All Episodes
Previous Next
March 29, 2024 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
48:29
EPISODE 703: GOOD FRIDAY SPECIAL - HUMANITY VS UNHUMANITY

Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiecSave up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSOGo to https://www.BlackoutCoffee.com/POSO and use promo code POSO20 for 20% OFF your first order.Support the Show.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Sign up today.
It's called the Pozo Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Totally free.
the Pozo Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host Jack Posobiec.
Deliver us from evil!
We've been categorizing these communist revolutions throughout the ages.
We've put up a huge series of podcasts called The China Files.
Many of you may have seen that.
We put up another one earlier this year, The Chronicles of the Revolution, and we're getting all the way up to the cultural Marxists of today.
And so tonight, Proud to announce that we have signed a deal with a publisher.
We are going to be publishing all of this in a new book that will teach us all how to identify the cultural Marxists, how to use their playbook against them, how to crush their revolutions, and we will specifically call them that which they are.
Because they reject the human rights of others.
They reject the humanity of their oppressed classes.
I submit to you that they themselves have become the unhumans.
All right, Jack Posobiec here, live Washington DC.
Today is March 29th, 2024.
Anno Domini.
Today is Good Friday.
And as such, on Good Friday, we have to remember what it means to be Christian, what it means to be living in a Christian-majority nation, what it means to be living in the Christian-majority West.
There's something that's gone completely upside down in our society where We decided that we needed to be more tolerant and so to state basic facts like we are a Christian majority nation and that we are in the Christian majority West became intolerant we were told.
And so, in order to become more tolerant and more respectful of the rights of the minorities and the rights of many other groups, we were told that we weren't supposed to flaunt it, that we couldn't have prayer in schools anymore, that we couldn't read from the Bible in schools, and this was done for Years after the 1960s, but prior to that, schools in the United States used to open with a Bible verse.
Bible verse and the Pledge of Allegiance.
It's exactly how it was.
Nobody thought that was an institution of religion.
And nobody thought that this had any issue with our Constitution.
And yet, bit by bit, we've lost what it means to be us as a people.
We've lost what it means to understand where we've come from.
And we've seen so much of our society stripped away since we've gotten to that point.
In the 1950s, in New York City, you used to see crosses on Good Friday across the New York skylines.
This is still the Christian majority West, but the question is, if we are the Christian majority, then why is it that we've pushed Christianity so far out and we've replaced it with a new set of morals?
See, this is the dirty little secret.
It's that we haven't replaced Christianity with some American set of morals.
No, we've replaced it with a new set of morals.
A totally inverted set of morals.
A totally backwards set of morals.
Because even Western values were by and large based on those which came from, of course, the Greek world, the Roman world, and the Bible itself.
And so, these all made sense for our civilization.
This is what created the greatest civilization the world has ever known.
And yet, now, that very civilization is crumbling.
Well, there are those of us who believe that this is actually being done on purpose.
That it's deliberate.
Remember, decline is a choice.
You don't have to be in decline.
You don't have to accept it either, by the way.
You don't have to let your borders be overrun by mass migration.
of hordes of third worlders running into your country.
You don't have to have violent criminals killing police officers like Jonathan Diller in cold blood at a bus stop.
We don't have to live like this, actually.
The only difference is that people need to actually wake up to understand what is going on.
That what's going on is not the unintended consequences of good intentions.
No.
No.
What's going on is the absolutely deliberate intentions of despicable, despicable people and the consequences that they want.
They embrace unhumanity because they reject humanity itself in the humanity of their opponents, in the humanity of anyone they seek to oppress.
And that is why we've written the new book, Unhumans, all about them.
You can go check it out on Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Skyhorse Publishing.
Make sure you go get a copy.
Raw Egg Nationalist will be joining us next.
Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications so you'll never miss a clip.
You'll never miss a new live episode.
And we're putting them out every single day of the week.
But I got a hankering yearning deep inside for this book called Unhumans.
I just can't.
Tells the story of secrets and my job.
Back live, Human Events Daily, Washington DC.
The book is Unhumans, currently top 50, just broke back into the top 50 of Amazon.com.
And actually, our next guest has written a column about the book, and in fact, some of the controversy about the title of the book for HumanEvents.com, Raw Egg Nationalist.
