All Episodes
Previous Next
June 12, 2024 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
48:56
Ukrainians Place POSO on ANOTHER Hit List

Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec:Save up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSOGet $200 off a 3-month supply kit from ‘My Patriot Supply’ when you go to https://www.preparewithposo.com. Upgrade your closet with Rhone and use POSO to save 20% at https://www.rhone.com/POSOSupport the Show.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey folks, I want to remind you that the Turning Point Action People's Conference is coming up this June 14th to 16th in Detroit, Michigan.
Get your tickets and then go to unhumansbook.com to come to a special meet and greet for the launch party of The Unhumans Book with myself and Joshua Lysak.
I'll see you there in Detroit!
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host Jack Posobiec.
The war that Hamas started on October 7th with this barbaric attack It's time, once again, to do what I did when I was a senator.
GO ON, MORE PEOPLE WILL SUFFER.
MORE KALISTANIANS WILL SUFFER.
MORE ISRAELIS WILL SUFFER.
IT'S TIME ONCE AGAIN TO DO WHAT I DID WHEN I WAS A SENATOR.
BAN ASSAULT WEAPONS.
WHEN SOMEBODY TELLS YOU WHO THEY ARE, YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE THEM.
When somebody tells you what they're going to do, especially Donald Trump, who seems more unhinged than ever before, it's, as everybody's been saying, it's important to believe them.
And, you know, Rachel Maddow came out a couple of nights ago saying she was concerned that she may be, you know, sent to a camp.
And it sounds crazy, but it's not because of what Donald Trump's been saying.
Oh, I'm so glad you brought up the January 6th committee.
We'll be talking a lot more about that in the coming weeks.
There's been a lot of investigation about that committee.
I don't think it was properly constituted.
I don't think it was, uh, it was, has properly administered.
And now we know that, um, apparently some of the evidence was hidden and some maybe even destroyed.
House could vote on holding Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress.
The action is related to Garland's refusal to turn over recordings of President Biden's interviews with former special counsel Robert Herr.
Here's the thing, even small Trump's shifts by voters can have some big, big impacts.
This is the simulation if the election were to land on turnout and vote choice, just like it did in 2020 when Biden won.
But let's assume for a second that youth turnout drops by about ten points, and you see third-party candidates getting a little more support.
You see the electoral landscape shift just based on that alone, a very real possibility.
Trump then favored to win.
And another scenario, if you see a shift in black and Latino voters, ten points more to Trump.
Again, something the Biden team is worried about.
You get a map that looks like this, Trump winning by an even bigger margin.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky drummed up military and financial support from European leaders today at the start of a two-day conference in Berlin.
The World Bank estimates that crane will need $500 billion over 10 years to rebuild.
All right, Jack Posobiec here, live Human Events Daily.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition.
Today is June 12, 2024.
Anno Domini.
Well folks, we now have, and I believe we have the calendar, the countdown clock, right guys?
The countdown clock is there.
Let's throw it up.
Our official countdown clock.
We've got 145 days, 10 hours, 56 minutes as I speak until the end of the 2024 election.
That's it.
That's all the time you have.
So for all the distractions out there, for all of the e-drama, for all the people who want to whine, want to complain, do this and that, let me tell you what time it is.
It's Trump o'clock and you better be ready.
You better be having boots on the ground.
You better be starting work.
This weekend, we are going to be working by holding a massive voter registration ballot operations initiative, where?
Right in Detroit, Michigan, the central heart of the Rust Belt.
Right between Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio.
That is where this country, and I've been telling you this for years, that's where this country will be decided that is the frontline of freedom.
The frontline of freedom!
In this world and the frontline in the fight against the globalists.
What are the globalists up to now?
Well, just got the news last night.
I was informed by Congressman Jim Banks.
That I have been placed on yet another Ukrainian hit list.
I got an email from Congressman Banks, a letter actually detailing everything that was going on, explaining this.
Obviously there are a lot of people who were put on this letter, American citizens.
The question is, why do we continue to send arms, continue to send financial support to a country that's willing to do this to American civilians?
Have we done this to Ukrainian civilians?
I don't believe so.
Why are we doing this?
Why is Joe Biden right now going to the G7 signing a security guarantee in Italy at the G7 on the sidelines with Vladimir Zelensky?
By the way, this is the second Ukrainian hit list I'm on, because now I'm also added to the Ukraine Mirodviridz hit list.
This is great, this is great.
Ukrainian intelligence has been coming after me for years at this point, and I say, bring it on.
Because let me tell you something, Vladimir Zelensky, you think you're the only one making lists?
Because guess what?
I got a list too.
We got a list.
And let me tell you something, you have less than one year.
You have less than one year, so make your decision!
Make your decision now!
Who do you want to side with?
Do you want to side with your own people?
Do you want to side with freedom?
