 of the federal U.S. Code of Laws for voyeurism.
And so those two specific things are what.
Says he's not a public person.
This is news, new to me, and she sounds like a liar.
But I've done federally.
I've also worked with state lawmakers to draft a bill to strengthen South Carolina state law because it's a misdemeanor and a $500 fine on first offense.
That particular bill would make it a felony and make the financial penalties significantly higher because we want to deter these people as much as we can on the very first offense.
And then it gets worse from there.
And so I've been working with state lawmakers.
And then, of course, I have my own legislation at the federal level based on the experiences I uncovered with all of these women.
Sure.
And I know that I know, and I appreciate you giving us your time.
Gerald, I know you have a question.
I know, and by the way, everyone out there, you can follow her and send her your questions at rep NancyMace on X.
Yes, Gerald.
Yeah, so again, thanks.
And we're on the same page here.
Like, bury the pedophiles under the jail.
You know, like these guys should be getting long prison sentences if what we're claiming is true.
I think the question that I had for you is: I've had a theory about this that I'm really worried about.
We've seen people tried in the media before.
I'm not saying that's what you're doing, by the way.
I just want to set this up because you're somebody who's experiencing this, and I think your opinion would be very valid.
I am of the mindset that to balance this out and make sure that justice is served and people aren't taken, like Brett Kavanaugh, taken through the media, basically just to smear his name, right?
Sure.
We shouldn't be making names public and accusations this dire.
I mean, these are very serious accusations that somebody has been raped and some people's privacy has been violated at the very least.
Yeah, there's a lot of very serious allegations here until a legal process has gone through.
Yeah, so she's essentially using her congressional power to defame her ex-boyfriend and saying, well, but I've spoke the police won't do anything about it.
Well, take the L, honey.
Take it.
That's an L. Just eat it.
You know, police want to convict people.
So if you didn't have enough evidence, it just is what it is.
I wonder what your opinion is on that because I understand that there are problems potentially with that because we want to hold people accountable.
Sometimes the justice system doesn't do us justice, essentially, or it takes so long to do justice that justice is really delayed and that's kind of denied.
But at the same time.
I signed on to the Audacity Network.
Thank you.
Wish there was an app.
There is an app.
There's an app.
Yeah, you go to the app store.
It's on there.
So, yeah, guys, normally I do stream.
I haven't plugged this today, but normally I stream on my app, The Audacity Network.
I mean, you can do unlimited super chats on there.
And you can have access to all my old content.
We also have a new school group.
And like, that's basically a learning community.
Everybody that signed up for the app before the 15th is automatically into that.
But that's going to be cool.
We're going to do events through the school group.
We're going to get highlighted.
Like, basically, it's a one-time lifetime access.
And it's the first link in the description.
And it's basically you guys investing in the future of this platform because I really believe that in the next 10 years, I'm going to, thank you, Pearl from Lemonade Lover.
Thank you.
I'm going to interview some really cool people and I want to share my network with you guys.
So they're going to give modules, different presentations.
We have some stuff from to help you fight the child support system right now on there.
We also have a MLB baseball player put some advice if you want to get into that.
I put stuff on how to be a YouTuber.
Andrew Wilson has some extra content on there.
So it's all on the school group.
And it's just going to get better and better.
It's a one-time purchase for life.
And you do have to apply to be in it because I can't have any weird people that are like, I mean, the internet's weird.
You guys get it.
But you get on a phone call and we just talk about if it's a fit.
I'm haven't we seen so many people's lives ruined.
You cannot unring the bell.
It doesn't matter how many times you go out and tell people that Johnny Depp didn't do what Amber Heard said.
He's still not working.
He's still not getting that time back.
He's still not getting the contracts back for Trevor Bauer.
You're still not having Brett Kavanaugh's kids not think that, hey, did something happen with my dad where he was drunk and raped somebody.
So shouldn't there be some more protections here to make sure that everybody is protected in this system and it doesn't swing one way or the other with allegations being made in public that are very specific when cases haven't been tried yet?
Well, I think that, you know, in this particular instance, I am exposing what is completely shattered and broken and corrupt in South Carolina's court system and justice system.
If I had not spoken up, there would be no investigation.
And in fact, one of the rape victims didn't get her victims' rights advocate until the day of my speech on February 10th, six months later after she came forward.
And that's appalling, and I agree.
And pardon me for interrupting, but could that also have been done without saying names is my question.