We are honored to have back on the program.
It's always a pleasure, Jack, and I've just managed to regain control of myself, actually, after listening to that wonderful AI-generated song you played.
That's really quite something.
You're actually going to be playing it in your ear and in your head all day, aren't you?
Yeah, I think I am now.
Yeah, that's the point.
Running psyops on my own audience and my own guests.
But with this book, The Unhumans, there was some controversy over the title itself because I remember when we were sort of Going back and forth, Joshua Lysak and I, the co-author, and saying, oh, should we just call it the Secret History of Communist Revolution?
Should we just call it, you know, something like, something blasé, like the Red Revolutions?
And I said, no, I want to go a bit further, because we're not just talking about the revolutions or You know, as things that randomly happened, it's actually because a specific group of people who have embraced a specific set of ideas, and that's where the title Unhumans came from.
And yet there were, and I assume people on the left would be very upset about it, which they were, and the SPLC, we call them the Secret Police Legislative Council, So the Secret Police Legislative Council was attacking me, I think during the book announcement, actually.
But then there were even people sort of like from the classic liberal, you know, segment and the center that were attacking the title as well.
And you came out and wrote a column about all about this.
Walk me through it.
Yeah, well, I mean, first of all, it's worth saying that this is an incredible achievement to get into the top 50 books on Amazon.
I mean, that is, you know, there are millions of books on Amazon.
It's a it's a really big thing.
And it should be should be seen, I think, as and this is how I start the column.
It should be seen as a great achievement.
You know, we've got a great book, a really compelling book that's in the top 50 on Amazon.
That means thousands and thousands of people have already preordered this book and tens of thousands of people are going to buy it.
To find out about, you know, the most murderous ideology in history, the most murderous evil regimes in history, and hopefully how to protect themselves against it and protect the nation, their families, their communities, etc.
That's a good thing.
And yet, and yet, once again, we discover that people who are supposed to be on our side are are among those who are, you know, criticizing and saying, Oh, this is too much.
You've gone too far.
Um, and it was, and it was about the title fundamentally.
It's about the title on humans.
And I mean, basically what you're trying to do with this title on humans is get at the fact that actually this is, this is metaphysical.
Really.
We're talking about a metaphysical phenomenon.
It's something that is, It goes beyond mere politics.
It's not.
This isn't just about differences between, you know, Democrats and Republicans and people in the middle.
It's it's a metaphysical thing.
Communism and the communist worldview and what it does to people, it is all encompassing.
It is metaphysical.
Anyway, that's what I think you're trying to get at with the title.
But instead, what we get is we get Yeah, we get people on on our side in inverted commas saying you're dehumanizing your your enemies.
That's precisely what the communists did.
Oh, I don't know.
You know, everybody has a good side.
Everybody's capable of repentance.
You know, Thomas Sowell was a Marxist when he was a young man and he went on to become, you know, a great conservative author.
And I think they're totally missing the point.
Firstly, as I say, it's you're not saying that communists aren't people.
You're not saying that they're inhuman or that they're non-human.
What you're saying is fundamentally that they have a, they adopt, uh, they inhabit a kind of persona or are inhabited by a persona, which actually makes them anti everything that makes people human.
And it's not only a personal process that these individuals who become communists go through.
Sadly, it's something that they force on everyone else.
Um, and that's what you're trying to get at, but really this is a, and this is the, then the second half of the, of the essay.
I tried to get into the fact that actually this is just part of a broader problem that we have with the right today, where basically so many people on the right, not on the center right, are losers and they're, they're unaccustomed to, to success because, you know, for decades we've had reversal after reversal and success after success coming from the left.
And actually, so many people who are on the right and on the center right are almost conditioned to be afraid of success.
And so when they see somebody being bold, somebody putting forward a bold, compelling book that really stridently argues against communism and is informative, then their first Their first reaction is to lash out and say, oh, no, you're going too far.
It is a very strange tendency, but it's very, very noticeable.
There is a you know, something you just said reminds me of one of my all time favorite Trump tweets where this was back during I believe it was Access Hollywood weekend or just just thereafter.
in 2016 October where he said, "Disloyal R's are far more difficult than crooked Hillary.
