Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec - LOCK THEM UP: DNI Brings Receipts On Obama’s Treasonous Acts To Undermine The Trump Presidency

July 21, 2025 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec

47:58

LOCK THEM UP: DNI Brings Receipts On Obama’s Treasonous Acts To Undermine The Trump Presidency

Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec Go to https://www.patriotmobile.com/poso/ or call 972-PATRIOT and get a FREE MONTH of service with promo code POSO. Support the show

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
	It is completely free.
	It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
	You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
	We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
	Go to humanevents.com/slash pozo, sign up today.
	It's called the Posto Daily Brief.
	Read what I read for show prep.
	You will not regret it.
	Humanevents.com slash pozo.
	Totally free.
	The posto daily brief.
	This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
	A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
	This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
	Christ is...
	I mean, but the Democratic Party's favorability is at 28%.
	Can you win back the House with numbers like that?
	The American people are with us on the issues.
	The polling suggests, though, that the American people are not with you in trusting Democrats right now.
	What we need to do is examine the entire Federal Reserve institution and whether they have been successful.
	You know, all these PhDs over there, I don't know what they do.
	This is like universal basic income for academic economists.
	U.S. Border Patrol officer is recovering.
	He was shot in a New York City park.
	The agent was shot in the face and arm, but managed to return fire, hitting the gunman in the leg.
	Police say later the suspect, 21-year-old Miguel Mora, walked into a hospital and is now in custody.
	Authorities say he's a Dominican national who entered the country illegally back in 2023.
	Make no mistake, this officer is in the hospital today fighting for his life because of the policies of the mayor of the city and the city council and the people that were in charge of keeping the public safe.
	I'm calling on every single mayor and sanctuary city and sanctuary governor to change their policies and to change their tactics right now.
	The Obama administration manufactured and politicized intelligence to create a narrative that the Kremlin was trying to influence the 2016 presidential election.
	The intelligence showed that, again, Russia did not have either the intent nor the capability to be able to impact the outcome of the United States election.
	So it was very striking when we look back again at the documents that I declassified and released that shows there was a shift.
	Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily here live in Washington, D.C. Today is July 21st, 2025.
	Anno Domini.
	So here is an interesting situation that's going on right now when it comes to the DNI documents, the Gabbard file that dropped on Friday.
	Now, if you saw me on War Room Friday evening or Saturday morning, I've had a lot of time to now go through these, but I've also noticed something very, very suspicious.
	Have you noticed, for example, all of the people trying to tell you that there's nothing new in there?
	And I happen to notice that one of them was Andy McCarthy.
	And in fact, Andy McCarthy of National Review says that, oh, this is just a frivolous argument, a frivolous argument from the DNI.
	Frivolous, really.
	Do you really think that the DNI's office would go through chapter and verse and the team over there, this dig team that she put together along with Joe Kent over at NCTC, who still needs to be confirmed, by the way, and so many others.
	Do you really think that they were working on all this just for fun?
	That they put it out just as like, oh, this will be fun to do on a front.
	No.
	This is newly declassified intelligence information that we didn't have, particularly that Barack Obama ordered the president's daily brief to be withheld.
	Okay.
	Withheld on that December 8th date so that they could hold a meeting instead.
	Why did they do this?
	Because during December, so look, here's how it works.
	President's daily brief is like a newspaper.
	The newspaper goes, I know it's not a newspaper.
	Just go with me on this.
	It's like a newspaper.
	It gets sent out.
	The president gets it.
	A lot of other top officials get it.
	It includes various articles and various assessments, different products that are coming out.
	So, hey, here's a tipper.
	Here's something that happened.
	Here's a long in-depth analysis piece.
	Here's some hot intel from CIA.
	Whatever it is, whatever they think the president should have to grouse over on their daily intelligence diet, that would be given to them.
	However, on that day, he ordered that the entire PDB be stricken.
	Why?
	Why should it be stricken from the record?
	Well, because during the transition period, post-election, pre-inauguration, who else has access to the PDB?
	Oh, that's right.
	The president-elect.
	Donald Trump and his team, which at the time included General Flynn and so many others, Steve Bannon, by the way.
	They all had access as well.
	So he blocks it because he didn't want the president-elect to see the assessment, the original FBI assessment that said Russia didn't hack the election.
	Because if Trump knew that, it would have come right out.
	And yet, so many questions now.
	Mike Pompeo, when he was CIA director, remember, he becomes CIA director just weeks later.
	Why didn't he put this out?
	Why are we only learning about all of this now?
	That you ordered the intelligence to be changed.
	And don't sit there and say it's a conspiracy.
	We have your emails.
	And Tulsi Gabbard saying it.
	It's not Joe Ken saying it.
	It's not even me saying it.
	We have all the emails.
	Tulsi Gabbard brought the receipts of every single one of them.
	Brennan, Clapper, the rest.
