All Episodes
Previous Next
July 30, 2025 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
48:08
Tariff the Overseas Call Centers

Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec Right now find out how to claim your free 4-week food supply, and join millions of Americans who are preparing with My Patriot Supply. From ‘My Patriot Supply’ go to https://www.MYPATRIOTSUPPLY.COM/JACK. Support the show

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com/slash pozo, sign up today.
It's called the posto daily brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
Humanevents.com slash pozo, totally free.
The pozo daily brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
It's a real safety day.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Safety day.
Safety day.
Oh yeah.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Pisovic.
Christ is.
U.S. President Donald Trump has declared a 25% duty on Indian imports.
I'll share it with you now and read it out verbatim.
They have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine.
All things not good, India will therefore be paying a tariff of 25% plus a penalty for the above starting on August 1st.
U.S. and Chinese officials are agreeing to push for an extension of their 90-day tariff truce after two days of trade talks.
Both sides are calling them constructive, but there's still no big breakthrough.
Tsunami waves started hitting Hawaii after a powerful 8.8 magnitude earthquake hit Russia's Pacific coast overnight.
The University of California reached a $6.45 million settlement with a group of Jewish students.
They claimed in a lawsuit that they were blocked from parts of the UCLA campus by pro-Palestinian protesters last spring.
The group claims discrimination because of their faith and argued that UCLA failed to ensure their protection.
The House Oversight Committee has officially rejected Ghelane Maxwell's request for immunity in exchange for her testimony to Congress.
The committee subpoenaed Maxwell last week as part of what it calls an investigation into the federal government's handling of the Epstein case.
Maxwell previously said that she would not testify without immunity, but her attorney says there is another path that could convince her to cooperate.
Can you guess it?
It's an act of clemency from President Donald J. Trump.
Sidney Sweeney is facing woke backlash as the face of American Eagle Jeans.
The superstar actress announced her latest partnership with the brand, launching a new campaign highlighting her, quote, great jeans.
Some on the left wasted no time attacking the advertisement and its tagline, saying that it's not about a pair of pants.
It's actually racist.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily here live, Washington, D.C. Today is July 30th, 2025.
And oh, Domini, I'd like to thank the President of the United States.
You just saw him there, folks.
He got done everything that he was talking about.
He was speaking in the Roosevelt room of the White House, but he cut his remarks off early.
I guess, I don't know, I guess he had to go and watch Human Events daily.
But, you know, I saw this tariff tweet from President Trump earlier today on India, and it really got me thinking.
I dug into something.
Do you realize that outsourcing is not tariff?
I didn't realize that.
So the tariffs cover the goods that come from other countries, but not the services that come from other countries.
This is, it's unbelievable to me that this was not already included.
So we need to correct this right away.
Number one, tariff the remote workers.
All outsourcing should be tariffs.
Countries must pay for the privilege of providing services remotely to the United States the same way as goods.
This would apply across all industries, and then you lever it as necessary per country.
Go and look.
Go and look at the unemployment rate for males under 30, especially those 16 to 24.
It has nosedived since 2000.
In 2000, 62%, 2022, 43%.
And all of this, while outsourcing increases and outsourcing firms advertise remote services for less than half the costs.
So it's really simple.
Tariff remote workers now.
If there's AI cloud servers, there's bot work, whatever it is, whatever it is that's being hosted overseas, tariff all of these services.
It's ridiculous to me to think that when we're in a situation where there's an American who could do that job and a company wants to go and make a deal with a foreign country and a lot of these jobs, as we all know, whether it be call centers, whether it be IT, so many other features of this, where it can be done, and there's no tariff.
And I looked this up.
They are excluded from tariffs.
Although remarkably so, there have been a few chances and a few instances where people speculate that it could possibly come up anyway.
This is where we need to get into, folks.
We need to tariff the remote workers.
I don't understand why this hasn't been said.
Well, I do understand why it's been said before again.
There are billions and billions of dollars on the line when people say, oh, wait a minute, but you're going to hurt my small business.
You're going to hurt my big business.
No, no, we're done with it.
We're done with all of this.
If people want to operate, if these countries want to operate and have access to the U.S. market, because the United States is an exclusive market, a luxury market, a premium market, if you want access to that for your goods or your services, I don't care if it's Europe, I don't care if it's Asia, I don't care if it's Southeast Asia, India, wherever, wherever they're coming from, doesn't matter.
Doesn't matter to me.
