All Episodes
Previous Next
June 24, 2025 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
41:09
Exclusive: CIA Director told Mossad Leadership To Back Down After Trump Brokered Ceasefire

Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec Go to https://www.patriotmobile.com/poso/ or call 972-PATRIOT and get a FREE MONTH of service with promo code POSO. Support the show

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com/slash pozo, sign up today.
It's called the posto daily brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
Humanevents.com slash pozo, totally free.
The pozo daily brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
Stay deep.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Pisovic.
Christ is.
President Ticket of Truth Social just a short while ago.
He says, Iran has officially responded to our obliteration of their nuclear facilities with a very weak response, which we expected and have very effectively countered.
There have been 14 missiles fired.
13 were knocked down.
One was set free because it was headed in a non-threatening direction.
I am pleased to report that no Americans were harmed and hardly any damage was done.
The posture before Ford O was hit was President Trump saying unconditional surrender.
Iran responded, we will never surrender.
Okay, that's to the number one power in the world.
We are the world's hegemonic power here in the United States.
So that was their answer.
Then they were asked, hey, are you going to negotiate with the United States?
They said no.
And they said, and we will never end enrichment.
We would rather have war.
Caitlin, I've just been given word that Iran, according to a diplomat who briefed CNN, Iran has agreed to the ceasefire.
Presidents going back to Bill Clinton have said it is the policy of the U.S. government not to allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon.
But under every president except Trump, Iran marched closer and closer to being able to put onto a ballistic missile a nuclear warhead that could take out an entire city.
President Trump took action flawlessly through the United States military to obliterate Iran's nuclear sites and to stop them through the use of military force from having a nuclear weapon.
Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I've never seen before.
The biggest load that we've seen.
I'm not happy with Israel.
I'm not happy with Iran either.
We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f ⁇ they're doing.
Do you understand that?
So we have a ceasefire.
I hate this word ceasefire.
I really do.
The president hated it a few days ago, too.
What's needed now is this, in my humble opinion.
Iran should be forced to sign a surrender document.
Unconditional surrender.
They lost their nukes.
They've lost their Air Force.
They have no ground-to-air protection.
China didn't step in.
Russia didn't step in.
Not a single Arab country stepped in.
The Supreme Nazi is hiding in a bunker, much like Adolf Hitler did.
Adolf Hitler wasn't thrown a lifeline.
He wasn't thrown in a lifeline.
He was going to be killed, so he committed suicide.
I'm very much interested in seeing how this plays out.
I really am.
Because what does an agreement look like?
Does that mean the Supreme Nazi survives?
Does that mean the regime survives?
I guess so.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition Human Events Daily Here Live, Washington, D.C. Today is June 24th, 2025.
Anno Domini.
Mark Levin trashing President Trump's ceasefire deal, attacking President Trump, really going after him, just torching him.
This guy who was a DeSantis backer, his family worked for the DeSantis campaign, didn't disclose that when he was giving these puff interviews to DeSantis.
Remember, he was a never-Trumper all the way back in 2016, said he would never support Trump, said he would never vote for Trump in the general.
And now he's telling us that he's trashing President Trump's historic peace deal in the Middle East.
What is this guy's problem?
What is this guy's deal?
And by the way, the voice, Mark, you're from Cheltenham, from Narristown.
Nobody around there talks like that.
Can just get like a hot tea, maybe some lemon.
I don't know.
Folks, we have exclusive news that I want to break here on Human Events Daily.
I'll break down some more of that later in the next segment.
We're coming up to a break.
CIA director was on a phone call with Mossad leadership earlier today and told them to back down after President Trump brokered this ceasefire.
This is according to two sources who are familiar with the call to individuals.
Folks, Mossad wanted to keep going.
Israel wanted to keep going.
And we know Iran wanted to keep going.
President Trump and his team, including the director of CIA Ratcliffe, were also telling them, stop it right now.
Jack Basobic will be right back with more breaking as it's continuing.
