All Episodes
Previous Next
March 5, 2025 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
40:43
THE UNHUMAN RESPONSE TO TRUMP'S PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS, THE LEFT HAS EMBRACED ANTI-HUMANITY
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Poso Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Poso.
Sign up today.
It's called the Poso Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Poso.
Totally free.
The Poso Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth-generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
Last night was to the heart of it.
The human stories interwove right into the speech when President Trump's trying to accomplish.
But most importantly...
It showed the Democrats as almost, you know, Jack Posobiec's book on human.
It showed them almost as anti-human.
America is back.
I want to do what has not been done in 24 years.
Balance the federal budget.
We're going to balance it.
The media and our friends in the Democrat Party kept saying we needed new legislation.
We must have legislation to secure the border.
But it turned out that all we really needed Was a new president.
The doctors gave him five months at most to live.
That was more than six years ago.
And tonight, DJ, we're going to do you the biggest honor of them all.
I am asking our new Secret Service director to officially make you an agent of the United States Secret Service.
During the disastrous...
And incompetent withdrawal from Afghanistan, perhaps the most embarrassing moment in the history of our country.
Tonight, I am pleased to announce that we have just apprehended the top terrorist responsible for that atrocity, and he is right now on his way here to face the swift sword of American justice.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily.
Today is March 5th, 2025, Anno Domini.
Today is Ash Wednesday, period of 40 days, 40 nights before the arrival of Easter.
And President Trump's speech last night, which we're going to be getting into, we're going to be breaking down, but there was one piece of it that I think a lot of people, a lot of people, have skipped over.
Something a lot of people have missed.
And there's a lot from the speech, but something that I think was seminal.
Absolutely seminal.
The perpetrator of the Abbey Gate attack has been captured and was brought to justice.
And President Trump there in front of the assembled House and the Senate, the Supreme Court, the one time all year when you see all the power structure.
Of Washington, D.C. assembled in one storied hall.
He announced that the animal, the scum that took out 13 of our honored soldiers and Marines is being brought to justice.
Because no matter where you are, no matter where you go, no matter where you try to hide, if you lay a hand on an American service member If you lay a hand on an American service member and if you kill an American service member, you will be found and you will be brought to justice no matter how many years it takes.
That's the President of the United States that I want to have for my country.
That's the Commander in Chief that I want for my military.
That's the United States military and the government.
That I signed up for and swore an oath for.
That if you're going to send someone downrange, that if you're going to put someone on deployment, that if you're going to go out there and they will faithfully execute the orders of the chain of command, and if they are killed in the line of duty, that their government will work tirelessly to go after anyone who perpetrated that and have them either brought to justice or sent to their maker.
The fact that this scumbag was still going around sucking air, free air, for four years after that attack.
Years after our honored dead were lying buried at Arlington National Cemetery, it was a disgrace.
And President Trump stood up and did the right thing for those people, for those families, and for all veterans and service members everywhere.
God bless America.
We'll be right back.
America first truly means...
Welcome to the second American Revolution.
All right, Jack Posobiec, here we are back.
Human Events Daily.
And right there in the Capitol that you're looking at, it's a rainy day in Washington.
A stormy day in Washington because the days of thunder have arrived.
The storm is crashing down.
And let me tell you something, folks.
Just a few weeks ago, Governor Kathy Hochul ordered the closure of live poultry markets in New York City due to this rising hysteria surrounding the H5N1 bird flu.
Now, critics are warning that pandemic fears may be weaponized to challenge Trump's mandate and to undermine RFK Jr. and his vision as the leader of HHS.
Now, is this a health crisis or a power play?
Last summer, Dr. Peter McCullough warned about the bird flu.
Linking the virus's rapid spread to gain-of-function research, now a common practice at many labs globally.
Dr. McCullough urges early prevention just in case, recommending a contagion emergency kit.
From the wellness company, KISS Medical Board approved solution with five critical life-saving medications like ivermectin, Tamiflu, a nebulizer, and hydroxy.
Hydroxychloroquine.
Yeah, that's right.
I said it.
Hydroxychloroquine.
Now, these are medications.
You can have access to them, ivermectin, as well as these hard-to-get medications, because we know they are, in the event of another pandemic.