Tariff them all.
Tariff the remote workers and go and push.
Go push your senators.
Go push your congressmen because they'll say, well, hold on.
We got to pull that out because, and what happened?
Remember, we were going to get remittance taxes as well, which of course remittances should be taxed at 100% rate.
There's no question about that.
Because I'm sick and tired of people treating our country like an economic zone, like it's an economic extraction zone where the only point of the United States is for people to come.
And these are all economic migrants that are coming here when it comes to from that perspective and the economic extraction that's going on by these corporations, the multinationals, and of course, the remote work countries, these hubs themselves.
It's sick.
And I'm sorry to, you know, to the Tom Friedman, oh, the world is flat.
No, no, it is not.
We do not live in a global economy.
I live in the United States of America.
That is my country.
That is my home.
And I am sick and tired of all of these people extracting from it and treating it like it is some sort of plaything.
No, this is our home and it will be defended militarily through law enforcement and of course economically.
No more hard times for the people of the United States.
Jack Psovic, right back.
Stand in our way and our golden age has just begun.
This is Human Events with Jack Psovic.
Now it's time for everyone to understand what America First truly means.
Welcome to the second American Revolution.
All right, Jack Psovic back here, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C. Folks, let me tell you something.
This summer isn't just hot.
It's historic.
Flash flood warnings are at a 40-year high, and we've seen the damage that can come from them.
It's not slowing down.
Towns underwater, roads washed out, and in every crisis zone, the same thing.
Crowds standing in line waiting, waiting for bottled water, waiting for food, waiting for someone to show up and save you.
They tell you that help is on the way, but what if it's not?
What if help takes days or doesn't come at all?
You think the system's built to protect you?
They can barely handle one emergency, let alone a dozen.
Well, I don't know about you, but I'm not going to be the one caught empty-handed.
And right now, MyPatriot Supply is giving away four weeks of emergency food.
Just go to mypatriotsupply.com slash Jack and find out how to claim your free four-week food supply and join millions of Americans who are preparing with MyPatriot Supply.
Claim your free four-week kit today at mypatriotsupply.com slash Jack.
That's mypatriotsupply.com slash Jack.
So wanted to get in all of the information that we're seeing coming out.
Russia gate, these documents that are now being released by the DNI, CIA poised to declassify even more documents related to this.
By the way, a lot of this stuff was mentioned by James Comey in his book.
So for a lot of people saying, oh, we didn't know about this, you know, Russian intel on Hillary, Comey actually mentions it in his book here and there.
And you can get a, you could understand the story if you just read his book, which I horribly did one day because I felt a lot of a lot of control left when I read that one.
But it was very interesting because it had to do with this Loretta Lynch moment.
But there's a huge context that I think a lot of people are missing.
So for someone to help us go through all the context, we've got the great Matt Gates of the Matt Gates Show over at One American News joining us now.
Matt, how's it going?
Good, Jack.
And I know you were concerned about me.
I survived the tsunami in San Diego.
There was an extra foot of water as a result of this earthquake that occurred out in the ocean.
And what I understand is that the national security apparatus is blaming Vladimir Putin now for the tsunami.
He must have ordered it.
It must have been done to help the Republicans win the midterms somehow.
And that's probably the story that they'll run with.
But yeah, it's interesting to see the Russia hoax back in the news because it really was the original sin of the intelligence apparatus against the country.
The way they want to write history is that January 6th was this great attempted coup, but the real attempted coup was December 9th.
After Donald Trump shocked the world, beat Hillary Clinton.
Obama decides he has to discredit Trump.
He assembles his national security team.
They, I think, probably fess up at some point that the letter from the 51 intelligence officials didn't work.
The lies that others had sort of weaved together to try to make Trump look like an asset of the Russian government, none of that tradecraft had worked.
And so now what they were going to do is lash the dossier that they already knew to be subsourced by Russian intelligence, that they already knew was assembled by a foreign spy who hated Trump.
They were going to take that dossier and lash it to an intelligence community work product.
And when this unprecedented thing happened, there were regular folks at the CIA, patriotic Americans, who stood up and said, no, this is not acceptable to include in anything that we would put our imprimatur on.
They joked that this would be like citing the national inquirer to get surveillance authorities or to make an assessment.
That's how ridiculous it was.
But John Brennan demanded it anyway.
And that wasn't because John Brennan had an original thought.
It's because Barack Obama told him to.
So Obama made the, called the order.
