June 19, 2024 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
48:41
The Migrant Summer of Violence Continues...Biden Down BAD in Polls
Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec:Save up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSOGo to FIRINGSQUADFILM.COM to purchase tickets and learn more about this extraordinary film. That’s FIRINGSQUADFILM.COMGo to https://www.BlackoutCoffee.com/POSO and use promo code POSO20 for 20% OFF your first order.Secure your online data TODAY by visiting ExpressVPN.COM/POSO. You can get an extra three months FREE.Support the Show.
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Sign up today.
It's called the Pozo Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Totally free.
The Pozo Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
It is an in-your-face show of unity born of necessity.
Kim provides Russia hundreds of thousands of artillery rounds and missiles for its war in Ukraine.
And in return, Kim is hoping Putin will help him with his nuclear and ballistic missile program.
And indeed, after hours of meetings, the two leaders did pledge support for one another in what Putin called a fight against the imperialist policies of the U.S.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is calling on the U.S.
to send more weapons to support its war against Moss.
Netanyahu just released a video saying the Israeli military needs the tools in order to, quote, finish the job a lot faster.
I said it's inconceivable that in the past few months, the administration has been withholding weapons and ammunitions to Israel.
In a landmark decision, President Biden just signed a new executive action that will shield undocumented spouses of U.S.
citizens from deportation.
The program will protect an estimated 500,000 undocumented migrants who have lived in the U.S.
for over a decade.
After a long investigation, Rachel's murder is no longer a free man.
The Hartford County Sheriff says Rachel Warren's killer has finally been caught.
Authorities in Tulsa, OK took 23 year old Victor Martinez Hernandez into custody late Friday night.
He's been charged for killing and raping Moran on the Mom Pod trail in Bel Air in August of last year.
According to investigators, Martinez Hernandez is a citizen of El Salvador.
They say he killed a woman there in January of 2023, then illegally fled to the United States a month later.
After already facing street justice, Christian Inga now awaits a judge and jury.
The 25-year-old, caught by nearly a dozen neighborhood vigilantes, Police say Inga is the man who attacked two 13-year-olds last week and forced them into the woods at knife point.
It's there where authorities say he sexually assaulted the 13-year-old girl.
Police say Inga is a migrant from Ecuador who entered the U.S.
through Eagle Pass, Texas back in 2021.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily, live once again from Washington DC.
Today is June 19, 2024.
Anno Domini.
So I got a message up here for MSNBC in general and Joy Reid in particular.
Here's my response.
Joy Reid, you want to say my name?
Well, here's a couple of names that you're not saying.
Here's a couple of names that you won't say.
Joy Reid.
How about Lakin Riley?
And Lakin Riley's killer, Jose Antonio Ibarra, a Venezuelan illegal.
How about Rachel Morin?
Her murderer, Victor Antonio Martinez Hernandez, an El Salvador illegal.
How about the 13-year-old girl who was tied up and brutally raped in a park in Queens by Christian Giovanni Ina Landi?
An Ecuadorian illegal.
By the way, an Ecuadorian illegal who received what we like to call a different kind of justice.
What we like to call a more localized version of justice.
You see, this is what MSNBC won't tell you.
What Joy Reid won't tell you.
She'll complain about Jack Posobiec, and she'll complain about Donald Trump every single day, no matter what we do.
And yet she won't say the names of the brutal killers that are terrorizing our people, that are terrorizing this country, This unhuman freak up in Queens took a 13-year-old girl and tied her up, then tied up her boyfriend at knife point and made him watch while he raped a child in front of him.
And then left.
He said that they had to stay there or he would come back and kill them.
This is the kind of freakish violence that's going on in America's cities.
This is New York City, ladies and gentlemen, in this summer 2024.
So I ask yourself, Is this what the media is talking about?
Is this what MSNBC is focusing on?
No, they don't want to focus on this.
They don't want to focus on, what are we calling them?
Oh yeah, Biden's newcomers.
They don't want to tell you about what Biden's newcomers are doing to this country.
They don't want to tell you about the five children of Rachel Moran who have to grow up without a mother now in Bel Air, Maryland.
Because she was raped and murdered on a hiking trail by one of Biden's newcomers.
No, MSNBC, Joy Reid, they don't want to talk about that.
Well guess what?
We will and we're not going to stop.
We're back.
We will.
We will.
Jumping on my computer.
Going to preorder town.
Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications so you'll never miss a clip.
You'll never miss a new live episode and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
You talk about influences.
These are influences and they're friends of mine.
Jack Posobiec.
Where's Jack?
He's done a great job.
All right, Jack Posobiec.
We're back live.
Folks, I gotta tell you, going online without ExpressVPN is like not having a case to your phone.
Most of the time, you'll probably be fine, but all it takes is one drop and you wish you spent those extra few dollars on a case.
Listen to this.