"They come at you from all sides.
"They don't know how to win.
"I will teach them." And it's exactly what you're talking about, This idea that you have to maintain a certain form.
You couldn't possibly stoop as low as the other side.
When they go low, we go high.
You couldn't possibly actually use some of the tactics of the opponent.
Why, that would make you just as bad as them, wouldn't it?
Well, what I think as well, fundamentally, is I think that these people, these people, these doubters on the right, if you will, in the centre-right, I don't think they, I still don't think they really understand exactly what the radical left wants.
I don't think they realise that actually they're not going to stop at anything short of revolution and that they are actually, as they have in the past in Russia, In Central America and Latin America, everywhere in China, everywhere there has been communist revolution, they've killed millions of people.
And that will happen again.
They will kill people, lots of people.
But these doubters seem to think that actually, no, it's just going to be politics as normal.
And actually, we can appeal to the better natures of these people.
And they'll, you know, they'll let us remain in the center as liberals.
And, you know, we will be untouched by any of the nastiness.
But actually that's not the case at all.
And it really does make you wonder actually just how far the left is going to have to go before people, these people making these criticisms of the book and people who behave like this more generally, how far will the left have to go before they wake up?
Genuinely, I don't know.
And it's quite interesting, too, because there's also a tendency from, again, the very same crowd, to say, well, if we just throw Trump off the ticket, if we get Trump and Trumpism out of the party, then we can go back to the way things used to be and we won't have to worry about this nastiness anymore because all of this is going on because of Trump.
and Trump supporters and his, you know, his coterie of individuals that are, you know, they're supporting him online and other places.
And it's, I think they've actually missed a fundamental, a fundamental timeline here because MAGA and Trumpism and all of this did not begin this current phase of politics or this current phase of whatever you want to call political life right now, because it's not just politics. a fundamental timeline here because MAGA and Trumpism and all Did not begin this current phase of politics or this current phase of whatever you want to call political life right now, because it's not just politics.
It's this is actually the attempt to correct the incorrectness that's going on.
And so if Trump fails, you are going to have a left wing that is completely running roughshod over everything.
Yeah, for sure.
And also, I think it's worthwhile actually remembering, look, that this isn't just about America.
I mean, this is going on across the entire length and breadth of the Western world.
You know, these same forces are mobilizing.
You've got the sort of populist right and you've got also the hard left.
You've got the same kinds of things taking place in countries like Germany, for instance.
Look at what's happening with the alternative for Deutschland, the sort of populist anti-immigration party.
And the left is trying to ban it.
There's there's actually political violence.
States basically state sponsored political violence against Alternative for Deutschland candidates.
Rampant political persecution.
This isn't just, you know, you can talk about, you can't actually talk about Trump in isolation.
This is a broader phenomenon.
And so, yeah, I mean, I think that these, I think that these people are very, very misguided in thinking that if Trump is out of the picture, things will just go back to the way they were.
No, they won't.
As you say, what you'll have then is you'll have a left that is totally unopposed and Then they can do exactly what they please, like they did in Russia, like they did in China, like they did in Latin America, and in other places.
You know, and we've already seen little tastes of this BLM.
We've seen Antifa.
We've seen these movements across Europe.
We've seen the migrants brought in from Africa, from the Middle East.
In the U.S., it's from Central America, Latin America.
And many times these are dregs of society.
These Indios coming up.
And Trump himself even called out the fact that they don't even speak Spanish.
They don't speak English.
They don't speak any language that anyone in the country speaks because they're speaking these local tribal languages.
They're completely ill-suited.
But what we go through in the book, and we're coming up on a break, but in the next, I want to talk about this some more, is this idea that it actually is happening by design, that when you have a coalition of the fringes, the way to build more power is to increase the amount of those fringes. the way to build more power is to increase the We're speaking with Raw Egg Nationalist.
Today is Good Friday.
We are here, Human Events.
The other day.
It tells a story of secrets and a mystery.
The hidden tales of the communist history.
It's in a mystery.
The hidden tales of the communist history.
I want to know the truth, what really went down soon.
So I'm jumping on my computer, going to pre-order town.
Pre-ordering live, human!
Can't wait to get my hands on that phone.
Alright, Jack Posobiec, we are back live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C.