And what America First truly means.
Welcome to the second American Revolution.
All right, Jack Besobic, here we are back live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C., sweltering day here in the capital of the Republic.
President Trump's massive American flags flying atop the White House now.
And folks, in times like these, you got to stay connected.
And when you are going to stay connected, we know there's lots of choices to be able to do so.
So why wouldn't you go with a company, go with a service provider, use your economic agency, personal agency, economic agency, dare I say, economic warfare to choose a company that has the same values as you, that puts their money where their mouth is, and actually works for the American people, pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, pro-First Amendment, and supports America's law enforcement and our veterans.
Who am I talking about?
I'm talking about Patriot Mobile.
Switch to Patriot Mobile right now and I'll give you a great deal.
You go to patriotmobile.com slash posto or you could call them at 972Patriot.
You can then get a free we're talking free month of service with of course the powerful promo code POSO.
Again, that site is patriotmobile.com slash posto patriotmobile.com slash posto.
Get connected, stay connected in trying times, but also make sure that your money isn't going to people who hate you.
That's what this is all about.
I want to break down now a little bit more of this exclusive report that we have with some of the behind the scenes negotiations.
I've got this from two individuals who are familiar with the negotiations that led up to this ceasefire.
And a report was on a live stream last night with Charlie Kirk talking about this.
And the issue is that in discussions between U.S. intelligence, so the director of CIA, as well as Mossad leadership, there was a question of Mossad saying they wanted to go further.
CIA director said, no, because this is the president's word and the president's order has been ceasefire.
The ceasefire has come down no further and put in as leverage, if Mossad or the IDF continued to go further, that the United States would pull intelligence cooperation.
Remember, this was done in Ukraine to try to also help with brokering a ceasefire there.
So after that, Mossad backed down.
This is huge information, only reported here on Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice with Jack Bosobic.
Folks, this is where you come because we've been ahead of the news for the entire game.
The lamestream media can't keep up.
Someone else who's consistently ahead of the news and ahead of the narrative is Rogan O'Hanley.
You might know him online as DC Draino.
He joins us now.
Rogan, how you doing, brother?
Hey, you know, it's been a slow news week.
I wish we had something more exciting to talk about.
Yeah, I'm not really sure.
You know, I mean, it's, you know, there's the 4th of July is coming up, you know, barbecue, hamburgers, hot dogs, a little bit.
No, Rogan, walk us through this because two weeks ago, right, the entire world was saying World War III is coming.
The Stray of Hormuz is going to be closed.
Gas will be $6 a ballot.
There were serious risks at play.
President Trump found a way to navigate all of this and is now in a position where he's, my favorite part of this, he congratulated both sides.
Congratulations to everyone, including the Iranians.
And then at the same time, though, this morning, I really have to say, slapping down both sides as well, like a couple of children for acting out.
It's like how I am with my kids.
Walk us through how President Trump was able to pull this off and how these neocon warmongers are just frothing because they didn't get their war.
Yeah, this was a masterpiece in foreign policy, in surgical strikes, in using peace through strength.
This is the Trump foreign policy doctrine in action.
We've actually seen this before, right?
Congressman Matt Gates called this Solomani 2.0, but I would take it even further.
This could be ISIS 2.0.
This could be the Houthis 2.0, right?
Trump engages in negotiations.
He gives people a chance.
If they don't want to come to the table or they aren't being reasonable, he drops some bombs on senior leadership heads or calls them out and says, I know where you live.
He's done this to the Afghanistan leadership.
And now he's done this.
He's threatened publicly the Iranian leadership.
And he says, listen, we can make a deal and you can be happy and you can live with your regime and your oil money or you can FAFO.
And, you know, maybe that's the new name for it, the F-A-F-O Trump foreign policy doctrine.
But just absolutely masterful.
You know, there were some people with egg on their face after this.
I would say the Warhawks look pretty foolish right now.
They wanted World War III.