Every time you connect to an unencrypted network, cafes, hotels, airports, wherever, your online data is not secure.
Any hacker or state or non-state actor on the same network can gain access to and steal your personal data.
They'll steal your passwords, your bank logins, your credit card info, all while you're sipping a latte reading the latest from human events.
That's why you need to prepare and stay frosty using ExpressVPN.
It would take a hacker with a supercomputer over, seriously, over a billion years, billion with a capital B, to get past ExpressVPN's encryption.
Look, you need to use ExpressVPN.
I use this thing when I travel.
We're going around.
We're using airports.
We're in different places.
You need to be safe.
I need to be safe.
You never know who's going to pull up your browsing history next.
So secure your online data today.
Here's what all of the Human Events audience, all the Patriots within my voice, it is incumbent upon you.
ExpressVPN.com slash poso.
That's E-X-P-R-E-S-S-V-P-N dot com slash poso.
And you can get, check this out, an extra three months free.
ExpressVPN.com slash poso.
All right, folks, we're very excited.
To bring on our next guest because this has a sense of urgency.
We are only, and I'm just going to say it folks, we are a week and a half away.
We are a week and a half away from when Stephen K. Bannon, the leader of the war room posse, is set and has been ordered to surrender himself to the Department of Justice, the Bureau of Prisons.
Jeff Clark, former Attorney General Associate, is now on with us here in the Trump administration, by the way, to explain how there is a way that the currently constituted House of Representatives can actually undo what was done by the to explain how there is a way that the currently constituted House of Representatives can And we cannot forget that it is inseparable.
The subpoena that Stephen K. Bannon was ordered to respond to came from an illegitimate committee.
But of course, the current House of Representatives is now controlled by Republicans.
At the time, it was controlled by Democrats.
Jeff Clark is back to walk us through the steps.
Jeff, how are you?
I'm good.
Good to be with you, Jack.
And this is highly important.
So I'm glad to be here with your audience to explain what's going on.
Well, this is great.
And all credit, by the way, to Matt Gaetz.
He came out and really gave a lot of life to this.
Roger Stone has also been someone I know has been polling for it.
But I haven't been walked through all the legalities and the process of it yet.
So what is the process by which the currently sitting House of Representatives can declare the Jan 6th Committee and declare those subpoenas illegitimate?
Sure, so there are three options, Jack, in order of, you know, highest aggressiveness to least aggressiveness.
So let me start with the first.
That's the Congress, the House, passing a resolution by majority vote that basically disclaims, repudiates the January 6th process.
It was established in violation of law in multiple respects.
It didn't have a ranking minority member.
It did not have, therefore, a minority counsel who needed to get equal time in any depositions.
And the January 6th committee under Nancy Pelosi, Bennie Thompson, Liz Cheney, they tried to cover up for these defects by naming Liz Cheney the vice chair of the committee, making her kind of an ersatz ranking minority member.
who could appoint a Rahim minority council, but it doesn't work, it didn't work.
They realized they couldn't really claim that.
They just tried to sort of pass that off for anyone who might buy that for appearances sake.
And so all of the depositions they conducted, all of the subpoenas they issued, Jack, all of those are what lawyers call ultra virus, They're all outside of the committee's authority.
And it's entirely proper for the House of Representatives, under new management now, to say that fact and just pronounce that the rules of the House established for the January 6th Select Committee were not followed.
And for that reason, the very base act that Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro were found guilty of in criminal contempt of Congress for disobeying is a nothing burger because, you know, you have to have something that's proper in order to to unlawfully disobey it.
That's the starting step.
So there's a resolution that's been introduced by Representative Burleson, and there are 24 other signatories at that to this point.
I call them the Stalwart 25.
And I think that what your posse, Jack in Human Events, needs to do, and anyone from War Room Posse who's watching as well, you need to get with your representative and you need to advocate to them that they need to sign on to this petition.
Well, okay, so this is huge.
So, they sign on to the petition, the petition goes forward, the Jan 6th Committee is then declared illegitimate, the subpoenas then are rescinded.
So, if the subpoenas are rescinded, let's say, best case scenario, all this happened today, where does it go tomorrow?
It's not like the Bureau of Prisons just automatically says Steve Bannon doesn't have to surrender, so how does it work from that step?
So, Jack, look, you know, you can expect maximum resistance from the Biden-Garland Justice Department, right?
We know that as soon as night follows day.
So, if the resolution is passed, I would expect that Steve Bannon's lawyers would immediately present the evidence of that, an official copy, which is judicially noticeable, to the D.C.
Circuit in the first instance, that's the appellate court with jurisdiction over Steve at this point, and then to the U.S.
Supreme Court, failing that, Arguing that, you know, the leg of the stool that holds all of this nonsense up, you know, this made up misdemeanor from hell that's really never used against anyone who happens to be a Democrat.