And it's a genuine question.
I just want to clarify.
Hasn't there been an ongoing, you just said police investigation since 2023?
So that would be before your statements, right?
But she didn't get the advocate until six months later.
This other person, I mean, for yourself, or 11 months.
Different victims have come forward at different times of the investigation.
Now, remember, I didn't know who all the women were right up front.
I had to go find some of them and identify them.
I did that because our law enforcement, state law enforcement wasn't doing that.
Six months into the quote investigation, to my knowledge, they hadn't contacted any victims.
Yeah.
That was a real problem for me.
Yeah.
I mean, so.
But what about your, but for you?
What, why do you, because you made your claims, right?
You can't, some victims may not, like you said, want to come forward, but yours, that's been open since 2023 before you came out and stated his name publicly.
Like, let's say, because this is the question people have, and I know that, and I appreciate you allowing us to be fair.
There could be a universe in which Nancy Mace and this Mr. Bryant had a very ugly falling out.
You got these while you were together and then used it against him.
And the investigation reveals that there is actually no crime.
Like, if that happens, should he be able to sue you?
Well, hey, it doesn't really matter.
Let's just say there.
Checkmate.
There was a very nasty breakup.
Let's just say it was the worst in the world.
That doesn't negate.
Dustin said.
Any girl that says they accidentally found nudes on a guy's phone should go to jail for lying that I was filmed without my knowledge, without my permission, without my consent.
Yeah, but it was in the living room.
Sorry, bitch.
Take the L.
This is an L. Eat the L. Eat it, eat it, eat it.
And those videos were saved for years.
And that is not, that's not okay.
Not by any standard.
And so it doesn't really matter, you know, that part of it.
But add on top of that, I find all these other potential victims and all this potential other wrongdoing.
And to see really nothing happening and only because of the public attention is the investigation moving forward.
I don't expect, honestly, I expect very little out of this because that is very typical.
Was she a woman's right advocate before the relationship?
If not, what do you mean it doesn't matter?
It's a typical of South Carolina and the justice system.
I mean, there's a case in Myrtle Beach where the guy was chased nine miles down the road, shot 15 times in the back, no charges.
And when, you know, now the feds are stepping in.
I am going to ask the feds to step in on this and provide some oversight because there's been, I believe, obstruction of justice by the solicitor and other issues that underscore the political bias and the unfair way that some of the victims have been treated.
Some of us feel like we've been treated like criminals and the criminals treated like victims.
And that's not the way the system is supposed to work.
Like victims have rights.
They're supposed to be protected.
Their identity is supposed to be protected.
Witness intimidation is not supposed to be allowed by law.
And the solicitor will not prosecute for witness intimidation.
And there have been numerous examples of it over the last couple of months.
And so when you see the system break down in the way that it has, this is the only recourse we have.
You're right.
That has to be.
That is unconscionable that that stuff is still out there.
And I 100% agree, but I want to laser in on the point.
I agree with you.
More attention has to be brought to this.
That's that public pressure.
Good.
Make sure this stuff gets changed.
Did his name have to be used to accomplish that?
Because it's a bell that cannot be unrung.
You may be 100% right in this case, but what about some of the other cases we've seen in the past and yet future where maybe a name gets dropped in public and people drag them through the social media hellscape that happens after that in the media hellscape?
You can't unring that bell.
Did his name have to be used for you to be able to make this point?
100%.
The hellscape that women, the hellscape.
I agree with the women, but we're all on that same page, Representative.
I'm trying to be very fair.
I'm 100% like bury these guys under the jails.
Well, the guys who actually commit rape.
Yes, the guy who's committing rape and disseminating these pictures are the worst of the worst.
We would kick their ass if they were in front of us.
All of us agree on that.
But you do understand the jeopardy we have where people's lives are being ruined by this.
How do we balance that when public accusations include people's names while an investigation is going on?
Is there a better way for us to accomplish all of it to keep women safe, but also to make sure that men are not just going to, with no recourse?
Like I sue the lady who accused Trevor Bauer, but you're not going to get any money from her.
She's just going to declare bankruptcy million dollar contract.
Like that happens a lot.
And I want to make sure that neither one of these things happen, that the rape doesn't happen, that the voyeurism doesn't happen, and that the men's names, if they don't have to be used, and I don't see a reason why they do yet, maybe there is one.
Well, let her, Representative Megan.