Folks, the world is in flames.
Bidenomics is a complete and total disaster.
But it cannot, it will not ruin my day.
Do you know why?
That's because I start my day with a hot America First cup of blackout coffee.
This coffee is 100% Americana.
Blackout Coffee is 100% committed to conservative values.
From sourcing the beans to the roasting process, customer support and shipping, they embody true American values and accept no compromise on taste or quality.
Look, I love this stuff.
It powers me.
It powers the business.
It powers the show.
It can power you, too.
Go to blackoutcoffee.com and use promo code POSO20 for 20% off your first order.
Easter is this weekend.
Give your friends and family the gift of being awake, not woke, with Blackout Coffee.
That's blackoutcoffee.com slash poso, blackoutcoffee.com slash poso, promo code poso20.
Talking with Raw Egg Nationalist today and you know Egg, there's a bit of this sort of concern trolling that I really think that the biggest struggle that I have on a regular basis when I talk about these things is people from like this middle, they act almost as gatekeepers, they act as almost these wet blankets to anyone who actually wants to take action and the issue is, look yesterday,
We did the show yesterday, segment one, and then later throughout the show we were live through this funeral, this funeral wake for a New York City police officer who was killed making a routine traffic stop.
A guy was parked illegally in a bus stop.
And this officer was slain.
Then the very next segment was, you know, slain by a guy who, by the way, slain by a guy who had been let out of jail, but arrested 21 times, a career violent criminal.
Very next segment is Donald Trump's lawyer losing his law license.
And yet I sat back and I say, well, this is clearly anarcho-tyranny.
This is obviously and so clearly a specific and legitimate plan that they are using to
Unleash criminals in major city centers to destabilize the country and then to use lawfare against any opponent that they that they seek and yet when I when I go and say this to people it's like these classic liberals and establishment conservatives and others who say oh no no no just talk about the history just talk about what happened in the past and one of the things that we get into in the book in on humans is that well there were a lot of times where people in the past faced this thing and
And they themselves, like the Russians in St.
Petersburg in 1917, said, oh, this this will never happen for me.
That's that's just you know, that's just that's just people that are you know, that's just people who said something wrong or did something wrong.
They're the ones who are going to get in trouble, not us.
It's never going to come for me.
It doesn't always work, though, does it?
No, no, it doesn't.
In fact, There's a very poignant segment in the Gulag Archipelago, Alexander Solzhenitsyn's great book about the hideous terror in Russia of the Gulags and Stalin, where he says, you know, something along the lines of this.
Millions and millions of poor Russian peasants were marched off into the Siberian wastes to die in the Gulags.
And the intellectuals had nothing to say about that.
But it was only when Stalin's men when the the NKVD that you know, the secret police came for the intellectuals that suddenly they they cried out You know, the revolution has been betrayed.
We have been betrayed.
This is an outrage The historic the historical Example that the historical record is totally clear, you know, and that's why this book is so important I think is because it lays out the history we are history doesn't You know, history doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes.
And we can very clearly see similar things happening today, as happened in the early 20th century in Russia and elsewhere with radical leftist groups.
And I think it behooves us and it behooves us in memory of all the people who died, all the millions, the tens of millions of people who died to wake up and take notice of this.
And what's amazing too, that we go in throughout the book, and you mentioned how history doesn't repeat itself or rhymes, and one of the things that we broke out in the book was an attempt to actually define the situation that we find ourselves in currently, right?
Because so many people will say, and you see this on Twitter a lot, where people will say, well there's no revolution going on right now, there's no cultural revolution, nobody's You know, walk down the street on a regular day and leftists will, we saw this in 2020, by the way, when I would say, hey, they're burning down the city.
And some leftists in Portland would post a picture with their, you know, with their coffee mug and, you know, having brunch in some cafe saying everything seems fine to me.
You know, even though last night the police station had burned to the ground or something like this.
And so it becomes this sort of this this denial in terms of what's actually going on.
But we we find a way to say, well, hold on.
This isn't a civil war.
This isn't a cultural revolution, at least as it was in terms of China in 1967.
And the reason is, and this is something that Joshua actually developed, that in the same way that warfare itself has changed from first generation, second generation, third, all the way to what we're in currently, fifth generation warfare.