	Who's in the meeting?
	Victoria Newland.
	We understand what happened here.
	This was meant to be a hostile act, not just to the Trump administration, but remember, Russian diplomats were thrown out of the country on the heels of this.
	So why is it then that Andy McCarthy and the National Review would be saying it's frivolous, That it's not a big deal.
	Pay very close attention to the people telling you that it's not a big deal.
	Mark Levin is saying that we need to move on from Epstein.
	He's saying that it's a distraction.
	Who cares?
	It's a time waster, even though Mark Levin was talking about it just a few weeks ago.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	These are the people that we really need to pay attention to because why is it, why is it that they are telling us to move on and don't worry about this stuff?
	People like Mark Levin, people like Andy McCarthy, so many others out there, I really want to know why it is they're making these statements.
	But we're going to pay attention and we're absolutely going to be archiving everything in the receipts folder.
	Ladies and gentlemen, we'll be right back.
	Human Events continues your market's voice.
	Stand in our way and our golden age has just begun.
	This is Human Events with Jack Pasobic.
	Now it's time for everyone to understand what America First truly means.
	Welcome to the second American Revolution.
	All right, Jack Pasobic.
	Here we are live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C. Folks, let me ask you a question.
	Do you have a cell phone?
	Do you have an iPad?
	Do you have anything, any electronic device that uses an internet connection?
	Of course you do.
	But these days with your mobile devices, there's so many different things, different options that you can use to prepare and connect to the internet.
	The question is, are you using one that donates to the libs?
	Are you using one that donates to causes and funds things like DEI and CRT and wokeness and things that ultimately oppose the very same beliefs and ideals that you have?
	Well, if you are, it's time to make a switch because I'm here to tell you right now, there's good news.
	There's one that you can get behind and it's called Patriot Mobile.
	Go right now, all Patriots, go to patriotmobile.com slash POSO or call 972Patriot and you can now get a free whole month of service with promo code POSO.
	Remember, that's patriotmobile.com slash POSO.
	These guys support the freedom of speech.
	They support the Second Amendment.
	They support veterans, first responders, the whole nine yards.
	Really simple.
	Stop giving your money to people who hate you and exercise your economic willpower and your economic agency to your family and show the woke corporate types in corporate USA that we stand with the Patriots.
	PatriotMobile.com slash POSO, PatriotMobile.com slash POSO, and use promo code POSO.
	I want to bring on now the Washington Bureau Chief of Reitbart News, Matt Boyle.
	Matt, I want to get into this stuff out of the DNI's office because I disagree with some of the, you know, these chirpers, this like sort of like low whisper campaign that, oh, this stuff isn't new.
	I think there are significant new details in there, specifically the president's daily brief.
	That information was not public before.
	And we are getting new information from the DNI and from the Trump administration writ large regarding exactly how high all of this went for the beginnings, the genesis of Russia gate, the fact that they blocked the president-elect from having access to the original report.
	But then, of course, also, I think the question on a lot of people's lips is, okay, great.
	What comes next?
	Where do we go next?
	So the DNI, that position has been filled.
	She's out there, of course, all over Tulsi Gabbard on media, telling people where to go, telling people about this.
	She's leading this work of her people.
	But when it comes down to actual action, what next steps do you expect to see?
	And what do you think of the report?
	Well, yeah.
	So I would also add that in addition to the great work of Tulsi Gabbard that has filled in a lot of the gaps that we didn't know about with this declassification she did last week.
	A couple of weeks ago, we had the CIA director, John Ratcliffe, had released an assessment that was done by career CIA employees that demonstrated certain things regarding the ICA, right?
	The intelligence community assessment that formed the basis for the Russia hoax eventually from there.
	And John Brennan, the then CIA director back during the Obama administration, had testified later to Congress that he had nothing to do with the crafting of the ICA.
	And that's what everything seems to hinge around here, right?
	Like, and that's the stuff that Tulsi Gabbard released here that really is starting to, we're starting to see the picture get colored in, where it does appear as though the actual real truth about the intelligence community's position in the aftermath of the 2016 election is that Russia did not interfere in a way that influenced the outcome of the election at all.
	And that now looks as though Barack Obama himself, as well as several senior people around him, conspired, like Brennan, like Clapper, like Comey, et cetera, conspired to change the intelligence in a way that was designed to try to hurt President Trump on his way into office in his first term to delegitimize the then incoming president of the United States.
	And so this is extremely troubling.
	I think that we need to see, look, we saw back during the Biden administration, which is the term between President Trump's two terms, the Democrats harping on nonstop that there were threats to our democracy.
	And they did primetime hearings through the January 6th committee where they forced a whole bunch of people to testify.
	Remember Liz Cheney and all of them doing all of that.
	I think we need something bigger than that.
	So Speaker Johnson, Leader Thune, if you're listening, I think we need a bicameral commission between the House and the Senate.
	They can do this.