Yeah, sorry.
Why did the name specifically?
Because you said they revealed your identity.
And again, I didn't know about this until you started speaking about it.
So if they did that, that's horrible.
And that would be the answer.
But why did the name have to be used?
I believe that there is a present danger, particularly at some of the locations I mentioned in my speech where underage children are.
Yeah, okay.
Now she's using the kids prop, like the real abusers to take down her ex-husband.
Oh, this is such live cooking.
I wanted to be sure that families and parents that I...
What an evil woman.
This woman is like the bottom of the barrel, evil.
Fucking batshit crazy.
I don't know that the general public knew that there are certain locations that I would not advise your child to go to because of some of what was being filmed or allegedly or being done at those locations with cameras.
To me, as a mom, I have a choice.
As a mom, fuck you.
I am so tired of women using their motherhood status in order to guilt people into doing what they want.
I'm going to tweet.
I'm tweeting right now.
Nancy, I'm going to tag her.
Nancy Mace is an evil woman using the justice system.
Using her.
Yeah, I'm tweeting.
I went through the process of the last year and a half and I learned about all these other allegations of potential wrongdoing from parents who were aware of things being filmed about with underage children, potentially, you know, all of that.
To me, this is a clear and present danger at one of the properties I mentioned in the speech.
And so for me, this is like, this was like an immediate clear and present danger to my constituents, not only just to women, but potentially underage girls as well.
And like, you know, I felt like I was doing my civic duty to protect my constituents.
And then on top of that, I'm obviously doing the legislation, working with state lawmakers.
I've got dozens of federal bills.
She dated him.
She can't be much better.
But like, this was an immediate, holy shit.
Oh, my God.
The app button on the website doesn't work.
The app has been removed from the app store.
I don't see it in the live stream network.
No, otherwise I would have used the platform to send a message directly.
Okay, Doug MPA, can you make a note of that?
We're going to figure out what's going on.
There are kids over at this property.
Things are being allegedly filmed at this property, including potentially really bad things.
That to me was like, we don't have time to do that.
What really bad things, though, because I would imagine if children are at any property right near there.
Thank you for the $50 super chat.
That was really nice of you.
You have security camera footage to make sure that everything is kosher.
Steve, I've been swearing this whole time.
I'm asking you guys not to swear.
I'm not a perfect person.
I'm sorry, guys.
Is this where you talk about child rape at these properties with this Mr. Brian?
I haven't said that.
I have not said that.
Sexual abuse.
I would say that things I would qualify as CSAM.
Yeah.
Potentially.
And that, and again, these guys from Mr. Bryant deserve every single ounce of punishment that we can get.
But that moment was in 2023 when you found that information, right?
Like that is the, that is the holy shit moment.
Well, yeah, but I've over the course of the last year and a half talking to potential victims.
I've just learned so much more and I'm informed by other potential wrongdoing and crimes.
But then even since my February speech, I've had parents come forward with some claims and they're really damning.
And, you know, kids are at risk as long as these certain individuals, at least one individual that I spoke about in my speech, if he's still free, kids are in danger and they should not be at that location.
And so just, you know, for me, it was like, I didn't have a choice.
This is clear and present danger.
I want to protect kids.
I want to protect women.
This is what I have to do.
And I stand by every word I said in my floor speech.
I stand by every word.
Go home.
Watch your kids.
I said in my hearing yesterday, this can't go on.
And I'm going to run through a brick.
I'll run through a brick wall if I have to.
I know.
She keeps saying potential victims.
Are they victims or not?
We got to let court cases have due process.
And if they don't convict them, sorry, you didn't have the evidence.
Protect my constituents and to protect kids and protect women across South Carolina, all across the country, really.
I stand by everything.
Well, I hope that, and thank you for clearing some of that up.
I hope that justice is served.
It looks like it's going to go through this process.
And with that amount of evidence, it would seem like there will be some people put in prison for life.
Representative Nancy Mace, we appreciate you taking the time.
I know it must be very difficult.
And thank you for giving the floor to me.
The lady in the black manifesting alternative realities.
I don't know.
To people who are giving you some tough questions.
Thank you for the super chat, guys.
You're sending a lot today.
I appreciate you all.
Tough questions.
You guys are so nice.
I like the colliloquy.
So thank you.
All right.
Thank you very much, Representative Nancy Mace, everybody.
What an evil one.
All right.