Clapper went and kind of weaved all this together.
And then when there were people saying, absolutely not, we are not going to include this, Brennan overruled them.
Now, why is that criminal and relevant today?
You fast forward to 2023 and you had Brennan sitting in a deposition where I was asking questions.
And ostensibly, the subject of the deposition was the 51 intelligence officials who said that the Hunter Biden laptop story had all the indicia of Russian disinformation.
And so I asked Brennan, how did you know that this Hunter Biden laptop had all of these indicia of Russian assembly and Russian intelligence and information operations?
And very piously, very arrogantly, in a professionally self-preening way, Brennan says, well, Matt, it's all of my experience studying Russia, studying their tradecraft, knowing them like the back of my hand.
It's all of That, which culminates in my ability to make this assessment regarding the laptop.
Once he gave that answer in 2023, he opened the door to any question about any assessment he had ever made as to Russia.
And so I started asking about the steel dossier.
And that is when John Brennan perjured himself to my questions.
He said that he had nothing to do with the steel dossier, that this was the FBI requiring it to be included, that he didn't analyze it at all.
And now we have a whole lot of witnesses who are going to say he's lying out of the CIA.
Here's what I'm wondering.
How good are those witnesses going to stand up, Jack?
Because if you're CIA Director Ratcliffe, if you're DNI Gabbard, two people I have a lot of trust in and a lot of respect for, you write up what people are telling you in the investigation.
But that is the Amuz bouche.
Like to get to the real meal, you've got to see those people testifying in Congress, in a courtroom, somewhere, explaining how this happened and narrating it.
Because you and I narrating the Russia hoax now is an insufficient level of accountability.
There has to be criminal process.
There have to be public hearings on this.
And I think that the Congress needs to be up to that task.
Look, and there's no question, right?
So, and I've said so many times, none of this ends with until we see Democrats in handcuffs and people say, well, you just want revenge of revenge.
Or a bunch of these people are Republicans.
Oh, yeah.
Some Republicans too.
Don't get me wrong.
Anyone, anyone who broke the law on this.
But the point is, is we've got so much of an unbalance here when the actual criminality was being committed by them on a routine basis.
And by the way, even prior to that, we know that he went up to the House or excuse me to the Senate and lied about same guy, John Brennan, lied about wireless wiretapping over and over and over until Edward Snowden came out and proved that those were lies.
Never charged.
Well beyond the statute of limitations there.
Then to your point, people are saying, oh, this is past the five-year statute.
Ah, but he committed further lies even in later hearings.
Plus, you could bring him right now.
Okay, John.
So say that wasn't a hearing.
Say that wasn't perjury back then.
Will you testify now?
Oh, why not?
This is also the same reason you keep seeing these Biden officials taking the fifth every time that they are brought in.
Why?
Because they don't want to have to commit perjury.
It's so obvious.
And by the way, I'm sure we can find instances as well of Clapper and Comey committing these same acts.
And look, if Roger Stone had to go through, and I sat in the courtroom with him and Steve Bannon, and if they had to go through what they went through on these very same questions, General Flynn and all the way up to, of course, Donald Trump himself, then there's no question that the country needs this.
And actually, Matt, if you could talk for just a couple minutes on that, does the country need this process?
If we don't do it, it will happen again.
Someone will believe that piously, that in service of their own aggrandizement, that converting political opposition research into counterintelligence investigations will be the normal course of practice.
And what you mentioned about this being routine may end up being what hangs these guys.
Here's what I mean.
Typically, these folks don't really fear a perjury prosecution inside of Washington, D.C. I wanted to vote like 92% for Joe Biden.
It's all of the careerists.
You're going to get a jury there that is the most favorable jury to an Obama.
This is what I was warning about on last week.
Right.
But there is a tell in how the DOJ is pursuing this.
The reporting indicates that this is not going to be a perjury charge like you saw with Roger Stone or some sort of evading Congress charge like we saw with Navarro and Bandon.
They are investigating a conspiracy where venue can properly lie wherever there is a predicate criminal act in furtherance of the conspiracy.
That's why Pam Bondi has put together this strike force at the DOJ to take in, to ingest this information.
It's not just about the questions of fact and law.
It is also a question of venue.
And if any one of these cats was down in Palm Beach sending emails or out in Jackson Hole, Wyoming on a phone call or sending a text message from the Eastern District of Virginia, they sink venue in places where real Americans are going to be on the grand jury, real Americans are going to be on the jury.
