All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 4, 2023 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
43:20
EPISODE 575: Who Will Be The Next Speaker of The House and Will The Pope Allow Same Sex Marriage?

Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec Save up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSO Go to https://www.patriotmobile.com/poso/ or call 878-PATRIOT to get free activation with offer code POSOGo to https://www.BlackoutCoffee.com/POSO and use promo code POSO20 for 20% OFF your first order.Support the Show.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Sign up today.
It's called the Pozo Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Totally free.
the Pozo Daily Brief.
We are in a fifth generational conflict.
A commentator, international social media sensation and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host Jack Posobiec.
Deliver us from evil!
Yes, I will.
At the appropriate time, I will be.
Judge Arthur N. Garan has now put a gag order, a specific gag order, though, regarding posting or publicly speaking about any member of his staff.
Doing the right thing isn't always easy, but it is necessary.
I don't regret standing up for choosing governance over grievance.
It is my responsibility.
It is my job.
I'll boo all you want who have hollowed out this town and have borrowed against the future of our future generations.
I'll be happy to fund my political operation through the work of hardworking Americans, $10 and $20 and $30 at a time.
Nancy Pelosi is being kicked out of her Capitol hideaway office today, moments after Congressman McHenry became acting speaker.
He made that decision.
Bottom line, the House is in chaos without a leader.
I think I'm in pretty good stead with the former president.
You'll see me on the campaign trail with him soon.
And by the way, you know who you won't see on the campaign trail at a big rally?
Kevin McCarthy.
Because if Kevin McCarthy took the stage at a Trump rally, he would be booed off of it like Lindsey Graham.
A lot of people have been calling me a bad speaker, but all I can say is we'll do whatever's best for the country and for the Republican Party.
You know, we're leading, I don't know, I'm sure you don't read too much in the papers, but we're leading by like 50 points per president.
My focus is totally on that.
If I can help them during the process, I will do it.
But we have some great people in the Republican Party that can do a great job as speakers.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily with Jack Pacific, live from Washington, D.C.
Today is October 4th, 2023.
I know, Dominic, folks, we got a lot of craziness going on in Washington, D.C.
My phone has been blowing off the hook, but of course, because today is the Emergency Broadcast System Day, I decided to throw my phone in the microwave.
Look, I got people calling me from every single angle, every tribe, if you will, in the house.
Jack, help me get behind this guy, Jack.
Oh, Jack, get behind this guy for speaker.
Oh, Jack, we need this guy to speak.
How about this?
You know what I haven't heard yet?
You know what I haven't heard?
I haven't heard, Jack, we want to listen to the voters.
Jack, we want to listen to the people of this country.
Jack, we understand what your priorities are.
Or, even better, tell us what the people are telling you.
And then we can have a conversation about who's going to be speaker.
I'll tell you right now, Nancy Mace, the Fed, is completely out.
Tom Emmer, not a wartime consigliere.
Let me tell you something, Tom Emmer.
You've got a better chance of being the speaker of the Ukrainian Rada than you do as the Speaker of the House of the United States of America, the House of Representatives.
So why don't you call your boy Zelensky and maybe he can get you a plane ticket, alright?
Hearing a lot about Jim Jordan?
We'll see.
Maybe if Jim Jordan is willing to cut a deal with Matt Gaetz, put Matt Gaetz on the Weaponization Committee, okay, give Jim Jordan the speakership, we can talk.
But I got questions about him when it comes to Google, I got questions about him when it comes to Ukraine, a lot of this.
We've got Evita Duffy from The Federalist on with us right now.
Evita, No, I want to make sure you're not calling me in right now on your phone.
Is your phone currently either within one of the silent Faraday sleeves or secure in your microwave at this time?
It's not in my microwave, but it's completely turned off.
Excellent, excellent.
Avita, what are you hearing about the speakership and really just from your perspective, where does it come in that, you know, that we see something like this that's happened and now it just suddenly seems like the entire house is in chaos?
Yeah, so I'm a little bit split on this speaker question.
I know it's probably not what you were expecting from me, but my dad was in Congress for 10 years, and he always came home and complained about just the gridlock.