	They could form a bicameral committee With House members and senators for the special select purpose of investigating this.
	They should hold prime time hearings.
	They should subpoena John Brennan, James Clapper, and the rest of them to come in and testify on live television under oath.
	And then also, we have seen referrals made to the Justice Department, to the U.S. Attorney's Office here in Washington, D.C. for people like Brennan already, right?
	Because of the stuff that the CIA came out with a couple weeks ago, we've seen referrals over that to the Justice Department.
	And then I would imagine that, and I believe that Tulsi Gabbard has said that there have been referrals from what she's uncovered as well.
	So we need to see both a joint bipartisan, bicameral congressional investigation into James Clapper, John Brennan, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, anyone else, James Comey, anyone else that was involved in all of this.
	And we need to see law enforcement consequences where people, if there were crimes committed, there needs to be charges brought and convictions made for people that broke the law.
	And, you know, and again, there are major, wide-ranging worldwide life and death consequences for what these people did.
	You mentioned several of the things, you know, like the U.S.-Russia relations, the eventual Russian invasion of Ukraine.
	A lot of that stuff could have possibly been avoided had these people not altered the intelligence for political reasons.
	And so I think that there are some very serious problems here that need to get unpacked and unfurled.
	And it should happen on prime time television so the American people can see it.
	So again, that's up to Speaker Johnson and Leader Thune, but I would hope that they engage in that.
	And then also the law enforcement side of consequences come down to what the Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney's Office and others involved in that would do.
	So, but I hope there are consequences and there need to be.
	And the story needs to be further fleshed out.
	We need to have more clear answers about this.
	There needs to be a, the public needs to know more about it.
	And I think that this scandal warrants that level of attention where they would do such a thing.
	Yeah, and I hear you.
	What's interesting is that I'm seeing in the chat right now, there's some people were mentioning when you said about the hearings.
	Some people are saying, oh, we don't want hearings.
	We just want indictments.
	But then other people saying, no, we do want the primetime television.
	We do want the transparency.
	And so make the case, make the case for politically speaking, why you think that primetime hearings would be important.
	I think the American public needs to know what these people did.
	And we need to be, you know, we need to show the people that so that you can do both.
	We can walk and chew gum at the same time.
	You can do indictments, but also do congressional hearings and tell the story to the American public.
	But I think that the public needs to know why you're seeing a focus on this.
	You need to explain that to people.
	You need to show, not tell, what these people did and why they did it and why it was so bad and what the consequences of it were.
	And I think that you need to do that in the brightest light as you possibly can so the most people possible can watch nationally.
	I also think that it would be very smart for the networks across the board to carry such hearings live if and when that were to happen.
	I don't know if they would do that.
	Some of them did, I think, on some of the January 6th hearings.
	But I think that people, the public deserves to know this stuff.
	And I think that the American people deserve the truth.
	And I think that, you know, shining the light as bright as possible on this is the best possible outcome so that we can be, you know, first off, truly understand what happened.
	And secondly, be sure that it never happens again.
	Wait, and by the way, you know, interestingly enough, so one of the biggest issues with this, of course, when, and you just mentioned it, is that the broadcast networks don't air it.
	The left doesn't air it.
	However, if you were able to, and I was just thinking of this as we were going through, wait a minute, there's such an obvious way to make this happen.
	All you would need to do to force them to have, no, obviously, if you can get them to you subpoena Brennan, Clapper, Comey, you bring them in, obviously that's easy.
	The other way that you can get them to be forced to cover it, have Trump go.
	Have Trump actually go to the hearing itself and he's there.
	What?
	You're allowed to, President of the United States can attend a hearing.
	Of course he can.
	And if he goes, then the media is going to be forced to cover it.
	They have to gear their coverage towards this thing.
	Then they've got to debate one way or the other, up or down.
	I mean, you could even do stuff at the White House.
	People should get very, very, I think, creative with these types of things.
	Because look, you've got the presidency, of course, but you only have so much time.
	They are going to the August recess.
	Then, of course, look, you know, then all of a sudden, boom, you're in the fall.
	After fall, you're in a shootout.
	Midterms are basically beginning next year.
	So I do want to talk to you about midterms and kind of get into that picture when we come back a little bit.
	But I think there's a lot of ways that this can play out in real time.
	And that will actually generate, all right, generate what you're going to need is that momentum for any charges that come forward.
	Right back.
	Human events daily.
	hear Real America's Voice.
	Talk about influencers.
	These are influencers and they're friends of mine, Jack Pisovic.
	Where's Jack?
	Jack, he's got a great job.
	All right, Jack Pasovic.
	Here we are back live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C. We're on with Matt Boyle, Breitbart News.
	Well, I wanted to get in here because, you know, President Trump, so when you're talking legislatively, he's got his signature legislation for this term locked in.
	That's the big, beautiful bill.