And this prosecution that would even include the lies John Brennan told in Washington, D.C., could properly lie in another place in the country that would really frighten these people.
Doug Mackey, who's someone that's been a friend of mine for a decade now, his case was brought in Brooklyn.
So I think it's the Eastern District of New York.
He said, why is he all the way up there?
And they said, because there were victims of his conspiracy in that district.
And so that's what they're a block away, by the way, from the Hillary Clinton campaign headquarters from where it was in 2016.
They moved his venue all the way up to New York.
He was a West Palm Beach guy, and they moved it all the way up there on this theory that there were victims of his conspiracy who were living there.
So this, all of these things are absolutely important, by the way, and crucial to go through right now.
And I love the fact that it sounds like that's exactly what they're thinking of, because that's one of the reasons that we've had trouble with this before, because how do you get past a DC jury?
How do you get past a 95% Democrat district to change the venue?
It's as simple as that, folks.
John Brennan, James Clapper, Jimmy Comey.
Hope you're watching.
We'll be seeing you very, very soon.
Right back.
quick break jack so big matt gates real nervous voice Talk about influencers.
These are influencers and their friends of mine, Jack Pasovic.
Where's Jack?
Jack, he's got a great job.
All right, Jack Pasovic here back live, Human Events Daily.
We're on with Matt Gates.
And as we're speaking, though, there's a lot of econ news that's breaking.
We were thinking that Jerome Powell might finally lower interest rates to help people out with a little bit of the housing industry and all this, this house, this closeout of the housing industry that so many people have been denied access to.
I have this whole theory.
That's why millennials are so into collecting things and so focused on Marvel movies because they were cut out of housing, which blocked them out of family formation and all the rest.
But that's a story for another situation.
But Matt, why don't you break down some of the latest information that we're getting regarding the breaking economic news?
The good news is that we just saw that in the second quarter of this year, the economy grew at a 3% annualized rate, which is really remarkable considering when I was entering the job market in the Obama years, we were told as young job seekers that the economy would never grow at more than a 2% rate.
And so Obama had us at 1.8, 1.9, and was telling us that's just what we should accept as the new normal.
So an economy growing at a 3% annualized rate is doing 50% more for you in terms of opportunity than the Obama economy at its best moments.
And for all of that good news, the challenge is that Jerome Powell still doesn't want you to be able to buy a house.
The growth in the economy would suggest that there is enough production to justify lowering interest rates without spiking inflation, because there's more stuff.
There's more things happening in the United States, largely as a consequence of President Trump's carrot and stick approach to trade.
Like other presidents, Republican and Democrat, viewed trade as this gift that America gave the world.
It was part of our largesse.
And when we brought people into trading relationships, we thought it would cause them to act more like us.
Well, when we saw the Chimerica dream turn into a nightmare for the American middle class, we saw just the opposite, that we were actually becoming more and more like China.
And so now with the economy growing stateside, with the EU, with Gulf states, with other Asian economies pouring money into America, it would seemingly be the time to lower interest rates, to give more younger millennials and Gen Z an opportunity to think about the American dream and home ownership.
And that would have tremendous societal benefit.
We often look at the American economy as just a collection of producers and consumers, but we're more than that.
We are a nation.
And you're right.
The historians will write about all the things we did to stop family formation in this country, whether it was economically, whether it was just from like a value standpoint, or whether it was the poisoning, the biological war that was waged on women and men that have really impacted fertility.
And I think that if people can get access to capital, we can get an updraft from the Trump economy and it might be our last chance to turn it around.
I think that's right.
And there's been some, I've been working on, we're going to do a whole show on this at some point, but there's, since we're on the subject, there's this idea that's been popping around on social media that we're actually in a silent depression.
And I love this term.
I think it's so fantastic because it talks about how the factors that we use and the metrics that we use to define economic well-being, whether it be the stock market, whether it be GDP, even GDP per capita, when you have this massive influx of migrants is, you know, it's completely inflated because it doesn't account for population shift.
And so when you just track actual, but then when you shift that on its head and you track things like home ownership, when you track things like wage growth, purchasing power of, you know, purchasing power parity, so this idea of how far does your dollar grow, you can see these massive swaths of the American people that haven't seen anything other than a downward trend since the 1990s and in some aspects, the 1960s, when you track it all the way back.
And so, but then of course, this is why you'll get people sit up there and say, whoa, you know, oh, well, look at this, look at that.