When he was elected in 2010, Republicans had a massive majority in the House.
There was so much potential, there was so much that could have been done, and yet not much was done, right?
we're in an even slimmer majority right now.
And I think that people underestimate how much politicking and personal issues and vendettas come into play with everything that goes on in Congress.
These are people.
And so do I think Kevin McCarthy was the greatest speaker of the house we've ever had?
No.
Do I think that he was better than John Boehner?
Yeah, I do.
Do I think that he was a genuine conservative?
No, I don't.
But do I think that there is a lot of negotiating and concessions that have to be made in Congress?
Yes.
And so my real fear with this whole thing is that we had a decent Speaker of the House And now we're going to go into weeks of trying to find a new one, and he might not even end up being any better than Kevin McCarthy, and we're not going to fix the border, we're not going to address the Biden crime family, we're not going to do really what the American people want to do because we're distracted by this Speaker nomination, and the Republican Party is completely disorganized.
This is very concerning to me because we need to be focusing on Biden crime, on the border, on inflation, and if we're focusing on the Speaker of the House, we're not doing the things that matter to the American people.
Are there any names that you're currently looking at?
Because I threw a couple out there for me.
I'm a non-starter when it comes to Mazer Emmer.
That's just where I stand based on looking at their records.
Jim Jordan.
I could have a conversation about Jim Jordan.
Byron Donald's a name that I've heard thrown around out there.
Cole, some other ones.
Are there any names that you're hearing or any names that you're personally looking at?
Well, I'm hearing the name Scalise a lot, and I have to say I'm not excited about that.
This is my fear, right?
I don't think that any of the potential names that have been floating around, except for perhaps Jim Jordan, are going to be any better.
And frankly, they'll probably be worse than Kevin McCarthy.
And my real question right now is to Matt Gaetz, because he's the one that's instigated this whole takeover of the House.
What is his plan?
Who does he think should be the speaker?
Is Matt Gaetz willing to step up and do it?
I'm sure that's not going to happen, but the point is that this is a really difficult job.
This is a thankless job.
And so I don't know what the plan is, really.
He instigated this whole thing, but never really brought forth a plan for the House moving forward.
And so I'm looking to him.
He hasn't said anything so far, and that's really concerning to me, because the options that we've just talked about, not very good.
Well, at the same time, we also have to realize that this doesn't actually change the composition of the majority.
So there's no way, right?
So if Matt Gaetz and the MAGA caucus, I think I was saying the Gaetz block yesterday, they can do this again.
And I think that's something that nobody is talking about that.
So if Jordan gets it, let's say it's Jim Jordan, right?
He's kind of the sort of easy money, the safe money right now is that Jim Jordan is going to be the guy who gets it because he can He really does have the ability.
I know Charlie was just on here talking about how Jim Jordan can kind of unite the clans, unite the tribes on a lot of these different issues.
He's not perfect on everything.
Most people generally like him.
That being said, there is something of a check on anyone going to the speakership because of Gates and this block showing that they've been willing to play the nuclear option.
And that essentially creates a situation where if they're not worried about the repercussions from this, we're talking about the money that's being spent against them, the earmarked that are going to be completely thrown out the window for any appropriations that come up or any of the CRs, that doesn't that then Evita create a sort of check on anyone really who wants to become speaker?
Yes.
Yeah, it does.
And I think as a whole, that's actually a very positive thing.
I think we should be looking at individual appropriation spills.
These giant spending packages are always ridiculous.
They always have earmarks.
They always have problems.
What I think is really important when we look at this whole issue is We do have checks coming forward.
There is a positive to that.
So yeah, I think there are ups and downs to it all.
No, I think that's right.
And what we're going through, the broader picture here is, this is indicative, I think, of just the anger of the grassroots out there.
Because in any other situation, this never would have been able to take place.
But you've got a grassroots in this country, you've got a conservative base that is so incredibly upset at Washington, D.C., that they're just not willing to take They don't want to compromise, right?
I read the comments, I see what I get in.
They don't want to compromise, they want action.
And look, Evita, we have you on all the time and we talk about this.
