Sept. 11, 2024 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
49:09
TRUMP RETAKES LEAD IN POLYMARKET - UNDECIDEDS TURNING ON KAMALA
Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec Save up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSO Go to https://www.BlackoutCoffee.com/POSO and use promo code POSO20 for 20% OFF your first order.Get $200 off a 3-month supply kit from ‘My Patriot Supply’ when you go to https://www.preparewithposo.com. OCI is a single platform for your infrastructure, database, application development, and A.I. needs. If you want to do more ...
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Poso Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Poso.
Sign up today.
It's called the Poso Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Poso.
Totally free.
The Poso Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
Christ is-- Tim Rawls and I are both gun owners.
We're not taking anybody's guns away, so stop with the continuous lying about this stuff.
We have to have a buyback program and I support a mandatory buyback program.
It's gotta be smart.
We gotta do it the right way.
Let's remember Charlottesville.
And what did the president say?
There were fine people on each side.
You had people, and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally.
Donald Trump, the candidate, has said in this election there will be a bloodbath if this and the outcome of this election is not to his liking.
Mexico has taken over a period of 30 years 34% of the automobile manufacturing business in our country.
Think of it.
We're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line.
And you're not going to be able to sell those cars.
If I get elected...
Now, if I don't get elected, it's gonna be a bloodbath.
She's a Marxist.
Everybody knows she's a Marxist.
Her father's a Marxist professor in economics, and he taught her well.
Wait a minute, I'm talking now.
If you don't mind, please.
Does that sound familiar?
You just started by saying she's going to do this, she's going to do that, she's going to do all these wonderful things.
Why hasn't she done it?
She's been there for three and a half years.
They've had three and a half years to fix the border.
They've had three and a half years to create jobs and all the things we talked about.
Why hasn't she done it?
She should leave right now, go down to that beautiful White House, go to the Capitol, get everyone together and do the things you want to do, but you haven't done it and you won't do it.
Because you believe in things that the American people don't believe in.
The worst vice president in the history of our country.
Donald Trump left us the worst attack on our democracy since the Civil War.
Holy s**t!
God!
Oh, my God!
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily.
We are live in Washington, D.C.
Today, of course, is 9/11/2024, the 23rd anniversary of the terrorist attacks on the United States, 9/11/2001.
We've got, so President Trump right now is currently in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, and we're working on getting the live feed up of that for you.
We've also got coverage at Ground Zero, but I want to talk to you about something that, and we'll get into the debate, don't worry, but I want to say something.
We lost so much on 9-11, but we lost even more than we realized.
We lost the country that we were.
The country that you grew up in no longer exists.
The country that you grew up in no longer exists.
What do I mean by that?
I mean, when I went to visit 9-11, or when I went to visit 9-11, when I went to visit the World Trade Center in the 90s, when I went there with my family, the country that we were before, it's gone.
But we can get it back if we fight.
I want to go now to David Zeer over at Ground Zero right now in New York City.
David, you were at the memorial with President Trump and Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, all the rest of them.
You also visited the FDNY, the fire department, the station.
Tell me a little bit about what went down this morning.
Well, Ladder 4, the whole shift was wiped out.
Engine 54, Ladder 4, Battalion 9 are down on Water Street, right across town from here.
They lost all 15 guys on their shift in 9-11.
And, you know, 377 firefighters have died since 343 died that day.
But, you know, there's a feeling on the ground here.
I'm outside of O'Hara's pub by Ground Zero.
The firefighters are here.
A lot don't want to come on camera.
They don't want to get political.
I lost one of my best friends, Peter Brennan, Rescue 4, 288, climbing up the tower on 74th floor, came down on him.
This is a somber day.
But Jack, we were talking, you know, I don't know if enough people get it.
There's a lot of, like, if you talk to 95, 98% of the people around Ground Zero, they don't know the roots of the 40 years of global terrorism, Islamic terrorism, Islamo-terrorism in New York City and all that.
And people are complacent.
The rich people step over the bodies on the way to Starbucks.
Uh, and I don't know if people get it.
And then you have those consequences of 9-11, like the Patriot Act, and where they, you know, they track your deposits and all that.
People don't trust the government anymore, you know?
So, there's so many things that changed for America on 9-11.
Yeah, that's the shooting point here, is that not only did we lose that innocence, but we actually used to have a level of trust for our government.
It sounds naive.
It almost sounds ridiculous to say, but we did have that.
David, thank you for being there.
We're just coming up on our break.
Thank you for telling those stories.
Thank you for giving truth to this.
And the fact is, we lost those great people.
We lost those great Americans.
We lost a country.
But we can fight to bring it back.
Stay tuned right back, human events daily.
Stay tuned.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
You talk about influences.
These are influences.
and their friends of mine.
Jack, so like where's Jack?
Jack, he's done a great job.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard to Hear Human Events.