Get yours by filling out a digital intake form and your kit arrives in one to two weeks.
Don't wait until the deep state puts whatever plan they might have into action.
Stay ready for the unexpected.
So, we played that clip of Bannon earlier this morning talking about the response, the Democrat response to the State of the Union.
It wasn't really a State of the Union, but ceremonial.
I would say it was a ceremonial State of the Union in many ways, many, many ways.
And this is something that was absolutely atrocious.
It was disgusting.
The way that they went forward and attacked the president, the way that they went forward and did all this was a joke.
It was disgusting and it was awful.
I'm told now that we have Brian Glenn from the White House.
He just participated in the president's press secretaries.
Well, Jack, he kind of...
I got some slapback on my IFB, by the way, if you guys can fix that.
Basically, she unpacked the approval ratings from last night's speech as far as Americans are favorable of his stance on Russia and Ukraine, favorable about immigration, favorable about tariffs.
They felt optimistic.
That he was absolutely delivering the promises of the campaign just six weeks into that.
Took some questions from the media.
Obviously, it didn't last as long as we thought.
It was a slight delay in getting started.
But just really kind of recapping such a successful speech last night on the House floor.
And it was a successful speech, and that's something where the Democrats have had no response whatsoever.
There's been no Democrat message, no unified front.
76% of Americans supported the speech, supported what they heard.
And really, Brian, what President Trump did, he's embracing the common sense solutions to so many of these issues, as well as, by the way, just bringing on those direct human moments.
The connections with the angel moms and talking about their daughters, signing executive orders right in person, going, and the moment with E.J. Daniel, of course, the moment as well with the West Point cadet, I should say, cadet select, because he has now been selected.
Again, these were key moments that Democrats chose to attack.
They chose to criticize, and in one case, very crudely criticize.
In times that they really, and by the way, having been an understanding of how these events are put together, I don't think that the White House really was prepared because who could imagine that the opposition would be attacking moments such as that?
Sure, okay, you're going to attack Doge and they're going to attack cuts and all of this and talk about austerity and talk about inflation tariffs, but attacking these human stories.
Brian, how is it that the Democrats would walk right into something like that?
Yeah, we expect them to, you know, kind of stand up against the policies.
We know that.
But to stand up against something like a 13-year-old boy who's battling brain cancer, who gets his honorary Secret Service badge, to stand up against the families of angel moms, things like that, that's a human issue.
So really, my question is this.
What does the Democrat Party stand for in general?
Not only physically, what would it take for Democrats to stand up and support anything?
Because last night, it's a big nothing burger for them.
They have some big Identity crisis in that party.
There's no leadership.
There's shots of House Democrats.
I know Jasmine Crockett put a TikTok video up her basically skipping and dancing down the hallways and dropping an F-bomb in one of the press gaggles, one of the press arenas before this speech.
So I don't know what they stand for, and I hope Americans, Jack, watched last night the ones that maybe didn't even vote.
Or maybe vote a Democrat.
Go, you know what?
Do they really stand up for American values?
Are they really working hard for me?
And the answer is no.
And President Trump showed his leadership.
It was full on display last night.
Well, and that's exactly what it is, because these events, and I was talking about this last night on a live stream with Charlie Kirk, is that there are so many people who only plug into politics at key moments, whether it's a presidential debate, whether it's one of the conventions, And then, again, for these State of the Union type addresses.
And to the sort of average non-political follower, not non-news junkie like, you know, like you and me, Brian, you know, and the other great folks around here is, you know, they're plugging in.
They want to see what's going on.
They're in.
They're out.
And what they saw was, of course, a command performance from President Trump, but more to the point, what they saw from the other side was childish.
It was raucous.
It was juvenile and at some point it was actually it was just just anti-human to attack a child with brain cancer to attack a boy who wants to join West Point and serve his country to go after these human interest cases to not stand for them and not say, this is what makes our country great.
Again, all of the cases, the use cases that you would say, well, these are the things the Democrats normally champion.
But again, because their default is to oppose anything.
That is an association with Donald Trump.
The problem is they are actually shrinking their circle smaller and smaller because I just don't know who wants to continue to support a shrill group like that.