	People are also talking about other spending packages, different bills, appropriations, of course, that have to come up at the NDA this year.
	But a lot of people are saying, you know, they're not sure that the White House will push for another piece of major legislation prior to the midterm elections.
	They're saying that you don't necessarily see that.
	Now, that being said, you could, I think, given Trump's position right now, you certainly could see him adding things to these spending packages that are already sort of in the works, the perfunctory things that always have to come through.
	And I think he does actually have a lot of time on his hands to be able to do something like that prior to midterms.
	But thinking backwards from midterms, where do you think the House and the Senate are as it stands to their majorities?
	And do you think the legislative calendar will get anything on it that reflects that?
	Well, okay, so just starting with where the two chambers are.
	First off, the Senate is very strongly Republican right now.
	Republicans have 53 seats.
	The pickup opportunities for Democrats in the midterm elections in the Senate are very few, far between.
	Republicans, I know that the political establishment thinks that Republicans had a setback with Tom Tillis's retirement announcement in North Carolina.
	I think that actually helps the Republicans' chances of holding that seat because I think Tom Tillis was an inherently damaged Republican candidate who was going to face serious problems in a primary and or a general election.
	And so now they're going to have a good shot of holding that seat.
	Republicans, on the other hand, have good pickup opportunities and Democrats have a lot of retirements going on out there.
	Gene Shaheen's retiring in New Hampshire.
	You have the Democrat guy, Gary Peters, retiring in Michigan.
	So those are pickup opportunities for Republicans.
	Of course, Republicans also have their probably best shot is in Georgia at taking on John Ossoff.
	So Republicans have a really good shot at holding their majority in the Senate and perhaps even bolstering it and adding to it.
	We'll see.
	They've got very few defensive places out there that they've got to play defense and they have a real good chance at going on offense in this upcoming election.
	As for the House, it's a coin toss.
	It really is where the public is at, I think, at any given moment.
	But you would figure that going into a midterm election after President Trump just won the and Republicans won the trifecta in D.C. in this last election, history would generally say that the Democrats would be heavily favored to win the House of Representatives.
	There's only two times in the last century where this has not gone that way.
	It was in the immediate aftermath of FDR's victory in 2000, in 1932.
	In 1934, Democrats actually added to their House majority.
	And then in the immediate aftermath of George W. Bush's victory in 2000, Republicans added to their House majority in the 2002 midterm elections.
	Those were really extenuating circumstances for our nation, right?
	Like, so in 1932, obviously we were going through the Great Depression.
	You had FDR and the Democrats doing the New Deal, et cetera.
	So that was a big part of why that happened.
	And then in 2002, that was the immediate aftermath, of course, of the 9-11 terrorist attack and the beginning of the war on terror, which really seemed to be why that happened for Republicans.
	I think that we could be heading into a similar type of a moment here where Republicans actually hold and possibly even add to their House majority, depending on how things go.
	There's a big case that we're watching with redistricting in Texas.
	So we'll see that could add as many as five extra House Republicans in the upcoming election.
	And then there's also, I mean, just the Democrats are so much of a mess right now.
	Like they don't have a clear leader.
	They don't have a clear vision.
	You have socialist radical Islamists taking over the Democrat Party from everywhere from New York City to Minneapolis.
	You know, this Memdani guy and then this other guy, Omar, up in Minneapolis.
	It's just, I think that scares people in middle America.
	And the fact is, is that you have, again, a Democrat Party that is so vehemently against immigration enforcement.
	There's one National Democrat in elected office that I can think of, one, that actually defends ICE agents.
	And that's John Fennerman, the senator from Pennsylvania.
	Other than that, I can't think of a single one that could take even the most reasonable positions.
	Look, over in the United Kingdom, for instance, you have the prime minister there.
	He's the leader of the Labor Party, which is basically their Democrat Party.
	Kier Starmer, he's out there calling for no more migrants into the United Kingdom that don't speak English, right?
	Like, so there's not a single Democrat in America that has that position.
	Not one, right?
	Like, so the fact is that the Democrat Party has become so extreme, so cosmopolitan, so elite, and so coastal that I think they're going to have a very tough time convincing voters in places like Maine's 2nd District to give someone like Jared Golden a second chance, another chance, yet again, to go win an election.
	Up there, you have a really strong Republican candidate and the former governor, Paula Page, running against him.
	Republicans can pick up some seats and they very well could not just hold, but add to their House majority.
	So I would put it at a coin toss right now, which party wins the upcoming midterm election.
	Again, history would dictate that the Democrats probably have the edge, but there's a lot of things cutting the Republicans' way.
	And if the Republicans stay true to the agenda, they could follow through on this political transformation.
	Again, that feels a lot like the New Deal was for Democrats in the aftermath of the Great Depression.
	So, with FDR, this moment could be like that for the Republicans if they follow through on what they said they were going to do.
	And the Big Beautiful Bill did a lot of that.