We are back.
Jack Posobiec, Washington D.C.
folks.
I'm a proud American, and that means if you come after me or my family, I'm going to be ready.
That's why I rely on my Patriot Supply.
Their 3-month Emergency Food Mega Kit comes jam-packed with 33 varieties of filling and delicious foods.
Not only does that include creamy chicken-flavored rice, old-fashioned spaghetti, and savory, cheesy broccoli soup, but you'll also get a bonus protein kit with diced beef.
And flavorful chicken chunks, three varieties of beans, plus three different fruits, vegetables, and snacks.
All in all, this emergency food kit provides a whopping 2,500 calories a day to keep you well-fed and ready for anything.
That's why the only way I see it is that it's my duty and all of our duty As an American, to be self-reliant and not rely on handouts.
And that starts with the foods you can depend on for up to 25 years.
Go to MyPatriotSupply.com.
Go right now to save $300 on your mega three-month emergency food kit.
It ships fast and free.
Go to MyPatriotSupply.com to save $300 on your kit.
MyPatriotSupply.com.
So folks, when we think about the debate last night, This is a great example.
This is a great example of that debate, the way things went down, the way things were.
You say, hold on, America's changed.
America is not the country we used to be.
We've got hordes of migrants that the government is paying to put into our homes and our towns and our neighborhoods.
And anytime you try to bring something up about it, The corporate media goes in and blasts Trump about it, talks over him.
When Trump talks about narrowly being shot and killed by an assassin's bullet, David Muir talks over him, cuts him off, says, we've got a lot to cover today, and doesn't even follow up on it.
By the way, David Muir never said that line, never used that line, which is a psychological tactic, and David Muir, who is an absolute hack, someone I've had no respect for for a long time, It was really weird watching Trump debate those three women last night because that's what this was.
It was a struggle session.
a lot to cover.
We have a lot to get to.
We have a lot to get to, to silence and diminish whatever Trump just said, and then move on to the next thing.
These are the mean girl tactics.
And I have to say, it was really weird watching Trump debate those three women last night, because that's what this was.
It was a struggle session.
Yes, it was a struggle session, but President Trump did not I want to bring in now Darren Beatty.
I'm sure he's got a lot of opinions on the debate as well as also someone who was a presidential speechwriter in the White House.
From Revolver News, Darren Beatty, how are you?
Doing great.
How are you?
So how do you how do you handicap the spectacle of what we saw last night?
Because I'm not sure you can actually refer to it as a debate.
Yeah, you know, these things are always hard to grade because You can look at it and say who objectively did a better job, but then you have to look at sort of the meta issues in relation to, you know, underlying energies of campaigns.
And in Kamala's case, I think there's a specific phrase that I think may have been, I don't know if David Frum came up with it, it may have been his only good phrase if he did.
It's called the soft bigotry of low expectations.
And I think Kamala didn't do great whatsoever.
I think on the issues that matter to swing voters, namely the economy, inflation, Trump did better.
I think Trump galvanized the base with his high energy and absolutely spot on comments on immigration.
And so for those reasons, I would myself give the edge to Trump.
Just look, playing the devil's advocate, I could see an argument that basically the bar is so low.
I mean, think of Biden's performance last time.
Like, that's basically where the bar is for the Democrats.
And so you could say for Kamala Harris, simply to demonstrate the lowest standards of plausibility for being able to occupy an office and kind of say stuff without Collapsing or looking completely and manifestly idiotic.
I think it's arguable that she may have passed that test.
And it's possible that the standards are actually so low that that in the end is the only relevant thing.
But again, my sense, my intuition is Trump actually won it.
It wasn't decisive.
I don't think it will fundamentally change the dynamics of the race.
But I continue to think what I propounded in our sort of classic analytical and strategic pieces at Revolver about the dynamics of the race and giving advice to Trump.
I think the more Trump exposes himself, his personality, the more people like him.
And fundamentally, the more Kamala Harris exposes herself, the less people like her because she's Unlikeable on a kind of visceral level that people might not even understand.
And I think this, perhaps more than anything, accounts for the fact that, for instance, now you look at prediction markets, she's doing worse than she was pre-debate.
Guys, let's pull that up if that's true.
I hadn't actually seen that, but I've been traveling a bit this morning, took the train down, so I was at the debate last night in the social media war room with the campaign, a lot of good friends there.
Woke up this morning, took the train back from Philadelphia, now back in D.C.
here, but this may have been something where...
And we're working on an editorial over at Human Events that talks a lot about this, and it's going to go up on humanevents.com after this, where if you're a member of sort of liberal Twitter, you think, oh yeah, we got the clap back.
And the three women in their mean girls circle sort of did their clap back at Donald Trump.
And they laughed at him from the mean girl table.
And that's what the entire debate was.