And that's why, by the way, you have a lot of Democrats, bigger and bigger names, Sai Simone, for example, at MSNBC calling out their behavior as saying, you guys really need to stop because you've completely lost the plot.
Yeah, you're absolutely right, because I was just going to mention, if you turned on a lot of the legacy media, they kind of echoed a lot, not all, but some echoed what the Democrats were doing.
The lower third said, you know, Trump's divisiveness sets tone in speech.
And the only people that were being divisive were the Democrats that weren't being supportive of just basic human success stories.
That came up today in the briefing.
Carolyn Levitt kind of made mention that, you know, You turn on your mainstream media, you've got negativity all day long.
Their audience is shrinking.
And you know what?
I saw an interesting post on X the other day, and I'll try to find it and retweet it.
Democrats strategize on how they can win moving forward.
And believe it or not, there was three things they needed to focus on.
More patriotism within their party.
Love of country.
Not getting behind radical candidates for some ideology that...
Overwhelmingly, the people of this country don't support.
So they're trying to separate themselves from the crazies, but they better do a little better job than what they did last night, because that was with the whole signs and the whole, you know, Representative Green.
It was a complete joke, a complete joke.
Brian, you're there at the White House.
We've got to run to a break.
Where can people follow you?
Brian Glenn, TV across the board.
I appreciate it, Jack.
Thank you.
All right, thank you, Brian Baer, for Real America's Voice.
I want to also welcome in, by the way, we are here in Hour 3 of the Charlie Kirk Show with his audience on the Salem Radio Network.
We are back.
You know, you talk about influence.
These are influences, and they're friends of mine.
Jack Pesovic.
Where's Jack?
Jack.
He's done a great job.
All right, folks, we're back.
Jack Posobiec here on Human Events Daily.
J.D. Vance, by the way, Vice President, Secretary of Defense Hegseth, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard have all just landed at the southern border.
They are on their way to Eagle Pass as we speak at this very moment.
I want to bring in here, we've got...
Our favorite resident anti-communist Evita Duffy is joining us, host of Bungie Report Early Edition, and she is also, I can see, celebrating Ash Wednesday.
Evita, how are you?
I'm doing so good, Jack, and I do have my ashes, and I was telling you before the show started, I had to get them before I came on because I knew that you would give me crap if I didn't have my ashes on, and I went to Ash Wednesday Mass in the evening instead.
I absolutely would have a beat of you did the right thing.
And so when we look at the speech, though, we look at the response to this from the Democrats there.
I wrote this book on humans last year.
You and I have been talking about communism for years and years and years.
And what it talks about is the fact that the communist, the leftist, is not animated by justice.
They claim they are, but they're not.
They're actually animated.
They are animated by resentment, envy, heady jealousy, greed, all of these various envies that they have coalesced into this completely incoherent gobbledygook that they claim is a political ideology, but it doesn't make any sense and it was never supposed to because that's not actually what they stand for.
Can you combine this?
For us, Evita, why was it that the Democrats were so resentful of the positive thing?
A child with brain cancer getting a chance to be on national TV and recognized by the Secret Service, someone going to join West Point and serve his country.
Why was the resentment the response from the Democrats?
It was such a human moment, Jack.
I'm not even going to lie.
I started to tear up.
I started to tear up when this little boy received this honorary And he gave the hug, and it was so emotional, and it was so beautiful, and it was so human.
And this is somebody who has nothing, right?
I mean, this is a young child who survived brain cancer.
The worst of the worst.
You're a young kid, and you have your whole life ahead of you.
And this horrible thing happens.
And it was just, I think it's a moment that highlighted, as you saw the contrast of this young boy in this beautiful moment, that real humans would...
All be touched by, you saw them sitting.
You saw these women in their frumpy pink blazers, angrily with their arms crossed, frowning at this moment that was incredible.
And you have to think, why?
Is the Trump derangement, is the envy, and it's not just you said it's envy of the have-nots, it's also about power, right?
They're angry.
They see Trump delivering this speech.
They see that their colleagues on the other side of the aisle are cheering and they're happy because the right has won.
And they are furious at this.
And for that reason, they can't even bring themselves, Jack, to take joy in one of the most human moments that I have seen since President Trump's election.