And yeah.
By the way, listen.
Nancy, I invite you on my show.
I got questions.
The first time I've ever complicated.
I have this light, like we have to get, but we don't really have to get the brakes.
Yeah, sorry.
I was like, let her answer.
No, no, no, that was my fault.
I just wanted to get that point of using names.
None of it seemed like.
They said she better not look into Twitch.
None of it seemed like it really answered the question.
Yeah.
Except for the case she was trying to make was, well, there's a clear and present danger with children.
And I'm like, well, that was in 2023, that there was a clear and present danger when you found that out.
So if it was a bullshit moment, I have to do this right now to make sure these kids are safe.
That would have been in 2023.
And I'm not making an accusation.
What I'm saying is that does not seem like the defense that I would say, oh, that's.
She said the investigation wouldn't start.
It started in 2023.
There was just no, there was just nothing coming of it, which, considering the evidence that we've been told exists, is odd.
Yeah, they need to look into that.
And look, she answered some of the hard questions, but I really do think you've got to balance these things out.
You can't run guys' names through the mud and just run away.
Because it happened to Crowder.
Crowder's so nice.
He's just a good guy.
And that evil woman did the same thing to him.
When something doesn't come to fruition, there's no conviction or even facts come out that contradict your story.
Not in her case, but in these other cases.
So it's like, listen, I disagree with naming this person.
This person could be the worst person on the planet, could have child porn, could have raped children.
And I want this person to literally be buried under the jail, whether alive or dead.
It doesn't matter to me.
If they did it.
No, 100%.
But if it's something where they were going through couples counseling and she had a thumbprint and she accessed readily available footage that wasn't deleted with security camera footage in a house where both of them were naked and this is part of a rough breakup.
Look, the criticisms are legitimate because a lot of guys, you know, a lot more people who've gone through something like that than people who've been raped or have been subject to a roving rape group, which, if it's true, awful.
Seems to defy some of the logic when you look at the timeline.
And I see why people are being critical.
I don't like the idea that women aren't believed.
And that was a pushback.
And it's like, that's just not true.
The exact opposite is the truth.
And I think that's a big reason that she came forward because women are believed.
And this guy would have to be an idiot.
I'm sorry.
You'd have to be an idiot if you're like, oh, yeah, we're already going to couples therapy because things are rough.
Here's my phone with crotch shots.
Yeah.
That's bad.
I mean, listen, I'm not defending in any way the actions if they turn out to be 100% what she said.
Not at all.
Crowder didn't give a damn about men's concern until it happened to him personally.
Never forget that.
It's a classic Tradcom behavior.
That's true.
That's completely true.
I want to do a one-on-one with Crowder.
When I get to a certain city, it could happen in the future.
Not going to say the city.
I'm just saying.
Well, in fact, the very opposite.
I'm questioning the methods because the methods matter in this case.
It matters for all of us.
It matters for my three sons that I have going forward.
It matters how we handle this stuff as a society to make sure that women are protected, but also to make sure that men who have no recourse in these situations don't lose everything over an allegation that is not true.
Do you think you'll ever have a sperm egg that turns into a lady?
It's just men for their.
Yeah, this interview was awesome.
He couldn't be too direct with it because, yeah, I mean, they're afraid of women too.
They got to be.
I mean, that woman could make a lot of people.
I mean, look at what she's doing to her ex-fiancé.
She can make a lot.
Like, women don't understand that.
I mean, I'm sure there's men that fear me, right?
You know, I got my podcast.
I could say what.
I wouldn't, but I could understand why they would.
Anyways, I'm starting to get kind of sleepy.
It's getting late.
I've been filming all.
I filmed earlier some pre-recorded stuff that's coming.
So, anyways, guys, like the video on your way out.
Please subscribe to the channel and ring that notification bell.
If you can, hit the like video.
I am going to show my divorce documentary trailer.
Again, if you guys want to donate, it would be great.
If we got to 300K, I could get this thing done.
I could get it done in it for men.
But right now we're at like 23,000.
So.
So there's this clip going viral online.
We just, you know, we gotta, that's all I can.
If we got to 100, I think I could get it done.
Anyways.
So this is clip going viral online of a dozen women being asked the following question.
Do we need men?
Most answered very quickly, no.
Because men are useless.
This headline from The Hill, it caught my eye.
Most young men are single.
Most young women are not.
Young men have fallen faster than any demographic in America over the last 40 years.