But if you're someone who's an activist, and whereas, of course, if you're a conservative, you're wondering, well, what's going on here?
Why aren't we having any discussions about the substantive issues?
President Trump bringing up very, by the way, very good economic questions about these bounce back jobs.
I believe is what he called it, saying that, you know, your economic growth has gone toward to jobs that were recreated after the lockdowns ended.
And then for any new jobs, it's all gone to these foreign low wage workers like the Haitians that you've all been importing in from 1600 miles away.
And by the way, look what they're doing to the, you know, the wildlife and the populace of Springfield, Ohio, just to name one town or Lima, Ohio, which is right next door.
You can go on and on with this.
Again, she had no substance.
So if you're a voter who's in one of these states that's in any of these situations, you don't care about the mean girl tactics.
You're sitting there wondering, why is it that she isn't doing all of this?
And that really was the line, I think, that President Trump landed the best.
Why aren't you doing all these things now when you're the one in office?
And by the way, I'll just say this because I haven't said it yet on air, but I would love, and Darren, I'll get your take on this.
I would love to see the campaign take Kamala's statements on war and America's role in war.
And President Trump of course bringing up the human cost, the lives lost on Ukraine's side, on Russia's side, Israel, Gaza.
Whereas Kamala runs in and says, we need America's ideals and we must stand with our allies and we must be strong in the world.
And so take her comments and then go back and find comments that are similar that were made by Dick Cheney, by John McCain, by Mitt Romney, by some of the most ardent neocons.
And just play it George W. Bush and just play it on a loop over and over and over because she really adopted.
and Hillary Clinton, of course, Hillary Clinton, Madeleine Albright, Victoria Nuland, all the rest.
Darren.
The connection is even more direct than that.
They're the party of war.
The connection is even more direct than that.
She explicitly affirmed John McCain and Dick Cheney at the debate.
So it's like, yes, I'm sure that her rhetoric in relation to foreign policy is similar, but it's not even that disguised.
She explicitly endorsed them.
And basically bragged about the fact that she said, Oh, how about this Trump?
Look at all of these, you know, Bush hacks, these Bush failures that ran the country into the ground.
And basically like no serious person would, would disagree with that, including Democrats up until recently, at least were smart enough, or at least partisan enough to say that Bush was a disaster.
She gets up there and she brags about the fact that all of these washed up former Bush people, including Dick Cheney, and I think she mentioned Liz too, And John McCain, the disgraced John McCain, one of the most disgraced names in American politics, she gets up there and she brags about it.
So I think that just reinforced, yeah, she's a part of the war party now.
You could see that in her comments on NATO.
You could see that in her comments on Ukraine.
And Trump had, you know, very great answers on this stuff.
First of all, he said Russia wouldn't have even gone into Ukraine had they not seen the disaster of Biden's withdrawal from Afghanistan, which could very well be true.
And secondly, he said, look, he was baited into this question.
Who do you want to win the war?
He's like, I want the war to stop because who's winning it now?
America's losing because all of our money is going to corrupt oligarchs and defense contractors.
But I guess they're the same thing.
All our money is going there.
More Ukrainians are dying needlessly and Russians are dying needlessly.
Nobody benefits except for the worst scum on the earth.
So he's asked, well, you know, who do you want to win the war?
I just want to end the war.
So I think he really leaned into another major comparative advantage, undeniable comparative advantage, that Donald Trump is the peace candidate.
And I know that most of the electorate The electorate is totally bored with, totally uninterested in foreign policy, but the electorate is interested in peace.
The electorate doesn't want another disaster like the Iraq war.
The electorate doesn't want to send hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars ad infinitum to Ukraine for no purpose.
Everybody's tired of it.
We're almost as tired of that as we are of the government dumping Haitians in the neighborhoods to go and eat geese and dogs or whatever else that they eat.
They're eating the dogs!
They're eating the cats!
They're eating the ducks!
They're eating... By the way, we found Honduran migrants in Nebraska were eating a bald eagle last year, which is actually a federal crime.
And again, you can find story after story.
And we've got people, Frontline has sent people down, which is fantastic for Turning Point.
They're running around and just talking to people.
Just talking to people.
There's YouTubers going down.
Taylor Hanson is down there.
Folks, ABC and David Muir, the three ladies at the debate last night, the mean girl tactics, they're not going to win.
People can see the truth.
We'll be right back here.
Human Events continues.
I rolled with bloods, and them boys had a saying.
You can't be listening to all that slappy, whack, trimatizolitsabam ship, nippy-bam-bam, like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
All right, Jack Pacific back live, Washington, D.C.
Back in D.C., first time in about a week since I've been on the road.
We were down in Texas, we were up in filthy Delphia, and now we are back in D.C.
Folks, the world is in flames and Kamala Harris is a complete and total disaster, but I cannot and will not ruin my day.