	Though I do think to your original question there about more legislation, there's probably some more things they could do beyond that.
	And then also being out there, you know, effectively communicating that stuff.
	And then to our previous segment, further communicating and on covering and holding accountable people who have done historic wrongs to this nation, like the crew around Barack Obama at the end of his presidency.
	And that's what it comes down to.
	That's exactly what it comes down to.
	Matt Boyle, where can people go to follow you and your work?
	Yeah, I'm on Agset Emboy One.
	I'm also on True Social at RealMatt Boyle.
	And just go to Breitbart.com.
	Our whole team here at Breitbart is working around the clock nonstop.
	So a great crew here at Breitbart.
	Check them out, folks.
	Breitbart is always putting up the latest.
	We're right back with America's Voice Human Events Galaxy.
	Where's Jack?
	Where's Jack?
	Where is he?
	Jack, I want to see you.
	Great job, Jack.
	Thank you.
	What a job you do.
	You know, we have an incredible thing.
	We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who'll be getting published.
	All right, folks, Jack Pasobic.
	Here we are back, Human Events Daily.
	Folks, I got to tell you something.
	I've been looking over across all the stories that have dropped this morning.
	And then all of a sudden, this Hunter Biden absolute crash out interview comes in.
	And we've got to go through it.
	To help me out on this, we got Kenny Cody, opinion editor over at Human Events.
	Kenny, what's up, man?
	Hey, Jack.
	How are you, brother?
	All right, Kenny.
	Now, have you seen this video yet?
	You've seen some of it you were saying?
	Yeah, I've seen the whole Biden was on Amy during the Trump debate.
	I saw the little rant he went on about illegal migrants trying to protect them and we got to play this.
	We got to play this part because this is something it's tearing up the internet right now.
	I want everyone to see it because there's so much here we have to unpack.
	Guys, let's play that clip of Hunter Biden right now.
	I'm going to be like all these Democrats say, you have to talk about and realize that people are really upset about illegal immigration.
	You.
	How do you think your hotel room gets cleaned?
	How do you think you have food on your table?
	Who do you think washes your dishes?
	Who do you think does your garden?
	Who do you think is here by the sheer job?
	Just grit and will that they figured out a way to get here because they thought that they could give themselves and their family a better chance.
	And he's somehow convinced all of us that these people are criminals?
	I mean, what an absolute crash out.
	Now, first of all, it's pretty simple.
	It's like, guys, it's not complicated.
	They just hate white people.
	I mean, white men commit crimes 145 times more likely to than immigrants.
	Just not true.
	Just so not true.
	There's no evidence of that whatsoever.
	And you want to talk violent crime?
	No, absolutely not.
	This guy, I don't know, Kenny, do you think he's, because to me, to me, it looks like he's doing two things.
	Number one, he's running.
	He's running for some kind of office.
	And by the way, God bless him.
	I hope he runs in 2028.
	But also, it looks to me like he's kind of crashing out because he's going through withdrawal.
	Like he's not getting access to the good stuff anymore.
	First of all, remember, he lost all that Coke in the White House to begin with, never got that back.
	I don't know.
	Maybe they cut him off.
	Yeah, that's kind of what it seems like.
	I mean, I don't know whether to call this a crash out or a crackout.
	I mean, that's the kind of vibe he's giving off is he's losing his mind.
	He's ranting about white people.
	He's going on this big tirade saying, F you, F this, F that, and saying if we're against, you know, for mass deporting illegal migrants, we're not going to get food on the table.
	I remember when Sharon Osborne went on the view and was trying to justify why mass deportation shouldn't happen.
	And she's like, who's going to clean your toilet, Donald Trump?
	Like, this is exactly not only what the elitist class of the United States feel like.
	Like, how is this a compliment to anybody who's actually advocating for migrants to stay?
	They're doing these low-down jobs and that billionaires could hire them as their maids.
	That's what Hunter Bines probably mad about.
	He's probably mad that his maids getting deported or something.
	And that's the kind of the elitist mindset that a lot of these liberal Democrats are using.
	They're not worried about these criminals being deported and less rapes and less murders happening because these criminals are being deported to their country.
	They're more worried about the little slave labor and hard work labor and labor that they're doing at their mansions that they're going to lose out on when these people are deported because they're not supposed to be in the United States illegally in the first place.
	So I think he's just crashing out over not having his drugs, not having his maids, not having the people who he is indentured servitude and trying to employ them for.
	And he's just mad about it.
	He's probably trying to clean himself up for political office, but it's just really sad.
	This is the mindset of liberal elitist Democrats.
	Yeah, and there's another scene.
	I've gone through a bunch of this.
	There's another part of it where he talks about like, I was totally qualified for Barisma, totally qualified of encyclopedic knowledge, of encyclopedic knowledge of the region.
	Really encyclopedic knowledge.
	That's why they hired you.