They've flouted congressional subpoenas many times with impunity.
And then, you know, arguments need to be made that Steve definitely, in light of this, should be able to stay out pending his appeal, pending his cert petition.
To the U.S.
Supreme Court asking them to take this result and his improper trial, where basically he couldn't present any defenses of himself, Jack.
As you know, he wanted to present a defense that his lawyers had advised him that since President Trump had invoked executive privilege, that he had a reason and he was not in willful disobedience of a subpoena.
And they prevented him from saying that.
Instead, the jury was essentially misinformed, even though it was a biased D.C.
jury.
As most of them are given their political makeup, but they were sort of led to believe that, you know, Steve just thumbed his nose at a congressional subpoena without more.
But that's not what he did.
He got sophisticated legal counsel.
He was advised not to show up.
And that defeats willfulness right there.
And under our criminal laws, there is no basis for reading willfully as to have some kind of special, different meaning when you're talking about congressional subpoenas compared to when we're talking about committing other purported types of crime.
So that would be the first step.
The resolution passes, then it would be put in briefing and motions practice before the D.C.
Circuit and the Supreme Court.
And the other two options, right, are that, you know, the next one is that the BLAG would act, and I know you've spoken about this, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, which is headed up by Speaker Johnson.
And that group controls so and Republicans controlled by a three to two majority.
They can file an amicus brief with the court system.
Arguing that the, you know, the whole rug has been pulled out from under the illegitimate January 6th committee and they can help Steve that way.
And the last thing, which certainly can be done, is that Speaker Johnson could just write a letter to the courts and say, this is my understanding as Speaker of the House, as informed by my general counsel, That, you know, we now believe that these subpoenas were illegitimate because the committee was operating in violation of the rules that even the Nancy Pelosi house had established in the 117th Congress, Jack.
Well, and there you go.
So all of us, because this, this is kind of like, it's, it's similar and, and, you know, folks around here know I've said a million times, I'm not an attorney, but this reminds me of something similar to a fruit of the poison tree argument.
Yes, exactly.
You know, the fountain of error here is the fact that the January 6th Committee was established in violation of law.
Let's just start with the fact that it was supposed to have 13 members, but Nancy Pelosi only put nine members on there.
Then second, under, you know, long-established House procedures, you know, the majority party doesn't get to pick the membership of the minority party, right?
The minority party picks that.
And then we have a scrum.
an adversary process that takes place based on the respective strength of the two parties in the House or in the Senate.
And it's that which Nancy Pelosi shortcutted by saying, "Oh no, no, no, you can't put Jim Jordan, "you can't put Jim Banks on this committee.
"I'm gonna pick the members.
"I want Liz Cheney and I want Adam Kinzinger." Right, very convenient people who carry a Republican label, ostensibly, but are deadly Trump haters. - That's not how it's supposed to work at all.
Right.
Precisely.
These guys had already decided to go all in with the Democrat narrative.
Exactly.
And look, it is, as I pointed out many times in my own briefs, right, since I've had my own subpoena fights with this committee, the committee voted every single time I've ever seen in the public record, we don't know about any secret votes they might have taken, over preliminary votes, nine to zero.
So it had nine members every time they had to present a vote, they would say, would they all voted for it, right?
So it was just a monolith that was handcrafted by Nancy Pelosi to reach a predetermined result.
And I also think that that's not just in violation of the traditions of the House, it's in violation of basic due process.
If something the House does is gonna turn into something that can send somebody to jail, where they lose their liberty, right?
A process like that is, you know, a joke of a sham.
You know, it's a mockery.
It's a direct due process violation.
Goes right back to the Fifth Amendment, ladies and gentlemen.
Stay tuned.
And the Sixth Amendment, too, by the way.
Stay tuned.
We'll be right back.
Jeff Clark with more.
Are we going to be able to keep Steve Bannon out of jail?
Stay tuned. - I grew up in the hood, I rolled with bloods.
And them boys had a saying.
You can't be listening to all that slappy whack.
Trimada's all, it's a bam ship.
Nippy-bam-bam.
Like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Alright, Jack Pasovic back live here, Human Events Daily.
Folks, America is finally starting to see how corrupt our judicial system and our government actually is.
Just look at what we're talking about, what they're doing to Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro, and President Trump.
As terrible as it might be, we wouldn't be able to see the truth had we not gone through this process.
So, sometimes there is a bigger plan in the works.
Which brings me to a new movie that I want you to see when it comes out in a few months.
It's called The Firing Squad and it stars, you're gonna love this, Kevin Sorbo and Cuba Gooding Jr.
This is the remarkable true story of a group of men sentenced to death for trafficking drugs in a third world country who find redemption in Christ Jesus.
While they're awaiting their fate, they made it their mission to convert the entire prison camp to embrace Christ.
It's an inspirational story and a reminder that God is always at work.