Do you know why?
It's because I start my day with a hot America First cup of blackout coffee.
This coffee is 100% Americana.
Blackout Coffee 100% committed to conservative values from sourcing the beans to the roasting process.
Customer support and shipping.
They embody true American values and accept no compromise on taste or quality.
Look, I love this stuff.
Wouldn't be able to travel the way that I do running around dealing with goblin bellies like we were dealing with the communists in filthy Delphia yesterday.
How do I do it?
I go to blackoutcoffee.com slash poso and I use promo code poso20 for 20% off.
Your first order.
Back to school, of course, is going on right now.
We got back to school night tonight.
And so it's never too soon to give mom and those close to your heart the gift of being awake, not woke, with Blackout Coffee.
Darren, I'd like to ask you an interesting question.
There was a moment where David Muir brought up January 6th.
He talked about it at length.
Kamala Harris mentioned being there on January 6th, but her answer was very vague as to where she was and the conditions under which she found herself.
She mentioned, she sort of made a general sense that she was also at risk.
Yet, she didn't get into the specifics of why.
And I remembered our conversations in that moment, and I believe this is only the second time that she's ever actually spoken about it publicly.
And I just have to give props.
You were right.
She did not mention the pipe bomb.
You know, I think this is so weird.
As people know, people have been following this.
You know, I've been on this pipe bomb story from the very beginning, you know.
Uh, in repetition, and there are a lot of details about the pipe bomb.
People should just go to revolver.news and get caught up if they're interested.
But one of the more interesting things with Kamala is we just confirmed from the IG report that was vigorously suppressed by the corrupt open borders zealot, Mayorkas.
It came out and it confirmed that Kamala Harris, her motorcade came within 20 feet of these pipe bombs on January 6th that the FBI maintains were viable devices.
She was in the building as the pipe bombs were discovered, and then she was evacuated.
And so leaving aside the universe of damning details about the pipe bomb that is outside the scope of our conversation here, just ask yourself, the most politically opportunistic creature on the planet, other than maybe Hillary and some others, Kamala Harris, Why would she forgo the opportunity to milk politically the fact that she almost lost her life to this ostensible MAGA pipe bomb?
You know, the whole media, all the Democrats, they've been bending over backwards to give us this false narrative of January 6th as this uniquely deadly terrorist event.
In fact, Kamala Harris herself last night said it was the worst thing since the Civil War.
Gone to great lengths, even lied multiple times, including about officers dying.
They said this one particular officer was bludgeoned to death.
That turned out to be false.
So they bent over backwards to lie to support this false narrative.
And yet one thing that they actually don't have to lie about is that Kamala Harris indeed was in the DNC building, and she did indeed come within a hair's width of this pipe bomb on January 6th.
You would think, ordinarily, this should be the number one talking point about January 6th.
Instead, it's their most carefully guarded secret, to the point that Kamala Harris outright lies.
Last night, when given the opportunity to say, hey, I almost lost my life, and think of the parallelism there of she saying, well, look, I know Trump had an assassination attempt, but I had it first.
You know, to even it out a little bit.
And so, just to jump in here real quick, that, so she could have brought that up.
She could have talked about this.
Would have been a great moment for her, by the way, to seemingly put, you know, show herself in a good light, say that she's taking the high road, show that she's able to do that.
And I think a lot of those undecided Americans would look at this and say, wow, that was incredible.
I expected her to be partisan.
She wasn't.
She didn't do it!
She didn't do it.
I'm puzzled by this.
It's obvious to me why she wouldn't have done this from the beginning, because she didn't want to draw attention to the pipe bomb at all, and she didn't want to get pesky researchers like me looking into it.
But that cat's out of the bag, you know.
Hopefully no Haitian comes and eats it.
But that cat is out of the bag.
That's long since gone.
So at this juncture, I don't understand why Kamala wouldn't just, even to try to shut people like me up, just say, hey, yeah, I was at the DNC.
I narrowly escaped the pipe bomb.
That's not going to really change the dynamics at this point, because it's already in the end stage.
They're already in cover-up mode.
We've already published more than enough material to satisfy any intellectually honest person.
That the January 6th pipe bomb thing was an operation and fake.
So I don't get why, at this point, she's still holding on to this cover-up.
It's like, what do you have to lose?
Just say it and, you know, take a little wind out of my sails.
Undermine my talking point a little bit.
Why, even at this late stage, is she so adamant about not talking about this?
I honestly find it extremely strange and I don't have any explanation.
Well, and in addition, we can see the other corollary to that with President Trump, when he is the one, so we get a question about January 6th, which is four years ago, by the way, yet, so that's J6, J13 was less than two months ago.
Less than two months ago, Donald Trump almost had his head blown off.
on live television and Andrew Kloster's cut this great tweet where Trump says, excuse me.