And that's key.
To me, that's absolute key, because anything that's associated with Trump Anything that's associated with their political enemies, they view as the adversary.
So, by the way, you know, so for all the Schmidians out there who say that, you know, all politics is friend-foe distinction, there you go.
There you go.
That's the answer to your question.
He's just right.
You know, you don't have to sit there and say, oh, I disagree with this thing you wrote.
No, no, no.
He's just right.
Politics does boil down to this, the friend-enemy distinction.
And that's clearly what the Democrats showed on full display.
They view all of these things as political enemies because they're associated with a political enemy.
And so all of their flowery talk about justice and equality and equity, it flies out the window.
Why?
Because this is what their politics truly is.
Mask off moment.
One minute to the break of Eat It Up.
Well, Jack, I think that...
If you look at the way that Democrats view the world, if you are somebody who doesn't have power or doesn't have really political utility to them, they don't value you.
They'll value a woman who wants the right to abortion, but not the child who's being aborted who can't cast a vote.
I think that is at the heart of this.
And so this young man has no political utility to them.
They can't take joy in this moment because it helps Trump, because it reflects well on him.
That is how deranged they are.
It's complete derangement.
It is mental illness as a political ideology.
And people say, oh, well, it's incoherent.
We're going to point out the double standards.
And this is another part of it, too.
If you point out the double standard of hypocrisy, they don't care because they don't actually believe it.
There's so many things that we can use here to teach about this.
But I want to teach about something else that just happened with this latest Supreme Court decision that came out.
Including Amy Coney Barrett.
We'll be right back here.
Human Events Daily, as well as the third hour of the Charlie Kirk program with his audience on the Salem Radio Network.
And Jack, where is Jack? - Where is Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting politicians.
Jack Posobiec here, back live.
Human Events Daily.
You're looking down at a rainy National Mall there in Washington, D.C. We are getting a little bit of a rainstorm hitting us.
Folks, on January 20th, 2025, the White House declared a national emergency.
I wouldn't be a surprise if we started experiencing more frequent power outages, as well as electronic magnetic pulse, or EMP attacks, electromagnetic, that could fry all electronics in the country and shut down the grid for months or even years.
Most people can't survive without electricity.
That's why MyPatriotSupply has just released the new Grid Doctor 3300. This is the first solar generator with revolutionary EMP Intercept technology.
This groundbreaking system will protect your backup power from devastating EMP attacks, ensuring your family stays safe and comfortable when others are left in the dark.
With an industry-leading 3,300 watts of power, it runs everything from refrigerators and freezers to medical devices and power tools.
It includes a free 200-watt waterproof solar panel for unlimited renewable energy.
Do not wait until it's too late.
Get your grid, Dr. 3300, with EMP Intercept technology now at mypatriotsupply.com.
Secure your family's future with mypatriotsupply.com.
mypatriotsupply.com.
So, the breaking news that came out just before we went to air here was this new Supreme Court ruling.
Striking down the plan to defund USAID, specifically the Doge plan, by stopping payments.
Now, I've looked into some of the details of the case, and I want people to understand that there's still going to be other bites at the apple with USAID. First of all, the ruling was only on the emergency injunction.
The underlying case is still working its way through the appeals process.
It's then going to go to the From the local court, from the district court, the circuit court.
It's then going to go up to the Supreme Court when that happens.
So we know all of that's going to take place.
This was the emergency appeal.
There's also an underlying contract issue.
So it's more than just the funding of USAID. And there's other ways that we'll get bites at this Apple II, one of which, of course, is going to be in the budgetary process.
But there's something that I wanted to get into.
And I wanted to discuss, this is big.
This is really big.
Amy Coney Barrett.
The role of Amy Coney Barrett, someone who voted against this, against the conservatives, against the conservative majority on this, something where Alito and so many others are coming out saying, what are you doing?
How can you allow for one Local, federal judge to enact an emergency injunction that binds the entire nation.
Clearly, the founders did not intend for that framework to make any sense whatsoever.
But then you also have this case of Amy Coney Barrett, and she is someone who, by the way, humanevents.com actually ran a story saying that we were a little bit concerned about Amy Coney Barrett all the way back.