I would say the Pannekins look a little less foolish for not necessarily knowing how Trump does this stuff.
He's the same guy we've known for the last five years.
And the ostriches, the pure isolationists, they look a little silly too, because you can't just hide from the biggest state sponsor of terror and hope they just suddenly turn nice.
The people that look the best out of this are obviously President Trump, his administration, our U.S. military.
God bless them.
They did a great job.
And the people that were pretty calm and rational about this, you know, you can call them Trump loyalists.
You can call them people that have just seen this show before.
And we knew kind of what the outcome was going to be.
Kim Jong-un, right, with North Korea.
We knew what it was.
A lot of mean tweets, some threats, maybe some airstrikes, and then a really good peace deal.
And then in fear Trump fashion, he congratulates both sides and hopes they make a lot of money.
Well, and by the way, just I'm seeing breaking news from Trey Yangst out there.
He's saying that Israel's home front command has lifted all restrictions on civilians that were put in place during the 12-day war with Iran.
So that's, we're calling it the 12-day war.
President Trump has named this.
I don't think historians will be able to find a better name for the 12-day war.
That's clearly going to be the name of this thing.
And it also sets a timeframe of saying, look, this shouldn't turn into the 13-day war, the 14 to 15 days, 16. It's the 12-day war, and that's it.
But Rogan, like when it comes down to it, President Trump has never said that he's against use of the American military.
What he said is that he's against these forever wars, these regime change operations, these things that were pushed by the likes of Lindsey Graham, John Bolton, and so many others, because they have never found a war that they didn't like.
And you got folks, I called him maniac, Mark Levin, was just foaming.
So I hate that word, ceasefire.
I hate that word.
I say, well, I'm sorry, but that's Trump's word.
And the point being is he said this was in the objectives of the American and the interests of the American people.
And that's it.
And I think a lot of those guys really exposed themselves of trying to turn MAGA into something that it never was.
Right.
As we've seen, MAGA is not very mobile.
We've been set in our principles for a long time.
And that's how we've stayed this entire time.
We didn't want forever wars, But that is not the same as zero military action to protect strategic American national security interests, and that's what we saw here.
And I think even people who were a little nervous about what was going on would agree that what was done was tempered, it was proportionate, and now we can all move on and get back to mass deportations, which is what we really want to focus on is the domestic agenda.
But again, this is a formula for success.
We saw the Bush era doctrine of just invading countries and sitting there for 15 years and losing our troops and spending literally trillions of dollars.
Or we've seen, let's just drop 20 bombs and call it a day, right?
And, you know, I remember in his first term, he did the same thing with the Taliban.
He dropped a Moab, right?
The mother of all bombs.
And everyone cheered.
Right.
And then he did the same thing with ISIS.
And, you know, this, this is the same consistent foreign policy doctrine the entire time.
I think there's just a little bit of hysteria on both sides and both sides should on the extremes of both sides.
And, you know, Trump is a, is, he just put himself in the history books once again.
If he does not get a Nobel Peace Prize for doing this, and for now we're hearing there might be more Abraham Accords potentially with Syria and Lebanon.
Who knows who else might join?
Hopefully we get Saudi Arabia.
I mean, that is doing something that so many U.S. presidents have said they were going to do, bring peace to the Middle East.
And Trump is actually doing it.
And now we have to get the Gaza war ended as well.
Well, and not only that, but he's, of course, going to NATO right now.
We're going to come up on a quick break here, Cuban Events Daily, Real America's Voice.
We're on with the great DC Draino Rogan O'Hanley.
President Trump, of course, on his way to the NATO summit in The Hague in the Netherlands, where he has said that he may meet with Ukraine President Zelensky.
And of course, since ceasefires are the name of the day, then perhaps, just perhaps, he could be looking to broker something between Ukraine and Russia as well.
We'll be looking for those breaking updates.
Of course, as always, here at Human Events Daily.
be right back.
Today, you know, they talk about influencers.
These are influencers.