Kevin Sorbo, I've talked to him.
He wants this film to be part of a nationwide revival.
And we'll be leading viewers in prayer in the hopes that this will bring one million souls to Christ.
Go to FiringSquadFilm.com.
That's FiringSquadFilm.com to purchase tickets and learn more about this extraordinary film.
That's FiringSquadFilm.com.
We're on with Jeff Clark now.
Now, Jeff, you've got some of the actual legal briefs that we're looking at here that pertain to what exactly we're talking about.
I want people to understand this.
Nancy Pelosi polluted the January 6th committee, and that is key to the House Republicans exonerating Peter Navarro, by the way, could potentially actually spring him right now from prison and prevent Steve Bannon from having to go.
Jeff Clark's got the receipts.
Jeff, what do you have for us?
Sure, Steve.
So look, this is the biggest gem from the DOJ brief that was filed against Steve Bannon just two days ago.
You're going to like this.
It's really rich.
It's total hypocrisy coming from the Biden administration and from the Garland Justice Department.
So, end quote.
So just stop there for a second.
his claim for special treatment with the bedrock principle of equal justice under the law, even-handed application of the bail statute requires Bannon's continued detention.
So, end quote.
So just stop there for a second.
They're saying that Steve is making an argument for special treatment when he's the first person essentially to be jailed under this statute or to be potentially jailed after Peter Navarro in a very long time when we have Eric Holder thumbing his nose at a subpoena, we have Merrick
Garland himself in recent weeks thumbing his nose at a subpoena to get access to the audio tape of Joe Biden being interviewed and deposed by special counsel Robert Herr.
I mean, the hypocrisy is so thick you can't even cut it with a knife.
And that's one of the reasons, Jack, why my group, the Center for Renewing America, is spearheading this effort to call on your member of Congress to join the resolution and to vote to pass that resolution, finding that the January 6th committee was an abomination, really, and that everything it did was legally defective and void.
And, you know, I'm joined in that effort.
If you go to our website, the Citizens for Renewing America, you can find our workup of this by my colleague at the Center and its citizens, Wade Miller.
He's a former Marine.
And if you're going to be in a fight like this, you always want to have a lawyer coupled with a Marine, Jack.
It's good company.
Look, I keep saying this.
We need to return back to the type of people who are willing to fight.
You have to be active in your beliefs.
And by the way, I take this directly from the left.
You know, the left is always active.
The left is always agitating.
The left is always pushing the Overton window.
The left is always pushing for action.
They don't sit back and say, oh, the right's being hypocritical.
They do a little bit.
But they don't sit back and wait for things to happen.
They are the ones who are actually driving the ball down the field.
So unless we do that, unless we actually take shots on goal, that doesn't mean every shot is going to make it.
But guess what?
If you take 10 shots, one of them might, two of them might, three of them might, and then guess what?
We got points on the board.
And suddenly, with points, it's like, it's like, and Jeff, you've been in DC a long time.
What is it about sort of Republicans, and particular, by the way, not asking you to speak out of turn or out of the classroom here, but I noticed a lot of Republican legal types do not like the confrontation the way that you do.
You know, Jack, I think it's a crisis of courage, right?
It's one thing to be in the confines of the debating society, of the federal society, right?
And the fight is essentially between, you know, some member of the left who's called in to represent them.
and then it's otherwise a fight between conservatives and libertarians.
It's another thing to roll up your sleeves, really be a man in the arena, and to take the necessary steps to save the country, right?
We're not just talking about something that's a debate about how law schools should function, We're talking about, you know, bottom line issues of life and death.
And, you know, we're watching CNN.
They're crawling over the fact that they want to send Steve Bannon even to Rikers Island, right?
Or they're going to send him to a place where he's going to be like in a communal lockup, you know, when he's 70 years old, you know, roughly.
I don't know Steve's precise age.
I mean, it's truly ridiculous.
And look, I feel a fire in my belly about this.
I'm not personally on the line about this.
I had my own fights with the January 6th Committee about subpoenas, but the advantage I have, I guess, is that I've been inside the Justice Department.
Constitutional law, I know a lot of legal arguments to make, and so they never actually sent me to the floor.
So I'm not benefiting from this resolution.
We at, you know, the Citizens for a Renewing America, we're calling for this petition, you know, that we sort of put on our website, for you to call your congressmen so they join the resolution so they can try to undo all the damage that the January 6th Committee has done.
And it's even not just, you know, Steve and Peter, right?
Or some of the others mentioned in the resolution, like Dan Scavino.
It's the people who are the ordinary people who, you know, showed up, you know, on January 6th, and they were hit with all kinds of subpoena process, legal bills they couldn't afford, right?
Wouldn't it be great for them to get some justice with a declaration from our current Congress, which was supposed to be elected, to undo these kinds of things?