Do you want to stand with the free nations of the world?
Or are you just completely bought and sold by the globalists?
And if so, what can I say?
You know what they say about those wages.
Those CIA early retirement programs, you don't get to take it with you, buddy.
You don't get to take it with you.
We'll be right back.
Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
You know, you talk about influences.
These are influences.
and they're friends of mine, Jack Persovic.
Where's Jack?
Jack, he's done a great job.
All right, Jack Persovic back live from Human Events Daily.
Folks, another day, another breaking news story buried.
You know, they'd rather talk about anything else than what's really going on.
It's not because they don't know what's happening.
The media pundits and talking heads just don't want you paying attention.
The real stories, the Human Events audience knows that you have to dig beyond the headlines to find the truth.
Prepare for what will come with MyPatriotSupply.
Since 2008, MyPatriotSupply has helped millions of Americans get ready for the worst.
Today, their best-selling 3-month emergency food kits are flying off the shelves.
Get yours right now at MyPatriotSupply.com.
This food kit offers over 2,000 calories every day.
Plus, with ultra-durable 4-layer packaging, it lasts up to 25 years in storage.
Order all the kits you need and get $200 off.
Free shipping is included.
Look, you've been warned about what can happen.
Don't live in fear.
Take back control of your future.
Because this isn't just food, it's freedom.
Stock up on these food kits at MyPatriotSupply.com.
MyPatriotSupply.com.
I want to go in real quick to our chat because Pixie Cox is in here saying, so Ukraine is making hit lists for the American people.
Are we making hit lists for Ukraine?
And asking about who's going to be on that list.
Look, look, I think that this is There are many questions that need to be asked here and it's very clear why are we so completely on board with the country?
Why are we funding them?
Why are we giving them a mutual defense pact or some of this security 10-year guarantee when it isn't going out?
By the way, We do have breaking news just as we came on, and I'd like to ask my guest about it, even though this wasn't exactly what we were planning, that breaking news, the House has just voted to hold Biden's Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt The vote passed by one vote.
208 to 207.
Darren Beattie, our guest, was coming on.
We're going to talk about some other stuff, but Darren, I've got to get your response very quickly here.
The House has actually done something and voted to hold AG Merrick Garland in contempt.
Will anything come of this?
What's your reaction?
Well, speaking as someone who's held Merrick Garland in contempt for many, many years, I do have to applaud this development in Congress.
As to whether it will go anywhere, I mean, we'll have to see.
Chances are, probably not, but even so it's a good symbolic gesture because I think in the whole rigmarole of everything going on, and we have so many villains these days and even more clowns, it's easy to forget the specific role of Merrick Garland as a fixture
For a very long time, for decades actually, and all of the nefarious developments that we see crystallizing and coming to fruition today in the Trump era.
I point out at every opportunity Merrick Garland had the domestic terrorism portfolio under Clinton, where he was a lead cover-up man in charge of covering up the truth about the Oklahoma City bombing, and this was a first wave of the deep state of doing January 6th fedsurrection like things only in Oklahoma City, obviously it's far darker and far more serious.
I always think now that the public understands the lies behind January 6th, the public may be more psychologically prepared to revisit some of these darker things such as Merrick Garland's involved in Oklahoma City, but this all goes back a very long way.
And you know what?
You know, people like Garland, who are, to the regime, reasonably competent, good janitors, I call them, because they're mop-up men of the highest order.
Their job is to mop up the crimes of the regime.
And there are only a handful of people like this at a high level, and so they have to constantly be recycled.
He's proven that he's trustworthy to the regime.
He keeps secrets and some things.
Not everybody is cut out for this kind of work.
I pointed out about Stephen D'Antuono, who was one of the cover up men for January 6th.
He had to resign because he didn't have the psychological fortitude to hold very dark secrets on his shoulders, whereas Merrick Garland is constituted in a different way.
And that's why he's been trusted by the regime for so long.
So I'd say anything that puts the spotlight on Garland specifically is to be welcomed.
And...
Look, and it's exactly right.
Look, folks, we also have to remember something that Merrick Garland has refused subpoenas from congressional committees, investigatory bodies that are looking into various things that are going on that have happened since he took office.
Specifically, they've asked about the video, the audio from Biden's interview with special counsel Herr.
He's refused to do so.
This is to the Oversight Committee, and he has refused their official subpoena.
Refusing a subpoena from Congress is the exact same crime that Merrick Garland has put Peter Navarro currently behind bars to do.
And by the way, there's a great story in The Economist right now that's freaking out about Navarro coming back and they're saying his Dark vision for the world economy could potentially be taking place in just a few months time and I God I hope it does And this is also what this is also the same activity that Steve Bannon is currently being sent behind bars by Merrick Garland for remember you don't have to be above the law when you decide that you are the law of the
You know, Darren, by the way, I just have Mike Benz on.