	No, bro, they hired you because they didn't want to get on the sanction list after Biden and your dad and Victoria Nulan overthrew the government of Ukraine in 2014.
	That's why they hired you the cash out.
	Nobody, but I mean, this is classic addict talk right now, by the way.
	If you know anyone who's been involved with drugs or addiction, this is exactly how they talk.
	I'm the greatest.
	Everyone's against me.
	Totally paranoid.
	But I want to, you know, just the paranoia to speak, but I really want to talk about too, this, this, he's telling you the attitude of the ruling class, right?
	To your point about the indentured servants that, oh, who's going to mow our lawns?
	Who's going to raise our kids?
	Who's going to, yo, are you, are you going to go and spend some time with little Navy?
	Are you going to go spend time with her?
	Oh, no, you're not.
	No, you're not at all.
	Hunter Biden, who has she, by the way, has she met her grandfather yet?
	Has she had the opportunity to meet her grandfather?
	Probably not.
	Has he even acknowledged?
	I mean, what's he doing?
	He's not in office.
	Why not invite her up to up to Rehoboth or when you go up to Martha's Vineyard or one of these things?
	No, they won't.
	But not only is it, it's obviously, again, just about the cheap labor for the 1%, but they're so anti-white because when they're anti-white, right?
	Remember, they think that as 1%ers, that they are part of like, and when I say 1%, I just mean the ruling elite.
	When the ruling elite think that they're the 1%, they're beyond race.
	Remember, they're the new people, the progressives.
	They're so progressive.
	They're beyond race.
	They're beyond structure.
	They're beyond any of these things.
	When they're talking about whites, well, Kenny, I'm just going to say it.
	They're talking about working class, particularly people in Appalachia, particularly people in Middle America, the Rubes, the losers, the people who they just completely look down upon.
	That's exactly who he's talking about.
	How do you feel about that, Kenny Cody?
	How does that make you feel?
	I'm disappointed, but not surprised.
	I mean, this is the exact same party that, you know, Mitt Romney told, you know, back in 2012, you know, Joe Biden went told people that Mitt Romney's going to put people back in chains.
	He's talking about the Appalachians.
	He's talking about these low-class middle-white people.
	This is exactly who they've lost, and they're mad about it.
	They're mad that the Republican Party and IMAGA have found a way to get through to the same people that they hate.
	They always stood on the back since FDR, Woodrow Wilson, and others have stood on the back of Appalachia, have stood on the back of the middle working class, and they are mad.
	Hunter Biden and his family are mad, but they no longer have that basis in the same way they did for other minority classes and other poverty-rate classes.
	The middle-aged white America, middle class, are attempting to go over the Republican Party now because people like J.D. Vance and the populist nationalist movement within the GOP are finally listening through to these Americans who have felt disenfranchised for so long by people like Hunter Biden and his crime family that have been lost, their backs have been stepped on.
	We have been used as a class to vote for Democrats, vote for unions, vote for state politicians who want to just live off the welfare state, want America to live off the welfare state and be dependent on the government.
	This is who they have lost in the last about five decades or so.
	And now, really in the last 15 years, now have a party to identify with, with a GOP that uses MAGA as a base.
	And they know that the MAGA is the future of the middle class.
	They know MAGA is the future working class party, and they can't stand that.
	And now they're going to use whatever mantras they have to use in order to disenfranchise the same people that used to vote for them and mass in the Democratic Party.
	And that's what Hunter Biden's mad about.
	He is mad at a class of people, whether that is immigrants, whether that is illegal immigrants that he's losing to indentured servitude by getting deported, whether it's the same working class that elected his father back in the 70s that the Democratic Party has now lost.
	He is furious.
	And this is the embodiment of the Democratic establishment and the elitist establishment of the Democratic leftist movement.
	They are losing on the same people that elected them decades ago, and they have no idea what to do about it.
	No, they don't.
	And, you know, he's saying the, yeah, the quiet part out loud.
	He's absolutely saying the quiet part out loud.
	I kind of love this, though.
	I love the crash out.
	I love that everything it's got to.
	By the way, I want to shift just a little bit because we've got this clip.
	I have to play it before we run.
	You got about two minutes here, guys.
	It's another clip I wanted to react to.
	This is, we got, so Mark Levin, apparently last night, and this is the question of the day.
	It's what's about to be.
	I was going to play a clip from Mark Levin last night talking about Epstein and then Mark Levin all the way back in March talking about Epstein.
	Play the clip, guys.
	But I will tell you this.
	We better be united.
	We better be strong.
	We better be focused.
	We better be articulate.
	We can't waste our time on Epstein and other stuff that are going on here that some people want us to focus on.
	I'm about to had it with all that stuff.
	Welcome back, America.
	We're here with, and I'm very excited about, this Attorney General Pam Bondi, a good friend, especially a good friend of my wife, but a wonderful lady, a great lawyer.
	I want to get into this Epstein thing a little bit.