To just, you know, lay it on the line and say, hey, this is all, you know, BS, and it needs to be vacated.
That's what we need.
What can you tell us about the place, now currently they're talking about sending Steve to this Federal Corrections Institute up in Connecticut.
What can you tell us about the conditions there where he's initially been ordered to surrender?
Well, I understand that only roughly.
I haven't been there, Jack, but, you know, I don't understand it to be a great place.
You know, they're definitely, if you're talking about a misdemeanor, right, a misdemeanor level crime where you're only talking about a sentence of a few months, Why wouldn't you put them in a minimum security camp-like setting, especially given Steve's age, right?
Steve is not a violent threat of any kind.
I'm convinced that they want to send him to something that's much more closer to maximum security, like Rikers, because, you know, either they're so evil-hearted they want to see harm come to him, or because The conditions of the lockdown will be so extreme that he won't even be able to communicate to the outside world, you know, to to the war room posse to communicate those who will run the show in his absence.
And this shows you that the real objective is to take him off the field, to take one of our most effective political players and leaders off the field during the key last four months before the election.
Jack, it's just so transparent.
That's what they're doing.
That's what they're doing to Alex Jones.
That's what they're doing to Michael Patrick Leahy in a ridiculous, you know, fight about the manifesto, the trans manifesto there, where the judge can't even name what order she issued that Mike might have violated.
You know, it's just the same playbook again and again, and it's all about squelching speech.
And so it just shows, right, there's a whole conspiracy going on to squash real civil rights like First Amendment liberties.
And as an American, we just can't, Americans, we just can't stand for it.
Look, I remember serving at Guantanamo Bay and Guantanamo is based on a federal prison.
And so they talk about how there obviously are different levels.
So there's satellite camps, which is for the females, which I believe is the one from FCI Connecticut, which that TV show Orange is the New Black is based on.
And people remember that was not some kind of super minimum security sort of place.
Then, by the way, the low-security facility they have, you know, male inmates, secure perimeter, dormitory-style housing, you've got accommodations, multiple bunk beds, federal standards, but, you know, has faced overcrowding in the past.
I've got a little report right here.
Basic medical facilities, work programs, educational programs, some recreation.
It does have visitation during visiting hours.
Visitors are subject to security checks and regulations.
Obviously re-entry services.
I mean, these are play, and by the way, by the way, and Jeff, we also know this, that these federal facilities, they still all have all the COVID protocols still in place, don't they? - Yes, you know, that's my understanding, right?
So it's even more reason to lock things down.
And look, let me remind you of what happened with Peter Navarro, right?
So members of Congress wanted to visit Peter Navarro down at his prison facility in Florida, and they wouldn't let them in, saying that, quote unquote, you know, Peter Navarro is too notorious.
Right.
I think when Peter gets out, he needs to get himself, you know, a whole shirt line of, you know, the notorious Peter.
That should be his book title.
That's his book title.
That's his that's his merchandise line.
Peter Navarro, too notorious.
It's perfect.
The too notorious Peter Navarro.
Jeff, I'm looking at the timer.
I realize we've only got about a minute left.
Tell people what is the website to connect with your new organization and how can people get involved with this petition to nullify the Jan 6 committee and these crooked and illegitimate subpoenas?
Sure.
So I think it's a quick Google of Citizens for Renewing America.
That's the website.
And then if you search for how to help Steve Bannon on the site, you'll quickly pop up our proposed resolution, which is a little more complicated than the one that Representative Berluson has introduced.
But his one is great, too.
And you can urge them to pick up elements from ours.
And you should call your congressman.
Use that as a model.
The two documents on there are a call for action.
And then the proposed resolution draft itself, Jack.
This is perfect.
Citizens for Renewing America.
File the petition.
Everyone needs to sign this.
Nullify the Jan 6th Committee.
Nullify the subpoenas.
And then, Speaker Johnson, of course, do the right thing and nullify all of this so we can go back to correcting the errors of this country and doing the work of the people.
Jeff Clark, thanks so much, man.
Where's Jack?
Where's Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting policies.
Jack Soh, back live, Human Events Daily.
Folks, the world is in flames and Bidenomics is a complete and total disaster, but a Canada will not ruin my day.
Do you know why?
It's because I start my day with a hot America-first cup of Blackout Coffee.
This coffee is 100% America.
Blackout Coffee is 100% committed to conservative values, from sourcing the beans to the roasting process, customer support, and shipping.
They embody true American values and accept no compromise on taste or quality.
By the way, so we had a four-hour delay getting out of the midwest yesterday getting out of ohio back to dc uh had some maintenance issues all that stuff that we're all used to hearing now a little door on the 737 action so this morning by the way four extra hours in a terminal kids were good kids were good but i'm telling you we got in really really late last night and this morning i'm sitting there going Need my blackout coffee.
Absolutely need my blackout coffee.