And they're friends of mine, Jack Prasevic.
Where's Jack?
Jack, he's got a great job.
All right, Jack Prasevic here.
We are back live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C., beautiful American flags flying in front of our White House.
And we're on with the great D.C. Draino, Rogan O'Hanley.
We just learned President Trump has arrived, of course, there at The Hague, making his way over in the Netherlands to that NATO summit.
We're going to be tracking all of that in real time, President Trump touching down in Europe.
But one of the things that he was doing while he was on the plane, on the crossing of the pond, as it were, was posting a series of truth socials and a number of which included a collage of tweets, all regarding mass deportation and really focusing on specifically this domestic agenda.
Rogan, I wanted to get your thoughts on this.
Does it look like President Trump is trying to pivot or perhaps I should say recenter, redirect his fire specifically at this domestic agenda of mass deportations?
Well, I think he's been looking at Jack Basovich's Twitter.
I mean, that's obvious.
You were one of the first voices to say, hey, let's get back to what truly matters for the midterms, and that's mass deportations.
I mean, this is historic.
Don't get me wrong.
Nobel Peace.
He looks at everything.
He looks at everything.
Yeah, but we got to get focused.
And I was just looking at his truth on the break and he posted what Joe Biden did to this country can never be allowed to happen again, right?
And I think that has something to do with investigations.
You know, I don't want to get ahead of the DOJ here, but the AutoPen is one of the biggest scandals in U.S. history.
What happened in the 2020 election is one of the biggest scandals in U.S. history.
So the American people want justice for those types of initiatives.
But the number one thing that trumps everything else is mass deportations, because it all comes down to the 2030 census.
I know all your viewers know all about this.
They didn't even need the illegals to vote.
They just needed warm bodies in their districts to steal congressional seats, electoral college votes, and federal funding.
So that's the most important issue that we got to get back to.
And frankly, you know, I'm one of the, I guess, first or few people to say, hey, Magda, let's all get back together.
All right.
Everyone had a day.
Some people could dunk on each other yesterday.
Some people could, you know, eat a little crow.
All right.
That's that's behind us.
Let's get on to the next stuff.
We need this movement versus the machine that has been destroying this country.
So everyone, come back together.
Let's get these mass deportations going.
Well, and I think that's right, because at the end of the day, and I had people who were attacking me for saying this, I said, I actually do think this is a national security threat.
And it's a national security threat that I would honestly rank pretty much number one.
I would rank it number one for the American people.
What is a direct threat?
People warn about sleeper cells.
People warn about God knows what came over the border when the Autopen, as you say, rightly say, was in command over the last four years.
And more to the point, we know that there's transnational cartels, transnational drug networks, narco-terror organizations like Trende Aragua or MS-13 that continue to be operating throughout America's cities.
And guess what?
That's absolutely a national security threat.
So I know, look, the ratings go up, you know, go up and go down and say, oh, well, you know, there's this terrorist group in the Middle East and this group and this country is going to war with that country.
But that's not who was burning down, okay, Los Angeles a couple of weeks ago.
It wasn't Iran doing that.
No, it was this massive invasion force that's here right now in the United States.
So I think President Trump understands, look, nukes, we have a problem with that.
The rest of it, take care of it yourselves, because right here, we need to focus on the 20 or more.
What do you think, Rogan?
Some people say 20, some people say 50. Where do you come down on that?
I come down around 40, to be honest.
We got 10 million fresh ones that we know about, right?
It's probably 15. Yes.
We probably had at least 20 before that.
So yeah, I guess around 40. And this, But, you know, listen, I want to say it's, you know, to the people that were freaking out, how many troops did Trump put into Iran?
Zero, right?
How many troops are currently on the U.S. border?
Thousands.
All right.
This is the first president we've had that is putting troops to protect American borders as opposed to overseas.
So we obviously got to give him a lot of credit for that.
We got a really good Supreme Court ruling yesterday, 6-3.
Judge Amy Konet Bear remembered that illegal immigration is bad.