	I think the American people are very curious about who's on this list or these lists.
	You have been doggedly trying to get all the information.
	And now we learned, thanks to you, that you've been stonewalled by people in New York.
	Do you want to explain that?
	But I assume the Southern District of New York is, or has been, holding on to this information for a reason.
	That is, they don't like the names on the list.
	And of course, we know New York is a hotbed of the Democrat Party, and that includes in legal circles.
	Do you think that's part of the issue here, that they're trying to protect a lot of names and individuals?
	What's going on, Mark?
	What's going on?
	This is our question of the day.
	Do you agree with Mark Levin, at least now, or do you agree with the Mark Levin back in March?
	Mark Levin at one time said the American people really care about the Epstein list, but now Mark Levin says it's a wasted time.
	So send us your email, 1776 at humanevents.com.
	1776 at humanevents.com.
	Which is it, Mark?
	And by the way, folks, why do you think Mark has switched on this so incredibly quickly?
	I don't know.
	I may have a few ideas, though.
	jack russobek back real america's voice human events daily Jack is a great guy.
	He's written a fantastic book.
	Everybody's talking about it.
	Go get it.
	And he's been my friend right from the beginning of this whole beautiful event.
	And we're going to start going out to make sure it's going to be quite a good thing.
	Amen.
	All right, Jack, Pacel Pakura back.
	Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C. I want to get in here with Kenny Cody.
	We're on with him, and he has a great new piece out talking about the MAGA race to restore the American dream and that it needs Gen Z to win it.
	Kenny Cody, walk us through your new piece and the importance of Gen Z to the movement and to the coalition.
	Well, I mean, I got this information about something that Charlie Kirk said.
	You know, before 2028, that's when the next generation is really going to solidify where it's going to turn.
	And I think they're going to listen to populist sentiment no matter what.
	They're going to listen to nationalist sentiment no matter what.
	And whether we're going to go the route of, you know, Bernie Sanders, AOC, Zoron, Mom Donnie kind of populism and promising free things and ensuring people are going to have cheaper rent because we're going to have rent control, or we're going to go down the pathway of J.D. Vance, Donald Trump, MAGA nationalism, and MAGA populism, which is exactly what we need to capitalize on because this next generation is worried about housing.
	They're worried about sustaining families.
	And they're even more working class than they ever have been before.
	That's actually become a problem for all universities.
	Gen Z is now among the trade, like in trade schools and vocation, more than they ever have been in American history.
	That means that the next generation is going to be a lot more dependent and a lot more part of the middle class, which is exactly what we just talked about in the previous segment that Moggett is still trying to capitalize on.
	And now we have a better connection to Gen Z than we ever really have before.
	When you saw the, I think it's around 47, 48% of Gen Z actually voted for Donald Trump, even though he lost.
	It was very, by a very narrow margin and like I did almost by like 20 points of what he lost by in 2020 and 2016.
	When we're seeing that evolution, we now know that Gen Z is the generation that we can count on not only to turn up, but to support the policies, the America First policies, bringing manufacturing jobs back here, having fair trade deals through tariffs, a foreign policy that does not send our boys and girls off to war and our men off to die in endless war overseas.
	They enjoy this kind of populism because it matters to their lives.
	They want to stay alive.
	They want to provide for their families.
	They want their, you know, their wives to be taken care of.
	They want their spouses to be taken care of.
	And this next generation, mainly comprised of young men, need to be capitalized on as a reliable motive base to create a future for the GOP because that is what the GOP is going to become.
	We're a party that is anti-war, that is anti-elitist class, and going to be pro-America first working policies.
	And that's what we have to concentrate on to get this next generation.
	They don't like the neoconservative country club Republicans of the Bush and Romney eras past.
	They enjoy Trump, Vance, MAGA populism.
	That's what they voted for.
	That's what they're getting with this administration and what they're going to be voting for come next election.
	And we have to change within the next three and a half years, or we're going to lose this generation.
	The next generation of a voter base is either going to go in the direction of socialism through populism or conservatism and MAGA conservatism through populism.
	And we need to ensure that it's the right way instead of the wrong way.
	And so when you're looking at stuff like this, that's why when I talk about some of these issues, when I talk about why the United States needs to be very wary of getting involved further in Middle East conflicts, actually, let me ask you, I'm going to ask you, interview-wise, as someone who understands Gen Z, when it comes to these Middle East conflicts, whether it be Iran, whether it be Israel, whether it be Gaza, whether it be Syria, are these things that Gen Z is interested in?
	No, I don't think so.
	I think that there is a basis now, and they're not necessarily like pro or anti any country, right?
	Like they're not pro-Israel, anti-Israel.
	They're not pro-Iran, anti-Iran.
	They're not pro-Syria, anti-Syria, or pro-Afghanistan or anti-Afghanistan.
	They just don't want America to be involved in war at all.