So you, if you find yourself in a situation like that, just go to blackoutcoffee.com slash poso and use promo code poso20 for 20% off your first order.
Summer is here!
So whether or not you're caught up in one of those things, look, we all love our summer vacations, we love our summer travels, but we know sometimes it's like you need a vacation from the vacation.
That's where Blackout Coffee comes in for that extra pick-me-up.
BlackoutCoffee.com slash Poso.
BlackoutCoffee.com slash Poso.
Promo code POSO20.
Powers you.
Power yourself.
Power your family.
Power your business.
Real quick, by the way, got to get into some of these great comments that we received on our opening monologue talking about the migrant violence.
And it's really the invader violence because that's what they are.
Got a message here from Candy.
These murderers are directly on Garland, Obama and Biden administration.
Patrick J. Collins, the third Biden and his admin are accomplices in these murders, Jack, and the NGOs.
Brownie 63.
Don't forget the MSM.
AK forever in my heart.
This news makes my stomach turn.
Every congressman should have to go and see the remains of these victims up close and personal.
I could not agree more.
I absolutely could not agree more.
Rich Barris, the People's Pundit, joins us next.
Rich, I know we got some polls to get into, but let me ask you about this issue, the migrant violence, the invader violence.
This is something, and Joy Reid's up there screaming about me all last night, but she won't talk about what's going on.
The American people see this.
Look, they saw the street justice that went on with the 13-year-old.
13-year-old girl gets tied up and raped in front of her boyfriend, and the guy on his little bicycle there got street justice out in Queens.
They said they waited for him outside a bodega.
Look, I think the insane levels of violence, this is Mad Max-style violence that's going on in our cities.
They can't ignore it, so that's why they're running all these, oh, I hate Jack Posobiec, Jack Posobiec is such a bad man, kind of segments out there.
Rich, talk to me about how this is driving the election.
Yeah, I was just going to say, in reaction to that, what I would say to Joy Reid is that isn't it ironic?
I mean, and I'm not alone.
Other pollsters will back this up.
The two things that we hear about when we're talking to black voters who are now voting for Donald Trump is one, obviously, the economy.
I had more money under Donald Trump.
Things were better under Donald Trump.
And then two, it's immigration.
They absolutely cannot stand the flood of illegal immigrants, which, by the way, they view to be coming at a direct cost to them.
Which, are they lying?
Whose schools are being emptied out and being used as flophouses for illegal migrants because they're overflowing and there's nowhere to put them?
Whose schools?
Is it the white liberal schools that Joy Reid's friends send their kids to and she sends her children to?
No.
It's the less fortunate, working class areas, inner city areas that aren't even working class.
They're unfortunately even worse because nobody has paid attention to any of their problems or grievances for years since Trump and the economic zones.
Uh, the Economic Opportunity Zones, that's it.
I mean, that's, it is overwhelming, it is over and over, it is constantly regurgitated, and it's incessant when we conduct these polls.
So, I mean, she can ignore it all they want, but no one's going to point the finger at you, Jack, and say, you know, these voters that I'm talking about, they're not going to watch a Joy Reid segment and say, you know what, I guess my problem is from that Jack Posobiec guy.
No, that's not going to work.
I mean, people have, it's, that's over.
And I think the sooner The Joy Reads of the World figured that out, the better for them.
Biden's newcomers, they're Biden's newcomers.
I'm just going to keep saying it over and over.
These are Biden's newcomers.
This is what Biden's newcomers are bringing to our neighborhoods.
This is what they're bringing to our towns.
This is what they're bringing to our communities.
So if Biden's newcomers want to, that's what we said, we're supposed to call newcomers.
Fine.
These are Biden's newcomers.
It's Biden newcomers doing this to 13 year olds in Queens, to mothers of five like Rachel Moran.
in Maryland.
It's Biden's newcomers that are doing this to Laken Riley.
It's Biden newcomers who are doing this over and over and over.
Rich Barris, though, I got to ask you.
So if all of this is on Joe Biden and I look at poly market and I know, I know the betting markets are what they are, right?
I don't lead myself with the betting markets, but there's a big one that popped up over the weekend.
31% now, as of today, believe that Joe Biden will drop out of the presidential race.
This has now almost doubled from where it was just two weeks ago.
But I'm skeptical, man.
I'm skeptical.
I just don't know if I see it.
What's your take?
Does Biden drop out at the convention?
Listen, we were talking about this earlier.
LBJ is the incumbent president that we could point to in modern times, or he bailed.
But I mean, that announcement was made on March 31st, 1968.
There was time.
There's a couple of things.
I mean, we could do a whole show on this, Jack.
One is, Joe Biden, it polls the strongest against Donald Trump.
So it's a difficult thing, if you're the Democrats, to look around and see, who would we bring off the bench?
Who would we take off the bench?
The bench is not developed yet.