It's a different world now.
Like, we don't need men the way that they used to.
The future is female.
Men and women are drifting further apart and society is crumbling because of it.
A fascinating debate has broken out about the value of marriage.
You've kind of got the TradCon versus Red Pill thing.
This men's rights crowd that sometimes just goes too far the other way.
Oh, you need to stop acting like grown boys and infants and actually become men.
Marriage is a bond and it's a sacred bond.
It's a machine designed to extract resources from you.
Now many of the red-pilled have taken the position that it's bad for men to get married.
Hannah Pearl Davis or just pearly things.
One of the most controversial faces in all of the internet.
She goes on to say that marriage is a terrible deal for men.
Because if me and you were in a business contract, you would never sign a contract where I am paid to leave.
Gee, what could go wrong there?
74% or something of divorces are initiated by women.
Men have everything to lose, primarily their own children.
Men get killed by the courts and by divorce laws.
I had no idea that courts of family law were courts of equity, not courts of law.
Because in family court, you don't need evidence to accuse someone of abuse.
You need no evidence.
When you guys say get married young, a lot of these men don't know what they're signing up for, and you're not going to be there when their entire life falls apart.
I interviewed them on the other side.
I didn't meet my son until he was 15 months old.
How much did you spend trying to get him back?
The legal fees alone was about 200,000.
Before you know it, you're homeless.
You're literally just thrown out onto the street.
We absolutely reinforce bad behavior from women.
Wives are taught to leave their husbands.
And then daughters grow up without their fathers.
Family is the foundation of society.
Every problem in society comes from single mother homes.
A lot of women will just chase this negative rabbit hole of happiness, endless happiness.
Feminism's biggest failures is it lies to women.
We tell women to date as many guys as possible.
We tell them to put off family into marriage.
You are allowed to leave your perfect husband.
You are allowed to end a relationship with a really great boyfriend.
Oh, freeze your ex, have an abortion.
What?
You're evil.
I don't think there's anything else in life that we actually ever go into preparing to fail.
Right.
Like if you have the mentality of this is going to go wrong and be pessimistic, naturally the outcome is going to be that it's going to fail anyway.
It's self-sabotage.
And that's the thing.
Like women are so willing to leave marriages because they're not happy.
This is not about happiness.
The most important thing is the children.
And the problem is we have a modern society where it's me, me, me.
My feelings leave when I feel like it instead of doing what's best for the kids.
This myth that we live in an age of male privilege.
Where's my male privilege?
They think, well, men have all the rights.
They have all the power.
Privilege patriarchal system that we have.
Why doesn't our society care about men's rights?
I have no friends, no wife, and no social life.
Men are alone in this situation.
Men are homeless.
Men are thinking about eating guns.
I've seen so many men on the brink of suicide and they didn't do anything wrong.
How are you equal if the men are the ones that have to fight and die to defend the country?
The men are the ones that build and maintain all the infrastructure.
Women are helplessly dependent upon men.
The so-called deaths of despair from suicide, overdose, or alcohol, three times higher among men than among women.
Culture is telling men, you are no good.
You got to get your act together.
I think men have failed themselves.
What kind of a man are you?
What kind of a woman are you going to attract?
If men are in trouble, so are women.
Everybody knows this is a huge problem, but nobody wants to admit it.
Every single woman at the table said they wanted a man.
500K, 500, 300K, 300K, 200K.
Am I crazy?
Everything is really set up against you to fail as a man.
If men make less than women, women don't want to marry them.
So you know who wants more economically and emotionally viable men?
Women.
I don't want to be an independent woman anymore.
I don't want to be a strong, independent woman.
I'm overage.
When is it going to be my turn?
Where are we meeting the men that don't stop?
I can't keep having these same conversations.
The only simp here is you, Pearl.
You sent for women.
I think you sent for women.
She's a provocateur.
She says stupid stuff, but Pearl is right about this.
It's already happening.
It's just not out in the open yet.
Now it's just hookup culture is going to be our fairy tale ending because men don't want a wife and women can't find a husband.
The future, if everybody follows your path, is there is no future.
We go into population decline and our economy goes into decline.
Civilization will crumble.
The American story does not end well.
This is an existential crisis failing young men.
What up, guys?
So the time has come where we are finally doing this divorce documentary.
It's by far the biggest and most ambitious project I've ever embarked on, and I need your help.