But you're totally missing all of these people that are locked out of these economic booms that are coming in because of the factors you're talking about.
Yeah, I've never really shared this with anyone, but this reminds me of a conversation I had with Donald Trump on January 6th of 2021.
And, you know, we were speaking to him on that day, and he said he was going to go tell people that they needed to go home.
But he said this, he said, I'm not going to trash these people because these people have been walked all over for 40 years.
And there was a grace and a humanity and an empathy and an understanding for that condition you described.
And it, of course, never excuses violence.
But for people who were on that day feeling a culmination of so much, I think it does for a lot of folks stretch back to the false economic promise of globalism and these, a lot of these trade deals that hurt us.
And, you know, we now see Trump making those people's lives better, making all of our lives better.
And so with, you know, the purchasing power that you talk about is actually all that matters.
It doesn't matter how much money you have.
It just matters what can you get with it.
Can you get a roof over your head?
Can you get food?
Can you participate in your church with the resources that you have at your disposal?
And when people have that, they actually are happier and they do live better lives and it causes a societal positivity swing that isn't measured in quarterly earnings.
No, it's exactly right.
And I think that that's something that's at the very heart of MAGA, right?
This is why all those people in places like Mozani, Wisconsin, or Pontiac, Michigan, Battle Creek, Michigan, Butler, Pennsylvania, right?
Why do the people of Butler, Pennsylvania flock to Trump rallies?
Because he goes there and he shows that he actually cares about the situation they've all been through, that they've all been in.
And he said he is their one shot.
He is the one shot that they have left at turning it all back.
It's as simple as that.
I didn't know we were going to go so deep on this one, but here we are.
Matt Gates, we got to run.
We're just about out of time.
Where can people go?
That was too fast.
Let's do an hour next time, Jack.
All right, we'll do an hour next time.
We're locked up.
Angelo, book it.
Nice.
Good seeing you, my friend.
Give people the coordinates.
Yeah, no, I'm at Matt Gates on social media.
I make the Matt Gates show on One American News.
It's 9 o'clock Eastern, 6 Pacific, OANN.com.
And we're now on Spectrum Cable, Dish, and Sling.
We are re-platforming the amazing network that you helped build.
And we know that.
We know we stand on the shoulders of the great Jack Petovic at OAN New New New New News.
Small part, small part.
Antifa played a part as well.
Matt Gates, everybody.
Be right back.
jack basobic human events daily rumor Jack.
Where is Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys that be getting published.
All right, Jack Prasobic, here we are back live, Human Events Daily.
We're talking about so many things today here on the program.
We're talking about the wars overseas.
We're talking about the lies from our own intelligence community.
We're talking about fixing the economy and how our economy has become so broken because it's not working for families anymore.
It's not working for the blue-collar families anymore, working class families, people who have that background.
It's simply not working at all.
And so when it comes down to it, you know, you got a situation here in South Carolina where Lindsey Graham is up for reelection.
And now a number of people are vying for that seat, this warmonger, this childless warmonger of Lindsey Graham.
And so one of those candidates vying against him is Mark Lynch, who now joins us.
He's a businessman.
He understands economics and he's here on Human Events Daily.
Mark, thanks for being here.
Thank you so much for having me, Jack.
It's an honor to be on your show.
Well, and it was great to see you last week at General Flynn's summit.
Certainly turned into a security strategy session, a working group, and it was really good to see to get a chance to meet you there.
Yes, sir.
It was awesome.
It was a great time.
So many great people there.
So explain to us your background and why you've decided to make this run now.
Well, I am a successful businessman in Greenville, South Carolina.
I took over my father's business back in 1985.
God's the center of our company, and we're just trying to be a good steward of it.
And he's blessed us.
We've grown 35 times since my tenure in 1985.
We've grown from five employees to 110, and God has blessed us with just a tremendous, awesome staff here that works together in our culture.
And we've got, I've been married 37 years, have two awesome children, four beautiful grandchildren.
I'm a deacon in our church at Burnsview Baptist Church.
And I got into this back meeting these gentlemen that are the head of international security.
That's when I met Mike Flynn maybe four or five years ago and working with us.
And I was asked to run for a state Senate seat.
I did.
I almost won.
I lost by 5%.
My election was stolen for that 2020 race also.
And when people met me and saw that I had a backbone, that I had integrity and honor and courage, they asked me, would you run again, please?
We need you to run for something.
So my wife started pushing a little bit last summer and said, you know, I think you need to run against Lindsey Graham.