Thankfully, we got one good decision out of that, let's just say, inconsistent justice.
But we got a 6-3 ruling that Trump could deport people back to different countries than where they came from, right?
Because they would say, oh, I don't want to go back.
I fear for my life, even though it's all BS, right?
The NGOs are just coaching them on this.
Very few are actual asylum cases.
And if they are, you know, we're happy to help.
But where's the asylum for South Africans and people in Europe being tyrannized for posting memes on X?
But whatever.
We won't go down that road.
So 6'3 ruling.
And then what does the Biden judge do the next, you know, a couple hours later?
Defies the Supreme Court.
And then now we see Chad Mizel, the chief of staff in the DOJ, say this is an act of Article III insurrection.
Stephen Miller says fireworks today.
So we're going to fight, brother.
We got to run.
Thank you, Jack.
All right.
Follow him, DC Draino.
You guys know where to find him.
It's Drano.
Everybody knows where to find Dreano.
We'll be right back.
Human Events Daily continues.
Human Events Daily continues.
Hey, Jack, where is Jack?
Where is Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who'll be getting published.
I think that we'll see what happens between the Senate and the House.
I am confident that what the Senate passes over to the House will move through the House pretty quickly.
Do you expect to have to call some of these members, especially if there's a difference between the Senate bill and the House bill to try to lean on them and say, okay, this is what you guys have to accept?
I think we've had lots of pre-game meetings, so I think we're in a good spot.
Mr. Secretary, you say this is economic growth.
The CBO accounts for economic growth.
It says it would control the deficit over the next decade.
Well, the CBO doesn't account for economic growth.
They had a 1.8% static score, or they have a spike and then down, which we at Treasury disagree with, CEA disagrees with, and I believe most Wall Street banks disagree with.
Will you be up here Friday night, Saturday night, maybe talking individually to some of these members as some of these amendments come together to try to get them on board if they have reservations?
Look, we're at Treasury, the administration, we're here for the members.
President Trump's leadership on this has been fantastic.
Chairman Smith in the House started working on this bill a year ago.
Senator Thune has been very ambitious.
So my sense is it won't come to that.
How involved will the President be in the final hours here?
President's been involved all the way.
So thank you all.
All right, Jack Pasebiki, right back live, Human Events Daily.
There's Secretary Besant saying that he believes that the big, beautiful bill will be passed quickly.
We know that President Trump has set that for July 4th as a potential target date.
That's next week.
So we will see.
Now, I really wanted to get into, and I want to apologize to viewers before I bring this next guest on, because this is going to, you're going to hear some extreme rhetoric, some things that are very, very maniacal and unhinged because you see this guest and we have had her on before, but apparently she's from a family that makes the abortion writers over and the scribblers over the abortion scribblers of the New York Times very, very upset.
It's Evida Duffy, our favorite anti-communist.
Evida, you know, will you apologize to the abortion scribblers and will your family apologize for having so many darn children as well as just being, you know, successful and in the public eye so much?
They would like us to, Jack, this is an incredible thing that happened this week.
So let me just give someone out.
The New York Times wrote a massive hit piece on your family.
Yes, yes.
There has been this reporter at the New York Times pestering everybody for months now, like distant relatives, old roommates, or parish priests trying to dig up dirt on our family.
She is a former Washington Post abortion reporter.
Now she's cosplaying as a family expert for the New York Times, but it's very obvious what this entire piece is about.
It was essentially to slam my family, my dad for being a wonderful family man, having nine kids and wanting other Americans to also have more kids.
That was the thesis of this incredibly stupid and frankly offensive hit piece.
So you have too many siblings, your mother and father who was very successful, or you're very successful.
They're not allowed.
Was she able to find any actual, you know, dirt?
I'm so confused about what exactly was the newsworthiness of this piece.
There was nothing.
So, okay, so one of the big no-nos in the article was my dad is actually implemented at DOT Department of Transportation.