From Maneuver Conflict to 4th Generation Warfare, where you've got the synthesis of propaganda, media, with kinetic action, and now 5th Generation Warfare, where it's social media, it's internet, in addition to small kinetic actions.
That's essentially what we're in.
We're in a 5th Generation Warfare version of a Communist Revolution.
So what is that?
What would you call that?
And our argument is that what we should title that is is an irregular revolution.
So it's an irregular revolution because it's not one that's sort of going on in your face every day, but it could be in your face if they use their favorite tactic against you, which and pretty much everyone on the right who or just anyone who's stood up or posed a threat to any of them has faced these things.
We call them micro revolutions.
And so micro-revolutions are the new tactic.
And a micro-revolution is something that can be launched on a daily basis.
In fact, they are launched daily.
Huberman, you know, Andrew Huberman had a micro-revolution launched against him a couple of days ago for no reason other than the fact that, you know, by the way, he talks about a lot of the things that you talk about in terms of healthy living and healthy living without the pharmaceutical companies.
And so there are these all of these different tactics out there that keep being run or myself when I was at CPAC that actually add up to a communist revolution, but in a regular communist revolution.
Do you think that that might be a way to try to explain to people what it is that we're living through right now?
Yes, yeah, I think.
Yes, I think you do have to impress on people the fact that that circumstances change.
And America in the 21st century is not Russia in 1917.
It's a totally different kind of society.
History rhymes.
It doesn't, um, uh, you know, but, but, but fundamentally, fundamentally, you can see nevertheless that there is a, there is a, there are a variety of different tactics being used, but there is nevertheless, uh, there's evidence of a clear sort of, um, There's a machinery behind all of it that you can see, and you see the workings of it with particular events like the Black Lives Matter riots in, you know, the mostly peaceful riots in 2020.
All of a sudden, at the click of a finger, you know, you get suddenly the mobilization of this of this vast, vast paramilitary force across the length and breadth of the nation.
I mean, that's really quite something.
But like you say, that's not required all the time.
It's required in certain circumstances.
And 2020, the Black Lives Matter riots, that was a display of force.
I think that was a you know, that was the velvet glove was taken off and the iron fist underneath was revealed.
But a lot of the time that isn't necessary.
A lot of the time it's it's much more subtle.
It's indoctrination in school, it's the universities, it's the general kind of cultural revolution that's going on in the media, in film, across social media, etc.
So yes, I mean, I think, yeah, that is one of the best things that the book does, is to show people that actually, look, this is a different kind of revolution, but it is a revolution nonetheless, and it should be understood fundamentally In the same way as previous communist revolutions should be understood.
And it's simple because, as you said earlier, this isn't, and I was on with Don Jr.
recording this week as well, and I said, look, this isn't, we're not having an argument that's in the sense of a normal political argument.
I'm not arguing about, you know, should taxes be higher?
Should this tax rate be higher on this bracket or this company?
What should the marginal rates be?
Or, you know, What social program should we extend, and which ones should be sunsetted, etc.?
Sure, those are normal political arguments.
This is fundamentally different from all of that, and it should be something, by the way, where anyone who, if you're just, you know, part of what Elon Musk and Alex Jones and myself, we were on that 1X basis, we called it team humanity.
If you are for humanity, then you have to stand against Yeah, absolutely.
It is.
And I think that, yeah, I think that the title is totally apt.
And once people understand what the title actually means, once they understand that this is about, you know, a metaphysical problem, this is about a force, an historical force that is That is totally against the man's better nature, against man's better inclination, against all of the good things that we all want to have and to see realized, then I think it will make much more sense.
But yes, it is a fundamental metaphysical battle that's taking place and people need to understand it within those terms, within those really like the ultimate stakes.
This isn't, as you say, Just a standard political battle about taxation or women's rights or any other form of rights or whatever.
This is actually about fundamentally the kind of the kind of world we want to live in, the kind of nation that you want to live in, whether you will live in a free nation where people actually can engage in politics and have disagreements, or whether you want to live in a nation that is ruled at the tip of a bayonet.
Quick break coming up.
Raw Egg Nationalist is our guest.
Human Events Daily continues.
In tales of the communist history.