We're seeing conservatives thrown into jail for their beliefs, pro-lifers thrown into jail for their beliefs, and then we're being told we need to send another couple of billion to Ukraine, and we don't actually ever seem to get anywhere when it comes to any of these issues.
Right.
And what I found very interesting in the wake of this takeover, this Speaker ouster, is who are the wolves in sheep's clothing on the right?
I think this was a Democratic move.
This was a fair, cut-and-dry vote.
Speaker McCarthy lost, and now we're going to move in a different direction.
And at the same time, you have really these uniparty Republicans in the Senate, in the House, I don't know if that's my computer.
There we go!
NSA!
That's the NSA!
That's the NSA coming for us right there.
There it is.
That's Deep State.
That's the NSA.
They found me, Evita!
They found both of us.
They're coming for us now.
What I was saying was that we have Republicans like John Cornyn in the Senate who are calling the Republicans who did this domestic terrorists.
That's literally what he said yesterday, that this was a terrorist attack, the ouster of Kevin McCarthy.
We have people on the right who think just like the left.
And this speaker, ouster, I think really show people's true colors.
Who is beholden to the Uniparty and who is actually interested in listening to the American people and the concerns that they have?
We have already, the FBI, the Biden administration, members of the Democratic Party and the corporate media labeling anybody that disagrees with the left a domestic terrorist.
You're a pro-lifer, you're a traditional Catholic, you are a MAGA Republican, you are a J6er, imprisoned without due process, This is what they want to do to the right.
We can't have Republicans parroting the talking points of the left.
And I think that this speaker ouster really showed who was on the side of the American people and who was on the side of the left.
No, Navita, we're going to break here, but I'll add to that.
I didn't like what I heard Newt Gingrich say.
I don't like what I heard Newt Gingrich say about Matt Gaetz calling him a traitor.
I don't think that's the right kind of language.
I think that's the kind of language that leftists use, and I'm very confused at why Newt Gingrich, a guy who's a lifetime conservative, would be talking about his fellow conservatives that way.
Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications, so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
When I grew up in the hood, I rolled with Bloods, and them boys had a saying.
You can't be listening to all that slappy whack.
Trematizol, it's a bam ship.
Nippy Bam Bam, like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Jack Posobiec back here at Human Events.
You know, folks, I gotta say, my microwave burst open.
My cell phone jumped out of it and attacked me in the last segment.
It was completely crazy.
I don't know what happened but folks let me just tell you something.
This is what the media and the government are doing with cell phone companies and that is why you need to make sure that your cell phone company, Patriot Mobile, That is the switch to make, because it's been America's only Christian conservative wireless provider.
When I say only, trust me, they're the only one.
Glenn and the team have been great supporters of this show, which is why I am proud to partner with them.
Patriot Mobile offers dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability to access all three major networks, which means you get the same coverage you've been accustomed to without funding the left.
When you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're sending the message that you support free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity of life, Second Amendment, and our military veterans and first responder heroes.
Their 100% U.S.-based customer service team makes switching easy.
Keep your number, keep your phone, or upgrade it.
Their team will help you find the best plan that fits your needs.
Go to www.patriotmobile.com slash poso and get free activation when you use promo code poso.
Join me, make the switch today.
www.patriotmobile.com slash poso.
That's www.patriotmobile.com slash poso.
You know, we were talking about the speaker race and before we move to the next topic, I just want to say, you know, Trump He's put his name in there.
I don't know, folks.
What do you think?
Send us a message.
Do you think Donald Trump should be the next speaker?
But, Evita, I wanted to play this clip because we've seen a strange spate of the killing of left-wing activists, victims of crime in this country.
One in Baltimore, one in Philadelphia, now one in New York City.
And this one in New York City, we actually have a very harrowing video of it.
I've watched it maybe a hundred times at this point.
I want to play this very quickly and then make some comments on it.
I want to play this.
I'm so sorry.
Are you okay?
Are you okay?
Go watch him.
- Go watch him, go watch him. - So these two individuals in this footage that you guys just saw there, the guy's name is Ryan Carson.
They're self-described Antifa members.