So yeah, I was there and I almost had my head taken off by an assassin who was shooting him and then David Muir cuts him off.
Sir, sir, we've got a lot to get to.
We've got a lot to get to.
Yes.
It's never once talked about again.
And And I hate to do the, you know, the sort of cliche conservative thing, but just consider for a moment, had Kamala Harris been the one shot at, at an event, or Barack Obama, and just it would be the only thing spoken about by mainstream media.
And I'll go out and say, it's a failure.
It's a failure of conservative media, particularly Fox, particularly Newsmax, many of these guys, To not highlight this, to not highlight the story.
Melania Trump, by the way, cut a fantastic video yesterday where she's the one who brought it back up again.
We, by the way, over at Human Events and myself and Joshua Lysak, are releasing the first book on the assassination attempt on Trump.
We get into Crooks.
We have an, and Darren, you and I will need to discuss off air about some of the things that we've uncovered in my private investigators' independent investigation into Thomas Matthew Crooks.
But that remains to be seen.
But the book is called Bulletproof and it comes out soon.
But Darren, it's never even talked about.
It's never even brought up as a topic of discussion, and it's almost as if it didn't happen.
No, it's really incredible, and look, I've talked to people, even people, you know, in national security world, even people who are kind of, you know, left-leaning and things, and nobody serious can even look at Butler and say that There's not a very real possibility that there was a setup that was an inside setup to assassinate Trump.
And maybe this is why the pipe bomb thing is so sensitive right now, kind of answering my own question, because that surveillance footage that you showed of the pipe bomb being discovered at the DNC, part of the bombshell there is that it shows Kamala Harris's secret service detail.
They clearly knew that the bomb was fake in advance because they stand around, do nothing, and they let a group of children walk right by it.
Kamala Harris's Secret Service knew in advance that the bomb was fake.
And so the Secret Service is an interesting parallel, if not link, between the pipe bomb hoax, the pipe bomb operation, And the Butler operation, where at the very least, the Secret Service, they make one mistake, you could chalk it up to incompetence.
They make a hundred impossible mistakes together, you start to wonder if there's something more than incompetence.
So, Darren, actually... Under the DHS, the same Secret Service that's housed within the DHS, the most corrupt and politically weaponized bureaucracy within the deep state.
We actually go and in one part of the book, and I'll just reveal this, we took what we call the 12 independent security failures of Butler PA and we input all of them into GPT-4 Omni.
And GPT-4 Omni is the latest iteration from OpenAI that you can get.
And so we went into GPT-4 Omni and said, what actually are the probabilities of all of these things happening at the same time that a malicious gunman, by happenstance, decides to attend a rally and take a shot at President Trump?
The answer that we got back was one in one septillion was the probability from GPT-4 Omni.
And actually, GPT-4 Omni responded to us, and I don't have the exact quote on me, but it said, Essentially, the sheer high level of unlikelihood that these things happened all by chance are a true cause for concern.
That's GPT-4.
Yeah.
No, absolutely.
I know we've spoken about before, of all of this improbable stuff happening just within a narrow window in which it would be particularly useful to the regime at the point After Biden's disastrous debate performance and before Trump names his VP ticket.
That's a very critical window.
The extreme rarity emphasizes how statistically improbable such an event is, suggesting that if it occurs, it might not be due to mere chance.
As you say, J.D.
Vance was not yet chosen at that point.
He was chosen two days later.
There was still time.
The ticket was not set.
And, by the way, The nomination for president had not happened yet.
So the convention at that point was still potentially open.
That's why this matters.
Darren Beattie, where can people follow you and get access to Revolver?
Revolver.news.
We have some special new things right at the top, our full analysis of the debate.
And for people who are interested, Sticking it to the regime.
We've got Fedsurrection merch now.
So, I hope to be wearing that soon.
Check it out.
Fedsurrection.
Oh, man.
And a lot more.
We'll have to get some graphics next time you come on.
We're definitely going to be promoting that.
Darren Beatty, Revolver.
Check him out, folks.
Rich Barris joins us after the break.
Human Events.
Where's Jack?
Where's Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting policies.
Jack Persily, back live, Human Events Daily, folks.
I gotta tell you about Human Events' newest episode sponsor.
We get the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure.
All right, come on.
We know AI might be, and probably is, the most important new computer technology ever, storming every industry, and literally billions of dollars are being invested, so buckle up.
The problem is that AI needs a lot of speed and processing power.
So, how do you compete without your costs spiraling out of control?
It's time to upgrade to the next generation of the cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure OCI.
OCI is a single platform for your infrastructure database, application developments, and AI needs for all the business owners, business managers out there.
OCI has four to eight times the bandwidth of other clouds, offers one consistent price instead of that variable regional pricing, and of course, nobody does data better than Oracle.
So now you can train your AI models at twice the speed and less than half the cost of the other clouds.