He keeps bringing up Oklahoma City whenever I mention Merrick Garland.
You keep bringing up Oklahoma City every time I mention Merrick Garland.
I think we might be—the stars might have aligned.
We might be in the right place at some point here soon to do a deep dive on that dark chapter in America's recent history.
Indeed, I think the public is ready for it.
And it's one of those things just like, you know, four or five years ago, six years ago, it was too delicate.
You know, people didn't want to even think about something like that.
And so beyond just the important story of January 6 itself, there's this whole mated dimension that I think now the general public is prepared to revisit and re-examine Some antecedents that are actually far darker.
You know, Oklahoma City hundreds of people died.
Children died.
It's a completely different scale from January 6.
And yet, it's there as an open, festering wound for anybody who wants to pay attention to it.
So, I very much think if we think the public can handle it, and they should be able to handle it, it might be time to revisit some of these things.
Well, and let's talk about that for a second, because January 6th was a date that for, I would say, the first six months, Republicans were terrified.
Republicans were completely cowed into silence after that date.
The Twitter ban hammer was swinging down.
Twitter, of course, banned the sitting president of the United States in the wake of this.
This was meant essentially to be the death knell of the right, the death knell of any hope for conservative or populist politics.
And I want to play a clip right now of the current frontrunner for not just the Republican nomination, but also the presidency itself.
If you look at the betting markets and poly markets and some of the stuff out there, A clip where Donald Trump in Las Vegas last weekend, the teleprompter with his prepared remarks went down, and what topic was the very first thing that he decided to speak of?
Guys, let's play that clip.
Go in!
Go in!
How about Scaffold Joe, the guy on the scaffold?
Or how about the big FBI guy, or whatever, wherever he comes from?
Go on in, everybody, go on in!
What a setup that was, what a horrible, horrible thing.
And you know, that blows two ways.
Darren, what's President Trump talking about there?
Scaffold Joe and Ray the FBI guy?
Do those names sound familiar to you at all?
Yeah, you know, it's quite gratifying to see that.
And, you know, Trump has been a follower, specifically of Revolver, for a long time.
In the course of writing a blog on that very rally, on those statements, I looked it up, and the first time that Trump tweeted out something pro-Revolver, That's a deep cut!
September 2020.
So we're going back a long way.
We only started in June of 2020.
So he's been following the material for a long time.
My interview with Trump on Rumble, I think it's the most viewed thing on Rumble.
We get into Ray Epps.
So he's familiar with this.
But what really surprised me, frankly, was the reference to the scaffold commander.
That's a deep cut.
That's a deep cut.
Yeah, right.
Somehow he became Scaffold Joe, which is a great moniker for him.
Why not?
Maybe he knows something.
Maybe he knows something.
We don't know who this guy is, and that's the thing.
That's one of the big mysteries of January 6th.
We know who Epps is.
He's a known quantity.
Someone else, and there's video of this for people who want to see.
It's on our classic piece, Meet Ray Epps Part 2.
It's not just about Epps.
It's about a handful Of extremely suspicious characters who were pre-positioned at the Peace Monument before the Proud Boys got there, well before Trump finished speaking.
And many of these people positioned there before Trump even started speaking.
And yet they happened to be positioned right at that initial decisive reach point.
And one of the most egregious actors, who ended up going right up on the scaffold telling everyone to move forward, move forward, and then go into the Capitol, he hasn't even been identified.
Let alone indicted and I mentioned on some other interview I think I think it was with Glenn Beck who's taken an interest in this to his credit I said look I've expended a considerable amount of resources relative to our shoestring budget at Revolver To use facial recognition technology to identify this guy.
I've done everything in my power to identify this Scaffold Commander, and I've been unsuccessful.
So I'd really love to know who that is.
And it's nice to see Trump, you know, Epps is a household name by now, which is great, as he should be.
He sort of symbolically represents the sham of the fedsurrection.
But Scaffold Commander, again, we're getting into the You know, the interesting parts of the album here, you know?
And Trump has listened to that album, it seems, probably more than once.
And so, you know, I hope that when he's back in the White House, he can start acting upon some of these things.
Oh, we're gonna need... To use some more resources beyond what's at our disposal currently at Revolver News.
Less than one year, boys.
Less than one year.
President Trump going into the deep cuts.
Scaffold Joe!
Scaffold Joe.
More to come after this.
More to come after this.
We're on with Darren Beattie.
Darren, and, oh, real quick, I just want to give you guys a word from today's episode sponsor, Roan.
Folks, the world's descending into chaos and every day it feels like more and more that something radical needs to be done to fix it, but one thing you shouldn't have to worry about is your clothes.
Roan saw the need for radical reinvention and stepped up to the challenge.
Roan's commuter collection is the most comfortable, breathable, and versatile set of products known to man.