They were heavily involved in Black Lives Matter.
One of the things that really strikes me in this footage is that Carson actually goes, and this is 4 in the morning, New York City, in the Brooklyn area, goes over and tries to engage the knife-wielding maniac, tries to talk to him, tells him, chill, chill buddy.
This is the end stage of progressivism.
They actually believe that they can achieve utopia just through their words and their kind intentions.
And then you see his girlfriend, fiancé, and people are very confused because she doesn't seem to understand what's going on.
She doesn't seem to realize that there's mortal danger.
She doesn't seem to realize that her boyfriend has just been stabbed to death in front of her eyes.
You notice she doesn't even really react until she sees the pool of blood.
She's talking about calling 9-1-1, then she doesn't actually provide a description of the suspect to police, because early reports said police don't have a description.
And this is what I wanted to say is that, and I want to get your take on Evita, because I tweeted something earlier today, and I know I'm hitting you with this cold, but I said you need to understand that appeals to reason do not work specifically on liberal women because the left has used emotional conditioning to reprogram the maternal instinct of protection of the oppressed
and be marginalized the way that they would normally be protective of their own children.
These people are emotionally demoralized and will reject true information, even if their own friends, and in this case, their boyfriend are being killed in front of their eyes.
Evita, do you think I do you think I'm on to something with that?
Evita Smith: You are 100% on to something.
I mean, that is That's exactly what's happening.
I went to the University of Chicago, which is a school on the south side of Chicago.
We had several students actually, classmates of mine, be killed on the south side due to random violence, random robberies.
We interviewed the students and then we interviewed the southsiders.
This massive majority of left-wing, mostly women, said, you know, we need to have community policing.
We need to, you know, take the racism out of it.
We need to make sure that we are being equitable in the way that we deal with crime.
Meanwhile, the people that actually live full-time in these communities that have grown up on the south side of Chicago said, no, we don't need less police.
We don't need community policing.
We need real justice.
We need real protection and safety.
Otherwise, people will die.
I just I think we are seeing such a bizarre perversion of every norm, every biological instinct in people.
And that's really what progressivism does.
That's what that's what's happening to the woman who watches her boyfriend die before her eyes and then refuses to give a description to the police.
I mean, how backward, how how bizarre and twisted is that?
And it's the same kind of thing that would inspire somebody to commit a crime like that.
This is a spiritual crisis where people are confused about what their purpose is on this earth, where their priorities should lie.
Everything's been jumbled up to adhere to a certain ideology, and an ideology that is Marxist at its core, and that is tearing our country apart from every corner.
And this is the key, and this is why, and I would love to say this to the right, and I say this to my fellow conservative pundits or whatever you want to call it out there, is that all of these people saying, "Oh, we can just appeal to reason.
We can use facts and statistics and studies to show that our side actually works out better in the end." You don't understand.
You're never going to win with these appeals to reason, because they're not operating off of reason to begin with, okay?
They have been emotionally conditioned.
Demoralized and reprogrammed, Yuri Bezmenov style, to believe that they need to care for the marginalized and the oppressed.
They'll probably, and Evita, I remember actually seeing your reporting at the University of Chicago, but you will see the exact same things of them saying, well, you have to understand those people are victims too.
They're victims of society.
They're victims of marginalization, and so we must think of their interests.
And people are saying to me, well, how could this woman not give a description to the police of a man who just stabbed her boyfriend to death and left him to die on the street in a pool of his own blood?
And it is because this maternal instinct, and I know that, Evita, you've talked about this so many times when you come on here, that all women innately have, it's been reprogrammed It's been repurposed and re-channelized to focus on these oppressed groups.
They're abusing and exploiting, emotionally abusing, and you can get into SSRIs and talk therapy and all that stuff, which is part and parcel of it, in order to sort of shift women away from the protection.
And by the way, this also includes, you know, liberal women who have kids too, right?
They're playing on that natural instinct and using it against them in order, essentially, to allow stuff like this to go unpunished.
Yes.
Yes, absolutely.
There's a reason why in 1984, the women in the book, George Orwell's 1984, were some of the greatest advocates for Big Brother.