If you want to do more and spend less, like Uber, 8x8, and Databricks Mosaic, take a free test drive of OCI at oracle.com slash jack.
Very excited, folks, to get Rich Barris on here, the People's Pundit.
Rich, how you doing, man?
Living the dream as always, my friend.
How you doing?
Thanks for having me.
So we have breaking news, all the news that we saw last night.
We actually do have another piece of breaking news.
And guys, if you've got that graphic up, Darren Beattie mentioned this.
We went back to double check.
And yes, Darren was exactly correct here in the last segment.
Donald Trump back up in poly market national trends.
He's 50% to 49.
This is the one and that's the poly markets, the one that's got the most money in it.
There's a lot of crypto in there.
Again, this is a huge market.
And so for all all of liberal Twitter last night said and Drudge Report, which is a huge part of liberal Twitter and the three women that Trump was debating up on that stage last night, we're all in agreement.
This was the end of Trump.
This was the end of it.
He was out.
You know, he's never coming back.
And yet he's up in poly markets today.
Rich, to what do you attribute this seemingly inexplicable development?
Yeah, I think they're starting to see what we're starting to see, which honestly is surprising me a little bit.
The data is rolling in and undecided voters didn't feel the same way.
Are you saying they didn't feel the joy, Rich?
Please do.
They didn't feel the joy?
Are you saying they didn't feel the joy, Rich? - Not at all.
And I got, I mean, I'm starting, the picture's starting to develop and I can get into some specifics here, but I think, you know, by a traditional sense, you know, the pundit class and how we traditionally gauge these things, you could say she won.
And Hillary Clinton won every snap poll too in 2016.
But then when you would talk to the undecideds, they would tell you something very different, even if they thought she won on like style points, you know, When it came to policy and what they're voting on, she did not win.
And then something else happened to Hillary Clinton.
She got very unpopular because the more people saw her, the less they liked her.
A couple of things here.
One, the policy.
There are voters who are undecided, who might even have leaned Kamala before this debate, that were watching this thing.
They needed an excuse to vote for her, and all she gave them was an excuse to vote against Trump, and that was not good enough for these people.
So they thought maybe she was an empty shell and was hoping that she would prove them wrong, and she didn't.
That's number one.
She did not meet the presidential justification, right?
Why are you running?
Why you now, right?
And Obama had it.
Trump had it.
I mean, God, even Biden had it, whether you liked it or not, even though it was a little bit difficult to figure out.
And then there's another thing I got to be just fully honest with.
And I guess people don't have the courage to say it, but I'm going to say it.
She, those facial expressions, how she looked.
And I think what happened is that they told her no cackling.
Men don't like the cackling.
Certain women don't like cackling.
You sound ridiculous.
And it comes across very badly.
It's unpopular.
No cackling.
And instead of cackling, she was making these awkward, even nasty facial expressions.
We speak a lot through body language.
Most communication is non-verbal.
And I'm telling you, we're hearing it all last night and today.
We're not like others who snap all at 1130 at night.
We wait until the next day and we're starting to get around of the people who were undecided in our last poll, who agreed to answer a couple of questions after the debate, if they watch it.
And it's not going well for Kamala Harris.
And that's what we're hearing.
It's like the men who were undecided, Jack, which is different from Biden.
When Biden was in the race, it was mostly women still undecided.
Now it's mostly men.
And the men are like, gone, bro.
That boat has sailed.
And some of the women that she was trying to, you know, win over and really kind of just wanted an excuse to vote for her, she did not cross them well.
She just didn't.
And it was this, why Trump is bad fest.
That worked in 16.
It's not going to work this year.
And there's a reason for that.
One is, they remember the Trump presidency.
And everyone is saying my life was better under Trump.
And she had to convince me that she would somehow do something different than Biden.
And she's not.
And she didn't.
And that's the problem.
So even as surprised as I am, This thing seems to be going well for him.
Oh, and by the way, the same media that three to one him last night for an hour and change, right, is the same media that just lied to them about the state of Joe Biden's mental capacity.
You know, they hid his senility and they blame her as well.
And You know, it's backfiring.
There's no love for them right now, Jack, and for them to have done that, it's just that they're unbelievably unaware.
So, Rich, we just put up on humanevents.com, and we were working on this editorial, and I was on the train down from Philly to D.C., kind of going through this, and we came up with the headline, Last Night was Trump vs. the Mean Girls.
And if anyone remembers the movie Mean Girls, that's what it was.
It was the mean girl tactics the whole night.
It said, oh, don't worry about that.
And then she just laughs and it comes across.
And you're like, what are you what are you doing here?
Like, you're not even making any sense.
We're trying to have a conversation.
Trump's talking about bounce back numbers and the jobs, the the the foreign labor market that being imported, that they're the ones that are actually getting the jobs.