That seat's coming up for reelection and you can take him out.
You can do it.
And so we met with some good consultants and they agreed and we're in it to win it.
You know, we've been debt-free in our company since 1999.
And meeting with Roger Stone a while back, he said, Trump will want to see your amount of skin in the game and your polling.
And my wife and I prayed about it and we pushed $5 million of our own retirement fund to help start this campaign off.
So we're in it.
We're here to take Lindsey out.
And what is it about Lindsey Graham?
And certainly I've had my disagreements with him, but I want to hear from your perspective.
You know, you talk about the people of South Carolina, the great state.
You know, I say that as a darn Yankee, a dang Yankee from Philadelphia.
But, you know, I've been to South Carolina a number of times.
Charleston is absolutely gorgeous.
The food is incredible in the low country.
And I've never had a bad time in South Carolina.
And then I meet Lindsey Graham and I say, how is this guy representing that state?
It just doesn't track.
Right.
Yeah.
He's not one of us.
He's betrayed South Carolinians and America and Donald Trump, and he stabs him in the back repeatedly and is doing so again right now, even though he's been endorsed by him.
But, you know, the biggest difference, and we have a lot of people moving into our state from woke areas across the country, and they believe they're in a red state.
And then when we show them the Freedom Index, their constitutional voting record, like Lindsay, his lifetime score out of 100 Is 57% of the time he votes correctly.
So he's betraying his oath as a Republican.
The conservative review score is 43% voting record, lifetime voting record.
Club for growth is 65.
Anything below a 70 is an F, and he's failing in all the different scorecards that we can look up as voters just to see how our representatives are doing.
So that's just one minor thing.
You know, he just got endorsed by some pro-life, I would call them fake pro-life organizations because on his website, he's okay to murder babies in the womb up to 15 weeks.
I'm 100% pro-life, and abortion, that's just a nice word for murder.
That's not an option for me, and I'll fight to keep pro-life on top, you know, as a topic that we're going to nail down and finish off.
We've killed over 63 million of our own children in this country, 10 times more than Hitler killed Jews, and that's got to stop.
But I'm a God-first candidate.
That's the basis of our platform.
When we bring God back first again into our government, that's the only way our Constitution works.
And every decision I'll make will be done biblically first, through the first filter, and then through the Constitution next, or it's a no for me.
And our country only works that way the way our framers wrote the Constitution with godly, moral society.
And so we've got to get back to that and get rid of all the corruption and craziness that's been going on.
And I'm here to see.
Well, Mark, I completely agree with you on that point because the American Constitution does something that no other government hitherto had done on earth.
And it provides an extreme amount of freedom to the American citizens.
You don't see this from governments in the past, and you don't even see it in places like Europe today.
They just simply don't have the amount of freedoms that we do in this country.
It's an incredible amount of personal liberty.
But for that liberty, the price we pay, of course, is responsibility.
And that responsibility is always supposed to be filtered through, and it certainly was at the time through the idea of having Christian.
And that said, they had that strong moral Christian fiber to their being.
They certainly came from Christian countries.
And so the idea was that all of that freedom would be tempered by their religion and by the moral code of Christianity.
And so when the left came to the United States and started getting into places of power, what was the very first thing they did?
They tried to take God out of the public square because if you take out God, now suddenly it's all just a bunch of words.
Now freedom can be whatever you want it to be because there's no filter.
That's right.
And we've allowed it and we've got to take it back.
God tells us in Genesis and Matthew 18, I'll loose what you lose and bind what you bind.
God's in charge, but we've been given everything we need to rule and reign and have dominion down here.
And we just got to have the right people get back into Congress and that'll run the country the way our forefathers designed it and honor the Constitution.
You know, if I get in as the servant of the people to be their voice in D.C. for the great state of South Carolina, my only job is to protect the God-given, unalienable rights that God gave us, and that's what the Constitution does.
We've stepped way out of bounds.
Government's gotten too large.
We have too many agencies we've created that are unconstitutional that's causing all of this inflation and the printing of money.
You know, we need to get back on the gold standard and get to a 10% flat tax and get rid of property taxes.
And the tariffs that Trump's introduced, I'm so happy that's started.
There's a little bit of adjustment period we'll be going through, but that'll help fund our economy and level up and equalize the low cost that other third world countries have in making products for us.
And we can bring manufacturing and bring jobs back to America.
Well, Mark, wait a second.
You've got a business background.