I want to know the truth, what really went down.
So I'm jumping on my computer, going to pre-order town.
Pre-ordering lives, humans.
Can't wait to...
Pre-ordering lives, humans.
Can't wait to get my hands on that book.
Gonna dive into his pages.
Take a closer look from the Russian Revolution.
To the play, risk and this book.
Alright Jeff, so we're back live at Human Events Daily.
We're here, Good Friday, Raw Egg Nationalist is our guest.
Egg, one of the things that I think that the right fundamentally misunderstands about the current left or the leaders of the left, whatever you want to call it, you always have to use these sort of like euphemisms to get around all of these things, but they misunderstand something about the current state of the left because
When we're talking about on humans, those who embrace on humanity, we're not talking about people who are successful or accomplished in any way.
We're talking about people who have used politics to create this coalition of the fringes in order to gain political power.
And by the way, this isn't necessarily just done in representative government, like this mayor of Baltimore who's been running around attacking white people all week after a bridge collapsed in his town.
That had nothing to do with white people, by the way.
That it's in the judiciary, it's in the bureaucracy, it's in corporate America, it's in the corporate world.
And so what is it about these people?
They seem like they're not actually fueled by wanting to create a better world.
Why is it that they just want to destroy everything?
I think I think you're right about conservatives and the right.
They don't understand actually how leftist politics works.
And they don't, for all that they might claim to understand politics, and they don't understand the way that the left builds these coalitions of the fringes.
Now, what is a coalition of the fringes?
Well, it's basically a sort of motley crew of all the downtrodden, the dispossessed, the deviant and the diseased within society.
And that is how Leftist politics basically has always worked.
It's how Leninism works archetypally.
That's what Lenin did.
He gathered together, you know, the poorest segments of society and in particular the unemployed, the criminal, etc., the work-shy, in order to build this coalition that he could then, you know, use to seize power.
Now, these people are people who, by their very nature, are dispossessed.
They are resentful, they're unsuccessful, and so they bear the psychological scars of that particular state.
They're not interested, as you say, in making the world a better place.
They're interested in seizing power and getting revenge.
Politics is a means of revenge, really, fundamentally.
And it was and that's exactly what what the Russian Revolution was for so many of the people who participated on the side of the Bolsheviks.
It was they were getting their own back against the kulaks, against the wealthy, successful peasants, against the bourgeoisie, the people who had success supposedly at their expense.
And it's a very, very powerful motivation, hatred and resentment.
And people on the right don't really quite understand just how powerful it is.
But it's actually powerful enough to change the course of history.
It has changed the course of history.
Resentment is basically the driving force behind leftist revolution.
And so this resentment politics, this idea that we're going to enter the, because most people, most, you know, I think your average person, your average person who even considers themselves progressive, they'll say, well, I want to go into politics.
I want to enter into public life.
I want to enter into activism, whatever you call it, political action, political life to make the world better, because I see something going wrong with my town or my neighborhood or my whatever it is.
And they'll say, you know, and perhaps if we pursue this new policy, it will it will benefit our our town and we can get, you know, a better hospital or better doctors or attract some some better some better businesses that we that we like.
But this is a wholly separate origin of the the breadth of a of a political coalition, because you're talking about a new generation almost groomed for mediocrity because they only know this politics of destruction, because you're talking about a new generation almost groomed for mediocrity because they only know this politics of destruction, this Of stripping bare everything.
And by the way, you see this a lot in post-modernism because they're always trying to deconstruct everything.
Oh, we have to deconstruct this.
We have to deconstruct that.
Well, the problem is when you're deconstructing everything and so you actually see this in art as well, I guess is an interesting thing to note because they're constantly deconstructing the greater art that was made before them, but they're not actually able to create anything of their own.
Yes, yeah, it is fundamentally a destructive impulse.
And what's interesting, you know, you mentioned about the sort of what you might call like the do-gooders, the people who get involved, say, at like a kind of middle level, people from from sort of good backgrounds who have high ideals.
I mean, their motivation is interesting, but it's I think it's separate from the fundamental motivations of the masses, which are which are based in resentment now.
Early on, then, you know, in the in the early 20th century, the Russian Revolution, then the main the main motivations, the main the main sort of motivation that that united this this coalition of the fringes was economic in a sense, or the main status was economic.