We're talking pants, dress shirts, quarter zips, polos, blazers, and more that are great for every occasion.
Their four-way stretch fabric is breathable and flexible, meaning there's one less thing to be uncomfortable with.
They're also made with wrinkle-free technology and gold fusion anti-odor tech, so you'll be smelling fresh and clean all day long.
Did I mention They're 100% machine washable.
By the way, guys, last time, you guys remember when I was at that Charlotte NASCAR race and I got to meet President Trump with my father for his 70th birthday?
I was wearing my Roan, and let me tell you, that thing stayed completely wrinkle-free, completely fresh, out there in the heat.
I knew that I had to wear something special to go meet the President, and so I wore my Roan.
So go to roan.com slash poso, r-h-o-n-e dot com slash poso, and enter promo code POSO for 20% off your order.
The commuter collection can get you through your work any day and straight to whatever comes next.
That's rhone.com slash POSO.
Use promo code POSO, 20% off your entire order, rhone.com slash POSO.
All right, Darren Beattie, we were just talking a little bit about January 6th, some of the things that we've learned in the last couple days, even just weeks about this.
And the biggest one that I think that we've uncovered in the last couple of days has been that not only did General Milley, of course, we know, countermand President Trump's order for 10,000 National Guardsmen there,
We're also learning more and more about his mental state at the time, finding out that he actually believed, he actually believed that Donald Trump might order the National Guardsmen to declare martial law on the Capitol or arrest members of Congress and all of these other completely farcical things.
And I just want to point out something that, and you sort of mentioned this earlier when you were talking about Oklahoma City, that General Milley's violations of his orders were not victimless.
Ashley Babbitt died that day.
If General Milley had followed his orders, Ashley Babbitt would be alive.
She'd be with her family right now, all these years later.
So there were victims.
There was blood spilled that day.
And yes, I do lay that at the feet of General Milley, and I think people need to understand that more.
But Darren, there's also a new wrinkle, and this was in this really deep, you know, New Yorker piece that not a lot of people paid attention to.
But Julie Kelly and her team have been pulling it out, and I'd like to get your response to it.
We now know that General Milley was in direct communication with Susan Rice of the Obama administration fame, one of the people who directly went against General Flynn.
She was the person who unmasked him.
She's the one who leaked his name to the Washington Post, more than likely.
David Ignatius, who put the column out there about him.
She was directly involved in the FISA warrant on President Trump.
Of course, Biden in the room for these things.
And so one of the things that I think we need to do when we look at January 6 isn't so much Millie's actions, but who was it?
Because I don't think that General Millie himself was the one coming up with all of this.
No, I think he had people that were planting seeds in his ear.
And now that we know that he was talking to Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Susan Rice, I think we're starting to get a picture of who exactly that was.
Darren, does this change the entire way we look at January 6?
Well, it does address this enduring question as to why on January 6, the Capitol enjoyed not just ordinary levels of security, but uniquely poor levels of security.
That's very strange because now we know that there's just been mountains of evidence that would indicate something was going on.
Every agency We've learned that all of the key militia groups that allegedly planned this in advance were littered with informants all the way up to the very top.
In some cases, one wonders, was there anyone belonging to these groups who wasn't working for the government in some capacity?
So they were well informed in advance.
And in the case of some of these curious people, like we've been talking about, Epps and Scaffold, Joe, as Trump calls him, There's even some indication that the government goes beyond not doing anything when they know what's happening, but actively instigating some of these things in critical ways.
And so, you know, there have been a variety of theories.
I know a lot of people have identified Pelosi as one of the chief culprits, but my intuition and sense has always been this is a higher pay grade than Pelosi.
And so now that we're starting to hear more about the mindset of the Military.
The military side of these things, I think, is an underexplored area.
And, of course, the conversation with Susan Rice are, at the very least, very suspicious.
But I do think there is a military element to January 6th that we haven't explored.
And, you know, there's another story beyond the New Yorker story that just kind of died and no one has followed up on.
I think it was in Newsweek saying that On January 6th, the acting Attorney General called on all of these commandos with shoot-to-kill authority who were in the Capitol and around the Capitol of that day, and there was no explanation as to what type of information led to making that decision that we need to put all these military special forces commandos around the Capitol
Nobody's really followed up on that or has been in a position to do so.
So there's weird stuff going on with the military on top of the fact that a lot of the most suspicious characters at that initial breach site, including Ray Epps, are former military, former Marines.
And there's, you know, again, it's conveniently connecting to Oklahoma City, We know there's a specific trajectory, a specific type of infrastructure whereby people who are former military or who drop out of the military operate in this kind of gray zone where they're called upon to do domestic operations like this.
So again, I think these are These are conjectural things at the moment, but again, having studied this for a long time, one develops a sensitivity and intuition, and I absolutely think that there is a military side to this specifically that is very underexplored.