He's making these these fantastic arguments, things that would, by the way, Thomas Sowell, Thomas Sowell would have been proud of President Trump's, or I guess he could be still proud of President Trump's performance last night in his attempt to talk about the actual economic issues.
But Kamala Harris runs in and she said, oh, a tariff is a Trump sales tax.
I'd love for him to have turned and said, define a tariff, Kamala Harris.
Just define what a tariff is for everybody so that we could see that you know what you're talking about.
People are sick of the mean girl tactics.
The undecided, when you just told me that the majority of undecideds are men, well, there you go.
Men can't stand that crap because it's all about this.
Oh, because all right, I'm just gonna say it.
I'm just going to say it.
All right, I have to say it.
Women seek truth through consensus.
Men seek truth through objectivity.
What is objectively true versus what the group thinks is true?
Rich, what do I mean by that?
Yeah, I mean, that's kind of true.
We're different, certainly different between men and women.
Women appear to be a little bit more social.
You know, they're more and that's why, by the way, they're more subjected to or they're more susceptible is a better word.
What is it?
What is the social desirability to bias?
What does that mean?
So let's say there's a woman who really does like what Trump is saying, but like the Tupperware party that she attends every Thursday night is just going on and on, cackling like Kamala about how Trump's such a bad, not decent person.
She would be more inclined to be swayed by that social pressure than a man.
I mean, that's just the truth.
I mean, it's all in our polls.
It's peer pressure.
It's peer pressure.
Ear pressure.
But guess what?
You know who's the most susceptible to it?
Educated supermen.
Low-testosterone men.
And low-testosterone... And low-testosterone men.
Yeah, the Dane County boba sippers, bro.
Like, they're the worst when it comes to that.
Well, when we're talking about males, the male sex anyway.
But I'll tell you, check this out.
53-year-old woman from California leans to the left, has voted for squishy Republicans in the past, but typically votes Democrat, doesn't like Trump, doesn't like MAGA, certainly has forever, said that last night was the best she's ever seen, Donald Trump.
The best she's ever seen.
She was leaning to Harris before this debate, and now she's voting for Trump.
That's crazy to me.
I mean, I just cannot believe what I'm hearing.
Did she say why?
Did she explain why?
Substance.
It was just like all about she didn't like how she came across, but it really didn't matter to her because Trump rubs her the wrong way attitudinally as well.
So it really came down to, like, she did not hear anything but, Trump's a bad guy.
Trump's a bad man.
You can't vote for Trump.
And I guess she's getting to an age where she's just over that crap, Jack.
And she knows she's dealing with real-world problems.
She wants somebody to make it better.
She did say, I didn't like it, but life was better under Trump.
You know, economy was better.
I don't like I didn't like it because I didn't want to give him any credit for it but here we are now you know so uh you know it's kind of like this realization and that she's a see-through candidate she's a see-through you mentioned Tupperware she is the Tupperware candidate she's see-through she's saran wrap there's nothing there there's nothing inside if you want substance you gotta go with the real thing right back Human Events Daily Rich Barris
...ear about the boring people at your office and trying to listen to the new human events with Jack Pazovic.
Jim, back live, Human Events Daily.
Folks, we're going through these breaking numbers about how the undecided voters, as it turns out, the true undecided voters, tend to be breaking terms.
They didn't like the Mean Girls treatment, the gang up, the struggle session that they were trying to put him through last night.
He's trying to have serious discussions about serious issues in the real world.
She's talking about phantom abstractions.
And he's talking about, look, you got migrants running around in the Midwest.
You've got inflation running out of control.
Nobody's able to get a job.
You're lying about these bounce back numbers.
You slashed a million jobs off the rolls from the Bureau of Labor Studies again and again and again.
You just keep lying about the state of the country.
And then, oh, by the way, an assassin tried to take me out two months ago because of things that you have been saying about me.
And then she continued to repeat them.
There was no substantive follow up or discussion on that.
So ever.
And now the Undecideds, they're like, you know what?
We're sick of this crap.
We want to go with the guy who is it.
Do we like the way he says it?
No, but we appreciate the fact that he's not lying to us.
And if you're someone, and Rich, what do we always say about the Rust Belt?
I'll pass it to you.
We always say they vote with their wallets.
And if you're someone who votes with your wallet and you turned in last night, was there anything of substance for you?
- No, I mean, there wasn't.
And just to give, I was looking during the break just to give people an update.
We had asked undecideds from the last poll if you're gonna participate.
I mean, if you're gonna watch the debate and 88% said they were going to, which I didn't believe, but people sometimes say that. - No, never. - But we're actually getting, no, but they said they would.
So we said, would you mind if we ask you some follow up after the debate?
And so we're collecting them today.
This thing's two to one.
It's actually not quite two to one.
It's like 66 and change to 31.