He's the secretary over there that he's going to prioritize DOT funding for places that have higher birth rates.
He wants to promote infrastructure in places that are rebuilding the next generation of Americans.
This was deeply disturbing to her.
This reporter, her name is Carolyn Kishner, and she starts to quote Democrat senators calling this dystopian.
It's like the handmade sale.
She, I mean, it was a very deranged piece.
She also was citing my siblings and I making pancakes on Fox and Friends and saying that we all looked very uncomfortable to sort of paint this narrative that my dad is using us all as props.
We aren't props.
We are a very loving, very normal, albeit large family.
And for some reason, this is deeply upsetting to a lot of childless cat ladies out there who happen to be journalists at the New York Times.
I'm not sure.
We are, we're playing, just so folks know, we're playing President Trump's arrival to The Hague now, the NATO summit.
We'll cut live.
He doesn't appear to be taking any questions right now.
You can see him walking up the steps.
Just an incredible shot, by the way, as he heads into his closed door meeting there.
And we'll cut live if he does appear to take questions or if he's giving remarks ill.
It doesn't appear to be at this point.
By the way, just to respond to that first point you made about, so the Secretary of Transportation wants to divert funding to places that have higher birth rates.
Well, wouldn't that mean that places where the population is growing?
So because the population is increasing, they might need more funding for transportation because there's more people there.
I mean, this is the most obvious policy that you could think of.
And rather than use some kind of, you know, Kakamimi, race-based, you know, DEI or, you know, critical race theory analysis, he's simply saying, oh, well, there's more people here, so we should put more money there.
What am I missing?
That's exactly right, Jack.
This is just common sense policy from the Trump admin from the Department of Transportation.
What I think is interesting is this is, there's a history here.
Margaret Sanger, who is the founder of Planned Parent and her number one abortion provider in America, had a deep hatred of large families, especially Catholic families.
She has all these quotes in all of her writing.
I went through them all when I was in college and did an entire piece on it.
But basically, she thought that they were the bane of society, that they were creating poverty and crime.
And so she hated large families.
She believed that we had an overpopulation problem.
Today, it's very obvious that we have an underpopulation problem.
The Democratic Party is still anti-natalist, but now they're not just anti-natalist, they're specifically anti-American babies because they will admit that we have an underpopulation problem.
Margaret Sanger was totally wrong, but they want us to replace ourselves, not with our own children, but with mass immigration, mostly from third world countries.
So there's a really deep hatred of not just babies and children and family, but American families underpinning this entire article and really the movement and ideology behind it.
It's so clear they're anti-family because they understand that family units, and this is why Karl Marx had said that he's against the nuclear family.
Black Lives Matter, a cultural Marxist organization, said that they were against the nuclear family.
Because having a society or having a family that's based on the state, having a society that's based on government doesn't work if you have a society that's based around strong families, strong religion, strong communities, all of the things that built the United States and all of Western civilization into what it is.
And so in order to shift that, what do you have to do?
You have to attack the family.
And, you know, forgive me for speaking personally, but your family stands as a massive threat to the entire liberal project because you've got a mom and a dad who are very successful.
They live in the public eye, but also at the same time, have a huge, happy family.
And so the longer that people see that, the more the cognitive dissonance is triggered by people hearing, wait a minute, I was told that I had to choose between family and career or choose between my dreams and, you know, living, as you say, the handmaid's tale, when in reality, that's a false choice and it always was one.
Well, Jack, that's exactly what is happening right now.
Because if you look at what Democrats are offering the world, what is it?
DoorDash addictions, scrolling endlessly while you're by yourself in your apartment, like this is not happiness.
And then you look at a family like mine, and I'm going to tell you what, we're a very authentically happy family.
Imperfect, chaotic.
This is what families are like, especially big families, but we're very happy.
And I think that they are threatened by the example that families like mine give to the rest of America that you can have it all.
You can have very, you can have a very successful life.
You can be well off and you can have a beautiful family, a loving family.