I'll ask you that again because it's something that's I'll have to look this up, but it's in real time.
Maybe you remember, wasn't there a specific on the record denial by Chris Ray, where he was asked this very question about informants on January 6th in the crowd.
And he said something along the lines of my agency had no informants, something, Something very specific like that.
There were no uniformed informants.
I'm trying to remember exactly what it was, but it was a denial where it left open a lot of potential possibilities.
There is one sort of iconic exchange, which actually served as the introduction to our first classic piece on the Fed's direction.
That was between Amy Klobuchar's questioning Ray And Ray and Klobuchar says something to the effect of, you know, don't you just kick yourself wishing you had informants so you could have prevented this?
And actually looking at his specific answer, he was he was a good lawyer that day because he sort of sidestepped the question without answering it directly.
He didn't say we didn't have informants.
He basically said, yeah, you know, rest assured we did everything we can.
And, you know, we want to bat 100 percent.
And he basically doesn't answer the question.
Um, which I guess is good for him, because as it turns out, we know for a fact, New York Times begrudgingly reported this, that the FBI itself had multiple informants in the Proud Boys alone, some of whom were texting their handlers in real time from the Capitol on January 6th.
And we've subsequently learned every agency had informants.
Capitol Police, Metro PD.
We've learned of the extensive role of the ATF in January 6th, and you know, One of the main guys that we've identified as a chief cover-up suspect, Ashton Benedict, I think we've talked about him before, who remarkably is the head of intelligence and dignitary protection at this very moment for the Capitol.
So the person who I think there's overwhelming evidence suggesting this is a key cover-up person for January 6th, the pipe bomb specifically, is currently head of dignitary protection and intelligence at the Capitol.
He's responsible for protecting, you know, congressmen, which is amazing.
So the ATF role is extensive.
The ATF brought in the CIA, and it's likely that those bomb-sniffing dogs, the ones that managed to miss those January 6th pipe bombs because they had COVID that day and infected their sense of smell, those dogs were in all likelihood CIA.
And we've learned, you know, think about that.
Of all the dimensions of January 6th that the CIA could have been involved in, It's kind of amazing that they were involved in the bomb sniffing dog aspect, when that would already been such a suspicious area, given our reporting on these dogs that managed to miss these pipe bombs in the building that Kamala Harris was in, but still refuses to admit for whatever reason.
So, all of these groups had informants.
They were littered all the way up to the very top with informants.
The government was in a very broad position to be informed and yet they ensured that there was uniquely poor security on that day.
I think we can figure out the rest.
Look, and we've only got about a minute left, but having done some work with explosive sniffing dogs and things of that nature when I was in the intelligence community, you know, typically if the dogs aren't barking positive, that's because there is no positive.
And so if you think that there's something going on, like a pipe bomb, that you're going to clear the entire RNC and DNC for, then you would have picked that up initially with one of those dogs.
That's the entire reason you use them!
That's why you see them at airports, etc.
You know, there's different dogs trained for different things.
There's drugs.
There's various types of narcotics that they use dogs for.
But you can't train, you know, one dog for multiple scents.
It's each dog is trained for one specific thing.
And so, if these are bomb-sniffing dogs, then guess what, ladies and gentlemen?
That's what they're going for.
Darren, where can people go to get more?
And tell us real quick if there's anything coming up next at Revolver.
Revolver.news.
Check out our piece on Trump in January 6, and check out our major latest investigative piece on Donald Harbin.
We are in the endgame of the pipe bomb story.
I have one piece that I'm working on meticulously, and that should come out next week, and that will complete our reporting on the pipe bomb series, so stay tuned for that.
It's a big one.
It's an important one.
We're very, very close, so it's exciting.
Congratulations, Darren, and congratulations to all the work you've done to shift the narrative from day one to where we are now.
now stay tuned rich barris joins us next human events daily jack where is jack where is jack where is he jack i want to see you great job jack Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting Pulitzer's.
Alright, check this out, we're back live, Human Events Daily.
So I'm reading through, you know, you gotta see what's going on on the left, folks.
You gotta see what's happening on the other sides.
You have to look at their acolytes.
You have to look at their oracles.
And one of them is veteran Democrat strategist Simon Rosenberg, Twitter's apostle of liberal optimism, and says that early midterm voting data is giving him hope.
This is in a huge piece from Politico from way back in 2022.
And in playbook today, they're saying, oh, oh, just remember that this guy is saying that, you know, you don't be anxious about these polls.
Just look at some of the stuff that's coming out.
MAGA is underperforming the polls, the special elections, the runoffs.
They're not doing as well as the polling states.
And so, you know, you guys shouldn't be so worried.
The Democrats are going to come back.
Joe Biden's going to come back.