There's talent on it, but it's not known.
And it would be an enormous Herculean task.
To not only get that talent known, but also to somehow quell the anger that's going to come from the Kamala Harris wing of the party that's going to be very angry that they leapfrogged America's first non-white, first female vice president for one of those people who are on the bench.
Who, by the way, is either a white woman or a middle-aged to older white male.
That's all they have.
So I just don't see it.
And then that's not even a legit.
And, you know, by the way, you know, they want to bring Hillary back in.
That's why they did the whole surprise guest with Hillary at that.
What was that like, that L.A.
thing with the celebrities?
They bring her out and she's wearing all white, as usual.
Say, pick me, pick me.
I'm here.
I'm still here.
Just kind of, you know, just just as we talk about.
Think about it.
Just as we talk about.
He raided Muammar Gaddafi's closet after they killed him.
Right, assassinate Muammar Gaddafi, steal his DRIP.
But when, right when we're talking about, what?
What?
It's true.
They assassinated Muammar Gaddafi because his DRIP levels were too high.
I will stand by that.
I will absolutely stand by that statement.
They assassinated him because his DRIP levels were too high and, of course, because he was hoarding gold because he wanted to introduce an all Africa-based currency.
Never doubt what the US government is willing to do when the when the world reserve currency of the US dollar is on the line, especially when it comes to the Petro dollar.
Talk to the Saudis about that.
But the idea is right when they're talking about Biden dropping out, suddenly Hillary Clinton resurfaces.
Do we really think that's by mistake?
Do we really think that's a coincidence?
No, I don't think so.
She would love nothing more, Jack, than not only to get another bite at the apple, but to get another bite at Trump.
She would.
She's always wanted to be president.
She feels robbed.
But again, there's so much to discuss on this.
There's also tens and tens of millions of people who voted for Joe Biden in the primary that they're going to have to tell, without them getting upset, that those votes are void.
They're null and void.
We don't care about them, and we're going with somebody else.
It also is a risk for anyone who would try to engineer that.
Understand the Biden family is under enormous pressure.
They're exposed.
So was the Biden team that runs around the Bidens and has for years.
And what do I mean by exposed?
If they lose this election, they're exposed to legal issues.
You know, Trump could come after them for like actual crimes that they swept under the rug.
And the people around them would be exposed as well.
And the Biden family is just not going to let that happen.
And the people around the Biden family are not going to let that happen.
I understand what people are saying.
But absent something that I don't want to say out loud because I believe in the power of words, absent that happening, I don't see a way, a realistic way, that they could get rid of, they could dump Joe Biden.
I agree.
I said to President Trump personally now over a year ago that Biden will be on the ballot if they have to prop him up with a stick.
And I still stand by that.
A stick.
If they have to weekend at Bernie's, that guy, weekend at Biden, they will do it.
Because their bench is even worse.
Their bench is even worse.
Are you going to put Hillary back up there?
No.
Biden is going to be there unless they decide they're ceding the election.
Coming up, quick break.
We'll explain what we're talking about next.
next Rich Paris. - About the boring people at your office and trying to listen to the new human events with Jack Posobiec. - All right, Jack Posobiec back live here, Look, folks, I'm saying it, man.
I'm saying it.
Don't be surprised that Hillary Clinton is suddenly making more public appearances just as they talk about removing Joe Biden from the ballot.
Look, there's no question in my mind that she is throwing her name back in.
This is the shadow primary.
How many times have you said that?
The shadow primary for the Democrat nomination.
It's not a public primary, no.
It's a shadow primary.
Hillary's throwing her name out there.
And you watch, Kamala Harris is gonna come back out again.
And I've heard a lot of people, Rich Barris, by the way, also even suggest, well, if Biden goes down, then they just, they switch slots up.
Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, then as vice president.
So your first openly gay man running as on the vice presidential ticket, you know, the first the first non-white woman running on the on the presidential ticket.
You know, they're going to go for the first, the historic, et cetera, et cetera.
But ultimately, I think that if Kamala Harris goes in as the candidate, let's just say, you know, devil's advocate, that Biden decides to walk up to that Chicago stage or, you know, sort of stumble up to that Chicago stage and say that he doesn't accept the nomination, he wants Kamala to do it.
That means they're pulling, they're popping smoke, they're pulling out of the presidential race.
You're going to see a lot of that Democrat money and a lot of that dark money, the Arabella investors, the Soros money, etc.
It's all going to go To your local races, it's going to go to your state races.
They know Kamala Harris can't win.
It's as simple as that.
Because, Rich, look, we've got this new, um, where's the poll?
This poll out of Iowa, where Trump is up 18 points.
Rich, if Trump is up 18 points, and you and I have talked about the Rust Belt for so long, I just spent, you know, an entire week up there.
We went from Detroit down to Sandusky.
We went over to Cleveland.