I keep hearing from the left that business owners don't want the tariffs.
Yeah, no.
In my lifetime, I watched, like, we sell appliances and furniture and bedding and TVs.
Well, we witnessed all the American manufacturing of televisions back then.
It was Zenith, RCA, Philips, Magnavox.
All those companies got taken out by brands from Japan when they first came over here.
And that was Sony, Hitachi, Toshiba, JVC.
Now it's the Korean brands of Samsung and LG coming in.
And the quality is inferior.
And, you know, we're losing our manufacturing ability here.
And during COVID, we saw how vulnerable our country was because we don't make anything anymore.
We're dependent on foreign nations.
And some of them are enemies of America.
And they make our pharmaceuticals now in China.
I don't feel right about taking that.
This is a great conversation.
We'll have to continue it at some other time.
Mark Lynch, go give him a follow, folks, lynchforsenate.com.
Mark, God bless you.
And thanks for joining us here at Human Events Daily.
Jack, thank you for having me on.
All right, folks, right back.
Go Microsport!
Jack is a great guy.
He's written a fantastic book.
Everybody's talking about it.
Go get it.
And he's been my friend right from the beginning of this whole beautiful event.
And we're going to turn it around and make our country great to get to him.
Amen.
All right, Jack Patovicuri are back live, Human Events Daily.
Now, I want to be clear, you know, we don't, you know, we love mypillow.com promo code Posto around here, but I got to tell you, I love a great set of genes.
I just, I just find a great set of genes.
When you Get a great set of genes, you really have to appreciate it.
And I think it's time that we all take a moment to step back here on Human Events Daily to appreciate a great set of jeans.
Play it, boys.
Jeans are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color.
My jeans are blue.
Sidney's tweeny has very keen.
I'm not here to tell you to buy American Eagle jeans.
And I definitely won't say that they're the most comfortable jeans I've ever worn.
Or that they make your butt look amazing.
Why would I need to do that?
But if you said that you want to buy the jeans, I'm not going to stop you.
Because we're clear, this is not me telling you to buy American Eagle jeans.
Sidney Sweeney has very keen.
You see what I did there, right?
Hi, I'm Sidney Sweeney, and I'm from Spokane, Washington.
I can work as a local hire as well, though, and I'm available for the American Eagle Jeans Campaign shoot.
Profile on hands, please.
Thanks.
We'll be in touch.
Cindy Sweeney has very genes.
Next.
What can I say?
The jeans are great.
The jeans are great.
Now, the left is completely melting down over this.
So I had to get on Olivia Krolchuk to talk about this.
Olivia, you know, we just played some of the ads there.
They're obviously funny.
It's a pun.
You know, Sidney Sweeney has great genes, et cetera.
But the left is losing their minds.
And in fact, they're calling this Nazi propaganda.
And I'm just going to step back and say, imagine the billions of dollars and years upon years of conditioning and programming that it took to overcome, to go from,
you know, those Calvin Klein ads from a couple of years ago where they had like, I don't know, gigantic Swahili warriors and, you know, burkinis on the cover of Sports Illustrated from Somalian migrants to just going back to having Sidney Sweeney in a pair of jeans.
Amazing.
Oh, gosh, they're showing it.
Oh, sorry.
Olivia Krolchuk.
Why is the left losing their minds over this?
God forbid we have someone that's not overweight, fat, ugly, or a minority doing an advertisement for a company.
Of course, they're going crazy because someone that's not ugly is on screen.
God forbid a company is smart and actually uses an attractive woman who can sell jeans to women and men for that matter.
Of course, the left is mad about it because we're not promoting something that's DEI.
Well, and, you know, it's amazing because people want to sit there and say, oh, my gosh, oh, my gosh, this is right-wing coded.
And here's what's interesting, right?
That it actually proves what I've been saying for a full year.
It's July, right?
So a year and a month at this point now, I wrote a whole book about this saying that all of leftism is rooted in envy and anger and resentment and jealousy.
Leftism is all about jealousy.
And if you understand that, and that it's a collection of people who are envious and resentful and just want to tear everything down, that's what leftism is bred into, then you will understand the reaction to this and why they make it political, because there's obviously nothing political on its face about the ad.
But in a sense, it does actually stand as a testament to the fact that things are real.
And guess what?
There's a reason that everyone around the world goes to visit places like Rome and goes to visit the cathedrals of Europe, because as it turns out, beauty is objective.
Yep.