They were the ones that would turn in people, make sure that there was adherence.
to whatever narrative the state was promulgating.
Women are very susceptible to this because women have a desire to feel safe, to feel protected, and to have a loyalty to something, right?
And so what's happening right now is there's a lot of single women, right?
Many single women who don't have a boyfriend or a husband, don't have very strong familial ties.
This is true of actually every young person.
And so they look to the government or they look to an ideology to find a home or to find solace or to find protection, right?
And what's happening right now, what we just saw, is exactly that.
It's women who don't have the familial ties, the spiritual ties, and their new religion is really leftism.
And their new loyalty, right, is not to their family, which they wanna do, which women inherently have.
It's now to the ideology.
And that's why when she sees somebody die before her eyes, She cannot give the description.
Women are very unique in that and I think that's why it's so important if you're raising a young woman to make sure that you can buck that.
Evita, I pulled the actual lineup from 1984.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the party.
The swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers out of unorthodoxy.
And remember, for folks who haven't read the book, spoiler alert, she's catfishing him the whole time!
That's the point of the novel.
She's catfishing him to turn him into the inner party.
That's actually the point of 1984, and she's seducing him, and, oh, come meet with me in the forest, and everything's gonna be great.
No, the whole thing is catfishing.
The whole thing is catfishing, and essentially, the guy, Wilson, is a simp for... what's her name?
I forgot her name off the top of my head.
He's a simp for her, the same way that Gatsby is a total simp for Daisy in that book, and Ben and I have this huge long-running argument about Gatsby.
But this is what we need to explain, that the classics, the writers of the past in America, and Orwell's obviously UK, they understood this thing.
They understood the role that women and men and simping plays in our society, and how the parties can use it against them.
Evita Duffy, where can people go to get your coordinates?
Where can they go to get all your fantastic information?
So my articles are at TheFederalist.com and my Twitter is EvitaDuffy underscore one.
Folks, go listen to Evita Duffy.
Understand the dangers of simping for communism.
Orwell was right.
Evita Duffy has got this nailed down.
Stay tuned.
Human Events Daily continues. - ...in my ear about the boring people at your office I'm trying to listen to the new human events with Jack Posobiec.
Human Events Daily, Jack Posobiec back here live, Washington, D.C.
I gotta tell you something, I'm fired up this morning.
You know why I'm this fired up?
It's because, not only because things are going the way they're going in D.C.
for once, it's because I had my promo code POSO20, BlackoutCoffee.
BlackoutCoffee.com, promo code POSO20.
I'm telling you, if you want to be energized, The same way that this show is energized every single day, this is the hottest hour of news that you're going to be getting on a regular basis, and I'll tell you the way to do it.
Especially when you've got two little toddlers who are running us roughshod, I'm telling you.
Our two-year-old is the one, by the way.
He is the last one to go to bed, and he's the first one to get up.
He gets up even before me, which is why.
He stays up later than me, too, and he's starting to now.
He'll be bouncing off the walls.
I'm like, did he get into my blackout coffee?
Did AJ get into my blackout coffee?
I'm talking to Tonya Tay.
I'm like, sweetheart, make sure the seal on that bag is like double sealed or something, because I think he's getting in there.
He's got like double toddler energy, and I think it's because of the blackout coffee.
So we're going to put it on the higher shelf.
We're going to make sure that it's double sealed from now on.
But I'm telling you, folks, If you're not a toddler and you're listening to Human Events Daily, then you, too, can have toddler-level energy.
BlackoutCoffee.com, promo code POSO20 for your subscription.
Julia!
Julia is the name.
Wilson, simping for Julia throughout 1984.
Someone else who understands the dangers of simping is Dr. Taylor Marshall.
Dr. Taylor Marshall, welcome back to Human Events Daily.
How are you, Jack?
Good to see you.
Lots of good news.
So I was just explaining that, you know, it's 1984.
One read on it that a lot of people miss is that she's catfishing him throughout the entire novel and that Wilson is actually simping for Julia when Julia herself is an agent of the party.
She's a fed.
She's basically a fed.