In 2019, 2019, asking if she was really the best choice, if she was really the best choice for Supreme Court.
Well, came out and said that she was not.
That was from John Zmirak.
And we took a lot of guff for publishing that all the way back in 2019. And now we see her rule on case after case after case, siding with the liberals.
Although, of course, she also did.
Take out Roe v.
Wade.
I want to bring on Evita Duffy here because I want to go through some of this.
You know, Evita, I don't know if you've looked at X. I know you said you were at Mass.
People are outraged.
People are outraged against Amy Coney Barrett.
It's something that's going completely viral right now.
And they say, what is wrong?
How is this someone who, look, is she more conservative than the person that she replaced?
Sure.
Okay, fine.
Yet it seems like she falls in with the liberals on every single issue.
Outside of pro-life.
So was this the cost of overturning Roe v.
Wade?
Or is this just someone who is completely sort of in line with this kind of like Pope Francis version of Catholicism?
And here we are discussing the Catholics on the court on Ash Wednesday, which is kind of different from the more conservative.
Shall we say, Benedictine version of Catholicism that, by the way, Alito and Gorsuch, I believe, and of course Clarence Thomas, are also all Catholic, yet they don't exactly agree with Amy Coney Barrett.
Wanted to get into that with you, Alito.
What's your take?
Well, she probably is a Vatican II Catholic, Jack.
She probably loves to shake hands at the Mass.
She likes it when the minister is like not a priest, but like some woman who is like completely irrelevant to the Mass or the order of the Mass.
But in all seriousness...
I have been shocked by the way that Amy Coney Barrett has ruled on so many of these cases.
I remember the hype around her.
I remember the way that conservatives fought for her.
I mean, we put it all on the table.
We went to bat for this woman because the left was coming down on her really hard.
I think they probably knew the way that she would rule on Roe v.
Wade.
I have close family members who were affected by her decision when it came to the military vaccine mandate.
I'm going to tell you what, Jack, the one that makes me the most upset was her ruling on Missouri v.
Murthy.
And the way that she just said, apparently the federal government seems to have the right.
To just go in and direct the censorship of social media companies, censor directly regular Americans, directly and indirectly, through various NGOs that were set up by the government itself, founded by former CIA officials.
So, I mean, it has been...
Really troubling to see the way she has ruled on so many of these cases.
We fought really hard for her, and it did not pan out the way we wanted to.
And this latest case, I think, is going to potentially set a really negative precedent that some lower court judge can just say, yep, the American people have to continue paying billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid that now we know what it's going toward, right?
transgender surgeries in peru and in some cases promoting atheism in nepal completely meaningless pointless um aid that now i guess a judge can just come in and say you have to continue payments for also i want to make a slight correction Gorsuch was raised Catholic, but he is now no longer Catholic.
He is actually, in fact, Episcopalian, which is the American version of the Anglican Church.
However, Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett are all Catholics.
So we've got a Catholic supermajority on the Supreme Court right now.
That is six out of the nine.
We also have two Protestants and one Jew, Elena Kagan.
And so the question there is, I guess I have a Vita, is why is it then, because you get this all the time, they'll say like, well, you Catholics are all this and you Catholics are all that.
But in fact...
We've got a huge split.
We've got huge splits here among the Catholics.
Like Sotomayor and Thomas couldn't be more radically different in terms of their jurisprudence, and yet they're all Catholic.
And so when you were talking about the Vatican II Catholics, and when I mentioned a Pope Francis Catholic as opposed to a Pope Benedict Catholic, we are talking about very deep splits in the faith, and something that I think comes down to this huge sort of like,
Reformist movement that's really been pushing to the forefront a lot in Catholicism, but at the same time, you're also finding in the Catholic movement, particularly among a lot of Zoomers, which I think you know something about, where you actually see Zoomers embracing traditional Catholicism.
What's going on?
I mean, it's such a good question, Jack.
And I'll just preface by saying I met Clarence Thomas.
He was actually the one that swore my dad into office.
And he's the most amazing man.
And he is traditional.
And I... Truly, he is one of the only people that I've met in D.C. who I would trust with my life, who I just think is a genuinely moral person.