So as far as those who have decided, the undecided number has gotten very small, which means it's like less people to persuade.
And we're not the only one finding this.
Reuters got a story on it.
Listen to what this guy said.
I read to you during the break.
People should hear this.
48-year-old guy, Biden voter, was leaning to Harris before the debate.
He said, quote, I felt like the whole debate was Kamala Harris telling me why not to vote for Donald Trump instead of why she's the right candidate.
He said if the election was held today, he would vote for Trump because Harris didn't provide any clarity on her policies.
And there is a reason for that, Jack, and you got into it before.
They're trying to pull a Biden 2.0 here where they hide her and who she is and make general statements about policy.
The problem is they're not going to get away with it.
It doesn't look like anyway, this time because people took their word for it last time.
They said, well, no, we don't want to shut down the Keystone Pipeline.
The first damn thing they did in office was shut the Keystone Pipeline down and thousands of people lost their jobs and even more supportive jobs from the Keystone Pipeline in Pennsylvania.
You know what I mean?
I remember it like it was yesterday, Trump having to put them on the teletron in Erie County during one of his rallies, showing past statements because the media was holding water for the Biden-Harris ticket.
And it just seems like Even people who want Harris to give them a reason to vote against Trump, she's not doing it.
And let's not forget something.
This was the most unpopular vice president before this propaganda narrative pushed by the media.
This was the most unpopular vice president in history.
More unpopular than Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney, all right?
And then she suddenly bursted up to popularity because of a fake Narrative.
I mean, it's fake.
It's not real.
And then I guess maybe what happened last night is that she went on the screen and people remembered why they didn't like her six months ago.
And that is a problem.
And you know what else, too?
And what else, too, is you had someone up there.
It's like in football, right?
It's when your quarterback drops back to go for the pass.
It's you have the defensive line is all there and they give him the time.
They give him the time that he needs to make the pass.
That's how these women moderators were doing with Muir and Davis.
They're blocking Trump.
They're doing everything they can to block him.
Hold him back.
Hold him back.
Block him back.
And she's able to drop back.
She's in the pocket.
She's looking around.
Okay, I'm going to throw here.
I'm going to run this play.
I'm going to do this.
That's what she's doing.
Meanwhile, he can't get to her because they keep jumping in to cut him off again and again and again.
And to me, It goes back to what you just said, perhaps it actually has gotten to the point where people out there in the country, and we've seen this of course with Elon Musk, we've seen it with Sean McGuire from Sequoia, people like David Sachs, people like the All In podcast, and not all of them but a lot of them, that a lot of the RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, Nicole Shanahan, these people are saying, you know what?
We're sick of this crap, this corporate crap.
And Donald Trump is, it showed to me, and I'd love for Trump to say this as well.
He talks about it, but he's got to say it publicly.
I'm up against a system.
There is a system that's against me.
And more importantly, they're against you.
This is the system.
Kamala Harris is just the face of it.
She's the puppet.
They're the ones that are actually running things.
And then you see things like ABC, which is totally controlled by Disney, one of the largest multinationals in the world.
Then you just, you, once you see it, you can't unsee it.
Run by somebody who's personal friends of Kamala Harris and literally introduced Kamala Harris to her husband.
I mean, this is, and that's why Trump has to articulate this a little bit better, but I think what, and not a little bit, I would say a lot of it, but the thing he has going for him.
Is that if you're the undecided voter who isn't thrilled about either one of them personally, but you know Trump has a record and then the Biden administration has a record and they were giving, honestly, the voters, some of those voters were giving her the time.
Look, we're not the only ones.
The New York Times poll showed those undecided, said we need to know more about Kamala Harris.
We don't know enough about her.
Also, half the country said she was too liberal and only 40% said she was just about right.
Half the country said Trump was in the middle, the political middle, just about right.
And only 37% said that he was too far to the right.
So there's already like structural disadvantages there.
She needed to meet that presidential bar and she didn't meet it.
So she had a decent performance that is enough for the Washington punditry class and even myself.
It was bad.
I don't think people should not underestimate the impact of those smug faces.
this thing but it wasn't a knockout and honestly those style points are not enough to overcome what people saw non-verbally i'm telling you it was bad i don't think people should not underestimate the impact of those smug faces george herbert walker bush looked at his watch jack one time and he did himself you know one time he's like i'm a little busy for this you know i mean she refused to acknowledge that and just like all the political class out there
they were fused and by the way by the way one one bad one bad one bad News cycle from an illegal alien and she bought it.
I don't think she realizes how much debt she took on, how much baggage she potentially took on by doing the things that she did.
Rich Barris, the People's Pundit, give him a follow, folks.
By the way, huge shout out and also I would like to take just one moment to say A very special happy birthday to the editor-in-chief of the Postmillennial and Human Events, Libby Emmons.