Tell me, if the voters of Iowa are at 18 points for Trump, how does he lose Wisconsin and Michigan?
I just want to say before, real quick, just a little pat here.
People can go to BigDataPoll.com, go to the Public Polling Project, look at the last Rust Belt poll, and you will see that ours in Iowa was Trump plus 15.
When we released that, of course, everybody dismissed it.
That's not possible.
Now the Ann Seltzer's poll came out.
Now everybody is having a heart attack over it, and that's because of what you just said.
The overlapping demographics.
In many ways, there are parts of Wisconsin, large swaths of Wisconsin, that mirror Iowa far more than they mirror Pennsylvania or even Michigan.
It's too many overlapping demographics.
And when I'm talking about demographics, I'm not just talking about white versus black versus Hispanic, right, versus Asian and other.
I'm talking about ethnicities and ethnic voting patterns for different But between the two different parties and of course the major ones that play there are Norwegians right and other Scandinavian voters whether they're they're Germans of course as well and what in different denominations whether they're Protestant or Catholic and bottom line here is there is just no way that Donald Trump carries a Iowa by 18 points and does not win the state of Wisconsin by a pretty comfortable margin.
And here's the kicker with that.
In 2016, all of the people who got it wrong looked back and said, looking at that Selzer poll, it was Trump plus seven, the final poll, looked back at it and said, that was kind of a canary in the coal mine.
That was a bit of a warning.
The other polls are wrong.
The Rust Belt's hard to poll.
Wisconsin's notoriously difficult to poll.
We should have listened to Ann.
She was forecasting his strength in the Rust Belt.
That's why people are having a coronary over this poll, because in many ways you can make an argument that Iowa polling has more predictive value on where the state of Wisconsin is going than recent polling in the state of Wisconsin.
That is just a fact except for Ron Johnson in 22 Republicans were outclassed there with the get out the vote.
That's what happened and it was a midterm election But this is a presidential cycle and it will have a lot higher turnout and there's 31 in Iowa Give people a stat between Obama the Trump era and the Trump years.
Iowa has 31 pivot counties or swing counties in It's the most out of any state in the entire country.
31 voted for Barack Obama, who then switched and voted for Donald Trump.
And Trump held, by the way, all of them in 2020.
And then some of them got more Trumpy.
Some of them got a little slightly less Trumpy.
18, Jack, is a blowout.
A blowout!
And it means a blowout for the rest of the Rust Belt as well.
So you're talking about a Rust Belt sweep?
- You're talking about a Rust Belt sweep. - Oh, absolutely.
Even Minnesota is in serious, serious trouble because Iowa has, when we're talking about those Scandinavian descent. - For the Democrats.
Yeah, absolutely.
Because Minnesota has a lot of Scandinavian ethnicities that have been very tough for Republicans over the years.
And there's not as many in Iowa, but they're there.
And so it gives us an idea.
And by the way, I'm talking about Swedes and Finns.
They tend to be much more liberal than Norwegians, especially Norwegians who are Catholic.
So, you know, Minnesota would be, I mean, I don't want to just say this out loud, but I guess I have no choice.
If Trump is winning Iowa by 18 points, he probably has a tiny lead in Minnesota.
And by tiny, I mean anywhere between like one to three points.
I mean, that's what prior, uh, you know, that's what, that's what.
I think I'm being generous, actually.
I mean, he won Iowa by about eight, and he lost Minnesota by about seven.
So you do this.
And Minnesota is not a state that Republicans win.
It's just people don't understand this.
This is not a state that we should even be normally talking about.
In terms of presidential politics, but here we are.
Trump is now expanding the map because Biden is in complete physical as well as political collapse.
Everyone can see it.
Now you're getting these people that are turning on Biden and they're looking at, it's not necessarily that they're suddenly waking up to Trump, but it's more of a larger picture, I think, of waking up to realize that they've been lied to.
and that their lives have gotten considerably and measurably worse than they were four years ago.
And I know that's a powerful statement.
We say it so much, it's almost a cliche, but it's just true.
It's just true.
And people can see the A/B test in a way that they've never seen before, because Trump isn't just a challenger.
He's also the former president.
Final minute, Rich Paris.
Perfect example.
In 2020 and 2016, we asked a very simple question The Midwest, many parts of it are very adverse to war and foreign interventions.
They don't like liberal internationalism, and they don't like neoconservatism.
And in Minnesota, we asked people, who do you think was most likely to start a war?
In 2016, it was fairly close.
And Hillary Clinton barely held on when Trump won Iowa by almost 10 points.
She barely held on by about 2 points.
In 2020, it was by—people told us that Trump was more likely.
So, it was—they were sold a lie.
And now, you know, I mean, that's going to change opinions.
Locals.peoplespundit.com.
Go give Rich a follow.
By the way, I'd like to thank the audience for making this the No.