Then you have, you're right, these other Catholics who are Catholic in name, and they don't seem to share any of the same values as someone like Clarence Thomas.
And it makes people wonder.
And I think that there has been infiltration in the Catholic Church, Jack.
I think this has been happening for decades.
I think it's been purposeful.
And you, there is a rejection of tradition, a dumbing down of the faith.
You're even take what's what we're in right now.
We're entering into Lent.
It's Ash Wednesday.
The way that the medieval Christians used to handle Lent was very based.
I mean, there was, there was no meat anytime, right?
It was not just Fridays.
And they ate, you know...
A little bit of bread and herbs and they were really taking the penance and the fasting seriously.
And young people right now are craving that.
In a world where everything is about comfort and about personal happiness, people are desiring suffering.
I think people need suffering to feel good.
This is the reward system of humanity.
This is actually God's design that we suffer.
And then you have the reward of Easter.
You have the fulfillment of your reward in heaven, right?
You toil here on earth, you do good here, and then you get your eternal reward.
Young people are craving this.
This is why you're seeing.
A lot of conversions to Islam because they do take their faith seriously, as flawed as it is, and we need to return to that if we're going to stand any sort of chance at taking back the West and keeping the Western Christian values alive and not being drowned out by secularism or Islam or otherwise.
Well, I couldn't agree more.
And when I look at the jurisprudence of Amy Coney Barrett, I just have to say it.
DEI is alive and well in Republican politics.
It really is.
And I think a lot of conservatives and, you know, come at me if you want, but a lot of conservatives have to actually wake up and look at themselves in the mirror and say, all right, guys, are we really against DEI or do we just say that we're against these programs?
But when it comes to Republican politics or the people who get platformed in conservative media or all of these other things, Are we not also following those same DEI practices?
And I think that with Amy Coney Barrett's decision here and a number of the decisions that you've just mentioned, it gives us an opportunity to finally sit down and actually have that conversation.
And Jack, maybe this is a little bit of a controversial take here, but I'll mention that There's a bipartisan effort right now in Congress to not have in-person voting, that we want to be able to vote remotely because working mothers, mothers who are members of Congress, can't handle it.
And I'll just say, I don't think that's a good reason.
That's not a good reason.
And if you are a mother and you want to spend time with your infant child, which I think is a beautiful thing, maybe you shouldn't be in Congress if you can't make this work.
And that sounds bad, Jack.
I don't think it sounds bad at all.
Go ahead.
I was going to say, I don't think it sounds bad at all.
I think it sounds wonderful.
Mothers spending time with their children.
Yes, that's incredible.
In fact, that's what newborns, as a matter of fact, absolutely need.
We're coming up on a quick break.
Folks, we're dropping all the thought crimes here.
We are getting in tons of trouble, but why not?
Because it's Ash Wednesday, and we are letting it all out.
We'll be right back here.
Jack Posobiec, Vita Duffy on, who knows, maybe this will be the last episode of Human Events, Daily Real America's Voice.
third hour of Charlie Kirk on the Sealing Radio Network.
Jack is a great guy.
He's written a fantastic book.
Everybody's talking about it.
Go get it.
And he's been my friend right from the beginning of this whole beautiful event.
And we're going to turn it around and make our country great again.
Amen.
I let myself feel joy about DJ, and I hope he's alive for another, you know, 95 years, right?
And I hope he lives.
And the life he wants to live.
He wants to be a cop.
He knows what he wants to do.
And I hope he has a long life as a law enforcement officer.
But I hope he never has to defend the United States Capitol against Donald Trump supporters.
And if he does, I hope he isn't one of the six who loses his life to suicide.
And I hope he isn't one who has to testify against the people who carried out acts of seditious conspiracy and then lived to see Donald Trump pardon those people.
For the record, and this is disgusting, the president made a spectacle.
Out of praising a young man who thus far survived pediatric cancer as if the president had something to do with that.
This was in the midst of him praising Doge.
Doge cuts, among other things, have cut off funding for ongoing research into pediatric cancer.
All right, guys, we are back here.
Washington.
Jack Posobiec along with Evita Duffy.
We're talking about the curious case of Amy Coney Barrett.