And he's simping for a Fed, and so there's so much that actually ties into this.
It's infiltration, Jack!
It's infiltration!
It's infiltration!
It's exactly!
And it's using women, it's plying women, and there's that great line that Orwell gives, it was always the women above all the young ones.
Who were the strongest adherents of the party, the swallowers of the slogans, the amateur spies, the nosers out of unorthodoxy.
George Orwell, 1984.
When did that come out?
1947?
Nailed it!
Just completely nailed it, 80 years ago.
But you see also this clip, this clip of the, and let me just get your take on as well, and maybe, you know, see differently.
This woman watches a guy in New York City get stabbed to death, her boyfriend, stabbed to death in front of her.
And then doesn't react until, I don't think she realizes the gravity of what's actually going on, but then when police come, we're told that she didn't give a description of the black suspect, the knife-wielding, you know, maniac who just stabbed this guy.
Could have killed her too, by the way, and thank God he didn't, right?
I'll say that.
Um, but I view this as, I said, what I said is, and this is getting a lot of attention online, I said that what the left has done is reprogram the female maternal instinct in many of these liberal women that would normally be targeted towards the protection of their own children, And repurposed it for the protection of the marginalized, of the oppressed.
And so when you get these guys around out there who say, we just have to appeal to reason, we have to explain to them why transgenderism is wrong, we have to explain to them this, and I say, you're not getting it.
You're totally not getting it because what they've done is they've repurposed the maternal instinct.
And what you have to do is is correct, right?
Correct that back to God's original purpose.
I don't know.
What do you think?
Am I am I off base?
Yeah, I mean, I've said for a long time, the whole the rise of the Karens, you know, the Karen, the Karen is the childless woman who has become the mother of all society.
And she views everyone as her kid.
And she's policing them, she's correcting them, she's just trying to be everybody's mama.
And this is the quintessential post-Christian, post-civilized role of the woman.
She doesn't have her own children.
And so she is the mother to the whole world in this sort of liberal understanding.
The other line I like for that is the awfuls, the affluent female white urban liberals.
It's excellent.
But let's go in a little bit here because you're breaking a lot of news.
There's a ton coming out of this Synod that's going on in Rome.
Now, we had you on a couple of weeks ago.
You told us, right?
You here on this program, for the first time that anyone heard it, I want to say in conservative media, at least conservative news media, That you said that Pope Francis was likely going to be moving on two things.
Number one, blessing of same-sex marriages, or same-sex unions, essentially, I should say.
And then number two was females to the priesthood.
One thing that I actually heard, by the way, from a source I have on the ground in Rome.
I didn't even tell you about this.
is that what it looks like they're going to be doing is pursuing this strategy of incrementalization.
And so it won't be full-on female priests, but they're going to move from female Eucharistic ministers to female deacons.
And so before we get into all the weeds and for the non-Catholics to understand what all that is, just what is the Synod and why is this such a big deal?
First off, no one knows what the Synod on Synodality is.
This is called the Synod on Synodality.
It's a multi-year Basically, the idea is instead of the Catholic Church looking like this top-down monarchical tyranny, we're going to go and do surveys all over the world.
We're going to survey people in Africa and Asia and South America and North America, and we're also going to survey non-Christians and non-Catholics, and we're going to say to them, what do you think we could be doing better?
You know, it's the suggestion box.
What should Catholicism look like?
What is the Holy Spirit calling us to today?
And then they're going to collect all those suggestions, filter them back to Rome, and then the Pope and the Synod Fathers are going to make judgments and new policies.
And we've known all along they want to move in a progressive way, they want to move Catholicism into basically an alignment with the EU, And the UN and the Davos and the Great Reset and all these ideas, eco-theology, liberation theology, this is what they want.
But they can't look like medieval popes doing it.
So they have this sort of synod on synodality where they're looking like, oh, this is not what we want.
This is what the people want.
The Holy Spirit's moving through the people.
And it's kind of a subversive, not kind of, it is a very subversive way to play church.
And that's what's going on.