	I think they're fine with having allies and having relationships and things like that.
	But when it comes to just getting involved in formal ways, putting boots on the ground or bombing countries on behalf of others, Gen Z overall, whether it's on the left or the right, reject the idea that we are going to get involved in Middle East conflicts.
	You know, they're the same generation that had to sit back and in 2005, 2007, when their parents are watching the news, they're watching the deaths that are happening in Iraq.
	They're watching the intervention in Afghanistan failing.
	They remember when Osama bin Laden got killed in 2011.
	They're remembering all these events and they question why we're still involved in all these conflicts.
	We've had now the Russo-Ukrainian war that's happened in the last few years.
	We've had the Gaza conflict, and there's not really any part of Gen Z that wants America to be involved in boots on the ground foreign policy like has been done over the last few decades.
	And I think that this is now an anti-war generation.
	Now, whether that's on the left or on the right, this generation, if there's one thing they agree upon, is that we don't want more wars.
	We don't want more conflicts.
	We don't want more deaths that are being suffered by our generation that's going to be sent overseas and our children are going to be sent overseas to die on behalf of wars.
	So I think that this generation inherently just rejects war as a concept.
	If it's necessary, retaliation, foreign policy, that's one thing.
	When it comes to getting involved in foreign conflicts, it's something they holistically reject.
	Well, and you look at some of the candidates now that are being embraced, whether it be Zora Mondami in New York City, or whether it be this guy, Omar Fatah, who just won the endorsement of the Democrats in the Minneapolis mayor's race, which essentially means, you know, he's well on his way to becoming the next mayor.
	What do they offer?
	They offer full-on socialism.
	They offer full-on free stuff.
	They offer, hey, we're going to go to all the white people, take away their stuff and the rich CEOs and go and take it for.
	And by the way, can I just say, guys, guys, take the B-roll off for a second.
	Can I just say something for a second here?
	Because this is important.
	All those CEO memes that were going around this weekend, the, you know, oh, this, uh, this guy, he had an affair, cold play, et cetera, et cetera.
	Keep in mind that that once again, all those CEO memes that were running around this weekend were going viral because leftists hate CEOs.
	And specifically, they hate straight white CEOs.
	And once again, right, people are going to say, oh, Pesobik's condoning the behavior.
	No, I'm not, but I'm explaining the tensions that lead to our society being in this situation where it is.
	If they were not straight, if that was not a white couple, guess what?
	I guarantee you, you would have not seen the response that you did this weekend.
	And call that a thought crime, call it whatever you want.
	I'm just saying what it is, that that's part of the same reason that you're seeing people support Luigi Maggioni, Omar Fatah, and Zora Mamdani.
	Kenny Cody, am I wrong on this?
	Is that the reason?
	Is there a huge buildup in this country of just sort of anti-CEO, anti-capitalist, anti-affluence, anti-success, and particularly among Gen Z?
	I think so.
	I mean, there was another example, and Jack, I don't know if you remember this or not, whenever Aaron Meyer, I think when he was coaching the Jacksonville Jaguars, was caught out at a bar and like these fraternity girls or these, you know, these fraternity girls went up to this coach who's very famous and it went viral.
	And it was one of the reasons he got fired from the Jacksonville Jaguars.
	It's kind of the same thing here, like as these right affluent CEOs or leaders that are inspirational to the youth that are getting lambasted for their personal conflicts.
	And this guy was in the wrong without a doubt.
	I mean, this guy cheated on his wife.
	He had the confidence to go out and publicly cheat on his wife and both of them deserve the divorces that are soon coming and deserve to have their money taken away.
	But the spectacle that the media makes of it and the memes that become of it, it would not happen to any other race of people, would not happen to any other sexuality of people, any other class of people besides the ones that have been targeted with this particular meme and this particular attack on this dude.
	And like I said, I don't feel sorry for him at all just as a person or as an influencer.
	But when it comes to the class of people that always get attacked, it's always the same rich white men that are getting attacked by the mainstream media because they hate them.
	And it's shown in sports.
	It's shown in entertainment.
	It's shown in media or whatever else.
	And it's very out there in the open.
	It's just like what Hunter Biden talked about, right?
	His interview.
	It's the same kind of vitriol that's been showing in every class, whether it be politics, entertainment, or sports.
	It gets shown in everything and it's out in the open and we should criticize it when we see it, regardless of who it affects.
	It's as simple as that.
	Kenny Cody, where can it go to follow you, brother?
	At Katie Cody TN on True Social and on X. And you find all my articles archived at humanevents.com.
	All right, folks, check it out.
	Send us your questions, comments, emails.
	Get into our question of the day, 1776 at humanevents.com.
	We'll read the best ones on air.
	As always, make sure you're following us, Real America's Voice, Human Events daily.
	We've got a huge, huge lineup later today on Real America's Voice, all the shows.
	Make sure you leave it on this dial.
	Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission.

▲