And yet, when I look at polymarkets and I look at some of these other things, not only do you have Trump way up, but even in some of the new polls out of Pennsylvania, RFK is in complete collapse.
No money, no problems for RFK.
Richard Barras, the People's Pundit, is here to talk to us about all of this.
Rich, let me get your response real quick directly to this challenge from Simon Rosenberg, Twitter's apostle of optimism for liberals, saying that the GOP is going to fizzle based on the special election last night where they say Republicans underperformed and the midterms where he also says Republicans underperformed.
I don't understand what is so difficult for these people.
To grasp.
There are two reasons why, and I hear from the left and the right, that kind of argument.
Well, in 22, Republicans underperformed.
In the special elections, Republicans underperformed.
What I would say about this is that Simon's showing his age making arguments like this.
That's what I would say.
He's outdated.
It's dinosaur thinking.
There's something that's indisputable fact.
There's two reasons why this is not a correct argument.
One is the obvious one.
Donald Trump.
Simple answer, short answer.
Past is not always prologue, but Jack, it is an indisputable fact.
You remember all the research we did on the Trump or Bus voter from 16 to 24 and then during the primary cycle in 24.
There is a vote.
It's really, I'm simplifying it by saying a vote because it's different groups of people.
But there is a vote that Donald Trump gets out that the Republican Party has proven themselves incapable of getting out without him.
And they have always benefited more from him being on the ticket than he has benefited from their coalition that was existent before he got on the scene.
And that is an indisputable fact.
All right.
Now, everybody started, you know, adopting the phrase Trump or bust everybody from Suffolk University to Emerson College all over the place because they see it and it's real.
Now, how much of that is up to the Trump campaign that they're going to get out?
You and I have talked to that.
about that many, many times.
And I think that that's fair to argue.
But the reason that really just puts the nail in the coffin to, you know, the second reason puts a nail in the coffin to his argument, which is this.
It's not just our polling.
It was everybody's polling.
Donald Trump outperformed every Republican candidate in the 22 pollings.
So, for instance, maybe Kerry Lake was up by 3 points in Arizona and ended up losing by 12,000 votes.
Well, Donald Trump was up by 6.
So, even if you adjusted for that underperformance, Donald Trump would still carry Arizona.
Ron Johnson, same thing.
Fetterman and the CD Media big data poll that we conducted in Pennsylvania, Fetterman was up by four.
Donald Trump was up by seven, right?
So this is everywhere.
In Clark County, Nevada, you could see Lombardo was doing well.
He was only down by three or four in Clark County.
Donald Trump was up by two or three.
So while Lombardo had a two-point statewide lead, Donald Trump's lead was seven to nine points in our polling going back.
Georgia, we had Walker up by one.
He wound up losing that initial vote by one.
Very close result.
You know, I mean, one point is one point, well within sampling error.
But Donald Trump was up by nine.
So you understand what I'm saying?
Even if you adjusted for it, you could see those voters that we're talking about in that poll.
And everyone else is polling, whether you look at the 22 vote, 20 vote, 18 vote, 16 vote.
Donald Trump performs better among these voters than the voters that came out in 22.
He performs better among presidential cycle voters and those voters than he did about, you know, among those who came out in 18.
It's just the changing coalitions.
Democratic coalitions getting more educated, which is a higher propensity vote, and the Republican Party's getting more working class, which is a lower propensity vote.
But in a presidential cycle, to hang your hat on that, Keep drinking the copium, bro.
I mean, that's, I don't know what else to say. - Look, this just seems like copium to me because, and I'll put it this way, and I've said this way so many times, so many times, that Donald Trump's performance electorally actually mirrors that of Barack Obama.
I was just going to use that example.
We've said it so many times on air.
Democrats had this exact same problem.
Republicans started looking at it this way, and it's because he speaks the same way Obama did, by the way, to a specific group of voters that only come out for their guy.
They only want to come out when there are guys on the ballot.
And by the way, you talk to some of these new Trump supporters, you talk to some of these, again, the low propensity voters, the low pro voters that everyone's talking about.
And as you've, um, as you've coined the phrase, no propensity voters for someone who's just never voted before at all, they don't, I mean, their world is not politics.
And if your world is not politics, you, you don't know anyone's names.
You don't know about special elections.
You don't know about midterms, you know, Donald Trump.
And you know you want Trump in because Biden is screwing everything up.
We got the numbers out, by the way, earlier today.
I want to read through some of these numbers because MAGA Inc.
War Room has it.
Since Biden took office, gas is up 54%, auto insurance is up 51%, cars and trucks 46%, electricity bills 29%, baby food, formula, pet food, groceries, your rent.
Don't even get me started on interest rates.
Interest rates are what, between 6% and 10% out there right now, folks?
Things are bad.
The price of money.
So everything is up.