Notice how all the people who are mad about it, the liberals, are ugly.
Every single video that I've seen posted is a minority or someone who's very overweight complaining that Sidney Sweeney is beautiful.
She's skinny.
She has a larger chest.
That's what the people like.
That's what the people want.
And they're mad about it because they're jealous.
I will say the one thing that I do disagree with is that, yes, conservatives are pushing this.
They're applauding it, which it is a step in the right direction.
But also conservatives are supposed to be following more traditional roles and morals and values.
Is selling sex something that we should be promoting?
No, but I do think we're making one small good change.
That's a great point.
That's certainly a great point.
And then by the way, that's exactly the type of thing.
Like, I would love to get back to the type of America where we are talking about the raciness of the ad rather than, of course, the race of the actress or the model in this case that they've put back together.
But it's like, we've gone so far off the rails that it's like we can't even get back to just the very basics of where we used to be as a country to be able to say, yeah, you know what, that might not, you know, maybe I don't want my kids watching that necessarily, that type of thing.
You know, I think of that as a dad all the time.
That being said, you know, when I consider the alternative, I'm like, well, I'd much rather have my kids watching a Sydney Sweeney ad than some of the stuff they are, the other stuff that's out there.
I agree.
I think we need to go back to the ads from decades ago, like Ralph Lauren, Kate Spade, those vibes, the Tommy Hilfiger vibes, where people are covered, they're dressed nice.
You look at them and you say, oh, they're beautiful.
I want my family to look like that one day.
That's what people buy.
They buy things that look attractive to them.
So why wouldn't we promote that?
I mean, the greatest ad to my mind of all time is the Gillette Razor ad from the 1990s.
Gillette, the best a man can get.
And it's just, it's just a father and son.
And so a grandfather.
And he becomes a grandfather in the course of it.
So he has a son, then his son has a son, and they're passing the razor on.
And it's just the best.
It's just the best ad I've ever seen.
And to your point, there's, there's, you know, you don't need quote unquote sex To break through in it, but what do you have?
You have standards and you have this idea that there are standards and standards are real.
Because, and you know, let's get back to that.
Because, by the way, you're making an argument that there should be a standard against this, which would then preclude the idea that there are standards.
Leftism is a complete denial of the standards of reality that we all know exist.
There are some people that are better looking than others.
There are some people that are thinner than others.
There are some people that are more athletic than others.
There are some people that are smarter than others, faster than others.
It's just reality.
And so conservatism starts with an acceptance of reality and then saying, okay, this is human nature.
This is reality.
How should we, you know, how should we deal with it?
How should we set up society to best serve human nature?
Whereas leftism begins with a complete denial of human nature.
Agreed.
I think that conservatives can recognize that reality and then make a change.
If they realize, hey, maybe I'm overweight, I should go to the gym.
Or hey, maybe I need to change this.
They'll actually make a change.
Instead, the liberals just look at it and then they try to push everyone down because they can't take care of themselves.
They're ugly.
They're fat.
They're all of this.
And they don't do anything to change it.
And they live in this delusion.
Actually, that reminds me of something that happened just in your home state, you know, where it kind of lines up with what we're talking about.
Separate story, but this horrific brawl that happened in Cincinnati, apparently one of the judges came out and said that he granted a very low cash bail to one of the assailants and said he had binge drunk.
And the reason that he was so drunk was because he had been overserved.
So it was actually the bartender's fault that he was so drunk.
It was the bartender's fault that he was so drunk, not his fault for drinking the beers.
Well, of course, it could never be his fault.
He was a minority.
So God forbid we place any blame or responsibility on him.
And I'm not surprised to even see that happening in Cincinnati.
That's like an every other day situation.
But notice how none of the major news outlets were covering it because it was a white person that was beat up by a group of minorities.
And it's, I mean, we've certainly, I would say social media has driven this to the point where it's been forced.
And it just occurred to me that here we have it yet another standard that is a double standard.
So the double standard gets applied to one group of people, but not to another, right?
In your home state of Ohio.
Rivia Kolchu, Olivia Krolchuk, we've got to run.
Where can people go to follow you?
At Olivia Krolchuk on X, TikTok, and Instagram.
All right, give her a follow, folks.
Sidney Sweeney, right?
I love the jeans.
The jeans are great.
And I know Tanya Tay is watching, but I'm sorry, sweetheart.
I love the jeans.
Love you too, baby.
Don't worry.
Don't worry.
▲
Export Selection