And it's not nightmarish to have a lot of kids.
This is an existential threat to the entire left-wing project because again, these people are pagan in their hearts and they hate the idea of the joy and fulfillment and happiness and civilization building really that comes with large families.
I think that's right.
Avida, if I could, I wanted to pivot here a little bit because we've been talking about obviously this huge news, President Trump and everything that's going on, ceasefire, 12-day war.
We're going to war, are we not going to war?
Is it just a nuclear press, et cetera, et cetera?
And one of the things that you have been so good on is really kind of giving us that, being that lens into the window of Gen Z, of Gen Z thinking, what's trending on TikTok, things like that.
So if you could walk us through how has this 12-day war and now the ceasefire and all of that, how is that playing out with Gen Z in your view?
Well, one of the reactions I saw on TikTok, I think it was today, somebody said, oh, wouldn't it be great if there was nuclear war?
Because then the ozone layer will be damaged and we'll all get a nice tan.
So there's some very unserious reactions from Gen Z. We're not always a serious generation, but I think the overwhelming response has been, we do not want war with Iran.
This is a generation that has seen many failed conflicts in the Middle East, numerous forever wars, and they can't be duped like previous generation have because they have the full context.
There was a lot of panic when President Trump authorized these strikes against Iran.
To see him now say, I am not interested, emphatically say I'm not interested in a forever war with Iran And in the Middle East, again, that he actually wants peace.
He wants an end to this.
It has been really heartening for people in my generation who, again, overwhelmingly do not want this to escalate any further than it already has.
And I think that has proven that President Trump really is the same guy we always thought he was because he really always was against these conflicts.
It's kind of what he made his name with on those in those original debates.
So I think Gen Z has been really happy, frankly, with what's happened given the circumstances.
Well, you know, I've been looking at some of the polling on this as well, and we've got about a minute till the break here.
So let me hold off.
I'll read some of these poll numbers when we come back, but it just seems that there is a huge generational gap when we see, particularly wars in the Middle East and the situation between Israel and Iran.
And then even prior to that, which is still ongoing, the situation between Israel and Gaza.
And this is something where when you really look at, it's hard to tell exactly where the line is.
Some people say it's at 55. Some people say it's much lower at 29, but you can really see a shift in support versus one side or the other when you look at it generationally.
And so this is something that also, by the way, I think President Trump as well as the conservative movement politically, the MAGA movement politically, have to look at as they're going towards not just support for the big beautiful bill and the domestic agenda over the next couple of weeks, but also, and I hate to be the guy who has to say this, midterms, that midterms are going to be coming up.
There's this New York primary for the mayor's race, which is essentially the race right now.
And it seems as though the socialists have a lot of momentum right now against Andrew Cuomo, a family whose name has been synonymous with New York for a long time.
I'm Jack Posobiec.
We'll be right back here at Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice.
Jack is a great guy.
He's written that fantastic book.
Everybody's talking about it.
Go get it.
And he's been my friend right from the beginning of this whole beautiful event.
And we're going to turn it around and make our country great again.
Amen.
At Turning Point USA, what we are doing every single day is we are dedicating ourselves and our staff and our students and our activists for a full revival of America.
Get ready to launch into the future of freedom at the largest student event in the nation.
SAS is back.
Join thousands of fellow students ready to pioneer a bold new era for America at our Student Action Summit.
And we're bringing in the biggest voices in the movement.
Featuring Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Dr. Ben Carson, Congresswoman Anna Paulina Leeda, Brandon Payton, James O'Peace, Benny Johnson, Jack Pesobic, and more from July 11th through 13th in Tampa, Florida.
Register now at SAS2025.com.
All right, Jack Pesobic, here we are back live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C., the great real America's voice, that huge exclusive that we had.
And I'll have this written up later at humanevents.com regarding the director of the CIA telling Mossad to pool its jets, literally, when it comes to the ceasefire or face a reduction or cessation of all intelligence sharing.