And Evita, when we cut this off, we're breaking all the rules around here, but we might as well, right?
It really is this kind of mindset where it's like the conservatives have a question.
It's like, what role do we want to actually have?
Do we want to be the woke light and uphold most of these sociological liberal shibboleths that they've enacted since the Obama era and are we just anti-trans but we're supporting all of the other liberal stuff and that's a woke light?
Or are we in fact actually standing for traditional society?
And by the way, I'm all for it, but like, tell me which one we're gonna be, right?
It's so true, Jack.
And this is the curse of conservatism, right?
What it is to be conservative is evolving and changing every day.
And so, you know, yesterday we were like, no gay marriage.
And today we're like, well, let's just not trance the children, but adults are fine.
And it's radically different because it's not really something to stand on, the idea of just conservatism.
That's why I like to use the word traditionalist or I'm a medievalist, I'll say, or something like that.
But just conservative has become really meaningless.
And I think...
To your point, Jack, it's not a winning game.
And you can look to the left to know that it's not a winning game.
I think that with Hillary Clinton, they tried to kind of play it in the middle.
I know that we think they're radical, and many of them are.
But in reality, Democrat, the DNC, has been very controlling of their more radical voices.
And they have pushed to the side people like Bernie Sanders or AOC and promoted people who tow the party line.
I think they would go for an AOC. I think they would go as radical left as they can, left-wing populism, and they might start winning.
I'm not trying to give them any free ideas here, but I think the same goes for us.
This is, by the way, I keep trying to explain this to people, and I go back to the book on humans, when people look at the popularity of Luigi Mangione, right?
There's an explanation for this.
There's an explanation because people are upset.
People are resentful.
People don't like their lot in society.
They don't like the way things are going.
And so there is a version of left-wing populism out there that can become extremely popular and is extremely popular.
It's also extremely murderous and violent and destroys society altogether.
But you can't sit there and look at the popularity of this guy and not tell me that it's a real thing, particularly among Gen Z. I mean, it helps that he's attractive, right?
But what he stands for is really, it gets to the heart of leftism, of chaos, of really no morals, no standards.
This is, Luigi Mangioni is exactly why I'm terrified of the left, and I hope that regular Democrats continue to keep their party in line for the sake of us all.
But that is where the energy is, Jack.
You're 100% right.
And Hassan Piker just called for...
The murder of Senator Rick Scott the other day.
So this is the guy who, he streams with AOC. He has very much the overlap of audience that we're talking about.
He does the video game stuff on Twitch.
Twitch only suspended him for one day.
One day suspension over this.
And by the way, nobody on the left Is actually going to be bothered by this.
They're going to say, yeah, you're right.
This guy, and then, you know, there was a Medicare thing, and he brought it up.
They don't actually care.
And by the way, Evita, I'll break, I'll go ahead, and since you've gone and broken a few thought crimes, I'll break one here, or commit a thought crime, I guess.
Breaking the thought laws that if Luigi at Maggioni's target, or Hassan Piker's target, had not been an affluent, white, Christian male.
Then, in fact, the left would hate it.
Because, again, it's not about healthcare.
It's not about justice.
It's about going after their enemy groups and their enemy classes.
So, let's say Luigi Maggioni had, and again, for hypothetical sake of argument, that this was some African American in a committed same-sex relationship.
Well, they'd be disowning Luigi Maggioni.
They'd be calling him racist.
They'd be saying horrible things about him.
They would not be celebrating him the way they are.
And I guarantee you, there's a connection here.
It is rich, white men that they want to completely eradicate from society.
And that is fueled by resentment, the same resentment that we saw last night.
Evita, we are at the end of the show.
Where can people go and follow all of your great insights?
Well, my Instagram and my X account are...
Evita Duffy underscore one.
And if you want to listen to my show, Bongino Report Early Edition, live, 9 a.m.
Eastern Time, rumble.com slash Evita.
So that's right, Bongino Report.
So you're basically a Fed now, Evita.
Is that how it works?
Like you're basically a Fed because you're on Bongino Report and he's a Fed.
So you're basically a Fed by way of proxy.
Evita Duffy, our Fed by way of proxy, are my favorite anti-communist.
Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission.
▲
Export Selection