But as as the 20th century has progressed, then actually economic class has become less of a uniting force.
And what we have instead is we have We have biology.
So we have a new kind of coalition of the fringes that is formed from people who are united by basically their rebellion against the facts of biology in certain fundamental senses.
So, you know, that is why maybe the most radical foot soldiers now of this of this sort of Leninist revolution that's ongoing are transgenders and people who are people who are, you know, so unhappy in their skin or that they're actually willing to, you know, to have radical surgery to change their body.
It's a very, very complicated sort of phenomenon, the way that this has changed, I think, over the last 100 years.
But fundamentally, the same motivating forces underlie it.
It's this same sort of gathering together of fringe groups together in order to pursue a policy of vengeance, policy of political vengeance and And that is that is absolutely absolutely what is going on today.
And that is absolutely what unites all of these leftist groups is their hatred and their desire to deconstruct the existing order.
And even if that means not constructing anything on top of it, because maybe they're not even capable of doing that, but they want to see the world burn.
Right, and you never see this.
You never see a successful version of one of these societies.
They just sort of coast until they run out of money from the Russian treasury or whatever it was.
So, it's also interesting that the people who do well, their highest value isn't competence or merit or excellence or greatness.
It's actually loyalty.
Loyalty to the regime.
Loyalty to the party.
Loyalty to the revolution.
And then who becomes the most loyal?
Well, inherently, the most loyal people would be the ones who most have no ability To achieve success, any modicum of success, anywhere else in society.
And I make the joke of looking at the Biden administration, but it really is instructive if we look at the Biden administration to look at these people like Pete Buttigieg and Rachel Levine and all of these clowns, this absolute circus that's up there, you know, bringing in Dylan Mulvaney and all of this stuff.
And the question, you know, we have to scratch our heads saying, well, how could all of this be?
But actually, it's part of an agenda because the more fringe you are, the more useful you become to the revolution.
Yeah, exactly.
I mean, it's not insanity, actually, when you look at it from the perspective of this coalition of the fringes.
It's actually perfectly sane.
I mean, they are promoting exactly the people you would promote if what you wanted was undying loyalty.
Because, ultimately, You are if you are the leader, you are the one who can give them what they want, which is power and the ability to lord it over people who previously were lording it over them.
So, yeah, it makes it makes perfect sense.
I mean, this isn't the left hasn't lost its mind.
The left is the left is being totally rational in pursuing its interests along this line.
I always try to explain this to people on the right because every single day I hear someone will send me a message or I get a text or whatever it is and they'll say, Oh, this is crazy.
I can't believe this happening.
This is so nuts.
This is unprecedented.
I say, no, this is exactly what we would have.
And through this lens in the coalition, the fringes lens, It is predictive, it is prescriptive, and it is, in fact, a way for people to actually predict and predate what will happen and what will come forward.
Because it's exactly, exactly an agenda that we've seen from Marxists and Leninists for over two centuries.
Stay tuned.
One more segment.
We're all right.
Next.
It's a mystery, the hidden tales of the communist history.
But I got a hankering, yearning deep inside, for this book called Unhumans I just can't hide.
Unhumans I just can't hide.
All right, Jack Persovic back live, final segment here.
The book is Unhumans, the secret history of communist revolutions and how to crush them.
Now, our guest is Roy Ignatius Egg.
One of the things that we talk about in the book in terms of prescriptions for doing something about this is something the right is also terrible at, and that's called presenting a viable competing vision, a viable competing vision for what the world should look like, what the countries should look like, what the West should look like.
And I've noticed that there's been this huge controversy lately over the phrase, and I tweet this every single morning, Christ is king.
And the reason to do that is number one, because I believe it, but it's also kind of become this sort of rallying cry for public support.
And it's very strange because people seem to have forgotten that Western civilization is still a majority Christian civilization.
Today is Good Friday.
Why is it that we are being told that this phrase itself is somehow bigoted, that it's not only is it intolerant, but that it's racist?
Why is this phrase so terrifying to people?
Yeah, it's a strange one, isn't it?
I mean, it's not like it's like Christ is King is a controversial statement within the Christian tradition, is it?