And the two, there are several issues, but the two main issues that are getting everybody worked up is women priests, which Pope John Paul II, Thomas Aquinas, any pope you consult before, This one says it's absolutely impossible, and that's because we believe priests confect the Eucharist by transubstantiation, that the bread and wine become the body and blood of Christ.
And since Christ had a male body, the priest must have a male body as well, because he says, this is my body.
That's the theology of it.
This is being overturned because we have feminism in our modern culture that says women can do everything a man can do, and sometimes they can even do it better, including being a priest.
And so there's this push and then the other push is the blessing of same-sex union.
So these are the hot topics right now and it's my conviction that this is what Pope Francis was brought in to do.
This is he is getting older.
He is more ill.
He's having problems with his lung and his intestines and his colon.
He only has so much time and so they are rushing this through.
This is their big opportunity.
This is the window To get same-sex blessings and women clergy, if they can pull it off.
Well, that's exactly right.
And even, I see so many, there's, they've put out new, you know, exorcism movies, right?
A lot of, and interestingly enough, a lot of the times that people, and you and I, we did, we actually won an award for our episode on Halloween last year, talking about exorcism and the Christian origins of Halloween.
In these new movies about exorcism, they're changing it to show that women can be priests, that nuns will wear the collar, and that they'll be the exorcists now.
There's a whole movie series called The Nun and The Nun 2, where The girl from American Horror Story, it's this Hollywood movie about another female, you know, nun who's sort of operating as a priest.
And so you're seeing, it's even in the newest Dracula on Netflix, by the way, where it's, again, it's a female operating as a priest to fight demons, etc, etc.
It's the same feminist coded depiction of the priesthood in a way that traditionally everyone would associate with A man being a priest, right?
And it is in these movies, by the way, where so many people in, I would say, the broader public come into contact with the Catholic Magisterium, with Catholic doctrine, the workings of the Vatican.
And I know it kind of seems like a backdoor way, but I've always pointed this out, because for people that aren't going into church on the regular basis, It's through Hollywood and it's through media, so you can't tell me for a second that this isn't in line with this very same predictive programming that we're seeing coming from Hollywood in the form of these movies.
Stay tuned, we're coming back.
Dr. Taylor Marshall, the author of Infiltration, breaking down the synod on synodality.
I'm always listening to Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
All right, Jack Pacific, back here live.
I'm in Washington, D.C.
Dr. Taylor Marshall is in Texas, but we're talking about what's going on now at the Vatican.
Pope Francis pursuing what Dr. Taylor Marshall says might be essentially his legacy.
Taylor, what I mentioned before about the deaconate and female deacons.
What is a deacon?
Why does this matter?
A deacon's not a priest anyway.
They're sort of a, you know, sort of an insistent priest, a junior priest, you know, not a full priest.
You know, why does this matter?
And why is this something that that could be pushed for?
Yeah, in the Book of Acts, the Twelve Apostles are preaching, they're doing their ministry, and they realize there's a lot of stuff in the church, like helping widows, helping the poor, that they can't do by themselves.
So, in the Book of Acts, they ordained seven deacons originally, and the deacons are there to assist the apostles in their ministry.
So, like you said, they're sort of like the understudies, they're the assistants, They don't hear confessions, they don't say Mass, but they are there at Mass helping the priest and in his parish ministry.
So, the idea of the Liberals is, well, let's do incrementalism.
Let's not go straight in and have a woman Pope.
We'll just, first we'll have altar girls, and then we'll have women as Eucharistic ministers, and women as lectors and readers, and then We'll have women as deacons, that's the current, and then we'll do women as priests, then women as bishop, and then we'll have women as pope.
So that's the incremental strategy.
And I think we can all agree that in politics and in religion over the past 100 years, the enemies of God have gone for the incremental approach.
And that's what worked for them, and that's what's going on right now.
And that's the same incrementalism they're doing right now with the same-sex blessings.
That they're pushing also in the Senate of Synodality.
Pope Francis came out in the last couple days and he said, well, you can bless one person or you can bless more than one person.
And so he didn't say you couldn't do a blessing of a same-sex union, but he said you could bless more than one person at the same time, which in a way just opens the door for there to be a same-sex blessing in a church.