And by the way, you know those interest rates are going to eventually get slashed, and when they do, that's going to have a huge effect on the markets.
They're doing this right now to artificially float the market, to juice the market, because Biden is in office.
There's no question about that, and for the election, certainly not the first time.
a central bank has done that.
That's what the Fed is currently doing and pursuing with this policy.
But so, Rich, when I come back to all of this, when I go back to all of this, if you're looking at the election from that perspective, then what should Republicans be doing to actually counter the things that Simon is saying and reach out to those low probe and no probe voters that you're talking then what should Republicans be doing to actually counter the things that Simon is saying and reach out to those low probe and no probe voters There are some really, I mean, I've seen there are some really good efforts.
One, I'll just pop out right now.
I don't know.
I hope they don't mind me saying it, but you go to 10xyourvote.com.
That's one of the more smarter new innovations Republicans are doing.
I mean, honestly, Jack, I mean, I know that the RNC and the tone is a big deal.
So what you're hearing from the former president, what you're hearing from Laura, what you're hearing from Michael Watley is good.
It's positive because it helps these Third-party independent groups do their jobs.
When you're telling voters that, you know, the election's rigged, you can't vote to the point where it's too big to rig, when you're saying that these voters that we're talking about are among the most distrusting, they're among the most cynical voters in the country, and they don't think that their vote particularly matters.
So tone is a big deal from the leaders, and they're doing well there.
If people would go and look what Republicans are missing, and you and I again, I've talked about this before, is that personal touch.
And I think, you know, some a group like 10X Your Vote is doing a great job with that.
It's currently only in Michigan, but I know they are planning to expand if they can in other states.
And what they're doing is using, you know, the grassroots to go out and get those people.
You'd be surprised.
You go and search for a bunch of people in Michigan, Jack, that you may know.
Um, you'd be surprised how many people you're going to find on that list who are low prop or no prop.
And the deal is, you know, you're not going to get, send them a text message and get them to go out.
Now, if the text message, if you found that voter and you, you know, you, uh, had talked to them about getting them out and then they got a text from me and it said, Hey, it's rich.
I spoke with Jack and he, he told me to give you a call, you know, to, to shoot you a message.
Remind you how easy it is to get on the absentee ballot list.
That would be a better way to approach it.
And that is, I'm just giving a very basic example, but they have to do this because they have to engage these voters.
It's the difference between a two point win and a four point win, a five point win in some of these states.
Democrats have a great ground game.
This is, you can't mirror exactly what Democrats did.
And I know a lot of groups are trying to do that.
It's a mistake.
Democrats are much more trusting of big systems and institutions.
It has to be more personal when you're doing it with these Republican groups.
Personal touch is key.
That's why I keep saying the MAGA block parties, the MAGA barbecues, MAGA community centers.
Bring everyone together and just don't even talk about, you know, knocking on doors and all this.
Just bring people together and explain to them how to vote, how to get your ballot, and stay tuned for more Rich Paris.
My ear about the boring people at your office.
I'm trying to listen to the new human events with Jack Posobiec.
Alright, so we're back live at Human Events Daily.
Alright, folks, these things happen.
Merrick Garland, just so you know, has not yet been held in contempt.
As of right now, there is a rules vote.
The final vote, whether or not to hold him in contempt, will happen about 30 minutes after the program goes off air today.
Going back to Rich Barris.
Rich?
Let me ask you about some of these new polls that are coming out.
Number one, before we get to... I want to ask you about the Monmouth.
I know you love your Monmouth, but I want to ask you about this poll on Pennsylvania, where it looks to me like RFK looks like he's imploding in there, man.
Yeah, I think as we get closer to the election, you're going to see the appetite for third parties.
It's there, but it's going to decline as people realize that they absolutely have to pick somebody.
We just did a national poll and he came in the lowest he's come in all year.
Well, really, since we started.
And I would also caution people.
He's claiming he's on 15 different state ballots.
He's more like on five to seven.
I mean, that's it.
And under one, He's on there as the natural law party candidate, and for conservatives it may sound like, oh, natural law, they must be conservative, they believe in natural law.
No, they're out there with some of their views, and they're rather marginalized in the state of Michigan.
So that, I think, was a bad move, and I think that's going to hurt him.
He should have stayed, or tried to stay, as an independent.
Here's the kicker.
This RFK impact has been much more complicated than people have given it credit for.
In some states, he draws more from Biden.
In some states, he draws more from Trump.
At the end of the day, we all may have given this a little bit too much action because Jill Stein, we don't know if she's going to be on in Pennsylvania yet, but she's going to be on the Green Party.
Um, more, more ballots at this point, you know, and the Libertarian Party, whether we pulled Lars Mapstead or Chase Oliver, steins out pulling the Libertarian Party.
And that's not me.
That's not just me.
That's like everybody.
So, um, RFK remains to be seen.