And we'll have more updates for that for you as this continues.
I want to get in, though, to some of the polling on Israel and really get into this conflict and how it relates to the generations.
And this is out of signal polling and analytics.
So Republican polls to Brent Buchanan found that 62% of voters over the age of 55 support Israel's war with Iran, compared to just 40% of those under 55. Only 30% of voters under 55 support providing weapons to Israel.
A 2024 Pew Research Center poll, now this is getting into Gen Z, found that among Gen Z, respondents aged 18 to 29 supported and sympathized with the Israeli people in the conflict with the Palestinians.
So that's 14% support for Israel in Israel versus Gaza.
That number was 47% of those aged 65 and up.
Republicans in the 18 to 29 camp were barely more pro-Israel than the Democrat senior citizens.
So Evida Duffy, I want you to zoom in here on the support for this incredibly low support number, 14% of Gen Z supporting Israel in the conflict with Gaza.
Explain that for our viewers who might be totally shocked to hear numbers.
And this is two research.
This isn't some back of the napkin math.
This is something that you do have to take it seriously.
And whether you agree with a specific number, it's low.
Explain that for viewers who don't understand.
Yeah, Jack, I'm not surprised by those numbers at all.
It certainly is consistent with what I see online, just as I'm scrolling.
And I think it has a lot to do with where people get their information.
If you are somebody who's over 65, you're probably watching Fox News and there is one presentation on that network.
If you're scrolling through TikTok, this is a digital age and you are getting all of the horrific images and videos out of Gaza.
Gaza has the highest number of child amputees in modern history.
It's very horrific what is coming out of that scene.
And it doesn't mean that there's not victims on both sides.
Certainly the hostages have been through hell.
But the point is, this is where Gen Z is getting their information.
This is how they are viewing this conflict.
And frankly, what I think, Jack, and especially among young conservatives, which are on the rise, Gen Z conservatives, is a desire for our leaders to focus on the home front.
A desire to have nothing to do with the horrific video and images that are coming out of the other side of the world and instead focus on things that are happening here at home, deportations, bringing up the value of labor in our country by getting rid of people who should not be here, actually making housing and education affordable for this generation, making it finally once again be a possibility for one Parent to work while somebody else can stay home and raise their kids.
They don't have to outsource to a nanny or daycare.
These are things that our generation actually cares about, that they're thinking about as they're starting their lives in America.
And it really feels like our leaders just aren't there at all.
And so, this, this is for people to understand, it's this idea that it's a general anti-war feeling, but also a feeling of being unheard, being unheard, facing conflicts.
And this is something where I had to explain this to somebody who was having dinner with the other night.
I said, look, you know, just look at the math.
If you're Gen Z, then that means some of your earliest memories are 9-11, the Iraq war, you know, and then not too long after that, the financial crisis.
There's literally no memory of what the world was like prior to all of these conflicts.
It's just been constant war, conflict, crisis, then COVID happens, et cetera.
So there's no normalcy.
There's no return to stability and something that we talk about all the time, but it never actually materializes.
Last minute to you, Avita Duffy.
Am I close?
Am I a little bit getting there?
What do you think?
Yes.
And Jack, I think that there is something, there's a mass awakening happening where people are revisiting lots of different parts of American history.
For instance, the Vietnam War is currently going viral on TikTok right now.
People are talking about it and what did we accomplish?
What actually happened?
Why were we there?
I mean, the Vietnam War, right?
You're supposed to learn about this in school.
But there are people revisiting these points in American history, and especially recent memory with the Middle East and Iraq and Afghanistan and wondering what actually was accomplished and are we better off today as Americans?
And the answer to that is actually no, because this generation, along with millennials, are the first to be worse off than their parents economically.
So there is a real feeling of betrayal in this generation when it comes to our leaders and what they've done over the last several decades.
Understood.
But fortunately, Avida Duffy is not being betrayed because she is living up to her parents' highest expectations.
And we will leave it there.
▲
Export Selection