And you could go ahead and throw flowers on the altar and send out invites and make it look exactly like a marriage.
But then you could say, well, it's not actually a marriage.
We're just doing the blessing of two friends.
Let's go ahead and ask the question then.
Why is it that Catholic doctrine for all of these years, for 2,000 years since the church was founded by J.C.
himself, that has never supported the blessing of same-sex couples?
Why not do that?
Love is love, after all, Dr. Taylor Marshall.
Love is love and love wins.
So shouldn't we just let people love whoever they want?
Shouldn't we be tolerant?
WWJD, man.
Well, you know, our Lord points to the beginning and He says, in the beginning, it was one man, one woman, Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
It's Adam and Eve.
And He created male and female.
And, you know, I hate to break this down.
It's kind of like the sex ed talk, but male have certain kind of Procreative organs and female have different procreative organs and when those procreative organs fit together and they become one flesh quite literally Those procreative organs were created by God to create another one flesh a baby You and I we have babies that grow up in two kids and then adults That's the way God designed it.
And that's why he made male and female procreative organs.
That's the purpose of Right?
That's the design of the designer who is God.
And so he, because that is such a powerful gift to be able to procreate another human person, God established very important rules.
You know, if you're going to run a nuclear reactor, which is a very powerful thing, you need to have very tight rules on that.
Same thing with procreating children.
There needs to be tight rules.
The tight rules are you must be married so that the child receives a father and a mother.
You can be an atheist and you can look at the psychological reports.
Children that have a father and a mother who are together, living in the same house, on the same mission, those children are healthier, psychologically better, they do better on sports, they do better in their grades.
It is the way God designed it.
And then matrimony is a permanent bond and a union to ensure that those children grow up in a home with a mom and a dad.
We know accidents happen.
Wars, parents dies or diseases, but the intention of God is that there are nuclear families with a permanent bond between mom and dad bringing new persons into the world.
Any kind of sexual activity that is not according to those rules has been deemed by society, even non-christian societies, as dangerous and subversive.
We would call in the Catholic Church disordered or, if acted upon, sinful.
So, we recognize that there are people who are tempted in all kinds of ways and have homosexual temptations, and that temptation in itself is not the committing of sins, it is the volition, it's the consent.
And so, because human sexuality is so powerful, it is so sacred, there are these rules upon it, and the primary purpose of matrimony is procreation.
And homosexuality, or you could even say Any kind of sexual aberration is not open to that human life.
And that's why the Catholic Church has this prohibition on it.
So, you know, that's the theological, that's the historical take.
It goes back to the way God designed humanity as male and female.
And we have these very important rules governing us.
Why?
For the benefit of human society.
We don't want fatherless or motherless children.
No, but I've always said that it, and I've come to realize, I guess I should say as I've gotten older, that the things that God prescribes for us as sinful are things that are actually bad for you in life.
And so that you can come to this realization on your own, it'll just take a lot longer.
And I'm sorry, Joe Rogan, but there already is a book that's written called The Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth, and that's the Bible.
So I highly encourage Joe Rogan to read that.
I heard he was looking for a book on that.
And I'll throw it out there again, and I say this when I go speaking around the country, that the oldest institution that we know of on the face of the planet, that we have archaeological evidence for, we go into when people were living in the caves, right?
We know.
Mom, Dad, Children.
Okay?
For thousands and thousands and thousands of years.
It predates literally everything that we have any history for.
It predates language itself.
Mom, Dad, Children.
Exactly as the Bible says.
And to all the skeptics out there, I would put that to them and say, well, it's the oldest thing we have.
And you know what?
Maybe Chesterton's Fence is Chesterton's Fence for a reason.
Dr. Taylor Marshall, where can people go to follow you and get more information?
You can go to taylormarshall.com, you can follow me on Twitter, or the best place is probably on YouTube, Dr. Taylor Marshall.
I've got my podcast over there.
Gotta go follow him, guys.
Dr. Taylor Marshall.
Nobody responds to Joe Rogan like he does.
Chesterton's fence, by the way, what does it mean?
Never change a rule or a norm until you understand why it was put there in the first place.
▲
Export Selection