I mean, Christ is King, Christ is King of the world.
And, you know, that that that that goes without saying.
And that is a but that is a motif that, you know, you see throughout the Bible and also throughout Christian history and iconography and art and everything that is kind of Christianity.
It's actually in the Bible.
It's an interesting bookend because it's the three wise men, the Magi, referred to Jesus as king when he is born.
And then it's also on the crucifix, Good Friday, you know, I-N-R-I, Jesus of Nazareth, king of the Jews.
So it's at his birth and his death, he's both referred to as a king.
Yeah, so it's not like this is some strange sort of imposition from the world of politics or anything like that.
But what I think fundamentally we're talking about, again, to go back to what we were saying in the previous segment, this is about inversion, it's about destruction.
Um, and America's history is Christian.
America is a Christian nation.
America's people have up until this moment been overwhelmingly, you know, majority Christian.
Um, so I think because it is, because it represents, it represents the great power of America's history.
It represents the, you know, it stands atop the, the sort of, uh, you know, America's history and America's ideals and values, etc., then it is a, it's something that I think scares the left, it scares the opponents of America,
of America's sort of true history and true destiny, because it is, like you say, of America's sort of true history and true destiny, because it is, like you say, it's a fundamental, it's a positive vision, and there aren't many positive visions going around these days, and so those that are going around that do still have power, that do still have the ability to galvanize large numbers that do still have the ability to galvanize large numbers of people and unite them in service of a greater cause than themselves, have to be degraded, have to be driven from the public square,
because they represent a threat to the coalition of because they represent a threat to the coalition of the fringes and to their unhuman ideals.
And we actually we had it in the intro of the show at one point is one of the one of the rallies that I was doing and I said Christ is King and then it's also in the recent CPAC you know freak out at me the micro revolution that was launched at me that when I held up the rosary you know And of course, me holding up the rosary, I said, we're going to replace democracy with this.
And they just, they lost it.
They absolutely lost their minds.
And I think there's also a piece of it too, where a lot of people have believed that, you know, when I say Christ is king, that means king of me.
That means king of myself.
That means I shouldn't actually go out and take this into the world.
I shouldn't actually try to apply this to others because to do so would be wrong for some reason.
But that's not how the left behaves.
And in fact, this sort of learned helplessness is totally, totally ahistorical.
This is a new phenomenon and no group in the world ever believed this, I really think, until the current West.
Yeah, no, quite.
It's a funny thing.
And I think what you have to remember, you have to understand, you know, communism and leftism as arising out of romanticism, out of the French Revolution and the killing of a king.
And there is that kind of, you know, no gods, no kings, that sort of attitude remains within leftism.
And I think the the specter of of some kind of superordinate force that stands over people and and is in judgment of them and guides their actions is
is a threat because it because it actually suggests that actually there's something you know men don't men don't create their own values men aren't the supreme arbiters of truth actually there's something else beyond men that is that is guiding them and they don't want that they want to they want to sever man's connection to to To any kind of force greater than himself.
And so that I think is why, yes, it is a form of learned helplessness.
I think you're alone in the world fundamentally in this sort of communist view of the world, even though, of course, it places great emphasis on the collectivity, the community.
Nevertheless, you are alone in the world because you are cut off from the divine, from the transcendent, etc.
Well, and the revolution becomes the divine and the transcendent.
So it's not so much that they don't have a belief system.
It's just that it's so completely inverted.
That's why their art is so terrible.
That's why they can't meme.
That's why their architecture and buildings look so absolutely ridiculous.
because as you say, they have no connection and they sever their own connection from anything transcendent, from anything divine or spiritual in any way, or they have the spirituality of, you know, sort of these like hippie type things that really go out there.
Raw Egg Nationalist, we've only got about a minute left.
Where can people go to follow you, to get your writings, to get access to everything you're doing? - Yep, follow me on Twitter.
I'm babygravy9 on Twitter.
My magazine is Man's World.
That's mansworldmag.online.
We've got a fully physical first edition of the magazine coming out in April.
It's dropping next month and you can order that from passage.press.
But I've got a substack as well, rawegstack.com, where you can read some of my writings.
But follow me on Twitter.
That's the best place.
▲
Export Selection