I mean, Jack, I'm, I'm worried we gave him too much attention, you know, like I really am.
His campaign does not seem to be knowing what they're doing when it comes to getting on ballots.
And that's been the case from the beginning.
Look, and this is something where, I mean, this is an art.
It's a real art to getting on the ballots.
It's something that requires absolute practitioner.
If you think, by the way, you can get on the ballot just because you go to the website and you read the criteria, oh, I'm going to get there.
Like, you have no idea what you're doing and you're not going to make it.
She obviously believed that.
She obviously did.
You need the money.
She obviously believed that, Jack.
They dumped Dennis Kucinich, who's a seasoned not only politician, but campaigner.
He knows the rules in many states inside and out.
They sidelined him for RFK's former CIA spook.
Talk about nepotism.
It was the dumbest move in the world.
The very first post I read of hers that she put out, that outline their strategy for targeting states was completely incoherent when you understand the rules for states.
And now they're finding themselves in what Dennis knows.
It's a small period in the summer when you're going to get whacked with a small window in many states to qualify.
And they were completely unprepared.
And look at the filings, this money that's being sent to these different firms, security firms, which then gets donated back.
Jack, this is weird.
I'm sorry.
Mark Halpern and I were talking about this on Newsmax.
I promised.
It's crazy.
I promised we could get to the Monmouth poll.
Have at it, brother.
Yeah, we all know how much I love the Monmouth poll.
But when even these polls are showing signs that are bad for Joe Biden, it's bad for Joe Biden.
The retrospective approval rating of Donald Trump has increased more than any president who left office with a negative rating in modern history.
In other words, what I'm saying is, Presidents rebound retrospectively, even George Bush, who left with a horrible approval rating.
He's now, you know, in positive territory with Gallup.
It takes years for that to happen.
Herbert Walker Bush, same thing.
It took over 10 years for his numbers to get respectful.
Now, Donald Trump began showing signs of life within the first year of Joe Biden's presidency, and now he's recuperated.
Mometh's still one of the more negative polls for Donald Trump, and they have him Uh, completely doing, you know, a reversal and seven points ahead of Joe Biden's current approval rating.
So, this is a problem for Joe Biden.
We saw it in the Marist Poll of Pennsylvania, too, today.
I've been asking this question for, like, a year.
Who do you think is the better president?
These men both have records.
Who was your life better under?
Who did a better job doing this?
Who was a better president on the economy?
It's Trump by a mile!
I don't know how Joe Biden is going to address or counter that, even if inflation improved.
I'm not sure that voters would give Joe Biden the credit.
I think they would maybe think it was like a kind of a natural occurrence or the Fed did it or whatever.
I'm serious.
They have such a poor outlook on Joe Biden as a steward of the economy.
I'm not sure how he can turn that around.
And you ask Pennsylvanians in your state, who do you think was a better president?
It's 55-45, brother.
55-45.
I mean, just what are we going to hear?
Let me put it this way, folks.
What's going to happen in the next five months that's going to change the trend line that we have seen for two known quantities, two presidents with two records for the better part of a year?
It's been remarkably stable for a year, Jack.
What's going to change?
Ask yourself that.
And if anything, if anything, no.
And of course, you know, the question now is, are you going to vote to put a convicted villain in the White House or are you going to vote to put a convicted felon in the White House?
Because we all know how closely the Joe Biden's son works with his father.
Who knows, by the way, what contracts he's taking in right now.
They say, oh, he's not doing that anymore.
Yeah, OK, sure.
Sure.
I bet.
Right.
He's just getting the contract after Biden's out of office.
Look, we know this has been the score.
No, I think that it's clear.
I think with the economy in the state that it's in, I just ran through the numbers right there.
I went through the idea that Joe Biden is completely sunk in so many of these cases.
They've got a couple issues.
Abortion is there.
that they're certainly going to go to and lean on.
There's no question about that.
We've seen that coming a mile away.
And President Trump, of course, has already said, he said, I want this to go to the states.
It's it's on that level.
That's what we're doing with it.
That was always the promise of Dobbs.
That was the decision, by the way, in Dobbs as well when it came to abortion.
And it's something that he's clearly not making a central point.
It's an economic campaign.
Another round of bank failures?
the way and just one minute left but there's what we're what we're likely due for here is another foreign policy blunder by joe biden between now and the 145 days we have left to the election last minute rich barris or a bank failure or two again another round of bank failures i mean we are teetering on the edge folks economically international relations standpoint uh the war in ukraine is lost
I mean, this is just, it's another blunder waiting to happen, and I just don't see what's gonna change.
I don't see it.
Rich, where can we follow you, brother?
Best place is Locals, Jack.
peoplespundit.locals.com.
Head over there, support the public polling project.
See you soon.
Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have my permission.
▲
Export Selection